Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
File Documents.614 North St.0248.2017 (82).ARBK
0248.2017.ARBK_Zoning_1 17.042C 614 W North Remodel - Permit 2017-10-02.pdf(1) Page: 3 Why are these walls shaded different than Checkmark: Unchecked the other walls? Author:jimp i II-� File Name: 17.042C 614 W North Remodel- Permit FP Response:The shaded walls are j 2017-10-02.pdfexisting to remain. All other foundation walls are being underpinned. REF: S2.002 Ni and Z 101 X. Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf(42) Page: 1 Please rewrite this.. The allowable FA is not Checkmark: Unchecked based on existing conditions but rather what Author:jimp the code allows for. The allowable FA= File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf 2,698.2 1- 1— FP Response:The allowable floor area is based on existing conditions.The existing, - 1 �' "" ..7 nonconforming floor area is 2,793.05 SF. REF:Z-001. Page: 1 15%of 2698.2 =404.73 . Checkmark: Unchecked • Author:jimp Ei ,o-,R File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf A FP Response:The deck area exemption on Z-001 has been updated to show 15%of 2698.2 SF, ,v. Z ._. which is the allowable floor area per R-6 zoning. REF:Z-001. Page: 2 In the future, please include the RDS Checkmark: Unchecked Approval signed by a planner as well as © Author:jimp the stamped approved RDS drawings File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf - FP Response: RDS Approval signed by 1 a planner, and stamped, approved RDS drawings will be provided in the re- submittal. REF:Z-002. i I lip Page:4 / . , \\--4 / ' Checkmark: Unchecked 7 7 N� ' f iE / / Author:jimp 12" -; �a File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf FP Response:The window well '-e E' is existing to remain. Dimension �I I has been revised to the original / �T 7'-4 7/8" depth. REF: Z-003X, Z-003, Z-101X&Z-101 ©*T-'a; l 5: Page:4 For this window well to be in the setback, Checkmark: Unchecked it needs to be the minimum necessary for o:==" Author:jimp building code compliance. this would be / °E File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf no larger than 3'x 6'since it serves two o®_ bedrooms-please revise. o FP Response:The window well is existing i to remain. REF:Z 003X, Z 003, Z 101 X& Z-101 Page: 6 Checkmark: Unchecked The mechanical engineer talked about an The mechanical engineer talked exterior chiller unit. If so, please show it about an exterior chiller unit. If Author:jimp so,please show it on this on this drawing. if it is within the drawing if it is within the File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf setbacks,ions in to meet all of setbacks, it needs to meet;�,ll-o #h the restrictions in i 26.575.020.E.5,Allowed FP Response: Chiller units have been added to the restrictions in 26.575.020i Et55,,AJIe _ .. . Projections into setbacks. Proposed Site Plan, Z-003&Z-202 Projections into Setbacks. -- 2/27/2018 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT Page: 7 Checkmark: Unchecked There is no reason to include wall Author:jimp demolition drawings or calculations for the iilDli1oe" File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf sub-grade space, because demolition is only above grade walls and roof.�'1rn"li FP Response:The wall demolition diagrams only include calculations of exterior walls above grade. Demolition diagrams have been removed from the lower level. REF: Z-006,Z-007 and Z-008. p $ Page: 8 There is a whole section of wall being cut Checkmark: Unchecked out here for the new chimney-revise IF --•. Author:jimp File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf FP Response:All demolition calculations w .. ., .. and graphics for diagram 13 have been . _ updated to include correct demolition 4 4 area. REF:Z-007 and Z-008. ;;;, Page: 8 There is a new door being cut in here- J Checkmark: Unchecked revise %1 Author:jimp File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf FP Response:All demolition calculations There is a new door and graphics for diagram 9 have been being cut in here- updated to include correct demolition DEN revise -ATION, SCALE 1/8" = 1-0" area. REF:Z-007 and Z-008. PjA ' LJ Page: 8 This window is changing shape-revise %� za Checkmark: Unchecked O `i CE N Author jimp-� ��-�? �� '� •l� p FP Response:All demolition calculations MI LU2 ' File Name: ZoningPermit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf . „ „ p and graphics for diagram 13 have been updated to include correct demolition ULATIONegEne w-Pe- — reViSG area. REF:Z-007 and Z-008. ro," °" Page: 8 The bank of windows is changing shape %^ r Checkmark: Unchecked -revise .. En a �, � t ,�� � Author:jimp '�' ' File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf FP Response:All demolition calculations rkE 59\_The bank ofwindows and graphics for diagram 2 have been kE a �ae'na.h..- updated to include correct demolition cz/ G; „v a ✓I FOR area. REF:Z-007 and Z-008. i Page: 8 A new opening is being cut in here. Checkmark: Unchecked Author:jimp FP Response:All demolition calculations Anewopen;nss File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf and graphics for diagram 18 have been t being cut In here. ,T updated to include correct demolition y area. REF:Z-007 and Z-008. I ;;,;,;;;y.;; ig;;;:.�;�;�;,;;,� Page: 10 Show the top of the chimney as being 'i'�n i'�--"'""' Checkmark: Unchecked _a._::,_o:_:,.; ■_,s., ;, r removed revise ___ VAS Author:jimp File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf FP Response:The top of the chimney Showthe top ofthe has been revised to show area being chimney-revis being-___ demolished. REF:Z-009. l removed-revise .4__ (1) (a) RECEIVED 2/27/2018 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT r-- 1 L—e Page: 10 As shown on the roof plans, much of the — �. Checkmark: Unchecked eaves are being shortened-revise e _ ' Author:jimp e F�, File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf FP Response:All roof sheathing, itstructure, heights, and overhangs are existing to remain. Verify in field. REF: General Roof Notes on Z-009. 7 44 4 4 q � Page: 11 o Checkmark: Unchecked 16 Author:jimp File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf FP Response: Graphic label has been updated from 19 to 16. REF: Z-010X. l 13. 5 q 45.00 sq ft Page: 11 E. Checkmark: Unchecked 15? 19 Author:jimp FP Response: Graphic label has File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf 15� been updated from 18 to 15. REF: Z-010X. 0 4' a' Page: 11 ° Checkmark: Unchecked 14? Author:jimp File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf FP Response:Graphic label has "' been updated from 17 to 14. REF: SUBGRADE CALCULATIONS Z-010X. ''-'' 2,779.67 Page: 13 Less than 15%of allowable and therefore � Checkmark: Unchecked a exempt. Author:jimp File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf FP Response: Existing Floor Area Less than 15'of Calculations have been revised to exempt allowable and therefore exempt all deck SF under 15%of allowable SF. REF:Z-011X. Page: 14 _. _l� _ Checkmark: Unchecked As per 26.575.020.D.8, Subgrade Areas, Author:jimp the diagrams above are supposed to 11 N —11 File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf show exposed wall above natural or ��go FP Response: Subgrade wall diagrams 1-8 have been revised finished grade. Looking at the exposed to show any exposed wall area above grade, excluding floor wall diagrams in the existing FA drawings, �_=- structure, per 26.575.020.D.8. Floor Area calculations have as well as the existing elevations,there been revised to reflect exposure. REF:Z-010-X and Z-013. should be exposed wall along the tops of many of these subgrade walls. Page: 14 o-�-__p Checkmark: Unchecked This does not match the structural Author:jimp drawings. Please make the two drawings - / File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf match. z, ,m.. FP Response: Structural drawings have = b ' been updated to match proposed walls in the lower level. REF:Z-013 and S2.001. RECEIVE( 2/27/2018 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT FIELD. Page: 20 1-1 1/2" Checkmark: Unchecked — Author:jimp FP Response:All roof sheathing, Firr �i'i File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf rafters, and overhangs are existing to M. remain. Heights are to remain � unchanged. All dimensions to be verified in field. REF: General Roof Notes on Z-104X. Page: 20 1'-1 1/2" ///// 4///////////, Checkmark: Unchecked %%%% "%%%%ZZ, Author:jimp FP Response:All roof sheathing, File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf rafters, and overhangs are existing to remain. Heights are to remain unchanged. All dimensions to be verified in field. REF: General Roof Notes on Z-104X. // /, Page: 20 1'-1 1/2" // Checkmark: Unchecked , NOMIIPME= Author:jimp FP Response:All roof sheathing, l`Ll , File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf rafters, and overhangs are existing to NEIN remain. Heights are to remain '11111 unchanged. All dimensions to be verified in field. REF: General Roof Notes on Z-104X. —_—__ Page: 20 1'-1 1/2" ----_ Checkmark: Unchecked cv Author:jimp FP Response:All roof sheathing, File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf rafters, and overhangs are existing to remain. Heights are to remain unchanged.All dimensions to be verified in field. REF:General Roof Notes on Z-104X. Page: 22 Checkmark: Unchecked 22' 5 1/4" Author:jimp File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf Page: 22 _±3. Checkmark: Unchecked As per 26.575.020.D.8, Sub-grade Areas, •mi I Author:jimp Sub-grade walls are to be measured File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf outward. Therefore,when projecting the FP Response: Subgrade wall diagrams 1-8 have been revised inside of the sub-grade walls out, if any to show any exposed wall area above grade, excluding floor portion of that wall would be exposed, structure, per 26.575.020.D.8. Floor Area calculations have then that exposure should be shown on been revised to reflect exposure. REF:Z-013. the sub-grade wall diagrams. Page: 23 Checkmark: Unchecked 25' 0" Author:jimp p FP Response: Existing ridge heights to remain File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf unchanged except for the extension above the -f - master bedroom. Roof plans, heights over topography, and all elevations have been T updated to show the 25'-0" height limit. REF: Z-005, Z-104,Z-201,Z-202 and Z-203. RECEIVED 2/27/2018 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT I I Page: 25 This post placement does not match your Checkmark: Unchecked structurals. please verify that the post will be Author:jimp outside of the setback. ce File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf _ FP Response: Structural drawings have been , E;,i„w updated to show correct post placement. REF: —® WNW i S2.002 and Z-102. j Page: 26 Checkmark: Unchecked The exception for Overhangs projecting Author:jimp into the setback is 1'-6". This overhang is 1'-11". I understand that part of this is Y File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf probably gutters,which are also allowed FP Response:The proposed remodel no longer includes a to project into the setback, but gutter along the new roof projection on the South side of exemptions cannot be combined. • the development. The projection is now 1'-4" into the Therefore the total projection cannot be setback. REF:Z-005. more than 1'6"-revise. / Page: 26 1'-11 1/16" Checkmark: Unchecked /;/ / Author:jimp FP Response:The proposed remodel no / File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf longer includes a gutter along the new /7/" roof projection on the South side of the I 1Wr1•1 development.The projection is now 1'-4" into the setback. REF:Z-005. Page: 27 1'-3 1/2" Checkmark: Unchecked Author:jimp FP Response:All roof sheathing, File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf rafters, and overhangs are existing to TIiITI1.111.1 — i . . � remain. Heights are to remain � � i�i unchanged.All dimensions to be verified in field. REF:Z-104X,Z-104, &Z-204 Page: 27 0'-9 1/2" I Checkmark: Unchecked 11 NT II Author:jimp FP Response:All roof sheathing, File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf rafters, and overhangs are existing to remain. Heights are to remain I I unchanged.All dimensions to be I I verified in field. REF:Z-104X, Z-104, &Z-204 Page: 27 0'-9 1/2" Checkmark: Unchecked Author:jimp FP Response:All roof sheathing, File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf rafters, and overhangs are existing to remain. Heights are to remain unchanged.All dimensions to be verified in field. REF:Z-104X,Z-104, &Z-204 Page: 27 0'-9 5/8" Checkmark: Unchecked Author:jimp FP Response:All roof sheathing, File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf rafters, and overhangs are existing to remain. Heights are to remain unchanged.All dimensions to be verified in field. REF:Z-104X, Z-104, &Z-204 RECEIVED 2/27/2018 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT Page: 28 25-0 Checkmark: Unchecked Nzi Author:jimp FP Response: Existing ridge heights to remain File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf unchanged except for the extension above the master bedroom. Roof plans, heights over _' topography, and all elevations have been ``°""ll' -' updated to show the 25'-0" height limit. REF: Z-005,Z-104, Z-201, Z-202,Z-203&Z-204. Page: 28 25'-0" Checkmark: Unchecked r �/_��� Author:jimp FP Response: Existing ridge heights to remain _ •� _=°1:d _ ' File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf unchanged except for the extension above the ;� ,�EZ master bedroom. Roof plans, heights over = A .� topography, and all elevations have been E ►' , updated to show the 25'-0" height limit. REF: Z-005, Z-104, Z-201,Z-202, Z-203&Z-204. Page: 29 On all of your elevations I believe that these Checkmark: Unchecked two lines are reversed. Author:jimp File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf FP Response: Setback and Property Lines Q.._.._,` have been corrected on all existing and --- ------ --- proposed elevations and sections. REF: Z-201 X,Z-202X, Z-203X, Z-201, Z-202, and Z-203. Page: 30 Checkmark: Unchecked It appears that the proposed patio will be Author:jimp more than 6"above the grade. Either E e°^ ^°w^° show how this patio is no more than 6" 6a°:° v S File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf above grade, or reduce the height of the --- o= FP Response: Graphics have been updated to show existing °o mo,°�Mw °� patio. grade around the proposed patio. The patio is less than 6" above any existing and proposed grade. REF:Z-203. 4 v Page: 30 Checkmark: Unchecked There seem to be several height Author:jimp challenges here. based on what you are ` a=j File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf showing as grade, 25'seems to be much j r,= - FP Response:The 25'-0" height restriction has been revised lower than what you are showing. Please ;?I either revise proposed grade or lower the Ef _ - = to be precisely 25 0 above existing grade. A 1/3 Point has I been added to both planes of the new projecting roof.All 1/3 maximum height line. This new roof — and 1/2 Points from roof eave to ridge are below the 25'-0" element over the brand new projection on height restriction. REF: Keynote 18 on Z-201, Z-202, Z-203, the front of the house has a different roof and Z 204. line than the rest of the gable, and therefore has a different 1/3 point. Please show both 1/3 points(the main gable and this smaller projecting gable) Page: 30 1'-2 3/8" - Checkmark: Unchecked eo Author:jimp FP Response: Graphics have been updated to r'i 1,1 , File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf show existing grade around the proposed II ♦.‘-- patio. The patio is less than 6"above any existing and proposed grade. REF:Z-203. Page: 30 25'-0" Checkmark: Unchecked Author:jimp FP Response: Existing ridge heights to remain File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf unchanged except for the extension above the master bedroom. Roof pla -a, „, WE topography, and all elevati&' jr updated to show the 25'-0" height limit. REF: Z-005, Z-104, Z-201, Z-202 and Z27/2 O 18 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT ,-'411111 Page: 31 Provide a 1/3 point for either side of this Checkmark: Unchecked Author:jimp projecting gable I== <==-=®=- File Name: Zoning Permit Set.614 W North St.2017.10.pdf ---- FP Response:A 1/3 Point has been added to both planes of the new projecting roof. All 1/3 and 1/2 Points from roof eave to ridge are below the 25'-0" height restriction. REF:Graphic labels B and D on Z-204. RECEIVED 2/27/2018 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT