Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.216 S Monarch St.0055.2019 (6).ACBK 0055-2019-ACBK_216 S Monarch_BuildingCommentl 2 HANDS ada requirements.pdf(1) • /Subject: PlanCheck J N Page Label: 1 Dimension the clearance under Author:justinh the bar to show you have proper File Name: 2 HANDS ada requirements.pdf knee and toe clearance. Either Color: • provide a legend for the key note references or remove them,they do no good without a legend to show what they represent. 2 HANDS EXISTING MAIN LEVEL.pdf(1) I Subject: PlanCheck -0 Page Label: 1 Provide structural verification Author:justinh that the partitions being ' File Name: 2 HANDS EXISTING MAIN LEVEL.pdf demolished are not structural. aq Color: • n333.nl nn!3,7 rl 2 HANDS INT ELS.pdf(3) I Subject: PlanCheck Your dimensions are measured Page Label: 1 Author:justinh from the wrong wall on this File Name: 2 HANDS INT ELS.pdf detail, the 12"max and 36" Color: • dimensions from the back wall should be from the wall adjacent M + the water closet. EL 1 MENS INT EL 2 MENS INT I Subject: PlanCheck You are missing vertical grab Page Label: 1 bars in both restroom elevations Author:justinh as well as on the general S INT EL,MI ENS INT Ell WNMENS INT EL WOMENS INT EL File Name: 2 HANDS INT ELS.pdf accessibility detail. Color: • INT EL MENS INT EL MENS INT EL MENS INT EL NI PLAN INTERIOR ELEVATIONS I Subject: PlanCheck Please correct the dimensions Page Label: 1 ;:b°° Author:justinh that are typed backwards on this httFile Name: 2 HANDS INT ELS.pdf detail. - Color: • IL 2 MENS INT EL 3 MEN 2 HANDS PROPOSEDMAIN LEVEL- revised.pdf(13) P p P /Subject: Group Page Label: 1 Demonstrate that you have x T is;I; compliant exit separation since �': Author:justinh �'� � �- �. File Name: 2 HANDS PROPOSEDMAIN LEVEL revised.pdf your are changing the location of �I- x..,T. the second exit(see IBC r-l- . Color: • =� �.r�. 1007.1.1). You are showing exit � I'°x° distance from the space, I need -*,` pa a to see that the exits are •71 --. - . separated by at least 1/3 of the - ' 2 MANI PLAN 1ST FLOOR largest diagonal of the space (see the dimensions I've shown as an example). ISubject: PlanCheck This portion of the accessible o Page Label: 1 MN Author:justinh route is shown as being 18"wide File Name: 2 HANDS PROPOSEDMAIN LEVEL-revised.pdf and it overlaps tables. Revise to Color: ■ show a proper 36"wide route it \, e . EM END Eli free of any obstructions. il 0 II i '� CU�U 'II! krr rilii 19 corr. o [ 0 lif —F..--4 I Subject: PlanCheck Page Label: 1 A vestibule or air curtain is Author:justinh required per IECC C402.5.7. =% Ave buleorair File Name: 2 HANDS PROPOSEDMAIN LEVEL-revised.pdf II PECCCw25:7adaa Color: • 1 — -- IF ° 1k 1"mrl Ili U ✓ Subject: PlanCheck Page Label: 1 Provide a detail for the new drop Author:justinh ceiling assembly. File Name: 2 HANDS PROPOSEDMAIN LEVEL-revised.pdf Provide a detail for the new drop Color: • ceiling assembly. ®_; ; MfgW4 "Subject: PlanCheck Maximum threshold height is r-- ■ 0 111 ® i Page Label: 1 1/2" per ANSI 404.2.4. DetailM�_ I 1lIIII!!1 Author:justinh _ .®®- j�111111 File Name: 2 HANDS PROPOSEDMAIN LEVEL-revised.pdf your thresholds or note this im III - Color: • requirement on your plan. 2 MANI ' A k NI FL proposed ✓Subject: PlanCheck Please remove this exit travel © Page Label: 1 Author:justinh line and the references to File Name: 2 HANDS PROPOSEDMAIN LEVEL-revised.pdf secondary exit per IBC 1006 that Color: • you show in this part of the unit, • I it is not drawn correctly nor is it i oII. v � � relevant. I .r SQ. I I P P o\,\ 67 SQ.FT.'®" JL L .lam H — I I 1 L,IT" ✓Subject: PlanCheck Are all tables in the dining room Page Label: 1 proposed to be 30"A.F.F.? If Author:justinh not, identifytables that are to J 1 Elf ais. m File Name: 2 HANDS PROPOSEDMAIN LEVEL-revised.pdf _ 11jr ,!! demonstrate your accessible i : �1I ---0 Color: ■ -- seating will be at the correct mg L_____=__ 1ikM height. II l � 1 R111 ud . i ® , /Subject: PlanCheck mmo -,;�, ,I, With an occupant load over 50 in • li_._ ,l el. :t * • Page Label: 1 • i Author:justinh o an assembly use you are ; i I� ��_=� � File Name: 2 HANDS PROPOSEDMAIN LEVEL-revised.pdf required to either provide panic >1 r1 1dmwa mail __� b Color: • hardware on both sets of exit doors per IBC 1010.1.10 or the 2 MANI PLAN 1ST FLol= e, : doors need to be clearly signed proposed ,� 1 = -� stating"This door to remain unlocked when this space is occupied"with a lock that is readily distinguishable as locked per IBC 1010.1.9.3. It appears per the cutsheets provided that the single side door will have panic hardware and the main doors will be keyed with a deadbolt that has a paddle turn piece on the egress side(inside) with the appropriate signage. If this is correct please note that panic hardware will be provided at the side door and that the front door will be signed "To Be Unlocked During Business Hours"with appropriate lock so that there is no confusion during construction. _ ✓Subject: PlanCheck Page Label: 1 You've included a cutsheet on - 2 Author:justinh an undercounter dishwasher for .1 --" - " File Name: 2 HANDS PROPOSEDMAIN LEVEL-revised.pdf the bar but it is not shown on the Color: • plan nor is it referenced in the mechanical letter. If you are I� NA �u nc ',21- ra ,,-b,,.,.,,„ L A N 1, proposing another dishwasher at e C t the bar show it on the plan and °' have the additional 70 cfm of exhaust it will require referenced in the mechanical calculation, currently they only account for one dishwasher on the main level. ✓ Subject: PlanCheck Page Label: 1 Does the building have it's own " Author:justinh grease interceptor system that File Name: 2 HANDS PROPOSEDMAIN LEVEL-revised.pdf your drains will feed into or will Does the building have it's own grease interceptor Color: • you be installing your own system that your drains will feed into or will you be interceptors? Installing your own Interceptors? ELEVATo , __ 'Subject: PlanCheck l _�>�? q Page Label: 1 What are you actually proposing �'' , E`EyAT°R ■.: ' here? It appears to be storage ■ Author:justinh pp g 4'p "I r without any door to access the � ; r �® File Name: 2 HANDS PROPOSEDMAIN LEVEL-revised.pdf �����p�!t. �-� _� Color: • space. Please clarify or revise as needed. 5 �- -•< 2 MANI PI UNIT 201A 0 propose ✓ Subject: PlanCheck Page Label: 1 Is one of these dashed lines Author:justinh intended to show the perimeter File Name: 2 HANDS PROPOSEDMAIN LEVEL-revised.pdf of the kitchen hood? Clearly Color: • identify the extent of the hood to °1 demonstrate that all appliances 1.. Pp _- I that require a type I hood are i= actually under it. Your note .'11° lI ,'-1 "location of hood"seems to point arkln93 Perking2 Parklrgt "' \ nn.o„ (Unn401) (un11201) 09r. i °'R to the rotisserie rather than I anything that resembles a hood layout. ✓Subject: PlanCheck Page Label: 1 Show required exit Author:justinh signage/lighting. 0 File Name: 2 HANDS PROPOSEDMAIN LEVEL-revised.pdf Color: • Show required exit signage/lighting. 17_2„ rn 301 East Hopkins- Duemani Ventilation Requirements Review.pdf(1) ddooso rnema, e e,ero�m�.,n ✓ Subject: PlanCheck a,�,rea"aad,r,oa„lomar,o Page Label: 4 The mechanical letter states that Author:justinh the exhaust and makeup air File Name: 301 East Hopkins-Duemani Ventilation requirements for kitchen exhaust °ne°�PS�a�Pe%^a° a°°m9e0Pa p can be met by adjusting and e°^a°=°° eva°.7° Requirements Review.pdf Color: • re-balancing the existing system. re" But regarding general ventilation it outlines various ways that the space may comply. You need to select how you actually propose to meet the general ventilation requirements outlined here and revise your plans to show how compliance will be achieved. bar pendant 53W.pdf(1) ✓Subject: PlanCheck This cutsheet does not provide „ Page Label: 1 Author:justinh a NRTL listing nor does this File Name: bar pendant 53W.pdf wattage seem to correspond to Color: • any fixture I can find on the ss.AI ComCheck(wattage does not E-E "— match what is shown on the report for the bar pendant). Please clarify or revise as needed. COM CHECK 2.pdf(7) ✓Subject: PlanCheck Page Label: 1 Demonstrate in the plans how Author:justinh you will be providing compliant lighting controls per IECC File Name: COM CHECK 2.pdf C405.2.1 405.2.5. Currently Demonstrate in the plans how you will be providing H.1.1.0 Color: • compliant lighting controls per IECC .1- .uanaf the plans make no reference as r 405.2.5.Currently the plans make noo reference as to r how the lighting will be controlled. to how the lighting will be "'"ct °"°... 20151E0C controlled. Ow* NW ✓ Subject: PlanCheck Page Label: 1 Submit the ComCheck report as Author:justinh a single pdf file,we will not File Name: COM CHECK 2.pdf accept separate pdf files for Submit the ComCheck report as a single Color: • each individual page of the pdf file,we will not accept separate pdf report in the future. files for each individual page of the - report in the future. COMcheck Software Versior IrriA Nfil Interior Lighting Con ✓Subject: PlanCheck Page Label: 1 You are not providing any . • n Author:justinh lighting info for any of the lower File Name: COM CHECK 2.pdf level spaces in your plans. A Color: • lighting plan for all applicable wa :,ti:;°aoroo rool ra:lePo�e�w! spaces needs to be submitted in "` order for me to verify this report is accurate and complete. Subject: PlanCheck Page Label: 1 Your fixture counts do not appear to match what is shown Author:justinh - - File Name: COM CHECK 2.pdf on the plans, but it is also hard - — Color: • for me to tell because you do not =_= label any of the light fixtures shown on the plan. For example, the circle that appears to be used in the main dining room in the space to represent a recessed light fixture is also shown in the kitchen and dish wash area, but you do not show any recessed fixtures in these areas on this report. Clearly label your fixtures on the plan with the same label you use here (LED 1, LED 2, etc.). I highly suggest submitting a separate RCP or lighting plan rather than trying to show this information on your floor plan, as the plan quickly becomes too busy to clearly show the level of detail you need to show. i/ Subject: PlanCheck Page Label: 1 These square footages do not &;inter „;ing Compliance C,F Author:justinh match the areas I measure on File Name: COM CHECK 2.pdf your plans,these all appear to Color: •■ be in excess of what the actual -S•EE° _mw -.. areas are. Revise the -- __ ComCheck report so that the areas you're claiming are accurate. Subject: PlanCheck AllowedWaft The cutsheet for the recessed � ry n tex Theho cutsheet for the Page Label: 1 e55e°fixture Sh° Author:justinh fixture shows an option for either n option for either a slo nee u17W or 29W type. a 17W or 29W type. This fixture 0.66 +This fixture wattage File Name: COM CHECK 2.pdf "should match on of Color: • wattage should match on of these. these. BCOE Fixture R.I. WM _:41 I Subject: PlanCheck Page Label: 1 Provide a cutsheet for the LED 2 fixture. Author:justinh i Fle Name: COM CHECK 2.pdf Color: ■ PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL.pdf(8) on,:--1 .rra.P... ✓ Subject: PlanCheck i 'I ll I ro Page Label. 1 vki,kj Author:justinh 0 these doorsDimension ,the 32clear"is thewidth minimumof allowed by IBC 1010.1.1 „ File Name: PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL.pdf fl..o, ,,1. . 4 :i Color: ■ 4 \ ,,MAN+,PLAN LOWER FLOOR ' _- ,P EIPOSFIl Int_ b 1- ,/ Subject: PlanCheck Page Label: 1 Submit your plan set as one file, Author:justinh we will not accept separate pdf File Name: PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL.pdf files for each individual sheet in ttyna,t1. esanafib:MIInwacce""'Par Color: • the future. .nes m�nnon marvmani:nen�m ine snare. r T ,,w41-ER ropw41ER Bar 1 Subject: PlanCheck Page Label: 1 Clearly show the location of your Author:justinh hood over these cooking File Name: PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL.pdf appliances. The mechanical � Color: • letter submitted stated only light � duty cooking appliances would r11 ,21i1iie11 be present under this hood per I ,° their calculations, electric ranges erg r ::® it are medium duty cooking —4 11 Nk 'I4oil 1 ��� appliances. Either revise the letter to show you can accommodate medium duty appliances or revise your plan to match what is stated in the letter. %/ Subject: PlanCheck Page Label: 1 Where are you proposing to vent _,.•,,•':•••. Author:justinh this new dryer's exhaust? File Name: PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL.pdf Color: ■ G IrI C r7.e�lj 1 � ®® �a i I l l PREP KITCHEN L . i, l'IPI J OMEryS <III`. l„WONryNS I I ._ve'�j© -' n ✓Subject: PlanCheck --, I ,,c I Page Label: 1 Accessible route should be � :._.r_ _ .... 7 . ! �_ shown as a 36"wide aisle rather Author:justinh ]."I File Name: PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL.pdf than just a line and it also needs_ to extend to the private dining el �r_� Color: • I room. ®_�� MANI,PLAN L1WER FLOOR - -.P QSEIl. . .. --- ,/ Subject: PlanCheck Page Label: 1 Show your accessible route as Author:justinh a 36"wide aisle rather than a s ®.®®®®®® File Name: PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL.pdf single line to demonstrate that r Color: ■ you have the required 36"clear rJ �_ ,rillimity." width 32"clear width is allowed ,11 1 where the route passes through doors). !mil liji YLi , Mn a '''. -[ nnnI , 1 V Subject: PlanCheck LER ,.o.. ..� � Page Label: 1 Show your proposed seating O layout in the private dining area = i# .: Author:justinh °° � and demonstrate how you will _____ _ _-0 File Name: PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL.pdf ii.• j Color: ■ provide the required accessible 1 seating within the space. l PRIVATE DINING -0 ®L. smasommemissioasniiim Subject: PlanCheck Page Label: 1 The clearances shown at the � � r_ Author:justinh lavatories are an incorrect size, � L ' ; File Name: PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL.pdf and no clearance is shown for o., Color: • the water closets. Revise the drawing to show a proper j ' ii, 30"x48"forward approach lil! clearance at the lavatory and the AN� 1 ro required 56"x60"clearance at ANNPLAN Lo-EIR FLOOR E the water closet per ANSI 603, 604 and 606.