HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.395 Thunderbowl Ln.0153.2017 (48).ARBK GRADING AND DRAINAGE REPORT
PREPARED FOR
DAVID JOHNSON ARCHITECTS
395 THUNDERBOWL LANE, ASPEN
41.1461061„.
WOODY CREEK
ENGINEERING
CIVIL DESIGN es WATER RIGHTS
P.O. Box 575
WOODY CREEK, COLORADO 81 656
970-309-7130
PREPARED BY
JOSH RICE, P.E.
JuLY, 05 2017
I hereby affirm that this report and the accompanying plans for the drainage improvements of Lot 7 Block
A,The Aspen Highlands Village P.U.D.was prepared by me for the owners thereof in accordance with the
provisions of the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan and approved variances and exceptions
listed herein. I understand that it is the policy of the City that the City of Aspen does not and will not
assume liability for drainage facilities designed by others.
Josh Rice,P.E. License No.
i
1. INTRODUCTION 1
2. GENERAL SITE DESCRIPTION 1
2.1 Existing Condition 1
2.2 Proposed Condition 2
2.2.1 Determination of Major/Minor 2
2.3 Drainage Basins 2
2.3.1 Historical Basin EB : 1 5
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 1.0 5
2.3.2 Proposed Basin PB : 1.1 5
2.3.3 Proposed Basin PB : 1.2 5
2.3.4 Proposed Basin PB : 1.3 5
2.3.5 Proposed Basin PB : 1.4 5
2.3.6 Proposed Basin PB : 1.5 5
2.3.7 Proposed Basin PB : 1.6 5
2.3.8 Proposed Basin PB : 1.7 5
2.3.9 Proposed Basin PB : 1.8 6
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 2 6
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 3 6
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB :4 6
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 5 6
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 6 6
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 7 6
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 8 6
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 9 6
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 10 7
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 11 7
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 12 7
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 13 7
3. STORMWATER BMPS AND ROUTING 8
3.1 General 9
3.1.1 Detention Calculation 9
3.1.2 Outlet Calculation 9
3.2 Pipe Calculations 9
3.2.1 Pipe A 10
3.2.2 Pipe B 10
3.2.3 Pipe C 10
3.2.4 Pipe D 10
3.3 Inlet Calculations 11
3.3.1 Inlet 1 11
3.3.2 Inlet 2 11
3.3.3 Inlet 3 11
ii
3.3.4 Intet 4 11
3.3.5 Inlet 5 11
3.3.6 Inlet 6 11
3.3.7 Inlet 7 12
3.3.8 Inlet 8 12
3.3.9 Inlet 9 12
3.3.10 Inlet 10 12
3.3.11 Operation and maintenance 13
APPENDIX A--NRCS SOILS REPORT 1
APPENDIX B--FEMA FIRM MAP 2
APPENDIX C--PLAN SET 3
APPENDIX D--HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS 4
APPENDIX E--HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS 5
APPENDIX F-DETENTION CALCULATIONS 6
1,1
1. Introduction
This report was prepared to meet the requirements of a City of Aspen Engineering Department Grading and
Drainage Report for a Major Design. The report was prepared for a single-family housing project at 395
Thunderbowl Ln, Aspen, Colorado, 81611 (the "Site"). Facilities providing water quality capture volume
and detention have been designed in this report and the associated plan.
2. General Site Description
2.1 Existing Condition
The property was platted as Lot 7 Block A,The Aspen Highlands Willage P.U.D. Based on the topograph-
ical improvement survey,the lot area is approximately 30,198 square feet.
The Site is located near the Aspen Highlands Ski Resort (see Figure 1). The soils are described by the
NRCS as, "Yeljack-Callings complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes" (see Appendix A). The hydrologic soil
group is"C." The lot is currently vacant.
Ng'
„te
roo0 ,A Falcon Rd
Aspen Highlands O
Ski Resort-Aspen...
395 Thunderbowl Lane
•
�r� `99jPi
c m'
w
3 too n Creek Rd /
Figure 1. 395 Thunderbowl Ln,Aspen Vicinity Map
(Source:maps.google.com)
The site is located well away from all major drainage ways and is not located within the floodplain bound-
aries the Maroon Creek. The Site is located within Zone X, as shown and described by FEMA(see FIRM
Map,Appendix B.)
2.2 Proposed Condition
A new single-family structure will be constructed on the vacant lot. The existing building will be demol-
ished.
2.2.1 Determination of Major/Minor
The Urban Runoff Management Plan (the "URMP") has two controlling triggers when determining the
permit requirements: interior demolition and exterior disturbed area. Based on these two triggers, Woody
Creek Engineering ("WCE") has determined that water quality capture volume ("WQCV") and detention
is required for the entire property.
The Site is located on a hill that slopes to the North at 12%. Drainage basins are delineated on Plan Sheet
C.1 (Appendix C, C.1). The basins are described in the following sections. The drainage issues and WQCV
treatment BMPs are also described.
2.3 Drainage Basins
Both Historical and proposed basins are described below. Table 1, below, describes the impervious area,
pervious area, total area, percent imperviousness, flow path length, basin slope, runoff coefficients for the
minor(5-yr) and major(100-yr) storm events and runoff flowrates for the minor(5-yr) and major(100-yr)
storm events. Although the Basins are delineated on Plan Sheet C.1 (Appendix C, C.1), they are also
provided in Figure No. 2 and 3,below.
Historical peak flows for the 5-year and 100-year events were evaluated for the Site using a time of con-
centration based on the flow path length and slope.
Table 1. Basin Information
TOTAL FLOW FLOW PEAK PEAK
BASIN RUNOFF RUNOFF PATH PATH FLOW FLOW
BASIN AREA IMPERVIOUS % COEF. COEF. LENGTH SLOPE 5YR 100YR
NO. (ACRES) AREA(ACRES) IMPERVIOUS 5YR 100YR (FT) (FT/FT) (CFS) (CFS)
EB:1 0.693 0.000 0.00 0.15 0.50 312.00 0.10 0.232 1.4845
PB:1.0 0.294 0.044 0.15 0.24 0.54 156.00 0.10 0.177 0.7824
PB:1.1 0.092 0.000 0.00 0.15 0.50 5.00 0.50 0.063 0.291
PB:1.2 0.032 0.000 0.00 0.15 0.50 5.00 0.50 0.016 0.1012
PB:1.3 0.011 0.000 0.00 0.15 0.50 5.00 0.50 0.005 0.0348
PB:1.4 0.016 0.000 0.00 0.15 0.50 5.00 0.50 0.008 0.0506
PB:1.5 0.010 0.000 0.00 0.15 0.50 5.00 0.50 0.005 0.0316
PB:1.6 0.049 0.049 1.00 0.90 0.96 5.00 0.50 0.144 0.2963
PB:1.7 0.015 0.000 0.00 0.15 0.50 5.00 0.50 0.007 0.0474
PB:1.8 0.022 0.022 1.00 0.90 0.96 5.00 0.50 0.065 0.133
PB:2 0.026 0.000 0.00 0.15 0.50 5.00 0.50 0.013 0.0832
PB:3 0.004 0.004 1.00 0.90 0.96 5.00 0.50 0.012 0.0242
PB:4 0.010 0.000 0.00 0.15 0.50 5.00 0.50 0.005 0.0326
PB:5 0.034 0.034 1.00 0.90 0.96 5.00 0.50 0.1 0.2044
PB:6 0.001 0.001 1.00 0.90 0.96 5.00 0.50 0.003 0.0076
PB:7 0.012 0.000 0.00 0.15 0.50 5.00 0.50 0.006 0.0367
PB:8 0.004 0.004 1.00 0.90 0.96 5.00 0.50 0.01 0.0213
PB:9 0.017 0.011 0.69 0.52 0.67 5.00 0.50 0.029 0.0709
PB:10 0.006 0.006 1.00 0.90 0.96 5.00 0.50 0.017 0.0341
PB:11 0.004 0.004 1.00 0.90 0.96 5.00 0.50 0.012 0.025
PB:12 0.010 0.010 1.00 0.90 0.96 5.00 0.50 0.03 0.0617
PB:13 0.014 0.000 0.00 0.15 0.50 5.00 0.50 0.007 0.061
2
N
I
1
1
\
1
1
I
I
/
I
I
1
FLOW FAT►+
I S = 0.10FT/FT
L -312 FT
ES:1
AREA:0.69 Acre 1
30198.82 SF
1
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
I
/
/
/
/
Figure 2. Historical Basins
3
/
•
•
•
•
-77i)
-
P8-6 - - - —
AREA:0.00 AC �— _ - I.
