The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.apz.20241217AGENDA ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION December 17, 2024 4:30 PM, Pearl Pass Meeting Room 3rd Floor, 427 Rio Grande Pl, Aspen I.ROLL CALL II.COMMENTS III.MINUTES III.A Draft Minutes 10/15/24 IV.DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST V.PUBLIC HEARINGS V.A Change in Use, 232 E. Main St., Continuance to February 7, 2024 V.B Resolution #__, Series of 2024 - 633 W Francis Street - Replacement of Nonconforming Structures - Special Review V.C Resolution #__, Series of 2024 - 730 Bay Street - Replacement of Nonconforming Structures - Special Review VI.OTHER BUSINESS VII.BOARD REPORTS VIII.ADJOURN minutes.apz.20241015 draft.pdf Final_633 W Francis_Memo_LPA-24-095.pdf 633 W Francis_PZ Resolution XX Series of 2024.pdf Exhibit A_633 W Francis St_Review Criteria.pdf Exhibit B_Application.pdf Exhibit C_Response to Comments_Amended Plans.pdf Final_730 Bay Street_Memo_LPA-24-103.pdf 730 Bay Street_PZ Resolution XX Series of 2024.pdf Exhibit A_730 Bay Street_Review Criteria.pdf Exhibit B_Land Use Application_730 Bay St._Special Review_09.06.24.pdf 1 1 TYPICAL PROCEEDING FORMAT FOR ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS 1) Conflicts of Interest (handled at beginning of agenda) 2) Provide proof of legal notice (affidavit of notice for PH) 3) Staff presentation 4) Board questions and clarifications of staff 5) Applicant presentation 6) Board questions and clarifications of applicant 7) Public comments 8) Board questions and clarifications relating to public comments 9) Close public comment portion of bearing 10) Staff rebuttal/clarification of evidence presented by applicant and public comment 11) Applicant rebuttal/clarification End of fact finding. Deliberation by the commission commences. No further interaction between commission and staff, applicant or public 12) Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed among commissioners. 13) Discussion between commissioners* 14) Motion* *Make sure the discussion and motion includes what criteria are met or not met Revised January 9, 2021 2 2 REGULAR MEETING ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION OCTOBER 15, 2024 Commissioners in attendance: Charlie Tarver, Maryann Pitt, Ken Canfield, Tom Gorman, Christine Benedetti, and Teraissa McGovern. Staff present: Haley Hart, Long Range Planner Ben Anderson, Com Dev Director Kate Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Tracy Terry, Deputy City Clerk Commissioner Comments: None Staff Comments: Mr. Anderson talked about how the P&Z and Council sessions are going to start aligning on the same night. He does not think Pearl Pass is a great room for these meetings, so he floated the idea of moving P&Z to another day or the week. The Board and Ben had a conversation about changing the day of the meeting and upcoming meetings Mr. Anderson also gave an update on the Planning director. They have narrowed down to 4 candidates who will be coming to Aspen to interview soon. Public Comments: None. Minutes: None Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest: None Submission of Public Notice for Agenda Items: Ms. Johnson said that notice was provided. Other Business: Response to HB23-1255 Staff Presentation: Haley Hart, long Range Planner; Ben Anderson, Community Development Director Ms. Hart gave an overview of the house bill. The request is to review and make a recommendation to Council. This is a response to HB23-1255, titled regulating local housing growth restrictions. The goal is to increase supply across all communities in Colorado. It preempts existing home rule regulations (Permits & local LUC provisions) that create growth caps for residential development. Local Government are no longer able to limit how many free-market res units are built in a year. This has to do only with residential, nor commercial or lodging. The Aspen impact is that it invalidates our annual residential allotments within GMQS, so our resolution is removing all mentions of residential allotments within our title. Mr. Anderson gave the history and context to GMQS. In the 1970’s Aspen was seeing increased traffic, new homes, new businesses, increased skier visits, increased population, and there was concern about traffic, infrastructure, over tourism, and other things. The community started looking at how to get a handle on it. When confronted with this bill, we had to do something. We felt if we didn’t bring this into compliance, we saw it as a window into challenges for these other things that we do not want to get rid of. This response is only about market rate residential, it is not about commercial or lodge, all that remains untouched. 3 REGULAR MEETING ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION OCTOBER 15, 2024 Mr. Canfield asked in the context of a residential allotment, is it a one housing unit or a bedroom and how is that determined. Ms. Hart replied it is one housing unit and allows a duplex with a single allotment. The board and staff had a discussion about FAR. Ms. McGovern asked if this would affect the demolition allotment program. Mr. Anderson said they are keeping demolition allotments separate from this elimination market rate residential allotments. Ms. Hart talked about the process to get to this point. She went over the changes that were made, there were 2 sections that had components directly mentioning residential free market allotments that they needed to redline. One was GMQS and the majority of what needed removed is baked into the table in the packet. They removed all mentions of residential allotments and how they might overlap in the chapter. The second section was within P&Z duties and powers subsection, right now you have the right to review and grant allotments, so they just removed the work residential. This targeted response does not change policy outcomes. Staff recommends that P&Z approve resolution 10 of 2024 bringing chapter 26.470 and section 26.202.010.f into compliance with Colorado House Bill 23-1255. Board Questions: Mr. Canfield asked about the language of affordable housing regarding category 4 or below in the red lines. Ms. Hart replied that was something that accidentally got eliminated during the moratorium update to this chapter and needs to be put back in. Mr. Gorman asked what will happen to large projects that are not finished. Mr. Anderson replied that allotments run parallel to vesting. Charlie left the meeting at 6:02PM Motion: Mr. Canfield moved to approve resolution 11 series 2024 as written; Mr. Gorman seconded. Roll call vote: Ms. Pitt, yes; Mr. Canfield, yes; Mr. Gorman, yes; Ms. McGovern, yes; Ms. Benedetti, yes. Motion passes 5-0. Adjourn: Ms. Benedetti motioned to adjourn; Mr. Gorman seconded. All in favor. Tracy Terry, Deputy City Clerk 4 633 W Francis – Replacement of Nonconformities Planning and Zoning Commission Page 1 of 8 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Jeffrey Barnhill, AICP, Senior Planner THRU: Ben Anderson, AICP, Community Development Director RE: Replacement of Nonconforming Structures – Special Review Public Hearing, 633 W. Francis Street. MEETING DATE: December 17, 2024 APPLICANT: West Aspen Grove, LLC, 380 Westview Drive, Athens, GA 30606 REPRESENTATIVE: Ryan Doremus, Thunderbowl Architects, 300 S Spring Street #201, Aspen, CO 81611 LOCATION: 633 W Francis St, Aspen, CO 81611 ZONING: Medium-Density Residential, (R-6) SUMMARY: The applicant requests a continuation of a nonconformity to renovate and reconfigure floor area of a nonconforming structure. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the request for the continuation of the nonconformities at 633 W Francis. REQUEST OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: The Applicant proposes to remodel and reconfigure floor area in a nonconforming structure. The applicant requests to alter the existing residence in a manner that will decrease the floor area overage on the subject property. As represented, the existing structure exceeds allowable floor area. Rearranging and decreasing the existing non-conforming floor area requires a Replacement of Nonconforming Structure review by the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission. Figure 1: Site Vicinity Map 5 633 W Francis – Replacement of Nonconformities Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 of 8 ❖ Non-conforming structures. (Land Use Code Section 26.312.030.(f)(2) Purposeful destruction) The applicant requests continuation of a nonconformity for the property at 633 W Francis Street. Any nonconforming structure that is purposefully Demolished or portion thereof which is purposefully destroyed, may be replaced with a different structure only if the replacement structure is in conformance with the current provisions of this Title or unless replacement of the nonconformity is approved pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 26.430, Special Review. Special Review requires approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission can approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application after considering a recommendation by the Community Development Director based on the criteria outlined in section 26.312.030., Non- conforming structures & section 26.430.040.(b) Replacement of nonconforming structures. Figure 2: Existing Conditions BACKGROUND: 633 West Francis Street is located in the Medium-Density Residential (R-6) zone district. The lot is approximately 6,019.32 sq. ft. The existing structure contains a nonconforming duplex residence. The property is currently over allowable floor area and has elements of the home that extend into the setbacks. The initial application requested a variance for a permanent planter box on part of the structure that was already encroaching into the setback. The applicant removed that request from the proposal. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes a changes to the structure to rearrange and reconfigure the floor area on site. The applicant proposes decreasing the amount of exposed wall in the lower level of the structure. To that end, the applicant proposes to construct additional lower- level space thus decreasing the amount of exposed wall area and lowering the countable floor area in the lower level. The upper-level decks will be reconfigured; decks are the only things changing on the exterior of the existing structure. Additionally, the applicant proposes to add a garage. The garage is allowed by right and because the property consists of a duplex can utilize a 500 sq. ft. garage exemption on site. This is not part of the special review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Overall, the floor area attributed to the structure will be decreasing by approximately 2 sq. ft. while enjoying a larger lower-level space. Table 1 demonstrates the changes in floor area calculations by level and deck area. Table 1: Existing to Proposed Floor Area on site. Figures 3 thru 9 depict the proposed site plan and existing and proposed floor plans. The graphics depict the changes to the floor area as a result of the reconfiguration/remodel of the proposed project. On the lower level, the basement will be getting larger which will decrease the amount of exposed wall area in the basement allowing for an increase in space while lowering the countable floor area. On the main and upper levels of the duplex, decks will be reconfigured but the building footprint will not be changing. Dimensional Limitation Allowable Existing Proposed Floor Area 3,605.70 sq. ft. 4,144.20 sq. ft. 4,142.58 sq. ft. 6 633 W Francis – Replacement of Nonconformities Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 of 8 Figure 3: Existing Lower Level Floor Area Figure 4: Proposed Lower Level Floor Area The applicant proposes creating new lower-level space (in orange) in the baseement. This will increase the amount of total subgrade wall area, thus decreasing the amount of countable floor area for the basement. 7 633 W Francis – Replacement of Nonconformities Planning and Zoning Commission Page 4 of 8 Figure 5: Existing Main Level Floor Area Figure 6: Proposed Main Level Floor Area The applicant proposes the addition of a garage (orange). The garage is allowed by right and the applciant may use the 500 sq. ft. garage exemption for the development of the garage. The applicant also proposes a spiral staircase fom the main level to the upper level (green). 8 633 W Francis – Replacement of Nonconformities Planning and Zoning Commission Page 5 of 8 Figure 7: Existing Upper Level Floor Area Figure 8: Proposed Upper Level Floor Area The applicant proposes the reconfiguration of deck space on the upper level (green). 9 633 W Francis – Replacement of Nonconformities Planning and Zoning Commission Page 6 of 8 Figure 9: Proposed Site Plan DISCUSSION: Section 26.312.030 Nonconformities – Non-conforming structures Replacing nonconforming aspects of a structure is subject to Special Review and may be allowed to be replaced or reduced if certain review criteria are met. Staff’s perspective on the authority to continue a nonconformity is shaped by two primary aspects - the intent of the code and the review standards. The purpose statement (Section 26.312.010) of the Nonconformities chapter states: “Within the Zone Districts established by this Title, there exist uses of land, buildings and structures that were lawfully established before this Title was adopted or amended which would be in violation of the terms and requirements of this Title. The purpose of this Chapter is to regulate and limit the continued existence of those uses, buildings and structures that do not conform to the provisions of this Title as amended. It is the intent of this Chapter to permit nonconformities to continue, but not to allow nonconformities to be enlarged or expanded. The provisions of this Chapter are designed to curtail substantial investment in nonconformities in order to preserve the integrity of the zone districts and the other provisions of this Title but should not be construed as an abatement provision.” The Nonconformities chapter also includes language regarding Purposeful Destruction, Section 26.312.030.F.2: “Purposeful destruction. Any nonconforming structure which is purposefully demolished or destroyed may be replaced with a different structure only if the replacement structure is in 10 633 W Francis – Replacement of Nonconformities Planning and Zoning Commission Page 7 of 8 conformance with the current provisions of this Title or unless replacement of the nonconformity is approved pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 26.430, Special Review…” The proposed development constitutes more than “normal maintenance”. The proposal constitutes “purposeful destruction”. The applicant requests altering the existing residence in a manner that will decrease the floor area overage on the subject property. Since the existing structure is represented as over allowable floor area, rearranging and decreasing the existing non-conforming floor area requires a Replacement of Non-Conforming Structure review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The proposed development does not extend or enlarge any areas that would increase the nonconforming nature of the structure. The proposed development reduces the floor area on site by approximately 2 sq. ft. None of the changes increase the nonconforming aspects of the structure. Section 26.430.040 Special Review – Review standards for special review. The mass, height, density, configuration, amount of open space, landscaping, and setbacks of the proposed development are designed in a manner which is compatible with or enhances the character of surrounding land uses and is consistent with the purposes of the underlying zone district. The purpose of the R-6 zone district is “to provide areas for long-term residential purposes, Short-term Rentals, and customary accessory uses…Lands in the Medium-Density Residential (R-6) Zone District are generally limited to the original Aspen Townsite, contain relatively dense settlements of predominantly detached and duplex residences and are within walking distance of the center of the City.” While a minimal reduction, the proposal does reduce the overall floor area on site by approximately 2 sq. ft. The proposal involves major additions to the subgrade space of the building minimizing additional development above grade. The garage will add development above grade but is allowed by right as all of the floor area of the garage will be exempt floor area per the Land Use Code. The existing deck floor area will be modified and reconfigured. The upper deck in the rear yard will be reconfigured and accessed by a spiral staircase on the main level and a door on the upper level. There will be minimal changes to any street-facing facades and exterior of the building. The proposed development will have a negligible impact on surrounding uses, but will constitute a significantt construction project. A majority of the work will involve changes to the subgrade level that will decrease the countable floor area of the lower level by creating more unexposed walls. The lower level space will go from 172.21 sq. ft. (1,722.14 sq. ft. x 10.00% exposed wall) to 170.59 sq. ft. (2,505.06 sq. ft. x 6.81% exposed wall). The associated development and reconstructions will have no adverse impact on the shading, traffic, parking, or other land use code sections. The proposed development complies with the conditions of Section 26.430.040(a) as shown above. 633 W Francis Street is located in the R-6 zone district and does not have any steep slopes associated with the lot. There does not exist special characteristics unique to the property which differentiate the property from other properties located in the same zone district. There are no special characteristics about this lot that are unique to this lot and similar lots in the R-6 zone district. Lots in the R-6 zone district in the West End are generally flat, original townsite lots. The lot is 6,019.32 sq. ft. in size which is not abnormal for lots in the R-6 zone district. Additionally, the property is nonconforming in not only floor area but partially lies within the setback and is nonconforming in relation to the ratio of floor area between units 1 & 2 which is a 75%-25% split of floor area. Unit 2 comprises approximately 20% of the overall countable floor area. Literal enforcement of the dimensional provisions of the zone district would not cause unnecessary hardship upon the owner by prohibiting reasonable use of the property. The property contains a duplex. Reasonable use of the property has been established over the years since the exsiting home was built. With that being said, aside from the garage which is allowed by right, this project increases massing below grade in favor of above grade. This is partially because a portion of the building is already in the setback, any further encroachment into the setback or a variance would be accompanied by a strong recommendation of denail by staff. This project marginally brings this site closer into conformity with the current code to the tune of 2 sq. ft. 11 633 W Francis – Replacement of Nonconformities Planning and Zoning Commission Page 8 of 8 Staff recognizes this project only minimally moves this property more into compliance with the land use code as it exists today. However, staff recognizes that there is no hardship that would hinder the applicant from reasonable enjoyment and use of the property if this project is not appro ved. Additionally, there are no special site circumstances which differentiate the property from other properties located in the same zone district or neighborhood. Because of this hardship criteria and lack of special site circumstances on the lot, staff must recommend that the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the proposed project . However, if the commission can make findings that a hardship would be caused by denying the proposed project and that special site circumstances differentiate the property from other properties located in the same zone district, there would be grounds for approval. Additionally, staff does acknowledge that the proposed project – as a remodel – desirably avoids demolition. REFERRAL COMMENTS: The proposed project was referred out to the Parks and Engineering Departments. The Parks Department had no comments on the proposal. The Engineering department conditions consisted of requirements that the applicant will need to fulfill at time of building permit submission. RECOMMENDATION: Community Development staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the request for a continuation of a nonconformity. Staff does not believe there are special site circumstances that affect this lot more than other lots in the same zone district, and does not believe there would be a hardship on this lot if the project is denied. PROPOSED MOTION: Two motions are proposed. The first denies the resolution while the second approves the resolution. Should the Planning and Zoning Commission support staff’s recommendation, Motion 1 should be read. If the Planning and Zoning Commission disagrees with staff’s recommendation and feels that the review criteria has been met and wishes to approve the variance request, motion 2 should be read: Motion 1. “I move to deny Resolution #___, Series of 2024, granting approval of the proposed garage placement. If the Planning and Zoning Commission decides that the criteria are met for the Continuation of a nonconformity, and disagrees with staff’s recommendation, the following motion may be used: Motion 2. “I move to approve Resolution #___, Series of 2024, granting approval of the proposed garage placement. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution #___, Series of 2024 Exhibit A- Staff Responses to Review Criteria Exhibit B- Application 12 Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution #XX, Series of 2024 Page 1 of 6 RESOLUTION #XX SERIES OF 2024 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION GRANTING APPROVAL FOR SPECIAL REVIEW TO REPLACE A NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE AT THE PROPERTY AT 633 W FRANCIS STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS PARCEL A, LOTS A AND B, BLOCK 22, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. PARCEL B, A PORTION OF THE COMMON ELEMENTS OF THE REED HOUSE CONDOMINIUM, ACCORDING TO THE CONDIMIINIUM MAP THEREOF RECORDED OCTOBER 28, 1997 IN PLAT BOOK 6 AT PAGE 38, AND AS DEFINED AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR THE REEDS HOUSE RECORDED OCTOBER 28, 1977 IN BOOK 337 AT PAGE 484. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-26-001 WHEREAS, the Community Development department received an application from Thunderbowl Architects representing West Aspen Grove LLC, requesting Special Review to replace a Nonconforming Structure related to a proposed remodel at 633 W Francis Street: and, WHEREAS, the property is located in the Medium-Density Residential (R-6) Zone District; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval of the requested development application; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered the application under the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code as identified herein, in particular Section 26.430, Special Review, considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and took and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on December 17th, 2024; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets the applicable review criteria and that approval of the request as described below is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare, and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission approves Resolution #XX, Series of 2024, by a XX to XX (XX – XX) vote, approving the requested land use reviews as identified herein. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: 13 Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution #XX, Series of 2024 Page 2 of 6 Section 1: Approvals The existing duplex dwelling is a non-conforming structure as defined in the Land Use Code. Approval is granted for a remodel as depicted in Exhibit A to this resolution, including: • Adding additional subgrade space. • Reconfiguring deck/covered patio area. • Development of a garage on site. The following table outlines the approved dimensional limitations that are permitted to continue. Minor adjustments may be made to the final proposed floor area due to unforeseen circumstances so long as floor area is reduced. All other development not subject to special review shall comply with all rules and regulations as deemed necessary by the City of Aspen upon review of the building permit submittal. Section 2: Engineering Department Conditions of Approval: 1. The water service line will be required to come into compliance with current standards. 2. A full utility plan will be required at time of permit. 3. Two curb cuts are not permitted. With the addition of the garage off the alley, the parking encroachment off North 6th Street must be removed. 4. If the project triggers a major level engineering review, a fully compliant utility plan, grading and drainage report, and other applicable documents will be required at time of building permit submittal. Section 3: Vested Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a vested property right attaching to and running with the lot for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property right. Section 4: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such site development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 5: Existing Litigation This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Dimensional Limitation Allowable Existing Proposed Floor Area 3,605.70 sq. ft. 4,144.20 sq. ft. 4,142.58 sq. ft. 14 Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution #XX, Series of 2024 Page 3 of 6 Section 6: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. FINALLY, adopted, passed, and approved this 17th day of December, 2024. Approved as to form: Approved as to content: ______________________________ __________________________________ Katherine Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Teraissa McGovern, Chair Attest: _______________________________ Tracy Terry, Deputy Clerk Attachment: Exhibit A – Approved Drawings & Calculations Exhibit A – Approved Drawings & Calculations 15 Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution #XX, Series of 2024 Page 4 of 6 Exhibit A – Approved Drawings and Calculations 16 Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution #XX, Series of 2024 Page 5 of 6 Proposed Site Plan 17 Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution #XX, Series of 2024 Page 6 of 6 18 730 Bay Street Replacement of Non-conforming Structure Review Criteria 730 Bay Street Planning and Zoning Commission Page 1 of 4 Sec. 26.312.030 Nonconformities – Non-conforming structures. Within the Zone Districts established by this Title, there exist uses of land, buildings and structures that were lawfully established before this Title was adopted or amended which would be in violation of the terms and requirements of this Title. The purpose of this Chapter is to regulate and limit the continued existence of those uses, buildings and structures that do not conform to the provisions of this Title as amended. It is the intent of this Chapter to permit nonconformities to continue, but not to allow nonconformities to be enlarged or expanded. The provisions of this Chapter are designed to curtail substantial investment in nonconformities in order to preserve the integrity of the zone districts and the other provisions of this Title but should not be construed as an abatement provision. (a) Authority to continue. A nonconforming structure devoted to a use permitted in the zone district in which it is located may be continued in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. Staff Response: 633 W Francis St. is located in the Medium-Density Residential (R-6) zone district. The existing structure contains a nonconforming duplex consisting on units 1 and 2. Duplexes are permitted uses in the R-6 zone district. The property is nonconforming in numerous ways: parts of the building are in the setback, there is a nonconforming floor area ratio between units 1 & 2, and floor area for the structure. Staff finds this criterion is met. (b) Normal Maintenance. Normal maintenance to nonconforming structures may be performed without affecting the authorization to continue as a nonconforming structure. Staff Response: The proposed development constitutes more than “normal maintenance”. As such, the applicant applied for Special Review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. (c) Extensions. A nonconforming structure shall not be extended by an enlargement or expansion that increases the nonconformity. A nonconforming structure may be extended or altered in a manner that does not change or that decreases the nonconformity. Staff Response: The proposed development does not extend or enlarge any areas that would increase the nonconforming nature of the structure. The proposed development reduces the overall floor area by approximately 2 sq. ft. The scope includes additions to the lower level to decrease the amount of exposed area thus lowering countable floor area, deck reconfigurations, and the addition of a garage on the site. None of the changes increase the nonconforming aspects of the structure. In fact, the garage is allowed by right and does not require special review as it is all exempt area. The code allows 250 sq. ft. per residence of exempt garage space. The City does not distinguish between how that 250 sq. ft. per residence is utilized. The applicant utilizes the 250 sq. ft. per residence on the garage for Unit 1. Staff finds this criterion is met. (d) Relocation. A nonconforming structure shall not be moved unless it thereafter conforms to the standards and requirements of the zone district in which it is located. Staff Response: The structure is not proposed to be relocated. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. (e) Unsafe Structure. Any portion of a nonconforming structure which becomes physically unsafe or 19 730 Bay Street Replacement of Non-conforming Structure Review Criteria 730 Bay Street Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 of 4 unlawful due to lack of repairs and maintenance and which is declared unsafe or unlawful by a duly authorized City official, but which an owner wishes to restore, repair, or rebuild shall only be restored, repaired, or rebuilt in conformity with the provisions of this Title. Staff Response: The proposed development does not involve any portion of the nonconforming structure being unsafe. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. (f) Ability to restore. 1. Non-purposeful destruction. Any nonconforming structure that is Demolished, or portion thereof which is destroyed by an act of nature or through any manner not purposefully accomplished by the owner, may be restored as of right if a building permit for reconstruction is submitted within twenty-four (24) months of the date of Demolition or destruction. 2. Purposeful destruction. Any nonconforming structure that is purposefully Demolished or portion thereof which is purposefully destroyed, may be replaced with a different structure only if the replacement structure is in conformance with the current provisions of this Title or unless replacement of the nonconformity is approved pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 26.430, Special Review. Any structure which is nonconforming in regards to the permitted density of the underlying zone district may maintain that specific nonconformity only if a building permit for the replacement structure is submitted within twelve (12) months of the date of demolition or destruction. Staff Response: The proposal constitutes “purposeful destruction”. The applicant request altering the existing residence in a manner that will decrease the floor area overage on the subject property, albeit by a small margin. Since the existing structure is represented as over allowable floor area, rearranging and decreasing the existing non-conforming floor area requires a Replacement of Non-Conforming Structure review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Staff finds this criterion is met. Sec. 26.430.040. Special Review – Review standards for special review. No development subject to special review shall be permitted unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all standards and requirements set forth below. (a) Dimensional requirements. Whenever the dimensional requirements of a proposed development are subject to special review, the development application shall only be approved if the following conditions are met. (1) The mass, height, density, configuration, amount of open space, landscaping and setbacks of the proposed development are designed in a manner which is compatible with or enhances the character of surrounding land uses and is consistent with the purposes of the underlying zone district. (2) The applicant demonstrates that the proposed development will not have adverse impacts on surrounding uses or will mitigate those impacts, including but not limited to the effects of shading, excess traffic, availability of parking in the neighborhood or blocking of a designated view plane. Staff Response: The mass, height, density, configuration, amount of open space, landscaping, and setbacks of the proposed development are designed in a manner which is compatible with or enhances the character of surrounding land uses and is consistent with the purposes o f the 20 730 Bay Street Replacement of Non-conforming Structure Review Criteria 730 Bay Street Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 of 4 underlying zone district. The purpose of the R-6 zone district is “to provide areas for long-term residential purposes, Short-term Rentals, and customary accessory uses…Lands in the Medium- Density Residential (R-6) Zone District are generally limited to the original Aspen Townsite, contain relatively dense settlements of predominantly detached and duplex residences and are within walking distance of the center of the City.” The proposal reduces the overall floor area on site by approximately 2 sq. ft. The proposal involves major additions to the subgrade space of the building minimizing additional development above grade. The garage will add development above grade but is allowed by right as all of the floor area of the garage will be exempt floor area. The existing deck floor area will be modified and reconfigured. The upper deck in the rear yard will be reconfigured and accessed by a spiral staircase on the main level and a door on the upper level. There will be minimal changes to any street-facing facades and exterior of the building. The proposed development will have a negligible impact on surrounding uses. A majority of the work will involve changes to the subgrade level that will decrease the countable floor area of the lower level by creating more unexposed walls. The lower level space will go from 172.21 sq. ft. (1,722.14 sq. ft. x 10.00% exposed wall) to 170.59 sq. ft. (2,505.06 sq. ft. x 6.81% exposed wall). The associated development and reconstructions will have no adverse impact on the shading, traffic, parking, or other land use code sections. Staff finds this criterion is met. (b) Replacement of nonconforming structures. Whenever a structure or portion thereof, which does not conform to the dimensional requirements of the zone district in which the property is located is proposed to be replaced after Demolition or destruction, the following criteria shall be met: (1) The proposed development shall comply with the conditions of Section 26.430.040(a) above; (2) There exist special characteristics unique to the property which differentiate the property from other properties located in the same zone district; (3) No dimensional variations are increased, and the replacement structure represents the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the property; and (4) Literal enforcement of the dimensional provisions of the zone district would cause unnecessary hardship upon the owner by prohibiting reasonable use of the property. Staff Response: The proposed development complies with the conditions of Section 26.430.040(a) as shown above. 