HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.975 Chatfield Rd.0104.2018.ARBK 0104.2018
PlanSet.975 Chatfield Rd.2018.06.Landscape_Change Order 2.pdf(4)
Page: [4] C1D-Bernsten-Landscape Sheetset-L.1.02
\I [II Checkmark: Unchecked Based on the civil drawings, it is not clear
t�� I� Author:jimp that the pool deck and the dining deck are
File Name: PlanSet.975 Chatfield both no more than 6"above grade in this
area. Please provide some sort of detail
, 1 Rd.2018.06.Landscape_Change Order 2.pdf toshow that this condition will be metU__] ji
' �� � see detail 2 on sheet L.5.03 for grade
1"ate around dining deck
Page: [4] C1D-Bernsten-Landscape Sheetset-L.1.02
Checkmark: Unchecked Please provide details sowing that both of
these rebuilt structures will be compliant FEE Author:jimp
t` File Name: PlanSet.975 ChatfieldEFIPE, with the setback requirements in
Rd.2018.06.Landscape_Change Order 2.pdf 26.575.020.E.5,Allowed Projections into
Setbacks.
-` see sheet L.4.03 for revised grading
and walls in setback
s,osF • Page: [4] C1D-Bernsten-Landscape Sheetset-L.1.02
If this is built right up along the concrete
Checkmark: Unchecked
�� Author:jimp retaining walls, then there is exposed wall
��iv IIII
File Name: PlanSet.975 Chatfield and a portion of this will count towards
' BOA FA. Please find a location where this is
+.o #; •j � _ Rd.2018.06.Landscape_Change Order 2.pdf
fully sub grade on all sides for it not to
y�MS...a�,nE count as FA.
',74 see sheet L.1.03 for revised layout
plan in this area
Page: [9] C1D-Bernsten-Landscape Sheetset-L.1.07
Checkmark: Unchecked I believe that this is supposed to be your
Author:jimp deck square footage verification sheet.
-..._____ File Name: PlanSet.975 Chatfield Please split this into two drawings
Rd.2018.06.Landscape_Change Order 2.pdf existing (Using what is actually on site
now)and proposed. Please show
amounts in a chart format with a total.
sheet L.1.07 has been revised to
show existing and L.1.08 has been
created to show proposed.
RECEIVED
12/05/2018
ASPEN
BUILDING DEPARTMENT