The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.406 E Hopkins Ave.0006.2008.AHPC406 E. HOPKINS AVE 0006.2008.AHPC MINOR HPC DEV. 273787330010 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 3 r Â£3 01 A-, 07< e d N 1 p 1 4 7 Fire Safety Note Abbreviations: 1. All building materials stored at the construction area, and/or in any area of the building are to be secured in a locked area. Access to suck areas is to be controlled by the Owner and/or the General Contractor. A Astragal KIT Kitchen 2. All materials to be stored in an orderly manner. ADD Addendum L Length 3. All flammable materials to be kept tightly sealed in their respective containers. Such ADJ Adjustable LAM Laminated materials are to be kept away from all heat sources. 4. All flammable materials to be used and stored in adequately ventilated spaced. AFF Above Finish Floor LAV Lavatory 5. All electrical power to be shut off where there is exposed conduit. AHU Air-Handling Unit LT Light 6. All electrical power in the construction area to be shut off after working hours. ALT Alternate M Mirror 7. The contractor will, at all times, make sure there is no leakage of natural gas in the ALUM Aluminum MAT Material building, or any flammable gas used in construction. APPROX Approximately MAX Maximum 8. The contractor shall provide fire sprinkler protection throughout the building. The ARCH Architect, Architectural MB Marble contractor shall be responsible for preparing drawings and specifications and obtaining the B Base MECH Mechanical permits for the fire sprinkler system. The fire sprinkler system must meet the requirements of all applicable codes and ordinances. BLDG Building MEMB Membrane BLKG Blocking MIN Minimum General Demolition Notes BO By Others MLDG Molding 1. Demolition and removal of existing walls, partitions, ceilings, denoted and graphically BR Bedroom MO Masonry Opening indicated. BRD Board MTG Mounted 2. Remove all existing mechanical items, plumbing, piping and electrical components in BRK Brick MTL metaINIC Not in Contract their entirety except as specified BSBD Baseboard NO Number 3. Work initiated to the exterior of the existing building is limited to the areas noted and BSMT Basement NOM Nominal graphically indicated on the drawings. Any other exterior work shall not be initiated without BTM Bottom NTS Not to Scale the prior written consent and knowledge of the building authority and architectural designer. BTWN Between OA Overall 4. The contractor shall provide all required protection and measures throughout the - C Carpet, Cornice OC On Center demolition and removal work for: the existing exterior of the building, the existing interior space to remain and the existing adjacent finishes and items which are N.I.C. CAB Cabinet OD Outside Dimension, Outside Diameter 5. The performance of any demolition work by the contractor or any sub-contractor shall be CH Ceiling Height OH Opposite Hand executed in accordance with the building code of the State of Colorado and all other CL Center Line, Closet OPP Opposite applicable codes and regulations. CLG Ceiling P Paint, Panel 6. The contractor shall obtain, prior to the commencement of the demolition work and with CLR Clear PL Plastic Laminate the consent of the base building management and owner of such work, all legal and regulatory permits as may be required for demolition, containers, carting, hauling, public way COL Column PLUM plumbing access or closing, and the disconnection and shut-off of all utilities as may be required. CONC Concrete PLYWD Plywood 7. The contractor is required the repair any imperfections to existing surfaces caused by the CONT Continuous POL Polished demolition process with the same of like materials unless specifically indicated otherwise on CP Ceiling Paint PT Paint the drawings and/or specifications. CRS Courses PTD Painted 8. The contractor shall remove all door & jamb sets as indicated on drawings & save for CT Ceramic Tile PVC Poly Vinyl Chloride eventual reinstallation. CTG Coating QT Quarry Tile 9. The contractor shall remove all light fixtures & mechanical grills as indicated on drawings DBL Double R Riser, Chair Rail and save for eventual re-installation. DH Double Hung RAD Radius DIA Diameter RD Roof Drain General Notes DIAG Diagonal RE Refer to 1. All work and materials furnished shall comply with The State of Colorado Building Code, DIFF Diffuser REF Refrigerator, Reference The State of Colorado Fire Code, The State of Colorado Regulations, the regulations of the National Board of Fire Underwriters, National Fire Protective Association Requirements and DIM Dimension REFL Reflected all Federal, State, and Municipal authorities having jurisdiction over the work, DISP Disposal REQ Required 2. Before ordering any materials or doing any work, each trade shall verify all DN Down REV Revision measurements at the building and shall be responsible for correctness of the same. No extra DR Door RH Right Handed charge or compensation will be allowed on account of difference between actual dimensions DTL Detail Rm Room and the measurements indicated on the drawings; any discrepancies between the drawings DWG Drawing RO Rough Opening and field conditions which may be found shall be submitted to the architectural designer for EXIST Existing RTD Rated consideration and clarification before proceeding with the work. The contractor shall be responsible for any deviations from the contract documents. ELEC Electrical SC Solid Core , Skim Coat 3. All the architectural designer's drawings and construction notes are complimentary and ELEV Elevation SECT Section what is called for by either will be binding as if called for by all; any work shown or referred to ENCL Enclosure SH Shelf on any one drawing shall be provided as shown on all drawings. EQ Equal SHT Sheet 4. The work to be performed consists of furnishing all labor, equipment, tools, EQUIP Equipment SHWR Shower transportation, supplies, fees, materials, and services in accordance with these notes and EXP Expansion Slm Siliar drawings; and includes performing all operations necessary to construct and install complete, EXT Exterior SPEC Specification in satisfactory condition, the various materials and equipment at the locations shown, 5. Full size or large scale details or drawings shall govern small scale drawings which they FC Field Check SQ Square are Intended to amplify FD Floor Drain, Field Dimension SS Stainless Steel 6. The standard specifications of the manufacturer for products called for in drawings and FF Finish Floor ST Stone notes are hereby made part of these notes with the same force and effect as though herein Â« FIN Finish STD Stained written out in full. FIX Fixture STL Steel 7. All materials required for the performance of this work shall be new and of the best FLR Floor SUSP Suspended quality of the kinds specified. The use of old or second-hand materials is :Â·'ristly forbidden, except for locations on the drawings that refer to removal and relocation of materials or FO Finish Opening SYM Symmetrical FOW Face of Wall T Tread, Trim equipment. Materials shall be used in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The contractor shall submit all product warranties. The contractor shall warranty all work as FR Fire-rated T&G Tongue and Groove per State of Colorado regulations. DT Foot TAN Tangent 8. The premises and job site shall be maintained in a reasonably neat and orderly condition DA Gauge period. The contractor shall remove all crates, calions and other trash from the work areas TEMP Tempered, Temporary and kept free from accumulation of waste materials and rubbish during the entire construction GALV Galvanized THK Thick GC General Contractor TO Trimmed Opening each day and shall be responsible for its proper disposal. The premises shall be protected GL Glass, Glazing TYP Typical throughout construction and shall be turned over in spotless and orderly condition. All GR Grade UON Unless Otherwise Noted fixtures and equipment will be left in undamaged, bright, clean, and polished condition. 9. All work shall be subject to final inspection by the architectural designer. GWB Gypsum Wall Board UTIL Utility 10. All plumbing and electrical work shall be performed by persons licensed in their trades. HOR Horizontal VT Vinyl Tile 11. The contractor shall take all necessary precautions to insure the safety of the building, its HM Hollow Metal VIF Verify in Field occupants and the general public during construction. HT Height managing agent, noting particularly any restrictions on noise, use of public entries, use of W Washer 12. The contractor will abide by all the rules and regulations set forth by the building's legal HVAC Heating, Ventillation, Air-Conditioning W/ With ID Inside Dimension, Inside Diameter WC Water Closet, Wall Covering power tools, timely and proper debris removal materials, storage, and estabjjshed working hours. IN Inch WD Wood 13. The contractor shall be responsible for providing a radon mitigation system throughout INS Insulation, Insulated WF Wood Flooring the building which shall meet the requirements of all applicable codes and ordinances, INT Interior W/O Without including the efficient building ordinance section 11.5. The contractor shall be responsible for JT Joint WP Water-proof preparing all drawings and specifications required for this radon mitigation system. 14. All dimensions take precedence over the scale of drawings U.O.N. All dimensions are to the face of stud or to the face of concrete U.O.N. All exterior studs to be 2X6 U.O.N. all interior studs to be 2X4 U.O.N 15. All interior stud walls & ceilings shall have 3' M" sound attenuation batts U.O.N. 16. No portion of the construction operations which requires a shop drawing or a sample submission shall commence until the submission has been reviewed and approved by the contractor then reviewed and approved for design intent only by the architectural designer, All such construction operations shall be in accordance with reviewed show drawings and samples. 17. Shop drawings are required for all shop fabricated work. This work includes, but is not limited toi exterlor and interior finish materials, structural and decorative steel, and built-in cabinetry. 18, Product submittals are required for all individually specified products, including but not limited to, doors, windows, electocal fixtures, plumbing, appliances, and hardware. 19. The contractor is responsible for providing all access panels as required by governing codes to all voids, attics, etc... The contractor must verify the type required with the architect prior to installation of said panels. General Safety Notes 1. Construction work will be confined to the immediate area of work and will not create dust, dirt, or other such inconveniences to surrounding properties. 2. Construction operations will not block sidewalks or means of egress for tenants of the adjacent buildings without 36 hours prior written notification. 3. Construction operations will not involve interruption of heating, water, fire alarm, or electrical services to the other tenants of the building 4. Construction operations shall be restricted to the hours indicated by building authorities. Except in the case of emergency and notification of the building authority 5. The contractor and sub-contractors shall be responsible for any property damage of the building owner or the personal property of any persons of the building due to the construction operations. 6. Strict supervision shall be maintained at all times during the course of construction operations as to minimize inconvenience to persons of the building and adjacent properties. 7. During and following demolition, each contractor shall be responsible for the removal from the premises all debris and products of the demolition not designated for reuse. The site shall be left broom clean at the end of each working day. 8. Refuse from construction operations is the sole responsibility and expense of the contractor and the sub-contractors. Refuse shall be disposed of in separate dumpsters or bins maintained at an approved location in the front of the building. Dumpsters and bins must be removed on a weekly basis. Construction materials shall be maintained and stored on the site, with the approval of the building authority, or on the street during the course of delivery. 9. Construction work will be confined to the indicated areas and will not create dust or other such inconvenience to the other adjacent properties. 10. Construction operations will not block sidewalks, driveways or means of egress for tenants of adjacent properties. 11. Demolition: All debris and products of demolition not designated for refuse shall be removed from the premises and legally disposed of. The site shall be left broom clean at the end of every working day. RECEIVED MAR 1 7 2008 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTINDEX \ 1Â«L EHEETINDEX ID Name CVR COVER FORUM PHI A0.1 GENERAL NOTES AO.2 FAR ANALYSIS 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 RO. Box 1606 AO.3 VIEWPLANE Basalt, Colorado 81621 D2.1 DEMOLITION PLAN PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 A2,1 FLOOR PLAN A2.2 ROOF PLAN Isis Addition A2.3 ROOF PLAN A3.1 ELEVATIONS 406 E. Hopkins Ave A4.1 SECTIONS Aspen, Colorado 81611 A6.1 ASSEMBLIES Suzie Krevoy CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR GEOTECH #GEOTECH STRUCTURAL #STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL #MECHANICAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CIVIL #### CONTRACTOR PROJECT SITE #CONTRACTOR RECEIVED - -- ' /9 ... 6 -- f s.--- .Â· 4.Â·dÂ·t ::0:Â·. 1...Â·<s.Â· 0:....:Â·.Â·Â· I i:,34-2 - Â·Â· i % ./ ..., 1..............â€ž..9.... .f-~-LI. .. 1 - , &-9-f k ..4 Â· MAR 1 7 2008 '% : 0 I . 1 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~1 ' ' u] >DARK CS!2â€¢ -- ,2 :. s ...1.1 11 1414â‚¬AVE y * y:Â· ry -4.'.-11,46&Â» % '7:-54~sr i ~~ff--4--~-1 - ~ i...tf~./..4...2~i. ~...j.: ..- 3 0 . C 7.- 2 2----k-W .: 2.. El .9 -4 -"Â·Â· Â· Nu#FA , i Â·Â· Â· Â·Â·Â· Â·Â· - ' I ..3 1% 17 . *; t.Â· 2 - . A-30 FUD ~' '\~ *uÂ·Â·$5Â·t f 0Â»- 4 '37 ' 11 ' . ' 1/ PUB 81041Â· Â· Â· Â·' 1- APANG#; 91 . 4- ~ Â«'b. - 3 : 4 4 * 4/ I.' ~ "-1- :3, : 1~~. i Â¥.47% c.1 r-, Upttat-Â»-444 2.4,913 l.-CfR.UL-' * 0--g-~t:=42il t. I...i:.maeÂ«1 i Â· --1 .. r:.....:;.Â»yeliZ\. n .,.. U. ....: 474 4 2.-Â·- -Il Â£ â€¢. ' ~7?Â·Cb A.... vt? ~.F FOD-'n-t- ;4~QZ. t~Â· - ,--4--3.<Pi-f.046,14 >J ' -6 .... :~- Â· MWAg::Â·kÂ·Â· ::Â·>Â·g%. 4 . . -'~~Â· "Â·Â·:Â·:.Â· ..'...- Â· -i.-2 : - t ' 4,\ Â· ' ~-2 -LE.Â·:,rÂ·,-:-9211~I---il t~-*A,INsr..4-+1 2--4Â·~i ...:SCIPUDSFA.A~ Â· ... -Â· - %4=0.-9 i>-3... . . 42~ --4.1,~il 2/01/08 DESIGN REVIEW .-Y (21 . ..:..~* ..:' '.. . -1 - : ... ... .....1 -4 rt....4. ..,1 MARK DATE DESCRIPTION It i,FÂ· e,Â£;&~*~tl 62 , -7-2-' 12 , Â·X -~- 1.-t'. Â·Â·':hh A-, , ... ..lE.. 'a 511 h , PROJECT NO: 0720 ~~4%:4Â® L : ~77 9-7: .:4..2.- Â·- DRAWN BY: SMW F Â· ...r: 2 4 -34-2- "Tk 2 , - .~ 4 Ar -'S.A x . ... P j .p.t, -~.*12~ coci~fi.J . : -f L. ' 9 n*< :Â·-*:-4:Â·-4 4Â·. .. 7?*Â·,1Â£: ..Â· <.:}Â·: 2 --,-4~1~~ . 1, â€ž21- . ..' 4 7%.. Cle -3. .7 T. .. .. % .. COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC # % - 1-1 : f-uÂ·Â·Â· - 'I . - -I'll'll'll'll'llill'll'll'll'll'll'll'll . ' I Â· .... I . - Al â€¢ r-4.Q, ~ . . . 1.4. i E COOPG' . 1 . SHEET TITLE Â·+ ........ 3/ 1 -- 1 2>.,$/ /2~bÂ· Â·Â· Â» Â·Â·>LÂ·'Â·Â·f~.- - '_.aL LP PUE'Â· t.- 2 1 4.--Â· .-+ AO. 1 P i i ....' 1. i -.-% - TR---3 k .- .-~ili~Â· -- -. *~ ~mit<gzÂ·51.Â·-...~--iÂ»CL~ Aspurt.4 1 -.I~., Â·.c. 1 299.e#,i~l-75.. Â·1~ 6 :1 f:. . /5 . . #1:.3..... lek Ve. 3/ I k...~ktÂ·Â·~~~~~~ -Â· ~3'i--~ - 1/. ..162 - 9.41 $ ..f-Â·~:.ij~ r*22UPÂ«.0.4444 1. C55/ CL RUD C SPA 1 1. .. ./ r. ....71 -77 .. d. 1 : Â·-:...it ... GENERAL NOTES 1 A -8444 41 ~Do i RECEIVED MAR 1 7 2003 . I \\\ \41Â« i./-1-0. - ' CITY OF ASPEN 0 \ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT '~ 1 .ili N E.2 \141.%: 4.\ \4\\Â«\1 , j \1111 9\11 t -hs# P*NX*. Hujj i glf'/1 Il FORUM PHI \< 2 14-Sh-*eÂ»NET<Lt\(L 1 \ aM \ i 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 I Â·efrzie~:* I RO. Box 1606 \ 1 \ Basalt, Colorado 81621 99.i?~34 0 5 PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 1 \ \\1 rv /*115 : Id~~~:~24 --1 11. 4 \ Isis Addition 406 E. Hopkins Ave 0 1 .1- '99 1.3 -~4- MAff\Â«4 --~1 .t- -Ii Fr... ALLOWABLE FAR 2 000 SF - NET LIVABLE Aspen, Colorado 81611 i \ ~1 Suzie Krevoy 1Â· A 7 TDR 500 SF .:' -1 4-4- e: i' 4 1.-2 4.1 - Â»\\ i. 0 'F-2- 4 -~ N TOTAL ALLOWABLE NET LIVABLE 2 500 SF - NET LIVABLE CONSULTANTS 2 ti\\ J .1 \ i 3 :gi-- Â» 42,4~14 4 1 4 1 :'\ f\91 ?G>- ALLOWABLE DECKS (15%) 300 SF 1 9\ 1 \ ~ 6== CD EXISTING UNIT NET AREA 1,970 SF #SURVEYOR SURVEYOR '47/VÂ« li }IN \ \ \ .n__.. ;Â·.-1- 6~~1111.~u-- tb-~,Lk_114-41~44 -Â·~-~Â«~-i~-'2 I ' 1 ' ~~ ~- ~ii> PROPOSED NET AREA 498 SF r-- i /Â· e~ GEOTECH am . \ 1 q TOTAL UNIT NET AREA 2,468 SF - NET LIVABLE ' DECK . ~7 -< f ~ | #GEOTECH 2. $ ".Â· . ~ ~- 56Â· 14.16.4 H~DRAL &30â„¢ 51/551 tn \,1 1 -rEN,Â°. 61â€¢Se ,*Aqiâ„¢AL h---1 My & 1 4 R.'SED DECK -Â· Â·Â·> - (ExteÂ»e mANAM: 70 RmMAN ' ' ~ ~ --- - .- - -- - ---- ----- -------- - (0 STRUCTURAL 1 1 b, I t ; #STRUCTURAL 1 $ UE/' V 8 (3 8 0 MECHANICAL 0 0 #MECHANICAL UNIT: B - PROPOSED 1/8" = 1'-0" LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CIVIL #### --2/.=./-*.18 1 n -1 U Â«91Â«1/943\00:*A \ Â»13>40~1 i ~14-134.+4-4~--6 \1\\04 :; ---0-t---4 r----~----- 662 ; CONTRACTOR #CONTRACTOR TO BE REMOVEP ----- 31 i li : 141 -=71 .Â»NotiftÂ¢k ~- - ---4-64>. Â«\4 70\ \ 1 ./ : 11 . 41 04 - DECK 4 A'$38F1*~3;LA)$)Aft---:art #'82-~f I 421 ./ ./ ./ I 1 2:4 1 - 1 1 71 \ 1 41-141 1-/7===1 ..= = I.*/= r 4N\N[\\ .\.Xb40~4~K~RK~Il., '' Ir---**04*'Â»2 1 EXISTING RA.R. CALCULATION ~ *17Â«<~7Z---1Â»i 1 ~ - - < '~ ALLOWABLE FAR 2,000 SF - NET LIVABLE 1 411 911 9 23â‚¬11Â©. 1 (41 -1- 41 141.1.1 1 141-1- it ' 4 1 \ \1\' ALLOWABLE DECKS (15%) 300 SF i , t. 9 :-4-1 1 V , 1.1\ 11 I -- -- pomION OF EXISTINS S~ 1 1 k \11\'11 1\ . PARAFET ~LL Â· Â· f-- TO BE ReMovEP ;-fl\16 1 Â· ,Â· HPC 2/01/08 DESIGN REVIEW UNIT NET AREA 1,970 SF 11 344 1.- UNIT GROSS AREA 2,070 SF ; F.-44111- 1 & i ~ Â© MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 9 1\L 10 . - I - , I I ' -.-1 . 1 1, â‚¬=== ir:W '---- ---- -|~~ i PROJECT NO: 0720 DRAWN BY: SMW \ ill /1/H TEMP. ILASS GUARDÂ» 7 RA,L AT HOT TUS PEDK ELOSE -Â·+ 4, - 5. -1 j 3 TE>1 ./ASS ./ARPRAIL--- - T 4- -- . -- DECK i > 1 411.~.- 'reops.'res ! 1 COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC v i - 9. F i ,-- .e- 36" Ii/H HANDRAIL i (BOTW SIDES) ' SHEET TITLE 1 1 It i 1 --- --Le.Ass aulâ€¢21.45 1 -Â· - ~----- Â· - - f I d -- ; ._1321_- 1 1 . : 4 RAISED) DEOK -Â· - O AO.2 i (EXISTING ./Al/All /0 REMAiN) - -- ... j i 1.1 1 : It* t 0 0 0 0 Â® Â® UNIT:B- EXISTING 1/8" = 1'-0" FAR ANALYSIS a .6 : REGENES MAR 1 7 21: j CITY OP r.yee' CIr COMMUNITY DE'Jttot>Â¥1 /V --- -------- ------------ --- -ACTUALVIEWABLEPLANE-- --- 0 . -_-_-____-_---___- rviEWF[AREPER*lij - -FORUM PHI 1 -- 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 - 5.- fl - ---- RO. Box 1606 Basalt, Colorado 81621 PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 -- A.H. UNIT A FREE MARKET ADDITION - 1 UPPER LVE.0 Isis Addition 73/ Ir EL=121'-9 i , EÂ»Â«3.1 1- li 1 /1 ill f 1 406 E. Hopkins Ave 1-1 12:1 .1 6 MECI-I 1~,c'-' ~ Aspen, Colorado 81611 _ 1 2 Suzie Krevoy 11 n-V 1 1 0 MECH. i 1---1 r I n V â€ž pf.#r#~-ft i. . | 3 ~ Â· PROJ. LVE. ~0 //2/J ;-4 THEATER A n 11 - 5*.2-HY t. EL=Ilf-10' CONSULTANTS F e L j,5-1,44..~ . IRS n f: rcur.'*Irr :2~1 2 1 SURVEYOR ' ft ~ r 45.-$~9&M_:L #SURVEYOR - Tj r lr~~~;~A Ad n U N D - 1 8 1Â· -2,9-/ON' rflll --- w e 4.- 1,AE<'.....it - MAINLY.L. Pâ€¢ - v j 56Â»r-:11 .., 1-26=/00'-0' ~~00/ -En 100'-0 - 790854' GEOTECH 1- 0 96'40' 0 i 4~40' -\ 1 #GEOTECH 1.4 i 1 1 1 1 n i 1 11 1 - STRUCTURAL Â· PROJ. LVE ~ ELÂ·86'-11" #STRUCTURAL 1 1 1 1. *STOR. '- r--7 THEATER D 1 0 -1 83'â‚¬ 2. [33.-1 n J - - n 1 c.7 P - - n -9 03*=221 1 7, re.h%=~--- MECHANICAL n n wn,~ CS tfieâ‚¬~01!1 1 Ap 11 #MECHANICAL 14 - d rd cl# t:4f r.-ril .Â»2*R'1\ En â‚¬177. 1 LOWER LVE. ~ - 0 STOR...Â· EL=74'-9 73'-9 JuNAÂ·~.iÂ¢-1 f.3.-Il - 1=13 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT - 2 VIEWPLANE SECTION 1/8" = 1'-0" CIVIL #### L H CONTRACTOR #CONTRACTOR -1- 1 V 1 1 III- 11\ rÂ« HPC 2/01/08 DESIGN REVIEW MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO: 0720 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE PROJECT SITE AO.3 VIEWPLANE PER VIEWPLANE VIEWPLANE PLAN 1" = 50' RECEIVED MAR 1 7 2008 CITY OF ASPEN I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT \\\. TAPERED INSULATION | P.O. Box 1606 EXTERIOR MATERIAL TO BE ~ REMOVED: STRUCTURAL FORUM PHI[ WALL TO REMAIN 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 ELI - CUT AND REMOVE EXTERIOR SLAB & PREPARE STRUCTURAL SLAB TO RECIEVE 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 INTERIOR FINISHES TO MATCH EX[SITNG. PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 10 (-f= = 1-1 (7=77 , i ' 1 Isis Addition 1--I[------31--1 ! 1 L-JI I l_jl . !_ -1 FE--7 -O-111 1 | 406 E. Hopkins Ave 51.- - 1 1 -353 1 1 1 1 1, lili 1 \ 1 -- -*-3 C/- 1 \-.~- 1.=~==3.=....~... ...... , Ld----*=Â« i [ REMOVE WINDOW AND PREPARE ~ ' 0- 14 01 1 - AREA TO RECIEVE DOOR . ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 1 1 1 1 1 -4 , 1 Suzie Krevoy 1 It 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 # 1 1111 - 1 WALL TO BE REMOVED 11 --1 11 CONSULTANTS .ht J../. 4 AND FLOOR TO BE L__-] 9----41 U~--1 REFINISHEDTO MATCHJ I L---.--2 ~ MECHANICAL ' 1 SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR REMOVE DOORAND PREPARE ' \ AREA TO CONTINUE WALL / 1 GEOTECH \ . 1 1/M *1 0 //1 j-----Â·Â·Â·---1- -2926----...m.- &__--_....__ _____._-__ CJ i ----g_ I #GEOTECH -9. f. -- --- 1 -- 1 / 1\ 0 09 1 1 1 \ 1 REMOVE MUD UNITAND PERPARE - - STRUCTURAL AREA FOR PANTRY UNIT 1 1 #STRUCTURAL ---- 1.---I. 1 1 - 1 1 1 *--2 ---7---7-- MECHANICAL 1 - --11 2 -,TE-3 11 #MECHANICAL 1 2 EXISTING CONDO <C= - REMOVE DOOR AND PERPARE AREA \ 14 â‚¬J-- --- I ---1-------_ 311 FOR LARGER CASED OPENING -_> ----1- ----- - -- --- ----Â® $11 1 FLEL -â€žrt-=Â»30.--IL ~E-~EL -7 - 3-11*9 1 iE r--L- 1 - 1 LANDSCAPE ARCHEECT <-- J '1 1 1 0-1 1 11 4 f--- . -'- ---- --- -1 l=_4, 5 04% L 1 :\ I #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1 1 1 1-.1 1 1 L.1 '.-// 1 1---, 1 - 4 t * 1 ~ m--th..1- 1 4 1 1 11 1 1 1 / , 11 1 I i Il 1 \'\ 1 -----1 1 1 2 11 1 If I 1 1 1<--- PORTION OF EXISTING t k.=r. --1 ) 1 PARAPET INALL 1 1.- - ' 1 1 1 44 8 1 1 1 dll 1 \1] 1.-1/ 1 1 1 1 TO BE REMOVEP 1 1 CIVIL -1 X X i P i I Il_... ._1 \ \ 1 ' i ,------T---- #### 1 1 lili I i Ir - 1 1 1 8 1 1 I 1111 1 <71 1 1 t ! ------ 1111 1 ,.,4 'Fle' 1 1 11 1 1 -h,\.\ 1 1 1 _41.-il_ 1_ l.-12 L' b -- 1-,- .0.'.W 1, 1 || iii I 1 A--4 1 0 1/9 VI J --- t 1 1 1 1 i f /1 1 \ 1- -1 h r \\ i --- f- ' 1 1 : C) CONTRACTOR j V i j L- 1--- 1 \ 1 1 f ' #CONTRACTOR 0 -3 / L.-1 ' 11' SIM. EEj '61' HIGH TEMP. GLASS Â®UARD- RAIL AT HOT TUB PECK EPSE i UP i I 1 , 3 1----4 -rEMP. SLASS aUARDRAIL --- - DECK 1 3 4-- 1-Â·- ------Â· Moon> STEPS 1 -- - 4 1 1 B (BOTH SIDES) ~ ~ 1 1 1 HPC 2/01/08 ESIGN REVIEW : -- t : ~ TEMP. GLASS GUARDRAIL t:357 , j MARK DATE DESCRIPTION | -1 - , : --- RAISED DECK -----3 - (EX}ST]Ne DRAINAGE TO REMAIN) PROJECT NO: 0720 1 DRAWN BY: SMW 1 i I ~ COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC i ' ' SHEET TITLE D2.1 1 It?01> 1 1 1 -F 1 , 6 4) GO Â® DEMOLITION PLAN RECEIVED MAR 1 7 2008 1 1 CITY OF ASPEN ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 512>/ 17'-5" , .le 5'-21/7 , 10'-60 Â·-1/2 ~ 0- ; 1-17 // 7 8 5-81,7'- ~r 3'-111/7 , 4'-81/7 .. , _FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 PO. Box 1606 4 11 Basalt, Colorado 81621 NEEL----hz-*-=--;---/-4----1, 1 -~~ 4-92. P--1 n 11-p.t==ar-1 ~i~ 4 02 1 1 ../ I f. E-- -1 E- vii , 3 8 i - PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 1 1 L. -6 1 /1 1 GUEST -_ 1 BATH ~ ~ r I 1 1 ./ - -53 --: ~ , ~-1 GUEST Isis Addition 01 -1 I -4 r - --1 11 11 r-- -tÂ» 1 CLOSET 406 E. Hopkins Ave 3 1 1 i 11 4, 11~ i 1 561 V 1 5,.,4,71 f=iii==:=~ 7--__ 1 1 1 1 (-1 11 :11 -1~ : 1 ill 11 1 1 \11 4 n f " $ L Â£ 1 < -teams; 6=A:Â«50, Â£ /.- P _- Suzie Krevoy Ik 1 1 Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 1 3.4 1 ,(62)1~4 k,E V I v' 2-= - - -:4 J L--2 ----ll--+1 ECE--7/, , 4'-11/2" ~01'-7" 4 3'-111/2'~ 4- 81/Z' ~ \ 1 1 M 24 MECHANICAL 4 ,1 4 CONSULTANTS 0 1----1 70 1----~ r.....i / -\ 4 8 32' we 5-5' )~ ~.li'z ~- 0051 LU r -~~T- =--n -=11 Fll- [ h SURVEYOR 1 - - - - - ~ e i ~ . #SURVEYOR AQC (Â¥) \ -Z I 9 1 11 1 N 1 1 1 41_-1 ~ L -JGÂ®ST SUIT,1 1 1 1 1 1 | ~' 1- GEOTECH 11 ---- 1 111 Ill I 98 1 4 1 I: PJ ' il: ' M te Â·Â·Â· #GEOTECH 1 1 13 1 Lka--4 1- ~-----2 Â· i . I & 1 r E r h D - 1 r-3 Ul i .Â©* 1 .1 . . 1 t i U U V 9>--\- d : 4 STRUCTURAL 1 N N Â£ ') %1 1 ~ i li {--Jl 0----1 ~ i I 44 1 6 ' 5 ~l L..1.2 - 4,2-\,f\1 (- 7 #STRUCTURAL UNUUU CO IN 1 --4.- Cg 01 1 lEi 01 2 ./ I co - 1 -r--1-1 \0/ . 3 MUD ROOM Ar I 101 i * MECHANICAL ~ OFFICE~ 1 EXISTING CONDO 1 1 AREA I m Â® f [)03 1 | - #MECHANICAL Bo I 1 'Fl - 44 I 1 : !1 / \ 97} i ' ..L .,4 11 1 1 11 1 ,---1 .... 1 1 j / 2 r-- ~ ~3 1 1 1 1 1 \ 1 + -4 .4 6-TI, i p.Â·--9 (09 cr=--Â·--'*V c DR)21 -/ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT --3 j--Ut 1 Fl--7 1 I /' k:=r, 1 1.' 3 3' 0 5'-4" 5'-4" L L L [- 6- #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1 :71 11) L..._ _-_.- -- - - -- -~2 -**- 1 4:431 - 8 1 1 1 lilli 1 1-] 1-:L J 1 1 1 1 lei 10'-8" i~ ~i i i T\ i~~ 17'-5" 1 1 jill I 51/2 / :11 4/ ty$...%, 1, 1 i ,Â·EL -44 86 1 1 _ _ - - - 3 1 b 11 1 1 JA FIL ' L -- CIVIL 1a#* L -r .1 LE 2. 1._j - - 3 i 1, cr 52) f- -3 ~ r-. L /0 1 Â»-11 1 - -\1\\\1111 ~1- F f E-.Â« - ~~~ CONTRACTOR - -/rl)~31 .. #CONTRACTOR 5-- ut 3 ; 1 0 1-0- _122 Â· Â· 'i,T .,1, ..11 P 1-1 1 UP aR @ 1, ea. 6 DECK I *., ....------- MOOD STEPS ~ 9 ---* ....- ./-4-_-.--....._ .. 91 - ,>Â·- -Â·- Â·Â·Â·--Â·---Â· 56" HleH HANDRAIL in i._ - ---- - (BOTH SIDES) m I. 1 /02\ 1 V --Â·- TEMP. GLASS GUARDRAIL A----1 1 1 4,-01Â£ HPC 2/01/08 DESIGN REVIEW C - Â·- RAISED DECK Â·-----Â·Â·-3 < MARK DATE DESCRIPTION (EXISTING DRAINA<BE TO REMAIN) --- [Efi] PROJECT NO: 0720 DRAWN BY: SMW ! COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC -~ SHEET TITLE 0 0 -A2.1 l.9 Â®(3 ADDITION 1/4" = 1'-01' FLOOR PLAN 4 > /0,/ /,7 RECEIVED MARI 7~.-g i CITY OF 4 ip = e COMMUNITY (11:vt .r'**i- 4 FORUM PHI 54 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 P O Box 1606 Basalt, Colorado 81621 NEW SKYLIGHT TO MATCH PHONE 970 279 4157 FAX 866 770 5585 EXISTINGS (TYP OF 6) 1 1 Isis Addition 406 E. Hopkins Ave 3, Aspen, Colorado 81611 PROPOSED Suzie Krevoy k ;: 4,%.2 ' 2 . 2 1 < ' STANDING SEAM k /'b 4 < Â· i IL e 2 1 4 VAULTED ROOF . - CONSULTANTS TO MATCH 2 E I .92 - SURVEYOR < >.,ifil, , 4 , % 4 r : A 1 .: Fart 3 f > f? 5 / #SURVEYOR â‚¬ ' ' 1/. ; 4/,Â·5. . i A 1 f. 1 - */1 Q./.9. % 1 1 MECHANICAL N 2'f a'/ : I I 41 1 . 'I .:Al. 1 2 , 'i '' ./ h f $ d 42'~ t â‚¬ ' 1 â‚¬ 4 ' 1Â·r , b ' GEOTECH 1 'R, . k I 1 1 : /1 1% ' , 1tt, ~ , 0 ., - #GEOTECH 21 3 . 2 4 â‚¬ f :, I b ' ~ 1 ' St X 44 1 1 1 ,/,1 .1, Â¥ 1 1 ..1 t, 1 * STRUCTURAL 5. 1 4 & 1 %< i!,/' ' ' '. #STRUCTURAL 1 .1, , '< D , r 6.1 â‚¬ ./ , 1,48 . h: , 2 t. r , .1 '2 : 2 i EXISTING i > â‚¬) 3 4 , MECHANICAL STANDING SEAM Â· I 'i #MECHANICAL 31k, VAULTED ROOF 1 , â‚¬ , 4 , 14, * %1 â‚¬ 2 > 04 : f ' 4 a. 1 f 1 4 ,'4~ 'X X k k & i LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT r 1 4:.1 1 i <(:3< i#9~ 2 :, k , . ;t t,$ 1:,, .wisd'*' b #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1 % . 4,Â»1 .>2 ,/ I E . ,>,.' 4.. tr, 4 4 0%>' 1 1 1. 4 '. 1 />91 < k.t '<4 0 i~ Â© ~ EXISTING P 2 :.4 + <5:,1 ..S-4- 4 4 f-8 '>. 4 ~ CIVIL Â¥ % : I,4 STANDING SEAM #### 32' i'% I z 1 1 '9 Cd . 11,1 1 :51< I ,- . 4 1 I 0.'62 1 .1, $ 0 1, t' I , ''<. VAULTED ROOF >0 â‚¬ 4 ./%1:, 4 8 I , 4 4.1 % 4 1 11 4, '1 Â· , ,4 , . '16 '/ f ''3 13 1, 1 'Â¥. I ' . #CONTRACTOR 1 45 I \1 ' 4 , '' b. %'p 1 : '' 1 CONTRACTOR 1 1 0 I. t>: . 1 , .1 V >11 'T. 1, I, ; 1, P .31 2 2 >,4 ' , 4.' 1 ''1 ' . F M , ..9 a 1 I .1 4 F M'* 1 L 1 1 UP BR @ 1, 1" ea 1 Â¥ DECK 1 1< -- -m ----- PNOOD STEPS ~ 1 9 Hle:4 HANDRAIL 1 @ 3 m ,_ - (80'TH SIDES) lA HPC 2/01/08 DESIGN REVIEW 5. 1 V MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 1, 1 1 1 A - - ,/ 1 ~ - - TEMP 61.-ASS GUARDRAIL ~h 1 - - 1 4'-0" PROJECT NO 0720 4----- - '-"- RAISED DES< > ~~~ _DRAWNBYSMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC (EXISTiNe PRAINAGE TO REMAIN) - i SHEET TITLE i 1 A A2.2 rio> 1 2 6 8 4) O 8 ROOF PLAN 2 ENLARGED ROOF PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" foot *.p >f WY'=2 M.... - - -h p -,S .# . ..>I.7.:=& 2 â‚¬W>Â» V V t ,Â·)4...f$~.....+ RECEIVED MAR 1 7 2 21 3 CITY OR Ai:Pf,1;U COMMUNITY DEVELOptic.ld â€¢ -FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 RO. Box 1606 Basalt, Colorado 81621 PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 1.1 1 1 Isis Addition 406 E. Hopkins Ave Aspen, Colorado 81611 EXISTING STANDING SEAM OnLE DFLLE Suzie Krevoy VAULTED ROOF AHU CONSULTANTS 252Â· SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR FLAT ROOF GEOTECH #GEOTECH 1 1 STRUCTURAL #STRUCTURAL 111 lili = PROPOSED 9~ STANDING SEAM r -1--41 VAULTED ROOF MECHANICAL TO MATCH . 2 : ' MECH. ~ #MECHANICAL 1.:..11:21:/::. . UNIT , 1 -35'--Cr FEWN.4 -- - 1 ---------- aR. ~ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT \ &44%4 .. 4 ~ 11 11. 11 #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT A : T t~:~ : 1 . r i ~:. EXISTING STANDING SEAM . 43 VAULTED ROOF ~ A~~ ~: I I %##4 i4%%% 444% 4% "0% 1% 4% CIVIL 1 4%4 1-lij *%2% : 1%44% #it## i S 1 :':i' 2.i lili lili EXISTING 29 STANDING SEAM VAULTED ROOF 'i :i':6 1:.:Â·tii . ~i 1. : 1. ... CONTRACTOR H. 1 li' i ':1 3::~.iti~:21 11 1. ~Â·: ii Â·:t #CONTRACTOR 1 i; Â· -t 10 1 - ' . t -- 1 11 liz - - ~--Â·--Â· ---- SNOW FENCE 0 1 i --THRU T OVERFD ~ < PLANTER > ~ F/N/SH lEi HPC 2/01/08 DESIGN REVIEW MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO: 0720 3 ROOF PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0" DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE A2.3 ROOF PLAN mi,Imn 6 RECEIVED MAR 1 7 2008 0 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT â€¢ FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 1 20. Box 1606 Basalt, Colorado 81621 PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 Isis Addition -- --- 406 E. Hopkins Ave -- Aspen, Colorado 81611 - ---01 ~ 1~ E E- Suzie Krevoy 1 .L. . - I 0 * . L' C - El 7 . f -4 -1. -If-â€ž- I.1., ~-1-- .4 1 -------- CONSULTANTS 1 ---2*=/ ----T--- 1 - -Â»-2 n-;~ - "~ - - SURVEYOR 1 2 1Â· .----*-r----: #SURVEYOR 7 7 - 7 Â·I- - 1.- Â£ J -- 1_1 1 ~ " ~ _--_- --- r T ~" r 0 ID~ - QL -- UID 7 - f L 1 11 -- - L- - r 1 GEOTECH . | | Tl III--1 #GEOTECH 1 LEz. E. 1 _ ..1 1 1 1 - . E )1 hi 1. rl & -rL_ -- 1 1 1 1 STRUCTURAL - r. 1.-4 .1 3-- Â«rÂ»-339~- ..%. 1 _1 It #STRUCTURAL 4 --- 1 0 -----4- ff---7 OU FLLE 00 ->00 IIJ 00 6CIifoo foo=fol uttl a-ti|~~-3P---]_ _ 32- MECHANICAL #MECHANICAL , 1 r---] 11-3 R--1 - I_ --i r-----~ - ..........,-----,â€ž..... - I i , 1- /1 / 1\ MH'' -. i-.._'-/-.#.---1-Â·Â·---- #LANDSCAPE ARCHITEC \ 1 11 / 1 1.1 , It- i .1 1 / 11 - 1 41 1 ~ ~ -- -- LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1 IN 1 / -- 00 1 - - -- m - ... I Â· El- CIVIL #### CONTRACTOR #CONTRACTOR HPC 2/01/08 ESIGN REVIEW MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO: 0720 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE A3.1 ELEVATIONS RECEIVED MAR 1 7 2008 CITY OF ASPEN . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT . -----Â·~~---- -FO_RUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 RO. Box 1606 Basalt, Colorado 81621 PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 Isis Addition 406 E. Hopkins Ave - Flb Tin Aspen, Colorado 81611 -ri Suzie Krevoy r 11 )Ir CONSULTANTS 1 --Il---Il---------- CD SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR 0 SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1 '-0" GEOTECH #GEOTECH STRUCTURAL #STRUCTURAL - 111 1 1 -0 n. 4 , MECHANICAL #MECHANICAL J - 1 , 011 b LL R 011 0 D h LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT N 11 0 #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 03 8 . I . 011 1 1 -731, 0 1 1 11 1 - 11 19< U -t CIVIL Tqq-J ~ .- 1 I. 1 ---- -9 #### (D 1 1 . .........1 11 .1 .1 . ........ CD SECTION ~ SECTION CONTRACTOR SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" #CONTRACTOR ' --3-NX . ... .- 1 ----- HPC 2/01/08 DESIGN REVIEW - L,--11 1 1 I ~ ----------------- *--#=F- irTiT m-7 21- -- ~ /9083% 10-00*0#*--Ir- MARK DATE DESCRIPTION I PROJECT NO: 0720 1.1 1 DRAWN BY: SMW - 11 11 LL m 1 0.1 -i-li 0 COPYRIGHT Forurn Phi LLC 5 11 11 11 1 1 0 01 -. .. - - SHEET TITLE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1\ / \ LU . -- 1 00'.Et / thuf...... 1.7 A4.1 0Â«- . Ii-1--i- 2 k \ i ; C ) 1 1 ..... 1. - :\ 1 ---- L - I | | 1 - T-- - ----------------- <D 11 0 -- SECTION ~00~ SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SECTIONS 3 IA - .â‚¬-.2 L . WINDOWSCHEDULE 1 MARK A--i--4 HD HT 1 Operation Type 1 NOTES RECEIVED Operation E---I--T-- 1 FIRE RATING I NOTES WIDTHHEIGHT 1 HEAD I JAMB 1 SILL I LUEL-L-12"LE-41/2"11'41/2"_fixed MAR 1 7 2008 CITY OF ASPEN L wO2 ! 231_1 4,-11" !10'-11" ! Fixed ~ - 1-223_1'4"-111_-1.22"-Fixed COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT L-F)4 ! _21_1 4, P ! Side Hung ~ ___ = L--224-122"!_1122*Upor-Single swing ~ ! ! LwO5 ! _331 ! 51 !81 ! Side Hung ~ _FORUM PH_1 L_306 1 _21_! 5'-6" P ! Side Hung ~ _- 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 L_510 1_231_1.21 !21-6" ! Top Hung 1 --- - - RO. Box 1606 L.-22-1.211ME"-!Si-*UMorSliding____!__3 1---!----------!~ ! w11 1 51-2 1/2" ! 2' ~2'-6" ~ Top Hung ~ = Basalt, Colorado 81621 L.-221-LEELLI_193-92225*-Swing_L__4___-~ L_W12 1 -5'-2 1/2"--1 21 ~2'-6" ~ Top Hung ~ - PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 L--009-LEELL-L-l,Single-DoorSingle-Swing_!~ 8' Single Door Single Swing Isis Addition 406 E. Hopkins Ave Aspen, Colorado 81611 Suzie Krevoy . /31 i337 CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR .---*l ---STANDING SEAM COPPER ROOF{NG 4 ' 4 ' 4 . OVER COMPOSITE ROOF MEMBRANE % TO.STEEL o "K' OVER PLYWOOD SHEATHING OVER %' - 11 $ RIGID INSULATION AND BLOCK#NG %i ; GEOTECH OVER VAPOR BARRIER OVER METAL '? 1 1 ' DECKING. TURN COMPOSITE ROOF oPPER SHINGLE OVER , 1 -, #GEOTECH 91 1 MEMBRANE DOWN OVER BLOCK/NG. SEPARATION LAYER OVER \ BITUTHENE WER '6' PLYWD. rL' b . 4 ------END PLUG PROVIDED BY c k /1 Â¥ 22---- ROOFING MANUFACTURER 3 SHEATHING T.O.SECEL...2._ElL. ( [M~ - il 11 4 STRUCTURAL --4---3----* -M-- --~---Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·4~~~ -~PPEf? stÂ·liNGLE FTN?~11 POINT- 9 N./.C. C\1 \2137----14 : - tt A 1. ' 4 R-19 BAIT INSULATION r-- 02 / i #STRUCTURAL 1 1 AS.3 V ._14 METAL STUDS Â© F.M.UNE 11 It I 4 . <- fe'METAL STUDS @ AH.UNITS ~\ ~0~ \430 4 ' . It 11 . 1 \Do 1 to) @ 1 - -/2, PLYWOOD AND RIPPED 2*8 ~ REFER TO SECTION 1 1 * TREATED WOOD BLOCKING 4 . -* - - NSULATION AND INTERIOR *| t--1 FOR ADDIT/ONAL ~22 to MECHANICAL #MECHANICAL FINISHES Ngle FN.UNK 7\ \22/ INFORMATION i ~ h / :.-\ 1 -FORMED COPPER FASCIA TO t ~ -__i_ ._ 14 NiC. MATCH COPPER ROOF[NG ~ P.M.UN\T F.M. UNIT t ~-----------~~~~ /---1 4 1 1 It- 111 1 1 . i HEmyl@.191!LE-SEE-SCHEDULE~. i In ----$-*--*- \ 2.-Â·r Â£ \ 3 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT U L-------FORMED COPPER FLASHjNG ' ' -4 #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT- t Ill - -Â·---HEAD FLASHING WITH f It R 1 --------------.--IM--8- -- EL = 121'-IC \ f UPPER LEVEL 6.1 ROD and SEALANT EL= 121'1 ,\~ 1 ~---Â·---------Â·--COPPER SHINGLE OVER SEPARAI-ION ~ -----ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD 7 LAYER OVER BITUTHENE OVER c WINDOW FRAME 9 PUWD. SHEATHING HEAD EXTENSION - SHIM AS CIVIL ~-------Â·Â·-------Â·-Â·Â·-â‚¬ METAL STUDS J REQUIRED. (bURÂ© F.M.UNIT) 12 #0111# A9.3 rh GUTTER @ F.M.U. Ch WINDOW HEAD @ COPPER SHINGLES 3" = 1'-0" .222 WALL SECTION 38"=1'-0" 221-----------WAL~=---3/8"-1'4" CONTRACTOR D03 DETAIL 3" = 1'-0" 22:~ #CONTRACTOR ---------STANDING SEAM COPPER ROOFING ----STANONG SEAM COPPER ROORNG OVER COMPOSITE ROOF MEMBRANE OVER COMPOSITE ROOF MEMBRANE OVER PLYWOOD SHEATH?NG OVER OVER PLYWOOD SHEATHING OVER 4 RIGID INSULATION AND BLOCKING 2 RIGID INSULATION AND BLOCKING NER VAPOR BARRIER OVER METAL OVER VAPOR BARR/ER OVER METAL --- OPPER SHINGLES O/ER SEPAR#J-ION - 1 - 3 DECKING. TURN COMPOSITE ROOF DECKING. LMER OVER BITUTHENE OVER PLYWOOD 11 - ~ 90 1 i~ MEMBRANE DOWN OVER BLOCKING. u SHEATHING. LAP BITUTHENE OVER 4 -w - - - TURNED UP ROOF MEMBRANE AT BASE. -/2" PLYWOOD AND RIPPED Zx8 ~ ~ -TREATED WOOD BLOCKING BOLTED INTERIOR t $ EXIEBIQR ----- ------ ------- 2 4 TREATED WOOD BLOCKING ~_ N 2% TO STEEL BENT PLATE 0 - -4* U ?- _ 0 ________~________-31/40 REiNFORCED CONCRETE TOPPING 11 N - SLAB (WiTH RADIANT HEAT TUBING 4 r _ -BENT PLATE -SEE STRUCTURAL i 51 e WHERE OCCURS) OVER WATERPROOF 4 O MEMBRANE OVER 34Â° PLYWOOD ---- --FORMED COPPER FASCIA TO n WER Z ROLLOUT 60LATION MAL MATCH COPPER ROOFING B (FLOATING FLOOR SYSTEM.) 11 11 11 C . 93 i It 4 1 C Â·WA-- a --Â·-----ATERPROOF MEMBRANE TO i CONTINUE OVER TD.CURB " < AND UNDER ROOF MEMBRANE ti u ) 4 A-1 flm--1 11 11 . 11 3. REINFORCED CONCRETE TOPPING HPC 2/01/08 ESIGN REVIEW u FORMED COPPER SOFF}T AND ~40% SLAB (WiTH RADIANT HEAT TUBING E 18!Ill I WHERE OCCURS) OVER WATERPROOF ROOF MARK DATE DESCRIPTION FASCIA TO MATCH COPPER ROOFING Nmle . 04 J F.MU. fit 91 -11 ---STEEL BEAM WHERE OCCURS- TURN ROOF MEMBRANE UP WALL 1-0' STEEL BEAM WHERE OCCURS- MEMBRANE OVER TAPERED INSULATION. SEE ST-RUCTURAL u SEE STRUCTURAL i:/f>%: L.:EZZiED MINIMUM. It -~ ; 1 ,--- -- -- --- - -LIZ<klgi.. ---- PROJECT NO: 0720 SEE PLAN FOR DIM. â€¢ - -------Â·---BLOCKING-SHOOT TO STEEL BEAM - --------- â€ž I , BLOCKING-SHOOT TO STEEL BEAM DRAWN BY: SMW I. :.:'0,~â€¢'..* 0 . I COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC 1 , to ....4, + A, .8...D,l,D.1.Dl.~.,4a 1 It ./2/14# I - OPPER SHINGLE OVER SEPARATION -- " LAYER OVER Bn-UTHENE OVER I.''I.A. A.5 '9,4., b. E ", b..IM. I.1.b"'.1 SHEET TITLE " i -PPER SHINGLE WER SEPARATION U 1/20 PLYND. SHEATHING 0/Â· . I . A 4 .6, 4. . 41---STRUCTURAL DECK -- . L. . * LAYER OVER BITUTHENE OVER 11 Â·Â·Â· t . r . + 92' PIYWD. SHEATHING 6, 44 1 11 1 -----------===9 -4' METAL STUDS / 1 a METAL STUDS NOTE: Â·---Â« ASPHAI IMPREGNATED A6.1 -----60 METAL SrUDS u FLOATING FLOOR SYSTEM , 8-ACKER BOARD U SHALL BE MODEL RIM BY -- i u KiNETICS NOISE CONTROL tNC. ---- ---5'WIDE CONCRETE CURB ------ --- -HNSULAT/ON AND /NTE/NOR L-------IGID INSULATION (SEE STRUCTURAL> ----- -----INSULATION AND INTEAOR 1 11 FINISHES NJO.@ F,M.UND- It FINISHES N.I.C.@ F.M.UNIT 1 u 1 /i /h RAKE FASCIA @ F.M.U. <7 ROOF OVERHANG @ F.M.U. TYPICAL EXT. WALL BASE SHOWN) AH.UNIT COND[TION l 114" = 1'-0" E-- ASSEMBLIES !294 DETAIL 3"=1'0" 022 DETAIL 3" = 1'-0" .22=-~ n 1 1 \\\ \ 1%1 \" \ 1 -- ,/11*~4 a i X \1 14- - 4 141\49 (3 I \\\ Al f i <- 1 ~ MECHANICAL ~ , .1 1Â« ~<~~1 \\ \ FORUM PIll 4\1 . .1.4: .114'klgZÂ£(JJRbfr. 62,.9 -Dk . IN \ 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 \ \ th X RO. Box 1606 Basalt, Colorado 81621 .~ ~1>yAN PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 . .1 1 iA k' I~~ke~fy./Aff--~---f - G.-- Ki\\t\. 1 \a Â· x ,1,1 4..21 r ~M \\ 1 1 111\UN>x. 1\484\Fv 11 4*~~\\~.~~ Isis Addition 4!fi Â«501 f976 1 PROPOSED F.A.R. CALCULATION 406 E. Hopkins Ave Â® . 19 . 0 ALLOWABLE FAR 2,000 SF - NET LIVABLE Aspen, Colorado 81611 'fÂ»\ 1-11- 1.-4- -1 -- V,D-X< 1 -it-- : :DIÂ·. 24 r + lit~ , --AW-f - --~ - Â·4 11 rA 10 . Suzie Krevoy 11\ 1\ ; 1 B,,- - r 4 , 4 4.1- +2 TDR 500 SF h 7 -1 9 - D .1 , 4 ---... _._ ...___ TOTAL ALLOWABLE NET LIVABLE CONSULTANTS ALLOWABLE DECKS (15%) 300 SF IMIL. 1 2,500 SF - NET LIVABLE \\ 1 64 \1 1 ..').Y< lk- ~4 - , 1-\ 1 SURVEYOR 1 1- f â‚¬ . -i 1 1- 1 - = G EXISTING UNIT NET AREA 1,970 SF #SURVEYOR G - PROPOSED NET AREA 498 SF 1 1 1 1 TOTAL UNIT NET AREA 2,468 SF - NET LIVABLE 1 1 %, -- 9 $54 n 1 - --.- ---.-. 5 GEOTECH DECK 1 41 . ~, . Â· '!00/ sj #GEOTECH â€¢ -- - 56' /49,4..DRAL 3 iii -- -r 4, leDâ„¢ /!DES.1 1 Â· i i 1, .te. 0 : < V RAISED DESK - -> (EXâ‚¬Â·TiNG CÂ«ANAbZ 70 ~MANÂ· _ --~ i~- - -- -- - - <* Â® STRUCTURAL !11 i #STRUCTURAL 10Â· 0 00 0 00Â® MECHANICAL #MECHANICAL 1 UNIT:B - PROPOSED 1/8" = 1'-0" LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Â· #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT <fi CIVIL #### b--4 n k===4 '1 1 i-- i- ~ e 4949944 -f<{tipiÂ«j~ ~ CONTRACTOR #CONTRACTOR 1 1 --11\14{--f~~ thiffi~ 1+41 3 4 '1; . . lk:Â·-1 31-2LN X t:+31.- 1\11\11 \Â», f NY VAA \40+~8 1% ,7 DECK 1 - \\. 41.44 ,.4 . 1/\!\ 1\\.. 17=5=E=-=---Â·=- --=12=t EXISTING RA.R. CALCULATION ALLOWABLE FAR 2,000 SF - NET LIVABLE ,_I>*9, .*tittÂ¢ff<f--2-- 3-44Â« _-- ==---_-., A.- --__--- - '24=u=---lE~/~ --dE#. _ ... -_. Â® 1 - IL ;1 1:.- 1 :- 9-1 \ 4 -1, 4 4- F. ALLOWABLE DECKS (15%) 300 SF 1 â‚¬ 13. 4 11 1 , 1 1 :, -1Â»,-A--Â»91H 1\ 99149Â«444' ~- - 1 v*51 1 :-iliff: 2'1#1~RZ#~ 1,970 SF - Â· -- P./.10/ OF ./1/TINe 5/07/08 DESIGN REVIEW : CÂ«\\ \Â«Â« \3'a.,1 1 : i \~4 11 ~. ~ , j, UNIT NET AREA 4-1 t l. i 4- - =11 ' UNIT GROSS AREA 2 070 SF 71 ]Kfr~TrHiw<*2 1\\ MARK DATE DESCRIPTION \1 1\ 1 0 JI If.4-3 % {\ . \ 1 ,-- 1 ~ -6 1 AllikiHihk 'Â« \1 -2 - --- I - .4.--------I .. .1 --~ 4.-- ---_ tr ., .-Te./.* - P.- - E--1- - -Z!11 -- -1-- -- ~ ~ PROJECT NO: 0720 - CA . ..4 TEMP. 61-ASS .ARP- ~ DRAWN BY: SMW *M ~ RAn- AT Hor ne DEOK =GE - 4 ~ 1. el-ASS GUARDRAIL--- - -L DECK ~ | COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE I - .------- ET I RAISED 'ECK --- -> G (EXISTING PRAINAGE TO REMAIN) _ AO.2 1 1 j 1 00006Â® 2 UNIT:B - EXISTING 1/8" = 1 '-0" FAR ANALYSIS -_-------------------------------------------------------- ACTUALVIEWABLEPLANE r --- O , . --- EVIEWFCANE-FER G. I.S. ------ FORUM PHI RO. Box 1606 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 Basalt, Colorado 81621 ---1=11% PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 A.H. UKIT A FREE MARKETADDITION /---4- .4 - ti r UPPER A * Isis Addition UL 1 ~ 1 ,-rr.,1 i 1 f . , , 11 EL.=!21'-10' 1 11 1 406 E. Hopkins Ave CJ 1*1 U 6 MECH ~ / 0-- , 1 Aspen, Colorado 81611 - J n Mi Suzie Krevoy 0 ECH. 11 r - -1 n Â· PROJ. LVE. ~ r.il n V rzR?{ CONSULTANTS 112'-3 -1 THEATER A n r ,- 2,:>vyÂ·sÂ· rlÂ·-1. 1. 14_L..4 P r 5,4-3,214~A n .? r--rlriIA-7-----1 =.1 SURVEYOR n 1 rs- -71 #SURVEYOR n 1 rshnfÂ·'Fft - 0 Â©f..5537$f .4 . MAN LVL. C. . 100'-(7 = 790854' GEOTECH I E6100,2---,I J. J L 96'-10. Â·, Â· i ., . . 4 1 1 1 1 #GEOTECH 1 I Ill .9 M j t i . -0....le=r PROJ. LVE ~ STRUCTURAL 1 L l' Â·Â·1 ELÂ·86'-ItÂ» #STRUCTURAL 0 STOR. 1: F--1 THEATER D , - -1 rÂ·. 83'-6* i~4 rEl n q J - M r 5 hzwÂ·i- ry -- n g cyak*-1 i Â·'' MECHANICAL 9 n 2 H -, MNT--1 . #MECHANICAL Cid C.k,-1Â£-21=ye. ,Tr:::-:-2:y...v.: --- --~7---:,.91...: 0 STOP?. i . =5 =9 - eN td rzlÂ·Irm LOWER LVE. ~ - EL=74'-9 1........ 13'-9 -1Â·..'2.Â·P.*=Lili. ..- .. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT HPC VIEWPLANE SECTION 1/8" = 1'-0" CIVIL #### CONTRACTOR #CONTRACTOR 00 071 V L 1 V 3/L-_ I -- ilm 11 iiI/A'.a*, HPC 5/07/08 DESIGN REVIEW . MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO: 0720 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE PROJECT SITE AO.3 VIEWPLANE PER GIS VIEWPLANE - VIEWPLANE PLAN 1" = 50' f . -1 5121/, 17'-5" ' E. . cle" . 5.-81/7 , 5'-217 , 10'-6" L ,/ 64 3.111/7 , 4'-81/2 ' 2'-7 < ~ A . /,/,~1/2' 1 D . D . FORUM- PH_I 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 RO. Box 1606 _ .IL 4, 0 Basalt, Colorado 81621 ~ F Â· PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 I I FY= = c 1 f -r==1-1 r--lr--1 kl , 3, L 1 il r' ' r ----- 1 L_J I I l_ __1 1 ' 1 0 4 1 - 14,_ - _1_1._ _ il . 14. 1 0 R.Z--- 1 1 - /5/1 ..4 N /1~ Isis Addition 1 : i 1~J | GUEST 0-' I ... r - -\- r---1 Il 4--901=,4.-- 4-- -,--79.r==,-44 4 11 r- 1 2=r E- 3 1 I 1 1 0 1 1 1 111 60 /4 9 1 1 406 E. Hopkins Ave 1 0 'lili 1 I lili --1 } ; 1 1 1 1 - Â¢ 1 1/All / lA Aspen, Colorado 81611 - Suzie Krevoy 1 n \N.A: n. (% i.,1-.1- 41 1 l (~ ~-81/27~ , \ 1%00 1--]L-Al: it_JI / . MECHANICAL 4'-11/2" Vl 1-7" ,], ' 3-111/2 1 1 4 ,4 1 1 . O 8 -CONSULTANTS i, m.,1 6'-5" k 4'-11/2 'V )--.1.1 6 -h r 5. 24 SURVEYOR -1 . m 1 1 0 :~r-~1---~--~----~~ 2 [------~ --. ED D05 1 #SURVEYOR tc ..... lili 11 1 1 e j %1 21 1 --4- L z]Gl*ST SUITEI 1 1 A A ..0 1 POP N 1 - l7---i r ~ V 01 lit 1 GEOTECH #GEOTECH :1 1 1 1 1. 01 .1 41 b B / I , *11_4 J & L__-2 4 0 . i 1 - 7-1 ' 1 e %/ 7- IL=t Ti ~-9 , . <604 ED lei E ic 7 11,9 \1 / ev 1 i STRUCTURAL Iii f~ -3 \ . #STRUCTURAL .1 4 1 \\ i l--4.-j 1 -1 " 1111 1 1 0 99 7 2%10 0 1 1 2 N 1 -~ 2 u U U . ..1 1 $ 1 1 P,4 . 1 -'.--4.- ...4 1 . N. -I - *-t- A * *. ... -. I -- ..~- 4.- 4-, ... -- 01 1 LE] 0 00 'UT, 1" 1 #i 1 1, 1 1 1 1 11 . 110 /4 4 1. 4< o o 4 1 MUD ROOM OFFICE ~ > MECHANICAL 101 - ' 1 EXISTING CONDO 6 0 17 AREA >b< #MECHANICAL I -%% ==. 1 FllyÂ« 7 - 1/ 1 . W 1 9 --4- 1 441- )1 1\ vy f.-1 --1 4 1 .ly 1 LUU - 1 4 U i 441 - 2 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT -W ; T i TE 21 71 - 1 /6 1 64 -Â»-- ~ * #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Pr, 0%52" e 1 1 1% :14 11\ 1 1 1/ 1 h -1 gif 1 lili '73 1,1 3'-4" ~ 2'-1112' , , 1 19 4 1 * 1 ; 481 -8.01 1 1 1 lili 1 1 14 60-312 . 1 . I 1 521 Â© 1 1 1 1 .-- *-Ip -4, -I -4- -4- .-- *e- 6 - L J \ \ 1 11 11 1 7/ 1 1 1]11 1 1 /1 17'-101/2 CIVIL IiI }'% Fill_ -,gld.4 1 -_J I b H d Fri, 1 Â«440yÂ« L_-19 i LE 2 1 - L -- - L -Ja --- , 24 1 N #### LIL)_Ll___1 /7-\ N /:i 1 F- -i [- -i I ./9 h /1 J L -1 1 1-1 ] - L ~ #CONTRACTOR A .- 1 CONTRACTOR -- d 04 0 . E_.-'-. ~~~~0--_ 2-2.--20 4 . . 11 1 ''' 1 0 UP OR @ - 1" ea. L i 6 - DECK 1 1 4 - MOP STEPS ~ 11,3--71 ' 1 All "--2 - A 4 --- --Â·--Â· 336' HleH HANDRAIL I - - - (BOTH BDES) 1 1! trbit- im 1 1 ./ 1 111 - a. 1 1 1 111 1 V 1- W 9 4,-0" 1 K HPC 5/07/08 DESIGN REVIEW i., 1|~ < --- RAISED DECK --------Â·Â·Â» MARK DATE DESCRIPTION (EXISTING DRAINASE TO REMAIN) . | CL - -----------1 1 PROJECT NO: 0720 1 DRAWN BY: SMW 1, 320" U 1 1; COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC i ' SHEET TITLE t . (D (3 (D (3 Â® Â® -A2.-1 1 ADDITION 1/4" = 1'-0" FLOOR PLAN /000 mummit,imin,i~tit,in,ittit,itit,~~ti,-mim,A "~r . $10 h!3NMO k 1 m 101.1 .1 N _J 02 Of < < O k- O O D - O A Z < 1 LU O < 0 > DIa # z z D LU < O 0 0 _1 0 3 09 0 0 1 ; 1 i 1 1 1 1 i 11 ! 1 ' , 1 1 1 It : \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , _1__1-a__-i 1 h=/O > -9 1 1 1 1 1 1 - .- Vi 1 , - l 1 It I It 11 F 1 1 11 - 1 1 111 -- 1 1 - ---#.- , 1 ?BÂ»/1,4 : -Tl 1 1 1 6--- - 1 9 1 29 X *0~.5 1 : 110Â·SX." 11 1 r ' 0 1 * 0 i 0 1, 1 10 0 .0-19*2.6 a 3 1 't 1- 1.0-** x #O-le i 1 1 1 11 V 23 *,>*>13 '23 a Â»t. 2, g >-2. ./.>....0............0/ ' I B - 22. v u b . V> 3.2 +22... v . _ I Â» >3, / 2.........yet'tvs'/I......... , / i 1 lilli I 1 4.0.,9 X Â«92 1,-N< 5 1 1 11 11 17 k--1930fÂ¢Jr 111 J > 2.>21 Â¥.k v - - > + > 2- -- . . W - -- - -- --- - - -- lili 4 J 11~ *.y-~ 1 ...... #.......2-....-Il. : I.-2 - . 1 1 1 1 4,1111 1 i Ill &. : 1111 1 lillil : 111 > 1 Ili kililtitilli 1 Ill;,11 i '*211, 1/1 ..... . I ..:..'.' I - * Â» e> 2..Â»>3>7. â‚¬ 9 k.- - ,/../.. ' . t. 2.>2 .r ./. >>- -> " f 1 111~ 1 1 111 1 4 111* 1 1 41 'III'ill 11 ; 11(111 1 1 i 1 1 ~ ~ 1 Irl lilli 1,0.,9 X .9-+5 1 1 111 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ill 1 1 1 1 11 ' 111|~ T 1 11 1 MIl & V .0 2.....22-* I.....1 2 Â»/ -n f ' 1---- 1 1 11 i lili V 1 1 111 . .. /y > ......... 3 ' ..... 1 2 Ill 1 || i 1 <Ol -1 1 lin L'-1 ~1 I 11 ! 111 '- , 1 1 Â»07.:8 4.-/ .>4 Da<150<7 ,4 - - PU - Ba<re -c T , 4 i L.* w-~-I 0 Z U.1 . =0.c. - . - . 1 7 4 '11 1 0 1 1 - *~ 2-Ad,a<.-ovaa,- LU 5 D . e./-2-1 27'Â·. -- ---2.--a-Â¢-â‚¬3-nÂ©+2 .0- .2. t- f , I| 1 V if ~b| 1 1 11 ' -- - 1 1 : 11 i ~2 :1 .....:.Eli. v I ~Eyb230&>a,Le. - .. e-Let'.A~j.2 --~=.1.-=.~12.1â‚¬22AeLt~- 1 ~ 4 1 4 ~ 111 -1 1 : lit lill */24Â»*3.--.0 3. A- 1, - GUA. - I# .crne In . I. 41& T 1 1 -- :.--- "...'ll--....I -4./4 V 1 11'I 11 1 192>tal- -2-2*2-tw.-1>ettiHI: I. ia-4,-~ -10-,2Â£2~ ..' -Â£0~U~-2aeÂ£2_21ph,-,~ - Ly_# . -:- i ~ 4' >dle_. .:_2 - . -4~~ n..2.-t-->.<Ce.-_t~~ u.a-2 - i~+35~Â£'1_:,t-~~Pltki t 1 1 11 : -- lit 1 11 kit '111 - u i ; lill. Li "hl Ili IIi ' F 4 1 1>~ ~ll! ~~lil M lan..1.v ....i-r.- -t,2~.Ab/4211â€žP.71.2.u.....-. * -Il:.U ..g'.11*. . -* *- .6..1- li I i i t i ! 1 ' i lilli \\\4 11 1 11'11:11' 1 --2151.2 L i i +44 1,1, lilli L 11 540#un-* .ax'Â»"ax<g Â»4 4 .4%â‚¬**G'> 4 4 1 M 2 y..94Â»4 1 1 -- 1 4 1 r-- -------- 11 1 , - 1 1 1 11 1 11 1 1 1 1 et 4 CAPE ARCHITECT tif80/= OdH #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 062~ ON 103PObld 311 'lld LUnJ03 1HDINAdOO #SURVEYOR GEOTECH #STRUCTURAL #MECHANICAL #CONTRACT #GEOTECH srL 31Va MMVIN 311ll 133HS AG NA/\VbICI MECHANICAL ~ 77*J =1002:1 a311AVA 119'*INVH NDING SEAM PROPOSED VAULTED ROOF . FORUM P-H_I 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 RO. Box 1606 Basalt, Colorado 81621 PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 1 : 1 1 1 1/ I Isis Addition 406 E. Hopkins Ave - EXISTING STANDING SEAM OrioE Aspen, Colorado 81611 DFLLE Suzie Krevoy VAULTED ROOF AHU CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR F LAT ROOF GEOTECH #GEOTECH 1 1 STRUCTURAL #STRUCTURAL 11 N - 23 ' PROPOSED | = . 1= E f: i .El E ~E~ L UN. =1:1 4// STANDING SEAM ===-W ... -Ill i MECHANICAL I 4% VAULTED ROOF T 1 #MECHANICAL TC MATCH \ 1 UN/T P/-4 #Â·1;1:i.iii t .: .. i i i d .& 4/1 0 Â· Â·Â·Â· .:ie:â€¢ 9/ 1 .: :Â·: 1:1 1 4 1 Rf-* ---------- OLA. P .t:=t ' ::110 t 1 :1:= 1.'i : :1 A. m r 4% 4% a.; IIi:*11 ' : 1:' 1 1:.1:, i : E z 3 1:1 - 1 -44 4444 1 Â·t 44 ~44% 44% 1 /5% 04% LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1 .: id :: i i i #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT H i . i ; F EXISTING STANDING SEAM i i i I |f : i; 4 1 : i:. 717174 1 VAULTED ROOF i d t.i li timit:%1 [3&40 ill Â£44%% 44 44 \ CIVIL i li ! ' I. I I :! /211 i ' ;i::j 1 i :i %: 1!1. 1 A#/ 2 4* %4 #### ii;i :1; i t:,1Â· :i! Â·jj.:i 1.:}iÂ·!St {ilikti . is:: Â·Â·i i STANDING SEAM : 1- 1 i} 1 1~1 ~ ~-~ ~ ~~ El h. .~1 . . . 1 EXISTING VAULTED ROOF 2:i E ~:~ - CONTRACTOR #CONTRACTOR . L--- SNOW FENCE m , THRU T 1 ': OVERFb IL - p.1.-P. :Pli.-Il-~-~t.-Il . .*I- - -Il.*I..I - ~-..-9#*I- -- 41.. L_-- _ El '1 1 e HPC 5/07/08 DESIGN REVIEW MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO: 0720 3 ROOF PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0" DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE A2.3 ROOF PLAN \N\\E~ f - ->4- Eli FORUM PH-I 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 1 1 i RO. Box 1606 Basalt, Colorado 81621 PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 ----- ------- ------- ----- 1Â«Â«__ Isis Addition 406 E. Hopkins Ave 1 '' Aspen, Colorado 81611 - Suzie Krevoy 1. . -17 t 2-2 ]I-*LU Jit-I-11-6222721 -Â· :1' 1.2~~.I~ I** -L-11 - -1.1 I]PrtÂ£ --Â· 4 . I 1- 1 E CONSULTANTS -.. - - ~ 1 -- - -- ----- SURVEYOR r - -1. Â·Â· Â·- T ...1Â· %'- 3-" 6 niv- 11- 7 * I ~ â€¢ ~~*-- - /,111 LrÂ·Â£Â· 2, .r -9Â·4 r r - 7.-r j Ek-9 - re:I ---Â·-Â·--FÂ·--- ---T- .1---- 'la -. 221 ,-i . -12-3--~v IZ]22 71.- . . '~~ ~ *Â· AL I ,-/41 - _ ~ ~ - #SURVEYOR -1-//~---7--------#-L--- --*--- __-_ -7-7=#Â· h -1 .1+ . Â·Â· 1 .a . 7 -- - 992- L 11 - 9 -926: . - r-7 -42- El-3 f- LE] Elll ful_~IF ~~#-*f--4~~~-~-*-7v#---w**Mr-~; - ~-"T I~i-L'~- FIrr . 33?24/- lIp i 1 114 .4~.Â£Â· 4~.. l*r - .1 r. â€žâ€ž- ---------------------- ----------- Â«139:11. 11 - 9 7-Â·44.41 *- ----- ------ --------q--I GEOTECH : #GEOTECH " 421 1 lthu'* ~r Z - - $ 1.-6 41=-* VE'al 32 Ur; Â· LL J ..1 4 1 + _ c 'r 1. L ..1 : , cle 1.- 1 -,-4â€¢r 1 . â€ž.1- 1 li 1 1 1111 il I t ~,1,!1 ~ . 1 Â·0111 ! -L- 1- 4 *.- L.-1 .14-1-7 1-1 -.1-1- -- 1--1 - 1.-42._1_ 4-r--4 - STRUCTURAL #STRUCTURAL + /J-- ft/t-t + - r- ------- - - ' - - -1. 1 - 1 ; L -1~.1211 - I. -1 1 r E I. - ==- 1 0 lifililil 1 1 , 0.01 EL LI[tllum EL 313 ~-1312* DID ->P-13- - 1 1 1.1. 1 11 1 1,1 1 1 -r-4 1 -ff- EL] 21221 223 -1 9- r--~ r-~-1 ---- --=====4- MECHANICAL 4 - #MECHANICAL , 1, 1 11 /,1 1\ 1 11 /1. 11 .3= 1 1 1 1 ~ ------- ' | ' % - -d - - 1. LIZ- N / / \\ 22 M IE \ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT \ - 1 -:2 1 LIZ.- + ..._--- , -_-- --. __ #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT i 00 2- . -- , 1 1 i // 1 1 - r.t~ --[E~ ~ 1_ll / ' E--~~~Ir~~~~~-- ' 1 /1 , .-=' , 4 CIVIL #### 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 FRONT ELEVATION - CONTRACTOR #CONTRACTOR HPC 5/07/08 ESIGN REVIEW MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO: 0720 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE A3.1 ELEVATIONS ~--~--------------------- 0% FORUM P-Hl 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 RO. Box 1606 ----1-------------r Basalt, Colorado 81621 PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 Isis Addition 406 E. Hopkins Ave CD - flilin dillm Aspen, Colorado 81611 Suzie Krevoy lot P J Â£ CONSULTANTS -Ill------------------ cb SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR 0 SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" GEOTECH #GEOTECH 1 STRUCTURAL #STRUCTURAL 111 1 Imi . "'- 9dl Ill I Il~"H.--viii iii - --------- - -- - , > MECHANICAL -- - --- - ~ ~ . : . : I #MECHANICAL - --- 1 : 011 rl LL . co ~. - .-Â· '> 0 1 1 0 ~ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT &.1 1 1 - 1 h <,1 iÂ· p #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT e! .... L 0 0203 a-70-1 . ca , . 1 . - CIVIL . - f \ ./ Â· _-_1________________ 1 1 ..Â· --- 1 . . #### CD 1 0 0 SECTION ~~ CONTRACTOR SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" #CONTRACTOR - 1 r----- N X 4 HPC 5/07/08 DESIGN REVIEW :- ~------4----- : ,4--4------ imilim MARK DATE DESCRIPTION -- /-- 1................ ~- i - -- - - PROJECT NO: 0720 DRAWN BY: SMW 1-:5 - R 1 0 0 ..~.. . COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE -1 ..... I 0 : Â· . 1 - ILLI \ 1 : 1 & 171 " lor 1 - . 1 1.1 . I. - f ./ - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 31 ~ ./ CD SCALE: 1/4" = 1,0. ~ SECTION SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SECTIONS I . dIA - .Â£-21 . 1 ' EX]ST}Ne HISH BRE,K PARAPET FORUM PHI \ I EXIST]Ne BRICK INALL 4 - STONE GAP TO BE REMOVEP -. . \ t -V / -0.--\ 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 /1 \\ SLOPING PARAPET BEYOND - ~ ANGLE OF VIEW FROM 65'-0" RO. Box 1606 FROM FRONT OFBUILDING _-2/A____u ------ . ** 55123237*b * I 4*- -3 WA gopx*2 Sm N \ Basalt, Colorado 81621 L- .-J b ' PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 1. I i 1><6 SPAGED AOOD PLANKS TO REPAIR OR REPLACE MASK MATERPROOFINe Isis Addition INATERPROOF MEMBRANE and EXISTINS LOK BRICK PARAPET AREA ORAINS AS REQUiRED -Awks 406 E. Hopkins Ave 1RRAME 3/4" EPIE DECK OVER FURINC -7~Sh- I a ..1 8 48 22221221 f Aspen, Colorado 81611 e 7 -r m %* Suzie Krevoy 3/4" FURING OVER STRUCTURAL DECK - Â· EXISTING BRICK over EXISTINS STRUCTURAL DECK CONCRETE BLOOK 4 4 -L i~XXFf--)3~9)~~* EXISTINe CONCRETE DECK CONSULTANTS 44 XK >f Â· 1 0 4% PÂ»<.2 1 9 Rk ><-3:' .Â· SURVEYOR L,>1 - ' #SURVEYOR U- /4/ I I :rl.n n nn' pl i 11194 1 , GEOTECH I i #GEOTECH 7 9 C EXISTING FWNPOMS l , STRUCTURAL #STRUCTURAL n MECHANICAL #MECHANICAL 1 '>O[3297 --*n I 1 ju- r*RE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1 -9 1 2 CIVIL #### Â© CONTRACTOR #CONTRACTOR MAIN LEVEL HPC 5/07/08 DESIGN REVIEW EL = 100'.0â€¢ MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 6 . 0 . > -' 1 ~ __~~_ ~~~rr PROJECT NO: 0720 4 A 4. I *8%1'El Elt- 1 , DRAWN BY: SMW 'A A I . 14 ... . COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC t> . I 6 5 I . - SHEET TITLE . I , '.B . A '6Â· a . I . I . . I b B . 1 B 5 . .6 - %/ \/ A4.2 -Â·I A I .1 6 - I I EDÂ·t>: I a 0 - i a &-2 Â£ 6 1 Â· 14 SECTIONS A WALL SECTION 1/2" = 1'-0" 0 0 THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0006.2008.AHPC I0 PARCEL ID NUMBER 2737 07 3 30 006 PROJECTS ADDRESS 406 E. HOPKINS AVE PLANNER SARA CASE DESCRIPTION MINOR HIST DEV REPRESENTATIVE STEVE WILSON DATE OF FINAL ACTION 6.6.08 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON 2/10/10 .. â‚¬ 71-7 073 33 00(o rn & 9 Â«Â£ A k Y L L.,1-Ay)vÂ· 6, Lx, ~51,!~1210. Eile Edit Record Navigatla FQrm Reporis Format Iab . i* 4 *X , e -S g ~E *J 6 J â‚¬6 J- ~i W J ' A O j~ ~ il~rp l ~ Â·0 Â§0 0 I G ~ ' A d R .h| d J * li I .2 1 9 0 j P 1 7- J~| Mduabon I Custom Fields 1 Adior, | Feet | P,ceD ~ Fee Surrwn,x | Slt) Berrnts ~ Attachments I Routing Status IRouting Mistory I 51 ~ Permit Type ~ahpc ~|Aspen Historic Land Use Permit # ~0006,2008.AHPC Address |406 E HOPKINS AVE 2| Apt/Suite ~A City |A5PEN state E--3 m |81611 g| Permit Information Master Permit | Routing Queue ~ask,107 Applied ~02/19/2008 _,1 Pro]ect 1 2| Status ~end,ng Approved 1 J < a Description ~ MINOR HI5TORIC DEVELOPMENT Issued ~ ~ Finall 121 Submitted ~STEEV WILSON 279-4157 Clock FJ *#- Days |~55 Expres ~02/13/2009 j Owner Last Name |1<REÂ¥OY 2| FIrst Name I 406 E HOPKINS AVE i ASPEN CO 81611 , Phone I *; [2 Owner Is Applicant? 1~ App'icant <~ Last Name KREVOY -I| F/st NNne| ~ 406 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN CO 81611 24 Phone i Cust# |21894 10? Lender , Last Name | 1| First Name | 9 Phone ~ 11* Permit lendeis luM address AsperGold(bl lill' I~_ Recold: 1 of 1 l ~ ' 1 ~ L \r Â£5'\- 04Â«Â£/u 6\ al Lj i c?CActs - #31*- -wee.â€¢e-,w*w - 0 n 0 1-3. 137 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 406 E. Hopkins Avenue, Isis- Minor Review and Mountain View Plane Review (Public Hearing continued from March 26,2008) DATE: May 14,2008 SUMMARY: The Isis Theater has three residential units on the roof. The unit closest to the front of the structure is currently a 2,000 square foot home, with a proposed bedroom expansion of 500 square feet. As part of the City's effort to retain the Isis as a viable theater, a commitment was made to facilitate the applicant's desire to expand their home (although the project must be found to meet the historic preservation guidelines.) A code amendment was passed, allowing TDR's to increase downtown residential unit sizes. This does not add more allowable floor area to a site, but rather allows individual units to go beyond the square footage limitations that currently exist in some zone districts (in the Commercial Core the limit is 2,000 square feet.) After this application was submitted, it was recognized that another code amendment is necessary, allowing TDRs to land on designated buildings for this limited purpose. The code amendment is expected to be decided at City Council on June 901 Staff supports the amendment because it does not increase the overall size of a project on a landmark site, and we believe that creating a wide market for the TDR's will help to make them a successful preservation tool. The amendment must ultimately be passed in order for the project to be constructed. It is not unusual for HPC to approve projects which rely on determinations that will be made by other boards. For instance, HPC reviewed the Aspen Jewish Community Center at length before it moved on to P&Z and Council. Because of the rooftop location of the Isis expansion, staff has determined that Minor Review is the appropriate process. The board is also asked to evaluate a deck expansion and new railing, as well as to make a determination whether the project negatively affects a protected view plane which originates from the Hotel Jerome. HPC discussed the project on March 26,2008. Minutes are attached. At the time the board appeared to have no objections to the new railing or to the View Plane exemption, but the group agreed with staff that the bedroom design required restudy. The architect has revised the addition so that it appears to be associated with the new construction on the east side of the historic Isis in terms of its placement, form, and materiality. A recessed connector is used to minimize the appearance of a long plane across the Hopkins elevation of the rooftop. Staff supports the project as revised. The applicant has requested that, if there are additional concerns with the addition, the railing and deck be allowed to go forward now. .. APPLICANT: Susanne Krevoy Separate Property Trust, represented by Steev Wilson, Forum Phi. PARCEL ID: 2737-07-330-010. ADDRESS: 406 E. Hopkins Avenue, Isis Theater Condo Unit B, Block 87, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado. ZONING: CC, Commercial Core. MINOR DEVELOPMENT The procedure for a Minor Development Review is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC wil[ review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. If the application is approved, the HPC shall issue a Certificate of Appropriateness and the Community Development Director shall issue a Development Order. The HPC decision shall be final unless appealed by the applicant or a landowner within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 26.316. Staff Response: The proposed addition infills an open area between the east side of the subject unit and the stair tower. It is held back from the wall perimeter. The roof on the addition is designed to align with the form and height already established by adjacent construction. Materials and fenestration are similar to existing within the project. At the time that the redevelopment of the Isis occurred, HPC spent substantial time focusing on the rooftop development, and the need to make it secondary to the historic theater. Pulling the unit in from the parapet walls was very important. This was the source of some concern with the previous design. Staff finds that creating a connector and tying the materials into the elevator addition are improvements. From the streetscape view, the addition does appear to be distinct from the main portion of the Krevoy unit, which is copper clad. The board is presented with two options for the roof design. The first option follows the curve of the existing main roof of the unit. The plate height is 12'3" in the front and 9' 3" in the back. The second option provides a flat roof of 12'3". In staff' s opinion, the rationale for pursuing a 2 .. flat roof would be to reduce the overall height to something closer to 9'. There is no benefit to the streetscape, or to the units at the back of the building, from raising the rear plate height. With the proposed new design, we are not convinced that dropping the height of the addition and eliminating the band of transoms at the front really serves the project and lets the new bedroom hold up to the stature of the elevator tower. Staff supports Option 1. HPC previously endorsed the railing, and we have no further objections to it. Detailed drawings are provided in the packet. MOUNTAIN VIEW PLANE REVIEW The building falls within the Main Street View Plane, which originates from the Hotel Jerome. Because this project requires historic preservation review, evaluation of the impacts on the view plane is being assigned to HPC rather than P&Z. See. 26.435.050.Mountain view plane review. C. Mountain view plane review standards. No development shall be permitted within a mountain view plane unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below. 1. No mountain view plane is infringed upon, except as provided below. When any mountain view plane projects at such an angle so as to reduce the maximum allowable building height otherwise provided for in this Title, development shall proceed according to the provisions of Chapter 26.445 as a Planned Unit Development so as to provide for maximum flexibility in building design with special consideration to bulk and height, open space and pedestrian space and similarly to permit variations in lot area, lot width, yard and building height requirements and view plane height limitations. The Planning and Zoning Commission, after considering a recommendation from the Community Development Department, may exempt a development from being processed as a Planned Unit Development when the Planning and Zoning Commission determines that the proposed development has a minimal effect on the view plane. When any proposed development infringes upon a designated view plane, but is located in front of another development which already blocks the same view plane, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider whether or not the proposed development will further infringe upon the view plane and the likelihood that redevelopment of the adjacent structure will occur to re-open the view plane. In the event the proposed development does not further infringe upon the view plane and re- redevelopment to reopen the view plane cannot be anticipated, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall exempt the development from the requirements of this Section. (Ord. No. 12,2007, Â§22) Staff Response: The addition does fall within the view plane, however the housing units across the back of the Isis already intervene, so there is no new impact. Staff finds that an exemption is appropriate. 3 .. DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: â€¢ approve the application, â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or â€¢ continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve Minor Development and View Plane Exemption for 406 E. Hopkins Avenue, Isis Theater Condo Unit B, Block 87, City and Townsite o f Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado, as represented in Option 1. In order for the addition to be constructed, a code amendment allowing TDR' s to land on a designated property must be passed. Exhibits: Resolution #_, Series of 2008 A. Relevant HPC Design Guidelines B. March 26,2008 minutes C. Application Exhibit A: Relevant HPC Design Guidelines 1.15 Minimize the visual impacts of site lighting. o Site lighting should be shielded to avoid glare onto adjacent properties. Focus lighting on walks and entries, rather than up into trees and onto facade planes. 2.6 Maintain masonry walls in good condition. o Original mortar that is in good condition should be preserved in place. o Repoint only those mortar joints where there is evidence of a moisture problem or when mortar is missing. o Duplicate the original mortar in strength, composition, color, texture, joint width and profile. u Mortar joints should be cleared with hand tools. Using electric saws and hammers to remove mortar can seriously damage the adjacent brick. 4 .. u Do not use mortar with a high portland cement content, which will be substantially harder than the brick and does not allow for expansion and contraction. The result is deterioration of the brick itself. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. u A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. o An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. o An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. o A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. o An addition that is lower than or similar to the height o f the primary building is preferred. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. o For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. u The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. 10.12 When constructing a rooftop addition, keep the mass and scale subordinate to that of a historic building. u An addition should not overhang the lower floors of a historic building in the front or on the side. o Dormers should be subordinate to the overall roof mass and should be in scale with historic ones on similar historic structures. 61 Dormers should be located below the primary structure's ridgeline, usually by at least one foot. 10.13 Set a rooftop addition back from the front of the building. o This will help preserve the original profile of the historically significant building as seen from the street. 5 .. 10.14 The roof form and slope of a new addition should be in character with the historic building. u If the roof of the historic building is symmetrically proportioned, the roof of the addition should be similar. o Eave lines on the addition should be similar to those of the historic building or structure. 13.13 Use flat roof lines as the dominant roof form. o A flat roof, or one that gently slopes to the rear of a site, should be the dominant roof form. o Parapets on side facades should step down towards the rear of the building. o False fronts and parapets with horizontal emphasis also may be considered. 14.6 Exterior lights should be simple in character and similar in color and intensity to that used traditionally. o The design of a fixture should be simple in form and detail. Exterior lighting must be approved by the HPC. o All exterior light sources should have a low level of luminescence. 14.7 Minimize the visual impacts of site and architectural lighting. u Unshielded, high intensity light sources and those which direct light upward will not be permitted. o Shield lighting associated with service areas, parking lots and parking structures. o Timers or activity switches may be required to prevent unnecessary sources of light by controlling the length of time that exterior lights are in use late at night. u Do not wash an entire building facade in light. u Avoid placing exposed light fixtures in highly visible locations, such as on the upper walls of buildings. o Avoid duplicating fixtures. For example, do not use two fixtures that light the same area. 14.8 Minimize the visual impact of light spill from a building. o Prevent glare onto adjacent properties by using shielded and focused light sources that direct light onto the ground. The use of downlights, with the bulb fully enclosed within the shade, or step lights which direct light only on to walkways, is strongly encouraged. u Lighting shall be carefully located so as not to shine into residential living space, on or off the property or into public rights-of-way. 6 .. A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING MINOR DEVELOPMENT AND VIEW PLANE REVIEW FOR 406 E. HOPKINS AVENUE, ISIS THEATER CONDO UNIT B, BLOCK 87, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO; RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2008 PARCEL ID: 2737-07-330-010 WHEREAS, the applicant, Susanne Krevoy Separate Property Trust, represented by Steev Wilson, Forum Phi, has requested approval for Minor Development and View Plane review in order to expand the unit at 406 E. Hopkins Avenue, Isis Theater Condo Unit B, Block 87, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Minor Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.C of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, an exemption can be granted from the View Plane requirements if it is found that "When any proposed development infringes upon a designated view plane, but is located in front of another development which already blocks the same view plane, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider whether or not the proposed development will further infringe upon the view plane and the likelihood that redevelopment of the adjacent structure will occur to re- open the view plane. In the event the proposed development does not further infringe upon the view plane and re-redevelopment to reopen the view plane cannot be anticipated, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall exempt the development from the requirements of this Section;" and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated May 14,2008, performed an analysis of the application based on the review standards and the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and recommended HPC approve the project with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on May 14, 2008, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found that it was consistent with the review standards and "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and granted approval with conditions by a vote of to .. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC approves Minor Development for 406 E. Hopkins Avenue, Isis Theater Condo Unit B, Block 87, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado as represented in Option 1, presented to HPC on May 14, 2008. In order for the addition to be constructed, a code amendment allowing TDR' s to land on a designated property must be passed. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION on the 14th day of May, 2008. Approved as to Form: ATTEST: Jim True, Assistant City Attorney Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Michael Hoffman, Chair 0 . ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 26,2008 Chairperson, Michael Hoffman called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Commissioners in attendance: Alison Agley, Ann Mullins, Jay Maytin, Sarah Broughton and Brian McNellis. Nora Berko was excused. Staff present: Sara Adams, Historic Preservation Planner Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy City Clerk Monitors: Main Street sidewalk - Sarah 300 W. Main - Ann Lift I task force - Alison 406 E. Hopkins Ave. Isis - Minor Development - View Plane Review Proof of legal notice - Exhibit I Elevations - Exhibit II Sara said the application is for the roof top units. There are three residential units on the roof top right now and two affordable housing units at the rear and one free market toward the front parapet. The subject is the free market unit. Right now it is 2,000 square feet which is the maximum cap for a free market in the commercial core. The applicant seeks to land a TDR to increase the unit size to 2,500 square feet. We are just talking about unit size not the floor area on this parcel. Right now our code says you cannot land a TDR on a landmark but when we did the code amendment in the summer we didn't specifically say you could land a TDR on a landmark; however, we meant to do that. The intent is to increase a unit size not the FAR or mass on the property so we see now conflict with landing a TDR to increase the unit size in the allowable mass. We are going forward to Council that this is allowed. What is before HPC is the minor development application in which you will be discussing mass, height, materials etc. The question is whether the mass is appropriate and does it meet the guidelines. We did not want to hinder the applicant by putting this off until the code amendment goes through. If HPC decides to approve this application it is contingent on the approval of the code amendment. 2 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 26,2008 HPC purview: The proposed addition fills in the space between the current unit and the elevator shaft that is existing, It aligns in form and height with the existing construction and will have a curved roof like the one that is existing right now. The materials will be the same. Staffs main concern is that the proposal diminished the minor spaces that you can interpret when you look at the Isis and filling in the space will create a wall effect. The architect is very sensitive to that wall effect idea and is setting back the proposed addition from the parapet and railing but staff doesn't find that is enough setback to create a height differentiation. Staff is proposing that possibly the height be dropped on the proposed addition. There are some issues with that because of the curved roof. It is 12 feet towards Hopkins and goes down to 9 feet at the rear. If the height drops in the front and back you will have unusable space in the back. We were suggesting a flat roof for the addition as it would be hidden behind the elevator shaft and visually would not have an impact. We are also unclear as to the impact to the affordable housing units at the rear. In terms of the railing there are minimal impacts on the parapet. The applicant is also proposing to eliminate the flower box. They are required to have a railing because the parapet isn't tall enough to meet code requirements and the railing will pop up about six inches from the height of the historic parapet. Staff is also concerned with excessive deck elements and snow build up behind the parapet wall. HPC also has to consider the view plane review. Right now the affordable housing units block the view plane from the Hotel Jerome so there is a negative impact of this addition on the view plane. Steev Wilson, Forum Fhy Susanne and Brad Krevoy Michael said his concern is that he wants the city to go through the process that a private citizen goes through. Sara said this has nothing to do with the City being part of the Isis. This has to do with the Krevoy's owning the property. Steev said we are ten feet back from the front wall and are pulling the massing away from the street. Looking at the view plane review it passes through the ADU's which are at the back of the building. You would never see the addition from the Jerome view plane. We are holding the railing 3 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 26. 2008 back from the wall three feet so that the activity isn't up against the wall. As you approach the building the railing disappears relatively quickly. From the ADU view we want to keep the flat mass across it. If the addition where a flat roof we would have to bring the height up two feet in order to get reasonable height in the bedrooms and it would block out much o f the sun coming into the ADU and that would be impactful on the rear side of the building as much as the high portion is on the front. We would match the existing materials and keep it non-retlective and inconspicuous as possible. Sarah said there are two areas of guardrails. Steev said in terms of snow we will be able to clear it offbetter and we would be happy to put snow melt in if necessary. Michael asked Steev to explain the fenestration. Steev said there are transom windows over the door to add more light into the area. Michael said one of his concerns is the light reftection at night. Brad Krevoy said the area is a bedroom and they will have block out blinds from ceiling to floor. Chairperson Michael Hoffman opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. The public hearing portion of the agenda item was closed. Michael said there are three issues: Change in the parapet wall. View plane non-issue. Addition. Michael addressed the view plane. The board had no issue with the view plane. Parapet wall. Alison said she would suggest snow melt. Sarah said snow melt is not that great energy wise. Ann said actually when the sun is out the snow melts quickly. Sarah asked if the parapet wall could be flashed differently so that the water can go a different way. Steev said the snow melt is coming from the plane side through and down the roof drain so the snow melt will be corrected, 4 .d'*1 0 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 26,2008 The snow can go through the roof drain or coming down on to the lower roof deck which is also drained. The board had no issues with the parapet wall. Addition: Michael said the first question is whether HPC should allow the addition. Sarah said this is a done deal by the landing of a TDR. Brian said HPC's purview is to determine i f the mass and scale is appropriate. Sara said this is like a regular application, you need to determine if the mass is appropriate. Jay said i f council denies the TDR what happens. Sara said the approval of the resolution would be contingent up council approving the code amendment. Michael said there are two issues; is this a good idea and is it legal in the sense that it meets the city's regulations. Michael said the legal right is the code amendment and HPC's issue is should we allow the addition to the roof top residential unit of the Isis. Sara said when the code amendments went through the intention was that within the commercial core historic district on a landmark or on a non- landmark you can increase the unit size from a 2,000 square foot cap to 2,500 square feet by landing a TDR. The intent of the code and what the code says now are conflicting. HPC needs to consider this application minus the TDR. They have the FAR to do this on the property and you are just discussing whether the mass and height are appropriate. Brian said if we deny this in its entirety they still have the ability to expand minus the TDR. Sara said no they don't because there is a cap on unit sizes for free markets in the commercial core and that is 2,000 square feet which is the size of their unit. Michael asked the board if the applicant should be allowed to expand that residential unit on the roo f of the Isis using our guidelines. Sarah said fundamentally she believes in the code giving TDR's some street value. Sarah said she can't answer the question. Michael said he has the question whether it is appropriate at all. 5 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 26,2008 Jay said if we make a determination then council doesn't approve the amendment. Michael said in the very beginning is it appropriate for us to deal with this before they have the legal authority to do so. Alison said Sara said the reason we are doing this is to not slow them down from the permitting process. Ann said it seems more logical that you would get clarification from the code before we start discussing a design. Michael said he agrees with staff, if we don't have to hold them up then lets not. Jay said he is not in favor of doing work that is inconsequential. Ann said she has comments about the design and massing but didn't realize we were supposed to be deciding whether it was an allowable thing or not. Sara said you are discussion the project and applying the guidelines. Michael went through the HPC Design Guidelines, 1.15,2.6. Alison said guideline 2.6 is fine. Ann commented that the packet is well put together. Her biggest concern is that you cannot tell if the addition is tied to the Isis or the elevator (10.3). Making it lower is not a solution. If you could pull it back a little further you wouldn't perceive such a horizontal line across the top. Another concern is the fenestration and light pollution and reflection which will make that addition much more prominent than what is up there already. Jay said the addition fails at 10.3. By filling the space in you do loose the historic character of which building is the historic building. It is broken up nicely and to connect it from the front fagade can you really distinguish from the addition of the Isis to what the Isis was. Michael said guideline 10.6 is not in compliance. The design ofthe addition is not compatible in size and scale with the main building. Michael said guideline 10.10 has been met. Michael also said the materials are compatible and he feels guideline 10.11 has been met. 6 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 26,2008 Michael said guideline 10.12 talks about the roof top addition and that the mass and scale should be subordinate to that of a historic building. The proposal is not subordinate and it is not set back which is in violation of guideline 10.13. Jay pointed out that only a minimal portion is on the historic building and that is something that should be considered. Sarah said she agrees with the comments. Many of the guidelines can be achieved with some tweaks to the massing. The way it is pushed back works well and maybe there is a way to step it down from the transom windows to help. The break that was in the first addition was successful. Alison said she isn't sure if bringing the front line of the addition back would work or perhaps where the mud room is bringing that front door back which would help break up the pieces. The idea is not to read straight across. Alison also said she is worried about light pollution but having glass does make the addition read as its own piece. Jay said there are ways to achieve guideline 10.3. Jay said he would be happy to look at the addition again after some of our concerns are addressed. Brian also agreed with Alison that the mud area could be redesigned and the height could be brought down. Bringing the roof down and pushing the element back would ease some of the concerns. Brian said he has faith in our TDR system and allowing a TDR would allow something beneficial to happen elsewhere in the city. Brian also agreed that the design is in conflict with guideline 10.3 but there are things that can be done to make this work. Michael pointed out that he is not convinced that there are things that can make this addition happen. MOTION: Sarah moved to continue the public hearing and minor development until May 14~h second by Ann. Steev said he would like to hear a better definition of what guideline 10.3 means to the board. We took the character of the roof top addition and employed a setback which does bring the roof height down. In the packet it does read quite separate from the rest o f the building. With one larger element we paid attention to what the building below was doing. 10.3 is not 7 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 26,2008 clearly defined. We need to decide how to come to an appropriateness that the board would be comfortable with. Sarah said the appropriateness is not the roof addition but on the historic structure. In the original addition it came in on both sides and addressed the symmetry ofthe historic resource. Now all ofa sudden we are changing that character. There are ways to lessen that impact. It needs to relate to the Isis. Steev said are we keeping the understanding of the historic fagade more continuous? Brian said adding the addition blurs the symmetry of the Isis. Ann said the original fa,;ade needs to be kept the dominant feature of the entire block. Steev pointed out that you will never see the elevation. Ann said somehow you need to make the new addition recede whether it is in materials, colors or less glazing. It needs to disappear in the background. Michael said he does not know how those impacts can be mitigated. Steev said he is getting the idea. I have heard materials, height and the lowering of the distinction o f the previous roof top addition and keeping with the symmetry o f the building and making this perhaps a bridge piece or something much more subordinate. We tried to pull it back and design what was approved in the past. Jay said by building this piece between the two additions you loose the ability to differentiate between the historic structure. It takes away from the integrity of the historic structure. The way it is drawn there is very little difference on the upper structure, you are connecting a structure to an elevator shaft. Brad Krevoy asked if this review is happening because we have 4% of the addition that connects to the original Isis structure or is it the jurisdiction of this group over the entire addition. Michael said HPC has review over the entire addition. Brad thanked the HPC. Brad said this project started 30 years ago when he used to work at the Isis in the summertime and when the theatre was going to be retail and no Isis he stepped in and made an investment with that unit so that there can be a theatre in the City. When the 8 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 26,2008 city came to me again and said we are going to loose the theatre's again they said they needed a favor from me and we said we would help in whatever way we can. We want to live here with our kids and we need another bedroom for our daughter. I think the confusion is that there is a gap in communication between what we where told and having relied upon in a very serious way before buying the TDR and before agreeing the Isis should remain a theatre and not retail. They wanted to do the entire thing in retail before the city purchased it, We are in a very uncomfortable position with HPC. You do a great job. We went through this process when we built the Isis brick by brick to get to our unit in the first place. It is very uncomfortable to be in this position here because we are being told one thing by one group of the City and then we come to HPC with the setbacks etc. that would make it work and being told you have to do a lot more. At the end of the day we are going to have something severely unlivable. The more you ask us to setback the more we will be living in a shoe box. That is not why we bought the TDR or why we agreed to consent to the City all those things. Susie Krevoy said they just heard from Sara about the amendment to council for the TDR. We have an agreement with the city that the mayor has signed allowing us to add the 500 square feet ifwe purchased a TDR and in exchange they could convert the theatres into retail space because they did need our permission for that. There is a signed agreement allowing us i f we purchased a TDR to do this. We have purchased the TDR. Steve Barwick has been involved and Paul Menter approving the agreement. Now we really do not know what to do and we don't know how to proceed. Michael suggested the Krevoy bring that issue up with the City attorney. Sara said HPC should be reviewing what they are proposing to see if it meets the guidelines for an addition on top of the historic resource. Jay said it might be important to have some of those people here who created the contract. Sarah said she doesn't want the applicant to leave here with false hope. Aesthetically this is mass and scale. With some modifications that we talked about today I could approve this addition to the roof of the Isis. I am not the only one voting. Brian said the majority sense that there is some design abilities that would allow us to go forward. 9 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 26, 2008 Brad Krevoy said this entire project for the past 12 years has been to work everything out. I am feeling from the comments that we might have a shoe box or nothing. I am very confused. Alison said she personally feels there are ways to push and pull on that favade and not just push. You can pull on certain parts and still have 500 square feet. I'm not saying it has to be small you just need to keep the symmetry of that original addition over the Isis as somewhat sacred. Jay said does the legal ramifications of this contract over ride? Brad said HPC does a great job. What if we did it exactly in alignment and pushed it out to the street from where it is now because we are thinking about the fire department and what is happening there. Take the addition forward and not have a setback. That would be another way to address this. When the fire department is up you won't see anything on the view plane. Michael said the contract has nothing to do with the Historic Preservation Commission and we can't act as lawyers. The second part is design issues and the majority of the commission would like to see other ideas. Vote on motion: All in favor, motion carried. 202 N. Monarch Street - Major Development - Conceptual, Variances and Residential Design Standards (cont'd from 3/12) Colored Photographs - Exhibit I E-mails and letters - Exhibit II Gena Berko letter - Exhibit III Noticing - Exhibit IV Sara explained that the lot was condominiumized into two lots, Unit A and Unit B. Unit A has the Blue Vic on it. The application is for Unit B, a new single family home. The property is accessed off Bleeker Street and there is an unused alley to the north. HPC granted a 500 square foot FAR bonus to the entire property for the addition of the Blue Vic. This subject unit has 2,053 of FAR available. The applicant requests conceptual approve and some variances. The applicant provided two design iterations. 10 0 0 0 FORUM PHI 174 MIdlandAve, Suke 201 11 P. O. Box 1606 - Basalt, Colorado 81621 PHONE: 970~279.4157 FAX: 860.770,5585 1 _ Hee:,26,3 - Isis Addition - 406 E. Hopkins Ave Aspen, Colorado 81611 0 LE Suzie Krevoy CONSULTANTS 00 SURVEYOR #SURVEYO GEOTECH #GEO ECH U El . 11 11 1 - -- STRUCTURAL C] Il E]1[3 L]LI E 00 ELI [30.00.00 0 I =21 MECHANICAL C / /1 9-1 1. 1 / 1 1~ - ~ - t-f 1; 14 1 / - - 4- H LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT \/ 1/ \1 NOSCA E CHI CT i / , / \/ 00 CZEZZ=]'' , 0 c-= 09 - - ' X -11//, 1 CIVIL CONTRACTOR h qv, 2LQ46 fer 92 - HPC 3/26/08 DESIGN REVIEW MARK DATE i DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO: 0720 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE ELEVATIONS .. Historic Preservation Application Package Cover Letter TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COUNCIL APPLICANT: Steev Wilson, Representing Brad and Susan Krevoy DATE: May 14,2008 RE: 406 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE (ISIS BUILDING)- MINOR HPC APPLICATION AND VIEWPLANE REVIEW Proposed Projects Amendments by HPC on March 268 of 2008 0 Maintain the symmetrical appearance of the historic fagade. * Maintain the Character by keeping the masses separate. * Break up the massing to prevent a long wall effect. Response: In the current design we have attempted to address all ofthe issues from the previous meeting. Symmetrical Historic Faqade: The Addition has been modified by creating a linking element between the existing building and the proposed roof top addition. The linking element over the mud room area is held to 8'-6" tall and has been setback an additional 1 -6- from the front of the building. Massing Separation: The massing of the Addition has been modified by the insertion of the connector piece. The connector will be glass with a standing seam roof; it will bridge between the copper shingle of the original structure and the now brick of the proposed. It is our intention to have the Addition's character respond more to that of the stair tower and prevent it's competing with the existing elements. Wall Efleet: The wall effect has been attempted to be mitigated by the varying of heights setbacks and materials. It is our hope that you find this a successful variation. We have also included two design options to further lower the height. Option 1 maintains the vaulted roo f proposed in the original scheme. Option 2 depicts a flat roof which has reduces the total height of the building and further varies the character of the elements. .. OPTION 1 I. wd 90:2 23'* 2 --I. F#4 $ 3- 51...Al, le'l i â€¢ Â· 1 5 Â« --/ Â·CÂ·Â· ' f - I . 1 ' d 4. .Â»74 . 21.,h V m = 1 ~.~ * 3 MIA 'r, 1- -- 1 t>r ... 1 711 1 1,4, I I 4 .0 A . 3,/ I 1. 1 +0 4% 9.4 4 . 25: 4 - 44.Â©,C . . 1 .- - E I . . aw-;* 191:, 41 9 '. t il 1 ~ I; . 92~1,11,1 j' 1 1.5 3 3-34 -; 2 .-i 1 1,1 . . 0 +Ul 1 , 1 I 6 .-:' 2- .1 *:53:>-* I. .. 1 .1 07 12 4.0 134{.71,7 1 ~'. Â·; 2 1 -,Â· y:Â·ed??36:i~#.**'*,.*~i ilm Â· z>.~,2~~*;Â·,iEZ>,41 1 i -'Â· - '42Â·'./'#wi/~r 3 4 1,11 f ' ./4 I<).M I <9/ U i 1-m"*bite#Wip. 39- Â·. 4<FT' k e . 9â‚¬? 1+ 1 . 9 + 1 - , : Cukki,9132,73~f...4...4~#'/ Let 4 . al Â£ .f & .Â·Â·07,4 2Z 2 ..4 â‚¬ 41% ..4 45'Â·; 1 3/*2 \ N -&/1.. Â· ..Ailt'jil// 0 1, i c ..' ~â„¢67....my---R-*v,Â·, ,r'-;,FZ 1 1: imill=/8/4 - illiglitY.r I/"la -:1* film , L.,1 1 . W FlAÂ¥g 9fs--m 3 ./ <'..1 4 1, i ..E - :.14 - , r '04' ~ tA /7' \ 44 ,/ WAS 4 C 49. ft 32~'Â£ - .... & 4 - -4- . 1:/. i .1 1 1 1 44 f ./ L r--3,- : 1 Cf It ,\ 1, 4 .F 1. - W~~Il{ 11 e V Â£ r , 1% 1 . 1 46'i ; 1 *444 a - - fly m~'42 .1 f . - r i 1 -:- a.. 1 *P ' 1 . . .f 21 - 1 â€ž le , ...4 .It + 1 1 40 ' 1 -3 % 6.. . 4 r P .0 9 1- 4 -Ilimi 4 % . \\Lt 3., 4 1 n' it C . .4-6 7 K C *k 7 Ne f i - -. N rf-, . fÂ» *' :f>.11 '44.11:r,Â¥744?32 1 , .. .1 ? b '.7,4,5,&....t:li.qi"ZE Â£4651.62/.4. f<332 't.*. I * .....*r- I Lt â€¢ ...111 . 1 , I ' 4.-:. 4>.1443 - S. AÂ· B< 1&=g V .44â€¢ ....4-'.......â€ž i *4*-r. lili. Il - 11.1 11 'i_.~il.Xi J p 21 f' ji L . . 24. -7 - ~101/ Â· 4 Â©Â· 11 Ji IFIEW ,9, 11. - a HMS -. ..9 1 1 1- 1 ..IL .!414 -1-16. L !15 1 ' , '%-m-=-â€¢ Ni : - 1 +4 4 .2.-46*- 4,4.304Â¥mia//MeL. .. : L- j-,9% 2~ 12* I Â® lu'l~ r.:-- 4- 1 #/*.;,id*.'+ 0 ,% â€¢4 *jrs. e,~*Â»tj~ k in. d,â€¢ .,#J,#.. 2 1 1 *1; , 34 ...p r i pill/ *A I - i - r--- .V ..â€žC : - 1 1-1,6 C ... h -21 . - .."11 I .1 ..M... - -3 - * 11/# 1 A 1, 1 - .Â·.â€¢,44 ----~--DOE,Gl Â¥ /'ti//.4-~~.~~~~~~~ -; - 13* -41.11. ~ - ~,lill~~ . U.- J2V .../ CL ' fE*%:e~ _-Â»- I $ AA. - & -I ..44*--- ~- 1 -lit-7 31/4/4 E-i-* 4 2.7 , IiI N 40(Â¢594 : .1. j -Â·er, T r J, 1 d ./ I ._ r. 1 j , . . . .. . ... . 1 lili /.-/' .1 ......~ si,~/ li'lill Â· .-11 . r â€¢ 'S U iMS.. :1 .1 -/-. '.: a 91%~ 4 e.ar. - h ... *d---- - W. . ..:9.-'.4*9.i.. 1':'Â· ' Â· 5 17MIR ,..gel,6~;.t-' ---IM- 1' 421 Â·,. . L.* '- 11 - 1 11 Â°6441- - -1 â€¢ b --2/7 , ..- f ' ..1 2 3. 9-NFF , - 9 - -11 1 - 191 - 2 118.411.A â€¢- 4 Z.4-,k= -â„¢ -k . . Â·16 ..1 1 . rt--Am I ~ Â·r . 9. I I ./Ak -.1 . , ,/1,~>*> Ator'~ <â€¢~i Â¢*hyÂ«426:+9Â·~4247:='274~4Â·bÂ¢Â»S*'*.6Â»Â»Â»I 4 ..3-1~ " 4 - ~ . 1 .41.- I . 4 a . I.,10 ..a 1 m P *i././ 6- .. 0 U I. I. I. 4 4 'lat /1 E -1- 9 ..... 7.-: -4 ,Â»2 + -1.1 -- , . Â· 1 la. -â€¢ i 1.: I. - <' 1*644*4=1111'HE:..8 4#6 tt n . * I ... # I F *1~1 r .9 . 43 4~ - I. 0 / 'I.*-1 4 , 4 BPM . W. r" 'g# 3,1 4, ./. I f ilililillillilli Ar-. 1.-#~ 4 v..7 . i I. -*-440174.C ' k..:ht ph<i - - - B. \ --~4 '51~$. - :. f.34<. -6 1 --71 ~ 7.4, 4 IÂ·41-12;129'Li-.JEEPf S =.-- I'~ - I &3/*-TES?Â· 9 32 2 Â·.. -/ .. Â·- *4 ; a, 1. ./:. r 3* 11 1.._ . -Trz Fu-rz, 1Hm . 1 4 u "" 94 1 0 1-4.. , *. 4 I Afwivt'BA.***-- +-it.*---- - -k 3. 2 11Â·'â€¢*' AP:1~.T $/:liwill'll/"IMI'll'll'll"Il/"Il ' 13 10=CE:.24:,py'.I-.12-1 5126- 1 - . 7311- 1.-91 -%% IZI # 16.. - 0 4. * Â¢. Sfl,Jt- 4 9 94 1 - - - ?11' 4. a- 11.:. N.=9. . 'hy 14*78/&/'d = 7 @r- .Iue' IN - 1// Ul~~ *-All'i. L.# 4 e. 4.. di.....V 0 '9:0 . . 41Â£ t. 055.-2,.*. 1 4.94 ... 9 +7 - Ill'll"Ill"Ii,/*jff 'FA 88 PM - - ....m....4. ./ 1 ki . 41L, ' /7 / â€¢h i - 2%42Â£ .1 6 p . -ir-, M " Eper. 1 -- ,2 -4 I .4,5., 1 - A .Odd 1 6 +I I ..... . Â« L ~ ~-- .1 l41 |: 1. 14 1,i 'A !1 --6.-- 11' I li 1.1 -1 1 2 1 7 =t . 9 L . 4 -=, N . , = ZE-- Â£ . .. -1 -bl. . , I . 1 4 22 ,- Â· 1.0- -s - t..22& 7 37+ I.~ 22Â« I. 1 ...29; , I.=21*. - -1 ge 9 1 1.00= ... .râ€ž Iiiiiii -26-SU 1-+ - 2 1 1 1... W../1......&., 4-d.â€ž- 1/ Â·14% ki .:Za -1 -A - , 1 ri:Â·71: 1., 1. L Cit,X,~ - -2//1 ./8 Al\V'kÂ·â€žAa. 4 9.5 .Al ./ I . .-1 9/ 44 \.1 1 .... . 2 1 F==3 0 1\ 7â‚¬31 14<.05#T#ME##41 ./:1 : 4. 53 2~ '.'4: I [icIii L/ -/ 1 jr-' 0 f- 0 1: 6/0- 1 FORUM PHI 1 1 - 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 P.O. Box 1606 2*11=Flti~ 4~ Al#%3~#*41 7 \LD --- Basalt, Colorado 81621 PHONE: 970.279 4157 FAX: 866 770.5585 f]_I 1 1 23Â»4WWMI:~044,~Upql. -4-4 -1 Isis Addition J 406 E. Hopkins Ave . ALLOWABLE FAR 2,000 SF - NET LIVABLE Aspen, Colorado 81611 Suzie Krevoy t_ TDR 500 SF 4 Eun TOTAL ALLOWABLE NET LIVABLE 2,500 SF - NET LIVABLE CONSULTANTS 4, ALLOWABLE DECKS (15%) 300 SF SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR ==r EXISTING UNiT NETAREA 1,970 SF 11 111 - -K PROPOSED NET AREA 498 SF ~ -~ - *p*hÂ«\04*po\>\ AL/t iti*%0>3*904413%42] - O - ~ TOTAL UNIT NET AREA 2,468 SF - NET LIVABLE 1 1 1 4- @ "- h GEOTECH COK 111 4 + It -1 r-71 - --- --- --- -- ~------Â·d!+44 L u-- #GEOTECH Ir-, , 1 1 S' 1--5----i------------- 1 -t=EENT- 1 1 1, -- ..rEE - ' 0 1 1 - --- i. STRUCTURAL 1 #STRUCTURAL '-1 -1 - 7 - 7 (~3 8 8 8 MECHANILL #MECHANICAL 1 UNIT B - PROPOSED 1/8' = 1.-01' LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CIVIL r 01 c____.1------ CONTRACTOR 0 <tix.,\ <reÂ·+51 2,61. 161/HtÂ·21Â·*' *>~tiR 1 .. iNk<634. 1 1 #CONIRACTOR 1 "-1 HAN*4%941$42ealiA#.dix EXISTING F.A.R. CALCULATION 2Â»>3<x<ji~., 5 Â©94 *84 wilÂ·;ERPtAQ;?4%26444itt<RkiRSEÂ·*62**Apf 111 1.1.-. -- - -0 ALLOWABLE FAR 2,000 SF - NET LIVABLE /1+1 M ALLOWABLE DECKS (15%) 300 SF UNIT NETAREA 1,970 SF HPC 5/07/08 DESIGN REVIEW UNfT GROSS AREA 2,070 SF Q MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 1 ' DRAWN BY: SUW PROJECT NO: 0720 , COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC 1 SHEET TITLE 0 1 1 1 Â® G6Â®41 0 0 2 UNIT:B - EXISTING 1/8" = 1-0" FAR ANALYSIS 4,1 .... ./ 01 , FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 PO. Box 1606 Basalt, Colorado 81621 -- - Â· -------------------------- ------ VIEWPLAim-FER-iT.5. - 0- ---- FREE MARKET ADDITION PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 ~~ UPPER LVL * Isis Addition El-AP40 406 E. Hopkins Ave Aspen, Colorado 81611 11[E] III, 1 Suzie Krevoy - -~ PROJ.lyl- A THEATER A CONSULTANTS n ;~,-Si rEG:6-" h SURVEYOR . 1- r. - 5 dia t--1 #SURVEYOR _ MAW LVL 0 9 ? .Lili~~1 11_1.1:_==- , ---=1 EL,m-0 10[3â‚¬ ~1*M J GEOTECH :1 1 Il 1* 1 #GEOTECH ... 1 1.1 lillil .1 C PRALLVL- 0 STRUCTURAL 1 ' -Â· El-Â·06'-1. #STRUCTURAL * STOR. THEATER D . 83'-6* . Er- ## :~ MECHANICAL #MECHANICAL LOIVER L.VL. 0 STOR. ELÂ·74-5Â· 07,1 b ..9 +9 r ~ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 2 VIEWPLANE SECTION 1/8" = 11-0. CIVIL ##1## CONTRACTOR 1CONTRACTOR 009 Â« - r-Dr iii a 1 1,~ 9 41 HPC 5/07/08 DESIGN REVIEW MARK DATE , DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO: 0720 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE PROJECT SITE AO.3 95 Vl WPLANE PER VIEWPLANE VIEWPLANE PLAN 1" = 50' .... 10-6- . 7. 1 z aW 9.0â€¢r . 11'8 - . 5-2.. I ' ' .1. 1 ,~1 -9 f y-11- r '' FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 PO, Box 1606 O --M H n 3. ---4-. Basalt, Colorado 81621 rf==i-) 9 1- 7-3 I u_J I 1 l_ U 1 1 F. u-- 1 1 ---4 Isis Addition 77=74---1- 1 -0 1 GUEST f / 1 --3 C,-' 1 C 1 : 1 --r- * 11 r---â‚¬. r~ GUEST _ BATH ]\ / e k 406 E. Hopkins Ave 0 1 1 . re-----Ie& ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ ] i Aspen, Colorado 81611 Iii ' ' L A QU Suzie Krevoy l.__J L_--1 1-0 0.-4- i ~ . 4' 1, CF"r~1 MT / 4.-89 . EL- - 1 MECHANICAL F__-_ I 1----1 ~.-__J _0 . h CONSULTANTS Â¢ V I / 4'-1" & SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR 1 1 1 1 1 #bGEOTECH m=Ii L ~GUES-UU'm * : $ i 111 ~4 ~ 1 GEOTECH k _I 2 0 9 1 W 8 L ~12 447 : 201 1 7 4 1 STRUCTURAL ---=ul' L~-L 0-=# Â¤41...1 ~-=;- F 13.-2 h= -==,7.1 ---+ - -- ' #STRUCTURAL -- -1 4 4 MECHANICAL c < h 4 k -4 4 -4 : 5- F \4/ MUD ROOM I 101 EXETING CONDO . I - 6~ (D/. * OFFICE AREA â€ž #MECHANICAL L.m _LI 7-JÂ«a----4.-1- 4 1 - 1 6.=_ <5_/91 - 1- L 1-3 -Y r---1 11 1 5- 1 (/ 3 5 4-48.-2 1~ r--, 1 I li l 1 - r C 1 171 1.1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1,11=fE=f #F -J . #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT r----1 E EI Zili -1 1, 9 1-1 j ' r. I 40 6 6 111 11\ 1 1 'jil 1 -1 11- L I 10Â·2~0- 1 1 7 i 'L- 1 1 \ ~LE) L __-] Il liti j ;11 09 L-- 1 + \-1 G 1 : 1 1 F r 11 1 /74 1 17'-101 #ItÂ»# CIVIL 1 11 1 1 \ 1 Lc 2,0 -- Ly-Tw 11 2 -'L 1 -__ J r# 1 j i-' fle r--1 1 1 L. 2-71 -3 c=== > 10/9 4/1 - 012.24 2-1, - CONTRACTOR 0 0 __222221.._0 4Â·TI 1- 1- #CONIRACTOR IL.... -1-21. L ----- reap :Â·rEPS ~ DECK ~ ~~ b 7...X/.7 , - 96' +41,1 HANPRAIL Z: -_4__1 (BOT.....) I 'l - 1 --- 4 fj 41 Hpc 5/07/08 DESIGN REVIEW - RAISEP DECK --- -> (Exell,e PRAINAGE To Iâ€¢EMAIN) MARK DATE DESCRIPTION DRAWN BY: SMW Emi PROJECT NO: 0720 COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC Je SHEET TITLE 0 0 Â® Â® Â® X2.1 1 ADDITION 1/4' = 1'-0' FLOOR PLAN r k--, - - 613 83!~10 .... FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 PO. Box 1606 Basall, Colorado 81621 PHONE: 970,279,4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 Isis Addition 406 E. Hopkins Ave Aspen, Colorado 81611 NEW SKYUGHT -0 MATCH Suzie Krevoy l EXISTINGS ( rYP. OF 6) CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR 11 #SURVEYOR PROPOSED | 1 1 .1 1 ~2 1 STANDING SEAM VAULTED ROOF Ill 11 111 1111-=1 1 1 TO MATCH GEOTECH #GEOTECH 1 ill'[il~: 1 11 STRUCTURAL #Sl RUCTURAL r, 1 Immil - 1 93**2 i I *beat= *f#il MECHANICAL- lili'lli 1 1 1,20 #MECHANICAL 11 1 1 I lili EXISTING 9 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT STANDING SEAM 3 ! 1 \ ALLTED ROOF 1 Iii i 11 1! 1 I lilli i 1 ' Imi 188 Â® ' . CIVIL 'efi#E* ##11# 82%1" 1 I lea : 1 1 1-1 ~1 1111 1 1 1 1-1.- :1 i, i EXISTING CONTRACTOR STANDING SEAM VAULTED ROCF 1 1 1 #CONrRACTOR :i -!u ~111 ~[-11 1 :1 .j 1 1 Iii 1.I:I~ lilli 1 , 8 111 l_- 1111 1 - -. - 0 !1 il: 'iii Zl. HPC 5/07/08 DESIGN REVIEW -- 1. 0,1, F MARK DATE ~ DESCRIPTION j ..Ii---il. -1-Ii---7 DECK ! tt - - MOOD STEPS 9- ~ PROJECT NO: 0720 (moâ„¢ stmes) DRAWN BY: SMW 5/. /6/HAN/RAIL- I - - COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE V Â¢ < RAISED DEC< --Â·-4 (EXISTINe DRAINASE TO REMAIN) 1 Â® X2.2 Ecol ROOF PLAN 2 OILARGED ROOF PLAN . (.9 (20) (9 (5) 6) Â® 1/4~ =1Â· L-0001[J 1 .m'., FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 PO. Box 1606 Basalt, Colorado 81621 PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 Isis Addition 11 lili 406 E. Hopkins Ave Aspen, Colorado 81611 DELLE EXISnNG STANDING SEAM UPLLE VAULTED ROOF Suzie Krevoy AHU CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR FLAT ROOF GEOTECH ------1 #GEOTECH 1 1 STRUCTURAL #STRUCTURAL 11'11 1 1 1 I 'lilli lilli 1 1 111 1 PROPOSED 1 121 Â· | VAULTE[,ROOF 1 SANDIND SEAM , Il | TO VTCH / ~ || MECHANICAL C 1 MEa H #MECHANICAL . UNIr 122 1 11= 1 1 1- 1 1 t.* 1 . - --- LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 111 1 1% EXIST N 3 ST 4ND N,3 SEAM ~ ~ ~ i | I /A ATED R.Xf lilli lili 'fl 'lil "11]--N--[f---- CIVIL #### 1 EXISTING ! 1 STANDING SEAM i | VAULTED ROOF #CONIRAC'TOR CONTRACTOR 11 111111 1% L.-- SNOW FENCE 7 i 1 ----------r- 6-T#mu r 1 1 OVERFb 1 1 ANISH 11, 1 1 i; ii imi-Ip T e HPC 807/08 DESIGN REVIEW MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO: 0720 3 ROOF PLAN 1/8' = 1'-0' - DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE 2~2.3 ROOF PLAN 1.1 -=g=Jâ€¢illillimillillillillilillilililill --le=,1./.101.1......./.- .. I. I i~ Milli.licillillillilill egen======r--==========r-=-5.====-===========A============e===================g==5 == ............. Elia[Iffifi~ *:=5~ :r----=--~------7---r:---1---1-Fi~-1-2#<-IM#:.----~T/~ -1.1~1-1~1-lim=-,~~m.~ ..... mae=Ill .1 A=-4...1'SE=,1 'ET== lili 1 . mil.li.1.~~Il-Â¤...I-'~I-Ii- 1#=--=1- I~ . M/#1** ,-6-. r!]19=fire'T.Irili~~ - E::11 %11 "FS - /////1/,-1--LJ --1 1.11-1 1.--. . j [ 1 I ilill 11.,1.1 ------ -1=-;p;=-~==z*=----s*=Li7ZfitiLLILT-------- --------- --9 FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 PO. Box 1606 BasaM, Colorado 81621 PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 Isis Addition 406 E. Hopkins Ave Aspen, Colorado 81611 Suzie Krevoy CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR #S RVEYO GEOTECH EOT H " - STRUCTURAL U L 1 MECHANICAL - CC 71 L- 1 .........illime,H~ ~ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT NDSCAP ARCHI CT * Jll lin#Hil __K~L__il ~~Â©IgI~Z~r;~I*I*I;Il=pul=m=p=p:/*g~JZ;I~EEEI CIVIL Mur~UIU.UJU.IZ.*~D-' ~44u441.rL-4tl*C~ rNt.-t,~- Z7~~J~7~ZI~~~7~7[ZZZZ~ZZZZEZZZEZZZZEZZZ~ZZ~~ -- ] -ik-,Â¢ ~~ SECTION 1 SCALEÂ· 1/4Â·Â· = 1Â·-U -- CONTRACTOR 2/ -2Â»m---- NX - HPC i 5/07/08 baGN REWEW- MARkÂ»Â¥Er-BEERIPTION FPECO~0 11,~ ---------- PROJECT NOÂ· 0720 DRKWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE 01 A4. 1 .91 1 CIM f USECTION - 2-1 SECTIONS .. OPTION 2 Â¢4~li/ ~ //. A61./.1.WA: . . - 9-%.9. 1 3. 't ' ,â€¢ar'Â· -9 g. fÂ·Â·... Il k Â¢ AN i, N .7 1 , 2 3 + -,-- P 9. . .mi I d....6& rj./A I -- . 4*- /1 ?%11 E= I 4 I '!4 ~ ~Â» 1 ....2 1 1 4 '12' 11 U P...4 41 2 ~ -Â¢' f. j~'Â¥i.4~ -â‚¬J 4 ' Â· frâ€¢ 6.14.3 1' 7, 2 0 1 .t U 7 4*e 1.' ' .Â· I .'r ' 7, , 144 7 4.::+ 2 G --A<*2177.. 4-4 Â¢ 9 % :'. m 5t; 4 - 02.1 .. . .4 S 4;04 4 'LI ' 1% ~ Â·4 'Â£ I 1 /4 - i I .9 .. fi' I L 4 * I y i f ,> p Â« Si Â· 4 ./ .. ;r..-r ' - 11 , I .4 1, . . Fl a--e . 4<8#123 1 7//4/41 + '61'.. d ... Wd 90:2 961 -Â©=Â»-y Af- 4 r-4 94Â·'Â·I .1,/ 1â€ž110=1. X - *- I 1 * 11 1 --'. I .**1. tal Â·4 ~: 3'Ee--4.%Â·r,?,Â· .*76.Â· ~ #Ef Â· . 'f #fE#Iff} i L.=%~ Â· 1 W.'*' L ' I ?11 . :r.. - A 9, 4 1 62-â€¢ , - .f.-' I ..4. ~ -~ Â·'i ' ~'~t~-4.-11â€¢ - Â£ lâ„¢* 6 . 2-3.4042 - Â·D ~ 2~p ~.* 1 W. '. , U ./-l . . 60+1:â„¢*8.A, 4 = .Lj 19 jill 7.- W , '1416.2 1 A./1 -- )*.~-~ -- t A 1 / ~~ - ~ U,2 r-- 1 -3, . 09 . - ./. i~ 1 ,-~ ------~ *Ii./.-M i#: .â€ž=41'eut.4 =Â»-- 8 . JIC ..i'*,1 .-r 6 9 not, L. 1:.9. i k --y 411 1-, 10.,77â€žâ€ž ,- A IiÂ«- i %2'K-- 4 2:U (PM-4-- 72* e , 49 4 - *.: f 13 -~'trÂ» Â¢ Ar' i 7 1 r f =Ree. I -- . 1"49-=-â‚¬,1 4 f'.LEL I r .. k . I 1-.F 4 .474> I . 204 - ' FUÂ«.2* . : *4Â·Â· - Â· 2~ 3<. 1f .r- 4 f0 ' 4; 111 - 4Â· 0 ' c E.- .imel=- t ..... it: 51>,1 : a 'r 'AA_ . 'K im,1 Â«*35* 24 /1,4192Â£:4*il*"1Â£.2 -, 9 2 1&1~Wjmiâ€¢*In ' 4rk#'~~~-/*-i .: ~1%4 .n~ *,Â»Â«~,t X '~AL'- =-4 4/Fetty;8~ 04~27: , ---N 1* .5 - 4/ 1 \Ati U' *.&' 1,. a /0-7- -2 1 il/-- * 1 1-3> .j ..11<Il -4 0- I .42' - -1. *- 7 . -72 9- 4161'8'~&*417# - '' -W-0.- t.i-' Â·' +;*1Â¥~lf. 4* 1 -17) I j i.li- .1 -1.-- .-A .. A.4 .re,%4-0.- u, 1.- 4* 4. 4.4. p - 1 4/ 1 . . i ./ ' 1**'... t.clr. 1,9Â¢T i ..2. 1 r=Â¥6 1 . 4 -A,Olt: :1 JR . 1. - -1 1*..L i irJ.i - 4 25,44{t.---L;~ , i I 4 2 .15= -1 % -4 ' *6&2**44. 4 *$043 2. l Â·li .. $& MI .Ar/Â·Â·. li * . I 1 + NIA 09% 1 6 1. 14 .5 & b f w . < 4J j . 4 ~TBeb. > 4... 1 I I i , A : 2 /,1 0 4 ..8 UN 6445<. + 4 ./.*41. ... f A. 6%41 . 1 . 1 '6.,i i.;.H.;,iati:.. t. 24='24 :t . 1.: . \5 4.0 9 .'1 3'48 . - .,1,Â£,ft;f' Â· .i Al#.. X 1' Â·:- -41 -1 1 4 r 7~ - 8 -j L.=1~ ; * 10Â«- |e l . ..1 Al/*~*i #. <*r.g- (1â€¢Li. , ' .' ~6 - . 0-g- 0Â£44490. t#*........ 'Er-3<1,1 Â·7 g R # 1942.1, - -=~ -.... 4. t , .45Â·.1 J.M....3- 9 -4 d .... r M....4/* tip 4 ./---- Â«=. 4,"Il i i f lk.,: ' ,.. 8, :+ 4. * *t'Elf*0 0 1 ! 7/i W Wdg --.&- ,â€¢f i ./Ar/- tfy *ti - , - X.0 ~ -Put , / 7 -, 1 Â· / ,4 % 1-0 .04-1 K i . I N . ---11.- 5 --- â€ž *1 =1 140,4 _22-,-i .% r r..: Er - .el.. iIi-t : >(1 -- ,Â·62 .11 1 -643:. ip= ..m r 2,9-9 . 1,/4. ..1- 4 4 9, i > ./.- 2.8 R :61 i U fl'Lv,-Â· - m r . *.,4.-..1-- le-Â·tifi- IL. - .11, 11 11-. 11 .37 fFI' ~**3:0 1442â€ž 3,Â·5/3 --- TZ 1 /14 /:~2-----1----18 43Â·Â·1-4 . 4 1~41,* d - i./30 .:fi.ty 1 -- -/-'p-1 - 11 . 2222% i -. - -a:.111, -* 4, Ir-07..6- 911'll-'ll-'11--Â· I . 9*Y Â¢ , 1.... . 2... .. 1 - I 1 11..6 1 *...... 4..... . Â·t'f?JER,!-:01'-44,4*LgVg: 7: Â·118PM - 12, *.....20.,4 . -6/4~,1- Â£ i.1 9 . k ' 1-.414 4. 1 444 ** F< - i.. *----#-.- =-:177. - + :77 ,k 42. 1 - 2~741 *: *' 0 f 2 1 h= < *- .. . - $ - 9. 41.-6 ~ #Et=f diz~(~14-JE~~2/4#JU4+1'<4499223Â¥7 - P m-*miz- . 1. I I -1 - 1 ' - r- 4 *62Â·--4,2~-4%L_~~ . # - 1 1 11.-111 L Â£ 4 1... I ' t 1-- 4 Â· 1. 1 . 6 1 . 6, It: 0 5 . *&*a mai#r. 1 r. ' -f ' m i-~ ~bl?A G=... -r': 9/i = I. /4 ==4,0 1. .. a 719% r 55 - -Â· -m â€¢*36 9 ~ --'. 44-*FÂ· - .40 7;1/. - 4 . m f."imp,lt :'. Imâ„¢et~ 1.06Â¥ I a. n.- 7 .1 I 1 201* 4. 0 _t 1 ~96.* 4 1 1 f y 7 .h . :/ 1 J i: -/6.-IN/'./. *vii.'--I... 0 1 ?J fit. 1. Y~;0.-Pi,; ~- 3@,- /':2 . *7 - - b. 4 11 1/ P./4 11 m "14 1,- // 7* --0......9-....=-4 114 //Ch *FAMI 3 1 2-â‚¬2Â· 1 <3~ 1 10 â€¢ Â· .in 2340 . 1~.-' -1 1 '....'. 4-+ 44 .... ./ :81, 1 -- - - -~ ---------------- -- -----~- - ----Â·------------{EEWPLANE PER G.LS. -- FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 -- - ---- - - ---- 1 PO. Box 1606 Basall, Colorado 81621 FREE MARKET ADDITION PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770 5585 AH- U.IF A [-*H--1 , ' ' 1,Â·' ~Â·- 1 I a-/2/'171 1 ~~~=1-q UPPER LYÂ£.0 Isis Addition L 1 ~ 1 i_,y .1 1 f 1 It i L 1 4 -r--9-111 406 E. Hopkins Ave n MECH .1-r Aspen, Colorado 81611 n I Suzie Krevoy -0-ECHL-- Ir--1 .1 ! - 0 .3 -29' -Â·-43i _ PROJ.0/L A Ny-3'' THEATER A n| ~' r s,~2EU - -- - ~ r--- mae .1/ CONSULTANTS . 3 .481.1*F:9 1 1- . 'L=,U~. SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR n L.G.[0*.,/1' 11 R " GEOTECH ]1 . 1 #GEOTECH -r :.11 E Â· #STRUCTURAL PROJ.lyL Ch STRUCTURAL . 1 L THEATER D i â€¢ 0 = .1 -Ill 9 1.. 12. . - MECHANICAL 6, - LOWER LVL ~ #MECHANICAL EL-7Â¢-9 * STOR. 73'-0 LS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 2 VIEWPLANE SECTION 1/8" = 1'-0" CIVIL #IMI# Â«1 fÂ« CONTRACTOR #CONIRACTOR 0/ HPC 3/26/08 DESIGN REVIEW MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 0720 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE PROJECT SITE AO.3 G\S eig- VIEWPLANE VIEWPLANE PLAN 1" =50 .... .Un 4(i,1 1~ 6 Â»r r . 2.7 .. Z 0.8,9 3'.1,e $ 4'-8v FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 44 Po~ Box 1606 lilli/ - P=====M n=====n.. ---Ei".,-n--~1,/illillilllllll~~~lil~/-6-=~ __av/ Basalt, Colorado 81621 -11 7 1Â· El kin.zi -2 ~ 1 L-J I ~ 1 ~ Ir- - nE - --ll I PHONE:970.279.4157 FAX:866.770.5585 0 FLU -- ' --1 I VE 1 4 *_ _LL_ __~~ ~_~ ~ _~_~___-2--r GUEST Il 5 + r---1 0 11 r CLUOESSETT ~- 3 BATH J \ f e Isis Addition 111 1 406 E. Hopkins Ave 11 1 1 / -rl r----------------- Aspen, Colorado 81611 11 1 4--01 07 Il - 4--1. J:~i :. 1-:Iil -f. 9 ' 1.t 1 Suzie Krevoy L---J 2% 1.- - 1' _ CONSULTANTS In 3=11 ---- 41.lur #SURVEYOR SURVEYOR k===- 4â‚¬]IETIZIn ~. L Z]GUEST SUITE, , I r ' i 100 3 ~I ~_ ~ 1 GEOTECH #GEOTECH ~6 STRUCTURAL - 001 -i. - #STRUCTURAL 4 -JL_ 7 11===. OiliZLECU~~~LIZIZE 9---1 Ens-Tr~ COYVDO , ~ MECHANICAL h A k -1 k -4 1 1 OFFICE #MECHANICAL 4 19--t---r--3 1 // \ ---$ 16=~im 4_9 1 77711 443 1 1 1 1 1 Ill / ~~4 ) L./ ;le~ 0 '1 1.4 -2 1.'P /3 1 --4 1 i Fl LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 6 4---4 - J J.E rein.- 111 11\ 1 . 1 #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 0110 1 [1 / 4 r. r.â€ž- $ i 9 (5 + LN r 26 1 0 f i , 4 1 . 1 5-3,4 11Â· 4 1, 10Â·-2,7 1 1 ce-/:79.P-*> 1 1 -1 17'-100' 4% 1 4 9*.1 CIVIL 1 ~~ 1- - T li .-- 1 h 7 5--- , 0 C=== 1 1 4 --- CONTRACTOR - - --- o 1CON I'RAC'IOR L_-â€ž11 IL_-1. DECK I *-- -- -- 4Â©05> STEPS i Â¥ LE==. 9 --1' /1/H FIA"Mlljl -' ~ t-- - (boâ„¢ sIDEs) 1 ., 1- 1 05 - 1 4'-0â€¢ i Â· - HPC 3/26/08 DESIGN REVIEW < RAISED QQIÂ·-9 ; - ~ _____ _ ______ _____ moSTâ„¢e DRAINAÂ®E TO REMAIN) _ MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 1 1 ~ | PROJECT NO: 0720 1 m 1 1-1-3 DRAWN BY: SMW 1 1 COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC | SHEET TITLE 84 4 08 Â® Â® A2.1 1 ADDITION 1/4- = 1'-0' FLOOR PLAN AkliNd .... FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 PO Box 1606 Basalt, Colorado 81621 PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 Isis Addition 406 E. Hopkins Ave I Aspen, Colorado 81611 - NEW SKYLIGHT TO MATCH Suzie Krevoy EXISTINGS (TYR OF 6) . CONSULTANTS I lilli '1 SURVEYOR 1 1 ~1 0~111'i' 1 #SURVEYOR 1 11 1 1 11 1 11 1 1. 1 1:1 #11 1 5.1 lili 2 8 *GEOTECH ...11 1 1 EPDM FLAT ROOF I ~~-- ~ GEO-rE}4 ij 1 4*21 .*241 1 1 1 El MECHANICAL #STRUCTURAL i 1 STRUCTURAL 1 11 IIi 11 14,1 - MECHANICAL #MECHANICAL 1 1- 11 1 1 1 1 ri ! 1 1 1 D.ISTING , . 1 1,11 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT --------- #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT STANDING SEAM 1 \ At-TED ROOF i , 1 11 1 ~I @11 21*1 ,Â·Â·Â·-Â·\ CIVIL Â® 1 111 1 : ' '|||/ ~|lijil P 1 ~'ll il :i 1 1.!1~1111 11 1 PI 1 EXISTING CONTRACTOR STAND NG SEAM #CONTRACTOR 1 - VALILTED ROCF - ~ 181 1 1 ------ 0 . 1:l.: 1 1 i HPC y26/08 DESIGN REVIEW MARK DATE ~ DESCRIPTION DECK I -- ),009 sifs 1 '10 --- 58' Hleâ€¢4 1.1/N//AIL DRAWN BY: SMW 1 111,1 M maTH SIDES) j - COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE 1 1 I I < RAJEED DECK-- < 460.1 1 | *1671- DRAINASE TO REMAIN) -- -- - --- --=- - -- - ---- -- ---- --- --- --- - -- - - -- --- ---- - - ----Â® A2.2 r - 9*-=-*i..:+=I~.L--i---.I.1--=.I=-i 1 1 le L I ROOF PLAN 2 ENLARGED ROOF PLAN 1/4' = 1'-0" - CD (33 (9 09 6 L-000 u -1 FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 PO. Box 1606 Basalt, Colorado 81621 PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 1 Isis Addition 406 E. Hopkins Ave Aspen, Colorado 81611 DFULE ~ EXISTING STANDING SEAM UFLLE VAULTED ROOF Suzie Krevoy AHU i CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR FLAT ROOF: GEOTECH Z ' - - #GEOTEECH STRUCTURAL #STRUCTURAL 1 lili 11 1 11 ~ 11 1 balilli.1 3 1 111 1 -1 EPDM FLAT 1 ROOF 1 1 MECHANICAL l H MECH. 1 #MECHANtcAL R {-1 UN~ &j 21 , LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT I EKIST N) ST #NO N,3 SEAM I I #LANDSCAPE ARCNTECT -/AJLTED R X'F | 11 1 ;:1 1 1 ##Al# * EXISTING i STANDING SEAM VAULTED ROOF L_ !111 F f CONTRACTOR 1RNJNIRACIOR - r, r.1-1 4 -1 7 1- j- Al- Â· - J- . - . L-- -- 5NOW FENCE ATHRU T 1 MERFL / FINISH 1 1-1 . - - - --I- -1 i--8--17--T e HPC 726/08 DESIGN REVIEW MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO: 0720 3 ROOF PLAN 1/8- = 1'-9 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE ROOF PLAN 1= ..... m~ -- - 1-/ha7- 1**Ill:./.Ill/'Il~:I'Il//Ill/:Il:'ll'Il/:I'Il:'Il/:Ill:'Ilim"libmilligililgilillili~t-lillinlâ€¢~ -8."ill::~~I~---::'::::1115*7::EEil:::::~~---yâ‚¬.'~id~-' Il 40,ig,mr#mwitEgge@iM,M,I,jitÂ¥â€¢1â€¢Â¥â€¢11.,44,-991,-,--mwaw: --%.irimaaE!. = - Il EEP= Z*EtÂ£ c...=d,=il-a:LIIIU I .....fjo~FEE.-111~111'illizimmiuilit:Mili""litill'!1111'ilimil,i"'â€ž'U,#'. 1111 ililiEillilillililiEil 1.r--Ilm-- al-=Ullillill 21 ===11 == / 462~1 1.~mil wgi-1~41-Ilic=. .....- .. 11,1 01.1 .- I. E:li~kill~k.~.~~ili~:~F::::--~mi:i:,il:E",El -- 11'llilillill- = 1. .4.--M.. ---- iÂ¥**~iEEilli2ltiliE:i'~:JEEE,1,-ilillel:fie*tffil! il~ailizillialig-=71~~ .- lI =2 =I - =/1-51*3212/2/2/5,~ililil - ---- -- .1 ------- 1 .-----~- i.lilli U.. 5;-~---~------------------E-------;. 1 -1 - 0 0 .. , milihib=b- -------------- mir:imâ€¢gamEN:----:i--2E-c'.::Ej-4.'~val limmill.gl~.~Ill~ .Wim 'ililillfil-ni Ilillillilili0'llililillill Sm:=6â€¢-Ilm 1 1.1.. 1--:~Emi lill:'11~ :m==11/////11E---1 ------------- It :ZE=ZEZZ ~ :ZE=ZE=ZE=ZE-- -.I ....... 1=.11-111-E - 0 11!1, lag .. Historic Preservation Application Package Cover Letter TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COUNCIL APPLICANT: Steer Wilson, Representing Brad and Susan Krevoy DATE: May 14,2008 RE: 406 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE (ISIS BUILDING)- Parapet Wall and Deck Proposed Projects Amendments by HPC on March 26th of 2008 * No amendments were proposed for this portion of the project during the minutes of the previous meeting. Request: We request that this portion of the project be approved separately. The deck portion of the project is being pursued with a separate permit, being done at a different time. and we would like to have use of the deck this summer if possible. I have included a separate set of approval drawings for record and review. .... Â£22 -I , -0 1. . , f / v , J u t 4- . 1.-7, a Iii 8 . Â· FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 P.O. Box 1606 1 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 F OJA. PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 .1 1 1 . , 0 Isis Addition Z 406 E. Hopkins Ave UFLLE Aspen, Colorado 81611 DFULE | Suzie Krevoy 1 - CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR FLA ROOF - GEOTECH #GEOTECH 1 - -- --- - -r- ~ 1 REMOVE PORTION OF 06 BRICK PRIVACY WALL AND h , ~-REPAIRCC-LOT : STRUCTURAL #STRUCTURAL Il " , " N i MECHANICAL L 1 MECH. 9 #MECHANICAL 1 -2 Â· -{20) : 4-0 "Wir' LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPEARCHRECT 81 4 b - 42--- - --- --Â·--------------C) CIVIL PARAPIT WALL REPAIR ~RE~~n~0 CONC, WERE WALL IS 1 REMOVED 4% A 1 19 1 i 0 4-' . CONTRACTOR #CON TRACTOR 1 ...=.===r==Al=. .~ REMOVE PORTION OF MECHAN#CAL GRILL - PARApiT TO TO. SLOPED IN FtE oF PLANTER F-1 b CONC OFPLANTER (IVER TO SHEET Â¥24) f ~ 1 1 i REMOVE PLANTER AND ALL MATERIALS TO T.C.SLE]#E~ EONÂ¢IKB 1 WATER PROOF SLAB AND PAIAPET AND 'REP FOR DECK. X lim 11 I i 1 1 1 F D.M. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 5/7/08 HPC REWEW ~ ~ | MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO: 0720 Â·71 9-4 13'-9 / ~ 16'-B' 1(71. DRAWN BY: SMW 1 18.-2 <t I C 13" COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE 44 4 Â®Â®Â® D-1 DECK DEMO 1/8" = 1'-0" DEMOLITION PLAN Â® CEÂ©_ * *Â® Â®e 0 . . 0 FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 P.O. Box 1606 WOOD PRIVACY FENCE,TO Basalt, Colorado 81621 - MATCH EXISTING TO BE PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 TEMPORARY Isis Addition 111 lili 1 1 ki 406 E. Hopkins Ave Aspen, Colorado 81611 Suzie Krevoy CONSULTANTS MECHANICAL SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR 1 1 1 I11 GEOTECH ~ 111 -= -#GEOTECH 1 1 i Cj ----- STRUCTURAL 1 11: 31 1 #STRUCTURAL 5 - MECHANICAL #MECHANICAL 1 | 41|I| , 0 1 11 1/1 --- - --- -- -G) LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT I r 1 1 1 ~. EXISTING ' STANDING SEAM CIVIL VAULTED ROCF i #IN)# i 1 III K CONTRACTOR #CONIRACTOR - ~ 1 1 ~ ~ 1 ----1.-------- 1 1 8 Â® 111 : . ,-11. f 2-:- EU. n AT. DECK i â‚¬ j --woop slips 4 - r.e==-1 -' 9 - 1- -4 i i morÂ·,sweal 4 ----Â·- 50 Mal MAIC/RAIL 14 + 5/7/08 HPC REVIEW m li I . -1 - ---- -- , 1 a MARK DATE i DESC*IPTION 1 :il .2 E-7Bi# Q<CK---1 Â£ PROJECT NO: 0720 C RAISED DECK - DRAWN BY: SMW (EXISM. ORAÂ»,AaE To .EMAIN) 1 1 ~ COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC m 1 SHEET TITLE 1 1 4//4 55Â·-2 0 9 1 'i 4 1 1 0 0 4 Â®Â® 1 PURPOSED DECK 1/4' = 1'-0' FLOOR PLAN /-0(DO ul .... - EXISTIND HÂ»+ BRICK PARAPET FORUM PHI EX15Â·rING eR/<92 MALL â€¢ STONE GAP TO !95 REMOVED 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 EWING PARAPET BEYOND - .r/ ANGLE OF VIEW FROM 65'/ P.O. Box 1606 1 ---- 4~ - FROM FRONT OF BUILDING3 Basalt, Colorado 81621 PHONE: 970.2794157 FAX: 866.770 5585 It ; 14 SPACED MOOD MLANKS TO REPAIR OR .rPLACE MAel< Vu'TER~â€¢Roorihe Isis Addition MATERFIROOF Neâ€¢E~Alâ‚¬ Grid EXISTING L.01â€¢L BRO< fARAPET AREA ORAINS /5 REGUIRED 406 E. Hopkins Ave 1/4Â· EPIE DECK OVER FURING ---lb'/Ii< a ~Â·a , â€¢ a Aspen, Colorado 81611 3/4' FIRING OVER STRUCTURAL DECK - PAW !-i .-.- Suzie Krevoy 5Z~*&22&:Z-- CONSULTANTS ExISTING CONCIRETE PeCK ------7 1-20 SURVEYOR , #SURVEYOR * 4 nt, A A v 2 1 - GEOTECH #GEOTECH < Exts-Ve MlhPOP'IS STRUCTURAL #STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL #MECHANICAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CIVIL #WAÂ¥ CONTRACTOR #CONTRACTOR 2,2 *93Â· 5/7/08 HPC REWEW -1 n A n.n nA n'.n nA 1 1111 MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO: 0720 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE - A4.2 SECTIONS A WALL SECTION 1/2" = 1'-0 =Â«1* 142*Jur, . A. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen I-listoric Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 406 E. Hopkins Avenue, Isis- Minor Review and Mountain View Plane Review DATE: March 26,2008 SUMMARY: The Isis Theater has three residential units on the roof. The unit closest to the front of the structure is currently a 2,000 square foot home, with a proposed expansion of 500 square feet. As part of the City's effort to retain the Isis as a viable theater, a commitment was made to facilitate the applicant's desire to expand the subject unit (although the project must be found to meet the historic preservation guidelines.) A code amendment was passed, allowing TDRs to expand downtown residential unit sizes. The expansion does not add more allowable floor area to the site, but rather allows individual units to go beyond the 2,000 square foot limitation that currently exists. During review o f this project it was recognized that another code amendment is necessary, so that TDRs can be allowed to land on designated buildings (to expand unit size. not FAR), which has not been the case. Because of the rooftop location of this expansion, staff has determined that Minor Review is the appropriate process. The board is also asked to evaluate a deck expansion and new railing, as well as to make a determination as to whether the project negatively affects a protected view plane which originates from the Hotel Jerome. A site visit is planned for the day of the meeting in order to view story poles and a mock-up of the railing. In terms of the graphic information available at the time of staff review, we find the addition to be appropriate in placement, however a restudy of it's height is necessary to reduce impacts on the historic structure. In addition, we have concerns with the possible visibility of the proposed deck railing, as well as the extent that use of the deck may bring additional visual impacts along the front parapet wall. Restudy is recommended, with the understanding that the site visit is likely to be very valuable in understanding the degree of the concerns. APPLICANT: Susanne Krevoy Separate Property Trust, represented by Steev Wilson, Forum Phi. PARCEL ID: 2737-07-330-010. ADDRESS: 406 E. Hopkins Avenue. Isis Theater Condo Unit B, Block 87, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado. 1 0 . ZONING: CC, Commercial Core. MINOR DEVELOPMENT The procedure for a Minor Development Review is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. If the application is approved, the HPC shall issue a Certificate of Appropriateness and the Community Development Director shall issue a Development Order. The HPC decision shall befinal unless appealed by the applicant or a landowner within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 26.316. Staff Response: The proposed addition infills an open area between the east side of the subject unit and the stair tower. It is held back from the wall perimeter. The roof on the addition is designed to align with the form and height already established by adjacent construction. Materials and fenestration are similar to existing. At the time that the redevelopment of the Isis occurred, HPC spent substantial time focusing on the rooftop development, and the need to make it secondary to the historic theater. Pulling the unit in from the parapet walls was very important. Staff has some concern that this addition diminishes the sense that there are minor spaces on the roof. and instead creates a long wall across the Hopkins fagde. This is mitigated by the fact that the space is significantly recessed from the street. We find that the project would better comply with the guidelines if the addition was minimized in height, reducing it's visibility and the wall effect. Although the barrel roof form is established, a flat section on the new construction would not be inappropriate. Relevant guidelines are: 10.12 When constructing a rooftop addition, keep the mass and scale subordinate to that of a historic building. u An addition should not overhang the lower floors of a historic building in the front or on the side. u Dormers should be subordinate to the overall roof mass and should be in scale with historic ones on similar historic structures. 10.14 The roof form and slope of a new addition should be in character with the historic building. o If the roof of the historic building is symmetrically proportioned, the roof of the addition should be similar. u Eave lines on the addition should be similar to those of the historic building or structure. 2 .. 13.13 Use flat roof lines as the dominant roof form. u A tlat roof, or one that gently slopes to the rear of a site, should be the dominant roof form. u Parapets on side facades should step down towards the rear of the building. u False fronts and parapets with horizontal emphasis also may be considered. The project also includes a proposal to convert an existing raised planter into a deck surface, right behind the historic parapet wall. The deck requires a 36" rail, which will be mostly hidden by the parapet itself across the south, but not along the east and west sides. The application does not contain enough information to evaluate the visual impact of this rail. but a mock-up at the site will be helpful. Staff is concerned with the rail (intended to be a cable rail) being a visible modern element that conflicts with the historic character of the building. In addition, we have some concerns with the "furnishings" that might be used on the expanded deck. Again, when the theater was redeveloped, holding back the rooftop construction was important to HPC. The installation of the railing should not result in additional snow Filing against the back of the parapet wall and deteriorating the masonry. Guidelines to note are: 2.6 Maintain masonry walls in good condition. u Original mortar that is in good condition should be preserved in place. o Repoint only those mortar joints where there is evidence of a moisture problem or when mortar is missing. u Duplicate the original mortar in strength, composition, color, texture, joint width and profile. u Mortar joints should be cleared with hand tools. Using electric saws and hammers to remove mortar can seriously damage the adjacent brick. u Do not use mortar with a high portland cement content, which will be substantially harder than the brick and does not allow for expansion and contraction. The result is deterioration ofthe brick itself. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. U For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 10.13 Set a rooftop addition back from the front of the building. u This will help preserve the original profile of the historically significant building as seen from the street. MOUNTAIN VIEW PLANE REVIEW The building falls within the Main Street View Plane, which originates from the 1 lotel Jerome. Because this project requires historic preservation review, evaluation of the impacts on the view plane is being assigned to 1-1PC rather than P&Z. 3 .. Sec. 26.435.050. Mountain view plane review. C. Mountain view plane review standards. No development shall be permitted within a mountain view plane unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below. 1. No mountain view plane is infringed upon, except as provided below. When any mountain view plane projects at such an angle so as to reduce the maximum allowable building height otherwise provided for in this Title, development shall proceed according to the provisions of Chapter 26.445 as a Planned Unit Development so as to provide for maximum flexibility in building design with special consideration to bulk and height. open space and pedestrian space and similarly to permit variations in lot area, lot width, yard and building height requirements and view plane height limitations. 1 he Planning and Zoning Commission. after considering a recommendation from the Community Development Department, may exempt a development from being processed as a Planned Unit Development when the Planning and Zoning Commission determines that the proposed development has a minimal effect on the view plane. When any proposed development infringes upon a designated view plane. but is located in front of another development which already blocks the same view plane, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider whether or not the proposed development will further infringe upon the view plane and the likelihood that redevelopment of the adjacent structure will occur to re-open the view plane. In the event the proposed development does not further infringe upon the view plane and re- redevelopment to reopen the view plane cannot be anticipated, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall exempt the development from the requirements of this Section. (Ord. No. 12,2007, Â§22) Staff Response: The addition does fall within the view plane, however the housing units across the back of the Isis already intervene, so there is no new impact. Staff finds that an exemption is appropriate. DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: â€¢ approve the application, â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or â€¢ continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. 4 .. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the height of the new addition be reduced, with further direction to be provided based on the scheduled site visit. Similarly, the impact of the railing must be discussed after viewing the mock-up. View plane exemption approval is appropriate as proposed. Exhibits: A. Relevant 11PC Design Guidelines B. Application Exhibit A: Relevant HPC Design Guidelines 1.15 Minimize the visual impacts of site lighting. o Site lighting should be shielded to avoid glare onto adjacent properties. Focus lighting on walks and entries, rather than up into trees and onto facade planes. 2.6 Maintain masonry walls in good condition. u Original mortar that is in good condition should be preserved in place. o Repoint only those mortar joints where there is evidence of a moisture problem or when mortar is missing. u Duplicate the original mortar in strength, composition, color, texture, joint width and profile. u Mortar joints should be cleared with hand tools. Using electric saws and hammers to remove mortar can seriously damage the adjacent brick. u Do not use mortar with a high portland cement content, which will be substantially harder than the brick and does not allow for expansion and contraction. The result is deterioration of the brick itself. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. u A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. u An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. u An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. u An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. o An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. u A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a difibrentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 5 .. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. u An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. u For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. u The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. 10.12 When constructing a rooftop addition, keep the mass and scale subordinate to that of a historic building. u An addition should not overhang the lower floors of a historic building in the front or on the side. o Dormers should be subordinate to the overall roof mass and should be in scale with historic ones on similar historic structures. u Dormers should be located below the primary structure's ridgeline, usually by at least one foot. 10.13 Set a rooftop addition back from the front of the building. u This will help preserve the original profile of the historically significant building as seen from the street. 10.14 The roof form and slope of a new addition should be in character with the historic building. u If the roof of the historic building is symmetrically proportioned. the roof of the addition should be similar. o Have lines on the addition should be similar to those of the historic building or structure. 13.13 Use flat roof lines as the dominant roof form. u A ilat roof, or one that gently slopes to the rear of a site. should be the dominant roof form. u Parapets on side facades should step down towards the rear of the building. u False fronts and parapets with horizontal emphasis also may be considered. 14.6 Exterior lights should be simple in character and similar in color and intensity to that used traditionally. i The design of a fixture should be simple in form and detail. Exterior lighting must be approved by the 11PC. u All exterior light sources should have a low level of luminescence. 14.7 Minimize the visual impacts of site and architectural lighting. u Unshielded, high intensity light sources and those which direct light upward will not be permitted. u Shield lighting associated with service areas, parking lots and parking structures. 6 .. u Timers or activity switches may be required to prevent unnecessary sources of light by controlling the length of time that exterior lights are in use late at night. u Do not wash an entire building facade in light. u Avoid placing exposed light fixtures in highly visible locations, such as on the upper walls of buildings. u Avoid duplicating fixtures. For example, do not use two fixtures that light the same area. 14.8 Minimia the visual impact of light spill from a building. u Prevent glare onto adjacent properties by using shielded and focused light sources that direct light onto the ground. The use of downlights, with the bulb fully enclosed within the shade, or step lights which direct light only on to walkways, is strongly encouraged. u Lighting shall be carefully located so as not to shine into residential living space, on or off the property or into public rights-of-way. 7 .. A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING MINOR DEVELOPMENT AND VIEW PLANE REVIEW FOR 406 E. HOPKINS AVENUE, ISIS THEATER CONDO UNIT B, BLOCK 87, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO; RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2008 PARCEL ID: 2737-07-330-010 WHEREAS, the applicant, Susanne Krevoy Separate Property Trust, represented by Steev Wilson, Forum Phi, has requested approval for Minor Development and View Plane review in order to expand the unit at 406 E. Hopkins Avenue. Isis Theater Condo Unit B, Block 87, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Minor Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.C of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The t-IPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, an exemption can be granted from the View Plane requirements if it is found that ~'When any proposed development infringes upon a designated view plane, but is located in front of another development which already blocks the same view plane, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider whether or not the proposed development will further infringe upon the view plane and the likelihood that redevelopment of the adjacent structure will occur to re- open the view plane. In the event the proposed development does not further infringe upon the view plane and re-redevelopment to reopen the view plane cannot be anticipated, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall exempt the development from the requirements of this Section;" and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated March 26,2008, performed an analysis of the application based on the review standards and the "City of Aspen I-listoric Preservation Design Guidelines, and recommended HPC conduct a site visit to determine whether the review criteria are met; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on March 26,2008, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, conducted a site visit, and found that the application was consistent with the review standards and '~City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and granted approval with conditions by a vote of to 0 . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC approves Minor Development for 406 E. Hopkins Avenue, Isis Theater Condo Unit B, Block 87, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County. Colorado with the following conditions: APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION on the 26th day of March, 2008. Approved as to Form: ATTEST: Jim True, Assistant City Attorney Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 1Michael Iloffman, Chair .. ATTACHMENT 2 - Historic Preservation Land Use Application PROJECT: THE CITY OF A:PEA Name: ISIS THEATER CONDO UNIT:B Location: 406 E HOPKINS AVE. ASPEN, CO 81611, ISIS THEATER CONDO UNIT:B (Indicate street address. lot & block number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 273-707-330-010 APPLICANT: Name: KREVOY SUSANNE SEPARATE PROP TRST Address: 2311 LA MESA DR, SANTA MONICA, CA 90402 Phone #: (310) 600-2990 Fax#: (310) 576-7761 E-mail:_susiekrevoy@aol.com REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Steev Wilson Forum Phi Address: 174 Midland Ave. Suite 201 P.O. Box 1606 Basalt. CO 81621 Phone #: _ (970) 279-4157 Fax#:_(866) 770-5585 E-mail: swilson@forumphi.corn TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): U Historic Designation E Relocation (temporary, on J Certificate of No Negative Effect ~ or off-site) E Certificate of Appropriateness J Demolition (total -Minor Historic Development demolition) -Major Historic Development El Historic Landmark Lot Split -Conceptual Historic Development -Final Historic Development -Substantial Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) Existing Condo is a 2,000 SF square foot residential portion of an MU building containing: 3 Bedroom 3.5 Bath PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) We propose to add 500 SF through the use of a TDR containing: 1 Bedroom and 1 Bath General Information Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 .. ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: ISIS THEATER CONDO UNIT:B (FM) Applicant: SUSANNE KREVY Location: 406 E Hopkins Ave, Aspen, CO 81611 Zone District: CC Lot Size: 9000 Square feet Lot Area: 9000 Square feet (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: No Change Proposed: No Change Number of residential units: Existing:1 Free Market 2 AH Proposed: No Chanize Number of bedrooms: Existing: 3yree Market Proposed: 4 Free Market Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): 0% DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: 2,000 sq. ft. (FM only) Free Market Allowable: 2,000 sq. ft. (FM only) Unit Only Proposed: 2,500 sq. ft. (FM only) Principal bldg. height: Existing: No Change Allowable: No Change Proposed: Lower Access. bldg. height: Existing: _none Allowable: none Proposed: none On-Site parking: Existing: No Chanfre Required: No Change Proposed: No Change % Site coverage: Existing: No Change Required: No Change Proposed: No Change % Open Space: Existing: No Chamre Required: No Change Proposed: No Change Front Setback: Existing: No Change Required: No Change Proposed: No Change Rear Setback: Existing: No Change Required: No Chan;ze Proposed: No Change Combined F/R: Existing: No Chanize Required: No Chan;ze Proposed: No Change West Side Setback: Existing: No Change Required: No Change Proposed: No Change East Side Setback: Existing: No Chanize Required: No Change Proposed: No Chanfre Combined Sides: Existing: No Change Required: No Change Proposed: No Change Distance Between Existing: No Chanfre Required: No Change Proposed: No Changg Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: We will not be affecting any of the existing non- conformities concerning the height or foot print of the existing structure. Variations requested: Maintain existing encroachments if any. FAR addition of 500 SF via the extinguishing of 1 TDR. Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING MINOR DEVELOPMENT AND VIEW PLANE REVIEW FOR 406 E. HOPKINS AVENUE, ISIS THEATER CONDO UNIT B, BLOCK 87, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO; RESOLUTION NO. 10, SERIES OF 2008 PARCEL ID: 2737-07-330-010 WHEREAS, the applicant, Susanne Krevoy Separate Property Trust, represented by Steev Wilson, Forum Phi, has requested approval for Minor Development and View Plane review in order to expand the unit at 406 E. Hopkins Avenue, Isis rrheater Condo Unit B, Block 87, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Minor Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.C of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, an exemption can be granted from the View Plane requirements if it is found that "When any proposed development infringes upon a designated view plane, but is located in front of another development which already blocks the same view plane, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider whether or not the proposed development will further infringe upon the view plane and the likelihood that redevelopment of the adjacent structure will occur to re- open the view plane. In the event the proposed development does not further infringe upon the view plane and re-redevelopment to reopen the view plane cannot be anticipated, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall exempt the development from the requirements of this Section;" and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff repoM dated May 14, 2008, performed an analysis of the application based on the review standards and the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and recommended HPC approve the project with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on May 14,2008, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found that it was consistent with the review standards and "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and granted approval with conditions by a vote of 5 to 1. RECEPTION#: 550532,06/26/2008 at 09:25:32 AM, 1 OF 2, R $11.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC approves Minor Development for 406 E. Hopkins Avenue, Isis Theater Condo Unit B, Block 87, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado as represented in Option 1, presented to HPC on May 14,2008. in order for the addition to be constructed, a code amendment allowing 1 DR's to land on a designated property must be passed. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION on the 14th day of May, 2008. Approved as to Form: ATTEST: 014,4 5/5%10 ,Â·<jim True, Assistant City Attorney Kathy Sttickland, Chief Deputy Cle;k j Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATIDN CO~MSSION 41/ .164(- Michael Hoffman, Chidr Page 1 of 1 .. Sara Adams From: Sara Adams Sent: Friday, August 22,2008 9:20 AM TO: 'Steev Wilson' CC: Dan Brabec Subject: isis permit Hi Steev, I need you to email me a floor plan of the deck expansion on top of the Isis. I also need an eastern elevation to confirm that the deck expansion and associated railing are not visible behind the east side of the parapet. I am required to get approval from the HPC monitor before I can sign off on the permit. Sara Sara Adams 1 Preservation Planner City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St.I Aspen, CO 81611 t: (970) 429.2778 f: (970) 920.5439 www.aspenpitkin.com 8/22/2008 .. ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 4-06 GAs-i- 1-(OPI<ENS AvENU â‚¬ , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: WeARâ‚¬2-Mj HARCH 26, â‚¬ 5:00Â£4 200 8 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, ANAE-,p 6002-61 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen3 Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: L/'- Publication of notice: By \he publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 200 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records o f Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) .rd .. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area ofthe proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. < 6% _â‚¬ 30- Signature / The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this ID day of 0/l - , 200_3; by 4,7~.00Â«1- .5457,-â‚¬.7 PUBLIC NOTICE WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL RE 406 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE (ISIS BUILDING) - MINOR HPC APPLICATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, March 26,2008, at a My commission expires: 03 flo,/Dolb meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, Sister Cities, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado, to consider a 500 square foot enlargement of the free market unit located on the roof of the Isis Building. . 1 00 i Aic,< 01 614- The property is owned by Susanne Krevoy Sepa rate Property Trust, 2311 La Mesa Drive, Santa Notary Public 43 -csfi.335'2 Monica, CA 90402, represented by Steev Wilson of Forum Phi, 174 Midland Avenue, Ste. 201, P.O. Box 1606, Basalt, CO. This unit is legally de ,:EFI'Ak' '' Jil scribed as 406 East Hopkins Avenue, Unit B of the Isis Theater Condominiums, City of Aspen, Colo rado, parcel ID # 2737-073-30-10. For further information, contact Sara Adams at the ~p:....'0'.-=-~x City of Aspen Community Development Depart f LAURA 01 t-~AL ment, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2778, saraa@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Michael Hoffman, Chair :88 Aspen Historic Preservation Commission ATTACHMENTS: %IiI. 2 Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on March 9, 2008.(1251677) COPY OF THE PUBLICATION My Commission Expires 08/10/2010 PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED B Y MAIL .. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 406 East Hopkins Avenue, Unit B of the Isis Theater Condominiums , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: March 26,2008 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, Steev Wilson (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: 6, TY Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. 5W Posting of notice: By posting o f notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the 1 0th day of March 2008, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. 54/ Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) .. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area o f the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. tA _i-J Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this l O day of MAECK , 2002, by ST Ce,g \NILS Ovi WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL ANNA CABRAL-MISHMASH NOTARY PUBUC My commission expires: 6 102- j lo STATE OF COLORADO 4.7 4 My Commission Expires 05/02/10 Notary Public ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL WO,WeA*MMAA elline, el ze)16;uol ~ .0 .teied ? salpe, senent)43 316 EAST HOPKINS LP AEP FAMILY LLL 3.9389931% A STAR RANCH FUND 1 LLC RYANCO INC C/O ANDREW V HECHT GARFIELD & 89 VAGNEUR LANE 5525 E CALLE VENTURA HECHT PC BASALT, CO 81621 PHOENIX, AZ 85018 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER ALH HOLDING COMPANY INC ALLEN LEONARD A 111 SAINT MARYS 435 E MAIN ST PO BOX 8316 1300 S STEELE ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 DENVER, CO 80210 ASPEN EXTREME LLC ASPEN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BALDWIN HARLEY A 11 3375 CRYSTAL CT 420 E HOPKINS AVE 205 S GALENA ST COCONUT GROVE, FL 33133 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BANKERS MORTGAGE CORP BENTLEYS AT THE WHEELER BERGMAN CARL R & CATHERINE M 1616 ORCHARD AVE PO BOX 10370 PO BOX 1365 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81501 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 BLAU JEFF T BOHNETT MARSHA ANN TRUST BRAND BUILDING LLC 181 E 65TH ST 5411 KILAUEA PL 205 S GALENA ST NEW YORK, NY 10021 HONOLULU, HI 96816 ASPEN, CO 81611 CENTRE OF ASPEN LLC 54.6248989% CALDWELL CHARLES G & DEBRA H CITY OF ASPEN C/O KATIE REED MGMT 514 E BRYAN ST 130 S GALENA ST 210 S MONARCH ST #B SAVANAH, GA 31401 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 COLORADO CABLE 75% DAVID DOGWOOD LLC 13.5% COLLINS BLOCK LLC C/O S GOODMAN OR J M BARNETT C/O LOWELL MEYER 205 S GALENA ST 500 PRES CLINTON #310 PO BOX 1247 ASPEN, CO 81611 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 ASPEN, CO 81612 DOLE MARGARET M DUVIKE INC DENSON JAMES D GO FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF C/O AERSCAPE LTD PO BOX 1614 CEDARIDGE 230 S MILL ST TUBAC, AZ 85646 PO BOX 8455 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 GALENA PLAZA LLC 30.3845777% GILBERT LEONE 2.7624071% FOOTLOOSE MOCCASIN MAKERS INC CO/ RONALD GARFIELD ESQ CO/ RONALD GARFIELD ESQ 6601 US HIGHWAY 133 601 E HYMAN AVE 601 E HYMAN AVE CARBONDALE, CO 81623 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GOLDEN ARTS CONNECTION LLC GODIVA HOLDINGS LLC GOLDSTEIN PETER & ALAN DBA ASPEN INTERNATIONAL ART 435 E MAIN ST 150 METRO PK#2 213 S MILL ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ROCHESTER, NY 14623 ASPEN, CO 81611 Y ~ Â®09&5@AMBAV~ Elf] Yeinjeed lead Asea ,0, .]*1 Â·42,1...,= Jade.1 DaedÂ¥ 12179 Â®09L5 31VldW31 Â®AIDAÂ¥ @Sn 3 - Vagel lead AS83 I e,'.. WO)'AJBA*WL#MA elime, el ze,Insuol~ Â¥ - Jeled ? sepe# senanb!4 HANSEN STEVE 11.8169824% HALL CHARLES L HANSEN CANTINA LLC 15.72% CO/ RONALD GARFIELD ESQ PO BOX 1819 PO BOX 9343 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 HENDERSON JAMES C HILLIS OF SNOWMASS INC HINDERSTEIN FAM REV TRUST KUCK KATHERINE M 170 E GORE CRK PO BOX 1576 4880 HARLEM RD VAIL, CO 81657 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 GALENA, OH 43021 HYMAN MALL COMMERCIAL CONDOS ISIS BUILDING LLC JW VENTURES LLC LLC PO BOX 8769 205 S MILL ST # 301A 290 HEATHER LN ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 KANTZER TAYLOR MICHAEL FAMILY LCP ELYSIAN ASPEN OWNER LLC KANDYCOMINC TRUST #1 C/O LODGING CAPITAL PTNRS/ DAVID 766 SINGING WOOD DR 216 SEVENTEENTH ST SIMS ARCADIA, CA 91006 MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266 430 W ERIE ST #501 CHICAGO, IL 60610 LESTER JIM LEVY LAWRENCE F & CAROL LOMA ALTA CORPORATION 395 SOUTH END AVE #29N 980 N MICHIGAN AVE #400 PO BOX 886 NEW YORK, NY 10280 CHICAGO, IL 60611 LANCASTER, TX 75146-0886 MAIN & MILL LLC 34.28% MILL STREET PLAZA ASSOC LLC MILL & MAIN LLC C/O LOWELL MEYER C/O CAPMARK INC 2900 OCEAN BLVD PO BOX 1247 200 WITMER RD CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625 ASPEN, CO 81612 HORSHAM, PA 19044-6657 MILLENNIUM PLAZA LLC MMWCRB#2 7.57% MOTHER LODE INVESTORS LLC C/O MEYER LOWELL 595 S BROADWAY #200 620 E HYMAN AVE #1 E PO BOX 1247 DENVER, CO 80209 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 MTN ENTERPRISES 80B SILVER SLAM COMMERCIAL LLC RUHNAU DAVID F & SHARON ENGEL C/O HILLIS OF SNOWMASS C/O RELATED COMPANIES/ JEFF BLAU PO BOX 7209 170 GARE CRK DR 60 COLUMBUS CIR RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067 VAIL, CO 81657 NEW YORK, NY 10023 SMITH ASPEN QEAA LLC 11.5% SOUTHDALE ANESTHESIOLOGY PROFIT STANTON LAVONE KAY TRUSTEE FBO C/O LOWELL MEYER SHARING TRUST FBO ROY G BRYAN LYON HARRY.167% PO BOX 1247 5836 LONG BRAKE TRAIL RD 500 E MARKHAM STE 305 ASPEN, CO 81612 EDINA, MN 55439 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 US BANK NA & MCNULTY ZELPHA MARIE VAIL FINE ART GALLERY INC WALL JANET & RICHARD A .083% 205 S GALENA ST #13 PO BOX 1953 422 WHITE AVE, PO BOX 608 EDWARDS, CO 81632 ASPEN, CO 81611 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81501 12173 Yelnjeed Bed Asea 104 - Aeded Dae.Y fZEI Â®09L5 31Â¥ldW31 */LiaAÂ¥ @sn 1 Â®09&5Â®AUSIAV~ L-/ 1 1- r _ - _ INk, : t4233 siegel lead Xso3 . 1-- -- -- ---0 . . leâ€¢ ' lUOVAH,AR'MMAA 811!nei ei ze,insuo) Ill , 1 ieled V saipe, 58;,enb!23 WARREN DOGWOOD LLC 13.5% WELLS FARGO BANK WALL JANET L C/O LOWELL MEYER C/O DELOITTE TAX LLP 9762 BURNLEY PL PO BOX 1247 PO BOX 2609 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 ASPEN, CO 81612 CARLSBAD, CA 92018 WHEELER BLOCK BUILDING LLC WENDELIN ASSOC WILLIAMS DEXTER M TKG MANAGEMENT INC C/O 150 METRO PARK 82 W LUPINE DR 1001 CHERRY ST STE 308 ROCHESTER, NY 14623 ASPEN, CO 81611 COLUMBIA, MO 65201 WOODS FAMILY LP PO BOX 11468 ASPEN, CO 81612 67%1 'j-'-i ds i 4-,rÂ·., ....j-. --- .V frl.Frl Â®09'Â·5 3~ly'd'Nal Â®44@Av esn 1 Â®091Â·5Â®AMaAÂ¥ . 9â‚¬1 siegel leed Ase3 1/1 .. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 406 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE (ISIS BUILDING)- MINOR HI'C APPLICATION AND VIEWPLANE REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday. March 26. 2008, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission. Sister Cities. City Hall, 130 S. Galena St.. Aspen. Colorado. to consider a 500 square foot enlargement of the free market unit located on the roof of the Isis Building, and Viewplane Review into the Hotel Jerome viewplane. The property is owned by Susanne Krevoy Separate Property Trust, 2311 La Mesa Drive, Santa Monica, CA 90402, represented by Steev Wilson of Forum Phi, 174 Midland Avenue. Ste. 201, P.O. Box 1606, Basalt, CO. This unit is legally described as 406 East Hopkins Avenue, Unit B of the Isis Theater Condominiums. City of Aspen. Colorado, parcel ID # 2737- 073-30-10 For further information. contact Sara Adams at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St.. Aspen. CO, (970) 429.2778. saraa@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Michael Hoffman, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on March 9,2008 City of Aspen Account .. PUBLIC NOTICE DATE: March 26,2008 TIME: Meeting at 5:00 P.M. PLACE: City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen PURPOSE: To consider a 500 sq. ft. enlargement of the free market unit located on the roof of the Isis Building, and Viewplane Review into the Hotel Jerome viewplane. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING DEPARTMENT 130 S GALENA ST, ASPEN CO gll) 92&5090 44. + f.4 J : . I<MFO /1 . . . I ..... . 6%:F. . 1,151?01&911*'Irc Ik - * *00... ...0 4 1 4 9. I. . %*41 - . I. . $ 1 ..1 +Il I -1- I Â· ; rv".* + 4 + . - :4,! e : .. I. It . / I iftÂ·* dih P Â· 3* i :. . 9 14* + ' 1 --4 ./ . I V. . + ...... . -It'.- i e.. lit /. p .._44 53 1.4. .f~ I ' I - 41.- :+40.4 . ie : 1 . I .3/.-I/- . ..96 r .....4.p.' I It...- I 7 /4 4 I 4 + . I ./ ..,4.......... ..... I . 4,4Â»'*64. 0:1.'/1 . 4,Â·. 5.*Re. 3 I . Â·L I. Ff... m.- . L :- 11â€¢Alâ€¢ 11 I " &:t.. ./. 1 i â€¢â€¢ Wi#, .. t I . I 2 4 S.-4. + .+ + I I. . I . $ I â€¢ A.,t + . L..4 /*. P. .-,E - . " T + 6-49 ...... :ld . R; *.Y Â· .. . V:.:.. + . 1 13 JA; Â· ~h. .,t + A* 'ili -. in. . * A.... 4 4 0,+ i , i '~ â€¢â€¢ 4,y 4 1 a L .4 f h + & .2. r PUE NOTE . r+ t 1 9,1 - I .10 ' E. r,:. j o..3, r ..1. r:LACE , . .'PC; -,Â· q.Â· a 'A + 1, U , , . W I ./ 'ri... - . !Â·'.88 'Â·'Â·:53't:' f. . ':.. 1 t' 10 Â· I t I V.#, 5 4. 1 I li D + ...Â¥%1 /1 .. ......-+ I :~ry i :/ 3 + Â· I ftPÂ· M . .......1....... . 4, . I 1 . .-- .14 + I. 1 .454 . I I . --4. . - ... - . 4 4 . - .-r ........ . -C=li -P... .j':,4 4 ..1*:., '14 1.*+44 V.... . : Aâ€¢ Â£* ..:.~-2 . I I. P,-I.. = I ? 6 + .0 I =&9 ..1.k=.F - 2-~.12 12*itkir" -2</ I . ... * ..2. ... 4.4. :.4 -%-.4 + + di* Gal. fle,AME= :rfrz,39:il. â‚¬41,=....5..In $ I . . :..Â·a~-irammit *Â¥7.: 72' 11""HilliFT- + 1 3.4 - + .alt, J. + 1 fle. + *T . . + + il . + I. & 1 1/P, 1 --I ,- 4.. t- .': I -; 3.... ... C .. a $ 4 lei --.. ./. 1 I <30: 'll'..6 ./1/ - + :8. . ..eY... : ija .. 3 +i . . t 1. i + + .. 1 1... .t li .. . eli t De 1 1 - . .1, 1 + + 0 --6 .$.*4 + ht 1 1 + i ./ I .*4 . 7 ..1 ler" - h 1 . I I. i. + I . I.,1 + $ â€ž â€¢ . - â€¢Aâ€¢â€¢â€¢ I I .... .........f....... 114 f/'*/,4 4//4 03/03/2008 11:41 3105767'~ KREVOY PAGE 01/05 1 0 4 5 18 . 1- 2. tja : f ta D - U . U.4 C E 4.926 54 1 0 6 - P C I 6 67440.-- -V O 11 0. 0 9 \B n 2% f: 12. P /8# 0254 /4 0 -2 u Lâ€¢ â‚¬r 22 U E P 2 t2 ' -Fti~ 4 U aj 1 = - 3 40 0~Nes. U L, 1 C j fi- 12.f 4% 9 2 8 C d 45â€¢Â·U. Q,t'fl 'J9"Je~~~.1 nupro 'flmÂ£ GO I dIHSHRNAO tIO .LNi[V~N9 4,4.Jd wero,65 C.,4\ Glqz'ag 01 DE - 1 -56 : 9 :4 13 F 6aff--i -Â»a-~'3EC~2~0 The foregoing instrument was acknowl /7,7. . 46&*r#im6445aÂ¥,a*ma,.5*i, agi#*mb CERTIFICATE OWNER: MARf JAW* 1Â¥16 14:Vate 1.WkllkAibR No, T5' 3% Ull- caripÂ£(ATE No. 015 THIS IRREVOCABLE CERTIFICATE EVIDENCES AND REPRESENTS ONE "HISTOIUC ~RAJ?SPERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHT (7-DR)" AND MAY BE TRANSPERAED TO AND SHALI PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ON A "RECEIVER SITE" IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 26.535 OF THE CII Y OF ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE, issued pursuanr ro Ordinance No. 32, , Series of %DD4, , this Certificate is pegÂ¤ual and irrevocable and shall be honored by the City of,Aspen. A~ considerationandin exchange forissuance ofthis Certificate, development rights have.been reduced on the Historic L.ndmark propetry identified as Parcel ID No. 24% Â·124 **'00 and morecornmonly known aAÂ® W.14!AM 9., 1,r L k Der ye lor 11 j 31,DCKÂ£x), Aspen, Colorado, pursuant ro a permanent deed res[[iaion which has been placed on the property and which is filed of record with the Pitkin Coulity Clerk and Recoider 8 reception no. 943?le When ptoperly endorsed below, rbe original of this Certijiolte shail constit:,te ownership ofibis TDR by tbe Certif*aft Ow,zer,1,11}ted aboile. Tbe Ce,Â·tiflcatâ‚¬ OwnelÂ·,iury tr,inifer ibir Ce,tijicate :tt aily time by an assignment of ownership, which Alit be evidenced by a duly â‚¬xecuted and notarized auignment, kirated on the back of this docitme,it. Upoit cu~dence of tte tral:*r cf ow,le,ship, the City 4 Agen shall re-issue G Certificate in the new owner>s name. CITY ISSUANCE Issued by die City of Aspen, Colorado this OWNER ACCEPTANCE day of 0/.blec 1 2061 Accepted th'is / * day of ~,1|0 1/0716â‚¬4 Â£2Â·40 DTL 4 UALL/49 , 4,147&,J 5]GNATURE OF CER~|~CA I~OUN F.E. NA_Kl~>ABO~.Â·-1. attest: -.-- 6 ci_-0 The furegoing ins~]~heig~15 acknowledged, before Inc this ~ et C[TY CLERK kiof NO90+1>-84/ . 2001 by-07*45* A. Mehom+3 48 11Â¢11#11 Ihe party accepting ihis TDR cenificate. *44 49>% A A MCO /4, ifS?:Â·~----- -/--/:frit'io STATE OF COLORADO 1 ~ 3S- ~g-~7'~ 0OTAR p ~~... â‚¬, -** County Of Pirkin - c._ ~ c~t.. PUB'UG ..Â·~ A' f MOTARY PUBLIC .,44' OF e.cOP .e . -Â· Â©Â» 2,D tvlkit:4100- .i,+reS+1; all 03/03/2008 11:38 310576~ KREVOY PAGE 06/06 .. 534579 I lililiNI Illf ]Ill Fll IN m -- Il 1-1 lilli Illl 02/16/2007 01:46; Page: 1 of 9 JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN 2-JNTY L R 46.00 D 0.00 OCCUPANCY AND USE DEED RESTRICTION, AGREEMENT, AND COVENANT 44 4 6<hitlit A THIS OCCUPANCY AND USE DEED RESTRICTION, AGREEMENT, AND ==e:i' COVENANT (the "Agreement") is made and imposed this *15 day of C.1.Aw-&21Â· 2007, by the CHY OF ASPEN PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY, a Colorado nolrofit Corporation ("Owner"), for the benefit of and enforceable by the CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, (the "City") a home rule city and political subdivision duly organized and existing under the constitution and laws of the State of Colorado. WlTNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City has been duly organized and is validly existing as a home rule city under the Colorado Constitution and the home rule charter of the City: and WI-lEREAS, the Owner is a Colorado nonprotit corporation that is duly organized. validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Colorado, and is duly qualified to do business in the State of Colorado; and WHEREAS. the Owner has, on the date hereof purchased the following condominium Uluts Commercial Unit A, Isis Theater Condominiums according to the Candi)minium I~Â·lap thereof, recorded on December 9,1999, in Plat Book 52, Page l al Reception No. 438434 in the records of the office of the Clerk and Recorder of the County of Pitkin, Colorado (the "Plat"), and as defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for Isis Theater Condominiums recorded on December 9. 1999, at Reception No. 438433 in said records; and Residential Units C & D, Isis Theater Condominiums according to the Condominium Map thereof, recorded on December 9,1999, in Plat Book 52, Page 1 at Reception No. 438434 in the records of the o ffice o f the Clerk and Recorder of the County of Pitkin, Colorado, and as defined and described iii the Condominium Declaration for Isis Theater Condominiums recorded on December 9,1999, at Reception No. 438433 in said records (the "AH Units"k (collectively, Commercial Unit A and Residential Units C and I) shall be referred to herein as the "Acquired Property") as assignee of the Isis Property Group, LLC ("Isis Group") pursuant to the Purchase Agreement dated as of September ]2,2006, between isis Group and CC Aspen, LLC; and WHEREAS, the Owner is authorized, under its articles of incorporation and bylaws, action of its board of directors and applicable law, to: (a) acquire and own the Acquired Property; 1 ill ill 11111111'H Ill'lill'll'111111 1111111111 02/16/2007 01'49 534579 Page: 2 of 9 JAN.CE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COUN-Y CO R 46.00 0 0.00 (b) lease to the City the Acquired Property; and (c) execute, deliver and perform its obligations under this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized, pursuant to Section 1.4 of its Charter, to accept and perform its obligations under this Agreement; and WHER-EAS, the execution, acceptance, and performance under this Agreement has been duly authorized by the City in accordance with that certain Memorandum of Underslanding approved by the City of Aspen City Council by Resolution No. 99, Series of 2006, on record with the City of Aspen City Clerk's Office; and W-HEREAS, the Owner, pursuant to and in accordance with, the above referenced Memorandum of Understanding, agrees to restrict the future occupancy and use of the Acquired Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, for value received as described above, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Owner hereby represents, covenants and agrees as follows: 1. This agreement shall constitute covenants running with the real properly described hereinabove as a burden thereon for the benefit of, and shall be specifically enforceable by the City Council of the City. Upon the conveyance of the Acquired Property from the Authority to the City, and upon any re-conveyance of the Acquired Property from the City to any other grantee, assignee, purchaser, or other successor in interest, the restrictions and covenants shall continue to run with the real property, but the beneficiary and the right to enforce this Agreement shall remain with the City Council of the City. The right of enforcement shall be exercised, ifat all, by the City Council of the City, by any appropriate legal action including but not limited to injunction, reversion. or eviction of non-complying owners and/or occupants. The City Council of the City shall have the right to amend or modify the covenaj'tls at any time in its sole and absolute discretion. 2. The name of the building which includes and incorporates the Acquired Property shall be named the "Isis Building." 3. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary contained in the Condomini urn Declarations for Isis Theater Condominiums (recorded at Reception No. 438433, 6 seq. in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorders Office), no further development shall be authorized or permitted on the Isis Building's roo f (including the highest floor of the Isis Building on which are located the AH Units and Unit B the decking and mechanical elements, including any replacements thereof) Reconstruction or replacement of existing improvements and structures on lIN: roof are not restricted by this provision, provided they are made iIi the same locations and with the same dimensions as the improvements and structures existing as of the date o f recording of this deed restriction or arc made within the unit boundaries shown on the Plat. The addition of a bedroom that does not * tu 0 -- . 11 111 lili lilli 1111111111111'l lilli 1111111 02/16/2007 01:46; 534579 Page: 3 of 9 JAN f CE K VOS CAUD -LL PITKIN COLA-Y GO R 46,00 0 0 00 ~ exceed 500 square feet to Residential Unit B (the free market residential unit on the third floor) shall not be restricted by this provision. 4. Upon any re-condominiumization or the subleasing of portions of Commercial Unit A within the Acquired Property to create a retail space (Commercial Unit 1), a theater area comprising the easterly ground floor theater and the lower level theaters (Commercial Unit 2), or the construction ofan addition ofapproximately 576 sq. ft. in the current exterior open space in the southeastern comer of the Isis Building (Commercial Unit 3, also referred to as the "Notch" area), the following restrictions shall apply to the respective units or subJease areas of the Acquired Pl-open y a. The tenant under ally sublease from the City to, or owner of, Commercial Unit 1 shall use commercially reasonable efforts to sublease Commercial Unit 1 to one or more tenants thal are deemed "mid-level" retail uses or any retail uses which are local businesses (as opposed to national or chain type stores). Mid- Level retailers shall generally be defined to be those retail merchants that meet the retail industry's middle three classifications of merchandise categories as described below as Moderate, Bridge and Better. The businesses named below are included by way of example, but not limitation, and are not intended to be the only ones permitted in each category but arc listed as examples of the type of businesses that are representative of each category, Moderate is defined as tenants such as Gap, Hollister, Banana Republic, Victoria's Secret, Replay, Ron Herman, Fred Seigel, Club Monaco, American Eagle, J. Crew, bebe Sport. Lucky Brand Jeans, Abercrombie & Fitch, Levi's, Ann Taylor Loft. Bridge is defined as tenants such as Aim Ta>lor, Anne Klein, Sigrid Olsen, Puma, Jiticy Couture, Guess, Armani AX, BCBG, Bebe, Coldwater Creek, Urban ()ulfitters, Anthropologie, tuid L Jill. Better is defined as tenants such as Brooks Brothers, Lisa Klein, Stuart Weitzman, David Yumian, RLX, RL Ralph.Lauren, Rugby, Lacoste, Apple Computer. Sony Style, Scoop, Coach, Sony Style, Apple, Talbot's. Ted Baker, Diesel, Williams Sonoma, Pottery Barn, Toumeau, Giorgio Annani White Label, Emporio Armani, Tonimy Bahama, Burbeny, Cole Hahn, Movado, Hugo Boss, John Varvatos, Eileen Fisher, Calvin Klein, Intermix. f ~- b. No restaurant uses shall be permitted in Commercial Unit 1, unless appropriate mitigation is paid to the City pursuant to the City Land Use Code in effect at the time of requested conversion to that use; 3 534579 Page: 4 of 9 F 1111'llill HI illillili-11 lili I'll illl 02/16/2007 01:48 JAN: CE K VGG CA-ILL PJT.<IN -01-N,Y C. R 46.00 D 0.00 and, provided further. that the City Council of the City. in its sole discretion, approves such change in use. c. The uses for Commercial Unit 2 shall be limited to only the purpose of operating movie theaters, subject, however, to occasional use for live performances, community events, meeting rooms, speeches, auxiliary uses for Aspenfilm presentations and other artistic, educational, nonprofit or community purposes; and provided, however, that the restriction set forth in this paragraph (c) shall terminate and be of no further affect upon any termination of the Lease Purchase Agreement dated as of the date hereof between Owner, as lessor, and City, as lessee (the "I-ease'l i f such tennination occurs pursuant to clause (ii) or clause (ivi of Section 4.01(b) of the Lease. d. The uses for Commercial Unit 3 shall be limited to the uses set forth above for Commercial Unit 2, and, in addition, shall include a caf6 bar or similar use. e. Other uses may be approved by the City Council of the City for Commercial Units 2 & 3 ifil determines in its sole discretion that technological, sociological or economic changes rendering theater use obsolete or impracticable. 5. Notwithstanding any language to the contrary contained in that certain Occupancy Deed Restriction und Agreement for an Employee Dwelling Unit Approved Pursuant to Ordinance No. 95-59, recorded in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office as Reception No. 419855, et seq, relating to the Al I Units, the owner or tenant of Commercial Unit 2 shall have the first right to select the tenants who will lease either of the AH Units as they become available from time to lirne, subject to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines. The City shall have the second right to select tenant to said units for its employees. subject to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines. The owner or tenant of Commercial Unit ] shall have the third Iight to select tenants to said units for its employees, subject to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines. The owner or tenant of Commercial IJnit 2 and City shall both be given notice by the owner or tenant of Commercial Unit 1 at the time the owner or tenant o f Cdmmercial Unit 1 learns of an upcoming vacancy of any AH Unit and both shall have the same 30 days from the giving of said notice to exercise said rights by providing written notice to the owner or tenant of Commercial Uni! 1 within said 30 day period. The owner or tenant of Commercial Unit 1 shall provide said notice upon learning of an upcoming vacancy. but not earlier than ninety days from the expiration date of the existing lease on either of the AH Units that will become vacarit. The rights granted above shall be subjecl To the owner or tenant of Commercial Unit I 's (as the landlord under the leases for [he 4 .. Il lili lilli lili l llili 1111- 11 11 -11111 lili 02/18/2007 01:46; 534579 Page: 5 of 9 JANICE K VOS :AULILL PITKIN 3-.TY CO R 46.00 D 0.00 AlI Units) ability to deliver the AH Unit(s) in the event of difficulties which may bc encountered with the existing tenant. 6, Upon the conveyance of either of the AII Units to any third party, such transfer shall be subject to a conveyance by the City to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, of a 94 of 1% undivi(led ownership interest in each of the units. however, such ownership shall not include any right to rents or proceeds of sale, nor other economic interests, nor any obligation for the payment of any costs of ownership, nor any decision making authority with respect to the use, operation, control, etc, of the Ati Units. In order to facilitate any conveyance of the AH Units, City agrees to execute such documents and take any actions as may be necessary to perfect the transfer of title desired by the transferor or transferee oj the AH Units, without any further consideration owing to City or Owner. 7 The owner or tenant of Coinmercial Units 2&3 shall not sell or grant any naining rights to any portion of Commercial Units 2 or 3, including, but not limited to, the interior theaters without the consent ofthe City Council ofthe City. In granting or denying its consent to such naming rights, the City Council of the City shall take into consideration the reasonable needs of the then current owner or tenant, but shall have absolute discretion in its decision. BREACH 8. jn the event that City has reasonable cause to believe the current owner or tenant o f any unit subject to the Agreement is violating the provisions o f this Agreement, City by its authorized representative, may inspect any unit of the Acquired Property between the hours of 8.00 a.m. and 5:00 p.ni., Monday through Friday, after providing the owner or tenant with no less than 24 hours' prior written or oral notice. 9. City, in the event a violation is discovered, shall send a notice of violation to the owner or tenant of the unit detailing the nature of the violation and allowing the owner or tenant thirty (30) days to cure. Said notice shall state that the owner or tenant may request a hearing before the City Council of the City wilhin fifteen (15) days to determine the merits of the allegations. REMEDIES 10, There is hereby reserved to the parties hereto any and all remedies provided by law for breach of this Agreement or any of its terms. In the event the parties resort to litigation with respect to any or all provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover damages and costs, 11]cluding reasonable attorney's fees. 5 0 0 - 534579 Page- S of 9 02/16/2007 01 :46; JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COUNTY CO R 46.00 D 0.00 11. 111 the event the Acquired Property, or any unit within the Acquired Properly, is sold and/or conveyed without compliance herewith, such sale and/or conveyance shall be wholly null and void and shall convey no title whatsoever upon the purported buyer. Each and every convcyance of the Acquired Properly, or any unit within the Acquired Property, for all purposes, shall be deemed to include and incorporate by this reference, the covenants herein contained, even without reference herein to this Agreement. I 2. In the event that the owner or tenant of a UIlit fails to cure any breach, City may resort to any and allavailable legal action, including, but not limited to. specific performancc of this Agreement or a mandatory injunction requiring sale of the unit by owner; or in the event of a lease, to relinquish al] leaschold interests to the ('ity. GENERAL PROVISIONS 13. Netiga. Any notice, consent or approval which is required to be given hereunder shall he given by mailing the same, certified mail, return receipt requested, properly addressed and with postage fully prepaid, to any address of the party as long as prior written notice of the change of address has been given to the other parties to this Agreement and shall be deemed given on the third business day after mailing as required above. Said notices, consents and approvals shall be sent to the parties hereto at the following addresses unless ott=wise notified in wnting: To Owner At the mailing address of the unit owncr as shown in the records of the Pitkin County Assessor's Office To Aspen: City Manager 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 14. Severability. Whenever possible, each provision of this Agreement and any other related document shall be interpreted in such manner as to be valid under applicable law; but, if any provision of any of the foregoing shall be invalid or prohibited under said applicable law, such provisions shall be ineffective to the extent of such invalidity or prohibition without invalidating the remaining provisions of such document. 15 Choice of Law. This Agreement and each and every related document is to be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado. 16. Successors. Except as otherwise provided herein, the provisions and covenants contained herein shall inure to and be binding upon the heirs. successors and assigns of the parties. 6 .. 111 11111111111111[111.11'11111111111 02/16/2007 01:4N 534579 Page, 7 of 9 JANILE K VOS - .DILL . :T IN JOUNCY CC R 48.00 D 0.00 17. Waiver. No claim of waiver, consent or acquiescence with respect to ally provision of this Agreement shall be valid against any party hereto except on the basis of a written instrument executed by the parties to this Agreement. However, the party for whose benefit a condition is inserted herein shall have the unilateral right to waive such condition. 18. Further Actions. The parties to this Agreement agree to execute such further documents and take such further actions as may be reasonably required to carry out the provisions and intent of this Agreement or any agreement or document relating hereto or entered into in connection herewith. 19. Modifications. The parties to this Agreement agree that any modifications of this Agreenient shall be effective only when made by writings signed by both parties and recorded with the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] 7 .. 1 lillill -11111 lill 1 1-llilll'll ?22:Z ..:3114) A e..t J.,41.E K US C U.ILL FITKIN 20 Jh.TY CO R 26.00 D 0.00 ORDINANCE NO. 6, SERIES OF 2007 .1- 1.1.1 ti<010{c AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL GRANTING GROWTH MANAGEMENT APPROVAL PURSUANT TO SECTION 26.470.040 (C)(1) & (D)(3), ENLARGEMENT OF A HISTORIC LANDMARK AND ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITY AND FOR AN EXPANSION AND CHANGE IN USE, ALLOWING RETAIL, FOR A PORTION OF THE ISIS THEATER, 406 E. HOPKINS AVENUE, LOTS L, M, AND N, BLOCK 87, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2737-073-30-006, -011 and -012 WHEREAS, the applicant, Isis Property Group, LLC, represented by Haas Land Planning, Klein, Cotd, and Edwards; and Charles Cunniffe Architects, has requested approval for Growth Management in order to enlarge, partially remodel and change the use o f a portion o f The Isis Theater, 406 E. Hopkins Avenue, Lots L, M, and N, Block 87, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado; and WHEREAS, the applicant submitted an application to the Community Development Department for a Minor Historic Preservation Development, Commercial Design Review and Parking Waiver specifically from the Historic Preservation Commission (IIPC), and Growth Management Review for an Enlargement of a Historic Landmark and Essential Public Facility specifically from the Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z); and both of these boards have reviewed and handled the applications in accordance with their purview; and WHEREAS, the HPC, through its Resolution No. 2, Series of 2007, granted approval for a Minor Development Application for changes primarily to the doors and windows of the Isis Theatre building, approved a waiver of the parking requirements and fees associated with the additional commercial area, and approved the Commercial Design Review; and WHEREAS, the P&Z, through its Resolution No. 5, Series of 2007, recommended that the City Council approve the Growth Management allotments for an Enlargement of a Historic Landmark and Essential Public Facility Minor Development Application allowing 1,861 sq. ft. of net leasable area; and WHEREAS, the application has identified that, due to the fact that no specific tenant has been identified and that tenants will change, the proposed space configuration within the building is not set but will change over time within the old "Theatre One" area (the western-most ground floor theatre); however the, application proposes to establish a total o f 1,861 additional square feet of new net leasable area, for a total gross retail area of 5,725 sq. ft., with 5,226 sq. ft. allowable as net leasable area; and WIIEREAS, the Community Development Director has found and decided in his letter of December 22,2006, that the Isis Theatre qualifies as an Essential Public Facility, because of its ownership by a public entity with a future transfer to a non-profit corporation serving a public Isis Growth Management Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2007 Page 1 of 5 . 11 m 11111111111 l ili 1:11 lili llilliallilll 536448 Page: 2 of 5 04/10/2007 11:31 JAN.CE K LOS CAUDILL PITKIN COLTY CO R 26.00 D 0.00 interest, perpetual deed restriction for a theatre or public use, and undivided public ownership interest in the affordable housing units and a perpetual restriction limiting additional development on upper levels of the building, all of which serve a public interest and the needs of the community; and WHEREAS, the application is considered exempt from Ordinance No. 19, Series of 2006 and Ordinance No. 51, Series of 2006, otherwise known as the "Moratorium Ordinances", because the project is considered an Essential Public Facility; and WHEREAS, the Isis has a long history of land use approvals that have allowed for various approvals, uses and dimensions for the building including the following: 1) Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 36-95; 2) City Council Ordinance No. 58-95; 3) City Council Ordinance No 59-95; 4) A March 19, 1996 amendment to Resolution No. 36-95 was granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission without formal adoption of a resolution; 5) City Council authorized use of the Special Review process to consider the amortization of open space payments via adoption o f Ordinance No. 45-96; 6) Final approval by the HPC on March 12,1997; 7) Council adoption of Resolution No.18-98 approving the deferral of payments in-lieu of open space for a five year period (such payment has been made); 8) A pair o f minor HPC amendments to the final approval were approved on March 10, 1999 and September 8, 1999; 9) Growth Management Commission Resolution No. 2-01, approving a re-evaluation and exemption from the scoring and competition procedures ofthe GMQS for the conversion of the ground floor o f the Isis building to retail use; and 10) MOU executed pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 99, Series o f 2006. WHEREAS, the City Council, according to Section 26.470.040 of the Land Use Code, must review the Growth Management application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project' s conformance with the applicable criteria and the City Council may recommend approval, disapproval, or approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director, pursuant to his authority under Section 26.304.060(B)(1), finds that the Growth Management reviews for Enlargement of a Historic Landmark for Commercial Use and for an Essential Public Facility should be combined finding that the combination would eliminate or reduce duplication and ensure economy of time, expense and clarity; and final approval rests with the City Council; and WHEREAS, The Council finds that the applicable development review standards are met by the proposal, provided that the conditions established herein are complied with. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Isis Growth Management Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2007 Page 2 of 5 .. 111111~Illilli -11-1111111-11-11-1-Illil'll 04/10/2007 11:31 536448 Page: 3 of 5 JANICE K VOS CAUCILL PITâ€žIN COUN FY CO R 26.00 0 0.00 Section 1: Enlareement of a Historic Landmark for Commercial Use and Essential Public Facility Growth Management Allotments The City Council grants a Growth Management Allotment for an Enlargement to a Historic Landmark and for an Essential Public Facility finding that the project meets the applicable criteria. The Growth Management approval allows for an area of new gross leasable of 1,861 sq. ft. and a gross retail area of 5,725 sq. ft., with 5,226 of that area allowable as net leasable area, as such term is defined in the Land Use Code. Section 2: Limitation for Restaurant Use A restaurant use is not permitted as part o f this approval as a use in the "retail area" and any future proposed conversion to a restaurant use must gain approval by the Aspen City Council in , accordance with the deed restriction recorded at Reception No. 534579, in the offices of the Pitkin , County Clerk and Recorder. Such conversion, if approved by the City Council, may gain its - Growth Management Review and approval administratively in accordance with the Land Use Code in place at the time of application. Section 3: Affordable Housing Mitieation Affordable housing mitigation requirements shall be satisfied by payment of a cash-in-lieu fee at the time o f building permit issuance for the tenant finish of the retail space; the payment due shall be based on the actual amount of Net Leasable Area (NLA) provided for in the tenant finish building permit application, and the following formula: â€¢ 2.6 FTE per 1,000 square feet ofNLA; â€¢ First 4 FTE = zero employee mitigation; â€¢ Next 4 FTE mitigated at 30%; â€¢ Remaining FTE mitigated at 60%; â€¢ Apply credit o f three (3) FTE already housed; â€¢ Access cash-in-lieu fee based on Category 4 requirement in place at time of building pennit application. Section 4: Building Permit Application The building permit application shall include the following: 1. A copy of the final Ordinance and P&Z Resolution. 2. The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set. 3. A construction management plan pursuant to the requirements of the Community Development Department. 4. A fugitive dust control plan to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineering Department. Section 5: Exterior Lighting Lighting shall be pursuant to the Historic Preservation Minor Development approval pursuant to Resolution No. 20, Series of 2007, and the City's lighting regulations. Isis Growth Management Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2007 Page 3 0 f 5 .. lilli lilli lilli 1 11111111-lili 11111111 lili 536448 Page: 4 of 5 04/10/2007 11:31 JANICE K VOS CAUC~LL PITKIN COLN-Y CO R 26.00 D 0.00 Section 6: All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 7: This ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinanees repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 8: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 9: The City Clerk is directed, upon the adoption of this ordinance, to record a copy in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Section 10: A public hearing on the ordinance shall be held on the 2nd day of April, 2007, in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 12th day of March, 2007. ,~ Ifelen Kilin Klanbcud, Mayor Attest: Kathryn S. K~h, City Clerk FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved on this 2nd day of April, 2007. Attest: /IM--. V . 4421Â«0*24 - 1 tl~lE&04.4~~~ Kathryn S. K~(,City tlerk Ifelen Kalin Kfanderud, Mayor Isis Growth Manlgement Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2007 Page 4 of 5 Approved as to form: ,/ gl V 9 . rÂ·. A , Â·r-4-- / Â£'7, / /5 /0-fikt,Â·Ou John P. W-orcest~r, City Attorney '.1111111'llir li lillill li ilill ilillill 04/10/2007 11:3 536448 Page: 5 of 5 JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COUNTY CO R 26.00 D 0.00 Isis Growth Management Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2007 Page 5 of 5 .. MEMORANDU-M TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kathryn Koch, City Clerk DATE: October 5,2007 RE: Appointment of Protest Hearing Officer - Jeffrey Evans Initiative Petitions Regarding the Entrance to Aspen The deadline for filing a protest to the direct connection and modified direct connection petitions filed August 31,2007, is Wednesday October 10,2007. See below: C.R.S. 31-11-110. Protest states: (1) Within forty days after an initiative or referendum petition is filed, a protest in writing under oath may be filed in the office of the clerk by any registered elector who resides in the municipality, setting forth specifically the grounds for such protest. I have certified the petitions sufficient as to signatures and plan on reporting that at your next Council meeting, October 22,2007. I have been assured a protest will be filed by the deadline, tomorrow. Due to the tight time lines as outlined in the Colorado Revised Statues, I am requesting approval of the appointment of a protest hearing o fficer before the fact. If no protest is filed, this issue will be moot. C.R,S. 31-10-111(3) states: (3) Every hearing shall be held before the clerk with whom such protest is filed. The clerk shall serve as hearing officer unless some other person is designated by the legislative body as the hearing officer,,. I request Council designate Karen Goldman as the hearing officer. Ms. Goldman was city clerk o f Lakewood, Colorado, for 11 years and is presently Secretary to the Colorado State Senate. Ms. Goldman was appointed by City Council as hearing officer in July 2002 for the initiative petition on the Entrance to Aspen and in April 2004 as the hearing officer for the initiative petition on the parking garage and most recently as the hearing officer in the initiative protest April 2005 regarding the Burlingame annexation VANN ASSOCIATES, LLC Planning Consultants October 9, 2007 RECEIVED HAND DELIVERED CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mr. Chris Bendon, Director Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Vacation of Dean Street Right-of-Way Dear Chris As we discussed, Aspen Land Fund lI, LLC wishes to withdraw it request to vacate the remaining portion of the Dean Street right-of-way. The vacation request was submitted in connection the Applicant's final PUD application for the Lodge at Aspen Mountain. With the denial of that application, vacation of the right-of-way is no longer required. I would appreciate it if you would inform the City Council of the Applicant's desire to withdraw the application and remove it from consideration at tonight' s Council hearing. It is my understanding that no further action is required on behalf of the Applicant to terminate the application review process, and that the original vacation request will not be subject to any prejudicial treatment pursuant to the Land Use Regulations. Should you have any questions, or if I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Yours truly, w. ~ AssoCLAÂ¢fks, LLC punI~Vann, AICP V SV:CWV ec: John Sarpa Arthur C. Daly, Esq. c:\oldc\bus\City.ltr\![r44802. cb2 230 East Hopkins Ave. â€¢ Aspen, Colorado 81611 ' 970/925-6958 Â· Fax 970/920-9310 Page 1 of 1 .. Sara Adams From: Sara Adams Sent: Thursday, February 28,2008 4:48 PM To: 'Steev Wilson' Subject: Isis free market enlargement Hey Steev I am working on the Isis application for the Krevoy residence. It would be great if you could address the following points: 1, Supply a copy of the approvals (Ordinance/Deed restriction/Resolution) that allow the unit to be enlarged. 2. Roof plan of entire building that includes the AH units. 3. Address the HP Design Guidelines for a new addition to a historic landmark. 4. Provide perspectives of the new addition as viewed from the street. HPC will want to understand the impact of this addition to the Isis building, as viewed from the street (not just in front of the Isis, but if it is visible from down the block). Thanks and call me if you need any clarification. Sara Sara Adams I Preservation Planner City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St.I Aspen, CO 81611 t: (970) 429.2778 f: (970) 920.5439 www.aspenpitkin.com 2/28/2008 .. Fire Salety Note Abbreviations. 1. All bultding material; *red It the concuction ar,a, -Wor In .W .. of the buiding are to be secured In i locked area. Access to suck /8- 18 to be contfolled by the Owner and/or the General Cormactor A Astragal KIT Kitchen 2. All matortals to tired in an orderly manner. ADD Addendum L Length 3. All nammable materlals to be kept tightly gealed in Ihelr respectlve containers. Such ADJ Adjustable LAM LamInated mateelels are to be kepteway flown el heat sources. 4 All flimmible matirlili to be used andstored in adequately ventilated spaced AFF Above Finish Floor LAV Lavatory 5. All electical power to be ehut off where there 16 exposed conduit. AHU AIr-Handling Unit LT LIght 6. All electrical power In the construction area to be shut oll alter working hours ALT Alternate M Mirror 7 Th/or///r will. / all times, rake sure th,re li no le/kage of natural gas in the ALUM Aluminum MAT Material buiding. or any Ilimmible gam wied In con,tructlon APPROX Approximataly MAX Maximum 8 The contractor Ihall provide Ilre *prlnkler protection throughoul the bulldhg Thi ARCH Architect, Architectural MB Marble contriÂ¢lor shall be responsible for pr,paring drewings and speoiÂ¢Ic-ne and obtaining the B Base MECH Mecharical pefmlls lor #le hiplinkler systern. The nre sp,Inkler syster must meet the requlrementn of BLDG Building MEMB Membrane all appllible oode: and ordinancel BLKG Blocking MIN Minimum General Demolltion Notes BO By Others MLDG Molding 1. Demolltlonand removal of existing wills. pil*oni. cellngs, denotod and gr,phlcally BR Bedroom MO Masonry Opening Indicated. BRD Board MTG Mounted 2 Remove ill existing mechanical Himi. plumbing. *Ing and electrical components in BRK Brick MTL metaINIC Not in Contract their antlrety except as specilled BSBD Baseboard NO Number 3. Work InitlatÂ»d to the exteflor Of #18 exiSting building b limited to the areas nood and BSMT Basement NOM Nominal graphleally indic-d on th, dmwIngs. Any other extedor work shall not be INt,-d without BTM Bottom NTS Not to Scale the p,tor wlitten consent ariel knowledge of the building authority and a,chltectural designer. BTWN Behveen OA Overall 4 The con#actor shall provide /11 r,quIred protection Bnd measures throughout the demolition and removal work for: the ,*11#ng exteriof of the building, the existing Intonor C Carpet, Cornice OC On Center spac, to remain and the exl,!Ing adjacent finlehes and items which are N.I.C. CAB Cabinet OD Outside Dimension, Outside Diameter 5 The perlormance of any damolition work by the contiactor or any sub-contractor shall be CH Ceiling Height OH Opposite Hand axecut,d in accordince with thi bullding coGe of the State of Colorado and all other CL Center Line, Closet opp Opposite applicable codes and reg-ons. CLG Ceiang P Paint Panel 6 The contractor kil obt,1. prim to thecommencement of thedemolltlon work and with CLR Clear PL Plastic Laminate the consent of the base building management and owner 01 8uch work, /M legal and COL Column PLUM plumblng regulalory permits as may bi requIred ~r: clemolleon. con~Iners, carir, hauling, public wly acce,8 or closing, and the disconnoction and Ih,*-off of 0 uUIilles a, nuy be roquâ„¢i. CONC Concrete PLYWD Plywood 7. The conhclor / required th* inpair Iny Imperfections to Ixist,ng surface, caused by the CONT Continuous POL Polished demolltlon process with the same of Uke materlals untess speclkally indicated otherwise cn CP Ceiling Paint PT Paint the drawings and/of specillcations CRS Courses PTD Painted 8 The contracbrihall remove all doof & jamb setias indkated or, drawings & save fof CT Ceramic Tile PVC Poly Vinyl Chloride eventual relnetalletion. CTG Coating OT Quany Tile 9. The contractor shall /move aH light Mitures & mechanic,1 grills as Indicated on drawings DBL Double R Riser, Chair Rail and Mve for eventual re-Ingtall,tlor. DH Double Hung RAD Radius DIA Diameter RD Roof Drain General Notes DIAG Diagonal RE Refer to 1. Allwork ind materials fumIshid shall comply wlth The State of Colorado Bulding Code. DIFF DIffuser REF Refrigerator. Reference The State of Colorado F ire Code. The State of Coloredo Regulations. the regulatlons of the Nabonal Board of Fire Unde,writern. Nationd Fire Protactive As,ociation Riquirements and DIM Dimension REFL Reflected all Federal, State. and Munkipal authomles having ludidlition ovef the work. DISP Disposal REQ Required 2 Befor,ordefing any ritidilior doing iny work, each tade ihiliverlly all DN Down IREV Revision measureninb al the building and shall be responsible for correchies d the Barne. No ext,a DR Door RH Right Handed charge of compenlatlon wil be allowed on account oldlflerence between actual dimen:lons DTL Detail Rm Room and th, measurement; Indicated on thedr-Ing, any *crepencles bet-en the drawings DWG Drawing RO Rough Opening and field condltions which rn-y be found Ihal; 68 oubmit- to the archit/ctural designer lor EXIST Existing RTD Rated consideration and dBAllcation before p,oceedIng with the work. The coreaclor shall be ELEC Electrical SC Solid Core . Skim Coat responsible for iny diviallon, from the contract documents. 3. All the irchltectumi disignefs drawings and construction note, arecomplimer,tary and ELEV Elevation SECT Section what Is call,d for by elther will be binding as If called for by all. Dny work shown or referred to ENCL Enclosure SH Shelf or, any one drawing Ihell be provided am shown on el driwines EQ Equal SHT Sheet 4. The work to be performed consiels of furnishing all labor, equipment. tools, EQUIP Equipment SHWR Shower tren/portation. iupplie/. fees, melertals, and Gervicee In accordance *101 thess notes end EXP Expansion Slm Sillar drawingi, and include, pe,forming al operations neceismy to construcl and Inital complete, EXT Extenor SPEC Specllicabon * satl,lactory condition, the various mal./1/ and equlpment at th' locato- shown. 5. Fu~ Ike or large scele detali or dr-Ang@ shill govern sman icale dr-Ings which they FC Field Check SQ Square are intended to amplity FD Floor Drain, Field Dimension SS Stainless Steel 6. The standard specillcations of themanufacturer for producm called loria drawIngs and FF Finish Floor ST Stone notal are h-by made part of thele notes with the lame forGe end eflact al though herein FIN Finish STD Stained written out In full FIXFbdure STL Steel 7. All matarlals required for the pe forrr-ce of thl@ wo* shall benew and ofthe best FLR Floor SUSP Suspended quality of thi kinds specilled. The ule of old or second-hand materials 1, st,lcuy forbidden, FO Finish Opening SYM Symmetrical except for locations on thedrawings th,trefÂ»r to removal and r,location of materills or FOW Face of Wall T Tread, Trim equipment. Materials shall be used In accordance with tile manufacturafs spedlicattons T he con trecto r shall submit all produ ct warr an ties . T he contractu r -11 vaninty,11 wo rk ae FR Fire-raled TAG Tongue and Groove per State of Colorado regulations. DT Foot TAN Tangent 8. The premIses and job glte nhall be m,Intained ina reasonably neat and orderly condition DA Gauge TEMP Tempered, Temporary and kept free from accumulation of waste materials and rubblsh during the enthe consuuctkon GALV Gatvanized THK Thick period. The contrictor Bhall rer~ve 811 crat,8, cartons and othef trash from lhe work are/s GC General Contractor TO Trimmed Opening each day andshall beresponsible for lt; proper d*posal. The premises shall be protected GL Glaa, Glazing TYP Typical throughout construction ind ihill to turned over In spottess and orderly condition. All GR Gracie UON Unless Otherwise Noted #xtuis ind equipmont will bl left In undimaged, bright, clean, and polished cof,dmon. 9. Allwork -11 be subJect b Mnal Ir,Ipection by the archnedural deslgner, GWS Gypsum Wall Board UTIL Utility 10 All plumbing ind electrical work ihall be perfolmed by person, Ncenmed In their trades HOR Horizontal VT Vinyl Tile 11. The contractor shall take all necessily precautiorls to ilmure the Bility of the building, Its HM Hollow Metal VIF Verify in Field occupent, ind the gineral public during congluction HT Height W Washer 12. The conwactor will abU, by all the rul,i and regulations aet form by the bulldIng': 10*I HVAC Heabng, Ventjllation, AirÂ·Condittoning Wi Wth managing agent. no:Ing particularly any restrlcllor, on noise, u- of public entries, tme of ID Inside Dimension, Inside Diameter WC Water Closet, Wall Covering power tvolo, limely and proper deblls removi, materlali. turage, end e-bll,hed werking hours. IN Inch WD Wood 13 The contractor shall be responsible for providing a radon mitigation system throughout INS In;ulation, Insulated WF Wood FloorIng INT Interior W/OWithout ~cludIng the emciont building or*lance -tion 11 5. The con,actor -1 be respor-le for 31 JOW* WP Water-prool preparing all drawing, and ipecificallons requked for thle radon mltigamn 8Â¥stem. 14. All dlmen,lons take pr,idence over thi scale of drawlnes U.O N. All dimensions Ble ko the f-ce of,tud or to the lic, 01 concrete U.O N. All â€¢*torior slua to b, 2)<6 U.O N. al i-nor Ituds b be 2*4 U.O N. 15 Al] Interloritud walls & ce#Ing, shell have 3' W *ound attenuation batts U.O.N 16. No portion of the construction operations which requIres I .hop dr-Ing or I simple submlisionshall commence until the submisolon ha, beon reviewed and approved by the contrector then reviewed end Ippfoved for daolon Intent only by the Irchltectuil designer. All such constructkon operations st,80 be in accordance with revlaw,d show drawings and samplel. 17 Shop dr/wlnes are required for al Ihop filfic/ted work This work Indudos. but Is not hrnited lo. eut,rlor and Inter,or linish matarials, structural and decorative 8-1. and built-in cabineuy. 18 Product submleals Ire required for all indÂ»Bually speciled products. Including but not limited to. doore, windows, electricallixtures. plumbing, appliances, Ind hardware. 19. The contractor li mpoiltle for providing all accei panels- requhd by go-nIng codes to all voide attics, etc... The contractor muit verlly the type required with the architect prior * Installation 0/ said panels' General Safety Note, 1. Construction work will be oonflned t, the Immediate area ot work and wil not create dust. dirt or other such Inconvenlence, to surrounding properties 2. Construction operations will not block Bidawaks or m-ne of egress for tanant, of the adjacent buildings without 33 hours prior written notiflcallon. 3. Coniluction ope,ations will not Imoh,e Intemupton of heatIng,water, lim ali,m, or electrlcal servical' the other tenants of th, building 4 Construction operations shall te resvicmd ko the hotn indicated by building authorities. Except in the case oferne,gency and notmcation of the building authority 5. The contractpr and subxontractor, mhall be reepor,Gible for any property damagiofthe buldIng owner or the personal propeny of arly pemons of the building ckle to the construction operat,or~ 6. Strict *upervision ahall be mmint,ined it all #Ines dI,Ir,9 the courle d co,~truction operations - to minimize Inconvenlence to perions of the building and adjacent propertlem 7 During and following.d,molmon, each contrlitor ihill be responsible for the removal . The slle Ihall'be left broom aleen at the,nd of each working day 8. Refuse from conaDuctionopefations i the sole liponsibltiW and expense 01 the contractm ind the eub-contractors. Relume nhell be dispoied of In Beparate dumpitei or bins maintained at en approved IDcation in the front 01 the building. Dumpsters and b- muit be removed on a weekly basil. Contuttlon meterlaimaha~l be milntlined and stored on the Ilte, with the â€¢pproval of the building authority, or on the sheet during the courus of de-y 9. Con,truction work wlit be con,-d b the indicated are= and wil not cr-le dust or other such Inconventance to the other a*cent properties. 10. Constructlon operations .11 not block ild.walks,dmeways or means of egri- lor tenants of adjacent propertm. 11. Demomlon: All debri, and producti of demolltion not deilgneted lt,r -,le *al be removed Rom the premlies ind Igaly disposed 01. The Ilte,hall b, len broom decnet the Ind of avery wo,king day .. PROJECT INDEX SHEET INDEX ID Name CVR COVER FORUM PHI AO. 1 GENERAL NOTES A02 FAR ANALYSIS 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 PO Box 1606 AO.3 VIEWPLANE Basalt, Colorado 81621 02.1 DEMOLiTION PLAN PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 A2.1 FLOOR PLAN A2.2 ROOF PLANI Isis Addition A23 ROOF PLAN A3.1 ELEVATioNS 406 E, Hopkins Ave A41 SECTIONS Aspen, Colorado 81611 ha 2 SECTIONS Suzie Krevoy Ag.1 ASSEMBLIES CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR GEOTECH #GEOTECH STRUCTURAL #STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL #MECHANICAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPEARCHITECT CIVIL ##11# CONTRACTOR PROJECT SITE - #CON I'RACTOR f,S.%511&142#.&29.Â·i.'.'41(2%~ --37.1..... J.t;.:It'* 1 le?:1â€ž\ 1 .X,IWi.Aii-j'*93~a 4 1*w -4 t.il..~ ~,F,Jb~6~F~.1~6.1#Â§~91IA.. ~~.7~.OR'~~I~~~tk*:S#-11- HPC Â¥26/08 DESIGN REVIEW MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 4- + - 12 15â€¢' ... PROJECT NO: 0720 COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC . m-- e -t, -Ad DRAWN BY: SMW SHEET TITLE - PU..,:/I'lli//'ll"/Immid,7,"p#;42~9%,An'foifil=ez..1 \11.521/ '*r GENERAL NOTES .... 1 1 -/ - r -*Ill NPÂ¥Â¥ *x * .1/,Â»MoltÂ®Â». 1 1 41* :: - - 4 11 - 11 1 FORUM PHI F l 44Â«: 46: 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 PO. Box 1606 \\ &44,1<Â»u.\194*5%**\*Yas,q-'. 1 -1 1 PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 Basatt, Colorado 81621 7 11?~r 1 Isis Addition PROPOSED F.A.R. CALCULATION 406 E. Hopkins Ave 2,000 SF - NET LIVABLE Aspen, Colorado 81611 -IL Suzie Krevoy TDR 500 SF TOTAL ALLOWABLE NET LIVABLE 2,500 SF - NET LIVABLE CONSULTANTS _ ALLOWABLE DECKS (15%) 300 SF SURVEYOR 1 84%**>9&499#*het,8&4 Â»93%44*tf* ==== CD EXISTING UNIT NET AREA 1,970 SF #SURVIVOR 0 --JC -in + I~144<OAAA}Uttlyt~ -77 ' ' - J 1 1 1 -- - ~ PROPOSED NET AREA 498 SF , -74-f>t- -_ __ 1 TOTAL UNIT NET AREA 2,468 SF - NET LIVABLE GEOTECH r--1 . . - - .Â· â€¢- wâ€¢-4 1 _- - -- - --0 *3EOTECH 1 42 ftc-1 -- 2EEEFF- -- -1- -7==--~---~...-.-~ . 1 1 1 --- -.~ 1=*w..6,-' Fi- - - j - -. -. ~~ STRUCTURAL LL. f)V.- - : #STRUCTURAL Â®4Â®Â®Â® MECHANICAL #MECHANICAL 1 UNIT:B - PROPOSED 1/8 . = 1'.0" LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPE ARCHiTECT CIVIL #11## 0 ~<41~32<4K~ 11~ CONTRACTOR #CONIRACTOR 1 - ..1-- il - LN&*1.4 1 Â«Â¢*1*444<44. 1 844+431. 2 *jig,LIAEEE/RE'z 1. I ./. Â·-L â€¢lt,we. 11 1 EXISTING F.A.R. CALCULATION 2,000 SF - NET LIVABLE ALLOWABLE FAR ALLOWABLE DECKS (15%) 300 SF UNIT NETAREA 1,970 SF : !1*4*24 1Â«30**L-Â»947~\Uthi* 1 UNIT GROSS AREA 2,070 SF HPC 3/26/08 DESIGN REVIEW @ MARK DATE DESCRIPTION R = 1~1 --,- -(E) - 1 , PROJECT NO: 0720 DRAWN BY: SMW CEOK - 1 ~ CD COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC -71 - i 1 SHEET TITLE r - - - - - - - 11 u m 'h Â® AO.2 1 1 4 6 0 0 0 Â® 2 UNIT:B - EXISTING 1/8Â· = 1'-0" FAR ANALYSIS .... y. - -- - - - - -- -- -- - - -- -- - --- - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - -- -- - ---- -- - - -- - - - - - -CEIENEWABLEPUNED- - - -- FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 RO, Box 1606 9/ -F Basin, Colorado 81621 PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866 770.5585 FREE MARKET ADDITION AH. Urr A 1-P@*-1. UPPER~.tyL tj Isis Addition - 406 E. Hopkins Ave ~~ME~ Ml-4 '/1 1 I 11 i. 1-1 1 1~1 Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 n 5 11 Suzie Krevoy 0-59-3 r- ~ 1 _ __13- - -amiA A THEATER A 1% I! .3 119-16 1: L . .Ls~~ rÂ· ".~~ EL-Ur-<9--'V CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR 1 1- 0 4 cs,â€¢'-a, 1 t---1 ~' #SURVEYOR . - . _ MAIN tyL t,â€¢.../ 0 0771 - ~3 \00.0 Â· 790854 GEOTECH 1 1 -1--- 1 Ill #GEOTECH It Â¢ d Â· I . PROJ.WL STRUCTURAL #STRUCTURAL- it 1' Â·Â· EL 9 0 THEATER D * STM Â·, r 834â‚¬ l r. IZE - / MECHANICAL #MECHANICAL Â©3 ti =41 ..â€¢A r-5. hp gl . LOWER LVL * EL=7<-9 02 2.-rt_i ~ ~-~~ '~ '- L=.3 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 2 VtEWPLANE SECTION 1/8" = 1'-0" CIVIL #### CONTRACTOR #CON FRACTOR 1 4 " -11 HPC 3/26/08 DESIGN REVIEW MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO: 0720 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE PROJECT SITE AO.3 11,0 40,1, VIEWPLANE VIEWPLANE PLAN 1n = 50' < L--1-1 .... //Al F...e 17-9 5-2,0. , 10, :7 V.BW . 3Â·11-Â· ....Â· 0 FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 P.O. Box 1606 0 . m====4 - r..== =9 -, PHONE: 970.279 4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 Basalt Colorado 81621 rr=rt fl=7-1 .1 1 Ir-- 7 r -t-11 1 0 A--i1---9 -I L 1 Isis Addition 1 L_J I It _.J 1 1 GUEST \ O ' --3 c-, i 4 j 11. 1 1 . L--91 -1 E - 1 4 r---1 0 i GUEST - - 1 CLOSE]I~ ~7 BATH i / 4 W k_L.11 C| OD 1 i, 61 I lili LJ e \ Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 /// 101 /1& i// 4 b /- F---------------- 406 E. Hopkins Ave lili 61- 1 L 1 , ~ I.- " i &----id, , l___ J L_--1 1--41 0--f 1 1 - MECHANICAL I Suzie Krevoy 4 't~ E 4-__7 Li-11 44- 71.'4* CONSULTANTS ' 41" .V . SURVEYOR 4- ill-2 p70.-M #SURVEYOR 1 '.Fi =====1' 1- ~ ~G~EST SUFf f. Â«-4 k - iii $ GEOTECH #GEOTECH U 74 1 Z ee 1 -- 5001 : - < STRUCTURAL , , J A-\- _ - #STRUCTURAL m .TF . p---ri #\<~/ Â· Â· 1 1 P y 4 4-r* 4-c-4 : MUD ROOM ' 0,%2' I 101 i BOSTING CON[)0 8 2, 1 69 11 1-L /0 .3 -_ - -3 - -- - - - ~~~~ #MECHANICAL 4 1 MECHANICAL 1-RE=1--_Â©-31 //_h _031 r-=, 1332 1 -2-200//1- 4 .- ;.R-- I It 1- 7 i L-11/ 10- chÂ·Â·-5=-./14r 11 1 11 1 0 - 3 1 1 U \_.' LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT All_ 2 u__L_-2--3 11Er-16-----7 r=- r----1 12,irl 4,7-1 31 F -1. 7 1 3, 01 ~ #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 11 11 11\ 1 .I 111 42 1 1 \ 1 1 . L -----2 11 i 4 n ~ t r ' 114 11 . 1" V,if 711 'LJ 1 \ 'LU, 1 ;!11 1 l.1-4 L.2 1 -Ch #11#* 1 - --1- 11 i 1.-V j 111 12 - \ \ 1 1 1 1 1:11 1 CIVIL lili #\ 1 All_IL 2 -L -1 .- - .3 ......I= ---J I - LciD- - LE-T-' * 1 - 1/) -1 4/9\ LM] U -- ~ - P E /2 -f/ t/-/ / - 0 1 -3222-22_..._ID CONTRACTOR L___11 IL--_. 1 #CONFRACTOR -- 2-- + BR. - 1. 041. DECK i - -- â€¢coP STEPS F-=7 + --- 9*" Hle)4 /[AhDRAIL (90â„¢ Spes) i , 4-0â€¢ u HPC 3/26/08 DESIGN REVIEW 0Â£ 41 C -3 RAISED DECK ---- -> MARK DATE DESCRIPTION ~ (EXISTING ORAINAGE TO REMAÂ® PROJECT NO: 0720 DRAWN BY: SMW ~ COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC i i SHEET TITLE i i 0 0 Â® Â® All 1/4" = 1 '-0Â· 1 ADDITION FLOOR PLAN OWNER C14 ___--__ - .... FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 ~ - PO. Box 1606 Basalt, Colorado 81621 . NEW SKYLIGHT TO MATCH PHONE: 970.279 4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 EXISTINGS (TYP. OF 6) Isis Addition 406 E. Hopkins Ave ~ ' ~ ~|/~ i ~ ,~ ~ | ~~ | Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 Suzie Krevoy 11 1 PROPOSED STANDING SEAM 11~1111. TO MATCH - - SURVEYOR MECHANICAL VAULTED ROOF ------------- CONSULTANTS #SURVEYOR 1 1 1 11 1 GEOTECH : 1 1 1 1 - i . - #GEOTECH :119 ~!11~Fill 1 : 1 1 STRUCTURAL #STRUCTURA In 111-4 arit - 11 -- 1 11UJ 1 ! 1 1 EXISTI *3 i j 1 1 1 9 1 STANDING SEAM 1 1 ' ' ~ . ~ ~ ---- MECHANICAL ; , #MECHANICAL- \ AULTED ROOF ~ '~ 2 BE 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 j' 14%1 1 ' ~ ~ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LIlli ##LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT I laaE I 1 f '1 i[ 7 I lili EXISTING : 4 0 1 STAND NG SEAM i #am ~,~ CIVIL 1 ' VAULT ED ROOF ~ ~ . 9Â«0444Â« ~ CONTRACTOR #CONTRACTOR 3 ; 11 1 ----.1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 j ~ DECK I * --6 4----Â· Woop sÂ·reps ' 2,3 - -- 4- p.----- Se' +11*H HANDRAIL 1/ 1- HPC 3/26/08 DESIGN REVIEW | "'| MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 11 1 1 ~Â·Â·Â· -- .4121.g, PROJECT NO: 0720 < R.teeD DECK ----9 DRAWN BYÂ· SMW 1 IXISTINe DRAINAGE TO REMAIN) --1.$- - -r-#. ~- ---------- b. ~ ~ COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC 1 -- .--1-- -<- Ii.--i---rill'----I=-:- - -1 - SHEET TITLE 1 1 1 A2.2 1 1 6 Â® 0 Â® ROOF PLAN 2 ENLARGED ROOF PLAN 1/4 - 1 '-O. /-000 0 1 FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 RO. Box 1606 Basalt, Colorado 81621 PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 1 - . . .. il li li I Isis Addition 406 E. Hopkins Ave Aspen, Colorado 81611 DFUE ~ EXISTING STANDING SEAM UFLLE VAULTED ROOF Suzie Krevoy f AH CONSULTANTS - SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR FLAT ROOF GEOTECH #GEOTECH STRUCTURAL #STRUCTURAL 11Hdilit[L ; 1 || ii ~ PROPOSED I|' - 81,1 1 Â·bTâ€¢N/ING SEAMi ,--ED ROOF I MECHANICAL L 1 AECH. 1 #MECHANICAL ~ 1 UN/r G'.al 1 11 1 1 ! 1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT I EXIST N) ST AND NÂ·3 SEAM I, ) 4 #LANDSCAPE ARCHIE(2 T /All TED R X,F h - 1 2 ' UNI)& ill"# 1 --14Â» - CIVIL 1 1 ### 1 1 11 ~ EXISTING STANDING SEAM 11 I i VAULTEDROOF 1 CONTRACTOR 1 1 1 1 1 ~ONTRACTOR 9-1= -- -- -- ---1-1-.4 + 11 ~-- -- 5140% FENCE f '-THRU T m 1 OVERFL FINGH t-X-*YE* 1 i 1 f m I 11 i ---=-=.u_. e HPC 3/26/08 DESEGN REVIEW MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO: 0720 3 ROOF PLAN 1/8Â· = 1'-0. DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE ROOF PLAN .. FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 P O. Box 1606 BasaH, Colorado 81621 PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 868.770.5585 Isis Addition - ---- 406 E. Hopkins Ave F â€ž. 11 * ,i El ti -O U _ Aspen, Colorado 81611 I__I * i,wi ~ U Suzie Krevoy CONSULTANTS -- Elgl- SURVEYOR #SURVEYO _____ GEOTECH EO E H STRUCTURAL 0 0 [I EJEE OE 00.00.00.00.00.00 O MECHANICAL C AL / 1 537-Â·~~- \ fiN / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ~ j~ ~---- #LAN CAPE ARCHITECT 00 \ 7 . If 1 . .1 CIVIL CONTRACTOR HPC 3/26/08 EaGN REVIEW MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 0720 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE ELEVATIONS - .El - 1,4-22 - *01 1 =amil :Ill'111 I Illillillillillibri @Â®.*1 1 -7. -4-2-- - ----7- --- I . -Image / ./0-/ Il.im... 1 ... -1 ..1-lESI-~:Ii:--JE~fl'ilfisimER*,gal.(&i-gill i..~1 -1- leam 0%*Ble,ilfil:1~:1113~IipilitiE.:f~~i,185,3: ilill-I.......- I.'ll'......'.'ll.'I-'I.I..'I'....I.i-- - -""- 0. 11-1----.%imifga~~~s~- m~===Elti-2-k--E-E-~,~lmilmili~-Bi __:a#=r-=Hrx~--==.-- I leilliE*gle:I,iligr-illibi . Illm"/4//am:::1/inf--- i'"I'll//Ill i#Ell-~I-~~~~li~i=-I------I~'1----- - - 1-41. tilf---ft P .... *1*3#,a lâ€ž,Iri-~fiâ€žma,3,= ~A~~ Al 1 lillillillillilillilli~.~~ilill/~ill/~~i/~i'll~~illill i I- = 1.....ill,1 - L_ m 1 1 0. Â®~11.11.11.0 .... . Â® i t--------- EX)511)* )41*H BRICK /ARAPET FORUM PHI EXISTIN, BRICK r,IALL , STO,2 CAP TO BE leMOVE) \3 4 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 SLOPING PARAPET BEYOND --\467.I~ - ~eN=\~ ANGLE OF VIEW FROM M'.0 P.O Box 1606 ~ ~~<~~~<~ 4 - FROM FRONT OF BUILDING Basalt, Colorado 81621 A F -f PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866 770.5585 h 1 - *"Imma-7---*94%=-r'WQB TO ~?@&27i*@Re /,d Isis Addition 1 1 ~~ EXISTIND LOM BRICK PARAPET AREA DRAINS AS REQUIRet> 406 E. Hopkins Ave 3/4Â· EFIE DECK OVER FURING Aspen, Colorado 81611 6 - . ' 314Â· FIRING OVER STRUCTURAL DECK - &40Â¤ 1 - Suzie Krevoy eXISTIN* BRICK Ov- [KICTINS CT,415TLÂ»401- DES,4 CONC~TE BLOCK EXISTINS GONSRETE DECK - CONSULTANTS 1-EC) SURVEYOR #sURVEYOR 4 h .4 >'i r, -ni " 1 k-- rN=Â·4< * 3895 1 GEOTECH *GEOTECH < EXISTING NNPOre // .L---- STRUCTURAL #STRUCTURAL 2:SU 1 ' -' MECHANICAL #MECHANICAL 3~ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CIVIL #### 401 CONTRACTOR #CON I'RACTOR 2 22Â· HPC 3/2808 DESIGN REVIEW 6 - *F:Â·A 7 n ri-n .n n n n'.n n A MARK DATEE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO: 0720 , -Â·-1.,;' 1.Wit,;21 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE X4.2 I I SECTIONS A WALL SECTION 1/2" = 110' .. ZEEDOWSCHEDULE i 1 MARK - HD HT 1 Operation Type 1 NOTES 1 --- ~~T~T~1 FIRE RATING 1 NOTES 1 1 VIDILL -IME*1____1__-__-L____-_.-~ L_mo~. !_44Â· ! 4'-11" !10'Â·11" ! Fixed ! ~703 ~ 44' ~~ _4'-9 !10'.5 ! Fbed ~ -CASgpPENING !-32&.1__11- !-- 1 - !9 ! SkieHung ~ ~ 004 ~ 4'4' ~ 8' ~Double Door Single Swing ' LaEL-1_21-1- -51- -18' ! Skie Hung ~ . __._- _-~ FORUM PHI L-ME-!_L- LIE. 19 - ! Sdi Hung ~ 174 Midland Ave, SuRe 201 L_.Tll_54_!-_E-_F-6.- 1 Top HIng ! - ------4 PO BOX 1606 L_ElLLE-21/2" L 2' !2'-6' ! Top Hung ~ Basalt, Colorado 81621 1 008 12'-6â€¢ 1 8' ISingleDoorSingle SwIng ~ 1223---1-- 1-1 1 1 --- PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 5'-21/2 2 2-r Top Hung Isis Addition 406 E. Hopkins Ave Aspen, Colorado 81611 Suzie Krevoy El CONSULTANTS ' SURVEYOR #SUR O ---------Â·--------Â·-Gr ANDING SEAN COPPER ROOFiNG wER CONPOS/TE Ray â€¢EMBRANE ~"yfl*9-1,---, WER PO-WOOD SHEWHING WER i liul ~NS/D #/SUL4r/ON AÂ¥0 aLOCKING . ======4=======.==..=./4 1 11.' WER IAPOR BARRIER WER METAL , DECKING. TURN COWPOSITE ROOF ' WEMBRANE DONN WER 8UXKING. 1, PER SHINGLE WER 4~ EO ECH SEPAR#TION LIER PER h -END PLUG PROVIDED 81 BrrUTHENE 0/ER '4Â· PLYWR ' 1.4.11\ ROOF IMS IDNUFICTURER SHEATHING TO fTFFI e NURIB ~. ~~~~~~~~~1~~-~ B & /71\ 1''k----41 NJ,C. 71 ~*7-1.4.1.11[M STRUCTURAL 4 /-~A- UtEll - ---*49 BAT INSUMTION 8.4 1 t... 383-1-1 â€¢ METAL STUDS e F M.UNfT 4-00 BCOCOAG V.1,0 *71,11 REFER TO SECTION ~4 1 -6.PAOOD .D PUPPED 2. ; m @1 ~~ ......... 6 WEr,L STUDS e AM.UNRS 1 ' 1 4 ~~ ~ FOR ADD/nONAL I t MECHANICAL FINISHES NiÂ£* FN.UNIT /NFORWAT/ON + CAL- -FOAUED COFER FASC/A TO ~ ~ ' r-lEi----1,zjw,Â·c, WECH COPPER ROOED,G CQPPER SHINGUE ST,Mr FOINT F.M. UNIT F.M. UNIT ~ ._..12.2.13124 sw.~ ' | 3 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ORNED COPPER FLASHING , LANDSC EARCH{ CT 4541.1.. - AO FUGHING W{TH _.._ EL Â· /2r-9 - 80]D or,Â¢ SE/UNT -R SHINGLE 0/ER SEPARATION ~ -ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD UtER WER BirtrrHENE WER , WINOON FRAME 72' Ply#[1 SHEATHING CIVIL EAD EXTENSION Â· SHIW AS f WETAL St'UDS 1 REOUIRED. 2lm.0 FN.UNE) 12 /0.3 C-h GUTTER @ F.M.U. /-1 WINDOW HEAD @ COPPER SHINGLES 'â‚¬02. WALL SECTION 3/8" = 1'4Â· W01 WALL SECTION 3/8 = 1'-0' 3",1,-0' CONTRACTOR D03 DETAIL . _-3-_1_11 0-91 DETAIL 3Â· = 1+4 --*MAG SENA COPPER RCOFING r--------Â·-Â·--Â·-Â·---Â·-----5fAN0ING SEAN COPPER ROOFING OVER COMPOSITE ROOF ME,BRANE ~ O/ER COMPOSRE ROOF MEMBRANE 0/ER PLYWOOD SHEATHING OVER -*44 WER Ply#OOD SHEATHING WER 6-9 .1 RIGID INSUU,rION NID 81&(10110 - --- ----------Â·--~3~_-___-___-n-31 -iD INSUUNON AND BLOCKING 0/ER Â¥01*OR -AAER WER MET-#4. ~ r OfER VAPOR BARRER WER METAL DEctuNG. TuRM cowposiTE Roop EF~F~F7VV~EF~FÂ¥VF~f~F'T~FT-7E---rr-14 \ OECKING. L------===-= 5##1?69 /Mmigm,l INLIM.&%ED WOOD 8Â£0GWNG 80.LTED IMILERE MEMBRANE DONN OVER BLOCKING. ~~~p~Ti~~E~t BASE. ~----36Â· plr#000 AND RIPPED 2*8 Ll.--4..1-4-*kikki*Â·.Ul=-1-1~*La.*, -AU[m 47 TO STEEL BENT PUrE -20-3-7- 1%0511 EKI028 TREATED WOOD BLOCKING r---------%4=69IA----------------*S:'~IraN'mF TTOO~ ' \71N?8-4-8EArr MATE - SEE =RUCTURAL ---------FORMED COPPER F;GCIA TO h-11/ \A i MATCH COPPER ROTING ---il--Mff,zir'TrJal \lili (FiDATING FLOOR 9STEMJ 11 UP~Â·lk------------MFZSEWE~~ TO i-IJI 11/ T I 111 V AND UNDER ROOF MEÂ¥88*E L+-+----Fo#WED COPPER SOFFIT NID HPC 3/26/08 SIGN REVIEW FeCIA TO WATCH COPPER ROOFING .viao ri m' in--_~0~~~ ACICÂ¥- MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 4-4--4--\-aU---Â·-------STEEL BEN, WHERE OOCURS- --U------N~---4-4---STEEL BER WHERE OCCURS- 2Â£ 41 L,/rA MEMBRANE WER TWERED} iNSULATION. ---- SEE STRUCTURAL MJE | ~ | SEE STRUCTURAL 1~ MEMBRANE UP WALL HY U L.litill---Ii#=1*.~TO STEEL BEAN PROJECT NO: 0720 112 ---- 1 111 L-1.----111'zzz==f-1.---8Â£000*-907Â©STEELBEAW DFUWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC 440#44#44-+F-*44-fL- SHEET TITLE ~11|EK--------------COPPER SHWGLE OVER SEPARAT/ON 1 1 1 Â§4' PLYWR SHEAD'#NG -Â· .Â· -/ ' 1 -Lâ€¢ , â€¢ -â€¢ Â· - --------------1 LATER OVER BITUTHENE VER 1 , . / , , V Al - 1 15 7 \'t---â„¢r-DECK 9 PiNG SHEATHING , â€¢1 1---71 /1 4-r METAL sruos -2.=m/-* G--~~--------9 METAL STUDS -----1 A6. 1 METAL STUDS $ SHAL BE MODEL RIN Bir j K/NET/CS NUSE CONTROL/NC. L----------~17*1) & l*rION AND IKERIOR --O INSULATION 1 *WUTION AND INTERIOR 1 FINISHES N'Â£10 FE.UNm FINGHES N.IC.0 F.N. UNA- 1 /1 RAKE FASCIA @ F.M.U. /-'\ ROOF OVERHANG @ F.M.U. r) TYPICAL EXT. WALL BASE t#*Wi CONDITION 4-,W- ASSEMBLIES 224 -- DETAIL ----3=14 222_ DETAIL y = 1%0' 005 DETAIL 1 1/2'= 190' . .. RcutiVED MAR 1 7 2963 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Historic Design Guidelines Checklist New Additions 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. 0 A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. The addition is iii the character ruith the current roof top addition of the historic buildbig. 0 An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of tile primary building also is inappropriate. The addition is in the character of the current roof top addition. 0 An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. Our addition does not relate to the historic portion of the bitilding. 0 An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. Our riddition does not cover historically significant portions of the building. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. 0 An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. 0 A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. Our addition utilizes a setback to achieve this effect. 10.5 When planning an addition to a building in a historic district, preserve historic alignments that may exist on the street. 0 Some roof lines and porch eaves on historic buildings in the area may align at approximately the same height. An addition should not be placed in a location wliere these relationships would be altered or obscured. 10.5 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building, 0 An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. N/A 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. N/A (See Rooftops) .. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. 0 Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. The Roof on the addition is unulted to match the existing roof top addition, 0 Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. The roof of the addition is not flat. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. 0 For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. 0 The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. Rooftop Additions 10.12 When constructing a rooftop addition, keep the mass and scale subordinate to that of a historic building. 0 An addition should not overhang the lower floors of a historic building in the front or on the side. 0 Dormers should be subordinate to the overall roof mass and should be in scale with historic ones on similar historic structures. (No doniters) 0 Dormers should be located below the primary structure's ridgeline, usually by at least one foot. (No Doriners) 10.13 Set a rooftop addition back from the front of the building. 0 This will help preserve the original profile of the historically significant building as seen from the street. 10.14 The roof form and slope of a new addition should be in character with the historic building. 0 If the roof of the historic building is symmetrically proportioned, the roof of the addition should be similar. 0 Eave lines on the addition should be similar to those of the historic building or structure. Building & Roof Forms 11.5 Use building forms that are similar to those of the historic property. 0 They should not overwhelm the original in scale. 11.6 Use roof forms that are similar to those seen traditionally in the block. 0 Sloping roofs such as gable and hip roofs are appropriate for primary roof forms. .. 0 Flat roofs should be used only iii areas where it is appropriate to the context. E On a residential structure, cave depths should be similar to those seen traditionally in the context. 0 Exotic building and roof forms that would detract from the visual continuity of the street are discouraged. These include geodesic domes and A-frames. 11.7 Roof materials should appear similar in scale and texture to those used traditionally. 0 Roof materials should have a matte, non-reflective finish. (No reflective roofillg lilaterwls) Materials 11.8 Use building materials that contribute to a traditional sense of human scale. 0 Materials that appear similar in scale and finish to those used historically on the site are encouraged. (Materials similar to the existing roof top addition) 0 Use of highly reflective materials is discouraged. (No reflective materials) Architectural Details 11.9 Use building components that are similar in size and shape to those of the historic property. 0 These include windows, doors and porches. E Overall, details should be modest in character. 11.10 The imitation of older historic styles is discouraged. 0 This blurs the distinction between old and new buildings. 0 Highly complex and ornately detailed revival styles that were not a part of Aspen's history are especially discouraged on historic sites. - t :-- - . -... :$--7,2,1, El. 4... . N.. . I 1, I 4 4 <3 i 1: 1 : 1 A Â¢ 5 n i , -4 -9 4 1 '1 . . 2 'i 0 ' ti k b 41.3. B F ? 1 104 4 507. 1 81 1 4 < 0 + ./57 . p 115 0 41 . 1 1 , 111. 1 1 '19 1 4. . 'r .. Â· it K .---41 11 . .5 ,-.... . t, 1 Â¢ .*./ 1 .. 1, -2---2-.2 49 . lip 1.1 - liÂ· . Â· C ; wl 1 \ f. -: j 15 1 C i{. 'i 1 1, 1 CO 3 ' M m :I / *.-) I . r ':1 E t, ~ 23 PROPO**6 - ' i 2 :4 3 , 2 .< 1 U ' 1 : i: M . ADDIUON # t: . ' 1 .,2 r . . 1 Â·Â· 7 4*ZZ Â· 04... ./. f .3 r . 120. , 4.4. N 5, - 1 . ' Â£ -.' i E HOR'KINS; ivt 1 .-----------0------------ 1 ,<r-.'.':237Â·- ----Â·21 i !1 1 1 F~3-1--FE:-71?'... '. 4 1 . 1 4 -4 1---1 -1 3.46 - 1 i 1, I }1 --1...I-.... - :-4 1 ! 9 / , , r 0 â€¢ -*..Â£ 2 1 S 11. 1 C - 4-1------- ---Â»-4- - .---= 1 05>1. , X I " ../ i Ll i 3 t Â· Â· j -I.- -. -..,44.......0 . i Ij > 1 141 . .1 1.-1 I Â· 41 b '. E â€¢ 6ti i --- 9- ./F . . 1 ,t b , 4.6, - I 19' : 4 0 1 , . 11 tt 14/4/r.. 13 1% 1 &. -/A p t.,rr 44 - .... . ./1... .~I'll//A :Â®/2/ . 1 0 7 4% - I Â¥ -4. t .C : I . C ,-18/.. I . - I I -4.* ..4 . 1-- --I./99 Â¥%/f~* t JAM/7 1.1/9. 1,2- 1/4."8 p -- 7 439;-a -1 :4 E # ; - - 4**z#u#*e4 *-*-~#44 I# *4 ~~b . ... "4: Al"KIL..4/M *-44 , ImleÂ» --74 0 . 21'791111- r. 1.11 ....3 -19 I /4/ 4 C- 9~=---M - IN-1. f..... - LOCATION 1 - EXISTING 4 2:06 PM 10%-r. k 2 et it. . 1/ l. F. 4 . 9,0 : 24- - 4 , ..1 & FF : 8 6 - - 7,2 . r.==FE 1 . . ' 0. Â¥ 2 Ii* - -- I .....I..../. I. 4/5. 12: 71Â¢9+ -211Â« 11:flfal 13 L.. - :'hy'. ...9- it ' * .{, I 4 7 i -pl 7 9. , 0 -4> f . t 1- . 41 1 -e ~ - ay 4-,0 -. 1.-L -:. , A .. a. - Ve,-1,9 ' 443 /4a= thit 27'U h - Ullil 'W 2- - 24. LOCATION 1 - PROPOSED ~ 2:06 PM I + -I. bil 4 : Tilid--' '4 -1 f.. . -,-2 -- ... W.'h- ~# 4* % rvit..-/1///1/21;A Litaraille:Mill#flik. VIIIIIM. ' - Imb -56/ Ele?*;Â»Or 1441- -'-I=~ . IF # <li 'FLI 2 3 M.#11 J[f r .. ... 2 -** 0)8> 1.iwill/""1/3 0 - -I--.*-.- ./.-.9.9-. 41.6.$* 1- *.u i. . 1 I f -t I - 6 01 -)1 ---' . Ill=- .*-- .--- . ~#*..~ - . 17 r.i- - ... ... r,4~6/ // 3 * 3* 1 4- 1 1A u-lh 11 t W - 2, A ' ..0 ./.-:I-- . . 4%(1Â®11 Kill"lizillk * 4 2:ijripioi--~ ION 2 - EXISTING 9 / r, 4 ~ 144 $ R 1 -1. 1. 7.... .01 r=Ste/, --** IA 76 r e 4 Â¥9014 :lillill'llillb..7 4<il=:/1 * EE.*&". 1'.. ~11' i r f 17 r s .. bÂ·. p77./.....1./........... . 12 : 1 , / li lit, i:f F r ./ ... ,.'~ Utw -1 -- 1 19&-=Â· ....au .1, 1 . 1 -*_ .,idiIA F[f * F</Â£~ - -9~ ... ... F~n-4 -r . --1-- -0-0 r A #I *-- e.cz - â€¢9 4 \>cr , ki. P Â£ M / 1 J.h .9,4 . 1 1 -1'4444~ L VLNK 4 + 514(.\(lic<(11 -1- 42:TFR-- TION 2 4 PROPOSED G . , Â¢ B...IW . V K & fl I I + AIR .-.IN 't jl:jt Â·Â·,:4*hibidÂ£*e;;Atilb-4113 R/'"217</:i././.Il//" . i ,e~Â·Â·4â‚¬' 0-7- I# ~G~ ~ i 1 il 2 t 4 lit ' iha. 0 - . A .5.- - 4, le ./ =- #fli 4 1#4-tililip-- * - Â· >51 1 - , -54 : Â¥4* 7 , . 7,0 + 1?41!9% i... :T-.50.,Â».~. V ~â€¢IR , 4 --7.& , - r-,--N-- 4 1 4 4,1 Â·?1./..'- - + ItÂ·:. ... r - 4 b 7/ $ 11 A 1. LOCATION 3 1 265;Ii.. - 846â€¢~h.L -~'~~-Â«- luz ,=-- 'me 4.- 't. .4,14,7 -1 e .:C,=1 t\ 1 ' 11.11 E #" 1.4.: ... 4 #flt I i #2 1-ic. " 11 1 Â£ 146 4 :2.14 â€¢BE{t~ Â¥ Â·~~27 :1- Z. 1 ..... 9 - 1 r./ ; 9 /&1,1,~f F , pr 1 4-4 -e . r Ill 9 ...N . 7 167 -4-- 1 1 r- i J *r 1 11 4 * 1 , 4 , V. - - - ~ DOUGL; i 4. 61/1 ./all ....Il-i-- ' -/1-0 /MIW'ik - LOCATION 3 - 'tu~~ED ~,~ 2~C.~1~ ~'~ - K # _.-I 1 - Ir'P~ I JiÂ¥ 61 ..97- 11, - 71.'ll'lilimil'.' . .t---~ M Ude-- 4 r ---' - . :7 .414. 0 . - /*Â·r ~j .,/ - Â¥. 4+ . 1â€ž1 4, . 1]L ,- â€¢' Ti .......<I.'I.-/6...' 4. , â‚¬....r i 6 a- . *-1 4_~r 6 ... - " va- 11 1 - 1 ~ 'J'. ..4 i -4 *k j Fr- A - 7.1 j.2 A . 1...I ./.- 4 - 7 .-- - 1-/- . - 91- ... 9 =/ ~8 PM T~ .. I LOCATION 4 - EXISTING m U. --.. 7.- f 1--'Al-ill--Ii- emâ€¢=8+/848%9' -//0-1 y 3- *:-0 -- ~pmri Ph-- 40:12 :.. -all --I'..a:.-- I.. 1 . 1, .R--- :.. - - I -:-2 f.3 . 1 ir- It Â£ .CL ft m.~11.,7 11- 1*2 1 1.14 Fy'.'-1 2, 1.1 I'll:..A -- ~~'/-2/4,#*%/. Â· -- - f , 231 -- Ill.Ill. Â· U~1 4. 64'9. s r , , 424 4 r - ~t *,1 .1.-41 kim A . :â‚¬ , Â¥-i V- lib, hz/.".44#\ -Willill -1 - ~.1 i././ : * . ... fÂ» i. \41 .. --~ â€¢yal El -/ .... '. -- lar .An ..r / LOCATION 4 - PROPOSED OPM 4,~ 11. n 6%.. 1. 11 I ju .,rd - 7. Mr W .1 -9 . e T' -9441 W - 1 h Xh 724.3 6- 1 r.- . t....i: 3 -4/,%*+PEE d - - B - - By 0- 'i.~:-3~.----612*..-- 24& 6-1 1, 1-2,-1 34, - EF 2 - A *Pa 44 < ~/ I .... .#H//0 -9 2 * ~ li F ik -iâ€¢ I. 1 - 7 (4-ill - . - r- 22,1 . -~ E. . - 1-- 9 beld I al ell'.*Ff ...1 --. 12= r =~11 -i=â€ž~,.,-,i'A 1 LOCATION 5 - EXISTING 4 y :h0 PM -- 4 0.-t***111==taE;L -- --1... e *I....Z=A '1~ .I -1./ b. , I. f / /-4/V -*... irk -4 . . ~ 197-?$ 1-2 S . 1 I tr f ... -151BT Arjr.3. -*-* 3-PirlfT ' I I + ; ,- == --- -6 -7 -32, - *1-1-434 ~22 ' 'EL' .'. - - r â€¢-11. - 2.G- MEE I li .23 ' - w litÂ· ]* r- 1K / b -P= ~ 4,7,1. *2.*9.. 44*Il//'2w '77/7. * Â¥~'~1.-~1~ - , 4 '~2 1. ~r a- - be hd!-3 Liall -at G -A j EL ; A -441{* - F.,- le 7.2<19 0 19., 1.-46 6 - S 4 i,U#Illk. P -- Â¢4$'Wil lid"/pr .. 4' ./ 1. J..../Tr----I./1*L.......p.7 i - - ~ A:,9 - - Â·Im"r.#*A Â·Ort a LOCATION 5- PROPOSED ~ 2:08 PM r.-4.- m - 1././.'I/Il-.I'W///-/=46â‚¬' - 2-1/1-_a 741 e - .r A ---77-- < ./14 .i -r~--rr ungdjul,~3/3/=r-/-/121_13_31_32 r Tr, 1- - 1 lit- I . Â« . 13*{ ,. + .1 I ..I VA.0 1, : It LI b = '-: . -h 14 'da UTZ, rv I --.-b.Al Pl' A ~ --1 6 Â· -. . .i ad i 44/lill' F till//9 111 1. i 1 7~ 1 --Il f 1. 1. wr4#.3 9 1â€ž,F,Â«-;.. ..:. . .-6,.Ad h LOCA~ 1, EXISTING~344 \<f~ 1~ 1 1 V , I N ./.' ~ija/- A-,- 3,1, l * fl @22=,LP wjgwjjj,trj~g~~r,tuzr=UJÂ»LU=UJ~W~rgWaU- ~ 1 - 1116U ~ - 1 - 4 11rt'01 IF-In ' k | '*Pok 1 1--I F --. 1 4*:Â·4 Â·Â·-IÂ· I. L i. 1 .. . li + 31"Q ': <*; . 3.-* - *al: 14 p Fr . -1-5. 1-~ lat- ~ - ~ 1 1,53- 40 1 ./.il''ll. ~VA , il 4 ~,1,5 - mi / 'E Al 1~-4- . I , 0-7 -t' /975 i\43rr. 4 , LOCA1~~N - PROPOSED 4 \ 3~ '*k U '01. f A- . 2,/A -6664--2.-- - - -' - -,/ ,~il- - rx'-aL-4/u'j z,-4LIA'--" - f' - - 1 0 1 2-1 - i t 4 r- 1. --- J 11 >â€¢r'.71~e' - .--- ./. 1 44.-1 111.t -7.;2 *ti~ - 1 I...I- 1 1 4 04 "flb'N~ 14, 6 1? . -1 . .-- . .1. 1. , 1 1 k. - 4 9 -- .. ..id .111 M.1- a A 4 + f , 4 ki w i.4 k._21 -' ' 0 7-1 . 1 01--111) . 4, f. 1 *1, _ â„¢I*'Li I '- t-- 1 LO TION 7 - NOT VISIBL~~ PM \ 11-f ti -L-=1 -I'lliw- - 1 f 4 C - - - 0 -=%125.- 0-# - #i~/Stb1 il ,_ 4.4.., 1DX:, ~ n; 3 4 !- .. -fil - -- %11 - I U.f J MI -t f - r I- 0, -1 a r .-' ge=. ail- ., 11 uu . U 1 4---- 1, -- 5--I-- iÂ·29/ Wil . - .----.1 - -A - ft//.--//... I- I I. - . 7 / <-1/ 1- --, ...-.: LOCATION.06 NO i VISIBLE ~ L.//74 1. ..hiN=.2 --'ll=.--- r-Â· lefi 1 026 - '421.-.F-/I.-m .....- r L i AL-IL,7,711 ..1,6~<Liy/Â£.. PU#** i V + u*:1.- p >1/ Â¢ r , r M \,5 1 , le 14 2 P . . 1 . 41 ' 1 1/ f 1 . 7 1. 4* . 1 Ut - }j 0 1 4 4 1 937 b 4--t 1 4 1 '1 f.': 5,5. L 4 '14 . - el 1 .. - ill.V . :,1 1 111â€¢ 2 k 8 4 v r Al " . G. ,..... + . 4.1 2 1 . 41 .1. ...- . 0 i h il ~J \ * t~ . U ta , 44 r . t; e , 1 I 1 9 *2 V I 4 . 0 r //.k>*S iv. .t, ./ :t E 1% = 0 !pRopo**6 3 1 v 4 ''~ . (1 /1 2 t' , ; 9 f : 1 * *f t. , # ADDIUON ~ 1 1 44 L.i , t 1 3 1 . Â»t- /26 all, ; .. , IL '---it I ' t i' â€¢, A./.*...h. ' .4/Al-*+I-...-I-...*.......F 1 1 1 E HOPKINS AVE ir--4- .-------- f ". 4 8-I 1-1...7- Ll.'ll#r- --- -Ir--0.......M.. rr.-77-1 fl %- i i i i :i 7 , f 8 4 1 } .. 1â‚¬ f 1 0Â· 1.-7 1.-1 t . t... 1 + .i43 1 > - -- #I : Â¥ , 5>10 1 ./ 1*. f ./. *t 1 1 . D--4.t 1 5 i il . I. A ' i U , k 4 4.4 1 r 1 f 11 6 2, Â· i! i '1 1 , i ' .' . :21 i1 7-04-'-0404' *I-. .-Im 4 -%4~/A#35-44-4 . .. . 1 r . .Â» 1 1 1 %.1 a . 4 If 1 , / 0 - 11/'F.~..2 - 1.1 - 16 S. I ~p â€¢u i 1 i ./ -- 9/4 4 1 ... 4*#/**/~0- I b d Â·c-- **'IiIIâ‚¬1' ....~.*:*-1/4 61. 1."4 ; : 1. 1,2 .: 7 r + . 4 9 i ,~Â·S t.-1 1 1 , I e â‚¬9. 0 1 244 * r,k ilâ€¢ * . 226*-Er. 1 V . i. . Â·r .,1 1 - . UE . 0 6.. . A J ' 46 L. t r Â¥Â· Â¥ a % 44 -4. 4 .1 -1 . 1 . i.{ ti J. 4 .1 - 417071 Wd 90:2 9NliSIXEI - & NOI19307 9. $ il 1 , 4, .. :Â·dif. 4. ... I. 1/lf 3- 4 41* .L - 17/6 4,f ~ * . 0:'ffirr . r.1 t~? ,-1~:5â€¢ ... :.'-1 ... + - 2 1 4. 1 . . 0 r. 3 la - %40 .33, lie' WI' ; , 4 11 F 6 - ' I . , 'i 1 1 '1-. r,=- 4* f; *.W."I -*42) .42:'1~ -1.--5 - l' ** â€¢I. lf,~~~~. '%-.tÂ·â€¢Â· 217Â¥ 11- LOCATION 1 - PROPOSED ~ 2:06 PM 1 4* .... --*...f,M//./.- ---0 Erin -4 le -I.. I.W./7/ I I. .-eme *01 . . :4 E.~33-21 .,4- .D42 6 ~ f 11 V i f 7 4 LÂ«t fy ~.-Â·....-'5) r 9,21.- '. - qi \%.4 * 24 ..V' 9 ' "dd ' 1 I * f ** 2,2- 6/9*64..0. -i.4 , 43 044% ....0.-62 7. ag. 4.-r f . Ae' .-> := r- E: L 4 â€¢61- ... ././LJL-*. t. W A....FI- 111 - :ER 1 #g,iltrE'I . '% .p}. W ]!a: t.5.4- - - . I i.vi pÂ» a .L -//. 42.FR--- A..UM...F ION 2 - EXISTING ./ - I I /34 'A NU 04 ., .L~A*6/1 ''r~ L . . 27 . 14'.)*4 1. - .i Â·Â·* I.'-.../--. 2 1 3.'*....004 â‚¬* WAÂ¢ I./. .%21.Â» I Z t- r n Irr 24 1*ZÂ¥.â€¢al ri-in.-4 - m u -' :#.t / f fl F //8 Â¥.. ..40 . 4 .4. 1- - - ~*:. 7,74- 1 ...,\.4 B- e 1 7 h.= + t. 3 1/WY , f - i Â¥4 * .... 1 I i ..... --1- I --- ' ./.- /2 ..% - ./*I.,-4 7. MIAL, t./bt . 4 -/It==- 04*+ 1 1, . 1 N iplill.ill-W .L TION 2 - PROPOSED 4 ---- 1~ 26 p 3----.......â€¢604 f> ./ 2 /. Jr 1 -1 - T Â¥ .14 'f.- Ij*- =111.7 E 4 F il 1611 If Ill 'AK.: f 10 r ./ -<1 9~./. -1. -~ i---=A-4-- r 9 1 tÂ¢ 4 Â¢ I 4 .f 'll ': T .....U N.- - 1.1 9 . 11&41 -1 ' mir,i:JEJ+19*"5:.- I- = Cli 0 ...141 #*f - Â· a I ,- - -"..2 . r .q r- f-.72- - ---8.- .- -- 1/ * I '=.11: 4 -1- , *ij l~~~>/// 11,6 9.-h..4'. Â» I - -- -L"---DOUGÂ£ 61 2 "I'llillaisvillj.- 1.0....1-j.=Â«4- I . i LOCATION 3 - 4*N,~6 - 4-/lia- 1,24 - -ir-- hfif *i -I'lle/1/1/MIC./. ..2~ZE 1 1 ... 1 - I -I. - 1 ./ *.1 -1 :gr 1, . .....I r ?A -7 r f f ff f !1 ji 44 -1 1 4 1 Ft 4 11; IMI~ 1 * ' 1*/4, f Â· e.; r .,47 1 .6 Â·Â· 1 126 A; C .41 t;tÂ· Â· '7 1 0 f ' f g 1 -.1;-0 ju~il lmE'IR: I i 1 . ...4 -ilf 2 11 1 0 - . i ... -- 7 - --*92 .4/ â‚¬ p - 4 . *=-U--- r'16*42 r 4-I.- . -1 Oouit, * *14 lili./...U.....1 *. f - - * LOCATION 3- 0 - .....' 7 ,/4 . ' G . 490 L . f - ..---m. ....6- . -#a~-.an'#~- - .0.~ -117!: $ .1 ... . 162*-:~. imilmr-*105' J r * ' I - - . - N,W..2.Â·â€¢ - 1-, :,2-24- 21-Â· a 1/*024#9..~.4-' 19 4 0..ti:1;3* 1 . 34 4 - --- 1 -1.. ,4 ..3 , - Â· 1 ' I * 11 - -4, A- ... r. - .i ~ 4 k,41.Â¢I -1-7 . 11' 1?*1 1/1.. V A lf't,q.7-2, /2%/6.-/Â·Er --4- - $ 4 1 . P lip Yi ' :4). A-#Aff*fi x E . C.F...;. f.~ "~all- tr, 01+11 Â¢ , 1 ~532 ' 4 9 f 9/9/li'livnf- 121Â£~~ Ill/ , 1?L 1 . V .", - -- I.- 5 .... 9- r.-13*...#- 4 Â¢41 1 - Â£ 110/ 2 i ---.... I. .I Â«yu..././.-: -3~ #Mul'*/m"I.#I.").B.. 3/Fil lemm~~~'~,4- 1~2~ ,-- 4. 2 ..,L;,--5 // *'-'/' 5-;'-Q~~i:/'/Â·45; 2 /*64/mid'if , **C . U, =/5- Ut--9 - / \\ V'118 PM LOCATION 4 - EXISTING ~~i , 1 7, , rr .'Ad i - 1- .2 .....12%-77 1 lir- U.Â·-Â·; -. - 1?. t ~--=~~~---=~~~ i tr- -AN .: 1- . -mr Â· - - . ... 1 : 1.30.. f--tr# -lpi oÂ·: - 1 - 42* =79â€žtja -r . - 4 . $ -**' ... - * 1 -- 11 ~i <ev * ti r ' ~ =:Illâ€¢Jlk 1â€¢ . E. -9.- I -- t.* Il. #./.------./0 ..81- <-'1 - . 9- ' 1 --0.4 ~..... I.....'ll.-I S.- n . - I .t ....bill/ ,/i/.GAW'-i .*-- --4.4**w)- \ f .... 4, q /* . --.&/ -.~',4.- 4 .= el < -AA / LOCATION 4 - PROPOSED 410PM b 1.1.'* ..1 3 Â».aa 1 ~ Â·ft' A./All/*Ii.-.Vi)< Â¥ r ... . -/ i â€¢ '16 JU c... -9.-El Â»45 -r-,.1Rmr r .4 ... icy. 1 - 're .,01%. â‚¬ 4 -*.- '- .,/0/8,1~'HE ' ru .-4 r C .ix,4 -- ' N~N --*...... 4.--1 --1 T . 1Li*Â», -il-/.b' iwt. --* rit 1 11 -% i - Ic. L ~ Ill 7- CL '*, h h, 11,~0 i. 4- 1 - - , il 1-'i # - 4â€¢ 1.1/12 1~ I rti : ...., : i T r , 4- iflpy - â€¢ '1:- 0 - ll,Â· 75. 4- 1/hir /1 1 41 " . 1 1.4- -â„¢- - ~4'10 0-- A . i i .1.317 1- A.1. 1 A- = 6 - L.'iâ‚¬,UT.u? li?~Â·947-mÂ·. 6Â·99Â·,rÂ«... 118 PM LOCATION 5 - EXISTING a b U.....6 -./ -4 le: L + / < 70 -8 1/ 1 . ./ J 4/ r.,1.4, i 1,7 -r. . **r ,. V ./.-. . I --0 <tlyy414qb~*"~6* Â·.Â« im .i .*lr4r~7,<7~.*A# . a ",7,1 1 -V 3 1 #27./.5~*-. 4 4 3#322- - .1 . ....... i 911- 09 Â£11'/,wriil,1, Mi V.- â€¢0- *itikâ€¢ I I'--IrM 1- , %-1.- --5.--Il.-8-*BAN-m~ ia 1.1 -- 'ililiiA: Â»U . ti *I.ke' ,r ~,~423%8 PM LOCATION 5 - PROPOSED ... -- '---*4"19JI# AÂ»4-=Â·41.40'446;WAM'F'#'tk ): / 4 / , - /.55. lillill/illill/""Ill:lill. Ill""Imill"'llillillill'llill'll'll//IMIN'.-V/.44//.LIFG.~ .6. M i Â·Â· ilk tl L * 1 1 -V.--- Â· '.= 3- . ' I . ..r-- Â· . 99 - 4-16 . .-0 - -- 1 11 4,71 ;l ~*u'* ' ..: ./.- 1 7.09:*91 < ~ 4.-< 6 : 7- 1 Â¢11=k".W r Â®Adr.,1.- A- i ! mt'* 1~ -r 72*71 277 . 4 *9-- 1 '943 ./. 1 11.1 1--2~ 1 3- 0 - ...'. -.-:t... --=-â€¢--mmr- * /iQlai~'.~-. " AD- Â» I Le ~1!fh v LOCAT~N - k VA 1 . K Â«431-r .1 I â‚¬ 4 , ty â€ž1-1. '' * f~ ' '=f-~*3~ 1-y lr2-IZ.~+c~Â¥*-Â¥ELyjy~'~" -~~ ~Dt---- ~ ~ . * WI #-_ *Ikir -*2>1 1 -11-EIP Ill- - 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 lilli"ll . F e. - S Ar r- 11/./*11 111.wrL- -,4 (â‚¬. 6/fi:'/4///.1/*- Â¥ . I'llillill. â€¢ 0 al Wil#F-'; 5 .. , M~~ if w#Ar $--11-I-/.Ill - It 'Ii--% 3> 41 1 - ... --W , 4 , At .. . '.1.Il.3~.2#09,7.- ttlull/h"Ir- - %Lr- -- - - ~-9: I. i =35. m 141 e. 1 1044'llilltlit- _- f' . 1,"i n "*3 Ii LOCATION 6 lÂ©PROPOSED w 0Aviti liA A . \ 1 - 1- 1 21 L.4 - .1 A .....:Â·.i 1..../., - f 1 -- - ..1- 24 I 1 *Am/ A- . I .. * 1(398//4 e ! a g- 1 1 . {16. fl.I . I ~,~r .464., Mit 9.4% 44*Di*f 'L . a f * . . . 1 1%9 k , e. 7-, #*iii 1 * ./.1: -p-- 4 *124& i' , *; 1 -,1, - ~.y. 41.- ... 1 ....,- R , 7 14211 ./. /! I4 r ~ ~ }C~Â·; i,1 LOCATION 7 - NOT VISIBLE ....409 PM 9 :-Â» *-i'.t,all.@~ ..= 4. l . 1 >tr j '* .P I t . - U- ~ 1 - 1 , - - $ __ l. a + *Jil /&;, . * Irm. --* I , 23 ./ .4, 0 - F . #.' 7//' :' 4 . 1 2 , . --O 2 -'Â»7 9 1, 46 .4 9, i I .'...- 4111*...'".1 -----r --9 k 1 *__ ' 11-423<19 -:1- -9-2,1 ..1 F . 5- lj434 1 1- 1,Â· N.Cu,- E- 0 , r, - .. . tvtÂ¥ a 8/,E l lilil 1 ill//ml ....ilifilif'I...I##2 ~1#. ililri jililiz:#ir- r :Ihillillill:,5/ 9 -'- 1 /1 - 0/.da.11 0 -:.I - I...I-.- . J'1% .ill 11 i 1,1 - - 'I * , -~**<. 7.""9" R. M 1 19.1 . i' 1 *Â» 4-- =15, Immr m:t - 31.. 1 -1.jiliti.F --- - I --- 4=. $ 204.#/ I -1 - -IA. -L . C /.7/ . % 11 1 I 5,4 4~ |liCATION*. NOf~BLE ~ -Ill'-I ./ r i &... ./ dillillilliz.Irtrritii~~~lillillill .. Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with your application. This information -will help us review your plans and, ifnecessary, coordinate -with other agencies that may be involved. YES NO 0 0 Does the work you are planning include exterior work; including additions, demolitions, new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration? E Does the work you are planning include interior work; including remodeling, rehabilitation. or restoration? 0 0 Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this time? 0 0 In addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No Negative Effect and a building permit, are you seeking to meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation or restoration of a National Register of Historic Places property in order to qualify for state or federal tax credits? U If yes, are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in conjunction with this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are eligible. Owner-occupied residential properties are not.) E If yes, are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check all City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use: U Rehabilitation Loan Fund E Conservation Easement Program 0 Dimensional Variances 8 Increased Density [3 Historic Landmark Lot Split E Waiver of Park Dedication Fees 2 Conditional Uses El Exemption from Growth Management Quota System O Tax Credits Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 03/03/2008 11: 41 31057677~ KREVOY < PAGE 05/05 WHEREAS~ the Authority intends, upon the purchase of the Acquired Property, to execute a Lease Purchase Agreement with the City, and WHEREAS, the Authority and the City intend to re-condominiumize the Acquired Property after the purchase of the Acquired Property as follows: Unit A shall be re-condominjumized so that the West Main Theater and a portion of the Lobby becomes Commercial Unit 1 and the remaining theaters become Commercial Unit 2, as more particularly depicted in the plans (the "Plans") included as part of the Subleases between the City of Aspen and the Isi$ Retail Group, LLC and Independent Films. Inc.; and, WHEREAS, the City intends to sub-lease Commercial Unit 1 to the Isis Retail Group, LLC, for use as retail space, and Commercial Unit 2 to Independent Fjlms, Inc. (commonly known as FilmFest) for the operation of theaters; and WHEREAS, Krevoy consents to the re-condominiumization as described above pursuant to the Plans. NOW, THEREFORE, 11]e parties agree as follows: 1. Krevoy hereby consents to the re-condominiumization described above pursuant to the Plans and shall execute any requisite documents to comply and conform lo the Declarations to evidence their consent hereto. 2. The City Council of the City of Aspen shall within two (2) months of the closing on the purchase of the Acquired Property review, discuss, and consider an .amendment to the current Municipal Land Use Code provision that limits the square footage allowed for free market residential units in the City's Commercial Core (CC) Zone District to 2,000 square feet. The amendment to be reviewed, discussed and considered shall be an amendment to increase the limitation by no less than 500 square feet (the "Proposed Code Amendment"). Upon the approval of a Development Order from the City Council, Krevoy shall receive expedited service from the City of Aspen Building Department in processing any building permit submitted by Krevoy. 3. The Authority and City shall, as owner and tenant of the Acquired Property, consent to the re-development of Unit B (the free market residentia] unit owned by Krevoy) for the addition of up to 500 square feet for a bedroom and shall execute any requisite documents to 4 comply and conform to the Declarations to evidence their consent hereto. The Authority and the City represent and covenant that the sub-leases to Isis Retail Group, LLC and Independent Film, Inc. will not restrict or limit such addition to Unit B or give such sub-tenants any right to restrict such addition. 4. The Authority and City, as owner and tenant of the Acquired Property, shall consent to Krevoy' s right to maintain a storage in room 404 West; subject, however, to bujlding 712026.RED mfOHN nl/16/073.48 PM 2 03/03/2008 11:38 31057~1 KREVOY PAGE 02/06 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made this t~;1~day of /Â£22MF/*,7/, 2007, by the CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, (the "City") a home rate city and political subdivision duly organized and existing under tile constitution and laws of the State of Colorado, the CITY OF ASPEN PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY, (the "Authority") a Colorado nonprofit Corporation, and SUSANNE KREVOY SEPARATE PROPERTY TRUST ("Krevoy"). WITNESSE"IH: WHEREAS, the City has been duly organized and is validly existing as a home rule city under the Colorado Constitution and the home rule charter of the City; and WHEREAS, the Authority is a Cojorado nonprofit corporation that is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Colorado, and is duly qualified to do business in the State o f Colorado; and WHEREAS, the Authority contemplates the purchase of the following condominium units: Unit A, Isis Theater Condominiums according to the Condominium Map thereof, recorded on December 9, 1999, in Plat Book 52, Page 1 at Reception No. 438434 in the records of the office of the Clerk and Recorder of the County of Pitkin, Colorado, and as defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for Isis Theater Condominiums (the "Declarations") recorded on December 9, 1999, at Reception No. 438433 in said records; and Units C & D, Isis Theater Condominiums according to the Condominium Map thereof, recorded on December 9,1999, in Plat Book 52, Page 1 at Reception No. 438434 in the records of the office of the Clerk and Recorder of the County of Pitkin, Colorado, and as defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for Isis Theater Condominiums recorded on December 9, 1999, at Reception No. 438433 in said records (the "Acquired Property") as assignee of the Isis Property Group, LLC ('Isis Group") pursuant to the Purchase Agreement dated as of September 12,2006, between Isis Group and CC Aspen, LLC; and WHEREAS, Krevoy is the current owner of a free market residential condominium unit with a legal description as follows: Unit B, Isis Theater Condominiums according to the Condominium Map thereof, recorded on December 9, 1999, in Plat Book 52, Page 1 at Reception No. 438434 in the records of the office of the Clerk and Recorder of the County of Pitkin, Colorado, and as defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for Isis Theater Condominiums recorded on December 9, 1999, at Reception No. 438433 in said records. and, M 2026. RED IBJOHN 02/1 007]:4% â„¢ 1 03/03/2008 11:38 31057671~ KREVOY PAGE 03/06 code restrictions and access requirements for equipment maintenance; and, subject further, to future changes to said room as part of any remodel to the Isis Building. The Authority and the City represent and conveant that the sub-leases to Isis Retail Group, LLC and Independent Film, Inc. will not restrict or limit such storage room use or give such sub-tenants any right to restrict such storage room use. 5. The Authority and City, as owner and tenant of of the Acquired Property, shall consent to amendments to the Declarations that will authorize Krevoy to reconstruct the wall in the patio area adjacent to Krevoy's unit to allow an expansion of the patio in accordance with the appended map, Changes to the design of the wall and construction ate subject to applicable City building codes. All construction costs shall be the sole responsibility of Krevoy. The Authority and the City represent and covenant that the sub-leases to Isis Retail Group, LLC and Independent Film, Inc. will not restrict or limit such patio expansion to Unit B or give such sub- tenants any right to restrict such patio expansion. 6. City hereby covenants that the Isis Building shall be insured as of the date that the ownership of Commercial Unit A is conveyed to the Authority. Insurance for the Isis Building shall be kept in place by the Condominium Association, Evidence of said insurance shall be provided to Krevoy upon request. 7. City hereby covenants that the Condominium Association has been re-instated with the Secretary of State and that it shall continue to be maintained in good standing by the Condominium Association. City hereby covenants that it shall work with the Condominium Association to permit landscaping and a low boundary wall to be constructed in the open space in front of the Krevoy entrance. Said landscaping and low wall construction shall be designed, constructed and maintained at City's or the Authority's expense with the consent and cooperation of the Condomituum Association, 9. City hereby covenants that all construction that may take place as part of the remodel o f Commercial Unit A shall be in full compliance with the Aspen Municipal Code: and, particularly, in compliance with days and hours of construction permitted, In connection with such construction activities, the Isis Retail Group, LLC has represented to the City that construction activity will not start until April 9.2007, and will be completed before the start of the Aspen Food and Wine Classic (early June, 2007)Â· City has no ability to enforce this representation, but shall use its best efforts and powers of persuasion to ensure that the construction activity contemplated shall proceed during the above referenced dates. 10. City covenants that the theater operator has indicated that theater patrons that form a line to enter the theater shall be directed towards the west when the retail stores are not open for business. 11. City hereby covenants that a reasonable solution will be attempted, at the City's expense, to separate the entry buzzers to tbe Krevoy Unit B from the remaining other entry buzzers for Units C and D. <12,~f~ .tlde fal 0-7-1*Â£.Â· 4-- 712026,*D JBJOITN 02/I 6/07 3,48 PM ~ 03/03/2008 11:41 31057671I KREVOY PAGE 04/05 12. City hereby covenants that no venting from Commercial Unit 1 or Commercial Unit 2 shall open onto tbe pati.o/deck area adjoining Unit B and no venting shall be pointed towards Unit B. 13. City hereby covenants that it has spoken with Marshall Smith of Metropolitan/Rocky Mountain Resort Cinemas. Inc., operator of the Isis Movie Theaters in Aspen, and he has indicated a willingness to provide Krevoy with six (6) lifetime passes to the Isis Theater; provided, however, that the passes are not transferable and shall remain valid only during the period of time that Metropolitan/Rocky Mountain Resort Cinemas, Inc is exhibiting movies at the Isis Theater. 14. Except as otberwise provided herein, the provisions and covenants contained herein shall inure to and be binding upon the heirs, successors and assigns of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this instrument on the day and year above first written. CITY OF ASPEN PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY 87 // A g...0~...06/,0*I'-="K Iliesident- P7 CITY OF ASPE90 GQDORADO Helen Kalin KIS!10-drud, Mayor ATIpST: Kathryn S. tfh,'dii Clerk SUSANNE KREVOY SEPARATE PROPERTY TRUST Byl; ~t - ---c_p (2~64<A- C Trustee <2~~> ?12026.k.0 JBJOHN 02/16/07 3:48 PM 4 03/03/2008 11:38 31057677~ KREVOY PAGE 05/06 ISIS THEATER CONDOMINIUMS N, -BLOCK 87 oF PrnaN, STATE oF COLORADO ~1 N 2 5 .ALLE]LBLQCK--27 . 1 M..1 L ; r y ~ 1.* 1 1- 1 1 LiÂ·~1 11 10 - 1 =0.01 UII=Â°1 i. 6 1- t K 6/ alr : b|| -LiNTRAN- y 11 B (fl.CE) 0.11' . . I Xec LELL 0 84,4- PA.90 PATIO J 04.0 re'(0.0.6.3 Â£42. 2-.-=111.1~,J.,;1.11,~~3.-.7- :.1- ..M..1.1~'Ir.1~IT,TI .lili .~~1,1.~.~A-- / .1 1 i lilli I. i : 11 MED,1 1 - W ZI 11 VA 45,4' . mi 42 9 .UOâ€¢' i / lili U i 1 1Â»+4 ' - bri U. t k,14 M ' 1 F 4.-1 / lili 1 1 3 I â€¢ .- -9- 499= .4 41 (Lot UNIT 0//1 3 2 11 l A -- i / i l / i /,m l/ ff'it AÂ©Â£ UNIT B> / 1{!ilitiilj LOT N (44,Â£ 3 % 2 R b J 1 1 i i ? hUNROO HE):H~ 03/03/2008 11:38 310576~ KREVOY PAGE 04/06 EXHIBIT A MAP OF KREVOY PATIO EXPANSION (see attached page) 712026.RED INOMN DZ/]6/07 3:49 PM A-1 .. Fire Safety Note Abbreviations: 1 All building matenals stored at the construction area and/or in any area of the building are to be secured in a locked area. Access to suck areas is to be controlled by the Owner and/or the General Contractor. A Astragal KIT Kitchen 2 All materals to be stored in an orderly manner ADD Addendum L Length 3 All flammable materials to be kept tightly sealed in their respective containers. Such ADJ Adjustable LAM Larninated materials are to be kept away from all heat sources, 4 All flammable matenals to be used and stored in adequately ventilated spaced. AFF Above Finish Floor LAV Lavatory 5 All electrical power to be shut off where there is exposed conduit AHU Air-Handling Unit LT Light 6 All electrical power in the construction area to be shut off after working hours, ALT Alternate M Mirror 7 The contractor /11. at all times. make sure there is no leakage of natural gas in the ALUM Aluminum MAT Material building, or any flammabte gas used in construction. APPROX Approximately MAX Maximum 8 The contractor shall provide fire sponkler protectin throughout the building The ARCH Architect, Architectural MB Marble contractor shall be responsibie for preparing drawings and specificdons and obtaining the B Base MECH Mechanical permits for the fire sprinkler system. The fire sprinkler system must meet the requirements o:f BLDG Building MEMB Membrane all applicable codes and ordinances BOÂ«3 Blocking MIN Minimum General Demolition Notes BO By Others MLDG Molding 1 Demolition and removal of existing walls. partitions ceitings denoted and graphically BR Bedroom MO Masonry Opening indicated BRD Board MTG Mounted 2 Remove al existing mechanical items, plumbing, piping and electrical componer:Is in BRK Brick MTL metaINIC Not in Contract their entirety except as specified BSBD Baseboard NO Number 3 Work initiated to the exterior of the existing building is Wrnited to the areas noted and BSMT Basement NOM Nomi nal graphically Indicated on the drawings Any other exterior work shall not be initiÂ»d without BTM Bottom NTS Not to Scale the prior wntten consent and knowledge of the building authonty and architectural designer. BTWN Between OA Overall 4 The contractor shall provide all required protection and measures throughout the demoliaon and removal work for the listing exterior of the building the existing interior C Carpet, Cornice OC On Center space to remain and the existing adjacent finishes and items which are N I C. CAB Cabinet OD Outs1de Dimension, Outside Diameter 5 The performance of any demolilion work by the contractor or any sub-contrac:or shall be CH Ceiling Height OH Opposite Hand executed in accordance with the building code of the State of Cobrado and /11 other CL Center Line, Closet OPP Opposite applicab!/ codes and regulations CLG Ceiling P Paint, Panel 6 The contractor shall obtain, prior to the commencement of the demolition work and with CLR Clear PL Plastic Laminate the consent of the base building management and owner of such work, all lecal and regulatory permits as may be required for demolition, containers. carting. hauling public way COL Column PLUM plumbing access or clos'ng, and the dIsconnection and shut-off ofal ublities as may be required CONC Concrete PLYWD Plywood 7 The contractor is required the repair any imperfections to existing surfaces caused by the CONT Continuous POL Polished demolition process with the same of like materials unless specifically indicated otherwise on CP Ceiling Paint PT Paint the drawings and/or specifications. CRS Courses PTD Painted 8 The contractor shall remove all door & jamb sets as indicated on drawings & save for CT Ceramic Tile PVC Poly Vinyl Chloride eventual reinstallati,]n 9 The contractor shall remove all light fixtures & mechanical grills as indicated on drawings CTG Coating QT Quarry Tile and save for eventual re-installation DBL Double R Risen Chair Rail DH Double Hung RAD Radius DIA Diameter RD Roof Drain General Notes DIAG Diagonal RE Refer to 1 All work and matenals furnished shall comply with The State of Colorado BuildinG Code. The State of Colorado Fire Code The State of Colorado Regulations. the regulations of the DIFF Diffuser REF Refrigerator, Reference Namonal Board of Fire Underwriters National Fire Protective Association Requirements and DI M Dimension REFL Reflected all Federal. State. and Municipal authorities having jurisdiction over the work. DISP Disposal REQ Required 2 Before ordering any matenals or do ng any work. each Yade shall verify all DN Down REV Revision measurements at the building and shall be responsible for correctness of the same No extra DR Door RH Right Handed charge or compensation will be allowed on account of difference between actual dimensions DTL Detail Rm Room and Ihe measurements indicated on the drawings any discrepancies between the drawings and field conditions wh ch may be found shall be submitted to the architectural designer for DWG Drawing RO Rough Opening EXIST Existing RTD Rated consideration and clarilication before proceeding with the work. The contractor shall be responsible for any deviations from the contract documents ELEC Electrical SC Solid Core, Skim Coat 3 All Ihe architectural designer's drawings and construction notes are complimentary and ELEV Elevation SECT Section what is called for by either will be binding as if called for by all: any work shown or referred to ENCL Enclosure SH Shelf on any one drawing shall be provided as shown on all drawings EQ Equal SHT Sheet 4 The work to be performed cons,sts of furnishing all labor equipment, too~s EQUIP Equipment SHWR Shower transportation supplies. fees. materials. and services in accordance with these notes and EXP Expansion Slm Siliar drawings: and indudes performing all operations necessary to construct and install comp1ete. EXT Exterior SPEC Specification in satisfactory condition, the varlous malena's and equipment at the locations shown. 5 Full size or large scale detai's or drawings shall govern small scale drawings which they FC Field Check SQ Square are intended to amplify FD Floor Drain, Fiele Dimension SS Stainless Steel 6 The standard specifications of the manufacturer for products called for in drawings and FF Finish Foor ST Stone notes are hereby made part of these notes with the same force and effect as though herein FIN Finish STD Stained written out in full. FIX Fixture STL Steel 7 All matenals required for the performance of this work shall be new and of the best FLR Floor SUSP Suspended quality of the kinds specified The use of old or second-hand materials is strictly forbidden FO Finisn Opening SYM Symmetrical except for locations on the drawings that refer to removal and relocation of materials or equipment Materials shall be used in accordance with the manufacturer's specificallons FOW Face of Wall T Tread, Trim The contractor shall submit all product warranties. The contractor shall warranty all work as FR Fire-rated T&G Tongue and Groove per State of Colorado regulations DT Foot TAN Tangent 8 The prem ses and Job site shall be maintained in a reasonably neat and orderly condition DAGauge period. The contractor shall remove all crates, cartons and other trash from the work areas TEMP Tempered , Temporary and kept free from accumulation of waste materials andj rubbish during the entire construction GALV Galvanized THK Thick each day and shall be responsible for its proper disposal The prem:ses shall be protected GC General Contractor TO Trimmed Opening throughout construction and shall be turned over in spotless and orderly condition. All GL Glass, Glazing TYP Typtal fixtures and equipment will be left In undamaged bright, clean, and polished condit,on GR Grade UON Unless Otherwise Noted 9 Al! work shall be subject to final inspection by the architectura! designer. GWB Gypsum Wall Board UTIL Utility 10. At! plumbing and e~ectrical work shall be performed by persons licensed in their trades. HOR Horizontal VT Vinyl Tile 11. The contractor shall take all necessary precautions to insure the safety of the building. its HM Hollow Metal VIF Verify in Field occupants and the general public during construction. HT Height W Washer 12 The contractor mil abide by all the rules and regulations set forth by the building's legal HVAC Heating, Ventillation, Air-Conditioning W/ With managing agent noting particularly any restrictions on no se, use of public entries use of ID Inside Dimension, Inside Diameter WC Water Closet, Wall Covering power tools. timely and proper debris removal. materials, storage, and established working hours IN Inch WD Wood 13 The contractor shall be responsible for providing a radon mitigation system throughout INS Insulation, Insulated WF Wood Flooring the building which shall meet the requirements of all appticable codes and ord,nances. INT Interior W/O Without including the efficient building ordinance section 11 5 The contractor shall be respons,ble for JT Joint WP Water-proof prepanng all drawings and specifications required for this radon mitigation system 14. All dimensions take precedence over the scale of drawings UON All dimensons areto the face of stud or to the face of concrete U O. N All exterior sluds to be 2X6 UON all interior studs to be 2X4 U.0 N. 15 All interior stud walls & ceilings shall have 3 W sound attenuation batts U O N. 16. No portion of the construction operations whch requires a shop drawing or a sample submission shall commence until the submission has been reviewed and approved by the contractor then reviewed ancj approved for design intent only by the architectural designer All such construction operations shall be in accordance with reviewed show drawings and samples. 17 Shop drawings are required for all shop fabricated work This work indudes. blit is not limited to exterior and interior Rnish matenals, structural and decorative steel and built-in cabinetry. 18. Product submittals are required for all individually specified products including but not limited to doors, w,ndows. e'ectr,cal fixbres plumbing, appliances and hardware 19. The contractor is responsib,e for providing all access pane~s as required by governing codes to all voids, attics. etc .. The contractor must verify the type required with the architect prior to installation of sa d panels. General Safety Notes 1 Construchon work will be confined to the immediate area of work and will not create dust, dirt, or olher such inconveniences to surrounding properties 2 Construction operations will not block sidewalks or means of egress for tenants of the adiacent buildings wlthout 36 hours prior written notification. 3 Construction operations will not involve interruption of heating, water. fire alarm or electncal services to the other tenants of the building 4 Construction operations shall be restricted to the hours ind:cated by building authorities Except in the case of emergency and notification of the building authority 5 The contractor and sub-contractors shall be responsible for any property damage of the building owner or the personal property of any persons of the building due to the construction operations. 6 Strict superv~sion shall be maintained at all times during the course of construction operations as to minimize inconvenience to persons of the building and adJacent properties 7 Dunng and follow,ng demolition each contractor shall be respons,ble for the rerroval from the premises all debris and products of the demolition not designated for reuse The site shall be left broom clean at the end of each working day, 8 Refuse from construction operations is the sole responsibihty and expense of the contractor and the sub-contractors. Refuse shall be disposed of,n separate dumpsters or bins maintained at an approved location in the front of the building. Dumpsters and Sns must be removed on a weekly bas s. Construction matems shall be maintained and stored or the slte with the approval of the building authority. or on the street during the course of de,ivery. 9 Consouction work will be confined to the ind:Gated areas and will not create dust or other such inconvenience to the other adjacent properties 10. Construction operations will not block sidewalks dnveways or means of egress for tenants of adJacent properties 11. Demolition: All debrs and products of demoation not designated for refuse shall be removed from the premises and legally disposed of. The site shall be left broom clean al the end of every working day .. PROJECT INDEX e \\\ EHEETINDEX RECEIVED ID Name CVR COVER FORUM PHI A01 GENERAL NOTES AO 2 FARANALYSIS LJ 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 MAR 172] P.O. Box 1606 A03 VIEWPLANE Basalt, Colorado 81621 D21 DEMOLITION PLAN CITY OF ASPEN - PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX 866.770,5585 A21 FLOOR PLAN COMMUNITY DELELOPMENT Isis Addition A2 2 ROOF PLAN A23 ROOF PLAN A31 ELEVATIONS 406 E. Hopkins Ave A41 SECTIONS Aspen, Colorado 81611 A61 ASSEMBLIES -CONSULTANTS- Suzie Krevoy SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR GEOTECH #GEOTECH STRUCTURAL #STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL #MECHANICAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPEARCHITECT CIVIL ###t# CONTRACTOR PROJECT SITE - #CONTRACTOR 4.. ... 0-...2.-bl . E=f 1'& 4.-4 I i .-Â«, " & R.'-trA' i I. c ,-Â·-44-.,4...T~Li: , . 4,*sZZ>- ~1 ~ ~ '; ~ . , R.S'ra pup .~ ~01.1 AIL.~. . 4,1.-Â»*rj r. . 9*Â·0 - .''e.- souf'!.~~E,Â·., ~ , t..mc-4* .., i h.....k- . .0 NC .PA 7 -t . .---Â·7~Â·o:~j',~ .n:~~..1.-2...:.f#' Â·,- ->3.9: : -~-4 41 K 'Ringur, 9 -* Â·Â·a ., - 31.-1.,1 'Â·.' ' .>AM, 1~* _ q-~-~2~~ AN'J A..MA -_Â· 4.7.#4#JL, ~Â·~.~.4:ti;~I.j. ~8-9-sâ€¢j,4? .,i~ ! , -Â·fFJ-,-'?31.-\ r , ;6-9.4.2-i .*7 ~:Â·wujp.~ft-~-.r~i.,~~.furt/GR.. 3,Â·._Ly<.9 9 37Â·9 1 9 1 m.=- li HPC 2/01/08 DESIGN REVIEW ti44.'1031 .4 MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 4.49-,21*LE*#*Goe**4*5:.WO~% 2, jA-24- .....'~.,4.c.%-- >il, 4-i, -3Â·Â·Â·>.~3~ Â·. 3-4 PROJECT NO: 0720 Â· DRAWN BY: SMW EqÂ·, -->,-z.j' ''-Â£44'Pf.'*-Mt,2/Â·7.-2*114-:&6&/14<$*ms/J<- -:.- -':s . .: c.. SHEET TITLE . Â«4Â§â€¢=*rk,-:-*..429 L:' i - 0 PÂ·-Â» 2=-4 i ' 31 .2 COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC M .R-5 PUD Â·---' -FENZ#%.. "' 't-~'Â·7 7:52 2. R.15 â€¢UP~.,jt;*5;hiR+SWJ, rift#tif),<4Â·3,Â¥4~:*Abrn,P:,Str--i-,i'9.i.4.0 0-3.22~Â· AO. 1 '44*.LI <4. rk-*A 444.-274.t... ....46.H 'Tf 3101~..~~~~2~1432, PLÂ«4~ f.vtl- Â·11 - .--"cl > Â· .../'~3-4,fa,>.40> 7 -d. fllCPUDi,9.:-~.-22~~ 'r' .. Â· - -17*:4'.-*IM+414 --' *Fi:f Me~'*~*~6Â· ,-3221~1.3.. P "//" . 4694. .: '.64 <. f. /5, Pur, c al'. -Â· -1.-Uli ,; ~FT/' -%.k.JU': ~.~44-0 - GENERAL NOTES .... dp 44 0 4 ' M . FORUM PHI 428 SF - NET LIV L 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 Basalt, Colorado 81621 PO. Box 1606 PHONE 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 4 1 1 L '12.6 4. i- ~~' PROPOSED F.A.R. CALCULATION 406 E. Hopkins Ave Isis Addition 44 < /43/#; E In .4 T. - ./ ~tat976-bF~kNEI+NABLE~. -~ 4 ~\~ i i -Ed 0 - 1 [=35-- N \ r.=0 1 - ... 1 \ \Irl 3 C . /1 I - 12 (D ALLOWABLE FAR 2,000 SF - NET LIVABLE Aspen, Colorado 81611 El \11 181 1 'â€¢ 44- 41 ty , 2, ' 1 + il : 11 2- TDR 500 SF Suzie Krevoy r 1.-1-Â» 4 â‚¬ Â· \ - - . 1 - %.-9 M , 4 \ . ' \ 1 - I 25 + TOTAL ALLOWABLE NET LIVABLE 2,500 SF - NET LIVABLE CONSULTANTS 1 /1 ALLOWABLE DECKS (15%) 300 SF SURVEYOR . '' 1 0 1 . .4 , EXISTING UNIT NET AREA 1,970 SF #SURVEYOR -O PROPOSED NET AREA 498 SF , TOTAL UNIT NET AREA 2,468 SF - NET LIVABLE : 49%:-J GEOTECH CEO< . â€¢I ies,2 s.- #GEOTECH e - - 0 ..... Zesâ€¢~ i STRUCTURAL -- -Â©Te-~-2 '0.-'. 2 -. 9 #STRUCTURAL 0 0 0 0 LE) 0 MECHANICAL #MECHANICAL 1 UNIT B -PROPOSED 1/8" = 1'-0" LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 4241 CIVIL 'Il- k=~-.=-_~~-r-n - th -3 \Â·iÂ·3. Â£ 4 /1 1 ..1 .'.1.... & 1 to...OvED I 9/1 V-,4 0 ExelNe CONTRACTOR tÂ» 1 -41*j ke 1 >-41 ~ MECH#CAL Â· #CONTRACTOR 4 LT 11 x 1 + 4% 1 21.3 1 Arl - DECK EXISTING F.A. R. CALCULATION 49- LOW?+4~LN#BCE<.... 2*0, 9 - - -- - -3 14 9-4 7- ALLOWABLE FAR 2,000 SF -NET LIVABLE f 64: 1 1 .. ALLOWABLE DECKS (15%) 300 SF P.. .Al i Bil -If 1 1 127-1 i 4 ...Â· k Â·- 4 UNIT NET AREA 1,970 SF a 3 2 HPC 2/01/08 DESIGN REVIEW UNIT GROSS AREA 2,070 SF Q MARK DATE DESCRIPTION .-EJ 3 - - -- -- -Â® - PROJECT NO, 0720 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC l*OK 1 '...Smâ€ž~ - ---O - 7 , . SHEET TITLE 1 ; ....... I @ (i) V - AO.2 80Â®Â®9Â® 2 UNIT B - EXISTING 1/8" = 1 '-0" FARANALYSIS .... f[(ALMILABL - - -, -- -- - ----- ----- ------ ----- -- ---- -- --- 0 -- -- .~ 1- -- - -- ----- - -- -- -- - - --- - - -- -- - -- ---.-- ---- -- -- -------~ -----99 -2-PEAE-3- - --- \ --N-**3.-- -- -- - - FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 P.O. Box 1606 Basalt, Colorado 81621 PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX 866.770.5585 A.H. UK IT A ~ FREE MARKETADDITION Â· 1 9Â»*- E-1-9 UPPER LYL._Ck Isis Addition 1 1 1 1_,3-'71 ~ f 1 Ilj f L 1 1"-9 -' 1-UVI I I 406 E. Hopkins Ave i Â· -- flj 11 --- =21.417-5-p 7 MECH NE|-r' 84- - - Aspen, Colorado 81611 i r Suzie Krevoy n r r-/ _*#faL_ l,_[--11 ,-r-.1 -13)- n 0 sh q#-: PROJ.0/L rj 112-3 9 I THEATER A ELÂ·111-107 99 CONSULTANTS n # r sh"04**AL : SURVEYOR 1 - n 1 0 54!Zi - - : . tr.4***r-- #SURVEYOR -1 MAIN LVL. Ch tyl 29 44=/3/22.- )2/////EL01<7-.Ifr 50040" ~ 7908.54 GEOTECH 095-,cr : J L K -Â· #GEOTECH 1 1 1 ~ 1 1-1 1 1 1/ , 9 PRQU-ya /2. STRUCTURAL * 5709. THEATER D 1 1 1- 1 ' ELÂ·86' ir VI/ #STRUCTURAL 83'-6. 1 ~ - 7 Ill- n .3.-C-f~~T- . , MECHANICAL I *STOR. 117 #MECHANICAL q,Â· v ,-. ili 1 ,/ I ... ..4 EL.74'-9 977Â£ Â· LOWER EVE. 0 IÂ·Â·~ 1 73'-0, ' R '.~-1 i LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPEARCHITECT 2 VIEWPLANE SECTION 1/8" = 1'-0" CIVIL #### Â«Â«'.4-3 [I Â«1-11 CONTRACTOR #CONTRACTOR 00 L Or'~ Jil- HPC 2/01/08 DESIGN REVIEW MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO: 0720 DRAWN BY SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE PROJECT SITE AO.3 (96 VIEWPLANE PER VIEWPLAI\IE VIEWPLANE PLAN 1 " =50' EXTERIOR MATERIAL TO BE REMOVE D: STRUCTURAL FORUM PHI WALL TO REMAIN 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 231 CUT AND REMOVE EXTERIOR SLAB & P.O. Box 1606 TAPEREDINSULATION \ PREPARE STRUCTURAL SLAB TO RECIEVE Basalt, Colorado 81621 INTERIOR FINISHES TO MATCH EXISITNG PHONE 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 ~ ~- ~~--~ --- i Isis Addition rf=rl ' ~ # i--ir/ - 11- -1 . I. ; 1 L-j I 1 l--J 1 L_irr--3-r---Til__1 -4~ 406 E. Hopkins Ave En-_ 1 1; 11 lili L/ [ REMOVE WINDOWAND PREPARE AREA TO RECIEVE DOOR ! l 2 --____ Aspen. Colorado 81611 Suzie Krevoy l it , 1 1 , 1 -\\ .... - 1 1 14 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Al zi~ 1.- VALL.OBEREMOVED[ I , j j CONSULTANTS N AND FLOOR TO BE L__ 2 L---1 1--U Ul--7 REFINISHEDTO MATCH~ | 1~ | L_____J ~ MECHANICAL ~ ~ SURVEYOR ~ 1,1 #SURVEYOR 1 - + 14 1 1 -1, REMOVE DOORAND PREPARt : X AREA TO CONTINUE WALL - I ------------------ GEOTECH #GEOTECH 1 1 0 1 REMOVE MUD UNITAND PERPARE < , AREA FOR PANTRY UNIT STRUCTURAL #STRUCTURAL 1 4 - I- -___/_3232 ---I--- - - MECHANICAL j 0--4 4 -4 4- -7 #MECHANICAL EXISnNG CONDO REMOVE DOOR AND PERPARI AREA ' ----~ FOR LARGER CASED OPENING ~._ . 1 3 6==T- 1 ,-1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT -1 #LANDSCAPEARCHITECT 1 , 2-1. 1 0 1 1 -1.-ce--L- 1 1-1. -1 1 ,-4,-; 1 1-g 7------7 0,--- 1-9- 7 1 ' | 1 1111 1 173 I-- PORTION OF EXISTINS ~ % â€¢ PARAPEr FNALL n 1 & 1 bl; 1 ~ i TO BE ReMOVED --------- . CIVIL #### 8 i 111 11 1 ----- J 1 Li=P_LA_-_J 1 l_c 26 - 2 PAL-i 1 Ll 32 1. h 0 / L J C' -r-? 4 <, J L 2-4-J (71-' - CONTRACTOR # NTRA T R r ,\-/ / '463 2-1 _.._ .._. . _.._. _ __.~_. ; _.._ _._ ._ _ _ ._ ._._- j _*-_.._._- _-._ Â®----.1 ------- + -- --L.-- --- , , ---- r - -- - - - - -- ~8~ 18' HIGH TEMP. LASS GUARD- 31,1 ~~ RAIL AT HOT mle PECK EEPSE - eR e lea. I i ~ TEMP. GLASS GUARDRAIL - ,-- 1 DECK - pwoor> 57,5 /2 -1 1' -- - Be Hle}41 HANDRAJL 1 (BOTH SIDES) , 5 mit 1 :. 1 1 -- --- I HPC 2/01/08 DESIGN REVIEW -~-- TEMP GLASS GUARDRAIL ~h di 1 - -fl 1 1-_-_tel i ' IMARK DATE -DESCRIPTION JZZE------7 ' ~ 4 -- -- RAISED DECK ----Â·-- 4 464 Â£'v EXISTING DRAINAGE TO REMAIN) PROJECT NO: 0720 : DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC 03 1 1 1 ) SHEET TITLE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 4 0 9 Â® Â® Dal D-1 DEMO PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" DEMOLITION PLAN .... 512>'' 17'-5 1 ' // /12 . 10Â·-6- ~, 2-7~'N 2' ,* 5'-~1Â°Z ~* 3Â·dll'. '' 4 4-8.7 ,Â«5. I '1 1 FOR'UM PHI l--... 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 R O. Box 1606 ~ ' ~ \ Basalt, Colorado 81621 - Â»=t~- ~.ThEEERE---LIPIREEYE 11Â· ~- ry-: 12rr,4 n 3 Fr-1-1 ~ ~ '7 -Er-*7 ///////////////I it (-33 0 ~i - 1 1- -1 1 9 1,3 .d f PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 1 l_ O A-%- I ~46~~ Isis Addition j 6 P GUEST - - BATH GUEST CLOSET 64 1 It 0 8/0 Ill Â© T_- r -----------------1 406 E. Hopkins Ave 1 , i Aspen, Colorado 81611 11 IC 1 1 Suzie Krevoy L - -_ .0 M - (64 1.- 1 \ 0-1 Il=11 // 1 4-1.2 71Â·-7- â€ž , 3Â·-11 / ,i , s *_ ! MECHANICAL ,~ I ./ - b N L...\ [1~1 n 1 L-JIN-rn'7~~~ ~ A-k' 'V & $1 ~ SURVEYOR 87 1 4.112 , <4% # 6 V - 4'.1% CONSULTANTS 1/ 1 1\ , #SURVEYOR M mt --3-j 1 i====h 1 :412---- - - 1 EGUEST SUIT~ --- 0 0 GEOTECH 100 '1 4 - 1 V b 11 - 0 - ~ ----i__.! #GEOTECH 0- Ilte 1 . i h, I L_11 0 E 1 1 If=f 2-â‚¬) : 1 /7 9109-\ A ,< 1 k tri-- #STRUCTURAL â‚¬3 41 STRUCTURAL 1 ID O 1- -----"------- 7- 1 \\4/ h : 1 C - r--44- - 4' -7 I MUD ROOM ~ OFFICE I , -- 101 1 i EXISTING CONDO 4 I AREA MECHANICAL a a (910 /-- 491 / #MECHANICAL 01_6-112-2267 ..- + ----.- 1 4 - -_t . r -3 1 #LANDSCAPEARCHITECT 1 9~ [J 21 4 /3 <1_~\ 1-=~i-,~,+ Â© /~---7- ~~- ~ ~V~ / 49 ----- 1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1 1 1 11\ 1 1 / 3/31 A,/ 5-4' , | h!! 1 :Ta tr'I F - ~-4' ~ L k ----1 I ir-un i Inc<:46~#1,8 1 3 1 >I ! \14 4 1 1{01111Â© i 1 1 1 1 dll 1 I , 6 â‚¬* 10 -8 --911 1 ' :H 1 /74 fT\ 66 17Â·5 0 1 / | CIVIL 1 1 111 1/1 - krt_U 0-- ~ 94~ j ; 1 FIt.r 1-42_21__-2 - --4 ' & LE 9 11 -1 -- 4.U E r H n ( 1 J 1\ 11 /9 4 11 - -- - E--61 L b CONTRACTOR #CONTRACTOR UP 692 -1 I -1 7.00+ 1 DECK i i ] 1-----r--Â·Â·Â·-- hoop emps 10 1 4 7 ~~Â® W ;_ _~~_ __ _*p HieH IANDRAIL j (BOTH SIDES.) ~ 1 76 -- -1 1 i i v ~--,-- TEMP. SLASS aUA RAIi-93 HPC 2/01/08 DESIGN REVIEW RAISED DECK Â· 4 ..IM.-'...--,P--9. - --f... .- - EXISTINEÂ· PRAINAE To REMAIN) --- --------~- - ------ ------- - -- ---- -- ------ -- - -- - --- ----- U---- --9- --- .