HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.183 Red Mountain Rd.0038.2018 (6).ARBK Markup Summary
Civil Set.183 Red Mtn Rd.2018.01.pdf(1)
~a°- Page: [1] C1-COVER BP C1.0
/ �' i Author:jackd This utility plan is inconsistent
,,_ File Name: Civil Set.183 Red Mtn Rd.2018.01.pdf with the plan on the next page.
ir--_,i,,,„ ,
; , Rectify.
'4,0:* / i fJj 2i: = Sheet rectified.
/a- 1 :...,
Soils Report.183 Red Mtn Road.2018.01.pdf(1)
Page: 2
Author:jackd The geotech recommends not
File Name: Soils Report.183 Red Mtn Road.2018.01.pdf building below groundwater
e + level. Provide proof you are
is „�y g �o�aaaieuor complying with this
leakagetl expensive and there recommends
. recommendation or provide a
�o, are geotech approval of proposed
ap S EE'Th 1,FE- designto Teveal tile mime end extent of vonanons In the subwrface condldons
�s,a
g;tl wre�P,=,.o e=M Cthena The initial letter from the Geo-tech on
7-3-17 made that statement. In the later
document, 8-10-17; after the site was
explored. Under the section preliminary
planning, it specifies the design criteria for
the portion of the basement below water
level. It includes items demonstrated in the
design drawings including micro-pile tie
downs, a mat slab and dewatering. I have
removed the earlier letter from this
submission as the later dated letter
supersedes it. We believe we have
demonstrated full compliance with
recommendations of the Geotechinical
engineer.
RECEIVED
02/13/2019
ASPEN
BUILDING DEPARTMENT