54.64 SF \`_
1 NisPB a
AREA:0.03 AC AREA 0 01 AC
1471.96 SF 450.26 SF ��� _
PB:1.0
AREA:0.29 AC
PB-3 12787.05 SF
PB-7 AREA 0.00 A
\, AREA 0.01 AC 152.70 SF
- 507 87 SF
P8:2 PB:11
AREA.O03 AC AREA:0.00 AC
/// PB:9 NU 1146.87 SF 180-19 SF
\\( AREA:0.02 AC
P81 7
72818 SF
AREA:0.015 AC PB:10 _
66629Sr AREA 001AC
1040H41
245.48 SF �/'PS:1.5P8.8 \_—- r AREA:0.01 0 -
AREA:0.01 A P8,13 PB12 4- 18 SF
153 99 SF ��`�—'-�._ AREA 0.01 AC AREA 0.01 AC
--- 612.28 SF 443.00 SF( P8:1{{88
I REA:D. AC 1 f'
PB:1.� 970.57 F
PB:1 A 4.REA:0 04 AC
AREA-07 2142.34$F
714.57 SF
:1.3`'� L_
A01 t ^
SF
479.1 I !,�%
2 _ -
AR :032 C -' - - --
1 --.
'_„._ •8.11
AREA_$.• AC
----�40_01'18SF-`
�� �~ ^
Figure 3. Proposed Basins
4
2.3.1 Historical Basin EB : 1
Historical Basin EB : 1 slopes to the north at 10%and encompasses the entire lot, as shown in Figure 2.
The basin developed a historical 100-yr flowrate of 1.518 cfs. Refer to Appendix D for additional infor-
mation.
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 1.0
Proposed Basin PB : 1.0 makes up the northern portion of the proposed site, and is composed of grass and
the back patio. The basin developed a 100-yr flowrate of 0.782 cfs and is 15%impervious. The majority
of PB: 1.0 is captured by the rain garden,while the northern portion is allowed to sheet flow to the drain-
age ditch.
2.3.2 Proposed Basin PB : 1.1
Proposed Basin PB : 1.1 is a pervious grass basin. The basin developed a 100-yr flowrate of 0.291 cfs.
PB: 1.1 is captured by Inlet 5 where it is transferred to the Rain Garden via Pipe B. Refer to Appendix D
for additional information.
2.3.3 Proposed Basin PB : 1.2
Proposed Basin PB : 1.2 is a pervious grass basin. The basin developed a 100-yr flowrate of 0.101 cfs.
PB: 1.2 is captured by Inlet 1 where it is transferred to the Rain Garden via Pipe A. Refer to Appendix D
for additional information.
2.3.4 Proposed Basin PB : 1.3
Proposed Basin PB : 1.3 is a pervious grass basin. The basin developed a 100-yr flowrate of 0.035 cfs.
PB: 1.3 is captured by Inlet 2 where it is transferred to the Rain Garden via Pipe A. Refer to Appendix D
for additional information.
2.3.5 Proposed Basin PB : 1.4
Proposed Basin PB : 1.4 is a pervious grass basin. The basin developed a 100-yr flowrate of 0.0506 cfs.
PB: 1.4 is captured by Inlet 3 where it is transferred to the Rain Garden via Pipe A. Refer to Appendix D
for additional information.
2.3.6 Proposed Basin PB : 1.5
Proposed Basin PB : 1.5 is a pervious grass basin. The basin developed a 100-yr flowrate of 0.032 cfs.
PB: 1.5 is captured by Inlet 7 where it is transferred to the Rain Garden via Pipe B. Refer to Appendix D
for additional information.
2.3.7 Proposed Basin PB : 1.6
Proposed Basin PB : 1.6 is composed of the driveway parking area. The basin developed a 100-yr
flowrate of 0.296 cfs. PB: 1.6 is captured by the trench drain(Inlet 6)where it is transferred to the Rain
Garden via Pipe B. Refer to Appendix D for additional information.
2.3.8 Proposed Basin PB : 1.7
Proposed Basin PB : 1.7 is a pervious grass basin. The basin developed a 100-yr flowrate of 0.047 cfs.
PB: 1.7 is captured by Inlet 4 where it is transferred to the Rain Garden via Pipe A. Refer to Appendix D
for additional information.
5
2.3.9 Proposed Basin PB : 1.8
Proposed Basin PB : 1.8 is composed of the driveway. The basin developed a 100-yr flowrate of 0.133
cfs. PB: 1.8 is captured by the trench drain(Inlet 6)where it is transferred to the Rain Garden via Pipe A.
Refer to Appendix D for additional information.
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 2
Proposed Basin PB : 2 is a pervious green roof basin. The basin developed a 100-yr flowrate of 0.083 cfs.
PB:2 is captured by Roof Drain 8 and routed to Inlet 8,where it is transferred to the Rain Garden via Pipe
B. Refer to Appendix D for additional information.
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 3
Proposed Basin PB : 3 is a roof basin. The basin developed a 100-yr flowrate of 0.024 cfs. PB:3 is cap-
tured by Roof Drain 7 and routed to the driveway,where runoff is captured by a trench drain and routed
through Pipe B to the Rain Garden. Refer to Appendix D for additional information.
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 4
Proposed Basin PB : 4 is a pervious green roof basin. The basin developed a 100-yr flowrate of 0.062 cfs.
PB:4 flows onto PB:2 where runoff is captured by Roof Drain 8 and routed to Inlet 8. Runoff is then
transferred to the Rain Garden via Pipe B. Refer to Appendix D for additional information.
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 5
Proposed Basin PB : 5 is a roof basin. The basin developed a 100-yr flowrate of 0.033 cfs. PB:5 runoff is
captured between two gutter systems: One routes water to Inlet 10 via Downspout 1,while the other
routes water to Inlet 9 via Downspout 2. Runoff is then transferred to the Rain Garden via Pipe C to Pipe
B, and Pipe D to Pipe A,respectively. Refer to Appendix D for additional information.
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 6
Proposed Basin PB : 6 is a deck basin and is 100%impervious. The basin developed a 100-yr flowrate of
0.008 cfs. PB:6 runoff is captured by Roof Drain 1 and routed to Inlet 10,where it travels through Pipe D
to Pipe A, and then to the Rain Garden. Refer to Appendix D for additional information.
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 7
Proposed Basin PB : 7 is a pervious green roof basin. The basin developed a 100-yr flowrate of 0.037 cfs.
PB:7 flows onto PB:9,then PB:5,where it is captured by Down Spout 1 and routed to Inlet 10. Runoff is
then routed through Pipe D to Pipe A,where it is transferred to the Rain Garden via. Refer to Appendix D
for additional information.
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 8
Proposed Basin PB : 8 is a roof basin. The basin developed a 100-yr flowrate of 0.021 cfs. PB:8 runoff is
captured by Roof Drain 2,where it discharges via Lambs Tongue 1 and is picked up by Inlet 4. Runoff is
then routed to the Rain Garden via Pipe A. Refer to Appendix D for additional information.
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 9
Proposed Basin PB : 9 is a partial green roof basin that is 69%impervious. The basin developed a 100-yr
flowrate of 0.101 cfs. PB:8 runoff is captured by Roof Drain 3,where it exits via Lambs Tongue 1 and is
picked up by Inlet 4. Runoff is then routed to the Rain Garden via Pipe A. Refer to Appendix D for addi-
tional information.
6
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 10
Proposed Basin PB : 10 is a roof basin. The basin developed a 100-yr flowrate of 0.034 cfs. PB:10 is cap-
tured by Roof Drain 6 and routed to the driveway,where runoff is captured by a trench drain and routed
through Pipe B to the Rain Garden. Refer to Appendix D for additional information.
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 11
Proposed Basin PB : 11 is a roof basin. The basin developed a 100-yr flowrate of 0.025 cfs. PB:11 is cap-
tured by Roof Drain 9 and 10, and routed to Inlet 8,where it is transferred to the Rain Garden via Pipe B.
Refer to Appendix D for additional information.
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 12
Proposed Basin PB : 12 is a roof basin. The basin developed a 100-yr flowrate of 0.062 cfs. PB:12 is cap-
tured by Roof Drain 4 and 5, and routed to the driveway,where runoff is captured by a trench drain and
routed through Pipe B to the Rain Garden. Refer to Appendix D for additional information.
2.3.1 Proposed Basin PB : 13
Proposed Basin PB : 13 is a pervious green roof basin. The basin developed a 100-yr flowrate of 0.061
cfs. PB:13 is captured by Roof Drain 11 and routed to the driveway,where runoff is captured by a trench
drain and routed through Pipe B to the Rain Garden. Refer to Appendix D for additional information.
7
3. Stormwater BMPs and Routing
Low impact design has been utilized where possible to provide WQCV and detention.
9 Principles
1. Consider stormwater quality needs early in the design process.
The architect and owner considered stormwater requirements early in the process.
2. Use the entire site when planning for stormwater quality treatment.
Where possible, overland conveyance was utilized to increase the time stromwater is in contact
with natural systems.
3. Avoid unnecessary impervious areas.
Impervious areas were reduced where acceptable to the owner and the design team.
4. Reduce runoff rates and volumes to more closely match natural conditions.
The proposed peak runoff rates are no greater than historical runoff rates. The historical flow
paths are followed.
5. Integrate stormwater quality management and flood control.
Through the use of onsite BMPs, stormwater quality management and flood control are integrated
in the project.
6. Develop stormwater quality facilities that enhance the site,the community and the environment.
The site,community and the environment are enhanced by reducing the amount of sediment and
other river pollutants conveyed to the stream system. Hopefully,the use of these stormwater
BMPs on this property and throughout the community will improve the water quality of the Roar-
ing Fork River and its tributaries.
7. Use a treatment train approach.
A treatment train approach is not appropriate for this site.
8. Design sustainable facilities that can be safely maintained.
The stormwater BMPs located onsite can be easily and safely maintained and are readily accessi-
ble.
9. Design and maintain facilities with public safely in mind.
Elevation drops to stormwater BMPs are minimal and designed with public safely in mind.
8
3.1 General
Low impact design has been utilized where possible to provide WQCV and detention. Basin Routing is
described in Table 2,below.
Table 2. Basin Routing
SUB-Basin Final
ID Path 1 Path 2 Path 3 Path 4 Path 5 Path 6 Path 7 Basin ID WQ BMP ID
PB:1.0 Sheet Flow Rain Garden PB:1.0 Rain Garden
PB:1.1 Inlet 5 Pipe B Rain Garden PB:1.0 Rain Garden
PB:1.2 Inlet 1 Pipe A Rain Garden PB:1.0 Rain Garden
PB:1.3 Inlet 2 Pipe A Rain Garden PB:1.0 Rain Garden
PB:1.4 Inlet 3 Pipe A Rain Garden PB:1.0 Rain Garden
PB:1.5 Inlet 7 Pipe B Rain Garden PB:1.0 Rain Garden
PB:1.6 Inlet 6 Pipe B Rain Garden PB:1.0 Rain Garden
PB:1.7 Inlet4 Pipe A Rain Garden PB:1.0 Rain Garden
PB:1.8 Inlet 6 Pipe B Rain Garden PB:1.0 Rain Garden
PB:2 Roof Drain 8 Inlet 8 Pipe B Rain Garden PB:1.0 Rain Garden
PB:3 Roof Drain 7 Driveway Trench Drain Pipe B Rain Garden PB:1.0 Rain Garden
PB:4 PB:2 Roof Drain 8 Inlet 8 Pipe B Rain Garden PB:1.0 Rain Garden
PB:5(50%) DS 1 Inlet 10 Pipe D Pipe A Rain Garden PB:1.0 Rain Garden
PB:5(50%) DS 2 Inlet 9 Pipe C Pipe B Rain Garden PB:1.0 Rain Garden
PB:6 Roof Drain 1 Inlet 10 Pipe D Pipe A Rain Garden PB:1.0 Rain Garden
PB:7 PB:9 PB:5 DS 1 Inlet 10 Pipe D Pipe A Rain Garden PB:1.0 Rain Garden
PB:8 Roof Drain 2 Lambs Tongue 1 Inlet 4 Pipe A Rain Garden PB:1.0 Rain Garden
PB:9 Roof Drain 3 Lambs Tongue 1 Inlet 4 Pipe A Rain Garden PB:1.0 Rain Garden
PB:10 Roof Drain 6 Driveway Trench Drain Pipe B Rain Garden PB:1.0 Rain Garden
PB:11 Roof Drain 9,10 Inlet 8 Pipe B Rain Garden PB:1.0 Rain Garden
PB:12 Roof Drain 4,5 Driveway Trench Drain Pipe B Rain Garden PB:1.0 Rain Garden
PB:13 Roof Drain 11 Driveway Trench Drain Pipe B Rain Garden PB:1.0 Rain Garden
3.1.1 Detention Calculation Throughout the rest of the
To calculate water quality requirements,WCE calculated thDrainage Report an impervious area
of the basins, and time of concentration of the basins. ver area of 27% was used, not 31%. es,
while the impervious area equals 0.212. The time concen Based off Table 1, 27% seems e
11.27 minutes. accurate. Please verify.
Based on an overall imperviousness of 3 0 percent,the WQCV in watershed inches is 0.065 in(see Ap-
pendix D). In terms of volume,the WQCV over the tributary area of 0.693 acres is 163.6 cf(0.065 ac X
43560 sf/ac X 0.065 in X 1 ft/ 12 in). The proposed grading of the site, as well as pipe networks,route
runoff into the rain garden along the north end of the lot. This area provides 484.8 cf of detention((10ft X
2ft/2)X 48.48ft),which is adequate for the detention required for the 100 year storm(429 cf).
3.1.2 Outlet Calculation
In order to drain the 484.8 cf of detention a weir will be placed on the north end of the detention area. The
weir will allow for detained water to be released at the historical 100-year storm rate of 1.518 cfs. Thus,
the weir will have a bottom length of 0.295 ft to allow for a flow of 1.507 cfs at a head of 1.33 ft.In addi-
tion,the outflow velocity will be 2.51 ft/s. For more information,refer to Appendix D.
3.2 Pipe Calculations
Four pipes will be installed in order to route runoff to the Rain Garden. Each pipe is described below.
9
3.2.1 Pipe A
Pipe a captures runoff from Inlets 1,2, 3,4, and 10. Inlets 1-4 drain directly to Pipe A,while Pipe D
transports runoff from Inlet 10 to Pipe A. Inlet 1 provides a flow of 0.101 cfs,which is captured by a 4in
PVC pipe set at 5%.As a result,this section has a capacity of 0.439 cfs. Inlet 2 provides 0.035 cfs for a
total flow of 0.136 cfs. This is fed into a 4in PVC pipe laid at 18%,with a flow capacity of 0.832 cfs. In-
let 3 provides 0.051 cfs for a total of 0.187 cfs,which is carried by a 4in PVC pipe at 2%.As a result,this
section has a capacity of 0.277cfs. Inlet 4 provides 0.176 cfs for a total of 0.363 cfs,which is carried by a
4in PVC pipe set at 6.97%,for a resulting flow capacity of 0.518 cfs. Inlet 10 provides 0.102 cfs via Pipe
D, for a total of 0.465 cfs. This portion of Pipe A is a 6in pipe set at 6.97%,which provides a flow capac-
ity of 1.568 cfs. Pipe A drains into the bottom of the Rain Garden. See Appendix E for Pipe calculations.
3.2.2 Pipe B
Pipe B captures runoff from Inlets 5, 6, 7, 8,and 9. Inlets 5, 6, 7, and 8 drain directly to Pipe B,while In-
let 9 is routed to Pipe B via Pipe C. In addition, Inlet 6 is a trench drain laid across the low point of the
driveway. Inlet 5 provides 0.291 cfs of flow to a 6in pipe set at 2%,resulting in a flow capacity of 0.84
cfs. Inlet 6 (Trench Drain)provides an additional 0.61 cfs to Pipe B,resulting in a total flow of 0.901 cfs.
The trench drain will consist of a 6in Pipe at 2%,which will route flow into a 8in Pipe at 2%, for a total
capacity of 1.834. Inlet 7 provides 0.032 cfs,Inlet 8 provides 0.141 cfs, and Inlet 9 provides 0.102 cfs, for
a total flow of 1.18 cfs. This section of pipe consists of 8in PVC laid at 2%for a total capacity of 1.843
cfs. Pipe B drains into the bottom of the Rain Garden. See Appendix E for Pipe calculations.
3.2.3 Pipe C
Pipe C is fed by Inlet 9,which provides a flow of 0.102 cfs. Pipe C consists of a 4in PVC pipe laid at
8.11%for a flow capacity of 0.558 cfs. Pipe C drains to Pipe B.
3.2.4 Pipe D
Pipe D is fed by Inlet 10,which provides a flow of 0.102 cfs. Pipe C consists of a 4in PVC pipe laid at
32.07%for a flow capacity of 3.364 cfs. Pipe D drains to Pipe A.
10
3.3 Inlet Calculations
Ten Inlets will be installed in order to route runoff to the Rain Garden. Each Inlet is described below. In
addition, a summary has been provided in Table 3.
Table 3. Inlet Properties
INLET 50% FLOW D FLOW
NAME INLET TYPE CAP.(CFS) (CFS)
Inlet 1 NDS 9"Square(Str.Foam) 0.128 0.1012
Inlet 2 NDS 9"Square(Str.Foam) 0.128 0.0348
Inlet 3 NDS 9"Square(Str.Foam) 0.128 0.0506
Inlet4 12"Square Galvanized Steel 0.388 0.1763
Inlet 5 12"Square Galvanized Steel 0.388 0.291
NDS 5"Pro Series Channel
Inlet 6 Drain,5"by 20"Load Star Heavy 0.868 0.6103
Traffic Channel Grate, 16 ft long
Inlet 7 9"Square(Str.Foam) 0.128 0.0316
Inlet 8 9"Square Galvanized Steel 0.211 0.1408
Inlet 9 9"Square(Str.Foam) 0.128 0.1022
Inlet 10 9"Square(Str.Foam) 0.128 0.1022
3.3.1 Inlet 1
Inlet 1 will be a NDS 9" Square Structural Foam Inlet, and will capture 0.101 cfs of runoff. This inlet pro-
vides a 50%flow capacity of 0.128 according to NDS.As a result,the inlet has adequate flow capacity.
3.3.2 Inlet 2
Inlet 2 will be a NDS 9" Square Structural Foam Inlet, and will capture 0.035 cfs of runoff. This inlet pro-
vides a 50%flow capacity of 0.128 according to NDS.As a result,the inlet has adequate flow capacity.
3.3.3 Inlet 3
Inlet 3 will be a NDS 9" Square Structural Foam Inlet, and will capture 0.051 cfs of runoff. This inlet pro-
vides a 50%flow capacity of 0.128 according to NDS.As a result,the inlet has adequate flow capacity.
3.3.4 Intet 4
Inlet 4 will be a NDS 12" Square Galvanized Steel Inlet, and will capture 0.176 cfs of runoff. This inlet
provides a 50%flow capacity of 0.388 according to NDS.As a result,the inlet has adequate flow capac-
ity.
3.3.5 Inlet 5
Inlet 5 will be a NDS 12" Square Galvanized Steel Inlet, and will capture 0.291 cfs of runoff. This inlet
provides a 50% flow capacity of 0.388 according to NDS. As a result,the inlet has adequate flow capac-
ity.
3.3.6 Inlet 6
Inlet 6 is a 16ft Trench drain with NDS 5" Pro Series Channel Drain, 5" by 20" Load Star Heavy Traffic
Channel Grate. According to NDS,this grate has a capacity 50%flow capacity of 0.054 cfs/ft,resulting in
11
a total capacity of 0.868 cfs. The trench drain captures 0.61 cfs of runoff. Therefore,the specified trench
drain is adequate for required flows.
3.3.7 Inlet 7
Inlet 7 will be a NDS 9" Square Structural Foam Inlet, and will capture 0.032 cfs of runoff. This inlet pro-
vides a 50%flow capacity of 0.128 according to NDS.As a result,the inlet has adequate flow capacity.
3.3.8 Inlet 8
Inlet 8 will be a NDS 9" Square Galvanized Steel Inlet,and will capture 0.141 cfs of runoff. This inlet
provides a 50%flow capacity of 0.211 according to NDS.As a result,the inlet has adequate flow capac-
ity.
3.3.9 Inlet 9
Inlet 9 will be a NDS 9" Square Structural Foam Inlet, and will capture 0.102 cfs of runoff. This inlet pro-
vides a 50%flow capacity of 0.128 according to NDS.As a result,the inlet has adequate flow capacity.
3.3.10lnlet 10
Inlet 10 will be a NDS 9" Square Structural Foam Inlet, and will capture 0.102 cfs of runoff. This inlet
provides a 50%flow capacity of 0.128 according to NDS. As a result,the inlet has adequate flow capac-
ity.
12
3.3.110peration and maintenance
Table 4. presents the recommended maintenance procedures for rain gardens as found in Table 8.12 of
the URMP.
Table 4. Maintenance recommendations(URMP Table 8.12)
Required Action Maintenance Objectives _ Frequency
Inspections Inspect detention area to determine If Routine—Annual inspection of
the sandy growth media is allowing hydraulic performance
acceptable infiltration.
Lawn mowing and vegetative care Occasional mowing of grasses and Routine—Depending on aesthetic
weed removal to limit unwanted requirements.
vegetation.Maintain irrigated turf
grass as 2 to 4 inches tall and non-
irrigated native turf grasses at 4 to
6 inches.
Debris and litter removal Remove debris and litter from Routine—Depending on aesthetic
detention area to minimize clogging requirements,
of the sand media.
Landscaping removal and The sandy loam turf and landscaping Every 5 to 15 years,depending on
replacement layer will clog with time as materials infiltration rates needed to drain the
accumulate on it.This layer will need WOCV in 12-hours or less. May
to be removed and replaced to need to do it more frequently if
rehabilitate infiltration rates, along exfiltration rates are too low to
with all turf and other vegetation achieve this goal.
growing on the surface,
13
APPENDIX A-NRCS SOILS REPORT
USDA United States A product of the National Custom Soil Resource
Department of Cooperative Soil Survey,
Agriculture a joint effort of the United Report for
\ RCS States Department of
Agriculture and other Aspen-Gypsum Area,
Federal agencies, State Colorado Parts of Eagle
Natural agencies including the , g ,
Resources Agricultural Experiment Garfield, and Pitkin
Conservation Stations, and local
Service participants Counties
� { - lr
.41/11%
' �hr ' r �''► a� e
40
%lige if. de....
r,
...% .... .
ai4iitib •4• Ai • ''.'-, -, .,
,4,,,..., .....„ ow T-7 :%*.• ' • :••.,
. �
lOr i CI, k • • • '• • ••.- Ilk' .II.
10.0.1
U 11 ' . A .• es a ... i,••,
a r.
4itr‘ : . mt. . ' •-• •4 I I 'r*"
i 111.,. "1\4. ," F' lit
.--411cMiliallbc"-,e- ..1116 . .
. .1. _isio;.. . • .4.44,4,-.... -
0 ======== o00 tt ) "' 1,�s . „ 1tt
June 20, 2017
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs)or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist(http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call (800) 795-3272 (voice)or(202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3
Contents
Preface 2
How Soil Surveys Are Made 5
Soil Map 8
Soil Map 9
Legend 10
Map Unit Legend 12
Map Unit Descriptions 12
Aspen-Gypsum Area, Colorado, Parts of Eagle, Garfield, and Pitkin
Counties 14
14—Callings-Yeljack complex, 25 to 65 percent slopes 14
117—Yeljack-Callings complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes 15
References 18
4
How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5
Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
6
Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
7
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8
Custom Soil Resource Report
k Soil Map a
340010 340020 340030 340040 340350 340060 340070 340080 340090 340100
39°10'53"N I _ a 39°10'53"N
.i ' 4.4
•
II
' 4^ `' ♦ ,
4111.
i r
•
14416”4.- 4.; kft,#4
er
,,,* . 1191P% ,.: - .
-__Aillitillhanle1/4- ii; , -., v , - - • .
ligeW • .4%". .,- ; 0 ,
•
i 1
} g41`d4.,
Na
4_
1
t
. -
1. 4 i,': I. I
.t hMl, _, .
0 NM
4.
tr
'M .0. •ca i
Ara
40
•
- ` 7. :dhal . 1
1 _ •
14
a No
' i
V,A111 `slap��oy not be ds[bd a this scale. •. ti
39°10'49"N r 1 39°10'49"N
340010 340020 340030 340040 340060 340:60 340070 340080 340090 340100
3 3
'Os v
Map Scale:1:622 if printed on A portrait(8.5"x 11")sheet.
o N Meters o
0 5 10 20 30
Feet
0 30 60 120 UM180
Map projection:Web Mercator Comer cooniinates:WGS84 Edge tics:U Zone 13N WGS84
9
Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest(AOI) 14 Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
Area of Interest(AOI) 1:24,000.
Q Stony Spot
Soilsit Very Stony Spot
n Soil Map Unit Polygons Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Wet Spot
",. Soil Map Unit Lines Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
p Other misunderstandingof the detail of mapping and accuracyof soil
p Soil Map Unit Points pp 9
.• Special Line Features line placement.The maps do not show the small areas of
Special Point Features contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
Blowout Water Features scale.
Streams and Canals
kg Borrow Pit
Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
* clay Spot Rails measurements.
0 Closed Depression
o,/ Interstate Highways
Gravel Pit Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
.r US Routes Web Soil Survey URL:
Gravelly Spot Major Roads Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857)
® Landfill Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
• Lava Flow Background projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the
46 Marsh or swamp Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more
It Mine or Quarry accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
4 Miscellaneous Water This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
O Perennial Water of the version date(s)listed below.
v Rock Outcrop Soil Survey Area: Aspen-Gypsum Area,Colorado,Parts of
+ Saline Spot Eagle,Garfield,and Pitkin Counties
Survey Area Data: Version 7,Sep 22,2014
•• : Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Q Sinkhole
31 Slide or Slip Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Aug 12,2011—Sep
22,2011
oa Sodic Spot
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
10
Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
11
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Aspen-Gypsum Area,Colorado,Parts of Eagle,Garfield,and Pitkin Counties(C0655)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
14 Callings-Yeljack complex,25 to 0.2 11.5%
65 percent slopes
117 Yeljack-Callings complex, 12 to 1.7 88.5%
25 percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest 1.9 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
12
Custom Soil Resource Report
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
13
Custom Soil Resource Report
Aspen-Gypsum Area, Colorado, Parts of Eagle, Garfield, and Pitkin
Counties
14—Callings-Yeljack complex, 25 to 65 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: jq4z
Elevation: 7,500 to 9,500 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 18 to 20 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 41 degrees F
Frost-free period: 70 to 80 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Callings and similar soils: 50 percent
Yeljack and similar soils: 40 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Callings
Setting
Landform: Ridges, mountain slopes
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainflank
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Alluvium derived from sandstone and/or colluvium derived from
sandstone
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 6 inches: loam
H2- 6 to 12 inches: gravelly loam
H3- 12 to 34 inches: very cobbly clay loam
H4 -34 to 53 inches: very gravelly clay loam
H5- 53 to 60 inches: very cobbly sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 25 to 65 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0
mmhos/cm)
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Ecological site: Brushy Loam (R048AY238C0)
Other vegetative classification: BRUSHY LOAM (null_4)
14
Custom Soil Resource Report
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Yeljack
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainflank
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from sandstone and/or eolian deposits
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 10 inches: silt loam
H2- 10 to 24 inches: silty clay loam
H3- 24 to 60 inches: clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 25 to 65 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.60 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: High (about 11.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Ecological site: Mountain Loam (R048AY228C0)
Other vegetative classification: Mountain Loam (null_42)
Hydric soil rating: No
117—Yeljack-Callings complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: jq4t
Elevation: 7,500 to 9,500 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 18 to 20 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 41 degrees F
Frost-free period: 70 to 80 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Yeljack and similar soils: 50 percent
Callings and similar soils: 40 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
15
Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Yeljack
Setting
Landform: Structural benches, mountains
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainflank
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from sandstone and/or eolian deposits
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 10 inches: silt loam
H2- 10 to 24 inches: silty clay loam
H3- 24 to 60 inches: clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 12 to 25 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.60 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: High (about 11.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Ecological site: Mountain Loam (R048AY228C0)
Other vegetative classification: Mountain Loam (null_42)
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Callings
Setting
Landform: Ridges, mountains
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainflank
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from sandstone and/or colluvium derived from
sandstone
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 6 inches: loam
H2- 6 to 12 inches: gravelly loam
H3- 12 to 34 inches: very cobbly clay loam
H4 -34 to 53 inches: very gravelly clay loam
H5- 53 to 60 inches: very cobbly sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 12 to 25 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: High
16
Custom Soil Resource Report
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0
mmhos/cm)
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Ecological site: Brushy Loam (R048AY238C0)
Other vegetative classification: BRUSHY LOAM (null_4)
Hydric soil rating: No
17
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
18
Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nres142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nres142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf
19
APPENDIX B-FEMA FIRM MAP
2
t
paler-sae.,
/ 1
/ ` t
AP PKU XIMA II.51.AI l IN It IT
O` 600 0 71
/ ///
/YIP
I I q'I/TIaK RSIA NANUALL PMILAN
C
F�SIMAIICE RATE NAP
. I // I PIT KIN COUNTY,
COLORADO AND
INCORPORATED AREAS
\ i
_ --- �'i PANEL 203 OF 325
I
i .........••••••••• MO a. a
•
•
IS$17CO203 C
ZONE X f EFFECTIVE DATE.