-- -~~ MARK DATE DESCRIPTION - ---- 1 1 [Â¢31 1 1 1 - i PROJECT NO: 0720 1 ! - | 1 1 DRAWN BY: SMW i j COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC j~A - I i ' SHEET TITLE i ~AB,F Â© Â® Â® A2.1 -- l' .'1 1 ADDITION - 1 -U FLOOR PLAN ~WNER CLS 0 . . . FORUM PHI 1/\j 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 PO. Box 1606 Basalt, Colorado 81621 NEW SKYLIGHT TO MATCH PHONE 970 279 4157 FAX 866.770 5585 EXISTINGS (TYP OF 6) 2 L____3 L Isis Addition i 9 1 1 111 lili:Ii'll 406 E. Hopkins Ave i , ! Â· Aspen, Colorado 81611 i PROPOSED :i,1 ; | Suzie Krevoy 2 CONSULTANTS STANDING SEAM - T- 1- A VAULTED ROOF ~ 0'j =* i TO MATCH ~ ] 1 4 1 Bill 4*4 Il â€ž p .1 SURVEYOR 4%05* i : - 19*~83333* : El 1 â€ž = 1 #su RVEYOR ' ' 1 MECHANICAL 1 RE U#*4: . ~ 11 N . 1 GEOTECH : kE:2%4 - - - -- #GEOTECH *M- -I-I F.. '-Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·9Â·Â·Â·.Â·V 4*. 1 l STRUCTURAL #STRUCTURAL EXISTING 1 1 i ~ 1'! -----~ MECHANICAL i . Â· STANDING SEAM i VAULTED ROOF i | #MECHANICAL Mi"; 1 * 245: ~ 42*21 i Â·Â· LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 4 i /*Vil:Ii 1 :%30%: 01 - 1 -- 1 - 1 0-1 r L :11. 3 0 : #LANDSCAPEARCHITECT li. 1 EXISTING STANDING SEAM CIVIL #### 4 VAULTED ROOF ' CONTRACTOR #CONTRACTOR -- - ------- - -- --- -- -- ---~ 1 1 UP 1 eme -1 4-- I 1 - -1 1 DECK I < - r .-_._.___ woop STEPS 1 1 Â· wr id I ' ' 9,; 1->U-- - - 36" HleH HANDRAIL i in'.- (BOTH SIDES) ' 1 HPC 2/01/08 DESIGN REVIEW 1 . ' MARK DATE DESCRIPTION -- ------6---I-- - 1 /-Zi 1--- - TEMP. eLÂ»69 WARDRAIL t-43-1-- - 1 __44_._3 RASED DECK -- Â·--- -Â·> PROJECT NO: 0720 DRAWN BY: SMW (EX,STINS DRAINAaE TO QEMAIW - - 1 ----. 1 - - (8 - ---------- --- ------ -- - }------- --- ----- ------1----J-- : ------ ----~--------------- - ---- --------- __ _ _ _ ~ COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC ! SHEET TITLE { A2.2 1 001> 1 1 4 4 0 8 4 ROOF PLAN 2 ENLARGED ROOF PLAN 1/4" = 1-0 222&02*fesgi . -. 0 6/22/E. FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 RO. Box 1606 Basalt, Colorado 81621 PHONE 970.279.4157 FAX: 866 770,5585 Isis Addition 406 E. Hopkins Ave Aspen, Colorado 81611 EXISTING STANDING SEAM UFLUE DFIL E Siizie Krevoy VAULTED ROOF - -. . --.- ---- - -L 1 AHU - CONSULTANTS is, SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR FLAT ROOF GEOTECH #GEOTECH 1 1 STRUCTURAL #STRUCTURAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 PROPOSED 4% IL ~ Â· ~STANDING SEAM ' 1 1:1 1 14% &0%1 VAULTED ROOF T E---M--1#1 MECHANICAL . 1 Fed TO ATCH 111 1-*44 | AfECH. #MECHANICAL :; 1 Eal ~ ~ UNg i 3, 1 kÂ¥. 'a 111'P k E~<ISTI-1 st-DI-1SEA~ ~ ~ ~ ~*7 11. Le ~ 1 soox.:- ' LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPEARCHITECT VAULTED ROOF , gm: Ill , .,0Â¥:~ 1.-- -------------r - CIVIL i i Â· ' tkill, ~MT;::0 ' I 3 E EXISTING | i , 5 , STANDING SEAM i 1 i; ' : 1 : VAULTED ROOF i f j: ' 1 3 i 1 CONTRACTOR 1 i #CONTRACTOR r---r---=774 it F L -- SNOW PEACE ; LTHRU T ' OVERFL '1 ---PLAN=rER -- -----Â·> ~ FINISH ' Il Elli 1 HPC 2/01/08 DESIGN REVIEW MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO: 0720 ROOF PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0" DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE A2.3 ROOF PLAN =21 .\1 FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 P.O. Box 1606 Basalt Colorado 81621 - 1 11'll PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX, 866.770.5585 Isis Addition 406 E. Hopkins Ave 1--- Aspen, Colorado 81611 _a_ El r=-w===In 9 -4211 3-22 3 - 1-1 11.2 1 1892 1 911 U Suzie Krevoy _ Â·-r-~Â· 'rÂ·Â·Â·1Â·Â·-4-Ur_I CONSULTANTS i . r 7 -1 I -1 r 1 -4- - 7---- 2 -9-2-19~=~- -f -3 [-*-P Elf-/ ---- --4,+6 -_ _ _ . 17-L -- I . i ..w ~--un SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR %1_1-r' '<4-17 14 7- E-7 - -- -------------------- 964 4 -1-1 --A L_1 GEOTECH 7-- -- - --- ---- - - ~~ ~ - #GEOTECH ----- --r - iftÂ«Â«-9-9Â«F-]6 4 .Â· 4/ - -------' W.-#-I-Â·-----_ -'-7-21 i -# e -=!1 1 - - - / A r. ~------ 21- 4.111 111 1, - p ./.- '/ -- ----- - . --- - STRUCTURAL ; - 6~4+0_ zÂ£Ey 2 I. 22 _** r__ - rÂ·-Ir ErÂ·trLIfÂ· L.--4 #STRUCTURAL -T CIELICItra-- 1-2-17 ------ 1 0 - . .- A *432]I (I) (Ill[LIL] CI, OL-azEEP[L]L~REEN~3~p===4 811__-r--3_ ..~ MECHANICAL .IWIL #MECHANICAL 1 77 --_ - - Â·Â· ~ Fl / lili -ZIn-IZIL- 1 iFF-JIL i 1-2- 91 f==7 3 1 11 ./11 R- 11 1 7 *EFT - 1- 1 1 1 1 li -------~ - 3 === I al- --------- LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ,-- u 'll------ --man._22_nULLUL #LANDSCAPEARCHITECT 1/ 1 lir- --4=.Let.=.i-;19#14.-/f 1 / 1 01- r . -1.......1 1 19 i'm:r- - C _._ CIVIL #### 1 FRONT ELEVATION .1/4" - 1'-0" CONTRACTOR # NTRACTOR HPC 2/01/08 DESIGN REVIEW MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO 0720 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE A3.1 ELEVATIONIS . 0 . . / f , ipli -- -------- FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 P. O. Box 1606 ~ ~ PHONE 970.279 4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 Basalt, Colorado 81621 - - -4& 1/ Isis Addition ' - 406 E. Hopkins Ave OV 1 1 r= A Aspen, Colorado 81611 - A n 1 Suzie Krevoy CONSULTANTS 1 SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR ~ SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" GEOTECH #GEOTECH #STRUCTURAL STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL 17--~117--2-11,~ #MECHANICAL -7 - - ------- Â» % 1 mEE U 0 - mn= - 5 - @ 6 & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / 0 #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 0 1 . 011 2 -1/ ___-- _+ 3 072 1 r--2 0--b 1 n W 1.1 -" ta- - -- -- - - -- -- - #### te C SECTION SCALEÂ· 1/4" = 1'-0 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0' CONTRACTOR ~ SECTION #CONTRACTOR 46% -221-2~-- 49 ~LL g ~ -, ~ Mi~ PIL MI 1 - 1 M *= F # ~ M ~ ~ ~ m - --------: 1 HPC 2/01/08 DESIGN REVIEW 1- 1 libi - - - It MARK DATE DESCRIPTION - 4%1 ~C ~ ---r 1 L.----- -- ..1 ---- - I l PROJECT NO: 0720 | 1 DRAWN BYA SMW f-f--607- % 5 | | ~ COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC 4 1 1 .1 11 It t - SHEET TITLE 4 1 1 . 1 1 @ R I I 11 1 LU j Laf = all 1 \. i f f A4.1 pe \ I Itt = 1 1 , .1 11; --3 SECTION ~ SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SECTIONS SCALEÂ· 1/4' = 1'-0" /9 91///.Falf-7 . . . 0 DOOR #.ND FRAME SCHEDULE WINDOW SCHEDULE DOOR DETA L M )P MARK HD HT Operaton Type NOTES Sl 'E Operation FIRE RATING NOTES WIDTH HEIGPT MARK HEAD JAMB SILL Fixed W HT Wol 4'-4'0 5'-4 1/2 11'-41/2" C)01 3' 8'-6" Single Door Single Swirg W02 4-4 4'-11" 10'-,1 Fixed 002 57 8'-6" Doube Door Single Swirg V\/03 4'-4" 4'-5" 1 0~-5 Fixed D03 6' 9 Other CASE OPENING W04 4' 4 9 Side Hung ~ D04 4'-61' 8' Doub e Door Single Swirg W05 2-6" 5 8 Side Hung FORUM PHI D05 3' 8' Sirgle Door Single Sw ng W06 8' 5'-6" 9' Side Hung 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 806 6 8' Double Door Single Swing Wlo 5,-6" 2 2-6 Top Hung RO. Box 1606 D07 7-11" 8-6 Single Door Sliding Wll 5'-21/2 2' 2 -6" Too Hung Basalt, Colorado 81621 D08 2'-6" B' Single Door Single Swirg W12 5-2 1/2 2 2-8 Top Hung PHONE: 970,279 4157 FAX 866.770 5585 C)09 2'-6" 8' Singe Door Single Swirg SHR 2-6 8' Single Door Single Swirg Isis Addition 406 E. Hopkins Ave Aspen, Colorado 81611 Suzie Krevoy ASA CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR / 00 #SURVEYOR ST,U'D#.9 SEAM COPPER REOF/NG 0/ER Ca#POS/TE ROOF UEMBRANE i, 2-yrsv .r '... OVER PLYWOOD SHEATHMIG WER ReD INSULATj,ON AND BLOCKING , . 1 L : GEOTECH OVER VAPOR BARRIER OVER METAL -I .4 /// , DECKiNG. TURN COMPOSTE ROOF 'i 2 .-I. 9 #GEOTECH MEMBRANE DOWN CMER BLOCKING. COPPER SHINGLE WER A, - SEPARKI+NON L..WER O/ER 1 . 2---'-- -END PUE P;90WDED ar , ' L Â· 17-7%, A Q ./ -U==:==d=== 8!TUTHENE OlER 'h' PLYND. ROOFING MANUFACTURER SHEATH/NG _. TO.STFF[ 9 Â·GRID : Irw*- Nj,0, N, 42/ 1-4 /1,1 0 ----~ I./Ill STRUCTURAL I k 1 ; n in r 7-r INSUL.*rION 4 FEF ~8.3j' k acl //01 1 /71â‚¬ -- #STRUCTURAL -~~r~'44-/_ 7.~ / ~ . it ~ r TÂ« <---r'll --1::St*%:lf.*Dis , 6 1 1, 'AD 3 ---- 1 1 1 &--- -Â«/2 PLYWOOD AND RIPPED Zxe Â·, . 1 * /7\ REFER TO SECTION ! i TREATED WOOD BLOCK#NG Â·, 1 1 2 INSULATDI MID INTERIOR k---1 FOR ADDIT/ONAL N 1 &~2 - p MECHANICAL FINISHES N,Le F.M.UNIT .9 \22/ INFORMATION ' r-1. 10 #MECHANICAL 1 1 UlA NiC. -'ORMED COPPER FASCIA TO ~ ~ MATCH COPPER ROOFING F.M UNIT F.M. UNIT , 1 Il~IL - -. 1 1 COPPER-2jt?%=g- ST.E. 9KT.. 51.1 - ---~ | 8, HEAD HE/GHT -SEE SCHEDULE ; LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT rORMED COPPER FLASHING tr: L ir.*1 1 ' Â·-4NEAD FLASHING WITH nor====MÂ»94- - i- ----our-ci E-Unt. 0 ROD end SEPLANT . w-lk- 06\ EL - 120-4Â» COPPER SHINGLE (NER SEPARATION 3 --ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD 1 LATER OVER BITUTHENE OVER 4 WINDON FRAME 9 PUWD. SHEATHING ' 6,22 CIVIL J 6/ ' 4-01 .4.1014 - SHfM AS < N. 07 METAL STUDS ' REQUIRED. (NARÂ·Â© F.M.UNIT) AX #### i M ' /-h GUTTER @ F.M.U. rh WINDOW HEAD @ COPPER SHINGLES 3" - 1'-0" U 3" = 1'-0" W02 WALL SECTION 3/8" = 1 Lo" *01 WALL SECTION 3/8" = 10-0 CONTRACTOR D03 DETAIL 3" = 1'-0" D01 DETAIL 3" = 1-0 #CONTRACTOR Â·-STANDING SUM COPPER ROOFING ----STANDING SEAM COPPER ROOANG OVER COMPOS#TE ROOF MEMBRANE WER COMPOSFTE ROOF MEMBRANE E--2 O/ER PLYWOOD ShEATHING OVER . 2 0/ER PlyWOOD SHEATHING WER RIGID INSULATION AND BLOCKING . 9 -1, RIGID INSULATION AND BLOCKING OVER VAPOR BARRER OVER METAL -- ' OVER VAPOR BARRIER OVER METAL M DECK/AfG. COPPER SHINGLES OVER SEPARATKN, ..1'll I Ef--[-ift-F----, ,r Mt \ , - ~~~~~~121. ~ _f_ _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-~ -~~~~f-i-1~ ><~~ j ~~ TURNED UP mX?F UEA/BRA,VE AT BASE. 1/ 111\ /: SHEATHING. LAP STUTHENE EVER - LAYER 0/ER BETHENE 0/ER PLYWOOD i Â»Â« Pr L' PlYWOOD AND RIPPED 218 2 1 K-----TREATED WOOD BLOCK#Â£ 80Â£TED : 2-~ 111 EKEERIM \AM; st To STEEL BENT PLATE ' MER}OR w~.*7~*At.-.#*2..WL-:..Ul [ V f- 0 TREATED WOOD BLOCKING .h nri, jiI -6 ---- --sEn- 8-4TE SEE 577?UCFURK -44 -NE ORCED CONCRETE TOPPING r ' -Â« b SLAB (WITH RADIANT HEAT TUBiNG WHERE OCCURS) VER WATERPROOF MEMBRANE OJER 44Â· PLYWOOD I/1 /\ F- FORMED COPPER FASCIA TO -* '. 0/ER 2 ROU-OUT ISOLATION MAL MATCH COPPER ROOFING / /. (FLOATING FLOOR SYSTEM.) PI l 41 11 1 lift- it WATE,72,1OOF MEMBRANE TO ><4 111&=GÂ» AND UNDER ROOF MEMBRANE CONTINUE OVER TO.CURB i, --Â·Â·Â·- - FO/WED COPPER soFF/T AND , ' ->â‚¬ l,11 81 -- --3 REINFORCED CONCRETE TOPPING HPS 2/01/08 DESIGN REVIEW 1 f:EL ,-f l ,><h ?,1 WHERE OCCURS) 0/ER WATERPROOF ROOF MARK DATE DESCRIPTION ~ FASCJA TO MATCH COPPER ROOFING i NUE,0 K , Mi M~| SLAB (WTH RAENANT HEAT TUBiNG <- '. SEE STRUCTURAL TURN ROOF MEMBRANE UP WAIi re 7:[i BEAM WHERE OCCURS- ~ K.. C MINIWUM - STEEL BEAM WHERE OCCURS-H 1 ft, *1 MEMBRME OVER T APERED INSULAT ION. f ' 2 SEE STRUCTURAL 1. -i , 111 1 t SEE PLA 'OR DIN. , PROJECT NO: 0720 2,1 .WN,U *IW TO STEEL BEAM , 3 1 0- F---7 "t BLOCKÂ® StfOOT TO STEEL BEAM ."=- ~Raâ€ž...1-.~-9..~-Â· -Lu-i .a DRAWN BY: SMW =0641"-MMZ'~ 8 A M. 6 % I ' COPPER SHMGLE WER SEPARAT/GA' <M~"<"c~*~1,~,E~id'Y~'~ ..~ t' .,~I:I[~~1"~ 'J'24~'lil' 1 1~li~1~ Â·/2/ur COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC ~ ./ --11< LAYER 0/ER BiTUTHENE ovER a . Â· SHEET TITLE COPPER SHINGUE OMER SEPARATION 1 1, rnÂ·Â·onÂ»PhÂ·'.AÂ·, : LieER OVER BITUTHENE 0/ER - - -4 r /SHE-rH, - 41----STRUCTURAL DECK 9 POWD. SHEATHING It b ./ 1 -- - 7 METAL STUDS , ~~ *'-1*--'-- ' 6'MITTAL. STUBS NOTE: 1 1 1~ 9 Â· ASPUNT JUPREGNATED CMETAL STUDS < FLOATING FLOOR S'STEM \ ' ~#CKER BOARD 2 SHALL BE MODEL RIM ef ' A6.1 4 KINETICS NOISE CONTROLINC, 6 1 "1 1 I, ~ < 2,56'LAT/ON AVO /ATEROR iue'W .Â®LAI uÂ¥ INSULATION AND 11[rERIOR ' la 1 1 11 FINISHES N.1Â£.0 F.M.UNIT FINSHES NE.0 FN.UNIT â€ž C-) RAKE FASCIA @ F.M.U. /7 ROOF OVERHANG @ F.M.U. ~ TYPICAL EXT. WALL BASE AH.UNE CONDITION SHOWN) P/2" - 11-0,1 ASSEMBLIES D04 DETAIL 3" = 1-0" 802 DETAIL 3" = 1'-0" [)05 DETAIL 11/2"= 1'-0 .. Fire Safety Note Abbreviations 1 All building materials stored at the construction area, and/or in any area of the building are to be secured Ina locked area. Access to suck areas is b be controlled by the Owner and/or the General Contractor. A Astragal KIT Kitchen 2 All materials to be stored in an orderly manner ADD Addendum L Length 3 All flammable materials to be kept tightly sealed In their respective contair,Grs, Such ADJ Adjustable LAM LamInated materials are to be kept away Irom all heat sources. 4 All flammable materials to be used and stored in adequately ventitated spaced, AFF Above Finish Floor LAV Lavatory 5 All electrical power to be shut off where there is exposed conduit. AHU Air~Handling Unit LT Light 6 All electrical power Inthe constructlon area to be shut o# after working bolin ALT Alternate M Mirror 7 The contractor will, at all times, make sure there m no leakage 01 natural gas in the ALUM Aluminum MAT Material building, or any Mammable gas used In construction. APPROX Approximately MAX Maximum 8 The contractor shall provide fire sprinkler protection throughout the buMing The ARCH Architect, Architectural MB MartÂ¢e contractor shall be responelble for preparing drawings and specifications and obtaining the B Base MECH Mechanical permits *r the fire sprinkler symtem The fire sprinkler system must meet the requirements of BLDG Building MEMB Membrane all applicable codes and ordÂ¢nances BLKG Blocking MIN Minimum General Demolition Notes BO By Others MLDG Molding 1. DemoBtlon and removal of existing walls, partitions, cellings, denoted and gfaphlcally BR Bedroom MO Masonry Opening indicated BRD Board MTG Mounted 2 Remove all existing mechanical items. plumbing. piping and electrical components in BRK Bnck MTL metaINIC Not in Contract their entirety except as specmed BSBD Baseboard NO Number 3 Work Initiated to the exterior of the existing buildIng is limited to the areas noted and BSMT Basement NOM Nominal graphically Indicated on the drawings, Any other exterior work shall not ba initiated without BTM Bottom NTS Not to Scale the prior written conse'l and knowledge of the building authority and architectural designer BTWN Between OA Overall 4 The contractor shall provide ell required protection and measures throughout the demolition ariel removal work for the existing exterior of the building, the existing inte/or C Carpet, Cornice OC On Center space to remain and the existing adjacent Anishes and Items which are N.I C CAB Cabinet OD Outside Dimension, Outside Diameter CH Ceiling Height OH Opposite Hand 5 Ths perlormance of any demolition work by the contractor or any sub-contractor shall be CL Center Line, Closet OPP Opposite executed in accordance with the building code of the State of Colorado and all other applicable codes and regulations. CLG Ceiling P Pa nt, Panel 6 The contractor shall obtain. prior to the commencement of the clemolition work end wilh CLR Clear PL Plastic Laminate the consent 01 the base building management and owner of such work, all legal and regulatory permits as may be required for: demolition, containers, caning, hauling. public way COL Column PLUM plumbing CONC Concrete PLYWD Plywood access or closing . and the disconnection and shut-ofl of all utilitjes as may be required. 7. The contractor is required the repair any imperfecticas to exiting surfaces caused by the CONT Continuous POL Polished demolition process with the same of like materials unless speckally Indicated otherwise on CP Ceiling Paint PT Paint the drawings and/or specifications. CRS Courses PTD Painted 8. The contractor shall remove all door & jamb seta as indicated on drawings & save for CT Ceramic Tile PVC Poly Vinyl Chloride eventual reinstallation CTG Coating QT Quarfy Tile 9. The contractor shall remove all lightfixtures & mechanical grills as indiated on dreirings DBL Double R Riser, Chair Rail and save for eventual re-installation DH Double Hung RAD Radius DIA Diameter RD Roof Drain General Notes DIAG Diagonal RE Refer to 1. All work and materials furnished shall comply with The State of Colorado Building Code, DIFF Diffuser REF Refrigerator, Reference The State of Colorado Fire Code, The State of Colorado Regulalions, the regulations of the National Board of Fire Underwriters, National Fire Protectrve Associalion Requirements and DIM Dimension REFL Reflected all Fecleral State, and Municipal authorities having jurisdiction over the WOfk DISP Disposal REQ Required 2 Before ordering any materials or doing any work, each trade shall verify al DN Down REV Revision measurements at the building and shall be responsible for correctness of the sarne. No extra DR Door RH Right Handed charge or compensation will be alÂ¢owed on account of difference be/een acbal dimensions DTL Detail Rm Room and the measurements Indketed m the drawings: any d Iscrepancles between the drawings and field conditiona which may be found shall be aubmitted to the architectural designef for DWG Drawing responsible for any deviations from the contract docurnents. RO Rough Opening EXIST Existing RTD Rated consldentlon and clarÂ¢Mcatlon before proceeding with the work. The contractor shall be ELEC Electrical SC Solid Core, Skim Coat 3 All the architectural designer's drawings and construction notes are complimentary and ELEV Elevation SECT Section what Es called for by either will be binding as if called for by all: any work shown or referred lo ENCL Enclosure SH Shell on any one drawing shell be provided as shown on all drawings. EQ Equal SHT Sheet 4 The work tobi performed consists 01 furnishing all labor, equipment, tools, EQUIP Equipment SHWR Shower trensportatlon. supplies, fees, materlals, and services in accordance with these notes and EXP Expansion 5 Full size or large scale details or drawings shall govern small scale drawings which they Slm Siliar drawings and inclucles performing all operations necessary to construct and install corrplete. EXT Exterior SPEC Specification in satisfactory condibon, the valious materials and equipment at the locations shown. FC Field Check SQ Square are intended to amplify. FD Floor Drain, Field Dimension SS Stainless Steel 6 The standard spedlications of the manufacturer for products called for in drawings and FF Finish Floor ST Stone notes are hereby made part of these notes with the same force and effect as though herein FIN Finish STD Stained written out . full FIX Fixture STL Steel 7 All materials requhed for the performance of thls work shall be new and of the best FLR Floor SUSP Suspended guilty of the kinds specified. The use of old or second-hand materials is strictly forbidden, FO Finish Opening SYM Symmetrical except for locations on the dr/,Angs that refer to removal and relocation of materials or equipment. Matertals shall be used In accordance wlth the manufacturer's specifications. FOW Face of Wall T Tread. Trim The contractor shall submit all product warranties The contractor shall warranty all work as FR Fire-rated T&G Tongue and Groove per State of Colorado regulations. DT Foot TAN Tangent 8 The pmmiseS and job site shall be maintained in a reasonably neat and ordelly condÂ¢tion DA Gauge each day and shall be responsible for its proper disposal. The premises shall be protected TEMP Tempered . Temporary and kept free from accumulation of waste materials and rubblsh during the entire construction GALV Galvanized THK Thick period. The co ntractor shill remove am crates, cartons and oth/trash nom the work areas GC General Contractor TO Trimmed Opening throughout construction arid shall be turned over in spolless and orderly condition All GL Glass, Glazing TYP Typical fixtures and equipment will be left In undamaged, bright, clean, and polmhed conclition. GR Grade UON Unless Otherwise Noted 9 Allwork shall be subject to final inspection by the architectural designer GWB Gypsum Wail Board UTIL Utility 10 All plumbing and electrical work shall be performed by persons licensed in their trades HOR Horizontal VT Vinyl Tile 11. The contractor shall take all necelary precautions to insure the safety of the building, its HM Hollow Metal VIF Verify in Field occupants and the general public during construction HT Height W Washer 12 The contractor will abide by all the rules and regulations set forth by the building's legal HVAC Heating, Ventillation, Air-Conditioning W/ With managing agent, noting particularly any restrictlons on noise, use of public entnes, use of ID Inside Dimension, Inside Diameter WC Water Closet, Wall Covering power tools, timely and proper debris removal, materials, storage, and es~blished working hours. IN Inch WD Wood 13. The contractor shall be responsible for providing a raclon mitigation system throughout INS Insulation, Insulated WF Wood Flooring the building which shall meet the requirements of 811 applicable COdes and ordinances, INT Interior W/O Without including the emcient building ordinance section 11 5 The cor,tractor shall be responslble for JT Joint WP Water-proof preparing all drawings and specifications required for this radon mitigation system 14. All dimensions take precedence over the scale of drawings UON All dirninslons ate to the face of stud or to the face of concrete U.O.N. All exterior studs to be 2X6 U.O.N all interio, studs to be 2X4 U.O.N. 15. All interior stud walls & ceÂ¢Ungs shall have ]' A" soundattenuation bals U ON. 16 No portion of the construction operations which requires a shop drawing ora sample submission shall commence until the submission has been reviewed and approved by the contractor then reviewed and approved for design intent only by the archilectural designer All such construction operations shall be in accordance with reviewed show drawings and samples. 17 Shop drawings are required for @Â¢1 shop fabricated work Thls work includes, but is not limited to, exterior and interior finish materials, structural and decorative steel. and built-in cablnetry, 18 Product submittals are required for all individually specified products, including but not limited to, doorn, windows, electrical fixtures. plumbing, appliances, and hardware. 19. The contractor Is responsible for providing all access panels as required by governing codes to all voids, ames, etc, The contractor must velify the type required with the architect prior to netallatlon If 'ald panels. General Safety Notes 1 Constructkon work will be confned to the immediate area of work and will not create dust, dirt, or other luch Inconveniences to surrounding properties. 2 Construction operations will not block sidewalks or means of egress for tenan,ts of the adjacent buildings without 36 hours prior writlen notification. 3. Constfuction opelations will not involve interruption of heating. water,nra alarm, or electrical services to the other tenants or the building 4 Construction operations shall be restricted tothe houfs indicated by building authorities. Except in the case cf emergency and notification of the building authomy 5 The contractor and sub-contractors shaH be responsible for any propally damage of the building owner or the personal property of any persons of the building due to the construction operations 6 Strict supelvision shall be maintained at all times during the course of construction ope~ations as to minimize inconvenience to persons of the building and adjacent properties. 7 During and following demolition, each contractor shall be responsible for the removal from the premises all debris ard products of the demolltion not designated for reuse. The site shall be lelt broom clean at the end of each working day 8 Refuse from construction operations is the sole responsibility and expense of the contractor and the sub-cortractors. Retie shall be disposed of in wparate dumpsters or bins maintained at an approved location in the front of the building Dumpsters anci blns must be removed ona weekly bases. Construction materials shall be maintained and stored on the site, with the appfoval of the building a/hority, or on the street during the course of delivery. 9, Construction work will be confined to the indicated areas and will not create dust or other such Inconvenience to the other adjacent properties. 10 Construction operations will not block sidewalks, drtveways or means of egfess lor tenants of adjacent properties. 11. Demolition: All debris and products o f demolition not des*nated for refuse shall be removed from the premises and legally disposed of The site shall be leR broom dean / the end of every working day. .. PROJECT INDEX ~ ~ FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 P.O. Box 1606 Basalt, Colorado 81621 PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 Isis Addition 406 E. Hopkins Ave Aspen, Colorado 81611 Suzie Krevoy CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR GEOTECH #GEOTECH STRUCTURAL #STRUCTURAL - MECHANICAL #MECHANICAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPEARCHITECT CIVIL ##*it CONTRACTOR PROJECT SITE - #CONTRACTOR Muske).3/$44)U<Lk 8:14FA haz v 17.14Â»LY, 41.t:.*.ij:-~7~FRM 7'1,2>-4/ , 1 â€¢7~Â·24: Â·Â· R --#Â· ~2/Â· Â·'./2/~imâ€¢IAISrllitÂ· t'â€¢c~s.Af.Â· Â·~~- Â»Â·.4 W. 71.~ ...~..%*8#WI <44~ .1 tt 6 616&LAV~A'Wd<rk.#1246%1Â·:: ..'29 0,1 *4....4 k t,1 11 .1 -...' it~Nt.#*1 A. .. ., . I IMS I ' Â·~ .~,..75- f,~,Â·.b. TL |' L rt I HPC 2/01/08 DES/GN REWEW MARK DATE i DESCRIPTION .Â·u.Â· .:,r Iki.il';.32;Â·~ts<2,t ~A*. ?~ PROJECT NO: 0720 -+ DRAWN BY: SMW 99Â«9Â»0*â‚¬*99*geÂ«Â»4 COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC ~t~>Â« ~~C~~~~~t~~~Â©~Â·j*..3Â«;2~ SHEET I\TLE i.'*. /t)M)LA#*Ilt.. - 2%.',1.50477Aill7e-Gatj~)4*dtke)erv'bl 1 2 ~_ ~~.inpus~~f~ C~V~~D~~~~~.I~~~. ~~,~~~~~~~~~~~3~~~~6~~d6~~:~P~L,fZ .*t,'L)~<t~4- AO. 1 .i '~.2 ....r>Â·Â·r.-- â€ž14'146~St/448k,4/#112Â·+* Â·'i.ift.1*94[ :{Â»inttt: it:. .32 GENERAL NOTES .... 449 . O - L - - - 1 J...r,r:FOLK St.:946:ti"Li 22% L--- 11 450* 1 1! 11 0 FORUM PHI - .- 1, MEÂ¢,WOL 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 3 li i pe<*34$4 9.2 *41Â«<rit 't P.O. Box 1606 1/,1 ~ W tA; 1 1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 i , PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 1-' - . Isis Addition .gE*Â§11,970 SFINEILWAdLE-:A--,6 9*Ir - PROPOSED F.A.R. CALCULATION 406 E. Hopkins Ave 1 1 . -m: ALLOWABLE FAR R < Hy \ \ 1 . Â«004.-034 ~ 500 SF , 2,000 SF - NET LIVABLE Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 1 / 7 2Â» Suzie Krevoy TDR 1 1 401 1 I b ALLOWABLE DECKS (15%) 300 SF Â«PL 1. TOTAL- ALLOWABLE NET LIVABLE 2,500 SF - NET LIVABLE CONSULTANTS .\ h \44 V tÂ»<61Â« SURVEYOR leÂ»Â«<91.14.1. ...1 , I -~ - Â® PROPOSED NET AREA 498 SF 13--....J-- -.-.-%---:-*'ffÂ¢tkik~46{4FÂ« - ---T-- ~ EXISTING UNIT NET AREA 1,970 SF #SURVEYOR 1 TOTAL UNITNETAREA 2,468 SF - NET LIVABLE CEK 1 GEOTECH #GEOTECH 1 . l 1 ' 2 r=E ~ ~--JfirS-4, _i -5-3-Â«42620 1 STRUCTURAL | 1 #STRUCTURAL 31.101] i 1 1 1 0 0 4 10 0 0 0 MECHANICAL #MECHANICAL 1 UNIT B - PROPOSED 1/8" = 1'-0" LANDSCAPEARCHITECT #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CIVIL 1 \ ##40# ' P :I ...Ull:-*- '' t \\ ,Â«~ ~ ...fI>~ Â· Â· i43#GL~ CONTRACTOR l r- 1 =1-C~L i #CON1 RACTOR 88#:'.2 :442Â¢499Â©>77 1 1 \1 1 1 ~%&b,,:i.Â·Â· ~<diallutÂ¢ttlut Â»11Â«Â»91>44Â»~ 1 i-1 7 7 ... -- -m"*##64/Â£184*45&4-94+41*MUEFE_ DECK - 4\ Ill /=-=rE2193~- E==limm//1 . 4 24%~ Â¢6 1.rÂ¥ 1 144*L,W~~~~~~~ 1 EXISTING RAR. CALCULATION ALLOWABLE FAR 2,000 SF -NET LIVABLE ALLOWABLE DECKS (15%) 300 SF UNIT NETAREA 1,970 SF UNIT GROSS AREA 2,070 SF HPC 21/08 'DESIGN REVIEW 1 ~ikettxuit>Â»>FiE}~' il I G MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 0---1 L _ -~43*&,F::~.*Mk.*~.,~ AMPA<A.,i.ET 214*.-b~qFm1//J- 4-â€ž 8. '- -- <D PROJECT NO: 0720 -4 =,=M.#=-4 , DRAWN BY: SMW -- o t:, - --~ COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC OE~[ ; 1 + A--7-1 - ~77] *r1 -- 0 Deâ„¢- SHEET TITLE 9.- El lim 1 1 1 1 e4@@@Â® 2 UNIT:B - EXISTING 1/8" = 1'-0" FAR ANALYSIS . FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 P. O. Box 1606 Basalt, Colorado 81621 PHONE: 970.279 4157 FAX 866 770 5585 El*Â«-1 Isis Addition | | |7~* UPPER LVL ~ ' â€¢- 1 EL,121'-do - 1 1~1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 406 E. Hopkins Ave -0-YEPL- [7-1 MECH M ~f J - L' 44 Suzie Krevoy Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 n v r s,F .==94 \\2-8 THEATER A ELÂ·1!r-Â» CONSULTANTS PROJ. LyL n : c./5- 1 1- U a %1 4 1 SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR 2:? .514Â·f@Pal<11 11.11 1-' - EL./00'-67 0 MAIN lyL ci-77--:-7 -e 111 -2 1000Â·790854; GEOTECH L E i111 11- 1 #GEOTECH PROJ. 63/L 0 li \ t' EL.-86'-If #STRUCTURAL STRUCTURAL * STOR. THEATER D 83'â‚¬ 80 r irr= 0 -<j~ai~ - MECHANICAL I I #MECHANICAL '42.1.7-222'2. -. p""1 1 . .1-iF 7. LOWER LVE ~ ~~S3T.0~- - 1 EL-74'-5â€¢ L._J LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 2 VIEWPLANE SECTION 1/8- = 1'-0- #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CIVIL ##itit CONTRACTOR #CONTRACTOR J ~1 lit HPC 2/01/08 DESIGN REVIEW MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO: 0720 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE PROJECT SITE AO.3 es VIEWPLANE VIEWPLANE PLAN 1~ =50 1=808 4 0 6 0 'I., 6 Ir-,r . I . " " ,..W '~ ' I 1 , 1 FORUM PHI ~ RO. Box 1606 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 O. Wh*r) , L- - -Pf ----. --- Basalt, Colorado 81621 O 1 33 Â£ ILLIS~....14+ C P====C ----1.11=- ---~1 1 ~~ ir- - ir - tll 1 -LI 1 - 4,-3 771170 1 1 1 PHONE: 970.279.4157 FAX: 866770.5585 Â·'1 NOUEST 7122U 11 ' 1 E----- 4 i F- -11- _ _* I ._>L-/ BATH \0 1 1 1 1 Isis Addition 1 --3 C,- 6 |L~-< 4 0---' 0 | 1 GUEST _- 9 1 5 5 & i \2-- id jo il :14% 14 2-- - 1 406 E. Hopkins Ave 0 Z -60 I CLOSET 1 1 ~ 4 1 A ~ 1 Aspen, Colorado 8161 1 -3 1 1 1 1 1 U I lo ~1 iU 1 1 L _ -_J ~ i--13% 11 -L.-----_L- \ -1 =!==11 11 L===11 -~~*'/ 1 Suzie Krevoy I _-g.-':, 0. __.1:117Â»' 4'-8. --Pr"-0-- 1 1 9 MECHANÂ£At- , CONSULTANTS ----' _1.1 S :' 1.*e 5 th 6,-/ ~, 4411. 1 1 ///-001 M .4 / 1 "9 4 1 SURVEYOR 1 1 k' / <) 5 P 3073~ 27 1 A [-I--1 . i i #SURVEYOR -I--7 0 1#GEOTECH 11 1 1 2 7 1----u-:--_=-1-_L_-3-022-3~ M= A +GLIES~Su'% + 1 4--4 k 1 i GEOTECH P 6 \..,t= - 3 2 ' L_11 , . 11 1 r . 1 1 ' 0 Â»1 -KI ' __-__ 1 2 1 E 5- Â»em---4 -1 D 1 1 1 re 4-1 1 k STRUCTURAL - .L -1 110 0 1-1 1[DI_ r-1 1 u ...6 1- 04 -# - #STRUCTURAL e F It Â° 1 10 0-1---------.------.-- k - -Ii k -lit- -1 * - I"UD ROOM 1 '-r- --L x,0/ : : 91 1 MECHANICAL I 101 1 OFFICE tur - 0 #MECHANICAL 80611NG CONDO ~ AREA i ' â‚¬13!~ 73~ L-f-1. 49 L----64 41. 1 ~-1 1 4 -5-j 1 -----*.-- E-3 -p I 1-U~ 4 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPEARCHITECT I I :1# 1 1 leE\\ 1 3 f 1 1 , 1 .u i \11 t.=1; i }Â· 2 0'~1], 10.. ..99 4.....h.â€ž3$14 1 E- 1 " 1-lh gi - I 'L .1 M \ 1 ~ 17.1 'E L~, | I i fll i /7~-~ Civil tri I 1 0 1 #INN, 1-Lj_li-__3 -=-J1 4 U='5 -- 4 L. - * 1 1 ON /9 I A--4 1 L.-1 > Â· L_ - - e 41.4 2-1, /4 -/ f 41.7 -4- - / , CONTRACTOR #CONRACIOR 1 12.-/ 1 - =12 --Nfl-- DECK i ric,op STEPS . 411 -- - 7 -1 â€¢ Be /1//MANDRAIL ' ' (BOTH SID~) I 1 j W S /2\ I v L---- TEN... 61-ASS Â®(JAMDRAIL- 1~37 4'-O' J HPC 2/01/08 DESIGN REVIEW ( RAISED DOOK --------, ! - - MARK DATE DESCRIPTION (EXISTING ORAINASE To REMAIX 1 1 1 PROJECT NO: 0720 | | DRAWN BY: SMW ' COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE 0 0â„¢ 0 8 Â® Â® 1 ADDITION 1/4" = 1'-0 FLOOR PLAN Alf .... NEW SKYLIGHT TO MATCH â€¢ EXISTINGS (TYR OF 3) FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 i | | Basalt, Colorado 81621 PO. Box 1606 PHONE: 970.2794157 FAX 866.770.5585 PROPOSED VAULTED ROOF 406 E. Hopkins Ave /11 TO MATCH , | 1-1 Aspen, Colorado 81611 ~ S~ANDING SEAM _ Isis Addition | MECHANICAL Suzie Krevoy CONSULTANTS 1 11 SURVEYOR - #SURVEYOR 1 1 11, 1 10. 1 ENE Ina 1 -% t/ #GEOTEC r a. 112. GEOTECH 11 EXISTING| | | | ~ -2- i , : STANDING SEAM 1 lili 1 11.- : ' STRUCTURAL VAULTED ROOF i I L 1 1 #STRUCTURAL Iii 119 ~~~ i'~111-1, 3 1 1 jitÂ¢% | | | Â· ,~ |~ | | MECHANICAL #MECHANICAL 11 1 41 : .1 11 1 .1 1 i EXISTING STAND h G SEAM LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT VAULTE J ROC F 1 lili CIVIL r tj #### 0' lilli! i #J fl 1-4--- ---â„¢------- ~1 ----------- --- e ! CONTRACTOR #CON TRACTOR AOOP STEPS DECK k : 1 1 W 1 - ! 4 1 L-- m- SLASS GUâ€¢*PRAIL Â£13 1 44-0. ( :tAISED DECK ----4 mOSTING O-1-2 70 81'IN' _HPâ‚¬ 2/01/08 DESIGN REWEW 1 MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO: 0720 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE 00 0 0Â®Â® A2.2 2 ROOF PLAN 1/4' = 1'-0" ROOF PLAN 00007 . FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave. Suite 201 P O. Box 1606 PHONE, 970.279.4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 Basalt, Colorado 81621 ------Ii-~i==== Isis Addition - 406 E. Hopkins Ave - Aspen, Colorado 81611 Suzie Krevoy CONSULTANTS - ~ U [2]~ SURVEYOR - 1 #SURVEYOR -- 0 0 GEOTECH - #GEOTECH 1 0-7 STRUCTURAL TRUCTU L 0 0 1 -- L]E] 121[3 E]El E]El IEIJ EJE] 1 El[J E][il j E] -O En== MECHANICAL - CHA C 1 9//111-1 L [Â« 4 i Ill / 1 - /1.\ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 11. 1 / \ 0 9 czzl =I \ / 1 \\1 4/ \ 1/ 1 00 '. 0 0 0 CIVIL 1 FRONT ELEVATION 1/4Â· - 1-0 CONTRACTOR HK _i-201*8 ESIGN RE)(IEW MARK I DATE_,-QESCRIPTION PROJECT NO: 0720 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE ELEVATIONS .... --- ---jÂ»=~-===-TF~--- --7 FoKUM PHI 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 1 -1-- . P.O. Box 1606 --7nq__ 0_ -1,1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 PHONE: 970.279,4157 FAX. 866.770.5585 Isis Addition 406 E. Hopkins Ave imih 111~ lilli Aspen, Colorado 81611 Suzie Krevoy IL _ _ 1,=11_4~~ _1 _ _ CONSULTANTS LL__L.__22121-122222ILLIZZILL~___~ 6 SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR i / SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0Â· GEOTECH #GEOTECH STRUCTURAL T TU MECHANICAL C C - - - -- r77-1 2 i LANDSCAPE ARCHITEC #LANDSCAPEARCHITECT #mimmai M -_null IOull=Jll~1_7~~-U_-IL _ _ 1 CIVIL /LSECTION CL) SCALE: 1/4- = 14 CONTRACTOR e ----29*- rTlrlr711 - ----- --------- --)-*./.mifÂ£-T--- -2j-/72*MMMN#m""MR</F)---- - HPC ~ 2/0V08 DES/GN REV/EW MARK~-DATE,-DESCRIPTION - PROJECT NO: 0720 DFUWN BY: SUW r==71 M 1 - 49/ 0 1 01 1 COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC i 'm 1- 111 bllk*%%1111 111[= Il SHEET TITLE * III 1111 1 11Eti*2%211 lili El Int 1 Ikke**41111 1 ,11[1 A4.1 1 11 1 I L._*L-l I IMEW#*ME#/Mul I liLi kM Int F-TnTTTEÂ¥1 1 I Ir.r.. ..- " L_._L-__L~-- - 1 --1--=M -- ~A~SECTION=~- - - ~~ SECTION 0â€ž=m.=1-m~ 1-, SECTIONS ... 1--r-1--1 FIRE RATING | ~ MARK r-&-1-7-1 Operation ~HEAD ~ JAMB ~ SILL ~ ~ - --- â€¢ 002 -1 5-2" ~ 8'-6' ~Double Door Single Swing i NG. FORUM PEI][ 8: Single Door Single Swing 174 Midland Ave, Suite 201 L-EL_1.2-6'122_!39*-DELEng'z-swlog ! ! ! ! ! --- ~ P.O. Box 1606 PHONE: 970.279 4157 FAX: 866.770.5585 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Isis Addition L2EL-!_44'- 1 541/2' !11'4U2" ! Fixed ~ = --- 406 E. Hopkins Ave Aspen, Colorado 81611 L-EE-1-2112' !9' ! Side Hung ~ Suzie Krevoy 1_3% 1 13" 1 41-5" pO'-5" ~ Fixed ~ /Th CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR ||id #SURVEYOR I I -%#ENI COPPER mING ~ ~ Â£11 4 OVER COMPOSEE ROOF MEMBRANE T.O.STEEL o Kâ€¢- 0/ER PDWOOD SHEATHING 0/ER ,EGT33'-1 RIGID INSULATION AND SLOCIONG OVER VAPOR BARREA WER METAL ' GEOTECH DEC/(wa TUAN COWPOS/rE ROOF '|--,#GEOTECH WEMBRME DO#N WER BLOCKING. ---COPPER SHINGLE 0/Eat SEPRATION LNER CMER ...r.4 1 BITUTHENE 0/ER 92 PUYIND. : =-ama*;Pez916=' -D PUUG PRO.HOID 81 SHEATEUNG / n RODFING IAN,UF,CTURER -T-- rcÂ·-jjtyz~~~ -GIC-: 2- , NjÂ£. 1 5EfT--3 1- . 1 - N I STRUCTURAL .. OSI O , RUC U Â·fUETAL STUDS o F.lf.UN#r ~0 49.3 i e METAL STUBS o AH.UNTS -42Â· PlfWOOD AND RtPPED 2â€¢8 TRERED WOOD BLOCKAG NSULATION AND INTERIOR Gle (12 %~EN&%~ON ~ ~ ~22 Â¢ rp MECHANICAL FiNfSHES MALe FN.UNIT - INFORMATION C A CA f --FORMED COPPER FASCIA TO -12] AU.C. WATCH COPPER ROOFING F.M. UNIT COPPER SHINGLE.STAME POINT- F.M. UNIT ORMED COPPER PUSHING \84 -Id. 7-* #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LANDSCAPEARCHITECT 7 LI N EL- 240 1 ---EAD FLASHING WIT-H _ ROD cad SEN.ANT Z=====..11-4------------------ I -I-- -I -I)-I---- 7JLIJ-ktiyet #I- ..- 40+ r OPPER SHINGLE BER SEPARAFION -ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD LNER WER BITUTHENE 0/ER WIND)ON FRAME 16â€¢ Plma SHEATHING HEAD EXTENSDN - SHIW AS CIVIL â‚¬ METAL STUOS REQUIRED. (Mgo FN.UNIT) 12 , 1 093 /-h GUTTER @ F.M.U. r) WINDOW HEAD @ COPPER SHINGLES l-yri'-3" W02 WALL SECTION 3/8" = 1'-0' W01 WALL SECTION 3/8" = 1'-0' CONTRACTOR 003 DETAIL r = 1'-0" 001 . DETAIL 3Â· = 1%0Â· --grANDING SEAM COPPER ROOFING r-STANDING SEAM COPPER ROOFING \ OVER COWPOSFE ROOF MEMBR,ME 1 0/EER COMM)RTE ROOF WEMBFUNE OVER PirWOOD SHEATHING OVER ---# WER POWOOD SHEAT}11NG O,ER TUMED UP Roar NE,WBRAâ€¢E AT BASE. REID INSULATION AID BLOCIONG 6 9 9 89,0 INSULATION ME BLOCKING R r VII - OVER VAPOR BBERIER 04ER METAL ~ (MER Vâ€¢FOR BARRIER WER METAL DECKING. TURN COMPOSKE ROOF WrÂ·*~r-9-~rÂ«-t-t-tÂ»tÂ·+1-t-t-E /1 11 121 1 DECKING. :11>â‚¬ 38 4-----.-----~ =,0*&018 MEMBRANE DO#N 0/EA BLOCKING. Yl-1-n-~-rtl-*11-91-1-1 \ / 7 |~ ~-~Â·ED 11000 BLOCrae BOATED - SHEATHING UP BITUTHENE OfER 11\/ IKI25]E 1 >< 3 11 =8?" - -- -- 61 -------44,AN-------------avff%*2USET~r -r-r----r~ ~41-31-2131., WHERE OCCURS) 0/ER WATERPROOF --*fWIED COPPER FASC/A TO | 11 5-4 =R#%= &=16. Fl < t><f = MArCH COPPER ROOFING 3 FLOATING FLOOR SfÂ·STENJ u ~ l. ,Aâ€¢~--------------*grvecm TO AND UNDER ROOF MEMBRUNE -FORMED COPPER SOFFIT AND r---3' REINFORCED CONCRETE TOPPING HE 2/01/08 1 ES/GN REWEW SEE SrRUCRURAL 1- STEEL BEW WHERE OCCURS- --,~i--~----~ ~~,~~ - ~_ ___57E UP WALL /4 , FASCIA TO WATCH COPPER ROOFING SLAS NMTH R,DIANT HER TUBING -STEEL BEAU WHERE OCCURS- WW~EulÂ·207~'R~E~~~~E~WWN MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SEE STRUCTURAL- SEE OR DIAA. --------------al,OCKING--SHOOT TO STEEL BEW 1 PROJECT NO: 0720 KING-SHOUT TO STEEL BEAM - . 4 . . m'. F~ . .- =12===,11 DRAWN BY: SMW lili XIXII+F-[ JOI X X K IHIÂ·'7'Â·.itttfll-t COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC ' PER SHINGLE 0/EER SEPARKI-1011 *O*QEw@;Ig&=4.-.amn*mms,*~1%*m*_---12=1---- 1 . 1 1 LAYER 0/ER STUTHEME CMER SHEET TITLE PER SHINGLE WER SEPARATION 14' PIYWO.SHEATHING r--4 2 r.â€¢-1Â· " ..- 1--2 . r......,J . r-< FL--STAJCTURAL DECK --------------1 l*rER WER BTFUTHENE WER ---', i , , 1 1 METAL STUDS $$' Plnm SHEATHEAG - = A6.1 -------- METAL STUDS e METAL STUDS ~/ING FLOOR Srs!-Ell ~ ~ 1---.-----7---7--~HI~~rEIRED 1 1 1 SMALL BE â€¢ODEL RWar 1 K/NEUCS NOSE CONTROLIAC L.--------------01%7~ cuRB - NSULWION Z WERIOR --10 INSULATION --NSOLEDI AND INTERIOR , i FINISHES NJÂ£10 FN.UNE j FINISHES N.I.C. 0 F.Al.UNIT i rh RAKE FASCIA @ F.M.U. /0--1 ROOF OVERHANG @ F.M.U. C-) TYPICAL EXT. WALL BASE AM.UNVT CONDITION SHOMN) l / 3" -1'-0" < J--3"-1'*0"--FR".-RO" W ASSEMBLIES 221_ . DETAIL r = 1'-f -002-- -- DETAIL 3" = 1'-Or [)05 . . ._DETAILHW=1X' . FORUM PHI 174 MIdland Ave Surte 201 <LFr PO Box 1606 Basalt. Colorndo 81621 NEW SKYL IGHT TO MATCH PHONE 9702794157 FAX 866 7705585 EXISTINGS (TYP OF 6) Isis Addition 10 1 11 1,1 i 11411 P 1 L lilli 1 0114 406 E. Hopkins Ave Aspen. Colorado 81611 10 1 PROPOSE } 1/11 ! Suzie Krevoy i O 1 -MN | STANDING S- AM ~_:; i CONSULTANTS VAL.TED RCE,F , 19 : i s mt. i T D r 9.,CA SURVEYOR ] MECHANICAL 1 \ 11 1 GEOTECH #GEOTECH 1*3 1- p 1 1 I 1 - ' 1114 H T -1 STRUCTURAL p #SrRUCIURAL 1 11 1 11.1 : 1.: 1 1 1 1 11 1= 1 -1 i EXI:.TING DE I r ~2 - -ECHANICAL STANDI 46 SEAM { '~ I #MECHANICAL VAULTED ROOF i 1 1 1 i .3: 1 iii i !1 21 3 e - - - - - -Â· --63 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT - #LANDSCAPE ARCHITEIT 1 1 lili 1 a i 1 11 1 ' EXISTING E it :11 111 CIVIL STANDING SEAM ./ 1 1 1 2 4 VAULTED ROOF 1 -- ----- --- !1 1 ~ #COAURAC 1 0,4 CONTRACTOR Ii- 1:iII j- ./ â‚¬)- -1 - - Â£ _-.... -- ----- _â‚¬) 0, , DECK -Â¤EL ~ p-7 ----------- --- -63 +10 t-- -22---- +----- -- - -- -- - -- 0- 1~ 1 4 #-Â©- , mcâ„¢sâ„¢) | HPC M)1108 DESIGN REMEW 4 MARK DATE DESCRIPTION 1 - V -- 1 1 ---- ------ tv=.71.- -- ,_.01,/ PROJECT NO 0720 , ~ i.-~DRAWN BY SMW - fex,sine OM,-SE rap ie-e 3-2.-1 -2 -1 - . n - - __-_ _.- -- _ -.- - .-.-- - -_.- - -__ _~ _ --- C M 1 COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE I lEi I i 4 A2.2 000Â®00 ROOF PLAN ' ENLARGED ROOF PLAN 1.-0. T tx# 1~ EXJSTÂ»e .44*,1 e;UCk -ET FORUM PHI EX]snlee-'GIC 'I.U. i at;*ec-roee~e.,vrm>- 4 k-lf2-2--1 174 Mid~and Ave Sulte 201 ----1 111~1&~F - %*E OF 'll FR~~ 6, I PO Box 1606 Basalt. Colorado 81621 / PHONE 9702794157 FAX 8667705585 . 1-101*, r 1 ----2==~70 Isis Addition 1 $:44 1 406 E. Hopkins Ave I. E-0â‚¬l/OVER.Al<-_t. .~.__- _._'_1_-3_ ... ~ Aspen. Colorado 81611 â€žÂ·ruRIN'OvuarlUR"Ot.'-HM 1~ ' â‚¬0 01 Suzie Krevoy ~"~~----- --fIE1 3-':urry J, i,% CONSULTAN. SURVEYOR #SURVEYOR -'-'--t--I-'-I-----RBSTFMb 1 38:n.,-~~1/11.f--. 1 1 3.43 i.: f.1 1 JU-11-4)1'1 GEOTECH 1 1 1 Fl Â· ~ 0060Â·rECH - Â· STRUCTURAL- j ..UCT... MECHANICAL #MECHANICAL LANDSCAPE ARCH[TECT #LANDSCAPE ARCHEECT --7 CIVIL 0,41# CONTIU\CTOR 1 2 - - -- - 29~4~93-~ HPC 2~01%8 DESIGN REVIEW inn n,AnnnAnn . . L~ MARK DATE DESCRIPTION pROJECT NO 0720 DRAWN BY SMW COPYRIGHT Forum Phi LLC SHEET TITLE A4.2 SECTIONS A WALL SECTION 1/2- = 1.-0. $... 11;-r 7. 1. 7 1. y. r .1,~ ."4 -A 0 FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave Suite 201 PO 80* 1606 nk===0 -- -rt . P...1 lasalt Coll.60 81621 - - ---Injl 'E=Â·Â·Â·11 11 1 PHONE 9702794157.- 8667705585 .---E , ~ GUEST , - . BAT- 1\ / la 11-4__4 1 Isis Addition 1 1 1 '1 - ivr: F_ [-----------'1 406 E. Hopkins Ave , , i ~ I Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 1 J L--J 2-9 8.7 Suzie Krevoy - --3 - 1_ _ _ _1, 11 , h Al \ ! , 1 1 CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR 6 1 1.1 . IND. . 1 1 1 #SUR\'EVOR / 11 1 11. 1 -1: .1 lk~---~~~~~ ~7=]Â»~~Gl~ES~U~r~* ~ ~ Â°' f -~ - -- 1 / O _EL-1 --- 1 :11 -)] GEOTECH ' , #GECTECH . 1-_41-JJ. L_-2 J e=e STRUCTURAL #STRU.URAL 571 In ILD ROAM -9-5-3~â‚¬/ 90' OFrICE 4 -4'--40--4 MECHANICAL i /(Sm. CONDO : y=-re 7 1 AREA _ _ #MECHANICAL -= 1 En-innu~i-71 - 9 C I. 1 .W -1 14= 1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 692 7-T, --F- 181 En_ 1-44- .LANDSCAPEARCHITECT ~ ~ 2 11 11 1 11.7 :=1 I -]ID - M M CIVIL 1- -_J -/1-11 /9 2 1 Le ='u-- LEGil r. 1-1 ~ ~ n J 1, 0. 11 Ali J 1-11 p--504 ---I-/-90 CONTRACTOR #.,0-3- arzÂ»-~L_UL=.e/GN-;---DA #CON'*Clok K L=====d 1 1 1 1 FU---1 1 --I i -- - ---- - 1 1~- â€ž-â‚¬â‚¬ 2. L 1 HIC 2/0198 DESIGN REVIEW C - - -- . - - - Â· (ExisTÂ·Â»e CRA,1,â€¢em w gaÂ·6~1., ~ - . 1 MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROjECT NO 0720 11 M 1 1 , DRAVI. BY SMW i COPYR'GHT Foful'hi LLI + SHEET TITLE 6 8 A2.1 09 0 ADDITION 1/4. = 1.-0- FLOOR PLAN TR OWNER -S . FORUM PHI 174 Midland Ave Suite 201 PO Box 1606 Basalt. Coion.do 81621 PHONE 9702794157 FAX 8667705585 111 11111' il . 1 8 11 Isis Addition 406 E. Hopkins Ave EXISTING STANDING SEAM 1 Aspen. Colorado 81611 vAULTEDROOF Suzie Krevoy AMI 1 CONSULTANTS lilli lili SURVEYOR FLAT /0. 1 r GEOTECH STRUCTURAL #STRUCTURAL 1 1 il i I *6- hEA, T==1~ vA, 1_TED ROOF F k * ;L i I imic:~ t! MECHANICAL 1 ,~ 1'. IT]filli i : .... ,1 â€¢MECHANICAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 11 71 41 HITECT i : Â· 11.11 LIE I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT i 1 1 ' 1 Â·re*lkÂ·MAÂ·rir. 0Â»mur'I 11 1 1 , 1 11 VIATEDRIC' I 31 ' iE ; 1 .1- 4 !; .4 *:ii : Il i I U 1- h.:': HE] 1-111 -1~- Will,# CIVIL ExISTING I 1 1 : 1 1 1 ~ tri 1 11 1 | STANDING S~M 1 i | VAUCnED ROOF 1 CONTRACTOR #CONT.A. 0/ 1---- i' 11 11 1 - - V L Im --4.--- ....A.= -i- -v21-Â·CJ-Elil_ELI_ r A | L -g. Fre 71 -THRU 7 1 1 , 1 CVERFb 1 F- 0 i , i , 1 1 111 rm 11 HPC 2/01~08 DESIGN REVIEW MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO 0720 3 ROOF PLAN 1, . 1Â· 0Â· DRAWN BY S.W COPYRIGHT Forwm Phi lLC SHEET TITLE A2.3 ROOF PLAN 02/19/2008 07: 22 3105767761 KREVOY PAGE 01/01 .. 3)0 576- CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENr DEPARTMENT -776 i Agreement.for Pamint-Qfgia,fAilmn.RemIRPIng;LAimli!:adg:LE#i CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and KREVOY SUSANNE SEPARATE PROP TRST{hereinafter APPLICANID AGREE.AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for 406.E HOPKINS..AyE.lm]LA.ASEEN-21&1611 (hereinafter, THE PROLECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agree~ that the City of Aspen has an adopted fee structure for Land lise applications and tie paym.ent of all processing fees is R condition precedent to a detennination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the dze, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is nor possible at t]Es time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY furt}.er agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additiono] Costs to be biUed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they Ria neces,ary as costs are incur.red. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering in hit costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree rhar k is impracticable for CITY *aff to complete processing or pre$ent sul*cient information to the Histor:ic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City CÂ¢,uncil to make legally required findings for project consideration. unless current billings are pid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANr agree# that in coneideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fee; prior to a determir,ation of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $1.470_ which is for i hours of Community Development staff time. and if actual recorded costs /A exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY fur ~ the processing of the appli,:ation mentioned above, including post approval review at a rare of $245.00 p~~ planner hour over the initial deposit. Such pexiodic pRyments shall be made within 30 days of the billing d/////P APPUCANT 611Â·cher agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of proc511~ and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been p CrrY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By:- By:721.-At L ' ' L z-> - Chris Bendon Community Developnent Dkector Date: 2 -1 6 -08 Billing Address and Telephone Nitmber: Remirgd 231( LA Me,54 0.*i' ue BAA-[* /40 Al; 0,90_03 9:690.2 320 600 -1239 n . _ Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, 1 }pdated: May 29, 2007 Ie 39%#d A0A3B>1 619&18 6E6Ef*Â§0Â£6 G#:60 8008/82/Ze .. CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET CITY OF ASPEN mSTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION DATE RECEIVED: 3/15/96 CASE # HPC 8-96 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID # 2737-073-30-006 PROJECT NAME: Isis Building HPC Final Review Project Address: 406 E. Hopkins, Aspen Al/5-,4 APPLICANT: Isis Limited Liability Company Address/Phone: c/o Houston & O'Leary, Inc., 305 S. Galena, Aspen 81611; 925-8664 REPRESENTATIVE: Charles Cuniffe Architects Address/Phone: 520 E. Hyman, Suite 301, Aspen, CO; 925-5590 PLANNING FEE: $0 # APPS RECEIVED 0 # PLATS RECEIVED 0 TYPE OF APPLICATION:Final Review Review Rod, Alerting Date Public Hearing ? HPC IJYes CINO P&Z C]Yes C]No CC C]Yes E]No CC (2nd reading) C]Yes I]No REFERRALS: El City Attorney El Zoning m Environmental Health D City Engineer 0 Housing E Parks El Planning Il Other: U Other: DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DATE DUE: CLOSED/FILED DATE: INITIALS: ROUTE TO: u-rizASH dopl~CTDA- As - Buters SHEET NO OF | CALCULATED BY CF~g DATF 4-16-97 THE C]TY OF ASPEN CHECKED RY DATF PUBLIC WORKS & ENGINEER]NG Ve> 4 4 1 1-0 /4 SCAIF Le 1- 01191*v Hii 0%6MiLD ' s 4/ Revv O A J MAA-r d PA 01 1 T.1.'SH 00**PACTBA - /7<> 1 00 co#feÂ¢E' V t 9-2 : =-1 9 1 4 3 &13 5% AQ C 61-0 0 9 /4 A _ ,1 U -EMASH O.ke,c-n, A- 2 49 00 00 y r - 42-/' -'SP PRODUCT 204 1 (Single Sheet!) 205-1 (P,Od@[1} /;~*7Â® inc. Glmoll Mass 01471 To Ords, PHONE T)11 FREE 1 *2254380 :-MT-g3r '98=UlL:2qQ!1 c~-61 ajtltiI~f,EZ R I ID A . , 9~941 4.864 P.2 English: In.4.tle'lon 4,â€¢trudion, for rurb and skylight ' E*mile|r "&2%%*neâ€¢ 4â€¢ Inipah.;6n pam cuM- y lolduces _~~ Froo,ads: F.wile# d']r,glructioni pour Ilnsfaflahon dc la gou.-<o.Ne, el clu .uils de lumi*re VELU - 44. ECX 4-11 80a-_ vog A- - -- _ 1- 1-- fv- LAAE~/ --owl kfj- I !.6 i 0.-10. I D . _ . / 4, wilh B, FS' and Vi. EHAÂ©Ii-U;OY 56112 con + tragojews FS, FST y . R . .: VS, 11 ha~#2*Uue- r . A Â·Â·A PS, FSF e YS seule- 1,1 men L . 1 h\ / 1 *I- -*- ., dÂ® / / Englith: And- p. 24: 1 *0!1Â¢r,on of wÂ·6: P. 2: Pbr.nling arld crow malÂ©46 '. 3: cul, ng rough opining Â· 01,â€¢â€¢,61!ng wb P. 4: Ing#Ing w,6 i#,801: Ind= Ag. 2 4: 1.IWoc]60 d. 10 =, fi.: .'A~ -712 -74 M60. 3 Replcâ€¢loc y ze:cian. Ireasâ€¢ersole: X -1 NE~ 3. Ape'.4 4â€¢11â€¢,8- - M.â€¢61â€¢iâ€¢ 4.1. Nv=1 1 --49 1 culle Ng. 4: 18.*lad6, 6 la 0168 x fâ‚¬45 -7k#r% Frnne:,j *deâ€¢ , 2Â·â€¢: In.rgllahor, di ta aous P. 2: Man,licotion w coupe: Irar.*aol. P. 3: Coup. de I'g.ver,un~ 643.Â· MLerâ€¢Wage de 10 â€¢guko viar& 0. A: 1051Â¤Uafion 46 18 *006<glufc /0,4* Indux c. 5Â·10: 1.=Iter,on 4,4149. P. 3: p~*t~Aae /Â»Ughl - P. 6- Inito(Ane â€¢40(gh, 1 P. 'Â·4Â·. t,utt.t[W d.ddltg~ p, 10; D-1. r-/.'il' 'd,1,/' $' ' -4//2/- h.9101. indke p49 5-10: Invaloewn dai Iro,ul.x 40.5Â· Pmpa,ectu del ..0.4.1. . t De-- 8/f 769. 6: b.,gla<141â€¢ dat Irâ€¢Plu: , - 4613#,4- Ng. 74- 1.0010.9. del reÂ¢â€¢brim).Ble, Pag. 10 r.4.Ile. h-M-' Bunmis; 1,idet pÂ· 5-10: Inâ€¢vabarieâ€¢ du â€žN di 1 1,1.61.,0: P. 3: P,040,40* 4, pul, d. Ium,62 .4 Zzlry P, e: b,dallvion du pulth 6 lumle,e - . - 31 P. 7.9, Imh,1102Â©n 0.4 bordages P. 10: DEcils i .. AT7ACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name The Isis Theater Renovation & Expansion 2. Project location 406 E. Hopkins. Aspen, Colorado - Lots K,L & M Block 87, City & Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, CO (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning Commercial Core (CC) 4, Lot size 9,000 SF 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number Isis Limited Liability Co. c/o Houston & 0'Leary Inc. 620 E. Hyman. Aspen. CO 81611 925-8664 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number Charles Cunniffe Architects 520 E. Hyman, Suite 301, Aspen, CO 81611 925-5590 7, Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use . Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA - XX Final HPC 8040 Greentine Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. HisIOriC Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee - Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sEI. it., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) Two story brick/sandstone masonry and timber frame construction containing: Mnvip Thppter: 4,297 SF net leasable Plumbinq Sh-op: 1.469 SF net leasable Dwelling Unit: 153 SF net leasable (2 bedroom) 9. Description of development application Restoration of the original qtrept facade;: Additiong and intprinr renrvation to accommodate new screening rooms, lobby and conces,ion space, toilets, elÂ·ra evdtor, affordable housing units (2-3 bearoom) and tree market housing (1-3 bedrm) 10. Have you completed and attached the following? XX Attachment 1- Land use application form XX Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form xx Response to Attachment 3 XX Response to Attachments 4 and 5 , Â· JUL 21 '95 15:35 PIT~ COUM I-Y TITLE ARAF-nARAAnflA ,// EXHIBIT A f WII COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: 07/01/95 at 08:30 A.M. Case No. PCT10050 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: (a) ALTA Ownerts Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ TBD Premium$ Proposed Insured: Rate:RE-ISSUE RATE PROFORMA (b) ALTA Loan Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ Premium$ Proposed Insured: Rate: Tax Certificate $20.00 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: DOMINIC LINZA and KATHRYN A. LINZA . 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN, State of COLORADO and is described as follows: LOTS L, M AND N, BLOCK 87, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. TOGETHER WITH an easement for encroachment on Lot K, Block 87, City and Townsite of Aspen as set forth in Deed recorded in Book 347 at Page 988. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Countersigned at: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E. HOPKINS This Commitment is invalid ASPEN, CO. 81611 unless the Insuring 303-925-1766 Provisions and Schedules Fax 303-925-6527 A and B are attached. JUL 21 '95 15:37 Pl-IN~LUUMI Y I 1 ILL AIRAAARAnflfif 1[1 ~ NT! ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DISCLOSURES The owner's Policy to be issued, if any shall contain the following items in addition to the ones set forth above: (1) The Deed of Trust, if any, required under Schedule B-Section 1. (2) Water rights, claims or title to water. Pursuant to Insurance Regulation 89-21 NOTE: Each title entity shall notify in writing every prospective insured in an owner's title insurance policy for a single family residence (including a condominim or townhouse unit) (i) of that title entity's general requirements for the deletion of an exception or exclusion to coverage relating to unfiled mechanics or materialmens liens, excepc when said coverage or insurance is extended to the insured under the terms of the policy. A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnifying the Company against unfiled mechanics' and/or Materialmen's Liens executed by the persons indicated in the attached copy of said affidavit must be furnished to the Company. Upon receipt of these items and any others requirements to be specified by the Company upon request, Pre-printed Item Number 4 may be deleted from the Ownerls policy when issued. Please contact the Company for further information. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing contained in this Paragraph shall be deemed to impose any requirement upon any title insurer to provide mechanics or 1 materialmens lien coverage. NOTE: If the Company conducts the owners' closing under circumstances where it is responsible for the recording or filing of legal documents from said transaction, the Company will be deemed to have provided "Gap Coverage". Pursuant to Senate Bill 91-14 (CRS 10-11-122); (a) The Subject Real Property may be located in a Special Taxing District; (b) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained form the County treasurer of the County Treasurer's Authorized Agent; (C) Information regarding Special Districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. NOTE: A tax Cernificate will be ordered from the County Treasurer by the Company and che costs thereof charged to the proposed insured unless written instruction to the contrary are received by the company prior to the issuance of the Title Policy anticipated by this Commitment. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT10050 A and B are attached. < < 8*EXHIBiT B f . /1 '1 .. 4 IS 15 THEATRE DomIAIÂ¢ 6 Kdthryn Unza P.0, 80% 180 ASPal, COLORADO 8i612 July 26, 1995 To Whom It May Concern: This letter liereby grants to the Isis LLC, as holders of an option to purchase the Isis Theatre, the right to submit such land use application-s as may be necessary to obtain approval for the redevelopment of tile Isis property for tllreatre purposes. After reviewing the plans that the Isis LLC are submitting to you, we are 100% supportive of tile proposed plans. We would like to take this opportunity to say how happy we are tliat their intent is to keep theatres in this location. Yours most sincerely, Dominic and Kathryn A. Linza /~722~40 y>~Â«a/*90 - 408 E. Hopkins Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 925-7909 I 1 .. , EXHIBIT C ISIS L.L.C. July 21, 1995 Ms. Leslie Lamont and Ms. Amy Amidon Aspen Community Development Department 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Leslie and Amy: This letter authorizes Sonny Vann & Associates and Charles Cunniffe, Architects, to represent "us" in the processing of such applications as may be required to obtain approval for the redevelopment of the Isis property. Most sincerely Sam Houston D As Manager of ISIS L.L.C. 305 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970)925-8664 LOCATION MAP 0 . '1 ['4 t h. 1 01> 4<111 -----2----- i t C 61 4,4 t â€¢ V *,V -1.73 .rn -Â·74 , p L Â«ob. 9:-- - Ll.-04 , i % \ 191(741.43 54,5 8, \---ll-- - H g # K-*i 44\- -nal & m $01, '< 1$/3 eN Inil"ul, Ut'.10 i 1,92.7.rt/,1 ow,y, A Ne," f I . ..A.. . . Â· ooÂ« coul.. u, 1- - '1Â·:~<jitÂ·11Â·2.9 g f y J * , eÂ· 2 -5 \h? VI" 0, 4 --- -1 2, / j t'.51 ~ U A 'Â·in--1 / 4 -4 - , n< d -1 C..f-791-7'.m" 33'k ..\%r-9.- Aspe. l 4 EL -156 i- li -t %- M,In St Ilt*MY U 11 , t., d 1 4 224 . u -4:W ly, 4 -1 6:r A; 0 - ~ r li -113,1-1 Ght â€¢1% ~ ~ SU.â„¢,lil 9- A A, ./- #MAST " Fliod r.,5,1- LAS,q-lei , Â·Â·Â»vt ' * 71-~1 92.WQT\- 4 40G 13-, +FOF}<1140 \FÂ· t.*74' 4411~ 0 4 i U .\ -9 yrili r 4,(h \1 \ 9 4 CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS im 7-10-95 ISIS RENOVATION IOT, t M 1 H AtlrY 0100( il ' ~~ â€¢elÂ¢ r.Allr 110'â€¢"r; Avl"Uf, Atri,1 CO, ORADO In D,f Im/H AM. ' Unt y,I ' A;rER. rn rin Â· tulÂ· Miâ€¢nis,0 Â· ruÂ· iowi wit 37Â© 1 10,01.4,0 Avr Â· 1,1~tiâ€¢,01.CO Hi'll Â· 1111, MÂ¥71*-,rÂ·Ii â€¢ P.i W,1Â·714 i.ti .. The Isis Theater Renovation and Expansion STATEMENT FOR HPC FINAL REVIEW The proposed plan to renovate and expand the Isis Theater is intended to extend the functional life of this important cultural and entertainment facility. Generations of Aspen's citizens and visitors have patronized this institution since it opened its doors in 1915. Originally built in 1892, the Henry Webber Building was a commercial building before becoming the town's only theater during the silent movie era. The renovation and expansion plans are focused on several objectives for this landmark structure; the most significant being the restoration of the original street facade. This work will include: â€¢ Removal of the wood siding and canopy which conceal the original street level facade. â€¢ New, historically appropriate storefronts, glazing and doors. â€¢ Refurbish or replace as required the second floor windows. â€¢ Cleaning and repair of existing brick facing and sandstone details. â€¢ Repair and refurbish the existing Isis signage. The restoration effort will return the street facade to its original appearance and enhance the overall historic character of this neighborhood. The Henry Webber Building remains the last Commercial Core structure to undergo renovation. Expansion of the original facility will occur in three ways: new basement space to accommodate screening rooms, toilets and lobby space; infill of the vacant lot to the east to provide screening room, lobby space, elevator and stairway; and housing, including affordable housing units, on the roof of the existing building. These new additions are intended to defer to the restored facade of the original building in the following ways: â€¢ The infill addition is set back from the original street facade approximately 18'. â€¢ Materials and detailing of the addition are intended to be distinctive but appropriate and compatible with the existing building. â€¢ The affordable housing units are located along the alley to minimize their impact on the historic character of the original building from the street view. â€¢ The free market unit is setback on all sides to minimize its impact on the historic character of the original building from the street view. The development plan submitted for final HPC approval conforms to all representations made during conceptual review. Conditions placed on the conceptual approval were primarily focused on the selection of the exterior finish material palette. These were satisfactorily addressed with HPC through work sessions which occured subsequent to the conceptual approval. The final material and color selections are to be determined in the field with the designated HPC monitors. CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS FEBRUARY 19, 1997 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAR. 12, 1997 a. A waiver from the requirements of Section 26.58.040(19(4) (c), garages, carports and storage areas of the Municipal Code. b. A combined sideyard setback variances of4feet. c. As required by code, all structural features and /or support columns will remain within the required setbacks, or within the limits ofvariances granted from required setbacks. 4. Afive hundred (500) square foot jloor area bonus for the proposed addition to the nonconforming duplex structure, pursuant to Section 26.104.030, Nonconforming Structures, ofthe Municipal Code. 5. All approvals granted to this application may be rendered invalid if the easement vacation and other issues related to the water line that crosses the northerly portion of the subject lot are not resolved in a manner compatible with said approvals. Iffinal resolution of these issues in any way, precludes development of the proposal as approved, the applicant will be required to resubmit his/her application for conceptual review by the HPC. Prior to proceeding with Final review, the applicant shall submit legal documentation detailing the resolution of alt issues related to said water line, including a signed letter from a qualified representative ofthe a#ected water utility company. 6. Front porch to remain. 7. Restudy chimney in height and width. & Continue to work with the Water Department to reduce the 10' south easement. Motion second by Jeffrey. Motion carried 5-1. Jake opposed. Jake, Roger, Mark, Susan, Jeffrey, Melanie ISIS THEATRE - 406 E. HOPKINS - FINAL Melanie was excused at 7:45 PM. Gilbert stepped down. Amy stated that Staff is recommending Final approval with ten conditions as stated in the memo. Conceptual was done in 1995 and numerous worksessions were scheduled and no one submitted for final. She also 12 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAR. 12. 1997 stated that the project is quite visible and that a story board or display should be created while the restoration is being completed. MOTION: Roger moved to approve Final Development for 406 E. Hopkins with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide samples ofall materials for approval by the HPC and label all materials on the permit set. 2. The applicant shall retain the existing masonry wall on the southfacade andthose portioiis ofthewest facade which are currently visible. The applicant shall reconstruct the exposed portions of the east wall to match the west wall, using salvaged bricks and matching the coursing and mortar characteristics. A sample panel shall be created for the approval of stajf and monitor. 3. Physical evidence uncovered during demolition which provides more accurate injbrmation about the original appearance of the southfacade shall be incorporated into the restoration of thatfacade, with the approval of staff and monitor. 4. The applicant shall retain the existing "Isis" sign and reinstall in its current position. 5. The applicant shall submit specifications for repair Of historic materials, including cleaning and repointing of masonry, for approval by staff and monitor. 6. The applicant shall remove the awning from the west side of the existing structure. 7. The applicant shall repair and reuse all historic fabric on the south facade of the building, including the windows, cornice, and building plague. 8. Any changes which affect the exterior appearance of the building shall immediately be brought to the attention ofstafffor approval by staffand monitor. 9. The applicant shall create a story board describing the project to the public and place it near the project. 10. Eliminate the vaulted roofofthe elevator to-wer. Motion second by Mark. DISCUSSION Amy indicated that on the smaller set of prints which indicate conceptual approval 1995, the tower had a flat roof structure. What is being presented today on the full size set of plans is a vaulted roof that matches the new 13 . r ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAR. 12. 1997 addition. She stated that the elevator tower should be more compatible with the historic building and recommended eliminating the vaulted roof. Charles stated that the roofproposed enhances the building and allows them to bring the elevator equipment up to its maximum height. He stated that it ties the roo f together. The new element separates the old by the gesture of shape. Susan stated that she was opposed to taking down the east wall. She would like to ensure that the wall will remain old i f the bricks are to be cleaned. Amended motion. Roger moved to eliminate condition #10, second by Mark. All infavor of motion and amended motion except Susan who voted against the motion. Motion carried 4-1. Voting were Jake, Roger, Mark Susan and Jeffrey. 1008 E. HOPKINS - WORKSESSION NO MINUTES MOTION: Roger nloved to adjourn; second by Jake. All in favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, ChiefDeputy Clerk 14 .. MEMORANDUM - CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 610 E. HYMAN, ASPEN, CO 81611 -1 970/925-6590 970/920-4557 FAX ARCMITICTURE PLANNING INTERIORS TO. Amy Guthrie, HPC FROM: Geoffrey Lester DATE: January 18, 2000 PROJECT. Isis Theater JOB NO.. 9521 REGARDING: Landscape Trees To appease the City Engineering department's movie queuing concerns at the front exterior walk. Shaw Construction has temporarily filled in the future tree well areas with concrete. This move will allow maximum pedestrian flexibility during the winter months. These four tree wells are planned to be reclaimed later this Spring. The Owner will be providing trees and tree grates per the recommendations of the City Forester. 1 Â·] RAAA,Akl e l 1 1 I 1 L21UW D J J 1 killAA 031Uwut Ill J O 4 Â· 7 Anni 1 0 1Â·1]p P 81 .. MEMORANDUM I. CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS ,/3 610 E. HYMAN, ASPEN, CO 81611 970/925-5590 970/920-4557 FAX ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS TO: Amy Guthrie, HPC FROM: Geoffrey Lester DATE: December 7,1999 PROJECT: Isis Theater JOB NO.: 9521 REGARDING: Exterior Light Fixtures Amy, Attached is a catalog cut sheet and several drawings showing our preference for the exterior light fixture type and location. As a reminder, we eliminated all the light sconce fixtures from the historic facade leaving only two fixtures at the new addition to illuminate the housing units ground level entry. We feel the fixture design and material finish relates well in context with the curved copper canopy above. (We temporarily have this actual fixture in our office if you want to see it.) We are seeking your approval for this light fixture. Upon approval, we will replace the two temporary fixtures installed which met the building department's exit lighting criteria. Thank You. 1 ill mmuln ~~ H*WERBR &11: L rL.-UnFll--IE-1[~11~11~8 rF~ E] ' L -Â·' UAUUWUJULU~nILflf_~Ani[U-UWUUULUUitinUMUL[1.-r - 0.2 L-: -1 9 ~ L-.-3 L-2 0 I- --1 1 - lEn] 0 0 1 : 1 Â¤ ~23 12- 2 2 1 2 2-' 0-13 1 ry_-_1 02 -=.392- ~Lf~li Â· /1 / 1 1,~ 11 /\ %\ a j f..= j ,. 1 i , r I' 6.-L- 1 f IXTOFâ‚¬ UEAT(60 9 ( 2 ON IX) 11.1.11 [1:(61.0,1 . 1 1 2 -3 ' -10 I \ I 1 1 '' \ / / h f , / . 311-- % / - f / 1 1 . / 1 1 1 1 1 n Â¥ CUWED '30*t *a WelÂ£ A,6 Fl MAH Colig fâ‚¬l,(16 WelL 16 11+E OljtA/â‚¬t> c,â€¢*tel Aâ‚¬Due I .. ASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY , 0 -0. 14**fral /15 & 1 2 . ./. 1.- * 17(1*i/VA '2 25. 7 .,g-7.>31% 1 620 West Bleeker Street / Aspen, Colorado 60>11' / 970-92533721 / FAX 970-925-5349 . .I--? ..f,ivq '',4'M~/-1..4.'t., ' -' .1 r.:27 C*S-7 * 4..4 programs /Â¢ 4,1996 1.1 f , Whreler-Stallard House Museum Hoiden-Marm Mi.ing and Ranching Museum Future Museum at Litt One Independence and Ashc,ott Ghost TOWMS ASPEN\9 Time Travelerf for Childre;, Colorado Historical o Museum Aâ€¢â€¢ex Exhibits 1300 Broadway Public Archives Denver, CO 80203 HistoÂ·â‚¬ V.'alking Tours Trustees To whom it may concern: Prfident Doug Carlson This letter provides support for the renovation of the Isis Theater in Aspen, Colorado. Vice President My support comes from a conversation I had with Amy Amidon, Aspen's historic Beatrice Entema,IM preservation officer. AMM Hodges Sec:retary Over the years. the exterior ofthe theater has been changed to reflect a more '-modern" Sue C. Dirkes look. The brick exterior on the ground level has been covered with siding and is no longer in keeping with the buildings surround;ng it which have been restored or built in Tieasurer tne Victorian tradition (like the Hotel Jerome renovation with which I was involved) Stirung Cooper Therew owners wish to renovate the facade to its original design, which would enrich. Les Andmon not only the building itself, but the entire block on which the theater is located. Cud Bergma,1 lim Boud Merrill Ford This is a much needed and very deserved face lift for one of Aspen's most beloved Rogle Fr,und historical buildings. The theater plays host to both popular and avant garde films as Cfiristin, AubalÂ¢ Gerschel well as the nationally renowned Aspen Filmfest. I urge you to consider the funding Mar* HentAorn Laurie MÂ£Bride request being made by the Aspen Historic Trust. Rick Newton Wall, Obenneger Thank you for your consideration and support. Peter Pleiler Patti Stranahan Gen Vagneur sincFâ‚¬ji~~---3 Man'44 Wilmerdi-Mg Director lody Phflh'p5 McCabe Dufarlson President Aspen Historical Society CC: Amy Amidon Jody McCabe 1 1 1 99% 6 99.1 . 19 1 7 - ....--- I-- -- 1 IrL fi . 0 -- - 10- 1 - disaullilillill, ..44. . 1 1 I 1 1 11 4 = ~12 4~12-IN#L- fee,Oll-;r -, - 8 *AvelÂ© 0 %- FldÂ¢e 410 -)44 N . 1, 2-Er/L''p:.#%11'27ME- s- 6'Â·. .Â·~~,- .d?L:flit,2 ZG.li->73.-7 0- .-4- ..:d-/ -, t t, , 41 10 , 1 1 3' 4' ' , ' teÂ·.->tÂ·VE{.51'949>~Â·AL'' Â·5-1 4~9 ~Ot ' .1. u. - 1.9/, ..P . 1.. p 'c . '..:, . . -1,22 ~CA; i J it . 4. 1 r. 7 - 9 - HO , 47$.t - . 90 -0 - W 4 1 El i AÂ©-; , - j \ P-- I 1 /1 11 6~_7f- 6 + liz . MEMORANDUM .1. CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS Â®a 610 E. HYMAN, ASPEN, CO 81611 970/925-5590 970/920-4557 FAX ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS TO: Amy Guthrie, HPC FROM: Geoffrey Lester DATE: July 16, 1999 PROJECT: Isis Theater JOB NO.: 9521 REGARDING: Minor South Facade Revisions Amy, We would like to bring you up to date on several recent decisions pertaining to minor revisions to the historic South facade. 1. The Contractor recommends leaving the through bolts in place at the top of the facade. Allowing these bolts to remain will provide an improved permanent lateral connection of the historic facade to the new steel support structure built on the inside of the wall. As typically done in this circumstance, we will provide a decorative steel washer at these locations, most likely a simple square plate, painted black. (Refer to Sheet 1.) 2. We have decided to eliminate the previously approved exterior light sconce locations from the historic south and east facades. (Sheet 2.) We feel there is no historic precedent to merit these lights and do not wish for these lights to compete with the original Isis sign which we are restoring and putting back in place. We intend to replace the wall sconces previously shown on both sides of the main entry with fuily recessed soffit lights within the recessed entry. (Sheet 3.) We do still plan on retaining the 2 light sconce fixtures at the Free Market Unit ground level Lobby entry. Please call if you have questions or comments regarding any of these items. Thank you. cc: Jack Wheeler, Shaw Construction 1--1 4 0 -11 -; 1 '6/ 1 \01:7 ' 451 ' L el 0UWA319 +11009 - 1 1 1 1 1-- 1 - ~ , ~ -0<' 0 --~---'(1' D----1-4 ~4111 94.-ITI YE . 1 ' 3, /, 1.k /- I . 1 3 1 1 -3 1 4441 :1 111,11, 11'111:1 1 11 - 1 1 4, 11 ,i: Â·~r~~ Â· i~i,i,I lil, ,~,i r-,Â·-- HÂ·:r~i:r,i,-~--~;r---r,1 1,;~1 'r-r,71.-r-,;.'.11,11!--rÂ·I~,-T--I-r"JI--37~- _ .1,1 1,1 - - -v- I 1 I r i +11 11:,V - 11 , 1 i 11 .':/ 11.:fil 1 1 4 1,1 1 1 , ': - ; :I;:i;:i - , 1,111 11,1,1, 111 I':ii 1,1. 11-1 -: 44 D: U. - 42'::.:s - -0 :9 51:D -i OWN- - :s::': ' 1:-==' t===4 *Am 9 W [$1~lf, 1, :'> 4'.1 1 !,1 3 1 1 1 1,1,1 1-; 1 1 : 4;F;;% / ,;' i '' M 41:, ril~tr[: U 1, 1 , (14191- 0) - , 1:.I,111 -==r=zz===-'.L r'I Ji'.1.- u :,w - .--1 ' - 'zi",- .'"' .'- ===1:,':- ~ 1-r] T Ar''TrIT'l'!1! 1 11;19',r',41'!~ lu"rd,1/1.'rd'td tfi i:,j,;11'12.,Â·rÂ· ,<i!:'iÂ·, irihi i''i',;-.121,1 1'1Â·1 , -- .'- ,; 1-'il,:.,;'W+5'i],1.'544';tr LTI,,T~1;1,,6-~!,i;b:.~,(ttl~~,-41:41 Â«z~444 01 l ' P i.~1 2-i' MI '2-1 Fi 'r-4 Ff#-9 TA 'A'A A: A lei- '+4'94 A Fd!14''Pti!'19' 'ti~ ~ '7-3 grt-=â€¢Â·Â·:01%~ k A A- 13' PY 'M' h'Pi''A' 8 jr-f 'r,1 J L -1 ,Hi'41111, '11 1,WL 1.17 l?it~>, JY t'W'19~k>~1,1 ]Lfi)74 4?l~t?,1:!7!4 t?,T t U -- . 244 3-5*2 - .7 9%44444444*7&44*0'*L!,P[,b~414441E4ip,~4443 ri.44,- rn , ,!Tr, t' '1111:1 ; Â·4~T Â·rÂ·Â·Â·Â·Â· : r'r~â€¢TIT. i d..Lâ€¢ 11 .TÂ·Â·râ€¢, 'rT.riT ''i'' 11Ti | ~~ Â¥ 2681 Y 1 | | U areÂ»*O*1 838814\ 11 '"li L ~~~~~~_~~Turr--73 -~ ~ I 1 UUNU -- 0 981) bleter 6Â»36â‚¬ EUM{KlealoW f*00*L - 4{Et Etel EMUKEâ‚¬HqÂ·Â·IT DFAWL E-Vh. (90â‚¬ET 3-3 - A --/ r -] 3 -1 P -1 En -1-3 U E-1,/-1,[--1,P--1 ~, E 'mnlmlit- &-:TlNlmIN *fldljUVU~'LIUWUWUUU-lfUl-f[J-,-~ fU-WIJU-,lfUUVUUOUtl#tUul.Jlflfm--1-@ -1.41/1- 1 r .1. 7""r-19 Ii:';8~4~m ~â€¢i'~ IFL'il, 11 0.1 ' 1, 110 iti:+Uit:ti -111 1 **1 44:ir 41 2%1 Hir, lkÂ®:W 11110 2112Â¢ "141111 7,1. IMI, 00:11 -,Â· 5%11 -MEEL_*8 n ___ - n_ -=__~_ - L 1.1 â€¢- 1 1.1.11.JIL_,~, 1 11.1 . --1 '...9-t' 1--6,t'.1,- Tmll,I I~ ,1,:,97,7.97,7'llh; â€žIIIH~~M OUI,VUHIIIIIII,Â»/1,Â·7411,I,I'illlI,Illl Â·,IÂ·1111,11,111111,i 04 div'1#3* K* ybi;El Mtt 14,64#224:,Ill '1 1, ~ci ~ 1 - ' 11 1 1 1 111 1 .1, 11 Â£ 1 11 11 14'fl /.11 i :.i:: 11 ~1 ER'ITT ; tiE x 1 - 44111 6-A 81 â‚¬ / [1 4 0 I[1 - - J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ear[H EUMA11* 14,4tr- F & trofâ‚¬5 1Â·\3Â·19 -6 Â¢*MM}J . 0-6<ALOF 2 ) LIBET 1Fl)1-roFâ‚¬G It> Be ELA,416Â¥freD 2.0 Featt FAce Or H l'*tÂ¥16 ef:Â·lol<4 U.ril. 1 (1 1 'Cruot- ce Â»3 X '1 10-0 1 .. 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 11 1 J' 11 11 lili ~ 11 1 11 1. III 1 1 11 6 1 11 11 11 1 1 11 i 1 1 11 11 1 )1 31 !i 11 1 1 ; 11 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 ~ 11 11 1 1 11 1 1 11 11 - 11 1! - 1 -lk==rid -.12 1- M r -; f 1 1 . ----- A 4 :1 ! 1 1 -- 4 welau 1 1 /, 1 1 i 1 3 \ // . ~/ % r \ r ' / 27 1 \1 J 1 elawea> eM-rla>r ela/Arnold - *INÂ£ FEE:833â‚¬0 64-N 1,[,e{T FIrRFF (TOTAL OF -33 111 % 4 0 0 d I I 0 OI 39 12EFUÂ¤eD â‚¬Ceprr 8.043 Ar FecE,BeD arr,ef- 1, /3 -19 /1 1 6 b , 1 _ U A] 1[11111111111111 0---. ILL -u MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission .2 THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Direct(i~~I~ FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: Isis Theater- Extension of conceptual approval DATE: january 22, 1997 SUMMARY: This project received conceptual development approval on August 23,1995. Section 26.72.010 (F)(3)(c) provides that an application for final development review shall be filed within one year of the date of approval of a conceptual development plan. Unless HPC grants an extension, failure to file the final development application shall make the approval null and void. Staff has made an effort in all cases to inform an applicant when conceptual approval is nearing expiration, however both staff and the applicant overlooked the expiration for the Isis. After conceptual, the project came back to HPC on the following dates: September 27, 1995, November 8, 1995, January 10, 1996, February 10, 1996, and July 10, 1996. At these meetings the applicant presented restudies of the position of the dwelling units on the roof, material selections, and a request for reconstruction of the east and west walls. Staff finds that the applicant has made a good faith effo rt to pursue the application and therefor a one year extension of conceptual should be granted. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends conceptual development approval for the Isis theater be extended to August 23, 1997. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "1 move to extend conceptual approval for the Isis theater to August 23, 1997." .. -Wl_ MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: Isis Theater- discussion DATE: July 10, 1996 The Isis Theater project has received final approval from HPC. The applicant has begun to estimate construction costs and methods and wishes to discuss potential reconstruction of the east and west walls of the building. The west wall will be visible in only a few areas, and the applicant feels that reconstruction is prudent method. The east wall will be more exposed to view, but was constructed to be a "party wall" meaning that it would have typically not been visible because another masonry structure would have been built directly abutting it. The bricks are 'bommon" as opposed to "face" bricks and the mortar joints are not tooled. The HPC is asked to determine whether or not it is appropriate to reconstruct this wall to make it a more finished facade or to leave it in its current, original state. The amount of demolition proposed was a significant issue during the project review and the HPC strove to retain as much of the original fabric of the building as possible. . -r i. ). [213 2. Â·' July 3, 1996 < ;JUL 3 19,6 ~ ARCHITECTURE 'I PLANNING Amy Amidon Aspen / Pitkin HPO L.' . INTERIORS 1 / 130 S. Galena , Aspen Colorado 81611 ..2.1, .322' Dear Amy We are requesting a review of the restoration methods being considered for the Isis Theater project. During the HPC board meetings we attempted to keep as much of the historic fabric of the building in place as possible. We had hoped to be able to maintain the East facade to the point where the new addition begins and maintainÂ· , the entire West facade. At this time we are finalizing the construction documents, and will determine the total cost of the project. We would like to have the board consider some options on the final methods to renovate and restore the remaining portions of the original building. A large portion of the West facade is impossible to see today because it is behind the adjacent fox Photo building. We feel that since this portion of the building will not be seen it is more feasible to remove the portion of the West wall that is not in view. In addition we are requesting the final 101 of the West wall at the alley, which can be seen today, be documented with photographs and then rebuilt to the original appearance with the original brick. We feel this method will allow for a better final product at this location. Please note the front part of the West facade that is visible will remain in place and be restored to its original appearance. The existing condition of the structure and brick at this area has been reviewed by lain Lygo masonry and deemed appropriate for this type of work. 1he enclosed letter documents the review. These masons participated on the restoration of the City Hall building. The letter also details the difficulty in restoring the East facade of the building. We understand there may be some appeal in the appearance of the rough mortar work at this area but it appears that this wall was not meant to be viewed this way. We would like the board to consider the reconstruction of this wall using the original brick and to reconstruct it closer to the original appearance of the brick work at the other areas of the building. I have enclosed drawings to show were the outlined areas are located. We will bring photographs of these areas to the meeting and be prepared to discuss the potential benefits to the project. CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS Â· 520 EAST HYMAN Â· SUITE 301 Â· ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 â€¢ 970/925-5590 FAX 970/925-5076 CA .. Please contact me if you need further information or if you have questions. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. r - Sincerejy , , 0 . I -.t' i 2- 200.- John Wheeler AIA 090 0 fe 0 0 0, 0 1a AIm 0 1\. ~411 1 '=cilil Iâ€žI,11.11.1~1111111,11 11 11.1,1 111111,41,0.- 1 4.13 /1 =.0* I --{El r- i p --/ =*-0 u K 1 1 1.1 1 m 1 1 11 Frt = 0 1 12 1 UL = =i= 0- -"=3~4 0 0 410 ~,-u-*, I M g *All 1 =20 1 1 It 11 1 E I~ -- 12 EE1 =' E-Â£ EÂ· : Â® SOUTH COURTYARD ELEVATION 2-~31 e. 1 Z im b 02 6 16 CE< 1 U 1a gal 1 231 1 1 r. -Ij i i -â€¢re. 4,1 - - Ill --- *il -- - 0 SOUTH ELEVATION ~ 68 0 2 6 16 - Ee e 1=50 0 iE 1- I EAir- WALL TO =- - . 'f41*InhÂ·+4 1 ..1 IDE- RE.13'lll L.:r < _ - O 7: ; I , 1 -1 E=*414 1 it Z 1-0 2. f E}-- -=Are E Er-1 KEYNOTES PROG/â‚¬36 PINT 5 1 m"- MOTTO BE USED 1 FOR C[*611'ACTDON 1 ~ ! Elâ€¢,repa- - 1 1 1 1 %-1 4 r 1 1 1 - 1 1 8 8-YA-na- 6 1 1 1 i ib %= - 1---~50 0 rl- E*ST- El.EVAT1ON 5 A3.1 Z m 02 8 16 0..6 . 2.6..U.* 0<],1,01(13 88080 KEYNOTES 0 49 Gte 0-- ~11,0 gl"" cu#-' 1 -Fili~ilili 'Ii'|H|~Hm|MIt Â®Miummlll111~IliLI E ED=n-- , 0 12=- Â»28Â»1-1=~1~m rm .1// C-'ll'/B Â£/ i =re R,I"ll.I- ~ m-*C} MCIN ./a CAUL â€¢ kil 8 11 11 : !== S 11 1 1 1 1-1 1 1 1! Id Ee-i- WAL L TO KE-MAL,4 ~ 11 1 ES I ~~/-4 137E 12.6':51~22 16â‚¬17 Lbt FLACE_ ~ 1------------r--------- 1 ~ NORTH ELEVATION r alf U 33 1 0 2 6 16 - 0 8 0 0 0 - IY 1 1 1 11 J -71 2 . i / - &'ir#446ML ast<Â»/ 44 m o ; m m d C d W EST WALL TP :36 K EAU 1 LT 0 26 1 1\ \96 1 1 1\\ ~ 1, 0 12 0 90 1 1 6 PROGAESS *la ~ 1 1 NOT TO BE Ueal 1 FOR CON,nUCTION 0418 1 ...... 1 1 1 1 Z =ZIZE= 1 % cr =r-- E' 0 5 A3.2 Â® WEST ELEVATION 5 - 0 -a . 1 0 2 6 16 of]VIO,00 N)29Â¥tlfl 0 0 . InIN LYGO MASONRY QUOTE AND CONTRACT SHEET FOR SAM HOUSTON. The following is an estimate of cost comparisons for the methods of restoration of the brick facades of the Isis theatre. Prices supplied are meant as a guide only and are not for the purposes of quotation. The wall on the Mill St face of the building is in fair condition but will need to be repointed. Approxamately 200 bricks will need to be replaced at a cost of approximately $11500. The wall opposite the fire station is in poor condition having been laid as common (unseen) brickwork.Partial demolition of the wall would present the problem of having an unsupported "end" of a wall, constucted of decaying morter, while excavations are being made underneath. This, combined with the cost of shoring the wall would make repointing the existing wall far less feasable than demolition and reconstruction with the old bricks. The cost to repoint the old brickwork, excluding the cost of shoring would be $7500. The cost of reconstructing the wall using the old bricks would be $3800. This does not include the cost of demolition, cleaning,storing and removal of bricks from the site should this be necessary. This price is for the restoration of the exterior face only and does not include the cost of an interior skin of brickwork. Cleaning of the bricks could be done by us at the cost of $1400. Demolition should be done by the General contactor. Thankyou for your co-operation and I look forward to hearing from you in the near future. LAIN LYGO _4--_-2*00_i /1 1 UV - P.0 BOX 8532. ASPEN CO. ( 44 910 10.4 .. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Direct#@7-~ L..31 THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Planning Dirc FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer ~ RE: 406 E. Hopkins Avenue, The Isis- Final review DATE: March 12, 1997 SIJMMARY: The Isis, formally known as the Webber Block, was built in 1892. It was originally used for commercial shops until approximately 1920, when it was converted to a theater by the Women's Civic Improvement League, for silent movies and minstrel shows. The existing alterations to the front facade are believed to have been made in the 1960's. The application is to convert the existing one theater house into approximately four theaters. Conceptual and partial demolition approval from HPC, landmark designation, Ordinance #30 review, parking waivers, open space waivers, and GMQS exemptions from City Council have been granted. HPC conceptual approval was given on August 23, 1995 with the following conditions: 1. Restudy the free market unit particularly dealing with the south, east and west elevations and the placement and orientation ofthe unit. 2. A complete restudy ofthe tower and new additions as to materials, detailing, and being more simplified. 3. A complete package o f demolition plans and how the demolition will be carried out. 4. A complete plan of materials on the north alley. Numerous site visits and worksessions (minutes attached) have been held since that time to address areas of restudy. On January 22, 1996, HPC granted an extension to the conceptual approval, allowing the applicant to proceed to final review. APPLICANT: Isis LLC, represented by Vann Associates and Charles Cunniffe Architects. 1 .. LOCATION: 406 E. Hopkins Avenue, Lots L,M, and N Block 87, City and Townsite of Aspen. ' Conceptual Development PROJECT SUMMARY AND REV[EW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Lad Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to 5%, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to section 5-510(13)(2). Response: The project involves constructing an addition on the vacant lot to the east of the existing structure, adding two affordable and one free market housing units on top of the existing structure, reconstruction of the historic storefront on the existing structure, excavation of a basement and construction of new theater space, and rehabilitation/demolition of portions ofthe existing structure. In general, HPC has been in favor of the proposed design concept and the program for this project and has indicated support for the continued use of the Isis as a movie theater. The areas of greatest concern have been the visibility of the housing units, extent of demolition/reconstruction required, and material selection for the new construction. The applicant's initial proposal added five housing units on the roof. By working with the Aspen/Pitkin Housing office, the units were reduced to three, and the applicant and HPC spent significant time restudying the apartments to lower their profile on the roof and pull them in from the existing Isis walls to the extent possible. In terms of demolition, the applicant will remove the board and batten entrance and restore the original storefront to the extent possible, will retain the portions of the 2 .. west wall which are currently visible, and will reconstruct the portions of the east wall which will be visible in the new project (using salvaged materials). The interior of the Isis and the roof will be demolished to allow excavation of a basement and to accommodate the new theaters. Some discussion has been had about the "preservation message" which will be sent to the public during this significant and highly visible construction project. The suggestion was made to drape the building with fabric as is done in many projects in larger cities, however, staff recommends that the applicant create a small story board which may be displayed near the project. Finally, several meetings have focused on the selection of materials for the new construction, but no specific materials have received approval. Staff notes that there are two changes made from the conceptual design; the free market unit has been shifted forward approximately three feet and the elevator tower has been given a vaulted, instead of a flat roof. The applicant should discuss the reason for the relocation of the free market unit. Staff recommends the elevator tower not have a vaulted roof since it is not a typical roof form in the Commercial Core. Staff recommends that HPC grant final approval for the project with conditions. The project has required many compromises to meet all the goals directed at the site, including historic preservation, creating affordable housing, and retaining a community facility. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood o f the parcel proposed for development. Response: This particular blockface is one of the weaker ones in the Commercial Core from a pedestrian standpoint. The addition fills in a "gap" in the streetscape and creates a gathering area for people waiting for movies. One of HPC's primary concerns has been the visual impact of the housing units from the pedestrian's view. This and the fact that the units will be viewed from above from the ski mountain should be considered when building materials are selected. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 3 .. Response: The new addition is set back from the front of the theater and the rooftop addition should be unobtrusive enough to allow the historic structure to remain the predominant element and therefore preserve its historic significance. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The project does involve significant demolition and/or reconstruction of the existing structure. This may be balanced by the restoration of the original storefront. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) 4) Deny Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. Recommendation: Staff finds that the conditions of conceptual approval, with the exception of material selections, have been addressed and recommends HPC grant final approval for 406 E. Hopkins, the Isis Theater, with conditions. Recommended motion: "1 move to grant final approval for 406 E. Hopkins Avenue, the Isis Theater, as presented to the Aspen HPC on March 12, 1997, with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide samples of all materials for approval by the HPC and label all materials on the permit set. 2. The applicant shall retain the existing masonry wall on the south facade and those portions of the west facade which are currently visible. The applicant shall reconstruct the exposed portions of the east wall to match the west wall, using salvaged bricks and matching the coursing and mortar characteristics. A sample panel shall be created for the approval of staff and monitor. 4 .. 3. Physical evidence uncovered during demolition which provides more accurate information about the original appearance of the south facade shall be incorporated into the restoration of that facade, with the approval of staff and monitor. 4. The applicant shall retain the existing "Isis" sign and reinstall in its current position. 5. The applicant shall submit specifications for repair of historic materials, including cleaning and repointing o f masonry, for approval by staff and monitor. 6. The applicant shall remove the awning from the west side ofthe existing structure. 7. The applicant shall repair and reuse all historic fabric on the south facade of the building, including the windows, comice, and building plague. 8. Any changes which affect the exterior appearance of the building shall immediately be brought to the attention of staff for approval by staff and monitor. 9. The applicant shall create a story board describing the project to the public and place it near the project. 10. Eliminate the vaulted roof on the elevator tower. 5 0 0 - ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name The Isis Theater Renovation & Expansion 2. Project location 4O6E.Hokins AsenGolorado-LotsKL& M Block 87, City & Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin CountÂ¥, CO (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning Commercial Core (CC) 4, Lot size 9,000 SF 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number Isis Limited Liability Co. c/o Houston & O'Leary Inc. 620 E. Hyman. Aspen. CO 81611 925-8664 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number Charles Cunniffe Architects 520 E. Hyman, Suite 301, Aspen, CO 81611 925-5590 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA . .*Â©A Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceotual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision TexUMap Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee - Adjustment 8, Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. it., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) Two story brick/sandstone masonrY and timber frame construction containing: Mnvip Thpater: 4,297 SF net leasable Plumbinq SMoD: 1.469 SF net leasable Dwelling Unit: ,?53 SF net leasable (2 bedroom) 9. Description of development application Restoration of the original ftrept facadp;;Additiong and intprinr rpnnvation to accommodate nca screening rooms, lobby and concession Gpace, toilets, el, i evalor, affordaole housing units (2-3 bedroom) and tree market housing (1-3 bedrm) 10. Have you completed and attached the following? xx Attachment 1- Land use application form XX Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form xx Response to Attachment 3 XX Response to Attachments 4 and 5 11111111 .. ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: Isis LLC Address: 406 E. Hopkins, Aspen, CO 81611 Zone district: Commercial Core (CC) Lot size: 9,000 SF Existing FAR: - 8,044.76 SF Allowable FAR: 18.000 SF Proposed FAR: . 17,830 SF Existing net leasable (commercial): 5.669 SF Proposed net leasable (commercial): 11,693.5 SF Exis[ing % of site coverage: Approximately 69% Prcoosed % of site coverage: Approximately 95% Existing % of open space: Approximately 11% Prccosed % of open space: Approximately 5% Existing maximum height: Princloal blda: 28' -3" Accescrv bldo: Prccosed max. height: Princeoal bldc: 40' -0'1 Accessorv bida: P-coosed 4 of demolition: 70% nf extprinr wallq Existing number of bedrooms: Two (2) Prcecsed number of bedrcoms: Three (3) plus six (6) Affordable Hsg Existing on-site parking spaces: Four (4) Cn-site parking spaces required: HPC Waiver Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Prooosed: None None None Prone Front: Frcnt: Rear: None Rear: None . Rear: None Comoined Combined Combined Front/rear: None FronUrear: None Frondrear: None S ide: None Side: None Side: None Side: Nonp Side: None Side: None Combined Combined Combined Sices: None--Â· Sides: No ne Sides: None Existing nonconformities or encroachments: None/Eight (8) inches over the westerly hordpr nntn Int J Variations requested: None (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.It., site coverage variance up to 33'6, height variations underthe cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) .. LOCATION MAP 1â€¢ - t..3 C h t \ 4/,41 ~1*'3_ 1.-4-- 1.,t Â·Â· \~ 7%4224. -& .92'I ~ Â«,0 va.-0:.341 94.144:':h .': g/ l ,--- '44, b.1 4 -1 -1 \ \ Lf d â€¢3 ..i --1-- --1. 3 7 1 1 â‚¬:94\ 3 Nt=Z>/4 4.4- \1 92 ,N A.0./ .5, 12 1 t - ' 0 -9 6.0141, .2% :r Â« *Nfl Â»11 ilisii 611'.I J .â€¢râ€¢ T*X~ 0.4 t. ~4 M 0...il. 61 114"" f 7 J. : 1/, 91*Â· P, d Ct .$ I - C. ./1-r 1 / - ) 1-) , 1 9:01 6%44 4 9-4 4, 6 * , 11. n / * v gs, 5261~Cli-- F -a< t 2-3 f;01 6.UÂ· f N'. 3, j d -4 j ~ .-3 3 f ? -2 , 4 # .71>11%4. Aspen 3 6., 41 b-- AL t.. 'rt q\~ 'Â·Â·Â·Â·,4~ 28<4t Sf f M,-â‚¬32 K: Â· 4 Â· . 02 . f d. 44. 1 Â¥ It 'luÂ·' Lt. ..7 ' , 4 1 81-:TH 3, 41. *..DW <*ir~ 1 e~ d -21# 3 1 } A ti \ a- a.- 4.- 4 11Â·19 1. 0.0 *Â¥ i Â¢ Int '11442124. v ,Â« F 1 74<SIArd~fAI u F?U>d POT l-dE,q-lorz 0-- Z 406 8. 11+Orl<IM# ' VL ~4'?21:ki R# n, .6- -) 441 4 9 P '4,49.---) CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS ~ 740-95 ISIS RENOVATION torT tM, 0 611[Y :lorK Mi ~ . .. The Isis Theater Renovation and Expansion STATEMENT FOR HPC FINAL REFLIAN The proposed plan to renovate and expand the Isis Theater is intended to extend the functional life of this important cultural and entertainment facility. Generations of Aspen's citizens and visitors have patronized this institution since it opened its doors in 1915. Originally built in 1892, the Henry Webber Building was a commercial building before becoming the town's only theater during the silent movie era. The renovation and expansion plans are focused on several objectives for this landmark structure; the most significant being the restoration of the original street facade. This work will include: â€¢ Removal of the wood siding and canopy which conceal the original street level facade. â€¢ New, historically appropriate storefronts, glazing and doors. â€¢ Refurbish or replace as required the second floor windows. â€¢ Cleaning and repair of existing brick facing and sandstone details. â€¢ Repair and refurbish the existing isis signage The restoration effort will return the street facade to its original appearance and enhance the overall historic character of this neighborhood. The Henry Webber Building remains the last Commercial Core structure to undergo renovation. Expansion of the original facility will occur in three ways: new basement space to accommodate screening rooms, toilets and lobby space; infill of the vacant lot to the east to provide screening room, lobby space, elevator and stairway; and housing, including affordable housing units, on the roof of the existing building. These new additions are intended to defer to the restored facade of the original building in the following ways: â€¢ The infill addition is set back from the original street facade approximately 18'. â€¢ Materials and detailing of the addition are intended to be distinctive but appropriate and compatible with the existing building. â€¢ The affordable housing units are located along the alley to minimize their impact on the historic character of the original building from the street view. â€¢ The free market unit is setback on all sides to minimize its impact on the historic character of the original building from the street view. The development plan submitted for final HPC approval conforms to all representations made during conceptual review. Conditions placed on the conceptual approval were primarily focused on the selection of the exterior finish material palette. These were satisfactorily addressed with HPC through work sessions which occured subsequent to the conceptual approval. The final material and color selections are to be determined in the field with the designated HPC monitors. CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS FEBRUARY 19,1997 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23. 1995 Susan: I would think he would want a traditional awning. MOTION: Sven moved that HPC approve the awning for the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory; one foot skirt awning with materials and paint to match; second by Roger. DISCUSSION Melanie: That means he will have lettering on the street side and the courtyard side. I feel this is too much lettering. Sven: I also agree with Melanie that it is an impact. Amy: We usually say one style per building. AMENDED MOTION: Sven amended the motion to approve the submission with the requirement that the signage only be on one projected face of the skirt awning and that the color and lettering style needs to be the same as the other awnings; second by Roger. Passes 4 to 3. Martha, Susan and Linda voted no. Sven, Melanie, Don and Roger voted yes. 406 E. HOPKINS - ISIS - LANDMARK, CONCEPTUAL, PH Amy: I have listed on the board the conditions that I propose for approval. We have eliminated two units on the roof and there are story polls up. I feel we still need discussion about architecture on the roof top elements. Charles Cunniffe, architect: The main concerns seem to be the second story addition, the ground floor and facade were OK and everyone as comfortable with that. The second story architecture in terms of massing we were directed to look at something more contemporary in contract with. the existing building. Something that would complement the existing building. The S elevation has a less profile than it had before. The two critical places of public view are in front of the Gap and in front of Eddie Bauers. The renderings show the impact. We feel it is subtle yet it is obvious it is not part of the original building and it is a little cleaner. The curved roofs were generated by the view plane issue from the Hotel Jerome. We were able to hold that back by the closet and lowering the plate height. We also raised the front plate height of the units and lowered the back plate heights so the units would get the view toward the mountain. Regarding materials we are probably using a manufactured stone that would be a sandstone product in panels as a way to carry on the stone and the panels would be slightly darker in coloration. Different but subtle. We are retaining the Isis sign and we are saving the metal material in the rear. , 4 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 1995 Sunny Vann: We met with the planner and the housing office and it was clear from Dave Tollin, housing head that this could be handled from a staff level because the number of employees generated falls within the purview of the staff. We were able to ascertain that two three bedroom units on top of this project would more than meet the requirement imposed under us on the growth management. We feel the P&Z will recommend the same. This is all still subject to review and approval by the P&Z and from a formal referral from the Housing office. With respect to the theatres we are continuing to evaluate the layout of the theatres with a theatre consultant and it is possible that the seating will change. We heard what you said about wanting a large theatre. This one is less because we do not carry the seats right up to the foot of the stage and we do not have three or four rows of seats that are questionable from a movie point of view but are functional from an auditorium point of view. We will continue to look at those issues. At the last meeting I heard the roof was just too busy. Too muck walkways and too much roof going on. This allows us to pull the two affordable housings units back to the rear of the building. We- have cleaned up the court yards and the space between them. We have pulled back part of the free market unit so that it is all uniform 18 to 20 feet from the front of the facade which will make the east side of the free market unit disappear to the same extent that the west side does. Amy: At the last meeting we supported landmark designation, and HPC approved the parking waivers and the open space reduction. CLARIFICATIONS: Roger: What is the recommended material for the third story south, easc and west sides. Charles: Manufactured stone in panels and we can make them any size we want. Donnelley: The storage is down below and that makes for the two theatres up above. Previously the free market had a fire place and is there a fire place now? John Wheeler: If there would be a fireplace it would be a gas appliance but currently we are not showing one at all. Jake: One of my big issues is demolition. John Wheeler: We talked with Bill Drueding on how the city views demolition and if it .is over 50% they consider it total demolition, only as a code issue. If you demolish half or more of the structure then you have to go through full mitigation. He has 5 -- ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 1995 acknowledged that it isnlt total demolition but it is more than 50% and that is where it was left ac. Amy: It doesn't have further ramifications for them and that was what was my concern. Jake: When I looked at the numbers I saw that what you were adding was more than what the existing building was. How is demolition measured? Amy: FAR is the unit of measure but the only time it matters is a residencial demolition. With ord. #1 they are worried about 50% demolition. Jake: How much of the existing FAR are you demolishing? John Wheeler: The exterior wall is what is being retained. Jake: As I look at it I see the retainage of the west wall, north wall and a portion of the east wall. The building itself is being demolished. Charles Cunniffe: It is done all over the country. In order to gec theatres downstairs we have to get access to the whole body with machinery to get down and dig it out. In order to do that we have to get rid of the building thaz is there. We also have to underpin the building. Sunny Vann: Maybe I can clarify the regulatory side of it. When the Gap was reconstructed a full basement and roof was constructed and it was a substantial demolition on the building. The current code as far as the growth management is concerned is if we retain a portion of the building and it is not ccmplete demolition and we raised the site we only have to mitigate the additional stuff for net leasable square footage that is added to the building. From a commercial point of view the only issues in terms of impact are the net leasable square footage, FAR has nothing to do with what we are going to be required to provide in the way of mitigation for our growth management application. In terms of the regulatory side of this we are in compliance. In terms of whether you think there is more demolition that is a separate issue that is not governed by specific regulations in the code. That is a call on your part Jake. Chairman Donnelley Erdman opened the public hearing. Harley Baldwin: I own the building across the street and if any of you remember in restoring the Collins Block there were very strict rules and that was that if there were any additions tc the top ic could not be seen anywhere through town, not from across the 6 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 1995 street not from La Cocina not from the Hotel Jerome and that *was the rule and I feel we should abide by that rule here. I had to set my addition back 15 feet and push it down ten feet from where I wanted it to be. This building is extremely apparent from the Collins Block, Eddie Bauer and from in front of the Brand Building and half of historic Aspen. It looks like the new building is eating the historic building . - I feel it is much too high and in fact I found I could create a wonderful space on top keeping it out of site. I feel the idea of restoring the theatre is a terrific one. I do not feel there is any reason to have a setback cn the side. I feel setbacks on Aspen are terrible and they are not historic and not helpful. If he needs FAR let him put it there. I have noticed that the number of bathrooms here is ridiculous. It is way too high. The code requires way too many bathrooms. It looks like the new building has teeth on it and it is consuming the historic building, munching its way halfway through the building. You cannot see what we put on the roof frcm anywhere in town and that should be the standard, Thank you. Donnelley: We are in conceptual and we can take Harley's consideration. The Collins Block did have certain advantages with the parapet. Charles Cunniffe: I do not think we can make the addition go away but we have reduced it and that is due to the fact that each side has lower buildings to it and it will always be visible just by the nature of what goes around it. I would like to see this building taken on its own merit. Sven: I feel this is a much improved design particularrly in materials and summation of massing. The building sections on A.4.1 would seem to indicate that perhaps another structure look, the structure that holds up the housing unit floor, it looks like there is plenty of ceiling height in the lobby that could be handled differently. I am wondering if he could compress the roof structure of the theatres and possibly reconsider the ceiling heights of the theatres to further depress the housing units. This is in response to Harleyls comments which were valid. Charles: The space there is indicated for mechanical duct work. We are trying to preserve a view. Harley: The standard that it cannot be seen should stay. Les: You building was historically designated and that is the difference here. Harley: It should be designated. Les: We are getting designated with a design control. Â· 7 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 1995 Amy: Harley's property is on the national register and we do have complete design review over this because it is in the commercial core. In terms of the historic landmark they are getting GMQS exemptions out of it. There should not be a big difference here in the review. Donnelley: We need to take into consideration that the ultimate building is going to change the perception of the block. Charles: There were numerous comments but not a consensus so what we did was take those comments that would work and tried to work with all the comments in some way such as moving ic in a little. Susan: There is a lot of tenant storage and could not some of that space be used to reduce the height. Charles: We need air exchange and the air exchange has to occur up high. Susan: You couldn't use the basement? Charles: The owners wanted storage as well. We are trying to keep the housing impact off the building as much as we can. Roger: Could the duet work be exposed for theatres A and B? Charles: There would be sound problems and vibration transfers. The exposed duct work would have to have insulation worked around it to such an extent that it might not be attractive. We can look at that. Jake: You have created an area in the middle of the roof thac is a depressed area and by doing that you pushed the housing to the outside. It seems to me that you would want to concentrate your square footage in the corner and leave areas for setbacks for a more visible size of the structure. I am still concerned about demolition and it seems that you are retaining only 200 sqft. of the historic structure. We aren't saving much.of the building. John Wheeler: We are keeping 70% of the exterior fabric of the building and yes the interior of the fabric is being renegotiated. We cannot dispute the interior fabric. I feel you have to look at the exterior of the fabric and what is being, preserved to the outside. Charles: We feel the exterior fabric and the theatre use are the most important. Jake: If maintaining the theatre use destroys the building then 8 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 1995 I am perfectly willing to get rid of the theatre. I would rather have the building then the theatre use. What good is it to put in a use that destroys an historical building from an historical preservation point. I feel all possible options for renovation of the structure in its basic form should be explored before we leave that area. Would it be possible to invert the floor plans and in that way you would utilize more of the existing structure than in your present proposal. Charles: This building has an immense egress and to put more people down stairs would requike more impact on the building. We feel the main theatre is more historic where it is. There is no way to renovate this structure without demolishing the floor structures. The use that is there now was not the original use. We made the entrance to the building back to where it was historically. It is a ground floor entrance like all the other buildings in town. Sunny Vann: We need to see if more of the fabric of this building needs to be preserved. Amy: I understand what you are saying Jake but every commercial building in town is gutted just like this one is being gutted. We do not deal with interiors. I am not sure this is a significant interior. Sven: I feel this is close to compatibility requirements. This doesn't have the character of Harley's block but I also feel this should go through a stringent view committee. Having the housing a low impact is better. Harley Baldwin: This is one of the top ten buildings in down town and the theatre use is fabulous. I feel the theatres will add life to the downtown. Their parapets are just as tall as mine are. Peter Kuntz, I have worked for the New York City Landmarks Preservation Committee for several years in setting up guidelines for Greenwich Village and one of the things that maintains historic character at a point when it wouldn't last any longer is that when you do a structure on the roof like this the shape, fenestration those elements announce that it was not part of the original structure. Maintaining the original material, brick or whatever the volume was of the actual building stone, maintained and did not swallcw the building. The other thing that we found of vital importance was not breaking up the city scape itself. In this case it wouldn't matter if the addition were a glass and steel structure again in proportions that were compatible to the building next door itself but it is bringing it out to the street or only having a minor setback that maintained both the historic character of the building because it is part of the urban environment. You do not 9 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 1995 want to create dark gloomy spaces on the street. I do not know if pulling the addition building forward would allow more space on the roof. Charles: We wanted to take a little bit of the corner and have just enough gesture to make the addition read as a separate entity. We did not want the entrance precieved as an entrance to a commercial business as it is the entrance to the housing. There is a little planting/plaza there to set it back from the facade and it becomes a stage set for the theatre. Peter Kuntz: That was what we found was wrong. By making it a Stage set you destroy the point of the stage set to begin with because you have lost the urban experience. It wasn't the corner , of the building it was the overall feel. The city itself is an historic preservation feeling and is maintained by the character and quality of the street itself. Chairman Donnelley Erdman closed the public hearing. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Les: I wish we had different zoning requirements when we did the Collins Block Bldg. I feel wiz have learned a lot since we have done your building. We are not loosing any of the original building and we are getting the facade back to as close to the original as we can get. I feel there is community supporn for some compromise here and retaining the theatre is great. I would like to see a further restudy of the ducting if po,ssible. The Fire _ Dept. will be gone and probably another huge building will- be put in. Conceptual works for me. If you bring the parapets up then you loose the historical facade on the original building. Susan: Is it possible to put the stairway vestibule between the two units on either side? Charles: We wouldn't have the square footage. Susan: Possibly if they were narrower stairs- Charles: I believe this is the best solution. Roger: The demolition plan has been submitted and if it is an acceptable plan to staff then it is acceptable to me. The concept of demolition that you are proposing on the building since we do not deal wizh interiors and use Of interiors is certainly acceptable. The contemporary history of the building is a theatre and if we were strict preservationists and we dealt with the interior that would be tossed out in the community. We would say than you have to restore the building to what it was originally and 10 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 1995 if you can squeeze a theatre in fine. That is not what I want to see happen. I probably can not vote for conceptual as I feel we need a continued study of the roof top placement but I feel we are close. If we view this from the street the south west corner is the most dominant. The portion on the other corner due to the addition is not as conflicting to me; however, I feei the mass on the roof can be moved around. I would like more study of materials and I am not sure stone is an appropriate material on the third floor. I myself would prefer brick, a new brick and a different color and sheen. Even a rusted metal could have been used because that was what was on the back of the building. Continuing on with materials the new addition to the right which is inset has some sandstone lines on it which are trying to pick up those of the original building, I prefer th*t those be removed and that the new addition be simplified more and that if in fact those lines are necessary that they be done in brick not another element to pull cut the historic structure. Retain the Isis sign is a great idea. Metal on the rear needs to be studied and keeping the back simple is aporopriate. Submit specks for masonry repair is very important particularly on the corner where the piece is going back. Waive Ord. #30 and we have dealt with the issues of housing. In relations to Harley's comments the building to the west could be built out and raised higher and that might happen and the fire station could 'be sold and maxed out and that might happen. -If that were to happen I would demand that an entrance be in the little patio which would then create a sense of messy vitality and would be terrific. Donnelley: As Roger said the new addition rather the tower portion has not been restudied since the last time and there were recommendations made and they were not taken into consideration. I have a great deal of trouble with the roof configuration. The south east corner of the free market unit virtually will never be hidden and will always encrcach visually. I would recommend even if we give conceptual approval than the free market unit be turned 90 degrees and scmehow pulled back a significant amount in the neighborhood of eight to ten feet in both east and west corners. The AH component is as far enough back so that it will never be effected by the site lines but the free market unit will effect the site lines tremendously for a long period of time and I do not find it acceptable in that southeast ccrner. That is the main issue for me. I am recommending a restudy in plan of the southeast corner. I also find the tower watered down histcrism and it has crept into the city very heavily and I would like to discourage that. Charles: We did look at leaving the bands off but it left something to be desired. Sunny: If we go forward with conceptual that is to our benefit even if it is with conditions. 11 . ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 1995 Donnelley: I would suggest that a motion be made with a number of stringent condition and then the applicant can proceed and also deal with these conditions. John Wheeler: The story polls' are placed at three points and you cannot see them from across the street. Chairman Donnelley Erdman entertained a motion. MOTION: Les moved that HPC approve conceptual for 406 E. Hopkins with the following conditions: 1) A study session to address roof top materials, setback on the free market unit and the attempt the additionally lower the roof top units through interior ducting. Motion dies for lack of second. MOTION: Roger moved that HPC grant conceptual 406 E. Hopkins with the following conditions: 1) A complete restudy of the roof elements as to mass, scale and height and materials. 2) A complete restudy of the tower and new addition as to materials, detailing and being more simplified. 3) A complete package of demolition plans and how the demolition will be carried out. 4) A complete plan of materials to the north alley; second by Melanie. Discussion: Roger: Rooftop means mass scale and height. Jake: I am against the motion because this is a significant building and there is no reason to rush through this. The conditions that are proposed as part of the conceptual are huge and they are the kinds of conditions that need to be dealt with at conceptual prior to moving forward to final. Les: I feel we are very close to being there. Amy: We need the waiver of Ordinance #30. Donnelley: I find asking a restudy of the roof is vague. We need to be explicit. My suggestion was that the free market unit be relocated and reconfigure so that it offers a significant setback on three sides, south, east and west. I personally do not have a problem with the employee units other than perhaps in detail, 12 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 1995 possibly a stronger break in plane between new and old. AMENDED MOTION: Roger amended the motion to scratch complete restudy and add restudy the free market units particularly dealing with the south, east and west elevation and the placement and orientation of the freemarket units. Also to add the waiver of Ordinance #30; second by Melanie. Sven: What about story polls. AMENDED MOTION: Roger amended that the story polls be retained or replaced until the board has an opportunity to see them; second by Melanie. Sunny: What abcut materials. Donnelley: I was talking about using brick and I was talking about using brick specifically on the tower which comes to the ground. Sunny: We are looking for more clarity of whether the materials should be emulation of the original materials or a contemporary material for the solution. Donnelley: That needs to be clarified how the applicant responds to the request to physically move the walls of the free market units back. If they are moved back there is a definite break in plane and it would be less visible then it may be appropriate to continue with a brick expression. Sven: The side theatre and tower at a conceptual level I am approving it in volume and stuff but I am still wavering how appropriate that style is. It is not just a question of materials for me. Depending on how the roof is solved I feel that should integrate into how the stair and housing unit is solved and those two should be visually linked and I would include that in conceptual review. Donnelley: The suggestion is that a revision to the massing and locazion of roof elements may indicate the need to tie the fabric of the roof more closely with the fabric of the tower. Sven: We can't evaluate that until we see the roof solution. Donnelley: Now we have three different things, the old brick of the historic resource, the new of the tower that comes to the ground and a third dealing with the roof. It maybe appropriate to reduce that to two expressions. Roger: I think that is clear to the applicant and does not have to be included in the motion. You might use a brick that is 13 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ~ AUGUST 23, 1995 different than the historic brick but close. Donnelley: I agree with Sven that in addition to just a material study of the tower that it may be wise to incorporate the material of the tower or all new additions into one kind of fabric for all of the additions to the building. Sven: I want this as part of the checkoff list. Les and Sven didnrt vote. VOTE ON MOTION: All in favor of motion and amended motion. Passes 6 to 1. Jake opposed. 525 W. HALLAM - WYCKOFF - FINAL Amy: I am recommending final approval with the recommendations that they get a letter from the structural engineer stating that the shed can be moved. This appears to be feasible. We need to know how and where the shed will be temporarily stored. The applicant needs to post a bond and I am recommending $3,000. or whatever the cost is to mcve the shed. They want to make this work and get moving. They also do not have their landmark approval yet and the condition would be that if they do not get landmark that the city would use that money to put the shed back. Work with staff and monitor on restoration of historic materials, remove the cresting on the porch of the new addition and finally assign an HPC member to be a monitor. Glenn Rappaport, architect: We lowered the garage into the ground a foot to deal with the height problem. We took Jake's comment about dropping the roof at the point of the new addition on the north L so it would be a better differentiation. The little metal detail on the roof we don't have a problem with that. The reason we put that there is that we believe there will be a snow problem with the way the snow comes off the main roof. We thought that it would end up breaking the snow and go over the side instead of over the front. The intent would be to make something a little mcre abstract and we would like to work that out with the monitor as we do think there might be a problem. We have the letter from Mr. Cole the engineer regarding the shed. Regarding the shed there is an overlap of about 1 1/2 feet from the old position and the new position. We would like to dig under there and form the foundation and slide the building over onto the new foundation. That assures us that if we don't get landmark designation we haven't moved the building. Julie would like to discuss the bond amount. CLARIFICATIONS : 14 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 27, 1995 have to make it an ADU and as a conditional use P&Z will probably require one parking space for that which means we will be required to have three parking spaces and we can only get two in the garage so we would also request a parking space for the ADU. Amy: If they choose to resolve their volume issue with an FAR bonus then you should probably say now if HPC is willing to grant the 500 sqft. bonus. AMENDED MOTION: Roger amended his motion to add a parking space variance for the possible placement of an ADU unit in the basement; second by Les. Les: I don't consider these little mining shacks boring or ugly and I personally love them. They are the essence of what the east end of Aspen used to be. They are re-landscaping next door and what has happened with this extensive landscaping we have lost a building. By requiring a landscape plan I am afraid the building will disappear. Roger: If you require it then you can control it. You can see what the plantings are. VOTE: All in favor of motion and amended motion, motion carries. ISIS - WORKSESSION Donnelley: We did a site visit and observed all the story polls. Sunny Vann: We would like to. make sure we are on the same track before going to P&Z and that is why we are back so soon. John Wheeler: We have extended the existing wall back. We have stayed away from the back units. The four points left from conceptual one was the restudy of the free market unit and we feel we have done that and hope we have met your concerns. Another was the aspects of the tower and we changed the soldier bands and another aspect was the demolition plan. The fourth mater was the material on the alley side and the material on the upper level, brick or stone and the existing metal that is on the back. Regarding demolition the existing wall will stay in place and the walkway in front of the street along the sidewalk will be at six to eight feet high. As the facade is renovated and restored we will put panels in there such as was done with the city hall building. John Wheeler: We also supplied a streetscape elevation from the Caribou alley side which demonstrates how low it is and it will be difficult to see the eave lineÂ· from across the street. 12 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 27, 1995 Roger: Where will all the mechanical equipment be placed on the roof. John Wheeler: We have discussed this briefly and it will be to the back and vented to the back alley. Roger: It will be through the roof and out tne wall on the alley side. Is there additional space for future use such as a restaurant which needs venting? John Wheeler: We have not anticipated that degree of change. Linda: What is the vent that is there now going to be used for? John Wheeler: It is for the projection rooms which are currently located up front. Donnelley: I feel we are dealing with details rather than the overall conceptual and I am afraid I am going to drop a bomb. The applicant has attempted in every way possible to accommodate our desires and if I were a lay person coming upon this building for the first time my first impression would be that all that has been saved of the block are the perimeter walls. By dropping the roof top construction and the roof cop construction built form is a new event that has been proposed for an historic building in Aspen which we should all be cognizanc of. By dropping that the first impression is that you have a shell, The Weber Block and inside that eggshell you have new construction which is poking up above and behind the parapet walls. When you drop and drop you only see part of a facade, part of the volume poking up and by inference we assume that volume could drcp all the way down to ground level and that is what I see when,I look at this building. There is an inferred continuation of these volumes that go right down through and we just have a thin paper wall. That is a horrible precedence. Jake: That is what is happening. Les: If you had to solve than what would you do? Donnelley: You would do something that we don't want and bring all of the development to the outside and have a break in materials. Once you pull it all back in which is what we asked for you have a definite change in expressicn. We do not want it part of the historic resource. You have the cubic volume rising out of the center of the shell. Jake: You will only read that from up above. Donnellev: You see it frcm several places. 13 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 27, 1995 Sven: I approved conceptual because of the importance of the Isis and the revitalization. This does not look like a renovation project to me. I approved conceptual largely because of the housing program and the theatre expansion. I feel the applicant is responding to HFC's fires and trying to put out single issues but a couple of meeting ago Donnelley pointed out that we were grasping for a coherent overall solution now just a problematic, solution. We still do not have a successful character to the entire project. We have the Isis, the tower, and the housing and not a common thread that ties them all together into a successful solution. It is very important that we resolve the architectural solution before we go to final. Donnelley: The new constructicn could be more integrated to the wall. New fabric can be integrated. John Wheeler: That is fair input and we struggled with that. Donnelley: We are talking abcuz the expression of new and old. Possibly the top of the tower could tie into the housing etc. by materials. Sven: If you did a clay model of the masses of all of the additions you would see the three different animals and possibly you should only have two. I wanc to see one visual image of the Isis with these additions. Sunny Vann: At the last meeting we were to make the roof top add_ition different and to explore contemporary and use color. We need consensus to the character of the addition. We can refine elements and play with materials. We may never get all of your unanimous approval on this. Donnelley: John has already recognized the certain schizophrenia that exists as to the way the new is differentiated from the old. John was opening up the issue so that it could be dealt with. John Wheeler: Exactly. Sven: I do not see the tower and the overall housing on the roof top in a combined theme. Donnelley: Lets go back to the basics you have face brick on the south wrapping around the corner then it is a softer nonfaced brick that is on the east side and some on the west and now another brick needs introduced that works on the new. Roger: Why couldn't the new be cortin or something else. Donnelley: That is the architects decision and we are talking 14 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 27, 1995 about brick A, B and material or brick C. Also the articulation. Can the commission agree that- a material should be chosen that unifies all of the new work between old and new and not several materials. John Wheeler: We would not have a problem with that and we are leaning toward masonry for function and longevity and keeping with the street facade. Melanie: No matter what you say it still looks like a shell. Susan: Regarding building structures on historic roofs I assume that hasnrt been done except for Harley's place. Amy: There are a few like the Cantina that have a roof top addition but it is not this much construction and is dealt with in a different manner. Roger: In any other parts of the country are there projects similar to this that you know of that.could be used as an example. John Wheeler: We feel that we have come up with an adaptive reuse of the Isis. Les: Conceptual we have agreed that they can bui_ld something on the roof. Linda: When I look at this from my own gut feeling somehow the curve on the roof of the three elements and trying to be compatible with the tower are not compatible due to the shape of the roof. Charles Cunniffe: The idea is to have a contrast. It might be too modern. It could be dealt with by a radical change of material. Linda: No, I feel it needs to be the change of the roof line. Charles Cunniffe: One you will never see it. Susan: What if they were more curved. Charles: At one time we did think of connecting the curve between the elements and that would be be a successful solution. Sven: The tower has always been a problem as it stands alone. Donnelley: You could have surface filigree linking the front to the back to pull it all together for privacy. Les: Are you suggesting that the middle units have one roof line that goes from the front to the back or just on the side. 15 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 27, 1995 Donnelley: You need to pull all of the new built forms together. Sven: I do not see these elements integrated yet and at a clay model scale level you. could work with the issue, a thing growing over the Isis and blending in and integrating. Charles Cunniffe: We are beyond the gestation period. We need to tie the treatments together programmatically. Jake: I am more concerned wizh the street view. What if you pulled the tower forward. I am concerned about the intersection of the new piece and old piece and how they join. They need a clear dramatic articulation. Roger: On the tower what if the entire plane were glass. Charles Cunniffee: We could draw that up if the Board desires us to go with something that modern. Donnelley: In your housing you have shown that you are pulling the glazing back from the surface of the masonry. There is another area that you want to tie togezher. Charles Cunniffe: We have a building that we have grown something softly over and in a way the new building is poking out of the softness and I think it would be nice if we can tie that together. Melanie: What kind of material would be softer? Donnelley: Have you looked at a panelized expression. Charles Cunniffe: You get a grid work of panelized manmade stone mix and it is a stone panel and that could contrast with the original brick. Donnelley: We need a consensus of what the issues are and give precise direction. Charles Cunniffe: We do need something left that we can design architecturally. I do agree that what we have talked about will work. Donnelley: The east and west elevation have the same expression but two different situations. The west is an historic elevation and you are bringing new construction up to it and the east elevation is new. There is no reason for them to be the same. Charles Cunniffe: We thought the manufactured stone had a nice feel to it. 16 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 27, 1995 Roger: I feel it is too massive. You are applying a heavy material on top of an historic building. Linda: I agree it is too massive and you need something lighter. Roger: And with a different expression. Donnelley: Roger has something there that a masonry expression gives us the feeling that this form has to carry all the way down through because it has so much weight. A lighter expression material is needed. Sunny Vann: The character cf the addition can be resolved. Are you comfortable with the setback on the free market. Donnelley: I am sure all of the commission would like to see a greater setback for the free market. Sunny Vann: The free market unit is carrying this project. Jake: The old building is pounding the south axis and the top stuff is just pounding it. There is no three dimensional character to it on the top. Charles Cunniffe: Are we OK with what we have for the free market units and the modification of materials for the stair tower. Donnelley: We are talking about dealing with the expression of the building. MOTION: Donnelley moved to adjourn; second by Jake. All in favor, motion carries. Meeting adj ourned at 8:00 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland Chief Deputy Clerk 17 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION NOVEMBER 8, 1995 Donnelley: We don't want it to look historic. Roger: What are your thoughts on the unit to the left which is the new one regarding materials. John Davis: We were trying to use similar materials brick and lap siding. Jake: Separate the second story mass from the historic resource. You need to be careful that you do not have windows looking into windows on these narrow sites. It will hurt you in terms of selling also. Mark Ward: We can look at turning the garage. Susan: Someone already said this but I feel it is overwhelming to the historic house. ISIS THEATRE - WORKSESSION Amy: We have a new rendering in the packet and they are scheduled to go to P&Z. Donnelley: The changes made will be presented. Charles Cunniffe: The main items of consideration were to pull in the free market unit in front which is in the middle to hold the line with the entry tower and change the curve so that it implies a tie together of the overall shape. Also to press it into the top of the building. John Wheeler: On the east side we had to step in the facade. Charles Cunniffe: On materials we were going to keep the original brick and do a more contemporary brick treatment whether it be a glazed brick or something else. We are showing a jumbo brick but having a different brick treatment that would wrap all of the addition and on the upper level carry it up as a wall then everything inside reads as an internal fabric to that exterior part of the wall. You have basically three materials, original, new and a lighter material that look like it belongs on top of a roof structure. Donnelley: We had talked about a fabricated stone material in a larger scale and what happened to that idea. Charles Cunniffe: That is still open. We haven't actually picked the actual material. We wanted to get your idea. 12 . ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION NOVEMBER 8, 1995 Linda: Have you spoken to Darryl Grob our new fire chief and they. are def-initely considering goifig into a development on the site of the fire station with housing on top for employees. It might be a good idea to review the project with him since you are next door. They do not know what is being proposed. Amy: I just have a question. Is there a great financial advantage to you in building the affordable units on the site as opposed to buying down other units in town. Charles Cunniffe: I can't speak to that but there is no advantage either way and I thought there wasn't an option. We went to a lot of work with the housing office to let us build less. Amy: Originally you proposed more and from the GMQS application there is the feeling that this is more than enough. The reason for bring this up is across the street the HPC said no third story and they bought housing. Charles Cunniffe: I doubt if you could build or buy offsite cheaper than on top of this building. Donnelley: One area that everyone is concerned about is the free market unit and we are all trying to push it back. The restricted employee units back there are not a real problem to me but the free market unit seems to be a problem to everyone. That is the thing that makes economic benefit. Charles Cunniffe: The owners are squeaking about how little free market they got. This will be occupied by the manager and employees from the theatre and that is the reason for putting it on the building. I came in here thinking we have done everything we had to do. There is no way they can keep this project alive without coming back with some resolution. I would have to renegotiate the contract and ask them to find housing offsite. Frankly I wouldn't want to be in anyone's shoes trying to find housing offsite. Amy: You buy down an existing unit and that is what I have been suggesting. Charles Cunniffe: It would be unfair to ask us now to reconsider this entire project. Roger: The issue is to preserve the integrity of the historic building and with that thing on the middle of the historic building is not preserving the integriâ‚¬y. This needs to be looked at and we are asking that it be looked at. Amy: It was a suggestion and it might be to your benefit. 13 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION NOVEMBER 8, 1995 Charles Cunniffe: They have tried to look at this with no rooftop development from day one. They couldn't find anything that made economic sense. If you can tell me where there is something that can be built for less than $90. sqft. and bring a manager in. Roger: I am not saying we would deny the entire thing I am asking that it be looked at. Charles Cunniffe: I am saying it was looked at getting the roof top off. Amy: We have all struggled with what is on the roof. Linda: We need people living downtown. Roger: We are not trying to put Charles back into the loop. Charles Cunniffe: The drawing shows how much of the addition you can see from an empty street corner. With the suggestion of stepping the unit back some and going to a darker color and softer material that addition looks subservient to the overall building. Donnelley: We are familiar with how the massing is going now and the last discussion we had was that the interior materials which are all new work would reflect a likeness which would be a metal panel aesthetic though the specific material has not been chosen. Charles Cunniffe: We looked at vertical copper sheathing, non reflective. I would like to come in with samples and meet with individuals and go over to the building and look at how the new brick could look next to the old. Roger: Copper seems to be used frequently and it might be interesting to look at one of the Folensby products with a soft patina similar to the mining buildings. Charles Cunniffe: In looking at the roof form in a way with this being a darker material it is almost like an assemblage of buildings and this building looks like a building beyond. Les: I can live with this and my only concern is the materials and we will have to look at those and it will take some time. Donnelley: We don't want it to be a heavy material. Amy: They are going to P&Z and asking for a FAR bonus for affordable housing and it is really P&Z's final decision. We possibly need something in writing that shows how you have considered it. 14 0 . ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION NOVEMBER 8, 1995 Linda: How soon can you get materials together? Charles Cunniffe: In a week or two. Jake: I do feel this has progressed significantly from earlier but I did vote against it in the beginning. I still feel the free market is problematic. Linda: If I were an employee I would enjoy a view just as the free market unit has. Roger: What if P&Z says take the housing off what will you do then. Jake: Can they go to p&Z saying that HPC feels this massing is compatible. Roger: I have never been comfortable with it but that is the best they could do. The design is great. The concept of not having it there is very interesting. Charles Cunniffe: I understand it that we have an OK except we were to push down and pull back the center unit where it was and come back with the new scheme and that is what we have done and it has made it a better building. In an ideal world no addition would happen on the building but given the direction we got we followed that and I feel it is a successful solution. We like the results of this. Donnelley: The question was asked have you thoroughly explored the employee housing off site and have the free market occupy that space. Charles Cunniffe: I will be happy to explore it further and that is a valid question. Donnelley: We are not denying that the preliminary approval has been granted for the massing so your next step is materials but still if you could explore that option it would be great. Charles Cunniffe: I can see the advantages also. I can turn it over to Sunny Vann and have them give HPC a letter giving their feedback on that. Amy: All I am saying it isn't done until it is built and if any ideas come in lets address them. Charles Cunniffe: If it pencils out cheaper I am sure they would go with it. They might not have thought that they could get that 15 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION NOVEMBER 8, 1995 reading. Amy t. P&Z may say they want that unit off site. Sven: You got conceptual because a lot of us like the program. Melanie: We were talking about what could be done to cover up the building while you were working and when I was in Charleston I took some pictures that might be incorporated. Charles Cunniffe: Another plan could be wrap something up that relates to the movies. Linda: That would make it inviting and interesting so that people would have a positive feeling about the project. Charles Cunniffe: Where do we stand? Donnelley: You are going to find out why or is their any compelling reason why your program is locked into providing all of the housing onsite and then materials. Donnelley: You might preface to P&Z that although we gave preliminary approval we would be much happier if there were housing on the roof that the one forward element were removed. John Wheeler: Conceptual was given and the conditions have been met. Donnelley: If the aspect of less housing i.e. only free market were on the roof we would really be delighted to see the free market replace the present location of the housing. Charles Cunniffe: You all have sanctioned this with final choice of materials; however, your druthers would be not to have the housing on top. Donnelley: We have always had reservations about that mass that is forward and directly over. Charles Cunniffe: Can I have a straw poll to refer to P&Z that there was consensus. Aside from P&Z being able to remove housing the only condition that I feel we are down is that the final choice of materials will be done at a. worksession on site. Amy: That is the only issue left but you have conditions like keeping the Isis sign. Les: The only other issue left is materials. 16 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION NOVEMBER 8, 1995 Donnelley: There are other issues but the main one is materials. Linda: I agree. Jake: I cannot agree. 801 E. HYMAN Amy: Some of us did a site visit today. This project was approved in 1989 and John Elmore owner and Stan Mathis, architect came to HPC and there was a house on this property, a little green building that was rated one on the HPC inventory and there was also an historic garage on the alley. At first HPC wanted to keep the entire thing and then the house' could go away and keep the shed and then the shed went away. Basically it was a completely empty parcel but as a condition of the demolition they got to review the new project. I reviewed all the minutes today and there was definitely a discussion about wanting to retain the form of the original one story house on the side and have that one story element at the corner. There was also the discussion of wanting this building to differentiate itself from the next door building which I believe John Elmore also built. They would like to eliminate the gabled roof on the one story element and switch to a porch form. My only comment that I feel is that HPC felt it important and you should keep that in mind before you change it. Stan Mathis, architect: This house and the outbuilding was rated a one and what became important to the committee at that time was the mass and bulk and keeping that as low as we could. As the house has been built I made a mistake by not arguing to lower the gable end. There is a deck. Donnelley: You are talking about altering the one gable end. Stan Mathis: There is a deck and we would continue the porch roof element. What was finally approved had no windows and it was all mass and bulk. Melanie: The fireplaces have been switched and this is massive and everything is on the street side. Stan: The drawing may or may not be what was finally approved. What was finally approved had to do with the mass and shape of the house only. Les: I do not remember all this detail. Stan: That is correct because we said we weren't going to show you the materials because you didn't have to. 12 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FEB.14. 1996 Chairman Jake Vickery called the meeting to order at 5:15 p.m. with Roger Moyer, Martha Madsen, Melanie Roschko, Linda L.E. Smisek, Susan Dodington and Sven Alstrom present. Les Holst and Donnelley Erdman were excused. MOTION: Moyer moved to approve the minutes of January 24, 1996 as amended; second by Dodington. Motion carried 5 - 1. Smisek opposed. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Smisek stated that she visited 939 E. Cooper regarding the lack of siding to complete the project. Amidon stated that she talked to the contractor and they will use all the old siding as best possible. Madsen seated at 6:30 p.m. ISIS - REVIEW MATERIALS Roschko stated that she would like to see a material that isn't solid in color rather than another new solid material. The Isis is one color except for the side. She also stated that she oppoded the color and would rather see a brick shape instead of a 8 x 8. She is not opposed to a ceramic finish on the brick. From the front of the building another solid material color would not be appropriate. Dodington stated that she would like to see more color and material options. Alstrom stated that the 8x8 tile is not compatible in color or shape. The dark iron spot in the brick material is OK and the use of copper is OK but he would like to see a sample o f zinc at the next meeting. The mortar color should match whatever the masonry is. Roschko also stated that the mortar color should match the masonry. 1 0 . ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FEB.14. 1996 Smisek stated the iron spot brick is significantly compatible with the tones o f the old brick and that the gray tile worked well. The acid down copper is compatible and would blend in with the tones of that block and the block across the street. Moyer stated that the applicant responded mainly to Donnelley's concerns and he felt a consensus should be attained by the Board. Does the Board what the attachment to be totally modern or a continuation and blending to the building. The architects thought we wanted it more different; however, my feeling is that we need a worksession to look at more materials. He also stated that the copper material presented is not particularly historically beneficial to a landmark building. The patina of the copper is appropriate and I would like to see other materials along with the copper. The smooth 8 x 8 is not appropriate in this building unless the philosophy of the HPC is to do something real modern. Various Iineal brick should be presented. The darker brick is good for a solid foundation. Vickery stated that it is difficult for him to offer information on color and material because he voted against the project. He also stated that the Board needed to give consensus to the applicant. â€¢ Do we want to see something radically modern. â€¢ More detail use of 8x8 as opposed to a linear brick. â€¢ Use of cooper vs options. Vickery stated at the next meeting that the applicant should come back with a drawing indicating where the materials will be used, particularly viewed from the street. Roschko stated that the new building should look like it is part of the old building but new. Dodington stated that she was opposed to totally modern but possibly the use of a different size of brick and color would differentiate between old and new. It should flow either by the size of the brick or color choice. 2 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FEB.14. 1996 AIstrom stated that he wanted the project to look new but he was opposed to the use of the 8 x 8. Straw Poll No 8x8 tile Color of 8x8 -no 50 - 50 thought the use of the iron spot brick could be incorporated. patina o f the copper is appropriate See more materials match materials with drawings. Alstrom stated that he liked Donnelley's theory but not the use of 8 x 8. 918 E. COOPER AVE. - LOTS M&N Amidon stated that the issues from the last meeting were to lower the plate heights on the second floor and that has been reduced to eight feet and the ridge line is now 25 1/2 feet which is lower than most of the surrounding buildings. There was discussion about articulating the duplex as two separate units and a recessed wall has been placed between the two units. There are two windows on the alley facade that violate the volume standard and that can be resolved easily. The mass and scale is complete for Lots M & N. Dodington stated that she was concerned about the stone. John Davis, contractor stated that he was looking at a random stone in gray. The stone will be either rectangular or square. Field stone will not be used and they intend to stay uni form with the depth o f the stone. Roschko stated her only concern is the material. She is concerned that it wililook massive. Davis stated that the plate heights were reduced from ten to eight feet. Moyer asked i f the railing that is drawn in stone could be changed to an iron railing which would soften the area. 3 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 10. 1996 MOTION: Roger moved to continue the public hearing and conceptual approval for 706 W. Main until a date certain, July 24, 1996; second by Susan. All in favor, motion carried. ISIS - 406 E. HOPKINS - PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CONCEPTUAL Amy stated that the issues are the east and west walls of the building and under the approval they were required to be retained. The west wall is mostly hidden by the Fox Photo Bldg. and will not be exposed to the public. On the east well that is currently facing an empty lot the mortar is squeezing out and they are considering whether that wall should be reconstructed to be a more pleasing surface. John Wheeler, architect for Cunniffe and Assoc. met with a mason on what best serves the building. If the Board maintains that you allow us to not have to maintain the west wall, approximately ten feet does project past the back o f the fox to the alley. We are asking to have the ability to dismantle that small portion that does project and boat wrap it and build it back to its original intent. On the east side it is clear that it is not faced brick and we are unclear as to what should happen to that brick. Thirty feet on the west wall will be kept in place and worked on. It is in good shape. On the east exists utilitarian brick and a rough face and it is in bad shape. Reconstruction with hand chosen bricks could make for a better product. Roger asked what the applicant wanted to do on the west wall. John Wheeler stated remove what is behind the Fox photo bldg. On the east they want to dismantle it and reconstruct it in keeping with what the rest of the brick looks like. He also stated that it is more expensive to leave the brick on the east wall. The Fox photo bldg. would have to be underpinned. Melanie asked if the east wall could be built with face brick to match. John Wheeler stated that there would be a sufficient amount left and they could select the best pieces of brick. He also stated that you can see through .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 10. 1996 the east wall and it would be very costly to rebuild and tuck pointing it in place would be difficult. Amy stated that this is an aesthetic issue. Suzannah asked i f they would keep the keying in of the street facade to the side in the brick. John Wheeler stated that they would not have to get into the keying portion ofthe brick and they fully intend to maintin the main facade. The brick on the front facade is in the best shape of all the brick. There are stress cracks but that can be brought back in. Jake asked how they would support the front facade when all of this work is done. John Wheeler stated that steel beams are sandwiched together and incorporated somehow to the street. The walls are then underpinned. The significant portion o f the project is the foundation and excavation work. Sven stated that soil tests should be conducted. John Wheeler stated that three soil tests have been conducted. Susan stated that the west wall brick is of a different color and the front facade brick is all the same color. She stated that the west wall brick looks older. John stated that some o f the bricks have been water stained and some are more exposed than others. He also stated that the quality of the brick causes color changes. John also stated that the face brick on the front facade was intentionally to be different. It was not unusual to have a more expensive front. Susan asked about the brick pattern on the edge which is the key. John stated that they will retain that key pattern. 3 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 10. 1996 Amy stated that the awning was placed on the building by the Fox photo and the Commission would like to see it removed permanently. John stated that the awning would have to be removed during construction. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Susan stated that when buildings are taken down and put back they never look old, they look new when put back even with different mortar. She feels the walls are going to be the only thing left beside the cornice. The walls are the oldest looking part ofthe building. She feels it is important to save the walls. She also feels the east wall is critical. She also stated that the community would rather see the wall stay old to remind them o f how old the building really is. Charles Cunniffe, architect stated that the brick would have to be washed and repointed. Roger stated that he would allow the walls to be removed. He also stated at some point a building will be against the east wall and that wall will not show. Suzannah stated that she also had no problem with disassembling and reconstructing it. It is not feasible leaving it stand while excavating as you risk the chance of caving in problems. She would rather have the materials be saved. Sven stated what they are proposing is better for the long term life of the structure and more of an urban solution. In response to Susan's concern one issue is compatibility. Melanie asked i f the east wall would look like the west? John stated that the east would look like the west but they could photograph it and make it look like what the east used to look like. Amy stated when the wall is removed we wililoose the (ghost of Aspen). 4 . 0 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 10. 1996 John stated that the wall has to be cleaned. Mark stated that he would be in favor of rebuilding the wall with the condition that a mock up is done and utilizing the same bricks. John stated that the wall can be put up to match the west or it could be different. Roger stated that the east side is being added onto and it is stepped back 18 to 20 feet. The only part of the east wall that will be visible is the 18 feet or so. Why not leave the 18 feet there. John Wheeler stated that the area is very tight and it would be hard to get around. Roger stated that the applicant should be allowed to take the brick down and clean it up. MOTION: Sven moved to approve the reconstruction of the walls using selected and designated brick,from the existing building, second by Roger. DISCUSSION Jake stated that the applicant represented that the east wall would be rebuilt to look like the west wall and a mockup will be provided. John Wheeler stated that they can work with a monitor to determine which wall is best suited to match when reconstructing the east and west walls. Mark stated that there will be different colors ofthe brick and the mortar should be addressed. John Wheeler stated that a sample panel will be provided. Amy stated that a photograph of existing building should be displayed in the building. 5 . ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 10. 1996 Roger stated that the bricks will come down, cleaned and put back up. The mortar color can be addressed by the monitor and staff. Amended motion: Sven amended the motion to state that the coursing of the east wall when it is reconstructed should reflect the current coursing that is existing on the east wall. The mason on the project should have demonstrated historic experience. Texture and color of mortar to be determined by Staff and monitor; second by Roger. Motion carried 6-1. Susan opposed. Melanie asked about the back part of the west wall. The west wall will be reconstructed, the front part in place. The rear part they want to take down and reconstruct and will it be reconstructed as the west wall or as a new part of the building. John stated as the west wall. 517 E. HOPKINS - MINOR Amy stated that this is a minor review to construct a new facade basically. There is no increase in FAR. New veneer will be on the bldg. All the windows and doors will be replaced. A section o f the roo f will change. There are no other historic buildings on that entire half block. Staff recommends approval with conditions that information on doors, windows, and light fixtures be submitted. Charles Cunniffe stated that they are trying to clean up the building and attract business. Roger asked if the windows and doors will be clad. Charles stated yes. Sven stated that they want to contrast the stucco and slate mass against the existing brick. Charles stated that they want to emphasize the area in front. 6 -... 94 . ,.# -~422*. . 9/W<*b~*87#29 $ ='.*1: % % h. rn#-i Â·Â· Â· i,-:fV '0"'f .40 2.-:Pil';KAI \ :* i:,1 : diff.~~4Â£ 41+41~* . ' r,?Â·~2~;hit ~:,44*399~ 1g~4<.:7 711. . vi.$* I , .. i #4 1'5*V 01/0/:tiâ‚¬'224\:-:60 41*%#A.thd.:-1 -4VA Wai . Lit&Â¥ pe'*'fÂ·*,t.it.~~ -~ Â· ~ ':.:Â·..*.31 11 Â·: 4 .*~ F: 44Â·171- ~~L Â·+4~ i - ~~'0~ . Â·,r~~'A . .4 / '1. . 1 F+-i;38*0*2NNmg2. .1 <- ' 1/41: 1 .1 RIÂ¥.A' 'Â·... . MiGgrade,9 . .:..' ,$..al f.'Â·. Â·., . 7,;.- 4*56Â·ZID- , 'f,-r<.~,~~ 1 . / .145Â£-4 . 1410: , - -- - - - 2.-.-*-3.* :-,fre: .:.hU -- 0.0/3/1/11. f ./ . - . /1/// 2 Â¥- - - ./4 ../. - . , 1 - f , ~~~~~---------*e,hydR - â‚¬-4 ' Ilt. 19-=.02 ~Wibiar % 1 ......=..Uy##/**4 - 1.ril, *f:/Ill..../7./'. 34 .. .. 11 "Jit, '1312 'Jilli 1 j 1 j, 1 1///t i:jal 1,Â·' 94.6 . 'i'12 4 \ .U lilli, /jill 111111, C Nlit 1 49/ ft 1 1 2 11 rflt *- !>41 1 NO ~ '1 15,04 .-- - -. A V Q 7 $ tliillitillittll: - Vififte , di) 3.3(Â·Â°lt' 1, t' 1 /1 &:\.0 151'0433 .. MEMORANDUM /4. CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS EJ 610 E. HYMAN, ASPEN, CO 81611 970/925-5590 970/920-4557 FAX ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS TO: Amy Guthrie, HPC FROM: Geoffrey Lester DATE: July 16, 1999 PROJECT: Isis Theater JOB NO.: 9521 REGARDING: Minor South Facade Revisions Amy, We would like to bring you up to date on several recent decisions pertaining to minor revisions to the historic South facade. 1. The Contractor recommends leaving the through bolts in place at the top of the facade. Allowing these bolts to remain will provide an improved permanent lateral connection of the historic facade to the new steel support structure built on the inside of the wall. As typically done in this circumstance, we will provide a decorative steel washer at these locations, most likely a simple square plate, painted black. (Refer to Sheet 1.) 2. We have decided to eliminate the previously approved exterior light sconce locations from the historic south and east facades. (Sheet 2.) We feel there is no historic precedent to merit these lights and do not wish for these lights to compete with the original Isis sign which we are restoring and putting back in place. We intend to replace the wall sconces previously shown on both sides of the main entry with fully recessed soffit lights within the recessed entry. (Sheet 3.) We do still plan on retaining the 2 light sconce fixtures at the Free Market Unit ground level Lobby entry. Please call if you have questions or comments regarding any of these items. Thank you. cc: Jack Wheeler, Shaw Construction CIA rn 4/1 2 4 U- U l[* 7~~R4 N _Iia DA410 -6(88 TTT r. T 1.OPÂ¢*MYÂ·0 -1 1 (0 -lbTMO - r , U, r- - 11.- 1,25 5 41- El O 023 221.01 - 2 23210=31 u LE' 20 Â»Â«0 1 1 i. 1 -1 11 -~ 10/ / r-7 5gmt-EgYAâ„¢Q- 7.\5.90\ 1 /8 S {LO.