HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.134 Maple Ln.0138.2019 (7).ARBK Redline Answers to Comments
0138.2019.ARBK_134 Maple_Engineering1
134 MAPLE_BLDG PERMIT DRAWINGS.pdf(9)
SEW Jk Page:4 Do not provide optional shoring
, 71 File Name: 134 MAPLE BLDG PERMIT DRAWINGS.pdf
nD„�;„,_„� — methods. Provide one plan. If
°"` additional soil information is
*Optional shoring methods have been removed and needed to determine the
II 1,Nclarified in the plans.As Depicted in the plans the appropriate plan that information
1 East Side will use trench box shoring and the North needs to be obtained prior to
A ---
/ L
Side will use site built shoring per stamped permit issuance.
OPTIONAL SHORING METHOD
ID=��• °.Ien.I°°I structural drawings.
5.B rL ON SOILS OBSERVATIONS,UPPER FOUNDAT PROVIDED ADDED
Page:4 No utilities are depicted on the
JELLED PRIORTO LOWERIXCAVATIONSTO PROVIDED ADDEDSHOR File Name: 134 MAPLE_BLDG PERMIT DRAWINGS.pdf
excavation stabilization plan.
I Shallow and deep utilities need
f` No utilities are depicted on the excavation stabilization
`
*Utilities are now depicted on the excavation to be depicted in order to ensure
plan.Shallow and deep utilities need to be depicted in stabilization plan. no conflicts exist. Please depict
order to ensure no conflicts exist.Please depict all
Ig utilities on the stabilization plan.
all utilities on the stabilization
jj plan.
;i
5
ORING MAY ME REQ'D. Page:4 Provide written documentation of
JKSTO PREVENT SATURATION DURING RAID File Name: 134 MAPLE_BLDG PERMIT DRAWINGS.pdf
JILDING FOUNDATIONS+SLAB ON GRADE neighbor approval for
4N,N=IGHBOR APPROVAL HAS BEEN GRANT *Neighbor approval letter was included on the construction access/layback.
cover sheet of the plans and is now also
Provide written documentation added to the excavation stabilization plan.
of neighbor approval for
construction access/layback.
T.L
EXISTING FNDTO REMAIN '
Page:4
v Note 7 for the North Side
---- F."1! File Name: 134 MAPLE_BLDG PERMIT DRAWINGS.pdf
excavation indicates the area
*North Side Shoring detail will be used for may be layed back as opposed,N,I,ote 7 forthe North Sideexcavation indicates north side stabilization and to shored. Please show limits of
ACKe area may be layed back as opposed to la back excavation as well as
hored.Pleaseshowlimits oflayback stamped engineering does are included y
xcavation as well as side slopes. side slopes.
4 la with the drawings.
'CUT HERE
=5'-6-5'-I w fin e a
-U anIt.Slab on Grad
I P
PTH FROM BOSIA6=5Vx I
n '!
Page:4
File Name: 134 MAPLE_BLDG PERMIT DRAWINGS.pdf Engineering cannot sign off on a
permit that says existing
=R°°.°° *Excavation stabilization plan has been foundations may be used for
°'I"w�e"°° shoring. Please solidify the plan
fPROPERTY IJ�I� ° clarified and has been reviewed and approved and only submit what will be
ommea °�°'° • by our structural engineer. See new drawings done during construction. If
:PERIENctSO E and stamped shoring details.
T5 !% during construction an
I USEf7TO ASSIST IN SHORING (I,;',;=a,6„ alternative plan is determined, a
t CONSTRUCTION ACCESS/LAYBACK
on change order needs to be
NI
O - submitted.
RECEIVED
08/29/2019
ASPEN
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Page:4 Per OSHA standards vertical
Per OSHA standards vertical File Name: 134 MAPLE_BLDG PERMIT DRAWINGS.pdf cuts cannot exceed 5' in depth. If
cuts cannot exceed 5'in depth.
If 6'is needed the soli must be 6'is needed the soil must be laid
laid back at 1.5:1 sloe or a * Lay back will not be necessary with shoring system must be back at 1.5:1 sloe or a shoring
provided. updated shoring system. system must be provided.
NG NORTH SIDE
'Max.TO FOUNDA ALL LOCATED Min.2'8 t
N GRA H STRADDLES PROPERTY LIN
IEPTH
)RING PER DETAILS+SITE OBSERVATIONS
Page:4 Without a soils report, it is
Withoutasoils report,it is assumed the File Name: 134 MAPLE_BLDG PERMIT DRAWINGS.pdf assumed the site has type C
site has type C soils.Type C soils require
a minimum 1.5:1 layback.Please refer to *Type C soils will be assumed.Trench box shoring soils.Type C soils require a
OSHA Regulations(Standards-29 CFR). minimum 1.5:1 layback. Please
Sloping and Benching-1926 Subpart P method will be used on the East Side of the
App B. excavation. Bench cut will not be needed. refer to OSHA Regulations
If 1.5:1 layback is not achievable,a (Standards-29 CFR). Sloping
shoring system must be utilized.The 4' and Benching- 1926 Subpart P
and 5'bench do not meet the OSHA
standard. App B.
If 1.5:1 layback is not
achievable, a shoring system
must be utilized. The 4'and 5'
bench do not meet the OSHA
standard.
Page:4
File Name: 134 MAPLE_BLDG PERMIT DRAWINGS.pdf There is no sheet S6.002.All
shoring systems need to be
SEE S6.002 FOR STAMPED VERSION * Excavation Stabilization(EX 1) plan has been stamped by a professional
updated and now EX 2.0 has the stamped engineer.
drawings from our structural engineer.
There is no sheet S6.002.All
shoring systems need to be
stamped by a professional
engineer.
Page:4
_ \ File Name: 134 MAPLE_BLDG PERMIT DRAWINGS.pdf Clarify where each of these
shoring methods are going to be
"-"""" * Plan has been updated to visually show where utilized.
each shoring method will be used.
av 1 o as
BXIBOR•SitleStl
RECEIVED
08/29/2019
ASPEN
BUILDING DEPARTMENT