- JUNE 4,1001
K y_
J
Tr...sr,ctG.a:w..,..ona,S...arc.,..r...04fl.in. .
we F1MI...y•.Yrt n.,f, T..nook.......,l.R ,.1.0..
. ,noon n . .01 In l . ..
c! WOO.n.....1 i.... .�...... ...W ...........v�. .
G i,9v1 a.ae a.�n.•
+ no, soon
cud.Ya .'R ..Yv ,
w m
crock err FG F cud row on.l.wow,.r:fen p.
APPENDIX C-PLAN SET
3
WOODY CREEK
THUNDERBOWL ENGINEERING
WOODY CREEK ENGINEERING,LLC
P.O.BOX 575
WOODY CREEK,COLORADO 81656
395 T H U N D E R B O W L L N . ASPEN , CO REEKENGINEER
WOODYCREEKENGIN EERING.COM
81611
114111P1 ®
NOTES:
cr W 1. ALL MATERIALS,WORKMANSHIP,AND CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE STANDARDS AND
Q a SPECIFICATIONS SET FORTH IN THE CITY OF ASPEN("COA")MUNICIPAL
CU
CODE,COA TECHNICAL MANUALS,AND APPLICABLE
C G/. STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS.WHERE THERE IS CONFLICT BETWEEN
THESE PLANS AND THE TECHNICAL MANUAL OR ANY APPLICABLE
\� N.' STANDARDS,THE HIGHER QUALITY STANDARD SHALL APPLY.ALL UTILITY
c,
+► a WORK SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE UTILITY.
O O �� QC 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION
C l� ,jvc)oce AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS
0 BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND,WHERE
cn
POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD.THE INFORMATION IS NOT
(V TO BE RELIED UPON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE.
e� 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ONE(1)SIGNED COPY OF THE
CC
e CIO0o' C d APPROVED PLANS,ONE(1)COPY OF THE APPROPRIATE CRITERIA AND 0
(t oo n ` 0 SPECIFICATIONS,AND A COPY OF ANY PERMITS AND EXTENSION
�` " ThUnd erbotir/ -��a�� F a�oOn AGREEMENTS NEEDED FOR THE JOB ONSITE AT ALL TIMES. 0
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ASPECTS OF
y�°� SAFETY INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,EXCAVATION,TRENCHING, Z
de�� SHORING,TRAFFIC CONTROL,AND SECURITY. w
5. IF DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS CONDITIONS ARE
3 pe n Highlands Q O� ENCOUNTERED WHICH COULD INDICATE A SITUATION THAT IS NOT 0-
0IDENTIFIED IN THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CO
eso r l+ - Aspen... CONTACT THE WOODY CREEK ENGINEERING,LLC IMMEDIATELY. a
6. ALL REFERENCES TO ANY PUBLISHED STANDARDS SHALL REFER TO
THE LATEST REVISION OF SAID STANDARD UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED '
OTHERWISE. z
7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN IN 0
J
lirLDACCORDANCE WITH MUTCD TO THE APPROPRIATE RIGHT-OF-WAY —I` AUTHORITY(TOWN,COUNTY OR STATE)FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ANY
C� W1 In Q
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN OR AFFECTING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. CO
Q'e(b° THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ANY AND ALL 0
• TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE
• • \\Li)))
i' 395 Thunderbowl Lane CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. CO
• 8. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ALL LABOR AND �/LI
• • MATERIALS NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE INTENDED
• 4 IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS OR AS DESIGNATED TO BE Q Q
•• PROVIDED,INSTALLED,OR CONSTRUCTED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY
•
• 9/lOj NOTED OTHERWISE.• z
• • 1..ii- 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING ROADWAYS
• • 3 FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND DIRT TRACKED FROM D
• • �Q THE SITE.
• . 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RECORDING AS-BUILT i_ r
• • INFORMATION ON A SET OF RECORD DRAWINGS KEPT ON THE I r
• • ��` CONSTRUCTION SITE AND AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES. LC) Cr C'
• • 11. DIMENSIONS FOR LAYOUT AND CONSTRUCTION ARE NOT TO BE 0 r o
• • SCALED FROM ANY DRAWING.IF PERTINENT DIMENSIONS ARE NOT SHOWN, H Cr) cO w
• •
\\\\
• • CONTACT WOODY CREEK ENGINEERING,LLC FOR CLARIFICATION AND
• • r ANNOTATE THE DIMENSION ON THE AS-BUILT RECORD DRAWINGS. 7/5/2017 DATE OF PUBLICATIONce
• • >C Q 15.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF >
/ 'Z THE COLORADO PERMIT FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGE,THE STORM -- PERMIT o
• L.
O'
• WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN,AND THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. o
• 7 3 16. ALL STRUCTURAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE w
cit INSTALLED AT THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO ANY OTHER Z
• • 0 0 EARTH-DISTURBING ACTIVITY.ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE
• / 419)-
• 1 MAINTAINED IN GOOD REPAIR BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL SUCH TIME AS
• • IL THE ENTIRE DISTURBED AREA IS STABILIZED WITH HARD SURFACE OR O
le
co
LANDSCAPING. ct
* • a 17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SEQUENCE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES IN 0
SUCH A MANNER AS TO MINIMIZE POTENTIAL UTILITY CONFLICTS.IN =
GENERAL,STORM SEWER AND SANITARY SEWER SHOULD BE �I
CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE WATER LINES AND DRY o
UTILITIES. 8
U
Ld
VICINITY MAP N COVER SHEET
x
0
0 100 200 400 000 ,_� m
Scale:1"=200'
0
C 1 0 0 e
EXISTING BASINS PROPOSED BASINS 4
WOODYY CREEK
ENGINEERING
WOODY CREEK ENGINEERING,LLC
P.O.BOX 575
WOODY CREEK,COLORADO 81656
(P):970-429-8297
WOODYCREEKENGIN EERING.COM
> >
��� A
�� \ r �V� / �� r' \Vv
- - / 8240.00 ) 24O
- / - - 80.0
0-- -� I -� _
AREA:0.00 AC
i --- 54.64 SF
/` --- I \\ \ .-"84114, AREA:0.03 C AREA:4 06 SF C -'-'--
AREA: \\\
A
�8245.00 / \ - -. --- \ i824`r 1471.96 SF
- --- FLOW PA I �. �Ps:1.o
1
0.29 AC \ I
------ \ L 312 FT PB:3 12787.05 SF
-� \ \ \ I S 0.10 FT/FT \\ PB:7 AREA:0.00 A I \I •
\ \ - EB6 __-- AREA:0.01 AC 192.70SF Z
_ \ \ -----AREA:0.69 Acre I I ' ---� 507.87 SF AREA:O O I '
\ \ 30196.82.SF L _
\ \ \
\ \ �... �/. I -02dy1 / 114687 SF C 0
AREA:0.03 AC PB.11 0 1 2N5I
�250.00 /
\ \ \ 8250.00\ P8:. AREA SF0A
AREA:0.02 AC /
\ \ \ \ \ \ / \ \ I / PB:1.7 728.18 SF J J
A \ \ / \ J� AREA:0.015 AC PB:10 \ 9���
_ \ \ \ \ /\ y/ 668.29 SF �- AREA,0.01 AC
\ \ \ \ \ \ 245.48 SF
,\,- - \ \ \ \ \ / PB:B - \ IREA 0.010 iOM
O\ \ \ \ \ \ \ / \ AREA:0.00 A PB:13 PB 12 .18 SFiiii 'r / O- v V A ` A AREA:0.01 AC 'REA:Q.OM\ \ \ 153.99 SF - \ ��PB:1 8 W (n'-8255.00 \ \ \ / \ J✓ 612.28 SF 443.00SF `Y'�-825 00-� AREAO.e 2ACA \ Pal s7os7 F\ A A A A �_ A \ _ I •6:1.4 AREA:0.0 �� CO1 11
\ AREA: •C 21 2.34
\ V A A A 12
oo - 714.57 SF �`�
00
V A / -I /� ARE•0.011 A .• /•- 7
LLJ
\ j \ \\_ / 7I 479.1:- / 7 /.
\ \ \ 121
U
J J
eso•o A \ ��Or. AR •o��� �� 7 T
•
\ \ \\ � \ N 400.
VJ
_ �\ 8 V -N., v A \SI\ V � -� Cr)260.00 L F \ 8260.00 - L I- ``J < m
m
l \ \ \ I \ \ \ I 7/5/2017 DATE OF PUBLICATION Z
I _ I _ 5/25/2017 CONCEPTUAL G&D i
- �, 6/23/2017 PROGRESS GRADING -
���V TOTAL ���� FLOW FLOW PEAK PEAK w
BASIN RUNOFF RUNOFF PATH PATH FLOW FLOW z
BASIN AREA IMPERVIOUS % COEF. COEF. LENGTH SLOPE 5YR 100YR n
TOTAL FLOW FLOW PEAK PEAK NO. (ACRES) AREA(ACRES)IMPERVIOUS 5YR 100YR (FT) (Fr/FT) (CFS) (CFS)
BASIN RUNOFF RUNOFF PATH PATH FLOW FLOW PB:1.0 0.294 0.044 0.15 0.24 0.54 156.00 0.10 0.177 0.7824
BASIN AREA IMPERVIOUS % COEF. COEF. LENGTH SLOPE 5YR 100YR PB:1.1 0.092 0.000 0.00 0.15 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.063 0.291 m
NO. (ACRES) AREA(ACRES) IMPERVIOUS 5YR 100YR (FT) (FT/FT) (CFS) (CFS) PB:1.2 0.032 0.000 0.00 0.15 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.016 0.1012 G'
EB:1 0.693 0.000 0.00 0.15 0.50 312.00 0.10 0.232 1.4845 w
P8:1.3 0.011 0.000 0.00 0.15 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.005 0.0348 0
PB:1.4 0.016 0.000 0.00 0.15 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.008 0.0506
PB:1.5 0.010 0.000 0.00 0.15 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.005 0.0316
PB:1.6 0.049 0.049 1.00 0.90 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.144 0.2963 I
PB:1.7 0.015 0.000 0.00 0.15 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.007 0.0474
PB:1.8 0.022 0.022 1.00 0.90 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.065 0.133
0
P6:2 0.026 0.000 0.00 0.15 0.50 5.00 0.50 0.013 0.0832 N
P6:3 0.004 0.004 1.00 0.90 0.96 5.00 0.50 0.012 0.0242 I
P13:4 0.010 0.000 0.00 0.15 0.50 5.00 0.50 0.005 0.0326 w
P6:5 0.034 0.034 1.00 0.90 0.96 5.00 0.50 0.1 0.2044 BASINS 3
PB:6 0.001 0.001 1.00 0.90 0.96 5.00 0.50 0.003 0.0076 a
PB:7 0.012 0.000 0.00 0.15 0.50 5.00 0.50 0.006 0.0367 x
P6:8 0.004 0.004 1.00 0.90 0.96 5.00 0.50 0.01 0.0213
m
P6:9 0.017 0.011 0.69 0.52 0.67 5.00 0.50 0.029 0.0709 N d
P6:1 0.006 0.006 1.00 0.90 0.96 5.00 0.50 0.017 0.0341 ►• C 2 0 0 3
PB:11 0.004 0.004 1.00 0.90 0.96 5.00 0.50 0.012 0.02525
PB:12 0.010 0.010 1.00 0.90 0.96 5.00 0.50 0.03 0.0617 0 10 20 40 80 .��
P6:13 0.014 0.000 0.00 0.15 0.50 5.00 0.50 0.007 0.061 Scale:1"=20'
v
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING CONTOUR WOODY CREEK
PROPOSED CONTOUR ENGINEERING
SPOT ELEVATION XXXX.XX
CONC. = CONCRETE WOODY CREEK ENGINEERING,LLC
HP = HIGH POINT P.O.BOX 575
WOODY CREEK,COLORADO 81656
TD =TRENCH DRAIN (P):97°'29-8297
WOODYCREEKENGIN EERING.COM
:, �
RAIN GARDEN
600
BOULDER WALL /. /j,Sl. _ r� V-. IWEI R 057 FT
TOW:8240.57 0 eCI L = 1.00 FT
BM 8239 / 0`ti�' 00 �� CREST EL : 8240 FT
AREA = 390.56 SF / \
WOCV= 151 CF / / `.6, \n 1
FLAT AREA = 151 SF�/ ``�,\
i r
DETENTION CAP. = 425 CF �� �,i/,, � \\,\
/ o0 0 '240.00 I
. ,,L leko°°• — czo W►iaa
i 'gtiNti� Ti, l;;
<i a/0o /
PIPE A / �� �� \
�J J I
PIPE D / �i u A� III
.-1� II PIPE C
�� PIPE
/ ilit DOWNSPOU DOWNSPOUT 2 .00 ��
/ ROOF
�/ ��� DRAIN 1 DRAIN 08� u
// �o �� ROOF ROOF VAAVAA a 0 � I
''•� LAMBS ROOF rDRAIN 6 DRAIN 7 u / / ZN6I A
/�pAl 0'\ o TONGUE 1 DRAIN 3 ROOF 0
1c/eeot �z5000 f
DRAIN 9 ��
ski 0t ���� ROOF 'I '".
k�/0 \ \ I ��'� ROOF DRAIN 10 �I 08' �'s/
/l00 �- D ' DRAIN 2 92p6_°
/�11 ,8251.00�� ?Oo i1 aZd1 0 O 021 '^
//k\•
� �8252.00,1 8, 7�1 / .1J
/ -,-8253.ee 'ROOF—� 2 `9 r e -6.8� �/V111 N
// ti 8255 0. --,M4I i i1 DRAIN 4 N 84m�m��� �� 1„V CO
// _ —�'�825.00 rROOF co �I I /1�
/ �82 \ DRAIN 5 �rb�'8.00 8247 F.\/ ICL in
/ LLJ
—� \ 88.00 11 80.009.00- -/ a O
/ VA TW:8256
/ \ 7.825?ppBW:8253
TW:8251
/ w8 jr,. LW':8244.5 ��
/// CA A�Sg Op 825'5) ..