633 W Francis Street is located in the R-6 zone district and does not have any steep slopes associated with the lot. There does not exist special characteristics unique to the property which differentiate the property from other properties located in the same zone district. There are no special characteristics about this lot that are unique to this lot and similar lots in the R-6 zone district. Lots in the R-6 zone district in the West End are generally flat, original townsite lots. The lot is 6,019.32 sq. ft. in size which is not abnormal for lots in the R-6 zone district. Additionally, the property is nonconforming in not only floor area but partially lies within the setback and is nonconforming in relation to the ratio of floor area between units 1 & 2 which is a 75%-25% split of floor area. Unit 2 comprises approximately 20% of the overall countable floor area. 21 730 Bay Street Replacement of Non-conforming Structure Review Criteria 730 Bay Street Planning and Zoning Commission Page 4 of 4 Figure 1: Areas of existing building in the setback No dimensional variations are proposed or increased. The applicant requests no variances for the proposed development as all new development is located within the setbacks. The proposal involves reducing wall exposure on the lower level, thus allowing for the addition of the basement area with a little reduction to countable floor area. Literal enforcement of the dimensional provisions of the zone district would not cause unnecessary hardship upon the owner by prohibiting reasonable use of the property. The property contains a duplex. Reasonable use of the property has been established over the years of this residence existing. With that being said, aside from the garage which is allowed by right, this project increases massing below grade in favor of above grade. This is partially because a portion of the building is already in the setback, any further encroachment into the setback or a variance would face harsh criticism by staff. This project marginally brings this site closer into conformity with the current code to the tune of .19 sq. ft. Staff recognizes this project minimally moves this property more into compliance with the land use code as it exists today. However, staff recognizes that there is no hardship that would hinder the applicant from reasonable enjoyment and use of the property if this project is not approved. Additionally, there are no special site circumstances which differentiate the property from other properties located in the same zone district or neighborhood. As such, staff finds Criterion (1) and (3) are met. Staff finds Criterion (2) and (4) are not met. 22 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GENERAL LAND USE PACKET Attached is an Application for review of Development that requires Land Use Review pursuant to The City of Aspen Land Use Code: Included in this package are the following attachments: 1.Development Application Fee Policy, Fee Schedule and Agreement to Pay Application Fees Form 2.Land Use Application Form 3.Dimensional Requirements Form (if required) 4.HOA Compliance Form 5.Development Review Procedure All applications are reviewed based on the criteria established in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code is available at the City Clerk’s Office on the second floor of City Hall and on the internet at https://library.municode.com/co/aspen/codes/municipal_code. We require all applicants to hold a Pre-Application Conference with a Planner in the Community Development Department so that the requirements for submitting a complete application can be fully described. This meeting can happen in person or by phone or email. Also, depending upon the complexity of the development proposed, submitting one copy of the development application to the Case Planner to determine accuracy, inefficiencies, or redundancies can reduce the overall cost of materials and staff time. Please recognize that review of these materials does not substitute for a complete review of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. While this application package attempts to summarize the key provisions of the Code as they apply to your type of development, it cannot possibly replicate the detail or the scope of the Code. If you have questions that are not answered by the materials in this package, we suggest that you contact the staff member assigned to your case, contact Planner of the Day (970-429-2764/planneroftheday@gmail.com), or consult the applicable sections of the Aspen Land Use Code. 23 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 Land Use Review Fee Policy The City of Aspen has established a review fee policy for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. A flat fee is collected by Community Development for applications that normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. Review fees for other City Departments reviewing the application (referral departments) also will be collected when necessary. Flat fees are cumulative, i.e., an application with multiple flat fees must pay the sum of those flat fees. Flat fees are not refundable. A review fee deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff time is required. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Various City staff also may charge their time spent on the case in addition to the Case Planner. The deposit amount may be reduced if, in the opinion of the Community Development Department Director, the project is expected to take significantly less time to process than the deposit indicates. A determination on the deposit amount shall be made during the pre-application conference by the Case Planner. Hourly billing shall still apply. All applications must include an Agreement to Pay Application Fees. One payment including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of Aspen. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required fee(s). The Community Development Department shall keep an accurate record of the actual time required to process a land use application requiring a deposit. The City can provide a summary report of fees due at the applicant’s request. The applicant will be billed for the additional costs incurred by the City when the processing of an application by the Community Development Department takes more time or expense than is covered by the deposit. Any direct costs attributable to a project review shall be billed to the applicant with no additional administrative charge. In the event the processing of an application takes less time than provided for by the deposit, the Department shall refund the unused portion of the deposited fee to the applicant. Fees shall be due regardless of whether an applicant receives approval. Unless otherwise combined by the Director for simplicity of billing, all applications for conceptual, final, and recordation of approval documents shall be handled as individual cases for the purpose of billing. Upon conceptual approval, all billing shall be reconciled, and past due invoices shall be paid prior to the Director accepting an application for final review. Final review shall require a new deposit at the rate in effect at the time of final submission. Upon final approval, all billing shall again be reconciled prior to the Director accepting an application for review of technical documents for recordation. The Community Development Director may cease processing of a land use application for which an unpaid invoice is 30 or more days past due. Unpaid invoices of 90 days or more past due may be assessed a late fee of 1.75% per month. An unpaid invoice of 120 days or more may be subject to additional actions as may be assigned by the Municipal Court judge. All payment information is public domain. All invoices shall be paid prior to issuance of a Development Order or recordation of development agreements and plats. The City will not accept a building permit for a property until all invoices are paid in full. For permits already accepted, any unpaid invoice of 90 or more days may result in cessation of building permit processing or issuance of a stop work order until full payment is made. The property owner of record is the party responsible for payment of all costs associated with a land use application for the property. Any secondary agreement between a property owner and an applicant representing the owner (e.g. a contract purchaser) regarding payment of fees is solely between those private parties. 24 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen (“City”) and Address of Property: Please type or print in all caps Property Owner Name: Representative Name (if different from Property Owner): Billing Name and Address - Send Bills to: Contact info for billing: e-mail: Phone: I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. 20, Series of 2020, review fees for Land Use applications, and payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner, I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $. flat fee for . $. flat fee for $. flat fee for . $. flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature, or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices sent by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy, including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for processing my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. City of Aspen: Phillip Supino, AICP Community Development Director City Use: Fees Due: $ Received $ Case # Signature: PRINT Name: Title: 25 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTIVATIVE: Description: Existing and Proposed Conditions Review: Administrative or Board Review Required Land Use Review(s): Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) required fields: Net Leasable square footage Lodge Pillows Free Market dwelling units Affordable Housing dwelling units Essential Public Facility square footage Have you included the following? FEES DUE: $ Pre-Application Conference Summary Signed Fee Agreement HOA Compliance form All items listed in checklist on PreApplication Conference Summary Name: Address: Phone#: email: Address: Phone #: email: Name: Project Name and Address: Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 26 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Complete only if required by the PreApplication checklist Project and Location Applicant: Zone District: Gross Lot Area: Net Lot Area: **Please refer to section 26.575.020 for information on how to calculate Net Lot Area Please fill out all relevant dimensions Single Family and Duplex Residential 1) Floor Area (square feet) 2) Maximum Height 3) Front Setback 4) Rear Setback 5) Side Setbacks 6) Combined Side Setbacks 7) % Site Coverage Existing Allowed Proposed Multi-family Residential 1)Number of Units 2)Parcel Density (see 26.710.090.C.10) 3)FAR (Floor Area Ratio) 4)Floor Area (square feet) Existing Allowed Proposed 8) Minimum distance between buildings Proposed % of demolition 5) Maximum Height 6) Front Setback 7) Rear Setback 8) Side Setbacks Proposed % of demolition Commercial Proposed Use(s) Existing Allowed Proposed 1) FAR (Floor Area Ratio) 2) Floor Area (square feet) 3) Maximum Height 4) Off-Street Parking Spaces 5) Second Tier (square feet) 6) Pedestrian Amenity (square feet) Proposed % of demolition Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Variations requested: Lodge Additional Use(s) 1)FAR (Floor Area Ratio) 2)Floor Area (square feet) 3)Maximum Height 4)Free Market Residential(square feet) 4)Front setback 5)Rear setback 6)Side setbacks 7)Off-Street Parking Spaces 8)Pedestrian Amenity (square feet) Proposed % of demolition Existing Allowed Proposed 27 April 2020 City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying that the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Property Owner (“I”): Name: Email: Phone No.: Address of Property: (subject of application) I certify as follows: (pick one) □This property is not subject to a homeowner association or other form of private c ovenant. □This property is subject to a homeowner association or private covenant, and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. □This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners a ssociation or covenant beneficiary. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document. Owner signature: Date: Owner printed name: or, Attorney signature: Date: Attorney printed name: 28 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT April 2020 City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURE 1.Attend pre-application conference. During this one-on-one meeting, staff will determine the review process applies to your development proposal and will identify the materials necessary to review your application. 2.Submit Development Application. Based on your pre-application meeting, you should complete to the application package and submit the requested number of copies of the complete application and the appropriate processing fee to the Community Development Department. 3.Determination of Completeness. Within five (5) working days of the date of your submission, staff will review the application and notify you in writing whether the application is complete or if additional materials are required. Please be aware that the purpose of the completeness review is to determine whether or not the information you have submitted is adequate to review the request, and not whether the information is sufficient to obtain approval. 4.Staff Review of Development Application. Once your application is determined to be complete, it will be reviewed by the staff for compliance with the applicable standards of the Code. During the staff review stage, the application will be referred to other agencies for comments. The Planner assigned to your case or the agency may contact you if additional information is needed or if problems are identified. Staff will draft a memo for signature by the Community Development Director that explains whether your application complies with the Code, and will list any conditions that should apply if the application is to be approved. Final approval of any Development Application that amends a recorded document, such as a plat, agreement, or deed restriction, will require the applicant to prepare an amended version of that document for review and approval by staff. Staff will provide the applicant with the applicable contents for the revised plat. The City Attorney is normally in charge of the form for recorded agreements and deed restrictions. We suggest that you not go to the trouble or expense of preparing these documents until the staff has determined that your application is eligible for the requested amendment or exemption. 5. Board Review of Application. If a public hearing is required for the land use action that you are requesting, the Planning staff will schedule a hearing date for the application upon determination that the application is complete. The hearing(s) will be scheduled before the appropriate reviewing board(s). The applicant will be required to mail notice (one copy provided by the Community Development Department) to property owners within 30 feet of the subject property and post notice (sign available at the Community Development Department) of the public hearing on the site at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing date. (Please see Attachment 6 for instructions.) The Planning staff will publish notice of the hearing in the paper for land use requests that require publication. The Planning staff will then formulate a recommendation on the land use request and draft a memo to the reviewing board(s). Staff will supply the applicant with a copy of the Planning staff’s memo, approximately five (5) days prior to the hearing. The public hearing(s) will take place before the appropriate review boards. Public hearings include a presentation by the Planning staff, a presentation by the applicant (optional), consideration of public comment, and the reviewing board’s questions and decision. (Continued on next page) 29 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT April 2020 City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 6.Issuance of Development Order. If the land use review is approved, then the Planning staff will issue a Development Order, which allows the applicant to submit a building permit application. 7.Receipt of Building Permit. Once you have received a copy of the signed staff approval, you may apply for a building permit. During this time, your project will be examined for its compliance with the Uniform Building Code. It also will be checked for compliance with applicable provisions of the Land Use Regulations that were not reviewed in detail during the land use case review. (This might include a check of floor area ratios, setbacks, parking, open space and the like). Impact fees for water, sewer, parks, and employee housing will be collected as part of the permitting process. Any document required to be recorded, such as a plat, deed restriction, or agreement, will be reviewed and recorded before a building permit application is submitted. 30 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PRE-24-020 DATE: March 12, 2024 PLANNER: Sophie Varga, sophie.varga@aspen.gov, 970-429-2778 PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS: 633 W. Francis Street / 310 N. 5th Street. – Replacement of non- conforming floor area; Setback Variance PARCEL ID #: 273512426001 REPRESENTATIVE: Ryan Doremus, ryan@thunderbowlarchitects.com, 970-274-1421 DESCRIPTION: The subject site is a 6,018 square foot lot in the Medium-Density Residential (R-6) Zone District and is developed with a duplex. The property is a substandard sized lot for a duplex in this zone district. Due to the lot size nonconformity, the total allowable floor area is limited to that of a single-family residence (26.312.030.f.2.a, Non-conforming Structures – Density Replacement). The existing duplex is over allowable floor area and over the 15% deck exemption. The applicant proposes to re-arrange the non-conforming floor area and deck area. The non-conformity will not be increased. Replacing a non-conformity is subject to Special Review (26.430). The applicant proposes to reduce deck area in the setback by building permanent planters in the front yard setback. The development in the setback requires a Dimensional Variance. The applicant may combine the reviews before the Planning and Zoning Commission. RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS: Section Number Section Title 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.312 Nonconformities 26.314 Variances 26.430 Special Review 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.710.040 Medium Density Residential (R-6) For your convenience – links to the Land Use Application and Land Use Code are below: Land Use Application Land Use Code REQUIRED LAND USE REVIEW(S): • Dimensional Variance • Replacement of Nonconformities REVIEW BY: • Staff for determination of complete application and recommendation • Planning and Zoning Commission for decision PUBLIC HEARING: • Yes, Planning and Zoning Commission PLANNING FEES: $3,250 for 10 billable hours of staff time (additional/lesser hours will be billed/refunded at a rate of $325.00 per hour) 31 REFERRAL AGENCY FEES $1,500 – Engineering Flat Fee $975.00 – Parks Flat Fee TOTAL DEPOSIT: $5,725 APPLICATION CHECKLIST – Please email the following as a single PDF to CDEHAdmins@aspen.gov. Please include PRE-24-020 in the subject line.  Completed Land Use Application, including signed fee agreement and HOA Compliance Form.  Pre-application Conference Summary (this document).  Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application.  Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant.  A vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen.  Site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status, certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado.  A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approval associated with the property. This should include existing and proposed site plans, floor plans, floor area plans, and any other necessary depictions of the proposed project.  Written responses to all review criteria outlined in Land Use Code Section 26.314.040 and 26.430.040. Once the application is deemed complete by staff, the following will then need to be submitted:  Total deposit for review of the application. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 32 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Location: 633 W. Francis St. Aspen, CO 81611 Parcel ID #273512426001 Applicant seeks variance for the planter boxes located within the front and side setbacks at the upper level Primary Deck. The Primary Bedroom's private deck encroaches into the front and side setback, and we are proposing new planter boxes that take some of the Floor area out of the setback but still retaining the deck for use. The current square footage is also non- conforming by todays requirements/standards, and we are moving the countable FAR to be used at more appropriate locations without increasing the the fact that the building is non- conforming and above today’s allowable FAR numbers. 33 REPRESENTATIVE AUTORIZATION LETTER 3/13/2024 This letter is to confirm that: Thunderbowl Architects 300 S. Spring Suite #201 Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 274-1421 Is authorized to act as a representative on behalf of the owner: Walt & Kate Templin; West Aspen Grove LLC 380 Westview Dr. Athens, GA 30606 With regards to seeking a Land Use Exemption for a proposed door height variance on the property located at 633 W. Francis St., Aspen, CO 81611 Walt Templin/Kate Templin 34 633 W. Francis St, Aspen, CO 81611 REVIEW CRITERIA RESPONSE CHAPTER 26.312. - NONCONFORMITIES Sec. 26.312.010. - Purpose. Within the Zone Districts established by this Title, there exist uses of land, buildings and structures that were lawfully established before this Title was adopted or amended which would be in violation of the terms and requirements of this Title. The purpose of this Chapter is to regulate and limit the continued existence of those uses, buildings and structures that do not conform to the provisions of this Title as amended. It is the intent of this Chapter to permit nonconformities to continue, but not to allow nonconformities to be enlarged or expanded. The provisions of this Chapter are designed to curtail substantial investment in nonconformities in order to preserve the integrity of the zone districts and the other provisions of this Title but should not be construed as an abatement provision. Sec. 26.312.020. - Nonconforming uses. (a)Authority to continue. Nonconforming uses of land or structures may continue in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter and this Section. (b)Normal maintenance. Normal maintenance may be performed upon nonconforming uses of land and structures, provided that the maintenance performed within any twelve (12) consecutive month period does not exceed ten percent (10%) of the current replacement cost of the structure. (c)Extensions/expansions. Nonconforming uses shall not be extended or expanded. This prohibition shall be construed so as to prevent:(1)Enlargement of nonconforming use by increasing the net leasable area, the net livable area of a dwelling unit, or the area within a structure in which such nonconforming use is located; or(2)Occupancy of additional lands; or,(3)Increasing the size, considering all dimensions, of a structure in which a nonconforming use is located. (g)Demolition or destruction.(1)Ability to restore. Any nonconforming use located in a structure which is purposefully demolished, pursuant to the definition of Demolition, may not be continued or restored. Any nonconforming use located in a structure undergoing construction, which does not constitute a demolition, has an approved development order, and an approved building permit shall not be considered discontinued.(2) Non willful destruction. Any nonconforming use which is demolished or destroyed by an act of nature or through any manner not purposefully accomplished by the owner may be restored as of right, regardless of the extent of demolition or destruction, if a building permit for reconstruction is submitted within twenty-four (24) months of the date of demolition or destruction. RESPONSE: 35 Sec. 26.312.020a – The structure will continue to be non-conforming (per today’s code it was non- conforming before proposed work). Sec. 263.12.020c – There is no intent for the project to be enlarged past the current ‘net leasable’, ‘net livable’, or ‘Area’, but to reuse the same area square footage in a more appropriate way. Sec. 26.312.030. - Non-conforming structures. (a)Authority to continue. A nonconforming structure devoted to a use permitted in the zone district in which it is located may be continued in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. (b)Normal maintenance. Normal maintenance to nonconforming structures may be performed without affecting the authorization to continue as a nonconforming structure. (c)Extensions. A nonconforming structure shall not be extended by an enlargement or expansion that increases the nonconformity. A nonconforming structure may be extended or altered in a manner that does not change or that decreases the nonconformity. (1)Historic structures. The first exception to this requirement shall be for a structure listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. Such structures may be extended into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, may be extended into the minimum distance between buildings on a lot and may be enlarged, provided, however, such enlargement does not exceed the allowable floor area of the existing structure by more than five hundred (500) square feet, complies with all other requirements of this Title and receives development review approval as required by Chapter 26.415. (2)Mandatory occupancy accessory dwelling units and carriage houses. The second exception to this requirement shall be for a property with a detached Accessory Dwelling Unit or Carriage House ("ADU") having a mandatory occupancy requirement. Such a detached ADU may be enlarged or expanded by up to five hundred (500) square feet of floor area, provided that this bonus floor area shall go entirely to the detached ADU and also provided that the ADU does not exceed the maximum size allowed for an ADU or carriage house. The enlargement or expansion must comply with all other requirements of this Title and shall receive development review approval as required herein. a.Procedure. The procedure for increasing the maximum floor area of a property for the purpose of increasing the size of an ADU requires the submission of a development application. The development application shall be processed under Chapter 26.430, Special Review.b.Review Standards. An application for increasing the floor area of a property for the purpose of increasing the size of an ADU shall meet the standards in Section 26.520.050, Design Standards, unless otherwise approved pursuant to Section 26.520.080, Special Review, as well as the following additional review standards: 1.Newly established floor area may increase the ADU up to a cumulative maximum of five hundred (500) square feet of floor area and is required to be mitigated by either of the following two (2) options. (i)Extinguishment of Historic Transferable Development Right Certificates ("certificate" or "certificates"). A property owner may increase the ADU 36 by extinguishment of a maximum of two (2) certificates with a transfer ratio of two hundred fifty (250) square feet of floor area per each certificate. Refer to Chapter 26.535 for the procedures for extinguishing certificates. (ii)Extinguishment of unused floor area from another property. A property owner may increase the maximum floor area of a property for the purpose of increasing the size of an ADU by extinguishment of a maximum of five hundred (500) square feet of available un-built floor area from one (1) property to the ADU. 2.The additional floor area is a conversion of existing square footage which was not previously counted in floor area. (Example: storage space made habitable or the additional floor area creates a more desirable, livable unit with minimal additional impacts to the bulk and mass of the ADU structure. 3.The additional floor area creates a unit which is more suitable for caretaker families. 4.The increased impacts from the larger size are outweighed by the benefits of having a larger, more desirable ADU. 5.The area and bulk of the ADU structure, after the addition of the bonus floor area, must be compatible with surrounding uses and the surrounding neighborhood. 6.For the transfer of allowable floor area through the use of Historic Transferable Development Right Certificates, the certificates shall be extinguished pursuant to Chapter 26.535, Transferable Development Rights. 7.For the transfer of allowable floor area from a non-historically designated property to an ADU deed-restricted as a mandatory occupancy unit, the applicant shall record an instrument in a form acceptable to the City Attorney removing floor area from the sending property to the mandatory occupancy ADU. (a)Authority to continue. A nonconforming structure devoted to a use permitted in the zone district in which (d)Relocation. A nonconforming structure shall not be moved unless it thereafter conforms to the standards and requirements of the zone district in which it is located. (e)Unsafe structure. Any portion of a nonconforming structure which becomes physically unsafe or unlawful due to lack of repairs and maintenance and which is declared unsafe or unlawful by a duly authorized City official, but which an owner wishes to restore, repair or rebuild shall only be restored, repaired or rebuilt in conformity with the provisions of this Title. (f)Ability to restore. (1)Non-purposeful destruction. Any nonconforming structure that is Demolished, or portion thereof which is destroyed by an act of nature or through any manner not purposefully accomplished by the owner, may be restored as of right if a building permit for reconstruction is submitted within twenty-four (24) months of the date of Demolition or destruction. (2)Purposeful destruction. Any nonconforming structure that is purposefully Demolished or portion thereof which is purposefully destroyed, may be replaced with a different structure only if the replacement structure is in conformance with the current provisions of this Title or unless replacement of the nonconformity is approved pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 26.430, Special Review. Any structure which is nonconforming in regards to the permitted density of the underlying zone district may maintain that specific nonconformity only if a building permit for the replacement structure is 37 submitted within twelve (12) months of the date of demolition or destruction.a.Density replacement. A duplex or two (2) single-family residences on a substandard parcel in a zone district permitting such use is a nonconforming structure and subject to nonconforming structure replacement provisions. Density on a substandard parcel is permitted to be maintained but the structure must comply with the dimensional requirements of the Code including single-family floor area requirements. RESPONSE: The existing building will remain, with the addition of a new garage. The additional FAR will be added to the lower level with the adjustment to the footprint and exposed wall area. This includes the additional floor area below the proposed new garage and connection to the existing building. The existing deck floor are will be modified with the reconfiguration of the existing rear deck and reduction of the existing non conforming (in setback) front deck. CHAPTER 26.314. - VARIANCES Sec. 26.314.010. - Purposes. Variances are deviations from the terms of this Title which would not be contrary to the public interest when, owing to special circumstances or conditions, the literal enforcement of the provisions of this Title would result in undue and unnecessary hardship. Variances shall only be granted in accordance with the terms of this Chapter. Sec. 26.314.020. - Authority. The Board of Adjustment, in accordance with the procedures, standards and limitations of this Chapter shall approve, approve with conditions or disapprove a development application for variances to the terms of this Title. If the application for a variance is part of a consolidated application process authorized by the Community Development Director pursuant to Subsection 26.304.060(b)(1), the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Historic Preservation Commission may review the application for a variance using the standards and procedures set forth in this Chapter. Sec. 26.314.030. - Authorized variances. Variances may only be granted from the following requirements of this Title 26: (a)Dimensional requirements. (b)Permitted uses, but only to allow for the temporary off-site location or storage of materials, structures or equipment pursuant to building construction or construction staging. Sec. 26.314.040. - Standards applicable to variances. (a)In order to authorize a variance from the dimensional requirements of Title 26, the appropriate decision-making body shall make a finding that the following three (3) circumstances exist:(1)The grant of variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and policies of this Title and the Municipal Code; and(2)The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building or structure; and(3)Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district and would cause the applicant 38 unnecessary hardship, as distinguished from mere inconvenience. In determining whether an applicant's rights would be deprived, the Board shall consider whether either of the following conditions apply:a.There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel, building or structure, which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions of the applicant; or b.Granting the variance will not confer upon the applicant any special privilege denied by the terms of this Title and the Municipal Code to other parcels, buildings or structures, in the same zone district. (b)In order to authorize a variance from the permitted uses of Title 26, the appropriate decision- making body shall make a finding that all of the following circumstances exist:(1)Notice by publication, mailing and posting of the proposed variance has been provided to surrounding property owners in accordance with Subparagraphs 26.304.060(e)(3)a.—c.(2)A variance is the only reasonable method by which to afford the applicant relief, and to deny a variance would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship such that the property would be rendered practically undevelopable, as distinguished from mere inconvenience.(3)The temporary off-site storage or construction staging can be undertaken in such a manner so as to minimize disruption, if any, of normal neighborhood activities surrounding the subject parcel.(4)If ownership of the off-site parcel subject to the proposed variance is not vested in the applicant, then verified written authorization of the parcel's owner must be provided.(5)Adequate provision is made to restore the subject parcel to its original condition upon expiration of the variance, including the posting of such financial security as deemed appropriate and necessary by the appropriate decision-making body to ensure such restoration. Sec. 26.314.050. - Procedure for variance approval. (a)Initiation. A development application for a variance may be initiated by over fifty percent (50%) of the owners of the real property for which the variance is proposed. (b)Determination of completeness and review by the planning director. A development application for a variance shall be initiated by the submission of a development application to the Community Development Director in a form established for such purposes. The Community Development Director shall review the application and determine its completeness and shall refer written comments to the appropriate decision-making body. (c)Steps required. One step is required to review an application for a variance: A public hearing before the appropriate decision-making body. (d)Notice requirements: publication, mailing and posting (see subparagraphs 26.304.060[E][3][a]—[c]). (e)Decision-making body action. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the appropriate decision-making body shall determine if the application meets the standards of this Chapter and shall issue a resolution to approve, approve with conditions or disapprove the application for a variance. RESPONSE: Variance request will be for an area that already is non conforming, and we are only bringing it more into conformance. 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 9 . 7 ' 6.9' 16 . 7 ' 12.6' 34 . 5 ' 13.7' 23 . 3 ' 16.1' 9.2' 1 1 . 7 ' 1.6' 6 . 8 ' 1.8' 7 . 1 ' 29.3 ' 3 . 4 ' 2.9' 9 . 7 ' 4.5' WO O D P O R C H CO N C R E T E P O R C H BA S E M E N T ST E P S FL A G S T O N E W A L K CONC R E T E PARKI N G A R E A WEST F R A N C I S S T R E E T NO R T H 6 T H S T R E E T S 1 4 ° 5 0 ' 4 9 " W 7 6 . 4 1 ' N75° 0 9 ' 1 1 " W 6 0 . 0 0 ' BA S I S O F B E A R I N G S N1 4 ° 5 0 ' 4 9 " E 1 0 0 . 0 0 ' S75° 0 9 ' 1 1 " E 6 0 . 0 0 ' S 1 4 ° 5 0 ' 4 9 " W 14 . 4 4 ' E G S SPA CO N C R E T E P A T I O BU I L D I N G O V E R H A N G TW O - S T O R Y G A R A G E TWO- S T O R Y W/BA S E M E N T A R E A STON E & W O O D H O U S E 633 W E S T F R A N C I S S T R E E T (7 7 . 6 5 ' R I G H T - O F - W A Y ) 7907 7907 79 0 8 791 0 7909 7908 7909 790 9 7 9 1 0 7908 PROPERTY LINE TABLE LINE L1 L2 L3 L4 BEARING S35° 42' 53"E S54° 17' 07"W S35° 42' 53"E S54° 15' 38"W DISTANCE 4.31' 1.25' 1.50' 5.82' L 1 L2 L3 L4 REED S H O U S E COND O M I N I U M ALLEY BLOC K 2 2 GRAV E L A L L E Y DYH S FF E 79 1 0 . 6 0 BASE M E N T 7901 . 9 7 C O N C R E T E WALK PA V E D R O A D W A Y (74.7 2 ' R I G H T - O F - W A Y ) PAVE D R O A D W A Y CA N T I L E V E R INLET 7905. 6 SITE BENCH MARK FOUND 1" ALUMINUM CAP ILLEGIBLE ELEVATION:7906.50 FOUN D R E B A R & 1 - 1 / 4 " YELLO W P L A S T I C C A P L S 9 1 8 4 FOUN D R E B A R & 1 - 1 / 4 " YELLO W P L A S T I C C A P L S 9 1 8 4 W. W . W.W . W . W . 6.0'(T I E ) 4 . 0 ' (T I E ) UP P E R D E C K 31 . 3 ' ( T I E ) CITY OF ASPEN GPS CONTROL MONUMENT #7 CITY OF ASPEN GPS CONTROL MONUMENT #9 S 3 2 ° 1 2 ' 4 6 " E 5 2 . 4 8 ' ( T I E ) N1 6 ° 5 8 ' 1 0 " E 1 0 6 7 . 9 8 ' ( T I E ) LOT C LOT B LOT A (21.0 7 ' R I G H T - O F - W A Y ) PROP E R T Y A R E A 6,019 ± S Q . F T . 0.138 ± A C R E S STEPS ST E P S MAIL B O X EDGE O F P A V E M E N T ED G E O F P A V E M E N T DR A I N A G E S W A L E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 5.0' R E A R A C C E S S O R Y S E T B A C K 10.0' R E A R P R I N C I P A L S E T B A C K 15.0' F R O N T A C C E S S O R Y SETB A C K 10.0' F R O N T P R I N C I P A L SETB A C K 5. 0 ' S I D E S E T B A C K 5. 0 ' S I D E SE T B A C K PARKI N G SIGN ST E P S FFE 791 0 . 6 0 FFE 790 8 . 5 9 79 1 1 . 1 7 FF E 79 0 7 . 1 0 79 0 6 . 9 1 7 9 0 6 . 7 4 790 7 . 3 8 790 7 . 6 1 7907.61 7906.94 790 8 . 5 0 791 0 . 5 4 791 0 . 5 5 791 0 . 4 5 7910.49 79 1 0 . 5 3 79 0 9 . 0 79 0 9 . 5 4 7908. 8 6 7908. 8 3 79 0 8 . 2 3 79 0 8 . 0 6 7 9 0 7 . 8 7 7 9 1 1 . 0 8 79 0 7 . 8 6 79 0 7 . 4 7 791 0 . 4 5 79 0 8 . 7 3 ST E P DRA I N 7901 . 9 2 VICINITY MAP WATER LINE SEWER LINE TELEPHONE LINE GAS LINE CATV LINE ELECTRIC LINE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL DYH S FIRE HYDRANT SANITARY MANHOLE ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER GAS METER ELECTRICAL METER G LEGEND E SURVEYOR 'S CERTIFICATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, HOWEVER IT IS NOT A GUARANTY OR WARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. NOTES: 5.THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE COMMITMENT, THEREFORE, ANY EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE THAT MAY AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. 6.ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88) REFERENCED FROM NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY (NGS) STATION S159 HAVING AN ELEVATION OF 7720.88. 7.CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1-FOOT. 8.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES WITHIN ZONE X WHICH IS 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD HAZARD ACCORDING TO FEMA FIRM MAP NO. 08097C0354E WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 15, 2019. 9.NO NATURAL HAZARDS OR SLOPES OVER 20% EXISTS ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. W/TOPOGRAPHY LOTS A & B, BLOCK 22-CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO PARCEL NO. 27350-124-26-001 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT TRUE NORT+ COLORADO LLC A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY P.O. BOX 614 - 386 MAIN STREET UNIT 3 NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com PROJECT NO: 2024-105 DATE:February 6, 2024 DRAWN RPK SURVEYED DJB-GBL SHEET 1 OF 1 TRUENORTH A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY 10' 5'20' SCALE: 1" = 10' N PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECEPTION NO. 696909 PARCEL A LOTS A AND B, BLOCK 22, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN STATE OF COLORADO. PARCEL B A PORTION OF THE COMMON ELEMENTS OF THE REED HOUSE CONDOMINIUM, ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM MAP THEREOF RECORDED OCTOBER 28, 1977 IN PLAT BOOK 6 AT PAGE 38, AND AS DEFINED AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR THE REEDS HOUSE RECORDED OCTOBER 28, 1977 lN BOOK 337 AT PAGE 484, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THAT PORTION OF THE REEDS HOUSE CONDOMINIUM FORMERLY KNOWN AS A PORTION OF LOT C, BLOCK 22, CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID COMMON ELEMENTS, BEING ALSO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT C, WHENCE THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT C BEARS NORTH 14 DEGREES 50'49" EAST 14.44 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 35 DEGREES 42'53" EAST 4.31 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54 DEGREES 17'07" WEST 1.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 35 DEGREES 42'53" EAST 1.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54 DEGREES 17'07" WEST 5.81 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT C; THENCE NORTH 14 DEGREES 50'49" EAST 9.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. COUNTY OF PITKIN STATE OF COLORADO. 0 NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. SET NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" PINK PLASTIC CAP TNC PLS38215 WOOD FENCE CATV PEDESTAL CLEAN-OUT SCALE: 1" = 500' FOUND REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP LS37972 (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) TREE TYPE TRUNK DRIP 1 ASPEN 12''24' 2 ASPEN 10''16' 3 ASPEN 10''16' 4 ASPEN 11''18' 5 ASPEN 10''16' 6 ASPEN 10''16' 7 ASPEN 11''18' 8 ASPEN 10''17' 9 ASPEN 10''16' 10 ASPEN 8''15' 11 COTTONWOOD 65''50' 12 MOUNTAIN MAPLE 12''21' 13 CONIFEROUS 5''10' 14 CONIFEROUS 4''6' 15 CONIFEROUS 7''14' 16 CONIFEROUS 9''16' 17 ASPEN MULTI 14''26' 18 ASPEN 11''18' 19 ASPEN 14''26' 20 CONIFEROUS 11''18' 21 ASPEN 7''12' 22 ASPEN 10''18' 23 ASPEN 6''10' 24 CONIFEROUS 8''14' 25 CONIFEROUS 8''14' 26 CONIFEROUS 13''24' 27 ASPEN MULTI 14''24' 28 ASPEN 7''13' 29 CONIFEROUS 7''12' 30 CONIFEROUS 8''14' 31 CONIFEROUS 12''24' 32 CONIFEROUS 12''24' 33 CONIFEROUS 6''12' 34 CONIFEROUS 7''13' PROPERTY ZONING CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE SECTION 26.710.040 - MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R6) SETBACKS FRONT: PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS: 10 FEET ACCESSORY BUILDINGS: 15 FEET REAR: PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS: 10 FEET ACCESSORY BUILDINGS: 5 FEET PORTION OF PRINCIPAL BUILDING USED SOLELY AS A GARAGE: 5 FEET SIDE: MINIMUM FOR EACH: 5 FEET TOTAL BOTH SIDE YARDS: 15 FEET PLUS 1 FOOT FOR EACH ADDITIONAL 200 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS LOT AREA TO A MAXIMUM OF 25 FEET OF TOTAL SIDE YARD. FRAN C I S S T R E E T HALL A M S T R E E T BLEEK E R S T R E E T 6T H S T R E E T 7T H S T R E E T 5T H S T R E E T MAIN S T R E E T CITY OF ASPEN SMUG G L E R S T R E E T SITE 54 F SD CO SP A-101 1 1 1 1 1 A-101 SIM A-101 1 SIM A-101 1 SIM 14 A 1 XXX ENLARGED DETAIL NUMBER SHEET NUMBER DETAIL NUMBER SHEET NUMBER BUILDING SECTION NUMBER SHEET NUMBER INTERIOR ELEVATION NUMBERS SHEET NUMBER DOOR SYMBOL WINDOW SYMBOL REVISION JUNCTION BOX HOSE BIBB JB HB FINISH MATERIAL 2'-7" 2'-8" TICK LEADER DENOTES DIMENSION TO FRAMING ARROW LEADER DENOTES DIMENSION TO FRAMING DIMENSIONING KEY FOR ALL DRAWINGS EXCEPT DETAILS1KEYNOTE SYMBOL PENDANT LIGHT FIXTURE LED LIGHT FIXTURE -UTILITY LED STRIP COVE LIGHTING CEILING MOUNTED SMOKE / CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR W/ BATTERY BACKUP EXHAUST FAN SPEAKER RECESSED DOWNLIGHT WATER-RATED FIXTURE WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE RECESSED DISPLAY LIGHT FIXTURE CEILING / SOFFIT HEIGHT SYMBOL WR +13'-11" REFLECTED CEILING PLAN CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE ASPEN, COLORADO 1/4" = 1'-0" LAND USE APPLICATION 07/29/2024 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 COVER SHEET 23005.00 G-000 633 W. FRANCIS ST. & < @ 0 # A.C. ACOUS. A.D. ADJ. ADJAC. AGGR. ALT. ALUM. APPROX. ARCH. ASPH. BD. BITUM. BLDG. BLK. BLKG. BM. B.O. BOT B.P. BTWN. C.B. CEM. CER. C.J. CLG. CLKG. CLR. C.M.U. CNTR. C.O. COL. CONC. COND. CONN. CONSTR. CONT. CONTR. CLOS. C.T. CTR. C.W. DBL. DETR. D.F. DIA. DIM. DISP. And Angle At Diameter or Round Pound or Number Air Conditioning or Asphaltic Concrete Acoustical Area Drain Adjustable Adjacent Aggregate Alternate Aluminum Approximate Architectural Asphalt Board Bituminous Building Block Blocking Beam Bottom Of Bottom Building Paper Between Catch Basin Cement Ceramic Control Joint Ceiling Caulking Clear Concrete Masonry Unit Counter Clean-Out Column Concrete Condition Connection Construction Continuous Contractor Closet Ceramic Tile Center Cold Water Double Detail Drinking Fountain Diameter Dimension Dispenser DN. DR. D.W. DWG. DWR. EA. (E) E.I.F.S. E.J. EL. ELEC. EMER. ENCL. E.O.S. E.P.B. EQ. EQUIP. EXIST. EXP. EXT. F.A. F.A.U. F.B. F.D. F.E. F.H.M.S. F.H.W.S. FIN. FIXT. FLR. FLASH. FLUOR. F.O.C. F.O.F. F.O. PLY F.O.S. F.P.R.F. FR. FT. FTG. FURR. FUT. G. GA. GALV. G.D. GEN. G.F.I. GL. GND. GR. G.S.M. GYP. Down Door Dishwasher Drawing Drawer Each Existing Exterior Insulation & Finish System Expansion Joint Elevation Electrical Emergency Enclosure Edge of Slab Electrical Panel Board Equal Equipment Existing Expansion Exterior Fire Alarm Forced Air Unit Flat Bar Floor Drain Fire Extinguisher Cabinet Flat Head Machine Screw Flat Head Wood Screw Finish Fixture Floor Flashing Fluorescent Face of Concrete Face of Finish Face of Plywood Face of Stud Fireproof Frame Foot or Feet Footing Furring Future Gas Outlet Gauge Glavanized Garbage Disposal General Ground Fault Interrupt Glass Ground Grade Galvanized Sheet Metal Gypsum H.B. H.C. HD. HDBD. HDR. HDW. HDWD. HGR. HGT. H.M. HORIZ. HR. H.R. H.W.H. I.B.C. I.D. IN. INSUL. INT. INTER. I.R.C. JAN. JB JST. JT. KIT. LAM. LAV. LB. LIN. LT. MACH. MAINT. MAT. MAX. M.B. M.C. M.D.O. MECH. MEMB. MTL. MFR. MIN. MISC. MTD. MUL. (N) N. N.I.C. NO. or # NOM. N.T.S. Hose Bib Hollow Core or Handicapped Head Hardboard Header Hardware Hardwood Hanger Height Hollow Metal Horizontal Hour Handrail Hot Water Heater International Building Code Inside Diameter Inch Insulation Interior Intermediate International Residential Code Janitor Junction Box Joist Joint Kitchen Laminate Lavatory Pound Linear Light Machine Maintain Material Maximum Machine Bolt Medicine Cabinet Medium Density Overlay Mechanical Membrane Metal Manufacturer Minimum Miscellaneous Mounted Mullion New North Not in Contract Number Nominal Not to Scale O.A. O.C. O.D. OPNG. OPP. PERIM. PL. P.LAM. PLAS. PLYWD. PNL. PNT. P.S.I. PT. P.T. PTD. P.T.D. PTN. P.T.R. Q.T. R. R.A. RAD. REC. REF. REFL. REFR. REG. REINF. REQ. RESIL. RET. REV. RM. REMOV. R.O. RWD. S. S.A.F.F. S.C.D. S.D. SCHED. SECT. S.E.D. SEP. S.H. SHT. SHTG. SIM. SL. S.G.D. S.L.D. Overall On Center Outside Diameter (Dim.) Opening Opposite Perimeter Plate Plastic Laminate Plaster Plywood Panel Paint Per Square Inch Point Pressure Treated or Post Tensioned Painted Paper Towel Dispenser Partition Paper Towl Receptacle Quarry Tile Riser Return Air Radius Recessed Reference Reflected Refrigerator Register Reinforced Required Resilient Retaining Revision/Revised/Reversed Room Removable Rough Opening Redwood South Self-Adhered Flexible Flashing See Civil Drawings Storm Drain or Soap Dispenser/Dish Schedule Section See Electrical Drawings Separation Sprinkler Head Sheet Sheathing Similar Sliding See Garage Drawings See Landscape Drawings S.L.T.D. S.M.D. S.P.D. SPEC. SQ. S.S. S.S.D. STD. STL. STOR. STRL. S.V. S.W. SYM. SYS. T. T.B. T.C. TEL. TEMP. T.&G. TER. THK. T.M.E. T.O.C. T.O.P. T.O. PLY. T.O.W. TYP. U.B.C. UNEXC. UNF. U.O.N. VAR. V.C.T. VEN. VERT. VEST. V.G.D.F. V.I.F. VOL. W. W/ W.C. WD. W.H. W/O W.P. W.P.M. WSCT. W.S.P. WT. WR. WW. See Lighting Drawings See Mechanical Drawings See Plumbing Drawings Specification or Special Square Stainless Steel See Structural Drawings Standard Steel Storage Structural Sheet Vinyl Shear Wall Symmetrical System Tread Towel Bar Top of Curb Telephone Tempered Tongue & Groove Terrazzo Thick To Match Existing Top of Concrete Top of Plate Top of Plywood Top of Wall Typical Uniform Building Code Unexcavated Unfinished Unless Otherwise Noted Varies Vinyl Composition Tile Veneer Verticall Vestibule Vertical Grain Douglas Fir Verify in Field Volume West Width Wall Covering Wood Water Heater Without Work Point or Waterproofing Waterproof Membrane Wainscot Wet Standpipe Weight Water Resistant Welded Wire ABBREVIATIONS GENERAL NOTES SHEET INDEX VICINITY MAP PROJECT STATISTICS PROJECT DIRECTORY 1. The work included under this contract consists of all labor, materials, transportation, tools and equipment necessary for the construction of the project leaving all work ready for use. 2. The construction documents are the property of Thunderbowl Architects Inc and its Consultants and are to be used as instruments of service for construction of this project only. Use for any other purpose, without authorization, is not allowed. 3. The plans indicate the general extent of new construction necessary for the work, but are not intended to be all-inclusive. All demolition and all new work necessary to allow for a finished job in accordance with the intention of the drawing is included regardless of whether shown on the drawings or mentioned in the notes. 4. Any errors, omissions or conflicts found in the various parts of the construction documents shall be brought to the attention of the Architect and the Owner for clarification before proceeding with the work. 5. The General Contractor shall maintain a current and complete set of the construction documents on the job site during all phases of construction for use of all the trades and shall provide all the subcontractors with current and complete construction documents as required including specifications and architectural supplementary instructions. 6. The General Contractor shall verify and assume responsibility for all dimensions and site conditions. The General Contractor shall inspect the existing premises and take note of existing conditions prior to submitting prices. No claim shall be allowed for difficulties encountered which could have reasonably been inferred from such an examination. 7. Written dimensions take precedence. Do not scale drawings. 8. See SYMBOLS area of this sheet for dimension standards. 9. All dimensions noted "verify" and "V.I.F." are to be checked by Contractor prior to construction. Immediately report any variances to the Architect for resolution, then coordinate resolution w/ all work of all trades. 10. Coordinate all work with existing conditions, including but not limited to: irrigation pipes, electrical conduit, water lines, gas lines, drainage lines, etc. Notify Architect immediately of any conflicts. 11. Provide adequate temporary support as necessary to assure the structural value or integrity of the building. 12. Protect all existing building and site conditions to remain, including walls, cabinets, finishes, trees and shrubs, paving, etc. 13. Details shown are typical. Similar details apply in similar conditions. 14. Verify all architectural details with structural, civil, landscape and design/build drawings before ordering or installation of any work. 15. All changes in floor materials occur at centerline of door or framed opening unless otherwise indicated on the drawings. 16. Install all fixtures, equipment and materials per manufacturer's recommendations. 17. Verify clearances for flues, vents, chases, soffits, fixtures, etc. before any construction, ordering of, or installation of any items of work. 18. Sealant, caulking and flashing, etc. locations shown on drawings are not intended to be inclusive. Follow manufacturer's installation recommendations and standard industry and building practices. 19. The General Contractor shall remove all rubbish and waste materials of all subcontractors and trades on a regular basis, and shall exercise a strict control over job cleaning to prevent any direct debris or dust from affecting, in any way, finished areas in or outside job site. 20. Contractor shall leave premises and all affected areas clean and orderly, ready for occupancy. This includes cleaning of all glass (inside and outside) and frames, both new and existing. 21. Any survey monuments within the area of construction shall be preserved or reset by a registered civil engineer or a licensed land surveyor. 22. Verify all finish materials with the Architect and the Owner prior to installation. On site mock-ups of building assemblies, finish assemblies, paint and/or stain samples, etc. may be required for approval. 23. Contractor to coordinate utilities shown on architectural drawings with electrical, plumbing, mechanical, and any other consultant drawings. Contractor to coordinate all the trades. 24. Structural observation shall be required by the Engineer for structural conformance to the approved plans. 25. It is the General Contractors responsibility to obtain inspections and special inspections as necessary. 26. All construction to provide a waterproof, weather tight building. Contractor should flash and caulk as necessary to achieve this requirement. PROJECT ADDRESS:633 W. FRANCIS STREET, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PARCEL ID:#273512426001 FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSTALLED:NO APPLICABLE CODES: · 2015 IRC (International Residential Code) Chapters 1-10 · 2015 IRC appendixes: · Manufactured homes, F: Radon, J: Existing Buildings & Structures, H:Patio Covers, K: Sound Transmission. · 2015 IPC (International Plumbing Code) · 2015 IMC (International Mechanical Code) · 2015 IFGC (International Fuel Gas Code) · 2015 IECC (International Energy Conservation Code) -Prescriptive Path · 2015 IFC (International Fire Code) · 2020 NEC (National Electrical Code ZONING:R-15B FLOOR AREA:EXISTING : 4142.50' PROPOSED : 4,142.31' PERMITTED USE:Residential SETBACKS:Front -10', Rear -10", Side -10' TYPE:Type V -Non-rated OCCUPANCY:Type R-3 OVERALL PROJECT HEIGHT AND AREA:Maximum Height XX' PROJECT SUMMARY:REMODEL OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE -2 CAR GARAGE -5 BEDROOMS OWNER/CLIENT: West Aspen Grove LLC CONTACT: Walt Templlin 633 W Francis Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Tel: N/A email: walt@templin@gmail.com or kate@natapa.com ARCHITECT: Thunderbowl Architects CONTACT: Ryan Doremus 300 S. Spring Steet, Suite 201 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Tel: (970) 710-2938 email: ryan@thunderbowlarchitets.com CONTRACTOR: Contractor CONTACT: Contact Person Address Line 1 Address Line 2 Tel: (970) XXX-XXXX email: contact@blank.com LANDSCAPE DESIGN: Owner CONTACT: Contact Person Address Line 1 Address Line 2 Tel: (970) XXX-XXXX email: contact@blank.com STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Owner CONTACT: Contact Person Address Line 1 Address Line 2 Tel: (970) XXX-XXXX email: contact@blank.com CIVIL ENGINEER: Owner CONTACT: Contact Person Address Line 1 Address Line 2 Tel: (970) XXX-XXXX email: contact@blank.com MECHANICAL DESIGN: Owner CONTACT: Contact Person Address Line 1 Address Line 2 Tel: (970) XXX-XXXX email: contact@blank.com SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE SYMBOLS FLOOR PLAN 1. All walls with shear plywood shall have a continuous flush finish. Furr walls or continue plywood to maintain the required flush finish. 2. Offset studs where required so that finish wall surfaces will be flush. 3. Provide blocking for all artwork, towel bars, and tissue holders, typical. 4. Provide water resistant gypsum board behind all plumbing fixtures, under and around tub and shower enclosures to a height of 70" minimum above the drain inlet, or approved backer board under tile. 5. Finish materials for all baths, showers, walls at shower enclosures shall have a smooth, hard, non-absorbant surface such as tiles/ceramic tiles, portland cement, or eq. REFLECTED CEILING PLAN 1. Verify in field all existing dimensions. 2. See interior design drawings for exact locations and specifications for sconces, pendants, and all other decorative fixtures. 3. Per 2015 IECC Section R404 -75% or more of the lamps in permanently installed lighting fixtures shall be high-efficacy. ELEVATION / SECTION 1. Verify framing heights for all windows and doors with selected manufacturers rough opening specifications. 2. Contractor shall verify all exterior materials, finishes, and colors with the owner and the architect prior to installation or application. 3. If provided, see enlarged wall sections for typical exterior assemblies. DRAWING NOTES 633 W. FRANCIS ST., ASPEN, CO 81611 07/29/2024 LAND USE APPLICATION G-000 Z-001X Z-002X A-001X Z-001 Z-002 A-001 A-200 A-201 A-202 A-203 COVER SHEET EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS EXISTING WALL AREA CALCULATIONS PROPOSED FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS PROPOSED WALL AREA CALCULATIONS EXISTING SITE PLAN PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION LA N D U S E A P P L I C A T I O N 7/ 2 9 / 2 0 2 4 55 DN 1722.14 S.F. UNIT 1 -LOWER LEVEL EGRESS/ WINDOW WELL EGRESS WINDOW WELLWINDOW WELL WINDOW WELL 1600.97 S.F. E. UPPER LEVEL UNIT 1 43.15 S.F. E. UPPER COV. DECK 229.42 S.F. E. UPPER LEVEL DECK 125.34 S.F. UPPER LEVEL STAIR/ELEV. F.A. / EXEMPT E. UPPER LEVEL DECK - 278.27 S.F. 194.22 S.F. E. UPPER COVERED DECK 5' - 1 0 7 / 8 " BUILDING AREA -UNIT 2 EXTERIOR DECK AREA -EXEMPT EXTERIOR DECK AREA BUILDING AREA -UNIT 1 FLOOR AREA LEGEND COVERED DECK/PATIO AREA BUILDING AREA -COMMON GARAGE -EXEMPT N EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS EXISTING LOWER LEVEL GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) EXISTING LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS EXISTING LOWER LEVEL FLOOR COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 1,722.14 S.F. 171.52 S.F. EXISTING MAIN LEVEL GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 826.33 S.F. 860.64 S.F. COMMON - S.F.UNIT 1 - S.F. UNIT 2 - S.F. EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FLOOR COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 826.33 S.F. 860.64 S.F. EXISTING UPPER LEVEL GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 1,726.31 S.F. EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FLOOR COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 1,600.97 S.F. EXISTING DECK GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) EXISTING DECK FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 507.69 S.F. EXISTING EXEMPT DECK FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) EXISTING DECK COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 0.00 SQ. FT. EXISTING COVERED PATIO/DECK GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) EXISTING COVERED PATIO/DECK FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 687.57 S.F. EXISTING COUNTABLE COVERED FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.)237.37 S.F. 0.00 S.F. 1,722.14 S.F. TOTAL x 9.96% EXPOSED WALL AREA= 171.52 S.F. NOTES: STREET FACING/FRONT PORCH 349.11 SQ. FT. RDS EXEMPT 15% EXEMPT DECK/ALLOWABLE = -540.46 - (21.00 REWORKED) EXISTING EXEMPT DECK FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) UPPER DECKS: 229.42 S.F. + 278.27 S.F. -540.46 S.F. FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS EXISTING LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 171.52 S.F. EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 826.33 S.F. EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 1,600.97 S.F. EXISTING DECK FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 0.00 S.F. EXISTING COVERED FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 237.37 S.F. EXISTING EXEMPT UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) -125.34 S.F.125.34 S.F. EXEMPT UPPER LEVEL STAIR AND ELEV. AREA -349.11 S.F. 338.46 S.F. 860.64 S.F. 338.46 S.F. TOTAL COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 2,836.19 S.F. 445.67 S.F.860.64 S.F. 4,142.50 S.F. TOTAL ALLOWBLE FLOOR AREA 3,602.88 S.F. EXISTING EXEMPT LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) -1,550.62 S.F. COMMON : 349.11 S.F. + 344.94 S.F. UNIT 1 : 43.15 SF. + 194.22 S.F. 237.37 S.F. 107.21 S.F. 107.21 S.F. 107.21 S.F. 860.64 S.F. UNIT 2 349.11 S.F. E. MAIN PORCH 107.21 S.F. FOYER ST AI RS EGRESS/ WINDOW WELL WINDOW WELLWINDOW WELL EGRESS 826.33 S.F. UNIT 1 OUTLINE OF DECK ABOVE WINDOW WELL 14 ' - 4 5 / 8 " 338.46 S.F. E. MAIN (BACK) COVERED PORCH 11 ' - 6 1 5 / 1 6 " 344.94 S.F. CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE As indicated 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 23005.00 Z-001X 1/8" = 1'-0"Z-001X 1 EXISTING LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA 1/8" = 1'-0"Z-001X 3 EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA 3/16" = 1'-0" EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS4 Z-001X 1/8" = 1'-0"Z-001X 2 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL AREA PLAN 07/29/2024 LAND USE APPLICATION 56 SURFACE AREA -ABOVE GRADE SURFACE AREA -BELOW GRADE SURFACE AREA LEGEND 1615 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 12 14 105.98 S.F. 174.02 S.F. 4.54 S.F. 210.49 S.F. 13 60.94 S.F.33.40 S.F. EXP. @ DOOR ACCESS FTR. STEP 1.00 S.F. 4'-5 1/8"3'-7 1/2"3'-8" 8' - 0 5 / 8 " 17'-8 1/8" 32'-11 1/8"13'-3 7/16" 22'-2 1/2" 216.39 48.78 S.F. 60.66 S.F. 5.10 S.F. 137.87 S.F. 8' - 0 5 / 8 " 8' - 0 5 / 8 " 14'-8 7/16" 9' - 1 1 5 / 8 " 110.55 S.F. 36.02 S.F. 8'-3" 7' - 1 1 5 / 8 " 7' - 1 1 5 / 8 " 5'-10"2'-7 3/4" 38.76 S.F. 28.83 S.F. 3'-10" 7' - 1 1 5 / 8 " 30.55 S.F. 126.01 S.F. 15'-9 3/4" 7' - 1 1 5 / 8 " 22'-2 5/8" 23.20 S.F. 9' - 1 1 5 / 8 " 115.22 S.F. 7.67 S.F. 12'-4" 9' - 1 1 5 / 8 " 7'-3 3/4" 8' - 0 5 / 8 " 54.45 S.F. 4.43 S.F. 8' - 0 5 / 8 " 9'-5 3/8" 70.47 S.F. 5.61 S.F. 8' - 0 5 / 8 " 7'-2 11/16" 53.95 S.F. 4.21 S.F. .26 S.F. 15'-5 1/8" 115.41 S.F. 8.81 S.F. T.O. SLAB @ HIGHER L.L. T.O. SLAB @ LOWER L.L. B.O. FRAMING @ HIGHER M.L. B.O. FRAMING @ LOWER M.L. 98'-10 1/8" 96'-10 1/8" 88' -10 1/2" T.O. SLAB @ HIGHER L.L. T.O. SLAB @ LOWER L.L. B.O. FRAMING @ HIGHER M.L. B.O. FRAMING @ LOWER M.L. 98'-10 1/8" 96'-10 1/8" 88'-10 1/2" 90' -9 1/2" 90' -9 1/2" 2 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 12'-4" 10'-10" 7'- 2 1 1/ 1 6" 16 16'-6 5/16"5'-8 3/16" 13 ' - 3 7 / 1 6 " 32'-11 1/8" 3'- 7 1 5/ 1 6" 14 ' - 8 7 / 1 6 " 8'- 3" 10 ' - 7 1 / 1 6 " 4' - 5 1 / 8 " 3' - 7 1 / 2 " 3' - 8 " 17'-8 1/8" 5'-10" 2'-7 7/16" 3'- 1 0 5/ 1 6" 15'-9 3/4" 15'-5 1/8" N CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE As indicated 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 EXISTING WALL AREA CALCULATIONS 23005.00 Z-002X EXISTING BUILDING SURFACE AREA: 1 WALL AREA:EXPOSED WALL AREA: 94.34 S.F.33.40 S.F. EXISTING TOTAL SURFACE AREA:1,893.58 S.F.211.86 S.F. EXISTING TOTAL SURFACE AREAS : 1893.58 S.F. + 211.86 S.F. = 2105.44 SQ. FT. TOTAL SURFACE AREA. EXISTING TOTAL SURFACE AREAS : 211.86 SQ. FT. / 2,105.44 S.F. TOTAL SURFACE AREA = 10.06% ABOVE GRADE SURFACE AREA OF LOWER LEVEL TO BE COUNTED TOWARDS FLOOR AREA. 1/8" = 1'-0" EXISTING WALL AREA CALCULATIONS - WALLS 1/8" = 1'-0"Z-002X 1 EXISTING LOWER LEVEL WALL AREA PLAN WALL NUMBER 2 142.41 S.F.4.54 S.F. 3 265.17 S.F.48.78 S.F. 4 106.98 S.F.1.00 S.F. 5 210.49 S.F.0 S.F. 6 146.57 S.F.36.02 S.F. 7 65.76 S.F.5.10 S.F. 8 67.59 S.F.28.83 S.F. 9 30.55 S.F.0 S.F. 10 126.01 S.F.0 S.F. 11 197.48 S.F.23.46 S.F. 12 122.89 S.F.7.67 S.F. 13 58.88 S.F.4.43 S.F. 14 76.08 S.F.5.61 S.F. 15 58.16 S.F.4.21 S.F. 16 124.22 S.F.8.81 S.F. 2 Z-002X 07/29/2024 LAND USE APPLICATION 57 L 1 L 2 L 3 L 4 INLET 7905.6 S I T E B E N C H M A R K F O U N D 1 " A L U M I N U M C A P I L L E G I B L E E L E V A T I O N : 7 9 0 6 . 5 0 FOUND REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP LS9184 MAILBOX PARKING SIGN 1 23 4 5 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 6 2 7 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 4 S14°50'49"W 76.41' N75°09'11"W 60.00' S75°09'11"E 60.00' S14°50'49"W 14.44' C I T Y O F A S P E N G P S C O N T R O L M O N U M E N T # 9 S 3 2 °1 2'4 6 "E 5 2 .4 8 '(T I E ) N16°58'10"E 1067.98'(TIE) 7907 7 9 0 7 790 8 7910 7 9 0 9 7909 7910 7908 LOT C WEST FRANCIS STREET NORTH 6TH STREET PAVED ROADWAY (74.72' RIGHT-OF-WAY) PAVED ROADWAY EDGE OF PAVEMENT EDGE OF PAVEMENT DRAINAGE SWALE BUILDING OVERHANG TWO-STORY GARAGE (77.65' RIGHT-OF-WAY) GRAVEL ALLEY D YH S HOT TUB TO BE REMOVED AREA 0.138 AC + W A L K WALK PARKING 1 PARKING 2 STONE DRIVEWAY ALC 6' (B) BENCHMARK=7906.18' YPC LS# 9184 1' (B) S 14o50'49" W 6o41' (R) N 75o09'11" W 60.00' (R) DRAINAGE DRAINAGE N. 32o30'03" W 52.39' S 75o09'11" E 60.00' (R) L6(F) W W W W W W W W W EE E E E W V W WV OPC LS# 37972 (G) YPC LS# 91842' (B) TR A S H E E E E E E E C P E C E C T S S S C E E P C C C C EP P 2 PARKING SPACES RESERVATION REC# 448550 G G S WALK N 14o50'49" E 100.00' (R) L5(F) EDGE OF PAVEMENT EDGE OF PAVEMENT 2 PARKING SPACE ENCROCHMENT LICENSE REC# 448728 S 14o50'49" W 14.44' (R) 7 9 0 6 ' 633 W. FRANCIS ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 LOT A & B BLOCK 22, CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO PARCEL # 273512426001 NORTH 6TH STREET W E S T F R A N C I S S T R E E T HYD. MAILBOX STONE PATIO STONE PATIO DECK DECK TREES, PER SURVEY UTILITY METERS EXISTING SOLAR PANELS EXISTING SOLAR PANELS SKYLIGHTS WINDOW WELL WINDOW WELL WINDOW WELL EGRESS CHIMNEY FLUE, V.I.F. EXISTING FENCE EXISTING FENCE DRAIN 10'-0"FRONT SETBACK SETBACK 5'-0"SIDE YARD 5'-0"5'-0" PROPERTY LINE GARAGE SETBACK FRONT SETBACK PROPERTY LINE SIDE SETBACK PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE SIDE SETBACK 9" / 1 2 " 9" / 1 2 " 5 3/4" / 12" 9" / 12" 5 3 / 4 " / 1 2 " EXISTING DRIPLINE DIM., TYP. REAR SETBACK ALLEY EXISTING TREE, VI.F. DRIPLINE IN FIELD N EXISTING LOT COVERAGE: R6-SEC.26.710.040.D7-MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: 6,000-9,000: 50%, MINUS 1% FOR EACH ADDITIONAL 300 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS LOT AREA, TO A MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE OF 40% LOT SIZE: AREA 0.138 AC +/-= 6,011.28 SQ.FT. STRUCTURE AT GRADE: 1,790.76 SQ.FT. LOT COVERAGE:1,790.76 S.F./ 6,011.28 S.F.= 29.79% OF SITE ALLOWABLE: 3005.60 S.F. / (50%) (6,011.28 S.F. /2 = 3,005.64 -((11.28 x100)/300)x.01)=.0376S.F)) (3,005.64 S.F. -0.0376 S.F. = 3,005.60 S.F.) EXISTING TOTAL COVERAGE: CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE As indicated 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 EXISTING SITE PLAN 23005.00 A-001X 3/16" = 1'-0"A-001X 1 EXISTING SITE PLAN 07/29/2024 LAND USE APPLICATION 58 DN DN LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA 2,504.86 SQ.FT. EGRESS WINDOW WELL WINDOW WELLWINDOW WELL WINDOW WELL EGRESS/ WINDOW WELL 860.64 S.F. UNIT 2 826.33 S.F. UNIT 1349.11 S.F. P. PORCH 107.21 S.F. COMMON AREA OUTLINE OF DECK ABOVE BELOW DECK EXEMPT AT GRADE EGRESS/ WINDOW WELL EGRESS/ WINDOW WELL WINDOW WELLWINDOW WELL WINDOW WELL EGRESS/ WINDOW WELL 338.46 S.F. DECK AREA 492.56 S.F. GARAGE AREA EXEMPT 21.33 S.F. SPRIAL STAIR AREA 1600.97 S.F. P. UPPER LEVEL UINT 1 43.15 S.F. P. COV. DECK 194.22 S.F. P. COVERED DECK 125.34 S.F. UPPER LEVEL STAIR/ELEV. F.A. / EXEMPT 12'-0 1/16" P. UPPER DECK 342.81 S.F. P. UPPER DECK 154 S.F. 8'-8" BUILDING AREA -UNIT 2 EXTERIOR DECK AREA -EXEMPT EXTERIOR DECK AREA BUILDING AREA -UNIT 1 FLOOR AREA LEGEND COVERED DECK/PATIO AREA BUILDING AREA -COMMON GARAGE -EXEMPT N PROPOSED FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL FLOOR COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 2,504.86 S.F. 171.33 S.F. PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 826.33 S.F. 860.64 S.F. COMMON - S.F.UNIT 1 - S.F. UNIT 2 - S.F. PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FLOOR COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 826.33 S.F. 860.64 S.F. PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 1,726.31 S.F. PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FLOOR COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 1600.97 S.F. PROPOSED GARAGE GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 492.56 S.F. PROPOSED GARAGE COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 0.00 S.F. PROPOSED EXEMPT GARAGE FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) -500.00 S.F. PROPOSED DECK GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) PROPOSED DECK FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 518.14 S.F. PROPOSED EXEMPT DECK FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) PROPOSED DECK COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 0.00 S.F. PROPOSED COVERED PATIO/DECK GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) PROPOSED COVERED PATIO/DECK FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 687.57 S.F. PROPOSED COUNTABLE COVERED FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.)237.37 S.F. 0.00 S.F. 2,504.86 S.F. TOTAL x 6.84% EXPOSED WALL AREA= 171.33 S.F. NOTES: STREET FACING/FRONT PORCH 349.11 S.F. RDS EXEMPT 15% EXEMPT DECK/ALLOWABLE = 540.43 S.F. PROPOSED EXEMPT DECK FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) (U. DECKS: 154 S.F.+ 342.81 S.F.)+ 21.33 S.F. STR. 540.43 S.F. FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 171.33 S.F. PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 826.33 S.F. PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 1,600.97 S.F. PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 0.00 S.F. PROPOSED DECK FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 0.00 S.F. PROPOSED COVERED FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 237.37 S.F. PROPOSED EXEMPT UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) -125.34 S.F.125.34 S.F. EXEMPT UPPER LEVEL STAIR AND ELEV. AREA -349.11 S.F. 338.46 S.F. 860.64 S.F. 338.46 S.F. TOTAL COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 2,836 S.F.445.67 S.F.860.64 S.F. 4,142.31 S.F. TOTAL ALLOWBLE FLOOR AREA 3,602.88 S.F. PROPOSED EXEMPT LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) -2,333.53 S.F. COMMON : 349.11 S.F. + 338.46 S.F. UNIT 1 : 43.15 SF. + 194.22 S.F. 237.37 S.F. 107.21 S.F. 107.21 S.F. 107.21 S.F. 500 S.F. EXEMPT GARAGE CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE As indicated 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 PROPOSED FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 23005.00 Z-001 1/8" = 1'-0"Z-001 1 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA 1/8" = 1'-0"Z-001 2 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"Z-001 3 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA 3/16" = 1'-0" PROPOSED FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS4 Z-001 07/29/2024 LAND USE APPLICATION 59 DN SURFACE AREA -ABOVE GRADE SURFACE AREA -BELOW GRADE SURFACE AREA LEGEND 2 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 19 ' - 2 " 12 ' - 1 " 32'-11 1/8" 8'- 3 1/ 1 6" 14 16'-6 5/16"5'-8 3/16" 16 3'-4 11/16"3'-0"14'-4 5/8" 13 ' - 3 7 / 1 6 " 2'-7 3/4" 5'-10" 14 ' - 8 7 / 1 6 " 13 20'-9 7/16" 3'- 1 0 5/ 1 6" 15'-9 3/4" 2 4'- 6 3/ 4" 24'-5 9/16" 20'-9 1/4" 17'-8 1/8" 3' - 6 1 / 1 6 " 4' - 5 3 / 8 " 3' - 7 1 / 2 " 4' - 5 1 / 8 " 12 T.O. SLAB @ HIGHER L.L. T.O. SLAB @ LOWER L.L. PROP. T.O. SLAB @ LOWEST L.L. 14 210.11 S.F. 15 216.02 S.F. 16 234.28 S.F. B.O. FRAMING @ HIGHER M.L. B.O. FRAMING @ LOWER M.L. 98'-10 1/8" 96'-10 1/8" 24.02 S.F. EGRESS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 105.98 S.F. 4.54 S.F. 221.39 S.F. 125.36 S.F. 20.00 S.F. EXP. @ WINDOW WELL 1.00 S.F. 4'-5 1/8" 3'-7 5/8" 4'-5 3/8" 3'-6 3/4" 8' - 0 5 / 8 " 17'-8 1/8" 32'-11 1/8"13'-3 7/16" 22'-2 1/2" 216.39 48.78 S.F. 60.66 S.F. 5.10 S.F. 137.87 S.F. 8' - 0 5 / 8 " 8' - 0 5 / 8 " 14'-8 7/16" 9' - 1 1 5 / 8 " 110.55 S.F. 36.02 S.F. 8'-3" 7' - 1 1 5 / 8 " 7' - 1 1 5 / 8 " 4'-10"3'-4 5/16" 44.31 S.F. 23.28 S.F. 9 10 11 256.76 S.F. 3'-10" 7' - 1 1 5 / 8 " 30.55 S.F. 126.01 S.F. 15'-9 3/4"24'-4 13/16" 21.07 S.F. 12 ' - 6 3 / 8 " .26 S.F. 87' -3 3/4" 88' -10 1/2" PROP. T.O. SLAB @ LOWEST L.L. T.O. SLAB @ HIGHER L.L. T.O. SLAB @ LOWER L.L. B.O. FRAMING @ HIGHER M.L. B.O. FRAMING @ LOWER M.L. 98'-10 1/8" 96'-10 1/8" 88'-10 1/2" 136.19 SQ. FT. 12'-1" 11 ' - 3 1 / 4 " 289.79 S.F. 13 14'-4 5/8"3'-0"3'-4 11/16" 11 ' - 3 1 / 4 " 19'-2" 11 ' - 3 1 / 4 " 20'-9 7/16" 87' -3 3/4" 90' -9 1/2" 90' -9 1/2" 24'-8 5/8" 11 ' - 9 1 / 8 " 11 ' - 9 1 / 8 " 12 ' - 6 3 / 8 " 1.03 S.F. 11 ' - 3 1 / 4 " N CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE As indicated 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 PROPOSED WALL AREA CALCULATIONS 23005.00 Z-002 PROPOSED BUILDING SURFACE AREA: 1 PROPOSED TOTAL SURFACE AREA:2,707.32 S.F.185.10 S.F. PROPOSED TOTAL SURFACE AREAS : 185.10 S.F. + 2,707.32 S.F. = 2,707.32 S.F. TOTAL SURFACE AREA. PROPOSED TOTAL SURFACE AREAS : 185.10 S.F. / 2,707.27 S.F. TOTAL SURFACE AREA = 6.84% ABOVE GRADE SURFACE AREA OF LOWER LEVEL TO BE COUNTED TOWARDS FLOOR AREA. WALL NUMBER 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 1/8" = 1'-0"Z-002 1 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL WALL AREA PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0" PROPOSED WALL AREA CALCULATIONS - WALLS2 Z-002 15 07/29/2024 LAND USE APPLICATION WALL AREA:EXPOSED WALL AREA: 145.36 S.F.20 S.F. 142.41 S.F.4.54 S.F. 265.17 S.F.48.78 S.F. 106.98 S.F.1.00 S.F. 221.39 S.F.0 S.F. 146.57 S.F.36.02 S.F. 65.76 S.F.5.10 S.F. 67.59 S.F.23.28 S.F. 30.55 S.F.0 S.F. 126.01 S.F.0 S.F. 278.09 S.F.21.33 S.F. 290.82 S.F.1.03 S.F. 136.19 S.F.0 S.F. 234.13 S.F.24.02 S.F. 216.02 S.F.0 S.F. 234.28 S.F.0 S.F. 60 L 1 L 2 L 3 L 4 INLET 7905.6 S I T E B E N C H M A R K F O U N D 1 " A L U M I N U M C A P I L L E G I B L E E L E V A T I O N : 7 9 0 6 . 5 0 FOUND REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP LS9184 MAILBOX PARKING SIGN 1 23 4 5 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 5 2 7 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 4 S14°50'49"W 76.41' N75°09'11"W 60.00' S75°09'11"E 60.00' S14°50'49"W 14.44' C I T Y O F A S P E N G P S C O N T R O L M O N U M E N T # 9 S 3 2 °1 2'4 6 "E 5 2 .4 8 '(T I E ) 7907 7 9 0 7 790 8 7910 7 9 0 9 7909 7910 7908 LOT C WEST FRANCIS STREET NORTH 6TH STREET PAVED ROADWAY (74.72' RIGHT-OF-WAY) PAVED ROADWAY EDGE OF PAVEMENT EDGE OF PAVEMENT DRAINAGE SWALE BUILDING OVERHANG TWO-STORY GARAGE (77.65' RIGHT-OF-WAY) GRAVEL ALLEY D YH S S AL L E Y PARKING 1 PARKING 2 YPC LS# 91842' (B) C T N 14o50'49" E 100.00' (R) / L5(F) EDGE OF PAVEMENT HYD. DECK SKYLIGHTS EXISTING WINDOW WELL EXISTING FENCE DRAIN AREA 0.138 AC + STONE DRIVEWAY ALC 6' (B) BENCHMARK=7906.18' YPC LS# 9184 1' (B) S 14o50'49" W 6o41' (R) N 75o09'11" W 60.00' (R) N. 32o30'03" W 52.39' S 75o09'11" E 60.00' (R) L6(F) OPC LS# 37972 (G) TR A S H C T 2 PARKING SPACES RESERVATION REC# 448550, LOCATED AT GARAGE EDGE OF PAVEMENT2 PARKING SPACE ENCROCHMENT LICENSE REC# 448728 S 14o50'49" W 14.44' (R) 633 W. FRANCIS ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 LOT A & B BLOCK 22, CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO PARCEL # 273512426001 NORTH 6TH STREET FR A N C I S S T R E E T EXISTING STONE PATIO EXISTING STONE PATIO DECK TREES, PER SURVEY UTILITY METERS EXISTING SOLAR PANELS EXISTING SOLAR PANELS EXISTING WINDOW WELL EXISTING WINDOW WELL EGRESS EXISTING FENCE TREES TO BE REMOVED SETBACK 5'-0" SIDE SETBACK 5'-0" REAR 5' REAR SETBACK FOR GARAGE 10' MIN. REAR SETBACK FOR PRINCIPAL BUILDING SETBACK 10'-0" REAR PROPERTY LINEGARAGE SETBACK REAR SETBACK FRONT SETBACK PROPERTY LINE SIDE SETBACK PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE SIDE SETBACK SETBACK 5'-0" SIDE YARD 9" / 1 2 " 9" / 1 2 " 9" / 1 2 " 9" / 1 2 " 9" / 12" 5 3/4" / 12" 5 3 / 4 " / 1 2 " 10'-0"FRONT SETBACK 7909 7 9 0 979097910 79087908INLET 7905.6 79 0 8 7908 7 9 0 8 79 0 7 79 0 7 7907 7910 79 0 7 3/4" / 12" V.I.F. REPLACE ROOF WITH A CLASS-A WOOD SHINGLE ROOF SE T B A C K 1' - 8 1 / 4 " F R O M 3'x3' PROPOSED WINDOW WELL GARAGE FNDN.8'-3 7/16" GA R A G E FN D N . 4' - 1 1 1 5 / 1 6 " BUILDING OUTLINE FOR PROPOSED GARAGE NEW WALK ADDED TO EXISTING EXISTING WALK EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTING SIDEWALK N PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE: R6-SEC.26.710.040.D7-MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: 6,000-9,000: 50%, MINUS 1% FOR EACH ADDITIONAL 300 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS LOT AREA, TO A MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE OF 40% LOT SIZE: AREA 0.138 AC +/-= 6,011.28 SQ.FT. STRUCTURE AT GRADE: 2,290.51 SQ.FT. LOT COVERAGE:2,290.51 S.F./ 6,011.28 S.F.= 38.10% OF SITE ALLOWABLE: 3005.60 S.F. / (50%) (6,011.28 S.F. /2 = 3,005.64 -((11.28 x100)/300)x.01)=.0376S.F)) (3,005.64 S.F. -0.0376 S.F. = 3,005.60 S.F.) PROPOSED TOTAL COVERAGE: CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE As indicated 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 23005.00 A-0013/16" = 1'-0"A-001 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 07/29/2024 LAND USE APPLICATION 61 ELEVATION / SECTION GENERAL NOTES 1.ALL ROOF PITCHES SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE ROOF PLAN. 2. VERIFY FRAMING HEIGHTS FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS WITH SELECTED MANUFACTURERS ROUGH OPENING SPECIFICATIONS. 3. ALL DOWNSPOUTS TO BE TIED INTO PERIMETER DRAIN SYSTEM IF EXISTING OR PROPOSED -UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS. 4. PCONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXTERIOR MATERIALS, FINISHES, AND COLORS WITH THE OWNER AND THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OR APPLICATION. 5. IF PROVIDED, SEE ENLARGED WALL SECTIONS FOR TYPICAL EXTERIOR ASSEMBLIES. MATERIAL LEGEND SYNTHETIC WOOD DAVINCI SHINGLE WOOD SIDING STONE VANEER STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF T.O. FINISH @ MAIN L.L. + 98'-0" T.O. UPPER LEVEL F.F. + 109'-11" 7 9 T.O. EXISTING L.L. F.F. + 88'-11" 6 8 T.O. F.F. -L.L. (HIGH) + 90'-10" T.O. FINISH @ MAIN LEVEL (HIGH) + 100'-0" T.O LOW RIDGE + 128'-5 1/4" T.O. PROPOSED L.L. SLAB + 86'-3 3/4" 1 A-304 1 A-305 1 A-306 12 18 ' - 6 1 / 4 " 9' - 1 1 " 2' - 0 " 7' - 2 " 1' - 1 1 " 2' - 7 1 / 4 " 11 NEW DAVINCI SHINGLE, STYLE TBD EXISTING WOOD SHINGLE, PROPOSED COLOR TBD EXISTING STONE VANEER TO REMAIN, PAINT TBD NEW METAL HANDRAIL T.O. HIGH RIDGE + 132'-8 3/4"12'-9 3/8"7'-9 5/8"3'-7 1/2"9'-8 1/8"2'-8"11'-3 1/2" 4' - 3 1 / 2 " GAS METER LOCATION 10 CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE 1/4" = 1'-0" 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 PROP. NORTH ELEVATION 23005.00 A-200 1/4" = 1'-0"A-200 1 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION 07/29/2024 LAND USE APPLICATION 62 ELEVATION / SECTION GENERAL NOTES 1.ALL ROOF PITCHES SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE ROOF PLAN. 2. VERIFY FRAMING HEIGHTS FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS WITH SELECTED MANUFACTURERS ROUGH OPENING SPECIFICATIONS. 3. ALL DOWNSPOUTS TO BE TIED INTO PERIMETER DRAIN SYSTEM IF EXISTING OR PROPOSED -UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS. 4. PCONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXTERIOR MATERIALS, FINISHES, AND COLORS WITH THE OWNER AND THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OR APPLICATION. 5. IF PROVIDED, SEE ENLARGED WALL SECTIONS FOR TYPICAL EXTERIOR ASSEMBLIES. MATERIAL LEGEND SYNTHETIC WOOD DAVINCI SHINGLE WOOD SIDING STONE VANEER STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF T.O. FINISH @ MAIN L.L. + 98'-0" T.O. UPPER LEVEL F.F. + 109'-11" M T.O. EXISTING L.L. F.F. + 88'-11" D AG T.O. F.F. -L.L. (HIGH) + 90'-10" T.O. FINISH @ MAIN LEVEL (HIGH) + 100'-0" T.O LOW RIDGE + 128'-5 1/4" T.O. PROPOSED L.L. SLAB + 86'-3 3/4" 2 A-302 1 A-303N O 2' - 7 1 / 4 " 1' - 1 1 " 7' - 2 " 2' - 0 " 9' - 1 1 " 18 ' - 6 1 / 4 " 21'-5 1/4"16'-5 3/8"17'-1 3/4"23'-2 1/2" 3' - 0 " 3' - 0 " 6' - 9 " EXISTING STONE CHIMNEY TO REMAIN, STONE TO BE REPAINTED HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING, REPAINT, COLOR TBD 3' - 0 " T.O. HIGH RIDGE + 132'-8 3/4" 4' - 3 1 / 2 " B A EGRESS WINDOW 2'-0 1/2" 4' - 6 1 / 2 " 15 ' - 6 " T.O. FINISH 7908'-9 1/4" GRADET.O. FINISH 7907'-7 1/2" GRADE 13 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " EXISTING GRADE CONTOUR CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE 1/4" = 1'-0" 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 23005.00 A-201 1/4" = 1'-0"A-201 1 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 07/29/2024 LAND USE APPLICATION 63 ELEVATION / SECTION GENERAL NOTES 1.ALL ROOF PITCHES SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE ROOF PLAN. 2. VERIFY FRAMING HEIGHTS FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS WITH SELECTED MANUFACTURERS ROUGH OPENING SPECIFICATIONS. 3. ALL DOWNSPOUTS TO BE TIED INTO PERIMETER DRAIN SYSTEM IF EXISTING OR PROPOSED -UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS. 4. PCONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXTERIOR MATERIALS, FINISHES, AND COLORS WITH THE OWNER AND THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OR APPLICATION. 5. IF PROVIDED, SEE ENLARGED WALL SECTIONS FOR TYPICAL EXTERIOR ASSEMBLIES. MATERIAL LEGEND SYNTHETIC WOOD DAVINCI SHINGLE WOOD SIDING STONE VANEER STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF T.O. FINISH @ MAIN L.L. + 98'-0" T.O. UPPER LEVEL F.F. + 109'-11" 79 T.O. ROOF JOIST + 132'-2" T.O. EXISTING L.L. F.F. + 88'-11" 68 T.O. F.F. -L.L. (HIGH) + 90'-10" T.O. FINISH @ MAIN LEVEL (HIGH) + 100'-0" T.O LOW RIDGE + 128'-5 1/4" T.O. PROPOSED L.L. SLAB + 86'-3 3/4" 1 A-304 1 A-305 1 A-30612 3' - 0 " 3' - 8 3 / 4 " 18 ' - 6 1 / 4 " 9' - 1 1 " 2' - 0 " 7' - 2 " 1' - 1 1 " 2' - 7 1 / 4 " 1'-0" 11 6' - 9 " 3' - 0 " 13 ' - 9 1 / 4 " 13 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " B C 0'-8" 11'-3 1/2"2'-8"9'-8 1/8"3'-7 1/2"7'-9 5/8"12'-9 3/8" EXISTING SITE CONTOUR 10 CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE 1/4" = 1'-0" 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 PROP. SOUTH ELEVATION 23005.00 A-2021/4" = 1'-0"A-202 1 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 07/29/2024 LAND USE APPLICATION 64 ELEVATION / SECTION GENERAL NOTES 1.ALL ROOF PITCHES SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE ROOF PLAN. 2. VERIFY FRAMING HEIGHTS FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS WITH SELECTED MANUFACTURERS ROUGH OPENING SPECIFICATIONS. 3. ALL DOWNSPOUTS TO BE TIED INTO PERIMETER DRAIN SYSTEM IF EXISTING OR PROPOSED -UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS. 4. PCONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXTERIOR MATERIALS, FINISHES, AND COLORS WITH THE OWNER AND THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OR APPLICATION. 5. IF PROVIDED, SEE ENLARGED WALL SECTIONS FOR TYPICAL EXTERIOR ASSEMBLIES. MATERIAL LEGEND SYNTHETIC WOOD DAVINCI SHINGLE WOOD SIDING STONE VANEER STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF T.O. FINISH @ MAIN L.L. + 98'-0" T.O. UPPER LEVEL F.F. + 109'-11" M T.O. EXISTING L.L. F.F. + 88'-11" DA G T.O. F.F. -L.L. (HIGH) + 90'-10" T.O. FINISH @ MAIN LEVEL (HIGH) + 100'-0" T.O LOW RIDGE + 128'-5 1/4" T.O. PROPOSED L.L. SLAB + 86'-3 3/4" 2 A-302 1 A-303 NO 18 ' - 6 1 / 4 " 9' - 1 1 " 2' - 0 " 7' - 2 " 1' - 1 1 " 2' - 7 1 / 4 " 21'-5 1/4"16'-5 3/8"17'-1 3/4"23'-2 1/2" C 3' - 0 " T.O. HIGH RIDGE + 132'-8 3/4" 13 ' - 9 1 / 4 " E 11 ' - 3 " EXISTING SITE CONTOUR T.O. FINISH 7909'-3 1/4" D 15 ' - 3 1 / 4 " T.O. FINISH 7909'-0" GRADE T.O. GRADE T.O. FINISH 7907'-10 1/4" T.O. GRADE 4' - 3 1 / 2 " CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE 1/4" = 1'-0" 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 PROPOSED WEST ELEV. 23005.00 A-203 1/4" = 1'-0"A-203 1 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION 07/29/2024 LAND USE APPLICATION 65 F SD CO SP A-101 1 1 1 1 1 A-101 SIM A-101 1 SIM A-101 1 SIM 14 A 1 XXX ENLARGED DETAIL NUMBER SHEET NUMBER DETAIL NUMBER SHEET NUMBER BUILDING SECTION NUMBER SHEET NUMBER INTERIOR ELEVATION NUMBERS SHEET NUMBER DOOR SYMBOL WINDOW SYMBOL REVISION JUNCTION BOX HOSE BIBB JB HB FINISH MATERIAL 2'-7" 2'-8" TICK LEADER DENOTES DIMENSION TO FRAMING ARROW LEADER DENOTES DIMENSION TO FRAMING DIMENSIONING KEY FOR ALL DRAWINGS EXCEPT DETAILS1KEYNOTE SYMBOL PENDANT LIGHT FIXTURE LED LIGHT FIXTURE -UTILITY LED STRIP COVE LIGHTING CEILING MOUNTED SMOKE / CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR W/ BATTERY BACKUP EXHAUST FAN SPEAKER RECESSED DOWNLIGHT WATER-RATED FIXTURE WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE RECESSED DISPLAY LIGHT FIXTURE CEILING / SOFFIT HEIGHT SYMBOL WR +13'-11" REFLECTED CEILING PLAN CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE ASPEN, COLORADO 1/4" = 1'-0" LAND USE 11/29/2024 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 COVER SHEET 23005.00 G-000 633 W. FRANCIS ST. & < @ 0 # A.C. ACOUS. A.D. ADJ. ADJAC. AGGR. ALT. ALUM. APPROX. ARCH. ASPH. BD. BITUM. BLDG. BLK. BLKG. BM. B.O. BOT B.P. BTWN. C.B. CEM. CER. C.J. CLG. CLKG. CLR. C.M.U. CNTR. C.O. COL. CONC. COND. CONN. CONSTR. CONT. CONTR. CLOS. C.T. CTR. C.W. DBL. DETR. D.F. DIA. DIM. DISP. And Angle At Diameter or Round Pound or Number Air Conditioning or Asphaltic Concrete Acoustical Area Drain Adjustable Adjacent Aggregate Alternate Aluminum Approximate Architectural Asphalt Board Bituminous Building Block Blocking Beam Bottom Of Bottom Building Paper Between Catch Basin Cement Ceramic Control Joint Ceiling Caulking Clear Concrete Masonry Unit Counter Clean-Out Column Concrete Condition Connection Construction Continuous Contractor Closet Ceramic Tile Center Cold Water Double Detail Drinking Fountain Diameter Dimension Dispenser DN. DR. D.W. DWG. DWR. EA. (E) E.I.F.S. E.J. EL. ELEC. EMER. ENCL. E.O.S. E.P.B. EQ. EQUIP. EXIST. EXP. EXT. F.A. F.A.U. F.B. F.D. F.E. F.H.M.S. F.H.W.S. FIN. FIXT. FLR. FLASH. FLUOR. F.O.C. F.O.F. F.O. PLY F.O.S. F.P.R.F. FR. FT. FTG. FURR. FUT. G. GA. GALV. G.D. GEN. G.F.I. GL. GND. GR. G.S.M. GYP. Down Door Dishwasher Drawing Drawer Each Existing Exterior Insulation & Finish System Expansion Joint Elevation Electrical Emergency Enclosure Edge of Slab Electrical Panel Board Equal Equipment Existing Expansion Exterior Fire Alarm Forced Air Unit Flat Bar Floor Drain Fire Extinguisher Cabinet Flat Head Machine Screw Flat Head Wood Screw Finish Fixture Floor Flashing Fluorescent Face of Concrete Face of Finish Face of Plywood Face of Stud Fireproof Frame Foot or Feet Footing Furring Future Gas Outlet Gauge Glavanized Garbage Disposal General Ground Fault Interrupt Glass Ground Grade Galvanized Sheet Metal Gypsum H.B. H.C. HD. HDBD. HDR. HDW. HDWD. HGR. HGT. H.M. HORIZ. HR. H.R. H.W.H. I.B.C. I.D. IN. INSUL. INT. INTER. I.R.C. JAN. JB JST. JT. KIT. LAM. LAV. LB. LIN. LT. MACH. MAINT. MAT. MAX. M.B. M.C. M.D.O. MECH. MEMB. MTL. MFR. MIN. MISC. MTD. MUL. (N) N. N.I.C. NO. or # NOM. N.T.S. Hose Bib Hollow Core or Handicapped Head Hardboard Header Hardware Hardwood Hanger Height Hollow Metal Horizontal Hour Handrail Hot Water Heater International Building Code Inside Diameter Inch Insulation Interior Intermediate International Residential Code Janitor Junction Box Joist Joint Kitchen Laminate Lavatory Pound Linear Light Machine Maintain Material Maximum Machine Bolt Medicine Cabinet Medium Density Overlay Mechanical Membrane Metal Manufacturer Minimum Miscellaneous Mounted Mullion New North Not in Contract Number Nominal Not to Scale O.A. O.C. O.D. OPNG. OPP. PERIM. PL. P.LAM. PLAS. PLYWD. PNL. PNT. P.S.I. PT. P.T. PTD. P.T.D. PTN. P.T.R. Q.T. R. R.A. RAD. REC. REF. REFL. REFR. REG. REINF. REQ. RESIL. RET. REV. RM. REMOV. R.O. RWD. S. S.A.F.F. S.C.D. S.D. SCHED. SECT. S.E.D. SEP. S.H. SHT. SHTG. SIM. SL. S.G.D. S.L.D. Overall On Center Outside Diameter (Dim.) Opening Opposite Perimeter Plate Plastic Laminate Plaster Plywood Panel Paint Per Square Inch Point Pressure Treated or Post Tensioned Painted Paper Towel Dispenser Partition Paper Towl Receptacle Quarry Tile Riser Return Air Radius Recessed Reference Reflected Refrigerator Register Reinforced Required Resilient Retaining Revision/Revised/Reversed Room Removable Rough Opening Redwood South Self-Adhered Flexible Flashing See Civil Drawings Storm Drain or Soap Dispenser/Dish Schedule Section See Electrical Drawings Separation Sprinkler Head Sheet Sheathing Similar Sliding See Garage Drawings See Landscape Drawings S.L.T.D. S.M.D. S.P.D. SPEC. SQ. S.S. S.S.D. STD. STL. STOR. STRL. S.V. S.W. SYM. SYS. T. T.B. T.C. TEL. TEMP. T.&G. TER. THK. T.M.E. T.O.C. T.O.P. T.O. PLY. T.O.W. TYP. U.B.C. UNEXC. UNF. U.O.N. VAR. V.C.T. VEN. VERT. VEST. V.G.D.F. V.I.F. VOL. W. W/ W.C. WD. W.H. W/O W.P. W.P.M. WSCT. W.S.P. WT. WR. WW. See Lighting Drawings See Mechanical Drawings See Plumbing Drawings Specification or Special Square Stainless Steel See Structural Drawings Standard Steel Storage Structural Sheet Vinyl Shear Wall Symmetrical System Tread Towel Bar Top of Curb Telephone Tempered Tongue & Groove Terrazzo Thick To Match Existing Top of Concrete Top of Plate Top of Plywood Top of Wall Typical Uniform Building Code Unexcavated Unfinished Unless Otherwise Noted Varies Vinyl Composition Tile Veneer Verticall Vestibule Vertical Grain Douglas Fir Verify in Field Volume West Width Wall Covering Wood Water Heater Without Work Point or Waterproofing Waterproof Membrane Wainscot Wet Standpipe Weight Water Resistant Welded Wire ABBREVIATIONS GENERAL NOTES SHEET INDEX VICINITY MAP PROJECT STATISTICS PROJECT DIRECTORY 1. The work included under this contract consists of all labor, materials, transportation, tools and equipment necessary for the construction of the project leaving all work ready for use. 2. The construction documents are the property of Thunderbowl Architects Inc and its Consultants and are to be used as instruments of service for construction of this project only. Use for any other purpose, without authorization, is not allowed. 3. The plans indicate the general extent of new construction necessary for the work, but are not intended to be all-inclusive. All demolition and all new work necessary to allow for a finished job in accordance with the intention of the drawing is included regardless of whether shown on the drawings or mentioned in the notes. 4. Any errors, omissions or conflicts found in the various parts of the construction documents shall be brought to the attention of the Architect and the Owner for clarification before proceeding with the work. 5. The General Contractor shall maintain a current and complete set of the construction documents on the job site during all phases of construction for use of all the trades and shall provide all the subcontractors with current and complete construction documents as required including specifications and architectural supplementary instructions. 6. The General Contractor shall verify and assume responsibility for all dimensions and site conditions. The General Contractor shall inspect the existing premises and take note of existing conditions prior to submitting prices. No claim shall be allowed for difficulties encountered which could have reasonably been inferred from such an examination. 7. Written dimensions take precedence. Do not scale drawings. 8. See SYMBOLS area of this sheet for dimension standards. 9. All dimensions noted "verify" and "V.I.F." are to be checked by Contractor prior to construction. Immediately report any variances to the Architect for resolution, then coordinate resolution w/ all work of all trades. 10. Coordinate all work with existing conditions, including but not limited to: irrigation pipes, electrical conduit, water lines, gas lines, drainage lines, etc. Notify Architect immediately of any conflicts. 11. Provide adequate temporary support as necessary to assure the structural value or integrity of the building. 12. Protect all existing building and site conditions to remain, including walls, cabinets, finishes, trees and shrubs, paving, etc. 13. Details shown are typical. Similar details apply in similar conditions. 14. Verify all architectural details with structural, civil, landscape and design/build drawings before ordering or installation of any work. 15. All changes in floor materials occur at centerline of door or framed opening unless otherwise indicated on the drawings. 16. Install all fixtures, equipment and materials per manufacturer's recommendations. 17. Verify clearances for flues, vents, chases, soffits, fixtures, etc. before any construction, ordering of, or installation of any items of work. 18. Sealant, caulking and flashing, etc. locations shown on drawings are not intended to be inclusive. Follow manufacturer's installation recommendations and standard industry and building practices. 19. The General Contractor shall remove all rubbish and waste materials of all subcontractors and trades on a regular basis, and shall exercise a strict control over job cleaning to prevent any direct debris or dust from affecting, in any way, finished areas in or outside job site. 20. Contractor shall leave premises and all affected areas clean and orderly, ready for occupancy. This includes cleaning of all glass (inside and outside) and frames, both new and existing. 21. Any survey monuments within the area of construction shall be preserved or reset by a registered civil engineer or a licensed land surveyor. 22. Verify all finish materials with the Architect and the Owner prior to installation. On site mock-ups of building assemblies, finish assemblies, paint and/or stain samples, etc. may be required for approval. 23. Contractor to coordinate utilities shown on architectural drawings with electrical, plumbing, mechanical, and any other consultant drawings. Contractor to coordinate all the trades. 24. Structural observation shall be required by the Engineer for structural conformance to the approved plans. 25. It is the General Contractors responsibility to obtain inspections and special inspections as necessary. 26. All construction to provide a waterproof, weather tight building. Contractor should flash and caulk as necessary to achieve this requirement. PROJECT ADDRESS:633 W. FRANCIS STREET, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PARCEL ID:#273512426001 FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSTALLED:NO APPLICABLE CODES: · 2015 IRC (International Residential Code) Chapters 1-10 · 2015 IRC appendixes: · Manufactured homes, F: Radon, J: Existing Buildings & Structures, H:Patio Covers, K: Sound Transmission. · 2015 IPC (International Plumbing Code) · 2015 IMC (International Mechanical Code) · 2015 IFGC (International Fuel Gas Code) · 2015 IECC (International Energy Conservation Code) -Prescriptive Path · 2015 IFC (International Fire Code) · 2020 NEC (National Electrical Code ZONING:R-6 FLOOR AREA:EXISTING : 4142.50' PROPOSED : 4,142.31' PERMITTED USE:Residential SETBACKS:Front -10', Rear -10", Side -10' TYPE:Type V -Non-rated OCCUPANCY:Type R-3 OVERALL PROJECT HEIGHT AND AREA:Maximum Height XX' PROJECT SUMMARY:REMODEL OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE -2 CAR GARAGE -5 BEDROOMS OWNER/CLIENT: West Aspen Grove LLC CONTACT: Walt Templlin 633 W Francis Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Tel: N/A email: walt@templin@gmail.com or kate@natapa.com ARCHITECT: Thunderbowl Architects CONTACT: Ryan Doremus 300 S. Spring Steet, Suite 201 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Tel: (970) 710-2938 email: ryan@thunderbowlarchitets.com CONTRACTOR: Contractor CONTACT: Contact Person Address Line 1 Address Line 2 Tel: (970) XXX-XXXX email: contact@blank.com LANDSCAPE DESIGN: Owner CONTACT: Contact Person Address Line 1 Address Line 2 Tel: (970) XXX-XXXX email: contact@blank.com STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: DB STRUCTURAL CONTACT: Nate Decker Address Line 1 Address Line 2 Tel: (970) XXX-XXXX email: contact@blank.com CIVIL ENGINEER: Owner CONTACT: Contact Person Address Line 1 Address Line 2 Tel: (970) XXX-XXXX email: contact@blank.com MECHANICAL DESIGN: Owner CONTACT: Contact Person Address Line 1 Address Line 2 Tel: (970) XXX-XXXX email: contact@blank.com SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE SYMBOLS FLOOR PLAN 1. All walls with shear plywood shall have a continuous flush finish. Furr walls or continue plywood to maintain the required flush finish. 2. Offset studs where required so that finish wall surfaces will be flush. 3. Provide blocking for all artwork, towel bars, and tissue holders, typical. 4. Provide water resistant gypsum board behind all plumbing fixtures, under and around tub and shower enclosures to a height of 70" minimum above the drain inlet, or approved backer board under tile. 5. Finish materials for all baths, showers, walls at shower enclosures shall have a smooth, hard, non-absorbant surface such as tiles/ceramic tiles, portland cement, or eq. REFLECTED CEILING PLAN 1. Verify in field all existing dimensions. 2. See interior design drawings for exact locations and specifications for sconces, pendants, and all other decorative fixtures. 3. Per 2015 IECC Section R404 -75% or more of the lamps in permanently installed lighting fixtures shall be high-efficacy. ELEVATION / SECTION 1. Verify framing heights for all windows and doors with selected manufacturers rough opening specifications. 2. Contractor shall verify all exterior materials, finishes, and colors with the owner and the architect prior to installation or application. 3. If provided, see enlarged wall sections for typical exterior assemblies. DRAWING NOTES 633 W. FRANCIS ST., ASPEN, CO 81611 11/29/2024 LAND USE 00 Start-up GENERAL G-000 COVER SHEET Z-001X EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS Z-000 ZONING SUMMARY Z-001 PROPOSED FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS Z-002X EXISTING WALL AREA CALCULATIONS Z-002 PROPOSED WALL AREA CALCULATIONS Z-003 EXTERIOR RENDERS Z-004 EXTERIOR RENDERS Z-005 EXTERIOR RENDERS ARCHITECTURAL A-500 ASSEMBLY DETAILS A-502 TRANSITION DETAILS A-511 WINDOW DETAILS A-521 DOOR DETAILS A-601 UPPER LEVEL WINDOW SCHEDULE A-602 DOOR SCHEDULE A-611 INSULATION SCHEDULE A-092 LOWER LEVEL REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A-102 MAIN LEVEL REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A-122 UPPER LEVEL REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A-201 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION A-300 PROPOSED BUILDING SECTIONS A-401 ENLARGED STAIR A-411 ENLARGED FIREPLACE A-090 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A-100 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A-120 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A-001 PROPOSED SITE PLAN A-200 PROP. NORTH ELEVATION A-204 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION A-203 PROP. SOUTH ELEVATION A-900 SOUTH PERSPECTIVES A-130 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN A-301 PROPOSED BUILDING SECTIONS A-207 PROP. INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-208 PROP. INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-209 PROP. INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-210 PROP. INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-211 PROP. INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-212 PROP. INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-600 MAIN LEVEL WINDOW SCHEDULE A-091 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL FINISH PLAN A-101 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FINISH PLAN A-121 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FINISH PLAN DEMO A-101D DEMO LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A-111D DEMO MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A-121D DEMO UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN EXISTING A-001X EXISTING SITE PLAN A-090X EXISTING LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A-100X EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A-120X EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A-130X EXISTING ROOF PLAN A-091X EXISTING LOWER LEVEL RCP A-101X EXISTING MAIN LEVEL RCP A-121X EXISTING UPPER LEVEL RCP 66 ZONING ALLOWANCE & PROJECT SUMMARY PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PARCEL # 273512426001 ZONE DISTRICT MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-6) SETBACKS EXISTING (PRINCIPAL) ALLOWED (PRINCIPAL) PROPOSED REFERENCE 26.710.040.D4 26.710.040.D5 26.710.040 26.710.040.D6 26.710.040.D6 26.710.040.D8 SITE PLAN 10'-0" 10'-0" N/A 5'-0" N/A 10'-0" YES PRINCIPLE10'-0" / ACCESSORY=15' N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A PRINCIPLE10'-0" / ACCESSORY=5' N/A 5'-0" N/A 10'-0" FRONT REAR COMBINED FRONT / REAR SIDE COMBINED SIDE DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS CORNER LOT SUPPLEMENTAL BREAKDOWN INFO EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED REFERENCE NET LEASABLE / COMM SQ FT OPEN SPACE % MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE ON-SITE PARKING N/A N/A N/A NO NOT REQ'D FOR R-6 NOT REQ'D FOR R-6 NO LIMIT N/A N/A 26.575.020.I 26.710.080.D9 26.710.080.D SITE COVERAGE EXISTING GROSS LOT AREA (SQ FT) AREA OF BUILDING FOOTPRINT (SQ FT) SITE COVERAGE % 6019.32 SQ FT 1795.19 SQ FT 29.82% PROPOSED 6019.32 SQ FT 2287.75 SQ FT 38.01% REFERENCE SURVEY TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDRs) RECEIVED TDR CERTIFICATE SENT TDR CERTIFICATE TRANSFERRED TDR CERTIFICATE NO NO NO LAND VALUE SUMMARY 2020 ACTUAL VALUE LAND VALUE SUMMARY IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL $5,493,700 $7,491,300 $12,985,000 REFERENCE PITKIN CO. ASSESSOR PITKIN CO. ASSESSOR PITKIN CO. ASSESSOR NET LOT AREA ZONE DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS MIN. GROSS LOT AREA (PER R-6) MIN. NET LOT AREA (PER R-6) 6,000 SQ FT. NO LIMIT REFERENCE 26.710.040.D7 CHART 26.710.040.D7 CHART LOT SIZE PER SURVEY SQ FT REDUCTIONS FOR AREA WITH SLOPES 0%-20% (100% OF PARCEL AREA TO BE INCLUDED IN NET LOT AREA REDUCTIONS FOR AREA WITH SLOPES 20%-30% (50% OF PARCEL AREA TO BE INCLUDED IN NET LOT AREA REDUCTIONS FOR AREA WITH SLOPES GREATER THAN 30% (0% OF PARCEL AREA TO BE INCLUDED IN NET LOT AREA TOTAL REDUCTION IN FA ATTRIBUTED TO PROPERTY SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 25% SQ FT AREAS BELOW THE HIGH WATER LINE OF A RIVER 0% OF PARCEL TO BE INCLUDED IN NET LOT AREA SQ FT AREAS WITHIN EASEMENTS AND HIGH WATER 6,019.32 SQ FT. N/A N/A 0 SQ FT 0 SQ FT 0 SQ FT CALCULATION FOR THE TOTAL REDUCTION IN FLOOR AREA ATTRIBUTE TO A PROPERTY'S SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 25% SQ FT N/A N/A N/A N/A CALCULATION FOR THE TOTAL REDUCTION IN FLOOR AREA ATTRIBUTE TO A PROPERTY'S SLOPES WITH THE SLOPE REDUCTIONS 6019.32 SQ. FT. - 0 = 6019.32 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA REDUCTIONS SQ FT 0 SQ FT NET LOT AREA SQ FT 6019.32 SQ FT ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA PER R-6: NET LOT AREA BETWEEN 6,000-9,000 SQ FT = 3,600 SQ FT OF FLOOR AREA PLUS FOR EACH ADDITIONAL 100 SQ FT IN NET LOT AREA AN ADDITIONAL 16 SQ FT, UP TO A MAXIMUM OF 4,080 SQ FT OF FLOOR AREA. REFERENCE 26.710.040.D11a CHART3,600 SQ.FT. + ((16 x (100/19.32)) = 3,605.7 SQ.FT. TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA 3,605.7 SQ.FT. UNIQUE APPROVALS VARIANCES N/A N/A EXEMPTIONS AND REDUCTIONS FIRST 250 SQ FT = EXEMPT GARAGE (EXISTING) 251-500 SQ FT = 50% EXEMPT 501+ SQ FT = 0% EXEMPT N/A N/A 0.0000 N/A 494.76 SQ.FT. FIRST 250 SQ FT EXEMPT 251-500 SQ FT = 50% EXEMPT 501+ SQ FT = 0% EXEMPT 0.0000 0.0000 3,605.70 SQ. FT. x 15% = 540.85 SQ. FT. 26.575.020.D.7 26.575.020.D.7 26.575.020.D.4 GARAGE TOTAL (EXISTING) GARAGE (PROPOSED) GARAGE TOTAL (PROPOSED) TOTAL ALLOWABLE DECK 15% OF ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA = EXEMPT CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE 1" = 10'-0" 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 ZONING SUMMARY 23005.00 Z-0001" = 10'-0" ZONING SUMMARY 67 1722.14 S.F. UNIT 1 -LOWER LEVEL EGRESS/ WINDOW WEL L EGRESS WINDOW WELLWINDOW WELL WINDOW WELL 1600.97 S.F. E. UPPER LEVEL UNIT 1 43.15 S.F. E. UPPER COV. DECK 229.42 S.F. E. UPPER LEVEL DECK 125.34 S.F. UPPER LEVEL STAIR/ELEV. F.A. / EXEMPT E. UPPER LEVEL DECK - 278.27 S.F. 194.22 S.F. E. UPPER COVERED DECK 5'- 1 0 7 / 8 " BUILDING AREA -UNIT 2 EXTERIOR DECK AREA -EXEMPT EXTERIOR DECK AREA BUILDING AREA -UNIT 1 FLOOR AREA LEGEND COVERED DECK/PATIO AREA BUILDING AREA -COMMON GARAGE -EXEMPT N EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS EXISTING LOWER LEVEL GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) EXISTING LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS EXISTING LOWER LEVEL FLOOR COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 1,722.14 S.F. 172.21 S.F. EXISTING MAIN LEVEL GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 826.33 S.F. 861.65 S.F. COMMON - S.F.UNIT 1 - S.F. UNIT 2 - S.F. EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FLOOR COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 826.33 S.F. 861.65 S.F. EXISTING UPPER LEVEL GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 1,726.31 S.F. EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FLOOR COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 1,600.97 S.F. EXISTING DECK GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) EXISTING DECK FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 507.69 S.F. EXISTING EXEMPT DECK FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) EXISTING DECK COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 0.00 SQ. FT. EXISTING COVERED PATIO/DECK GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) EXISTING COVERED PATIO/DECK FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 687.57 S.F. EXISTING COUNTABLE COVERED FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.)237.37 S.F. 0.00 S.F. 1,722.14 S.F. TOTAL x 10.00% EXPOSED WALL AREA= 172.21 S.F. NOTES: STREET FACING/FRONT PORCH 349.11 SQ. FT. RDS EXEMPT 15% EXEMPT DECK/ALLOWABLE = 540.85 EXISTING EXEMPT DECK FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) UPPER DECKS: 229.42 S.F. + 278.27 S.F. 540.85 S.F. FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS EXISTING LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 172.21 S.F. EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 826.33 S.F. EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 1,600.97 S.F. EXISTING DECK FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 0.00 S.F. EXISTING COVERED FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 237.37 S.F. EXISTING EXEMPT UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) -125.34 S.F.125.34 S.F. EXEMPT UPPER LEVEL STAIR AND ELEV. AREA -349.11 S.F. 338.46 S.F. 861.65 S.F. 338.46 S.F. TOTAL COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 2,836.88 S.F. 445.67 S.F.861.65 S.F. 4,144.20 S.F. TOTAL ALLOWBLE FLOOR AREA 3,605.70 S.F. EXISTING EXEMPT LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) -1,550.62 S.F. COMMON : 349.11 S.F. + 344.94 S.F. UNIT 1 : 43.15 SF. + 194.22 S.F. 237.37 S.F. 107.21 S.F. 107.21 S.F. 107.21 S.F. 78.67%23.89%PERCENTAGE OF FLOOR AREA PER UNIT 861.64 S.F. UNIT 2 347.92 S.F. E. MAIN PORCH 107.21 S.F. FOYER STAIRS EGRESS/ WINDOW WEL L WINDOW WELLWINDOW WELL EGRESS 826.32 S.F. UNIT 1 OUTLINE OF DECK ABOVE WINDOW WELL 14 ' - 4 1 / 1 6 " 341.24 S.F. E. MAIN (BACK) COVERED PORCH 11 ' - 6 1 5 / 1 6 " 344.94 S.F. CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE As indicated 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 23005.00 Z-001X 1/8" = 1'-0"Z-001X 1 EXISTING LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA 1/8" = 1'-0"Z-001X 3 EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA 3/16" = 1'-0" EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS4 Z-001X 1/8" = 1'-0"Z-001X 2 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL AREA PLAN 11/29/2024 LAND USE 68 SURFACE AREA -ABOVE GRADE SURFACE AREA -BELOW GRADE SURFACE AREA LEGEND 1615 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 105.98 S.F. 174.02 S.F. 4.54 S.F. 221.39 S.F. 13 60.94 S.F.33.40 S.F. EXP. @ DOOR ACCESS 1.00 S.F.4'-5 1/8"3'-7 1/2"3'-8" 8'- 0 5 / 8 " 17'-8 1/8"32'-11 1/8"13'-3 7/16"22'-2 1/2" 216.39 48.78 S.F. 60.12 S.F. 5.06 S.F. 137.87 S.F. 8'- 0 5 / 8 " 8'- 0 5 / 8 " 14'-8" 9'- 1 1 5 / 8 " 110.27 S.F. 35.94 S.F. 8'-2 1/8" 7'- 1 1 5 / 8 " 7'- 1 1 5 / 8 " 5'-10"2'-7 3/4" 38.76 S.F. 28.81 S.F. 3'-10" 7'- 1 1 5 / 8 " 30.55 S.F. 126.01 S.F. 15'-9 3/4" 7'- 1 1 5 / 8 " 22'-2 5/8" 23.20 S.F. 9'- 1 1 5 / 8 " 115.22 S.F. 7.67 S.F. 12'-4" 9'- 1 1 5 / 8 " 7'-7 1/4" 8'- 0 5 / 8 " 56.62 S.F. 4.61 S.F. 8'- 0 5 / 8 " 9'-5 3/8" 70.47 S.F. 5.61 S.F. 8'- 0 5 / 8 " 7'-9 3/4" 58.35 S.F. 4.56 S.F. .26 S.F. 15'-5 1/8" 115.41 S.F. 8.81 S.F. T.O. SLAB @ HIGHER L.L. T.O. SLAB @ LOWER L.L. B.O. FRAMING @ HIGHER M.L. B.O. FRAMING @ LOWER M.L. 98'-10 1/8" 96'-10 1/8" 88' -10 1/2" T.O. SLAB @ HIGHER L.L. T.O. SLAB @ LOWER L.L. B.O. FRAMING @ HIGHER M.L. B.O. FRAMING @ LOWER M.L. 98'-10 1/8" 96'-10 1/8" 88'-10 1/2" 90' -9 1/2" 90' -9 1/2" 2 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2'-4" 1 0'-1 0" 16 13 ' - 3 7 / 1 6 " 32'-11 1/8" 14 ' - 8 7 / 1 6 " 8'-3" 10 ' - 7 1 / 1 6 " 4'- 5 1 / 8 " 3'- 7 1 / 2 " 3'- 8 " 17'-8 1/8" 5'-1 0" 2'-7 1/2 " 3'-10" 1 5'-9 3/4" 15'-5 1/8" 22'-11 1/8" 22'-2 1/2" 9'-5 3/8 " 7'-7 1/4" 7'-9 3/4" N CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE As indicated 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 EXISTING WALL AREA CALCULATIONS 23005.00 Z-002X EXISTING BUILDING SURFACE AREA: 1 WALL AREA:EXPOSED WALL AREA: 94.34 S.F.33.40 S.F. EXISTING TOTAL SURFACE AREA:1,909.96 S.F.212.25 S.F. EXISTING TOTAL SURFACE AREAS : 1,909.96 S.F. + 212.25 S.F. = 2122.21 SQ. FT. TOTAL SURFACE AREA. EXISTING TOTAL SURFACE AREAS : 211.86 SQ. FT. / 2,105.44 S.F. TOTAL SURFACE AREA = 10.00% ABOVE GRADE SURFACE AREA OF LOWER LEVEL TO BE COUNTED TOWARDS FLOOR AREA. 1/8" = 1'-0" EXISTING WALL AREA CALCULATIONS - WALLS 1/8" = 1'-0"Z-002X 1 EXISTING LOWER LEVEL WALL AREA PLAN WALL NUMBER 2 142.41 S.F.4.54 S.F. 3 265.17 S.F.48.78 S.F. 4 106.98 S.F.1.00 S.F. 5 221.39 S.F.0 S.F. 6 146.27 S.F.35.94 S.F. 7 65.18 S.F.5.06 S.F. 8 67.57 S.F.28.81 S.F. 9 30.55 S.F.0 S.F. 10 126.01 S.F.0 S.F. 11 197.48 S.F.23.46 S.F. 12 122.89 S.F.7.67 S.F. 13 61.23 S.F.4.61 S.F. 14 76.08 S.F.5.61 S.F. 15 62.19 S.F.4.56 S.F. 16 124.22 S.F.8.81 S.F. 2 Z-002X 11/29/2024 LAND USE 69 L 1 L 2 L 3 L 4 INLET 7905.6 S I T E B E N C H M A R K F O U N D 1 " A L U M I N U M C A P I L L E G I B L E E L E V A T I O N : 7 9 0 6 . 5 0 FOUND REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP LS9184 MAILBOX PARKING SIGN 1 23 4 5 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 5 2 6 2 7 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 4 S14°50'49"W 76.41' N75°09'11"W 60.00' S75°09'11"E 60.00' S14°50'49"W 14.44' C I T Y O F A S P E N G P S C O N T R O L M O N U M E N T # 9 S 3 2 °1 2'4 6 "E 5 2 .4 8 '(T I E ) N16°58'10"E 1067.98'(TIE) 7907 7 9 0 7 7908 7910 7 9 0 9 7909 7910 7908 LOT C WEST FRANCIS STREET NORTH 6TH STREET PAVED ROADWAY (74.72' RIGHT-OF-WAY) PAVED ROADWAY EDGE OF PAVEMENT EDGE OF PAVEMENT DRAINAGE SWALE BUILDING OVERHANG TWO-STORY GARAGE (77.65' RIGHT-OF-WAY) GRAVEL ALLEY D YH S S HOT TUB TO BE REMOVED AREA 0.138 AC + W A L K W ALK PARKING 1 PARKING 2 STONE DRIVEWAY ALC 6' (B) BENCHMARK=7906.18' YPC LS# 9184 1' (B)S 14o50'49" W 6o41' (R) N 75o09'11" W 60.00' (R) DRAINAGE D R A I N A G E N. 32o30'03" W 52.39' S 75o09'11" E 60.00' (R) L6(F) W WW W W W W W W EE E E E WV W W V OPC LS# 37972 (G) YPC LS# 91842' (B) TR A S H E E E E E E E C P E C E C T S S S C E E P C C C C EP P 2 PARKING SPACES RESERVATION REC# 448550 G G S WALK N 14o50'49" E 100.00' (R) L5(F) EDGE OF PAVEMENT EDGE OF PAVEMENT 2 PARKING SPACE ENCROCHMENT LICENSE REC# 448728 S 14o50'49" W 14.44' (R) 7 9 0 6 ' 633 W. FRANCIS ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 LOT A & B BLOCK 22, CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO PARCEL # 273512426001 NORTH 6TH STREET WE S T F R A N C I S S T R E E T HYD. MAILBOX STONE PATIO STONE PATIO DECK DECK TREES, PER SURVEY UTILITY METERS EXISTING SOLAR PANELS EXISTING SOLAR PANELS SKYLIGHTS WINDOW WELL WINDOW WELL WINDOW WELL EGRESS CHIMNEY FLUE, V.I.F. EXISTING FENCE EXISTING FENCE DRAIN 10'-0"FRONT SETBACK SETBACK 10'-0"SIDE YARD 5'-0"5'-0" PROPERTY LINE GARAGE SETBACK FRONT SETBACK PROPERTY LINE SIDE SETBACK PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE SIDE SETBACK 9" / 1 2 " 9" / 1 2 " 5 3/4" / 12" 9" / 1 2" 5 3 / 4 " / 1 2 " EXISTING DRIPLINE DIM., TYP. REAR SETBACK ALLEY EXISTING TREE, VI.F. DRIPLINE IN FIELD N EXISTING LOT COVERAGE: R6-SEC.26.710.040.D7-MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: 6,000-9,000: 50%, MINUS 1% FOR EACH ADDITIONAL 300 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS LOT AREA, TO A MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE OF 40% LOT SIZE: AREA 0.138 AC +/-= 6,011.28 SQ.FT. STRUCTURE AT GRADE: 1,790.76 SQ.FT. LOT COVERAGE:1,790.76 S.F./ 6,011.28 S.F.= 29.79% OF SITE ALLOWABLE: 3005.60 S.F. / (50%) (6,011.28 S.F. /2 = 3,005.64 -((11.28 x100)/300)x.01)=.0376S.F)) (3,005.64 S.F. -0.0376 S.F. = 3,005.60 S.F.) EXISTING TOTAL COVERAGE: CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE As indicated 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 EXISTING SITE PLAN 23005.00 A-001X3/16" = 1'-0"A-001X 1 EXISTING SITE PLAN 11/29/2024 LAND USE 70 DN DN DN LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA 2,505.06 SQ.FT. EGRESS WINDOW WEL L WINDOW WELLWINDOW WELL WINDOW WELL 861.64 S.F. UNIT 2 826.32 S.F. UNIT 1347.92 S.F. P. PORCH 107.21 S.F. COMMON AREA OUTLINE OF DECK ABOVE BELOW DECK EXEMPT AT GRADE EGRESS/ WINDOW WEL L EGRESS/ WINDOW WEL L WINDOW WELLWINDOW WELL WINDOW WELL 341.24 S.F. DECK AREA 494.76 S.F. GARAGE AREA EXEMPT21.31 S.F. SPRIAL STAIR AREA 1600.97 S.F. P. UPPER LEVEL UINT 1 43.15 S.F. P. COV. DECK 194.22 S.F. P. COVERED DECK 125.34 S.F. UPPER LEVEL STAIR/ELEV. F.A. / EXEMPT 1 2'-0 1/1 6" P. UPPER DECK 313.15 S.F. P. UPPER DECK 204.54 S.F. 8'-2" 8'-9 7/8" BUILDING AREA -UNIT 2 EXTERIOR DECK AREA -EXEMPT EXTERIOR DECK AREA BUILDING AREA -UNIT 1 FLOOR AREA LEGEND COVERED DECK/PATIO AREA BUILDING AREA -COMMON GARAGE -EXEMPT N PROPOSED FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL FLOOR COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 2,505.06 S.F. 170.59 S.F. PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 826.33 S.F. 861.65 S.F. COMMON - S.F.UNIT 1 - S.F. UNIT 2 - S.F. PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FLOOR COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 826.33 S.F. 861.65 S.F. PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 1,726.31 S.F. PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FLOOR COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 1600.97 S.F. PROPOSED GARAGE GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 494.76 S.F. PROPOSED GARAGE COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 0.00 S.F. PROPOSED EXEMPT GARAGE FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) -500.00 S.F. PROPOSED DECK GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) PROPOSED DECK FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 539 S.F. PROPOSED EXEMPT DECK FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) PROPOSED DECK COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 0 S.F. PROPOSED COVERED PATIO/DECK GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) PROPOSED COVERED PATIO/DECK FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 687.57 S.F. PROPOSED COUNTABLE COVERED FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.)237.37 S.F. 0.00 S.F. 2,505.06 S.F. TOTAL x 6.81% EXPOSED WALL AREA= 170.59 S.F. NOTES: STREET FACING/FRONT PORCH 349.11 S.F. RDS EXEMPT 15% EXEMPT DECK/ALLOWABLE = 540.85 S.F. PROPOSED EXEMPT DECK FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) (U. DECKS: 204.54 S.F.+ 313.15 S.F.)+ 21.31 S.F. STR. 540.85 S.F. FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 170.59 S.F. PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 826.33 S.F. PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 1,600.97 S.F. PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 0.00 S.F. PROPOSED DECK FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 0.00 S.F. PROPOSED COVERED FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 237.37 S.F. PROPOSED EXEMPT UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) -125.34 S.F.125.34 S.F. EXEMPT UPPER LEVEL STAIR AND ELEV. AREA -349.11 S.F. 338.46 S.F. 861.65 S.F. 338.46 S.F. TOTAL COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA 2,835.26 S.F. 445.67 S.F.861.65 S.F. 4,142.58 S.F. TOTAL ALLOWBLE FLOOR AREA 3,605.70 S.F. PROPOSED EXEMPT LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) -2,334.47 S.F. COMMON : 349.11 S.F. + 338.46 S.F. UNIT 1 : 43.15 SF. + 194.22 S.F. 237.37 S.F. 107.21 S.F. 107.21 S.F. 107.21 S.F. 500 S.F. EXEMPT GARAGE 23.89%78.63%PERCENTAGE OF FLOOR AREA PER UNIT CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE As indicated 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 PROPOSED FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 23005.00 Z-001 1/8" = 1'-0"Z-001 1 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA 1/8" = 1'-0"Z-001 2 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"Z-001 3 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA 3/16" = 1'-0" PROPOSED FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS4 Z-001 11/29/2024 LAND USE 71 DN SURFACE AREA -ABOVE GRADE SURFACE AREA -BELOW GRADE SURFACE AREA LEGEND2 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 32'-11 1/8" 14 16 13 ' - 3 7 / 1 6 " 2'-7 3/4" 5'-1 0" 13 3'-10" 1 5'-9 3/4" 17'-8 1/8" 20'-7 1/4" 22'-2 1/2" 4'- 5 1 / 2 " 4'- 4 " 3'- 7 1 / 2 " 4'- 5 1 / 8 " 24'-7 1/16" 23'-9 7/8" 21'-3 1/4" 18 ' - 1 1 " 12 ' - 9 1 / 4 " 12 T.O. SLAB @ HIGHER L.L. T.O. SLAB @ LOWER L.L. PROP. T.O. SLAB @ LOWEST L.L.14 233.16 S.F. 15 216.02 S.F. 16 234.10 S.F. B.O. FRAMING @ HIGHER M.L. B.O. FRAMING @ LOWER M.L. 98'-10 1/8" 96'-10 1/8" .97 S.F. 2 3 4 5 6 7 105.98 S.F. 4.54 S.F. 221.39 S.F. 1.00 S.F. 8'- 0 5 / 8 " 17'-8 1/8" 32'-11 1/8"13'-3 7/16" 22'-2 1/2" 216.39 48.78 S.F. 60.12 S.F. 5.06 S.F. 137.87 S.F. 8'- 0 5 / 8 " 14'-8" 9'- 1 1 5 / 8 " 110.27 S.F. 35.94 S.F. 8'-2 1/8" 7'- 1 1 5 / 8 " 9 10 11 259.15 S.F. 3'-10" 7'- 1 1 5 / 8 " 30.55 S.F. 126.01 S.F. 15'-9 3/4"24'-7 1/4" 21.07 S.F. 12 ' - 6 3 / 8 " .26 S.F. 87' -3 3/4" 88' -10 1/2" PROP. T.O. SLAB @ LOWEST L.L. T.O. SLAB @ HIGHER L.L. T.O. SLAB @ LOWER L.L. B.O. FRAMING @ HIGHER M.L. B.O. FRAMING @ LOWER M.L. 98'-10 1/8" 96'-10 1/8" 88'-10 1/2" 136.19 SQ. FT. 12'-1" 11 ' - 3 1 / 4 " 279.08 S.F. 13 11 ' - 3 1 / 4 " 19'-2" 11 ' - 3 1 / 4 " 20'-9 1/4" 87' -3 3/4" 90' -9 1/2" 90' -9 1/2" 23'-9 3/4" 11 ' - 9 1 / 8 " 11 ' - 9 1 / 8 " 12 ' - 6 3 / 8 " 1.03 S.F. 11 ' - 3 1 / 4 " 109.02 S.F. 36.38 S.F. EXP. @ DOOR ACCESS 4'-5 1/8"3'-7 1/2"4'-4"3'-7 1/2" 20'-9 1/4" 1 8 7'- 1 1 5 / 8 " 5'-10"2'-7 3/4" 38.76 S.F. 28.81 S.F. N CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE As indicated 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 PROPOSED WALL AREA CALCULATIONS 23005.00 Z-002 PROPOSED BUILDING SURFACE AREA: 1 PROPOSED TOTAL SURFACE AREA:2,697.88 S.F.183.84 S.F. PROPOSED TOTAL SURFACE AREAS : 183.84 S.F. + 2,697.88 S.F. = 2,881.72 S.F. TOTAL SURFACE AREA. PROPOSED TOTAL SURFACE AREAS : 183.84 S.F. / 2,697.88 S.F. TOTAL SURFACE AREA = 6.81% ABOVE GRADE SURFACE AREA OF LOWER LEVEL TO BE COUNTED TOWARDS FLOOR AREA. WALL NUMBER 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 1/8" = 1'-0"Z-002 1 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL WALL AREA PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0" PROPOSED WALL AREA CALCULATIONS - WALLS2 Z-002 15 11/29/2024 LAND USE WALL AREA:EXPOSED WALL AREA: 145.40 S.F.36.38 S.F. 142.41 S.F.4.54 S.F. 265.17 S.F.48.78 S.F. 106.98 S.F.1.00 S.F. 221.39 S.F.0 S.F. 146.21 S.F.35.94 S.F. 65.18 S.F.5.06 S.F. 67.57 S.F.28.81 S.F. 30.55 S.F.0 S.F. 126.01 S.F.0 S.F. 280.48 S.F.21.33 S.F. 280.11 S.F.1.03 S.F. 136.19 S.F.0 S.F. 234.13 S.F..97 S.F. 216.02 S.F.0 S.F. 234.10 S.F.0 S.F. 72 L 1 L 2 L 3 L 4 INLET 7905.6 S I T E B E N C H M A R K F O U N D 1 " A L U M I N U M C A P I L L E G I B L E E L E V A T I O N : 7 9 0 6 . 5 0 FOUND REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP LS9184 FOUND REBAR & 1-1/4" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP LS9184 6.0'(TIE) 4.0' (TIE) 31.3'(TIE) MAILBOX PARKING SIGN 7907.10 7906.91 7 9 0 6 .7 4 7907.38 7 9 0 7.6 1 7908.83 7908.237908.06 7907.86 1 23 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 7 2 8 2 9 3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 4 S14°50'49"W 76.41' N75°09'11"W 60.00' S75°09'11"E 60.00' S14°50'49"W 14.44' C I T Y O F A S P E N G P S C O N T R O L M O N U M E N T # 9 S 3 2 °1 2'4 6 "E 5 2 .4 8 '(T I E ) 7907 7 9 0 7 7908 7910 7 9 0 9 7909 7910 7908 LOT C WEST FRANCIS STREET NORTH 6TH STREET PAVED ROADWAY (74.72' RIGHT-OF-WAY) PAVED ROADWAY STEPS STEPS EDGE OF PAVEMENT EDGE OF PAVEMENT DRAINAGE SWALE 5.0' REAR ACCESSORY SETBACK 10.0' REAR PRINCIPAL SETBACK 5.0' SIDE SETBACK CONCRETE PATIO BUILDING OVERHANG TWO-STORY GARAGE (77.65' RIGHT-OF-WAY) GRAVEL ALLEY D YH S E S AL L E Y YPC LS# 91842' (B) C T N 14o50'49" E 100.00' (R) / L5(F) EDGE OF PAVEMENT HYD. DECK SKYLIGHTS EXISTING WINDOW WELL EXISTING FENCE DRAIN 0.138+ACRES 6019 +S.F. ALC 6' (B) BENCHMARK=7906.18' YPC LS# 9184 1' (B) S 14o50'49" W 6o41' (R) N 75o09'11" W 60.00' (R) N. 32o30'03" W 52.39' S 75o09'11" E 60.00' (R) L6(F) OPC LS# 37972 (G) TR A S H C T 2 PARKING SPACES RESERVATION REC# 448550, LOCATED AT GARAGE EDGE OF PAVEMENT S 14o50'49" W 14.44' (R) 633 W. FRANCIS ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 LOT A & B BLOCK 22, CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO PARCEL # 273512426001 NORTH 6TH STREET FR A N C I S S T R E E T EXISTING STONE PATIO EXISTING STONE PATIO DECK TREES, PER SURVEY GAS METER LOCATION BELOW EXISTING SOLAR PANELS EXISTING SOLAR PANELS EXISTING WINDOW WELL EXISTING FENCE SETBACK 5'-0" SIDE SETBACK 5'-0" REAR 5' REAR SETBACK FOR GARAGE 10' MIN. REAR SETBACK FOR PRINCIPAL BUILDING SETBACK 10'-0" REAR PROPERTY LINEGARAGE SETBACK REAR SETBACK FRONT SETBACK PROPERTY LINE SIDE SETBACK PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE SIDE SETBACKSETBACK 10'-0" SIDE YARD 9" / 1 2 " 9" / 1 2 " 9" / 1 2 " 9" / 1 2 " 9 " / 1 2" 5 3/4" / 12" 5 3 / 4 " / 1 2 " 10'-0"FRONT SETBACK 7909 7 9 0 979097910 79087908INLET 7905.6 79 0 8 7908 7 9 0 8 79 0 7 79 0 7 7907 7910 79 0 7 3/4" / 12" V.I.F. REPLACE ROOF WITH A CLASS-A WOOD SHINGLE ROOF GARAGE FNDN.8'-0 3/4" BUILDING OUTLINE FOR PROPOSED GARAGE NEW WALK ADDED TO EXISTING, VIF EXISTING WALK EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTING SIDEWALK 9" / 1 2" EXISTING CURB CUT TO BE FILLED (E) SOLAR PANEL 5.1 KW INVERTER & SHUT OFF ON MAIN LEVEL DECK BELOW T.O. SLAB 97'-9" T.O. SLAB 98'-3" T.O. SLAB 97'-4 3/4" T.O. SLAB 98'-0" VIF VIF 10'-0" SIDEYARD SETBACK 1'- 6 " 1'-6" WALL BELOW WALL BELOW 33 ' - 1 1 5 / 8 " TO F.F. 5'-0" . 7'-6 3/4" WALL BELOW N PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE: R6-SEC.26.710.040.D7-MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: 6,000-9,000: 50%, MINUS 1% FOR EACH ADDITIONAL 300 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS LOT AREA, TO A MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE OF 40% LOT SIZE: AREA 0.138 AC +/-= 6,011.28 SQ.FT. STRUCTURE AT GRADE: 2,290.51 SQ.FT. LOT COVERAGE:2,290.51 S.F./ 6,011.28 S.F.= 38.10% OF SITE ALLOWABLE: 3005.60 S.F. / (50%) (6,011.28 S.F. /2 = 3,005.64 -((11.28 x100)/300)x.01)=.0376S.F)) (3,005.64 S.F. -0.0376 S.F. = 3,005.60 S.F.) PROPOSED TOTAL COVERAGE: CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE As indicated 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 23005.00 A-0013/16" = 1'-0"A-001 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 11/29/2024 LAND USE 73 ELEVATION / SECTION GENERAL NOTES 1.ALL ROOF PITCHES SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE ROOF PLAN. 2. VERIFY FRAMING HEIGHTS FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS WITH SELECTED MANUFACTURERS ROUGH OPENING SPECIFICATIONS. 3. ALL DOWNSPOUTS TO BE TIED INTO PERIMETER DRAIN SYSTEM IF EXISTING OR PROPOSED -UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS. 4. PCONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXTERIOR MATERIALS, FINISHES, AND COLORS WITH THE OWNER AND THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OR APPLICATION. 5. IF PROVIDED, SEE ENLARGED WALL SECTIONS FOR TYPICAL EXTERIOR ASSEMBLIES. 6. EXISTING WINDOWS AND DOORS DENOTED AS: (E). FINISH KEY - EXTERIOR FINISHES SYNTHETIC WOOD SHAKE SHINGLE WOOD SIDING STONE VANEER COPPER STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF CODE DESCRIPTION ST-01 SH-02 WS-03 SS-04 T.O. FINISH @ MAIN L.L. + 98'-0" T.O. UPPER LEVEL F.F. + 109'-11" 7 9 T.O. EXISTING L.L. F.F. + 88'-11" 6 8 T.O. F.F. -L.L. (HIGH) + 90'-10" T.O. FINISH @ MAIN LEVEL (HIGH) + 100'-0" T.O LOW RIDGE + 128'-5 1/4" T.O. PROPOSED L.L. SLAB + 86'-3 3/4" 12 18 ' - 6 1 / 4 " 9'- 1 1 " 2'- 0 " 7'- 2 " 1'- 1 1 " 2'- 7 1 / 4 " 11 NEW DAVINCI SHINGLE, STYLE TBD EXISTING WOOD SHINGLE, PROPOSED COLOR TBD EXISTING STONE VANEER TO REMAIN, PAINT TBD NEW METAL HANDRAIL T.O. HIGH RIDGE + 132'-8 3/4"12'-9 1/4"7'-9 3/4"3'-7 1/2"9'-8 1/8"2'-8"11'-3 1/2" 4'- 3 1 / 2 " GAS METER LOCATION 10 1 A-300 PROPOSED STANDING SEAM COPPER ROOF 211A X 211B 6'-10"8'-10 1/2"X 211C 6'-10"8'-10 1/2" T.O. FIN @ BUNKROOM + 86'-5 1/4" WS-03 SH-02 3'- 0 " M I N CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE 1/4" = 1'-0" 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 PROP. NORTH ELEVATION 23005.00 A-200 1/4" = 1'-0"A-200 1 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION 11/29/2024 LAND USE 74 ELEVATION / SECTION GENERAL NOTES 1.ALL ROOF PITCHES SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE ROOF PLAN. 2. VERIFY FRAMING HEIGHTS FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS WITH SELECTED MANUFACTURERS ROUGH OPENING SPECIFICATIONS. 3. ALL DOWNSPOUTS TO BE TIED INTO PERIMETER DRAIN SYSTEM IF EXISTING OR PROPOSED -UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS. 4. PCONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXTERIOR MATERIALS, FINISHES, AND COLORS WITH THE OWNER AND THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OR APPLICATION. 5. IF PROVIDED, SEE ENLARGED WALL SECTIONS FOR TYPICAL EXTERIOR ASSEMBLIES. 6. EXISTING WINDOWS AND DOORS DENOTED AS: (E). FINISH KEY - EXTERIOR FINISHES SYNTHETIC WOOD SHAKE SHINGLE WOOD SIDING STONE VANEER COPPER STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF CODE DESCRIPTION ST-01 SH-02 WS-03 SS-04 T.O. FINISH @ MAIN L.L. + 98'-0" T.O. UPPER LEVEL F.F. + 109'-11" T.O. EXISTING L.L. F.F. + 88'-11" D AG T.O. F.F. -L.L. (HIGH) + 90'-10" T.O. FINISH @ MAIN LEVEL (HIGH) + 100'-0" T.O LOW RIDGE + 128'-5 1/4" T.O. PROPOSED L.L. SLAB + 86'-3 3/4" N O 2'- 7 1 / 4 " 1'- 1 1 " 7'- 2 " 2'- 0 " 9'- 1 1 " 18 ' - 6 1 / 4 " 37'-10 5/8"17'-1 3/4"23'-2 1/2" 6'- 9 " EXISTING STONE CHIMNEY TO REMAIN, STONE TO BE REPAINTED HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING, REPAINT, COLOR TBD 3'- 0 " T.O. HIGH RIDGE + 132'-8 3/4" 4'- 3 1 / 2 " B A 15 ' - 6 " T.O. FINISH 7908'-9 1/4" GRADET.O. FINISH 7907'-7 1/2" GRADE 13 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " EXISTING GRADE CONTOUR 2 A-300 1 A-301 X 211B 6'-10"8'-10 1/2"X 211C 6'-10"8'-10 1/2" 013A (E) T.O. FIN @ BUNKROOM + 86'-5 1/4" SH-02 WS-03WS-03 9" / 1 2 " 9" / 1 2" 9" / 1 2 " 9" / 1 2" WS-03 3'- 0 " M I N 5'-2" NEW DIVINCI SHAKE SHINGLE, COLOR TDB NEW DIVINCI SHAKE SHINGLE, COLOR TDB SS-04 HOSE BIB LOCATION 1'-6" CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE 1/4" = 1'-0" 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 23005.00 A-201 1/4" = 1'-0"A-201 1 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 11/29/2024 LAND USE 75 ELEVATION / SECTION GENERAL NOTES 1.ALL ROOF PITCHES SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE ROOF PLAN. 2. VERIFY FRAMING HEIGHTS FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS WITH SELECTED MANUFACTURERS ROUGH OPENING SPECIFICATIONS. 3. ALL DOWNSPOUTS TO BE TIED INTO PERIMETER DRAIN SYSTEM IF EXISTING OR PROPOSED -UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS. 4. PCONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXTERIOR MATERIALS, FINISHES, AND COLORS WITH THE OWNER AND THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OR APPLICATION. 5. IF PROVIDED, SEE ENLARGED WALL SECTIONS FOR TYPICAL EXTERIOR ASSEMBLIES. 6. EXISTING WINDOWS AND DOORS DENOTED AS: (E). FINISH KEY - EXTERIOR FINISHES SYNTHETIC WOOD SHAKE SHINGLE WOOD SIDING STONE VANEER COPPER STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF CODE DESCRIPTION ST-01 SH-02 WS-03 SS-04 T.O. FINISH @ MAIN L.L. + 98'-0" T.O. UPPER LEVEL F.F. + 109'-11" 79 T.O. ROOF JOIST + 132'-2" T.O. EXISTING L.L. F.F. + 88'-11" 68 T.O. F.F. -L.L. (HIGH) + 90'-10" T.O. FINISH @ MAIN LEVEL (HIGH) + 100'-0" T.O LOW RIDGE + 128'-5 1/4" T.O. PROPOSED L.L. SLAB + 86'-3 3/4" 12 3'- 8 3 / 4 " 18 ' - 6 1 / 4 " 9'- 1 1 " 2'- 0 " 7'- 2 " 1'- 1 1 " 2'- 7 1 / 4 " 1'-0" 11 6'- 9 " 3'- 0 " 13 ' - 9 1 / 4 " 13 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " B C 11'-3 1/2"2'-8"9'-8 1/8"3'-7 1/2"7'-9 3/4"12'-9 1/4" EXISTING SITE CONTOUR 10 1 A-3006'-0" X 203B 8'-0"12'-0"X 203A 8'-0"6'-6" T.O. FIN @ BUNKROOM + 86'-5 1/4" 106A WS-03 SH-02 WS-03 SS-04 WS-03 105A (E) EXISITNG WINDOW, RELOCATE CENTERED ON STARWELL BELOW X 106A 8'-3"18'-0" 3'- 0 " M I N OPEN HOSE BIB LOCATION 14 ' - 6 " 203A 1'-6" TO FACE OF FRAMING 1'-6" TO FACE OF FRAMING 1'- 7 " 8'- 0 " 12'-0"2'-0"6'-6" 1'- 7 " 8'- 0 " 8'- 2 " 18 ' - 6 " SPA ELECTRIC PANEL AND SHUTOFF CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE 1/4" = 1'-0" 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 PROP. SOUTH ELEVATION 23005.00 A-2031/4" = 1'-0"A-203 1 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 11/29/2024 LAND USE 76 ELEVATION / SECTION GENERAL NOTES 1.ALL ROOF PITCHES SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE ROOF PLAN. 2. VERIFY FRAMING HEIGHTS FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS WITH SELECTED MANUFACTURERS ROUGH OPENING SPECIFICATIONS. 3. ALL DOWNSPOUTS TO BE TIED INTO PERIMETER DRAIN SYSTEM IF EXISTING OR PROPOSED -UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS. 4. PCONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXTERIOR MATERIALS, FINISHES, AND COLORS WITH THE OWNER AND THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OR APPLICATION. 5. IF PROVIDED, SEE ENLARGED WALL SECTIONS FOR TYPICAL EXTERIOR ASSEMBLIES. 6. EXISTING WINDOWS AND DOORS DENOTED AS: (E). FINISH KEY - EXTERIOR FINISHES SYNTHETIC WOOD SHAKE SHINGLE WOOD SIDING STONE VANEER COPPER STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF CODE DESCRIPTION ST-01 SH-02 WS-03 SS-04 T.O. FINISH @ MAIN L.L. + 98'-0" T.O. UPPER LEVEL F.F. + 109'-11" T.O. EXISTING L.L. F.F. + 88'-11" DA G T.O. F.F. -L.L. (HIGH) + 90'-10" T.O. FINISH @ MAIN LEVEL (HIGH) + 100'-0" T.O LOW RIDGE + 128'-5 1/4" T.O. PROPOSED L.L. SLAB + 86'-3 3/4" NO 18 ' - 6 1 / 4 " 9'- 1 1 " 2'- 0 " 7'- 2 " 1'- 1 1 " 2'- 7 1 / 4 " 37'-10 5/8"17'-1 3/4"23'-2 1/2" C 3'- 0 " T.O. HIGH RIDGE + 132'-8 3/4" 13 ' - 9 1 / 4 " E 11 ' - 3 " EXISTING SITE CONTOUR T.O. FINISH 7909'-3 1/4" D 15 ' - 3 1 / 4 " T.O. FINISH 7909'-0" GRADE T.O. GRADE T.O. FINISH 7907'-10 1/4" T.O. GRADE 4'- 3 1 / 2 " 2 A-300 1 A-301 PROPOSED STANDING SEAM COPPER ROOF PROPOSED DAVINCI ROOF TILES PROPOSED STANDING SEAM COPPER ROOF PROPOSED STANDING SEAM COPPER ROOF X 106B 7'-0"3'-0" X 110C 9'-8"5'-10" 211A T.O. FIN @ BUNKROOM + 86'-5 1/4" SS-04 SH-02 WS-03 SH-02 WS-03 WS-03 WS-03 6'- 1 0 " HOSE BIB LOCATION 11 ' - 0 " 205A CO P Y R I G H T © 2 0 2 3 T H U N D E R B O W L A R C H I T E C T S THUNDERBOWL ARCHITECTS 300 S. SPRING ST. SUITE 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 710-2938 AR C H I T E C T S TH U N D E R B O W L SCALE PROJECT DATE 1/4" = 1'-0" 63 3 W . F R A N C I S AS P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 6 1 1 PA R C E L I D # 2 7 3 5 1 2 4 2 6 0 0 1 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION 23005.00 A-2041/4" = 1'-0"A-204 1 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION 11/29/2024 LAND USE 77 9 . 7 ' 6.9' 16 . 7 ' 12.6' 34 . 5 ' 13.7' 23 . 3 ' 16.1' 9.2' 1 1 . 7 ' 1.6' 6 . 8 ' 1.8' 7 . 1 ' 29.3 ' 3 . 4 ' 2.9' 9 . 7 ' 4.5' WO O D P O R C H CO N C R E T E P O R C H BA S E M E N T ST E P S FL A G S T O N E W A L K CONC R E T E PARKI N G A R E A WEST F R A N C I S S T R E E T NO R T H 6 T H S T R E E T S 1 4 ° 5 0 ' 4 9 " W 7 6 . 4 1 ' N75° 0 9 ' 1 1 " W 6 0 . 0 0 ' BA S I S O F B E A R I N G S N1 4 ° 5 0 ' 4 9 " E 1 0 0 . 0 0 ' S75° 0 9 ' 1 1 " E 6 0 . 0 0 ' S 1 4 ° 5 0 ' 4 9 " W 14 . 4 4 ' E G S SPA CO N C R E T E P A T I O BU I L D I N G O V E R H A N G TW O - S T O R Y G A R A G E TWO- S T O R Y W/BA S E M E N T A R E A STON E & W O O D H O U S E 633 W E S T F R A N C I S S T R E E T (7 7 . 6 5 ' R I G H T - O F - W A Y ) 7907 7907 79 0 8 791 0 7909 7908 7909 790 9 7 9 1 0 7908 PROPERTY LINE TABLE LINE L1 L2 L3 L4 BEARING S35° 42' 53"E S54° 17' 07"W S35° 42' 53"E S54° 15' 38"W DISTANCE 4.31' 1.25' 1.50' 5.82' L 1 L2 L3 L4 REED S H O U S E COND O M I N I U M ALLEY BLOC K 2 2 GRAV E L A L L E Y DYH S FF E 79 1 0 . 6 0 BASE M E N T 7902 . 4 4 C O N C R E T E WALK PA V E D R O A D W A Y (74.7 2 ' R I G H T - O F - W A Y ) PAVE D R O A D W A Y CA N T I L E V E R INLET 7905. 6 SITE BENCH MARK FOUND 1" ALUMINUM CAP ILLEGIBLE ELEVATION:7906.50 FOUN D R E B A R & 1 - 1 / 4 " YELLO W P L A S T I C C A P L S 9 1 8 4 FOUN D R E B A R & 1 - 1 / 4 " YELLO W P L A S T I C C A P L S 9 1 8 4 W. W . W.W . W . W . 6.0'(T I E ) 4 . 0 ' (T I E ) UP P E R D E C K 31 . 3 ' ( T I E ) CITY OF ASPEN GPS CONTROL MONUMENT #7 CITY OF ASPEN GPS CONTROL MONUMENT #9 S 3 2 ° 1 2 ' 4 6 " E 5 2 . 4 8 ' ( T I E ) N1 6 ° 5 8 ' 1 0 " E 1 0 6 7 . 9 8 ' ( T I E ) LOT C LOT B LOT A (21.0 7 ' R I G H T - O F - W A Y ) PROP E R T Y A R E A 6,019 ± S Q . F T . 0.138 ± A C R E S STEPS ST E P S MAIL B O X EDGE O F P A V E M E N T ED G E O F P A V E M E N T DR A I N A G E S W A L E 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 5.0' R E A R A C C E S S O R Y S E T B A C K 10.0' R E A R P R I N C I P A L S E T B A C K 15.0' F R O N T A C C E S S O R Y SETB A C K 10.0' F R O N T P R I N C I P A L SETB A C K 5. 0 ' S I D E S E T B A C K 5. 0 ' S I D E SE T B A C K PARKI N G SIGN ST E P S FFE 791 0 . 6 0 FFE 790 8 . 5 9 79 1 1 . 1 7 FF E 79 0 7 . 1 0 79 0 6 . 9 1 7 9 0 6 . 7 4 790 7 . 3 8 790 7 . 6 1 7907.61 7906.94 790 8 . 5 0 791 0 . 5 4 791 0 . 5 5 791 0 . 4 5 7910.49 79 1 0 . 5 3 79 0 9 . 0 79 0 9 . 5 4 7908. 8 6 7908. 8 3 79 0 8 . 2 3 79 0 8 . 0 6 7 9 0 7 . 8 7 7 9 1 1 . 0 8 79 0 7 . 8 6 79 0 7 . 4 7 791 0 . 4 5 79 0 8 . 7 3 ST E P VICINITY MAP WATER LINE SEWER LINE TELEPHONE LINE GAS LINE CATV LINE ELECTRIC LINE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL DYH S FIRE HYDRANT SANITARY MANHOLE ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER GAS METER ELECTRICAL METER G LEGEND E SURVEYOR 'S CERTIFICATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, HOWEVER IT IS NOT A GUARANTY OR WARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. LINEAR ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LESS THAN 1:15,000. NOTES: 5.THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE COMMITMENT, THEREFORE, ANY EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE THAT MAY AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY TRUE NORTH COLORADO, LLC. 6.ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88) REFERENCED FROM NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY (NGS) STATION S159 HAVING AN ELEVATION OF 7720.88. 7.CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1-FOOT. 8.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES WITHIN ZONE X WHICH IS 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD HAZARD ACCORDING TO FEMA FIRM MAP NO. 08097C0354E WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 15, 2019. 9.NO NATURAL HAZARDS OR SLOPES OVER 20% EXISTS ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. W/TOPOGRAPHY LOTS A & B, BLOCK 22-CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO PARCEL NO. 27350-124-26-001 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT TRUE NORTH COLORADO LLC. A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY P.O. BOX 614 - 386 MAIN STREET UNIT 3 NEW CASTLE, COLORADO 81647 (970) 984-0474 www.truenorthcolorado.com PROJECT NO: 2024-105 DATE:February 6, 2024 DRAWN RPK SURVEYED DJB-GBL SHEET 1 OF 1 TRUENORTH A LAND SURVEYING AND MAPPING COMPANY 10' 5'20' SCALE: 1" = 10' N PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECEPTION NO. 696909 PARCEL A LOTS A AND B, BLOCK 22, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN STATE OF COLORADO. PARCEL B A PORTION OF THE COMMON ELEMENTS OF THE REED HOUSE CONDOMINIUM, ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM MAP THEREOF RECORDED OCTOBER 28, 1977 IN PLAT BOOK 6 AT PAGE 38, AND AS DEFINED AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR THE REEDS HOUSE RECORDED OCTOBER 28, 1977 lN BOOK 337 AT PAGE 484, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THAT PORTION OF THE REEDS HOUSE CONDOMINIUM FORMERLY KNOWN AS A PORTION OF LOT C, BLOCK 22, CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID COMMON ELEMENTS, BEING ALSO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT C, WHENCE THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT C BEARS NORTH 14 DEGREES 50'49" EAST 14.44 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 35 DEGREES 42'53" EAST 4.31 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54 DEGREES 17'07" WEST 1.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 35 DEGREES 42'53" EAST 1.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54 DEGREES 17'07" WEST 5.81 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT C; THENCE NORTH 14 DEGREES 50'49" EAST 9.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. COUNTY OF PITKIN STATE OF COLORADO. 0 NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. SET NO. 5 REBAR & 1-1/4" PINK PLASTIC CAP TNC PLS38215 WOOD FENCE CATV PEDESTAL CLEAN-OUT SCALE: 1" = 500' FOUND REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP LS37972 (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) TREE TYPE TRUNK DRIP 1 ASPEN 12''24' 2 ASPEN 10''16' 3 ASPEN 10''16' 4 ASPEN 11''18' 5 ASPEN 10''16' 6 ASPEN 10''16' 7 ASPEN 11''18' 8 ASPEN 10''17' 9 ASPEN 10''16' 10 ASPEN 8''15' 11 COTTONWOOD 65''50' 12 MOUNTAIN MAPLE 12''21' 13 CONIFEROUS 5''10' 14 CONIFEROUS 4''6' 15 CONIFEROUS 7''14' 16 CONIFEROUS 9''16' 17 ASPEN MULTI 14''26' 18 ASPEN 11''18' 19 ASPEN 14''26' 20 CONIFEROUS 11''18' 21 ASPEN 7''12' 22 ASPEN 10''18' 23 ASPEN 6''10' 24 CONIFEROUS 8''14' 25 CONIFEROUS 8''14' 26 CONIFEROUS 13''24' 27 ASPEN MULTI 14''24' 28 ASPEN 7''13' 29 CONIFEROUS 7''12' 30 CONIFEROUS 8''14' 31 CONIFEROUS 12''24' 32 CONIFEROUS 12''24' 33 CONIFEROUS 6''12' 34 CONIFEROUS 7''13' PROPERTY ZONING CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE SECTION 26.710.040 - MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R6) SETBACKS FRONT: PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS: 10 FEET ACCESSORY BUILDINGS: 15 FEET REAR: PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS: 10 FEET ACCESSORY BUILDINGS: 5 FEET PORTION OF PRINCIPAL BUILDING USED SOLELY AS A GARAGE: 5 FEET SIDE: MINIMUM FOR EACH: 5 FEET TOTAL BOTH SIDE YARDS: 15 FEET PLUS 1 FOOT FOR EACH ADDITIONAL 200 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS LOT AREA TO A MAXIMUM OF 25 FEET OF TOTAL SIDE YARD. FRAN C I S S T R E E T HALLA M S T R E E T BLEEK E R S T R E E T 6T H S T R E E T 7T H S T R E E T 5T H S T R E E T MAIN S T R E E T CITY OF ASPEN SMUG G L E R S T R E E T SITE 78 Memorandum TO: Jeffrey Barnhill, Jeffrey.barnhill@aspen.gov Community Development Department FROM: Kyla Smits, kyla.smits@aspen.gov Engineering Department DATE: October 10, 2024 SUBJECT: Engineering Department Referral Comments PROJECT: LPA-24-095, 633 W Francis Non-Conformity Setback Variance COMMENTS: These comments are not intended to be exhaustive, but an initial response to the Land Use application submitted for review. Other requirements may be requested at time of permit. Survey 1. Include Surveyor's Certificate in compliance with the Engineering Standards survey checklist. Surveyor's Certificate shall state that the error of closure is less than 1:15,000. Site Plan 1. The water service line will be required to come into compliance with current standards. Each unit of the duplex should have their own service line unless the meter and backflow areas are in a shared mechanical space accessible to both units at any time. 2. A full utility plan will be required at time of permit. Each unit should have their own utility service lines if a common mechanical space is not available. Reach out to all utility providers to discuss ability to serve for proposed utility demands. 3. Two curb cuts are not permitted. With the addition of the garage off the alley, which is the preferred access point, the parking encroachment off North 6th Street must be removed. 4. This project appears it will trigger a major level engineering review. A fully compliant utility plan, grading and drainage report, and other applicable documents will be required at time of permit. 79 TO: Jeffrey Barnhill, Senior Planner FROM: Sammi Montalto, Planner I DATE: November 4, 2024 RE: 633 W Francis/ LPA-24-095 / Zoning Comments Thank you for the opportunity to provide Zoning comments on this project. 1. Zone District a. The zone district for this property is listed as R-15B but this parcel is in the R-6 zone district. 2. Floor Area Calculations a. Allowable floor area: 3,605.7 for a duplex in the R-6 zone district with a 6,019 square foot lot. 3. Duplex a. Per the definition of duplex: A residential building on a single lot or parcel comprised of two (2) attached Dwelling Units in either an over-and-under or side-by-side configuration having a common unpierced above-grade wall of at least one (1) story in height and ten (10) feet in length, or a common unpierced wall or floor/ceiling as applicable. Each unit in the duplex shall contain no less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the total floor area of the duplex structure. b. Since unit 1 is 2,836.19 square feet and unit 2 is 860.64, unit 2 makes up only 20% of the entire duplex structure. This makes the structure a nonconforming duplex. This nonconformity should be brought to P&Z along with the other nonconformities. 4. Setbacks a. This project requires a setback variance for the planters on the second story deck in the front setback, but the larger issue in this project is the side setback: b. The side setbacks are both shown as 5 feet wide. However, this is only the minimum side setback on each side. The minimum combined side yard setback for a 6,019 square foot lot is 15 feet. It appears that this is another way in which the structure is nonconforming, and the new garage will create more of a nonconformity. c. The roof of the proposed garage might project into the east setback more than the allowed 18 inches. This setback line is also nonconforming as is and should be at least 10 feet wide per Sec. 26.710.040.d. This project requires a review in front of the Planning and Zoning Commission due to the floor area of the structure being over what is allowable and is therefore nonconforming. However, there are other nonconformities to keep in mind with this duplex. The duplex itself has a nonconforming ratio between units 1 and 2, and the side yard setbacks do not adhere to the requirement for this lot. The proposed expansion would qualify as an expansion or increase of a nonconformity. If you have any questions, please reach out to me at (970) 787-0446, sammi.montalto@aspen.gov. 80 730 Bay Street – Replacement of Nonconformities Planning and Zoning Commission Page 1 of 10 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Jeffrey Barnhill, AICP, Senior Planner THRU: Ben Anderson, AICP, Community Development Director RE: Replacement of Nonconforming Structures Public Hearing MEETING DATE: December 17, 2024 APPLICANT: Bay Street Owner, LLC, 730 Bay Street, Aspen, CO 81611 REPRESENTATIVE: Mike Kraemer, Kraemer Land Planning, 200 Basalt Center Circle, Suite 201, Basalt, CO 81621 LOCATION: 730 Bay Street, Aspen, CO 81611 ZONING: Low-Density Residential, (R-30), PD overlay (Volk Lot Split, Lot 2) SUMMARY: The applicant requests a continuation of a nonconformity to renovate and reconfigure floor area of a nonconforming structure. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the request for the continuation of the nonconformities at 730 Bay Street. REQUEST OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: The Applicant proposes to remodel and reconfigure floor area in a nonconforming structure. The applicant requests to alter the existing residence in a manner that will decrease the floor area overage on the subject property. Since the existing structure is represented as over allowable floor area/deck area, rearranging and decreasing the existing non-conforming floor area requires a Replacement of nonconforming structure review by the City of aspen Planning and Zoning Commission. Figure 1: Site Vicinity Map 81 730 Bay Street – Replacement of Nonconformities Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 of 10 ❖ Non-conforming structures. (Land Use Code Section 26.312.030.(f)(2) Purposeful destruction) The applicant requests continuation of a nonconformity for the property at 730 Bay Street. Any nonconforming structure that is purposefully Demolished or portion thereof which is purposefully destroyed, may be replaced with a different structure only if the replacement structure is in conformance with the current provisions of this Title or unless replacement of the nonconformity is approved pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 26.430, Special Review. Special Review requires approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission can approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application after considering a recommendation by the Community Development Director based on the criteria outlined in section 26.312.030., Non- conforming structures & section 26.430.040.(b) Replacement of nonconforming structures. BACKGROUND: 730 Bay Street is located in the Low Density Residential (R-30) zone district with a Planned Development (PD) overlay (Volk Lot Split, Lot 2). The lot is approximately 36,938 sq. ft. and there are steep slopes and a building envelope encumbering the property. The existing structure contains a single-family residence and an attached Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU). The parcel was redeveloped in the 1990s with a building permit issued for the single-family residence and ADU in 1994. The property is currently over allowable floor/deck area due to land use code changes since the 1990s. The applicant seeks continuation of a nonconformity to rearrange and reconfigure floor area on site. The applicant proposes as part of this work: to convert 275 sq. ft. of existing unfinished attic into finished accessible floor area, change existing crawlspace into accessible basement floor area, add a 2-level garage car lift in the garage by dropping the slab in the existing garage, remove and reconfigure deck area on site, and install trees and landscaping. Since the applicant requests redeveloping and reconfiguring nonconforming floor area the proposal triggers Special Review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Figure 2: Existing Conditions 82 730 Bay Street – Replacement of Nonconformities Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 of 10 PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes a number of changes to the structure to rearrange and reconfigure the floor area/deck area on site. The applicant proposes decreasing the amount of exposed wall in the lower level of the structure. To that end, the applicant proposes to demolish two large window wells, replace one of the window wells with a smaller window well, convert existing crawlspace to accessible basement space, and lower the depth of the garage to create more wall area. This will decrease the countable floor ar ea of the lower level and allow the applicant to add the accessible attic space to floor area while decreasing the amount of floor area on site overall. Overall, the floor area attributed to the primary structure will be decreasing by 102 sq. ft. The applicant proposes eliminating or decreasing the size of numerous decks on site. Currently the deck area on site constitutes approximately 2,120 sq. ft. of floor area for the property (beyond the 15% allowed exemption for deck area). The applicant proposes reducing the amount of deck overage that counts as floor area to 444.52 sq. ft. This is a decrease of approximately 1,676 sq. ft. of floor area attributed to decks on site. The overall reduction of floor area on site is approximately 1,778 sq. ft. Table 1 demonstrates the changes in floor area calculations by level and deck area. Table 1: Applicant graphic on Existing to Proposed Floor Area on site. Figures 3 thru 9 depict existing and proposed floor area calculations. The graphics depict the changes to the floor area as a result of the reconfiguration/remodel of the proposed project. On the lower level, the window wells will be removed and additional subgrade wall space will be created by lowering the slab in the garage. Additionally, the hot tub deck and bedroom patio one will be eliminated, and a new 36 sq. ft. deck will be accessible off the lower level. On the main level, some decks are being wholly demolished while some others are being remodeled. Finally, the upper level depicts the attic area that will be added to floor area and turned into a finished office. The decks are represented by the light blue color in the graphics. The floor area is represented by the tan color. The garage is represented by the orange color. Finally, the proposed site plan has been included 83 730 Bay Street – Replacement of Nonconformities Planning and Zoning Commission Page 4 of 10 Figure 3: Existing Lower Level Floor Area Figure 4: Proposed Lower Level Floor Area 84 730 Bay Street – Replacement of Nonconformities Planning and Zoning Commission Page 5 of 10 Figure 5: Existing Main Level Floor Area Figure 6: Proposed Main Level Floor Area 85 730 Bay Street – Replacement of Nonconformities Planning and Zoning Commission Page 6 of 10 Figure 7: Existing Upper Level Floor Area Figure 8: Proposed Upper Level Floor Area 86 730 Bay Street – Replacement of Nonconformities Planning and Zoning Commission Page 7 of 10 Figure 9: Proposed Site Plan DISCUSSION: Section 26.312.030 Nonconformities – Non-conforming structures Replacing nonconforming aspects of a structure is subject to Special Review and may be allowed to be replaced or reduced if certain review criteria are met. Staff’s perspective on the authority to continue a nonconformity is shaped by two primary aspects - the intent of the code and the review standards. The purpose statement (Section 26.312.010) of the Nonconformities chapter states: “Within the Zone Districts established by this Title, there exist uses of land, buildings and structures that were lawfully established before this Title was adopted or amended which would be in violation of the terms and requirements of this Title. The purpose of this Chapter is to regulate and limit the 87 730 Bay Street – Replacement of Nonconformities Planning and Zoning Commission Page 8 of 10 continued existence of those uses, buildings and structures that do not conform to the provisions of this Title as amended. It is the intent of this Chapter to permit nonconformities to continue, but not to allow nonconformities to be enlarged or expanded. The provisions of this Chapter are designed to curtail substantial investment in nonconformities in order to preserve the integrity of the zone districts and the other provisions of this Title but should not be construed as an abatement provision.” The Nonconformities chapter also includes language regarding Purposeful Destruction, Section 26.312.030.F.2: “Purposeful destruction. Any nonconforming structure which is purposefully demolished or destroyed may be replaced with a different structure only if the replacement structure is in conformance with the current provisions of this Title or unless replacement of the nonconformity is approved pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 26.430, Special Review…” The proposed development constitutes more than “normal maintenance”. The proposal constitutes “purposeful destruction”. The applicant requests altering the existing residence in a manner that will decrease the floor area overage on the subject property. Since the existing structure is represented as over allowable floor area, rearranging and decreasing the existing non-conforming floor area requires a Replacement of Non-Conforming Structure review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The proposed development does not extend or enlarge any areas that would increase the nonconforming nature of the structure. In fact, the proposed development reduces the floor area on site by approximately 1,700 sq. ft. This is a significant reduction on site that reduces mass, brings the property more into compliance with the zoning code (albeit still nonconforming), and provides no increase to the main structures exterior massing. Most of the proposed work on site involves changing existing crawl space into basement area and existing attic space into an accessible attic space. None of the changes increase the nonconforming aspects of the structure. Section 26.430.040 Special Review – Review standards for special review. The mass, height, density, configuration, amount of open space, landscaping, and setbacks of the proposed development are designed in a manner which is compatible with or enhances the character of surrounding land uses and is consistent with the purposes of the underlying zone district. The purpose of the R-30 zone district is “to provide areas for long-term residential purposes, Short-term Rentals, and customary accessory uses…Lands in the Low-Density Residential (R-30) Zone District are typically located along river frontages in outlying areas of the City. The proposed development continues to provide a long- term residence and an Accessory Dwelling Unit. The proposal reduces the overall floor area on site by approximately 1,700 sq. ft. It reduces the perceived mass of the building by eliminating several deck areas. The proposal involves utilizing existing space inside the structure that currently do not count as floor area and turning them into usable space and countable floor area. This type of reduction in floor area from the proposed development is rarely seen in Aspen, where maximizing floor area and returns on investment, generally take precedent for applicants over reducing floor area. The applicant and representative have made a concerted effort to bring this structure more closely into compliance with the land use code. The applicant is reducing the floor area attributed to the residence by approximately 102.49 sq. ft. and the floor area attributed to deck by approximately 1,676 sq. ft. This is a marked improvement to the bulk and mass of the project. It reduces the floor area by 1,778.49 sq. ft. on the property. The additional floor area is created by decreasing the amount of exposed wall area on the lower level by eliminating two large window wells. That changes the amount of countable floor area for the lower level and decreases the amount by 377.49 sq. ft. That additional floor area allows the applicant to finish out the attic space and add that 275 sq. ft. to the floor area. The applicant will also be lowering the garage slab by about 7’ to 88 730 Bay Street – Replacement of Nonconformities Planning and Zoning Commission Page 9 of 10 accommodate a car lift. This improvement will involve lowering the slab beneath the existing garage and not changing the appearance of the garage area from the exterior. This will be 7’ below finished grade which is allowed by the land use code. This will also add additional below grade unexposed wall area to help the applicant reduce the countable floor area on the lower level of the structure. The proposed development will have a negligible impact on surrounding uses. A majority of the work will involve interior changes to turn the crawlspace into accessible basement area and the attic space (accessed through a hatch) into usable office space (connected with a door on the top floor). The associated deck removals and reconstructions will have no adverse impact on the shading, traffic, parking, or other land use code sections. 730 Bay Street is located in Oklahoma Flats, an interesting neighborhood in town, featuring steep slopes, stream margin review areas, and a plethora of lot configurations. 730 Bay Street is a large lot; however, the net lot area on the parcel is reduced by nearly 13,346.5 sq. ft. due to steep slopes. That is nearly 36% of the gross lot area that is excluded from the net lot area due to steep slopes. Additionally, the property was prescribed a building envelope as part of the Planned Development (Book 27, Page 71). All of the proposed development is within the building envelope or otherwise is an allowed exception into the setback according to current zoning code. No dimensional variations are proposed or increased. The applicant requests no variances for the proposed development as all development is located within the building envelope. The proposal involves reducing wall exposure on the lower level, thus allowing for the addition of the basement and attic areas into the floor area while still reducing overall floor area. The proposal eliminates roughly 1,700 sq. ft. of floor area from the site while eliminating mass and scale on the site. Literal enforcement of the dimensional provisions of the zone district would not cause unnecessary hardship upon the owner by prohibiting reasonable use of the property. The property contains a large single-family dwelling unit with an attached ADU. Reasonable use of the property has been established over the years of this residence and ADU existing. With that being said, staff has identified 4 items that separate this project from similar projects. 1. The decrease and minimization of additional scale and massing on the site; 2. The utilization of existing interior spaces rather than additional exterior development; 3. No variances are requested; and, 4. This proposal will permanently eliminate approximately 1,700 sq. ft. of countable floor area from the site and further bring this site closer into conformity with current code. The applicant succinctly demonstrates in the application that in 1994 the property conformed to the code at the time. In 1994, any deck within 30” of grade was exempt from floor area calculations. Current code dictates that any deck greater than 6” of grade be counted towards floor area. The proposal eliminates 1,676 sq. ft. of deck area on site. The project focuses mostly on interior improvements which minimizes the mass and scale as perceived from the exterior of the site. Dropping the slab of the garage, finishing out crawlspace into basement space, and turning the attic into accessible space all utilize existing spaces within the existing building to reconfigure floor area. The applicant requests no variances to make this work possible and works within their building envelope to extend the lifespan of the existing structure. The applicant and representative have worked diligently to bring this project more into compliance with the current land use code and their efforts do not go unrecognized. Staff recognizes this project as a net positive to bring this property more into compliance with the land use code as it exists today. However, staff recognizes that there is no hardship that would hinder the applicant from reasonable enjoyment and use of the property if this project is not approved. Because of this hardship 89 730 Bay Street – Replacement of Nonconformities Planning and Zoning Commission Page 10 of 10 criteria, and only this criteria, staff must recommend that the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the proposed project or find that a hardship would be caused by denying the proposed project. REFERRAL COMMENTS: The proposed project was referred out to the Parks and Engineering Departments. The Parks and Engineering department conditions consisted of requirements that the applicant will need to fulfill at time of building permit submission. RECOMMENDATION: Community Development staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the request for a continuation of a nonconformity. While the proposal meets most of the code, and staff believes would provide an overall benefit, staff does not believe there would be a hardship on this lot if the project is denied. However, if the commission can make findings that a hardship would be caused by denying the proposed project and that special site circumstances differentiate the property from other properties located in the same zone district, there would be grounds for approval. Additionally, staff does acknowledge that the proposed project – as a remodel – desirably avoids demolition. PROPOSED MOTION: Two motions are proposed. The first denies the resolution while the second approves the resolution. Should the Planning and Zoning Commission support staff’s recommendation, Motion 1 should be read. If the Planning and Zoning Commission disagrees with staff’s recommendation and feels that the review criteria has been met and wishes to approve the variance request, motion 2 should be read: Motion 1. “I move to deny Resolution #___, Series of 2024, granting approval of the proposed garage placement. If the Planning and Zoning Commission decides that the criteria are met for the Continuation of a nonconformity, and disagrees with staff’s recommendation, the following motion may be used: Motion 2. “I move to approve Resolution #___, Series of 2024, granting approval of the proposed garage placement. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution #___, Series of 2024 Exhibit A- Staff Responses to Review Criteria Exhibit B- Application 90 Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution #XX, Series of 2024 Page 1 of 6 RESOLUTION #XX SERIES OF 2024 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION GRANTING APPROVAL FOR SPECIAL REVIEW TO REPLACE A NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE AT THE PROPERTY AT 730 BAY STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 2, VOLK LOT SPLIT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 1991 IN PLAT BOOK 27 AT PAGE 71, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. PARCEL ID: 2737-073-73-002 WHEREAS, the Community Development department received an application from Kraemer Land Planning representing Bay Street Owner LLC, requesting Special Review to replace a Nonconforming Structure related to a proposed remodel at 730 Bay Street: and, WHEREAS, the property is located in the Low-Density Residential (R-30) Zone District with a Planned Development (PD) overlay; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval of the requested development application; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered the application under the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code as identified herein, in particular Section 26.430, Special Review, considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and took and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on December 17th, 2024; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets the applicable review criteria and that approval of the request as described below is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare, and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission approves Resolution #XX, Series of 2024, by a XX to XX (XX – XX) vote, approving the requested land use reviews as identified herein. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: 91 Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution #XX, Series of 2024 Page 2 of 6 Section 1: Approvals The existing single-family dwelling and attached ADU are a non-conforming structure as defined in the Land Use Code. Approval is granted for a remodel as depicted in Exhibit A to this resolution, including: • Converting 275 sq. ft. of existing unfinished attic into finished habitable floor area. • Converting existing crawl space toa full height accessible basement. • Dropping the slab of the garage to install a 2 level garage lift. • Reconfiguring deck area on site. The following table outlines the approved dimensional limitations that are permitted to continue. Minor adjustments may be made to the final proposed floor area due to unforeseen circumstances. All other development not subject to special review shall comply with all rules and regulations as deemed necessary by the City of Aspen upon review of the building permit submittal. Section 2: Engineering Department Conditions of Approval: 1. This project will be a major level engineering review and require a full PE Stamped Civil Plan Set, a PE Stamped Drainage report, and a Stamped Excavation stabilization plan. Other documents may be required at building permit submittal. 2. If the project triggers Major Level 2 review, this will require the property to come into full compliance with the Engineering Standards and the Urban Runoff Management Plan. Section 3: Parks Department Conditions of Approval: 1. Building permit submittal documents shall include a landscape plan, tree protection and preservation plan, a tree mitigation plan (planting plan), and irrigation design plan 2. Applicant shall note on all applicable plan sheets where encroachment into existing Tree Critical Root Zones is proposed to occur. 3. Tree Protection Zones shall be erected at the limits of existing Tree Critical Root Zones to be protected. 4. A development-related tree removal / Critical Root Zone Excavation Permit shall be submitted and reviewed by the City Forester upon Parks & Open Space approval of the master building permit submittal. Section 4: Vested Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a vested property right attaching to and running with the lot for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property right. Section 5: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented Dimensional Limitation Allowable Existing Proposed Floor Area 5016.52 sq. ft. 7,774.34 sq. ft. 5,995.85 sq. ft. 92 Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution #XX, Series of 2024 Page 3 of 6 before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such site development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 6: Existing Litigation This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 7: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. FINALLY, adopted, passed, and approved this 17th day of December, 2024. Approved as to form: Approved as to content: ______________________________ __________________________________ Katherine Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Teraissa McGovern, Chair Attest: _______________________________ Tracy Terry, Deputy Clerk Attachment: Exhibit A – Approved Drawings & Calculations 93 Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution #XX, Series of 2024 Page 4 of 6 Exhibit A – Approved Drawings & Calculations 94 Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution #XX, Series of 2024 Page 5 of 6 95 Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution #XX, Series of 2024 Page 6 of 6 96 730 Bay Street Replacement of Non-conforming Structure Review Criteria 730 Bay Street Planning and Zoning Commission Page 1 of 5 Sec. 26.312.030 Nonconformities – Non-conforming structures. Within the Zone Districts established by this Title, there exist uses of land, buildings and structures that were lawfully established before this Title was adopted or amended which would be in violation of the terms and requirements of this Title. The purpose of this Chapter is to regulate and limit the continued existence of those uses, buildings and structures that do not conform to the provisions of this Title as amended. It is the intent of this Chapter to permit nonconformities to continue, but not to allow nonconformities to be enlarged or expanded. The provisions of this Chapter are designed to curtail substantial investment in nonconformities in order to preserve the integrity of the zone districts and the other provisions of this Title but should not be construed as an abatement provision. (a) Authority to continue. A nonconforming structure devoted to a use permitted in the zone district in which it is located may be continued in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. Staff Response: The property is located in the Low Density Residential (R-30) zone district with a Planned Development Overlay (Volk Lot Split). The existing structure contains a single-family residence and an attached Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU). A detached residential dwelling unit and accessory dwelling units are permitted uses in the R -30 zone district. Staff finds this criterion is met. (b) Normal Maintenance. Normal maintenance to nonconforming structures may be performed without affecting the authorization to continue as a nonconforming structure. Staff Response: The proposed development constitutes more than “normal maintenance”. As such, the applicant applied for Special Review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. (c) Extensions. A nonconforming structure shall not be extended by an enlargement or expansion that increases the nonconformity. A nonconforming structure may be extended or altered in a manner that does not change or that decreases the nonconformity. Staff Response: The proposed development does not extend or enlarge any areas that would increase the nonconforming nature of the structure. In fact, the proposed development reduces the floor area on site by approximately 1,700 sq. ft. This is a significant reduction on site that reduces mass, brings the property more into compliance with the zoning code (albeit still nonconforming), and provides no increase to the main structures exterior massing. Most of the proposed work on site involves changing existing crawl space into basement area and existing attic space into an accessible attic space. None of the changes increase the nonconforming aspects of the structure. Staff finds this criterion is met. (d) Relocation. A nonconforming structure shall not be moved unless it thereafter conforms to the standards and requirements of the zone district in which it is located. Staff Response: The structure is not proposed to be relocated. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. (e) Unsafe Structure. Any portion of a nonconforming structure which becomes physically unsafe or unlawful due to lack of repairs and maintenance and which is declared unsafe or unlawful by a 97 730 Bay Street Replacement of Non-conforming Structure Review Criteria 730 Bay Street Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 of 5 duly authorized City official, but which an owner wishes to restore, repair, or rebuild shall only be restored, repaired, or rebuilt in conformity with the provisions of this Title. Staff Response: The proposed development does not involve any portion of the nonconforming structure being unsafe. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. (f) Ability to restore. 1. Non-purposeful destruction. Any nonconforming structure that is Demolished, or portion thereof which is destroyed by an act of nature or through any manner not purposefully accomplished by the owner, may be restored as of right if a building permit for reconstruction is submitted within twenty-four (24) months of the date of Demolition or destruction. 2. Purposeful destruction. Any nonconforming structure that is purposefully Demolished or portion thereof which is purposefully destroyed, may be replaced with a different structure only if the replacement structure is in conformance with the current provisions of this Title or unless replacement of the nonconformity is approved pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 26.430, Special Review. Any structure which is nonconforming in regards to the permitted density of the underlying zone district may maintain that specific nonconformity only if a building permit for the replacement structure is submitted within twelve (12) months of the date of demolition or destruction. Staff Response: The proposal constitutes “purposeful destruction”. The applicant requests altering the existing residence in a manner that will decrease the floor area overage on the subject property. Since the existing structure is represented as over allowable floor area, rearranging and decreasing the existing non-conforming floor area requires a Replacement of Non-Conforming Structure review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Staff finds this criterion is met. Sec. 26.430.040. Special Review – Review standards for special review. No development subject to special review shall be permitted unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all standards and requirements set forth below. (a) Dimensional requirements. Whenever the dimensional requirements of a proposed development are subject to special review, the development application shall only be approved if the following conditions are met. (1) The mass, height, density, configuration, amount of open space, landscaping and setbacks of the proposed development are designed in a manner which is compatible with or enhances the character of surrounding land uses and is consistent with the purposes of the underlying zone district. (2) The applicant demonstrates that the proposed development will not have adverse impacts on surrounding uses or will mitigate those impacts, including but not limited to the effects of shading, excess traffic, availability of parking in the neighborhood or blocking of a designated view plane. Staff Response: The mass, height, density, configuration, amount of open space, landscaping, and setbacks of the proposed development are designed in a manner which is compatible with or enhances the character of surrounding land uses and is consistent with the purposes o f the underlying zone district. The purpose of the R-30 zone district is “to provide areas for long-term 98 730 Bay Street Replacement of Non-conforming Structure Review Criteria 730 Bay Street Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 of 5 residential purposes, Short-term Rentals, and customary accessory uses…Lands in the Low- Density Residential (R-30) Zone District are typically located along river frontages in outlying areas of the City. The proposed development continues to provide a long-term residence and an Accessory Dwelling Unit. The proposal reduces the overall floor area on site by approximately 1,700 sq. ft. It reduces the perceived mass of the building by eliminating several deck areas. The proposal involves utilizing existing space inside the structure that currently do not count as floor area and turning them into usable space and countable floor area. This type of reduction in floor area from the proposed development is rarely seen in Aspen, where maximizing floor area and returns on investment, generally take precedent for applicants over reducing floor area. The applicant and representative has made a concerted effort to bring this structure more closely into compliance with the land use code. Table 1 is a graphic from the applicant showing the existing to proposed floor area for the development. Table 1: Applicant graphic on Existing to Proposed Floor Area on site. The applicant is reducing the floor area attributed to the residence by approximately 102.49 sq. ft. and the floor area attributed to deck by approximately 1,676 sq. ft. This is a marked improvement to the bulk and mass of the project. It reduces the floor area by 1,778.49 sq. ft. on the property. The additional floor area is created by decreasing the amount of exposed wall area on the lower level by eliminating two large window wells. That changes the amount of countable floor area for the lower level and decreases the amount by 377.49 sq. ft. That additional floor area allows the applicant to finish out the attic space and add that 275 sq. ft. to the floor area. The applicant will also be lowering the garage slab by about 7’ to accommodate a car lift. This improvement will involve lowering the slab beneath the existing garage and not changing the appearance of the garage area from the exterior. This will be 7’ below finished grade which is 99 730 Bay Street Replacement of Non-conforming Structure Review Criteria 730 Bay Street Planning and Zoning Commission Page 4 of 5 allowed by the land use code. This will also add additional below grade unexposed wall area to help the applicant reduce the countable floor area on the lower level of the structure. The proposed development will have a negligible impact on surrounding uses. A majority of the work will involve interior changes to turn the crawlspace into accessible basement area and the attic space (accessed through a hatch) into usable office space (connected with a door on the top floor. The associated deck removals and reconstructions will have no adverse impact on the shading, traffic, parking, or other land use code sections. Staff finds this criterion is met. (b) Replacement of nonconforming structures. Whenever a structure or portion thereof, which does not conform to the dimensional requirements of the zone district in which the property is located is proposed to be replaced after Demolition or destruction, the following criteria shall be met: (1) The proposed development shall comply with the conditions of Section 26.430.040(a) above; (2) There exist special characteristics unique to the property which differentiate the property from other properties located in the same zone district; (3) No dimensional variations are increased, and the replacement structure represents the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the property; and (4) Literal enforcement of the dimensional provisions of the zone district would cause unnecessary hardship upon the owner by prohibiting reasonable use of the property. Staff Response: The proposed development complies with the conditions of Section 26.430.040(a) as shown above. 730 Bay Street is located in Oklahoma Flats, an interesting neighborhood in town, featuring steep slopes, stream margin review areas, and a plethora of lot configurations. 730 Bay Street is a large lot; however, the net lot area on the parcel is reduced by nearly 13,346.5 sq. ft. due to steep slopes. That is nearly 36% of the gross lot area that is excluded from the net lot area due to steep slopes. Additionally, the property was prescribed a building envelope as part of the Planned Development (Book 27, Page 71). All of the proposed development is within the building envelope or otherwise is an allowed exception into the setback according to current zoning code. No dimensional variations are proposed or increased. The applicant requests no variances for the proposed development as all development is located within the building envelope. The proposal involves reducing wall exposure on the lower level, thus allowing for the addition of the basement and attic areas into the floor area while still reducing overall floor area. The proposal eliminates roughly 1,700 sq. ft. of floor area from the site while eliminating mass and scale on the site. Figure 1: 730 Bay St. Building Envelope 100 730 Bay Street Replacement of Non-conforming Structure Review Criteria 730 Bay Street Planning and Zoning Commission Page 5 of 5 Literal enforcement of the dimensional provisions of the zone district would not cause unnecessary hardship upon the owner by prohibiting reasonable use of the property. The property contains a large single-family dwelling unit with an attached ADU. Reasonable use of the property has been established over the years of this residence and ADU existing. With that being said, staff has identified 4 items that separate this project from similar projects. 1. The decrease and minimization of additional scale and massing on the site; 2. The utilization of existing interior spaces rather than additional exterior development; 3. No variances are requested; and, 4. This proposal will permanently eliminate approximately 1,700 sq. ft. of countable floor area from the site and further bring this site closer into conformity with current code. The applicant succinctly demonstrates in the application that in 1994 the property conformed to the code at the time. In 1994, decks were counted differently than current code. In 1994, any deck within 30” of grade was exempt from floor area calculations. Current code dictates that any deck greater than 6” of grade be counted towards floor area. The proposal eliminates 1,676 sq. ft. of deck area on site. The project focuses mostly on interior improvements which minimizes the mass and scale as perceived from the exterior of the site. Dropping the slab of the garage, finishing out crawlspace into basement space, and turning the attic into accessible space all utilize existing spaces within the existing building to reconfigure floor area. The applicant requests no variances to make this work possible and works within their building envelope to extend the lifespan of the existing structure. The applicant and representative have worked diligently to bring this project more into compliance with the current land use code and their efforts do not go unrecognized. Staff recognizes this project as a net positive to bring this property more into compliance with the land use code as it exists today. However, staff recognizes that there is no hardship that would hinder the applicant from reasonable enjoyment and use of the property if this project is not approved. As such, staff finds all criteria, except criteria (4), to be met. 101 Page | 1. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Bay Street Owner LLC: Special Review – Alteration of a Non- conforming Structure 730 Bay St. September 6, 2024 102 Page | 2. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 September 06, 2024 Bob Narracci Planning Director City of Aspen Community Development 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Bob, Bay Street Owner LLC is the owner of property located at 730 Bay St. and is represented by Kraemer Land Planning and Z-Group Architects in this land use matter. Bay Street Owner LLC (hereafter “Applicant”) requests Special Review – Replacement of a Non-conforming Structure review for a renovation of the existing single family residence. The property was developed with a duly issued building permit and issued a Certificate of Occupancy in 1996. The property contains an attached Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) with a voluntary Deed Restriction. The Applicant proposes to remodel the existing residence and reconfigure floor area to capture previously permitted but unfinished attic space. The Applicant also proposes to change existing crawl space into full height basement, reconfigure existing deck/spa, into a new patio, and excavate below the existing garage for a 2 level garage lift. Landscape improvements are also proposed. Floor area for the property and massing will decrease through an elimination of certain decks that exceeds exemptions and tabulate towards allowable floor area. The Applicant requests Special Review by the Planning and Zoning Commission for replacement/continuation of a non-conformity. A pre-application conference summary was provided on June 5th, 2024 indicating the land use review processes for this request. The following land use application details the request and is broken up into Sections: I. Exhibits II. Background and Existing Conditions III. Land Use and Permit History IV. Proposal V. Land Use Compliance and Review Standards VI. Summary 103 Page | 3. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Section I: Exhibits: The following exhibits are provided for a complete application and relate to Section II through Section V. All exhibits are referenced throughout the body of this application: A. Survey – Peak Surveying, Inc. (8.9.24) B. Proposed Drawings C. Previous Land Use History 1. ADU Deed Restriction – Rec. #371582 2. Certificate of Occupancy – Permit 4-325 (11.25.96) 3. Permit 4-325 Floor Area Calculation Sheet 4. Permit 4-325 Permit Application 5. Permit 4-325 Permit Drawings 6. Volk Split Ordinance No. 43, Series 1989 7. Volk SIA, Rec. No. 314104 8. Reinstated Volk Plat, BK27 PG71 9. Driveway Easement Agreement, Rec. No. 658960 D. Administrative Documents 1. Land Use Application 2. HOA Compliance Form 3. Agreement To Pay Form 4. Letter of Authorization 5. Proof of Ownership – Land Title Ownership Report 6. Pre-application Conference Summary – PRE-24-064 7. Vicinity Map 104 Page | 4. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Section II Background and Existing Conditions: The subject property is located on the north side of the Roaring Fork River in the Oklahoma Flats neighborhood, within the Aspen City limits. The property is comprised of the 2 lot Volk Subdivision containing an historic residence at 720 Bay Street (Lot 1) and a single-family residence, a non-mandatory occupancy ADU, and attached garage at 730 Bay Street (Lot 2). According to the issued survey, the subject property is approximately 36,938 sq. ft. in gross lot size. In review of the Pitkin County Assessor website and archived building files, the existing residence on Lot 2 was originally constructed in 1996 pursuant to Building Permit #4- 325. A Certificate of Occupancy for the residence has been issued to the existing residence and is retained in City files. The property is bordered by residential development on the north and west. A city trail borders the property to the east that allows pedestrian and bicycle public access through the Oklahoma Flats neighborhood. The Bay Street Right of Way (ROW) borders the subject property to the south. Legal access to the property is provided by both E Frances Street and Bay Street, with Bay Street holding the property address. Figure 1: 730 Bay Street 2022 Aerial Photo. Property outlined in GREEN. 105 Page | 5. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Property Zoning: R-30 (Low Density Residential – 30,000 sq. ft. minimum gross lot area) Table 1: R-30 Zoning Requirements Minimum Gross Lot Area: 30,000 sq. ft. Lot Size (per survey): 36,938 sq. ft. Net Lot Area River or natural water body Slope deductions Slopes > 20% up to 30% at 50% Slopes > 30% at 100% 0 sq. ft. (-)1,623.6 sq. ft. (-) 11,722.9 sq. ft. 23,608.62 sq. ft. Allowable Floor Area: 5,016.52 sq. ft. Front Yard Setback: 25’ principal 30’ accessory Minimum Side Yard Setback: 10’ Rear Yard Setback: 10’ principal 5’ accessory Height Limit: 25’ Existing residence 106 Page | 6. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Section III Previous Land Use & Building Permit History: Volk Lot Split – 1989 • Ord. No. 46, Series of 1989 • Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Rec. #314104) • Reinstated Volk Plat (Bk. 27 Pg. 71) The City of Aspen approved the Volk Lot Split (a.k.a “Subdivision”) pursuant to City Council Ordinance No. 43, Series 1989. This Ordinance executed the final plat and established conditions of the subdivision relating to vested property rights and applicability of past and future Code requirements. The Volk Subdivision plat was approved and recorded in 1989 and later amended and reinstated pursuant to the Plat filed at BK27 PG71. The City Ordinance is silent to any PUD specifics. A Subdivision Improvements Agreement (SIA) was executed between the owner and the City of Aspen establishing Volk subdivision parameters. Building envelopes are identified on the plat which includes a note that states the envelopes: “…apply only to the two (2) single family residences and their respective accessory dwelling units. All other accessory buildings and uses may be located outside of their designated building envelopes.” All buildings are located within the platted building envelope for Lot 2. Figure 2: Volk Lot Split Subdivision/PUD 107 Page | 7. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Building Permit 4-325 – 1994-96 The building permit enabling construction of the current single family residence was issued by the City of Aspen building department on September 9th, 1994. A Certificate of Occupancy was issued on November 25th, 1996. Building permit records include floor area calculations and floor plans that demonstrate the single family residence was in compliance with the maximum allowable floor area and floor area calculation methodology in the code at that time. Floor plans from the original construction of the residence are included in the application. Since the permit was approved and a Certificate of Occupancy was issued, there have been a number of code changes that have resulted in the current non-conforming status: 1. Net Lot Area – Steep Slope Deductions: The 1994 permit’s floor area calculation did not include net lot area deductions for steep slopes. The maximum allowable floor area in 1994 was 5,813 sq. ft. That is the allowable floor area under current code based on gross lot area. Current code uses net lot area to determine allowable floor area. Accounting for current steep slope deductions and the net lot area calculation, the current maximum allowable floor area for the property is 5,016.52 sq. ft. The inclusions of the net lot area steep slope deduction reduce the maximum allowable floor area of the property by 800 sq. ft., which contributes to the non-conforming status of the property today. 2. Deck Exemption: In 1994, any deck that was within 30” of grade was exempt and not included in the 15% deck exemption or floor area calculations. Under current code, any deck that is more than 6” above grade counts toward the properties deck area total. Exterior stairs are more strictly tabulated along with roof overhang calculation methodologies. These changes have a significant impact on the floor area calculations because in 1994, the property only included 850 sq. ft. of deck. 3. Garage exemption: the 1994 permit exempted 500 sq. ft. of garage from the floor area calculation. Current code only exempts 375 sq. ft. of garage floor area. 4. ADU Exemption: in 1994, 250 sq. ft. of the ADU was exempt from floor area. Under current code, because the ADU is attached and not a for sale unit, it does not qualify for a floor area exemption. Of note, in 1994 detached ADU’s were prohibited unless there was alley access, now detached ADUs are generally required. The result of these code changes is that the property now legally exceeds the maximum allowable floor area when calculated using the current methodologies. No changes from the originally permitted structure have occurred. The residence is considered a legally established non-conforming structure. 108 Page | 8. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Section IV Proposal: The Applicant requests Special Review approval for the following development activities: • Convert 275 sq. ft. of existing unfinished attic into finished habitable floor area. The use of the new attic will be a home office. • Change existing 5’6” crawl space into full height basement. Add a 2 level garage lift. • Remove a lower level deck and outdoor spa to create new on-grade patio and new spa lowered into grade. • Reconfigure a rear deck. • Install trees and a landscape wall to better screen from E. Francis Street. To balance the increase, the Applicant proposes to remove deck floor area and basement wall exposure that tabulates towards floor area. Removing exterior deck area will reduce the perceived mass of the residence thereby allowing an existing attic space conversion. This results in reduced final calculated floor area. Removal of the deck eliminates an appended element that contributes to the perceived mass of the legal non-conforming structure. Figure 3: Interior attic conversion to office space. Note: no change to exterior of structure. 109 Page | 9. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Figure 4: Street facing deck to be removed in GREEN Figure 5: Rear deck to be removed in GREEN Reconfigured rear deck 110 Page | 10. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 This reduction in perceived mass is consistent with the purpose and intent of the floor area regulations of the land use code to limit bulk and mass of structures, and is consistent with the intent and purpose of the non-conformities section. The Applicant proposes to remodel and extending the life of an existing structure, which aligns with other policies as stated by the City Council and re-enforced by the land use code. Demolition of the structure is not proposed. This application is a result of technical calculation methodologies that have changed over time and reduces the massing of the structure and more efficiently utilizes the existing building envelope based on the current owner’s preferences. Figure 6: Existing deck and spa to be lowered for new on grade patio and spa. Viewed from E. Francis Street. 111 Page | 11. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Table 2: 1994 Floor Area Summary: 1994 Calc* Upper Level 1,297 sq. ft. Main Level 3,600.5 sq. ft. Lower Level 965 sq. ft. Total ADU 528 sq. ft. ADU Exemption -250 sq. ft. Garage Exemption - 500 sq. ft. Deck Area 850 sq. ft. Allowable Deck Exemption 872 sq. ft. Deck Area included in Total FA 0 sq. ft. Total 5,112.5 sq. ft.** * Based on permit records using methodology in the code at that time, see Exhibit C.3. ** 1994 Allowable Floor Area = 5,813 sq. ft. Table 3: Current Floor Area Summary*: Existing Change Proposed Upper Level 1,114 sq. ft. (+) 275 (attic) 1,389 sq. ft. Main Level** 3,349 sq. ft. No Change 3,349 sq. ft. Lower Level*** 1,190.82 sq. ft. (-) 377.49 sq. ft. 813.33 sq. ft. Total Deck 2,873 sq. ft. (-) 1,676 sq. ft. 1,197 sq. ft. Exempt Deck 752.48 sq. ft. -- 752.48 sq. ft. Exempt Front Porch 435 sq. ft. (-) 5 sq. ft. 430 sq. ft. Deck Area Attributable to Calculated Floor Area 2,120.52 sq. ft. (-) 1,676 sq. ft. 444.52 sq. ft. Total Calculated Floor Area 7,774.34 sq. ft. (-) 1,778.49 sq. ft. 5,995.85 sq. ft. * Using current measurement methodology in the Code. ** Includes ADU ***Includes Garage (-375 Sq. ft. Exemption) 112 Page | 12. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Section V Land Use Code Review Standards: Land Use Code Chapter 26.304 – Common Development Review Procedures Applicant Response: The Applicant understands the requirements of this section. A pre- application summary was provided on June 5th, 2024. The deposit outlined in the pre-app will be paid upon notification of completeness. If the Planning and Zoning Commission grants approval, the Applicant understand that approval will be documented by issuance Resolution and Development Order that will include a three year vested right. Land Use Code Section 26.312.030 – Non-conforming structures includes the following relevant code language: (a) Authority to continue. A nonconforming structure devoted to a use permitted in the zone district in which it is located may be continued in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. (b) Normal maintenance. Normal maintenance to nonconforming structures may be performed without affecting the authorization to continue as a nonconforming structure. (c) Extensions. A nonconforming structure shall not be extended by an enlargement or expansion that increases the nonconformity. A nonconforming structure may be extended or altered in a manner that does not change or that decreases the nonconformity. (f) Ability to restore. 2) Purposeful destruction. Any nonconforming structure that is purposefully Demolished or portion thereof which is purposefully destroyed, may be replaced with a different structure only if the replacement structure is in conformance with the current provisions of this Title or unless replacement of the nonconformity is approved pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 26.430, Special Review. Any structure which is nonconforming in regards to the permitted density of the underlying zone district may maintain that specific nonconformity only if a building permit for the replacement structure is submitted within twelve (12) months of the date of demolition or destruction. Applicant Response: The structure contains a residential use which is permitted in the R-30 Zone District. The proposed development activities will change existing uninhabitable space into an office but reduce overall floor area by eliminating deck area. The scope results in a reduction in massing as appended elements are eliminated, and only interior space is reconfigured. Expansion and/or enlargement of the nonconformity are not proposed. Demolition is not proposed. The application requests the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the Special Review request as described. in a legally established non-conforming structure. Land Use Code Section 26.430.040.A – Special Review Dimensional Requirements: 113 Page | 13. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 (a) Dimensional requirements. Whenever the dimensional requirements of a proposed development are subject to special review, the development application shall only be approved if the following conditions are met. 1) The mass, height, density, configuration, amount of open space, landscaping and setbacks of the proposed development are designed in a manner which is compatible with or enhances the character of surrounding land uses and is consistent with the purposes of the underlying zone district. 2) The applicant demonstrates that the proposed development will not have adverse impacts on surrounding uses or will mitigate those impacts, including but not limited to the effects of shading, excess traffic, availability of parking in the neighborhood or blocking of a designated view plane. Applicant Response: The proposal will be in compliance with height, density, lot configuration, open space, landscaping and setback requirements for the R-30 zone district. Due to Land Use Code changes to deck calculations, among other changes, existing deck area exceeds the 15% deck exemption and contributes to the majority of the legal non-conforming floor area on the property. The property will continue to be used as a single family residence, consistent with the surrounding neighborhood, and the use will not change. The proposal has no adverse impacts relating to shading, traffic, parking and all other applicable land use regulations. Land Use Code Section 26.430.060.B – Special Review, Replacement of Non- conforming Structures: (b) Replacement of nonconforming structures. Whenever a structure or portion thereof, which does not conform to the dimensional requirements of the zone district in which the property is located is proposed to be replaced after Demolition or destruction, the following criteria shall be met: 1) The proposed development shall comply with the conditions of Section 26.430.040(a): Applicant Response: As described above, the development proposal complies with Section 26.430.060(a). 2) There exist special characteristics unique to the property which differentiate the property from other properties located in the same zone district; Applicant Response: The property contains steep slopes that contribute to significant net lot area reductions and reduced floor area. Since the property was developed in the 1990’s, deck calculations have become more strictive. These conditions are unique to this property. 3) No dimensional variations are increased, and the replacement structure represents the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the property; and Applicant Response: The residence is not being replaced and an interior remodel is only proposed. Floor area will not be increased by this application and will be reduced. Special Review approval will enable the current property to be renovated, enabling its reasonable use. A variance is not requested. 4) Literal enforcement of the dimensional provisions of the zone district would cause unnecessary hardship upon the owner by prohibiting reasonable use of the property. 114 Page | 14. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Applicant Response: Renovation of the existing structure is proposed and no additions or increases in massing or floor area are contemplated. Massing of the structure will be reduced by removing appended massing elements – exterior decks. The non-conformities section is intended to prevent expansions or enlargements to non-conforming elements, which is not the case with this application. To prohibit renovating and reconfiguration of the existing residence would prevent needed maintenance upgrades and create an unnecessary hardship by preventing a reasonable and practical interior remodel that does not result in an increase in floor area but reduces floor area. Land Use Code Section 26.710.080 – Low-Density Residential (R-30) Zone District Applicant Response: The property is approximately 36,939 sq. ft., which exceeds the minimum Gross Lot Area required in this zone district (requirement = 30,000 sq. ft.). The property is not square, but it has two street facing lot lines. The Bay St. lot line is ~110’ in length, the Francis St. Lot line is ~155’ in length – each comply with the minimum lot width requirement (100’). Compliance with floor area limitations of the zone district is enumerated in Table 2. Floor area will remain consistent with existing floor area. The property currently complies with all applicable setback requirements, and the proposed renovation will continue to comply with all setbacks. The applicable setbacks for a primary residential structure in this zone district are: • Front = 25’ (30’ for accessory buildings) • Side: 10’ • Rear: 15’ (accessory 5’, all other buildings 30’) The structure complies with the maximum height limit of 25’, no changes are proposed to the height of the structure. Section VI Summary: Thank you for considering this Special Review – Continuation of a Non-conformity application for a renovation and reconfiguration of floor area to a legally established non- conforming structure at 730 Bay St. This request meets and exceeds all the applicable Land Use Code requirements for Special Review approval. This proposal enables a renovation and reconfiguration of existing floor area that will enable the continued use of the existing structure without impactful alterations or redevelopment. The request is consistent with the purpose statement of the Non-conformities section which states, “It is the intent of this Chapter to permit nonconformities to continue, but to not allow nonconformities to be enlarged or expanded. The provisions of this Chapter are designed to curtail substantial investment in non- 115 Page | 15. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 conformities in order to preserve the integrity of the zone districts and other provisions of this Title but should not be construed as an abatement provision.” Floor area will remain the same, but overall massing will be reduced – the proposal does not enlarge or expand the extent of non-conformity. This is a technical change as a result of a minor renovation and reconfiguration of interior programing. The renovation will result in far less than 40% demolition, which is consistent with the intent of numerous other provisions in the land use code. The Applicant has provided all the requested information set forth on the pre-application summary from City of Aspen Community Development Staff. If additional information is needed, the Applicant is more than willing to assist in providing all necessary information for a complete review. Thank you, Mike Kraemer Kraemer Land Planning 116 W W W G G G G G G G T T T T T T T T T T T T T T CT V CT V C T V EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-UE EX-UE EX- U E CTV CTV CTV CTV T X X X T BOULDER BORDER GRAVEL DRIVEWAY SPA GRAVEL DRIVEWAY WOOD DECKCOVERED WOOD PORCH WOOD DECK BOULDER WALL WOOD DECK CONCRETE PATIO T1 T2 T4 T5T6 T7 T8 T9 T10 T12 T11 T14 T16 T18 T21 T13 T22 T24 T26 T25 T30 T29 T31 T32 T33T34 T35 T20 T27 T28 #5 REBAR & ALUMINUM CAP P.L.S. #33645 FOUND BEARS S2°23'11"W 1.38' #5 REBAR & ALUMINUM CAP P.L.S. #33645 FOUND BEARS S69°59'53"W 1.99' #5 REBAR & ALUMINUM CAP P.L.S. #33645 FOUND BEARS S39°13'47"W 2.78' #5 REBAR & ALUMINUM CAP P.L.S. #33645 FOUND BEARS S59°36'50"W 3.56' #5 REBAR & ALUMINUM CAP P.L.S. #33645 TBM = 7884.74' #5 REBAR & ALUMINUM CAP P.L.S. #16129 FOUND FLUSH WITH GROUND 32.5' WITNESS CORNER LOT 2 0.848 ACRES± 730 BAY STREET 2 STORY LOG CABIN W/ WALKOUT ADJOINER SHED ADJOINER SHED TIE PLANTER 20.6' 98 . 9 ' 83.1' STUCCO WALL GAS LINE @ BOILER STAIRS (TYP.) D STORM DRAIN S WV DYH T3 T15 T17 T19 T23 T36 T37T39 T38 T40 T41 T42 T43 T44T45 T46 T47 T48 T49 T50 T51 T52 T53 T54 T59 T55 T58 T57 T56 T60 T61 T62 T63 T64 T65 T66 T67 T68 T69 T70 T71 T72 T73 T74 T75 T76 T77 T78 T79 T80 T81 T82 T83 T84 T85 T86 T87 T88 T89 T90 T91 T92 T93 T94 T95T96 T97 T98 T99 T100 T101 T102 T103 T104 T105 T106 T107 T108 T109 T110T111 T112 T113 T114 T115 T116 T117 T118 T119 T120 T121 T122 T123 T124 T125 T126 T127 T128 T129 T130 T131 T132 T133 T134 T135 T136 N 74° 3 0 ' 0 0 " W 1 1 0 . 0 0 ' N 1 5 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " E 7 5 . 0 0 ' N 74° 3 0 ' 0 0 " W 8 2 . 5 0 ' N 1 5 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " E 1 0 1 . 0 0 ' N 77°30'00 " E 1 5 5 . 5 5 ' S 82°43'33" E 5 5 . 7 3 ' S 1 5 ° 3 0 ' 0 0 " W 2 5 7 . 0 0 ' BA S I S O F B E A R I N G S BOULDER WALL UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE (TYPICAL) UNDERGROUND CABLE TV LINE (TYPICAL) UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE (TYPICAL) UNDERGROUND GAS LINE (TYPICAL) FENCE (TYPICAL) #5 REBAR & ORANGE PLASTIC CAP P.L.S. #16129 FOUND 0.60' BELOW GROUND BEARS S 82°34'15" W 23.04' #5 REBAR & ORANGE PLASTIC CAP P.L.S. #16129 FOUND 0.30' ABOVE GROUND BEARS S 28°05'38" W 26.21' STAIRS CO N C R E T E AP R O N FENCE (TYPICAL) 15.2' 7.3 ' 5.5'3.4'6.7' 3 . 2 ' 9.2' 7.0 ' 20.0' 26 . 0 ' 11.9' 16 . 0 ' 4.2' 26 . 0 ' 24.2' 26 . 5 ' 5.4' 11 . 3 ' 16.4'5.0 ' 15.6' 7.6 ' 21.1' 7.7 ' 7.9' 14 . 2 ' 8.0' 7.4 ' 20.4' WINDOW WELL CO CLEANOUT BUIL D I N G S E T B A C K P E R P L A T B O O K 2 7 P A G E 7 1 B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K P E R P L A T B O O K 2 7 P A G E 7 1 SEWER MANHOLE WATER VALVE FIRE HYDRANT LOT 1 LOT 9 AND 10 BLOCK 3 OKLAHOMA FLATS ADDITION LOT 1 CREEKTREE SUBDIVISION CITY OF ASPEN GIBSON AVENUE PARCEL 2737 NO INFORMATION ASPEN JOY LLC SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED REC NO. 614266 B&Z 2010 REV TRUST WARRANTY DEED REC NO. 441594 BAY S T R E E T ASPH A L T R O A D BAY S T R E E T ASPH A L T P A T H AC AC A.C.UNIT (TYPICAL) WINDOW WELL FOUNTAIN 3.1' 3.1' 2. 2 ' 2. 6 ' RIDGE EL = 7902.20' RIDGE EL = 7902.17' RIDGE EL = 7908.28' RIDGE EL = 7911.18' RIDGE EL = 7904.93' THRESHOLD EL = 7885.00' THRESHOLD EL = 7874.94' THRESHOLD EL = 7874.88' 7874.74' 7874.76' 7879.46' FOUND SPIKE BEARS S 17°02'47" W 76.35' TO NORTHEAST CORNER LOT 2, VOLK LOT SPLIT AND N 63°50'07" W 2.10' TO NORTH CORNER, LOT 1 CREEKTREE SUBDIVISION 7877.96' BUILDING SETBACK PER PLAT BOOK 27 PAGE 71 7877.89' 7877.94' 7877.96' 7878.24' 7878.21' 7877.95' 7874.75' 7874.90' ACCESS EASEMENT AREA A FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOT 2 PER REC. NO. 658960 FRA N C I S S T R E E T 15' R O W FRANCIS S T R E E T 15' ROW UTILITY EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOT 2 PER REC. NO. 658960 ACCESS EASEMENT AREA B FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOT 2 PER REC. NO. 658960 FR A N C I S S T R E E T AS P H A L T R O A D 7 9 0 0 7 8 9 5 7 8 9 0 7 8 8 5 78 8 0 7875 7 8 7 3 7 8 7 5 7 8 8 0 7 9 0 5 S 68°5 2 ' 0 1 " W 1179.4 1 ' S 0 5 ° 1 2 ' 0 6 " E 1 1 2 8 . 6 2 ' CITY OF ASPEN GPS Q159 CITY OF ASPEN GPS 4 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN PER F.E.M.A. 1987 AND PLAT AT BOOK 27 PAGE 71 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD PER F.E.M.A. DATED AUGUST 15, 2019 AS PANEL NO. 08097C0358E E TELEPHONE PEDESTAL E E E E ELECTRIC METER ELECTRIC BOXES ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER 10'X10' ELECTRIC EASEMENT PER REC. NO. 393614 7 9 0 5 7 9 1 0 7 9 1 5 7 9 2 0 SLOPE TABLE NUMBER 1 2 3 MIN. SLOPE 0.000% 20.000% 30.000% MAX. SLOPE 20.000% 30.000% 3000.000% COLOR AREA 21985.02 3247.20 11722.90 NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. ByNO.Date Project NO.RevisionDrawn By: Checked By: Date: Computer File: P.O. Box 1746 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone (970) 625-1954 Fax (970) 579-7150 www.peaksurveyinginc.com S NW E P e a k S u r v ey i ng, Inc. Es t . 2 0 0 7 24008 1 OF 1 BAY STREET OWNER LLC CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO IMPROVEMENT SURVEY VOLK LOT SPLIT, LOT 2 730 BAY ST SMS JRN MARCH 19, 2024 008 .DWG 1 03/25/24 UPDATE SLOPES JRN 2 08/08/24 UPDATE TOPO JRN 3 08/09/24 UPDATE TOPO JRN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY LOT 2, VOLK LOT SPLIT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 1991 IN PLAT BOOK 27 AT PAGE 71 CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO N E S W 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 P e a k S u r v e y i n g , I n c . 020 20 40 8010 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LOT 2, VOLK LOT SPLIT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 1991 IN PLAT BOOK 27 AT PAGE 71 COUNTY OF PITKIN STATE OF COLORADO IMPROVEMENT SURVEY STATEMENT I, JASON R. NEIL, HEREBY CERTIFY TO BAY STREET OWNER LLC., THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE BASED ON MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF AS LAID OUT AND SHOWN HEREON; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT WAS MADE BY ME FROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY OF THE REAL PROPERTY PERFORMED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ON JANUARY 29, 31, FEBRUARY 21, AND JULY 26, 2024; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT IS NOT A GUARANTY OR WARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED; THAT, IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT, I RELIED UPON THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, ORDER NO. Q62017035, DATED EFFECTIVE MARCH 1, 2024; THAT THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL BUILDINGS, IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND ENCROACHMENTS BY OR ON THE REAL PROPERTY AND MATTERS REFERENCED IN SAID TITLE COMMITMENT CAPABLE OF BEING SHOWN ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN, AND THAT THIS PLAT IS IN ACCORDANCE OF AN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT AS SET FORTH IN C.R.S. §38-51-102(9). DATED: AUGUST 09, 2024 BY:___________________________________ JASON R. NEIL, P.L.S. NO. 37935 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PEAK SURVEYING, INC. NOTES: 1) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS, BUILDING SETBACKS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OR IN PLACE AND EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE SHOWN IN THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, ORDER NO. Q62017035, DATED EFFECTIVE MARCH 1, 2024. 2) THE DATE OF THIS SURVEY WAS JANUARY 29, 31, FEBRUARY 21, AND JULY 26, 2024. 3) BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF S 15°30'00" W BETWEEN THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF LOT 2, A NO. 5 REBAR AND ALUMINUM CAP P.L.S. 33645 FOUND IN PLACE AND THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY POINT FOR LOT 2, A NO. 5 REBAR AND ALUMINUM CAP P.L.S. NO. 16129 FOUND IN PLACE. 4) UNITS OF MEASURE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON IS U.S. SURVEY FEET. 5) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE AMENDED AND RESTATED FINAL PLAT OF VOLK LOT SPLIT (A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 1991 IN PLAT BOOK 27 AT PAGE 71, IN THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE. 6) ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON GPS OBSERVATION UTILIZING THE WESTERN COLORADO RTVRN NETWORK (1988 DATUM) YIELDING AN ON-SITE ELEVATION OF 7884.74' ON THE SOUTHEASTERN CORNER OF LOT 2 AS SHOWN. CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. 7) THERE WAS APPROXIMATELY 24-48" OF SNOW AND ICE ON THE GROUND AT THE TIME OF THE JANUARY-FEBRUARY SURVEY. 8) THE BOUNDARY AS SHOWN IS THE PLATTED VOLK LOT SPLIT LINEWORK. IT IS BELIEVED BY PSI THAT CORNERS SET BY THE PREVIOUS SURVEYOR AS SHOWN HAVE BEEN SET IN ERROR. SUBSTANTIAL BOUNDARY SEARCH AND ANALYSIS WILL BE REQUIRED TO ASSESS ADJOINER AND SUBJECT PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINES. TREE CHART COL O R A D O L I CE N S E D P R O F E SSIONAL L A N D S U RVEYO R JAS O N R . NE I L 37935 Exhibit A 11 7 Sheet #: Copyright 2024 Z-Group Architects, P.C. Project number: Construction Date: Prepared By: Checked By: Sheet Name: Jurisdiction Use: Seal: 9/ 6 / 2 0 2 4 2 : 4 2 : 2 4 P M A-0.01 COVER SHEET OF E R R E S I D E N C E R E M O D E L 2304 UNKNOWN DUNN 73 0 B A Y S T R E E T As p e n , C O 8 1 6 1 1 SH SHEET INDEX: ARCHITECTURAL PROJECT SCOPE •• •• •• (SEE INDIVIDUAL DISCIPLINE COVER SHEETS FOR SHEET INDEXES) GENERAL INFORMATION, ZONING AND CODE ANALYSISGENERAL INFORMATION, ZONING AND CODE ANALYSIS (INCLUDED IN ARCHITECTURAL INDEX) SURVEYSURVEY LANDSCAPELANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURALARCHITECTURAL This Document Set pertains to Landuse applicationReplacement of Non-conforming Structure Review Interior renovation of existing structure.Scope: SHEET LISTSHEET LIST A-0.01 COVER SHEET SURVEY L.0.03 OVERALL SITE PLAN L.3.00 PLANTING PLAN A-0.10Z CHARACTER DEPICTION A-0.11Z FAR CALCULATION - EXISTING A-0.12Z FAR - EXISTING EXPOSURE A-0.13Z FAR CALCULATIONS - PROPOSED A-0.14Z FAR - PROPOSED EXPOSURE A-0.05Z FAR BUILDING SECTIONS A-002D FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING LOWER LEVEL A-003D FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING GRADE LEVEL A-004D FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING SECOND LEVEL A-102 FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL A-103 FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED GRADE LEVEL A-104 FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED SECOND LEVEL DISCIPLINE SEQUENCE: CONTACT DIRECTORY PROJECT INFORMATION SURVEY : ARCHITECTURAL HEIGHT REFERENCE 7885' = 100'-0" VICINITY MAP PROJECT LOCATION OWNER:Jonathan & Effie Ofer 730 BAY STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 CONTACT: JJ OFER jjofer@gmail.com ARCHITECT:Z-GROUP ARCHITECTS, P.C. 208 MIDLAND AVE. BASALT, CO 81621 970-925-1832 OFFICE CONTACT: STEVEN DUNN 970-309-8233 steve@zgrouparchitects.com SURVEYOR:PEAK SURVEYING, INC P.O. BOX 1746 RIFLE, CO 81650 970-625-1954 OFFICE CONTACT: JASON NEIL 970-987-1382 jason@peaksurveyinginc.com SPECS.: MEP: STRUCTURAL: CIVIL: CONTRACTOR: LANDSCAPE:CONNECT ONE DESIGN 350 MARKET STREET, SUITE 307 BASALT, CO 81621 970-355-5457 OFFICE CONTACT: KATIE TABOR 970-618-3324 kt@connectonedesign.com PROJECT: OFER RESIDENCE 730 BAY STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 PARCEL ID: 273707373002 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE SURVEY AND PLATS ZONE DISTRICT: R-30 OCCUPANCY TYPE: R-1 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V-B SPRINKLER: NOT SPRINKLERED PROPERTY SIZE: 0.848 ACRES BLDG. AREAS: REF. AREA PLANS HEIGHT: 31'-8" NON CONFORMING SETBACKS: SEE PLAT BOOK 27/PAGE 71 ADOPTED CODES:CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE BUILD. CODE: 2021 ICC SERIES 2017 ICC A117.1 ELECT. CODE: NEC (CURRENT STATE ADOPTION) No. Description Date 1 CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING APPLICATION Exhibit B 118 119 120 Sheet #: Copyright 2024 Z-Group Architects, P.C. Project number: Construction Date: Prepared By: Checked By: Sheet Name: Jurisdiction Use: Seal: 9/ 6 / 2 0 2 4 2 : 4 2 : 3 8 P M A-0.10Z CHARACTER DEPICTION OF E R R E S I D E N C E R E M O D E L 2304 UNKNOWN Author 73 0 B A Y S T R E E T As p e n , C O 8 1 6 1 1 Checker No.Description Date 1 PAINT EAVE & TRIM CHARCOLE STAIN LOG SIDING NATURAL GRAY 121 UP DN DN DN UP DN DN UP UP DN 2 A-0.15Z UPPER LEVEL - 1044 SF DECK - 140 SF ATTIC DECK 94 SF STORAGE 70 SF OPEN TO BELOW 1 A-0.15Z 3 A-0.15Z 2 A-0.15Z MAIN LEVEL - 3,349 SF DECK 1 1,140 SF FRONT PORCH EXEMPT DECK 2 131SF ADU DECK 3 120 SF ADU DECK 4 210 SF 1 A-0.15Z 3 A-0.15Z ADU 2 A-0.15Z BASEMENT LEVEL - 1,960 SF WINDOW WELL HOT TUB DECK 506 SF BEDROOM PATIO 1 441 SF DECK - 91 SF WI N D O W W E L L GARAGE 594 SF 1 A-0.15Z 3 A-0.15Z CRAWL SPACE EX I S T I N G 6 ' OV E R H A N G I N G D E C K Sheet #: Copyright 2024 Z-Group Architects, P.C. Project number: Construction Date: Prepared By: Checked By: Sheet Name: Jurisdiction Use: Seal: 9/ 6 / 2 0 2 4 2 : 4 2 : 3 8 P M A-0.11Z FAR CALCS-EXISTING OF E R R E S I D E N C E R E M O D E L 2304 UNKNOWN Author 73 0 B A Y S T R E E T As p e n , C O 8 1 6 1 1 Checker No.Description Date 1 1/8" = 1'-0"1 FAR EXISTING - UPPER LEVEL 1/8" = 1'-0"3 FAR EXISTING - MAIN LEVEL 1/8" = 1'-0"4 FAR EXISTING - LOWER LEVEL 122 MAIN LEVEL100'-0" UPPER LEVEL 110'-0" LOWER LEVEL90'-0" 245 SQ. FT. 171 SQ. FT. 50 SQ. FT. (2) ANGLED WALLS CRAWL SPACE 2 A-0.15Z MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" UPPER LEVEL110'-0" LOWER LEVEL90'-0" 140 SQ. FT.54 SQ. FT. MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" UPPER LEVEL110'-0" LOWER LEVEL90'-0" CRAWL SPACE BEYOND 213 SQ. FT.29 SQ. FT.98 SQ. FT. 2 A-0.15Z MAIN LEVEL100'-0" UPPER LEVEL110'-0" LOWER LEVEL 90'-0" CRAWL SPACE 353 SQ. FT. 1 A-0.15Z 3 A-0.15Z MAIN LEVEL100'-0" UPPER LEVEL110'-0" LOWER LEVEL 90'-0" 140SQ. FT.179 SQ. FT. MAIN LEVEL100'-0" UPPER LEVEL 110'-0" LOWER LEVEL90'-0" ATTIC117'-4" 53 SQ.FT. MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" UPPER LEVEL110'-0" LOWER LEVEL90'-0" ATTIC117'-4" 24 SF MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" UPPER LEVEL110'-0" LOWER LEVEL90'-0" ATTIC117'-4" 212 SQ. FT.212 SQ. FT. 151 SQ. FT. 60 1 A-0.15Z 3 A-0.15Z Sheet #: Copyright 2024 Z-Group Architects, P.C. Project number: Construction Date: Prepared By: Checked By: Sheet Name: Jurisdiction Use: Seal: 9/ 6 / 2 0 2 4 2 : 4 2 : 4 1 P M A-0.12Z FAR - EXIST. EXPOSURE OF E R R E S I D E N C E R E M O D E L 2304 UNKNOWN Author 73 0 B A Y S T R E E T As p e n , C O 8 1 6 1 1 Checker No.Description Date 1 1/8" = 1'-0"5 FAR-EXISTING EXPOSURE-SOUTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"2 FAR-EXISTING EXPOSURE-NORTH CARETAKER ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"1 FAR-EXISTING EXPOSURE-NORTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"8 FAR-EXISTING EXPOSURE-EAST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"7 FAR-EXISTING EXPOSURE-EAST CARETAKER ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"6 FAR-EXISTING EXPOSURE-SOUTH CARETAKER ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"4 FAR-EXISTING EXPOSURE-WEST GREATROOM ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"3 FAR-EXISTING EXPOSURE-WEST ELEVATION EXPOSED WALL AREA : EAST: 140 SF SOUTH:274 SF WEST:575 SF NORTH:181 SF TOTAL:1,170 SF SUB-GRADE WALL AREA: EAST:289 SF SOUTH:245 SF WEST:84 SF NORTH:353 SF TOTAL:971 SF 123 UP DN DN DN DN DN UP DN UPPER LEVEL - 1044 SF DECK - 140 SF 94 SF STORAGE ATTIC 70 SF ATTIC 275 SF OPEN TO BELOW 4 A-0.15Z MAIN LEVEL - 3,349 SF FRONT PORCH EXEMPT DECK 3 120 SF DECK 1 700 SF DECK 2 83 SF DECK 4 24 SF 4 A-0.15Z BASEMENT LEVEL - 2,870 SF GARAGE 594 SF NEW BASEMENT MECH EQUIP COURT DECK 36 SF WINDOW WELL 4 A-0.15Z Sheet #: Copyright 2024 Z-Group Architects, P.C. Project number: Construction Date: Prepared By: Checked By: Sheet Name: Jurisdiction Use: Seal: 9/ 6 / 2 0 2 4 2 : 4 2 : 4 1 P M A-0.13Z FAR CALCS-PROPOSED OF E R R E S I D E N C E R E M O D E L 2304 UNKNOWN Author 73 0 B A Y S T R E E T As p e n , C O 8 1 6 1 1 Checker No.Description Date 1 1/8" = 1'-0"1 FAR PROPOSED - UPPER LEVEL 1/8" = 1'-0"2 FAR PROPOSED - MAIN LEVEL 1/8" = 1'-0"3 FAR PROPOSED - LOWER LEVEL 124 MAIN LEVEL100'-0" UPPER LEVEL 110'-0" LOWER LEVEL 90'-0" ATTIC 117'-4" 353 SQ. FT. MAIN LEVEL100'-0" UPPER LEVEL110'-0" LOWER LEVEL 90'-0" ATTIC 117'-4" 212 SQ. FT.212 SQ. FT. 151 SQ. FT. 226 SQ. FT. 4 A-0.15Z CRAWL SPACE 83'-0" MAIN LEVEL100'-0" UPPER LEVEL110'-0" LOWER LEVEL 90'-0" ATTIC 117'-4" 463 SQ. FT.98 SQ. FT. MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" UPPER LEVEL110'-0" LOWER LEVEL90'-0" ATTIC117'-4" 610 SQ. FT. 124 SQ. FT. 25 SQ. FT. EXPOSED ANGLED WALL 25 SQ. FT. SUB-GRADE ANGLED WALLREFER TO 6 SOUTH CARETAKER ELEVATION FOR AREA CALC. BEYOND CRAWL SPACE 83'-0" MAIN LEVEL100'-0" UPPER LEVEL 110'-0" LOWER LEVEL 90'-0" ATTIC 117'-4" 57 SQ. FT. 430 SQ. FT. 4A-0.15Z CRAWL SPACE83'-0" MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" UPPER LEVEL110'-0" LOWER LEVEL90'-0" ATTIC117'-4" 186 SQ.FT. 31 SQ. FT. CRAWL SPACE 83'-0" MAIN LEVEL100'-0" UPPER LEVEL 110'-0" LOWER LEVEL90'-0" ATTIC117'-4" 24 SF MAIN LEVEL100'-0" UPPER LEVEL110'-0" LOWER LEVEL 90'-0" ATTIC 117'-4" 294 SQ. FT.54 SQ. FT. CRAWL SPACE 83'-0" Sheet #: Copyright 2024 Z-Group Architects, P.C. Project number: Construction Date: Prepared By: Checked By: Sheet Name: Jurisdiction Use: Seal: 9/ 6 / 2 0 2 4 2 : 4 2 : 4 4 P M A-0.14Z FAR - PROP. EXPOSURE OF E R R E S I D E N C E R E M O D E L 2304 UNKNOWN Author 73 0 B A Y S T R E E T As p e n , C O 8 1 6 1 1 Checker No.Description Date 1 1/8" = 1'-0"1 FAR-PROPOSED EXPOSURE-EAST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"2 FAR-PROPOSED EXPOSURE-WEST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"3 FAR-PROPOSED EXPOSURE-NORTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"4 FAR-PROPOSED EXPOSURE-SOUTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"5 FAR-PROPOSED EXPOSURE-EAST CARETAKER ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"6 FAR-PROPOSED EXPOSURE-SOUTH CARETAKER ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"7 FAR-PROPOSED EXPOSURE-WEST GREATROOM ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"8 FAR-PROPOSED EXPOSURE-NORTH CARETAKER ELEVATION EXPOSED WALL AREA : EAST: 57 SF SOUTH:149 SF WEST:575 SF NORTH:152 SF TOTAL:933 SF SUB-GRADE WALL AREA: EAST:783 SF SOUTH:821 SF WEST:250 SF NORTH:757 SF TOTAL:2,611 SF 125 MAIN LEVEL100'-0" UPPER LEVEL110'-0" LOWER LEVEL 90'-0" 2 A-0.15Z CRAWL SPACE GREAT ROOM STORAGERECREATION ROOM KITCHEN BEDROOM BEDROOM DINING ROOM BEDROOM BATHROOM ATTIC CRAWL SPACE83'-0" MAIN LEVEL100'-0" UPPER LEVEL110'-0" LOWER LEVEL 90'-0" 1 A-0.15Z DINING ROOM ENTRY MECH STORAGE STORAGE ATTIC 3 A-0.15Z 16'-8" ATTIC 2' - 6 " CRAWL SPACE83'-0" MAIN LEVEL100'-0" UPPER LEVEL110'-0" LOWER LEVEL90'-0" 2 A-0.15Z DECK STORAGE ATTICCLOSET W/C W/C LIVING ROOM FRONT PORCH BEDROOM 2' - 6 " 10'-2 1/2" CRAWL SPACE 83'-0" MAIN LEVEL100'-0" LOWER LEVEL 90'-0" ATTIC ADU GARAGE CRAWL SPACE83'-0" Sheet #: Copyright 2024 Z-Group Architects, P.C. Project number: Construction Date: Prepared By: Checked By: Sheet Name: Jurisdiction Use: Seal: 9/ 6 / 2 0 2 4 2 : 4 2 : 4 5 P M A-0.15Z FAR BUILDING SECTIONS OF E R R E S I D E N C E R E M O D E L 2304 UNKNOWN Author 73 0 B A Y S T R E E T As p e n , C O 8 1 6 1 1 Checker No.Description Date 1 1/8" = 1'-0"1 FAR BUILDING SECTION 1 1/8" = 1'-0"2 FAR BUILDING SECTION 2 1/8" = 1'-0"3 FAR BUILDING SECTION 3 1/8" = 1'-0"4 FAR BUILDING SECTION 4 126 UP UP CRAWL SPACE GARAGE MUD ROOM LAUNDRY ELEVATOR CLOSET BEDROOM 5 BEDROOM 4 BATH 5 BATH 4 POWDER LO W E R H A L L CLOSET CLOSET MECH REC ROOM STORAGE STORAGE WI N D O W W E L L WINDOW WELL HOT TUB Sheet #: Copyright 2024 Z-Group Architects, P.C. Project number: Construction Date: Prepared By: Checked By: Sheet Name: Jurisdiction Use: Seal: 9/ 6 / 2 0 2 4 2 : 4 2 : 4 5 P M A-002D EXISTING - LOWER FLOOR PLAN OF E R R E S I D E N C E R E M O D E L 2304 UNKNOWN Author 73 0 B A Y S T R E E T As p e n , C O 8 1 6 1 1 Checker 1/4" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN - DEMO_EXISTING LOWER LEVEL No.Description Date 1 = 127 UP UP ADU LIVING ADU BEDROOM BATH CLOSET KITCHEN LIVING ROOM GREAT ROOM DINNING ROOM ENTRYBEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 3 BATH 3 BATH 2 POWDER CLOS CLOS DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK Sheet #: Copyright 2024 Z-Group Architects, P.C. Project number: Construction Date: Prepared By: Checked By: Sheet Name: Jurisdiction Use: Seal: 9/ 6 / 2 0 2 4 2 : 4 2 : 4 6 P M A-003D EXISTING - MAIN FLOOR PLAN OF E R R E S I D E N C E R E M O D E L 2304 UNKNOWN Author 73 0 B A Y S T R E E T As p e n , C O 8 1 6 1 1 Checker 1/4" = 1'-0"2 FLOOR PLAN - DEMO_EXISTING MAIN LEVEL No.Description Date 1 = 128 OPEN TO BELOWATTIC STAIR BEDROOMBATHROOM ENTRY CLOSET CLOSET CLOSET CLOSET DECK DECK STORAGE ATTIC Sheet #: Copyright 2024 Z-Group Architects, P.C. Project number: Construction Date: Prepared By: Checked By: Sheet Name: Jurisdiction Use: Seal: 9/ 6 / 2 0 2 4 2 : 4 2 : 4 6 P M A-004D EXISTING - UPPER FLOOR PLAN OF E R R E S I D E N C E R E M O D E L 2304 UNKNOWN Author 73 0 B A Y S T R E E T As p e n , C O 8 1 6 1 1 Checker 1/4" = 1'-0"3 FLOOR PLAN - DEMO_EXISTING UPPER LEVEL No.Description Date 1 129 DN UP DN A-2011 A-201 2 A-202 2 A-202 1 NEW BASEMENT GARAGE LOWER SLAB 7'-0" FOR CAR LIFT MUD ROOM LAUNDRY ELEVATOR CLOSET BEDROOM 5 BEDROOM 4 BATH 5 BATH 4 POWDER LO W E R H A L L CLOSET CLOSET MECH REC ROOM STORAGE STORAGE 4 A-0.15Z Sheet #: Copyright 2024 Z-Group Architects, P.C. Project number: Construction Date: Prepared By: Checked By: Sheet Name: Jurisdiction Use: Seal: 9/ 6 / 2 0 2 4 2 : 4 2 : 4 6 P M A-102 FLOOR PLAN - LOWER LEVEL OF E R R E S I D E N C E R E M O D E L 2304 UNKNOWN Author 73 0 B A Y S T R E E T As p e n , C O 8 1 6 1 1 Checker No.Description Date 1 1/4" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL 130 UP DN DN DN DN A-2011 A-201 2 A-202 2 A-202 1 ADU LIVING ADU BEDROOM BATH CLOSET KITCHEN LIVING ROOM GREAT ROOM DINNING ROOM ENTRYBEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 3 BATH 3 BATH 2 POWDER OUTDOOR KITCHEN OUTDOOR DINNING CLOS CLOS 4 A-0.15Z Sheet #: Copyright 2024 Z-Group Architects, P.C. Project number: Construction Date: Prepared By: Checked By: Sheet Name: Jurisdiction Use: Seal: 9/ 6 / 2 0 2 4 2 : 4 2 : 4 7 P M A-103 FLOOR PLAN - MAIN LEVEL OF E R R E S I D E N C E R E M O D E L 2304 UNKNOWN Author 73 0 B A Y S T R E E T As p e n , C O 8 1 6 1 1 Checker No.Description Date 1 1/4" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL 131 A-2011 A-201 2 A-202 2 A-202 1 OPEN TO BELOWOFFICE LOFT STAIR BEDROOMBATHROOM ENTRY CLOSET CLOSET CLOSET CLOSET DECK DECK 4 A-0.15Z Sheet #: Copyright 2024 Z-Group Architects, P.C. Project number: Construction Date: Prepared By: Checked By: Sheet Name: Jurisdiction Use: Seal: 9/ 6 / 2 0 2 4 2 : 4 2 : 4 7 P M A-104 FLOOR PLAN - UPPER LEVEL OF E R R E S I D E N C E R E M O D E L 2304 UNKNOWN Author 73 0 B A Y S T R E E T As p e n , C O 8 1 6 1 1 Checker No.Description Date 1 1/4" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL 132 Sheet #: Copyright 2024 Z-Group Architects, P.C. Project number: Construction Date: Prepared By: Checked By: Sheet Name: Jurisdiction Use: Seal: 9/ 6 / 2 0 2 4 2 : 4 2 : 5 2 P M A-901 EXISTING & PROPOSED MASSING OF E R R E S I D E N C E R E M O D E L 2304 UNKNOWN Author 73 0 B A Y S T R E E T As p e n , C O 8 1 6 1 1 Checker No.Description Date 1 1 ISOMETRIC NE CORNER - EXISTING 2 ISOMETRIC NE CORNER - PROPOSED 3 ISOMETRIC NW CORNER - EXISTING 4 ISOMETRIC NW CORNER - PROPOSED 133 Exhibit C.1 134 135 136 Exhibit C.2 137 Exhibit C.3 138 139 Exhibit C.4 140 14 1 14 2 14 3 14 4 14 5 Exhibit C.5 146 147 148 149 Exhibit C.6 150 151 152 153 Exhibit C.7 154 155 156 157 158 Exhibit C.8 15 9 Exhibit C.9 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTIVATIVE: Description: Existing and Proposed Conditions Review: Administrative or Board Review Required Land Use Review(s): Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) required fields: Net Leasable square footage Lodge Pillows Free Market dwelling units Affordable Housing dwelling units Essential Public Facility square footage Have you included the following? FEES DUE: $ Pre-Application Conference Summary Signed Fee Agreement HOA Compliance form All items listed in checklist on PreApplication Conference Summary Name: Address: Phone#: email: Address: Phone #: email: Name: Project Name and Address: Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) Exhibit D.1 168 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Complete only if required by the PreApplication checklist Project and Location Applicant: Zone District: Gross Lot Area: Net Lot Area: **Please refer to section 26.575.020 for information on how to calculate Net Lot Area Please fill out all relevant dimensions Single Family and Duplex Residential 1) Floor Area (square feet) 2) Maximum Height 3) Front Setback 4) Rear Setback 5) Side Setbacks 6) Combined Side Setbacks 7) % Site Coverage Existing Allowed Proposed Multi-family Residential 1)Number of Units 2)Parcel Density (see 26.710.090.C.10) 3)FAR (Floor Area Ratio) 4)Floor Area (square feet) Existing Allowed Proposed 8) Minimum distance between buildings Proposed % of demolition 5)Maximum Height 6)Front Setback 7) Rear Setback 8)Side Setbacks Proposed % of demolition Commercial Proposed Use(s) Existing Allowed Proposed 1) FAR (Floor Area Ratio) 2) Floor Area (square feet) 3) Maximum Height 4) Off-Street Parking Spaces 5) Second Tier (square feet) 6) Pedestrian Amenity (square feet) Proposed % of demolition Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Variations requested: Lodge Additional Use(s) 1)FAR (Floor Area Ratio) 2)Floor Area (square feet) 3)Maximum Height 4)Free Market Residential(square feet) 4)Front setback 5)Rear setback 6)Side setbacks 7)Off-Street Parking Spaces 8)Pedestrian Amenity (square feet) Proposed % of demolition Existing Allowed Proposed 169 April 2020 City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying that the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Property Owner (“I”): Name: Email: Phone No.: Address of Property: (subject of application) I certify as follows: (pick one) □This property is not subject to a homeowner association or other form of private c ovenant. □This property is subject to a homeowner association or private covenant, and the improvementsproposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association orcovenant beneficiary. □This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvementsproposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners a ssociation orcovenant beneficiary. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document. Owner signature: Date: Owner printed name: or, Attorney signature: Date: Attorney printed name: 6/18/24 Bay Street Owner LLC, by Peter Allen, Manager Exhibit D.2 170 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen (“City”) and Address of Property: Please type or print in all caps Property Owner Name: Representative Name (if different from Property Owner): Billing Name and Address - Send Bills to: Contact info for billing: e-mail: Phone: I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. 20, Series of 2020, review fees for Land Use applications, and payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner, I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $. flat fee for . $. flat fee for $. flat fee for . $. flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature, or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices sent by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy, including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for processing my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. City of Aspen: Community Development Director City Use: Fees Due: $ Received $ Case # Signature: PRINT Name: Title: Exhibit D.3 171 Page | 1. Kraemer Land Planning 200 Basalt Center Circle Ste 201 Basalt, Colorado 81621 June _18__, 2024 Bob Narracci Interim Planning Director & Zoning Administrator City of Aspen Community Development Department 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Bob: Bay Street Owner LLC is the owner of record for real property located at 730 Bay Street, Lot 2, Volk Lot Split, City of Aspen, Colorado (Parcel Identification No. 2737-073-73-002). Kraemer Land Planning and Z-Group Architects are authorized to represent Bay Street Owner LLC’s property interests in this land use matter requesting Special Review – Replacement of a Non-conforming Structure for a remodel of a non-conforming structure. They are specifically authorized to meet with City officials, represent Bay Street Owner LLC’s interests in any and all meeting and hearings, and execute the City of Aspen Land Use Agreement to Pay Form. Thank you, ______________________________ Owner/Authorized Agent Signature ______________________________ Owner/Authorized Agent Printed Name & Title Bay Street Owner LLC 730 Bay Street Aspen, CO 81611 Exhibit D.4 Bay Street Owner LLC, by Peter Allen, Manager 172 Land Title Guarantee Company Customer Distribution Order Number:QPR62017507 Date: 08/28/2024 Property Address: 730 BAY ST, ASPEN, CO 81611 Thank you for your order. Enclosed is the Property Report. If you need any modifications or have questions, please contact your title team. We appreciate your business. Thank you for putting your trust in Land Title. Your Title Team Roaring Fork Valley Title Team 533 E HOPKINS #102 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 927-0405 (Work) (970) 925-0610 (Work Fax) valleyresponse@ltgc.com Vesting Deeds: Pitkin county recorded 05/08/2023 under reception no. 694787 Plat Map(s): Pitkin county recorded 11/13/1991 at book 27 page 71 Exhibit D.5 173 Land Title Guarantee Company Property Report Order Number:QPR62017507 This Report is based on a limited search of the county real property records and provides the name(s) of the vested owner(s), the legal description, tax information (taken from information provided by the county treasurer on its website) and encumbrances, which, for the purposes of this report, means deed of trust and mortgages, and liens recorded against the property and the owner(s) in the records of the clerk and recorder for the county in which the subject is located. This Report does not constitute any form of warranty or guarantee of title or title insurance. The liability of Land Title Guarantee Company is strictly limited to (1) the recipient of the Report, and no other person, and (2) the amount paid for the report.. Lender: KAREMER LAND PLANNING, . Effective Date: 08/16/2024 at 5:00 P.M. Vesting: BAY STREET OWNER LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Property Address: 730 BAY ST, ASPEN, CO 81611 Legal Description: LOT 2, VOLK LOT SPLIT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 1991 IN PLAT BOOK 27 AT PAGE 71 COUNTY OF PITKIN STATE OF COLORADO We find the following documents of record affecting subject property: 1.SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED MAY 08, 2023 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 694787. Parcel No.: 273707373002 174 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PRE-24-064 DATE: June 5, 2024 PLANNER: Bob Narracci, Bob.Narracci@aspen.gov PROJECT ADDRESS: 730 Bay Street PARCEL ID#: APPLICANT: Mike Kraemer, mike@kraemerlandplanning.com DESCRIPTION: The subject site legal description is Volk Lot Split, Lot 2. The subject property is zoned Low- Density Residential, (R-30). The subject property is developed with a nonconforming single-family residence; it has been represented that the parcel is non-conforming with regards to floor area. The Community Development Department has not yet received a full floor area analysis at this time to confirm this representation. The applicant requests to alter the existing residence in a manner that will decrease the floor area overage on the subject property. Since the existing structure is represented as over allowable floor area, rearranging and decreasing the existing non-conforming floor area requires a Replacement of Non-Conforming Structure review pursuant to Section 26.430 by the City of Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission. The Parks and Engineering Departments will be referrals on the application. RELEVANT ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS: Section Number Section Title 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.312 Non-Conformities 26.430.040.B Special Review – Replacement of Nonconforming Structures 26.710.080 Low-Density Residential Zone District (R-30) For your convenience – links to the Land Use Application and Land Use Code are below: Land Use Application Land Use Code REVIEW BY: Staff for determination of complete application and recommendation Planning and Zoning Commission for Decision REQUIRED LAND USE REVIEW(S): Special Review PUBLIC HEARING: Yes, at the Planning and Zoning Commission PLANNING FEES: $3,250 for 10 billable hours of staff time. (Additional/ lesser hours will be billed/ refunded at a rate of $325 per hour.) REFERRAL FEES: Engineering - $5,000 flat fee for major board review. Parks - $975 flat fee TOTAL DEPOSIT: $9,225.00 Exhibit D.6 175 APPLICATION CHECKLIST – Please email the following application materials to CDEHadmins@aspen.gov as a single PDF:  Completed Land Use Application and signed fee Agreement.  Pre-application Conference Summary (this document).  Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application.  Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant.  HOA Compliance form.  A vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen.  Site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status, certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado.  A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approval associated with the property. This should include a Net Lot Area calculation and allowable, existing, and proposed floor area calculations and diagrams. If the proposed floor area conforms with underlying zoning, no land use review is required.  Identification of review process requested.  Written responses to all review criteria in Section 26.430.040.B. Following application completeness review, you will be notified by Staff when to submit the application fees. If any additional information is required for completeness, you will be informed accordingly.  Total deposit for review of the application. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 176 N 1s t St E Hopkins Ave N Garm is ch St Hallam Lake Aspen Community Church Paepcke Park IN Paepcke Park Out E D u r a nt A ve Wagner Park Wheeler Park Aspen St + Cooper Ave Lift 1 Rio G rande Drain H un ter C r e e k Red M o u n t ai n R d G i b s o n A v e Vi n e S t V i n e St Rio G r a nd e Pl M a p l e L n KingSt Nea leAv e O a k L n Jenny Adair Park Rubey Lot 6/ Williams Woods Theater Aspen Aspen Armory Eagles Club 184 Aspen Aspen Old Powerhouse Vine St Spring St. & Main IN Galena Street Shuttle Park Circle & Spruce Park Circle and Brown Clarks Market Lone Pine II Court House/ LibraryMill & Main Clarks Mkt Main St + Hunter St Aspen Aspen S S pri ng St S H un t e r S t Midlan d A v e S O r i g in a l S t Rubey Park Transit Center Park Ava Park Circle & Park Ava Mall & Mill Co we nha v en Tu nne l Silver lo d e Dr Ses ameSt SMOS - Pride of Aspen #7883 SMOS - Ballarat/General Jackson SMOS - Mascotte 99 Molly Gibson Park S a lv a t i o n Mascotte Ln 0 0.1 0.20.05 mi FEsri Community Maps Contributors, City of Aspen GIS, Pitkin County, © OpenStreetMap, Microsoft, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, USFWS, Maxar Legend DRAINAGE LP PD DRAIN/TRANS LP PD R-3 AH R/MF R/MFA R-6 R-15 R-15A R-30 L CL CC C-1 SCI NC MU P A PUB Driveways Edge of Pavement Aspen City Limits UGB Water Line Zoomed In Water Poly Parcels Structures Source: City of Aspen GIS City of Aspen GIS Exhibit D.7 177