HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.209 E Bleeker St.0320.2017 (10).ARBK 0320-2017-ARBK_BuildingComments_2
ArchPlanSet.209EBleeker.2018.04.pdf(14)
❑ I ---° Page: A2.2 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL•50FLOOR PUN--�'' " Protect membrane enetr tion of
fin.-� E1; • File Name:ArchPlanSet.209EBleeker.2018.04.pdf p
1b, flue in fire rated ceiling 15 IRC
L �J, i .I 1 � i Subject: PlanCheck R302.4.
- 1 Author: nickt
I g
Color: ■
- � ,II's! flue rerouted. Does not
—� pass through fire rated
�— ./i7 ceiling.
Witia
??�= Page: A2.2 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL•50FLOOR PUN Make it clear that Is wall is the
File Name:ArchPlanSet.209EBleeker.2018.04.pdf
Subject: PlanCheck 1 hour fire rate welling
---1_ Author: nickt separation .
-- UP261' Color: ■
tib _:
i • r Sheet A2.2
revised per
ti ' / . � i• comment
et
inj
l41 I' n-I Page: A2.2 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL•50FLOOR PUN Fireplace exhaus ust be 10'
awmm� = File Name:ArchPlanSet.209EBleeker.2018.04.pdf
p
•MI FIREFLace E347 Subject: PlanCheck from property I per 2015 IMC
1WW hi. Author: nickt 501.3.1 ite .
Color: ■
— Fire place exhaust
Fireplace exhaust rerouted to comply with
must be10'from 2015 IMC 501.3.1
property line per 2015
IMC 501.3.1 item 2.
Page: A2.2 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL•50FLOOR PUN
aI! Detail intersecti s of the
i 0 �w7 :rill I File Name:ArchPlanSet.209EBleeker.2018.04.pdf dwelling sepa ion wall with
I ` Subject: PlanCheck
other walls a drywall on the
Author: nickt
Yw
liNIMMOITEMINTI111
��Jq separa . wall must be
Color: ■
°6c co . uous through the
IIDetail added. ref. ersection.
II sheet 5iA6.2
,
PELL
F •s,`:.=-- _=- ., Page: A2.2 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL•50FLOOR PUN
_. •:_ ® t: The HPC variance does of
File Name:ArchPlanSet.209EBleeker.2018.04.pdf
- '4 , " resolve the buildingco conflict
= :I Subject: PlanCheck
..: '--• �` Author: nickt of the roof eave proxi ity to the
-?••-•a•ai: ■ property line. Dime ion the
Color:
{w - proposed distanc f the eave
�_ I _ from property li . Contact me to
.r Illli Irun discuss to se we can work out
t� -61-ii ir► =IL "` See Letter, attached an alternate ethod to solve this
I I ,- `4 I i I issue. 20 IRC table R302.1(2)
allows closer than 2'.
RECEIVED
10/11/2018
ASPEN
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Page: A4.2 PROPOSED•50BUILDING SECTIONS
Prov de an enlarged File Name:ArchPlanSet.209EBleeker.2018.04.pdf Provide an enlarg=: detail at this
detail at this locationlocation for fire -paration
for fire separation Subject: PlanCheck
continuity.The top continuity.T - op of concrete
UNIT AA of concrete wan Author: nickt
varies per the wall varie .er the foundation
foundation plan: Color: •
account for the plan;a- ount for the varied
varied heights. Detail added to sheet A6.2, e ..
__ems :, �,,, ,v„_ _. detail 8
drIii:iIF,••....•..••....•..••.•...•...•.•
vial
1ai
—•~••"--• Page: A5.1 WALLASSEMBLIES
c'•.°r°""lone rs,ce per Inch,s. File Name:ArchPlanSet.209EBIeeker.2018.04.pdf 3.5"of polyiso - ' 5.6 p= inch
.per u«adoeneli.vsIM
en Rvelnect 19.G rte.se plans oAn (per color. •energy.o w •-is an
emit REachech to show Met [N 18 Subject: PlanCheck
manta yseanothersovike.
•ve heard ire spay m poduct Ndy R value • 19.6. Revise pl.
Mat acts as a releases... ,5 Author: nickt
°'°rpwamInh'°Ma and RE` heck to show that
plies;perhaps Met.. I:OG Color: •
could he awbred ad wee. ,�:,,_ Wall Assembly revised. polyiso amount er use another solution.
1•••1" avw,ISEv Wes HI, wis
radd removed per our conversation. I've hea d of a spray on product
t ,K•� Historic walls to remain spray foam
eea,.4 I. - that act- as a release agent for
* • insulation- no need to revise this
�Yt spray fo,m in historic
• "aw E•-�"'""'" on RES check.
;d;q ;•;1' assemble s; perhaps that op
s
could be ex. M . . e I.
mm)from each side of the butt joints of the second h Page: A5.2 FLOOR/CEI LI N G•50ASSEMBLI ES The compound layer shall hefinishedfinishedwith joint ranP Includ- - atbly for floors
File Name:Arch Pl anSet.209EBIeeker.2018.04.pdf
Subject: PlanCheck ov- uncondi ion-.-,- e. Be
Author: nickt su • to coordinate it with e
Include an assent*fcr toots over candtiated space.ttn Color: ■ RES •-ck.
Bence to aocrdtme Ow*the REScttedc. Assembly added, 10/
A5.2
-rc ra-vaars;— raavuin_ Page: A5.2 FLOOR/CEI LING•50ASSEMBLI ES
_ 7File Name:ArchPlanSet.209EBleeker.2018.04.pdf ESR-1153 assemb requires
-e—} Subject: PlanCheck resilient chan en insulation
Author: nickt is install . the joist cavity.
Color: • Rev. details.
• Assemblies revised
c call out resilient
; � "tu �_.-�,,,� I channel
raw
Page: A5.3 ROOFASSEMBLIES
(\ /\ File Name:ArchPlanSet.209EBIeeker.2018.04.pdf Resilient channel quired at R 2
Subject: PlanCheck assembly pe R 1153 b.
irrraz�z Author: nickt
Color: • A embly revised
call out resilient
Resilient channel hannel
required at R-2
assembly per
ESR-1153 b.
RECEIVED
10/11/2018
ASPEN
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Page: A6.2 DETAILS
File Name:ArchPlanSet.209EBleeker.2018.04.pdf ovide fireca e fire rated
Subject: PlanCheck embrane •yp board
Author: nickt terminat: at concrete.
I I — Provide firecaulk Color: •
where fire rated Detail revis d to call out Fire
_where
(gyp board) Caulking
terminates at concrete.
I-HOUR ARE
PER E5R-II!
5IttL VLHIt 5h'K'TtI)W/MUNur.( Page: A6.2 DETAILS
GEMBATITIGUSFIREPROFFING,SEE File Name:Arch PlanSet.209EBIeeker.2018.04.pdf Sealant should be fire ca .
Subject: PlanCheck
FLEXIBLE SEALANT,TYP. Author: nickt Detail revised I out Fire
Color: ■ Caulking
Sealant should be fire
caulk.
TWO LAYERSY"TYP.'X'GYP.BOAT
Page: A6.2 DETAILS
File Name:ArchPlanSet.209EBleeker.2018.04.pdf Provide a test nd listed
BpIMI/R�ROFAG, %.', Subject: PlanCheck assembly he monokote.
CB
ROHE SFNNR, . Author: nickt Typic this would be a UL
Iis' g the specific application
Color: • Per our conversation, note
de a tested and quirements for a given size of
sked•ssercbyfor the Iro uret5l$ Wen'WNW,9. has been revised to address
monokote.Typir.ry MHO R)IR1960E OF STEEL RAM steel.
t aUL required thickness and will
Itstrig the application need to be inspected in the
re9utemenR tor a field.
9 n SiS of Steel. HORRERAI®flACR meow RSt
®HF$,ND/L,9
Page: A6.2 DETAILS Glass compl must I with
, File Name:ArchPlanSet.209EBleeker.2018.04.pdf
guardsp
Subject: Glass guards one of the following: Ha - a top
Author: nickt cap supported by at le-.t 3
Color: • panes of glass: have . top cap
-- supported independ: t of the
,.._.. _ glass: or in the cast of no top
Detail revised per our conversation cap. be at least tw. plies of
to use min. 2 layers of laminated & equal thickness . ass laminated
tempered glass. together. Provid details
demonstrating ompliance with
one of the al). a as well as
method of a :chment and
support. Mu.t support a point
load of 201 .s. Please note that
many gla-_ support
manufar rers require a top cap:
if you - ceed their design you
will n:-d a stamped engineered
desi, . (Ordinance 40. 2016)
LandscapePlanSet.209EBIeeker.2018.04.pdf(4)
Page: L.5.02 HARDSCAPE DETAILS
`'"•"' File Name: LandscapePlanSet.209EBIeeker.2018.04.pdf At the seating retainin all, if
... '' the measurement fro the top of
Subject: PlanCheck
— Author: nickt retained grade to th bottom of
Color: • the footing is gre r than 4'.
_ See attached letter from provide a stam d structural
Structural Engineer regarding design. The s cturals do not���D
landscape retaining walls include this esign currently.
,��� 2015 1 RC 105.2)
10/11/2018
ASPEN
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
�,,, ,.-REAFKK no su ace Page: L.5.04 HARDSCAPE DETAILS Bench surfac eeds 18" in
e'xceeds,8•In VAeth, File Name: LandscapePlanSet.209EBIeeker.2018.04.pdf equling Magma towidth, re ing the guard to be
be 36'nigh eeesuea Subject: PlanCheck
from the henonsurtace 36" measured from the
'°' '«I Author: nickt
a�a•7aZZ:�- Color: • Dim added to show bench b ch surface per City policy.
N •N/.TGV 66A
r -A0,0'6eF surface sits below top of spa.
100.� Guard rail is 36" above top of
spa. This puts guard 48"+
_I=_I�� above bench surface.
Page: L.5.04 HARDSCAPE DETAILS
"VI
"' File Name: LandscapePlanSet.209EBIeeker.2018.04.pdf
_�:_•� Subject: PlanCheck At the retaining wall. if the
:.;y measurement from the top o
-
-- retained grade to the bo of
; ;a Author: nickt
j� the footing is greater an 4'.
`s. _.,,.. ' \ Color: • See attached letter from provide a stam structural
• ' MIMI Structural Engineer regarding design.T ructurals do not
landscape retaining walls inclu is design currently.
V U 20 IRC R105.2)
Page: L.5.05 HARDSCAPE DETAILS
n�emm�hebht« File Name: LandscapePlanSet.209EBleeker.2018.04.pdf Dimension height guard (36"
r�nxcr ht= Ntle'-e Ze
min)2015 IRC 12.1.2.
MT= Subject: PlanCheck
--1 Author: nickt
it-r Color: ■
��`��``, refer to note on detail; top of
v.sx� .v,m ..., planter is 36" above steps.
A
LightingPlanSet.209EBIeeker.2018.04.pdf(2)
Page: EL101 LOWER LEVEL LIGHTING DIAGRAM q �,� Any recessed fixtures th
�' I r... 4 File Name: LightingPlanSet.209EBleeker.2018.04.pdf
= _=- -:-` penetrate the 1 hour rated
—�—� .� - �-���_= --- -� Subject: PlanCheck
- Author: nickt Reference Reflected Ceiling Plans ceiling must be ected per
-- J aim- - 2015 IRC .4. This would
- ,rt - , - Color: ■ (A10.1-10.3)for all lights
•1 ,I\ ■.ice require r d 'hats'or a drywall
mi. ii NI
:_ penetrating the 1 hour ceiling. box aro d each instance. Note
Spec.for proposed protecting require ent on plans.
1,['
submitted previously.
- 1 f'MI= , *Majority of lights sit in dropped
j ceiling below rated assembly.
-__=- _ _-__- Page: EL102 MAIN LEVEL LIGHTING PLAN
�� == ••�--
. , File Name: LightingPlanSet.209EBIeeker.2018.04.pdf Any recessed fixt res that
---4 i-- - Subject: PlanCheck penetrate the 1 our fire rated
I , ceiling must b rotected per
I I I Author: nickt
2015 IRC R3 .4. This would
;' .:,_A'_ ••ji'•,�,�, Color: ■ Reference Reflected Ceiling Plans
itI�,; I_. lf�: require rat hats'or a drywall
'' �� penetrating
the for all lights box aro d each instance. Note
I`i;_r penetrating 1 hour ceiling.
11.16 "h -' Spec.for proposed protection requir ent on plans.
Iti `tP€l,:11 _____ submitted previously.
.` - *Majority of lights sit in dropped
ceiling below rated assembly.
RECEIVED
10/11/2018
ASPEN
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MechPlanSet.209EBleeker.2018.04.pdf(3)
Page: M.0.002 System Description and Control Sequence
,••••••••••••...— Print these ERV calcul ions on
File Name: MechPlanSet.209EBleeker.2018.04.pdf
= Subject: Group the mechanical pla
a M� _"MM
�„�,,;',�n:nd. Author: nickt
Mem Mt - .1 ,,�ado..1,,..�.: ,;,1 . Color: ■
Calculations included on
Mechanical drawings.
Fme Mere FRY
:.aMMns m Ma
na lunk.pens.
\ Page: M.1.001 Lower Level Mechanical Plan
1 .!' - File Name: MechPlanSet.209EBleeker.2018.04.pdf Any ductwork penetrating the
.- = dwelling separation must co .ly
=1► � ��+�� Subject: PlanCheck
` 'I with 2015 IRC R302.4.2 for
' . - rim - Author: nickt
Color: • membrane penetrations an.
-Fair ' of •. . _¢ R302.4.1 for through
e
— \, •� - 4- j.- penetrations. The excepti. s for
._ y3=tee " _ sealing the annular spac: applyonly to pipe and conduit not
' ductwork. This leaves t, e option
---- of using a floor/ceiling :ssembly
In these locations (lower level)we that has had ductwor
have provided a dropped ceiling penetrations tested . part of the
below the fire rated assembly. The UL 263 or ASTM El 9 test. The
Mechanical duct work does not architect has selec -d an
pass through the rated assembly. assembly that has of been
Ref. building sections and RCPs. tested with ductw., k
penetrations. Eith•r choose
another assembl or provide
protections in ac ordance with
2015 IMC 607 o 2015 IBC 717.
Revise mechan al plans as
necessary to c -arly describe
methods and I•cations to
achieve corn. lance.
4 4 vE -- y__ ,,.-4 q Page: M.1.002 Main Level Mechanical Plan
I I ' ' File Name: MechPlanSet.209EBIeeker.2018.04.pdf The entir- ceiling on t main
- level is fire rated. e all
II Subject: PlanCheck
3 !I .••• •;4 ! penetrations an ow they will
- .`v ___ Author: nickt
I '"° Color: • be protected. ee note on
. t_ See revised rated ceiling previous s et.
• ' - r' locations for Main level
:
ue �
F e _ I I
F
PlumbingPlanSet.209EBleeker.2018.04.pdf(2)
Page: P.1.002 Main Level Waste and Vent Plan
i I � I I' File Name: PlumbingPlanSet.209EBleeker.2018.04.pdf Abov• trade plum '. ust
ti __________ = ' Subject: PlanCheck drain - - - i , not to
-_
lEhmnniii I Author: nickt the s p/lift -tion ' IPC
__
I"!' ili��'m-- !� ■ Color: •
712. `
iI ■ 1 — Per conversation with Nick Thompson
I on 9-19-2018, further investigation is
I required by the Building Department
Y ��! prior to granting exception for drain to
sump. REG investigated routing thru
building and around building envelope ��������
with no viable route available.
10/11/2018
ASPEN
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Page: P.1.003 Upper Level Waste and Vent Plan
`j' `j' File Name: PlumbingPlanSet.209EBIeeker.2018.04.pdf Prote outdoor er fixture
---_______ Subject: PlanCheck from f eezing.2015 PC 305.4.
__— �_ :Fg -_=__-__=_=_-, Author: nickt
— _ . � ;r Color: • Architect to coordinate fixture
� � I k freeze protection with Design/Build
� F
r, Contractor
_ °i� C�I � i �;.I
r;
RESCheck.209EBleeker.2018.04.pdf(3)
1` `compliance Certificate Page: 1
File Name: RESCheck.209EBleeker.2018.04.pdf You have chose ether'for the
' °° Subject: PlanCheck ceiling type. P•-se provide
'•w.:"""°'" Author: nickt supportine -.Iculations to
'""`. _. Color: • demon ate how you landed at
" Reference U-factor calculation a U-f or of 0.016. Be sure to
provided for roof assembly. inc .de the thermal bridging
:= wa=_ -=•- e'-cts of framing members.
ust match your roof
assemblies in the plans.
Page: 1
File Name: RESCheck.209EBIeeker.2018.04.pdf Provide owner/agent ntact info
ite: Owner/Agent: Subject: PlanCheck
St. Andy Fromm Author: nickt
Color: ■
Reference updated
Provide owner/agent REScheck for contact
contact info information.
o Better Than Code Maximum UA 1186
Page: 1
File Name: RESCheck.209EBleeker.2018.04.pdf
The walls do not ha 2
Subject: PlanCheck continuous insu on. Revise
-- Author: nickt REScheck atch the plans.
Color: ■
___-;= REScheck updated to reflect changes
- :.. in wall assemblies.
R-REMP.209EBIeeker.2018.04.pdf(3)
Page: 1 Sign the REMP rksheet
File Name: R-REMP.209EBIeeker.2018.04.pdf
Subject: PlanCheck
C. RREPAREDBY: Author: nickt
Prot Name: Color: •
Rhone&EMeI:
RENEWED:
RECEIVED
10/11/2018
ASPEN
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
ed.. Page: 2
1,M, °nsnat°n File Name: R-REMP.209EBIeeker.2018.04.pdf Provide specs/cut sheets for the
PA.Irovl . GGsaeaecay Inve.lssaeaed1y VIbr kW 9l1
1el "°br "W1 "W1 aa11 °. Subject: PlanCheck inverters an• •- to verify
m Author: nickt their rated o tput capa■ ty.
-=:� Color: ■
,a:kia l � These specs were provided in the
I —
.�I1 :7 original submission. We reviewed at
�_•—tir �� meeting
25= ;ems
Dep�atrom o"'re«'From Adjusmnt DCero Page: 2 The collecto -spect -1d tilt do
.'.. " Fac'r ' File Name: R-REMP.209EBIeeker.2018.04.pdf
ao...Grow1 f0phl.7=2
not appear • correspo d to the
COlperorGroup2■� .iM_L-:x11
ColedorGroup 3 r�UIMIAW ; Subject: PlanCheck
Cole ;Group4 Author: nickt roof plan. T -re is a •,•up that
CDlktrorGroup 6-, d Color: •
is nearly facin� S.- at 6:12
OIl•01Group7_ he col lector aspect MI tdai roof pitch.Other groups face
adiectrGroup6 _nd tilt do root appear:=::17
ad"'Group 9_oco respond to the M '�
Cdledor Group 10 roofplad.There is a ■=' East and West at 12:12 pitch.
cdledor Group ll_ IMIEJil
caleaorG roup 12_±roue that nearly .laggaj
collector Group 13 as np South at 8:12 Emgmai
CdlectorGroup 16_cot pith.Other . tguij
Collector Group 16_•roups face East anclEguij
CdledorGroup 16 .1 at 12:12 pitch. Ela..'ii1
caleaorGroup 1 y IM M '
<wenn,Gronn lR -
StructPlanSet.209EBIeeker.2018.04.pdf(2)
Page: [3] 17035.S2.2 upper-UPPER 24x36 All structure supporting a fire
�.lm r; =1 �� File Name:StructPlanSet.209EBleeker.2018.04.pdf rated ceiling above th air
�INI01 111# Subject: PlanCheck
Ill4' it Author: nickt level must also be 1 ur fire
�.+��' rated. This then c ies down to
li -■_��, . _ Color: • As reviewed at our meeting, Main level all structure sup rting those
� � INN members all wayto ground.
410341 1 structure carries down to top of
� _ 4..,+ was b—j concrete. Reference revised plans, Detail the itecturals to
sections, & RCPs for 1 hour fire rated achieve s.2015 IRC
R302.3. .
locations
Page: [5] 17035.S3.x det-17035 S3.1
File Name:StructPlanSet.209EBIeeker.2018.04.pdf Provide a special' pection
Subject: PlanCheck agreement for igned by the
RoMdee
n:re:d'en, special ins or, owner,
rod•ume■■de Author: nickt
ell m"d' Color: III
and fabricator.
o-ecdr,era •_�
v Y " "e«.=.. Special Inspections agreement
"ZAe m=an°dam1
attached.
_
;e.n: u§t _.._....
RECEIVED
10/11/2018
ASPEN
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
o ALB RIGHT
IGHT
October 2, 2018
Aspen Building Department
201 North Mill Street
Garden Level
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: 209 E. Bleeker Street site retaining walls
Aspen, CO
To whom it may concern,
This letter is to inform you that Albright&Associates has been retained to design all site retaining
walls for the above referenced project. The current site landscape plans indicate multiple site walls
which are not attached to the house. The landscape architect is indicating both concrete and
exposed steel retaining walls. The walls have relatively low grade to grade retention and would not
necessarily require frost protection. The exact wall heights will be determined during excavation
based on site conditions such as existing fences and protected tree roots. An agent of the owner
will provide a copy of our design and recommendations to the building department for your
review prior to construction.
Sincerely,
N.DO ficF
ti
Off' -•... AL /9• v
329 2 --4:
kVA
2018.1 . _ 06'00'
Stamp is not talid for budding department use unless it
contains a valid third party ter fled electronicsignature.
Jack L Albright, PE
Principal
17035 L1
RECEIVED
10/11/2018
Albright&Associates,INC • 970.927.4363 office - 970.927.3039 fax • 402 Park Ave.,Unit A • Basalt, CO 81621 • www.albright-assox gpgn
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
1111112111
arch tects
September 11, 2018
Stephen Kanipe
Chief Building Official
City of Aspen Community Development
Building Department
RE: 209 East Bleeker Duplex
Aspen CO 81611
Permit No. 0320-2017-ARBK
Subject: Historical Cabin Site Location Hardship
Attachments: none
As always, thank you for your Department's attention to detail and the Comments provided. Per my
discussion with Nick Thompson, it seems our HPC recorded approvals, which include the relocated
historic cabin, do not specifically address the cabin's roof eave overhang when it comes to the setback.
According to HPC, the variation is expressed in terms of setback requirements in the land use code. A 5'
setback is required. We placed the building 2' from the west lot line so a setback variance of 3' was
grated. The land use code allows an eave to be 18" past that line. From a zoning perspective, there was
no need to grant a variance relative to the eave.
Therefore, it would seem we have a bit of a disconnect between our HPC approval and how the Building
Department views the approval, ultimately resulting in a hardship for the project. Our cabin wall and
roof eave already have been designed with a one-hour fire rated assemble, as well as the structure
having a full fire suppression system. Additionally, the relocated cabin is sitting further away from the
property line than it is currently, improving the condition. Furthermore, HPC prefers to keep the
historical assets in their original location on site or at least as close as possible and this played a factor in
where the cabin is locAed.
Thank you for y ur attention and consideration. m
-Regards,.
Seth Hmielowski 9
G�
Principal o i ROta
Z-Group Architects, PC
RECEIVED
Z-Group Architects. P.C. • 411 East Main Street.Aspen, CO.81611 • Telephone:970-925-1832 • Fax: 970-9 -63/1y 1/2018
ASPEN1
BUILDING DEPARTMENT