The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.61 Meadows Rd.0003.2015.AHPCI -- + 0003.2015.AHPC 61 MEADOWS ROAD MINOR HPC DEVELOPMENT 2735 122 39006 A 9 4 A NE.\ '/ / l. Â£ A ic : r A 604 30 P THE CITY OF ASPENI City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0003 2015.AHPC PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2735 122 39 006 PROJECT ADDRESS 61 MEADOWS ROAD PLANNER AMY SIMON CASE DESCRIPTION HPC MINOR DEVELOPMENT REPRESENTATIVE KEITH HOWIE DATE OF FINAL ACTION 07/23/15 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 12/13/2015 2 7 35-- I 22 - 3 900 C 0003-2-OiS Â·AR?(L Permits ~ file Edit Record Navigate Fgrm Repors Format Iab Help ~ :ig X) 44 91 1 l i t 2 2 27 ~2 b . 0 ~ i Jump l jj i @loi 1, 1 E.43] E J C . 0,, 3 f Â·~, a , Wh ?tE -1 1-31 m INam i Custom Fields Wing Status Fee SummarY *Is Routing Bstory U .1 __ _ _ | Â§ Permittype ph:Â£ :Asper Histofic Land Use Permt #]0003.2015 AHE '0 ~1 Mdres 'El MEADOWS RD Apt''Sult26 ~ Cay ASPEN State ~~~~~ Zip 81611 Q Permit Infonnation 10 Master pennit I Routing queue asluli Applied 01/142015 , i Projed 1 Status 1?ending Approved 1 Desmpon APPLICAPON FOR MINOR HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT - ASPEN MEADOWS Mid ' i u TRUSTEE TeNNHOME REMODEL Clo#,Rna 1.1 : Ilt 1 Submibd]JENNA LARSON 3,79 3806 I Clock Â§~IC Days F--61 425 ~01/05;2016 ~ M * Owner ~ Â· ~1' Last name NSF 1976 INVESTMELTS L Fatname TRUSTEE TO?NHOME 61ASPEN MDWS UNIT 6 Ad:dree ASPEN CO 81611 ~au Applicant Â® Owner is applicant? E Contactor is applicant? 69 Last name NSF 1976 #NESTMENTS. L First name HOWNHOME |61ASPEN MDWS IUNFI 6 Phone ~19701 379-3806 I cu* Â¢ 2%11 | Addreg |ASPEN CO 81611 Lender Last name First n:ame Phone ~ ) - Address --- AspenGold5 (smver angelas ~ 1 of 1 .: 9 6 fle 41 4,0Uoff 00 -81 15-5 . , 9,/1,-, Re--c_.a_,fvgT 3 172-2- . 1 pii.~15. No fj*-r,38 - A35 3\00 9Â©4 ~ 1. 414 2-3 1 I s (9=-f Ult- \aka-/ 10 P <L 1:::iseic,ki >'6in ]: DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. NSF 1976 Investments LLC, 4237 Del Mar Ave.,Carpinteri#CA 93103. Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address 61 Meadows Road, Condominium Unit 6, The Trustee Townhomes At-The-Aspen Meadows Condominiums, Aspen, Colorado. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property HPC granted Minor Development approval to make exterior modifications to the Townhouse and to underpin and excavate a basement. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Historic Preservation Commission approval was granted on May 27, 2015 through HPC Resolution # 17, Series of2015. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) July 2,2015 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) July 2,2018 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 23rd day of June, 2015, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. /1 ~ Chris Bendon, Community Development Director Avt S - AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: G \ Age-Acw s rkÂ¢aj Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, Ami -â‚¬-1. A Sco-2 ELA (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: 'V'000' Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper o f general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after * an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Â»02 2--9 Signature The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this Z day of _~out~ , 20â‚¬ by AAtâ‚¬~A. eccR-Cl./~ PUBLIC NOTICE Of WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and 2\ RE'[40 the creation of a vested property right pursuant to My commission expires: +-, the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertain- ing to the following legally described property: 61 Meadows Road, Condominium Unit 6, The Trustee Townhomes At-The-Aspen Meadows Condomini- 44 bj el_ ~ ~.-,4-0,0Â«- ums, Aspen, Colorado, PID#2735-122-39-006. Approval has been granted to make exterior modi- Notary Public fications to the Townhouse and to underpin and excavate a basement. Historic Preservation Com- .-.# mission approval was granted on May 27,2015 through HPC Resolution # 17, Series of 2015. For further information contact Amy Simon, at the City KAREN REED PATTERSON of Aspen Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 429-2758, or ATTACHMENTS: NOTARY PUBLIC amy.simon@cityofaspen.com. STATE OF COLORADO s/City of Aspen NOTARY ID #19964002767 Published in The Aspen Times on July 2, 2015. (11320776) COPY OF THE PUBLICATION ~25!**52!mfetmary 15,2016 jl A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING MINOR DEVELOPMENT FOR 61 MEADOWS ROAD, CONDOMINIUM UNIT 6, THE TRUSTEE TOWNHOMES AT-THE-ASPEN MEADOWS CONDOMINIUMS, ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION #17, SERIES OF 2015 PARCEL ID: 2735-122-39-006 WHEREAS, the applicant, NSF 1976 Investments LLC, represented by Poss Architecture and Planning, submitted an application requesting Minor Development review for the property located at 61 Meadows Road, Condominium Unit 6, The Trustee Townhomes At-The-Aspen Meadows Condominiums, Aspen, Colorado ; and WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards and recommended approval of Minor Development with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and accepted public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on May 27,2015; and WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Commission finds that the development proposal meets all applicable review criteria and that the approval of the request is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission approves the application with conditions by a vote o f 6 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That 11PC grants Minor Development approval for the properly located at 61 Meadows Road with the following conditions: 1. Replace the existing front door with a solid, painted door. 2. Do not move or alter (other than basic maintenance) the existing south facing window above the carroll. 3. The proposed dormer is not approved. 4. A report from a licensed engineer must be submitted with the building permit application ~ clearly indicating the approach to underpin the house in a manner that does negatively impact the historic structure. A bond, letter of credit or cashier's check in the amount of RECEPTION#: 620665, 06/12/2015 at 10:08:54 AM, 1 OF 3, R $21.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO $30,000 must be posted using the City's required format until the Certificate of Occupancy is granted. 5. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 61 Meadows Road, Condominium Unit 6, The Trustee Townhomes At-The-Aspen Meadows Condominiums, Aspen, Colorado. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication o f the notice o f final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 27th day of May, 2015. C /Â«8,-4.1 hrillis Pember, Chair Approved as to Form: 279 - - 2.-Al ~ebbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: 46/69/Amc 14athy Strit--land, Chief Deputy Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Skadron and Aspen City Council FROM: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer Notice of HPC approval of Minor Development for 61 Meadows RE: Road, HPC Resolution #17, Series of 2015 ' 4 Â· MEETING DATE: June 22,2015 BACKGROUND: On May 27, 2015, the Historic Preservation Commission approved *14Â· 4 - _,6~_ E ./ft i V Minor Development for a prqject at 61 Meadows , it ..t~ r, ~E~'#~'S~ -p 41~"' 9-i..~4~ Road, which is one of eight Trustee Townhomes lib T , designed by Herbert Bayer at the Aspen Institute. 1 -111'FA' Tr fv ~::~.rib~t~ - =1* -ab- The townhomes were built in 1965 as short term -1 1 accommodations for special visitors associated - ,~ * r 1 9 ~ 1-1 1 - 1 with the Institute's programs. Today the Institute - i )7 1 . 1.- 6 711\,1 ;1, e , retains ownership of some of the units, while others 1 1 --If . ~-42 .* -e L ' $7 1- 49 -4 are individually owned and used as primary 11*... residences or second homes. --' -4..t,Â·1~' *'*i),Sal# --2.1772 f HPC discussed this project on May 13,2015 and continued for restudy of proposed alterations at the th rear of the unit. Revised plans were approved on May 27 . The alterations approved by HPC were underpinning the existing foundation in order to excavate and construct a basement; replacing the existing non-historic front door; removal of a non-historic door leading into the storage area under the carport; replacing all exterior sconces; and extending the living space right behind the carport, into the rear patio. A request to add a dormer to the rear of the unit was denied. The board approved the project by a 6-0 vote. PROCEDURE: This is not a public hearing and no staff or applicant presentation will be made at the June 22nd Council meeting. If you have any questions about the project, please contact the staff planner, Amy Simon at 429-2758 or amy.simon@cityofaspen.com. Pursuant to Section 26.412.040(B), City Council has the option of exercising the Call Up provisions outlined in Section 26.412.040(B) within 15 days of notification on the regular agenda. For this application, City Council may vote to Call Up the project at their June 22nd meeting. If City Council does not exercise the Call Up provision, the HPC Resolution shall stand. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Approved plans Exhibit B: Draft HPC Resolution #19, Series of 2015 Exhibit C: Draft HPC minutes, May 13th (May 27th minutes unavailable at packet deadline) 1,4lt i U it /4 ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING May 21, 2015 Amy Simon City of Aspen Historical Preservation Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado, 81611 Re: Aspen Meadows Townhome Remodel - Revisions to original submittal Dear Amy, Please accept this letter as a response and description of the changes to the original submittal for the remodel of Unit #6, Aspen Meadows Townhome remodel. Per the staff memo from May 13, 2015, these were the concerns of the HPC: 1. Front door redesign Concern: The proposed front dooT design is not consistent with the original front door design Solution: We will replace the proposed front door design with a solid core painted wood front door with no glass which is thought to be the original design. 2. Proposed shift of an original window on the south Elevation Concern: Shifting of an existing historic window. Solution: We have reviewed all the permit applications for the remodel of other units located iii the building department files. We were able to locate and existing elevation drawing. In the drawing there is evidence of 2 windows on the south elevation, although they are not drawn as a typical window. They look to be drawn as a louvered type of window. This may have been done for privacy reasons between the units. It might be noted that the majority of the units have windows on the side walls of the units that are not historic in size or location. If the current location of the window is desired to be retained, we can install a window and back paint the glass so that the window looks frosted. This window will not be visible from the inside of the lin it. 3. Soiith Extension Concern: The Moposed south extension raises aboue the carport roof, obscuring the original sloped TOOf line. Solution: The sozith extension has been redesigned so that all the new massing occurs below the flat roof of the carport. Iii this new mass, we have proposed a new fenestration pattern (horizontal wood siding) and separated the roof forms by two feet (2'-0") to delineate this element as new. There is a philosophical question when it comes to the length of the eaves on the flat roof addition. There are two options: a. Keep eaves consistent with the garage flat roof eaves - this makes the forms look similar but does not show the building element as "new" against the existing structure. 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 (t) 970/925-4755 (f) 970/920-2950 WWW.BILLPOSS.COM ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING b. Make eves depth different - this direction make the element read as new against the existing structure but one can argue makes the entire composition a little disjointed as you have a variety of cave lengths on a small building. We are not stire what the correct answer is on this. If the overall form is accepted by HPC, I could go either way on the eave depth. It is currently shown as option b, longer than the carport eaves to allow the element to read as new. We are amendable to either direction on this issue. 4. New dormer on back roof. Concern: The proposed back dorm.27 is not inset from the roof and changes the original Toof form. The height of the dormer obscures the original Toof line. Solution: We have piilled back the size of the dormer in width, depth, and height to allow the original roof to be seen in its original form. In the original memo the back of the linit was identified as the area for expansion. As quoted: "The rear facade is appropriate area for expansion and it appears that all of the units have had some alterations here" This is where we have proposed the expansion. We acknowledge the concern that we are adding to the existing roof form and there is the concern that we are setting precedent for all units to add dormers in this location. We believe that the addition of the revised dormer will not affect the overall integrity of the original design for these reasons: a. Preservation of original roof form - The new dormer design meets the criteria of 7.7 and is subordinate to the scale of the historic building. b. Solid and void - For the back of these units, it was expressed that the rhythm of the solid and void of the units was desired to be retained. Unfortunately, this rhythm has been interrupted on units two, folir, and nine where the back terrace has been filled in by a building form. The dormer allows us to maintain this rhythm by placing the floor area in a location that does not affect the solid-void relationship of the units. c. Sightlines - Sightline to the back of the unit are limited and can be broken down into two categories - Public and private. 1. Piiblic - The public sightlines to this ilnit are from the trail below the complex. We have walked the trial and provided photos from various vantage points along the trial. The roof of unit #6 is not visible from any point on this trail. We encourage the HPC board to walk this trail previous to our next meeting. 2. Private - The private sightlines occur from the area of lawn around and along the lawn area at the back of the complex. To get to this stage in this process we have had to proctire the Aspen Meadows HOA approval. All of the neighbors including the HOA president (next door in Unit #7) approved the original dormer scheme. d. Materiality - We have designed the dormer with windows on three sides to differentiate the new dormer from the existing structure. 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 (t) 970/925-4755 (f) 970/920-2950 WWW.BILLPOSS.COM ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING 5. West Extension Concern: This section of the proposal was not identified as objectionable in the HPC memo. Solution: This part of proposal will remain as proposed. We hope that th is letter mitigates the concern of the HPC staff and we will have your support with the revised proposal. If you need additional material(s) or need to meet to review details of the revised proposal, please contact iii Respectfiilly submitted, Keith Howie, Authorized Representative for NSF 1976 Investments, LLC. 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 (t) 970/925-4755 (t) 970/920-2950 WWW.BILLPOSS.COM j I I . I,-4 ~it:% ::.. . 4/ y th~.0...~;' -- L-Â«SU lit - + - 11 - 1........ ..1 -elim LI_LIL : t ~ /I --21 i -- w .: "i *- 4 N =~ MY-Â©9~4 1 . 4 2 I : 1.9 - I + 1- I 9/1 + -7 -'--3~ 1 .... .L..1#'.:18/72 - =:MI::~:Elm -â€ž9;,2-*. 4 : IWI-Mt ./.idrh ~,~4 ~.1 4-- 0.10. 11,4 *k 'F/4 ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 0:00--Â· 05/20~I' ' ~'' HPC REVIEW 1 31 r -10-g 2 1~ 9*Tiv~446 - 21 I,IGINAL :FC 11 111:11 4 1 1 1 -"lili j . n ... .' "' 1 A> 11~LAK*to /CPLD Re<* OVE' Â£ C,PA.'., - - 2: 1 '4-0 1 ' 1. r i ~ M 544&1,:1,4 -4,; 9 16 1 . -1 L - z. E 4TION - REVISED PROPOSAI ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL poss HPt07 0 1 11-1-h- finii"111111111IH ' ' 1 1|'!|'11~1 |1'r- ---"..........11-~ 1 ~111 1. 1 r ... ' a,KOSED '-E 01 11; IC [7[Fl.Fr[:7Â«\ 1 i ~ ., SOUTH El i_V,1 110 ri- ORIGINAL PROP(.,S u T- LALL '11't~! i'j -~ ~ ,-1 7 3.f+ff- i.1--4'ti TE'-1-- ~1 lili" 11111-l['ill-l'-11-1-Z-*/ 1, ./.teÂ©HULRHEIGHT FLATROOÂ®Al lili 11 1 1 1 Â» DORMEHANDEXPANSLON F 7~fl\- 4,/-1 'Ill kil li I 11 1 - 'Tr~Tr SOUTH ELEVATION - EXISTING 6 + OE-LUU.1-LU_11111. ~.0fdlilt*r-ti-~ ,~ ~ :,1 n i Â·. fi: ~ -6(41,~ , 1 -IL- IIE-IF ' ' 11- . ..Ill 1.--' ij --L_' -e ITH El F.ATION - REVISEDEROPOSAL ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL poss i.-2.- NWKÂ·_ 8â€ž,1.D N- Il,, Â·'6 HPIDB I . t UT[l: 1 1- I 1 i 11 J --~r- -1 i 1 11 -L - , Â«rrfiff 13 - 2 .., NORTH ELEVATION - ORIGINAL. IPROPOSAL. -L . , -L 2/U.... 1.f.i':-77~~~--7--2 3 Till] Il 1 L!.C.RTH ELEVATION - Ey ISTING T.- i 1~ -- ~- -~~~-~~ 9 -NORTH ELEVATION - REVISED PROPOSAL ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL poss 1 ANNII, HPC RtvIL., BUILDING t I Lv 'Â·. 0 /NS Hpljo Miltii rÂ·=Â·LL.....~ . '~ylf| 111111111111!111{ III[~ ..11+.Â·.11Â£.LL 1.-7 11,I rl Ilf,11111' 41 Fy' 1- 4 1 1 1 lilli 1 lili 1 11- 7--p . 4 111 1'1'1 L' '111,1 7 1~ 6'[Si El EVAHON -ORIGINAL PROPOSAL lili, 1 h--1/' INI Ir.,I'N I 11~ Il Ill IIi'bil' IL u 1111111111111111111111111 lilli 111[2 11 3 -~6~,2 2~~* 4449 [f-ff.4!111 Ilt 44T~1 f f-TTn Tl-[-T 7T1#TTTETTTnl TITT i-TTT- ~~~ " 111111!222.,"lillyiI"I'"i imimprumnrbariBI-Â£01 ILIL[J~:ri A p LIU lilill iII J - 1.1 1 1 WEST ELEVATION - EXISTILG -u:!ILILI 1.211 -IlltillI[Ill-E=E~ 434;-tuÂ«=4~- a lIp * En,211 101 ----~ 7 WEST ELEVATION -REVISED PROPOSAL, ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL poss HPC REVIEW : 8(JILDING . r HPtD9 0 4 ' A 4 1 --, I 321 ID,)â€žAiffL~~EOUCEDOO~UE, -:.-- .... - - VALLEY AXON - ORIGINALL-Y PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH ':: 4, 1 i .. q/4 . .A , VALLEY AXON - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH . I -1.22, '0& -1-â€¢? VALLEY AXON - REVISED PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 pqi/â€¢ â€¢ TIâ‚¬~T ~~li~ t*111A1l1~11 HPC REVIEW : 3D IMAGES 0590/15 HPC 21 Eiwim- 1 '19..=,7, 'r==L-j CJ . m.Â«11 - - I A /1 1 - 1 .4.- t , %Â§- W 9 . " lt\ ~~~ 711~~r VALLEY AXON-ORIGINALLYPROPOSEDCONDITIONSFROM THE SOUTH ECU . 4. 0-7 . ....mal - 241 ..4Â« - - INK i. 133 /&.ge.Aairt ..R./.- B VALLEY AXON-EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ~~ Â· .,im#*7'$4#'#EJ-- - '* ~ L ..j -- 15UA-'=1~jt f *1319 #6 , t &.71 - e. -U.]11 yALLEY AXON - REVISED PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN,CO 81611 HPC REVIEW : 3D IMAGES HPC 22 ti Lii.i. ili, 05/20/15 - =-0 1*Â·:'-4--1.2.Â·.2:-Â·7. -- I =M-=HS ~LIA#JF #millk ....../Ve:1/kilgiiff#0.#9 Im,Bmela:8;WlriEE:y- r N 1-31 16~" 11 9 1 k ~'41 ti <67;~r-9// 4=2161*E- Il/b -millill 1& - :1-1.03*.,1..'..A PERSPECTIVE - ORIGINALLY PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH Â¢/r.l -1, 1.,&-'4%------m--1//// I .1 /'IL-lcÂ·I.I.*I.,1.'.....2.-'I.= P-Mr-liatipli~/8'.. ----V#p ]~fl -/11212*I PERSPECTIVE - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH , --~Fill -inâ€¢1-1 111.1 ....1- ./.a..1/dwil.-=- .- b 11 A *41 - 1& -&. - PERSPECTIVE -REVISED PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD, ASPEN.C081611 poss HPC REVIEW : 3D IMAGES HPC 23 05/20/15 Ii,iri,,1.41.irâ€¢].riâ€¢'ll- =1*nt= - -7- 1 -i M Will'-D~ illr. i .9 -51.4:11' 4- I'll' Wil 1//8 : L IME---mblIM1491Â£Bkvkkil.=~ PERSPECTIVE - ORIGINALLY PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH '1% 9 -90-7TYA,ssi ee~Cm PERSPECTIVE - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH e:ilir-[1,11-- =p 4; 1| AE-1//,1 1 ...7.*all'lifjh PERSPECTIVE - REVISED PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD ASPEN.C081611 poss HPC REVIEW : 3D IMAGES HPC 24 mWM.41 Bll/1 ~Il '1111~11 '1,1 in i., i. â€¢i.. - iii,i:. :.i.- 052(kl 5 .- 1 M __i, - d....2 E t PERSPECTIVE - ORIGINALLY PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH = A 9............P- < 1770,6. t --- C i PERSPECTIVE- EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH i ~,1 PERSPECTIVE - REVISED PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWSRD ASPEN,C081611 POSE. rn --U-, HPC REVIEW : 3D IMAGES HPC 25 il.7â€ž111."1 05/20/15 *mi"/I 0 $ 1 ~ 1 1 1-41, I l PERSPECTIVE - ORIGONALLY PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ~ 11 ................................I............ill. 1 y 1 L A. PERSPECTIVE - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH r m....-1 PERSPECTIVE - REVISED PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN. CO 81611 pgf. HPC REVIEW : 30 IMAGES HPC 26 05/Cy15 1- -a. Ca:~r i .u 'i i I r,a j AA. . -%45 1.~ FRONT AXON - ORIGINALLY PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH >A. 5 .....Er-isr. --j......Ir - 3 Â£ $51 **,4/20/1-=21"/I"91%#lil'.61.......d -- ir'<evAA FRONT AXON - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH 1 E <.---44 " L FRONT AXON - REVISED PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN.C081611 HPC REVIEW : 3D IMAGES HPC 27 e El#-41-9*40 05,70,15 ... /1 tal.-, f g 11. 1-JE. .-r~f Lt- dil'll. 1 Â·-T Â¢4 - 0 c. k-I 1. \ . FRONT AXON - ORIGINALLY PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH 1 -41 er.-'-..'-14 2 .""""" - ,-W- UY.V//*.1.1517 FRONT AXON - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH Il .-\I -3X / 7- '3-Â« U FRONT AXON - REVISED PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN. CO 81611 pols.,. ili.1. ilil~ 11,1,1, iii IPC REVIEW : 30 IMAGES 05/20/15 HPM28 Al.illdll 8 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING MINOR DEVELOPMENT FOR 61 MEADOWS ROAD, CONDOMINIUM UNIT 6, THE TRUSTEE TOWNHOMES AT-THE-ASPEN MEADOWS CONDOMINIUMS, ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION #17, SERIES OF 2015 PARCEL ID: 2735-122-39-006 WHEREAS, the applicant, NSF 1976 Investments LLC, represented by Poss Architecture and Planning, submitted an application requesting Minor Development review for the property located at 61 Meadows Road, Condominium Unit 6, The Trustee Townhomes At-The-Aspen Meadows Condominiums, Aspen, Colorado ; and WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards and recommended approval of Minor Development with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and accepted public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on May 27,2015; and WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Commission finds that the development proposal meets all applicable review criteria and that the approval of the request is consistent with the goals and objectives ofthe Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission approves the application with conditions by a vote of 6 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC grants Minor Development approval for the property located at 61 Meadows Road with the following conditions: 1. Replace the existing front door with a solid, painted door. 2. Do not move or alter (other than basic maintenance) the existing south facing window above the carport. 3. The proposed dormer is not approved. 4. A report from a licensed engineer must be submitted with the building permit application clearly indicating the approach to underpin the house in a manner that does negatively impact the historic structure. A bond, letter of credit or cashier's check in the amount of $30,000 must be posted using the City's required formal until the Certificate of Occupancy is granted. 5. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested properly right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public ofthe approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 61 Meadows Road, Condominium Unit 6, The Trustee Townhomes At-The-Aspen Meadows Condominiums, Aspen, Colorado. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 27th day of May, 2015. Willis Pember, Chair Approved as to Form: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk iffl~~ibil (3 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 13, 2015 Chairperson,Willis Pember called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Commissioners in attendance were John Whipple, Sallie Golden, Eric Sechrist, Bob Blaich, Gretchen Greenwood and Patrick Sagal. Nora Berko and James DeFrancia were absent. Staff present: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney Amy Simon, Preservation Planner Justin Barker, Planner Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk Bob moved to approve the minutes of March 25th second by Gretchen. All in favor, motion carried. 61 Meadows Road - Minor, Public Hearing Debbie said the affidavit of posting is in order and the applicant can proceed. Exhibit I. New elevations, Exhibit II Amy said there are 8 original townhomes designed by Herbert Bayer and they were used by the Institute as guest quarters. They are essentially cubes linked by open car ports. There are three units on the site and as a collect ion they are designated as landmarks. HPC has purview over the alternations ofthe townhomes. rhe minor development involves excavating under the existing building for a basement and several exterior changes. Staff has no problem with the removal of the non-historic door, light fixtures and extending the living space toward the west. There are four things of concern: The door is proposed to be a glazed door and the original doors were solid. The applicant has offered to make that a solid door. On the south side ofthe unit there is a proposal to shift two original small windows. Staff has objected to that. The applicant has agreed to not move the windows. The applicant wants to expand the space at the back of the unit which most of the other units have already done. Our objection is when they do that they want to go into the void where the car port is. They have revised it so that it just meets the carport but you are still going to see some 1 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 13,2015 aspect of the new construction in there and we still object to that. The other item is the proposed dormer on the back side ofthe house. They are trying to create some upper floor office by kicking the roof up with a dormer. The main concern is that dormers should be discrete and isolated within the roof form. We would like to see that dormer minimized and differentiated. The HOA approved the revisions. Staff is recommending continuation. Bob said if this is approved we should anticipate that others would want to do remodels. It is the streetscape that we are most concerned about. Kim Weil, Poss Architects Kim said the main reason to move the window is that it sits less than an inch above the car port. There is no flashing on the bottom side of the window. We were shifting it to help with our plan but we also wanted to keep the water out. The unit is completely stripped and you can see water infiltration Kim said the roof over the deck has been pulled back 8 feet as well as the dormer. The fascia line has also been carried down. Chairperson, Willis Pember opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. The public hearing was closed. Willis said there is no issue with the basement and the historic resource isn't being moved. The car port door will not be glazed. The south side window will not be moved. The issue is the encroachment ofthe garage space and the dormer. Bob said having the HOA approval is a good thing. Gretchen said one of the strengths of the design is the simplicity of the two roof planes. I have no problem with the dormer because it is hidden. When you start to extend the roo f o f the original Bayer form that changes things. The flat roof would maintain more of the form o f the original Bayer roof which is what those buildings are about. I would want to see a different design for the extension of the living room. Patrick said the flat roof is more appropriate so that the original shape stays the same. 2 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COiviMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 13, 2015 Willis said the roof form is very pure and the back side dormer violates the spirit of the Bauhaus design. Eric said he is not thrilled about the dormer and changing the roof form. I'm not too concerned with the front. In this case i f we change one roof then other owners of the row houses will want to change. I am concerned about setting a precedence. Sallie agreed with what has been said by the other commissioners. Bob said once we approve this others might come into change their roofs. It is a world class view. MOTION: Patrick moved to continue the meeting till May 27th with the recommendation to restudy taking the dormer out and study the flat roof. The garage door will be solid and the south window will not be moved. Motion second by Gretchen. Roll call vote: Eric, yes; Sallie, yes; Bob, yes; Jon, yes; Gretchen, yes; Patrick, yes; Willis, no. Motion carried 6-1. John said his only concern is the dormer. 3 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 61 Meadows Road- Minor Development, Public Ilearing continued from May 13th DATE: May 27, 2015 SUMMARY: 61 Meadows Road is Unit 6 of the eight original Trustee Townhomes designed by Herbert Bayer at the Aspen Institute. Several areas of the campus are landmarked, including the Townhomes, the Reception Center, the Health Club, Marble Garden and Anderson Park. LIPC design review is required for any changes to these historic resources. The townhomes were built in 1965 as short term accommodations for special visitors associated with the Institute's programs. Today the Institute retains ownership of some of the units, while others are individually owned and used as primary residences or second homes. There are three new units, one on the south end of the complex and two on the north, that were authorized in the 1992 Aspen Meadows Master Plan and constructed in 1996. The owner of Townhonle #6 is requesting approval to construct a basement under the existing building, to make an addition at the rear, and to complete other exterior changes. The amount of new square floor area involved in the project qualifies this as Minor Development. HPC discussed this project on May 13th. There were several proposed alterations that both staff and the board were comfortable with, namely: â€¢ Underpinning the existing foundation in order to excavate and construct a basement â€¢ Removal of a non-historic door leading into the storage area under the carport â€¢ Replacing all exterior sconces â€¢ Extending the living space right behind the carport approximately 2' westward, into the rear patio There were two areas where staff requested restudy, which the architect accomplished with amended drawings provided at the last hearing: â€¢ The proposal to replace the existing non-historic front door was amended to replacing it with a solid, unglazed, painted door. â€¢ The proposal to shift the location of a window on the south elevation, right above the carport storage was withdrawn. The applicant would however like to discuss some additional research that may indicate this window is not original. While a full set of Bayer' s original drawings has not been located, his south elevation is shown on the next page, compared to the existing condition. 1 1 'C:- Aâ€¢_.2 _0.-'66.-b .- . .5 4.- I -1 U g . -6-â€¢CAâ€¢" & f..1,Kâ€¢.AW. P.C. --3--- 7/iÂ».h---- q.: .1...7 1,/Det /5/0./. ' .~='.,21 I Â«22.- ' h ' '1' + 1 ... . /4. e- ./.1 .61....I , 1- 1 ~ 11 1- . 1 :1 7- - :p.,- - 9 _. ~ Ay :=.--1. -i-rE 30 9 ,93'4.R Z E- 2 3 7.1-Jt r 7: - - itt:'rfÂ°ti.:i,j?'76 246'Â· =: 2-=12 - Â· 'H - :-Â·: - 91*tifir:/141 Nont/..1,1.. - u ~...SEN T I 4 6/2, 41Â·:, 4. i , Â·,C,7 .*9.-s ..1?"T 1,101-1.1 + r:-2-3-Â¥ --92....--0 .ki a '411 11 1:,1 1) 6*ED--4 .. 12 , , 1 ' -1 94 FEEÂ¢4 Â· '-Â·iÂ· -- --Â· 4 Â·.1, , -! * F-13- .w~~ ~1 1 ')1111 ':1 1 - 4 _'2 1 + - 3- 1 P=.Ta-/34 .r , j.75=.4 1 a South facing windows as shown on Bayer drawing, above. Note that the openings are covered with louvers and do not match the existing windows below. However, other features shown on the Bayer drawing, such as aluminum louvers higher up on the wall were not constructed, so it is possible that some design changes were made in the field. It is not clear whether the existing windows are original or not. The architect suggests that the upper window could be back-painted because it will be covered from the interior. Staff recommends that existing window be preserved as it is. 1 . 1 T.&/1 /A= f 1 --- 1 t 1 - -- liliN i I n, .-1.-Z--1 --- 1---1-1- 1:1! 4.1. 14/911/Â¢4 'gll' 1 ~...7.-rÂ»-1 1A1,1 14ff 1* i m 1 1 D 7Â·-Eli- AL 1 12 - 11 -61 4 r ~11Â£ i .1 / \2 -_-_-_-_-_-_---_ 1 '.. M. 2 There were two aspects of the project which generated more debate and were to be restudied for this continued hearing: â€¢ Increasing the width of the rear living space approximately 6' southward, into the rear patio and popping up above the carport roof. This was to be restudied to create a flat roof on the addition. 97 0 9 ,Â« 31:E__ /1. 1.4 / 1, CD A 1) el ' 1 i '=:Â°'~>~-Tfa--/ A 1 1 .11 6 19, r- v :w,p. w 2 1 .... 7 n.vm 71 1 i.'/- 1 ' 1- 2 : '12-- 1 r I\11| 1~ - 011 El -fiT --41--i- 51IWI85}1%1_ _ -Â·-+4:NU~*"*'~ L ~ ~ill '1 0 ':' p*, i I Â·~t[i,it-41~ T-fi ~ ir-1 Mt=to:=:K~ ---- - â€¢ Adding a dormer over the rear living space (existing at left, proposed at right). The dormer was to be reduced or eliminated. 1. 92 -A 9 -9 0 8 0 0 9 0 = T r 44 1 i 1 10 i 1 1 ,12?1 20 I - 1 9194.1 CNES: Oftal 1 -r,14 1 -' r - lili 1 1 F!1111!BÂ· -- '.1. . J MI|Ill * Â·Â·';:Â·-6----~ . -- + -- ~2-~ EXISTING - NORTH ELEVATION <1~) PROPOSED -NORTH ELEVATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 3 The architect has submitted amended drawings to restudy the rear addition and the dormer. Staff supports the project with conditions of approval. APPLICANT: NSF 1976 Investments LLC, represented by Poss Architecture and Planning. ADDRESS: 61 Meadows Road, Condominium Unit 6, The Trustee Town-homes At-The-Aspen Meadows Condominiums, Aspen, Colorado. PARCEL ID: 2735-122-39-006 ZONING: RMF/PD MINOR DEVELOPMENT The procedure for a Minor Development Review is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the stajf analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. If the application is approved, the HPC shall issue a Certificate of Appropriateness and the Community Development Director shall issue a Development Order. The HPC decision shall be final unless appealed by the applicant or a landowner within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 26.316. Staff Response: The rrustee Townhomes were built as simple two story forms with low pitched gable roofs. Natural wood shakes covered the front and rear facades. The sidewalls of each unit were sided with painted white wood. Relatively small, mostly vertically oriented windows were used on all elevations. Each unit originally had a staircase leading to a small upper floor deck on the front fagade, which allowed the first and second floors to be occupied by two different tenants. The town-homes were linked together with carports. The main entry to each unit was placed at the back of the carroll. Over the years, minor changes have been made to the street-facing facades of each unit and more significant alterations have occurred at the rear. Some of the remodels have been reviewed by HPC. Others pre-date the historic designation. The architect for this proposal has provided photos of each of the original townhomes, attempting to indicate where alterations have occurred. This is very helpful information. There 4 is very little documentation of the original design. To date, staff has been unable to locate Bayer's original drawings or any early photos ofthe buildings. Much of the townhomes' significance lies in their character as a group and their relationship to the rest of the Meadows campus. They are located very close to the health club, restaurant, and gardens, but are somewhat screened from view. In staffs opinion, the front facades of the units are the area of most concern in terms of historic preservation. The rear of the units have some visibility from a public trial well below the back of the buildings. The rear faQade is an appropriate area for expansion and it appears that all of the units have had some alterations here. The alterations, for the most part, expanded the living space into the rear patio area. None of the additions are taller than the original structures or are visible from the front. The original size of each townhome is approximately 1,800 square feet of floor area. The units are limited to 2,500 square feet and three bedrooms. The proposed floor area for this project is 2,160 square feet. About half of the proposed increase is attributed to the construction of a basement level. Briefly, the project to be considered by HPC involves: â€¢ Underpinning the existing foundation in order to excavate and construct a basement â€¢ Removal of a non-historic door leading into the storage area under the carport â€¢ Replacing the non-historic front door â€¢ Replacing all exterior sconces â€¢ Extending the living space right behind the carport approximately 2' westward, into the rear patio â€¢ Shifting the location of an original window on the south elevation, right above the carport storage â€¢ Increasing the width of the rear living space approximately 6' southward, into the rear patio â€¢ Adding a dormer over the rear living space Staff supports the proposed basement excavation as a low impact way to increase the living area in the house. A new lightwell will be constructed at the rear of the site. Staff supports the removal of the non-historic door under the carport, replacing the existing front door with a solid painted door, replacement of the exterior sconces, and extending the living space behind the carport. We recommend the south windows, discussed above, be preserved as is. Regarding the proposed new dormer, staff finds that the architect has significantly reduced the impact of this feature through their restudy. We find that the dormer meets this guideline: 7.7 A new dormer should remain subordinate to the historic roof in scale and character. u A new dormer should fit within the existing wall plane. It should be lower than the ridgeline and set in from the eave. It should also be in proportion with the building. 1 The mass and scale of a dormer addition must be subordinate to the scale of the historic building. At the last meeting, it appeared that some board members felt that no dormer would be appropriate to add, because it would negatively impact the original form. HPC must determine whether this proposed new element is appropriate due to its very limited visibility, or not an appropriate change to a building so significant due to association with Herbert Bayer. 7.1 Preserve the original form of a rooÂ£ 1 Do not alter the angle of a historic roof. Instead, maintain the perceived line and orientation of the roof as seen from the street. u Retain and repair roof detailing. Regarding the rear addition, dropping the height of the roof so that the addition cannot be seen from the front is appropriate and allows this new construction to read as separate from the original structure. Staff does recommend that the proposal be redesigned so that this space has little to no eave overhang, particularly no eave projection wrapping across the historic west fagade. (see pink arrow.) â€¢IW -t-----,i -.4-EN[[ Ker DVER EXPANS ON, S 'GNITICÂ»ITLY REDUCED CORÂ¥:R~I - --L- (--I'(- t.-1 ' F :I....V I.-I. 3 $ 4, .-- F -- 7-1'w/M~~Iid,8.4,mi 40 9-=km. t:,4 12,1.-a-02 7~.~~ -Â» Vii, 15 Â·- i . f $ I .. e 4 < 1 4 4 :3 + -4 ~ ~ ..+~6 - ' : 1 4 p- .I, I. . ,+ ; Al'X 1,1.3 1 N..i~OvI-~ , A.V. ~ ~-* 4.15*b * ,- . t. 1 . Â£ -Il--i.- li. 569.**LF % e, I.' A--L. t,~3411 '1'r'.1.11 11.14 2 f ' L .__11,1~ . ry- . .i.al 111//ir-sap:~rai.mal ... - L.= fil 14Â© 1.07 1 /"1812'lill'D Un'-3/fri 4 V#.I'.-' -' ' F'164' r i 1 ..1 .4 b*= 1 1/19' F 4- ~ toi-% in : -t, ..#-1 -Ld 1 44 ./. + 1 --=E k 2----9-4--t--1.-IL . 9 3% 1 3 . ''* . '2 I /ALLEY AXON -REVISED PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH 6 Guidelines of concern are: 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation o f the primary building's historic style should be avoided. u An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. u For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, comices and eavelines should be avoided. RELOCATION The intent of this Chapter is to preserve designated historic properties in their original locations as much of their significance is embodied in their setting and physical relationship to their surroundings as well as their association with events and people with ties to particular site. However, it is recognized that occasionally the relocation of a property may be appropriate as it provides an alternative to demolition or because it only has a limited impact on the attributes that make it significant. The following standards apply for relocating a historic property as per Section 26.415.090.C of the Municipal Code: C. Standards for the Relocation of Designated Properties Relocation for a building, structure or object will be approved if it is determined that it meets any one of the following standards: 1. It is considered a non-contributing element of a historic district and its relocation will not affect the character of the historic district; 2!: 2. It does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district or parcel on which it is located and its relocation will not have an adverse impact on the historic district or property; 91: 3. The owner has obtained a Certificate of Economic Hardship; 21' 4. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be an acceptable preservation method given the character and integrity of the building, structure or object and its move will not adversely affect the integrity of the historic district in which it was originally located or diminish the historic, architectural or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties; and 7 00 0 Additionally, for approval to relocate all of the following criteria must be met: 1. It has been determined that the building, structure or object is capable of withstanding the physical impacts of relocation; and 2. An appropriate receiving site has been identified; and 3. An acceptable plan has been submitted providing for the safe relocation, repair and preservation of the building, structure or object including the provision of the necessary financial security. Staff Response: The Townhouse will gradually be underpinned with a new foundation and a full basement excavation will be completed. Although the house will not be lifted and moved during excavation, the standard assurances that the structure will be protected are required. A memo from a structural engineer addressing the preservation concerns must be submitted with the building permit, along with the standard financial assurance of $30,000. DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: â€¢ approve the application, â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or â€¢ continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC grant Minor Development approval with the following conditions: 1. Replace the existing front door with a solid, painted door. 2. Do not move or alter (other than basic maintenance) the existing south facing window above the carport. 3. A report from a licensed engineer must be submitted with the building permit application clearly indicating the approach to underpin the house in a manner that does negatively impact the historic structure. A bond, letter of credit or cashier's check in the amount of $30,000 must be posted using the City's required format until the Certificate of Occupancy is granted. 4. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise 8 exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 61 Meadows Road, Condominium Unit 6, The Trustee Townhomes At-The-Aspen Meadows Condominiums, Aspen, Colorado. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A-). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen LIome Rule Charter. Exhibits: A. Design Guidelines B. Application Exhibit A, Relevant Design Guidelines 3.2 Preserve the position, number and arrangement of historic windows in a building wall. o Enclosing a historic window opening in a key character-defining facade is inappropriate, as is adding a new window opening. This is especially important on primary facades where the historic ratio of solid-to-void is a character-defining feature. u Greater flexibility in installing new windows may be considered on rear walls. 9 61 Do not reduce an original opening to accommodate a smaller window or door or increase it to receive a larger window on primary facades. 4.5 When replacing a door, use a design that has an appearance similar to the original door or a door associated with the style of the house. A replica of the original, if evidence exists, is the preferred replacement. A historic door from a similar building also may be considered. Simple paneled doors were typical. Very ornate doors, including stained or leaded glass, are discouraged, unless photographic evidence can support their use. 7.1 Preserve the original form of a rooÂ£ u Do not alter the angle of a historic roof. Instead, maintain the perceived line and orientation of the roo f as seen from the street. 1 Retain and repair roof detailing. 7.7 A new dormer should remain subordinate to the historic roof in scale and character. J A new dormer should fit within the existing wall plane. It should be lower than the ridgeline and set in from the eave. It should also be in proportion with the building. 3 The mass and scale of a dormer addition must be subordinate to the scale of the historic building. 9.7 A lightwell may be used to permit light into below-grade living space. In general, a lightwell is prohibited on a wall that faces a street (per the Residential Design Standards). The size of a lightwell should be minimized. A lightwell that is used as a walkout space may be used only in limited situations and will be considered on a case-by-case basis. If a walkout space is feasible, it should be surrounded by a simple fence or rail. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. u A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. u An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. u An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. u An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. u An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. u A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10 00 0 0000 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. u An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. 1 Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. ci Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. u Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. u Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. u Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. 1 For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. u The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. 14.6 Exterior lights should be simple in character and similar in color and intensity to that used traditionally. zi The design of a fixture should be simple in form and detail. Exterior lighting must be approved by the HPC. u All exterior light sources should have a low level of luminescence. 14.7 Minimize the visual impacts of site and architectural lighting. u Unshielded, high intensity light sources and those which direct light upward will not be permitted. Shield lighting associated with service areas, parking lots and parking structures. Timers or activity switches may be required to prevent unnecessary sources of light by controlling the length of time that exterior lights are in use late at night. Do not wash an entire building facade in light. Avoid placing exposed light fixtures in highly visible locations, such as on the upper walls of buildings. zi Avoid duplicating fixtures. For example, do not use two fixtures that light the same area. 14.8 Minimize the visual impact of light spill from a building. 11 0 0 0 0 o Prevent glare onto adjacent properties by using shielded and focused light sources that direct light onto the ground. The use of downlights, with the bulb fully enclosed within the shade, or step lights which direct light only on to walkways, is strongly encouraged. u Lighting shall be carefully located so as not to shine into residential living space, on or off the property or into public rights-of-way. 12 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING MINOR DEVELOPMENT FOR 61 MEADOWS ROAD, CONDOMINIUM UNIT 6, THE TRUSTEE TOWNHOMES AT-THE-ASPEN MEADOWS CONDOMINIUMS, ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION #_, SERIES OF 2015 PARCEL ID: 2735-122-39-006 WHEREAS, the applicant, NSF 1976 Investments LLC, represented by Poss Architecture and Planning, submitted an application requesting Minor Development review for the property located at 61 Meadows Road, Condominium Unit 6, The Trustee Townhomes At-The-Aspen Meadows Condominiums, Aspen, Colorado ; and WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards and recommended approval of Minor Development with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on May 27,2015; and WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Commission finds that the development proposal meets all applicable review criteria and that the approval of the request is consistent with the goals and objectives ofthe Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission approves the application with conditions by a vote of to NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC grants Minor Development approval for the property located at 61 Meadows Road with the following conditions: 1. Replace the existing front door with a solid, painted door. 2. Do not move or alter (other than basic maintenance) the existing south facing window above the carport. 3. A report from a licensed engineer must be submitted with the building permit application clearly indicating the approach to underpin the house in a manner that does negatively impact the historic structure. A bond, letter of credit or cashier' s check in the amount of $30,000 must be posted using the City's required format until the Certificate of Occupancy is granted. 4. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval o f a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 61 Meadows Road, Condominium Unit 6, The Trustee Townhomes At-The-Aspen Meadows Condominiums, Aspen, Colorado. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 27th day of May, 2015. Willis Pember, Chair Approved as to Form: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk C--- TIVED ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING MAY 2 1 2015 CITY OF ASPEN May 21, 2015 COM~lry DEVELOPMER Amy Simon City of Aspen Historical Preservation Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado, 81611 Re: Aspen Meadows Townhome Remodel - Revisions to original submittal Dear Amy, Please accept this letter as a response and description of the changes to the original submittal for the remodel of Unit #6, Aspen Meadows Townhome remodel. Per the staff memo from May 13, 2015, these were the concerns of the HPC: 1. Front door redesign Concern: The proposed front dooT design is not consistent with the original Pont door design Solution: We will replace the proposed front door design with a solid core painted wood front door with no glass which is thought to be the original design. 2. Proposed shift of an original window on the south Elevation Concern: Shifting of an existing historic window. Solution: We have reviewed all the permit applications for the remodel of other linits located in the building department files. We were able to locate and existing elevation drawing. In the drawing there is evidence of 2 windows on the sotith elevation, although they are not drawn as a typical window. They look to be drawn as a louvered type of window. This may have been done for privacy reasons between the units. It might be noted that the majority of the imits have windows on the side walls of the units that are not historic iii size or location. If the current location of the window is desired to be retained, we can install a window and back paint the glass so that the window looks frosted. This window will not be visible from the inside of the 1111 it. 3. South Extension Concern: The proposed south extension mises abotie the carport roof obscuring the original sloped roof line. Solution: The south extension has been redesigned so that all the new massing occlirs below the dat roof of the carport. In this new mass, we have proposed a new fenestration pattern (horizontal wood siding) and separated the roof forms by two feet (2'-0") to delineate this element as new. There is a philosophical question when it comes to the length of the eaves on the flat roof addition. There are two options: a. Keep eaves consistent with the garage flat roof ear'es - this makes the forms look similar but does not show the building element as "new" against the existing structure. 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 (t) 970/925-4755 (f) 970/920-2950 WWW.BILLPOSS.COM poss ARCHITECT[JRE+PLANNING b. Make eves depth different - this direction make the element read as new against the existing strticture but one can argue makes 1Jhe entire composition a little disjointed as you have a variety of eave lengths on a small building. We are not sure what the correct answer is on this. If the overall form is accepted by HPC, I could go either way on the eave depth. It is currently shown as option b, longer than the carport eaves to allow the element to read as new. We are amendable to either direction on this issiie. 4. New dormer on back roof. Concern: The proposed back former is not inset from the Toof and changes the original roof form. The height of the dormer obscures the original roof line. Solution: We have pulled back the size of the dormer in width, depth, and height to allow the original roof to be seen in its original form. In the original memo the back of the unit was identified as the area for expansion. As quoted: "The rear fagade is appropriate area for expansion and it appears that all of the units have had some alterations here" This is where we ha~Â·e proposed the expansion. We acknowledge the concern that we are adding to the existing roof form and there is the concern that we are setting precedent for all units to add dormers in this location. We believe that the addition of the revised dormer will not affect the overall integrity of the original design for these reasons: a. PresenÂ·ation of original roof form - The new dormer design meets the criteria of 7.7 and is subordinate to the scale of the historic building. b. Solid and void - For the back of these units, it was expressed that the rhythm of the solid and void of the units was desired to be retained. Unfortunately, this rhythm has been internipted on units two, four, and nine where the back terrace has been filled iii by a building form. The dormer allows us to maintain this rhythm by placing the floor area in a location that does not affect the solid-void relationship of the units. c. Sightlines - Sightline to the back of the unit are limited and can be broken down into two categories - Public and private. 1. Public - The public sightlines to this iinit are from the trail below the complex. We have walked the trial and provided photos from various vantage points along the trial. The roof of unit #6 is not visible from any point on this trail. We encoiirage the HPC board to walk tlzis trail previous to our next meeting. 2. Private - The private sightlines occur from the area of lawn around and along the lawn area at the back of the complex. To get to this stage in this process we have had to proctire the Aspen Meadows HOA approval. All of the neighbors incltiding the HOA president (next door in Unit #7) approved the original dormer scheme. d. Materiality - We have designed the dormer with windows on three sides to differentiate the new dormer from the existing structure. 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 (t) 970/925-4755 (f) 970/920-2950 WWW.BILLPOSS.COM poss ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING 5. West Extension Concern: This section of the proposal was not identified as objectionable in the HPC memo. Solution: This part of proposal will remain as proposed. We hope that tliis letter mitigates the concern of the HPC staff and we will have your stipport with the revised proposal. If you need additional material(s) or need to meet to review details of the revised proposal, please contact us. Respectfiilly stibmitted, Keith Howie, Authorized Representative for NSF 1976 Investments, LLC. 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 (t) 970/925-4755 (f) 970/920-2950 WWW.BILLPOSS.COM li - I 2,9 .... 2." 4 . wt , r /0 & $ //~/f'.4 1 1* 4 i 4* . .. 0 2 ~ 0 4 m f)14//#A~/b-v4~~ fal, m-imt -y . - - 12=3 -a â€¢--4* il-<3-617 *f .- I -....- . , 1 519 - d kc --ru-- . . 1 311 - 2- 481 A rt ' 1 116 I ,-P.- -*-.-i f -:.. 2-<4 -)REM,~,11,-tÂ·11 b -- 4 * LI , 4 ///////3 al#&6 1 7- 1 - 4* FiqIF~9 1 ~ 205:3 1*h i. 1 -=UL--1 22=WN =rm@:. I 3- -- 4 . 2 * 1...,4 *VP P== 1 % . } 1 . 7/*. Â¢* Â»Â« .9 1 .0 . . | ji"/ ~~1. i 9 1-,"1 FL. Â·. 1 R, 4 y i ':, 1 221* 1 % . . Al . 16.1 1 *Il .4 . er - - A. -/ br 6.'â€¢19tj: e. 4 - - 4. ,"19* -Â· 0 7 i .,A - 1 - : ..1'Cr - AiÂ· . 4 ' - A . 0 9% 1 1 -r - f 1 - I , . -.. 1 I. ,r I . 4.1 ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 REHITECTURI- PI ANNIP, poss HPC REVIEW EAST WIAIN STREET A SPE N COLORADO 81611 0 2015 .C-r ES-.R. A'C F.A INPIC ; C 05/20/15 (T} 970 /925 4755 (F)970/920 2950 6....C... (-9/3 - Â·Â·- ~ 1 1 1 .4 . tu i' T~ 11'--~ '~- ~-ta.... 2- 1 1.!i'-OiltÂ·' 2!,i lilli'li . 1 1-1-1 -1 + 1. " h..,1/1 - .!194 1-1:11;11Â·41 -!F i 6 1Â£ 1 'f' w_ w, v Ur-. .. .. 1 .1-.116 1 111 BI .11 it.C -- - 1 I- A 7 ' ~ - ---TI . -1 ~ 1 la *.... [1! 1 - 1 11 ~ I L------ C B) Cr) lo 01 I - EAST ELEVATION - ORIGINAL PROPOSAL 5, -.11 1 I. I -M~ I ; 2- 1- i A 14--4' ' |~~~ - pn n Inn 0 4 U-*Ul lie E.Â· â€žÂ·114[142:1 1 1 i E ill|[I 'CI ZIO= 1 - --/ | |~ ~; E + *,4 I E i] '! i HIP\\1 1 . L ]E 1 1 REMOVED SLOPED ROOF OVER R .liIA -1 - Â· Â·~ : 1 EXPANSION 11 1 | -1 - - - 4. 1 E.Iii 1 07-36 - c<-3 EAST ELEVATION - EXISTING i 1 1- I El p n n *,+A_I L Y- 0 I. ,; .;...~ ~~Â·illi...11.:L li i 1 1 11.:' Â· Â· 1 14 . 11 1,0 -1 1.1-1 143"! 12 141!2; 1 1.. -- :. --- .L''Ii:...11.I~t ~il,10 :tÂ·!: i- : 4 1 ~1. 1 =1 1 1 1. 1 1- v 1 1 - 2411 4 3- L /1 EAST ELEVATION - REVISED PROPOSAL ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD ASPEN. CO 81611 ]SS 4RCHITECTURE + PLANNING HPC REVIEW : BUILDING ELEVATIONS imm~00 0 5'2.'4 0 rAIN .TREE- A "I. 1,30 416 . .n HPtD7 -' if#5:~ liJ -~ 0 00 0 0 .UT - -- g : 11 l 1~ 11 j -1] 1 1 L 4 idilip! UUIUU[IUJ 1 U 1.1 --- -:1 : 11. 1 1...1 7.1 11 ~i- Â·] ~'.-i F -E --ILI + - - I - 1 11111 1 ~ EXISTING & PROPOSED GRADE m 0 0 0 111111 9 / ~4~ 1 7 1.:1. -41SCING RID . *4 1 1 1 11 1 lili Ill:I I 1 17--~_ - -- 1011/1/1"1 IN~ I. -----.4-- h SOUTH ELEVATION - ORIGINAL PROPOSAL :11'il,;;0 641 1 - <2< 1 # E L at= ~ 2 P L ./ 1 5 2 - 0 111 . 4 3.tti ~ ~~ ~ ~~9 ~ i# ' REDUCE DORMER HEIGHT, FLAT ROOF AT UUOUU l:---9F. -u DORMER AND EXPANSION 11 7 0 1 .- 2~, _-Ii i~ Ili i ci al =E . r.~ Efel 6.1 /,// \\ III fl l~ i . . ~ 1 1 lilli 11 1 J i . 4 1, 11 \ 1 -i 1 r.7.- , 1 i~i ~ / \ 1111 -7\ . /1, -3 1 4 1/. PLY'LOâ€¢'.- '2. Â· L 4 7 2, E- j - - SOUTH ELEVATION - EXISTING rOU--A44%*At~ef U U U Z U I ..9 , liE U ; 'i| 1 ' D""a41/ - b 7-3,7-: Cy" 1 ~lb:t, S:=.1:332, :113{41122 LULL.k.AX.AAXAA-LAXAAXA.L. ~ - 1 ~.1~ l it 11 11 1 il' 11 ~j=EE-3 10- illill r- EXISTING& PROPOSED GRADE - Er# r-' 01 SOUTH ELEVATION - REVISEDPROPOSAL - ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss \RCHITECTURE + PLANNING HPC REVIEW : BUILDING ELEVATIONS HPt08 2.<.I :.TRE ET A Cil[.. :D.CR:~ID â‚¬t' , r O - 11 'I:32 05,20/15 Fac' p f 1 - f ;i 1 J U~Ki_~1_1~...~ I i iIi 1 1. 1 E i lili.lilli lilli 1 . , i I'!-17-1 ~11[Illn'11 2-~ . 1,1 1 11 1 1 -l-1- LI 1 . '1 --./- 9 4 i L : 1 1 . :1/ 1 1 ra--4.H-- 0~~6 11 . ||~ 2 i 111-,1 12- iiI t. 1 \Ill ! ,r 12~1_. Ljx- ~-2==2 1 1 -1 1 !1 9 Uf, i T-T~~~ ~ ~ I... 1,- ' F , ' rÂ· L.1 J i .0..1 - t.- e 0 /90 r L E =P---1-1 Â»r=*, -- 3 ' r.r i ' 1 i 1 - .... ~_ _ : *L .r I....1.. Ill _.1 It |t~ 1| 1 i i i i i'Iii 1[TITr-| 4,1- 1-13 11 1 1~ (i>-9.EST ELEVATION - ORIGINAL PROPOSAL U N H UM '2 I I'll .1 : E~[LI la 1~ ~ 1|~'- i L.|~ ip; 1 0 1 irj -fl- 4-41--F--ff.-1-4 1- I h' i 11 >, i i ~\ 15 1 ' 1 1 1 11 f i i 1 1 m M 1 1: 1 11 2 : 1(/-4:5 2 - W .4 -: 1 EXPANSION 1L F '4--'-4.;d:Â« 1 REDUCE DORMER HEIGHT. FLATTEN ROOF AT 1 1 1 H Hip L.1| 1. ~~|~ 1.~ |~~I U LU1L T ' 1- Ill 7111 El ' lillil I . lilit #.h'41 =44* i ~ -r?r 2 '111 1 Ill -i_~~~~~i~_11 i tt-, liE i i='W ,=&. 116~ 5 03 WEST ELEVATION - EXISTING *j-UT-: 11 --77 1 'Â»4-4 1 ) -1 i 1.;l.-1--- 7 - - ~i L I (H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. | ~' '1. ,jetii h '22~]]~,1,= ' lili Ilil Ililll ===-: 4 b Ell 2;13 n , 1 11 1 11 11 1,-d 0=mi r h WEST ELEVATION - REVISED PROPOSAL 47--nET- '. ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, 00 81611 ~OSS RC HITECTURE + PLANNING HPC REVIEW BUILDING ELEVATIONS HPt39 6 ./RE'- A..EN DEWS'll ' t. ~ -fi== '6.'-I.... O . f. ,-i 0 : r.. 00 1 0 1 4 w 9 ' 21 EL or) <rl rr . r Y.U--M-- i- E -E :Er 4 d 1 # ' , .....; 1- j I t. zw I -=Jilinmrrim4~M.J,11:Lilw-Imil """" W ' . I Â»1- R ~4 ~t w L ul,1,1â€žâ€ž,1~,~;,11;~n~:,11,211!1111[le,Jillam 1~1, 11.tzL , ' - ' LIU[L[ [[L[~~ ~ - 1 . 0 t> 0 2 1 0 _ w â€¢ < W --~ Cl -0 O 1/ 4.- Lj 0- . 0 -. 111...11,11111.1, m (n M 4- - i -~ 1 (20 -1 :,2 <C I i. 4- (6 - = -- CD r < --- # . - ~ 1 4*= ~ CA '' - - I. ~~,0=;am=-rÂ·Â·a M - 1 1 1 i ~11,1,1,1,1~ 1 11 1,1.1 1,1,11 m-,111Â·-'~~~"' Z ~14'11'11'11'1'1" '11'11'11'1-=â€žâ€ž-'-11-11'11'11'11'.1,1,11" O 0 - 0 1- ' 3 - -- - ------ 1- LU Â· -- R. Z I 1 1- 1 a: # --- -- ---- I. U*,~ 1 OIl. LIVI_ J.- (03 1 1 E < 1 1--. L 0\17 u., [12-1---4 4 96 1.1 1.N,1,1,1,1,i'!-ill iwi'llim~muÂ»imN#mil#/1/:Lule."J"Imim]JJJ,Wilm~.MI-n'.1./.--Iâ€¢ b-:rm:mr:!lu~rri:[Er, ] ]] ~J J~1~ ~11~ 9!1 ~ 1'11 1Jll Il L~ ~ . ... ..==~= ==;==== =]== = : ~1 ------I=~=17#==2X MM=-_ a -I / 1 ,\ : ,/1 1----=====1 1 11, r- 1. 1 i 1 L-i~illuiii-~L;G,<]=*6*2 - M-/=mi#~!E12.*.11,~iwl!41LiJ.*mJ. 1 L . :~ .:: l-La--'.................. ~ 1 1 L Lld___.---- _.null]=u,!91=1' ~ ~.i ,+=,i,==i~i~.;mi,~=~*1~--:Itl . 1 \\1.1- - IL -==-11~tr 1Z -â€¢ i 1 1 1 as A I i .--2 W e 1 H- 6, a 1/*Liâ€ž,Leu,Ii,Lei,1,1,1,1,1,~J]I,Jui,Jil[,~r[[[[I, 1,111 11 1 1 1,1 1 1- L ar 017 1--4668666-11 -p 1300IAI3H 0EfldH SNOI.LVA313 DNI(Illfie A31/d@ 3414 9 INNV14 311-93> ssod Obld 0361/\311 - NOI1VA313 HlbION 9NllSI)(3 - N011VA3-13 ! 1- I . -9 T . f. . . e \ =. iL 64& . I ,;&. . \ 1 , - 0 ., 3-)2Â· Vt // f , ..Â«'.C. - 4 Â·Â·a.c '4 ' EÂ» 45Â·9 1:~ Â· 4 41 :mt*.~ Â·A....' \41\ 'Uff-\ 1 , ---7-CE:Â·r ~ 1 Â·1 :,Â·Fâ€¢. S I..4 t Â»11 . VALLEY AXON - ORIGINALLY PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH 11.2,62--x \ ----- '' .#- -Il . 9,"9=--2 \*ar IGNIFICANTLY REDUCED DORMER, FLAT ROOF OVER EXPATISION ./ 1 # ~** Mt- 4 3 ., , I / 72 .-F.- 3 0 D. P 4.0 â‚¬ ./2 . 1 6 3 4 ne \ ~uu:fr- .. 41Â·t- ' - f. it s 0~- j a - ..nk b! 4Â¥.': -w * m -4 4-4 9 . I.. VALLEY AXON - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH / *LU i,: '052'A 1 1 -7 141- 1,4,1 ifu-1 41 - : 9 6. dit . ' 11 . 3*I--6 1 , . 7 1 1 0 W 490' 10 - t VALLEY AXON - REVISED PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 - poss ~Â©t 1-lili ! 1-;Rf PLANNING HPC REVIEW : 3D IMAGES ill=.M,OC~TE& HPC 21 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 Â® 2015 All/'Cn.n)'-I.'.' 05/20/15 T1970/925 4755 (F)970/920 2950 9 r. /4-,4 "6< /0- .<re-- EisÂ» ji r &\-i- h <8124-4-*44: ?1 1 Irrwes,- '9~.1 11 1 t -41 2%~1 rÂ¢w 11 t.------24 ji----47 L ill W /, â€¢ I. N-- - -- J.& , j-11 1 3-~ ---'., rt -- -- - =. 173. 4 \ 7 â€¢ wm--1.'7 <,1-4.4, 6 1 â‚¬> i Ti- TY ~y --" :/1/""glfi***"-1:*:MF49'.: * Fr -+ . #- VALLEY AXON - ORIGINALLY PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH E .~rl*11410&2"'lle/3 LiW \3\ 11 -f-- -l 1 *Ltill 't ~ikt,.4_1â‚¬?t- ~*0~* at --~-~Â¥L-=a , t . $ ft. 5 3~601 Ilill< 4%:L .i t f t i,n - i <116~â€¢ 2 2 ,.. -r . -4.- -%2- i-[,11- 1 3Â·:~t'V-371_&=_ _ -2 \ .pÂ·. i Â· I, -7 .râ€¢-Â·-n='- 11 V VALLEY AXON - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH . ~ , 11-Fl ' c#J: -4 0 . - 2.7 ~1 , 1 1[~;9 1 1-Cj Li:2-1 1-2~ ' 11*liM?. i -* 4 VALLEY AXON - REVISED PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss iRCHITECTURF PIANNING HPC REVIEW : 3D IMAGES HPC 22 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Â® 2015 Al'Im,UENOPUN-1'.. 05/20/15 /]970/925 4755 (F} 970/920 2950 - i 1 je-tÂ· .4Â·401-006/.2 -14 1 - - 1 '11 ..,9 - > IT- $3 - r M. Â·-Â· '41.:<C/Â·: -gÂ·.2 1 j lili JU *4.- 22%- -- --- ip :42'5~Lair,&,a<-1,9 4|.Vi#' ' 1 ' 1,-< .4 ~ 43-AG r.9 Â» 0 --ff. , 47- L--- 0 I ' -- tq R..4 , '4~ -1.? '. i 1 -4.1 ... a f . Â» 1 73ft.1.'At' 11 Jt V J* ~I 4. 1*2 2 -- - '. .. V.4.-5 4 .20 ---- -. 37 Â£46.45.4 . - tjllitiWlE WaKit p- -, Â· 2 . i 4-91*V Â· - . -5. 42 4. te L t: 't'~~'/41 j PERSPECTIVE - ORIGINALLY PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH - - 46:79 ' E ~ 1 1 - .. Â· 3 Â·'-'"'Â·,-i ' L-jFLATTENED ROOF OVER EXPANSION, <<f7% Â· Â· 2-1 Irc lili REDUCED DORMER - ti ... 4 e. , .-%/ k '4Â¥ 'i 2,0.,:4 &: I .=2221 --a:. $ N. di ./ PERSPECTIVE - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH 7'77 Â·Â· N t. C I I r. M i; i L 1.-1-. 6*-.r. 3 2 2 : - 1 -U- ---9 f/44 - --- PERSPECTIVE -REVISED PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 possl -illi JURf FIANNING HPC REVIEW 3D IMAGES HPC 23 STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 8161' Â® 2015 &5=%52=,c 05/20/15 [T)970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 5-3-'ILE T. ./ 12 1-i . L- i ~ 3 mi-TZE:~ N rIA...84 6 1.-0-'a /,1, atz>- - __r-d-1 k LA~ L 1 -11 1 ..4 4 t..9.-lip-311-.-H '=- E-Â«Â«9 4/ '~ fri//- 1.6= EnÂ·// Fi V., 1/di#78 j f '11 ._, A- 1./.Ill : 1-9- - --14.1...,E- F .4.ilk- 9 - Â¥460. i ./MI, 71 ~ Â·r.I=, d if t! P '- 1 :/,~ 1...... L./-44, li ff rr--IrT--I~ V.Fwifi-~r -'97,wifigE,i~Fel ~4 *:126. .# t' Â·,fET- .1 .... 49 - . . D #h ./ . W. . B - - 2 14 1-I.......1 . 1 1.8 PI'~~~~ ___---+1 1-1- 1-i---il PERSPECTIVE - ORIGINALLY PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH - F .mr be, 5~ 1&[},1 - ill - vE I :~ 64. - I . ../1----I - -2-_LULLLULLI_.-* 1.-pl~1 - .Â· ~F</1 I. ...20.1--0/5.Â£ b \ 1 9 P/7/. '-Â»145: 0 9 4 . B-- 1- -w#===+Rd': p..~grfr- -4 ilillillillillill./*.mmi//MIES.mkmetil//./.91 +F:Tililibl'Il... I L_ Â·i .L Wi~TE- Ck - -- -75~6 1 :44 - . 11 1 IL ~ 1. ......%19'mulww~, 1 ~ria - ... fir .: 182 i 11 ill *ty- PERSPECTIVE - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ...Eme, U ,*-2 3 "6.-1 b 511~4 4 I . 4 . 0 3 I *.. PERSPECTIVE - REVISED PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC REVIEW : 3D IMAGES HPC 24 POLLERS,15' A~EN, COLORADO 81611 ING Â® 2015 &&4~46. 05/20/15 .)910/925 4735 .) 970/920 2950 5Â£7X 15 2 G X ~ S -lf Et . Â· =e= - .Fi-i-tri..--.-\Mn -. 5.3.witâ‚¬ t~i=~4--J~I,--s~*--7.~,~2.~: *'c~- 9, g___ 1- ii jÂ·t' . 4 4-Fl--5, ilj i Â£ \11 i i 1.- 11, --- 1 1,1 k -- f.- a 3.19 .. i Â· LÂ·.t, 1 ---I.-~7 -- PERSPECTIVE - ORIGINALLY PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH -- rl A r 9 1 4 1 A...I --Zil:Â£IIICEIZetmE.4 1 j~. "~3 i- L -'.r. m 91Â·. 111 1 : 1-i---- --h---pKI.-Il- "/"-///:*I . IN j. ' . C. % 11 E-7 1 4 ': XM *â€¢ 'th r PERSPECTIVE- EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH lk 43 411 1.95 .r ..1 PERSPECTIVE - REVISED PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 POSEEL iHI 1 1 (11 1JR F Â· PLANNING HPC REVIEW : 3D IMAGES STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 0 2015 ==-'I 05/20/15 HPC 25 IT)970/925 4755 .) 970/920 2950 DZ=/2- .5 2 4: 2 I - Fln . -5.4 :71,3.i.. .: -UN ...'... . Â· . 2 i d 04 Lf- , A. 0 ... ~ clf~tle,i ..Â·.1- L y. ~szÂ» 4 1. - -rr- L.-r-~r 1 li - i %*1 U y 1-1 Â· 1 . I I " 1 1-- 1 LI L f - i Ip It 1 ' \ PERSPECTIVE - ORIGONALLY PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH . i I , 1,1 ilit i~ 1 V , -11--rr--- , ,+ F <1* # *4 49_1 il /# C hÂ¢ 31!,?*15 -1.-1.- 1 PERSPECTIVE - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH / 1 / A -, L-- 1 Ilk- -7~ '15 - - 1 . ~1 f. PERSPECTIVE - REVISED PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss ARCHI 1 t. (3 1 Ij RE - Fl ANNING HPC REVIEW : 3D IMAGES 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Â® 2D15 1@~4#4~~~~~ 05/20/15 HPC 26 IT)970/925 4755 .)970/920 2950 0.:.52/3. 4 ... f/ ~.-Â«tr, ' - \ Wrk) . // '3 -.--7 2 /// 0 +2Â©2Â»- < /, \1 / 99:k\-\*. 97 1 " '. ./ . ~1 . /6...... . U- :69 - ~ -- ..~,~- - 3- ~ FRONT AXON - ORIGINALLY PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH , \ 1 , '4*P 6%* -4. SIGNIF ICAIVTLY REDUCED DORMER 411 41 3 th 44 .-#, 1& - / 4 . 'y Â¥ 1 -=UElâ€ž 1 1 / p - 1 1\ 1. 1 1 4 4/ A N.'449 ./>i4-- . \ ./i. \ 1 9 - / FRONT AXON - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH , ~ 9 , N 1** \ \-1 0/ FRONT AXON - REVISED PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 pOSS V NITECTURE *PLANNING HPC REVIEW : 3D IMAGES HPC 27 ' 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPE~, COLORADO 81611 -9/Ill- Â® 2015 6/=Â£~=. 05/20/15 (T)970/925 4755 .) 970/920 2950 -CLAE '-I . E NORTH Srjx.5:2:2/ 1, 1 X '.1,Â£11 1 ./ 1 11. 4.. ., ,. Iv-11& â‚¬ ex -4. .Er, 9 .l<*** -F I 61 9 i ,Â§ 31 E- k=;Â»1 / , . 5:=Iw41 1 ' 7 1 ....Â·=IFÂ«.'0- -r"0 1, b. ..t - -- il FRONT AXON - ORIGINALLY PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH \ ----%-4 ,- // \1 %'* . /7 2*1 h. k xÂ« \ Â¥22 - " FLAT ROOF OVER EXPANSION. SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCED DORME . 4%: - +1 I \\ â‚¬4114 r . FRONT AXON - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH -%$42%/ %- 8 FRONT AXON - REVISED PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss r? CHITFCTUR f Â· PI ANNING HPC REVIEW : 3D IMAGES EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 CD Â®15 ~"'-Amc.rm, *U~~1&. 05/20/15 HPC 28 /)970/925 4755 /) 970/920 2950 ...2/'. IV.B. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Ilistoric Preservation Officer RE: 61 Meadows Road- Minor Development, Public Hearing DATE: May 13,2015 SUMMARY: 61 Meadows Road is Unit 6 of the eight original Trustee Townhomes designed by Herbert Bayer at the Aspen Institute. Several areas of the campus are landmarked, including the Townhomes, the Reception Center, the IIealth Club, Marble Garden and Anderson Park. HPC design review is required for any changes to these historic resources. The townhomes were built in 1965 as short term accommodations for special visitors associated with the Institute's programs. Today the Institute retains ownersliip of some of the units, while . others are indiyidually owned and used as primary residences or second homes. There are three . new units, one on the south end of the complex and two on the north, that were authorized in the 1992 Aspen Meadows Master Plan and constructed in 1996. - The owner of Townhome #6 is requesting approval to construct a basement under the existing building, to make an addition at the rear, and to complete other exterior changes. The amount of new square floor area involved in the project qualifies this as Minor Development. APPLICANT: NSF 1976 Investments LLC, represented by Poss -Architecture and Planning. ADDRESS: 61 Meadows Road, Condominium Unit 6, The Trustee Townhomes At-The-Aspen Meadows Condominiums5 Aspen, Colorado. PARCEL ID: 2735-122-39-006 ZONING: RMF/PD MINOR DEVELOPMENT The procedure for a Minor Development Review is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. If the application is approved, the HPC shall issue a Certificate of Appropriateness and the Community Development Director shall issue a Development Order. The HPC decision 1 P52 FORUM PHI 715 Wesl Main SDeet Swile 204 Aspen. Colo,ado 81611 P:/0.279.4157 F.866,770.5505 114 NEALE Don & Ann Shoit 114 Neale Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR S.....Inc 8261/G~ndAvenue Glenwcod Springs. CO 81602 [970)9454945 sur.co@gmall com CIVIL- Roanng Folk Eng,noe,Inw POBOX tlt7 Carbond...081623 ~970)948-7474 ilÂ¢hafdg@,leng..g PROPERTY LINE AND CENTERLINE OF PROPERTY LIlli AND CENTERLINE OF IÂ·=10' HORZ. 1'Â·=10' HORZ. SCALE: MECHANICAL DRIVEWAY PROFILES SCALE: DRIVEWAY PROFILES 025Â· VERT R&H Mechanical LLC 1-=2.5' VERA 0825,1,Charnber,Avenue WITH 30-ZONING VARIANCE n. /W Eagle, CO 81631 li (9703-8-2699 I.-I. bion.2./.mochanicaL.m ~ STRUCTURAL Evolve Slluclula! [Design 65 N 40 Slieei. STE 5 Carbond./.081623 .. ..0 (970)610-7708 4 N.,71.24% m ...I=Uls. saia@â€¢0.6//com r N ....'/'/ /1 f ..Â»câ€¢[ir - I.*/ 46 . ..... 4, CONTRACTOR 3 MA,5 -|. ~ M :12 Sievs Smilh Con,liuclk,n C w ....... J , , /"IN.G.li :t ~eM $ 1 ./.f /'I' .5* 6, r-* 1 ./:/.â€¢Ii 406 Aspen Airpolt Bus{now Conler *n,ColoradÂ©81611 .OÂ·~SU'll'/I;Ar.~FE'. 9970) 9:54288 ...7....... ."lif,A"m"ill......1/ ./.@steve/mill...clion.~orn 1 ./.,9,1,4/,unal.~/1927 . -41-/4 \ ~00' â€¢47,70/ OATEOFn*UÂ¢Al. -//6.80/F , /1 .-c./flcufa,r.... 01;CM / ' LMTJ~~'.9'. j. /42/ /41 g..*0.4, m, 2.,0 2174Â» - ~ 511/15 HPC SETBACI< REV .Â·ConC,Irt CD 5,2341 ROWIEMP ENCRUNT --I........Â£ CO 4/15/14 HPC SUB Al,1214[ME. co ./14 CLARIFICATION '.1 . , - A fi,/ 1 =62,6 7 &-1 LA/,fr~6 '-f'Â£/Fl -' '.9 CD 9/17/13 PERMITSET 1,8,80 \ ./.87,Â£,fl'.. 6 5 CLED,N# W I #, -\ Li,mw~wi~ Ji_ W iii ~'57 L/9 Lrcm#~gwrircuu' so 69/13 HPC CONCEPT, REV. ..;.Sg'.U SD 4./ ..Fh~kBUVEW j ...Jlm... -- EgE[0/Â·tri B .e,powiti,~I ai /4 .....'02 -1 , r EAH *f-'....{.iN .....,SÂ·, PROJECT I D 1211 \ ....AO CRAVd I BY: \ ......MI \ i.'...UN,11 L;:21 ----- -r=-4.JA- ------ %'eâ€¢,E;, COPYRIGHT FOPUM PHI. LLC miwin EVED,â€¢!il' -'. \ Lh'.Iâ€¢le \....... 1 .St,PON W \ Â·N....~ ,.....:lu . \ I. I ..all *m U=sgo fil#' VÂ¢ .cs,pal 0Â¥,02'le, ~yarlâ€¢!lu .fl,luâ€¢ Em~~w.lf- pr emf....7.<F-.#G,G i SHEETTITLE 1 A-30 ~ ..4 9 -/" t!Â§ M S a R,0â€ž 1 , DRIVEWAY PROILE KI DRIVEWAY PROFILE â‚¬30' CIVIL PROF ~- LSd Â« Â¥U f.ul =4 #Â·UU 1< IV.80 shall be final unless appealed by the applicant or a landowner within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 26.316. Staff Response: The Trustee Townhomes were built as simple two story forms with low pitched gable roofs. Natural wood shakes covered the front and rear facades. The sidewalls of each unit were sided with painted white wood. Relatively small, mostly vertically oriented windows were used on all elevations. Each unit originally had a staircase leading to a small upper floor deck on the front fagade, which allowed the first and second floors to be occupied by two different tenants. The townhomes were linked together with carports. The main entry to each unit was placed at the back of the carport. Over the years, minor changes have been made to the street-facing facades of each unit and more significant alterations have occurred at the rear. Some of the remodels have been reviewed by HPC. Others pre-date the historic designation. 20,2 2 y. 1 Â· The architect for this proposal has provided photos of.each of the original lownhoines, attempting to indicate where alterations have occurred. This is very helpful information. There - is very little documentation of the original design. To date, staff has been unable to locate Bayer's original drawings or any early photos of the buildings. Much of the townhomes' significance lies in their character as a group and their relationship to tile rest of the Meadows campus. They are located very close to the health club, restaurant, and gardens, but are somewhat screened from view. In staff' s opinion, the front facades of the units are the area of most concern in terms of historic preservation. The rear of the units have some visibility from a public trial well below the back of the buildings. The rear faga(le is an appropriate area for expansion and it appears that all of the units have had some alterations here. The alterations, for the most part, expanded the living space into the rear patio area. None of the additions are taller than the original structures or are visible from the front. The original size of each townhome is approximately 1,800 square feet of floor area. The units are limited to 2,500 square feet and three bedrooms. The proposed floor area for this project is 2,160 square feet. About half of the proposed increase is attributed to the construction of a basement level. Briefly, the project to be considered by HPC involves: e Underpinning the existing foundation in order to excavate and construct a basement e Removal of a non-historic door leading into the storage area under the carport e Replacing the non-historic front door o Replacing all exterior sconces o Extending the living space right behind the carport approximately 2' westward, into the rear patio o Shifting the location of an original window on the south elevation, right above the carport storage 2 P53 IV.B. â€¢ Increasing the width of the rear living space approximately 6' southward, into the rear patio â€¢ Adding a dormer over the rear living space Staff supports the basement excavation as a low impact way to increase the living area in the house. A new lightwell will be constructed at the rear of the site. Staff supports the removal of the non-historic door under the carport, the replacement of the exterior sconces, and extending the living space behind the carport. Staff has concerns with the remaining aspects of the proposal. Regarding replacing the front door, the applicant wishes to install a wood door with panels of glazing. Information in the Planning Department records indicate that the original doors were solid core birch doors with no glass. Further review is needed in order to determine if any of the Townhomes retain the original front door. If so, that door should be replicated. The guidelines state: 4.5 When replacing a door, use a design that has an appearance similar to the original door or a door associated with the style of the house. A replica of the original, if evidence exists, is the preferred replacement. A historic door.from a similar building also may be considered. Simple paneled doors were typical. Very ornate doors, including stained or leaded glass, are discouraged, unless photographic evidence can support their use. Regarding the proposed shift in location of an original window on the south elevation, staff does not support this change and recommends any conflict with the existing location be resolved by changing the new interior plan. The proposal conflicts with guideline 3.2. 3.2 Preserve the position, number and arrangement of historic windows in a building wall. o Enclosing a historic window opening iii a key character-defining facade is inappropriate, as is adding a new window opening. This is especially important on primary facades where the historic ratio of solid-to-void is a character-defining feature. o Greater flexibility in installing new windows may be considered on rear walls. o Do not reduce an original opening to accommodate a smaller window or door or increase it to receive a larger window on primary facades. Staff's most significant concern with the proposal is the southward expansion of the rear living space, and the new dormer over that space. Our concern is that the proposed work is designed in a way that destroys the expression of the original size of the space. An addition must be clearly understandable as new work. 3 P54 0 010 0 IV.B. The dark shaded areas ill the roof plan below represent the proposed expansions to the building. CE) T T â€ž 1. 1 Dormer 1/ ..1. 1 v. 17 i. , ,3--- 1 :..tÂ· 1 VV I o,A 1 1 7/" r- fF--*W% 'Â· .-1 / ' 21:Â·Â·IllÂ·:fl:,7 =- ---izz--- ripÂ·==D --i.- -{10) 1 - 1 5_ L_ ti ll- + -1-zz ~zz -~ - --- --T-~ FE-;4 - ..il .-- ---- 1 1 buitt.- --1 ..9 3- 3- , . -- - 71 . - - 2 22 24_ EE-EMe,1 - 1 M BA'.1 Nn EF! G.Â·i ~3= -7 :2_- _-22-~1ZZ-ZI--L Ill 1 I el Le)5 0 [t,F,Y - r-'FfIC.7 South extension 1 1 4Jb.1// I 11 . .0 -11-_L]_1_[il_____ u 1 1 ..â€¢,1./Wil 1 1 It 1=2 Â»-1.-3 2--- 1 -------------7 1 1 ----1 / Iii - 1 1 ILl i li.r 6-3 West extension (i) (t) Ct) I-J- (1), PLAN -PROPOSED ROOF As the project is designed, the original pitched roof on the rear addition is extruded 6' to the south. The original southern limit oftlie space is no longer defined and the extended roof can be seen from the front, popping up over the carport. Staff recommends this be restudied so that the new addition is no taller than the carport roof. 4 P55 1--2-It-9Jrrl-.f IV.B. Addition visible from front <-j Y V 0 . I ... /1 E . .... <-L â€¢Â·V- r 7 9 ~=e: 1 :1 1 - 16-4 ---â€ž - :,16- tlY]~2= *Maw/*mi ' 4 -A~in-7-kiLÂ·fuo~ fihl#' I':L,0*181 A - *- ---llb-Â¥17 ,-0.-I./ lEil -1-7 Qi 1-=:;--li j i-' Â·Â·Â· 6 :'1-_Jh ., 11:7.:- 1 :4, 1, 1 " 1 m#.7.,=v.Zi= Â·i...t--1 ny:Â·.Cm:V=c ccÂ·n -' - Guidelines which are not being met include: 7.1 Preserve the original form of a roof. o Do not alter the angle of a historic roof. Instead, maintain the perceived line and orientation of the roof as seen from the street. o Retain and repair roof detailing. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation ofthe primary building's historic style should be avoided. o An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. o An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. o A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. o For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. -23. P56 00 0 IV.B. Similarly, the rear dormer is an issue because it is not inset from the north faga(le and changes the original form of the roof dramatically from that vantage point. Any dormer should be pulled away from the sidewalls and generally minimized. The floor to ceiling height created by the new dormer is approximately 12.' The guidelines state: 7.7 A new dormer should remain subordinate to the historic roof in scale and character. o A new dormer should fit within the existing wall plane. It should be lower than the ridgeline and set in from the eave. It should also be in proportion with the building. u The mass and scale of a dornier addition must be subordinate to the scale of the historic building. .-/ Vy r-1 1 , (9 9 .,9 9 09 0 .1 G t itiei i I Â¥ 1 1 ..1 A F 7-, 1 Ilil,& . _ 11 ------EM:&9.'I, i *.Im 1 1- - illfl, -___Lial rA_EXISTING-NORTil ELEVATION (~11 PROPOSED - NORTH ELEVATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEI. RELOCATION The intent of this Chapter is to preserve designated historic properties in their original locations as much of their significance is embodied in their setting and physical relationship to their smÂ·roundings as well as their association with events enid people with lies to particular site. However, it is recognized that occasionaliy tile relocation of a property may be appropriate as it provides an alternative to demolition or because it only has a limited impact on the attributes that make it signijicant. The following standards apply for relocating a historic property as per Section 26.415.090.C of the Municipal Code: C. Standards for the Relocation of Designated Properties Relocation for a building, structure or object will be approved if it is determined that it meets any one of the following standards: 6 P57 IV.B. 1. It is considered a non-contributing element of a historic district and its relocation will not affect the character of the historic district; gÂ£ 2. It does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district or parcel on which it is located and its relocation will not have an adverse impact on the historic district or property; or 3. The owner has obtained a Certificate of Economic Hardship; 2Â£ 4. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be an acceptable preservation method given the character and integrity of the building, structure or object and its move will not adversely affect the integrity of the historic district in which it was originalIy located or diminish the historic, architectural or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties; and Additionally, for approval to relocate all of the following criteria must be met: 1. It has been determined that the building, structure or object is capable of withstanding the physical impacts of relocation; and 2. An appropriate receiving site has been identified; and 3. An acceptable plan has been submitted providing for the safe relocation, repair and preservation of the building, structure or object including the provision of the necessary financial security. Staff Response: The Townhouse will gradually be underpinned with a new foundation and a full basement excavation will be completed. Although the house will not be lifted and moved during excavation, the standard assurances that the structure will be protected are required. A memo from a structural engineer addressing the preservation concerns must be submitted with the building permit, along with the standard financial assurance of $30,000. DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: â€¢ approve the application, â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or â€¢ continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the project be continued for restudy. Exhibits: A. Design Guidelines B. Application 7 P58 IV.B= Exhibit A, Relevant Design Guidelines 3.2 Preserve the position, number and arrangement of historic windows in a building wall. o Enclosing a historic window opening in a key character-defining facade is inappropriate, as is adding a new window opening. This is especially important on primary facades where the historic ratio of solid-to-void is a character-defining feature. Greater flexibility in installing new windows may be considered on rear walls. Do not reduce an original opening to accommodate a smaller window or door or increase it to receive a larger window on primary facades. 5 When replacing a door, use a design that has an appearance similar to the original door or a door associated with the style of the house. A replica of the original, if evidence exists, is the preferred replacement. A historic door from a similar building also may be considered. Simple panelâ‚¬d doors were typical. Very ornate doors, including stained or leaded glass, are discouraged, unless photographic evidence can support their use. 7.1 Preserve the original form of a roof. o Do not alter the angle of a historic roof. Instead, maintain the perceived line and orientation of the roof as seen from the street. o Retain and repair roofdetailing. 7.7 A new dormer should remain subordinate to the historic roof in scale and character. o A new dormer should fit within the existing wall plane. It should be lower than the ridgeline and set in from the eave. It should also be in proportion with the building. o The mass and scale of a dormer addition must be subordinate to the scale of the historic building. 9.7 A lightwell may be used to permit light into below-grade living space. Ill general, a lightwell is prohibited on a wall that faces a street (per the Residential Design Standards). The size of a lightwell should be minimized. A lightwell that is used as a walkout space may be used only in limited situations and will be considered on a case-by-case basis. If a walkout space is feasible, it should be surrounded by a simple fence or rail. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. o A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of tile primary building is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. 8 P59 00 0 0 0 0 0 2 CO IV.B. o An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. o An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. o A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. o An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. o Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. o Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. o Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar.to those of the historic building. u Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. o Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. o For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. u The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. 14.6 Exterior lights should be simple in character and similar in color and intensity to that used traditionalIy. o The design of a fixture should be simple in form and detail. Exterior lighting must be approved by the HPC. o All exterior light sources should have a low level of luminescence. 14.7 Minimize the visual impacts of site and architectural lighting. o Unshielded, high intensity light sources and those which direct light upward will not be permitted. 3 Shield lighting associated with service areas, parking lots and parking structures. 9 P60 IV.B. Timers or activity switches may be required to prevent unnecessary sources of light by controlling the length of time that exterior lights are in use late at night. Do not wash an entire building facade in light. Avoid placing exposed light fixtures iii highly visible locations, such as on the upper walls of buildings. u Avoid duplicating fixtures. For example, do not use two fixtures that light the same area. 14.8 Minimize the visual impact of light spill from a building. u Prevent glare onto adjacent properties by using shielded and focused light sources that direct light onto the ground. The use of downlights, with the bulb fully enclosed within the shade, or step lights which direct light only on to walkways, is strongly encouraged. o Lighting shall be carefully located so as not to shine into residential living space, on or off the property or into public rights-of-way. 10 P61 00 0 IV.B. ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (t) 970/925-4755 (f) 970/920-2950 MEMORANDUM TO: Amy Simon City of Aspen HPC Chair CC: File FROM: Keith Howie Bill Poss and Associates Architecture and Planning, P,C. DATE: December 26, 2014 RE: Aspen Meadows Townhome Remodel - HPC Conceptual application El ENCLOSURE Unit 6, Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhome Remodel 61 Meadows Road, Aspen, Colorado, 81611 Dear Amy; Please find enclosed the conceptual, HPC application for..Unit 6, Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhome Remodel.- As directed, we are supplying 1 electronic copy for review and will await number of copies to be provided from you. Attachment 1: Signed fee agreement Attachment 2: Historic preservation land Use Application Attachment 3: Dimensional Requirements form Attachment 4: Pre-application conference summary + HPC Land Use Applicatlon Attachment 5: Current Certificate of title insurance Attachment 6: Applicants signed letter of representation Attachment 7: Evidence of Financial ability to undertake project - Attachment 8: HOA Compliance Form : Attachment 9: 8-1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the city of Aspen Attachment 10: Written description of the proposed development Attachment 11: Written and Graphic Report by S K Peightal Engineers Ltd. regarding ability of building to withstand excavation process. Attachment 12: Preliminary Site improvement survey by Aspen Survey Engineers, Attachment 13: Graphic Description of proposed development (separate PDF) Attachment 14: List of Prbperty owners within 300' of proposed development. Attachment 15: HOA approval letter If there are additional materials required, please contact me at 925.4755 x 284. Please send the public notice atyour convenience so that we may post. Respectfully submitted, ~,1-7 deith Howle Authorized representative for NSF 1976 Investments LLC. P62 .3 Pd*PACAM ekfr 1 IV=B= 4 4--*~,1**~4 7-* . -'.Â»9~Â«~crd-' :k.1,79.2-47.. h.., fÂ¥,f/=791=-~ ..d:'~.7.--â‚¬;29â‚¬r.....1.9'l:.2,3:1.-EÂ¥&1Pt,10:=11+KtÂ¢Ge*~~,*7'TÂ·*7-US -72=FF) C6MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE]URT#[ENT ,-cia ..L . -2*~2~~~ ... .,Â©441 1, Â· ~ .~ . Land Use Review Fee Policy The City of Aspen has established a review fee policy for the processing of land use applications. A ilat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. A flat fee is collected by Community Development for applications which normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. Review fees for other City departments reviewing the application (referral departments)will also be collected when necessary. Flat fees are cumulative - meaning an application with multiple flat fees must pay the sum of those flat fees. Flat fees are not refundable. A review fee deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff review is required. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Various City staff may also charge their time spent on. the case in addition to the case planner. Deposit amounts may be reduced it in the opinion of the Community Development Director, the project is expected to take significantly less time to process than the deposit indicates. A determination on the deposit amount shall be made during the pre-application conference by the case planner. Hourly billing shall still apply. All applications must include an Agreement to Pay Application Fees. One payment including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of Aspen. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required application fee. The Community Development Department shall keepan accurate record of the actual time required for the processing of a land use application requiring a deposit. The City can provide a summary report of fees due at the applicant's request. The applicant will be billed for the additional costs incurred by the City when the processing of an application by the Communitg Development Department takes more time or expense than is covered by the deposit. Any direct costs attributable to a project review shall be billed to the applicant with no additional administrative charge. In the event the processing of an applicatidn takes less time than provided for by the deposit, the department shall refund the unused portion of the deposited fee to the applicant. Fees shall be due regardless of whether an appI[cant receives approval. Unless otherwise combined by the Director for simplicity of billing, all applications for conceptual, final, and recordation of approval documents shali be handled as individual cases for the purposes of billing. Upon conceptual approval all billing shall be reconciled and all past due invoices shall be paid prior to the Director accepting an application for final review. Final review shall require a new deposit at the rate in effect at the time of final application submission. Upon final approval al! billing shall again be reconciled prior to the Director accepting an application for review of technical documents for recordation. The Community Development Director may cease processing of a land use application for which an unpaid invoice is 30 or more days past due. Unpaid invoices of 90 or more days past due may be assessed a late fee of 1,75% per month. An unpaid invoice of 120 days or more may be subject to additional actions as may be assigned by the Municipal Court Judge. All payment information is public domain. All invoices shall be paid prior to issuance of a Development Order or recordation of development agreements and plats. The City will not accept a building permit for a property until all invoices are paid In full. For permits already accepted, an unpaid invoice of 90 or more days may result in cessation of building permit processing or issuance of a stop work order until full payment Is made. The property owner of record is the parly responsible for payment of ali costs associated with a land use application for the property. Any secondary agreement between a property owner and an applicant representing the owner (e.g. a contract purchaser) regarding payment of fees is solely between those private parties. P63 IV.B. grACHMENT 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT r--- Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen ('FCity") and property: /4:le:AL A'>/49/0//tfaueÂ» 69*hone No.: 9Â», 979, 95* />444. PÂ·#t YFWTH Htuvilb Email: ,6;0*004/604*66,40:. 20001 Address of UNIT<* / Parâ‚¬U {AteM>OWÂ¢07 Billing ~4Â»2 AMA#/7*2*80&' Property: %276/3966 yzEHN/*0Â¢G /2,ye,MAddress: 24 6 N+4# er,â‚¬er (subjed of <>/,44/Bi,mt,Im*ow; ~4Â¥wp (send bills here) $*#7100* AP. 90740' 4/ application) P.700(4 1 eD . et 61J I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No., Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying al! fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. 1 understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ /4900. 00(\at fee for +/15Â¥//04 OP *7717;F77#015,% ffat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for - Â· For deposit cases only: The City and-1 understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. 1 understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it fs impracticable for City staff to complete processing, reviewF and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The CRY and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to rernit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ /*A'â€¢ARieposit for 4 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $315 per hour. $ -et deposit for 49-' hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be bil[ed at $265 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: ,,AP**Ay;Â£55 /999BETAE,V)71771#, layÂ»--- Chris Bendon / Community Development Director Name: kâ‚¬1114 NÂ©wie> Title: PV?*14-ZE) 4â‚¬:P IEGC,ENTRD(/8 City Use: 'pop. 19-76 14â‚¬ IND. Fees Due: $ Received: $ 1 -Npyember, 201 1 .:1-j .vt-<-0--- -2-I--Â·Â·fi j.-i~41 ~112--icily,Â¢,f *sp,t:[30-SPGate-na-841 (970) 920-50901-, P64 IV.B0 ATTACHMENT 2 - Historic Preservation Land Use Application PROJECT: Name: Â»F&614 MeÂ»povve TpwyÂ® UPWN Hy#110 121*Â® Location: . Gl . MeÂ©c\A.,AFLYAt)/ /Ape'll /01/OF*Pot 91&71 1 (Indicate street address, lot & block number or inetes and bounds description ofproperty) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 27*6 101%109 APPLICANT: Name: NeF 1176 INVâ‚¬erMÂ¢+11* 141*A Address: 4*1 !90'F MAP A*Nue, g:Ap.F!141*IA! 40,.15306 phone #: 000. 464,401* Fax#: *- E-mail: N Ft)124.00TTIB, MAC, tom REPRESENTATIVE: Name: 001*1 Howl#, 7049 AFLe l'IW41,{PU; Address: A,9 0. MAIN 41***r, Per#N, M. 01 64 1 Phone #: 1167Â·*14Â· etÂ»0 Fax#:112 *21Â¢e *WO E-mail: PRON[ 00 011,1,1*00 Â£*M TYPE oF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): 13 Historic Designation U Relocation (temporary, on Â¤ Certificate ofNo Negative Effect Â¤ or off-site) El Certificate of Appropriateness Â¤ Demolition (total demolition) -Minor Historic Development Â¤ Historic Landmark Lot Split -Major Historic Development -Conceptual Historic Development -Final IIistoric Developmetit -Substantial Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) 0600 PrrwokÂ» a*ex PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) 4%20 krtÂ»IA 89 4*W,err Aspen Historic Preservation T ast A 1Jse Application Requirements. Updated: May 29,2007 P65 EJEE IV.B. ATTACHMENT 3 - Dimensional Requirements Form (Item #10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects,) Project: ,*M#44 Meapowe 1-1,-wriÂ» *WN 1*1* Pram,M)04 Applicant: #*p Illp IN40*YW **S> U.â€¢LA Project Location: 4,1 1400*001* FoAP, A.*FWN i dfo. 1 014111 Zone District 4,YA - PÂ·Â¥19 Lot Size: -1,186 AeR;9 C *Â£64% 4. F) tfveÂ»4/|/ Lot Area: Â¢ Â·10% Apee (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area iii the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: NA Proposed: NA Number ofresidential units: Existing: ~ Proposed: H Number ofbedrooms: Existing: 1 Proposed: (IN UNt'r to ze 12%*DDGIA/@91 Proposed % of demolition: DIMENSIONS: (write 11/a where 110 requirement exists in the zoiie district) .. Floor Area: Existing:~%1'k\*Allowable:'ZADt)4.Fproposed: Â·2.16,0.ageF c 46 Height Principal Bldg.: Existing: 1,R' Allowable: 'LE~ Proposed:_-lfi;' - Accessory Bldg.: Existing: 144* Allowabi" flA Proposed: MA On-Site parking: Existing: 1 Required: 5 Proposed: 1- % Site coverage: Existing: N A Required: HA Proposed: MA % Open Space: Existing: BA Required: MA Proposed: IAA Front Setback: Existing: 141" Required: \ C~ Proposed: tAL 111 I r Il Rear Setback: Existing: 421- 7 Required: \ D~ Proposed: %;342-9>~ Combined Front/Rear: Indicate N, S, E. W Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: O Required: O Proposed: D Side Setback: Existilig: D Required: D Proposed: 0 Combined Sides: Existing: O Required: C) Proposed: Â¤ Distance between Existing: O Required: O Proposed: O buildings: Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note ifencroachment licenses have been issued: NONE Variations requested (identify the exact variances needed): Aspen Historic Preservation T.and Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 P66 Afy>V #MEA#-' #87 aw IV.B General Information Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with your application. This information will help us review your plans and, ifnecessary, coordinate with other agencies that I. I maybe involved. YES NO * 0 Does the work you Are planning include exterior work; including additions, deniolitions, new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration? 0 Does the workyou are planning include interiorwork; including remodeling, rehabilitation, or restoration? 0 47< Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this tinie? El X In addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate ofAppropriateness or No ~ Negative Effect and a building permit are you seeking to meet the Secretary of Ilie -biterior's Standards for Rehabilitation or restoration of a National Register of ~ ' Historic-Places property in order to qualify for state or federal tax credits? 0 0 If yes, are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in conjunction with this project? (Only incomeproducing properties listed on the National Register are eligible. Owner-occupied residential properties are not.) U El If yes, are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check atl City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use: 0 Rehabilitation Loan Fund 0 Conservation Easement Program O Dimensional Variances O Increased Density 0 Historic Landmark Lot Split O Waiver of Park Dedication Fees 0 Conditional Uses E] Exemption from Growth Management Quota System El Tax Credits Aspen Historic Preservation I an/1 T Ise Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 P67 IV.B. MET AdÂ· 4,48*tr + CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Amy Simon DATE: 11/18/2014 PROJECT: 61 Meadows Trustee Road REPRESENTATIVE: Poss Architecture + Planning REQUEST: HPC Minor Development DESCRIPTION: 61 Meadows Trustee Road is listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Site and Structures as one of the Trustee Townhomes designed by Herbert Bayer within the Aspen Meadows. The Aspen Meadows received approval as a Specially Planned area in the early 1990s. This approval established maximum square footage for various buildings and uses on the campus. The Trustee Townhomes were approved to each have a maximum floor area of 2,500 square feet, plus a garage or carport of 500 square feet. All calculations will be according to today's land use regulations. According to the SPA Agreement, each unit is limited to three bedrooms. The owner of the subject unit proposes to increase the basement area below the existing structure and to expand the ground level of the unit on the rear fagade. The total expansion will not exceed 250 square feet of floor area, therefore the project will be reviewed as Minor Development. Relocation criteria will also be applied in order to ensure proper techniques are used for excavating and underpinning below this historic building. Design review will be according to the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and the Residential Design Standards. The review Is a one-step process with a public hearing before the HPC. Below are links to the Land Use App]ication form and Land Use Code for your convenience: HPC application: http:#www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/Cily/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2011%20Historic%20Land%20Use%20App %20Form,pdf HPC Design Guidelines: http:#www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-DevelopmenUHistoric-Preservation/Historic-Properties/ Land Use Code: http://www,aspenpilkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use-Code/ Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.415.070.C Certificate of appropriateness for a minor development 26.415.090 Relocation of designated historic properties AHPC Minor Review/Refocation 61 Meadows Trustee Townhomes 1 P68 1 IV.B Review by: Staff for completeness , HPC for determination City Council for Cal[-up Public Hearing: Yes, at HPC Neighborhood Outreach: None Planning Fees: $1,300 for 4 hours of staff time. Any unbilled portion of this deposit will be refunded at the conclusion of the case, Additional staff hours, if needed, will be billed at $325 per hour. Total Deposit: $1,300 To apply, submit 1 copv of the following information: O Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. <0>177Â»60444* 0 0 Pre-application Conference Sunimary (this document). Ck'7Â»:NHaUT 44) U Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur;. consisting of a current (not older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the properly, and al[ mortgages, judgments, lions, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 017Â»Â¥,*Waur 60 El Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. <5477*49~597-6) 0 A site improvement survey (not older than a year from submiltal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Coloraclodi178#MenT O HOA Compliance form (Attached) (Â»77*MB,715) /20 0 A written report from a licensed engineer or architect regarding the soundness of the building its ability to withstand the excavation process and detailing the proposed plan. t*77*W01097- //,) O Evidence of the financial ability to undertake the safe excavation and underpinning, preservation and repair of the building; site preparation and construction of necessary infrastructure through the posting of bonds or other financial measures deemed appropriate. A letter of credit or cashier's check in the amount of $30,000 is typrcally required to be posted with the City for the duration of the excavation process. 27)4*11*'r~) 0 A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the properly. 607-Zpv~9Â·1041'~ /3) O Written responses to all review criteria. OM~7*464180-7 /2 ) U An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. /51777651*WAvtz) Once the application is determined to be complete, submit: O Adigital copy ofthe application provided in pdffile format. 0 10 copies of the project graphics, O Totaldepositforreviewofthe application. 41*09.00 Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right, 2 P69 R Matrix of The City of Aspen's Ilistoric Preservation Land Use Application Requirements P To review fulliprocedures for all applications, reference 26.415 of The City ofAspen Building Code, Historic Preservation Ordinance. When submitting multiple step applications, do not replicate submission matedals. Two copies of the application are required for a Cart*?cate o/No 29ct, 15 copies are required for each mectingall othdr review. Also note that an electronic version of all text documents is required in a.txt, .doc,.wpd, or.rtf format. Application Fees Type of Review Notice Requirements Requirements Deposit Fee Designation 1-9, 11,12 $0 Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c.) at HPC and Council - Consult with Historic Preservation Exempt Development So None Officer to confirm exempt status Certificate of No Negative Effect 1-9,15,17 $245 None Minor Development 1-10,15,16,17,36 $735 Posting Pursuant to Sections 26.304.060 CE) (3) (b) Maior Development / Conceptual 1-10,14,17,18,19,20 Development under 1,000 s.f, $1,470 Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections / Development over 1,000 s.f., $2,940 26.304.060 (IE) (3) (a) (b) (c) Maior Development / Final 1-10, 106,-21, 22, 36 Paid at time of conceptual Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) Substantial Amendment 1-10,16,23,24,25,36 1 $735 Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections 26.304.060 03) (3) (a) (b) (c) Demolition 1-9,26 $2,940 Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) Relocation 1-9,27-34 $2,940 Publication, Posting and Mailing Punuant to Sections 26.304.060 (E) 0) (a) (b) (c) Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Historic Landmark Lot Split 1-10 $1,470 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) at HPC and Council Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Rescinding Designation 1-9,35 - $1,470 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) at HPC and Council Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 0Zd 1\11-h:*,MEâ‚¬rr + *Nit> /97*Â¥016VT- + iv.~. KEY Ill Contained withinalettersigned by 12. Property ordistrict descriptioniticluding 27. A written description and/or graphic the applicant, the applicant's name, narrative text, photographs and/or other illustrations ofthebuilding, stnicture or address and telephone number, and graphic materials that document its physical object proposed for relocatioti. the name, address, and telephone cliaracteristics. 28. Awritten explanation ofthe type of number of any representative 13. Identification ofthe cliaracter-defining relocation requested (temporary, on-site or authorized to act on behalf of the features that distinguish the entity which offsite) and justification for the need for applicalit.Â¢~77?W//MaVT ,) should be preserved. relocation, ti~ The street address, legal 14, Verificationtliatthe proposal complies with 29. A w,Â·itten report Rom a licensed engineer or descriptioni and parcel - Section 26.410, Residential Design. architectregarding the soundness ofthe identification nuinber of thdÂ»T. n;) Standards, or a writtenrequest fora variance building, structure or object, its ability to properly proposed for development. fiom any standard that is not being met withstand the physical move and its ~ A disclosure of ownership of the !]3~ Photographs. building material samples rehabilitation needs, once relocated. parcel proposed for development, and other exhibits, as needed, to accurately 30. A conceptual plan for the receiving site consisting of a current certificate , depict location, extent and design of the providing prelinlinary ilifo1711atio17 Oil tile from a Title insurance company, or proposed work. (*T, 23) property boundaties, existing improvements attorney licensed to practice in the Mt An accurate representation ofall niajor and site characteristics and the associated State of Colorado, listing the names building materials and finishes to be used in planned improvements. ofall owners of the property, and the development, depicted throughsamples or 31. Evidence ofthefinalicial ability to al[ mortgages, judgments, liens, f-_, photographs. 647: /0 undertake the safe relocation, preservation easements, contracts and 1111 Scated elevations mid/or drawings of the and repair of the building, stiucture or object; agreements affecting the parcel, and proposed work and its relationslzip to the site preparation and colistructioli ofnecessary demonstrating the owner's right to designated historic buildings stiuctures, sites ilifrashucture through theposting ofbonds or apply for the Development and features in its context. tAll,-14 otlier fmancial measures deemed appropriate. Application. (ATQ #3> 18. Scaled drawings of the proposed stalctureÂ® 32. Supplementary materials to provide an 21 An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map or addition(s) depicting their form, including undeistanding of the larger context for the locating the subject parcel within their height, massing, scale, proportions and relocated property mid its impact on adjacent the City of Aspen. 277Â· 1) roofplan; and theprimary features ofall propeities, the neighborhood or streelscape. Ill A site plan depicting the proposed elevations in the neighborhood context. 33. If the applicant does notown tliereceiving layout and the project's physical 19. Supplemental materials toprovideavisual site, proof from the site'spropaty owner of relationship to the land and its description of the context surrounding the the willingness to accept tile relocated surroundings. /ATT /22 designated historic property or historic district building, structure or object. ~ A site improvement survey including at least one (1) ofthe following: 34. Evidence that the applicant has or is seeking certified by a registered land, diagiams, maps, photographs, 3-D inodel the necessary approvals to place the surveyor, licensed in tile State of (digital or physical) or streetscape clevations. building on theidentified receiving site. If Colorado, showing the current the site is outside of the city limits, status of the parcel including the 20. Preliminary selection ofpritnatx building verification that the building will be current topography and vegetation. materials to be used inconsttuction preseived on its new site througli a fomial (This requirement, or any part represented by samples mid/or photographs. action of the otherjurisdiction or a thereof, may be waived by tim 1-*E Astatement, including narrativetextor preservation easement. Community Development Director graphics, indicating how the Final 35. Awritten description ofhow the property if the project is determined not to Development Plan confonns to does not meet these criteria for designation. wariant a survey document.) t),77/Â© representations made orstipulations placed as ~' A lighting plan indicating thelocationofall ~ A written descriptionof the a condition of the approval of tlie Conceptual exteifor liglit fixtures and site lighting, and proposal and a written explanation Developinetit Plan. cutsheets foreach type of fixture proposed. of how the proposed development 22. Final draivings ofall proposed structures(s) Light fixtures must Co~nply witli the "City of complies with the review criteria and/or addition(s) inchided aspart of the Aspen HistoricPreservationDesign and The City ofAspen Historic development at W' = 1.0' scale Guidelines" mid meet the City Lighting Code. Preservation Design Guidelines 23. A revised site plan (61'17Â¥HMENT /8) relevant to the development 24. Revised sealed elevations and drawings application. Urr 18) 25. Photographs andother exhibits toillustrate El Additional materials, the proposed changes. documentation, or reports as 26. Written documentation that the Chief deemed necessary by the Building Official has detemined the building Community Development Director. an imminent hazard, g{ narrative text, E~ Completed Land Use Application graphic illustrations or other exhibits that Form, Signed FeeAgreement, and provide evidence that thebuilding, structure Â¥ee. CATE 1/4 or object is ofito historic or architectural [IN; Dimensional Requirement Form. value or importance. 11. Site orhistoricdistrict boundary map. (147; 9 Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 P71 IV.B. #r-tM Bur 6 ~â‚¬ WESTCOR POLICY NO. 123~ Land Titie Insurance Company OP-6-CO1045-3754777 ALTA OWNER'S POLICY (6-17-06) ISSUED BY WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing required to be given to the Company under this Policy must be given to the Company at the address shown in Section 18 of the Conditions. COVERED RISKS SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B, AND THE CONDITIONS, WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; a California corporation (the "Company") insures, as of Date of Policy and, to the extent stated in Covered Risks 9 and 10, after Date ofPolicy, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance, sustained or incurred by the Insured by reason ofi 1. Title being vested other than -as stated in Schedule A. 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the Title, This Covered Risk includes but is not limited to insurance against loss from (a) A defect in the Title caused by (i) forgery, fraud, undue influence, duress, incompetency, incapacity, or impersonation; 09 failure of any person or Entity to have authorized a transfer or conveyance; (iii) a document affecting Title not properlycreated, executed, witnessed, sealed, acknowledged, notarized, or delivered; (iv) failure to perform those acts necessaryto create a documentbyelectronicmeans authorized by law; (v) a document executed under a falsified, expired, or otherwise invalid power of attorney; (vi) a document not properly filed, recorded, or indexed in the PublicRecords including failure to perform those acts by electronic means authorized by law; Or_ (vii) a defective judicial or administrative proceeding. (b) The lien of real estate taxes or assessments imposed on the Title by a governmental authority due or payable, but unpaid. (c) Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. The term "encroachment"includes encroachments ofexistingimprovenients located onthe Land onto adjoining land, and encroachments onto the Land of existing improvements located on adjoining land. 3. Unmarketable Title. COVERED RISKS Continued on next page IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this policy to be signed and sealed as ofthe Date ofPolicy shown in Schedule A, Issued By: WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CO1045 * PCT24127W Pitkin County Title Inc. '*adE# By: ARAM 0%4#l*91 601 E. Hopkins #3 4*%11%02%? jresident Aspen, CO 81611 Mal I== 101 MACO'.,avu '*gy Attest: Secretary OP-6 AUTA 6-17-06 Owner's Policy OVLTIC Edition 2-25-08) P72 IV.B. 4. No right of access to and from the Land. 5. The violation or enforcement of any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (a) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (b) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (c) the subdivision of land; or (d) environmental protection ifanotice, describing anypart ofthe Land, isrecordedin the PublicRecords setting forth the violation or intention to enforce, but only to the extent of the violation or enforcement referred to in that notice. 6. An enforcement action based on the exercise of a governmental police power not covered by Covered Risk 5 if a notice of the enforcement action, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records, but only to the extent of the enforcement referred to in that notice. 7. The exercise ofthe rights ofeminent domain ifa notice of the exercise, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records. 8. Any takingby agovernmental bodythat has occurred andis binding on the rights ofa purchaser for value without Knowledge. 9. Title being vested other than as stated in ScheduleA or being defective (a) as a result of the avoidance in whole or in part, or from a court order providing an alternative remedy, of a transfer of all or any part ofthe title to or any interest in the Land occurring prior to the transaction vesting Title as shown in Schedule A because that prior transfer constituted a fraudulent or preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws; or (b) because the instrument of transfer vesting Title as shown in Schedule A constitutes a preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws by reason of the failure of its recording in the Public Records (i) to be timely, or (ii) to impart notice of its existence to a purchaser for value or to a judgment or lien creditor. 10.Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the Title or other matter included in Covered Risks 1 through 9 that has been created 6r attached or has been filed or recorded in the Public Records subsequent to Date of Policy and prior to the recording of the deed or otherinstrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in ScheduleA. 6. Â·O - I . The Company will-also pay the costs, aitornays' fees, and expenses incurred in defense of any matter insured against by. this Policy, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions. EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly exchided from the coverage (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Re- ofthis policy, andthe Company will notpayloss or damage,costs, cords at Date ofFolicy, but Known to the Insured Claimant attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: and not disclosed iii writing to the Company by the Insured Claitnant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation Insured under this policy; (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date ofPolicy Ciowever, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided uilder 00 the character, dimensions, or location of RIiy illiprOVe- Covered Risk 9 and 10); or ment erected on the Land; (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been (iii) the subdivision of land; or sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the (iv) environmental protection; ortheeffect of'any violation Title. of these laws, ordinances, orgovernmental regulations, This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the cover- 4. Any claim,by reason oftheoperation offederal bankniptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction age provided under Covered Risk 5. vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (b) Any govemmentalpolice power. This Exclusion 1(b) does (a) a frauditlent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. (b) a preferential trans fer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 2. Rights ofeminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 5. Any lien ontlie Title forreatestatetaxesorassessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching betweeti 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other mat- ten; Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer ill the Public Records that vests Title as (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured shown in Schedule A. Claimant; OP-6 ALIA 6-17-06 Owner's Policy Page 2 P73 IV.B. CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. DEFINITION OF TERMS Records" slia[I also include environinental protection liens filed in tile records of the clerk of the United States District Court The following terms when used in this policy mean: for the district where the Land is located, (a) "Amount of Insurance": The amount stated in Schedule A, as maybe increased or decreased by endorsement to this policy, (j) "Title": The estate or interest described in Schedule A. increased by Section 8(b), or decreased by Sections 10 and 11 00 "Unmarketable Title": Title affected by an alieged or apparent oftliese Conditions. matter that would permit a prospective purchaser or lessee of the Title or tenderon the Title to be released from the obligation (b) "Date of Policy": The date designated as "Date of Policy" in to purchase, lease, or lend if there is a contractual condition ScheduleA. requiring the delivery of marketabre titte. (c) "Entity": A corporation, partnership, trusts limited liability company, or other similar legal entity. 2. CONTINUATION OF INSURANCE (d) "Insured": The Insured named in Schedule A. The coverage of this policy shall continue in force as of Date of Policy in favor o fan Insured, but only so long as the Insured retains (i) The term "Insured" also includes an estate or interest in the Land, or holds an obligation secured by a (A) successors to the Title of the Insured by operation of purchase money Mortgage given by a purchaser from the Insured, Jaw as distinguished from purchase, including heirs, or only so long as the Insured shallhave liability by reason ofwar- devisees, survivors, personal representatives, or next ranties inany trans fer or conveyancp ofthe Title. This policy shall ofkin; not continue iii force in favor of any purchaser from the Insured (B) successors to an Insured by dissolution, merger, con- of either (i) an estate or interest in the Land, or (ii) an obligation solidation, distribution, or reorganization; secured by a purchase money Mortgage given to the Insured. (C) successors to an Insured by its conversion to another 3, NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GIVEN BY INSURED kind of Entity; CLAIMANT (D) a grantee ofan Insured under a deed delivered without The Insured shall notify the Company promptly in writing (i) in payment of actual valuable consideration conveying case of any litigation as set forth in Section 5(a) of these Condi- the Title tions, (ii) in caseKnowledge shall come to an Insured hereunderof (1) ifthe stock, shares, memberships, or other equity any claim of title or'interest that is adverse to theTitle, as insured, interests of the grantee are wholly-owned by the and that might cause loss or damage for which tile Company may named Insured, be liable by virtue of this policy, or (ii i) if the Title, as insured, is rejected as Unmarketable Title. If the Company is prejudiced by (2) if the grantee wholly owns the named Insured, the failure of the Insured Claimant to provide prompt notice, the (3) if the grantee is wholly-owned by an affiliated Company's liability to the Insured Claimant under the liolicy shall Entity ofthe named Insured, provided the affiliated be reduced to the extent of the prejudice. Entity and the named Insured are both wholly- 4, PROOF OF LOSS owned by the same person or Entity, or (4) if the grantee is a trustee or beneficiary of a trust In the event the Company is unable to determine the amount o floss created by a written instrument established by the or damage, the Company may, at its option, require as a condition Insitred named in Schedule A for estate planning ofpayment that the Insured Claimant furnish a signed proofofloss. The proof of loss must describe the defect, lien, encumbrance, or purposes. other matter insured against by this policy that constitutes the basis (ii) Withregard to (A),(B), (C), and (D) reserving, however,all of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis trights and defenses as to any successor that the Company of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. would have had against any predecessor Insured. 5. DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OFACTIONS (e) "Insured Claimant": An Insured claiming loss or daniage. (f) "Knowledge" or "Known": Actual knowledge, not constnic- (a) Upon written request by the Insured, and subject to the options contained in Section 7 of these Conditions, the Company, at tive knowledge or notice that may be imputed to an Insured by its own cost and without unreasonable delay, shall provide for reason of the Public Records or any other records that impart the defense of an Insured in litigation in which any third party constructive notice of matters affecting the Title. asserts a claim covered by this policy adverse to the Insured. (g) "Land": The land described in ScheduleA, and affixed improve- This obligation is limited to only those stated causes of action ments that by law constitute real property. The tenn "Land" alleging matters insured against by this policy. The Company does not include any property beyond the lines of the area shall have the right toselect counset ofits choice (subjecttothe described in Schedule A, nor anyright, title, interest, estate, or right of the Insured to object for reasonable cause) to represent easement inabutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, the Insured as to those stated causes of action. It shall not be or waterways, but this does not modify or limitthe extent that a liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel. The right ofaccess to and froni the Land is insured by this policy. Company will not pay any fees, costs, or expenses incurred by (h) <'Mortgage": Mortgage, deed oftrust, trust deed, or othersecu- the Insured in the defense of those causes of action that allege rity instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means matters not insured against by this policy. authorized by law. (b) The Company shall have the right, in addition to the options (i) "Public Records": Records established under state statutes at contained in Section 7 of these Conditions, at its own cost, to Date of Policy for the purpose ofimparting constructive notice institute and prosecute ally action or proceeding or to do any of mattem relating to real property to purchasers for value and other act that in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to withoutKnowledge. With respect to CoveredRisk 5(d),"Public establish the Title, as insured, or to prevent or reduce loss or OP-6 ALTA 6-17-06 Owner's Policy Page 3 P74 IV.Bg CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS - CONTINUED damage to the Insured. The Company may take any appropri- curred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Com- ate action under the terms of this policy, whether or not it shall pany up to the time of payment or tender of payment and that the be liable to the Insured. The exercise ofthese rights shall not Company is obligated to pay. be an admission of liability or waiver of any pr0ViSi011 of this Upon the exercise by the Company of this option, all liability and policy. If the Company exercises its rights under this subsec- obligations ofthe Company to the Insured under this policy, other tion, it must do so diligently. than to make the payment required in this subsection, shall termi- (c) Wheneverthe Companybrings anactionorasserts adefense as nate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or required or permitted by this policy, the Company may pursue continue any litigation. the litigation to a final determination by a court of competent (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties OtherThanthe Insured jurisdiction, and it expressly reserves the right, in its sole dis- or With the Insured Claimant. cretion, to appeal any adversejudgment or order. (i) To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the 6. DUTY OF INSURED CLAIMANT TO COOPERATE name of an Insured Claimant any claim insured against (a) Inallcases wherethispolicypennits orrequires the Company to under this policy. Ill addition, the Company will pay any prosecute orprovide for the defense ofany action orproce*ling costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the Insured and any appeals, the Insured shall secure to tile Company the Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the right to so prosecute or provide defense in the action or pro- time ofpayment and that the Company is obligated to pay; ceeding, including the right to use, at its option, the name ofthe or Insured for this purpose. Wheneverrequested by the Company, (ii) To pay or otherwise settle with the Insured Claimant the theInsured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company loss ordamage provided for underthispolicy, together with all reasonable aid (i) iIi securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the prosecuting ordefending the action or proceeding, or effecting Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up settlement, and (ii) in any other lawful act that in the opinion to the time of payment and that the Company is obligated of the Company maybe necessary or desirable to establish to pay. the Title or any other matter as insured. If the Company is Upon the exercise by the Company ofeitherofthe options provided prejudiced by the failure of tile Insured to furnish the required for in subsections (b)(i) or (ii), the Company's obligations to the cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Insured under Insured wilder this policy for the claimed loss or damage, other the policy shall terminate, including any liability or obligation than the payments required to be made, shall terminate, including to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation, with regard to any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any tileÂ·matter or matters requiring such cooperation. litigation. (b) The Company nlay reasonably require the Insured Claimant to submit to examination underoathbyany authorized representa- 8. DETERMINATION AND EXTENT OF LIABILITY tive ofthe Company and toproduce for examination, inspection, This policy is a contract of indemnity against actual monetary loss and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be or damage sustained or incurred by the Insured Claimant who has designated by the authorized representative of the Company, suffered loss or damage by reason of tuatters insured against by all records, in whatever medium maintained, including books, this policy. tedgers, checks, memoranda, correspondences reports, e-mails, (a) The extent ofliability ofthe Company for loss or damage under disks, tapes, and videos whether bearing a date before or after this policy shall not exceed the lesser of Date of Policy, that reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the (i) the Amount of Insurance; or Company, the Insured Clainiant shall grant its permission, in (ii) thedifference betweenthe value ofthe Title as insured and writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to the vallie of the Title subject to the risk insured against by examine, inspect, and copy all oftheserecords iii the custody or this policy. control ofathird partythatreasonablypertaintothelossordam- age. All information designated as confidential by the Insured (b) If the Company pursues its rights under Section 5 of these -- Conditions and is unsuccessful in establishing the Title, as Claimant provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall insured, not be disclosed to othersunless, inthereasonablejudginentof the Company, it is necessaryin the administration of the claim. (i) the Amount of Insurance shall be increased by 10%, and Failure ofthe Insured Claimant to submit for examination under (ii) the Insured Claimant shall have the right to have the loss oath, produce any reasonably requested infonnatioti, or grant or damage determined either as of the date the claim was permission to secure reasonably necessary information from made by the Insured Claimant or as of the date it is settled third parties as required in this subsection, unless prohibitedby and paid. law or governmental regulation, shall terminateany liability of (c) In addition to the extentof liability under (a) and (b), the Com- the Company under this policy as to that claim. pony will also pay those costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses 7. OPTIONS TO PAY OR OTHERWISE SETTLE incurred in accordance with Sections 5 and 7 of these Condi- CLAIMS; TERMINATION OF LIABILITY lions. In case o f a claim under this policy, the Company shall have the 9, LIMITATION OF LIABILITY following additional options: (a) If the Company establishes the Title, or removes the alleged (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Insurance. defect, lien, or encumbrance, or cures the lackof a right ofae- To pay or tender payment of the Amount of Insurance under this cess to or from the Land, or cures the claim of Unmarketable policy together with any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses in- Title, all as insured, in a reasonably diligent manner by any OP-6 ALTA 6-17-06 Owner's Policy Page 4 P75 IV.B. method, including litigation and the conipletion of any appeals, no joinder or consolidation with claims or controversies of other it shallhave fullyperformedits obligations with respect to that persons. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused to any controversy or claim between the Company and the Insured the Insured. arising out of or relating to this policy, any service in connection (b) In the event ofany litigation, including litigation by the Com- with its issuance or the breach ofa policy provision, or to any other pany or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have controversy or claim arising out of the transaction giving rise to no liability for loss ordamageuntil there has been a final deter- this policy. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance mination by a court ofcompetent jurisdiction, and disposition is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured. Att arbitrable matters when the Amount of alt appeals, adverse to the Title, as insured. of Insurance is in excess of $2,000,000 shall be arbitrated only (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to the when agreed to by both the Company and the Insured. Arbitration Insured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Insured in set- purstiant to this policy and under the Rules shall be binding upon tling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the theparties. Judgment uponthe awardrenderedbytheArbitrator(s) Company. may be entered in any court of competent jurisdiction. 10. REDUCTION OF INSURANCE; REDUCTION OR 15. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS POLICY; POLICY TERMINATION OFLIABILITY ENTIRE CONTRACT All payments under this policy, except payments macie for costs, (a) This policy together with all endorsements, if any, attached to attorneys'fees, and expenses, shall reduce theAmountof Insurance it by the Companyis the entire policy and contract between the by tlie amount of the payment. Insured and the Company. In interpreting anyprovision ofthis 11. LIABILITYNONCUMULATIVE policy, this policy shall be construed as a whole, The Amount of Insurance shall be reduced by any amount the (b) Any claim ofloss or damage that arises out of tile status ofthe Title or by any action asserting such claim shall be restricted Company pays under ally policy insuring a Mortgage to which exception is taken in Schedule B or to which the Insured has agreed, to this policy. assunied, or taken subject, orwhich is executed by an Insured after (c) Any amendment of or endorsement to this policy must be in Date of Policy and which is a charge or lien on the Title, and the writing and authenticated by an authorized person, or expressly amount so paid shall be deemed a payment to the Insured under incorporated by Schedule A of this policy. this policy. (d) Each endorsement to this policy issued at any time is made a 12. PAYMENT OF LOSS part of this policy and is subject to all of its terms and provi- sions. Except as the endorsement expressly states, it does not When liabilityandtheextento flossordamage have been definitely (i) modify any of the terms ancl provisions ofthe policy, OD fixed in accordance with these Conditions, the payment shall be modify any prior endorsement, CiO extend the Date of Policy, made within 30 days. or Ov) increase the Amount of Insurance. 13. RIGHTS OFRECOVERY UPON PAYMENT OR 16. SEVERABILITY SETTLEMENT (a) Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim In the event any provisionotthis policy, in whole or in part, is held under this policy, it shall be subrogated and entitled to the invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, the policy shall be rights of the Insured Claimant in the Title and all other rights deemed not to include that provision or such partheld to be invalid, and remedies in respect to the claim that the Insured Claimant but all other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. has against any person or property, to the extent ofthe amoutit 17. CHOICE OF LAW; FORUM of any loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses paid by the (a) Choice ofLaw: The Insured acknowledges the Company has Company. If requested by the Company, the Insured Claimant underwritten the risks covered by this policy and determined shall execute documents to evidence the transfer to the Coin- the premium charged thereforinrelianceuponthelawaffecting pany ofthese rights and remedies. The Insured Claimant shall interests in real properly and applicable to the interpretation, permit tile Company to sue, compromise, or settle in the name rights, remedies, or enforcement ofpolicies of title insurance of tile Insured Claimant and to use the name of the Insured of the jurisdiction where the Land is located. Claimant in any transaction or litigation involving these rights and remedies. Therefore, the court or an arbitrator shall apply the law of the jurisdiction where the Land is located to determine the validity I f a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss ofclaims against the Title that are adverse to the Insured and to of the Insured Claimant, the Company shall defer the exercise interpret and enforce the terms of this policy. In neither case of its right to recover until after the Insured Claimant shall have shall the court or arbitrator apply its confficts of law principles recovered its loss. to determine the applicable law. (b) The Company's right of subrogation includes the rights of the (b) Choice of Forum: Any litigation or otlier proceeding brought Insured to indemnities, guaranties, other policies of insurance, by the Insured against the Company must be filed only in a or bonds, notwithstanding any tenns or conditions contained state or federal court within the United States ofAmerica or its in those instruments that address subrogation rights. territories having appropriate jurisdiction. 14. ARBITRATION 18. NOTICES, WHERE SENT Either the Company or the Insured may demand that the claim or Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing controversy sliall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the Title required to be given to the Company under this policy must be Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Land Title Associa- given tc the Company at: Wes{corLandTitle InsuranceCompany, tion ("Rules"). Except as provided in the Ruies, there shall be Attn,: Claims, 875 Concourse Parkway South, Suite 200, Maitland, FL 32751, OP-6 ALTA 6-17-06 Owner's Policy Page 5 P76 /0 ALTA OWNER'S POLICY ! a (6-17-06) WE;STCOR LANI) TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE HOME OFFICE 875 Concourse Parkway South, Suite 200 Maitland, FL 32751 Telephone: (407) 629-5842 IV.B. Z.Ld Xollod S,3011Â£0 90-LI-9 VinV 9-dO IV.B. Owner's Policy of Title Insurance- Schedule A Issued by Name and Address of Title Insurance Company: Westcor Land Title Insurance Company, 201 N. New York Avenue, Suite 200, Winter Park, Florida, 32789 State: CO County: PITKIN Address Reference: 61 MEADOWS RD., #8, ASPEN, CO 81611 File No.: PCT24127W2 Policy No.: OP-6-CO1045-3754777 Amount of Insurance: $3,250,000.00 Premium: $ 3,479.00 Date of Policy: August 29, 2014 @ 10:59 AM Simultaneous #: NA Reinsurance #:OP-6-CO1045-3754777 1. Name of Insured: NSF 1976 INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 2. The estate or interest in the Land that is insured by this policy is: IN FEE SIMPLE 3. Title is vested in: NSF 1976 INVESTMENTS, LLC., A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 4. The Land referred to in this policy is described as follows: CONDOMINIUM UNIT 6, THE TRUSTEE TOWNHOMES AT-THE-ASPEN MEADOWS CONDOMINIUMS, according to the Condominium Map thereof recorded February 6, 1996 in Plat Book 39 at Page 16 and First Amendment thereto recorded April 1, 1997 in Plat Book 42 at Page 27 and as defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for The Trustee Townhomes At-The-Aspen Meadows recorded February 6, 1996 as Reception No. 389723 and Amendments thereto recorded April 1,1997 as Reception No. 403007, May 6, 1999 as Reception No. 430736, December 7,2001 as ' Reception No. 461578, January 3, 2002 as Reception No. 462538 and January 3,2002 as Reception No. 462539 Issued By Authorized Signatory P78 IV.Bu SCHEDULE B-OWNERS CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY POLICY NUMBER PCT24127W2 August 29, 2014 @ 10:59 AM OP-6-CO1045-3754777 THIS POLICY DOES NOT [NSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession, or claiming to be in possession, thereof. 2. Easements, liens, encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land, and that is not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, imposed by law for services, tabor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, which lien, or right to a lien, is not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, Including but not limited to. easements or equitable servitudes; or, (d) water rights, claims or title to water(see additional information page regarding water rights), whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), (c) or (d) are shown for the public records. 6. Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records 7. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, or garbage collection or disposal or other utilities unless shown as an existing lien by the public records. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 8. Taxes and assessments (not including condominium or homeowners association assessments or dues) - for the year 2014 and subsequent years only, a lien not yet due and payable. 9. Right of the proprietor of a win or lode to extract or remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted as reserved in United States Patents recorded June 8, 1888 in Book 55 at Page 2, January 8, 1890 in Book 55 at Page 6 and March 28, 1890 in Book 55 at Page 477. (view) 10. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted and right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States as reserved In United States Patent recorded May 3, 1892 in Book 55 at Page 24. (view) 11. Easement and right of way for Septic purposes as set forth in Easement Agreement recorded December 23,1965 in Book 217 at Page 550. .(view) 12. Easement and right of way for Water Transmission Line as set forth in Grant of Easement recorded April 24, 1972 in Book 262 at Page 916. (view) 13. Easement and right of way for Sewer Line as set forth in Easement Agreement recorded June 17, 1970 in Book 249 at Page 13. (view) 14. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations of Agreement Regarding Reservation of Facilities on Meadows Parcel, recorded September 1, 1982 in Book 432 at Page 133. (view) 15. Easement and right of way granted to Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Company, Inc., in instrument recorded August 14,1989 in Book 599 at Page 380. (view) (Continued) P79 IV.B. POLICY NO. OP-6-CO1045-3754777 CASE NO. PCT24127W2 SCHEDULE B-OWNERS --EXCEPTIONS-CONTINUED- 16. All matters as set forth in Declaration and Grant of Easements and Rights of User recorded January 24, 1992 in Book 667 at Page 814. (view) 17. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in "The Aspen Meadows" Specially Planned Area Development & Subdivision Agreement, recorded January 24, 1992 in Book 667 at Page 731. (view) 18. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded January 24,1992 in Plat Book 28 at Page 5 and the Condominium Plat for The Trustee Townhomes At-The-Aspen Meadows recorded February 61 1996 in Plat Book 39 at Page 16. fyiew 19. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Trench, Conduit, and Vault Agreement recorded July 30, 1992 in Book 684 at Page 887. (view) 20. Easement and right of way for an electric transmission or distribution line or system, as granted to Holy Cross Electric Association, Inc., in instrument recorded in Book 762 at Page 348. (view) 21. Easement and right of way for Sewer Line as set forth. in Easement Deed recorded in Book 762 at Page 351. (view) 22. Easement and right of way for Water Line as set forth in Utility Easement Agreement recorded in Book 762 at Page 355. (view) 23. Terms, conditions, provisions, oblfgations and all matters as set forth [n Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1991 by Aspen City Council recorded September 30, 1994 in Book 762 at Page 811. (view) 24. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements, restrictions and assessments as set forth in the Condominium Declaration for The Trustee Townhomes At-The-Aspen Meadows recorded February 6, 1996 as Reception No. 389723, and Amendments thereto recorded April 1, 1997 as Reception No. 403007, May 6,1999 as Reception No. 430736, December 7, 2001 as Reception No. 461578, January 3,2002 as Reception No. 462538 and January 3,2002 as Reception No. 462539, deleting therefrom any restrictions indicating preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin. (view) 25. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligauons as set forth in Designation and Assignment of Special Declarant Right recorded February 6T 1996 as Reception No. 389724 (viewl 26. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Agreement recorded August 14,1997 as Reception No. 407284 fview) 27. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners recorded April 28,2000 as Reception No. 442759 as Resolution No. 23-97. (view) EXCEPTIONS NUMBERED 1 THRU 7 ARE HEREBY DELETED, EXCEPT FOR SUBSECTION (d) UNDER PARAGRAPH NUMBER 5 (WATER RIGHTS). P80 IV.B. Obligatory Insurance Fraud Statement: We are obligated by Colorado Law (CRS 10-1-128) to provide the following statement: It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defratid the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial or insurance and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of'an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete or misleading facts or information to a policy holder or claimant forthe purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policy holder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado Division of Insurance within the Department of Regulatory Agencies. P81 IV.B. 047906% M edT"4 42 ~DS S *ANCIill t.Cft--ift{~ -,Â· PLA.?INING November 19, 2014 Amy Guthrie City of Aspen Historical Preservation Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado, 81611 Re: Letter of representation - Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhomes - Unit 6 ( Parcel 61) Aspen Meadows, Aspen, Colorado, 81611 Dear Amy, Please accept this letter as my permission to allow the following: Kim Well + Keith Howle + other representatives of Foss Architecture + Planning 605 East Main Slreet Aspen, Colorado, 81611 970-025-4755 To act on my behalf for the Conceptual and Final HPC application and approval process for the project referenced below. The property In question Is described as follows: Physical Address: 61 Meadows Road, Aspen, Colorado, 81611 Subdiviston: Trustee TWH @ Aspen Meadows: Unit 6 Parcel ID# 273512239006 Sincerely, *U.-9.6 Nancy Fullotti Owner of Unit 6 Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhomes Aspen, Colorado, 81611 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 0)970/025-4755 0 970/920-2950 WWN.BILLPOSS.COM P82 ATA-Am &17, 7 MV.B. ~OSS ARCm 11-Â·(; Un<L r!Â·4 AN[ENG November 21, 2014 Amy Simon City of ARI,en Historical Presengition Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado, 81611 Re: 1.etter of Understanding Regarding Finimcial Assurance Dear Amy, Please accept this letter :is my understanding that as my project is submitted for n btlilding permit evidence of the finkincial ability to lindertake the safe exclivation lind linderpinning, preservation, and repir of the bitilcling. I ftirtlier under.sland that :1 letter of credit or cashier's check in the amount of $30,000 is (71)iently required to be posted with the City during the exclavation process. The property in question is described us follows: Physical Address: 61 Meadows Roitcl, Aspen, Colorado, 81611 Subdiris ion: Trustee TWI-1 @ Aspen Meadows: Unit 6 l>art:el ID# 273512239006 Sincerely, 4{Â«9.7bulub Nancy 14*rlorri Owner of Unit 6 Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhomes Aspen, Colorado, 81611 P83 605 EAST MAIN STREEI ASPEN CC)81611 (8970/925-4755 m 970/920-20.50 ~Al\NU, illi i PORS Cf-HU IV.B. fâ‚¬TACHMENT 25 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed bv the property owner or Attorney representing the properiv owner. Name: B+F 147 9 INVBGrl\Aterâ‚¬>, U-6. Property Owner Cr): Email: hfor f btti@ MAO Â· 6'OM Phone No.: 006 4,24 41,2.3 Address of UN rr 4, /9,&*4 Â¥VEMOCAK, 1=pÂ«/Ee 1060,9111)Mee 910*91 *4 tvâ‚¬1%1*;W* F.abl>, /e#N 1 20, , 9/ 6 0 (subject of application) I certify as follows: (pick one) El - This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. El This property is subject .to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. '~, This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Evidence of approval is attached. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. 1 understand that this documentis*a public document. Owner signature: C date: 11 /'34 Aol 1-F Owner printed !~me: v c j /<9Â» or, . Attorney signature: date: Attorney printed name: P84 f ' +1TP,5-8 ME*IT 1 IV.B. ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING 131 - i % 9 .6- f ' 1 k % - Castle Creek - '%Â·kh-5. Sfaw#hferhouse T (litkh f - ./ - 14 1 . - 1 .. I Red Ame , - 1 - . 05 4 1 -7- - - 13.15- 9- 01 1 i I -1.- i -Â· t 6 - .9. 1 -0 1 1- ..174 -./ '1 -l 1 - 21; ' '' , lai N ..1 I . i'' . I.,- , 1 . - 6, . Â· i . . ~: ' --14 /rt I ., t. 1 - 1 - ..4 C--li-J-----1 -85 -1 - -- 6 1 \ 7-0 ... . , eepil-- *1 -b- 21 41 (16 - ( -- & 161 Ma#*s Â»D 1 -- 1.- h - - - 4.- 21 90. 4---- - ,-} 'r(,64*N, 20Â· 4216 Il Â£ . -1 -- i - 1 0 - ...... 4 1 4--1-- 4 ., A -1-6 2, - Â·Â·--d 1 1 - 1 4. . Gillespie Ard, - 4, . j ..ft --- - / ff - - 11 - -- -9 ,<,-,.,Q? Y:QlÂ°jj/0 ,Â·lili; -1 1.-:11?9., -1 1.---re - I . , , .i : I.-1 2 -< W 14>- - . ..Â·f 4 9 1404Â¢h..Marolt'Mihinq,4~ 1 :' --; 11.- I l~, 2'Â·- ~12/,sg,--~-:9,-Â·31: 1 -- 4-4.1 &'flainthitiO N{0640'm :.: 1 6' I r.,-~ C --rt >9Â°<67, ~ c 0 -0/#h'Â·lef'4--' 4 *1.'idot #2- . 22Â·,=32 Â· - :~. -L .... - - 1!otei?Jeroote,-Ah .--/1 Ad . SK--- ..7- 7 ' u Pr- - A-Vii,1160.-ria#.ri.(90'-.4-~ :1 Vicinity Map for 61 Meadows Road, Aspen, Colorado, 81611 P85 Pli-I'r.~;lj/,1 ....1.- 7,1,1~.-gl -92%5Â·*week- 5 IV.B. Pil-*41Â·MENT It ~OSS ARCHHIECTURE +PLANNING 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (t) 970/925-4755 (f) 970/920-2950 MEMORANDUM TO: Amy Guthrie City of Aspen HPC Chairwoman CC: File FROM: Keith Howie Bill Poss and Associates Architecture and Planhing, P.C. DATE: November 19,2014 RE: Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhome Reinodel U ENCLOSURE Unit 6, Aspen Meadows SPA Aspen, Colorado, 81611 1.Project Location The project is Unit 6, (Parcel 6i), at the Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhome complex in Aspen, Colorado. 2. Legal Address The legal address ofthe property is: . Subdivision: Trustee Townhome at Aspen Meadows: Unit 6 3. Project History The original Aspien Meadows buildings were constructed 1959-65Â· In 1992 a Special Planned Area (SPA) was submitted to the City of Aspen which outlined specific FAR and zoning requirements forthe entire SPA area. A copy of the PUD creating the SPA can be provided upon request. 4. Neighborhood Context The townhome complex sits in the within the Aspen meadows complex, located in the west end of Aspen. The trustee townhome complex was constructed in 1959 with eight units in the original structure. These units were constructed as separate units with flat roof forms over the carport areas that joined the units together. The unit to be remodeled was part of these original eight units. Three units (ito the south and two unitsto the north of the original structure) were added in 1992. 5. New Development This project involves the renovation of the interior and partial exterior of the townhome unit, the addition of 159Â·03 square feet of new floor area outside of the exterior boundary walls of the original structure, and the renovation of the back deck and stairs. The original Floor Area Ratio (FAR) as calculated by COA current standards is 1892.12 square feet (sf). The new FAR is 2160.38, a gain of 368=6 sf. P86 IV.B. ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING New Development Description The unitto be remodeled (unit 6) sits in between units 5 and 7 in a partywall configuration. Please refer to the site plan. As HPC is concerned with the exterior of the designated, the new development can be broken down intothe following areas: A. Eastside ofunit- Frontentryand carport B. South side of unit-Open air hallwayto backdeck of unit 6, fiat roof connection to unit 5 C. West side of unit- Back of unit with exteriordeckand stairs to grade D. Westside of unit- Open airhallwayto backdeckof unith flat roof connection with unit 7 A. Eastsideofunit- Frontentryand carport * Front Door design - The front door design will be changed. Please refer to the east elevation. We believe that the existing front door is not historic. The front doors (and some sidelights) of other units have been changed. * Removal of existing mud room door- The existing mud room door will be removed and replacedÂ· with siding to match the original siding. * New dormer and window addition - We are proposing to enlarge the living room on the west-side of the unit. To accomplish this, we must create a roof overthe living room.-In keeping with the vernacular of the existing roof forms and roof pitches, we have extended the existing roof form over the new portion of the living room. This roof form extends to the side of the original exterior wall of the unit. We feel that this is an appropriate way to resolve this roof condition and is in keeping with the established forms of the existing unit. The only time this form would be visjble would be when viewing the unit from a considerable distance away. As you get closer to the unit, the flat roof atthe carportcuts offthe view angletothiselement. B. South side of unit- Open air hailwayto back deck of unit 6, flat roof connection to unit f * Small rectangular window on Upper level - This existing window on upper level will be relocated approximately 18"tothe west * Addition to mechanical and mud room volume - We are expanding the mud room area west approximately two feet to allow the placement of a bedroom in the existing mud room space. The exterior door to the existing mechanical room will be removed and replaced with a BBQ area with storage above. Please refer to the existing and new main [evel floor plan. The fenestration on this elementwill be horizontal ix4 wood siding, painted white to match the existing siding. * New dormer and window addition - We are proposing to enlarge the living room on the west side of the unit. To accomplish this, we must create a roof over the living room. In keeping with the vernacular of the existing roof forms and roof pitches, we have extended the existing roof form over the new portion of the living room. This roof form extends to the side of the original exterior wall of the unit. We feel that this is an appropriate way to resolve this roof condition and is in keeping with the established forms of the existing unit. The view shown in the elevation will never be visible asthe elevation view would be inside unit 5. * Addition to living room volume - The Living room area will be increased by approximately four feet, six inches (41-69. The new living room wall will have new fenestration on the south wall. Please refer tothe existing and proposed south elevations. P87 IV.B. ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+ PLANNING C. West side of unit- Back of unit with exterior deck and stairs to grade * Addition to mud room volume - We are expanding the mud room volume west approximately two feet (2") to allow the placement of a bedroom in the existing mud room space. Two existing windows will be removed and replaced by different window fenestration on the west wall. The existing vertical wood siding will be used forthis volume. * Addition to living room volume - The Living room area will be increased by approximately four feet, six inches (4'-6") to the south. The existing roof form over the living room will be continued over the new living room addition. A fireplace will be added to the west wall and new fenestration will replace the existing fenestration. A new window will be added in the dining room area. Please refertothe existing and proposed west elevations. * New Light well- With the addition of a basement to the unit, we have created a new light well to bring light intothis area. This light well will have a painted steel grate and access hatch per code for egress. * New stairs - With the addition of the new light well, the existing stairs will be replaced with new stairs in a different configuration. Please referto the proposed plans and elevations. * Renovated exterior deck - The existing deck will be resurfaced and an outdoor firepit added to the exterior edge of the deck. We will be raising the grade at the deck edge approximately twelve (12") inches to be within thirty inches (30") from existing grade so a railing will not be necessary along the deckedge. A railing will be provided alongthe new stairs. * New upper level dormer element - To take advantage of the views southeast to Highlands ski area and Buttermilk we are proposing a dormer element that encloses and office. This dormer is the same pitch as the existing sections ofthe house. Please referto the plans and sections. HPC Design Guidelines Chapteri Streetscape and Lot Features 1.1 Preserve originalfences Existing: Front ofunit -There currently does not existanyfencing in thefront ofthe unit. Back of unit - There currently exists a black metal railing with vertical balustrades. This railing does not look to be historic. Proposed: Front ofunit- No railing forthe front ofthe unit Back of unit - The proposed design elevates grade/deck connection approximately twelve inches (12"- less than a 30" step to grade) to allow for removal of the existing ailing from back deck. Railing only occurs at stair to grade. Stair to grade will be j stainless steel stanchion posts with a diagonal stainless steel cable forthe balustrades. 1.2 Replacement Fences Existing: Front of unit - There currently does not existanyfencing in thefront ofthe unit. Back of unit - There currently exists a black metal railing with vertical balustrades. We believe that this railing is not historic. Proposed: Front of unit - No railing is proposed at the front of the unit Back of unit - The proposed design elevates grade/deck connection approximately twelve inches (12"). Per code (less than a 30" step to grade) allows for the removal of the existing railing from backdeck. P88 IV.B. ~OSS ARâ‚¬1111-ECTURE+PLANNING 1.3 Transparent Fencing See section i,2 above 1,4 New Fence Components See section i.2 above 1.5 Side Yard Fences Existing: The existing design is an attached townhome design where the east and west walls are party walts. There are no side yards on unit 6. Proposed: See above. There are no side yards on unit 6. 1.6 Replacement of Side yard Fencing See section i.5 above Retaining walls 1.7 Preserve original retaining walls Existing: The only retaining wall occurs atthe backexteriordeck. Proposed: This retaining wall does notchange. 1.8 Maintain Historic height Existing: The only retaining wail occurs at the back exterior deck. Proposed: The height ofthis retaining wall does not change. Walkways 1.9 Maintain the established progression of public to private spaces. Existing: There currently exists a 2 car carport at the front entry of the unit. You access the front doorto the unitthrough the carport. Proposed: The existing entry location and two carcarport does not change. Private Yard 2.10 Preserve Historic Elements of the yard. Existing: In the front (Entry side) of the unit there is a large boulder andsome small pine and aspen trees. In the rear of the unit there is acontinuous publicyard area behind the complex, and each unit has a private b exterior deck. In the current townhorne configuration, each unit has a small walkway between the units that lead to the back decks. There are no side yards. Proposed: The yard at the front of the unit shall remain the same. There are no historic elements in this front yard area. The public yard area at the back of the unit shall remain the same. 1.11 Preservation of mature landscaping. Existing: In the front (Entry side) of the unit there are some small pine and aspen trees. In the back of the unitthere are some mature Aspen trees running along the length of the building and in the planter areas on each deck. In the current townhome configuration, there are only small walkways between the units and no sideyards. Proposed: The existing trees shall remain at the front of the unit. The existing mature Aspen trees at the back of the unit and on the exterior deck shall remain the same. No existing trees will be removed. 1.12 Maintain Historic planting designs Existing: There are no historic planting designs. Proposed: The existing landscaping shall remain as is. P89 IV.B. ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING 1.13 Revisions should be consistent with Historic context See section 1.12 above 1.14 Additions to the landscape interfering with Historicelements Existing: There are no tandscape elements interfering with historic elements. Proposed: No landscape elements that would obscure the original unit will be planted. Please refer to the plans forthe back deck configuration. Site Lighting - 1.15 Minimize the effects of site lighting Existing: The lighting atthefront of the unit consists of surface mounted lighting on the north wail to the main entry. We believe that this style of light (coach tantern) is not original. The lighting at the back of the unit is surface mounted lights at the exterior deck. We believe that this lighting is not original. Proposed: The existing lighting willÂ· be replaced with surface mounted lights that are more in keeping with the original design of the structure. These lights will conform to the City - of Aspen lighting code. Please refer to the lighting cut sheet that is provided with this package. Streetscape 1.16 Preserve historically significant landscape designs and features Existing: There are no historically significant landscape designs and features in the vicinity of the unit. Proposed: The landscape area around the unit shall remain as is. 1.17 Maintain historic irrigation ditches Existing: There are no irrigation ditches in the vicinity of the unit. Proposed: There are no irrigation ditches in the vicinity ofthe unit. Chapter 2 - Historic Building Materials 2.1 Preserve original building materials Existing: The current building materials are stained cedar shingle siding and painted vertical wood siding. Please refer to existing elevation Proposed: All existing materials will be maintained on the entry (east) fa,ade. The new additions will be clad in the same materials as the original. Please refer to the proposed elevations and perspectives. 2.2 Protect woodfeaturesfrom deterioration Existing: The existing residence is modern in design and has minimalwoodfeatures. Proposed: The proposed renovation will replicate the existing wood features on the new roof fascia and trim conditions. Please referto the proposed elevations and perspectives. 2.3 Plan repainting carefully Existing: The current building has sections that were stained and painted. Please refer to existing elevations. Proposed: All existing materials will be re-stained or re-painted (using existing colors) using approved construction practices. P90 BAB= pOSS ARCHITECTUREÂ·+PLANNING 2.4 Brick or stone that was not painted historically should be not be painted Existing: The current building does not have any brick. There is an existing random pattern stone veneer wall atthe back ofthe exteriordeck. This is notoriginalto the structure. Proposed: The existing stone veneer wal! will be removed. A stone base will be added to the west exteriordeck. A stone material sample photo is included in this package for review. 2.5 Repair deteriorated primary building materials by patching, piecing -in, consolidating or otherwise reinforcing the material. Existing: The current building materials have been maintained andarein good condition. Proposed: Best construction practices will be used to tie the new additions to the existing structure. 2.6 Maintain masonry walls in good condition Existing: There are no masonry walls in the project. Please refer to existing elevations. Proposed: This section is not-applicable 2.7 Match the original material in composition, scale, and finish when replacing materials on primary surfaces. Existing: The current buildinginaterials are stained cedar shingle siding and painted vertical wood siding. Please refer to existing elevations. Proposed: All existing materials will be maintained on the entry (east) fagade. The new additions will be clad in the same materials as the original. Please refer to the proposed elevationsand perspectives. 2.8 Do not use synthetic materials as replacementsfor primary building materials. Existing: See section 2.7 Proposed: See section 2.7 2.9 Covering the original building materials with new materials is inappropriate.. Existing: The current building materials are stained cedar shingle siding and painted vertical wood siding. Please refer to existing elevations. Proposed: No original materials will be covered with new materials. 2.10 Consider removing later covering materials that have not achieved historic significance. Existing: The current building materials are original. . Proposed: This section is not applicable. Chapter 3 - Windows 3.1 Preserve the functional and decorative features of a historic window. Existing: We believe the original building was built in *58-60. They used the most modern window profile that was available at the time of construction. They did not use a historic type window, thus this section does not apply. Proposed: Thissection is not applicable. P91 IV.B. ~OSS Al{Cll]TECTURE Â·tjjl-ANNING 3.2 Preserve the position, number, and arrangement of historic windows in a building walk Existing: On the east, north, and south elevations we believe that current window pattern is original. On thewestelevation, we believethat thewindow pattern is not original. Most of the units have been altered so it is difficult to tell what is originalÂ·and what is not. Please referto the existing unit photos. Proposed: We are proposing that the windows on the east and south elevations remain the in the current arrangement. We are proposing a new window on the north wall in the office and new windows (and pattern) on the west elevation. Please refer to the new elevations, 3.3 Preserve the historic ratio of window openings to solid wall on afagade. Existing: On the east, north, and south elevations we believe. that current window pattern is original. On the west elevation, we believe that the window pattern is not original Most of the units have been altered so it is difficult to tell what is original and what is not. (Please refer to the existing unit photos). Proposed: We are proposing that the ratio of window openings to solid wall on the east, and south elevations remain the same. We are proposing a new ratio of window openings to solid wall on the north and west elevations. Please refertothe new elevations. 3.4 Match a replacement window to the original in its design. Existing: On the east and south elevations we believe that current window pattern is original. On the west elevation, we believe that the window pattern is not original. Most of the units have been altered so it is difficult to tell what is original and what is not. Proposed: If the windows on the east and south elevation are replaced, they will be replaced with as close a replacement profile as possible. The new windows on the north and west elevations will have a similar profile to keep the lookconsistent. 3.5 IN a replacement window, use materials thatappearsimitartothe original. Existing: See section 3.4 Proposed: See section 3.4 3.6 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening. Existing: On the east, north, and south elevations we believe that current window pattern is original. On the west elevation, we believe that the window pattern is not original. Proposed: We are proposing to keep the size and proportion of the historic window openings on the east, north, and south elevations. These arethe only elevationsthat are visible from the public entry areas. We are proposing a new ratio of window openings to solid wall on the west elevation to open up this area to the view. Please refer to the new elevations. 39 Match, as closely as possible, the profile of the sash and its components to that of the original window. Existing: We believe the original building was built in 1958-60. They used the most modern window profile that was available at the time of construction. Proposed: The proposed window profile will match the existing profile as closelyas possible. P92 IV.B= ~OSS ARCHNECTURE+PLANNING 3.8 Use a storm window to enhance energy conservation rather that to replace a historic window. Existing: Storm windows were not used on this project, therefore this section does not apply. Proposed: This sectiondoes notapply. Chapter 4 - Doors 4.1 Preserve historically significant doors. Existing: We believe thatall the existing doors are not original. Proposed: The doorto the existing mud room will be removed. The front door and the door to the upper level balcony on the east elevation will be replaced with doors that will be designed in a style appropriate to the early 1960's when the building was constructed. The doors on the west elevation that is not visible from the public access area are not significant historically and will be designed to match the proposed new window pattern. Please refertothe proposed elevations .7 - .. V .- - .Â¥...;- t. . --- . 4.2 Maintain the original size of a door and its opening. Existing: We believe thatall the existing doors are not original. Proposed: The doortothe existing mud room will be removed. The front door and the doortothe upper level balcony on the east elevation will be replaced with doors that are the current opening size. The doors on the west elevation that is not visible from the public access area will be designed to match the proposed new window pattern. Please refer to the proposed elevations. 43 When a historic door is damaged, repair it and maintain its general historic appearance. Existing: Please refer to Section 4.1. Proposed: Please refer to Section 4.1. 4.4 If anew screen door is used, itshouldbe incharacter with the primary door. Existing: We believe that alt the existing doors are not original. We can't determine jf there ever were screen doors. Proposed: If screen door are desired by the owner, we will design the screen doors to be in the samecharacteras the primarydoor. 4Â·5 When replacing a door, use a design that has an appearance similar to the original dooror a door associated with the style of the house. Existing: We believe thaâ‚¬ all the existing doors are not original and wewill replacethe doors. Proposed: The doorto the existing mud room will be removed. The front door and the doortothe upper level balcony on the east elevation will be replaced with doors that will be designed in a style appropriate to the early 1960's when the building was constructed. The doors on the west elevation that is not visible from the public access area are not significant historically and will be designed to match the proposed new window pattern. Please referto the proposed elevations- P93 IV.B. ~OSS ARCHITECTURE-1-PLANNING 4.6 - If energy consâ‚¬rvation and heat loss are concern, consider using a storm door instead of replacing a historic entry door. Existing: As far as we could discern, storm doors were not used on this project and we will not be using them, therefore this section does not apply. Proposed: Thissection does not apply. Chapterf-Porches The design of the existing and proposed unit does not contain a front or back porch. Entry is accomplished through a carport to the main entry. As we do not have a porch, this section does not applytothe project. Chapter 6 -Architectural Details The design of the existing and proposed does not contain extensive architectural details. The unit was built in the early sixties in a modern style that minimized architectural ornamentation and details instead or expressing them, .The proposed addition will continue the use of the same profiles, proportions, and joinery as the existing unit. We want the additions to appear as a seamless extension ofthe original unit. Chapter 7 - Roofs 7.1 preserve the original roofform of a roof. Existing: The existing roofform consists of a series of 3/12 sloped shed volumes. Please refer to the existing elevations. Proposed: There are two roof additions. These roof additions were designed to as closely as possible match the existing roof slope, proportion, and materials. a. Entry roof-this roof continues the existing slope of the main living room roof over the new addition. This is most clearly detailed inthe proposed south elevation. b. Office addition - This roof is in the same slope as the rest of the unit. This roof is most clearly detailed in the proposed north and south elevations. 7.2 Preserve the original eave depth Existing: Allthe existing eaves are plumb cut at various depths. Proposed: The proposed eaves will match the depth and cut of the existing eaves. 78 Minimize the visual impacts ofskylights and other rooftop devices. Existing: There are no skylights or rooftop devices on the project. Proposed: There are no skylights or rooftop devices proposed forthis project. 7.4 A new chimney should be the same scale as those used historically. . Existing: There are no chimneys on the project. Proposed: We are proposing a new living room gas fireplace, but it will have a side vent and no chimney. 7.5 Preserve originalchimneys, even if they areto be made non-functional. Existing:s Thereare no chimneys on the project. Proposed: We are proposing a new living room gas fireplace, but it will have a side vent and no chimney. P94 IvuBu ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING 7.6 When planning a rooftop addition, preserve the overallappearance of the original roof. Existing: The existing roof form consists of a series of 3/12 sloped shed volumes. Please refer to the existing etevations. Proposed: There are two roof additions. These roof additions were designed to match the existing roof slope, proportion, and materials. 7.7 A new dormer should remain subordinate to the historic roof in scale and character. Existing: Thereare nodormersontheproject. Pleaserefer totheexistingetevations. Proposed: The office addition is considered its own roofform and not a dormer. 7.8 Preserve originalroof materiats. Existing: The existing roof consists of a cedarshingles. Please refertothe existing elevations. Proposed: There new roof will be new cedar shingles in the same pattern asthe existing roof. 7.9 New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color, and texture similar to those used traditionally. Existing: See section 7.8 Proposed: See section 7.8 7.10 If it is to be used, a metal roof should be applied and detailed in a manner that is compatible and does not detractfrom the historic appearance of the building. Existing: Seesection 7.8 Proposed: See section 7.8 7.11 Avoid using conjecturalfeatures on a roof. Existing: See section 7.8 Proposed: See section 7.8 Chapter 8- Secondary Structures This project consists of a sing[e townhome within a complex of eight units. There are no secondary structures sothis section does notapplytothis project. Chapter g -Building Relocation & Foundations This project consists of a single townhome within a complex of. eight units. The unit will not be relocated and is not moving from its current location sothis section does not apply to this project. Chapter 10 - Building Additions Existing;Additions 10.1 Preserve and older addition that has achieved historic significance in its own right Existing: Wethinkthat there was one addition to the original structure. This was an addition to the mudroom area which extended the back carport wall into the carport by 5'-6". Proposed: This square footage of this addition will be incorporated into the new design. This massing occurs beneath the flat carport roof so the overall roof massing will not change. The second door that was added in a prior addition will be removed. This will leave one entry doorinto the unit. Wethinkthis is how the unit was originally designed. P95 IV.B. ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING 10.2 A morerecent addition that is not historically significant may be removed Existing: Please refer to section 10.1 Proposed: Please referto section ion 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building it maintained Existing: In the front of the building there was an addition made to the west wall of the carport from and undetermined time. A cosmetic (no changes on wail locations) renovation was made to the interior of the unit at some point in the past, but we do not know exactly when this was done. We think that the original windows were changed also. We do not know ifthe window fenestration on the rear of the unit is in its original pattern or has been changed. From observation, the majority of the units have had renovations and additions done to the rear of the units, making it hard to discern the pattern of the original window fenestration. Proposed: A) The old addition at the front of the unit will be incorporated into the new design. This massing occurs beneath the flat carport roof so the overall roof massing will not change. The second door that was added in a prior addition will be removed. This will leave one entrydoor intothe unit. We thinkthis is how the unit wasoriginallydesigned. B) In the rear of the unit the south wall of the existing living room and the west wall of the existing mud and laundry room area will be relocated to make the spaces larger to fit the program elements of the proposed design. In the living room, the roof form of the living room will be carried over the new living room space. A flat roof over the existing mud/laundry space will cover the new proposed square footage inthisarea. We have designed these 2 roof elements in this way to keep the form of the new roof consistent with the massing of the existing unit. At the upper level we have added a reverse dormer to the massing. We have kept the pitch of the roof with same as the other roof pitches in the unit and complex. Given the wide discrepancy of additions that have been made to the rear of many of the units, we feelthatthe additions made tothe rearof this unitstill allow one to interpretthe historic character ofthe unit. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time Existing: There was an addition made to the front of the unit at an unknown time. There was a cosmetic interior renovation made to the unit at an unknown time. Proposed: We feel the fenestration pattern of the new windows at the rear of the unit read as a product of its own time and that the proposed roof forms still allow one to see the original form ofthe unit. The renovation to the back of the unit does not have the room to be separated from the original unit so it does not make sense to make the renovation a product of its own time. P96 IV.80 ~OSS ARCHITECTURE-I-PLANNING 10Â·5 When planning an addition to a building in a historic district, preserve historic alignments that may exist on the street Existing: The existing building complex has a radiating unit alignment pattern. Please refer to the site plan. Proposed: The proposed design does not change the existing alignment pattern. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building Existing: The current unit is approximately 1892 4 Proposed: The new addition increases the existing footprint of the unit by 159 sf. We feel that the proposed addition/renovation is compatible in size and scale with the main building. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than the historic buitding, set it back substantially from the significant faccldes and use a "connector" to link it to the historicbuilding. Existing: The proposed unit is part of an eleven unit townhome building, eight of which are joined together. Therefore a connector is not appropriate to this type of design. Proposed: The proposed unit is part of an eleven unit townhome building, eight of which are joinedtogether. Therefore a connector is notappropriate tothistype of design. - 16.8Â· - Place an addition atthe rear of a building or set itbackfrom the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent ~ Existing: In the Font of the building there was an addition made to the west wall of the carport from and undetermined time. A cosmetic (no changes on wall locations) renovation was made to the interior of the unit at some point in the past, but we do not know exactly when this was done. We think that the original windows were changed also. We do not know ifthe window fenestration on the rear of the unit is in its original pattern or has been changed. From observation, the majority of the units have had renovations and additions done to the rear of the units, making it hard to discern the pattern of the original window fenestration Proposed: Front of Unit - The front of the unit wil[ remain the same save for the removal of one door on the west wall of the carport. This will leave one entry door into the unit. We think this is how the unit was originally designed. A portion of new roof that encloses the new addition to the living room will be visible from the front. Please refer to the perspective views of the front of the unit. Rear of Unit - In the rear of the unit the south wall of the existing living room and the west wall of the existing mud and laundry room area will be relocated to make the spaces larger to fit the program elements of the proposed design. In the living room, the roof form of the living room will be carried over the new living room space. A flat roof overthe existing mudilaundry space will coverthe new proposed square footage in this area. We have designed these 2 roof elements in this way to keep the form of the new roof consistent with the massing of the existing unit. At the upper level we have added a reverse dormerto the massing. We have kept the pitch of the roof with same asthe other roof pitches inthe unitand complex. P97 IV.B. ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNINGt: In the design bf the proposed unit we have returned the front elevation (removal of mud-room* door) to-the original designand limited all the major visual impact to-the rear ofthe unit. 10.9 Roofforms should besimilarto those of the historic building. Existing: The existing roofforms of the unit are shed andflat roofforms Proposed: The additions to the unit mimicthe roofforms of the original structure. The living room roof form carries the existing roof over the new addition. The mud room roof form carries the existing roof form over the new addition. The office roof form mimics the pitch of the existing roofs ofthe unit. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architecturalfeatures Existing: Theonly important architectural features could be the shingle/siding detailing, rooffasciw walltransition, andthe deck detailing atthefront of the unit Proposed: None of these existing details will be changed or disturbed. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. Existing: On the existing unit there is white painted vertical wood siding and stained wood shingle - siding. Proposed: The new additions will carry the use of the existing In*rials onto the new masses and will use the same type of detailing between materials asthe existing unit. Rooftop Additions 10.12 When constructing a rooftop addition, keep the mass and scale subordinate to that of a historic building Existing: There is no rooftop deck or architectural element in the current unit. Proposed: There is no roof deck or any other architectural rooftop element proposed in this renovation. 10.13 Set a rooftop addition backfromthefront ofthe building. Existing: There is no rooftop deck or architectural element in the current unit. Proposed: There is no roof deck or any other architectural rooftop element proposed in this renovation. 10.14 The roofform and slope of the new addition should be in character with the historic building Existing: The existing roofforms of the unit are shed andflat roofforms. Proposed: The additions to the unit mimic the roof forms of the original structure. The living room roof form carries the existing roof form overthe new addition. The inud room roofform carries the existing roof form over the new addition. The office roof form mimics the pitch of the existing roofs of the unit. Please referto the perspectives views. P98 IV.80 ~OSS ARC[ill-EC-IURE+PLANNING Summation The majority of the units in this complex have been remodeled within the lasttwenty to twenty-five years. The majority of the development has been performed on the back of these units. (Please refer to the existing unit photos) The front of these units have remained relatively unchanged save for design changes to the original front doors and the additions of side lights to some units. These units were originally designed to be used for visiting lecturers or academics that were at the institute for a short or extended period of time. The unitdesign allowed forthe top floorto be locked offfrom the main floor if two non-associated people were using the unit. Both groups would use the common mid-level entry into the unit. Since the units have been sold and are now usedassinglefamilytownhomes. In this proposal we are proposing to renovate the entire unitto more effectively use the space as a single family townhome. We will return the front of the unitto what we think wastheoriginal design. There have been numerous re-designs to the rear of these units and the cohesive design statement across the entire original building has been somewhat compromised, We feel that by placing all the development to the rear of the unit and by keeping the massing and roof forms similar to the original structure, we are keeping the historic resource intact. We askthat HPC grant conceptual approval of this project. Ipspectfully Submitted, AS, - ~eith'Howie, Poss Architecture + Planning Authorized representative for NSF 1976 Trust, LLC. P99 IV.B. NrthÂ¢41Â·me,trr i i S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Building Department C/O Keith Howie Poss Architecture + Planning 605 East Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 From: Stephen K Peightal PE Date: November 26, 2014 Re: Basement Addition Aspen Meadows Trustee Toi*nhouse 61 Aspen, Colorado My office has been contacted by Keith Howie of Poss Architecture, to provide professional engineering services for the above referenced project. We will submit our standard letter of agreement to provide the following services: 1- Observation of existing structure during demolition phase. 2- Design of temporary shoring and permanent underpinning structure. 3- Design and Documents for any additional permanent structural items. 4- Observation during new structural construction with Field Reports. I have reviewed Architectural remodel documents prepared by Poss Architecture. These documents define the intent to provide basement space at the current crawlspace. To help define existing structure, engineers with my office will observe the existing spaces prior to finalizing the shoring and underpinning design. Conceptually, this project involves opening the foundation at the east side, on Grid-5, for access into the crawlspace. Shoring of existing framing systems above will allow for this access. Excavation and staging of underpinning around the foundation perimeter is to be approached from the interior excavated space. The existing foundation walls to the north and south are understood as not common to the neighboring units, however, the foundation walls for those units are in close proximity. By approaching this underpinning process as opening and building small foundation sections incrementally from the inside, tile bearing soil stability for all units is maintained. Soil properties and design recommendations will be provided to my office by a soils engineer. Conclusion My office has begun the design process for this underpinning project. Find attached Concept sheets to define our construction approach to this phase of work. We have used this approach successfully on many prior similar projects, including those with much older foundations of less integrity. Please contact my office with any questions. 14076 SKPE 0 298 Park Avenue o #301 â€¢ Basalt CO 0 81621 0 (970) 927-9510 â€¢ skpe@sopris,net P100 IV B= PLACE STEEL CHANNEL SHORING / BEAMS BOTH SIDES OF EXISTING EXISTING FLOOR / COLUMN, TIGHT TO BOTTOM OF FRAMIN6 TO REMAIN ~ EXISTINe Â®IRPER. PER SHORING PLAN. EXISTINe \ la_ 1:OUNDATION |~-Â·,a .1 I 1-111- TU- . 0 1 1 ~ |. -~-1 EXISTIN6 61RPER EXBTING COLUMN $ 4. \ PAD I 1, Â· 1.1 i -4 4 [ 1 lird:41:M4ib~TmT#4re-Irriuiii[!WiING#6187117 7 1 4711*rit-UmUÂ·4#ila-,-01.1-41 ' \_ SPAN SHORING BEAM EX[ERIOR FOUNDATION TO EXTERIOR FOUNDATION. BOLT CHANNEL TO NALL 4 BEAR ON FOOTING. ~ INTERIOR SHORING - STEP I @ 1/20='Lou 14016 ISSUED: S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd -CONCEPT SHEET: 26 NOV '14 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS BASEMENT ADDITION 01.1 DRAWN: 298 Park Avenue Unit 301 RTE Basalt, Colorado 81621 ASPEN MEADOM #61 OIF: (970) 927-9510 skpe@sopris.net ASPEN, COLORADO 8 P101 IV.B. 4 1><1 1=1-ff... ~/ 1.1 1 m=.. fil 1 1 1 1 Ll_ 1 -' f ~ EXCAVATE INTERIOR IT ., '47 SEE UNDERPINNING DETAIL G L.Dk-1 . ~ull-tatrl.F//.r'- ~ REMOVE COLUMN $ PAD 1 1=]TRI A 1 BELON SHORINe BEAM 11-6111~h -41 [Zih. - 1 / A='"Fit-ril-Trar#1#riL"rr 11111 ~U.liT-01.'m-UiTN:![[84-rd 1 i ~ INTERIOR SHORINS - STEP 2 9 |/2'=l'-0" 14076 ISSUED: S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd CONCEPT SHEET: 26 NOV '14 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS BASEMENT ADDITION 01.2 DRAWN: 298 Park Avenue Unit 301 RTE Basalt, Colorado 81621 ASPEN MEADOW #61 OF: (970) 927-9510 skpe@sopris.net ASPEN,COLORADO 0 P102 IV=B= 3 Exterme FLOOR 1 FRAMING TO REMAIN 20_ .4 1 EXCAVATE TO WORKING PLATFORM. -91 9 -4 /1 SLOPE UP TO EXISTINS FOOTING W TO QH AS REQUIRED Ill-T:" . : 4 A. 6 , B, (19 FOOTING~ V,I.F. U EXISTING 2 -11 1 FOUNDATION \ PLATFORM 21-111-1: 1-11 1 \J EXCAVATE TO EDGE ~ I OF EXIMING FOOTINe. ~Wi&~L[~LE,11 ' ill 20 0 1 B. UNDERPiNNING~ -' 1 El l lEi I r ' 5EE PLAN STEP 1: EXCAVATE TO MORKING PLATFORM. EXCAVATE APPROXIMATELY 4 TO 6 FEET MIDE TRENCHES AS SEETION (DON PLAN. LEAVE UND]51URBED BOIL SECTIONS 4 TO 6 FEET MIDE BEThEEN FOR MALL SUPPORT. SHORE TRENCH PER GOVERNING REQUIREMENTS TO PREVENT COLLAPSE. rh UNDERPINNINS - STEP I 14016 ISSUED: S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd CONCEPT SHEET: 26 NOV '14 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS BASEMENT ADDITION 01.3 DRAWN: 298 Park Avenue Unit 301 RTE Basalt, Colorado 81621 ABPEN MEADOM #61 OF: (970) 927-9510 skpe@sopris.net ASPEN, COLORADO 8 P103 IV.B. "' J 2:Sl- 4 #5 VERTICAL DOMEL @ 10" O.G. DRILL AND 1~IT[ ~ 1 ~---~ El'OX'r 9. INTO BOTTOM EXISTING FOOTING. B. (E) FOOTINe~ . V.I.F. |.4 1 f ... - VERIFY 16" ~ OR GREATER 21-111-111-11 1.. 4 Â£ Es. EQ . r 44[13[EIii- 1 I /4 .Â· 4 - â‚¬ 1 - .ltd - ' L~| j - 4. 1 | 85 VERTICAL @ 80 0.0. \93rn=49 - 17 -~ DRIVE 160 INTO SOIL BOTTOM FOR LAP MITH FINAL \ | #5 HORIZONTAL @ 8' O.G. L-1 DRIVE 16' INTO SOIL SIDED FOR LAP MITH FINAL STEP 2: PLACE REINFORGING. FORM INTERIOR FACE IN LINE MITH FACE OF E)<15TING FOOTING ABOVE. POUR SECTION TIGHT TO SOIL. USE MECHANICAL VIBRATION FOR PROPER CONSOLIDATION. HOLD POUR St' TO 60 BELOW BOTTOM OF EXISTING FOOTINe. CONCRETE DESIGNED FOR 3000 PSI COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH. USE 4000 P51 MIX TO HASTEN CURING. rh UNDERPINNINe - STEP 2 ~// @ 1/2"=ILO. 14016 ISSUED: S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd CONCEPT SHEET: 26 NOV 14 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS BASEMENT ADDITION 01.4 DRAWN: 298 Park Avenue Unit 301 RTE Basalt, Colorado 81621 ASPEN MEADON #61 OF: (970) 927-9510 skpe@sopris.net ASPEN, COLORADO 8 P104 IV.B. "' 2:CL_ 4 'Tir,; - 1 11- ...1 I .9. 4 B. (E) FOOTIN(3~ V,I.F. . 4. . . I -111-Ill-LI 4 __tdU]-19'l' 4 - 0 It f=: 4 ' 9 fÂ· 1 2 111*11111117 5ICE_5: AFTER 9 DAY CURE AT ABOVE FREEZING TEMPERIWRED, REMOVE FORM AND PACK NON-SHRINK GROUT FULL AREA BETME EN EXISTING FOOTING AND UNDERP]NNING. AFTER GROUT CURED, EXCAVATE SOIL BETWEEN UNDERPINNINe AS SECTION @ ON PLAN. REPEAT STEPS 1 4 2. rh UNDERPINNINe - STEP 3 14016 ISSUED: S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd CONCEPT SIIEET: 26 NOV 94 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS BASEMENT ADDITION 01.5 DRAWN: 298 Park Avenue Unit 301 RTE Basalt, Colorado 81621 AEPEN MEADOW #61 OF: (970) 927-9510 skpe@sopris. net ASPEN, COLORADO B P105 IV.B. U "' N, 4 A t. '4 B. (E) FOOTING~ V.IF. 1. ~4 Â·4 | Â·4 4.. r.4 . <P. ~.- 4 -4 0 9 NEFI PLATFORM In\\ A-111.-1.t i i__U ~~~~111- _ 01 -- L00 M 111 3-LI--111=!-r~ B. UNDERPINNINe ~ ~ ' I El 11211 r SEE PLAN STEP 4: EXCAVATE TO NEN KORI<INe PLATFORM. 13>Â©AVATE P]TS SECTION O AND REPEAT STEPS 1, 2,4 3 FOR NEXT LEVEL DONN. UNDERPINNINe - STEP 4 @ ~/20:p.00 140-16 ISSUED: S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd CONCEPT SI-IEET: 26 NOV '14 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS BASEMENT ADDITION 01.6 DRAWN: 298 Park Avenue Unit 301 RTE Basalt, Colorado 81621 . ASPEN MEADOW #61 OF: (970) 927-9510 skpe@sopris. net ASPEN, COLORADO 8 P106 IV.B. "' t 261- 4 -T-F Â· Â· 1=lili 111= . 4 1 paJU 8. (e Foome* 2.s*24 5&380 V.I.F. . I. . 4 J -- 1. . 1. 4 /4 0 - Â· * - '' VERIFY 16" OR GREATER 40 4 NEFI PLATFORM 1-~ ..4.. 41. - 2-111.111-It - | #5 HORIZONTAL @ 8" O.0. ,,6=| | |E~~E| 1 1- 4 - 1 - 7.--1 DRIVE 16' INTO SOIL 5[DE5 Ill--111-1 ' 1 FOR LAP MITH FINAL ~ 84.,â‚¬01,_<~ . t_Ll 42*- i v v 1.-L~ ~~ 2 31/ B. UNDERP]NNINe . ~ . / L__1 42Â» SEE PLAN 15 VERTICAL @ 8' 0.0. STEP 5: PLACE REINFORGING. FORM INTERIOR FACE IN LINE MITH FACE OF UNDER PINNINe WALL ABOVE. POUR SEGTION TIGHT TO 50]L. USE MECHANICAL VIBRATION FOR PROPER CONSOLIDATION. POUR TIGHT TO BOTTOM OF UPPER MALL. Ch UNDERPINNING - STEP 5 14016 ISSUED: S KPEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd CONCEPT SHEET: 26 NOV '14 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS BASEMENT ADDITION . Cl.1 DRAWN: 298 Park Avenue Unit 301 RTE Basalt, Colorado 81621 ASPEN MEADOM #61 OF: (970) 927-9510 skpe@sopris.net ASPEN,COLORADO 8 P107 .O-~CEEOXEI 1ON IV.B. 4 ". t 2:611- 111-1. 4 ..:4 : B. (E) FOOTING* V.IF. . 6 4 -4 . 4 14 . 0 19,- r | 4~ â€¢ a Â·4 - .4. 4 . J PLACE SLAB TIGHT /1 TO BOND BREAKER 9 CONCRETE SLAB PER PLAN. SEE ARCH. FOR VAPOR BARRIER, ETC. 1 T.SLAB SEE FLAN~ ' REI- ., . 'El l lEi 11211'El l IF-' B. UNDERFINNINe~ El i Ift=i i i=A:El 11211 El 1121117- 5EE PLAN ' 14]1Â©1112111*11 El i El i Ir -111=111=111- STEP 6: EXCAVATE BALANCE OF INTERIOR SOIL. REPEAT MEPS 2 THRU 5 FOR SECTION Â® ON PLAN. PLACE LOMER FLOOR 5LAB PER PLAN. ~ UNDERPINNINe - STEP 6 @ 1/2"=I'-0' 14076 ISSUED: S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd CONCEPT SHEET: 26 NOV '14 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS BASEMENT ADDITION 61.8 DRAWN: 298 Park Avenue Unit 301 RTE Basalt, Colorado 81621 ASPEN MEADOM #61 oF: (970) 927-9510 skpe@sopris.net ASPEN, COLORADO B P108 IMPROVEMI}41Â· SURuCY l~+T â€¢ 0~ Il~t -*IMI+It 101-0~Â·fÂ¢ LCIEND AND NOTE:; r,*0, ./.0 -...1. I. ./c-{â€¢ 0~1Â¥17~AIWI~. 1'111~1 -MI~ Â¢~0* initirÂ¥ 084 - i G .1,1.4.,11.0 11Â¥ â€ž0~,frnâ€¢,A" M / f ASPEN SURVEY ENCINCEKS. INC. 1, Â·A 1*C 210 50ul GAUH,% WRIXT 6 Am'u' COLD,â€¢00 n . 1 / f >f\{ MICAÂ«/W (970) 025-3nlo JOI EÂ·i 2: .im ./.2 1.n .m- * .... *m. I / 4 / 4.4.1 1../.1011 fUMIN. 4 .,La W. Uâ€¢ . /-33/ 4 ~,7.L<-- ,Â· lail ~ ~ 9 JL 2 'W / / .:7-- DR. . ....911. $41,4, -4, I * * k - ./ . Â»1 2 ' , / 145,-Â»:)> ..4-v / .-- ==72-4-3 -- - . t. 21 t 6 /1 9 4// A / /. , 1 /3/ 1 4.- J 1 61 - /2-- /'.7 ' 1 1\ 1 1~ 'r-h -94-7. g 1 , 1 .\ q>----r--- --- '*- 3.--' alk l'-ts=:,~ _ - At d /4. h~./,Zon=6.- N., er'U,4 CU(3~01 \\ UNIT - i 'UNIT3 ,/ / 1 , - *I-I. 1-79~ 1 1 i Ph n -111 : i - 5% /1 \ / / \545 '0.-- $ / \0(7 /7 \ j l 1 ---4- r.-1,1 I - / UNIT 94 ~ , -- \7./ UNIT 8 UN IT Â£23 4-c=m] -1/0, Â»Â«94 P-Â·--1 UNaÂ· 6 r.3 2 1 - ' L_L -" -O ,~.KIMX, /79/ -1./ ./ / --- -2 72>277*-- - _ .i _ - ---4 - -- -47- .. 3/ i =--~ \ / 4, 7 / / 4\ - -- -262-25'11 .- 25--__~21 ....... :~r---~ML#/ W = . 1556 1 J ,Â»Irn,A,0,1 -./2*-- 8 3, -. i / "r.7.#.:7'V.,9 w n~ ....Inr en~-rn Iwâ€¢[010 - :- i.,~hw,zrn;â„¢rwl,u]-'.9 0:.'*' W . ---I- I- i....mi .:lii.... \ 0 0 / -Ii,-L,K -I ........" I.N...4 ./.pill iII 0 1/1 IMÂ¥/1.1/L.=IMÂ¥â€¢MI'. .MJ,IlÂ¢ u. ~D-m. 14.t hâ€¢d -./. ../.- I . EERE5#=-4-= 0 J O 20 40 .- I , I . 1// H , co,1...,0.â€ž ........... -O -.......# - ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 ' Hgo ~OSS ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING , EPCCONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : SREPLAN- E<]STING . I2,Uyl4 elli / =Â£1.1.:P 1*1 IV.B. ,. 31Â»#MENT 1 + DATE: 12/5/14 City of Aspen & INVOICE # 203245 Pitkin County GIS 130 S Salena St BILL TO: Howie Aspen, CO 81611 Foss Architecture & Planning Phone: 970-920-5453 PO Box 4312 Fax: 970-544-5378 Aspen, CO 81612 72Ck339-7200 DESCRIPBONÂ¢333%112. 0-0-h 0 74/9 3-4-â‚¬O ~UANTiTYNHRS-EEXTR SHEETS Â» AMOUNT-74.Of.Â»26 300ft Lot 6 Aspen Meadows Mailing Labels Trustees 1 $160.00 -*f Â· Makeall checks payable to City of Aspen ancl Sales Tax- 9.3% $13.95 reference GIS & the invoice number in the note. If you have any questions concerning this invoicer Total $163.95 - I o~ th q contact GIS at 970-920-5453, GIS@cityofaspen.corn. The Aspen/Pitkin GIS Department presents Womnationas a service lo the public, Evefy effwt has been made to ensure that the information ts accurate. The AspeWPita GIS Depailment makes no warranty or guarantee concerning Ihe condeteness, accuracy or reliability of the infonnation contarned in any map or data layer. Assessing accuracyand reliaNIKy of information is the sole responsibihty of the user and data shall be used and retled upon only at the risk of user. The AspeNPA*M GIS Depaffment does not mainlain a database of mineral *State e,mers. THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS! P110 Easy PeelÂ® Labels 1 A maim Bend along line to I ~ AVERY@ lv.Bl Use AveryÂ®Template 5160Â® ~ Feed Paper 'RE=g==ga expose Pop-up Edgeâ„¢ 1 ASPEN INSTITUTE INC CITY OF ASPEN KENROSS LUX S.AR.L 1000 N THIRD ST 130 S GALENA ST 3765 CHAMPION BLVD ASPEN, C081611 ASPEN, CO 81611 WINSTON-SALEMr NC 27105 LAMM RICHARD D QPRT 1/2 MCHUGH JOHN J 1/3 REED PRESLEY O & PATRICIA 5401 E DAKOTA #20 PO BOX 7954 375 BELLEVUE DR DENVER, CO 80246 ASPEN, CO 81612 BOULDER, CO 80302 SARPA JOHN G & JAN JONES SARPA SHERMAN HARRIS D 1/2 SIMPKINS B DOUGLAS JR 1/3 71 MEADOWS TRUSTEE RD 5401 E DAKOTA #20 P.O BOX 7954 ASPEN, CO 81611 DENVER, CO 80246 ASPEN, CO 81612 SMITH VICTORIA LEA SMOOKE BARRY ASPEN TRUST : STRICKLAND MARCIA D 1160 PARK AVE 1 155 5TH ANITA DR 1991 EALAMEDAAVE#9 NEWYORK, NY 10128 LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 1 DENVER, CO 80209 i i i j 1 1 ttiquettes faciles & peter ~ 4 Re P 111 hachure afin tie I www.avery.com I Sens de 1-800-GO-AVERY Utilisez le aabarit AVERYÂ® 5160Â® J charaernent ravaler le rebord PoP-upuc J 1 IV.B. December 23, 2014 Amy Simon City ofAspen Historical Preservation Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado, 8i61i Re: HOA Approval; Meadows Townhome 61 Dear Amy, The HOA for the Meadows Townhomes met on December 22, 2014Â· During this meeting the proposed remodel and expansion of Unit 61 was discussed and approved subject to the availability of floorarea as stipulated in the SPA, development, and subdivision agreement for the Aspen Meadows. ~iln Sarpa Â»for the Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhomes HOA V Pll2 4 :,0, ,~ 1, 3-....eÂ·.1.~11~i~iiiiii~Mii~~ii 1,~ .9,--tgy&~I././// :f- 42 I . 1. ; . 1 - - , 0 . 1'.2. t - , . 9. f *>f 'j . . 1 2 . /1 .4 1. \ i. 1-0-Â£3.1 0 i \ I. .3 4\ 6 5 0 ~Â· , 5 t I . Â£ 77 + t .7 -4,1 L,#' '--,"m/// ----,"/ , P.- . Iq 9 . 1 1 1 - - J.. . 2 7 I / 4 > ic i j [224 . 4Â» L 4 \ 1 M ..1 .7 4 1.4 A /11 - 1* h *2_15-=.12;,w..--*-- - . -7 1 .r :- 2: -1 = 1 , 1 . : 4 4 -. y /2 --- IBM- I p , L Â¢ ...1 f. 1 .76. .-- -3 I ' 149~ 1 ... - -, 7 T 1 tes . 9 le :1 1 1 m.4 ./. 1, % - Â·. --1182:Z- , 0, ~ N ; tÂ·=mul. 1? 1 --2 . j Â© 9 r-- -1 - 1 0 17 31 '' i I. 4 1. 9/7 12 4 6 16---.3-di:41 ill,..3 +rl : 1.'2--Mt .1 ..it JV 4 t# 1 - + ~. L.- -3 F - r 4,i ,Â·,~ , :*il 7 1 ... ' -1 2 Â· il:. in -/ c ..Â·A 4.1 *:' -/ â€¢ 4 1 :. ' 2% '~4 -Ii ' 4 *At, 4 U . .' (* 1 1 It. . . T 1 1 ' 14 . . P .4 4-t 4 '. ..' 4 . 4 1 .4 . a - :.16+ . 4 , . 1- V , 4 t 'k I.- . LE .1 #- 9 3 4 y .1 "' 1 - Â· ' m,- ' . Â· .1 Ar, -b 4 ' . . 13% 34%Â»1*Â« i . 22 4 ... :il.. 4,4 1 A 'Â·94 I l' I . . , ...... ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 HEFTI!121 MANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW '7 ASPEN COLORADO 01011 BLLPOSSE::OCAE (T) '70/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 O 2014 ARCHTECTURENIC'-4-, c 12/05/14 rv tÂ·':440Â¥ . 6 2 .I B NY 9, AMPROVE MI NI SURVE Y 4 LEGEND AND NOTES UNII 1, OF 11!i IRWUF [ 10* NI,0.11 K Al 11!L Aspf' 611/[*JWS. A CON,0/1/!li' O OUND SURVI Y /0/UU[ /1 AS D[ !Â·C /18 ED CllÂ¥ OF All[N. IVKIN COLINVY ' 10/ADO CONTAININGÂ· 6.40 50. f I. 1 ./ .11117 Rex 8 41. A SURVIY CON!1201 2 ~ PRI PARF D BY 1 / 44 9 1114 HY:,RANi z MANint ' {31. ASPI N SURVI Y F NCINI 1 RS, INC . lilli ' 1/ 4 2 . 1 AP 710 SOUIH CAE[NA 411Â¢11 1 // 41, 2 . ASA N, COICRA)0 81611 UNIÂ·AVI I ROAD / 46 1 1 Ne f l'HON[ /IAX (970) 924 .5816 'All R lili <3-d i)All ~J()[; 33 751920 / .4 a 5/02 Al L EAst MI NI S [ i:'ID iN liU E <:01,:I.NIUI NI OR KNOWN 0 4'..4 1.12 1,119 HURVIYeR All '/1./. 1*1401 5 ''*#31 â€¢r... -- .-- mI E INI OR!,f,WON 1 1,RNISHJ D BY: r.& 1'~IKIN C{RJNIY ./1. i (r, t' Alt NO.KI 11140 / 0 DAN D: 2/3/96 . 1. i. \ 1 + -, . -0.- 9 1// ~ / . 4 \ B\ \ \{ 10 /../*. 0- 1.1 0 / : 1 4 6 ,/ 1,1 5 -- : : .5,2 BEARING/. N /*34'W / 0 0 , 0 /* u \1 4-- 8--1--' /1 ./ I k-B' %; ' ./ 1% / ,- 7 -- i ---- W- 1 \ \-1 1 0.6 . 4, ..0 I %It IN // / :.P' 4. ILJ--/ 4 - . r, - I 4, O \ 1 1 <97 . X .% 1 , 0 \. N. 414 ..3 K. , 1 2/ . I ' ' hi 1 -- ,--- /-- .- - - W.- \ \ A L r --4 -- --~2-~ 1 20 % ....5 %' .- 5, ..<... *i I .i ' ' ' \ 1 orr-Or - I . ----- 1 1+&.#lili \ I - Â· 3~ 4 /1/ -g --t ~ UNIT 2 ---- \ ---- ./&.* ~ 1 .-.- .' . i . --.1 6Â»>Â« pf 1 -- - .3 01 L / -- 12 '-, -- - = 1 3 <~ , / /; 9 ; 1 1 i - / 4 , ,- .50 -- . C/' t. d UNIT 3 - ' 4 ~ 7 - , / / / \ i 1 11 1\-f rant h .Ji j r, I. .1 -14 ' -/*29"-- . 1 , / \ i UN IT 4_ 24_. -Â·--4---: - - F n ~ .-- 1 1 ..I= .411Â». , UNIT 9 , : 1 -1 1 . /. /1 i / " 4, Il '' te/ , 1-. ''/ 1 - UNIT 81 4 UNIT 5 1, 1 u - LA- / .... * - UNIT 7 --- - 1 3% 4 ..: 1 LI '1__ / , , -- -,~6 0 - / 'r. , I N -1- 5 / .- - 57 - p. z , - W. ~l-- - 14-LL - -./ â‚¬ d % /4, . ,/ / e. - ' '01 I ,Â« I I . ' I ---- / / 1 .TZ I Â·- 10}10 ,/., /. ,-h. 1 f .5 - Â· , ur .- , . % /... 1 -- - j / . i. - . .V - -- / 1 %i* % m / - +Pi I. - // 1.U Â»41 ' . ~, C[-RTU ICAIION rilte SURVIYED DU,2!NG_____________. _ -_ ... i IND R. ACCURATE p'.0. DIC UNDERUJCNED STAaÂ·; DIA1 THE PROPLHIÂ¥ Il_rÂ£Rl[Ul I'[REON WAS BASED ON l,IL r~Ell r'/R}ENCE AS SHOWN, AND T!,Al 1,1 i. ARE NO ; DISCRN 1>ANCit S (>1 RE COR'. BOUNDARY l INI feNI k I .. i Nâ€¢ ImACH/1 Nls 1./.1 NIS OR IN;}1.; 01 'NA. IN .. 1 '131 Irr . Ii>WI 10 /1 . Iii .< .. 0 0 ./ i / B<CON AS I. R[ON UlloWN. UNDLI<CUOUNI) 0 'll. W iIi NO AnoÂ¥1 GRCUND APPURI.NANCI.!3, AN:} DOCUUIN/3 01 12'COIU NO' : Â·11'l l' . lit ' SUMÂ¥012 .21 1 K.â€¢1' D. i.15 LU[MY IS VOID 'Nle i /1 f STAMP! D O 0 &8Â¥OM su Of â€ž. !411MYOR BLLOW. JOHN I. HOWORTH P.' ./. 25947 0 -, / , 1~ 20' , triu' .'.01Â¢1-; 4/ CCIC.9, E- YOL WÂ·.19 ....'i Â·'N~ 11{~ - -- . ile, 6...m *'*nic' 011 1... K./ 11Â·.1 9 /0 /@IN ..... :Ile'../0, lilli I /1 "ll .... ACIKI \ 1,â€¢91, ul ON *n o,FICI i. â€¢ 15 1Â· â€¢Â· 141 Ceâ€¢1-,1 f, .tâ€¢* 'I W le N / ....... In 'Al' 01 .â‚¬ CEIGHICAâ„¢;N >}8~/ 304â‚¬* 171 0 20 40 .-I-.-I-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-I-.-I-.---.-.-.I-.-.-.-.I. / (11 1,111 IC Aill N 1/ veil) 11 .81 .1 â€¢11 411'9 1, I: I 11 4 . Al u Â» 1 2 1 ./. CONTOURS . 2 ~ l.._ 8 M ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss Â·Ii ,#:41{ i j luRI rl ANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : SITE PLAN - EXISTING 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81511 .LIC.==J. HPC 2 Â® 1214 ,;C,IT='M-',01&,A 12/05/14 {T} 970/925 4755 (f} 970/920 2950 y50-/'2~=.I. ..0 6 9Â£64 'Aw -'94/ 7, Ll i - 6 -- -4 NPROV[ MI NI 5;l;IM Y n, I t (Di N D AND N{}11 S 1./ 1. 01 ill' rl?UFI11 1/WN./.1 S Al TH' ASM N WI ADOWS, 4 { ONI)(>MiN'U O ' O.JND SURVI Y .....i AS I SC RI,H I Cill 01 All' N. 11//N COUNI' CO! 0//1,0 CON[AlliNC ..tri 50. 11 V 0 U~WY BOX A 1 Y ('ONII<(1 4 m ~â€ž PRI PAk; 1) HY / I. I l.}RAN i Â·I 2 40[ z ASPEN St)[?VTY ENGINEERS, INC. 4 ,... IREB MI <2Â·'A 1 454' 2,0 LOWIH GA: I NA St RI i I * lANi.'It I.N..Wl ' At ' ASPI N, ColoRA[)0 81611 4 %47 MON#/[AX (970) 925 1815 1/5 34....Al Wl{'WN i,imul. ' J â‚¬ 'All R VA./ 74 I 1 ~SI MI N; S J !5111> JN 11'I ' 4 (31,!UJJÂ¥J N' IN KN{hÂ¥/ 1, 11.All .)11 0 /' m 3/02 25192/ W W P. 2 1111, .1 i.'i,LUION 1 l.. '. 0 3/. , I'liK'N l'.INIÂ¥ 11Â·11. 141-. , 4 & 'e 't-L CASI NO. Pâ‚¬ 1 , I 14{D 9 ....: 2/ 3/96 , '19 NY 1 J + 1 â€¢ 7 IL'~' \ & 1 . ,.4 / 'D .7 / ~1~ R 35 - ... f 3 . . ~ ./.',1 \ 1 \: 19 'A'Â·N .J J ~-- ., r- - -<-~-I.- i,%,5 4 81-P".ch ~ <~ /,/11 i 1-4 \- 2 3 .._ L._ ~ / / . -imi----71 - ~ / .1, - 9.. - /1 ..Ar-'1 'I ...#b . tz- - - - - . - A*- . 24?,51,1 9 + I ' '. 1 -r 111 \ 5 1 1 \ I.0.1 /11Â¥/4 A. 8 :\ 1 y / i '3 i 1 4 - 1- N (3 ~ ~ \ 0 C. P-Z ) INUINJSV] h , 1 4 ~Â¢4 --+ ./ 4&. . 1 i -- /90,1-y...3 4 â€¢ 1,1 t Â· , - - -:V- t% f y \ ' 4) F\X .4 / I i \ jo - . 1 - - -*- - -- 'r - 1~ /7 47 1 1 , r M. /9 .* 0 ..24\4 , m - 41* \UNIT 2 --Â· - --' 1 uit. v" 10 .1 . - -Z - 4 , \ , , ~ . IN-IME.3 3,M( il,3 0, .. -11*131 -- - 1 ' ' I.. *L. 1 11 r i -- ' ~%~~K 1 \,Sh Q / , // L ' Â» ~ ' 1 UNIT 3 - L 4/ / \ W ~ %*44 9 %. , / 2 -#' .i 1.Â·~ 2 "34 j X. 1 -x-. W {96 -- - 94 --- 4 .// I ./ , , UNIT 9 ~ ~; 1 ' x ' ~ j UNIT 4 .â€ž , u -. 1 11 *-1 / / , I. , UNIT 8 --- . , 4% ir- 46 UN IT 5 1 -- F AN . I n -.-- UNIT 7'1 / , 1, r 1 IN h 1 / -- /UNIT 6 t-W i .- i / / ./ , -- \29 ' / -* '. ' AN i . . 1 8 ~.' f. / + - 1 - ff 11 .--- VT -- - / * M / .%- ... / D J Rd . 10 / e ' - N ,!22 . I- )p' r: _ Â·UL % Â»-- 0. 2 1. / O -tr- - . c, - 1 -1 / / a 4 ,â‚¬+0 ./ / i. 1.1 - / CIRTE'ICATION -, 000 I ./ . ./ , 74,0, '- C) / 1~I[ lJNIM 12.{INFO 51ATI 5 1./ 11/ ['ROI'll?1/ {)12...I) I...N WAS lilli !;IM?vi U D DURING ....... .. .>4)07 AND 1; ACCURAN BASED ON 11,1 11{10 EVOENCE AS Si,OWN. AND MAI JAIRE ARE NO I /12Â·CRE'Al'.15 01 'fe'll. lilliNÂ¢r 'Nt .....11. ENCIO'(:11/1 NIS. t11 1.A';EU[NIS OR 121(1111!; Or WAY IN 11,1.1, F.VIDCNCE OR KNOWN tO MI , 0 // , 'Cl.IN 'S ,/RI ON ':/OWN. UNDING[?OUND /14 /1 5 W. 1 NO APOVICÂ·.ill' 1- - ' . Al'PURENANCEr. AN. DOCUMINIS or I.CORD NO,1 !,UlÂ·IN /O -O 11' (. 0 * // / -/ SURVEYOR A,4 ixe[Plf[K :HIS Sule/LY IS vÂ·)~r> UNi[.Ss wir STAM}'to = |~,i,t]WE Ef.Al 01 1,ir. famv{ 70,2 1,1 tow 1/HN I. HOWOR H P.I.S. 7/94/ 1- 20. ~Nulk .COR/% TI C'll,â„¢MS ./ Â¥Ct 'llt;1 Coyl:IF!*:f *â€¢ IFU,l AC;,Cl, B,(Un Ul'(>N ,W, 1,1,fâ‚¬T ClÂ¢ 1.1 Il,~1 .%â„¢4N 1,11,1 ... % 1 /71Ug,&'I.9 \ / ./. .cu Fly' Dr-keÂ·Â¥El ..i ..'.T IN K Â£,4 NT *Â¥ Al,Y AC 1/1,1 ....... ./ I.IC, INTl. ./i I. C.-iNLID /!NI 'AN T N 0 20 .} .---.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-I-.-I-.-.-.-.-.-.-I-.-.-0-.-.-.-I., / OUU,L{.ADCâ€¢, i' *?ID 0 - Wtt .UÂ»~I *;nÂ· h' - c, u , /-4-/ 1,Â·1 -li . 11-E t-KA'IN 'I,3- iÂ·[iâ€¢[1.1, 11-f 2 f OOT CONTOURS le % 2 7 .) rl ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 }SS ARCHITECTURE PLANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : SITE PLAN - PROPOSED 603 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 HPC 3 A 870/925 4755 I) 970~920 2950 (D 2011 ~~;~~,~. 12/05/14 12,5/=11 259/ (3) (4) (3) (1) (2) (5) (4) VIEW FROM MEADOWS TRAIL * f I * 00 1 - .-. ' C /' J<*aa . ~** r .' f I Â¥ 'C'it 1 I . lita Â· y. I 1,3 PA â‚¬ r. , .' Â¢.11 - ~el-~ , U . 1 . IIi~ L i 1 % 6 /\1 1 4 Ill 1 11% st 3 . 9 1 -2 1 / 11/A . UNIT 21 RENOVATIONS TO UNIT 21 INCLUDE: 1) NEW WINDOW ON SOUTH EXTERIOR WALL. 2) NEW WINDOW ON NORTH EXTERIOR WALL. 3) THE EXISTING DECK ON THE ORIGINAL UNIT HAS BEEN CONVERTED INTO A NEW LIVING ROOM. 4) NEW WINDOW FENESTRATION PATTERN ON NEW LIVING ROOM ADDITION AND EXISTING UNIT. 5) A NEW CANTILEVERED DECK AND STAIR HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE UNIT. UNIT 21 ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss '\RCHITFCTURF - PI ANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : UNIT 21 - EXISTING CONDITIONS 605 EASr/AIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 8161~ (T)970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 Â®1111 .E.=.---...R 12/05/14 HPC4 (5) (1) (2) (4) (6) (7) (3) (8) -. lit -, . 1.1 . I 411'-111 4 - -Q 1. '4\ y.9 1 1 .*4 VÂ· . - 1 . 4 N + 4 1. , .. 7. 14 1 t 6 ,Â·t te it;-186 . -Wer-4 '' B 75. - . 1 ~ ; - - .. 5. 1,1 4 -1 H i -- - '.. t-- & . * . -14-Ma 1 COK, 4 :p v .* At,72 ./ 6. - 1?L .. . I .. .. . I 2 I V 12. 0 1 - . 1 , 1/6Â£J< 2k 'I 1 1 i. 1 im 4 .11 .*Â¢â€ž 21 ,;6.1/ 1 124 / a~ (9) VIEW FROM MEADOWS TRAIL UNIT 31 RENOVATIONS TO UNIT 31 INCLUDE: 1) EXISTING DOOR REPLACED WITH NEW DOOR W/GLAZING AND SIDELITE. 2) EXISTING DECK DEMOLISHED AND REPLACED WITH LARGER DECK, WITHOUT ORIGINAL STAIRS. i' 3) NEW WINDOW ADDED TO EAST EXTERIOR WALL. |~4,4 .. 4) NEW SLIDER WINDOW ADDED TO NORTH EXTERIOR WALL. ' ' v Â¢ 5) NEW WINDOW ADDED TO WEST EXTERIOR WALL. 6) EXISTING STAIRS DEMOLISHED AND REPLACED WITH NEW WOOD STAIRS IN DIFFERENT CONFIGURATION. 19 7) ORIGINAL DOOR REMOVED. 8)NEW WINDOWS AND FENESTRATION PATTERN TO WEST EXTERIOR WALL. 9) NEW WINDOWS AND FENESTRATION PATTERN TO SOUTH EXTERIOR WALL. >tl - . ' U ~1 $ I UNIT 31 ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss u .til|il,lijift .pi/\NNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : UNIT 31 - EXISTING CONDITIONS 605 EASY IfIAIN STREET ASPEN, COHRADO 81511 12/05/14 HPIC5 (T) 970 f 925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 (1) (3) (6) (2) (4) (7) (5) VIEW FROM MEADOWS TRAIL f >C r. 1 r I , le: -= /14 1 .2,1 1 - 'ro , L Â«.. f *. 7 AN ,i . -I k 1 4 27>.. A 4 ./. '.....' 64 19 - , .4 , 1231// 1, 4 2- 12 I--Tli------ t#'8#00 --4. - \.... f..1 L. i: 4 1- tal: .11 i. 3. Â¥ al t 72+8 U -'. 7 11 -2% ---1 -I-/0.*:S."/ .3.M 4 4 149 i: ixpl-#0= - C 4 6 ? '74 9 . 1 -/9/ I'll.......F-Im- ' - m.slm ig UNIT 41 RENOVATIONS TO UNIT 41 INCLUDE: 1) EXISTING WINDOW AT NORTH EXTERIOR WALL REPLACED WITH NEW OPERABLE WINDOW. 3) NEW METAL GUARDRAIL AND STAIRS AT REAR OF UNIT. 4) A NEW CANTILEVERED DECK HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE WEST SIDE OF THE UNIT. 6) ALTERNATIVE PERIMETER TO NEW CANTILEVERED DECK. 7) EXISTING DECK TO ORIGINAL UNIT HAS BEEN CONVERTED TO A NEW LIVING ROOM W/ SHADE TRELLIS. ELEMENTS ORIGINAL TO UNIT 41 INCLUDE: 2) UNIT RETAINS ORIGINAL EAST (FRONT) FACADE. 5) ORIGINAL WINDOWS RETAINED AT WEST EXTERIOR WALL OF ORIGINAL UNIT. UNIT 41 ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss ARC HITECTURE Â· PLANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : UNIT 41 - EXISTING CONDITIONS 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 HPC6 12/05/14 (T)970/925 47W (f) 970/920 2950 1~Cli29Il~ :rt; (5) (2) (6) (1) (3) (4) (7) - r .*2) 4 - N - W. %123.3Â£;r :it"' --Â·K t ' ..' 92. M . '..k- 4- Â£ i ~ gk - %92=i#/. B 39*31 2/ 1 1 P I Â£ , lillit: D . 1 0 ,~.~~ ~1 : V. -- .* 5 ~~~~~'%1..,.ti.,%~~- 1 $ 4 -: irEA 6('Â·7:- 4 -- r- f~ - 2.4. -T , lilli ii!\ :ti VI -42< 3.- ..AW.f. 14 / I .d f.- '. 3 3, 1: 1 11\111, 6 , f:,3- .4. 1 I . ..2 0-4 1...14:,_. - 1\ 1 ~ , - 1 11,1,1 , 1 11 ' th kÂ·', VIEW FROM MEADOWS TRAIL UNIT 51 RENOVATIONS TO UNIT 51 INCLUDE: 1 4 1) ORIGINAL DOOR REPLACED WITH NEW DOOR W/ GLAZING AND SIDELITE. 1,~-6, ~Â· ~ s:jr , , 2)NEW WINDOW ON EAST EXTERIOR WALL AT LOWER LEVEL. f., 1~ 1 .4...4 :4;&$,14 7 ,~0 - j 3) THE EXISTING STAIRS TO DECK ON EAST EXTERIOR WALL HAVE BEEN REMOVED. . '.- â€ž .1* fO'hÂ·..:: f ,.'.# .*'. F.44,~. fl;~ .i~---- , 4) NEW WINDOWS ADDED TO NORTH EXTERIOR WALL. 4, 5) NEW WINDOWS AND FENESTRATION PATTERN ADDED TO WEST EXTERIOR WALL. 6) NEW SLIDING DOORS HAVE REPLACED ORIGINAL WINDOWS. 7) ORIGINAL STAIRS HAVE BEEN REMOVED. K 4 UNIT 51 ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 ~OSS ARCHITECTURE ' M ANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : UNIT 51 - EXISTING CONDITIONS 605 EAST Im STREET ASPEN. COLORMOD 81611 HPC 7 (T) 970/925 4755 (F]970/920 2950 @ 34 ,,ammi-â€¢-9,1 12/05/14 =C1425619PI~ (6) (7) (1) (8) (2) (4) (5) (3) ' K 4 , 4 Â·Â·Â· 2 / 4 3 91'. Â°fÂ»:1 . 33& Â£ 5.4690= 9% r....../.I.U...... -Â·9. Â· 'Â· Â· 44*3 - r. al m Wal * R & _ A Wy..5. 39g ;3 '' . 4 -- 2--- % 3 t. 1 1 1 I 1Â· zcy' b DitÂ· Â·k 1 1 : 1 .. 3 -- ~ ggil. 1 - UNIT 61 RENOVATIONS TO UNIT 61 INCLUDE: 1) ADDITION TO LIVING SPACE AT WEST SIDE OF CARPORT / EAST SIDE ORIGINAL EXTERIOR WALL. 2) NEW DOOR ADDED TO ADDITION. 3) ORIGINAL STAIRS LEADING DOWN TO DECK HAVE BEEN FILLED IN AND MOVED TO THE SOUTH. 4) STAIRS REMOVED FROM ORIGINAL DECK. 5) NEW WINDOW ADDED TO NORTH EXTERIOR WALL. 6) NEW STACKED STONE SIDING. 7) NEW WINDOWS ADDED TO WEST EXTERIOR WALL. 8) NEW SLIDING DOORS REPLACED ORIGINAL WINDOWS. UNIT 61 ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss ARCHITECTURE Â·PLANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : UNIT 61 - EXISTING CONDITIONS HPC 8 605 EAST mAIN STREET ASPEN. ColoRADO 81511 @ m. ====.,4 12/05/14 (T} 97 0 /925 4755 {F) 970/920 2950 %=3 4 4 (6) -71 1 (1) (2) (3) (7) Â«\1 1 (19) 41 \\1 1 t,772xcil~L' #IÂ·\'~*1.. ~~' '~ . ~'~ f~ - -- .DOL.Â· ,19 d :, 1 , - ----4 1 , t " 4 1 - -4, *02 '41 - - , , 711,4-* 1- --1.1 ; 1/.Fl... . 77/ --. 4 . . I . . ...7al .IE -1, 1.25 , 7 -, 11 1 I d- MAN,Jf.19 1,/B - r, e . m. ,â‚¬ r.'. 2 . 4..Ali - 2 .... -U vu*> 2 $ ~ ~C*. h" .R.#, 1.1=81 7.1 2.'. '*52 .0/ 9 1 *Bia/ I .&0~ / 4 i- ...' + . . /1 . i .1 - , ti A *.~ w ~ L I .0: ....4. ------F 77 L._____ Â¢01Â¢)27> 4% . 4 a. ~ â€¢22 %29 I - 23178 ~f r t:=2 ...&*2~ 11 , - -2 k 4, 2% . '-' 1,22,1 - UNIT 71 RENOVATIONS TO UNIT 71 INCLUDE: 1) ORIGINAL FRONT DOOR REPLACED WITH NEW DOOR W/GLAZING, SIDELITE, AND TRANSOM. 2) NEW SLIDER WINDOW ADDED TO EAST EXTERIOR WALL AT LOWER LEVEL. 3) NEW WINDOWS ADDED TO NORTH EXTERIOR WALL. 4) SHED ROOF ADDITION AT WEST EXTERIOR WALL OF ORIGINAL UNIT. 5) NEW WINDOWS AND DOORS AT SOUTH EXTERIOR WALL OF LIVING ROOM AT ORIGINAL UNIT. 8) NEW WINDOWS ABOVE AT WEST EXTERIOR WALL. 9) WOOD ADDITION TO EXISTING DECK. ELEMENTS ORIGINAL TO UNIT 71 INCLUDE: 6) ORIGINAL STAIRS REMAIN. 7) ORIGINAL WINDOWS ARE RETAINED AT LOWER LEVEL OF WEST EXTERIOR WALL. UNIT 71 ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss ARCHITECTURF - PI ANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : UNIT 71 - EXISTING CONDITIONS HPC 9 EAST mAIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 Â® MtÂ¢ Im=~ain 12/05/14 {T) 970/925 4735/)970/920 2950 12fyS.4 2 59 30 Pm L (1) (5) (2) (3) (4) (6) (7) 0. .: $ V lip:i,04,70 *0 -9 . i Â· i 1 . 1 ./ \.' .:itt ;.1.2 y ./ , .. 1 . + . X ./- X - , f 9-YGWI /2. ir. A V #NAA, )9 b tÂ·Â·F -1Â· Â· G 1 - 4 1 t. Â·ilkÂ·0' Â· il * ~~ .3 -i- -LI.:: ~..4 1 L M= r +~-Li i~ Â· 1,Â· '~0- ~,1 * - 4 G~Â·I k-i 4 ./ + . -9 4,4 : r '-i-Illillillilll kt . I * 1 ./Wel=F..2.9-!F.:41 i=--*91: 7 1 , , , 4 12 %4 f I./.11.Frl ?1-7- 1 /ivipp Elf P-/,-'p~-4 0 -Cl * *ir.Â·.:44 4* ~ . Agw- Mi . .71.*4 74 A 1 .P?.3 -Â·. i--. ~/4--14ka__ - j - ~ i --7&/U//"I . 4. 20â€ž - n W I li U N IT 81 RENOVATIONS TO UNIT 81 INCLUDE: 2) NEW DOOR @ CARPORT / EAST EXTERIOR WALL. 3) NEW WINDOW AT SOUTH EXTERIOR WALL. 4) NEW WINDOW AT NORTH EXTERIOR WALL. 5) NEW DOORS / WINDOWS AND FENESTRATION PATTERN AT SOUTH EXTERIOR WALL. 6) NEW DOORS / WINDOWS AND FENESTRATION PATTERN AT WEST EXTERIOR WALL. ELEMENTS ORIGINAL TO UNIT 81 INCLUDE: ' 1) ORIGINAL FACADE RETAINED AT CARPORT / EAST EXTERIOR WALL. 7) EXISTING STAIRS REMOVED, REPLACED BY NEW WOOD STAIRS IN DIFFERENT CONFIGURATION. UNIT 81 ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss \RCHITECTURE + PI-ANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : UNIT 81 - EXISTING CONDITIONS 603 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 12/05/14 HPC*010 {T) 970/925 4755 (F)970/920 2950 @ mt â€ž0=- .2,'SC~2 935 I (4) (5) (3) VIEW FROM (6) M EADOWS TRAIL (2) -7 \ .. . 4 1 1 - %1 I i., 1 7 ..0 1- h F r.,4 , 184#134399'll'll'll 5 â€¢ , Â·r . 4% a ~ tty Â· '4 f ...y fâ‚¬ . I T -I 2 - /.4 Â» .1 2..r= . % Â»k:f- ., /. h 1 *11* - . 1, L.-Â· i -~''ir * .74Â· r -~ r ... - ~4. t * .f, 4 *- 4-:44Â¢ f 4 ..t 3 * 419 0 - 4% '1374 7 - 4 6 1 Â·44* K r.â€¢â€¢. ,Â»a*pc,r,:-,47# :3 , rd'Â·Â·0*.4, Â· b - . f 4 . .â‚¬- -- 1 UNIT 91 RENOVATIONS TO UNIT 91 INCLUDE: 1) NEW WINDOW ON SOUTH EXTERIOR WALL. 2) ADDITION OF STORAGE AREA AT CARPORT / EAST EXTERIOR WALL. 3) NEW WINDOWS ON NORTH EXTERIOR WALL. 4) THE EXISTING DECK ON THE ORIGINAL UNIT HAS BEEN CONVERTED INTO A NEW LIVING ROOM W/ SHADE TRELLIS. 5) NEW WINDOW FENESTRATION PATTERN ON NEW LIVING ROOM ADDITION AND EXISTING UNIT. 6) A NEW CANTILEVERED DECK HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE WEST SIDE OF THE UNIT. UNIT 91 ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss ARCHITECTURE ' PLANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : UNIT 91 - EXISTING CONDITIONS 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. CO.ORADO 81611 (T)970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 12/05/14 HPÂ¢ll 1~2~14 2 39 e PIM L 8 9 8 8 m Â£ 3 1 . V 44' - 41- 19 - 8 1/2 6'-10' I 7 - 61/2' L 14' -3 15'- 81/2Â· 6'-10 7'-61/2' 14'-3 . f UNIT#71 -~ KU L- b f f ~ NEIGHBORING Â«A 11 1 1 1 1171 11 I , p l , i , ------- 1 1 I j \1 1 : ----I , , ~ 9 -10 3/8' ~ 1 -----la L----- 1 L----- 1 1 1 I.- - ill J NEIGHBORING / / / / UNIT #71 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 â‚¬14+ 1 it 1 EXISTING PC 2 1 T.O. GRADE 7 EL. 91'-5 Ill PROPOSED 1 11 WINDOW 2 ~ â€¢ 1 ~ WELL kE-37 N '1449 L. p EXISTING ~ PLAYROOM MEDIA STORAGE L CRAWLSPACE , TO. CONC. 1 EL 84' - 01 . IL-1 1. : 1 6.ialt HPC 1)4 + t:%24% I.-/ 2 ~ .--Â»...:L=--- Up 1 ~PC 16 6 /*/04' 1 DN 1 06 L 9 Dll i Â·Â·i t-1 -' 1-"t--t f -DN PWDR F-IC 1 1 - 1 1 EXISTING ~ ~~ 4 TO. CONCU , T.O. CONC.1 VESTIBULE STAIRS ~ - -_ EL, 97 -27 (0 A EL. 86'-4 7 m PROPOSED STAIRS / ~ =~ fl 1 LANDING DN b EXISTING ~ 5 1 ' DECK ~ EXISTING / MECH. - i -ILL 14 E .ST. FNDTN. WALL ~.0. CONC. 1 DECK / - 7 EL. 95' - 6 ~CO7~.1; STORAGE 4 T.o. CONC. ~ 1 2 FOF MER DOOR LOCATION - 7 EL. 95-6Â· / 1 -1 - EDGE OF ~ST[NG J -Â«///// MECH. LAUNDRY - EXISTING FOUNDATION WALLS ------Vt ~ PROPOSEDFOUNDATION / - |- WALLS -Â«p-~~~ LOW CEILING 011 1 PROPOSEDFIREELEMENT 2 'r-- , 1 - ~ --Â»-l C ) U 7 ' to , U 1 N n -- -- -- -~ - PERIMETER OF EXISTING ~ EXISTING PLANTER 1 1 I DECKTO REMAIN J 1 ~ IEXISTING PLANTER ~ 1 upt i - 1 1 ~11 1 UP,i I i 0-1 NEIGHBORING UNIT #51 ~ ~ ~- EXISTING STAIRS TO | I NEIGHBORING UNIT #51 1 REMAIN 4 all./1. -- 1 /* \\ HFC 16 ill I HPC 16 - U I U I 19 -8 1/2Â· 1 6 10. .t r - 61/r 14,-3 j~ 15'- 81/2Â· 6'-10â€¢ ; 7'-61/2 14' - 3Â· 6 I~ 6 6 6 2 3 {31 (4) 8 V .) t ' /-1 PLAN -BASEMENT/MECHANICAL-EXISTING ~ PLAN-BASEMENT/MECHANICAL-PROPOSED LEGEND SHADED AREAS INDICATE NEW CONSTRUCTION WHITE AREASINDICATE EXISTING CONDITIONS ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss A\RCI-lITE('.TURF *PI ANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : PLANS - LOWER LEVEL - EXISTING & PROPOSED EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 -Â» i ~ HPC 12 Â® m m=.-=U-<pC. 12/05/14 tr) 970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 125/X]4 2 56 52 Pif WITH 98*00 [2) (2) 7 44'.4Â· 15'- 81/2Â· 6'-10' T -6 1/2* L 14'-3Â· 15'-8 1/2 6'-10' | 7'-6 12' 1 14'-3 f 4 . HPC 17 Â£ 2 .1 1, Â¢ 6 . A-1 T - HFC 17 / V Vy Pt 1 27 , 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 273--4 41 0 41 1 1 2\\ 1 1 1 1 L.- i / / 1 i f ru NEIGHBORING 1 1 NEIGHBORING 1 1 1 J 1 UNIT#71 ; i 1 UNIT#71 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 ; ; #0 1 1 #F 1 1 / 1 J# 1 4. r" 1 E - 7 2449.1 REFR. rEN i - 2 CONCR~L_/ .~ EXISTING i ,LEDGE ~._.__...,-,_. ' 0..._ ~ 0 1 GRADE ~ '' ' GUEST / pC 2 , - - ill J -//7 0 1 T.0. GRADE ' 1 1 1 DINING ) 1 4 4-1 M. BATH / 1 7 EL 91'-5 1 1 ILL! 1 .INDOW WELL :|~ 0 ] , T.D. CONC.6 -- KITCHEN f " EDGE OF CEILING ABOVE --~ BEAM ABOVE 7, Â· 1 .-3, EL 95'- 6Â· T - 11 1 1 -~'~7 'CLOSET 12 , C> LIMING , QUESI 84 - T.O. CONC.A , '2 ....~..n-r-n~ EL. 95'-6â€¢ f ~ PROPOSED 1 KITCHEN - .r 2 8 /R - J rÂ» 1 G. M. f a /6======I U P MASTER : 1 1 1 1 .IIi 4 1. - ~_ Â£ I I.~~- li BEDROOM 1 PANTRY 1 1 1 ----- I 1 1 ~IPC 16 f '1: 941 - HPC 1) 4 241FC 16 , i-I 43Â« :1 1 11 k.j PROPOSED LIMING I Fp i I 4 n Ir--. -- 1 :1 1 CLO. 1 0 6 STAIR - f 4 -'fr Â¥, .1 r i x DN Fl: -W _Y ~ UP DN ~ ~ '1 t E- 1 ( 1 6======4 .. f -- --, : ! '-. EXISTING _~ | 1 ENTRY STAIRS T.O. CONC. I rn ' EL 100' -0~ , a.-O. 4'-9- 2-1 .. . | LANDING ./ DN J - - C# 1 PROPOSED STAIRS / F Ici 1 CLQaEI FITTI- 1.0 1 CLQ.'4 11 <j EXISTING . 1 -%7=11 EXISTING DECK 1-1 - 1 EXISTING , CARPORT - ~ | ,LT.O.CONC. T.O. CONCÂ· 1 - GUEST BEDROOM DECIR. ge- 6Â· - ' EL. 100'-0Â· 7 - L-- T.O. CONC.1 1 1 - T.0. CONC.6 = 1 .Et. 99' - 6Â·f ' EL 95'-61 1 UNEN EXISTING i i 4 : CARPORT i BQQM - 1,- ij- - 1 2=0[ ' 1 r:QUEST 11...218]]i f F~fi L- - .-1 . 'iF-Â·--pi ' , PROPOSED FIRE ELEMENT - 14----/1 . 11---1 ~-~-~-~-~-~ -0---co "PROESED , io 1 1 1 1 ,~E , 1 --- -7 r 11 PERIMETER OF EXISTING J up tÂ· Â·---t ' 6=121 ' 1 1 1 EXISTING PLANTER 1 1 '~-~ r 1 : i DECK TO REMAIN EABSTINGP~~ UPPER ~DE -7/ 3 , 1 i ~ up 04 ~ j- NEIGHBORING UP , lu 01 UNIT #51 1 T.O. GRADE L-1 PROPOSED BBQ i NEIGHBORING 7 EL.94'-0 1 UNIT #51 R I 1 It 1 It e_ 4 |-- 3 A I 1 --*Ii.---I.--Ill.-------...*--*i.-I-...i#-*--.-.----.=-Ii. 1 110 -1 1 1 19-8 1/2â€¢ L 6 10 7 -61/2Â· L 14'-3' ~ 1 6 15'-8 1/2 e - 10 1 7-61/2â€¢ 14' - 3 44-4 * * 44'-4Â· ~ 6 6 6 (2) (4 J /n PLAN -LOWER LEVEL/ ENTRY - EXISTING CONDITIONS ~ PLAN -LOWER LEVEL / ENTRY - PROPOSED LEGEND SHADED AREAS INDICATE NEW CONSTRUCTION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL - WHITE AREAS INDICATE EXISTING CONDITIONS 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 HPÂ¢13 poss .ARCHITECTURE +PLANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : PLANS - MAIN LEVEL - EXISTING & PROPOSED 505 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COtORA00 81611 1 1 (T)210/925 4755 {F) 970/920 2950 ]2/yX]â€¢38050. NORTH Â® m, 55%96,n 12/05/14 .0 -,ZI 4 L 0 9 8 09 0 5 44' - 4'T- 44'-4' T T T 15' - 8 1/2 61- 100 l 70 -6 1/2Â· l 14' - 3Â· 15'- 81/2' 6-10 7' -61/2 14'- 3 f . . 10 1. L 1 970 11. . f 1/1 n /Â« 1 1 1 1 5'-103/8â€¢ L 1 1 1 1.. ' 1 1 1 ---4 1 KNE 1 1 r---_ 1 L- , - L --- 1 NEIGHBORING 1 - NEIGHBORING 1 UNIT#71-/3 UNIT#;71 lit , :1 1 . 1-........... - +'r-~ 1 1 fil /1/ 1 1.- 1 I A -' ,----11 IP---- 91 --- I- IP -1 IP Â·Â· --11 U I =0=CU jÂ·Â·BENCHZ CLOSET 1 -- ' ' 1 ~ 41' J Le .A , ' LINE OF CEILING i i i / ABOVE -4 ~ MASTER ' %130 OFFICE CLOSET SITTINGAREA 11! -wow . T.O.CONC. -==JU~ Czzl = ,' _ T.O. CONC.+F= - OPEN TO LIVING Â· -- i i i WELL BELOW EL. 104' -5 1/2~ 0 , BELOW MASTER , - EL. 104'-5 19 1 1 BEDROOM C 4i V L - 1 . L N MASTER EXISTING 1. 2 M. CLOSET EXISTING - /~\ Â· BEDROOM BALCONY . BELOW ,, \ OPEN TOLIVING 2 21*at' BALCONY i L T.O. CONC.A -/\. - -- a - 1 EL. 95'- 6Â· f /\ 1, - , ~ MASTER 11=35 HIC 1~ 4 n / \ -- -- f- PROPOSED MASTER $ BATH . 2 ~~ ~, ~ FP BELOW >< 08Itl 2-- ~T 7 1 , -- 0 3 f , . 1 Dit h N \ ,\, -DN SOFFIT ABOVE - UP DN . 1 --7-2-43 ~ ~ "h . \ /... EXISTING STAIRS 2 1 ENTRY - .D BELOW TO. CONC. 1 - 1.1 - ' EL. 100' - 07 Â·iÂ·''r Â· ENTRY BELOW I F.O. WALL ABOVE . . iÂ· w //1 11 1 + LANDING ' ~- ~~~ ___~_____~ : i ~ PROPOSED STAIRS i ' m Â¤ CLOSET || ~ -\, : i' 1 J =4.#LIC- (j :1 1, ~ ~ * ; '~ LINE OF EXISTIN(if , 1 1 ~ UNE OF EXISTIN~/ 1 - OUSTING DECK e , i h BEAMS ABOVE BELOW BEAMS ABOVE i . P. EXISTING DECK MUD ~ " BELOW 1 . *M -~ 1 1 - 1 BEDROOM BELOW - I 1 1 . 1 a 1 1 LINE OF EXISTING lIli___/ I i LINE OF EXISTING , 1 OF ROOF ABOVE I ROOF ABOVE - PROPOSED)FIRE J | 11-,1 2 - , - i Â·i - r- J. -1 C J 1-ELEMENT BELOW 1 - 11 PROPOSED 11-111 F AN , 1 : | < D h~-4- - - u rNEIGHBORING DI ~| UPPER STORA~J+211- -5 =1 t. 4== - - _ L _ _ - ._ - - - i-4-<3 / UNIT#51 DECK TO REMAIN EXISTING .i PERIMETER OF EXISTING ~ ft y~ u 1 EXISTING fir ; 1 - ' t==PLANTERBELOW PLANTER BELOW . BORING -Â· - t - - PROPOSED BBQ J ~~r- =1:51 -' I A 1 - 1 11 1 __ 2 -11/2Â·~14+ ------ 1 l A 1 1 11\ HPC 16 HPC 16 -1 1 1 K.-2 - 1 1- 15'-8 1/2~ 6'- 10 1-6 1/20 14'- 3 15' -8 1/2 6' - 10 6 7'-61/2 1 14' - 3Â· ; 1 * * t 1 1 6 1 440 - 4. 6 6 0 03 03 l 4) C./ ill-, -\ PLAN - UPPER LEVEL / ENTRY - PROPOSED /h PLAN -UPPER LEVEL/ ENTRY - EXISTING CONDITIONS Uy) LEGEND - SHADED AREAS INDICATE NEW CONSTRUCTION ! ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 1 - *33 WHITEAREAS INDICATE EXISTING CONDITIONS , 1 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss \RC HITECTURE + PLANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : PLANS - UPPER LEVEL - EXISTING & PROPOSED 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. CIORADO 81611 1 l Â® 2011 :Az:==.1*& 12/05/14 HPC 14 IT) 970/925 4755 (F)970/920 2950 NORA 12'5!Z/3 C 21 (1 44'-C 9 9 03 (51 (3 3 8 T 7 - V -T- 4.' - 4Â· 7 15' -8 1/2 6-10' l P -61/2 ~ 14'-3Â· 15'- 8 1/2 6 10 L 7' -61/2 14' - 3' 4 4 + | A,7 A 1 HP- 17 u-1 1 T Â¥ 07 CRICKET -3 - PROPOSED WINDOW WELL BELOW / F-- PROPOSED DORMER TOMATCH SLOPE OF EXISTING ROOF 1 I 4/ - -- -â€ž-CD t 4 \/1 0 \ i 1/ 't : J 312 'HPI 11 1 1 . 11 --. : It. 3.12 3:12 3:12 1 1.11 L I -- 14{PC 16 HP>Cl)4 2 ~PC 16 U .1 - m PCLP' b 2 -- T L Ill . ~ :.-4- rt-. =41 f ~ F.0. FRAMING BELOW PROPOSED STAIRS / r-<~6 - - -r-17- 1 - 22-2 ----24 F.0. FRAMING BELOW LANDING r--1 - 1 1 ; DECK BELOW FlAT ROOF BELOW i FLAT ROOF BELOW Â»fÂ¢. DECK BELOW PROPOSED FIRE ELEMENT ~ 244~ --Â· BELOW / r - - - - - - - --- -- ------- -- ------- -- --------- - --------- - ----- - -- -4 -i C) 1 4 - 1- - - 1~ --- -1 - - - -9- ---D PERIMETER OF EXISTING J EXISTING EXISTING PLANTER DECK TO REMAIN PLANTER BELOW BELOW | 1 1 1 l A lA HPC 16 ~ < ' HFC 16 - 15'. 8 1/21 -6'- 10 L 7-6 1/2' L 14'-3 15'-8 1/2 1 - 6.-10' 7 61/2' L 14'- 3 6 6 44' -4. 6 66 { 4 ) v ~1) ~ PLAN - EXISTING ROOF C-) PLAN -PROPOSED ROOF LEGENQ -1 v - SHADED AREAS INDICATE NEW ROOF CONSTRUCTION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL - WHITE AREAS INDICATE EXISTING CONDITIONS I 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 S .\RCHI[FCTURF PI ANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : PLANS - ROOF - EXISTING @ PROPOSED EAST MAI. STREET ASPEN, C0t0RA00 81611 1 1 HPC 15 970/825 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 9 0 2014 ~;2~~~n 12/05/14 ~qt~ ap!,1 WORTH .2 - 22 .0 - 1 I 17'-0 -'3*'I.:IK.):.em-' + 1 3. 9 (2) (4} 5 1 2 3 4 5 ...' 44' - ~ 44-4' f 15' - 8 1/2' 6-10 7'- 61/2' ~ 14'.3. 15'- 8 1/T 6'-10 7'- 61/2Â· ~ 14'-3 f f 1 F + I i 1 1 1 lai 1 1 1 lei 1 1 44-4 - 1 T.O. EXISTING RIDGELINE : L-_.L PROPOSEDWINDOWS --~~ --- -~ -- -REMOVEEXISTINGWINDOW,REPLACE~ T 117'-8 A r.o. EXISTING RIDGFI INF 7 117'-8 W/ SAME SIZE, RELOCATE TO CENTER ON WINDOW BELOW & MATCH SIU I TO PROPOSED UPPER WINDOWS 01 - - 11 1 1 1 , PROPOSED LIFT / Â· Â· 4~1 U ;IPU U 11 -i tra.... I=urlÂ·Â·,~- ii i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ SLIDE DOORS -~ .0 >01 ~741!13"1 #1 r.-1 =====. Milf.1- " r râ€žâ€žHâ€žMâ€žâ€žâ€žrviâ€ž i;i~tttz PROPOSED ~ A T.0. FIN @ UPPER LEVEL FIREPLACE - U,-1 12! tr. fe<*1 1 T.O. FIN O UPPER LEVEl. /1 a'f# tij#" ME. +[7!:111~~ , 7 104'-5 1/2Â· - - 7 104â€¢-5 1/2 A.-11- , pl; ..6=...... 44 .1 ..11:11,3 .: 1 > .. 1 ill U /\ ...\ iuf - /1 ' ~(i~ . :. )1 4 1 .ty rtll ,/ i - 1 \0 / \ 1,U_ - I 2 6 T.O.FIN @ MAIN LEVEL ....li* i #1 .. A T. o.FIN @ MAIN l,EVEL r_r-~~ | ~ 100' -0~ -r-~-r-r,,1 1 -- .-- Â¥ 1 - T l Og- 0 & I. . 1 It 1 *= 1 -1 1 -11 1 -1 \,/ 1, i.-1 -------------- Â¢ J#Â·-T â€¢ I OWFR I FVFI .2 --7 A T.0.FIN@loWFRIFVFI J 1 95'- 6 ADD RAFTERS TO CONTINUE EXISTING PATTERN I ~ PROPOSED BBQ PROPOSED STORAGE AREA /--\ EXISTING - SOUTH ELEVATION ~ PROPOSED - SOUTH ELEVATION (BJ 00 0 0 00 0 41'.6 - 41'-60 2' - 4 17'-0 22' - 2 2' - 4 17' - 0' 22'-2 NEIGHBORING NEIGHBORING '2721 UNIT 51 - NT-17 ~13-7 UNIT 51 - FPC 108PC 21 V j~ 1 1 --- A T.O, FXISTING RIDGELINE ~ ~ PRO'ED WINDOW ANDDORMER m | ~ _ - _ 6 T.O. FAISTING RIDGFI INF 7 117'.8 1 117'-8 1 \ \ 1 1 1 NEIGHBORING I ~ UNIT 71 NEIGHBORING UNIT 71 -91 . - 4-Al //////6 j ' 'r'-1 J./.Iill..........li p. 1 -U Ifint iiiÂ·;il*a#ntlywf 4221'u n:,vili'' 1,11 fl/ Imli:al i 40*#1Mt}11$1 i â€¢ j I~,11'. -al 1 11 1 1 -- 7 \9. I lattt221Wl&,66,â€ž011. p."I' 67 1.1 F ..(., 1:' 2. 61 1 1 , r.-,01.1111 LIA JUIP ."- 6 T.O. FIN @ lJPPER I FVFI - 4, T.O. FIN@ UPPER LEVEL 11 104' - 5 1/2' 104'- 51/2 - â‚¬3Â·Â· . 'L: 26661;J tir E : r-0 ' F 1- ._ - ~ _ A T.0 FIN @ MAIN L FvFL . \ 1 i:.... 1. r A T.O.FIN @ MAIN LEVEL 1 11= 7 100' -0 .. , 1~~ E Q?=. 1-- - 7 100' -0 _ L V REMOVE EXISTING M UD ROOM DOOR PROPOSED FRONT DOOR DESIGN - - ~ EXISTING - EAST ELEVATION ~ PROPOSED -EAST ELEVATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss ./\RCHITECTURE *- PLANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : BUILDING ELEVATIONS EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 8~611 -4 1 1 12/05/14 HPC16 /)970/925 4755 {F) 970/920 2950 12'yzlt:CCCH < B ~ ( C )(D ) 41 6 99 / 1 22'-2' 17'-0Â· 2' - 4 22'. 2' 17'-0Â· NEIGHBORING UNIT 51 Â· ~- NEIGHBORING UNIT 51 Fpe,~fc Dr 242 -- - A TO EXISTING RIDGEX INT PROPOSED WINDOWS A T.O.EXISTING RIDGFI INF 7 117Â·-8 1 111 1 1 Vt*42 -UulliL:V 11 ~ & 1 1\1 1 \ NEIGHBORING i ~ 11 fk 1 UNIT 71 UNIT 71 7 i 111 ~ d 1 V, ~J,L NEIGHBORING 1 r- PROPOSED WINDOWS I.1 ~ 'L 4 A 1---11 1Â«.>11- ..I- l -1 5,4- 92 30 30 Al 1 ic Â¥7: N I -7 1 : 7 J i -Illilli._22 - 1 ./ 1 .1 -, i -7+14 .f - A T.OFIN@MAIN I FIEL 1 - 100-0 7 100-0 1 -- 1 *TOFIN@MAINIFVFZ ...._.1 Hnnut ; , I i ji :r< Illt_1 101 -u-ZI-77 - -li - _ .1, T.Q,FI N 9 1 OV ER i /Fi L 112- // 1 1 E- -- ./i.....ak-/All/,W.,IL/' 11111.0,12. 195'-6Â· Â·- t A T.o.FIN@IOWFRII-Vtl - 7 95'-6 211 + pr - - ~~-~~- L PROPOSED FIRE ELEMENT L - PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE L EXISTINGGRADE - - PROPOSED ~ FIREPlACE /-h EXISTING - WEST ELEVATION /-1 PROPOSED -WEST ELEVATION 22) 61 (31 (5) {41 (3) 0 9 9 0 C-/ (-1 44'- 4' 44'- 4' 7 1 14'-3' 7'-61/2 | 6'- 10' 15'- 8 112 14'.3. 7' -61/2 6' - 10 15'- 8 1/2 f 1 Â¢ f ~ Â·i 1 1 1 lei 1 1 1 1 1 ----------i--- A T.0, EXISTING RIDGELINE ~ STING Vi'INDOWSS~- - - ~ - - - _ - - -__L _ -_ -_ 6 T.o. FA,sTING RIDGFI INF T 117'-8 7 117'-8' PROPOSEDWINDOW ANDDORMER - 0 3Â«14 ill -1 T._4/ i &44' ; .Mi/,1193 11 '1 11 ' 11 1, 11 1, 11 11 u u u AM u.uu AT,o. FIN@UPPFR IFVFt 1 4 lt* 6 T.O. FIN @ UPPER LEVEl 1 104'- 5 1/2Â· 7 104Â·-5 1/7 F NEW FIREPLACE ~ ~EWSTAIRS 11.0.Flll.10YmR~FYÂ¥1 ,6 T.O.FIN e LOWER LEVEL ' 7 95'-6 7 99 - 6 1 - - 11 A 1 11 ~ EXISTING - NORTH ELEVATION ~ PROPOSED - NORTH ELEVATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss \RCHITECTURE + PLANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : BUILDING ELEVATIONS 603 EAST NIA. STREET ASPER. C0loRADO 01611 1 1 0 314 .=--. 12/05/'14 HPC 17 lT}970/925 4755 /) 970/920 2950 12/.:I'.ODS'/ 9-9 9-9 [B) (A) [BJ L./ 41'-6' 41'-6' 22 2 17'-0 22'-2 17'-0 1, 0 0 42Â¥21 'tpctr<C 1,7 V7 1 To. EXISTING RIDGELINE - - - - - - - - - -~ - - - - - - ,1 Tio. EXISTING RIDGELINE 1 1 7 117'-8 7117'- 8Â· /- PROPOSED WINDOWS 1 1 . 1 /Y 1 1 1 1 - - 1 -pE A | " ~Â£SIER -- 5?1&/ \ / 1 Â£ MASTER MASTER / PROPOSED UPPER STORAGE f 1 CLOSET FEDROOM CLOSET 2 -I.Ill.- . -.I./Ill- 4 RQQM ~ , 1 ~ EXISTING STAIRS Ji IN FOREGROUND CLAD TOMATCH EXTERIOR FINISH Â·- ClmET 1 ' - PROPOSED TOUCH-LATCH DOOR. - - 4 T.O. FIN @ UPPER LEV[L 5 T.O. FIN Â© UPPER L[vEL 7104'- 51/2Â· T 104'- 5 1/2 'ENTRY GUEST / - \~ ROOM/ ~-Â© M -1 BEDROOM / ..LL- / -7- PROPOSED OUTDOOR 88Q / HOOD ' ~ ~ PROPOSED FLOOR J 1 / . T.O.FIN O MAIN LIVE! 1/ /' j 4 T.O.FIN @ MAIN LEVEL. , LIVING / m FOUNDATION WALL -3 KITCHEN f 100'-0 EXISTING PORTION OF r.~-- T 100'- 0 PROPOSED FOUNDATION MALL i4- V V i r , / T.O.FIN @1 OWER 1 FVF L 1 ------ -, _ -_ A T.o.FIN @ LOWER I FIFI MECH. N 1 795-1 ~__ VESTIBULE MECH. 95' - 6 ExISTING CRAWLSPACE 1 2==./.mErna ill 1 r~ .6 T.O. CONC. @ ME.CH, ~ TO CONC. @ MFCH, C__1 LS - T 92' - 2 1 I gl\L- - - , 92'- 2 ~ MECIA . EXISTING FOUNDATION WALL STOUGE 'Â· ~ OFF FORMER STAIR LOCATION 1- PROPOSED FOUNDATION WALL TO CLOSE -- \/ 1 A T, O. CONC, Â© BASEMENT 7 84'-0 ~SED BASEMENT ~ ~ EXISTING SECTION - LIVING / ENTRY ~ PROPOSED SECTION - LIVING / ENTRY ' LEGEND SHADED AREAS INDICATENEW CONSTRUCTION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 1 - wHITE AREAS INDICATE EXISTING CONDITIONS , 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 ~OSS PCHUFf 12 ;RE . 01 AN{"4Â·'/ 1, I ,/, 1 gÂ·. '3%111!111 HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : BUILDING SECTIONS 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 (T)970/925 4755 (F~ 970/920 2950 4 0 mtÂ¢ AIC"'ECTUIND'*I... 12/05/14 HPC 18 *.~j 3 (4) (2) (11 (41 (D (23 h/ C.-, 44- 4 44' - 4Â·T- V - t r 14'-3 P -61/2 6'-10' L 15'- 81/2 L 7Â·- 6 1/2 L e -10Â· L 15'- 8 1/2 14' - 3Â· I ' ' '/7 1 0 1 1 1 Vi,51 1 1 4 T.O. EXISTING RIDGELINE ~-- 4 T.D. EXISTING RIDGELINE T 117'-8 f- --- 117'-8 -AO/--. EXISTING WINDOW REMOVED/REPLACED --"/9 WITH SIMILAR. RELOCATE TO MATCH SILL Â¤Â»Â«04Â« ;ir...% ----& W / OF PROPOSED WINDOWS ~,/~E~ PROPOSED WINDOWS ~ CLOSET i R ~I MASTER NICHE 7 MASTER MASTER SITTING / BATH BEDROOM , 1 \ 1 -1 _ - _ - _ 06 T.0, FIN 9 UPPER LEVEL ~D_____ 1 -.1-02 ===21.7...=-2.-=~- ---- 1 T.O. FIN e UPPER LEVEL 7 104' - 5 1/2 7 104' -5 1/2 EXISTING PORTION OF Â·Â· ~ '~ - PROPOSED FIREPLACE \14 FOUNDATION WALL CLOSET -1- A ,ilL. 1 PROPOSED 1 1 1 -r~* '~ - :.L - -~i 6 - ~'\- - - 1 100'-0 -QI LIVING AT.o.FIN o MAIN LEVEL FOUNDATION WALLS T.O.FIN Â© MAIN I FVFI 100.0 BEDROOM DIN NG - MASTER - 1 1\I/' ~ POCKET DOOR / = FOUNDATION WALLS OPEN TO BEYOND --, C= t~ /0 EXISTING PORTION OF 4 T,O.FIN Â¢ 1 OWFR I FVFI A T.O.FIN Â¢0 1 OWFR I FYFI 7 95'-6 7 95' - 6 EXISTING CRAWLSPACE -=.. 1 $ T.o. CONC. 9 MECH. 1 - - 1 , 2 1 T 0, CONG @ MECH. ~- 1 92' - 2 - ---- 1 7 92'-2 EL-1 0 STORAGE i , PWDR STORAGE 1 7 86 4Â· 7--z.. - C.3 .6 Tio. CONC Â©LANDING A TO. CONC. O BASFMFNT ~OPOSED BASEMENT ~ T 84' - 0 [2-1 1-3 0\ EXISTING SECTION - MASTER BEDROOM / LIVING ~ PROPOSED SECTION - MASTER BEDROOM / LIVING LEGEND | SHADED AREAS INDICATE NEW CONSTRUCTION i ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL WHITE AREAS INDICATE EXISTING CONDITIONS ~ 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss RCHI TECTURE *MANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : BUILDING SECTIONS HPC 19 1 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COORADO 81611 ~ ~ Â® 2014 KNI~m,i 12/05/14 (T)970/925 4755 (F) 97./920 2950 1 ' F (5) (2) (4) 5 44' - 4 (4 V 15' -8 1/2' ~ 10' 4 - 4. T P - 6 1/2 14'-3Â· 15'- 81/2 6, - 10 7' - 61/2 14' - 3' lf' fl f 1 1 A- EXISTING WINDOWS ~ r PROPOSED DORMER ~ SLOPED TO MATCH EXISTING / 1 1=414142---- -4--- 6 T.o. EXISTING RIDGFI INF 1 --- - -------4----- A Tio. EXISTING RIDGE! INF 7 117Â·-8 T 117'-8 \ Li l -Fz 11 ~ MASTER MASTER A OFFICE - - MASTER 11 1 CLOSET .......& BEDROOM SITTING MASIER 7 / ~ / I .1*fiti ROOM BEDROOM R...1-/' 111111iq 911;:11';fl Ii-grTII :-IIn i Li ! 1 T.O. FIN @ UPPER 1 FV I , 4 T.O. FIN O UPPER LEVEL - f 104'- 51/2 ===.J T 104'- 5 1/2' PROPOSED WINDOW -1 1 EXISTING PORTION OF FOUNDATION WALLS --7 A T,0 FIN Â© MAIN LEVEL GUEST T 100 -0 LIVING DINING DINING KITCHEN - KITCHEN M. BATH EXISTING PORTION OF FOUNDATION WALLS 1 T:O):FIN O LOWER LEVEL 1 T.O.FINÂ© 1 OWER I FVF F 92 - T 99 - 6 T 95Â·- 6 EXISTING CRAWLSPACE 1 4 T.O. CONC. @ MFCH, 1 T.O. CONC @ MECH ---I- f 92 - 2 -1_- 1 92 - 2 1_3 PROPOSED WINDOW WELL PLAYROOM MEDIA STORAGE 4 To CONCE@ LANDING ~ 86' -4 f 84' - 0 01, T.O. CONC. @ BASEMENT CJ LJ L_3 PROPOSED BASEMENT ~ EXISTING SECTION - MASTER BEDROOM / LIVING ~ SECTION - PROPOSED E/ W : LEGEND - SHADED AREAS INDICATE NEW CONSTRUCTION 1 ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL - WHITE AREAS INDICATE EXISTING CONDITIONS | 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss \RCHI [ECTURE '- PIANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : BUILDING SECTIONS EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO .1611 12/05/14 HPC 20 [T}970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 .2'5~314 1 C~ 5/ , --A I 1 .// - - - ~' N:*11,2, , Re 4 1/99*9. U Y**04 *:.sÂ·r 'r-: .,,0 0.1-4~- 1 7 92:Att .5/"-&. ,A h -3=11Â·-F 4 * .4 191 -mw. .. O I- I ae:~â€¢-- ~i 1- x D .0 ..3.; 1 '2: '941- .1 Â» --- ! I W . Ntâ€¢~@*'~ Â·' ~ 1 114 - . - \ ' --4'41 Er -2033--32%Â·~~i*p - \ ..54*,tr~.4 "Â·Â·: r 1, 7= 11. 1 ./ 4 f / ----=-*- ,$ ME l i 1-- / --- I - -~ii . ./Fr - get, -*I'll -- .*900) 7 ..../-- I . '. . .r - ../'.,1-â‚¬ 1 . Ampi-:4 "PA T . - ; , /52- /J --% . , '. #5>1 Â· Â·Â»,- -viÂ·, ' 1 + 5 .:, 4 r L -- - -<A-1 - -, n zx*-% -0 4 1Â«<7>\\ \ -,//- VALLEY AXON - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH VALLEY AXON - PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH . - -- .- I IP -, x1.-4 43: 4;rt-77 7 . DgE------- //1 b.,=a= . ./ 44. . 70â€¢ \ t *wililillillillifil 4. 1.7.'fr .. r. . ~ r ' 32. 1 . - I'll;../- ) ' "1 r, 0\ - - "- -- u 4--r 0 . = - 1-- .}2 1. -, , 1 --- ~ , ....71-Â£11 - g.)-- . 24 - 'I 4.9- 44 - , .7, ' , J -Â· :31&#A,Jpt. "p-- b Â·214:-Di --- ,/ f .1 --1 -d 4 -- %.- -8 1 , '9- -- 1 I til / p 7~: 11-W604:t '. I .St â‚¬*:-C Â£ Fil L $ UL*- ' 5 Z Â·. ir Â·1 . , ~ , 4 1 A t [F Â¥ mtz- 215@M-*Ir -- p 20'El#K . 1 :.,Â»,2.-2. !8>.. 1.W: -i...'I--414 1 - ..- f.--:-'- JF*... L-11-- - . I .$. .___j==Â·Â·jmtl...1 1 .4~~. ~ /4,Â·. 1'Â»4 V 1. A- a .7 -41 VALLEY AXON - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH VALLEY AXON -PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 Poss-AIN \RCHITECTURE PLANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : 3D IMAGES HPC 21 STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T)970/925 4755 ~F) 970/920 2950 12/05/14 =/'CO 55. / ' f i ' I ' i , itil 114 lAg..1 :1:1 1 Â·L. i 1 ! 1 Â·4 . St ~ 0 --1 .,4.-kA, - 14- 2/ 0 + / -- - 11 .41 17 JI,1 -,%991,1 1 ~....al. 4 - but....-- --229~ i ..Â«22\ 13".Illy W I -916-%1-= RU.Â®il + 1 - / 1 - /0 Â·1494 . / // 7-20 .+ . u/ box / -i- .1 ./ /7 1 r. 1 - tâ€¢ 1. 7 2 1 , 91 11 52.-- : \ 24:4 1 j20 \\ .N - /561 b \ ./ . \4 -3 54Â«1 - 3 1 -1 1,4 ''.~ A-1, '11+ 1 i 7 : $4 . / 3-1-/ Al<410 10 L t . ...53/ i//2 1-â‚¬ /6-171~ ~1 1 Ehh / 4116 . ->21>Â»77 / 2 - 7 41 - . I -1 I - T ./--1. 1 1 7 - Cls *,1 - =1 1- - - :/~////~4 - . ........L FRONT AXON - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH FRONT AXON - PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH t I h 2 , : ? 1, 1 4 -1-9/ .fl - i : - ed-~ -_- -- 1 - 7 '18 -al&: 1 6 .. 14 4 *-4 '1 /4.'/ 1 ...fln---E-d-. erÂ·.- a Â·N.JF~ , 1 -2 \ \ -â€¢Ii#~ =4 -4287 .. .k *AD r .-'t. f. r u>-la i \ *. /4 - / 4 I *1 - %9 tâ‚¬ ./ C'<. *.4- :44Â° ,/7, - - \ -% Wlri 1*4 - .:saeÂ·11 \ - -- - --- 1 1 . 1 1. ...922 1 1 , : FRONT AXON - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH FRONT AXON - PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss \RCHITECTURF + PLANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : 3D IMAGES 505 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COLOR,00 81611 Â® 2911 ~~~~~~,A 12/05/14 HPC 22 [T) 970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 [3~C1430]COP~ K . * Â·Â·*.p""Ill/ r - Â· 11 "f hell - L y â€¢ -'.. , i .fl -112212 - . -- . 7 , 1 ' ~ I'Â·,r . itÂ· ' i 4.11 1/ 3 -- 1 - i . - PERSPECTIVE - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH PERSPECTIVE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH -me---*--1.*'.p ..im-il ./ /'1 .A 0Â· 4 Â£ 67 / c ~~~~~~Hm 4. Â· ---- ---1--- 4 1 ..1- t======- 1 14 , # 1'61- ' R ;. - 9 R' tt . 1. 1 -t -- ...... .2 1142=1Â·L' 51721! ....~J//mp B):-2.-74- : â€ž/ 4. _ 4 i ., L ., pm 2- 3*29 12 1Â»Nt *-a' MWf 1*2''COUCIL .4 I '11Â« 6 1-,- L 1 1, 1L.J.i j I k '6 - â€ž .4 .. 1 1 - 01=mal-1. r... . r 1\ \\ \ \ 03 , Â·:FitÂ·*LL - I.- 2..t, 97'93.s?~ p 0 4,2 st? Â·2 3%1~ 37 UWÂ·-r-, Â·el"-,--A=4*--lf ' r'<.'---1---'- r '-* .=9â€¢. - 1 d' L. - . -liall.= -: ,~ .... :I ./.' - 1 PERSPECTIVE - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH PERSPECTIVE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss .ARCHITECTURE - PLANNING 0 9014 =====.pi 12/05/14 HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : 3D IMAGES HPC 23 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (r} 970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 1~143:Cl:24~ ' - ---- -t ~ t~j hi - <3 F-; Â·-17Â·f ..7* r... 11% 1.---11% _ _16.mY/FLSÂ»j I IIi I d - i\\ f~ 11'U- - 1 >= 4 - , 5. 3 ... I I -341 -6727-22Â»J 1 I - -- -' Â¥r. lq~ PERSPECTIVE- EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH PERSPECTIVE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH i .. ~,-1-1 li - .. 1 Â· ...1 - l. -1 if bil it k I Flb" --g . /1 1 i i>ti_-_I//7/t. _IC- 1--r -~ai~ P F 1-Tht 1 I- 111 ** . 1. - fl Â»1-i[4 ill - 0*21*, * 11 - '.LÂ« 1 4 _ 1 1 -4 - ~ 2 J----Ilillill-"IR'-m-=9./4~/L,dM....~LA.i.~.1%5!~~A~Q~Lk.~,-/-4- Â·i. -%--* .*al..........................................................-4>4.2,*.&. - : , Â· :I.&33 PERSPECTIVE - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH PERSPECTIVE -PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss .\RCHITFCTURE +PI.ANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : 3D IMAGES HPC 24 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COLORAOO 01511 Â® 20111 j~~~-,I 12/05/14 {T) 970/925 4753 (F) 970/920 2950 1~l13 C]3~ , EXISTING WOOD SHINGLE ROOF, TO BE MATCHED VERTICAL WOOD SIDING, WHITE, TO MATCH AT LIVING ROOM EXPANSION EXISTING ~1 4 ' '*TA ~ 1. 1 2* 2 ' - Pt, 1 4 , =:4, t 1 '.1 , u'l 9 100*1,..,, RD> fri:k lift /1/1 1 Ist , , 1: 4 1 11 1,11 i : ' i 1 M 1 ,1 , + I /1 1&57 1 1, 17 1,1 1 #ftt~} /1, 1 * 0 %%'*l/ .. 5 r i,i r p,/ . -1./ 1 1 1 1'/1...1 //1 ........, f . -:- ... 7- â€žM . r Â· 4Â· â€¢4â€¢ 1 y . . '- 4 - HOR'ZONTALWOOD SIDING, WHITE. SIM. TO NEW STANDING-SEAM METAL ROOFAT DORMER . ., el'. 3 EXISTING VERTICAL SIDING. : .. p..a 1 ... ..1..... 1- - â€¢ Â·-047â€¢ r â€¢t - - .:1 r E-Â·1&ret-* 3*lit--,6 3 14. -- @0 ,2,2 5.1 . 48~2*22 â‚¬1'\ 1 Â· . ~ 1.'Ir '- .*.-pke.' --+A#Tjz.- .m,~ uzr~ 1 fl.. /9/k 1 5 '~.44 J .w -- 7/ 7 41- 44 Â© * ill'llill"ill 3*\42Â¢~3601 0 . 'I. *ti '. ....ABLI,QI Ilibilli..... hy F-7>- L e --54 113.4 4.11 4 111 4 1- ."-- 4- A -, d 4.6% > 111 9 N L - 19 Â»1 0 - 1.- EXISTING WOOD SHINGLE SIDING, TO BE Â·Â·Â·~ ~/6~ RUNNING BOND FLAGSTONE DECK MATCHEDAT OFFICE DORMER EXPANSION 4*. '199,7,3 BLACK METAL PANELS W/PATINA FINISH RUNNING BOND FLAGSTONE DECK ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 pOSS i{ 11 1 Hu. HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : PROPOSED MATERIALS 605 EAST -IN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81511 IT) 970 /925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 205D 12/05/14 HPC 25 0 314 :N===:1,1 C ' (LIGHTING CONCEPT, NOT FINAL SELECTION) l'i{(}(;HFS< MarlveÂ·lt 5- CytinCon CMGO. 1-1(1 iriNG .9* W.* '*Pe .U Â» Ve W. 1 1 FC.5 1 (3) t..O 1. ./*. @- "" L-~am A l ( D | 71-6 112Â· 14'.3Â· 4 .. t I V ./. P.210 7Â·4 2 2 '7 15Â·- 8 1/2 6.10Â· 6 66.ENIG 030 31 .2 2 75....0 . 14 0 : - 1-- 01 - 1 5 10Â· 1 1 k\4\ 1 4474 , .0 1 1 1 r---- 1 r. | L_____ 1 NEIGHBORING 1 I UNIT #71 1 1 1 ir Â·- Â·I ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ _ -( A 3 P-/-4 1.- -4 - MASTER M OFFICE CLOSET CÂ¢221 .2!im WINDOW CIL \- â€¢ titru,k' aU,iÂ¥v'â€¢ I;'5 .Im./.Il .....tr. -,4 20 .... WELL BELOW - 1 , 4*efrtah yâ‚¬,4 Â·70' dfj. ~~~ MASTER i â€¢ Ca A,fwium /,ng.* . 9.6 1-0. ,Â¢= 4 -31' 04 BEDBWM 6 â€¢ F6674 Dew- 4./. .9.4/*co,,5,0 Na#Â·02-Wf. 1 -~~ Â·/56/5 tp2-4Â«9 Fe~Ul A~-V,- / top ic'In/10 -rnw *e unt \ '7 -~F~El I ..â‚¬ u.*6=, â€¢1'8793,11 64:ier,%â‚¬0-4 1â‚¬y FÂ»-6,6 \ i â€¢ M.I. 'll,.Il"......plh 1 M. CLOSET \%&202 -1:Kim Â£ OPEN TO LIVING 2 WHM /Â· â€¢ I.* CU .. c..en tared Pt,5/4 Ind BELOW ~ 1 C.- 431 Â· Ce./. /â€¢,fxglel b. P",4/5 -th top m.â€¢ey ' 1%3326)1Â£:17: .:ct:1: â‚¬11 -t.,4. â€¢ex,up..th MASTER 1 i.pc~ (LIGHTING CONCEPT, NOT FINAL SELECTION) i 28Iti U./ *#---I- _ Flo STEP LIGHTING AT EVERY DTHER =9#mmir ..11\ TREAD, REF. HPC 17 FOR ELEVATION' ,ON -' rEiD . -~ .1 1 - 6 EQ f EQ 6 \ 1 9[ PL--1 Â£- BRICK/1 1 NEW WALL SCONCES TO REPLACE NEW WALL ICONCES TO I EXISTING LANTERNS. fl_ REPLACE EXISTING LANTERNS, - REF. HFC 17 FOR ELEVATIONS, REF. HPC 16 FOR ELEVATIONS N 103 0 Ff- - 1 - . EXISTING DECK I i.:!: 2'1' RS '~ 1 BELOW bo 1 fi -- -- ---------------l C; 4 V - \ L- NEIGHBORING ~'1 UNIT #51 M' -----T---------u---Ti---**,* | - NEW WALL SCONCES AT STAIRS. 1 REF. HPC 16 FOR ELEVATIONS l 1------------- 2. I-k 1 4-1-14 1 15' 8 1/2 p. 61/2 6 14'- y 1 1 44'.4.1 6 6 - EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLAN UP ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss *UllitCIURL Â· PLANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW : LIGHTING PLAN EAST ..1. STREET ASPEN. COLORADO .101, --Â»-1 1 1 01014 ...=.%~I.I 12/10/14 HPC 26 .)970/9, 4755 {F) 070/820 2950 =IN~ NORB REVISIONS MADE: 1- SOUTH DORMER REDUCED SO AS TO NOT BE VISIBLE FROM THE FRONT. 2- SOUTH WINDOW WILL REMAIN IN EXISTING LOCATION 3- FRONT DOOR TO BE A SOLID DOOR. . . i. I ' . r 0 1 - 1 4 7 - 4 A r.,t- \04 . 1.1. . M 1 --- r~Eli~ .0 . 4 ,4 r. ' 1"' ---- 4 li~.'* I 1 -- 1 E- F . 11 1. + 111 111 L--1, L - 1 . e 1 J 2>2 1 R~ . .11 6 -J . -r.44 1 1 T~'tr/- - . 1 -I 9 1 1 s 1 lit/E~th-rph= -JL- . 11 4 1 . 1 -JAW 11 ~Â° '~~1'~[1Â»-Â·Â·Â·44.j , -- 4, . . 4 ~) 4 1,"- .4 I k ... . -le ~ 3% 46-5LT,UP?64 ---~ -ve---<R ?=434 1 -m==r - -22 I w I I - - fgm PFUR*~ r I - I C - , 4, ..1 k 1.. .' i h! 1 _ __ll - I 1 i '1 *10. %-- . it + 1 t 4.1 . . f , -r. . -r'tz -,21-,a~-- I p.v- . t 'Â· 4 '' 4 4 , .4 0.- 0 Â¥ â‚¬ 4. . i.r 0, . . 1.0. . 9 > I '/2 - 0% 4 Â· , V &- ;. 1,130' ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss irif-Â·411. ;,114 i ,-,HI,illo HPC REVIEW ri 665 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81 6 1 1 ./970/925 4755 (F)970/920 2950 <POSS Are ...S 0 2015 â€žIncm,R[*D.M. PC 05/13/15 ~ *21 5,.2.16 1 2948 FN 0 0 9 0 44Â· -4Â· ~ 44' - 4 - ktclf rpe 10' | CRICKET n | 1Â» PROPOSED WINDOW WELL BELOW PROPOSED DORMER TO MATCH SLOPE OF EXISTING ROOF -- ____.--.~ Lf.ELL~-- .- 1-- .- _ 1- -~ -1-13 - - 22Â» 21-- 11_-- --..1- râ€ž-1 -- r-4--1 -1 1--f- I.Ii W'--j- ----1 1 0 314_ â‚¬412-2---01Â«T-I-tfffrl 1 - 1 / 0 - I-' - - rtint-tkjt~-4-32Â«itiff>--460-44349 7-T- 4~~~ -321-9- I'- -r--- pij~t - _ r= 1 -4 .,+ - - 1 1 -1 1 1.---4 1 --- 1 1fÂ«4f 1. - .. - : . -- â€¢ i - -- 1 I 6 0.1-Â·__j=Â· -01_- -,iuj...p_Cif~frit=MJ--1 - - 1 14 .-3--- ,Â·3Â·12 -_ -- -4- '--r--1--r---r 61 ~43Â»--6 t--uNELLÂ· 9-=-4-1-123-9- ~ - 4-. el 1--4444=u -Â«m-=przo ,- -4-= p__ r-_---22224239[2/3 6 .__- PU R - -2.-221.2024-' i Â· 1- - -- --- --- - /.-:p -t -- t r-1 - -4~-1 - r--1-- -2 -1- ---1 - --/- - tn. 4 t.........4- E- ; . 1 1 -TI -..LA- Â·Â·Â·2 112~-â‚¬223 L --F--1 _ -t ,-----4---4-4 ~~r- - - -F,- --_Â·Â·Â·-Â·Â·- -t- w-- -- r1, 1 - --I -1- - iLE--7--i [-_. ...1,-L--- NUL, 6 - -- 1Â·4 --- .A =1 2 ; 2 Rji.- -. +_IL~ -_ --2 ~_--L-/ _ - -- _ 2-- F.O. FRAMING BELOW PROPOSED STAIRS / + i -3 27 -__-i--2-1__ L :-1 1 F L F.O. FRAMING BELOW . LANDING ' b 3â‚¬ DORMER HAS BEEN MOVED BACK SO AS . : 2 DECK 8ELOW FLAT ROOF BELOW FLAT ROOF BELOW ~ * NOT TO BE VIEWABLE FROM THE FRONT ~ DECK BELOW r ------- -- - - -- ----- - ------- - -- - -4 3 C ) 1 111 - -- -4 UÂ« 21 EXISTING PLANTER EXISTING 1 ~ -9 +I - i_-1<-*-_i_Â«-=Ii- - _ _4Â© BELOW PLANTER BELOW ~ _._ 1]1--g--- 1 1 1- i -2 1 15Â·.8 1/2â€¢ 6 6'- 100 1 7 -6 1/2â€¢ L 14'-3 151- 81/2 6'-10Â· 661/2Â· 14' . 3' ~ I 44'-4' 0 + m 6 6 6 ~ PLAN - EXISTING ROOF ~ PLAN - PROPOSED ROOF LEGEND SHADED AREAS INDICATE NEW ROOF CONSTRUCTION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL WHITE AREAS INDICATE EXISTING CONDITIONS 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, C081611 poss D;-41:Tcr -rupr C)1 07!iNG HPC REVIEW : PLANS - ROOF - EXISTING @ PROPOSED 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, ColoRADO .1.11 ll) fillit' I 1 =Pm-=mATE& HPC 15 .)970/925 4755 .} 970/920 2950 8 0 2015 .......Dull. 05/13/15 NORTH WINDOW WILL REMAIN IN PLACE DORMER MOVED BACK SEVERAL [2) ( 4 J ~ - FEETTONOT BE VIEWABLE FROM V ~ EYE LEVEL FROM THE FRONT ,-4{3) /1~ O-1 4/ V 41Pt 11 | I T L *eli, 1%1 1 7 1-_-4- ~ T.0 EXIWINg RIDGE IL - - - - - M - - - - - ----u * T.0. EXISTING RIDGE 1 1 | -12 -3 1 - 12 1--9-20=::k~L \ 1 1:] 1 1 J 1 T.O. FLAT ROOF ~~ _ JT.O. FLAT ROOF r 01 7 109' - 7, A-- - . - W Â· 1, | 7 109'.7â€¢ 1 1 4Â£ 1 U 4,4 L L__ .7/1"/I"977132--/ -~ lMFMI,1< kllâ€¢MImUNIriU -IL.: Â¢ 1~ PlÂ¢~UPPER LEVEL . $-22>215.9 3 1 1 T.O. PLY@ UPPER LEVEL f 104'- 51/22Â· . ' '' y ~- EXISTING & PROPOSED GRACIE 11 ' \ ..1 . .1 ... . 6 T.O. Pty@ MAIN LEVEL ~ ~ ~ ~ig 1.1 - . 2.i/ . I .-Â¢ T.O. PLY @ MAIN LEVEL 7 100Â· 0Â· - 100 - 0 1 , \/ 1- 6 T.O. PLY @ 1 own? i EYEL i - f 95Â· - 6 f - - 1- Â© SOUTH ELEVATION - EXISTING -1 SOUTH ELEVATION - PROPOSED SCALE 1/4Â· = 1-0 ~~ SCALE 1/4'- 1Â·.0 ( D )( c ) (B) (A) V 4) NEIGHBORING 8/h 0% 49 UNIT 51 - UNIT 51 1 001 V_ly 45 9, NEIGHBORING 79 1 7 11 1 ~ TO EXISTING RIDGE | | A SOLID DOOR ~ ~ TO. EXISTING RIDGE WILL BE USED TO L i REPLACE THE PREVIOUS DOOR 1 1 f--- NEIGHBORING = ~_-: ~ NEIGHBORING | UNIT 71 UNIT 71 1 1 . 9..erâ€ž~ -~..Bqi..,Â·,Â· Â· , 9.5 Â¢ TAI FLAT ROOF il. in-,{3 r. f Lur lai 1 1 4-7-ft ''' '~ .+I 11-By,1 1. , ).P' 1 -t" 41 U : .1 : ,1 1.#P 4 1 422 -â€¢-Irf# 011-Up**g; . - - - - Â¢ I&,PLY~UPPER LEVEL Â· i i \ - _ - - Â¢ T~ PILY~2UPPER LEVEL i "--7. liel lia ~1'~J~ IHI I,Â·i :1Â·!kli ' IT-Â·rr.--TT~ EXISTING&PROPOSEDGRADE ju: EXISTING & PROPOSED GRADE 1 T.O. PLY @ MAIN LEVEL T.O PLY O_LEVEL 7 100' -0 131 /r-'-~-= ------- */..f 100' .0. - /0-1 EAST ELEVATION - EXISTING - EAST ELEVATION - PROPOSED (2 } (l ) - SCALE 1/4 = 1-0 - SCALE 1/4Â· = 1'-0 ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss @ 2015 =t,:(D~Im~tel 05/13/15 HPC REVIEW : BUILDING ELEVATIONS HPC 16 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN COLORADO 81611 7/4, 1 16 (T ) 970 / 925 4755 (F}970/920 2950 ' Ill-015130 J8. A (B) *Urj T 0 *C, f 7 9 4 Vy f f NOT IN CONTRACT NEIGHBORING UNIT #51 NEIGHBORING UNIT #51, (NOT IN CONTRACT) ~ T.O. EXISTING RIDGE & 21- 31 ------------- -- 1 il-1 ;HBORING UNIT #71 (NOT IN CONTRACT) -7 lild"/IA 1 T.0. FLATEQQE -1 1 :il - -1091 -7. \ ~11-1/7*9-117 -'.' ....m-. - It ' 1 --- ~ 10 0 -i 1 -1 NOT IN CONTRACT - A T.0 FLAT 1100 NEIGHBORING UNIT #71. 1 1 T 109 - 7Â· : 1 ,1, 1 1 1 2 8 11 - --- ----: 1 A - ]:-~ . mi n . lilli*44444"11"1 I 0- - Rmi;'33Ill~HT - F EXISTING GRADE ~ * ~50.PLY @ LOWER LEVE 1 2# ru-- 33, -$1R LIGHTS @ E O. TREAD -E , 1 11 1114,6 - 76 n*,9 67;9 7;71:i A #u% 0~Â¥ririlri, rÂ· #11,~IL~TT'Of'IU..tr- A / , 18111:11111111111111IHI"Illl'11111'I Iillvfoll'f,0 1... * .i'E_ 1 1 / ./ 1 ==53=3~ --- ---- - --J , 1 1111 1 U.U.U.U.LUJULUUJUI.1-< LULU~l il Il :1 ~1~-'Â·' XISTING & PROPOSED GRADE vÂ·6 - /-4 T.O. PtY e LOWER LEVEL , 1'1' 1111'1'1'1~mi''ll"I"uwfl-'ll d<Pr- ...r 95.6 9 11 - -lp--n 1 'r OA WEST ELEVATION - EXISTING /~1 WEST ELEVATION - PROPOSED j SCALE 1/4Â· = 1'-0 13 ) ~ J SCALE 1/4Â· = 1Â·-0 9 of 09 (5) (02) 1 1_ ~ T.O. EXISTING RIDGE * T,Q: FXISTINGRIDGE 12 : C.C. OCS ~ ~ ' 11 .. _1 - NEIGHBOR'SCARPORTTOREMAIN. DASHED FOR CLARITY 1-2~11' ill,111.11 ~Ill'ill L.__ ~ 2- L I k~L./. ~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~'~~"~~~'' ~~~~~~~~~~~~~--Â»4~ --_-~ Il ~Ii H l.~ 4' - ----4- n ,-h h-*k- - 4 4 -4 -- w --1.- 1 - 1 0 1 - 1- u u 11'll'll'll'll'll' ' .kTO PLY @ UPPER LEVEL A T.O. pty. upPER LEVEL LkMnalMS-- 4- ------------ - ----------- EXSTING DOWNSPOUT @ 1 ,; f 11 1,1 . 7 104' - 51/7 Ilfill 7 104'- 51/2 NEIGHBOR'S ROOF - i 41 lili 1 1 111 It 1 EXSTING GRADE -~ -\'+% ' Illl,li I I il: :~ I iii['li i [1: :m M in -il ! 1 11. t-_Li==1111 e 1 18" 1, .S 4 p ... --1 1 -Ullill I ll H P m i-1 1 i li j :-11 EXSTING & PROPOSED GRADE --~ 1 11 -1:i.1 1 1 9.1 .1 .11 1. 11 lili: -----4-1 Iltil :~ EXISTINGGRADE --, < /- EXISTING & PROPOSED GRADE Ll-14. - - NORTH ELEVATION - EXISTING /DEMO ~ NORTH ELEVATION - PROPOSED '2 1 / SCALE 1/4Â· = 1'-0 SCALE 1/4Â· = 1Â·-0' ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 p OS~AST ?Al HUI-( 1!RE - PI ANNING HPC REVIEW : BUILDING ELEVATIONS STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 J 1 (T)970/925 4755 (F)970/920 2950 @ 2015 mLLPOSSA,~,~CLAU HPC 17 ~I,rEnmENCPL.Al,1,1,~ 05/13/15 M.915130.3/ = * - --- p. Y. 1~ Â¥4-~~~ - P- AN hi ... U r , N,al=- 4- I- - Ei - -~-i \t .A. t , ... , .:U U +7-,2 - 11 *2 1 h. --/4/11 #141 *.â‚¬31 0 0.-0 0, 32- T - I -_ --, -<f -P' \ ..18:,WÂ· ' \ N \ /49 *d .4 + \ 'UNS- /- '9 3 *---1 16 MZZ J..04 7 , /â‚¬1 VALLEY AXON - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH VALLEY AXON - PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH ' -- 7 4.Â·I . ~-6/14Â£34..' %.2 . =*V -i--- - 4 ~*AdZ f w_u--23<4/1.27 f .42- /1-- 1 h 9#PIpe L....... <71\1 1 \ 1 ~ 974//lits.94#~s'. i-k lw -/ 'P . a< - 49~ * ~ 11 111 11 1 fli W i .*M 2541.,4 4 ' 9 1 2 ''11 ~1 - 11111 1 r /.I Ii'll YIMPJ*% Ar.JfliN. 0 1 1 I ., 11 11 49-â€ž ' 'e .41 . F.. - - -%-LE=dll-)1 .rvi 74 1 . 0- -- VALLEY AXON - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH VALLEY AXON -PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss ,Â· +illl-(lll! PIANNIN\ BILLPCSS*ASSOCam HPC 21 HPC REVIEW : 3D IMAGES 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970/925 4755 .)970/920 2950 @ 2015 0RCI~CTURENCMAI-gln 05/13/15 ..7]15130.3/ 't , - '-1, E VT 'Â·~ ~ Â· . ~ *'Â·-,ct-i*V,iÂ·...3, 2.i:<~ 'Â· #/ le,F : - ...'... 1 : ...: Â«.- h----1:,4 I -5337# 1/ , -\11Â«/ 1 i /, / /Â©10/7 1#L 0/ Rk Aul 1 H ---7 * ~5/C?7Â·Â·CS--7--- 1 Nf \ i k ./. 79 i / 17 I, I , :'.:1.4. . ~4 - i 1Â«. 75,0 2,4 I.'Ill' ' .......X <X //' EL ~1. 6 '49 .49 3 - il ./ fL Nj 5Â«fil 1- '03 1 M Sh /1 /2/ 6 N\N \.1 97 . - I -414 49- / --1 // f :? a ./ .0// H . 1 .4 FRONT AXON - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH FRONT AXON - PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH 72' ' Â·~S,rl.P. ~ 3 54....0 ----'- ......... .--......1----h 1 . 4 . f~ L Dr T .5 42.1 11 . 1. 2.--=L ~4 1 \\ 1 .~Â«fit~)~ ./ I .AC 11111111 -; L. 4*2-5 - . 42. 5 ... - - - # : 1220 9.1 4 ~ - -0.2 , \ I '.- 0-' /0 %==i==S~ la \ 1 --S 4 / 6 --~ \4 1 Â«~~ 1 t --- .1 ----1. \3\ U \ -- 1 k'.: ,,---9 1.%Â»fl- - U I * 1 11Â£ G,02 -44 N . /'. 1 -Â«2Â»1-r~,- 1 \ Cl 4 =44 L L-- ---S>-7 1 8 -/Ut/-/ , ///- t - P. =G- . '. . ... 1 1.,e- - 1% FRONT AXON - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH FRONT AXON - PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss .f?CHITIi-11 H-N PI ANNING HPC REVIEW : 3D IMAGES EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 8:611 (T) 970/925 4755 .) 970/920 2950 BILLPOSSA~~SSOCUJER HPC 22 Â® 20]5 .m=*Pul.'I 05/13/15 11220131 218. , 2.6...i-*fyl _ ~~ _ 74-40 444.,.... -* : 4 -1 -:-:.IM' I::.1 .. 0 1 ''Â·rÂ¥:t.-jtfia Â·Â·,.- :r,A,E~ . ,-- ,.-,-16-fÂ·:-,-r-'4 f Â· '56;7 ' . *F*4..:.. - . 1 -1 Â·1,1 ~-Uf-F.30-.Aff ~~~ f 04*#%2.Â·: -1 ---1--k . : 1....f:j - 421Â¢.*00;H, -%..f :..4.4,-1/-1{fk,ji~/*laill I -- * t %*#eMT 1 roof 1 4 3 44 '13 . Â¢ -AF7Â£,A-------- - 1-~- I: - likll' . m i 14 I iii -1 't 1 4 { 11 .171 Epret; 1 R 9 1 1 I L â‚¬ 1, F 4 1 _ | 3- *1 1 11 -i'~~ 1 i le 8 2 4.'5'1--- 5..61 1 r. 3 $ M â€¢ Ill lit 1 1/l ~ Y Â¢41% I i it.. 45<#m'-W t- PERSPECTIVE - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH PERSPECTIVE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH rvi=.AM.--6:,~.7///1,=-- ~,2"7~ . d.. - - !1 - r -1 0..00-< J , - - t.-F,jiliES?--- Mt'K ' _ _':P:biri rt ~~i~ j--â€žd ---tt iII 1- > -<G#j :..1 .P-- *-----II[LU~ f\.7. I r . I --- Mk M 16â‚¬1 , 1 =64 . 4 --=--- - 9,-W'-4 1-31}. 2 1 7" A- 1- If.~iligir--11[ 11 *S- j, ' IT----- *r==3 -~-f-02-2-1-1 9- Eai Â£ 4.liBILI I,aF~ ,-,.- u -<i,ig' 1ll 1 9 a.1 : .1.4 12:l] -11 1 1 -1,2 - .2 71 ;71 : - MN b Wi 11[ 1 1 1---4,-11.-1 -1-:u Â»=. 1 - :55..9 [12.1/. -1 ..Fl ,/. - /-1 â€¢ c.. 34- I --r--~1 1 Lit'.Â·~ li - 1 M:& M"MI,Wa,ILLB:Â· i.0 9.91 1 j' d li'~1 . 1 1 .-1-1 . -41 41 + ~. .41 i.2 j * w Â·' : *... 41 [15. 1 -1 L 'N rfilt..f 1 - 177-iIi L / 4 /4 ..ix-- 7 1, Iii ,; 4Â· -- . kÂ· ~ , P Â· Â·Â· ' . ,â‚¬39% , Fy .2 -Â· , 1.0 7 1 . i Aft . , 0.7.1. -122 -4, 4 . 9 1 4%~t* 1 4,1 , t.-171* 1 .. . 9.: 4 , 1 PERSPECTIVE - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH PERSPECTIVE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss 1 i'' 1 C JUL r N NINO HPC REVIEW : 3D IMAGES HPC 23 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 @ 2015 BILLPOSSAIOAS'.AE M 970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 ARCI~TlmENIOU-G. Ke. 05/13/15 6,17-< Ill 13. . -- / m 'I - 1 41........7//2-- k Hil ----~2377 --4 - 9Â»614 I 4 -r71<0=36.L</S-...2-*_ 4 W .7 ,-6- - :r Ilill - . 11 1 11 -- \ 11 1 - . -- 7 t - 1. '61 1~i . % 3 - --*12:15- ~eg -I---- - -4337--7.:--- 11 1 I i 4. PERSPECTIVE- EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH PERSPECTIVE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH .. me-Â·. - . 4?33 : I. 'P".1 t. . t ,~. L / 6-4 . 1 \ -t: 1 il---f 1 11 13 1\ 1 Â·j' - r. 'r ; n *mi Mi Tri .:**18*4 1 -, 1.Â· - ..: Â·- r w #.1#* r â€¢ 1 11 El- 181 grh.=54144:0.1 - "'47 11 l iti lid li b + 1 - 4--7 I ~ U~ - 1 1 1 1 4 11 1 9 k I 1 0 f. 11 --1 *- 114 1 Â« U -\X- I. -4. #HI--- = PERSPECTIVE - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH PERSPECTIVE -PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 POS f.. e :L"'1 1 1 1 m 'LANNING HPC REVIEW : 3D IMAGES STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 BIUPOSS;,11Â©ASSOCIATU HPC 24 .)970/925 4755 (F)970/920 2950 @ 2015 ./.URE#PLAIMIkPC 05/13/15 bl 7,11% Ill 9/ 4'' , AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE (J=,-~ ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: RECEIVED 071 MAÂ»/5 @D , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: APR z 2 2015 M, Arj 1 73 , 20_1.3 CITY OF ASPEN COA*NTy DEVELOPIENT STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, ~1114 1-1-~ bul e (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. ~6 Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the Z I day of Afe- I L , 201 53 to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph ofthe posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, PDs that create more than one lot, and new Planned Developments are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signatul~e The foregoing "Affidavit o f Notice" was acknowledged before me this Â»2 day of ./2,0/I- 1.- , 20/53 by <29= TH Ht,wEE WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL 6.---- My commission expires: /2-3-/(> GIUSEPPE AMATO Notary Public State of Colorado Notary ID 20124077549 Notaryf#blid 1 My Commission Expires Dec 3,2016 ~ --- V ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 -I â‚¬ 441.4 1 - . 2 i.,f '- ft&*bg~k~~.t./~ 4 4A*&~ .4, 4 :#d 44 -s ' .L 1 7. 2.*991}31 an . '*h~. F ....,Rk<y. Â¥ 9 ....Â· 4 =~~7. /4 .t- - 0 14.'Â·44 464 'VAL . It .4 . .: '. r .. :.- W.F.,F . . 61, P. 0 .... Â¢ f.. . A A I t. 0 /'4 , *27 - 1 1 11,-; "~ . i, I 4 : .:al I. 4. 12'.4&'* 3 ' 11'- 97#uÂ·.1,/I'-Il- 11 1 44â‚¬ . I.-â€¢â€¢,â€¢7'1â€¢1â€¢Urhll-, 4 *m,17-1VH**/1- r . 4 / / f 1 9. A, : - C , : -7â€¢/ I J --4'.It 1. 1 1 4 - r --*W: *luewr/%1*/&A #2 i I . I "41'~t.: .Â· . - -tw 19'r .4.4 -- 5 2 . ./. I- ar * 1 *4. 24>$*"f * 4 #1 M*9.r,Â¢28 , ' 1 . 'jr j~'I " t 4.947"&Â· 16 4~1 .114. 4:443 Â·-tr':. 1 44 1-2%32'ff!Â¢%f,8. 4'. , 7, ..Â·32Â¢~A ;-*'f) 51%424â‚¬3 7,Â£4 44k,t .,~494'~,4 4'~~ # ,Â·,Â·Â·*,ra2â‚¬r, Â·R f *,1 . . '25 IA,04% t.~W - ' 2 .0.r #. - . 617 I ' " Ii- I . /. I ./ . 1. i 4 2 r. Â· 904 _ .7 ..... ..0 I . . f.Â® 4 I = *# 1, ..e - AP -, . Â·.Â· Â· .Â·...,,/4- 6 4//15. a. Â· .4 . ... . , 1 1, . t.- â€¢ 'f? .... 4.-:.Â¢ '1Â» 4 5 ..1/ , ~~1 , + .f 'la I- *40* w Â· t . /'.4 12-U'.44 f. miwi<Â£#1#: 4 9*27-7 4 7 : 4, te V< d + 6,..t ..34. 9., --V- 70-Ill'll:- 76 I . - 5 ..Ill"' 4,-' 1,6, *lillill/'ll - Â£ . . 41 1. :2 - .1 -1. * a - - - .IM'## I I ' . r /2 9-64,/.2- r. , k W 11 1 1 w ) ' -1 + +'.ti** 14 0,1.2,"'' (-1 34 9ymr' ' ' t.4 -44 / A- . Â·0=23=N-lft-- 7 1- i. I ..11- * 1 ..2 t. -- - .4- . 1//23,4,;W#4.. 9 ./ . *1-1 - Â« EXHIBIT 4 11 5-/3-/5- 1 REVEIONS MADE 1-SOUTHOORMERREDUCED'OASTONOTIEVISIBLEFROUTHE - FRONT 2- SOUâ„¢ WINDOW WILL REMAIN IN EXISTING LOCATION 3 FRONT DOOR TO BE ASOLID DOOR --- '1 .. , 1 - - y .. 4 * 4 -----1- Nt 4 . 1--ini . ll.,Â» -n--r A 1 =10113'Fj - -.Ilf - h==*1 3-* ! 1-i .t --11 v *.=-~=-fT i ruÂ· = lt-1*4/& yt BI#~1-' 12./#TE- &===- -----~- -- - N Â· -4. - 1,. U 1 . 7 -*G== 441 -J L.- t - 1 - - R .- ddly -11 1 - mk 'FU~~il - _ -0 1 Hill li 1 1 -'F . 1 -- ' 1 Ir p -73 - ---- --1 1 1 - 1 1 - -32. - --=.--==P=----- .1 0 1 1 t. -- 'f 1 -3 1 1, , _ ~LULL_~~., . 1 Â° 1 2_~-3*UU.0 i i f -3 0 11 I I? 4 1 k.,- . 7.. , 1 -Â·1 It 1 1 -I - , m. -22 -I i~/ :r--- -1 1 1 I . + /-. i. *-i J , V-- , 1 . 11 1< 1 1 .7,â€¢%~ I I- I. 1 . 6 ir 01 - ~ * 11* XiI - US \ r .Â¥ 0Â·.41 . r ~44: 7 -r- -- . 1. f. Cd. .Ify.1 9 1,/':.N. 1Â¢r:. ,<1' hÂ· :7%39<: . f.{ ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss HPC REVIEW 605 -,T MAI. M. AS~IM CDLORA.0 .1.,1 (T, *70~.5 q Mmm -So 0205&%#*gW 05/13/15 f - go LE-1 e | CRICKET T PROPOGEOWINDOW*ELLBELOW PROPOSEDDORMEATÂ©MATCH W) ---------r---1 /- - - - - - 4 - - - - 1- - 1 e EEEEEE~ ~~___~i~ju~_ ---- =mÂ»--Irk-==---ImW223=23=33=34-=r=zur.-â€ž,3=uu=zurnE=nE=- LE- - E---42-ZE===-23_- - - - -- -1------------------------------ ~~3Â«--2-3--FrE-/--=-3-HE-EE=2-233-E-. 7 - - - - -------------------L 1 - m L - -Ii --- - - - - - -- --6 -- -.W-----~-i-~- -- -- - ---~ --- LL; 'Â· p- Fo fRAMINGBELOW EDL= EkEGENEEE--Ar-jlj / 1 , - F.0 FRAMING BELOW l 4 DORMER HAS BEEN MOVED BACK SO AS 4 I DECK... FLATRI'llow FLAT ROOF BELOW : + ' lOTTO BE VIEWABLE FROM THE FRONT DECK BELOW ~ -----1 -21 11 ' 1 .12/. G .*.=-1 ~ ExisT,~~rER i .-/ -j 1- 2-U=-i -1 1 -~ 15'Â·81/ 1 6.. 7.6/2 14'.3 15'Â·81/ 6'.107 7-612' . 14'.3 6 6 -6 - 6 00 luGo ~ PLAN - EXISTING ROOF ~ PLAN - PROPOSED ROOF LiaiNQ CONSTRUCTION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL - WHITE.E. INDICATEEXISTINGCONDITIONs 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss HPC REVIEW : PLANS -ROOF -EXISTING @PROPOSED HPC 15 805 talT MAIN .7.,[, ASPE. CD'.RADD ,)6. -4.4-I.$' [T).70'.S 47. I) .0~020 2950 0,1 ==-, 05/13/15 2 7 +~ r'~r~b~~~t~~T]1-~~1}ljMfi~>-1 IWINDOW Will REMAIN IN PLACE 9 9 9 A m DORMER MOVED AACK SEVERAL f rEET TO NOT BE VIEWABLE FROM 1 EYE LEVE' FROM THE FRONT 1 1 r t..9 | *10 FrIATING RIDI' | | 1~TO IXISTING RID. 1 \ - 1 rÂ«JÂ» 0 ~~~~~ ROOF 1 1 n.,71'.mF 1 ilitilll 4.â€ž 861 L 1811 Te/-111 [4L :11 1 F EXISTING,PROPOSEDGR,DE 1 1;q//9.... U.d- , Six'PPERIFI 1. , TOP,Â¥/MAINI'l 1 + To PIY~~~NI FWI 1\~ .J- -0 %1 / 47~ -~~iOÂ»VA~f~~Fi ji- -1 v=IL-< NA SOUTH ELEVATION - EXISTING (33 SOUTH ELEVATION - PROPOSED I I SCA. 1/4' - 1'-0" 98 0 NEIGHBORING NEIGHBORING < j UN/51 - 61 UNIT 51 - r 10 p y 1 0.0 ..TING ... | A SOLID DOOR I 0 TO F*ISTING .IQGT WILL BE USED TO 1 ~ PREVIOUS DOOR 1 Â¥ 1 REPLACE THE 1 1 I- goRING r U. UNIT 71 4, U 1 01 F"&#tul, _ 'TOP//IJPPFRIF. 0 9 ;1 p 14 . 1 9 Fl'(,./. 'FWI hinn~ 11!411Â·221,,,pLEd riOs'.51. .49 - . 104'-51/ m EXISTING &PROPOSED GRN~E 1 %_14U- R--_.Er-7- _- F E]USTING&PROPOSEOGRADE 7 '00.-0 i ,~ TO PIÂ¥/MAINIFVT, Â¥ iooÂ·.0Â· - rÂ© EAST ELEVATION - EXISTING O% EAST ELEVATION - PROPOSED / SCILE 1.-14/ Cj SCAIE 1/4~. 140* ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss HPC REVIEW : BUILDING ELEVATIONS 10~ GAir -1~ ...1,/E. CO~O~DO .1,1 --7--* [T) 9~0~925 47- I) 9,0,*20 zeâ€ž .1.:.- HPC 16 05/13/15 O 67 9 1 0) 9 9 1 1 Ii- 1 NEIG~BORING UNIT B L i .MX EIGH80mNGUNIT,51 ] 1 T. .ING RI.F Air HBORING UNI ." I TO FI AT R./ 710/.7 - ~r--~ 1.A NEIGHBORING UNIT #71 -Ii--3 AUL1LI - t CY RogÂ¥ ; 1 N~ â„¢CONTRm .- 31 AL 1 ~ 1 1 11-- --1,1 0-4 1 1 $ L ,=3, Al'llilili'Fipjr~~~/ reir.1.1.Â¥1.,1....1,11.4 ......11 / 007.'PWFRIF,FI STAIR LIGH~SOEO TREAD F EXISTING GRADE i.,4 ULÂ·,&0- Â£ IiI 1/11'Ill'll lilli I ' 0 I I LLLU..LLL ' ull lili .111 1,0.9 1] P.6 '~ ' 111 111 7-31, r EXISTING&PROPOSEDGR~E /*raÂ· I &Â£1 - - - :11 =111 e // Â® WEST ELEVATION - EXISTING SCALE 1/4Â·.1Â·0Â· E :EST,~LEVATION - PROPOSED 9 0 9 99 9 I + TO ./TING Rl// + T.O. Bil.'~ InG' IC .C *73=*X ,- NEIGHBORSC.PORTTOREMNI L p - -- -- --- ---7 --- - --- ---/1--- -- --- --- Â¢ Il'NV'mwi 0 TO PÂ¥'11PPFRIFI EXSTING COWNSPOUT, I 104'Â·51/2Â· NEIGHBORS'OOF -- EXSTING&PROPOSEOGRADE 3 1----- - - 1. 1 lili - ix -L 1 11 1 F EXISTING'PROPOSEDGRADE iL, ' i == r- EXISTING .Re '~LL------ 7 0 4 - Ah NORTH ELEVATION- EXISTING/DEMO SCALE .'. 1'-0Â· (T) 5591 ELEVATION - PROPOSED ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss Hit REVIEW : BUILDING ELEVATIONS HPC17 10'IAST ..1. â€¢T*IET Al~EN CO.GRACC .1,11 -il..M*.I-* IT,1,0.â€žI .- /1 -D~920 .â€ž I .:5 -.&-- 05/13/15 ...........P-- i #af~--T-- I.-47 7/I. 64==J ---~i -44*ENZWHI'. - { h. ---- /1/94/4-4/MI'll -- .22.9 120-~9 - r // i 'llp.1.- --- 1/4.Â·14 : , --$ oj@~-* -3 ~'F'*~ -'/2:2/1.ked;*$ Â·1Â©.IÂ· â‚¬ I r 4 1 , ""/1 , 7*r i + %4%~ VALLEY AXON - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH VALLEY AXON - PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH - .\ 2-,~ b& -4. 1 %% â€¢E~#>-i*99-1- retrouÂ© 62217-- S & ~ - ~< ~~ 1 1kj rÂ· f rÂ¥- .1.4I.'Ul ---007 .0/- A 427Â» 0 ': 11 1 t,1 4: r. - ----1 r r> f . P 1.Â· fi'- ' -26'. 46.- - 11 111 11 1 --- 39.4 , } "' ' qu.2 -- --' ----- lot U I 2,6=47-1/ ~j > VALLEY AXON - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH VALLEY AXON -PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss HIC REVIEW : 3D IMAGES HPC 21 60, EAIT 'Ail ...T A.. CotoRACD ,!111 [T) 970,925 47~3 'F) 07D~*20 .. I lh'. #.-/ 05/13/15 /7 /22Â» 9 -~ A - -4 I. ~> i-T li '. 11 / 7 Fl-li~ - Â«\ j >d A pA 1////5 94 ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ 1 u-Q 1 ~\1*14*f . 14~ .1. 1 ,+1 4.,1 9- .iA )Â· j: 1 /f' ' 1 ';'/ M , Â« FRONT AXON - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH FRONT AXON - PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH - uB/%1â€ž//). I r. --44 7--773 *. 'Eu cbÂ¥-., i**&Ir F -711992'.. ------ph -1 - -.-flis] -pyli r K< ...4 i i I 3\ 8 -4â‚¬1/\ \ 8 2' '4; ///A/- 6 .-1 - *405- 1 ' FRONT AXON - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH FRONT AXON - PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss HPC REVIEW : 30 IMAGES HPC 22 . EAST .,1. ./. ASPEN CÂ©10'ADD mil . .0/e25 4,",f, @70,920 20â€ž 03Â·' 52&.. 05/13/15 t . '?7~Squ- *- l,-j TJL ---=22=2=21- i 43#1 -------- -. r Et.-1 - i -' 1.Â·.::4" -3 1. U :, r 0 -- uny='77==â‚¬ZSEGU~ - Flty Â·Â·:Â· 4.1 1 1 1 -7- 1 --- -MIl lilli Â·4 /1 f -1-1/ 4 [-"P#M./9 4 - i - PERSPECTIVE - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH PERSPECTIVE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH 0 .: t T.1 602==221==ir - ~ ~-Â·2==212~~ etivial.../----- FEE -liL -- -It-1-t--1.-c--~, 1, 1 '9" 14 U â‚¬'f,7 ---- 2 2 %.m,-4 L - --1- EN:.1 -1,1.l>-3 1-C--11.-L_. 3- Â·Â·i--~.ri-Kin/R 1 y ~@H n9 A.*I 6/ 7 .-rn 1, 3 I .8 1. .D = '. ..:|i , . 171 1111 -1 2 , ...-4,14 1 - - .1 -r - + 1 - - 4 - -9 i - 4 1 -1 7 PERSPECTIVE - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH PERSPECTIVE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss HPC REVIEW : 3D IMAGES HPC 23 63 Â£~ST -1/ ..11,"PEN COLOÂ»ADO ~1~11 IT> ,70,923 .75. fl).70/920 2.â€ž ./.5 -:.., 05/13/15 24--Â¥-7- Â·Â«-- / ~1.- .,-2.== f 1,1 ,=:-1----1 FaiL--- al:Wili5~Al -1-M52544 111 11 1 6-Fr--1 El I~ 3 --1--1---'r --L- 1 4 * 1111 1 41 I 3- . 1,-'"--'gF).:.:Jjapzqn.-la,W,...-.k - -=- __3\ I r PERSPECTIVE- EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH PERSPECTIVE - PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE NORTH IS I h--71-73 - 9 35 1 El ~Â·,~ riÂ»-~- 51 1 1 1_lyI,5 i )-- - - tj 4 1 4 --71 Wlmi -n-,1 -117 Ld IM 11 E 0 1 ' 1 ' *13Â£1~ LIli PERSPECTIVE - EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH PERSPECTIVE -PROPOSED CONDITIONS FROM THE SOUTH ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 poss HPC REVIEW : 3D IMAGES HPC 24 EAST Â¥,IM .1.E ET ASPEN COLORADO 01, LT) BN/.5 4?S, 4,) 47/i.20 26â€ž I %:' U.%.~.,. 05/13/15 91/2/4/44 7 'Ci RETAIN FOR JAN 1 4 2015 ' Vrmts#Meer 1 PERMANENT FILES CffÂ¥ 4),- 762#EN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT r.~~~ Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and 00013.20{S-- AW?c. Property: ,44*2!Â¥Â· b/â€ž49/*N/10(01%*D *9*hone No.: '774 9,7. 99* tunt BeP. Â¥â‚¬ PrH Ht,41 6 Email: Â»*/0060/*U.,454. 2441 Address of Unt-rEA f Pareibl V\EM>oWe Billing ~40,505Â· Apir,4/78&:tvfe Property: 114/926 7/tuwthyw g MlylcMZAddressi 44:e e. /t4##Af 4071*2891- (subject of 41 ,,69/:BL /01~ /4,4Â» (send bills here) ,Â¢*A** AP, 914 /7 application) #479014 1 00. â‚¬14,1} I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No., Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the properly owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ /4900â€¢001\atiee for f&Â¥40% OF Â£97~IFF'17#Ma% flat fee for $ flat fee for . $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid In full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shali be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. 1 understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 11900 02%5Zleposit for 4, hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $315 per hour. $ -10' deposit for -dIA' hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be bi[led at $265 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: ,40930Ay;95> /'~**~1#. Chris Bendon Community Development Director Name: KerTH HÂ©(Atte City Use: Title: A/17*A.Â» pâ‚¬*> 1299,8Vlyrl (e Fees Due: $ Received: $ ,Pop- M-76 14473 / NO. ' FNovembel-, 2011~ ic iI+h Â·99 n.2 f" â€ž.0: ~" i 1: to City of Aspen I 130 S. Gatena St. 1 (970) 920-5090 ELUPr * 3-772-2 CITY OF ASPEN Permit Receipt THE CITY OF ASPEN RECEIPT NUMBER 00037722 Account Number:29971 Date: 1/14/2015 Applicant: lrOWNHOME NSF 1976 INVESTMENTS, LLC Type: check #158 Permit Number Fee Description Amount 0003.2015.AHPC Planning Hourly Fees 1,300.00 Total: $1,300.00 ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING ,Â»1 ..1,53'.1 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (t) 970/925-4755 (f) 970/920-2950 JAN 1 4 2015 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL CITY 01- ASPEN ~" ' '* J; ':-"r AP,Ct f~PUT:,D PROJECT Aspen Meadows Townhome Remodel JOB # 21421.00 ~~ DATE 01/14/2015 E-MAIL ~ jlarson@billposs.com TO Amy Simon FROM Jenna Larson Bill Poss and Associates Architecture and Planning, P.C. Check + 10 Sets of Project Graphics + 52 ATTACHMENTS VIA FAX: Pages Including Cover (IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL ATTACHMENTS, CALL IMMEDIATELY) DESCRIPTION Attachment 1: Signed Fee Agreement Attachment 2: Historic preservation Land Use Application Attachment 3: Dimensional Requirements Form Attachment 4: Pre-application conference summary + HPC Land Use Application Attachment 5: Current Certificate of title insurance Attachment 6: Applicants signed letter of representation Attachment 7: Evidence of Financial ability to undertake project Attachment 8: HOA Compliance forin Attachment 9: 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the city of Aspen Attachment 10: Written description of the proposed development Attachment 11: Written and Graphic Report by S K Peightal Engineers Ltd. regarding ability of building to withstand excavation process. Attachment 12: Preliminary Site improvement survey by Aspen Szilvey Engineers Attachment 13: Graphic Description of propsoed development (separate PDF) Attachment 14: List of property owners within 300' of proposed development Attachment 15: HOA Approval letter COMMENTS Amy, Please find attached the required materials for HPC review. We'd also like to ask for a spot on the agenda if one opens up sooner than our current spot on May 13th. If you have any questions please feel free to contact Keith Howie at 925.4755 x 284. Thank you, Jenna Larson 1 1 1 'I - :42 ., E j L/er, ATTACHMENT 2 - Historic Preservation Land Use Application 0/4 N 1 4 2015 - 1Â»24.1 '- # 1 PROJECT: ocap 3.20 1 S- Â· AH fc- W Naine: Â»F&314 R'[0APom 1-FIWÂ® -TDWN HONfb Fel#vrvt, Location: _._6; 1 - 11~Dc\&88>AD f liâ‚¬Pel.11 150(,OF*Pol (R'64 1 (Indicate street address, lot & block number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 2-736 101 %1002 APPLICANT: Name: NeF 147& INVâ‚¬ertleNT* 1,1,A Address: 4067 17010 MAP Â»/014(*, CAPPIN'1*RA , DA.1$3016 Phone #: 000. 404.410* Fax#: --4 E-inail: N 1:Ul:.10.1:fTTI $ Mk, COM REPRESENTATIVE: Name: pgickl Hpwt#, Fp* AF'+ 11*41,{P. Address: A:42 . MA[ N 41140*fl ,#091'044, 02'. 01 64 1 Phone #: 1167Â·*11. *000 Fax#:110 .1Â¢0 0160 E-mail: 14'toNI 60 8,1,1,1Mp. MM TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): U Historic Designation [3 Relocation (temporary, on U Certificate of No Negative Effect m or off-site) U Certificate ofAppropriateness 0 Demolition (total demolition) -Minor Historic Development Â¤ Historic Landmark Lot Split -Major Historic Development -Conceptual Historic Development -Final Historic Development -Substantial Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description ofexisting buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) 469 pgrpgate# â‚¬4\~T PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) 49*5 *<Rf>*Aa> 4;**59 Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 E El DE /4 - . MottrA aNT e) 0063 :235\S. 0"26 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT r- Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed bv the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Name: 1497 141 G INVErl\Ater6, Ll.6. Property Owner ("1"): Email: hfor i b't~ @ W\AD Â· ODÂ¥V\. Phone No.: 006 62>4 411% Address of UNrE 4 htft?*4 Â¥V\eltotA)Â¢0 177*irEt* 100)Ntil>Mee propew. 6,> 1 Remoe)4, 12#d>, Mi#â‚¬Â¥4 1 60. t W 6 0 (subject of application) I certify as follows: (pick one) U This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. U This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. ~ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Evidence of approval is attached. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. 1 understand that this documentig public document, Owner signature: kef~~ /1'jE~------ date: (9 ( 1-4 t-20 l 4- Owner printed r~ or; Attorney signature: date: Attorney printed name: >cogÂ· 2-0 1 5-. Art\ PC Al Â»#Makt 41 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY ..IAN 1 4 2:'3 (1 r ji PLANNER: Amy Simon DATE: 11/18/2014 ; & P,'y. '.8, 'Pt t. PROJECT: 61 Meadows Trustee Road REPRESENTATIVE: Poss Architecture + Planning REQUEST: HPC Minor Development DESCRIPTION: 61 Meadows Trustee Road Is listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Site and Structures as one of the Trustee Townhomes designed by Herbert Bayer within the Aspen Meadows. The Aspen Meadows received approval as a Specially Planned area in the early 1990s. This approval established maximum square footage for various buildings and uses on the campus. The Trustee Townhomes were approved to each have a maximum floor area of 2,500 square feet, plus a garage or carport of 500 square feet. All calculations will be according to today's land use regulations. According to the SPA Agreement, each unit is limited to three bedrooms. The owner of the subject unit proposes to increase the basement area below the existing structure and to expand the ground level of the unit on the rear fagade, The total expansion will not exceed 250 square feet of floor area, therefore the project will be reviewed as Minor Development. Relocation criteria will also be applied in order to ensure proper techniques are used for excavating and underpinning below this historic building. Design review will be according to the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and the Residential Design Standards. The review is a one-step process with a public hearing before the HPC. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: HPC application: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2011%20Historic%20Land%20Use%20App %20Form.pdf HPC Design Guidelines: http://www,aspenpitkin,com/Departments/Community-Development;Historic-Preservation/Historic-Properties/ Land Use Code: http:#www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-DevelopmenUPIanning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use-Code/ Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.410 Residential Design Standards - 26.415.070.C Certificate of appropriateness for a minor development 26.415.090 Relocation of designated historic properties AHPC Minor Review/Relocation 61 Meadows Trustee Townhomes 1 0003Â· 2015 - Att A-- Review by: Staff for completeness HPC for determination City Council for Call-up Public Hearing: Yes, at HPC Neighborhood Outreach: None Planning Fees: $1,300 for 4 hours of staff time, Any unbilled portion of this deposit will be refunded at the conclusion of the case, Additional staff hours, if needed, will be billed at $325 per hour. Total Deposit: $1,300 To apply, submit 1 copv of the following information: Â¤ Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. <01-r~Â»awavr ~ D Pre-application Conference Summary (this document), Câ€¢w~7Â»: NMeur â€¢f) Â¤ Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occurJ consisting of a current (not older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the properly, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application, 647Â»Â¥:#Mavr 83 O Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant, (5}77/MVMEU,-6) 0 A site improvement survey (not older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado/*178*Menf O HOA Compliance form (Attached) 65777:!;+16*713) /20 0 A written report from a licensed engineer or architect regarding the soundness of the building its ability to withstand the excavation process and detailing the proposed plan. /A77*:mttevr /1,) O Evidence of the financial ability to undertake the safe excavation and underpinning, preservation and repair of the building; site preparation and construction of necessary infrastructure through the posting of bonds or other financial measures deemed appropriate, A letter of credit or cashiefs check in the amount of $30,000 js typically required to be posted with the City for the duration of the excavation process. (277778~#MetÂ¥~) 0 A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the deve[opment application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property, t>f777/21*Havt /3) O Written responses to all review criteria, (AÂ·rÂ»W#'.,EN,r /0 ) Â¤ An 81/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. <477*04*Urf,) Once the application is determined to be complete, submit: U A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. Â¤ 10 copies of the project graphics, 0 Total deposit for review of the application. 414*.80 Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City, The summary is based on current zonng, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 2 Ptl HMâ„¢r *17 6Â©NA General Information Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with your application. This information will help us review your plans and, ifnecessary, coordinate witli other agencies that may be involved. YES NO Does the work you Are planning include exterior work; including additions, demolitions, new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration? X L] Does the work you are planning include interior work; including remodeling, rehabilitation, or restoration? 0 ~ Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this time? 0 X In addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate ofAppropriateness or No Negative Effect and a building permit, are you seeking to meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation or restoration of a National Register of ~ ' Historic Places property in order to qualify for*state or federal tax credits? 0 0 If yes, are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in conjunction with this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are eligible. Owner-occupied residential properties are not.) [1 If yes, are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check all City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use: U Rehabilitation Loan Fund O Conservation Easement Program [3 Dimensional Variances 0 Increased Density 0 Historic Landmark Lot Split 0 Waiver of Park Dedication Fees 0 Conditional Uses 0 Exemption from Growth Management Quota System O Tax Credits Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 pr'F, AMEMr 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .. Land Use Review Fee Policy The City of Aspen has established a review fee policy for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. A flat fee is collected by Community Development for applications which normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. Review fees for other City departments reviewing the application (referral departments) will also be collected when necessary. Flat fees are cumulative - meaning an application with multiple flat fees must pay the sum of those flat fees. Flat fees are not refundable. A review fee deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff review is required. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Various City staff may also charge their time spent on the case in addition to the case planner. Deposit amounts may be reduced if, in the opinion of the Community Development Director, the project is expected to take significantly less time to process than the deposit indicates. A determination on the deposit amount shall be made during the pre-application conference by the case planner. Hourly billing shall still apply. All applications must include an Agreement to Pay Application Fees. One payment including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of Aspen. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required application fee. The Community Development Department shall keep an accurate record of the actual time required for the processing of a land use application requiring a deposit. The City can provide a summary report of fees due at the applicant's request. The applicant will be billed for the additional costs incurred by the City when the processing of an application by the Community Development Department takes more time or expense than is covered by the deposit. Any direct costs attributable to a project review shall be billed to the applicant with no additional administrative charge, in the event the processing of an application takes less time than provided for by the deposit, the department shall refund the unused portion of the deposited fee to the applicant. Fees shall be due regardless of whether an applicant receives approval. Unless otherwise combined by the Director for simplicity of billing, all applications for conceptual, final, and recordation of approval documents shall be handled as individual cases for the purposes of billing. Upon conceptual approval ali billing shall be reconciled and all past due invoices shall be paid prior to the Director accepting an application for final review. Final review shall require a new deposit at the rate in effect at the time of final application submission. Upon final approval all billing shall again be reconclied prior to the Director accepting an application for review of technical documents for recordation. The Community Development Director may cease processing of a land use application for which an unpaid invoice is 30 or more days past due. Unpaid Invoices of 90 or more days past due may be assessed a late fee of 1.75% per month. An unpaid invoice of 120 days or more may be subject to additional actions as may be assigned by the Municipal Court Judge. All payment information is public domain. All invoices shall be paid prior to issuance of a Development Order or recordation of development agreements and plats. The City will not accept a building permit for a property until ati invoices are paid in full. For permits already accepted, an unpaid invoice of 90 or more days may result in cessation of building permit processing or issuance of a stop work order until full payment Is made. The property owner of record is the party responsible for payment of all costs associated with a land use application for the property. Any secondary agreement between a property owner and an applicant representing the owner (e.g. a contract purchaser) regarding payment of fees is solely between those private parties. November, 20 11 ~ CÂ·Â·<% .7 Â«/21/42:0 -ilf R ~ LCity ofAspen I 130 S. Gatena St. I (970) 920-5090 ATTACHMENT 3 - Dimensional Requirements Form (Item #10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project: Â»*PW+J M #APow* 17*w> 1130~ lrWN 1*Mle MMOD01.0- Applicant: NAF '11(0 INVEÂ»rti'AM24, L.Ut Project Location: 45,1 Me*W,44, FÂ¢yhÂ¢1 Â»â€¢*FPN / 6324 1 2414111 Zone District: *FA - Frip Lot Size: 1.966 N.966 ( 00(*2 4.Â© Ale9MA,Â· Lot Area: 0.10% beyâ‚¬*. (For tile purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: NA Proposed: NA Number ofiesidential units: Existing: H Proposed: H Number ofbediooms: Existing: 00 Proposed: (IN ow,T to 199 12-ehADDeU/eQ) Proposed % of demolition: DIMENSIONS: (write iVa where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: Existing:~%11â€¢.11Â·Alloivable:10Dt)4.EProposed: Â«2.140.80(5~! 46 Height Principal Bldg.: Existing.Â· 'te' Allowable: 16~ Proposed:_+1IL:~ _ Accessory Bldg.: Existing: NA Allowable: WA Proposed: MA On-Site parking: Existing: 1 Required: 5 Proposed: 1- % Site coverage: Existing: 14 A Required: HA Proposed: MA % Open Space: Existing: 918 Required: M k Proposed: 1*A Front Setback: Existing: ~1>1" Required: \ 01 Proposed: \1\Â· 1" I r 11 Rear Setback: Existing: 921- 9 Required: \ O' Proposed: 1:41-22 Combined Front/Rear: Indicate N, S, E, W ExiStill g: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: E~isting: O Required: 0 Proposed: O Side Setback: Existing: O Required: 0 Proposed: 0 Combined Sides: ExisNng: Â£0 Required: C) Proposed: C) Distance between Existing: O Required: O Proposed. O buildings: Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note ifencroachment licenses have been issued: NONE Variations requested (identify the exact variances needed): Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 1 66 C Hlt, t:L ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING JAN 1 4 2015 605 EAST MAIN ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (t) 970/925-4755 (f) 970/920-2950 : 'Â· , Ch- :,Â·ir' EN CHECKLIST Construction Administration Project Closeout Pa ge - 2 ACTION As Requested CC ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING Â· ./ 11.4 4 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 1 5#' . t k ' lA .. (t) 970/925-4755 (f) 970/920-2950 1 4._- il:, , I~ ..~ c . Â·' MEMORANDUM JAN 1 4 2015 TO: Amy Simon Cl 11 02 A#4447/ .OR{1 04.3 i City of Aspen HPC Chair CC: File FROM: Keith Howie Bill Poss and Associates Architecture and Planning, P.C DATE: December 26, 2014 RE: Aspen Meadows Townhome Remodel- HPC Conceptual application D ENCLOSURE Unit 6, Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhome Remodel 61 Meadows Road, Aspen, Colorado, 81611 Dear Amy, Please find enclosed the conceptual, HPC application for..Unit 6, Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhome Remodel. As directed, we are supplying 1 electronic copy for review and will await number of copies to be provided from you. Attachment 1: Signed fee agreement Attachment 2: Historic preservation land Use Application Attachment 3: Dimensional Requirements form Attachment 4: Pre-application conference summary + HPC Land Use Application Attachment 5: Current Certificate of title insurance Attachment 6: Applicants signed letter of representation Attachment 7: Evidence of Financial ability to undertake project - Attachment 8: HOA Compliance Form : Attachment 9: 8-1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the city of Asperi Attachment 10: Written description of the proposed development Attachment 11: Written and Graphic Report by S K Peightal Engineers Ltd. regarding ability of building to withstand excavation process. Attachment 12: Preliminary Site improvement survey by Aspen Survey Engineers. Attachment 13: Graphic Description of proposed development (separate PDF) Attachment 14: List of Prbperty owners within 300' of proposed development. Attachment 15: HOA approval letter If there are additional materials required, please contact me at 925.4755 x 284. Please send the public notice at your convenience so that we may post. ResPFctfully submitted, I. 1- Reith'Howle Authorized representative for NSF 1976 Investments LLC. Matrix of The City of Aspen's Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements To review fullbrocedures for all applications, reference 26.415 of The City of Aspen Building Code, Historic Preservation Ordinance. When submitting multiple step applications, do not replicate submission materials. Two copies of the application are required for a Certe?cate of.Nomiect, 15 copies are required for each meetingall other review. Also note that an electronic version of ali text documents is required in a.txt .doc,.wpd, or.rtf format. Application Fees Type of Review Notice Requirements Requirements Deposit Fee Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Designation 1-9,11,12 SO 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c.) at HPC and Council Consult with Historic Preservation Exempt Development SO None Officer to confirm exempt status Certificate of No Negative Effect 1-9,15,17 $245 None -1 Minor Development 1-10,15, 16, 17,36 $735 Posting Pursuant to Sections 26.304.060 (E) (3) (b) Development under 1,000 s.f.,$1,470 Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Maior Development / Conceptual 1-10, 14, 17, 18,19,20 / Development over 1,000 s.f., $2,940 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) Publication, Posting and Miling Pursuant to Sections Maior Development / Final 1-10,16,21,22,36 Paid at time of conceptual 26.304.060 (IE) (3) (a) (b) (c) Substantial Amendment 1-10,16,23,24,25,36 $735 Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Demolition 1-9,26 $2,940 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Relocation 1-9,27-34 $2,940 26.304.060 (E) 0) (a) (b) (c) Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Historic Landmark Lot Split 1-10 $1,470 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) at HPC and Council Publication, Posting and Mail _ Pursuant to Sectons Rescinding Designation 1-9,35 - $1,470 26304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) at HPC and Council Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 lim Pi177'~fR WT + 04 b KEY [Il Contained within a letter signed by 12, Property or district description including 27. A written description and/or graphic the applicant, the applicant's name, nan*ative text, photographs mid/or other illustrations ofthe building, structure or address and telephone number, and graphic materials that document its physical object proposed for relocation. the name, address, and telephone characteristics. 28. A written explanation ofthe type of number of any representative 13. Identification ofthe Â¢]taracter-defining relocation requested (temporary, on-site or authorized to act on behalfofthe features that distinguish the entity which off-site) and justification for the need for applicant.077?W#/46EWT 6) should be preserved. relocation, ti~ The street address, legal 14. Verification that the proposal complies with 29. A mitten report fromalicensed engineer or descriptions and parcel Section 26.410, Residential Design architect regarding the soundness of the identification ntiniber of thoA77, /09 Standards, or a written request for a variance building, structure or object, its ability to properly proposed for development. fioin any standard that is not being met. withstand tlie physical move and its ~ A disclosure of ownership of the ~ Photographs, building materialsamples rehabilitation needs, once relocated. parcel proposed for development, and other exhibits, as needed, toaccurately 30. Aconceptual planforthereceivingsite consisting of a current certificate . depict location, extent and design ofthe providing preliminary infoimation on the from a Title insurance company, or proposed work. (*Tâ€¢ 8,) property boundaries, existing improvements attorney licensed to practice ill the ~. An accurate representation ofall major and site characteristics and the associated State of Colorado, listing the names buitding materials and finishes to be used in planned improvements. ofall owners of the property, and the development, depicted through samples oiÂ· 31. Evidence of the fiiancial ability to all mortgages, judgments, lions, ,_, photographs. (MT. 1Â© undertake the safe relocation, preservation easements, contracts and Jlt] ScRIed elevations and/ordrawings ofthe and repair of the building, structure or object; agreements affecting the parcel, and proposed work and its relationship to the site preparation and constructioli ofnecessary demonstrating the owner's right to designated historic buildings structures, sites infrastructure through theposting of bonds or apply for the Development and features in its context. (,1111â‚¬) other financial measures deemed appropriate. Application. t>477: a> 18. Scaled drawings of the proposed structure(s) 32. Suppleiiientary inatei ials to provide an lit All 8 1/2" x 11"vicinity map or addition(s) depicling their form, including understanding of the larger context for the locating the subject parcel within their height, massing, scale, proportions and relocated propeity and its impacton adjacent the City ofAspen. >774 11) roofplan; and the primary features ofall propeities, the neighborhood or streetscape. Mil A site plan depicting the proposed elevations in the neighborhood context. 33. Ifthe applicant does notown tlie receiving layout and -the project's physical 19. Supplemental niateiÂ·Mls to provide a visual site, proo f from the site's property owner of relationship to the land and its description ofthe context suirounding the the willingness to accept the relocated surroundings. (Arr. 101 designated historic property or historic district building, structure or object. ~31 A site improvement survey including at least one (1) of the following: 34. Evidence that the applicant has or is seeking certified by a registered land diagrams, maps,photographs, 3-D model the necessary approvals to place die surveyor, licensed in the State of (digital or physical) or sfreetscape elevations. building on the identified receiving site, If Colorado, showing the current the site is outside ofthecity limits, status of the parcel including the 20. Preliminatv selection ofptitnary building verification that tlie building will be current topography and vegetation. materials to be used in construction preserved on its new site through a formal (This requirement, or any part ~-~ represented by samples and/or photographs. action of the otherjurisdiction or a thereof, may be waived by the A statement, including natrative text or preservation easement Community Development Director graphics, indicating how the Final 35. A written description ofhow theproperty if the project is determined not to Development Plan confonns to does not meet these criteria for designation. warrant a survey docuinent,) (AM' 11 representations inade or stipulations placed as 1~fi~ A lighting planindicating thelocation ofall ~ A written description of the a condition of the approval ofthe Conceptual extetior light fixtures and site lighting, mid proposal and it written explanation Development Plan. cut sheets for each type of fixture proposed. of liow the proposed development 22. Final draitings ofall proposed structures(s) Light fixtures must comply with the "City of complies with the review criteria and/or addition(s) included as part of the Aspen Historic Preservation Desig,1 and The City of Aspen Historic development at'/4" = 1,0' scale Guidelines" and meet the City Lighting Code. Preservation Design Guidelines 23. A revised site plan (*117%#MENT /8~ relevant to the development 24. Revised scaled elevations mid drawings application, (ATT 22) 25. Photographs and other exhibits to illustrate ~ Additional materials, the proposed changes. documentation, or reports as 26. Written documentation that the Chief deemed necessary by the Building Official has detennitied the builditig Community Development Director. an immillent hazard, gr narrative text, E~ Completed Land Use Application graphic illustrations or other exhibits that Form, Signed Fee Agreement, and provide evidence that the building, structure Â¥ee. (677- 11â‚¬) or object is of'no historic or architectural F . Ii,nensional Requirement Form. value or importance. 11. Site or historic district boundary map. (~r~ i) Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 ieli /4, i*HMENT S ~'- Land Title Insurance Company OP-6-CO1045-3754777 WESTCOR POLICY NO. ALTA OWNER'S POLICY (6.17-06) ISSUED BY WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing required to be given to the Company under this Policy must be given to the Company at the address shown in Section 18 of the Conditions. COVERED RISKS SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B, AND THE CONDITIONS, WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation (the "Company") insures, as of Date of Policy and, to the extent stated in Covered Risks 9 and 10, after Date of Policy, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance, sustained or incurred by the Insured by reason of: 1. Title being vested other than as stated in Schedule A. 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the Title, This Covered Risk includes but is not limited to insurance against loss from (a) A defect in the Title caused by (i) forgery, fraud, undue influence, duress, incompetency, incapacity, or impersonation; (iD failure of any person or Entity to have authorized a transfer or conveyance; (iii) a document a ffecUng Title not properly created, executed, witnessed, sealed, acknowledged, notarized, or delivered; (iv) failure to perform those acts necessary to create a document by electronic means authorized by law; (v) a document executed under a falsified, expired, or otherwise invalid power of attorney; (vi) a document not properly filed, recorded, or indexed in the Public Records including failure to perform those acts by electronic means authorized by law; or (vii) a defective judicial or administrative proceeding. (b) The lien ofreal estate taxes or assessments imposed on the Title by a governmental authority due or payable, but unpaid. (c) Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. The terni "encroachment" includes encroachments of existingimprovements located onthe Land onto adjoining land, and encroachments onto the Land of existing improvements located on adjoining land. 3. Unmarketable Title. COVERED RISKS Continued on next page IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this policy to be signed and sealed as ofthe Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, Issued By: WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CO1045 * PCT24127W Pitkin County Title [nc 0,0 By: hiÂ®wl d WK,flg,/91 601 E. Hopkins #3 4' whitor,A Mkresident leif ZED )01 Aspen, CO 81611 %5:k coâ€ž,g 41 0%59360 Attest: Secretary OP-6 ALTA 6-17-06 Owner's Policy (WETIC Edition 2-25-08) 4. No right of access to and from the Land. 5. The violation orenforcement ofany law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (a) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (b) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (c) the subdivision of land; or (cD environmental protection ifa notice, describing any part ofthe Land, is recordedin the Public Records setting forth the violation or intention to enforce, but only to the extent ofthe violation or enforcement referred to in that notice. 6. An enforcement action based on the exercise of a governmental police power not covered by Covered Risk 5 if a notice of the enforcement action, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records, but only to the extent of the enforcement referred to in that notice. 7. The exercise ofthe rights ofeminent domain ifa notice ofthe exercise, describing anypart ofthe Land, is recorded in the Public Records. 8. Any takingby a governmental body that has occurred and is binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without Knowledge. 9. Title being vested other than as stated in Schedule A or being defective (a) as a result ofthe avoidance in whole or in part, or from a court order providing an alternative remedy, of a transfer of all or any part ofthe title to or any interest in the Land occurring prior to the transaction vesting Title as shown in Schedule A because that prior transfer constituted a fraudulent or preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws; or (b) because the instrument of transfer vesting Title as shown in Schedule A constitutes a preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws by reason of the failure of its recording in the Public Records (i) to be timely, or (ii) to impart notice of its existence to a purchaser for value or to a judgment or lien creditor, 10.Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the Title or other matter included in Covered Risks 1 through 9 that has been created or attached or has been filed or recorded in the Public Records subsequent to Date of Policy and prior to the recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred in defense of any matter insured against by this Policy, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions. EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Re- of tl]is policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, cords at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: mid not disclosed iii writing to the Conipany by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation Insured under this policy; (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (c) resulting iii no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date ofPolicy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided utider (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improve- Covered Risk 9 and 10); or ment erected on the Land; (e) resulting in loss or daniage that would not have been (iii) the subdivision of land; or sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the (iv) environmental protection; or the effect o fany violation Title. ofthese laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1 (a) does notmodify or limitthe cover- 4. Any claim, by reason ofthe operation offederal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction age provided under Covered Risk 5. vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (b) Any governmental policepower. This Exclusion 1(b) does (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 ofthis policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between 3, Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other mat- ters Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured shown in Schedule A. Claimant; OP-6 ALTA 6-17-06 Owner's Policy Page 2 CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. DEFINITION OF TERMS Records" shall also include environmental protection Iiens filed in the records of the clerk of the United States District Court The following terms when used in this policy mean: for the district where the Land is located. (a) "Amount of Insurance": The amount stated in Schedule A, as may be increased or decreased by endorsement to this policy, (i) "Title": Tlie estate or interest described in Schedule A. increased by Section 8(b), or decreased by Sections 10 and 11 00 "Unmarketable Title": Title affected by an alleged or apparent ofthese Conditions. matter that would permit a prospective purchaser or lessee of the Title or lenderon the Title to be released from the obligation (b)"Date of Policy": The date designated as "Date of Policy" in Schedule A. to purchase, lease, or lend if there is a contractual condition requiring the delivery of marketable title. (c) "Entity": A corporation, partnership, trust, limited liability coinpany, or other similar legal entity, 2. CONTINUATION OF INSURANCE (d) "Insured": The Insured named in Schedule A. The coverage of this policy shall continue in force as of Date of Policy in favor ofan Insured, but only so long as the Insured retains (i) The term "Insured" also includes an estate orinterest in the Land, orholds anobligationsecured bya (A) successors to the Title of the Insured by operation o f purchase money Mortgage given by a purchaser from the Insured, law as distinguished from purchase, including heirs, or only so long as the Insured shall have liability by reason ofwar- devisees, survivors, personal representatives, or next ranties in any transfer or conveyance ofthe Title. This policy shall of kin; not continue iii force iii favor of any purchaser from the Insured (B) successors to ati Insured by dissolution, merger, con- of either (i) an estate or interest in the Lands or (ii) an obligation solidation, distribution, or reorganization; secured by a purchase money Mortgage given to the Insured. (C) successors to an Insured by its conversion to another 3. NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GIVEN BY ]NSURED kind ofEntity; CLAIMANT (D) a grantee of an Insured under a deed delivered withotit The Insured shall notify the Company promptly in writing (i) in payment o f actual valuable consideration conveying case of any litigation as set forth in Section 5(a) of these Condi- the Title tions, (ii) in case Knowledge sliall conie to an Insured hereunder of (1) if the stock, shares, memberships, or other equity any claim of title or'interest that is adverse to the Title, as insured, interests of the grantee are wholly-owned by the and that might cause loss or damage for which the Company may named Insured, be liable by virtue of this policy, or (iii) if the Titles as insured, is rejected as Unmarketable Title. If tlie Company is prejudiced by (2) ifthe grantee wholly owns the named Insured, the failure of the Insured Claimant to provide prompt notice, the (3) if the grantee is wholly.owned by an affiliated Company's liability to the Insured Claimant under the policy shall Entity ofthe named Insured, provided the affiliated be reduced to the extent of the prejudice. Entity and the named Insured are both wholly- 4. PROOF OF LOSS owned by the same person or Entity, or (4) if the grantee is a trustee or beneficiary of a trust In the event the Company is unable to determine the amount ofloss created by a written instrument established by the or damage, the Company may, at its option, require as a condition Insured named in Schedule A for estate planning ofpayment that the Insured Claimant furnish a signed proofofloss. purposes, The proof of loss must describe the defect, lien, encumbrance, or otlier matter insured against by this policy that constitutes the basis (iD, Withregard to (A), (B), (C), and (D) reserving, however, all of loss or damage and shall state, to the extew possible, the basis rights and defenses as to any successor that the Company of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. would have had against any predecessor Insured. 5, DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OFACTIONS (e) "Insured Claimant": An Insured claiming loss or damage. (f) "Knowledge" or "Known": Actual knowledge, not construe- (a) Upon written request by the Insured, and subject to the options contained in Section 7 of these Conditions, the Company, at tive knowledge or notice thal inay be imputed to an Insured by its own cost and without unreasonable delay, shall provide for reason of the Public Records or any other records that impart the defense of an Insured in litigation in which any third party constructive notice of matters affecting the Title. asserts a claim covered by this policy adverse to the Insured. (g) "Land": The land described iii ScheduleA, and affixed improve- This obligation is limited to only those stated causes ofaction ments that by law constitute real property. The term "Land" alleging matters insured against by this policy The Company does not include any property beyond the lines of the area shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or right of the Insured to object for reasonable cause) to represent easement iii abutting streets, roads, avenues, alloys, lanes, ways, the Insured as to those stated causes of action. It shall not be orwaterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel. The right of access to and from the Land is insured by this policy. Company will not pay any fees, costs, or expenses incurred by (h) "Mortgage": Mortgage, deed of trust,trust deed, or other secil- the Insured in the defense o f those causes of action that allege riG instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means matters not insured against by this policy. authorized by law. (b) The Company shall have the right, in addition to the options (i) "Public Records": Records established under state statutes at contained in Section 7 of these Conditions, at its own cost, to Date ofPolicy forthe purpose of imparting constructive notice institute and prosecute any action or proceeding or to do any ofmatters relating to real property to purchasers for value and other act that in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to withoutKnowledge. With respect to Covered Risk 5(d), "Public establish the Title, as insured, or to prevent or reduce loss or OP-6 AIJA 6-17-06 Owner's Policy Page 3 CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS - CONTINUED damage to the Insured. The Company may take any appropri- curred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Com- ate action under the terms of this policy, whether or not it shall pany up to the time of payment or tender of payinent and that the be liable to the Insured, The exercise of these rights shall not Company is obligated to pay. be an admission of liability or waiver of any provision of this Upon the exercise by the Company of this option, allliability and policy. If the Company exercises its rights under this subsec- obligations of the Company to the Insured under this policy, other lion, it must do so diligently. than to make the payment required in this subsection, shall termi- (c) Whenever the Company brings an action or asserts a defense as nate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or required or permitted by this policy, the Company may pursue continue any litigation. the litigation to a final determination by a court of competent (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Insured jurisdiction, and it expressly reserves the right, in its sole dis- or With the Insured Claimant. cretion, to appeal any adverse judgment or order. (i) To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the 6. DUTY OF INSURED CLAIMANT TO COOPERATE name of an Insured Claimant any claim insured against (a) In allcases where thispolicy pernits or requires the Company to under this policy. In addition, the Company will pay any prosecute or provide for the defense ofany action or proceeding costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the Insured and any appeals, the Insured shall secure to the Company the Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the right to so prosecute or provide defense in the action or pro- time of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay; or ceeding, including the right to use, at its option, the name ofthe Insured for this purpose. Wheneverrequested by the Company, (ii) To pay or otherwise settle with the Insured Claimant the the Insured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company loss or damage provided for underthispolicy, together with all reasonable aid (i) in securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the prosecuting or defending the action or proceeding, or affecting Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up settlement, and (ii) in any other lawful act that in the opinion to the tiine of payment and that the Company is obligated of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish to pay. the Title or any other matter as insured. If the Company is Upon the exercise by the Company o feither oftlle options provided prejudiced by the failure of the Insured to furnish the required for in subsections (b)(i) or (ii), the Company's obligations to the cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Insured under Insured under this policy for the claimed loss or damage, other the policy shall terminate, inchiding any liability or obligation than the payments required to be made, shall terminate, inctuding to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation, with regard to any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any the matter or matters requiring such cooperation. litigation. (b) The Company may reasonably require the Insured Claimant to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representa- 8. DETERMINATION AND EXTENT OF LIABILITY tive of'the Company and to produce for examination, inspection, This policy is a contract of indemnity against actual monetary loss and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be or damage sustained or incurred by the Insured Claimant who has designated by the authorized representative of the Company, suffered loss or damage by reason of matters insured against by all records, in whatever medium maintained, including books, this policy. ledgers, checks, memoranda, correspotidence, reports, e-mails, (a) The extent ofliability ofthe Company for loss ordaniage under disks, tapes, and videos whether bearing a date before or after this policy shall not exceed the lesser of Date of Policy, that reasonably pertain to tile loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the (i) the Amount of Insurance; or Company, the Insured Claimant shall grant its permission, in (ii) the difference between the value ofthe Title as insured and writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to the value of the Title subject to the risk insured against by examines inspect, and copy all of these records in the custody or this policy. control ofa thirdparty (hatreasonablypertain to the loss or dam- age. Alt information designated as confidential by the Insured (b) If the Company pursues its rights under Section 5 of these Conditions and is unsuccessful in establishing the Title, as Claimant provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall insured, not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonablejudgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration ofthe claim. (i) the Amount of Insurance shall be increased by 10%, and Failure ofthe Insured Claimant to submit for examinationunder (ii) the Insured Claimant shall have the right to have the loss oath, produce any reasonably requested inforniation, or grant or damage determined either as of the date the claim was permission to secure reasonably necessary information from inade by the Insured Claimant or as of the date it is settled third parties as required in this subsection, unless prohibited by and paid. law or governmental regulation, shall temiinate any liability of (c) In addition to the extent of liability under (a) and (b), the Com- the Company under this policy as to that claim. pany will also pay those costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses 7. OPTIONS TO PAY OR OTHERWISE SETTLE incurred in accordance with Sections 5 and 7 of these Condi- CLAIMS; TERMINATION OF LIABILITY tions. In case o f a claim under this policy, the Company shall have the 9. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY following additional options: (a) If the Company establishes the Title, or removes the alleged (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Insurance. defect, lien, or encumbrance, or cures the lack of a right ofac- To pay or tender payment of the Amount of Insurance under this cess to or from the Land, or cures the claiin ofUnmarketable policy together with any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses in- Title, all as insured, iii a reasonably diligent manner by any OP-6 ALTA 6-17-06 Owner's Policy Page 4 method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals, no joinder or consolidation with claims or controversies of other it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that persons. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused to any controversy or claim between the Company and the Insured the Insured. arising out of or relating to this policy, any service in connection (b) In the event of any litigation, including litigation by the Com- with its issuanceorthe breachofapolicy provision, orto any other pany or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have controversy or claim arising out of the transaction giving rise to no liability for loss or damage until there has been afinal deter- this policy. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance mination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured. All arbitrable matters when the Amount ofall appeals, adverse to the Title, as insured, of Insurance is in excess of $2,000,000 shall be arbitrated only (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to the when agreed to by both the Company and the Insured. Arbitration Insured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Insured in set- pursuant to tliis policy and under the Rules shall be binding upon tling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the the parties. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) Company. may be entered in any court of competent jurisdiction. 10. REDUCTION OF INSURANCE; REDUCTION OR 15. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS POLICY; POLICY TERMINATION OF LIABILITY ENTIRE CONTRACT All payments under this policy, except payments made for costs, (a) This policy together with all endorsements, if any, attached to attorneys' fees, and expenses, shall reduce the Amount of Insurance it by the Company is the entire policy and contract between the by the amount of the payment. Insured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this 11. LIABILITY NONCUMULATIVE policy, this policy shall be construed as a whole, The Amount of Insurance shall be reduced by any amount the (b) Any claim of loss or damage that arises out of the status ofthe Title or by any action asserting such claim shall be restricted Company pays under any policy insuring a Mortgage to which to this policy, exception is taken in Scliedule B or to which the Insured has agreed, assumed, or taken subject, orwhich is executed by an Insured after (c) Any amendment ofor endorsement to this policy must be in Date of Policy mid which is a charge or lien on the Title, and the writing and authenticated by atiauthorized person, or expressly amount so paid shall be deemed a payment to the Insured under incorporated by Schedule A of this policy. this policy. (d) Each endorsement to this policy issued at any time is made a 12. PAYMENT OF LOSS part of this policy and is subject to all of its terms and provi- sions, Except as the endorsement expressly states, it does not Wite 11 liabilityand theextent ofloss ordainage have been definitely (i) modify any of the terms and provisions of the policy, (ii) fixed in accordance with these Conditions, the payment shall be modify any prior endorsement, (iii) extend the Date of Policy, made within 30 days. or (iv) increase the Amount of Insurance. 13. RIGHTS OF RECOVERY UPON PAYMENT OR 16. SEVERABILITY SETTLEMENT In tile event any provision of this policy, in whole or iii part, is held (a) Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, the policy shall be under this policy, it shall be subrogated and entitled to the deemednot to include that provision or such partheld tobe invalid, rights of the Insured Claimant in the Title and all other rights but all other provisions shall remain in full force and effect, and remedies in respect to the claim that the Insured Claimant has against any person or property, to the extent of the amount 17. CHOICE OF LAW; FORUM of any loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses paid by the (a) Choice of Law: The Insured acknowledges the Company has Company. Ifrequested by the Company, the Insured Claimant undenvritten the risks covered by this policy and determined shall execute documents to evidence the transfer to the Coin- the premium charged therefor in reliance uponthelaw affecting pany of these rights and remedies. The Insured Claimant shall interests iii real property and applicable to the interpretation, permit the Company to sue, compromise, or settle iii the name rights, remedies, or enforcement of policies of title insurance of the Insured Claimant and to use the name of the Insured of the jurisdiction where the Land is located. Claimant in any transaction or litigation involving these rights and remedies. Therefore, the court or an arbitrator shall apply the law of the jurisdiction where the Land is located to determine the validity If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of claims against the Title that are adverse to the Insured and to of the Insured Claimant, the Company shall defer the exercise interpret and enforce the terms of this policy. In neither case of its right to recover until after the Insured Claimant shall have shall the court or arbitrator apply its confiicts of law principles recovered its loss. to determine the applicable law. (b) The Company's right of subrogation includes the rights of the (b) Choice of Forum: Any litigation or otlier proceeding brought Insured to indemnities, guaranties, other policies of insurance, by the 1nsured against the Company must be filed only itt a or bonds, notwithstanding any terms or conditions contained state or federal court within the United States ofAmerica or its in those instruments that address subrogation rights. territories having appropriate jurisdiction. 14. ARBITRATION 18. NOTICES, WHERE SENT Either the Company or the Insured may demand that the claim or Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing controversy shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the Title required to be given to the Company under this policy must be Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Land Title Associa- given to the Company at: Wes(cor Land Title Insurance Company, tion ("Rules'D, Except as provided in the Rules, there shall be Attn.: Claims, 875 ConcourseParkway South, Suite200, Maitland, FL 32751, OP-6 AUTA 6-17-06 Owner's Policy Page 5 ALTA OWNER'S POLICY (6-17-06) WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 i e OWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE HOME OFFICE P 875 Concourse Parkway South, Suite 200 Maitland, FL 32751 ; Telephone: (407) 629-5842 9 @Ned #0!104 9.JOUA\0 90-L l -9 VrlV 9-dO Owner's Policy of Title Insurance - Schedule A Issued by Name and Address of Title Insurance Company: Westcor Land Title Insurance Company, 201 N. New York Avenue, Suite 200, Winter Parks Florida, 32789 State: CO County: PITKIN Address Reference: 61 MEADOWS RD., #6, ASPEN, CO 81611 File No.: PCT24127W2 Policy No.: OP-6-CO1045-3754777 Amount of Insurance: $3,250,000.00 Premium: $ 3,479.00 Date of Policy: August 29, 2014 @ 10:59 AM Simultaneous #: N/A Reinsurance #:OP-6-CO1045-3754777 1. Name of Insured: NSF 1976 INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 2. The estate or interest in the Land that is insured by this policy is: IN FEE SIMPLE 3. Title is vested in: NSF 1976 INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 4. The Land referred to in this policy is described as follows: CONDOMINIUM UNIT 6, THE TRUSTEE TOWNHOMES AT-THE-ASPEN MEADOWS CONDOMINIUMS, according to the Condominium Map thereof recorded February 6, 1996 in Plat Book 39 at Page 16 and First Amendment thereto recorded April 1, 1997 in Plat Book 42 at Page 27 and as defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for The Trustee Townhomes At-The-Aspen Meadows recorded February 6, 1996 as Reception No. 389723 and Amendments thereto recorded April 1,1997 as Reception No. 403007, May 6, 1999 as Reception No. 430736, December 7, 2001 as Reception No. 461578, January 3,2002 as Reception No. 462538 and January 3,2002 as Reception No. 462539 Issued By / Y ' c,/MAJA#A, v Authorized Signatory SCHEDULE B-OWNERS CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY POLICY NUMBER PCT24127W2 August 29, 2014 @ 10:59 AM OP-6-CO1045-3754777 THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession, or claiming to be in possession, thereof. 2. Easements, liens, encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land, and that is not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, imposed by law for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, which lien, or right to a lien, is not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or, (d) water rights, claims or title to water(see additional information page regarding water rights), whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), (c) or (d) are shown for the public records. 6. Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records 7. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, or garbage collection or disposal or other utilities unless shown as an existing lien by the public records. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 8. Taxes and assessments (not including condominium or homeowners association assessments or dues) for the year 2014 and subsequent years only, a lien not yet due and payable. 9. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract or remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted as reserved in United States Patents recorded June 8, 1888 in Book 55 at Page 2, January 8, 1890 in Book 55 at Page 6 and March 28, 1890 in Book 55 at Page 477. (view) 10. Right of the proprjetor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted and right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States as reserved in United States Patent recorded May 3, 1892 in Book 55 at Page 24. (view) 11. Easement and right of way for Septic purposes as set forth in Easement Agreement recorded December 23, 1965 in Book 217 at Page 550. (view) 12. Easement and right of way for Water Transmission Line as set forth in Grant of Easement recorded April 24, 1972 in Book 262 at Page 916. (view) 13. Easement and right of way for Sewer Line as set forth in Easement Agreement recorded June 17, 1970 in Book 249 at Page 13. (view) 14. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations of Agreement Regarding Reservation of Facilities on Meadows Parcel, recorded September 1, 1982 in Book 432 at Page 133. (view) 15. Easement and right of way granted to Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Company, Inc., in instrument recorded August 14,1989 in Book 599 at Page 380. (view) (Continued) POLICY NO. OP-6-CO1045-3754777 CASE NO. PCT24127W2 SCHEDULE B-OWNERS --EXCEPTIONS--CONTINUED- 16. All matters as set forth in Declaration and Grant of Easements and Rights of User recorded January 24,1992 in Book 667 at Page 814. (view) 17. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in "The Aspen Meadows" Specially Planned Area Development & Subdivision Agreement, recorded January 24, 1992 in Book 667 at Page 731. (view) 18. Easements, rights ofway and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject properly recorded January 24,1992 in Plat Book 28 at Page 5 and the Condominium Plat for The Trustee Townhomes At-The-Aspen Meadows recorded February 6, 1996 in Plat Book 39 at Page 16. tviewl 19. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Trench, Conduit, and Vault Agreement recorded July 30, 1992 in Book 684 at Page 887. (view) 20. Easement and right of way for an electric transmission or distribution line or system, as granted to Holy Cross Electric Association, Inc., in instrument recorded in Book 762 at Page 348. (view) 21. Easement and right of way for Sewer Line as set forth in Easement Deed recorded in Book 762 at Page 351. (view) 22. Easement and right of way for Water Line as set forth in Utility Easement Agreement recorded in Book 762 at Page 355, (view) 23. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1991 by Aspen City Council recorded September 30, 1994 in Book 762 at Page 811. (view) 24. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements, restrictions and assessments as set forth in the Condominium Declaration for The Trustee Townhomes At-The-Aspen Meadows recorded February 6, 1996 as Reception No. 389723, and Amendments thereto recorded April 1,1997 as Reception No. 403007, May 6, 1999 as Reception No. 430736, December 7,2001 as Reception No. 461578, January 3, 2002 as Reception No. 462538 and January 3,2002 as Reception No. 462539, deleting therefrom any restrictions indicating preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, refigion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin. (view) 25. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Designation and Assignment of Special Declarant Right recorded February 6, 1996 as Reception No. 389724 (view) 26. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Agreement recorded August 14,1997 as Reception No. 407284 f*yyl 27. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners recorded April 28,2000 as Reception No. 442759 as Resolution No. 23-97. (view) EXCEPTIONS NUMBERED 1 THRU 7 ARE HEREBY DELETED, EXCEPT FOR SUBSECTION (d) UNDER PARAGRAPH NUMBER 5 (WATER RIGHTS). Obligatory Insurance Fraud Statement: We are obligated by Colorado Law (CRS 10-1-128) to provide the following statement: lt is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial or insurance and civil damages. Any insurance coinpany or agent of ati insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete or misleading facts or information to a policy holder or claimant for the purpose of defiÂ·auding or attempting to def'raud the policy holder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado Division of Insurance within the Department of Regulatory Agencies. Wi i P,-4/4Â· Medi- 69 ~OSS ANCId]Ettli~tt:-' P{ A.?INING November 19, 2014 Amy Guthrie City of Aspen Historical Preservation Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado, 81611 Re: Letter of representation - Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhomes - Unit 6 ( Parcel 61) Aspen Meadows, Aspen, Colorado, 81611 Dear Amy, Please accept this letter as my permission to allow the following: Kim Well + Keith Howle + other representatives of Poss Architecture + Planning 605 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado, 8161 1 970-025-4755 To act on my behalf for the Conceptual and Final HPC application and approval process for the project referenced below. The property In question is described as follows: Physical Address: 61 Meadows Road, Aspen, Colorado, 81611 Subdivislon: Trustee TWH @ Aspen Meadows: Unit 6 Parcel ID# 273512239006 Sincerely, 166091Â£20 Nancy Furlottl Owner of Unit 6 Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhomes Aspen, Colorado, 81611 805 EAS1 MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 0)070/020-4755 (f) 970/920 2950 WWW.BILLPOSS.COM t . Th<2*MEAT 7 ~]OSS ANCi{Il l.(; 1111<1 !11 fli.11Â·nt.,4, November 21, 2014 Amy Simon City of A::pen Historie:,1 Pregenvition Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado, 816 It Re: Letter of Understanding Regarding I:inancial Asstir;ince Dear Amy, Please accept this letter As my understanding that as my project is submitted for n bt,ilding perinit evidence of the finaticial ability to lilidertake the safe exenvation :md <inderpinning, pre:tenÂ·ation, and rei)air of the building. I ftirther understand that A letter of credit or cashier's check in the alliolint of $30,000 is Irpically required to be posted with the City during the excin'Ation process. The property in question is described ns Ibllows: Pliysicpil Ackiress: 61 Meadows Romicl, Aspen, Colorado, 816 I t Subdivision: Trustee TWIÂ·1 00 Aspen Meadows: Unit 6 Parcel ll)/1 273512239006 Sincerely, *A.*7witto Nm,Ty 1~*,1 lor~i Owner of Unit 6 Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhomes Aspen, Colorado, 81611 605 EAST MAIN STREEI ASPEN CO 8161 l (11 970/925Â·4755 m 070/970-2958 WW\A, All I Pr-15:A r:nA! + ADM MENT 1 poss ARCI]ITECTURE+PLANNING \ a \ I %4 Castle Creek ,- ~~Â·Â·=.:~ f . 4 1 . 4?th- 1 1 t, Sfaughte/house 6 OD/ch f 2 11 k j- L ' i . 0 Â· 7. It . fled Suite- . .1.4. i Fy ''' lâ€¢ '. 0 - a . ./-1-f- -741- : 2 .3 4 - 0 1.1 -- . /+P IE]-b . I .1 1 -'84â€¢26 - ' -1 .1 1 . - 6 Rd ''1 . 9 'R- . ., ...... 30. 6 0 ... IL , .-.... . : >41>a /.1 * 2*0 ] ral *'' 1 - 7%- - $ '1 . l .â€ž 1 r. ..1, 00 . . ..: MADI - '1 441,4 -,1 4 '16,5,8,4 Â£50 1 216 Ill 1 . -i... 14 0. /5 1 .9 - ./ Â·... 7Â¥k, ~ . 01 i j ~1... .,4 . / .4*. f ~411 b. . . .. .'Gillespie.AN. . i: k.li.-9 z P.< .2-.2Lf.:.1,14iI#P..... 0- /Â·h,nt:br<rilk.4 1 @2 1 1Â·'Â· AI.!! ;,1,- ff ~ -t*~941'fil - -.1Â£---~64 --, ~ 1.1 c Â· :f st?~4*444* .4 lio.klen Ma,oft'Mining 7 ' \ ;6 ~ ' ./f ir: GE 644~2. t~~~' 3(; & Ra~nching Mus'eum U j 0 -9 --4 Â·-- 4.*idu,,2 ~ '.. *14014- i Â· , '% . , 1 .'' , . Â·i,' Ilotewerome, -AncÂ® A,.5 , , t- 0?- Ai;lial;Alâ€¢ Dâ€¢'A,1... -' 1 Vicinity Map for 6i Meadows Road, Aspen, Colorado, 81611 --twaroon-Veek Prri ,-*Mart- 10 ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (t) 970/925-4755 (f) 970/920-2950 MEMORANDUM TO: Amy Guthrie City ofAspen HPC Chainvoinan CC: File FROM: Keith Howie Bill Poss and Associates Architecture and Planning, P,C. DATE: November 19, 2014 RE: Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhome Remodel U ENCLOSURE Unit 6, Aspen Meadows SPA Aspen, Colorado, 81611 1. Project Location The project is Unit 6, (Parce] 61), at the Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhome complex in Aspen, Colorado, 2. Legal Address The legal address of the property is: Subdivision: Trustee Townhome at Aspen Meadows: Unit 6 3. Project History The original Aspen Meadows buildings were constructed 1959-65. In 1992 a Special Planned Area (SPA) was submitted to the City of Aspen which outlined specific FAR and zoning requirements forthe entire SPA area. A copy of the PUD creating the SPA can be provided upon request. 4. Neighborhood Context The townhome complex sits in the within the Aspen meadows complex, located in the west end of Aspen. The trustee townhome complex was constructed in 1959 with eight units in the original structure. These units were constructed as separate units with flat roof forms over the carport areas that joined the units together. The unit to be remodeled was part of these original eight units. Three units (1 to the south and two units to the north of the original structure) were added in 1992. 5. New Development This project invo[ves the renovation of the interior and partial exterior of the townhome unit, the addition of 159Â·03 square feet of new floor area outside of the exterior boundary walls of the original structure, and the renovation of the back deck and stairs. The original Floor Area Ratio (FAR) as calculated by COA current standards is 1892.12 square feet (sf). The new FAR is 2160.38, a gain of 368.26 sf. ~OSS ARCH[TECTURE+PLANNING New Development Description The unit to be remodeled (unit 6) sits in between units 5 and 7 in a party wall configuration. Please refer to the site plan. As HPC is concerned with the exterior of the designated, the new development can be broken down into the following areas: A. Eastside ofunit- Front entryand carport B. South side of unit-Open air hallwayto backdeckof unit 6, flatroof connection to unit 5 C. West side of unit- Backof unit with exterior deck and stairs to grade D. West side of unit - Open airhallwayto backdeckof unit 7, flat roof connection with unit 7 A. East side of unit- Frontentivand carport * Front Door design - The front door design will be changed. Please refer to the east elevation. We believe that the existing front door is not historic. The front doors (and some sidelights) of other units have been changed. * Removal of existing mud room door- The existing mud room door will be removed and replaced with siding to match the original siding. * New dormer and window addition - We are proposing to enlarge the living room on the west side of the unit. To accomplish this, we must create a roof over the living room. In keeping with the vernacular of the existing roof forms and roof pitches, we have extended the existing roof form over the new portion of the living room. This roof form extends to the side of the original exterior wall of the unit. We feel that this is an appropriate way to resolve this roof condition and is in keeping with the established forms of the existing unit. The only time this form would be visible would be when viewing the unit from a considerable distance away, As you get closer to the unit, the flat roof atthe carportcuts offthe view angle tothis element. B. South side of unit - Open air hallwayto back deck of unit 6, flat roof connection to unit 5 * Small rectangular window on Upper level - This existing window on upper level will be relocated approximately 18"to the west * Addition to mechanical and mud room volume - We are expanding the mud room area west approximately two feet to allow the placement of a bedroom in the existing mud room space. The exterior door to the existing mechanical room will be removed and replaced with a BBQ area with storage above. Please refer to the existing and new main level floor plan. The fenestration on this element will be horizontal 1><4 wood siding, painted white to match the existing siding. * New dormer and window addition - We are proposing to enlarge the living room on the west side of the unit. To accomplish this, we must create a roof over the living room. In keeping with the vernacular of the existing roof forms and roof pitches, we have extended the existing roof form over the new portion of the living room. This roof form extends to the side of the original exterior wall of the unit. We feel that this is an appropriate way to resolve this roof condition and is in keeping with the established forms of the existing unit. The view shown in the elevation will never be visible as the elevation view would be inside unit 5. * Addition to living room volume - The Living room area will be increased by approximately four feet, six inches (43-6"). The new living room wall will have new fenestration on the south wall. Please refer to the existing and proposed south elevations. ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING C. West side of unit- Backof unit with exteriordeck and stairs to grade * Addition to mud room volume - We are expanding the mud room volume west approximately two feet (2") to allow the placement of a bedroom in the existing mud room space, Two existing windows will be removed and replaced by different window fenestration on the west wall. The existing vertical wood siding will be used forthis volume. * Addition to living room volume - The Living room area will be increased by approximately four feet, six inches (4'-69 to the south. The existing roof form over the living room will be continued over the new living room addition. A fireplace will be added to the west wall and new fenestration will replace the existing fenestration. A new window will be added in the dining room area. Please refertothe existing and proposed west elevations. * New Light well -With the addition of a basement to the unit, we have created a new light well to bring light intothis area. This light well will have a painted steel grate and access hatch percode for egress. * New stairs - With the addition of the new light well, the existing stairs will be replaced with new stairs in a different configuration. Please refer to the proposed plans and elevations. * Renovated exterior deck - The existing deck will be resurfaced and an outdoor firepit added to the exterior edge of the deck. We will be raising the grade at the deck edge approximately twelve (12") inches to be within thirty inches (30") from existing grade 50 a railing will not be necessary along the deck edge. A railing will be provided along the new stairs. * New upper level dormer element - To take advantage of the views southeast to Highlands ski area and Buttermilk we are proposing a dormer element that encloses and office. This dormer is the same pitch as the existing sections of the house. Please refertothe plans and sections. HPC Design Guidelines Chapter i Streetscape and Lot Features 1.1 Preserve original fences Existing: Front of unit - There currently does not exist any fencing in thefront of the unit. Back of unit - There currently exists a black metal railing with vertical balustrades. This railing does not look to be historic. Proposed: Front of unit - No railing forthe front of the unit Back of unit - The proposed design elevates grade/deck connection approximately twelve inches (12"- less than a 30" step to grade) to allow for removal of the existing ailing from back deck. Railing only occurs at stair to grade. Stair to grade will be stainless steel stanchion posts with a diagonal stainless steel cable forthe balustrades. 1.2 Replacement Fences Existing: Front of unit - There currently does notexist anyfencing in thefront of the unit. Back of unit - There currently exists a black metal railing with vertical balustrades. We believe that this railing is not historic. Proposed: Front of unit - No railing is proposed atthe front of the unit Back of unit - The proposed design elevates grade/deck connection approximately twelve inches (12"). Per code (less than a 30" step to grade) allows for the removal of the existing railing from back deck. ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING 1.3 Transparent Fencing See section i.2 above 1.4 New Fence Components See section 1,2 above 1.5 Side Yard Fences Existing: The existing design is an attached townhome design where the east and west walls are party walls. There are no side yards on unit 6. Proposed: See above. There are no side yards on unit 6. 1.6 Replacement of Side yard Fencing See section i.5 above Retaining walls 1.7 Preserve original retaining walls Existing: The only retaining wail occurs at the back exterior deck. Proposed: This retaining wall does notchange. 1.8 Maintain Historic height Existing: The only retaining wall occurs at the back exterior deck. Proposed: The height of this retaining wall does not change. Walkways 1.9 Maintain the established progression of public to private spaces. Existing: There currently exists a 2 car carport at the Font entry of the unit. You access the front door to the unitthrough the carport. Proposed: The existing entry location andtwo carcarport does not change. Private Yard 1.10 Preserve Historic Elements of the yard. Existing: In the front (Entry side) of the unit there is a large boulder and some small pine and aspen trees. In the rear of the unit there is a continuous public yard area behindthe complex, and each unit has a private b exterior deck. In the current townhome configuration, each unit has a small walkway between the units that lead to the back decks. There are no side yards. Proposed: The yard at the front of the unit shall remain the same. There are no historic elements in this front yard area. The public yard area at the back of the unit shall remain the sarne. 1.11 Preservation of mature landscaping. Existing: In the front (Entry side) of the unit there are some small pine and aspen trees. in the back of the unit there are some mature Aspen trees running along the length of the building and in the planter areas on each deck. In the current townhome configuration, there are only small walkways between the units and no side yards. Proposed: The existing trees sha]1 remain at the front of the unit. The existing mature Aspen trees at the back of the unit and on the exteriordeck shall remain the same. No existing trees will be removed. 1.12 Maintain Historic planting designs Existing: There are no historic planting designs. Proposed: The existing landscaping shall remain as is. ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING 1.13 Revisions should be consistent with Historic context See section 1.12 above 1.14 Additions to the landscape interfering with Historic elements Existing: There are no landscape elements interfering with historic elements. Proposed: No landscape elements that would obscure the original unit will be planted. Please refertothe plans forthe back deck configuration. Site Lighting 1.15 Minimize the effects of site lighting Existing: The lighting at the front of the unit consists of surface mounted lighting on the north wall to the main entry. We believe that this style of light (coach lantern) is not original. The lighting at the back of the unit is surface mounted lights at the exterior deck. We believe that this lighting is not original. Proposed: The existing lighting will be replaced with surface mounted lights that are more in keeping with the original design of the structure. These lights will conform to the City of Aspen lighting code. Please refer to the lighting cut sheet that is provided with this package. Streetscape 1.16 Preserve historically significant landscape designs and features Existing: There are no historically significant landscape designs and features in the vicinity of the unit. Proposed: The landscape area aroundthe unitshall remain as is. 1.17 Maintain historic irrigation ditches Existing: There are no irrigation ditches in the vicinity of the unit. Proposed: There are no irrigation ditches inthe vicinity of the unit. Chapter 2 - Historic Building Materials 2.1 Preserve original building materials Existing: The current building materials are stained cedar shingle siding and painted vertical wood siding. Please refer to existing elevations. Proposed: All existing materials will be maintained on the entry (east) fagade. The new additions will be clad in the same materials as the original. Please refer to the proposed elevations and perspectives. 2.2 Protect wood features from deterioration Existing: The existing residence is modern in design and has minimal wood features. Proposed: The proposed renovation will replicate the existing wood features on the new roof fascia and trim conditions. Please referto the proposed elevations and perspectives. 2.3 Plan repainting carefully Existing: The current building has sections that were stained and painted. Please refer to existing elevations. Proposed: All existing materials will be re-stained or re-painted (using existing colors) using approved construction practices. ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING 2.4 Brick or stone that was not painted historically should be not be painted Existing: The current building does not have any brick. There is an existing random pattern stone veneer wall at the back of the exteriordeck. This is not original to the structure. Proposed: The existing stone veneer wall will be removed. A stone base will be added to the west exteriordeck. A stone material sample photo is included in this package for review. 2.5 Repair deteriorated primary building materials by patching, piecing -in, consolidating or otherwise reinforcing the material. Existing: The current building materials have been maintained and are in good condition. Proposed: Best construction practices will be used to tie the new additions to the existing structure. 2.6 Maintain masonry walls in good condition Existing: There are no masonry walls in the project. Please refer to existing elevations. Proposed: This section is not-applicable 2.7 Match the original material in composition, scale, and finish when replacing materials on primary surfaces. Existing: The current building materials are stained cedar shingle siding and painted vertical wood siding. Please refer to existing elevations. Proposed: All existing materials will be maintained on the entry (east) fagade. The new additions will be clad in the same materials as the original. Please refer to the proposed elevations and perspectives. 2.8 Do not use synthetic materials as replacements for primary building materials. Existing: See section 2.7 Proposed: See section 2.7 2.9 Covering the original building materials with new materials is inappropriate. Existing: The current building materials are stained cedar shingle siding and painted vertical wood siding. Please refer to existing elevations Proposed: No original materials will be covered with new materials. 2.10 Consider removing later covering materials that have not achieved historic significance. Existing: The current building materials are original. . Proposed: This section is not applicable. Chapter q - Windows 3.1 Preserve the functional and decorativefeatures of a historic window. Existing: We believe the original building was built in 1958-60. They used the most modern window profile that was available at the time of construction. They did not use a historic type window, thus this section does not apply. Proposed: This section is notapplicable. ~OSS ARCHITECTURE +PLANNING 3.2 Preserve the position, number, and arrangement of historic windows in a building wall. Existing: On the east, north, and south elevations we believe that current window pattern is original. On the west elevation, we believe that the window pattern is not original. Most of the units have been altered so it is difficult to tell what is original,and what is not. Please refer to the existing unit photos. Proposed: We are proposing that the windows on the east and south elevations remain the in the current arrangement. We are proposing a new window on the north wall in the office and new windows (and pattern) on the west elevation. Please refer to the new elevations. 3.3 Preserve the historic ratio of window openings to solid wall on afagade. Existing: On the east, north, and south elevations we believe that current window pattern is original. On the west elevation, we believe that the window pattern is not original. Most of the units have been altered so it is diJDcult to tell what is original and what is not. (Please refer to the existing unit photos). Proposed: We are proposing that the ratio of window openings to solid wall on the east, and south elevations remain the same. We are proposing a new ratio of window openings to solid wall on the north and westelevations. Please refer tothe new elevations. 3.4 Match a replacement window to the original in its design. Existing: On the east and south elevations we believe that current window pattern is original. On the west elevation, we believe that the window pattern is not original. Most of the units have been altered so it is difficult to tell what is original and what is not. Proposed: If the windows on the east and south elevation are replaced, they will be replaced with as close a replacement profile as possible. The new windows on the north and west elevations will have a similarprofile to keepthe lookconsistent. 3.5 IN a replacement window, use materials that appear similar to the original. Existing: See section 3.4 Proposed: See section 3.4 3.6 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening. Existing: On the east, north, and south elevations we believe that current window pattern is original. On the west elevation, we believe thatthe window pattern is not original. Proposed: We are proposing to keep the size and proportion of the historic window openings on the east, north, and south elevations. These are the only elevations that are visible from the public entry areas. We are proposing a new ratio of window openings to solid wall on the west elevation to open up this area to the view. Please refer to the new elevations. 31 Match, as closely as possible,the profile of the sash and its components to that of the original window. Existing: We believe the original building was built in 1958-60. They used the most modern window profile that was available at the time of construction. Proposed: The proposed window profile will match the existing profile as closely as possible. ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING 3.8 Use a storm window to enhance energy conservation rather that to replace a historic window. Existing: Storm windows were not used on this project, therefore this section does not appty. Proposed: This section does notapply. Chapter4 -Doors 4.1 Preserve historically significant doors. Existing: We believe that all the existing doors are not original. Proposed: The doorto the existing mud room will be removed. The front door and the door to the upper level balcony on the east elevation will be replaced with doors that will be designed in a style appropriate to the early 1960's when the building was constructed. The doors on the west elevation that is not visible from the public access area are not significant historically and will be designed to match the proposed new window pattern. Please referto the proposed elevations 4.2 Maintain the original size of a door and its opening. Existing: We believe that all the existing doors are not original. Proposed: The door to the existing mud room will be removed. The front door and the door to the upper level balcony on the east elevation will be replaced with doors that are the current opening size. The doors on the west elevation that is not visible from the public access area will be designed to match the proposed new window pattern. Please refer to the proposed elevations. 4,3 When a historic door is damaged, repair it and maintain its general historic appearance. Existing: Please refer to Section 4.1. Proposed: Please refer to Section 4.1. 4.4 If a new screen door is used, it should be in character with the primary door. Existing: We believe that all the existing doors are not origjnal. We can't determine if there ever were screen doors. Proposed: If screen door are desired by the owner, we wil! design the screen doors to be in the same characteras the primarydoor. 4.5 When replacing a door, use a design that has an appearance similar to the original door or a door associated with the style of the house. Existing: We believe that all the existing doors are not original and we will replace the doors. Proposed: The door to the existing mud room will be removed. The front door and the door to the upper level balcony on the east elevation will be replaced with doors that will be designed in a style appropriate to the early 1960's when the building was constructed. The doors on the west elevation that is not visible from the public access area are not significant historically and will be designed to match the proposed new window pattern. Please refer to the proposed elevations ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING 4.6 If energy constrvation and heat loss are concern, consider using a storm door instead of replacing a historic entry door. Existing: As far as we could discern, storm doors were not used on this project and we will not be using them, therefore this section does not apply. Proposed: This section does not apply. Chapter 5 -Porches The design of the existing and proposed unit does not contain a front or back porch. Entry is accomplished through a carport to the main entry. As we do not have a porch, this section does not applytothe project. Chapter 6 - Architectural Details The design of the existing and proposed does not contain extensive architectural details. The unit was built in the early sixties in a modern style that minimized architectural ornamentation and details instead or expressing them. The proposed addition will continue the use of the same profiles, proportions, and joinery as the existing unit. We want the additions to appear as a seamless extension of the original unit. Chapter 7 - Roofs 7.1 Preserve the original roofform of a roofÂ· Existing: The existing roof form consists Of a series of 3/12 stoped shed volumes. Please refer to the existing elevations. Proposed: There are two roof additions. These roof additions were designed to as closely as possible match the existing roof slope, proportion, and materials. a. Entry roof- this roof continues the existing slope of the main living room roof over the new addition. This is most clearly detailed in the proposed south elevation. b. Office addition - This roof is in the same slope as the rest of the unit. This roof is most clearly detailed in the proposed north and south elevations. 7.2 Preserve the original eave depth Existing: All the existing eaves are plumb cut at various depths. Proposed: The proposed eaves will match the depth and cut of the existing eaves. 78 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. Existing: There are no skylights or rooftop devices on the project. Proposed: There are no skylights or rooftop devices proposed forthis project. 7Â·4 A new chimney should be the same scale as those used historically. Existing: There are no chimneys on the project. Proposed: We are proposing a new living room gas fireplace, but it will have a side vent and no chimney. 7.5 Preserve original chimneys, even if they are to be made non-functional. Existing: Thereare no chimneys on the project. Proposed: We are proposing a new living room gas fireplace, but it will have a side vent and no chimney. ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING 7.6 When planning a rooftop addition, preserve the overall appearance of the original roofÂ· Existing: The existing roofform consists of a series of 3/12 sloped shed volumes. Please refer to the existing elevations. Proposed: There are two roof additions. These roof additions were designed to match the existing roof slope, proportion, and materials. 7.7 A new dormer should remain subordinate to the historic roof in scale and character. Existing: There are no dormers on the project. Please refer to the existing elevations. Proposed: The office addition is considered its own roofform and not a dormer. 7.8 Preserve original roof materials. Existing: The existing roof consists ofacedar shingles. Please refer tothe existing elevations. Proposed: There new roof will be new cedar shingles in the same pattern as the existing roof. 7.9 New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color, and texture similar to those used traditionally. Existing: See section 7-8 Proposed: See section 7.8 7.10 if it is to be used, a metal roof should be applied and detailed in a manner that is compatible and does not detractfrom the historic appearance of the building. Existing: See section 7-8 Proposed: See section 7.8 7.11 Avoid using conjecturalfeatures on a roof. Existing: See section 7.8 Proposed: See section 7.8 Chapter 8 - Secondary Structures This project consists of a sing[e townhome within a complex of eight units. There are no secondary structures so this section does not applyto this project. Chapter 9-Building Relocation & Foundations This project consists of a single townhome within a complex of eight units. The unit will not be relocated and is not moving from its current location so this section does not apply to this project. Chapter 10- Building Additions Existing Additions 10.1 Preserve and older addition that has achieved historic significance in its own right Existing: We think that there was one addition to the original structure. This was an addition to the mudroom area which extended the back carport wall into the carport by 5'-6". Proposed: This square footage of this addition will be incorporated into the new design. This massing occurs beneath the flat cat-port roof so the overall roof massing will not change. The second door that was added in a prior addition will be removed. This will leave one entry door into the unit. We thinkthis is how the unit was originally designed. ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING 10.2 A more recent addition that is not historically significant may be removed Existing: Please refer to section 10.1 Proposed: Please referto section 10.1 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building it maintained Existing: In the front of the building there was an addition made to the west wall of the carport from and undetermined time. A cosmetic (no changes on wall locations) renovation was made to the interior of the unit at some point in the past, but we do not know exactly when this was done. We think that the original windows were changed also. We do not know if the window fenestration on the rear of the unit is in its original pattern or has been changed. From observation, the majority of the units have had renovations and additions done to the rear of the units, making it hard to discern the pattern of the original window fenestration, Proposed: A) The old addition at the front of the unit will be incorporated into the new design. This massing occurs beneath the flat carport roof so the overall roof massing will not change. The second door that was added in a prior addition will be removed. This will leave one entrydoorintothe unit.We thinkthis is how the unit was originallydesigned. B) In the rear of the unit the south wai[ of the existing living room and the west wall of the existing mud and laundry room area will be relocated to make the spaces larger to fit the program elements of the proposed design. In the living room, the roof form of the living room will be carried over the new living room space. A flat roof over the existing mud/laundry space will cover the new proposed square footage in this area. We have designed these 2 roof elements in this way to keep the form of the new roof consistent with the massing of the existing unit. At the upper level we have added a reverse dormer to the massing. We have kept the pitch of the roof with same as the other roof pitches in the unit and complex. Given the wide discrepancy of additions that have been made to the rear of many of the units, we feelthatthe additions made tothe rear of this unit still allow one to interpretthe historjc character of the unit. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time Existing: There was an addition made to the front of the unit at an unknown time. There was a cosmetic interior renovation made to the unit at an unknown time. Proposed: We feel the fenestration pattern of the new windows at the rear of the unit read as a product of its own time and that the proposed roof forms still allow one to see the original form of the unit. The renovation to the back of the unit does not have the room to be separated from the original unit so it does not make sense to make the renovation a product of its own time. ~OSS ARCI-Ill-ECTURE +PLANNING 10.5 When planning an addition to a building in a historic district, preserve historic alignments that may exist on the street Existing: The existing building complex has a radiating unit alignment pattern. Please refer to the site plan. Proposed: The proposed design does not change the existing alignment pattern. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building Existing: The current unit is approximately 1892 s.t Proposed: The new addition increases the existing footprint of the unit by 159 sf. We feel that the proposed addition/renovation is compatible in size and scale with the main building. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than the historic building, set it back substantiatly from the significantfacades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. Existing: The proposed unit is part of an eleven unit townhome building, eight of which are joined together. Therefore a connector is not appropriate to this type of design. Proposed: The proposed unit is part of an eleven unit townhome building, eight of which are joined together. Therefore a connector Ts not appropriate to this type of design. 10.8 Place an addition atthe rear of abuilding or set it backfrom the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent ~ Existing: In the front Of the building there was an addition made to the west wall of the carport from and undetermined time. A cosmetic (no changes on wall locations) renovation was made to the interior of the unit at some point in the past, but we do not know exactly when this was done. We think that the original windows were changed also. We do not know if the window fenestration on the rear of the unit is in its original pattern or has been changed. From observation, the majority of the units have had renovations and additions done to the rear of the units, making it hard to discern the pattern of the original window fenestration Proposed: Front of Unit - The front of the unit will remain the same save for the removal of one door on the west wall of the carport, This will leave one entry door into the unit. We think this is how the unit was originally designed. A portion of new roof that encloses the new addition to the living room will be visible from the front. Please refer to the perspective views of the front of the unit. Rear of Unit - In the rear of the unit the south wall of the existing living room and the west wall of the existing mud and laundry room area will be relocated to make the spaces larger to fit the program elements of the proposed design. !n the living room, the roof form of the living room will be carried over the new living room space. A flat roof overthe existing mud/laundry space will cover the new proposed square footage in this area. We have designed these 2 roof elements in this way to keep the form of the new roof consistent with the massing of the existing unit. At the upper level we have added a reverse dormer to the massing. We have kept the pitch of the roof with same asthe other roof pitches in the unitand complex. ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING In the design of the proposed unit we have returned the front elevation (removal of mud room door) to the original design and limited all the major visual impact to the rear ofthe unit. 10.9 Roof forms should besimilartothose of the historic building. Existing: The existing roofforms of the unit are shed andflat roof forms. Proposed: The additions tothe unit mimicthe roofforms of the original structure. The living room roof form carries the existing roof over the new addition. The mud room roof form carries the existing roof form over the new addition. The office roof form mimics the pitch ofthe existing roofs of the unit. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features Existing: The only important architectural features could be the shingle/siding detailing, rooffascia/ wall transition, and the deck detailing at the front of the unit Proposed: None of these existing details will be changed ordisturbed. 10.11 On a new addition, use exter}or materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. Existing: On the existing unit there is white painted vertical wood siding and stained wood shingle siding. Proposed: The new additions will carry the use of the existing materials onto the new masses and will usethe same type of detailing between materials asthe existing unit. Rooftop Additions 10.12 When constructing a rooftop addition, keep the mass and scale subordinate to that of a historic building Existing: There is no rooftop deck or architectural element in the current unit. Proposed: There is no roof deck or any other architectural rooftop element proposed in this renovation. 10.13 Set a rooftop addition back from the front of the building. Existing: There is no rooftop deck or architectural element in the current unit. Proposed: There is no roof deck or any other architectural rooftop element proposed in this renovation. 10.14 The roof form and slope of the new addition should be in character with the historic building Existing: The existing roofforms ofthe unit are shed andflat roofforms. Proposed: The additions tothe unit mimic the roof forms of the original structure. The living room roofform carries the existing roof form over the new addition. The mud room roofform carries the existing roof form over the new addition. The office roof form mimics the pitch of the existing rooft of the unit. Please refer to the perspectives views. ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING Summation The majority of the units in this complex have been remodeled within the lasttwenty to twenty-five years. The majority of the development has been performed on the back of these units. (Please refer to the existing unit photos) The front of these units have remained relatively unchanged save for design changes to the original front doors and the additions of side lights to some units. These units were originally designed to be used for visiting lecturers or academics that were at the institute for a short or extended period oftime. The unit design allowed for the top floor to be locked offfrom the main floor if two non-associated people were using the unit. Both groups would use the common mid-level entry into the unit. Since the units have been sold and are now used as single familytownhomes. In this proposal we are proposing to renovate the entire unit to more effectively use the space as a single familytownhome. We will return the front of the unitto what we think wastheoriginal design. There have been numerous re-designs to the rear of these units and the cohesive design statement across the entire original building has been somewhat compromised. We feel that by placing all the development to the rear of the unit and by keeping the massing and roof forms similar to the original structure, we are keeping the historic resource intact. We ask that HPC grant conceptual approval of this project. F,â‚¬ - -- - - 1...11 - Submitted, C Keith'Howie, Poss Architecture + Planning Authorized representative for NSF 1976 Trust, LLC. 1. r J'rke.Hmetr It S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Building Department C/O Keith Howie Foss Architecture + Planning 605 East Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 From: Stephen K Peightal PE Date: November 26, 2014 Re: Basement Addition Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhouse 61 Aspen, Colorado My office has been contacted by Keith Howie of Poss Architecture, to provide professional engineering services for the above referenced project. We will submit our standard letter of agreement to provide the following services: 1- Observation of existing structure during demolition phase. 2- Design of temporary shoring and permanent underpinning structure. 3- Design and Documents for any additional permanent structural items. 4- Observation during new structural construction with Field Reports. I have reviewed Architectural remodel documents prepared by Poss Architecture. These documents define the intent to provide basement space at the current crawlspace. To help define existing structure, engineers with my office will observe the existing spaces prior to finalizing the shoring and underpinning design. Conceptually, this project involves opening the foundation at the east side, on Grid-5, for access into the crawlspace. Shoring of existing framing systems above will allow for this access. Excavation and staging of underpinning around the foundation perimeter is to be approached from the interior excavated space. The existing foundation walls to the north and south are understood as not common to the neighboring units, however, the foundation walls for those units are in close proximity. By approaching this underpinning process as opening and building small foundation sections incrementally from the inside, the bearing soil stability for all units is maintained. Soil properties and design recommendations will be provided to my office by a soils engineer. Conclusion My office has begun the design process for this underpinning project. Find attached Concept sheets to define our construction approach to this phase of work. We have used this approach successfully on many prior similar projects, including those with much older foundations of less integrity. Please contact my office with any questions. 14076 SKPE â€¢ 298 Park Avenue â€¢ #301 â€¢ Basalt CO â€¢ 81621 â€¢ (970) 927-9510 â€¢ skpe@sopris.net 2 PLACE STEEL CHANNEL BHORINe ~ BEAMS BOTH SIDES OF EXISTING 0 7 EXISTING FLOOR / COLUMN, TIGHT TO BOTTOM OF FRAMING TO REMAIN ~ EXISTING 611*ER. PER SHORING PLAN. 1 + lim 7 \ EXISTING 1 211_- FOUNDATION 74 1=m Â· . 1 11- EXISTING COLUMN 4 L 14 EXISTINe GIRPER 4 PAD 1 14. A . A 1 --4 4 1 -4. .: r .9. 1 41WlfimITMnammn-Clr~lu*EiEE:Â§-rai:imriÂ£Ll- - 1 UUm!-if~Â¥EE~mEmarr--- \_ SPAN SHORINe BEAM EXTERIOR FOUNDATION TO EXTERIOR FOUNDATION. BOLT CHANNEL TO MALL 4 BEAR ON FOOTINe. ~ INTERIOR SHORINS - STEP I @ |/2'=I'.O" 140-16 ISSUED: S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd CONCEPT SHEET: 26 NOV '14 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS BASEMENT ADDITION 01.1 DRAWN: 298 Park Avenue Unit 301 RTE Basalt, Colorado 81621 ASPEN MEADOW #61 op: (970) 927-9510 skpe@sopris.net ASPEN, COLORADO 0 4 ~3><1 1.1 11= I .11 4 4 EXCAVATE INTERIOR 1. ~ ' I.:,1 A. 4 , 5 z ~~ SEE UNDERPINNING DETAIL O|, ... .1 1 L..214.-1 Â«d REMOVE COLUMN 4 PAD 1 BELOW SNORING BEAM 1 [mulj - ---liMil-WrniurrAW'LurrFU-trf"'iTi"'memIBITIWI, 111 ~ INTERIOR SHORING - STEP 2 @ 1/2'=I'-0" 14076 ISSUED: S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd CONCEPT SHEET: 20 NOV '14 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS BASEMENT ADDITION 01.2 DRAWN: 298 Park Avenue Unit 301 RTE Basalt, Colorado 81621 ASPEN MEADOM #61 OF: (970) 927-9510 skpe@sopris.net ASPEN, COLORADO 8 1 EXISTINe FLOOR 1 FRAMING TO REMAIN 2:SLL_ 4 EXCAVATE TO FÂ©RKINS PLATFORM. -E!11 0 . /~1 SLOPE UP TO EXISTING FOOTING IV TO 2H 111= . 4 AS REQUIRED Irri" 4. A. A B. (E) FOOTINS< V.1.F. U EXISTING < 2 -.* -31 1 FOUNDATION PLATFORM ~ EXOAVATE TO EDGE ,,0/Tlf*Tit2n-2-1 1 OF EXISTING FOOTINS. ./6"-111-1, 1 a.11 26 11=. 1- Ell I : B. UNDERPINNING~ 0 I I--1- '11-11 lEi I 1- 5EE PLAN STEP h EXCAVATE TO WORKING PLATFORM. EXUAVATE APPROXIMATELY 4 TO 6 FEET MIDE TRENCHES AS SECTION (D ON PLAN. LEAVE UNDISTURBED MIL SECTIONS 4 TO 6 FEET PlIDE BETWEEN FOR MALL SUPPORT. SHORE TRENCH PER GOVERNING REQUIREMENTS TO PREVENT COLLAPSE. UNDERPINN INS - STEP I 9 1/20=1'-011 I4O16 ISSUED: S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd CONCEPT SHEET: 26 NOV '14 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS BASEMENT ADDITION 01.3 DRAWN: 298 Park Avenue Unit 301 RTE Basalt, Colorado 81621 ASPEN MEADOM #61 OF: (970) 927-9510 skpe@sopris.net ASPEN, COLORADO 8 L 1 #5 VERTICAL POPEL @ 160 O.G. DRILL AND ~1EPOXY 3" INTO BOTTOM EXISTINe FOOTING. 1 mut Â· d 4 ..RiA B. (E) FOOTINe~ V.I.F. 1. a ..4 .{ I K. 2- VERIFY 16'< OR 6REATER ~. EQ ;EGI,-4~\ 1 . -7Â»4- 11~11 f 1 1 . . 1-\ 0/ \ 7 115 VERTIGAL @ 8' 0.6. %7â‚¬91*7 U -9 DRIVE 10' INTO SOIL BOTTOM FOR LAP MITH FINAL ~ | #5 HORIZONTAL @ 8" 0.6 Ll DRIVE 160 INTO SOIL SIDES FOR LAP MITH FINAL STEP 2: PLACE REINFORCING. FORM INTERIOR FACE IN LINE MITH FACE OF EXISTINe FOOTINe ABOVE. POUR SECTION TIGHT TO SOIL. USE MECHANICAL VIBRATION FOR PROPER CONSOLIDATION. HOLD POUR 3" To 6" BELOW BOTTOM OF EXISTING FOOTINe. CONGRETE DESIGNED FOR 3000 P51 COMPREEIVE STRENGTH. USE 4000 P51 MIX TO HASTEN DURING. ~ UNDERPINNING - STEP 2 @ I/2"=I'-0' 14076 ISSUED: S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd CONCEPT SHEET: 26 NOV '14 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS BASEMENT ADDITION 01.4 DRAWN: 298 Park Avenue Unit 301 RTE Basalt, Colorado 81621 ASPEN MEADOM #61 oF: (970) 927â€ž9510 skpe@sopris. net ASPEN, COLORADO 8 U '"... 2=51. 4 lan.. lilli; f t. .1 U ... B. (E) FOOTI)!6,* V.I.F. Â£ 4 # : . . Ill Ill 11 1 4 V . b. f 1/4. 1- 4 4.4 -111%11121117 STEP 9: AFTER 3 DAY CURE AT ABOVE FREEZING TEMPERATURE5, REMOVE FORM AND PACK NON-SHRINK eROUT FULL AREA BETWEEN EXISTING FOOTINe AND UNDERPINNING. AFTER GROUT CURED, EXOAVATE SOIL BETMEEN UNDERPINNING AS SEETION Â® ON PLAN. REPEAT STEPS 1 4 2. ~ UNDERPINNINS - STEP 3 @ 1/21=11-011 [40-16 ISSUED: S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd CONCEPT SHEET: 20 NOV 94 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS BASEMENT ADDITION 01.5 DRAWN: 298 Park Avenue Unit 301 RTE Basalt, Colorado 81621 ASPEN MEADOM #61 OF: (970) 927-9510 skpe@sopris.net ASPEN,COLORADO B 3.........1 2211_ 4 Illa'. f . 4 1 .:8 V.IF. Â».*f- 2>4*XY B. (E) FOOTING~ 24*Â¥ 2.....#' . d 4.; 2 A . 4 4 . .h + 14 4.2 NER PLATFORM ~1 14 . \ 4%fent' Cll r b 2~ 0-1-1 11= 211'I B. UNDERPINNING . 1 1 1 -11 El i 1-. SEE PLAN STEP 4: EXCAVATE TO NER WORKING PLATFORM. EXEAVATE PITS SECTION O AND REPEAT STEPS 1,2,4 3 FOR NEXT LEVEL DOMN. UNDERPINNING - STEP 4 @ 1/211=11-013 14076 ISSUED: S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd CONCEPT SHEET: 26 NOV '14 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS BASEMENT ADDITION 01.6 DRAWN: 298 Park Avenue Unit 301 RTE Basalt, Colorado 81621 ABPEN MEADOM #61 OF: (970) 927-9510 skpe@sopris.net ASPEN, COLORADO 8 4 -7 21 t. ' 4 1.:Ap:..2 B. (E) FOOT]hle~ bfÂ«7. &44 V.I.F. L 4 4 1 .4 . -, VERIFY 16" ' OR GREATER NEFI PLATFORM E.\ Ill 111-11 4 8 ' - -_- #5 HORIZONTAL @ 8" O.5, ,idlIG[-lEi t'- :fl- -~ DRIVE 16' INTO SOIL SIDES/~-I I ~-" i I FOR LAP MITH FINAL ~ 4. Em -fal,-4~ 9 1 ' ' ~in 0 ./ 40 X U 129 ./\3 - LiT-~ '1 ~ ~ 4.1.]1 -*:Â·N B. UNDERPINNINS . 11--/ 11 El lilli Ir- i SEE PLAN ' N #5 VERTICAL @ 8' O.0. STEP 5: PLACE REINFORGING. FORM INTERIOR FACE IN LINE MITH FACE OF UNDER PINNINe MALL ABOVE. POUR SECTION TIGHT TO SOIL. USE MECHANICAL VIBRATION FOR PROPER CONSOLIDATION POUR TIGHT TO BOTTOM OF UPPER MALL. ~ UNDERPINNINS - STEP 5 @ 1/2"=11-01 I4O16 ISSUED: S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd CONCEPT SHEET: 26 NOV '14 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS BASEMENT ADDITION Cl.-1 DRAWN: 298 Park Avenue Unit 301 RTE Basalt, Colorado 81621 ASPEN MEADOW #61 OF: (970) 927-9510 skpe@sopris.net ASPEN, GOLORADO & 0 1 2=SZ.L -17[ I B. (E) FOOTING~ 39* 1*0 V.I.F. 1. : ,4 k 4 -4 . .. 4 0.4 Â· 0. 4 . J PLACE SLAB TIGHT 1. /1 TO BOND BREAKER 4 ~-~~-4-~4Â« 5" CONCRETE SLAB PER PLAN. SEE ARCH. FOR VAPOR BARRIER, ETG, T.SLAB SEE PLAN~ El ~,4... '.*..9..' .......,/' _ 'ah-1 1 1-Li i t-I i '-' i i--i i i- 1 -i i i Â·Â· * ~ El I lEi I lei 11E1 l lEil IE" NE Y .1 El I lEi I lEi l 'El l IF-' B. UNDERPINNING~ -111*7=Al=61 I lEi 11Ell lEi I I 5EE PLAN ' 13111*I I 1-1 U: 11 1 1-11 lEi I 1- 1-Ill=111- STEP 6: EXCAVATE BALANCE OF INTERIOR BOIL. REPEAT STEPS 2 THRU 5 FOR SECTION @ ON PLAN. PLACE LOMER FLOOR SLAB PER PLAN. C-) UNDERPI NNINe -STEP 6 ~ @ 1/2.=11-01 14016 ISSUED: S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd CONCEPT SlIEET: 26 NOV 114 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS BASEMENT ADDITION 61.8 DRAWN: 298 Park Avenue Unit 301 RTE Basalt, Cojorado 81621 ABPEN MEADOM #61 oF: (970) 927-9510 skpe@sopris.net ASPEN,COLORADO 0 .Cht. T LURVCY LEC[MON4O NOTCS . -r i Dr ,~r- -a.ill,t *0~1~M, rr*:-0 ,(1â€¢M'v .<Â»U~10 rt f,mcIN R. â€¢â„¢L-K. 4 ...../.0 ..... **Ce'lle */ FlÂ¢:PN,LO UY * ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC, 91 4 ~4â€¢1(~L 210 50,Jn, CALâ„¢A S,RCO -.,10[ d'EN. COLDIa85 81~1 ' ..In ..41Â¥C 111(0 .D-Allen 0wMMZD â€¢A~ 1 41 1 B\ \ M.â‚¬Ef--:581-----~4 . l i- 0 =--22 2 - f -93 \ 1 / / 4% 3 - -' 1 P~h.Â»f --Â· 42* 4 ' 1 1 - 0/ /2 k e i . I Â¥ \ 1 \ I - \ --It... ---e- - .-. -- /// 0///4 9/ ,â€¢ -- ---- t/' / -'- 2 0.--17-~4-4,4 4:*F.t j> M 4 //-. h . ./04Â»?/ . 1 2/ El ~ - 2-~ -~~31---J . 1-- *\\ 13 i '2 13 1 / 1 4 ill _ b..2 At A.Â© \UNIT 2-/ 4.-) 1 L ____..1 E f Â«: -0Â·v:+ \ t~.1 \ 3. .. 1 /f -7*Xtz 2.-1K .'; 4 L---- . 0 --- l \ I ..1 - t f ' , 3 -.-\ UNIT 3 .,---- -- 3 /1 '. t- '. , *4434(19 /UNCT9% , -' L ~ ~ Â£u-9--a----t// / .1 pift 'UNI 1 7 4 13 \ 1 < '4\ AZ' r , ---1 1 4 I r.9 hy \/\ D< , 13, UNIT 8 , - -, /UNIT 7~ ~ /-~ * f~-.*<---~- ~/ /~ / / / tt r\-/ 1 . h .,1/ .1 , . - 7 1 *- .-I ./.--7-,f-------- -9 ---140 -7~- -- i ...1 -- --9 -*% 2,2 --- --- 90/142049 // /. il.. ~' F , .9 /// 16 0 Ur* 11 61 // 2%23.'*AEÂ¢2?â‚¬25*- â€¢Â»/1.-'â€¢ â€¢r ... ...# i- Â¢11-1â€¢11!L i. râ€¢*:,-Â»r~. 3 / ./.1-t'.P_f. .m=.1/0. 1 me#=ti'.0,4-371:wrt- 2229=Eâ‚¬0252*2-9- . re' C-Â©un X ' ---. -u- -,â€ž-0.... ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 61 MEADOWS RD. ASPEN, CO 81611 CHITECTURE + PLANNING RPC'CONCEmAL DESIGN REVIEW : StrEPLAN- E)(1511NG 1205.04 HEO , TA*HMENT 1 + DATE: 12/5/14 City of Aspen & INVOICE # 203245 Pitkin County GIS 130 S Galena St BILL TO: Howie Aspen, CO 81611 Poss Architecture & Planning Phone: 970-920-5453 PO Box 4312 Fax: 970-544-5378 Aspen, CO 81612 720-339-7200 DESCRIPTION. ~ QUANTITY HRS / EXTR SHEETS AMOUNT 300ft Lot 6 Aspen Meadows Mailing Labels Trustees 1 $150.00 Make all checks payable to City of Aspen and Sales TaxÂ· 9.3% $13.95 reference GIS & the invoice number in the note. If you have any questions concerning this invoice, contact GIS at 970-920-5453, GIS@cityofaspen.com. Total $163.95 - The Aspen/Pitkin GIS Department presents Information as a ser,ice to the public. Eveg effod has been made to ensure that the infomlation 15 accurate. The Aspen/Pilldn GIS Department makes no warranty or guarantee concerning me completenea accuracy or reliability of the Informaion contatned in any map or-data layer. Asseising eccuracy and retfabtlity of Information is the sole responsibi~ty of the user and data shall be used and retted upon only at the risk of user. The Aspen/Pitkjn GIS Department does not marniain a database of nineral estate onners. THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS! Easy PeelÂ®Labels A ~ Bend along line to i 1~ AVERYÂ® 5160Â® | Use AveryÂ® Template 5160Â® j Feed Paper - expose Pop-up Edgeâ„¢ ~ A ASPEN INSTITUTE INC CITY OF ASPEN KENROSS LUX S.AR.L 1000 N THIRD ST 130 S GALENA ST 3765 CHAMPION BLVD ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27105 LAMM RICHARD D QPRT 1/2 MCHUGH JOHN J la REED PRESLEY O & PATRICIA 5401 E DAKOTA #20 PO BOX 7954 375 BELLEVUE DR DENVER, CO 80246 ASPEN, CO 81612 : BOULDER, CO 80302 SARPA JOHN G & JAN JONES SARPA SHERMAN HARRIS D 1/2 SIMPKINS B DOUGLAS JR 1/3 71 MEADOWS TRUSTEE RD 5401 E DAKOTA #20 P.O BOX 7954 ASPEN, CO 81611 DENVER, CO 80246 . ASPEN, CO 81612 SMITH VICTORIA LEA SMOOKE BARRY ASPEN TRUST STRICKLAND MARCIA D 1160 PARI< AVE 155 5TH ANITA DR 1991 E ALAMEDA AVE #9 NEWYORK, NY 10128 : LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 ~ DENVER, CO 80209 A itiquettes faclles 8 peter | Sens de 1-800-GO-AVERY Repllez h la hachure afin de ~ www.avery.com I Utilisez le gabarit AVERYÂ® 5160Â® chargement ravaler le rebord PoPÂ·up"c , 1 December 23,2014 Amy Simon City ofAspen Historical Preservation Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado, 81611 Re: HOA Approval; Meadows Townhome 6i Dear Amy, The HOA for the Meadows Townhomes met on December 22, 2014Â· During this meeting the proposed remodel and expansion of Unit 61 was discussed and approved subject to the availability of floor area as stipulated in the SPA, development, and subdivision agreement for the Aspen Meadows. Sincei'Al*~ t 44.- Â¢dhn Sarpa for the Aspen Meadows Trustee Townhomes HOA Amy Simon From: Keith Howie <khowie@billposs.com> Sent Monday, January 12, 2015 11:18 AM To: Amy Simon CC: Kim Weil; Jenna Larson Subject: RE: Aspen Meadows Townhome 61 existing and proposed SF numbers Hi Amy, Here is the FAR/gross sf breakdown. I have given you both the above and below gross square footage and FAR areas. Gross Square Footage Existing (sf) Proposed (sf) Lower level (below grade) 269.85 1310.36 +1040.51 Main level (above grade) 1240.22 1325.,12 +84.90 Upper level 577.48 733.39 +155.91 The above grade total is 84.90 + 155.91 = 240.81 sf The new area on the upper level is within the existing exterior walls of the original unit, but we are adding height to the existing walls at the office area. The gross SF number differs from the FAR calculation (368.26 sf) as some of the lower level is added into the overall Calculation due to the new window well. FAR Existing (sf) Proposed (sf) Lower level FAR 94.98 260.87 +165.89 Main level FAR 1116.19 1166.12 +49.93 Upper level FAR 577.48 733.39 +155.91 The above grade total is 49.93 + 155.91 = 205.84 sf Hope this helps, Thanks, KEITH HOWIE i Princiflal poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 865 Ea'>l. Main Stier,t Asper, ,)81611 970/ 925 4755 www billpoÂ· t i or'n 10"1[limvE[3 ...NTIALITY NOLCE 1 The nioi mation : Onlained m tbifi e r :1 Il {S con fidential <and ,>hall notÂ· be 5 h ared by a third D :art~ excent al ne.'rf >ar' to Derforr,1 1,0 , ,, i 11 yoid have recerved thise mail in error, pk,ase notitythefenderand delete thibeÂ·mal! From: Amy Simon [mailto:amy.simon@cityofaspen.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 4:54 PM To: Keith Howie Subject: RE: Aspen Meadows Townhome 61 conceptual pkg 1