// _� e?o-9, 8252 p0/
m
/ 280 8253.00—� z = z
O I ' I
//// \�\�e2 ` - 82`�`D0� \ zz i N. D 1— W o
/ V� 8255 00 S.IR CL '
0
\ �s e s.00 A �/A/
_ _ � r
5 /'�1 0
CD N
// �Bp0 \ � 8\8258257,pp � CO// �� \.00 82608259.00 o
// B 8�7 00. /\
cern
/ 2 2@2 6.00 826p.00\ '>/ 7/5/2017 DATE OF PUBLICATION o
// —\ A/\ \ I / Z
/ -'\Y)I\\ / 5/25/2017 CONCEPTUAL G&D
/ // 6/23/2017 PROGRESS GRADING o
/ y
/ — w
i
/
/ m
/ w
/
li
rn
0
E
G&D OVERVIEW
a
x
0
m
d
N o
0 10 20 40 80 1: C 3 0 0
Scale:1"=20' 3
v
- - PROPERTY LINE
---d- EXISTING CONTOUR
WOODY CREEK
PROPOSED CONTOUR ENGINEERING
x SPOT ELEVATION XXXXXX
CONC. =CONCRETE
HP= HIGH POINT WOODY CREEK ENGINEERING,LLC
P.O.BOX 575
WOODY CREEK,COLORADO 81656
TD=TRENCH DRAIN (P),970-429-8297
'- '-,
\ ,V
,
WOODYCREEKENGINEERING.COM
'.,
\/ S
\`‘
/ \
/1/ (;)
\ N,
cf',/ X \
// / /ol• 6 \ ,,
/7
‘,
//.---- --- / ,g•
FTLIOAANRT EwACABoRAOcEP=TUAv.O L W3D=9:EB 80Rwi2 25554W856i1%A5cG3SSL/79FFFFL//////z/e/,,,,,
4
f ,,,,•,,,• • • • ,,f:1":.*1 1.:1,„.",„..‘,i nk,..4„AN
ki,iA"Ii iiWLCi RE==EI,R o S11,T0.05g0.i b,
:F T.1 40 FT
\ \
\,i\
,
s
DETEN = 4 ,z/ /
,
\
' Su - ' ' • • -. 026 4, -\ / 1 ) \
ii/z
._____ .00 1
,___ --
/4---- -------/ , ' --- ----- u / '
____ -- "--- ------ ii 5 8240 L C2.0•8240.88 \ ,r
,
___ / - _ IMMUNE
- - -/X-77.a. ...d) 4.
„
,,s ___- ---
__---- -
---------__
//_--- 63
/ / ' 11.9". __------ „--------% \ / Z
---7; , IP. :±L, ------- e° ,--
8243.00
1 / , 8243.00- ii
/ \ 1
/
\ I \
,
\I\ \8244.36 11 .32 -\
.
8243.00 Z96,7/70/ ------ --_____
u ...---8244.52
----- ----_ __ 8243.33 Y C/7 ye/4 2.33 -824452 \ 1
0 "‘
/ LH 82438243.70 ..-----' \\\ 0
8243.33 - 824450
82-4-4.0o \
41IP DA----.44W siAtRs CO CO
,
,/ -• PIPE C
/'" \\' \ \k
CC'
PIPE B
/ --- .___ ,.. , II
7 8 3.42_ 8244.50 1
\ \ \ \\s
GUTTER 1 8244.68 8244.68 11,dil"L \ CO
\
-...
11 I ,.....10--, r
4.:
a 0
jobj... N \
LLJ
t .•.4 moONLIrraliP 1 -4- - - - - - - 8244.30
, 8244.82 RIM:8243.97 DOWNSPOUT 2 1 8244.78 ii 824,00 \ N s,
Z 0
1
Milli INV OUT:8242.12 4"PVC
-\- \ ,
8244.84 -- Ci
.../„_.__/ 45 00 400,..)* ' 8244.84 8244.92 -
82 . 4111111,---- , 8244.82
, ROOF--- 8244.92 8244.92
INLET-9 ,
, a,. -----
\ \ \
\
/
DRAIN 1 , RIM:8244.74
,
) ,
,,--'- " , W
INV OUT:8243.24 4"PVC ',
8244.92 ,
, L__------ /ii \ D d
/ / ------•
\ r181247.00 ,
,
H
88246.38 CL -
,
, \\ \ / I in ,8
,
246.56 „
, u 1 ) / CD (I) ".?'
,
, ,
,
,, , . ,
-----
/
% --- - .ii ,
, r
/ _- ---
/ A V-- """-\ , ,
, DRAIN 8 a ,
,
a , 8245.87 INLET.4 / L I I- CO < cog,
, ,,
..
4 -----)-1'
, _ - . \EA i, 41, RIM:8245.00 ROOF\ , -----__ ,r L.Jc
// AlliNi•-.1 ' , ,4 I N V 01 Ng_4823.4530540"47pCv c
8245.00 H / , 7/5/2017 DATE OF PUBLICATION 2
l, 5/25/2017 CONCEPTUAL G&D i
/ .A
\\• --- Alk k 1.1 1
1 LAMBS ,
,
,
1 117XIFN 6 DRAIN-7
8245.00 INLET-8
RIM8244.79 H / i / 6/23/2017 PROGRESS GRADING ---
Oc//e,O\ 8250.00 IrOIll ii.... 111
i_ _ _ No, ;244. -roNGuE 1, 1
1
1 8245.00 8244.90 INV IN8241.28 8" 1 „ /
INV OUT:8241.28 8" 1
--ROOF \ 1
1 /t / ,/ %"‹
DRAIN 3 1
1 1 I 7 0,0, , .-
i_____ ------ 4, r n
ROOF\ s '
() \ \ , lk'Ali" '1 / /
8244.84 DRAIN 91 II
\ \
,rfl2A4,50
8244.67
,/
8244.786244'5° 1
8244,83 / , ce/
/ \-- \•••44.92 le, '.
'1 ,
o.
, INLET-6-TRENCH DRAIN 16 FT
RIM:8243.73 - \
INLET-N44.78 DRAIN 1 0 1 Al < / ,. ,2'
,
/ \ INLET-3 , RIM:8243.86 ... •
01 / D
i\/\ \ \ \ 525°4%251.00 A
10 RIM8250.19 ' INV INI vN:082u4T2.8223462".2P3V8C.. U
1 INV IN:8242.18 8" All .1.11.01°.°-„, -' -. ------- \ / 8245.68
INV IN:8248.69 4"PVC 1 ilk INV OUT8242.18 8"
8248
\ , :-. ' ---,
, \ INV OUT:8243.88 4"PVC ...9,.„; .. \'
\ \ .`.- 8252.00- 11 ROOF-....„
8243.70 ,
1--
\ , DRAIN 4 '-',.... .10
' 8
1 ol'L'
/ ______ 111DRAIN 11 i
INLET-2 S. 1 S ,c1
-6.8%' ..,..4.____ 8246.69
`--------„,,,..._ 8254.79 RIM:8254.80
INV IN:8253.66 4"PVC 4
`o'8 II z co,s
8.4%.,________ G&D NORTH a'
N _8255.°0 --\--- --a.\
.--_ _ c_...a4.„ 1 INV OUT:8253.64 4"PVC
\ "---------
II 116w/N, c)-c
„ws, 1 2" CMP 0'
q
\ '"--"`\ -(78i5. IL 8254.55 ,
, / BW:8247.56
OT
- - - "A _,.00 If -' 8243.70 TOW:8247.56
INLET ,1
N c'
V \ \ bi RIM:8256.32 n
8243.70 .....".""""""""" ., .00 6/47I \ C30 1 L,
826-'90 INV OUT:8254.82 4"-VC INLET 5
' 8248.09
\ F8256 58 RIM:8250.0 4„ \,4 8249.00
c, 1 / 0 5 10 20 40 IgiV 6")
/
INV OUT:8242.62 6"P C
Scale:1"=10'
\ \----0 \ <A-
". i ROOF i 8249.87 Osei.'60P1)'- /-//\9 I / /./././ / d