Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.hpc.20151202ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 2, 2015 1 Chairperson, Willis Pember called the meeting to order at 12:00 Noon. Commissioners in attendance were Patrick Sagal, Nora Berko, Jim DeFrancia, Bob Blaich and Michael Brown. Absent were Sallie Golden, John Whipple and Gretchen Greenwood. Staff present: Jim True, City Attorney Amy Simon, Preservation Planner Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk MOTION: Bob moved to approve the minutes of Nov. 11, 2015; secon d by Jim. All in favor, motion carried. Public: Brent Gardner-Smith introduced himself as a reporter. Nora said the work session with City Council was great. The Aspen Modern Ordinance #28 section 6 specified that there are five properties owned by th e city that should be designated. In 2016 we should get those five properties protected; Red Brick, Yellow Brick, Mountain Rescue, mall and Hildur Anderson Park. We need to lead by example. Amy said there would be a hearing before HPC and City Council. MOTION: Nora made the motion that HPC recommends that staff take steps to designate the 5 properties in 2016, motion second by Bob. All in favor, motion carried. Guidelines Amy summarized the memo in the guidelines. We have tried to improve the guidelines with better clarity. This is basically a re-write of the entire document. We have dropped the glossary. In the introduction we have trimmed out anything that refers to the code because the code could change tomorrow. We tried to be more general. We want passion behind the design and a good explanation of what the proposal is. Bob suggested that there be a link to the National Register on page 20. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 2, 2015 2 Amy said there are about 25 properties on the register from Aspen. Patrick suggested that the purpose and intent of preservation from the land use code be added to the guidelines so that there is a natural transition. Patrick discussed adding when the guidelines should be revised. Jim said you could say that the guidelines can be reviewed every so many years. They are an advisory document. Nora said the guidelines give us the ability to say no. We need to know how the next generation gets protected. Historic Overview Amy said we replaced the images to show different aspects of the town’s history. Bob said he particularly liked the incorporation of the International Design Conference in the guidelines. Architectural styles Willis suggested that applicant write a description or narrative of how their project contributes to the sense of place of Aspen. Amy said this could be added to page 25. Chapter I is more of a perspective as to how the project fits into the town and neighborhood looking at maps, diagrams and site planning. 1.1 talks about setback to setback with nothing left. 1.2 Consider the value of unpaved alleys in residential areas. Amy said we will add a corner diagram including the front diagram. 1.25 discusses art work 1.8 is the addition of storm water Chapters 2-8 are chapters on rehabilitation ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 2, 2015 3 9.4 avoid making design decisions that require code related alternations which could have been avoided. Amy said the dormer statement should be moved to 7.6 guideline Chapter 9 is the relocation chapter 9.1 was added to address where people are underpinning and excavating . Proposals to relocate a building to a new site are highly discouraged. Chapter 10 building additions Amy said this addresses that the addition can’t be doubled in size. We also talk about corner lots and heights of the addition on a corner. Chapter 11 Amy said the only change is design a structure to be a product of its own time. Chapter 12 Amy said this chapter is the catch all chapter. MOTION: Bob moved to adjourn; second by Nora. All in favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 1:30 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk