The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About#landuse case.HP.214 E Bleeker St.0012.2007.AHPC273707343001 MAJOR HISTORIC 1 214 E BLEEKER 0012.2007.AHPC cje% 42 -- 1 H hal ) q 4 3110 1/./..... -I-lia 4. .. THE CITY OF AspEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0012.2007.AHPC PARCEL ID NUMBER 27370734001 PROJECTS ADDRESS 214 E. BLEEKER ST PLANNER AMY GUTHRIE CASE DESCRIPTION MAJOR CONCEPTUAL HPC CERT OF APPRO REPRESENTATIVE RYBAK ARCH DATE OF FINAL ACTION 3.28.07 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON 1/14/10 .. I '.t â€¢ .. 1 file Edit Record Navigate Pura Reports Format Lab Help .: t, 3.imp 1 2 $ Man Custorn Fl:ejds; Fet Ections Parcek RotÂ¢Ag St.stus Ff '.uniÂ·naM Routing ciÂ· ':wy Attachmeld. 6 Peimit T>,pe 3hpÂ¢ /Â·.pen h #,C Land Use Petmit # :001.-4007.AHPC Add:es: -14 E BLEEKER ST Apt.Suite Cip ASPEN State :CO Zip !81611 Pe,mit Intoinnation 0 - 9 Master Permit .__ _~,A-~d.-1.4.----1 R Gu:t{tig Olieue al ju07 Applied , 4 01 /2007 6 ' pr.,le,Ht Statue pending Appro<,ied I DetctiPt}or, MAJOR CONCEPTUAL HISTORIC. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS loued 5 Fin.al i i Submitted HYBAK ARCHITECTURE 927.1171 Clock Rt.,tining Days ' 0 Expires 52/24/2008 f i Owner | Last Marne ..: , E bLEEKER, UC F,ist Name :16 W MAIN ST i USE)EN CO 81611 e Phone [9201 920"3365 9 OvÂ·mei Is Api*cant? , Am){icarÂ·it - 310W MAIN,T Lad Name 214 E BLEEICER, LLC : F,>it Name "~ ASPEN 00 81 611 Phone :''Â·'01 92[ 3.65 Cust # 527331 Lende, Last Name FW Name Phone 1 i Record 1 1 1 i 47-> 7 Â£ '3(.4 1 ) c n L f 0 6 1 2 2 t.,2 0 $ a , 1 \ G > 1 Flo 3 Â£ i j 4 C 0 4 - 1 \ dju /1-1 . 9\ .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL), FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 214 EAST BLEEKER STREET, LOT A, BRUMDER LOT SPLIT, BLOCK 72, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 27, SERIES OF 2007 PARCEL ID: 2737-073-48-001 WHEREAS, the applicant, 214 East Bleeker, LLC represented by I)ave Rybak of Rybak Architecture and Development, P.C. requests Major Development (Conceptual) for the property located at 214 East Bleeker Street, Lot A, Brumder Lot Split, Block 72, City and lownsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project' s conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.I).3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated June 27,2007, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found that the review standards and the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines were been met, and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on June 27,2007. the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the review standards and "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and approved the application by a vote of 5 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: I hat 11PC hereby grants approval for Major Development (Conceptual) for the property located at 214 East Bleeker Street, Lot A of the Brumder Lot Split, Block 72, City and l ownsite of Aspen. Colorado with the following conditions; 1. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may. at its sole .. discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. 2. For Final review. the treatment of the gable element at the front entry must be restudied in terms of whether the gable end should be open, closed, glazed, etc. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 27th day of June, 2007. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION jeffrey Halferty, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk . . 0 . 0 . . CENTER LINE OF ALLEY- - PROPERTY LINE vvvv â€¢ ' 5' GARAGE SETBACK 2 0 9 -I. I El- --- -----1------ ------- -------- - 0 10' LIVING SPACE SETBACK +M/V~+ ~ BATH CLOSET Â· - /*V,1111~ 18'-5" X 8'-4" 13'-10" X 7'-2" EM/?41 Z 2 -N Â«4 0 T==31Â£ 9011 i __ ~__ GARAGE 0--- 18'-8" X 23'-8" ------- ( //b\AÂ»NO L.W. --- 4 1 1 . BEDROOM 2 BATH CLOSET . 0 3o 18'-5" X 14'-6" 13'-10" X 15'-8" 6' X 9' ~ 2 22 1 1 MECHANICAL < 11' X 8'-8" BEDROOM 3 15'-7" X 16' 1 1 1 1 1 r 0 0 0 0 . LAUNDRY 7 11' X 9'-90 L.W. MUD ROOM dw 16'-0" X 10' KITCHEN 1424 0 17' X 15' I HER , ' - 1 DRESSING 19'-0" X 11~9" 0 POWDER ~1 POWDER u [33' 0 ION -4 -- 5'-6" X 5'-0 - -- -- SHOWER | LU UPI-----1 MEDINGAME 1 11 5, M ----- <22.-1 ' DN - i 12--i-Wn I m N ------------Â·Â·Â·--------- DINING ROOM ~ ~ 1016' X 15' Llf VESTIBULE ~ 311-6 X 181 < 1115----11 Â©11 ~u:W 0 ------- I ' STAIR L____11 L.W. -_. STAIRÂ©___-m El 611 )11 1 1 903Â« . 1 HIS 1 _ _ _ i,iL - _ 22 | DRESSING | In ... .-= - --- ~ ~ 11 11 11 lilli 11 DO 1 9'-7" X 15-0" I lili 11 -- --- -- 1 1 lilli 11 L------------- â€ž 4 1 a I uÂ« n -- F~~13 Â· 00 - L.W. d UP --.-- 0 IUM 1 - u 27 m [3 1 -IO MASTER SUITE BEDROOM 4 BEDROOM 5 L__DEN__3 11 FOYER 11 ~GREAT ROOM -=.......... 20'-6" X 17'-6" 16-4" X 13'-10" ~ CLOEST , - 15 9" X 13'-10" 12'X 14' 1 1 8'-6"X 10'-10" I I r=A 17' X 22' - -J.-2~- - L U [ul - 0 0 | CLOSET BATH ' 5'-6" X 7' ~ 15'-9"X 7' 15'-9" X 7' FRONT PORCH DN d I. --- 111 lilli ~~ 10' FRONT YARD SETBACK 6|G ~ /43-1\~ / A 110 \\: N I Lu 4 // VIE , V"/ 1 1 K ---2 ~ PROPERTY LINE RECEIVED EACST BLEEKER STREET JUN 1 g 2007 rÂ© Dependent_onlower_Level_~ ri Deendent_on_Grour#level r*~ Dependent on Upper Level m,â€ž ....ASPEN -1/8"-= 11-0" U 1/8" = 1,-0" U 1/89+20" pu#WING DEFMMIENT East Bleeker - Lot A Residence 1 0 SCALE: 1/8"=1'-011 310 Sopris Circle Basalt, Colorado 81621 FLOOR PLANS ISSUE: June 18, 2007 970 927 1171 Cell 970 948 1012 dave@daverybak.com . . . . . . . Q *hiteobre and Deve1opmeni P C MOÂ¥61139 DUVAGICIIS 1 3Nll *183dOUd 0 . 0 0 -0.-0------,------- \\ V \\ 11.1,0 \ jill, 0/ 1!f j>\IN~'7 11 Â»14/ lili Â»11 - Wood Shingle Roofing //1\ /'f\ /1\ Ac. 2>; Wood Shingle Roof -- /,\ /4\ I Double Hung windows IT - -ir--r~ ~ ~ Standing Sam Standing Seam - Metal Roof 11 I Metal Roofing 1 11111110 111:11 b 1111 1 111 ~ Â·111~1Â· 1,~ '1'll IiI '1 i I I i Ill Il Il I ;iKEr Shingled Gable ib-64-]~4 , il I Il il:~ P !' 1Â·i'lilli!2' th Il I Pil Dill > | '| ' 11 i| i ivili'; i ii i., i,UL'I ,~ --4 il--.4.:Â·NN-4-,1-2= Existing Trees 0.42i L LiJ 11 111 1 1 11 1 4 1'11'i 11 1 ~ 11 1 1 11* 11 4 + -1, 7*+PPAYF~./.-1-9--~ Lap SIding Wood Lap Siding 0 111.L 1- 941.~6 - : IW 11-~Ji. i , //2/ 1111.- - Souble Hung WIndows -IrrfE===7 rn West 3 - 1/8"-=1ibir-- 2 ... --... SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 310 Sopris Circle Basalt, Colorado 81621 ELEVATIONS ISSUE: June 18, 2007 970 927 1171 -Cell 970 948 1012 dave@daverybak.com 0 0 0 0 0 : I-- - - &=...~I~-~1 - . Aill iliMil e. ~ - li ... -1'.1 .. .....r - ...~ 1 ihil -0*/ 1 1. 0. 1 ..... 4 .. 0.1 .1 1: 1 :Iwill........illi...........ilililillill . : e : m i /-1 t. .... 1 11.- . 1.0 -- . i , --MWI -1. il 1,--. L T el: 0 ; 0 A MMIR/M"-/E,/11 A - - . - -i~ -= Il - -Mil"im'Fill./'ll- t ....1--- . -E i } - 4 -- ~ . - 0 -1 ..1 1 ~/li.i~;#. ... - 1 .. 1*#. . - .1 - *....6/4..le..... 0 0 A .- .- .. I I /42 */* U 0 0 0 0 -------,-----i-----------------0~ / / I 1 /- \ r \1/ / --- 1 1 ' t ,-W'-NÂ£.U....:.*J-' 0- 1/0- ...1 -I / / 1 .V'~ 1 / 1. / / rri#921 ~~ ~ - TrI .r- Xi,!PLJ~ -- i --Za -z-1 1-1% 1*11113, i - - -. ~ 1- 1 22'24983.-...33 i -MI- . 1 - -1 - ..1 1 ' 4--' r ..44 - 1 -19 1 V X+- V _ ' I ttlite, /~ -*roj.-i -- IrAâ€¢.7 ifi,2":- ~ Â¢. "! Ifi _~, ~ 1- .~,LY!-! .. Â· ' I _f--1+73 42_2DtÂ· 1 ---- ~ =1~11 L . i 1 1-1.-11 -1 -J- -1 1 -~MMZXk.uji IMPT_ ---S-Â·-,NI-= 4 1--Ui=7711 - -9.lbe=- -Â·-Â· i 11 *30Â« 16. 1 - I -5-2--4-1Ef--c....1-5-73(31* 1 ----- - 2 -3*Lâ‚¬I*8*~f FL.r..7-f-TE.. - i - : -F< - =11- 10=21-t ET--2-29=--.- =-.-pi;__ - _ I- r - ------ 1 1 !- 4 I 4,40..r 23' -:2-:Z~--Z--t- 9 '.'.11 1 --/11 :11 ~ 408/p## ,-'* 1~ iff/LES 1 ; 1 :111: 1 I ~ 2,1 0 b |~1 1~ 1 / + 214 E. Bleeker Proposed Residence Â·--- 232 E. Bleeker EAST BLEEKER STREET 13.-BLOCK.-PLAL_..~ 1.-/ 1"= 20'-0" EAST BLEEKER - LOT A 3 nMOAF 310 Sopris Circle Basalt, Colorado 81621 BLOCK PLAN ISSUE: June 18, 2007 970 927 1171 Cell 970 948 1012 dave@daverybak.com ( c Rybak Architecture and Development, PC. ........ Â·01. <'dery*t:.Â»feat . . . . 0 0 . f i -u - -=* 914 6 4,4 -- 4 11 11.-21 -=zigpl- E- ----1 11 0111 11 x --- 1 - . -.-- *.- 4:' i- ' 77 r- I n 1 11 - / P-3)7.7.9.7777ruT'/-2=177--1.1.k.79 1 -1 -- *1:2Â· 141 L.11- 1.1,111.1.11Â·; , L 1-7 / ' i ,-44--r'--L_i-1-1-r n I 1- 1,1 1 Xr_2.2-Â·252_ 1 1. - IT-T -IZEZZL -T=-7=31-- -- - .11 11- 1.74 t, i ILL .i . .,Â·.,Â· -L-, I ~: -'J,-1-,d.-1- 7..1 '.'1- 1Â·-'-I-TÂ·~'- -L 1|-r-'l T.j - A / ...UJ ' 1-1_- -Lh IT-1, -~ LI'llf-Li.'llf 7 5 .11.11 L. it'11-LI'T- -11 1 1. + 1 1 1 1 1-1-J I 1 - A k ,-3- -1...r:3, J''*3..11111 1....r'JL-j-?1.13., i'.1.11'/-'.-----.-i...-3 .--f/.~ 1 D-Tz LIT- 1 -r 1 11 1 , I Â·-L.-0 ---I-rp.-1-11 -' ill|Li' 'I.I----F21Â£ Â· . y~j~'~~~~,id'' . r fi Â· 1 16 -'i.r-t-1-32Â£t --'F -r -7 f7 J ---i-:i, 1 1 1,-r. 4-rÂ· L-In-=ZIErld.1/n _ ---- --- - 11 91 \ n ri - ------- ---- ---- -- - 3 --1-U~~%'.,L-1' -_ : -F@fl t T". 1 -1- 1 -t #-lit-A d--11 .= LI-r----34~~Z~~772-~~~~ZPEEZEEEcEP-Â·- -----~ Ilill 11 *=1*1114_11' i - --- I --7-----r.til**52Â©54*fltÂ«tÂ«%433 il -211~~ M ~1 k hl| t.hvpf'r~. t 5 4 9 0'1'4[ 1 1--111 34>. 11 -2i*2*:*0%#*2*5t=*31 - - F-113 = Lijika** A--411 - --- --fllyk _.-1 lili .Â· ummm**9~ w, 5+ -'3 -1-%-Ii-H- rm Gae~~$:444=ckÂ»-~~i' | Fl:Â»1-Â«E--Efe- -- 1 =1 14 q E 1 - 1 4111 .Irl 14*f|'I#4. Ill ~ ~1.... .- 1. .. ...i i ltd #114941 u Lj 1 , ]Â«I'll' i' ~ " ~~~L 1 -Ar-44-1< â€¢â€¢.145 ,-:| ,|- - III I 1-! 1 ~:71- ' - -1 1 1-i ~ 1-1 1 1-, ~ -9----PUTE1-3 1- 4-1 1 I-1 , 1-i 1-1 i 1-: i - 1 -: i i-TT--r-====-1Â·- 1 - 1 - 1 - 4-2 1-i E-1 1 1-1 1 6 -1 1 1-1 : 1-14.-11.-1 1 12-1 1 1-111-1 I 1-11 1- 1 1-:11-1 11-1 1 1- 11-: 11-1 1 I--1 ' 1 214 East Bleeker Proposed Residence 232 East Bleeker 41/ 1/8" = 1'-0" ~ 4 j /Y * . /\A di:-~ , . ~~ELâ‚¬1 --- . -- il 1 f ~%1~ 1 ,, 1 F 1' 1-t' -1 1 ,//1 \ \ 3-i#.6---A~#~ '~''b)~ lili 0 - ..717 -1 Il,1111 11'11'11 1 -lu - I .-/'il-4399.2661 th 1-,-23~ ah l//29*ir=I tic'Ki#692 HI '_i~-- \\ t<-~~t -11, ~1'LI-il~ 1--= -- - - :,1 i 11 Â·Â·r-:,br . \31% fÂ·Â·tÂ«~00.- 1.1412-Jit-0~1-1 1.-- --Ell=r....-2 , *-1-, 4-U,- IÂ·,Â·Â·t-*uwpÂ·tÂ·r,-- - u- ., Â· TI--- - -I-'-11 . i , 14 - -- --~16>-1134 1-w'.F 2------ -- 9..nf----- -1=L=lup-#, ..IlfÂ§11 Itill' lilli 1.:A- 1 J,L-- ran ---- -- -rtii ~ ----44 L, 1 111 1Â¥99'111 611.11 2:1 111,11 11,(111'1111.- :x-== -- F | 1 11 1 | Il Â· 1 Il | 1 ,' 11 â€ž . 1 I , | i ~ . --- - =I ===== :1 L ...................... - - - -------J 430-; ~:1--3-24(1 - -------~- - -- -Â·i'I =IL_LLLIL. LLL_--/:,;:;::~ ...\47=7=777=1.........4.BEES,EEM//.#4 1 \\Ill[/11Â©917411.-=11 -1- - 6.*37-~2=Â»VE**ta#,96&..471*30''I**2.4/Flf,T2tg-Kit#Anti~,22~C ~~~"~~~~~ 7- 1 1 71'kf 11, 2-2Ix"PIJ- 4 .- PE=% 23 % 1 =-===1 1 111 111 lUfflfE?-474~4"-0=mett;~f~Eama~ -2 -- ---1 -111 111[ 143=3=-1--4 1 4 11 // 11 0-1,44 [-n -- - -- 2 11~41" 2 -lp~!~ f + - 9-.--~ . -,- - .... ..................... \ , 232 East Bleeker Proposed Residence 214 East Bleeker rh North 2 EAST BLEEKER - LOT A 4 SCALE: 1/8"= 1'.n. 310 Sopris Circle Basalt, Colorado 81621 BLOCK ELEVATIONS ISSUE: June 18, 2007 970 927 1171 Cell 970 948 1012 dave@daverybak.com I 0 0 0 0 0 0 1~k~h~~EandD~lo~Â«EC ....... Â«J ~b 1 1 1 \19 1 3?.4//7/7/ 4 Vi k /,1 1/ , \11A:,it , I f / , 1 i 11\, i ./ f , iÂ· i"m E ~211 AllY . ..F~ / 11>11.-1 ==@@*@@A@@@ 5 SCALE: 310 sopris Circle Basalt, Colorado 81621 BLOCK PERSPECTIVES ISSUE: June 18, 2007 970 927 1171 Cell 970 948 1012 dave@daver,bak.com ..,.,,.U RybakAmhite%mand DembpmÂ«P C 1 1 ~A-: I I.* - 14 i 4 --- m 1=7. * 1 ' , 1.1 *laÂ» 51. 4 4 E .E 11 k 1 ' 1 -- . : E - - im '*11 , 11 1// B .r- -IL_I 1 m 1 1 .- , 1.1 - . Â®.. r. . I. ... .. EL - 11â€¢ 1 --*.W -- 1 , 0 11 ./\ 1 : A a - A- . . . . AIIA -Z .. . .. I 0 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 214 E. Bleeker Street (New House)- Major Development (Conceptual) and Variance- Continued Public Hearing DATE: June 27,2007 SUMMARY: The subject property is a 6,000 square foot vacant lot which was created through a subdivision of the landmark designated parcel at 214 E. Bleeker. There are no historic resources on the site. HPC has full purview over the project. The project was reviewed by HPC on March 28th, and continued for restudy to better comply with the "Inflection" standard of the Residential Design Standards, as well as to pull the front fa~ade back into alignment with adjacent buildings, and address the composition of the front faQade in general. A lightwell which appeared to require a setback variance has been revised so that no waiver is necessary. Staff finds that the architect has successfully addressed HPC' s recommendations and supports Conceptual approval. APPLICANT: 214 E. Bleeker LLC (Kristeen Church), represented by Rybak Architecture and Development, P.C. PARCEL ID: 2737-073-48-001. ADDRESS: 214 E. Bleeker, Lot A, Brumder Lot Split, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6, Medium Density Residential. MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the Conceptual level, is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use.fode Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. 1 .. Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. This project is located on a block that is mostly comprised of Victorian era buildings. The subject house will be the only non-Victorian structure on this block-face and it sits between two one story miner's cottages, each of which is a 6,000 square foot lot with an allowable FAR of 3,240 square feet, just like the new building. The project must comply with the HPC Design Guidelines and the City's Residential Design Standards. The architect has provided a block plan and streetscape elevations which are very helpful in reviewing the project. He has clearly worked to reflect some of the proportions of adjacent structures and the pattern of small scale secondary buildings along the alley. HPC has recently reviewed rehabilitation plans for the landmark to the west. It was developed entirely as a one story building, and the block plan indicates that this was achieved through considerably more site coverage at the back of the lot via setback variances. The house which is the subject of this review is eligible for setback variances (due to landmark status), but does not require any. Based on feedback from Staff and HPC in March, the building has been reconfigured to pull the staircase more into the center of the structure, leaving more open space and/or one story forms along the eastern side of the site. This creates "inflection," as required by the Code. The Victorian home to the west is tall enough that more mass can be handled on that side, which is the direction that the architect took. The proposed new home is in alignment with the front setback of the adjacent residences, and the front porch has been modified to reinforce horizontal alignments with those buildings as well. The material palette, fenestration, lighting, and landscaping will be the focus of Final Review. Staff finds that, at a Conceptual level, the project meets the design guidelines. DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: â€¢ approve the application, â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or â€¢ continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. 2 .. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC grant Conceptual approval for 214 E. Bleeker, Lot A, Brumder Lot Split, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, with the following condition of approval: 1. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. Exhibits: A. Relevant Design Guidelines B. Application Exhibit A: Relevant Design Guidelines 11.1 Orient the primary entrance of a new building to the street. u The building should be arranged parallel to the lot lines, maintaining the traditional grid pattern of the site. 11.2 In a residential context, clearly define the primary entrance to a new building by using a front porch. 1 The front porch should be "functional," in that it is used as a means of access to the entry. o A new porch should be similar in size and shape to those seen traditionally. o In some cases, the front door itself may be positioned perpendicular to the street; nonetheless, the entry should still be clearly defined with a walkway and porch that orients to the street. 11.3 Construct a new building to appear similar in scale with the historic buildings on the parcel. o Subdivide larger masses into smaller "modules" that are similar in size to the historic buildings on the original site. 11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building. u The primary plane of the front should not appear taller than the historic structure. o The front should include a one-story element, such as a porch. 11.5 Use building forms that are similar to those of the historic property. u They should not overwhelm the original in scale. 11.6 Use roof forms that are similar to those seen traditionally in the block. o Sloping roofs such as gable and hip roofs are appropriate for primary roof forms. u Flat roofs should be used only in areas where it is appropriate to the context. o On a residential structure, eave depths should be similar to those seen traditionally in the context. 3 .. o Exotic building and roof forms that would detract from the visual continuity of the street are discouraged. These include geodesic domes and A-frames. 11.9 Use building components that are similar in size and shape to those of the historic property. o These include windows, doors and porches. o Overall, details should be modest in character. 11.10 The imitation of older historic styles is discouraged. 1 This blurs the distinction between old and new buildings. u ilighly complex and ornately detailed revival styles that were not a part of Aspen's history are especially discouraged on historic sites. 4 .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL), FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 214 EAST BLEEKER STREET, LOT A, BRUMDER LOT SPLIT, BLOCK 72, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2007 PARCEL ID: 2737-073-48-001 WHEREAS, the applicant, 214 East Bleeker, LLC represented by Dave Rybak of Rybak Architecture and Development, P.C. requests Major Development (Conceptual) for the property located at 214 East Bleeker Street, Lot A, Brumder Lot Split, Block 72, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated June 27,2007, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found that the review standards and the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines were been met, and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on June 27,2007, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the review standards and "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and approved the application by a vote of to NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants approval for Major Development (Conceptual) for the property located at 214 East Bleeker Street, Lot A of the Brumder Lot Split, Block 72, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado with the following conditions; 1. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole .. discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 27th day of June, 2007. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION jeffrey Halferty, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk' *LÂ¢8~***2*f:f}~ m *:34{ .4 Â§% 4%%~4Â§?*@44dgiwi*E--- I j:*'}P2*li-*AgÂ»*****&*{1{0224(fieÂ¢~ 4%~~Ft?**Â·@Ej;~d;~2*4*&*4--*--@20*Â§9*jÂ»#%*t@*jER *%*Te~A Vâ„¢ ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 28,2007 Sara pointed out that most of the original doors and windows are intact. Sarah said when she looks at this property the orientation to the mountain and how the house is sited is important. Alison said she feels criteria A for designation are met. The orientation to the mountain is historic. Michael said it clearly is an example ofa chalet style and the characteristics have not been destroyed. Brian felt that more than one criteria are addressed for designation. The most important thing is that the Chalet style is intact and the orientation of the property. Brian said he feels orientation of buildings should be included in the criteria for designation. MOTION: Sarah moved to approve Resolution #1 1 for 827 E. Dean Street to be included in our inventory of landmark buildings; second by Brian. Roll call vote: Brian, yes; Alison, yes; Sarah, yes; Michael, yes. Motion carried 4-0. 214 E. Bleeker - Conceptual Development and Variances, Public Hearing Affidavit of posting - Exhibit I Jason Lasser explained that there are no historic resources on this site and HPC has full purview over the project. The subject house will be the only non-Victorian structure on the block. It sits between two one-story miner's cottages. The allowable FAR is 3,240 square feet. No other variances are requested other than for a light well that is not technically required by the building code because it is proposed for a den. Staff finds that the project does not meet the inflection standard which requires new development to step down in height toward the one story structure. Jason pointed out that changes have occurred and David Rybak can go over them. The dimensional requirements for light wells are 3 x 3. Staffis recommending continuation. 8 d#vam=rim*'44#34#Wk*J.e. .*8.*,:...>4:R2Â§~ksk>I#%.telÂ·GallyaL ~~~ moal/1% 22< m{4Â§2 1 {{14%*49*41 21%%2%*1 %2-*&02&2Â»=1*x~*%&949*4*-: ~~~?1?}:}9%*4Â¥%43#4*49*k**4%Wi*jjojEA#*Â§~ie{*{I@ji}}i}kimÂ§&}1Â§Â§%01ia,il*%0 %E*Â«~2 V . ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 28,2007 David Rybak, architect. David said he made small revisions to demonstrate that the design meets the guidelines. The vacant lot has a series of cottonwood trees and spruce trees at the south end of the property and the east frontage which tend to restrict the site and we are trying to make everything fit within the context. The proposal submitted tonight eliminates any needs for variances and the light well sits within the setback. The proposal is for a two story residence with a partially detached garage and a small connecting link from the garage to the main house. There is a one story gable element to the west side and a two story gable form along the east. We chose a hipped roof cross gable to bring down the wall planes and not have gable elements on the western side. The guidelines state that hipped roofs are OK. The garage has a 12x 12 gable roof. Sara said because the property is sandwiched between two one story resources the property owner gets to decide which side to inflect on. They have to inflect on the length of the lot line as far back as the historic resource goes. Jason said staff is concerned about the two story element that is set back where the stairs go back to the second floor. We do not know if that is included in the inflection idea and we have not had a chance to review this with other planners in our office. The code says if a one story building sits directly adjacent to the subject site new construction must step down to one story along the common lot line. David said the inflection has to be a minimum of 12 feet along the street frontage. Vice-chair Michael Hoffman opened the public hearing. Mirto Malory thanks the architect for including them in the process. On a whole this is a unique place in the West End. Mirto suggested that the front fagde be broken up so that the church is clearly the dominant structure on the street. This is a neighborhood with gingerbread houses and unfortunately stone is not part of the gingerbread look on that street. One other question is the chimney. The mass seems large. The lilacs have been there for alliong time and hopefully they will be preserved on the alley. I f some of them have to be removed hopefully they will be replaced. Vice-chair Michael Hoffman closed the public hearing. 9 Â»WMliA@444*4*%4%*%1*%#%%*@%604%244*;*AeÂ®~~ ..1*0--..2/ 1#*/-'//' i' Al* -0-:*JA#"&3#&1*%----"WI***#-86*2%2*g**& ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 28,2007 Sarah thanked the architect for a complete packet. One concern is the alignment of the front wall in that it aligns with the front porches and not the front walls of the historic resources which make it more imposing on the street. The entry two story gable might be able to come down a little and be minimized. The bay window on the second story seems heavy and imposing. The inflection is definitely on the right side. The chimney is imposing and adding to the overall height of the house from the front. The one stoll garage fits in well with our guidelines and it is a nice nod that fits in with the character of our alleys in that neighborhood. Sarah recommended continuation to look at the massing of the fagade in the front. Brian also agreed that the massing on the front is a concern. Another concern is the fagade of the building extending to the end of the porches and that might cause a problem. Possibly that could be brought back a little so that it is not one solid mass. Alison pointed out that David has done a good job bringing the front elevation down to the one story. This building could be a lot more imposing. If the church elevation was there it would actually make this building look smaller. The point about the front fa,ade being all the way to the porches might be the reason it has mass and scale problems. She also agreed that the chimney needs to be less imposing. The roof forms read very nicely. th MOTION: Sarah moved to continue 214 E. Bleeker until June 27 : second by Brian. Roll call vote: Sarah, yes: Michael, yes; Brian, yes; Alison, no. MOTION: Michael moved to adjourn: second by Sarah. All iii favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 10 .. g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc 02/01/06 Land Use Application 3 THE CITY OF ASPEN PROJECT: Name: d *W fl*660#44 Location: LoT A z 600â€¢19&10 WT 'fbst Â£*T' 5%.02.61*:* 01&461.r (Indicate street address, lot & block number or metes and bounds description ofproperly) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) %137 0134000 1 APPLICANT: Name: 4.1+ It'. 80Â§Â£,4,04* . IA,6 Address: 240 1041- #414 *T. 1 1*fo/ro 2 6,8 3â€ž049 Phone #: 1 U -10*S Fax#: E-mail: INT-@04 6 509 044 Â·04,T REPRESENTATIVE: Name: R,,18A1<- 80:,Â£461310 uu 0~ DK.VE*WNLAT, fÂ·60 Address: 615 6#pe.9 08 00/4. n Â£~**1~- 4 Â· / 01&31 Phone #: 11.1 -lili Fax#: 917 -147I E-mail: '0#Ni (2, 0*v q,}4 De*- 09 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): Historic Designation E] Relocation (temporay, on or offsite) [3 Certificate of No Negative Effect U Demolition (total demolition) JK[ Certificate of Appropriateness U Historic Landmark Lot Split -Minor Historic Development -Major Historic Development E[ -Conceptual Historic Development -Final Historic Development U -Substantial Amendment EXISTING CONDmONS: (description ofexisting buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) Lor 96 161('AJT. 4*%&%33#6 6%APBAA@:19*& 1*006 71 00. Ait M,â€¢2*n PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings. uses: modifications, etc.) IBD .. 14lf,ve' 01#NK Am,49 AB,boe,Jui. ' FEES DUE: $ 9,4 700 General }Information Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with your application. This information will help us review your plans and, if necessary, coordinate with other agencies that may be involved. Â¥ES NO 14 0 Does the work you are planning include exterior work; including additions, demolitions, new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration? E] Does the work you are planning include interior work; including remodeling, rehabilitatioit or restoration? [3 10 Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this time? 0 "In addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No Negative Effect and a budding permit areyou seÂ©Ungtomeathe Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation or restoration of a National Register of Historic Places property in order to qualify 1%>r state or federal tax credits? E] C] Ifyes, are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in conjunction with this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are eligible. Owner-occupied residential properties are not.) 0 [1 If yes, are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check all City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use: C] Rehabilitation Loan Fund [J Conservation Easement Program [3 Dimensional Variances C] Increased Density El Historic Landmark Lot Split O Waiver of Park Dedication Fees 0 Conditional Uses [3 Exemption from Growth Management Quota System U Tax Credits .. Dimensional Requirements Form (Item #10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project: diw #Â£410."CÂ£ Applicant: 4,1 4 E. 3 vit*4,0.. 1..& c. Project Location: 6 r A , 17'un p.. lof 4,Â£11 Zone Distnct: IL-4 Lot Size: 6 090 6. rÂ· Lot Area: G, 000 4,f (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to tile definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: O Proposed: - Number of residential units: Existing: O Proposed: 1 Number of bedrooms Existing: 0 Proposed. 5 Proposed % of demolition: 0 DIMENSIONS: (write n/a where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: Existing: O Allowable: 5\110 Proposed: 5 jzH o Height Principal Bldg.: Existing: D Allowable: 9.S' Proposed: 1,5' Accessory Bldg, Existing: O Allowable: 161 Proposed: \5' On-Site parking Existing: Required: 1. Proposed: 1- % Site coverage: Existing: Required: 500/0 Proposed: 'bl*/6 171.6. s.Â¥. % Open Space Existing: Required: 4 ~ * P roposed: B 14 Front Setback 5 Existing: Required: tb Proposed: It. Rear Setback: A Existing: Required: 5 -ID Proposed: 5 1*' 6401*Â£ Combined Front/Rear Indicate N. S. E, W Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: E Existing: Required: 5 Proposed: S-,0 Side Setback: W Existing: Required: 5 Proposed: 9-ID Combined Sides: Existing: Required: \5 Proposed: i S MIA. Distance between Existing: Required: 41( . Proposed: R 1 4. buildings: Existing non,conformities or encroachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued: *18 Variations requested (identify the exact variances needed): .. 0.25 0 5 mHe n 0.5 kilometer 0.25 d 9 9 342: ' 4%4 0 ' A 4* .eot./90, 9 8. .., ..Â· - Hollow Â«Ilawn ./ 6 95, .0. p 9 4 7 1 .1, A O. .3>, (tila.Â¢&1/404. A- -7, A A /1 45 1, a de> 40- LEI.E 14* 00 0, :04,149 4/4904- 44 . 46 1.,tch *De * Â·Â·Â·- PEDÂ· 39: Eff = 04. Â¥\ =. # I. I Salvat)2'0 6'< 7 gfl, <26 4.-nmrâ€¢ Â·Â·Â· .& 9 .CF It-i.-- I j C Enstitute 95 40 Creek.Rd (1 2 JO a i dit ~~ng F.94 60 , . % 90 8 :' Gillespie st E ..2 0 i ..OkÂ¥ t.%/frig -8- 1 -2 ... g & R E '?f- 1 -j=- f : Spruce St 68 e E &5 ''~ n. Â· d 5 - T. Â· /.603 Â£:g 5 P. 42...: v 49. U b . SÂ·i ' S. 6 #' ... 5* st I J. - 12 1.1 .thr. .,O, N\09 r [1 Lia St <4 404 4 - :-- Gende * *F 81'Â· 'AC.44 4 7 -1 -rit'Ii' Utjt,!~CV . 4 4*#A.U .' C? 0- :. - 6 - 1*1 j COp G c Pit,f,iniC_o.unrv -422- , ~ Â· - 4 ., 0 -0.- 9 1i . Â£ Court!,8 .red 9 14 44 64.. ~ 09 -69., '0 US,{yef C E H -r- S 1 st St Coppe 0 63 ..=,4 4 6*?9913'/ 4. 4 9 Midlanoto .. 1 'Ave 3-4 2 -iI~, CO %~ ~~7,, * ~0 4 Q 47 1 Smuggier Gia/e Rd ar d Mascej,29 2. Regent St .-4. ,- 9-2~.~.~,....f, 57~4147 8*- f *7 i ..4, 07 . 3.1<ath,yns Way e *tan St . 'Â»f. D -r#kal F - -2'fil/0,~, 80.1 2--. 6 321 U %Â·97 80 8-1 ~39 # 0' &2 Lili Snatic. St DO Â· &Â·, Summit St 9 f f. 41 10 .~.1-5 ~ 4 ~pee..Bove. Rd i ~1 twÂ»Â« 44 91 411% Â·00 901\?Ster Toll Rd 0 i 4 wed&% e :,b '-10 0 !& 8 b 0. 45 2 0 to P V; Da/e 5-3 04(dmpie et twie.te~~* ~ &6 < ~*99~Â¢00Â©evÂ·: <Â£7'~ ,Â·BiuÂ·'..,. . I... I 091 j~ermde 0% MA ~. 9 Ute Ce,74@te #72 4. 49 99..Fork Do~. 14 C . 9. 8 ,. *ood Fid .... k. T. 14 2.-- ---1 4710-Â·.D -- - Cfjstal Lake 8~ ..~...~ d \ .e-, i',/0, o i â€žc? f-,2 7 f; 82 Fid Â·Area 01 .7% Â©21306 A,if.Aks:~SÂ·-'coA.â‚¬7 3 % d + 2006 TANA. Inc,/GDT, Inc -Â»m No" pew A/4 & 2 4410~/4 -2,66<7ws Garmisch~ St 409 I ginming Rd Alice j,yaunc01 UedsÂ·,1 id k 4/P 000~310 - Lupine .. r,vo 7 1/ Architecture & Development, P.C. TO: Amy Guthrie, Preservation Officer Sara Adams, Preservation Officer FROM: Dave Rybak DATE: June 18, 2007 RE: Lot A, Brumder Lot Split, New Residence The subject property was granted a Subdivision Exemption Lot Split via Ordinance No. 54-2005 by the City of Aspen. Lot A currently contains a swimming pool, while Lot B contains the "Wilbur Wilson Residence" built in 1893, which was approved for renovation by the H. P. C. via Resolution No. 13- 2007. The owner of the property, 214 E. Bleeker, LLC., requests a Major Development Conceptual Review for the construction of a New Single Family Residence on Lot A. The new residence will sit between the Historic Resource on Lot B to the West and the Historic Resource at 232 East Bleeker Street, on the East. The Resource on Lot B is a one story residence with a large hipped roof mass, while the Resource to the East is a one and one-half story Gable structure. The site also has a number of existing large trees along the East Property line which dictate structure placement outside of the tree drip lines. The large Cottonwood trees at the South East corner of the site create a visual break between the property and the Resource to the East. The existing trees and the Historical Resources which bookend the property have been the driving factor in the design process. A design was submitted and received a Major Development Conceptual Review Hearing on March 28,2007, during which the Commission members raised several concerns regarding the relationship of the proposed residence to the Historic Resources to either side of the property. The Conceptual Review Hearing was continued to June 27,2007. The issues discussed at the March 28th hearing included: Maintaining a one story inflection for the entire depth of the property. Prominence of the Two-story Gable form on the South Elevation. The subtractive forms of the Front Porches on the Existing Resources vs. the Proposed Massing. The design of the residence has been revised to address the concerns raised by the Commission members and meet the requirements of the City of Aspen Design Guidelines. The revised design is based upon the original concept to address the site constraints with a Two- story gable form running North to South along the East side of the property, and a One-story gable mass running West off the primary gable mass, toward the Historic Resource on Lot B. The composition creates inflection on the west side and allows the taller mass to be softened by the cottonwood trees to the east. .. Lot A, Brumder Lot Split, New Residence HPC Major Development Conceptual Review Application June 18, 2007 The Front Porch has been revised to run the length of the South Elevation. The porch will create the set back from the South Properly Line and align with the "Build-to" line of the adjacent Front Porch structures. This creates a consistency of the Front Porches being the primary element on the Street Elevation. The length of the proposed porch will visually tie the subtractive forms of the three porches together along the streetscape. The South fagade of the One-story Gable form running to the West, will align with the One-story Gable form running East on the adjacent 214 E. Bleeker residence. The one-story massing creates the required inflection per the Design Guidelines, and runs uninterrupted for the depth of the property. All two story massing has been moved at least 12' from the West Property line. The prominence of the Two-story gable form has been diminished by breaking the height of the element with the Front Porch Roof, and moving the South wall back from the "Build-to" line. The gable form will become secondary to the consistency of the Front Porch "line". The Two-story gable is extruded down to the porch elevation on the west side of the structure to diminish exposed wall surfaces and tie the higher roof to the lower elements. The main gable form runs north through the mass of the structure. Cross gables with hipped roofs, and one shed roof work off the primary roof to enclose the other second floor areas. A one story gabled accessory structure, enclosing a two car garage is located on the North setback, connected to the main structure by a 6 foot wide, 8 foot long one story gabled roof element. The proposed residence addresses the Residential Design Standards, and HPC Design Guidelines as delineated below: RESIDENTIAL DEISGN STANDARDS AND HPC DESIGN GUIDELINES NEW BUILDINGS ON HISTORIC LOT SPLITS The Lot split created by the previous owners created two 6,000 square foot properties; one containing the Resource on Lot B, and one existing as open space. The site constraints of the existing trees and neighboring Historic resources have generated a design which does not dominate either neighbor. The massing scheme was developed to compliment the context, while the material and detailing have been selected to fit into this historic block. The simplicity of materials and detailing will pay tribute to the historic neighbors, but not confuse the new building as being old. STREET SCAPE AND LOT FEATURES The structure is oriented to Bleeker Street on the south end of the parcel. The structure will be set back 12 feet from the South Property Line to match the setback of the Historic Resource to the East on the proposed location for the relocated resource to the West. HISTORIC BUILDING MATERIALS The material selection for the residence will include a field stone veneer base and painted lap siding and trims. The primary mass will have stone veneer up to a wood belt course band at the second floor height. The one story gable element and secondary elements will have stone bases with lap siding above. 2 .. Lot A, Brumder Lot Split, New Residence HPC Major Development Conceptual Review Application June 18, 2007 WINDOWS The windows will be a combination of vertically proportioned double hungs, with some fixed units introduced into the larger ganged window assemblies. DOORS The exterior doors will be divided-lite, glass paneled doors. PORCHES A Front Porch runs the length of the South Facade and includes a cross gable to frame the entrance. The cross gable extruded from the Two-story gable, which is elongated to the West to bring the main roof down to the porch elevation. This composition brings the two story massing down in scale and emphasizes the Main Entrance of the residence. ARCHITECTRUAL DETAILS The proposed detailing will be simple, complimenting the detailing of the resource on Lot B. 4 1/2" lap siding with lx6 corner boards, lx4 window trim with a small crown added to the head trim, and a lx6 with small crown fascia are the primary elements of detail. The upper section of the Primary Gable will be bowed out from the vertical wall surface, yet stay within the depth of the l' overhang, and clad in shingle siding. This gives some distinction to the gable element, and sets up a soffit for a bowed window bay on the second floor. The bowed gable element is also used on the North Fagade of the Primary Gable. ROOFS The Primary Roof will be a 14/12 gable running North to South. This Roof is elongated to the West from which the cross gable of the porch is created for the Entry. The one-story mass on the west will have a 12/12 gable to inflect that of the Historic Resource on Lot B. A 4/12 shed roof extends from this gable to create the Front Porch. Secondary roofs enclosing the Upper Level are hipped gables to reduce the mass and bring the eye down. A shed roofed are is also utilized on the North West corner of the Upper Level to minimize the roof structure. All Gable roof forms will have cedar shingles, while the shed roofs will have standing seam metal roofing. One Chimney element has been designed on the east side of the primary gable. The Chimney will be veneered in field stone, and include steps its massingto accommodate fireplace and flue alignments as it rises. Steps within the stone will also occur at the top of the chimney to develop contextual detailing. SECONDARY STRUCTURES A 12/12 gable form is placed on the North setback as a secondary structure. The form is reminiscent of the alley structures found within Aspen, and addresses the alley with a 16' wide overhead garage door. The door will have glass lights, and veneer trim to break up the wide door to look as two side by side doors. 3 .. Lot A, Brumder Lot Split, New Residence HPC Major Development Conceptual Review Application June 18, 2007 BUILDING RELOCATION & FOUNDATIONS A stone veneer base will wrap the entire structure to signify the foundation. The secondary structure will not have the stone base, as is historically typical of these elements. 4 CENTER LINE OF ALLEY- - - PROPERTY LINE ddgvyvvll r -- 5' GARAGE SETBACK . 10' LIVING SPACE SETBACK etz9424 CLOSET BATH ~ 7' X '- " 20' X 8'-37 9 1 1- --- --- 1 9-4 11 ./\ 6 +M/\MA I ~ 4 9~ i 0 111 BATH GARAGE 24% . 0. 5#-rl i , 0 14'-11" 5' 18'-8" X 23'-8" L.W. BEDROO 2 5 0/ 18'-4" X 4'-6" CLO#E 6' X ?' a 0- 1 M 1.- 0 , 1 U) i CE: m . 211 : , 10' X 13'- ' BEDROOM 4 MECHANI L 16'-7" X 18'41" DN DN c L.W, < | | MUD R O 13'-8" X 9 tel COV RD I / POR H 0 ||-- - DRESSING POW R r ==- , Eli_]dw 17'-0"X 12'-0 1 -- --- < POWDER DN KITCHEN ~ ~_ H SHOWER'* H -- 1 0 w m 1 Z + --- 1 10'-8" X 16' LU % ' UP 0 1.U DRESSING a. DN 02) 506" '-0" 1 HIS 9-7 X 6 8 00 2 1, a., u) --- 1 MEDIA/GAME 5 34'X 15'-8" | ~ DINING ROOM | STAR VESTIBULE UP I 18' X 14' rf 111 1 i ---1'Il~ 1 -- 0 1 HALL L.W. CL 03 BEDROOM FOYER| ~ --- - - MASTER SUITE BEDROOM Sul 4 1 1 1 1 -- 1 15-3" X1 ' 20'-6" X 17'-6" 16'-10" X 1,~:~~ Â· , GREAT ROOM - 1 DEN 11 8' X 8 17' X 22' 12'-7" X 14' I I I I , i 17-11 LINEN 1 0 211 El , L______ CLOE 1 0 51-91, 1 CLOSET , BATH rn FRONT ~ ~ BATH / pORCH 0-3 00 4'-9" X 6' [JO 10'-6" k-f -- ' 15'-6" X6' DN 4-2 / | ~ 10' FRONT YARD SETBACK LU il //11 Dl@ i A 10. PROPERTY LINE / -1 , \ e P 2 1 EACST BLEEKER STREET rit Lower Level Floor Plan -2GroundLeveLE!99[-plan 3-Ver_LeveLE]gor-Ela-n U 1/8" = 1'-0" 4-7 1/8" = 1'-0" U 1/8" = 1'-0" East Bleeker - Lot A Residence 1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0 310 Sopris Circle Basalt, Colorado 81621 FLOOR PLANS ISSUE: March 28,2007 970 927 1171 Cell 970 948 1012 dave@daverybak.com CE Rybak Architecture and Development. P. C. 3Nll A.LU3dOE]d 0E - I+-+A~-A~,+49.9 IE Wood Shingle Roofing 1 1 Wood Shingle Roof - Double Hungwindows In 11 11111~1111:lilli Standing Seam----rll- Metal Roof E- Standing Sam 1 Metal Roofing Shingled Gable- Existing Trees el ' j'i +JtÂ« 1~. - ...2 91.6 1 *19'11*1.-1-21- 61 A Lap Slding Wood Lap Siding-., 'Lmt -241Â»Â«19... 1 1 F r Souble H ung Windows--f~ n West - ~ 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 *26**0 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0 310 Sopris Circle Basalt, Colorado 81621 ELEVATIONS ISSUE: March 28,2007 970 927 1171 Cell 970 948 1012 dave@daverybak.com ( c Rybak Architecture and Development, P. C. - --- m * 00*~ ... . -- 5-5 - - Ill-1.1 -~%. All-010%0*22$>Neti@?33*4*i - -*09- 0. I. m ... . -... ... 11.1 -' " ~42~ a .11 11.1.1~ ~ al 111,1111.1 - 11 - - .. .In,#wi.*Mwi %% F~....ill ....... Ettlitritlt?32*~Lilliu'iL~~-----= ....- 1-12.ime m- // - 1.-9 . , 'e. ....1. 0.0 .0 1 . "Milillillillillillizill % 4 Iaw- .... -Il:'. -il... .1/88,1,7....... 1-& - â€ž1..1.-lillill-' .... Im= 1%~- ~1. -' . 0 0 : 0 , Wgiz,jia/2 .../*imi"ima 6â‚¬1/PE~%11 i..lilillilimmilimil./*;2:96./1.*.Fid.MiYirE"killii/1/li I. - 4 -Bil * I 111 -A./..mi~l........... ./. -Ilill-/.I- ..1 1./.- -!~~ - 4-9- _-M 10 - ./..... Â®: 0 .- -1- 0 - 0 . 1 1 --- / --i---- - --- - / / 1 \ 1/ / - '.-. -- r 0 4/ - (01 3 1 1 1 ,1 , 1 1 1/41 44.41 /21 il V' 0 -95 i 1 1 1 4 1 1 111!F-iF .1 11 --=E - - . m' =- - --44 1- -- - --- - -CE] L I :Il f -- .1 1 -=- 11, 1 i - m .1,$/- -'1 6 --1 - - _ Â§1 1111 1 , 1' 32 . : 4-- - '9 -fl # 1 * 1 11 ---- lilli,1 jU,MM-L + -7 1 491-4 , - - 11 31 1 - - -- 1.01-1 -t - 9 ~1'el 1 1 3 91#6 -h.-p -1=Z. 1 1 -11~75 '11Â£11 Â¢4% Aspen Community Church 214 E. Bleeker Proposed Residence 232 E. Bleeker EAST BLEEKER STREET --------1--------1-'.- -- @4,0.1 -: 1!rth'=.9 11 1 1 --- ' ./'*...i 1 -- 1 - ,-L 1 1 t { 4 r:ij-BLOCK_PLAN-~ 4-7 1" = 20'-0" EAST BLEEKER - LOT A 3 1 SCALE: - Lv -V 310 Soprs Circle Basalt. Colorado 81621 BLOCK PLAN ISSUE: 03/28/07 970 927 1171 Cell 970 948 1012 dave@daverybak.com â‚¬ Rybak Architecture and Development, PC. /4 1. TA + 21Â»1 1=-L--te,k. -I 1==11 (ICL_ - 4 SCALE: 1/8" 310 Sopris Circle Basalt, Colorado 81621 BLOCK ELEVATIONS ISSUE: 03/28/07 970 927 1171 Cell 970 948 1012 dave@daverybak.com 4 Rybak Architecture and Development, P. C. 5~Re .. - 1 - = 0-- .......r 1-mE L -- 1 1. mcmgli..=Elliafilleat- -% I. . !1!.i i -. : 0 .. Â·41+ 42 m Â·*7*Nmn'Immâ„¢mdn.eÂ»./.-m'mm//Ill-le'Immm-me-Il./.m//Ill,#Illmnlag - I I. -Il-.i .1 ~li , . 41:~ - . .... .... - . A - I A 1 i d 41 k / i 1,1, 1,1 1 4} HN Ill i 4 , / r. t.r-:1:~.11 1...1.1,1.1. f I LE-flt. SCALE: 310 Sopris Circle Basalt, Colorado 81621 BLOCK PERSPECTIVES ISSUE: 03/28/07 970 927 1171 Cell 970 948 1012 dave@daverybak.com (i Rybak Architecture and Development, P. C \~ t 4,3 Â¢ :4 %1 32. * gm#% .m .- + 1 7 1. -'111 2% : 111 f - : 11 i "11-4*~ I 41%.4#11 m. 9,1 2Â§5= 1 - . C- i- I. 1 ff - - m- - Rk- I 3% 1% .1 * 2%- 1 1 1 lili - * .9 /0 1?1 I. - ./ _-5> ~4 40 -- 44. i= 1 + 4,31111% 1 >9 1 . 1 * i : i P 1%: 1 -1 : il . / A- ... .- A A ;< i~Â· .- '42 -221 9 *8 ~31, BÂ£b EX_. .t CENTER LINE OF ALLEY- -- - - ------------- PROPERTY LINE .f~/vv vvt:;.i E--- 97 5' GARAGE SETBACK i Â° 1 P --- ---- 647 1 CLOSET 10' LIVING SPACE SETBACK . NMAM/1/1. 7' X L . 20' X 81-3" f . Â«VMA,1 i V f.. 0 /1 GARAGE O 0 BATH J 18'-8"X 23'-8" 14'-1:1" 5'- ' 2 ' +1Â«Fl S 1 4 0 OMAÂ» N L.W. BEDROO 2 --- 941+~42 1824" X 4'-6" ( CLO#E 61 X *' .7 .4- L - 01' 1 & 1 BEDROOM 31 11 | -_ 18'-0" X 18'-11" Il DN al' , DN 4 0 MECHANICAL 7 L.W. Â· | | 13'-8"Xe' g) COV RD | | 9'-6" X 1 e MUD R O POR H ELL U 1 ~ 1 DRESSING PIE]dw 17'-0"X 12'-0 i 00 ' -- I 4 .,0_. . POWDER ~ 'Â· KITCHEN | UJ I H POWDER 2>g~-1 nÂ·-t i 511 SHOWE - 10'-8" X 16' -P 9-6' '-0" ~ HIS _J LU Wet Bar , ,[2221 9L7!' X 6- ' Ct | DRESSING ;F '' 1-1-1 iii w 1 11 11'11'1 0, I te ~ vid 1.-,9, N 0 0 01 lifilill O-, Oil #rÂ®*=&..Ad MEDIA/GAME STAIR O=1 d 22 - =14 DINING ROOM 7'-3" X :1-(~ VESTIBULE 34' X 15'-8" I/,2 18' X 14' DO 11---1 UP rf 41 1 UP ..a : 1 Â¢ 1 11 It 1 I L.W. - 11 IWET / HALL C.L BAR ' MASTER SUITE L.W. ~~ 20'-6* X 171-6" BEDROOM * ~' 1 2% '31 0 rn] 0 16110" X 113'-01 Â· BEDROM 4 621 - DEN 11 FOYER GREAT ROOM - 12' X 14' It louiE -/ 9 15-32-13'--, LINEN 80 X 8 17' X 22' :/ 4 1 CLOE 1 0 51-911 ' 1 -1, 2/ S CLOSET BATH FRONT \~ BATH PORCH E-3 4'-9" X 6' , 7 \ // 15'-6"X 6 0 0 DN -4-2 1 M 10' FRONT YARD SETBACK tri 1 Im rilloymE!=evelf!99[13!9-n- b 1 U) 4--2 1/8" = 1'-O" - N\~ /~/'1 b I ~ 1 j,r 1/8" = 1'-O" 1 0- . 12 1 - 1 PROPERTY LINE 6/ 22 1 M - 1 ' / 1 : 1 EACST BLEEKER STREET Â«/ 1/8" = 1'-0" . , r,vo 74 1/ East Bleeker - Lot A Residence 1 I - ... hlteture & Development, PC. --- SCALE: 1/8"= 1'-0 310 Sopris Circle Basalt, Colorado 81621 970927 1171 Cell 970 948 1012 dave@daverybak.com FLOOR PLANS ISSUE: March 16, 2007 4 Rybak Architecture and Development, P. C. _MOVELL3s CIM 3Nll *183dOUd 0E f i 1. 1 1 11 '41 1.1 tilt J 9 1 1 1111 1 Â¢ nÂ«\,1111?:Yl.,11/11.t 11).: 1 >: ' ~ 71, 1''i' 1' 1. Ii' ' t*IRS.@~,y,4..ii, i .':' '~ y 1-2-41 1 Lq,~Â·, ~1 - lil,34{ ~/ t~ i' 1,~ 111.f I K ~1 1111 114,111;~111 1 ~ - - W..11 1 Tpa V It AL.1 1 11 'j' l' - Wood Shingle Roofing Wood Shingle Roof- - 7-- Double Hungwindows lilli ill'll 11.1111 11 - Standing Sam StandingSeam- Metal Roof ~ Metal Roofing 1111111 1- Existing-rrees Shingled Gable- 2 --11- lit-liu Wood Lap Siding--4 Souble H ung Windows- n West - 3 -1/8"-=110 2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0 1 - I ----- 310 Sopris Circle Basalt, Colorado 81621 970 927 1171 Cell 970 948 1012 dave@daverybak.com ELEVATIONS ISSUE: March 16, 2007 4. Rybak Architecture and Development P. C. mwdll *RUY 2. 2-Imt-1 - ... 2:93 ../ :515.-/-Y-- ... -9- - r 1.1 - .... .1 -- i .1.Wp. 11'li ... I . ... .. 11 1111,u ilÂ»42 ,Â· Â· .... -=.al=@24 : 0. ' I disilap *i ' _ . ....... ,=121- ===,2- ..1 .. . : 1. .. i -2â‚¬,r .... 1 --Ii i 4. 1 ..........1- .... e .:.. -- r: 1 0 .= 4~ ~ *-,IN~â‚¬ 51*2.,M#11*/adls 1 .. ew.Â¥4- 1***$**** -I-'-Il.F~; : 0 I m==02.m=S= 5 91mli,01 11%~mi - 'P. .1-1 1 Â·40' 4 . ..1 i 1 2 . 11. - - - 1. ..9- .1 .; .1 - : . t ...4 . 0 ..tia - I IHI- -~3 EN. .. ir-- - = k Al'ht . - +12 1 I N'.4.1 1~ MT#L=-----Immam JIT--- --- --- A .......=le:11'!M-'."I-..'."Wm~- : 0 0 .... . 4.- .- ..2 , 4 *% t. Y. 3 ./ . j / . %~1 - - 1 \1/ / * 4,4 -r (/1 , /1. It.> 1 1 21,:.: -. ., :.r . 0-il . , ' I j..; 7Â·.' ..#4.2% 1'' i: $ 4 il O 2. e 11'.lili.,111111.,1.Â¥~-ir,rx,, ml - 11,11,1-,L IN 1 ~. ---. ----231'Epi,wt: i ,"4."~ @1 -433#2,4 =4./.7 - .S : - 7 1,7 4,1.lil--1-1 li - I :r - ~-1Â·9* f_IL_ 2Â·''r m"di.,Inera2ZER**6~ 4111 11 1 1 1111 - 1 120& - - . -r ,/+ I 1 '1 111&-11 1 1.46 lip- $ I r --~L ;=61 , 1 - 41 -1 1 1 1 7-/ .I-k -:air- - 1. :1 1 1 1.-- 1 1.11(~:1-197%J?t, -11 1 1 - 1, 1 I =2..1 1 , ,' "i, fLAM --I~':41 f Aspen Community Church 214 E. Bleeker Proposed Residence 232 E. Bleeker EAST BLEEKER STREET 1 1 / '-.'m - 1 1.8 2 L * n i, i , --~ IrÂ·1*i' - - -4/ - - 3=1-4++ 1 1 1 17-516*Â·gr 1 - 1%. j ' :t i f 0 1-BLOCK-PLAN- - 1" = 20'-0" EAST BLEEKER - LOT A 3 SCALE: 1 11 - r,nt n,1 - Zv -V 310 Sopris Circle Basalt, Colorado 81621 BLOCK PLAN ISSUE: 03/16/07 970 927 1171 Cell 970 948 1012 dave@daverybak.com (c Rybak Architecture and Development, P. C. K.-------WIA%---*-#M#&*W.-#*--Y---VY'WT. -. .. 0-/ V*-Â»M-/# C.V.7 lili<l %. 4 .illill-i '1111 1 1< (11 11 lili (/1 1 1 11111119 11<1 -- -- --till A t 111 11 . I '' Ill Il I''I V < 2' - -- --5, 1. 1 1 1 11, i , 11 1 c W 1%1: 1? .- --- --. 11 l IA!11'11 11 /1 ~(6 1 %' 1 1 11 11. r ''.111'11/ lili/1 l,l' 11 11 1 11 / \ 211 111, 1 I 1, 1 L.-U-]In-,7- 1 1 1 V 1 1 11 1 4 --- +1 .- -----11~2444 1 ; 1 11 # 11 1 - d-- -- 1 Al-1-1-L 1 11 . 41 4.-r Li, -/2 1 1 . v ILI# i lili IT L. r l.i lÂ· iÂ·'Â·TÂ· -'-Ir- ;..L - Ii- ' ' 1 ' ' ~I 1,.1 Â· L-91'12'il L.'rk-2" '452~~Ll-Â·/ N~1~-1(29~ -- - -7 torri-------.'-.. -A .ILL/-5==;=1 r. 1 0 #4 - M ?i T Â»10=71= 12'111 I :7:,4-t,- -IL>.Â«1 -=====- -44-:_ -1'n--312 -]1~FPE~Gllf-ril--4,4-i'-~-~li~ DE' .~'~'-~i'~ILE-'1 3<: :li~*~3~1.'I~ -3-'~ ~V ~' ~ r JO,flf-fl~.~lu- rr -'-I --1- 17 2 , - - --1 -, L,., 1.-:1 -91 R * t' 3 1. 41'.~.:=3~d....2 - 7 -1 11 1 >*r-,1 - -=-1 1 1 1 / ~ . r / I Â·-Â· -ar' 1 11. 2./... 33--f.~â‚¬'2.-=4;Â·*-Jgz:ZA-Gl 'L â‚¬ied==02Sws===~c.==z.=esru*e=Â£.a..t_:z._ ~-EZLiz-Ez-'-4-illi_i-16_-.*~I--~r---~friE~E~FL~=~~ 1 1 1.1 - itti.'firdi=IlisIEZE'ILEEL:~= 77--E,-22'bzht'+9 11 - 1 ]11~-9-IfÂ«Â«r=Â» - 1 -1 *lili 11. Ul 4 1 !4 11 141 1 - _ Â»Lf 1 1 1 1. 11 IULLI 1 ! '-1 1 -1 - 1 41 1111 .11 1 U=Ul,i '32 . ~ 21 -- 1 1 . 11 - --- -1 - I -- 11 1 j .** 1 1 ~1 !% ./'~ t 1 1 U? 1 1% 1 j:' <: 1 'i'%41 /1 1 '1~ 1 1~ 1 1... il '.-~ imi 1 1%-' ..V. 1 .,~Vof.1 15''VY,1/ '.-#-U':1 '1~> ,~ ~[:Â·1.- 214 East Bleeker Proposed Residence 232 East Bleeker 1Â§9&!th Ll/ 1/8"= 1'-0" \1 1 /1 J 4, --- -- 51 1 11~11 r :11 , 'f - -- - 1 I 11 4 1Â·:~1Â·f lili 4 )111111- 1 i '4' i f C 14. le:... 1.1 t.~.1 l lili I 1 1 4 . ..4 1 1 1 11 5 1 -3 4 11 \ ____ - r - - - 213. S'kifF)~Lu 'I :11:Ii!,FÂ·.~ zi i.~12'L_ar' ''' Â·Ctil_JUIALLLE.%79474A91$f':Jp-~.Dil.~ 2--943 ~ -- - 4512==Ii= 1,9---=2.===.st 3 -'rl- 1 1.1-1.1TTr~'- In 11 1 I - i n T- 1 1 1 1, 1 1 rriLE,[Ilt-irrrE f;-1/~*F- u :14'Â· J-tui- :1Â·/ 14141 --k,1 111 11 I M - i '-'41.40.9*Â·iyr#Â·T+4-Tur'::]Alftf.7."7 71 ..11'1 \111/1,1.1!L-- 1 ~ 11.1 11~271111,7--IIi 1--11 - L-_LLT :,- 1 - 14- L Â· .h yfr A-t.-222-72.2,0 E- ,/ Â£1:4-2,t it.'Â· -7, 1 1 , ~111'All~ 111-2 2.-I // ~_.-,3-m-'4~L_+LI 1..1--1Ir . . A ||lt| |||: i i I 111 lili lili I f...9. .k..Le'DIiIIJI~~~I:~.-r?tÂ·*>c-@-f Â·4*1"-J!-rrrI; All lili' a lilli 2.21=*ciaballit,:=1244 .1,72Â¢1.1,1 1811 I 1 -1 - /E_lili.illf |Illl||till|mal|.1|1Â§11 t,L f- 1 Y , 11 1 1 i Lt---| 1 -4.11- 111Â·t - fr~PT~:137393397~Ttt~~f>fyftyfF313797.~'mr - - 1 11 1 11.1111- - 1 fu=4 - --- -- Flin~M 1'11, ---! r# 1, ~1 | lua ! th -i-l 11 2 211'+ , - 1 - -=--1 - 232 East Bleeker Proposed Residence 214 East Bleeker -2-NQ.rth - 1/8" = 1.-0" EAST BLEEK LOT A 4 ER - SCALE: 148" -1'A 310 Sopris Circle Basalt, Colorado 81621 BLOCK ELEVATIONS ISSUE: 03/16/07 970 927 1171 Cell 970 948 1012 dave@daverybak.com (1 Rybak Archltecture and Development. P C. I, /1 1 1, l 1 1/, f ' 0 1 .4--+IMM ' 1, ''J --%.- /7 . 3 . r js, ,' 1 *r . <4 71 --- geT-JU-7-4-~~. 2- :.2:f~~~~,Â·Â· ~.A:':.... ~Â·Â· li % 1 11. :' 1 1 - - UU.tu-L -=-.... SCALE: 310 Sopris Circle Basalt, Colorado 81621 BLOCK PERSPECTIVES ISSUE: 03/16/07 970927 1171 - Cell 970 948 1012 dave@daverybak.com (2 Rybak Architecture and Development. P. C '1*0;@MK 1.- V~-- i_*-* 1-.- N:%% 1* 1 j f 1 ~ I , 111 2--1 - 44 -Â·-Â· 1 4 r , i I' -* 42.-* 34 1 i -- e : 10. 1~ 7 3 1 $ , <I. i ell' 10 al *0 0 1 0 1.4 1 Niwi i P Â·i. a.149:1& 1, - 1 &41/4.10 Â·Â·21=4. If 1 1 ~ 08 Iii:*El li I 'll 8 ' 1: 1. '1* EM.43 Â· - 0 ,~ - 1 j . t 1 y .p A fIii '/4 I " 1# 1 1 I':i : : 5 1 , 11/1 1 1 0 Â·Â· REN 11 1%1 : li -- ~. , 0- -%0- - K$*.i.i W-MI.-~. --3 ... 1 - -0- A - I A i- -Â· f *g- *x D. 74. . 0 10 20 ONE FOOT CONTOURS LEGEND AND NOTES O FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCR I BED A SURVEY CONTROL D UTILITY BOX TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. DATED: JUNE 26, 2006 NO. PCT20764F VIC IN I TY MAP 1 ALL EASEMENTS NOTED IN TI TLE COMMITMENT ARE SHOWN 1.-500. i SHEDS ENCROACH INTO ALLEY 1----I FENCE SEWER, GAS, ELECTRIC, PHONE AND CATV LINES ARE LOCATED IN ALLEY 9441 * 6-QÂ·YÂ·r-Â© - Â·i ~ Â©5 + A -1 - --6-#W. 1 0 41 - - ~-789 I . 1 WATER LINE IS LOCATED IN THE STREET Q- 2-7 2.. 91 -0. 0 9 ENCROACHMENTS POSTED ADDRESS -214 04- . 1%3~ --9<\13â€ž 2 Af %041 fl : ' -ikAHÂ¢z.r -7 4 2 -1 . r 06-Â» ./19 SLANTED TEXT DENOTES TIE TO PROPERTY 44Â£22 W PORCH 6-D TREE WITH CALIPER (D-DECIDOUS, F-CONIFER DL-DRIPLINE) 20~ 69 ' 8,2, Or, DL 9 154,Â¢23*Â«' L 2-5 4 1 raph-rf- R.O.W ELEVATIONS BASED ON CITY GPS MONUMENT NO.9 ELEVATION 7929.882 4,; ~.__~ 74189<Ag~&65} 44~ f f=Â« Â° I 11 0- 860044 4 -3-~ &.i Unal ulvp,i vab : 72 BASIS OF BEARINGS REBAR WITH CAP LS 9184 FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER BLOCK 72, N 75Â°09' 11 'W t 79.81. 7.1*44* ,,?~~~~~~-~~11,4.~=-;iq,SITE CORNER OF LOT B AND THE CITY MONUMENT FOR THE NORTHWEST *le Ed&.v#1,41#rfi -1 -firi b~- l 1 lyÂ« F/ELD r<,j c.0 0 1.-1 C''En-- - .- J ..42 2 Â£9/ .-Â· - -1-Â· 114Â«42Â»6-/>10/999~864-*re-â‚¬ft Â· 69.- Nt... '- S }{ED f / -\-+T<*#- FENCE ENCROACHES 120.00 RECORD. 119.63 BOARDWALK DECK ulftjf- < -=*:4.49 92:Sttko-4â„¢~44~ -1 -1-,- 4 1~ l 1 PARKING 8- D 11Â» /-- 1 / ------30Â· 2 Mi 4 -,c 'U.Â·,4 -i'--=--r~' ~~6(t.*Â£ 1*'~17:r~*,%57'77& / .04. 5 8"D 460040, mt-40 -----JL- --.fi-- 00 . r.Â·Â» u r--N 1 not / dmv/7-4. YELLOW 9184 1 t r -7 L A 122*Â»<_3 47 1 Al\\FL-- DL 10' NX'Xwt> 7- // l 9%\fk f :1 f 10 -- , l 21 4.% 1 --- 12-F 8 $ -7 0/ '8.3 -%14* rALK 1 4 - I 1 9 A \ 1 1 PAT 10 1 443\' BRICK / LOT M / - 15-F 7 74 i \ / DL 14 CITY /IND 0 / 91 / 0 h OF ASPEN i I 1 HOUSE POOL 1 i ~ 70 1/A24% i ) DL 13' y/(All; 1 .-r.- 1 1 -- --. *'0 -2, I *-- - it , 1 l -R LOT A - j~ 8..f--~ 6 9 6,000 SO. FT. ./- RECORD 0~ /-- St Ll- 7893. 1 5,981 SQ. FT. ./- FIELD 1 / LOT R 2/ Ty 6D . '5'**10# OF ASPa DL 12 1#*\~ 1 IOWNS~ND / YELLOW / 1 6,0 / 9184 0 ~7~~/ / Dl.. 14' - 7891.1 4 /1\ \ / LOT B 40 // i - 6~ ~ ~ / 6,000 so . FT . ./- RECORg, 5,981 SO. FT. â€¢/- F !~0-D RECORD ~ 1 A CCORD BACK OF RECORD~ , DL 21' , 1 59 4'r 12 1 , '92\P- 5 ~)) ci- 9 2I 9.9, 12'D -IR~#~>. CERTIFICATION DL 18 -2Â»300â‚¬2 THE UNDERS STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCR IBED HEREON .WAS FIELD SURVEYED -- DURING 2006 AND IS ACCURATE BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS 2:MD 15 D ~ "flk -~9 ~~~I~*%(- / DL 22'55%&1*@7 ~RW~AC~N~ATSM&&MEO~OR~~E~FAN~15S I ~FFR~~ER@0 I *gm k~3&NC?gpkFTS, 9,10- DE#*'21'*Fir EXCEPT AS HEREdk'*H'4â‚¬Â£')UNDERGROUND UT ILITIESWITHNO ABOVEGROUND APPURTENANCES, ("2004 â„¢;7~- 6-0 / 049~ AND DOCUME~et.*20* 41@T SUPPLIED TO THE SURVEYOR ARE EXCEPTED, THIS SURVEY Il -X--2% J3,4.k ~~109: 8 7 / IS VOID UNLE*o*'9 97*MgE*.WitrH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW. 1 1 1 *933,A@4*24 -----*-- DATED-â€¢. 1*312MNI6 'â‚¬...' i,88 04 ./UÂ»/ ....'L./re .14 ~~- 30-D - 1 V gjf37*~ 60~ . 1 01-44~gp 6401 - DL 22 --3 --=m~2~Â« ~ 1 4 T . 93%% - *-- xrÂ»' . E 0- JOHN,Â·11 /How**il , .1. 5-1447 0.44 . \.~ SPIKE TBM 7891.00 Â»,--,=Â»- 1Â·318*30 10-D VCONCT --=*#- ; 9184 ON FENCE POST Â·41412 11,0.... ~ DL !44' APAD , --2â€žÂ». 5 7/#CNK Ll CURB 60. - p/ELD / CITY MONUMENT NW %-..0.-1 CORNER BLOCK 72 HOR I ZONTAL CONTROL --\ L--7892.4 -\ IMPROVEMENT/TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY EAST - OF BLEEF STREET LOTS A 74 7% A. o. W k 2 44 PLAT RECORDED JUNf 12, 2006 IN PLAT BOOK 79 AT PAGE 69 AS RECEPTION NO. 525131 BRUMDE* LOT SPLIT ACCORDING TO THE BRUMDER LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION CITY OF ASPEN t COUNTY OF PITKIN STATE OF COLORADO CONTAINING: 6,000 SQ FT ./- RECORD 5,981 SQ FT ./- FIELD PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET , ASPEN, COLORADO BIEI{ NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 Â· ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT ON THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT I N THIS PLAT BE COÂ»lENCED MORE THAN TEN DATE JOB YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. THE CERTIFICATION 15 VOID IF NOT WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE 10/06 26037GA SURVEYOR. ~00 001 3.617 09 041 N-- 1/8. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 214 E. Bleeker Street (New House)- Major Development (Conceptual) and Variance- Public Hearing DATE: March 28,2007 SUMMARY: The subject property is a 6,000 square foot vacant lot which was created through a subdivision of the landmark designated parcel at 214 E. Bleeker. There are no historic resources on the site. HPC has full purview over the project. Staff finds that the proposal requires restudy in order to meet the design guidelines, therefore continuation is recommended. APPLICANT: 214 E. Bleeker LLC (Kristeen Church), represented by Rybak Architecture and Development, P.C. PARCEL ID: 2737-073-48-001. ADDRESS: 214 E. Bleeker, Lot A, Brumder Lot Split, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6, Medium Density Residential. MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the Conceptual level, is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shal! be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of 1 .. the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. This project is located on a block that is mostly comprised of Victorian era buildings. The subject house will be the only non-Victorian structure on this block-face and it sits between two one story miner's cottages, each of which is a 6,000 square foot lot with an allowable FAR of 3,240 square feet, just like the new building. The project must comply with the HPC Design Guidelines and the City's Residential Design Standards. The architect has provided a block plan and streetscape elevations which are very helpful in reviewing the project. He has clearly worked to reflect some of the proportions of adjacent structures and the pattern of small scale secondary buildings along the alley. HPC has recently reviewed rehabilitation plans for the landmark to the west. That project is allowed the same FAR as the new house currently under review. It was developed entirely as a one story building, and the block plan indicates that this was achieved through considerably more site coverage at the back of the lot via setback variances. This new house does not require any variances other than for a lightwell that is not technically required by Building Code. There is a sense of more open space along the side lot lines on the Victorian sites to the east and west. Staff finds that there is a need to revisit that aspect of the subject proposal. The architect has extended the roof line of the streetfacing gable down to the first floor level, which may help to reduce scale, however the plate height on the first floor is approximately 2 feet taller than the adjacent Victorians. The following guideline does not appear to be met: 11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building. o The primary plane o f the front should not appear taller than the historic structure. o The front should include a one-story element, such as a porch. Staff also has a concern with the somewhat complicated massing of the building, although we acknowledge the architect's effort to break down the scale and to employ a cross gabled form. In general, hipped roofs are not typical of Aspen's Victorians, particularly on two story buildings. The building modules are roofed with a variety of forms that include includes symmetrical and asymmetrical gables, hips, sheds, and a flat roof. all of varying ridge heights. Admittedly the Victorian to the west has a number of roof forms, but again it is somewhat unique and Aspen and may not translate well to a new two story structure in such a sensitive location. We do not find this guideline to be met: 11.6 Use roof forms that are similar to those seen traditionally in the block. =i Sloping roofs such as gable and hip roofs are appropriate for primary roof forms. ci Flat roofs should be used only in areas where it is appropriate to the context. u On a residential structure, eave depths should be similar to those seen traditionally in the context. o Exotic building and roo f forms that would detract from the visual continuity o f the street are discouraged. These include geodesic domes and A-frames. 2 .. There was likely a different historic house on the subject site in the Victorian era, and it was only in more recent history that the lot became associated with the Brumder property. There is no particular reason why a new development should refer architecturally to the Victorian on the west more so than others in the area. Finally, although the applicant has not asked for a variance from the Residential Design Standards, Staff finds that the project is not currently meeting the "Inflection" standard, which requires new development to step down in height towards one story structures. One story structures, and the manner of inflecting towards them, is defined as follows: A one story building shall be defined as follows: A one story building shall mean a structure, or portion of a structure, where there is only one floor of.fully usable living space, at least 12 feet -wide across the street frontage. This standard shall be met by providing a one story element which is also at least twelve (12) feet wide across the street frontage and one story tall as far back along the common lot line as the adjacent building is one story. The applicant has a choice which side to inflect towards and has chose to address the west neighbor. The Brumder house to the west is entirely one story, therefore this project must also be one story along the entire west side o f the site, for a width of 12 feet across the Bleeker Street frontage. The stair tower on the proposed new house does not comply with the criterion. It is a particularly difficult challenge to strike the right balance when creating an infill building like this one, all the while avoiding replication of historic structures. Staff finds that the project requires additional restudy to fully meet the guidelines. SETBACK VARIANCE The criteria for granting setback variances, per Section 26.415.110.C of the Municipal Code are as follows: HPC must make a finding that the setback variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character o f the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. STAFF RESPONSE: Lightwells are allowed to project into required setbacks only to the extent that they are required by the Building Code and are no larger than the minimum size prescribed. This project has a lightwell in the west sideyard associated with a den. The den does not require a lightwell, so either it needs to be eliminated, revised, or granted a variance. Because this is a vacant lot, staff does not generally support the granting of variances, however we do hope to see additional massing study to achieve better compatibility with the surrounding Victorians and remain open to providing flexibility for this below grade element if it contributes to a better project. 3 .. DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The IIPC may: â€¢ approve the application, â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or â€¢ continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends continuation to a date certain. Exhibits: A. Relevant Design Guidelines B. Application Exhibit A: Relevant Design Guidelines 11.1 Orient the primary entrance of a new building to the street. 1 The building should be arranged parallel to the lot lines, maintaining the traditional grid pattern of the site. 11.2 In a residential context, clearly define the primary entrance to a new building by using a front porch. 01 The front porch should be "functional," in that it is used as a means of access to the entry. o A new porch should be similar in size and shape to those seen traditionally. o In some cases, the front door itself may be positioned perpendicular to the street; nonetheless, the entry should still be clearly defined with a walkway and porch that orients to the street. 11.3 Construct a new building to appear similar in scale with the historic buildings on the parcel. o Subdivide larger masses into smaller "modules" that are similar in size to the historic buildings on the original site. 11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building. o The primary plane o f the front should not appear taller than the historic structure. o The front should include a one-story element, such as a porch. 11.5 Use building forms that are similar to those of the historic property. u They should not overwhelm the original in scale. 11.6 Use roof forms that are similar to those seen traditionally in the block. o Sloping roofs such as gable and hip roofs are appropriate for primary roof forms. o Flat roofs should be used only in areas where it is appropriate to the context. 4 .. o On a residential structure, eave depths should be similar to those seen traditionally in the context. o Exotic building and roof forms that would detract from the visual continuity of the street are discouraged. These include geodesic domes and A-frames. 11.9 Use building components that are similar in size and shape to those of the historic property. o These include windows, doors and porches. u Overall, details should be modest in character. 11.10 The imitation of older historic styles is discouraged. o This blurs the distinction between old and new buildings. o Highly complex and ornately detailed revival styles that were not a part of Aspen's history are especially discouraged on historic sites. 5 Â¥ 1 .. ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 1-/r A , 81LUMO 1â€¢, 103- 6f LI r , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: ~AÂ·guÂ·1 10 , 200_;L STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) bAVID gy&*K (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: )( Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy qf the publication is attached hereto. * Posting of notice: By posting of notic e, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the j 1 day of **11601 , 200-~-' to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. X Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shallbe waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. CU-.2/ 46â€¢L Signaturet 0 . The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acl<ngpledged before me thist* day of ffknok. , 2009, by 1 19-Jtfl~ 1~(*1<\ ip:../....:40 00, PUR 110, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFLCIAL SEAL *~t /1/10 //97 My commission,expines: /0940<ful VABi,AL 6-0/?4/Ni ) ~~ 2703,~: Ndan> Public / %74... ATTACHMENTS: -Â»C==Â»:E:EP, COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL 1373% Â¢ I 1,1 111 1( 11)11( 1 1<1 i Â¢11 \ (/1 1;Ill \11)1 14 1 111 /1'ill 21-1 1 1;1 1 1 1/1 N.11<ill \1\1()14 1)lili (lill \1 2 1 1\( 1 1* I 1 \ 1 . 14 1 011)1 \ 1 1 \1 111 +M. 1 N 1 \\1,\141 )141\ 1 1 \\ 'h' 4 itu \.j.~ i, m,.. eli < 11, (,n:,.1, 6-1.- Â»j~-'/01 4 21 1 1 '/t ./.%:.1 111! V'' 1 /4."(/) . '1,1.11% 1 4,11.. ! /1 1 1,1 / 01 +IL 1 141:11...ic' li,! 01'111 ( 4, 1:p, f'. . diÂ· 1117 " 1Â· k. d 11' 2 *I &4'llf 2 I b!. r. ..: iii, { il Â· f 4.r . I : p': 1'11,1. 1!1 ... . Y 9 t; 1 I 9 19-4 A I. 1. h * Â¢ A ' It \( &1 1( 1 Â·11 H 1111 41 11.-li t U.. 1 \,\}litÂ¢ 14\! 11~ 41 \1 t il'11 U KI.11,1.11\1 iii '11.\ i K ~ i<:, 14 t 111,1 . 1 1. I. Hi 1,1 10 4,1 \M *4Â· ' . 0, l. 4 I - . "/I .11. 2.1. I -4/ 1, I. 0 . .0, -I, I , AM]AV-09-008-1 uo!:PnOSU!,P Ai. luewefuelp ep ill Â®091,5 Â®AMBAÂ¥ WeqeD eizesil!10 1003'AteA'4?74'iMAR 311!ne# el zetinstio.~ V ./ jeted V saipe, senenb!:,9 200 E MAIN LLC 20% 214 E BLEEKER LLC 225 N MILL ST LLC PO BOX 10147 PO BOX 7729 225 N MILL ST ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN COMMUNITY UNITED ALPINE PETROLEUM LLC AMATO JOSEPH A METHODIST CHURCH 435 E MAIN ST PO BOX 503 200 E BLEEKER ST ASPEN, CO 81611 HIGHLAND MILLS, NY 10930 ASPEN, CO 81611 BERGMAN CARL R & CATHERINE M BERKO MIRTE 71.165% CITY OF ASPEN PO BOX 1365 PO BOX 360 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 COX SAMUEL WESLEY EHC MANAGEMENT TRUST FROST PROPERTY LLC PUCHKOFF JULIE ELLEN C/O CROSBY CAROLYNN & JOHN M 2950 E BROAD ST 117 N MONARCH ST #1 3456 HIGH BLUFF COLUMBUS, OH 43209 ASPEN, CO 81611-1439 DALLAS, TX 75234 GARRETT GULCH EQUITY VENTURE LLC GETTMAN ROSA GIORDANO MICHAEL 2950 E BROAD ST 325 S FOREST 1411 GREEN MEADOW RD COLUMBUS, OH 43209 DENVER, CO 80246 CARBONDALE, CO 81623-9801 HAYES MARY FAMILY PTNSP LTD HIGH DESERT NEWSPAPERS INC HODES ALAN & DEBORAH PO BOX 497 500 DOUBLE EAGLE CT PO BOX 10628 ASPEN, CO 81612 RENO, NV 89521 ASPEN, CO 81612 HOTELJEROMEINC HODGSON PHILIP R 50% INT HOGUET CONSTANCE M C/O EVEREST CHRISTY G 212 N MONARCH ST 333 E 68TH ST 9000 N BROADWAY ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10021 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73114 KLEIN HERBERT S & MARSHA L KRABACHER B JOSEPH & SUSAN S LARSON KARL G&M MADELEINE 201 N MILL ST #203 201 N MILL ST STE 201 PO BOX 8207 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 LIGHT HOLDINGS LLLP MADDEN WALTER ROSS 37.5% MATTINGLY MARK & ALIXE 733 13TH ST PMB 101 300 PUPPY SMITH #203 929 CAMINO VIEJO BOULDER, CO 80302 ASPEN, CO 81611 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108 MYRIN CUTHBERT L JR 37.5% PACE LINDA MARIE PARZYBOK WILLIAM G JR TRUSTEE 300 PUPPY SMITH ST #203-101 445 N MAIN AVE 14023 220TH AVE NE ASPEN, CO 81611 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205 WOODINVILLE, WA 98072 ~ Â®091,9Â®AMEAV~ *1 A i e.imeed lead Asea .,0# ..1-= ieded peG=IT [333 Â®Â°9'6 319141/\131 Â®AleAV esn Itc/ Â¥ 1 1â‚¬9 siegel lead Ase3 143/\V-09-008-1 Uoil)MAgui,P ~ lueluablelp el~ *03~/UGAE'AA/\AM emne, 21 zeunsu v .tered e selpe, senenb!13 Â®09 L5 Â®AMUAV 1!Jecle6 el zes!1!*n PEARCE FREDERICK EDWARD PENN PAUL E & SUSAN W PUPPY SMITH LLC 216 E MAIN ST 3830 E 79TH ST 205 S MILL ST SUITE 301A ASPEN, CO 81611 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46260-3457 ASPEN, CO 81611 S & A EQUIPMENT COMPANY SADLER QUAL PERS RES TRUST #10 ROCKING LAZY J PROPERTIES LLC SCOTT LARSON GENERAL PARTNER 50% PO BOX 12360 PO BOX 910 8536 N GOLF DR ASPEN, CO 81612 PEWANKEE, WI 53072 PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253 SARDY HOUSE NEW LLC SEGUIN WILLIAM L & MARILYN SEMRAU FAMILY LLC CO FERRELL LAW P A PO BOX 4274 68 TRAINORS LANDING RD 201 S BISCAYNE BLVD 34TH FLR ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 MIAMI, FL 33131 WHEELER SQUARE ASSOCIATES 80% SUTTON KERMIT S & JENNY W C/0 FLEISHER CO INC 715 TENTH ST SOUTH 200 E MAIN ST NAPLES, FL 34102 ASPEN, CO 81611 Y FUR " 1 Â®0915Â®,AMBAV~ 09 & 9 e.injeed leed /[se) 10, mz~â€¢=â€¢- 1.eded peedl' ~Â§lj~~ Â®09'05 31Vldl/\!31 Â®AleAÂ¥ esn 1â‚¬094 1 jaa4S 11O113nnsul 005 m=NE 1 1 40 -ro siegel lead Asea M .. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 34- W *224/ CAÂ·.) 1/4- A- , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 26 Mintl , zoo-Jr STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) (name. please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) o f the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: fQ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) A n--.. --C 4-L./, .,Â·..10%14nr.+4-. 4, nunnl.n/-4 ln.,Â·ntn days prior to the public hearing. n .Upy UJ Wit pitULLUL.411Uft n U t 1 U L, / L E li /,O/ ..1/. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, * 1 - waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide A : , ; and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of ,200 , to and including the date and time of the public 23 Â¥1 - -*willkring. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners ofproperty within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) .. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal o f this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amen d~~f~I //4 L--- L -- Wignature The fomgoidg "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this~3*lay 200-7by 4501 riA:da /11 0 PUBLIC NOTICE -WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL RE:LOT A OF BRUMDER SUBDIVISION EX- EMPTION LOT SPLIT, 214 E. BLEEKER STREET- MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEP- TUAL), RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD RE- VIEW My commission expires: 011]9,-taÂ« NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday. March 28.2007 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, City Council Chambers. City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to 0 - '52<13.1.!?024Â·, consider an application submitted by 214 East /Notary Public <i Bleeker, LLC of 318 West Main Street, Aspen CO. The project affects the property located at Lot A of the 214 East Bleeker Street Brumder Subdivision Exemption Lot Split, Block 72 City and Towns,te of f JACKIE \ U /0 Aspen Colo.ado. HPC is asked to grant major Â« /O conceptual approval for a new resjdence on this l LOTHIAN j vacant lot and residential design standard review. A variance of 4 feet in the west side yard setback -"e----626~'- for a proposed lightwell shall be reviewed. For further information, contact Sara Adams at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St.. Aspen, CO. (970) 429Â·Â·2778, sa- raa@cl.aspen.co us. s/Jeffrey Halferly ATTACHMENTS: Chair, Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on March 11, 2007 (210817) COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL .. EXHIBIT r,vin 1 1/ Architecture & Development. P.C 1/ 1 1.....VA LETTER OF TRAL---9 PROJECT: Lot A, Brumder Lot Split DATE: March 28,2007 TO: Sara Adams FROM: Dave Rybak ATTACHMENTS: 1 Item, and Cover DESCRIPTION: HPC Conceptual Hearing Drawings - Revised 03/28/07 - 8 Sets Affidavit of Public Notice COMMENTS: ACTION: For your use. CC: 310 Sopris Circle Basalt, Colorado 81621 (t) 970-927-1171 (e) dave@daverybak.com .. City of Aspen Community Development Department Historic Preservation Application Package 14 EÂ»1-1 THE Cin' or ASPEN Attached is a Development Application for propelties listed on the "Aspen Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures" or properties within Aspen's Historic Districts. Included in this package are the following attachments: 1. Development Application Fee Policy and Fee Schedule 2. Land Use Application Fonn 3. Submittal Requirements 4, Summary of the Application Process Public Hearing Notice Requirements 5. 6. Affidavit ofNotice All applications are reviewed based on the criteria established in the Aspen Municipal Code and "The City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines." both of which are available to purchase at City Hall or on the web at www.bpcnet. com/codes/aspen under "Title 26" and www.aspenpitkin.com, respectively. m A CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT may be issued fbr minor work that does not materially change the historic character of the property or district, and the proposed work is clearly within the adopted design guidelines. â€¢ A CERTIFICATE OF APPROFRIATENESS must be applied for ifthe proposed work will make material changes that may alter, diminish, eliminate or affect the historic or architectural character of the properly or district in any way. We strongly encourage all applicants to hold a pre-application conference with a Planner in the Community Development Department so that any questions regarding the requirements for submitting a complete application, and the review process, can be addressed. Also, depending upon the complexity of the development proposed, all applicant should consider scheduling a work session with the HPC early in the conceptualization of the project. It is a good practice on large projects to submit one copy of the development application to the Case Planner for a preliminary detennination of any deficiencies in the infonnation being provided, which can reduce the overall cost of materials and staffhours billed. 11'I .. A preliminary consultation. with the Zoning...Officer and Building Department is also required in order to determine code compliance and to avoid changes to projects after the review process. ., .. ATTACHMENT 1 CNY OF ASPEN DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FEE POLICY The City ofAspen, pursuant to Ordinance 57 (Series of2000), has established a fBe structure for the processing ofland use applications. A fiat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. Referral fees for other City departments reviewing the application will also be collected when necessary. One check including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required application fee. A flat fee is collected by Community Development for Administrative Approvals which nonnally take a minimal and predictable amount of stafftime to process. The fee is not refundable. A deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staffreview is required, as hours are lilcely to vary substantially from one application to another. Actual stafftime spent will be charged against the deposit. Several diftarent staffmembers may charge their time spent on the case in addition to the case planner. Stafftime is logged to the case and staff can provide a summary report ofhours spent at the applicant's request. After the deposit has been expended, the applicant will be billed monthly based on actual staffhours. Applicants may accrue and be billed additional expenses for a planner's time spent on the case following any hearing or approvals. up until the applicant applies for a building permit Cuirent billings must be paid within 30 days or processing ofthe application will be suspended. If an applicant has previously failed to pay application fees as required. no new or additional applications witt be accepted fbr processing undl the outstanding ftes are paid. In no case wilt Building Permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. When the case planner detennines that the case is completed (whether approved or not approved), the case is considered closed and any remaining balance from the deposit will be reftmded to the applicant. Applications which require a deposit must include an Agreement for Payment of Development Application Fees. The Agreement establishes the applicant as being responsible for payment of all costs associated with processing the application. The Agreement must be signed by the party responsible for payment and submitted with the application and fee in order for a land use case to be opened. The current complete fee schedule for land use applications is listed on the next page. .. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City ofAspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and 4 14' E . B &Â£412-LA 2 10,0,00 (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGEEE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for Ustv *8,619*3611 00 1,7 64 BPÂ·UP,O,Dit LOF *pl:,QT (hereinafter, THE PROJECT) 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a detennination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope ofthe proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest ofthe parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to A-PPLICANT on a nionthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incunrd. CITY agrees it will be benefited thmugh the greater ceitainty of recoveiing its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or Cily Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration ofthe CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ 1.,180.00 which is for M & hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional montbly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $220.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit Such periodic payments shail be made within 30 days ofthe billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension ofprocessing, and in no case will building pennits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLIC*Â¥ By: BY. AWGA UÂ®/)7 te Chris Bendon L(L Community Development Director Dat 4%00 C C Bill To Mailing Address and Telephone Number: ., .. g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc 02/01/06 Land Use Application d THE CITY oF ASPEN PROJECT: Name: Fl W &86& ow. Location: 1.01- A , 612.UMDI,2- 407 4ft.,15'. t*-r Butitag. ST#40â‚¬r (Indicate street address, lot & block number or metes and bounds description of properly) Parcel ID# (REQUIRED) 7137 01343 00 1 APPLICANT: Name: 4. i 17 L. 8 LAtâ‚¬.#8 1 1â€¢66 Address: 310 10,041- 4474 *T. j '41(0.0 u 0 110,1 Phone #: lu -10*5 Fax#: E-mail: INaw@â€¢48 509#44Â·â€¢â€¢T REPRESENTATIVE: Nanle: ~46Mt, 4,01,1-Ur uu. d .DEVEâ€¢OP,â€¢RAIr. f. 6. Address: SID 6014,6 00 &64. , 88â„¢T , U 151&31 Phone#: 117 -"11 Fax#: 91,7-1,7 a E-mail: Davt 41, 0*vi.)2011 68*- 009 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ~ Historic Designation Â£ Relocation (temporary, on or off= site) Certificate of No Negative Effect El Demolition (total demolition) 1%[ Certificate of Appropriateness U Historic Landmark Lot Split -Minor Historic Developrnent -Major Historic Development Et -Conceptual Historic Development -Final Historic Development -Substantial Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) Lor lip v#*AlÂ«1, LKe#Â·31 h)6 594Â§0,AM.ge fo#6 11 BRÂ· &Â¢.6 MoveD. PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) 24 El .. t** 6 1 N 66â‚¬, fievl,) D'! R'&4 6 0 W 'L, FEESDUE: $ 0,900 General Information Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with your application. This information. will help us review your plans and, if necessary, coordinate with other agencies that may be involved. Y-ES NO K U Does the work you are planning include exterior work; including additions, demolitions, new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration? 0 Does the work you are planning include interior work; including remodeling, rehabilitatioil or restoration? C] M Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this time? 0 K In addition to City ofAspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No Negative Effect and a bujlding permt areyouseeking tomeet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation or restoration of a National Register of Historic Places property in order to quatily for state or federal tax credits? 0 If yes, are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in conjunction with this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are eligible. Owner-occupied residential properties are not.) E If yes, are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check a]1 City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use: 0 Rehabilitation Loan Fund E] Conservation Easement Program U Dimensional Variances E] Increased Density C] Historic Landmark Lot Split U Waiver of Park Dedication Fees El Conditional Uses El Exemption from Growth Management Quota System C] Tax Credits 0 . Dimensional Requirements Form (Item #10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project: 41*W 14*' 044'J ML Applicant & a * R. 13 46051 2,0 Pll,6 Project Location: bof k 000910.4. 1,03- 4fbjl~ Zone District: 9--6 Lat Size: 0 8 450 +Fl Lot Area: (R.. ODD 4 9 Â· (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: 6 Proposed: - Number of residential units: Existing: â‚¬, Proposed: 1 Number of bedroonis- Existing: O Proposed: 1% Proposed % of demolition: 0 DIMENSIONS : (write nla where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area. Existing: 0 Allowable: 3,2.01 0 Proposed: 1,140 Height Principal Bldg.: Existing: O Allowable: 15' Proposed: 1.5 ' Accessory Bldg. Existing: Allowable: 1,6 Proposed: \S' On-Site parking: Existing: Required: 1* Proposed: 1- % Site coverage: Existing: Required: 50'h Proposed: 1-,1.44 54. %196 % Open Space Existing: Required: Proposed: 51. Front Setback: 6 Existing: Required: it Proposed: Rear Setback: N Existing: Required: 6-ID Proposed: S toe **a-f,4, Combined Fronâ‚¬Rear: Indicate N, S. E. W Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: E Existing: Required: 5 Proposed: 5 - iG Side Setback: W Existing: Required: S Proposed: 5 - 10 Combined Sides: Existing: Required: \15 Proposed: 15 MWIFWM. Distance between Existing: Required: #j* Proposed: buildings: Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note ifencroachment licenses have been issued: HI* Variations requested (identit the exact valiances needed): N/A .. Matrix of The City of Aspen's Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements 1'0 review full procedures for all applications, reference 26.415 of'l'he City ofAspen Building Code, Hi storic Preservation Ordinance. When submitting multiple stcp applications, do not replicate submission materials. Two copies ofthe application arc required for a Certijicate of No Ejfect, 15 copies are required for each mectingall other review. Also note that an electronic version ofall text documents is required in a Itxt, ldoc, .wpd, or,rtf format, Application Fees Type of Review Notice Requirements Requirements Deposit Fee Publication. Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Designation 1-9,11,12 SO 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c.) at HPC and Council Consult with His.torie Preaervation None Exempt Development so - Officer to confirm exempt status Certificate of No Negative Effect 1-9.14.15,16 $225 None Minor Development 1-106 16,17,18,37 $675 Posting Pursuant to Sections 26.304:060 (E) (3) (b) Development under 1,000 s.f,$1,350/ Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Maior Development / Conceptual 1-10, 14,18, 19,20,21 Development over 1,000 s.f, $2,700 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Ma:or Development / Final 1-10,17,22,23,37 Paid at time of conceptual 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Substantial Amendment 1-10,17, 24,25,26,37 $675 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Demolition 1-9,27 $2,700 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (c) Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Relocation 1-9,28-35 $2,700 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (01 Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Historic Landmark Lot Split 1-10 $1,350 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (0) at HPC and Council Publication, Posting and Mailing Pursuant to Sections Rescinding Designation 1-9,36 $1,350 26.304.060 (E) (3) (a) (b) (o) at HPC and Council .. ORDINANCE No. 54 (SERIES OF 2005) AN ORDINANCE OF'rHE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A SUBDIVISION EX]EMPTION LOT SPLIT AT 214 EAST BLEEKER STREET mOTS N, Op P, AND Q, BLOCK 72, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO) WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from William G. Brumder Florida Land Trust, represented by Dates, KnezÂ©vich & Gardenswartz P.C. requesting approval of a Subdivision Exemption Lot Split of the pxoperty to be known as Lot A and Lot B of the Brumder Lot Split, located at 214 E. Bleeker Street, City of Aspen, Pitkin County; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.480.030AQ), the Aspen City Council, in accordance with the procedures, standards, and limitations of this Chapter, shall by ordinance approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove a development application for a Subdivision Exemption Lot Split, after considering a recommendation by the Community Development Department; and, 'WHEREAS, the Community Development Depaitment reviewed the application for a Subdivision Exemption Lot Split for the property to be described as Lots A and B ofthe Brumder Lot Split located at 214 E. Bleeker Street (Lots N, O, P and Q, Block 72, of the City and Townsite), City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado and recommended approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment at a public healing; and, WBEREAS, the City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with illa goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Subdiviion Exemption Lot Split for Lots A md B of the property to be known and described as the Brumder Lot Split located at 214 E. Bleeker St, City ofAspen, Pitkin County, is approved with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall submit and record a subdivision exemption plat that meets the terms of Chapter 26.480, and conforms to the requirements of the Land Use Code, in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder no later than .. 1 .# 180 days after approval of this ordinance. The plat shall indicate that no further subdivision may be granted for these lots, nor will additional units be I built without receipt of applicable approvals pursuant to this Chapter and growth management allocation pursuant to Chapter 26.470. Furtheimore, the proposed Lot Split Plat shall clearly label the proposed lot line that separates Lot A from Lot B and show all easements of record. 2. The Iot split plat shall exhibit two lots in conformance with the R-6 Zone District regulations and shall include the following plat notes: a. Upon redevelopment, all structures on these two (2) lots shall comply with the R.6 Zone District provisions, as may be amended from time , to time, with respect to the newly created lot boundaries and setbacks. Upon redevelopment, all encroachments into Public Right of Way shall be removed or properly licensed. b. Maximum potential build-out for the two (2) parcels created by lot split shall not exceed three (3) units, which may be composed of a duplex and a single family home. Only one unit is allowable on Lot B. c. The future development of Lots A and B shall be subject to Chapter 26.415, Development Involving the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmarks Sites and Structures or Development in an "H" Historic Overlay District. d. The future development of Lots A and B shall not be permitted to utilize the 500 square footage bonus pursuant to Section 26.420.020 (B) 1(4 e. Any setback nonconformity@ created by the new lot line shall be eliminated upon redevelopment or furthcr development of the applicable lot(s). f. Vehicular access to either lot shall be from the alley only. g. Upon redevelopment, the applicant shall construct sidewalk, curb and guttem according to the specifications of the City Engineer. h. Both lots are required to mitigate for affordable housing pursuant to Section 26.470. 040 13(1). 3. Both lots shall comply with the applicable development regulations prior to applying for building permits, including those regulations related to ' 1/" il- I-*11 .. 11 Residential Design Standards, Accessory Dwelling Units, and GMOS Exemptions. 4. The applicant shall obtain a tree removal permit prior to removing any trees from the site for which a tree removal permit is required pursuant to Chapter 13.20 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. Any tree to remain on-site during the development of Lots A and B shall have its drip line fenced off prior to, and throughout construction. Tree Removal Mitigation may be required for removal of trees pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 13.20. 5. The Applicant shall comply with the Aspen Sanitation District's rules and regulations. No clear water connections (roof, foundation, perimeter drains) shall be allowed. AM sanitation-related improvements below grade shall require the use of a pumping station. The existing sewer line may be used to service one of the new residences if it is inspected and determined to be satisfactory by the Aspen Sanitation District. If the existing service line is not used for the proposed development it must be abandoned and removed, 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards -with Title 25, and with the applicable standards of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municilial Code, as required by the City of Aspen Water Department. Upon redevelopment of the new lots, the applicant shall abandon the existing water service line prior to receiving new water taps. Section 2: All material representations and commitnents made by the applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 3: This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: If any sections subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court ofcompetent juxisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5: A public hearing was opened on the 9th and 234 day of January, 2006, at 5:00 PM in City Council Chambers, Aspen City Haff, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen, r /4 44 Cni-; 1 _07 Q. 0/ 0 ' , 1.1... . ' 1 ' 7-Â·% . r. i i - .. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on this 1218 day of December, 2005. Attest: ~duuÂ£*9 146. Katheyn s. 106ch, City tierk FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved by a _ vote on this 10th day of April, 2006. Attest: I ' Aeg ma ltf 13 0 1. 29 - 0 ..47*316#C Kathryn S. *h, City Clerk Hdren~Kalin - 0Rn~-d, Mayor Approved as to form: TT7~ Wtl*I 6-,Betm Worcester, City Attorney r / 2 + cnhi-(Ta_nin' l... . I. I i i ' .. .. *I ' .. 0.25 0.5 mik 0 n 'C 0.5 kilometer .. ~. ...4 9. I 5., 44 06 ~ jÂ·v''~0*~ 9. 1/ 4 9% -/ 40/ ler~ 6 - 42 b /4 27 0 4>>0 Hollow 4 ... il, 4 12 fe qi .ft chabil, Â· >â€¢E i-oil Rd 1.Â·+ 4*7 44; . ~: 1 '3- 9, 6/7* Ut:b tÂ· 64* . 'O- <b .9\ ..1> - 4. *'96-. .0 4.Â· 4:6 44411 93 84 ~~<~> 4> ~% 71,29#5*. ,466. 9id 201 X.....ef 8Â®4* Â·Â· - m E o 24] I .fau N.2,1 7 . 1 . :-J-w .. 01 3% .~ Salvaaof)Â·Â· - -ie#b 61 9, f' 0 :*:.. 0 g .fns f i'tuts, --~ Â·eek Rcl MAIÂ·Â· OP .- .... . 410/7 /0 . 90 1. . i-â€¢'Â·Â·. 6.4 1 12 4 4*949 1 O 0.0. 4 C 0 1 1, EC Gillespie St 0- (Ir) \ 44 -3,1 0 A Ped Ct 4 ta 1 9 ' m t .j 0) , n. D> 14 NOrM 32 12 U & 117*.. 5 d. a M Spruce St Â· VM \ f b Â· 49/h Â£09 44 --, 3..0 T 7 - 00 -00 ' S'g -,212 32 1 (0. . 6 , .1 ic?ed c 2 95 1 N w.Â· 7 he A men Art: ephe,t 6 7 i ~de 1 1 92/ ./. 004< 20 - b - J-j 4799Â»12,!t Â»Â«401 i se- g, 762 -,Or Q % Q %(P.<14 W Hallam St g :' 1 '/efi'./.2-~wrIC'---* 92.2 -':Baj' T 2 4- 16.4. LA A - 11 --:E.Â» 82. 1.-,c.-O.(3:23 6- ~A- ~- 997 ft * ~ 45 61< 8/4 . - %% 1 .9 &3 a e Â· [3) 'Ce is /Ll '40 9-, CP : - .-+. - - 2 29 c 8624~61 2 ~0 E i' (2 0~ 43-/-6 .4/Nop~i -Â«n=. ~~:~*r-~~47.~ c:_,- , @ende 4 Bay af 44,~4~vi CO F~*- 459 .5(.TE < -r~~4~~~,-.L,I-.Â°ir , 2-Â· .- :-Â·, Â·. 5.-. .2/9 03 00 ~ 4 .~ I-211 CO .0 65 - Pit.%Â·-7.Cqi- " J -- :4 .. â‚¬09 d k Â¢â‚¬44.. % 4. f - 2 2%,964 -349% 4- I y Â· p 39.. Â· - I' * I.--3V /9 V/)94 4'b, 1, CO ..99 28 ~Â» '139 ~.,.~f.. ff-i ~Ff v x ~ ~ -f -2 ff' 4\.. Â·20> ~ 4/Yedb y Md#.anciÂ·Â» i. Sinuggler Grove Rd 006 4.2.. Coopt Ave 4 92 44 1 cf ~ Â·Â·Â·Â· .92 -' p_. Ne -M 1.7.-- 0 f 4: MasceÂ¢iO, 5 3%2tvay r--1- 45 C '~~~''ffÂ·~4â‚¬66 44>Â· 97 2.3 4.1. 25-%...9 7 0. co 32 h . P.,1 - e. 0, Ul.......~1 6,1>...6 00 (4* 95 y 4 3.t M 0 -c 31] 879*. St -4, Â· .. 03 '" ~Â·Â·.z*@CO FD Â· %91%402 -40Â© , 94- .- 1:poi...3,JÂ» , 0 C Summit St ~1 . w 3 41 rAspell Qrove, Rd 25; a \34 b. -91 84Ajae 0 Â· , 44.3 Pimatfarv 4 4. 17 fork Dr. 2 Â·Â·-1 1 Ac Q 4, . 1 40*99.9 REL . 121 - I lid % ~ tj â‚¬>~est-viRM<,Dr Â¢ .ef 4 C>jeta/ Late BA~ ~ ~ 4 1= ., 1 - - - . 9044 1 U.noe r .C '14 Â·0 iÂ·, fite. i n Â· 82 J fr; 4-.9 L 9 1> Â©2006&1664-,4=tgÂ·-2-gu~w k V 8 p, 2006 TANA. Inc./GDT. Inc 0- joÂ»0' C.... ..3*3Â· 9 1 29 pa'ld ; .. ~ Meadows Rd McSI<Imrning FlU emijfloal Uedâ‚¬Xi Mountain LautÂ· ?O i:J; 11'Â·1 , ;le?l ,; :, ,Â·' .. ALTA Commitment For Title ]Insurance Fidelity National Title f nsurance Company AUTHORIZED AGENT: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS AVE. 3RDFLOOR ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970-925-1766-PHONE 970-925-6527-FAX 877-217-3158-TOLL FREE E-MAIL ADDRESS: TITLE MATTERS: CLOSING MATTERS: Vince Higens-vince@sopris.net TY Davis-tjd@sopris.net Priscilla Proh#-priscilla@sopris.net Joy Higens-joy@sopris.net Brandi Jepson-brandi@sopris.net (Closing & Title Assistance) FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY |'idelih \:ilinim| 1 illi, 11)4tltÂ·,111('t ( 4)11)I),111\ " I \Il, k al i. i LÂ·:' I Â·-m: , 1.11 |'dIL'.1 /''t'| h-. .. -~ Commitment for Title Insurallee Fidelity National Title Insurance Company A Stock Company COMMITMENT FORT![TLE INSURANCE FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, ilpon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedule A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount oj the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies oftitle insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate within six (6) months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever.first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding zilltil countersigned by an authorized officer or agent. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company has caused its corporate nam.e and seal to be hereunto agixed and these presents to be signed in facsimile under authority of its by-laws on the date sho-wn in Schedule A. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY {.<SEAL)~ P i ehidelli -7' 1 1/ il l %<Creha3 Countersigned: t Authorized Signature FORM 27-083-66 (10/03) ALTA COMMITMENT - 1966 .. CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The term "mortgage". when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed or other security instrument. 2. If the Proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge o fany defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the Proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or i f tile Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien or encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named Proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create tile estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is Subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the Proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are macie a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the Proposed insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of die status of the title to the estate or interest or (he Status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. .. COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: June 26,2006 at 8:00 AM Case No. PCT20764F 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: (a) ALTA Owner's Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ 6,250,000.00 Premium$ 5,147.00 Proposed Insured: Rate: Developers KRISTEEN CHURCH (b) ALTA Loan Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ 0.00 Premium$ 0.00 Proposed Insured: Rate: (c) ALTA Loan Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ Premium$ Proposed Insured: Rate: 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the - effective date hereof vested in: TRUSTEE OF THE WILLIAM G. BRUMDER FLORIDA LAND TRUST CREATED BY AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 21, 1967 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN State of COLORADO and is described as follows: LOTS A AND B, BRUMDER LOT SPLIT, according to the Brumder Lot Split Subdivision Exemption Plat recorded June 12, 2006 in Plat Book 79 at Page 69 as Reception No. 525131. PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E. HOPKINS, ASPEN, CO. 81611 This Commitment is invalid 970-925-1766 Phone/ 970-925-6527 Fax unless the Insuring 877-217-3158 Toll Free Provisions and Schedules A and B are attached. .. SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the requirements to be complied with: ITEM (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. ITEM (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record to-wit: 1. Duly executed Staternent of Authority for WILLIAM G. BRUMIDER FLORIDA LADN TRUST CREATED BY AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 21, 1967, a trust, disclosing the name of the trust, and the names and addresses of the trustees empowered to act pursuant to CRS 38-30-108.5. 2. Delivery to the Company of an executed copy of the Trust Agreement for WILLIAM G. BRUMDER FLORIDA LADN TRUST CREATED BY AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 21, 1967 for inspection and approval prior to issuing any policies. Subject to any additional requirements deemed necessary by the Company upon review of said Trust Agreement. 3. Deed executed by the Trustees of THE WILLIAM G. BRUMDER FLORIDA LAND TRUST CREATED BY AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 21,1967 To: KRISTEEN CHURCH 4. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Real Estate Transfer Tax as established by Ordinance No. 20 (Series of 1979) and Ordinance No. 13 (Series of 1990) has been paid or exempted. 5. Certificate of nonforeign status executed by the transferor(s). (This instrument is not required to be recorded) 6. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Declaration of Sale, Notice to County Assessor as required by H.B 1288 has been complied with. (This instrument is not required to be recorded, but must be delivered to and retained by the Assessors Office in the County in which the property is situated) 7. Completion of Form DR 1079 regarding the withholding of Colorado Tax on the sale by certain persons, corporations and firms selling Real Property in the State of Colorado. (This instrument is not required to be recorded) .. SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company~ 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Comrnitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen recorded in Book 59 at Page 190 and 521 provjding as follows: "That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws". 8. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded June 12, 2006 in Plat Book 79 at Page 69 as Reception No. 525131. .. ENDORSEMENT SCHEDULE FOR OWNERS POLICY ATTACHED TO AND BECOMING A PART OF CASE NO: PCT20764F SELLER: TRUSTEE OF THE WILLIAM G. BRUIVIDER FLORIDA LAND TRUST CREATED BY AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 21,1967 BUYER: KRISTEEN CHURCH The following endorsements will be issued in connection with the Policy to be issued hereunder as referenced above: ENDORSEMENTS: NONE REQUESTED For a fee of: $ For a fee of: $ For a fee of: $ For a fee of: $ For a fee of: $ Exceptions Numbered 1, 2, 3 and 4 will be deleted from the final Title Policy, upon compliance with the requirements set forth below. Exception Number 5 is automatically deleted upon recordation of the documents called for on the requirement page of this commitment. THE FEE FOR DELETING EXCEPTIONS 1 THRU 4 OR ANY PREPRINTED EXCEPTION IS $50.00 Exception Number 6 will be amended to read: Taxes for the current year not yet due or payable, upon evidence satisfactory that the Taxes for the prjor year(s) have been paid. NOTE: A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnifying the Company against unfiled mechanic's and materialmens liens, executed by the seller and any additional parties deemed necessary by the Company. The company hereby reserves the right to make additional requirements as may be deemed necessary in the event additional facts regarding development, construction or other building or work are disclosed to the company that may fall within any lien period as defined in the Statues of the State of Colorado, and may result in additional premiums and/or fees for such coverage. NOTE: A current survey, certified by a Registered Colorado Land Sun/eyor must be delivered to, approved and retained by the Company for Deletion of Printed Exception No. 3. (NOT REQUIRED FOR CONDOMINIUM OR TOWNHOME UNITS) .. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DISCLOSURES The Owner's Policy to be issued, if any shall contain the following items in addition to the ones set forth above: (1) The Deed of Trust, if any, required under Schedule B-Section 1. (2) Water rights, claims or title to water. (NOTE: THIS EXCEPTION WILL APPEAR ON THE OWNER'S AND MORTGAGE POLICY TO BE ISSUED HEREUNDER) Pursuant to Insurance Regulation 89-2 NOTE: Each title entity shall notify in writing every prospectjve insured in an owner's title insurance policy for a single famjly residence (including a condominium or townhouse unit) (i) of that title entity's general requirements for the deletion of an exception or exclusion to coverage relating to unfiled mechanics or materialmens liens, except when said coverage or insurance is extended to the insured under the terms of the policy. A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnifyjng the Company against unfiled mechanics' and/or Materialmen's Liens executed by the persons indicated in the attached copy of said affidavit must be furnished to the Company. Upon receipt of these items and any others requirements to be specified by the Company upon request Pre-printed Item Number 4 may be deleted from the Owner's policy when issued. Please contact the Company for further information. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing contained in this Paragraph shall be deemed to impose any requirement upon any title insurer to provide mechanics or materialmens lien coverage. NOTE: If the Company conducts the owners or loan closing under circumstances where it is responsible for the recording or filing of legal documents from said transaction, the Company will be deemed to have provided "Gap Coverage" Pursuantto Senate Bill 91-14 (CRS 10-11-122) (a) The Subject Real Property may be located in a Special Taxing District; (b) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained form the County treasurer of the County Treasurer's Authorized Agent; (c) Information regarding Special Districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. NOTE: A tax Certificate or other appropriate research will be ordered from the County Treasurer by the Company and the costs thereof charged to the proposed insured unless written instruction to the contrary are received by the company prior to the issuance of the Title Policy anticipated by this Commitment. Pursuant to House Bill 01-1088 (CRS 10-11-123) If Schedule B of your commitment for an Owner's Title Policy reflects an exception for mineral interests or leases, pursuant to CRS 10-11-123 (HB 01-1088), this is to advise: (a) There is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals or geothermal energy in the property and (b) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owners' permission. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT20764F A and B are attached. .. PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS, THIRD FLOOR ASPEN, CO 81611 970-925-1766/970-925-6527 FAX TOLL FREE 877-217-3158 WIRING INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL TRANSACTIONS REGARDING THE CLOSING OF THIS FILE ARE AS FOLLOWS: ALPINE BANK-ASPENI 600 E. HOPKINS AVE. ASPEN, CO. 81611 ABA ROUTING NO. 102103407 FOR CREDIT TO: PITKIN COUINTY TITLE, INC., ESCROW ACCOUNT ACCOUNT NO. 2020065129 REFERENCE:PCT20764F/KRISTEEN CHURCH .. Pitkin County Title, MInc. Privacy Policy We collect nonpublic information about you from the following sources: e Information we receive from youl such as your name, address, telephone number, or social security number; g Information about your transactions with us, our affiliates, or others. We receive this information from your lender, attorney, real estate broker, etc.; and Information from public records We do not disclose any nonpublic personal information about our customers or former customers to anyone, except as permitted by law. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to know that information to provide the products or services requested by you or your lender. We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that company with appropriate federal and state regulations. .. Fidelity National Financial Group of Companies' Privacy Statement July 1,2001 We recognize and respect the privacy expectations of today's consumers and the requirements of applicable federal and state privacy ]aws. We believe that making you aware of how we use your non-public personal information ("Personal Information"), and to whom it is disclosed, will form the basis for a relationship oftrust between us and the public that we serve. This Privacy Statement provides that explanation. Wereserve theright to changethis Privacy Statement fromtimetotimeconsistentwithapplicable privacy laws. [n the course ofour business, we may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources: o From applications or other forms we receive from yoli or your authorized representative; m From your transactions with, or from the services being performed by, us, our affiliates, or others; Â¤ From our internet web sites; o From the public records maintained by governmental entities that we either obtain directly from 1]lose entities, or from our affiliates or others; and o From consumer or other reporting agencies. Our Policies Regarding the Protection of the Confidentiality and Security of Your Personal Information We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion. We limit access to the Personal information only to those employees who need such access in connection with providing products or services to you or for other legitimate biisiness purposes, Our Policies and Practices Regarding the Sharing of Your Personal Information We may share your Personal information with our affiliates, such as insurance companies, agents, and other real estate settlement service providers. We also may disclose your Personal Information: s to agents, brokers or representatives to provide you with services you have requested; o to third-party contractors or service providers who provide services or perform marketing or other functions on our behalf. and a to others with whom we enter into joint marketing agreements for products or services that we believe you may find of interest. In addition, we will disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission, when we are required by law to do so, or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you. One ofthe important responsibilities of some of our affiliated companies is to record documents in the public domain. Such documents may contain your Personal Information. Right to Access Your Personal Information and Ability To Correct Errors Or Request Changes Or Deletion Certain states afford you the right to access your Personal Information and, under certain circumstances, to find out to whom your Personal Information has been disclosed. Also, certain states afford you the right to request correction, amendment or deletion of your Personal Information. We reserve ihe right, where permitted by law, to charge a reasonable fee to cover the costs incurred in responding to such requests. All requests must be made in writing to the following address: Privacy Compliance Officer Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 4050 Calle Real. Suite 220 Santa Barbara, CA 93110 Multiple Products or Services If we provide you with more than one financial product or service, you may receive more than one privacy notice from us, We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. .. INTERIORS Kristeen Church February 23,2007 Ms. Amy Guthrie Historic Preservation Officer City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado RE: Lot A Brumder Lot Split Dear Ms. Guthrie: As owner of the real property, Lot A, Brumder Lot Split, located on East Bleeker Street, 214 E. 8/eeker, LLC hereby submits an application for Major Development Conceptual Review for the renovation of the property. We have retained David Rybak, of Rybak Architecture and Development, P. C. to represent us during the application process. The Parcel I. D. number is 273707348001. Sincerely, Kristeen Church, Manager~ 318 West Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 970-920-9865 David Rybak Rybak Architecture and Development, P.C. 310 Sopris Circle Basalt, Colorado 81621 970-927-1171 318 W Main St P.O. Box 7729 Aspen, CO 81612 Telephone 970-920-9865 Facsimile 970-925-8442 Email Interiors@sopris.net .. A-v=a A v Architecture & Development, P.C. I 1 0 ip-'./ 1 1 1L TO: Amy Guthrie CC: FROM: Dave Ryba k DATE: February 23,2007 RE: Lot A, Brumder Lot Split, New Residence The subject property has recently been granted a Subdivision Exemption Lot Split via Ordinance No. 54-2005 by the City of Aspen. Lot A currently contains a swimming pool, while Lot B contains the "Wilbur Wilson Residence" built in 1893, and an outbuilding of uncertain date. The property has changed ownership from the Brumder Family to 214 E. Bleeker, LLC. 214 E. Bleeker, requests a IMajor Development Conceptual Review for the construction of a New Single Family Residence on Lot A. The new residence will sit between the Historic Resource on Lot B to the West and the Historic Resource at 218 East Bleeker Street, on the East. The Resource on Lot B is a one story residence with a large hipped roof mass, while the Resource to the East is a one and one-half story Gable structure. The site also has a number of existing large trees along the East Property line which dictate structure placement outside of the tree drip lines. The large Cottonwood trees at the South East corner of the site create a visual break between the property and the Resource to the East. The existing trees and the Historical Resources which bookend the property have been the driving factor in the design process. The proposed design will address the site constraints with a two story gable form to the east side of the South Elevation. A one-story element with a covered porch will run West off the main gable mass, toward the Historic Resource on Lot B. The composition creates inflection on the west side and allows the taller mass to be softened by the cottonwood trees to the east. The main gable form runs north through the mass of the structure. Cross gables with hipped roofs, and one shed roof work off the primary roof to enclose the other second floor areas. A one story gabled accessory structure, enclosing a two car garage js located on the North setback, connected to the main structure by a 6 foot wide, 10 foot long one story gabled roof element. The proposed residence addresses the Residential Design Standards, and HPC Design Guidelines as delineated below: RESIDENTIAL DEISGN STAN DARDS AND HPC DESIGN GUIDELINES NEW BUILDINGS ON HISTORIC LOT SPLITS The Lot split created by the previous owners created two 6,000 square foot properties; one containing the Resource on Lot B, and one existing as open space. The site constraints of the existing trees and neighboring Historic resources have generated a design which does not dominate either neighbor. The massing scheme was developed to compliment the context, while the material and detailing have been selected to fit into this historic block. The simplicity of materials and .. Lot A, Brumder Lot Split, New Residence HPC Major Development Conceptual Review Application detailing will prevent pay tribute to the historic neighbors, but not confuse the new building as being old. STREET SCAPE AND LOT FEATURES The structure is oriented to Bleeker Street on the south end of the parcel. The structure will be set back 12 feet from the South Property Line to match the setback of the Historic Resource to the East on the proposed location for the relocated resource to the West. HISTORIC BUILDING MATERIALS The material selection for the residence will include a field stone veneer base and painted lap siding and trims. The primary mass will have stone veneer up to a wood belt course band at the second floor height. The one story gable element and secondary elernents will have stone bases with lap skiing above. WINDOWS The windows will be a combination of vertically proportioned double hungs, with some fixed units introduced into the larger ganged window assemblies. DOORS The exterior doors will be divided-lite, glass paneled doors. PORCHES A Front porch, six feet in depth, runs the length of the west gable element, and includes an area of the main gable which is elongated to the entry porch elevation. This composition brings the two story massing down in scale and emphasizes the Main Entrance of the residence. ARCHITECTRUAL DETAILS The proposed detailing will be simple, complimenting the detailing of the resource on Lot B. 4 1/2" lap skiing with lx6 corner boards, lx4 window trim with a small crown added to the head trim, and a lx6 with small crown fascia are the primary elements of detail. The upper section of the Primary Gable will be bowed out from the vertical wall surface, yet stay within the depth of the l' overhang, and clad in shingle siding. This gives some distinction to the gable element, and sets up a soffit for a bowed window bay on the second floor. The bowed gable element is also used on the North Fagade of the Primary Gable. ROOFS The Primary Roof will be a 14/12 gable running North to South. This Roof extends in a tangential arch to the porch roof elevation to for the Entry. The one-story mass on the west will have a 12/12 gable to inflect that of the Historic Resource on Lot B. A 4/12 shed roof extends from this gable to create the Front Porch. Secondary roofs on enclosing the Upper Level are hipped gables to reduce the mass and bring the eye down. A shed roofed are is also utilized on the North West corner of the Upper Level to minimize the roof structure. All Gable roof forms will have cedar shingles, while the shed roofs will have standing seam metal roofing. 2 .. Lot A, Brumder Lot Split, New Residence HPC Major Development Conceptual Review Application One Chimney element has been designed on the east side of the primary gable. The Chimney will be veneered in field stone, and include steps its massingto accommodate fireplace and flue alignments as it rises. Steps within the stone will also occur at the top of the chimney to develop contextual detailing. SECONDARY STRUCTURES A simple 12/12 gable form is placed on the North setback as a secondary structure. The form is reminiscent of the alley structures found within Aspen, and address.es the alley with a 16' wide overhead garage door. The door will have glass lights, and veneer trim to break up the wide door to look as two side by side doors. BUILDING RELOCATION & FOUNDATIONS A stone veneer base will wrap the entire structure to signify the foundation. The secondary structure will not have the stone base, as is historically typical of these elements. 3