The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFile Documents.1419 Crystal Lake Rd.0009.2017 (40).ARBK 0009.2017.ARBK_Zoning_2 Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf(75) $oo, poM �nrr—ter Page: [1]A-201 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS — Checkmark: Unchecked 9'-1 3/8" T _ Author:jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf r.,9 roPoo.� --"r V - 10, I I v Page: [2]A-202 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS TII_, Checkmark: Unchecked n Author:jimp ___ File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page: [2]A-202 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS IT o o Checkmark: 20'-3 7/16" T O . Checkmark: Unchecked� „M„•, Author:jimp �_ _ ,•.,,« File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf I --1—��.1 Page: [2]A-202 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS Checkmark: Unchecked 9'-1 13/32" Author:jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 1 Page: [2]A-202 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS Checkmark: Unchecked 20.3981 sf Author:jimp 20 File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page: 1 Checkmark: Unchecked Zoning will require at least a zoning site Author:jimp plan showing setbacks. Zoning will require at least a zoning site plan File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf showing setbacks. Please see sheet A001 - Proposed Site Plan for property setback information Page:A-103-D ® Checkmark: Unchecked If a wall is being removed here, than it your eNval on¢end Author:jimp should show up in your elevations and .m1 " File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf your demo calcs drawings. Currently it • . does not. Please reconcile. 1 This is an existing window that is being removed. RECEIVED No wall area at this location is to be removed. We have updated this plan to more accurately show 09/29/2017 that only the window is being removed. ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT Page: A-104 I Checkmark: Unchecked 23'-8 1/16" Author:jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page:A-104-D Checkmark: Unchecked This demo plan for the roof does not quite This demo plan for the roof does not match up with your elevations. The quite match up with your elevations. Author:jimp The elevations show the ends of elevations show the ends of many rafter many rafter tails being cut off,but File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf that does not show up here or In tails being cut off, but that does not show your demo talcs.Please clarify,and revise your drawings to be We have revised our drawings to be consistent. up here or in your demo calcs. Please consistent. We are only reducing the dimension of roofs where clarify, and revise your drawings to be it is shown as demo on the demo plans. consistent. -------------------------- ------- Page: A-104-X t Checkmark: Unchecked 23' 8 1/16" Author:jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page: C6 This wall can be no taller than 42" (3'-6") ` Checkmark: Unchecked �. a 9 _ Author:jimp and will be checked at CO. r ,® File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf �� - Ok Page: HVAC 3 Checkmark: Unchecked Where is all of the new HAVAC Where is all of the new Author:jimp equipment being located? HAVAC equipment p All of the exterior equipment will be located on the being located? File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf roof. This includes condensing units and air handlers that will all be under 6' including pad. This equipment will be screened as necessary. Spec sheets of this equipment has been included. l�,�,-+� i•i c� Page: Z-001 Checkmark: Unchecked to Author:jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf T L V I Page: Z-001 Checkmark: Unchecked Author:jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf RECEIVED 09/29/2017 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT Page:Z-001 Checkmark: Unchecked Author:jimp • File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf V I' / s Page:Z-001 Checkmark: Unchecked 274.1 Author:jimp 274. 1 File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page: Z-001 Checkmark: Unchecked As per Sheet Z-004,the existing and Author:jimp proposed basement FA is not the same File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf We have updated Z-001 to match the calculations on Z-004 - which shows that the lower level existing and proposed FAR numbers are not the same. PM- Page:Z-001 Checkmark: Unchecked 25,618.85 _ Author:jimp — 3 25,618.85 File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf AlIMMMMOI 3,480.00 Page:Z-001 Checkmark: Unchecked — 10715.1 Author:jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 119,694.93 Page:Z-001 Checkmark: Unchecked 19,567.85 Author:jimp 3 19,567.85 File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page:Z-001 = 4781.69 sq Checkmark: Unchecked 4,774.1 Author:jimp s 4,774.1 File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf RECEIVED 09/29/2017 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT T Page: Z-001 Checkmark: Unchecked — Author:jimp 781.6^, sM ft File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Jf, Page: Same note as before!! You only revert to _== Checkmark: Unchecked Author: imp25% if the steep slopes reduce your FA File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf by more than 25% not if the sq.ft. of your steep slope reduction is more than 7- t,.,,_J We have updated this information on Z-001 accordingly 25%. Therefore your steep slope - and provided two cells showing the 2 different ways reduction should be 3,725.15+7,698.6= 6 to calculate this information. 11,423.75. . r.i tea., . Page: Z-001 Checkmark: Unchecked — Author:jimp + ft ; File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf I Page:Z-002 If the log holding up the log is removed, Checkmark: Unchecked . ili then the log's structural support has been • Author:jimp demolished and therefore it has been File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf .� demolished. �a As discussed and clarified via email if a log holding °m` up a log is removed then the upper log will only be counted as demolished if that log is also 1-7/ removed. In this instance we are not removing the upper log and this can be seen on sheet S2.4. Page:Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked If the log holding up the log is removed, If the log holding up then the log's structural support has been the logthe log's Author:jimp demolished and therefore it has been structural tur lsup File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf structural support has been demolished and demolished. therefore it demolishedhas been As discussed -and clarified via email - if a log holding up a log is removed then the upper log will only be counted as demolished if that log is also removed. In this instance we are not removing the upper log and this can be seen on sheet S2.4. m I Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked If the log holding up the log is removed, ] then the log's structural support has been ,` File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf demolished and therefore it has been � ,, demolished. %" n As discussed -and clarified via email - if a log holding m°fed ,a a . up a log is removed then the upper log will only be counted as demolished if that log is also removed. In this instance we are not removing the upper log and this can be seen on sheet S2.4. I%AI N N fj I L, Page:Z-002 ., i Checkmark: Unchecked ' If the log holding up the log is removed, 7 [ "11 Author:jimp demolished and therefore it has been .0 �i .f File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf demolished. ,0 ,„,, '°"""re''l therefore II has been As discussed -and clarified via email - if a log holding then the logs structural support has been • up a log is removed then the upper log will only be counted as demolished if that log is also removed. In this instance we are not removing the upper log and this can be seen on sheet S2.4. RECEIVED 09/29/2017 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT Page:Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author:jimp , — File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf '/ /,I Page:Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author:jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf j 1 =-� i Page: Z-002 1� A I Checkmark: Unchecked New Header being installed per S2.4 ;,� Author:jimp This area is currently being counted as demo. 1.°° _�= —' D File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf ILIA i I!I: 7"" Page:Z-002 1111111111111111.111111.111111111111111111111111V-7 Checkmark: Unchecked 1�� ■■■■■■■■■■■i61�bi Author:jimp 1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 /� File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf j1//1, 4i�i� �i1•i1•i1•i ��■■■■l � . moirmilificuiliellivireitr Checkmark: Unchecked Looking at your elevations, there is no 8 Author:jimp fenestration here. File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf This area is shown as existing wall area to remain. elevations,[here is no fenestration here. %% 13 ,,,,,^ I " IN H I Ln Page: Z-002 If the log holding up the log is removed, Checkmark: Unchecked � Author:jimp then the log's structural support has been /// NM demolished and therefore it has been File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf demolished. the lop.s removed As discussed -and clarified via email - if a log holding Fi,ed "° up a log is removed then the upper log will only be counted as demolished if that log is also removed. In this instance we are not removing the upper log and this can be seen on sheet S2.4. Page:Z-002 71111111111 Checkmark: Unchecked s'lu ■Author:jimp �n � mi �� mm �' so File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdfII■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I WM PPPII PPPII PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PM mommer RECEIVED 09/29/2017 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT Page:Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author:jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 16 7 y�A Page:Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author:jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page: Z-002 NE A Checkmark: Unchecked New Header being installed per S2.4 Author:jimp The proposed new header is shown as New Hcadg El 1' File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf demo on sheet Z002. Some of this header installed pe overlaps the existing door opening -so only part of the surface area of this new header i / counts towards demo. pal Page:Z-002 If the log holding up the log is removed, Checkmark: Unchecked Author:jimp then the log's structural support has been File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf demolished and therefore it has been demolished. l'; / as ,6 As discussed -and clarified via email - if a log holding i up a log is removed then the upper log will only be counted as demolished if that log is also removed. In this instance we are not removing the upper log and this can be seen on sheet S2.4. 3 1 4 5 Page:Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked See A 103 D at grid line 3.5. Plus S2.4 Author:jimp specifically says that this column will be Sae A-t03-0 atgnd line 3.5. File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf replaced. Plus 52.4 specifically says that 111 iii 5014 Ib VJIJ li j i In this instance we are not removing the upper column and have adjusted structural A, drawing S2.4 accordingly. Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked There is no exception for a built in Author:jimp parapet wall, and the Code treats this as File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf part of the exterior wall. � II We have revised our structural solution for this existing parapet wall at the garage and plan on keeping all garage walls unless noted otherwise. Please see an updated detail within the structural set. Page:Z-002 There is no exception for a built in Checkmark: Unchecked M.N., TM Author:jimp parapet wall, and the Code treats this as File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf part of the exterior wall. al We have revised our structural solution for this existing parapet wall at the garage and plan on keeping all garage walls unless noted otherwise. Please see an updated detail within the structural set. RECEIVED 09/29/2017 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT A Page:Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked New Header being installed per S2.4 b" �� Author:jimp The proposed new header is located above Newoead;being %i/% File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf installed.=S24 .,___-Y��,� the existing wall, and in line with the roof. The roof is being shown as demolished, III therefore the new header does not require additional demo in elevation. 'NG LOWFR I EVFL Page:Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked There is no exception for a built in 5CpQ Author:jimp parapet wall, and the Code treats this as There is no exception fora part of the exterior wall. bailtin parepet wall,and the File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf / Code treats this as part of the IG/ . ° We have revised our structural solution for this existing parapet wall at the re., " ��' garage and plan on keeping all garage walls unless noted otherwise. Please see an updated detail within the structural set. Page: Z-002 Naeneaderbeng Checkmark: Unchecked New Header being installed per S2.4 amalma rAr sza Author:jimp Header is now shown as demoed. ?'""`" ` File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page:Z-002 �% Checkmark: Unchecked becauseThis l is being demolished )the ere ntire wall is moving forward. 1 v=11 A Author:jimp l Ii File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf We have added this entire wall to the demo calcs and shown II `'PPA/ accordingly on Z002 d =ff.„ / Page: Z-002 ��■■■■ Checkmark: Unchecked Author:jimp ,— File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf zz � Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked �� Author:jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page:Z-002 If the log holding up the log is removed, ^-) Checkmark: Unchecked Hi �3 j Fr Author:jimp then the log's structural support has been File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf demolished and therefore it has been e demolished. w?° ad ' As discussed - and clarified via email - if a log holding been d end =m� d °" up a log is removed then the upper log will only be counted as demolished if that log is also removed. In this instance we are not removing the upper log and this can be seen on sheet S2.4. RECEIVED 09/29/2017 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT Page:Z-002 19 Checkmark: Unchecked Author:jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf I 18 ,p I Page:Z-002 14 Checkmark: Unchecked Author:jimp IA File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 19 Page:Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author:jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page:Z-003 Checkmark: Unchecked See note#9 about removing all exiting structural log beams and columns i Author:jimpJ Milli/ File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf We are removingan existingcolumn in this area as shown on sheet S2.4. We are also cuttingthe / ,;, � I.,° :. .,, existing glulam beam at this location to receive the new column. The existing column's plan view N n area has been accounted for in this section of roof 14 shown by the small rectangle that corresponds to this area. ° I °o Page:Z-003 Demolition for new duct and pipe „„r222 \N Checkmark: Unchecked y Author:jimp openings? Thri (�, \ .., File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf mm,i All new ducts and pipe openings will take place in roof areas that will be demoed. N Page: Z-003 Checkmark: Unchecked Demolition for new duct and pipe ,, Author:jimp „9„ openings? File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf All new ducts and pipe openings will take place in roof areas that will be demoed. 4••3 _•__• Page:Z-003 72.29 c.",t Checkmark: Unchecked .00 ..,,Vpp.•• Author:jimp : ),/. File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf , iv❖.❖.❖��❖.,��.❖�,�i❖.❖.•J RECEIVED 09/29/2017 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT Page:Z-003 _ Checkmark: Unchecked 23.-8 Author:jimp . . 23,8•_.__.____.__. File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf '15 sq ft 22/ I 23 42.29 sq ft 32.0 Page:Z-003 J_ I1 Checkmark: Unchecked See note#9 about removing all exiting Author:jimp structural log beams and columns File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf We are not removing any structural roof log beam and columns within this area. This can be shown on S2.4. v(iLzi -v - Page: Z-003 a Check your elevations. It appears that all � Checkmark: Unchecked of your eaves are being cut down. Please u{ Autho� mimp add that work to your demo total 1 = File File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf We have revised our drawings to be consistent. N_ - - We are only reducing the dimension of roofs where it is shown as demo on the demo plans. pp0 �0,2 Page:Z-003 00•.O•.�.F..5 Checkmark: Unchecked •iiiOi%p • •• •••••••••��•� • Author:jimp /•0000�..fl.;e4r File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 0.00❖.-.r-..-O. I Page:Z-004 Checkmark: Unchecked As you can see on sheet A-201,the ��.�a.° °°°`�aw Author:jimp bottom of the first story floor structure is e-� File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf above the new finished grade. Therefore, at least a portion of this wall will be - ' ` _ ' We have updated the main level wall calcs to match exposed. the sections and elevations. Per our discussion we will be taking the grade line shown in elevation adjacent to the building r i Page:Z-004 Checkmark: Unchecked Author:jimp -1 File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page:Z-004 V Checkmark: Unchecked Both tables seem to be missing a column f1Er Author:jimp for exposed wall. File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf °-99=1- We have re-imported these charts to include that column _1, f RECEIVED 09/29/2017 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT .. i Page:Z-004 Checkmark: Unchecked This does not appear to be the right -' amount of exposed wall. Please see the ,,,,..=�.n.,o, Author:jimp rynixeWe „ow,.,aa -- - Sheet A-202. I have preformed an area r File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf measurement based on the height of the mea„remen.ese,on the o,e, ien b We have updated the lower level wall calcs to match space shown in the sections. The the sections and elevations. resultant area is closer to 20sq.ft rather than 8. Page:Z-005 1 Checkmark: Unchecked 2'-8 19/32" TA Author:jimp ) File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 1 Page:Z-005 „ Checkmark: Unchecked 18' 11 7/32" Author:jimp —i 18'-11 7/32"—► File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf , 7 183.73 sq ft -Irl J Page:Z-005 Checkmark: Unchecked Add the calculation for the garage FA Add the calculation for the garage FA Author:jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf This is shown on Z001 but we have also included it on Z005 Page:Z-005 According to both the Civil and J o Checkmark: Unchecked Landscaping drawings,the stairs down to According to both the Civil and Author:jimp Landscaping drawings,the stairs File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf the path are being restored. Please add down to the path are being restored. lease add them to your proposed J dPleck total. a a These stairs will only be stones set in earth them to your proposed deck total. 4 and will therefore not be structured and therefore would not count towards FAR IMaink.r.I Deck N.e-Tctdtsf,1 it.a<r,, Page: Z-005 Checkmark: Unchecked Add the calculation for the garage FA Add the calculation for the garage FA Author:jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf This is shown on Z001 but we have also included it on Z005 1 L Page:Z-005 Checkmark: Unchecked 18' 7 5/16" 4,,�� Author:jimp L1875/16 —�I File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 8 246.20 sq ft t, i1 RECEIVED 09/29/2017 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT Page:Z-005 Checkmark: Unchecked Based on the measurements of the buried Author:jimp wall, this exposed area should be smaller. File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Please fix and adjust the amount of = counting FA. We have adjusted the amount of counting FA. Page:Z-005 2'-9 27/32" 5 Checkmark: Unchecked CN Author:jimp N File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf rn o- N Page: Z-006 For this area to be exempt from deck Checkmark: Unchecked �� oME totals,we will require this detail to show e Author:jimp File Na up in both the floor plan and structural !_ t:-------- • File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf drawings as well as the elevations. iab:�a IIIel L Wq We have updated our floor plans, elevations, and structural drawings to show this planter. Page:Z-006 Checkmark: Unchecked Please add a chart here showing total Please add a chart here showing Existing FA total Existing FA Author:jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf We have included a section from the summary sheet on this page. Page:Z-006 Checkmark: Unchecked Please add a chart here showing total Please add a chart here showing proposed FA total proposed FA Author:jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf We have included a section from the summary sheet on this page. RECEIVED 09/29/2017 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT