Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Land Use Case.414 N 1st St.A017-98
..- ~ L"""'~ CASE NUMBER PARCEL In # CASE NAME PROJECT ADDRESS PLANNER CASE TYPE OWNER/APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE DATE OF FINAL ACTION CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION ADMIN ACTION BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED BY A017-98 2735-124-18005 414 N 1st ESA & Special Review 414 N 1st Chris Bendon ESA, Special Review Lewis, Jonathan & Posada, Roberto Kiiey, Dan Approved Reso. 8-98 12/20100 Chris Bendon -'c-:--,,_ ."",- ,!! \: - 2735-124-18-005 A017-98 414 N. 1st ESA & Special Review 653 6*Uieb 8 ~2-002_a 1 t 4 1 r- .... 09 114 14 11/ 4JA\\JAVM .- IL 43~ 6+ *34 Wt\ 2 K L Ch 011, . .1 -rk - I < . 4 - ¥4441 ' 8 . 1 1 i '1 I -. J lu i rl i. : lit bl. 61*3 042/95 * *4 I , .. I - ' I './ / ~,d i j i i 64 \p 4t4 4 14 &.2. * 7 % 1 . 0 0 OFFICE OF DAN KILEY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • ARCHITECTURE r . I I , I I 1 I 4~ EAST FARM C-LOTTE VERIONT 05448 802-425-2141 . 0 ' I. . . 4 I I I 0 1 . ' \ b , 1 , >33r-»-w Black Stale Natunt CM Fimsh '. I I. -21"x21",a• Stone Pieces < S« 00 -d/cr. sto. , (*p) Entry G= grourd cover joil. ! - 1 -Il~-InE-Il-Il-li-lr-1-Iri li li il li il li lim ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ir ii rl --i fr;Zx 1:~&„:.M Stone Wall (typ) It " " H "Il ll III j LI'll H H H Illill U Ilillill U H M lill 11 1 11 11 it >271 -- r . I. L.deft, . - 1 ZEDE][JECIt]2\ -- ' ~ +1 ··If -. 203 0 ' o ' CZE]OUC]OC]C]Chj 02 Viodifi POLEHOUSE • ASPEN 0 -9 :7 0 CE -- .Eig . Enuy Col•t EL ~ Existing o.trkid[ Black Slate Natural Clca Finish , 0 ·i (renovation proposed) - 40.k- .. -4 0 02 -0 CE - -2. 4 \ - ----4----- v - iwith *4 cover joiia .. . h\ - Existing wood curb 0 53 » 1 1 -- -- 17-4.0 - L -/- L_ V. - -4 2149'9 -------- 11111111111111111111 11 1 2 21 '*21'ba' Stone Pieces ~- 1-3 1- -- -- -- 1--- --- -- - - - #449*Z with *rass loints . i. .- 0 - . -------==-tz-'- ---- . 0 0 z~%*:Ii;:0> *I'lj· 0 0 0 Black Slate Natural CleR Finish 0 -- 0 0 C ; , 1 0 rass - ~ ~ Proposed com. wall 1 0 , O 0 Or 0 0 - oif 45~?%*2-~ m . f . r_ Ill Proposed fountain culptum -21"x21'x2" Stone Ncts Scton concrete bam.#* joint, - - - - - 7 0 ~- Wood fence to parallel gop. Inc 14 0 - 1 tt' ·f 1 ' Black Slate Natural CleR Finish - With graajoints - 1 1 0 Date: 31 MAR€H ~98 r- extent of conc. base scale: 1"=10'-0" f/0 436 Revisions 4-kh 0 noon . 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 lili -8 1 1 1 111 11 1:.1 · 1 lili - -1 :. ·--+--21·,al'x2· sto. Pieces . Proposed flagpole ~ • 1 1 -- LI U 1 - : I Set on sand/cr stone bed, flush joints (typ) - 15 APRIL 1998 BLDG PERMIT 141: . : r al .1 9 0 1 01 16 0 ~ Black Slatc Natural Cleft Finish 21 APRIL 1998 PERMIT RES UBMIT - 0 3". 1 Interior Coutt . . 1 1 . Carnelian Red Granite . _ . 1.0..1 21·,al·xr stone Pieces L,--_- Existing tree (typ) with grass Ioints - - Proposed tree C typ) 0 0 Black Slate Natural CleR Finish - 0 11 0- 0 . .O i Service Gatc 11 H 21'x21*x2• Stone Pieces - Setonsand/cr. ston¢bed, flush.joints -n~ 0 , • 1 0 . 0 - ·r New curb section-~ 21 • L_-4 . Outdoor Gil ' ~=pavition 10000 - ' CIE~E 1 t-) 102!301 - , . *...1 2 0 = . t. 0.: 4 3 - i- fjkzd*Bk* Gratite I I ' 0 0 0 03 0 / O 0 1 1 1 1 111111 1.1 1 1 lit 1 0 0 0 0 1 Ll_j ' . O 0 0 0 - 7 '4 1 . 1.1 O 4 1H··44,0#-Miti 2.484 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z • ~ 0 . 0 . e - 0 0 0 0 0 • 11,1':i:/ 1 1- 1 EFEEW . t C GAR,·nSCH STREET EXr. y Black Granitc -_ - /" Cobbles 4 2 -44 -4- Burii*h Ne LA 400 PAVING PLAN I. *mat Project # - 2-UAL"ll <If,-' . .. -1 11 -1 -1 Nonh First Street PO LE \C- »b POLEHOUSE : --7- 6 k.7. 94% 414 Norm Flrst Street Aspen, Colorado .b. 2, 13 - 2 022 . taN.I. -1/~ hip <\--, C~ I lf.Ga' <> - 1 . 4 - -..4'~47 7». ; 35 q r.1/ - 9 4 4 4 1 7.J. , b¥ . 4 9 7 11 1 / 1/ve» \ 1, --» 1 4 Lil I '' hi 7 7 ' AX . .-1-7 1 //\1 1 -' . ~¢3-1/ ., + Evt [24/ 1%124lf L\All)f f r \ 1 1 1 -5 1 AACHTECT8 --;41.. r \29#654 1/ / ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ The Ememann Group/Architects 1 \'t Aspen, CO 81612 - I oj flrup€2:'G» / , h- \ ' r.u\* 1 -1 (t~0.2-/ .» 1,"gitio i ~ - \7«1- flit-i f/; i'\ t' 1~£i' 1 ) '/ (970) 925-2266 m. 4 6.41, .43. \ 1 . B.?24 ~.-1-_11 114096' -\ ' ' ) 1 ~ I f \ \11\ i I. - 4.,- of' via> .4-- 1%\- ..44.2 1./ V . ·/4 r., ,% 1.0 1,(-9.A« 7/- \ 81RUCTURALENG»€ERS KL& A of Colorado 80614th Street Golden, CO 80401 (303) 384-9915 MECHANCAL ENGIMEERS Beaudln Genie Consulting Engineers P.O. BOX 39 Veil, CO 81658 (970) 949-8108 LAMJeCAPEARCHITECTS Office of Den KIley East Fann Challotte, vr 05445 (802) 425-2141 laEFOORS David Schaefer 20 Fifth Avenue #15B New York New York 10011 (212) 475-3679 A -4>16* 1SUED FOR /1/26/98 '11,25 31 LAND USE App F/15/9 8 BLDG PERMIT 1/21/98 PERMIT RES UBs; I 7/16/98 HPC REVIEW : I .,LE SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS ' LA 600 .- '09**7~il r . litl 4* " -1 Tr-7-'"pur Ir 1/ 1 4 16- my - le- 5 B Lt IN! 2 01=2 .. - S F "1111"Imt 11 1 :ili:;:!u:~: .;11:,ii ' :· 11[1111,11 Mii&1? limtil .# 11~: 11!11,1~!lili!111.6 11111'Im lilli 1 11 1 lilli 1 111 - '" ' '*U'#*L. milii ikilii- •• i , i i lillililmlili - ................ !!m!!r 25 ........................ :=m .:.i.&..:...:E: 5:m ......................... :::::::: =E:BE HHESE ::;::m ®**immlilimQ 1 4 1 1 1 1 ¢ I I -. 1 I. 1 .0 0 :0 D / - 4. .. 2/5-- 'C -0/ -7 i' 2 .~ ~r : .. r ./p 4 , . 41,1 e - -+I- K-& h e- , / ,»45 47. / D- . .#*\f'' 04 4 .,.4 - - =6&41 A I - f ¢ 40 / - 2 - 1 11 K - / p l 6 - I - 1, . 1 i . 1 1 1 ...... , ...... .....11.................... -.......................... mm ....... W............„ ....1................1...1 ..........................1 EHE~ili!!:itilii!!N ...... ..............--m 1 .1.....11................1 ...... ........................1 ..........................1 ...11...............11...1 ........„„..........„„ mm .U....11................ ...................4,1...1 ......................„..1 ......1................ .........„........W„ ..........................1 11.....11......... ...... ........................1 .......................... wi#limitimma ....................... :2::":0: 2 : :2: m : 29:: 2::1 .........,1..............1 ..........................1 .,1....1 ................ .........................1 ........„„..........„ -- ..........................1 </fv71.e=9€2+9 -1€55/%*<.-5 ~ -2,€2*v~ lip/"9&452€./1.- - - - .0 - € .f. ' - - . ' +19 ... 2-1.- ..1.- - /7 - 12..3- r- -- ~,0~«.'1«'e®.·~ - 3_ - 0 M 0 : 1 €6434(f':ti *·· t!·'i.ar)'i ,£ i:.3.t:~ 10. · ~ 1+24¥,4 0 - 0,0 :. Se. I.M.. M , / L ,/ I ar-At,24»?/P- 1 - @l@l@l®l®l®l®l®l®I@I@ \ 1 \\ . i DESIGNWORKSHOP 1 1 \ \ \ h \ 1 N \ \~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ \~ Landscape Architecture . Land Planning \ N Urban Design · Tourism Planning ... 1 ;1 \ \ Albuquerque ·Aspen ·Denver •Jackson \\ d Sao Paulo • Santa Fe • Tempe . Lake Tahoe • \. -. Vail \ \ I 120 East Main Street I : ... \ \ ... Aspen, Colorado 81611 / (1001.41)* .~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ u~ ...~ ~~ . ~ ,~ Facsimile (970) 920-1387 I\\ \ , ----------------8 (970) 925-8354 .(999.61) \'~ x " ", 9'.' ij' : -0~ 0- i - WWW.DESIGNWORKSHOP.COM I - -I / l ./ ...% ~ N N *0001.731 · -1 . 1 7 - \.. ./ -- / /, -~ 5>>-- - -- 1 1 - -/ 1 M : -/-6 ./ : 0.. .6. *. . 0 + (1000.491 . -------961 - 6 NOTE: · // . Do not Cut % \ ~ ..% \\\ at Tree -·- ·- .._ ., .\ . \ mA -..-I - ' .-.- I .i .+ -# ~.-9i / *J tioo:.90 S /9 ; -' + j n i *- . \ (999.12) x e /// , *gof Edger 1001.70 ~ .2.. li /-~22-Vt-* X. I. I. \ X\\ I : /2 \2\.----/-/ \0--0</- \\ N.« - --- ew - ----------- 1001.90 1 - _ -- :\\ -Math: 1 1:/ TW 7/1. \ ../.. -M•411- 1003.40 E*e of . \ •~ . I ./ \ Ropdway ) ~ - -'1003.01 t'~~6*Jr-/ 11 1001.48--*~~ 'LUU'I W -1001,66 ew ill- ·- 11001~/U'~ 1 1 11.06 -)J \\.\ m 4 1 3 -UU .83 - 001 76 .C.Sok, . ~4 .. _ _ - -- ... *1004 26+ I I .. -. - 8 L C. Grade Culve Crnss Sect~~~~~ to Consistant Slope and ,- Match Existing @ - 1(~01_ J 1 Remove Existing ;Ii . 7 1 63 - j e :1 1 4 (1002.62) ~ 93 ~ ! E 1 ./1 I 1 4 E i 1 21 { Fif / / 192%99 (1004,32) @ f 1.-1 x T , 0 dger 1001.04. (1002.81) r i /1. I 1 l' \ j // ' It 1 : \ 18 1 1 Edger 1002.93 \ ; L--\ \\ \ R' I -\ rli~\e of Gate . ~ -- Match 11 -{ 1 , Through Existing 1 r 0*agpole © Edge of 1002.52~ Roadway J | 1002.91.1 ..1. [1 251 - 1. C 1--- 44 -_1992·38,3 ( 11002.43 1002.69.J d -li- for Irrigation' Proposed WAII 1 -- - 3 3 -117% --- i =iff----2-1 (by Others) I = V- 412- - f -0 t-L - I t - ~ . ~ 6-/1.-3 ---6--- 11 - It - T. 2 ID ~-11002.83 1 1 ISSUE DATF August 24,2000 1 1 REVISIONS 11 Match Ne v Asphalt, Sawclt at Street ~ ~ - - < # DATE DESCRIPTION 8-10-00 Pricing Set L - 8-18-00 100% CD Set - 8-24-00 CD Set Final Use of Ex ~ to be Veri 1 Match Existing Edge of Re - GCT RWS DRAWN: REVIEWED: 1 Grading | PROJECT NUMBER: 2338 Nij - NORTH o 5 10 20 1 1 1"=10'-00" SHEET NUMBER L4.01 1 0 1 @ l ® 1 ® 1 ® 1 ® l el ® 1 0 1 0 1 0 ©C O PY RIGHTDESIGWORKSHOP, INC. 3SAOH 31 + Od opejoloo 'uedsv e '002 1, . VJ'/H"-1-~ :... .1 = 1. . 11 .1 ..t . 1 : 11 e. 1, ====== " .... ...... .. 11 ./ I . I . . ... .. .1 ..411 1 . 01 ... .1 ; - ./ 4% t. 14. 1 11 -- 0 0 - 1.--1~ 1#2%=Em=Rn.." '4 111 1 - 4 0 4 " 64 , 1 %..2 . 11 1 4 ... ... , 11 . 0 1 ---- 1 0 11 . ... 1.- 11 ... = .1 1. .1 t. 7 1 1 0 .1 . . 0 % - 1 11% - .... ... -0- 1. .. .1 1. 11 - 1 0 1 ... -. - . 1 - 1 .. . .. 1 1 11 . . 1. . . = 01 . I I - -- .1 1, 1, I 1 11 . ... . , 11 .. 1 1 , . . 1 - -- 1 . .. .. ....... 1, I 1 ... 1. I .1 1 ./ 1 11 .0 . 0. ...... 11 . ..... I .1 . ./ 1 . I 11 1. 2 . - 11 11 : -- . 1 F . 1- & . . - .D . 11 01 1 - \ " S" 7 - . 11, 11 - 1. . .. 1 1, ' 0, ... 1 0 11 1. .1 4. 11 11 .C . 1 * I 1 11 .1 11 : 8- 1 ' 1 1.,0 I /, 1 " 1 . 0 11- .1 .1 1 11 . 0. 0 ... 4 0 . 11 . 1 1 1. , b . 0% e "" . . 00 ... I t ... 11 . 0 11 .. 11 :1 . . 1 : p .1 I 4 . 0 --0- 1 . : : r I ... 2: . 4 , I : I . I le * .A, . 1 A A , 4 4 • i -- i. .. .. - 0. ... ; i: -... . - - . -*'. 1 . I . £ E ...... ..:.................... S : 4 . . . . ¢ „ 1: i i : 11. .-.- / . .. .... - ... k : 2 : . 1 .1 - , -'.-.- I'l.-.. . . 0 - e . .. ... - . I . . ... , 4 O : ..... . . k . . *..*'- . I ./.-'--. . . ... :47 . . 1, .... -1 . . : . . . . 2 : .....#..-.-'-.-./.-....-i .. . . ..... . . 4 4 l i . : I ¥ . e .... 1--'-- .... 4 : 4 I 0 . .... . .. . . . . . ..... ... . e .... - . . A : . * k : f i 0 @ ® @ ® ® 0 ® ® e e \ DESIGNWORKSHOP I : I Landscape Architecture . Land Planning \ \\ t . ).. .~-~~\ :.. \\\\ IZZ..1 N~ i\\\ - Urban Design · Tourism Planning ... . , I - I h. 1 \ / , Albuquerque .Aspen •Denver •Jackson · / Sao Paulo •Santa Fe • Tempe • Lake Tahoe. i k\ Vall I \ 1 I .. U V. 1 -- . L. - 120 East Main Street / Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 925-8354 \ f \ - -- / / - ~ Facsimile (970) 920-1387 .... I. ..% ~..\ I : I. -- A \\ -- 1>1 -1 -->/ - WWW,DESIGNWORKSHOP,COM \ \ N \\ \ 0. N . , \ A ' \ * . I -- W +M./f mit 01 90~ I _ __ - --- -- -1 --- -- 1 - .. E-- Align Cornereffrallt omer 6TPaver \ ·., : .- .f -- l ti 5 1 \ h \ N.. \-\ \0 . 1 1 N . ---=I L_LI · 1 , \ Ef Gate Not * Corn Field Verify :74*2 ...91*:49 F.-li~ lii. -32%:·i DATE: August 10,2000 ONS - DATE DESCRIPTION - 8-8-00 Pricing Set 8-18-00 100% CD Set 8-24-00 CD Set Final 1: 2 REVIEWED: RWS- Layout PROJECT NUMBER: 2338 E BFLTI 11}1 0 5 10 20 - 1"=10'-00" SHEET NUMBER '491 1131 h.1 14 Ill 1%' 1 El® 0000 L2.01 'S Ill - 1.4 RU 1 1 0 1 ©COPYRIGHT DESIGWORKSHOP, INC. 3SAOH 31 + Od ope30100 'uedsv 29'-0" Ill'lls:%*11/,1/""""Ii""IA :111.-im1........0~ . I .. 9 0 :.. .. 21*15%1*Ii/ 4...../ 1. Ad~~hh, . . I If'I.. -. - . 8%31* '20 0 ... · 1. lill~lill ..ir.Nlwwmmmwmwwl|0||||~ 1 . ..2 ., ... ~ 9 .1 ...- :H /4 -.. . . - -- .-.: , ill"IN " 2 -- -2.. ' r.I-- - 0 ... .... .. , .."-7 1..............0 6. 1..............4 1..............2 ..............9 . 0 0 1.1.1111.1.1.111///....* .. 1 .......:... :. ..... -U- . I . I..............2 . ... 0 -- 20=1=0=210**ammimillimal,11,10==ME.il-*imil.Eiummam#MIN...... I - ..... 1..............2 ... .- 0 ./ -- 1 - .1., ..........................................51......... .- ..............9 .. . ..:R~Yull......I 1..............9 1- 0.- : 1..............9 . : .a~*11.1.1. ••ls......................................9=mullill'll . 4..... . 1 1 - : -------...~=w=maimm*:**22*%0*1@&18~22*2/912&1¥Qtte. im.......... i ....Sm....................................................... . '1 .... ..,9.- .-I----.......... ........................... 0 - ............ ............ . I. Ill: 0 ..2 : - I........... ---Il. &0.. 22.... ..m i. 11 - .. .-3-imil . *:* I. miall.. 0.0 & ... .. . 1 : a ..All....= :.0.-I- ...... 0 ... - - . . m ~ , ~ . .lilli . . 0 - 1 .11 \.m . 0 m VA:* 1. . E.* .:'. '' . - m'%1/2. -- . I - i--22*13*18= .... ... * .. ...........1,1..........1=1===1=.1. " 2% 4, ..............m......... . 0 - 1.lili... I -0- 0 .. ...1 0 0 - .. ... ... M •---8~~il~VI'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll .. ... 1-1 e. 1.... -- m:Mile 0 - .. - I.- 0 .0 . 0 . 0 . ..- ... . . . . . =.. ... . .... . . - 1 .. : 0. 1. I . . ... e .... 0 ....... 0 .. - 0 I . . .. . I . ' - 0 - .1-'- -Ii .*Il . --'- . ............. . I - - ' i 1 -- - - ' . - ' - .* - ... -. - .. : ... a . : - -1 - ... ... .0 0 - le e - 0- .. .0 0 -- 0 ..1 .. .......0 ..1 . 0 ... - 0 .. . - - - 0 -- a . - . . 0 -0 - I 1 . : 0 0 0 I i - . .'.#.. 0 . ... .. - - - - - 0 - a ... iE - i . . . 0. .- I :i ...... I . ii I.: I. . :: . 0 ./u'll:'ll.. .............. .. I. 40 . a . - - .. .. 1... ...0 .. .. ./ O @ 1 @ 1 @ 1 ® 1 ® 1 ® l ® l ® 1 0 1 @ DESIGNWORKSHOP Landscape Architecture . Land Planning Urban Design . Tourism Planning 4 1 Albuquerque . Aspen . Denver . Jackson . Sao Paulo . Santa Fe . Tempe. Lake Tahoe. ../ f-29/ /33 /32) /321 Vail FIELD RELD TO CHANNEL ..' 120 East Main Street RIB'-O" INSIDE - / · - 111 NOTCH EA SIDE FACE OF ~.~460~- 1 - -4 | #5 @ m EA MAY -7-F 41 ~ - - 1~~I~|~~~~~~~~~ Lbx~%~ O'-Ii . - 05 @ 12" O.0. . r / 4" RETURN i ' (970) 925-8354 Aspen, Colorado 81611 CHANNEL ~- 431 EAFACE \'1 4=* )' )' ' )' )L_,..J I - Y , ~_~~~1~~ 2.-IJi~ _„ )~-_ 1,1 - . I.. t~ ~'..,~.'.... :, A d ~ ~ 1. ..In=DA ' --- -'' .F - m .-*Y PER ARCH (2) - #4 EA TREAD -,< .. f-i, . .· 0 1 4/ '-- FIRE PIT DIMENSIONS Facsimile (970) 920-1387 050 O P.C O M 1! It= ii--i 439 11 \f 1 \99// A , 2'-6" 1 2'-6" 2' 6-6 #5 VERT 54 FOU'3%' C 12'>:MICKENED - 91*REINF 4 *) - 4 CONT. < 0" FOR ESCARPHENT MALL 11-211 FOR SPINE MALL f 790.2/4 BJL »43 4 JSE ING 2"OLA , C iO D915 ~ ESCARPMENT / SPINE WALL SECT /-~NESCARPMENT / SPINE WALL ELEV Menlo Pork. Colifornio • Golden, Colofodo • love~d. Colorado (ll) SCALE :I"=I'-O " - SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0" SHEET NUMBER Sl.1 | | | | | | | ~ | ® @ Copy'ght © 2000 KLA of Colorado opefoloo 'uedsv ! Be r . 0 0 - 9 44 , 1/1 . -12: M . I ' I - .. 4% I. 4. . I I. I. I 0/ I . ./ 0 0 0 ..- :. 0., . . 11 .A 0 1 0 :. 0: IA 1 1 1 01 1& 0 1 0 - s"... -- A e . 0. 0 11 .4 0 1 .A , 4 -/ D . - I " .; I. ... . I , - ==. , b 2 9- I .. 0 . ..1 1 - . - .. . .. .... . 1 1 1 ~1 0 1 0 0 lA, e A e . I . . . .. e . k .. . ... 0 .-- .. . P . P. - 0 0 4 P I. .,# , P . e. .. - G. 1 . I. . 0.-I - 0 - I .. . . , »# 0 I . 1 :. I . 0. -0 . - .- - 0 - * I .. A . I. 1 . .00 A .A .. . 1,0 A .A 0,0 A 1 AI- A 1 .... , .1, , . 0. A Ell . ./. . I... - .. . . 1 - .1 .. . . .. I . I. . r - . . A , A. I. . ... . . :. 1. .. . M . @l@l@l®l@l®l® ®l@l@l@ -- 00 , \ DESIGNWORKSHOP h \ ... I.\ . ...\\...\. 1 / 1 \\ 1 \ \ 1% I I 1 ' .. 1 h - -- Urban Design • Tourism Planning , Landscape Architecture • Land Planning 2-/ -\--~ -- - I --/ ./\ // Albuquerque • Aspen . Denver • Jackson - ./ - I 1 \ I \\\ \ N \ ~ \ . . I . \ . . ' I -- -* - - / ~. - % '\ t Sao Paulo . Santa Fe . Tempe • Lake Tahoe. \ \ \. N \\ :. . ~ - - - ~~ - - - / , + N & 1 - \ \ 4 1 - , Vail I ...\ I // 1 . XP . . 4 -f: 4-22 , f. ..2// f\\\ 11\.% fl % %-h /...... \" ~ -~ - I . I N~~ - ---- I \ - - - -- -- - ~«- ~ < 120 East Main Street / / Aspen, Colorado 81611 / 1 , Xp\ ........ ,/l ./ - - - - (970) 925-8354 \ -U# - - / I \l I i :\ . h ,/. , / Facsimile (970) 920-1387 - - - - f-- -- - / \ 1 0 N .:.: ./.\\. 1. I: I:\\\ h -:I--- - 1 \ 9- I --- ~ WWWDESIGNWORKSHOPCOM - I . - . \ . . ----*- 1 , A \' ' - ' . .' . N ---- ---- \. 1 - ----- ...r # . , -, 'mit 0 1 so 6 \ ~ . - 1 . \ N % . ---Il - XM ' N · · - - -- --- - -- ---- - - I .\\ / \ . \I . ..1 /2- t.· - . 217 XM I \ I. - 1 '1 / L '4 -1 -1 11 1-hlk n - 1 XI 0- 4 ·'It< e XM 1 - - ---- - /0 -- -- ~ / - / / ' 4 *.-. N -i ..- - ./- ----- -- - I -- - I e .;r 0 1 -- 1 3 XI 1 , --- -- j H / a - - , 1 -m V' inV. 1 LLILILILILILJ ' 1 -# / 0 j 000000 / XI I En ----- - 00 , - - - U *&9#44%44%%*41/49 - - - - -- --- --- --0- - - .1.-11 1 [1 0 '% / --- - / 044 - 00 4 I - -- -~"--- 0 XM - - - -- - D f\ XM ~ O O BJ , 0 ~· / XM 9 BR BR p Yexp ' 1 @ , 1 /, ,~ 1 3~841 - / 11£22:_ U X M XM ® Im I * : 0 **20 66 1 / CIP, /, - XP %0 X P LL M I 131< , c r , f el\ AF @ ' L' , BR -- ° NO_-E. TYPE BR dc BJ FIXTURES ARE ALSO SHOWN ON ( e I / 4*ty INTERIOR DESIGN DRAWINGS E Bqi ~ OF PAVILION TYPE XQ FIXTURES AAE LOCATED [N 10 - ER - Limit of Sod MOTE TYPEy BR FIX1 URES ARE LOCAtED IN CEILING -IJ 1 L) , I trK ~~ ~ - r------r--THE PAVIN¢ See Sheet L5 06 for ~Layout ~ Hj i l i q Hll l i i l i fl f l i l l l i ~ ~ ~ i f r l i i l i m ' Ac .coR \ 1 -'Q , 11 1 1 lu , r. 1 | . /4. ///-1 1 || ' SEE Pl 01 , 1 1 \ 11 >'M -BR - ER ~ ,· . 1 - ,g 2) - 'tb / 01 -18 11(:) UO O [0 CL l) V I ? /1. . 6--- i ~ xO 1 L-- -- -~------- c)'~DXM 1.* O >J X.I XJ 1 >J 1 - Il 1 ; iul lilil~-, Ir==11 1 lA- 1 1-1 lili I lum' 1 , 1 34.219 mIL„-1 E 1 ,/-- 2 2:Wi@=.-Al .W*44@00'~-TOTAL FOR XK XH 1 e -31)E -23 0 ® El-61 61-51 ® 10 / - -GRILL-LI.HTING XNE XM XM XM XM -- 1 - in - r----- 7 - - -- t' XH i== . , n -= 1 6, C @ 1 L ; XM = == 09 BR [44 -7 4-444] c ex .' 3 ~ ' == r == e i .4,i .j 112£4' i : E 1 1 ~TA ® \ y It ----.- , - ' XM 1 / == Mt 7 0 {A E : WA, D XM 09 4 0 XH 12 BR BR ~ E , 1 , '7/9 xr ~ , - == GR R R 1- ' - - --- , *,0 --- I NOTE ' ·-TLIRE5 ~02& t IRED 1 -1·11 192 7 ,- 1 M J ' ~ ® 1669E GARACt - ,2 - ' PR 111 Al"*4 11 ' ~ ' ' -- :1 111029 - '4=6 1 11 0 t»---- 1 - BR BR < e><M DED , / , 7 / ~ / el.. e t. , \/ ,- - ;#1_ XL . ® ; == xp 0 XH ALLOW 200W TOTAL FOR ~ ' - ' 0 0 1 -= 1 1 11.- 11.11 I 1121?14: r U j GRILL LIGHTING x , ' -- < 00 % 1 4 e . e e U x_ -- 1 1-61 - -'-- 111- 1 11' 231- I XL 111 - 11-1 r- i ~ XA XP xp el )04 * XH 4Irll y XH ~ XH ~ XH XH ~ XH ~ XH ~ A e 0 ' - - 7.. -,f- 13 ] -r-r-~~1~ · , - i .Ill--Ill--Ill--Ill--Ill-Ill---Il-Il--J 11 ALI ILA 31 77 It-- .i \/XA 1 1 v T:--:33 v VXA it Match New Asphalt, Sawcut at Street 11 11 11 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -Il -- -- -- U l 1 1 LEGEND i (REFER TO LIGHTFIXTURE SCHEDULE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION) ~ LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE XK o Below-gride flush mounted HYDREL 100wott PAR-38/SP At boae of 1 incondscent exterior uplight 9100 A PAR- SPOT flagpole. with etainle= ateel sealed 38/120/PSP/34/RGA-9· F~ LITETOUCH CONTROL PANEL houoing, round aluminum LOCATED INSIDE ARMOIRE TYPE SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION LAMP LOCATION(S) QUANITY NOTES trim ond a clear flat lers Lamp should k ~ 2· CONDUIT FOR AUDIO VISUAL PHONE & DATA COORDINATE WITH CELLO Rece-d Incondescent low B-K UGHTING 50watt EXU12V Gates 8 Powdercoot finish to meehanica# focueable - REVISIONS voltcge steplight wrth a cost CD-S/Q-8-FINISH TO 12voH match concrete ISSUE DATE August 24,2000 ~C;,u~~~~~£* ~~ ~e ~IN CONCRUE Coordinate with color ond placement used with c remote of Intercom XL ¤ Suffice Incandescent wall ABOUTE UGHTNG 100 watt Al@/IF Ently 4 Ortginally ap=ifled tronsformer Finish to Originally deatgnated mounted lighting with a 80200-BLK-WL-GB-H Inekle froated 120 BD 8-2100 100% CD Set motch concrete walls (BD) deep bowl reflector and o volt I * 41 by ODK 08 WM-1 8-10-00 Pricing Set gooeeneck brocket To be XB Ughtlng on grill to be bterior Grills (2) Fixture to be suitable for wet location. Origingly de,Ignated 41. I - 8-24-00 CD Set Final determined. -tected once grill hos been -lected or designed XM $ Woterproof duplex outlets 23 » e - by ODK 01 WM-2 XN Under vater tncindeacant HYDREL. 50/att Pool 13 ¤ low voltage uplight with 4842-3/RG OZ:66CB/n. *23 r stoinless steet hauling and cost bronze doors To be Constant color ~ - XC 0 Surface mounted low SK LIGHTING 20.att MR11/FL/24 Maln entrance 2 accommodoted with a 12 volt *Int- ~M~n~N~~0#E¥td remote tron,former In on LE voltage incondiscent M/N-23-BLW-9-11/ FLOOD gate exterfor adjustable accent MOUNTING TO BE 12,0It odequotely ventilated an light with clear lens To be DETERMINED -Ily accessible location. £ h- mounted to exterior outlet .7 - box containing 12 voR X0 Ljl Under water incondescent HYDREL 50watt MR16/C/FL Pool 5 A-_ tronsformer finish to be low voltage uptight with 4842-3 12 volt 4 4 block wrinkle. unl- ateel housing and 1 1 4 camt bronze doom. To be r- - e- ~ XD NOT USED remote tronsfomner in on accommodated with c i easily occessible location E-- 61 adequateiy ventilated an 1 it- 14 DRAWN REVIEWED XE NOT USED XP o Surface Incandescent low B-K-UGHTING 75 wati MR16/C/FL Tree trunk 11 XF Underwater pool light TO BE DETERMINED Allow 500 watte for Wit niche ct Pool Originally destanated voltage adjustable accent IRA-34-BLP-9-A Constant color flood to be selected. Pool and Spa ond Spa by ODK 04 WA light with mochined 12 volt Lighting aluminum housing, clear tempered glass lens ard XG NOT USED Integral tran,former. To be accomodated with nyton strap fltUng and oltve green XH 2 St,face mounted low BK UGHTING 20watt MR11/24 Perimeter walls 15 0,4!nolly designated Lighting Plan voltage Incondicent M/N-23-BLW-9-11 FLOOD by ODK os UP nylon strop wrapped cround exterior adjustable accent P/P-J-12' -T-BLW 12,oIt tre, trunk. 't--4 light with clear lens. 75 witt MR16/C/FL Column boss. 4 1= 1-- Mounting to accommodate XQ O Below grade Incandescint =EL - Power Pipe with integral 12 Itoint- Al hous,ng and MR--06/12V/FLCol/ C;r,*r,t color flood. low voltage uplight with 1 P 'f l volt transformer Flnt,h to o cast bronze door 12/HL-16 | - be block wrinkle XI O Pole mounted low vottoge TO BE DETERMINED BY' 20watt WR-11/FL Along front 3 EW + Decorative light fixture at TO BE DESIGNED 22 Allow 150 wotts Exterior entry 1 PROJECT NUMBER 2338 incandescent exterlor THE ARCHITECT FLOOD walkwoy floor level entry to be SELECTED Err THE cdjustoble occent light with 12volt de,Igned or -lioted by the ARCHrrECT clear lens and Integral low architect. voltage tranefInner Finish to be block wrinkle BR Recened incond-cent low BEGA 50wott GY6.35/12V Extertor soffits 21 voltage extertor downlight 1226/560 12/oR Steam room » 6 -7-ru i XJ ch Recened Incondescent low BEGA 20watt G4/12V Walkway leading to 4 wrth a stoinless Ite# fcce Sauna =ivnci, I 1325-MOD-617 12voIt Pool ond Spa - /I1 die cast aluminum housing, ET) distribution 1 49 4 on alymmetrical reflector, and a ribbed glaes lena as Not teed. 1 1 1 - 1QUANTITIES ARE APPROXIMATE AND MUST BE CONFIRMED WITH MOST CURRENT DRAVINGS. NORn4 0 5 10 23 5 - i SHEET NUMBER 6 flu L9.01 -4 1 1 | @ | ® | 08 ® | | ©COPYRIGHT DESIGWORKSHOP INC opeloloo 'uedsv Uig.#69._11+411,12 il:£#MA»W-t 0 ® @ O ® ® 0 O ® © 0 --- 7 Clema Jackmanii (Jackman - \ \ 0~- \ - ,---- - // DESIGNWORKSHOP Clematis)@6 0 c + + + ):.\.~ '''... ' ... . I. \ . . . .. . \ -- 1 - N .... , \ \\-% -' -1 -- 4 Cornus sencea 1 1 I \ --/ -/ Landscape Architecture . Land Planning (Red Twig Dogwood) . N N . Match Line ~ ~ -- - ----- - - // -/ - ~ --0 \. . I . // Urban Design . Tourism Planning x · U Match Line \ - - - // 1 44 ./. + Albuquerque · Aspen . Denver · Jackson \ Pi,ie -- I h ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Sao Pau o Santa Fe•Tempe Lake Tahoe . . - Ne Jet ~ - ~ ---- . --- - Vall 120 East Main Street ~ . . 1 - I I. I. I.. / / - ,~ - Aspen, Colorado 81611 5 N . . . I - / \ i .... .\ 1 7 \ -, , . - - (970) 925-8354 / A . I N . \ . -% ---- \ 111, / \ 1 I \ --*'-9 -I. / Facsimile (970) 920-1387 / \ 1 . I , --------------- -- --- ,- 1 - ' WWWDESIGNWORKSHOPCOM - 0 . \ - - --- - --- - - - A 1 li L / 1300 0. - 1 \ / -- *- -- , .- 1 1 1 . - h -- 4 * . - I - *. - - 1 f \\ %.-- ~~- % -- i#. *-I----I' 200 Vmca , minor Ki / (Perfwinkl¢i@_ - 480;:1 ' -11 i -~ ~ - - - -~ - 2 0 0 - // 12" o c rf:' L Pine _ / 4 11~ · 3-- C 0 \ 0 N. - - - -- -- *KH- £ - --- , -- - -n ... .. 9 -0 , T i-- El _ - *s<« t.) , --- ~f'' 1 - -~- - ~rt2\,_ ~~ ~ '1:1 0 .-i (+)ly.*- f - 7 2) (3 0 00 --- - i- 1 £J---r *-k/*) C.) 11 1. I -i - - m ,---- - -~ - - - - . ''1 111 00000 .3 - -- -+0®. c-i® - (Ir -- 20 Potentilla fruticosa "Goldfinger" - 11111 ~;l~~litl~~~1111~~1 11 ~11111 - -- - 8 rx-N~Ch. 0 -0 e i ,+ ) - potentilla 11 / El [3=1 0 1. - Pine 0 --- 'm,11,7,3'i<tifiwillislilutvk~qfillilill #.- L.,1 + h.4 / .- Eli 1 U 0 1~ 'J„' I hl,141~11;41'111 !,ill,11'„I, ~J + + .,. + , - (In ./ .- --- Needle~ -3 %0 0 0 -7> f--- - --~M lilli 11,11 111,1...1 1 1 1 1. - - <-1 00314-- '1 180 Arctostaphylos uva-ursi - ' EX] 1~1 1 11111 111[1'1j 11~11111 111 j'll'll'll'1411 11[1 1~1111'l~1111 - |1 4- r Iii. . (Kinnikinnil) @ 18"0 c 00 O,r.r. 1 - O0- li)(I)« - - _ _ 0----- ril v ... _ ------ :i,ii,~#i,!Wwl11'~"~1,1'1'111"ll"~Il'~'~I'~ 4,~ I"~i'~'l', 4- A~fi-- ~ UL) +++ ++ 1 - - I. 3- -= ' Needles ~ , tvolt Of Soo' + + + + - -~ tt _- 4-4.- 8 + + + + + + [1 , . 03 ...+ ++ + ++ 11 +I + + ·_ 183 Paxistima myrsinetis 61 :1ILI ~ - ' ~ Pine m 2 < r.-3*& 0 ---1--L-14 + I.+ ----- 11 (Mountain Lover) 4_-4--1--i~ 0 - 0 %A- 9 e + =- 0 < Pine ~ , 22) of SO / Needles 25 Viola ororata / 73 Dryopteris fillx-mas (Cat nip) @12"oc 1., 4 Need\21 ' 45 Hosta x 'Royal Standard" C g - --.- - 1 0 7 (Garden Violet) L Pine 1 1 Of Sed o Needle~ L_ Pine ~ b e\ (Plantian Lily) 150 Viola 0 1 0 Needle~ odorata(Garden 9 Dryoptens filix-mas / -.. L-SOD-7 - Violet) @ 12" ° 'rw-d r..944 ale Fern) 25 Spirea vanhouten - - 1 - ik ..4 .UR==ezi- E ' 'c ta-*SC 33 -2 - I. L-SOD-7 1 1Existing Dry Well Exact location of Steel Edger to be determined . a 71 Dicentra eximia "Snowarift" 70 AJuga reptans (for planted joints) by Landscape Architect in the Field Limitof Sod -~ (White Fringed Bleeding Heart) (Bugleweed) 27 Alce~ rosea "Nig " , 362 Galium ordoratum LU (Hollyhobk) (Sweet Woodruff) 1 L-SOD- L Pine -1 10 Populus tremuloides (Quaking Aspen) ' I ' ' 2 . Needial 315 Hosta x "Royal Standard" ~ | | < ~ \ 1 1 1 1/ Fs ~T7 70 Picea abies nidiformis (Plantain Lilly) : -- (Bird's Nest Alberta -~ 9 Populus tremuloides Spruce)@ 36" 70 Aluga reptans 2 1/2" cal (Quaking Aspen) (Bugle Weed) 11 \ + ++ @ 1 ..1 / U 1. 1 70 Aluga reptans (for planted joints) ~-, + + lilli 9 .~~ - - m 11 trill 9 Paxistima myrsinetts (Bugleweed) ++ | 1 -- ..71.- ~ @6"OC 80 Dryopteris filix-mas i , ' ~ , 460 Astilbe salicifolia ' -9-1-0.. ~ r(~ weii ¢hi (Mountain Lover) Soleirolia soletrolil , ,/", + -1 /1 / + + + 1 'tki}4 14 1 . (Male Fern) i (Star Astilbe) + ++ 1-+ L 1 C ---1 e r= - - - 69 Filipendula vulgans 20 Dryopteris , , , 0 4 ' I r.: felix-mas 0 g#/M../ ++ + - 41-1 L P,ne 11 li-i'. (Male Fern) _ +++ ++ ++ A Uff ~7- Needles \ El 'i tj I (MeadowsweeO ++ dll 1. WV ' 1 (Kinnikinnik) +++ 143 Arctostaphylos uva-ursi 11 1. -1 .\ ++++ 00 + Tai -- El \_ Pine I # Pine U ~~ Il ..1. -LE.1 < .8 , 31- f O L.,Qeed;G/ 0 . ~or igation 80 Celastrus scandens ell ¤ //. Needles 1 1 -, , (Bittersweet) \ 4- · 28 Picea abies 'nidiformis' r.li-,8 + 0 0, 1 p- - ------1 7 Ln - (Bird's Nest Alberta Spruce) L Pine . Need•A O + 9 + L e Needle~ 0-- / L Pine 0 + + + 00 /+ + + + + + + ++ 10 Cornus sencea + -:- 1- 1. '1 1 Needle~ g + + + +++++ (Redtwig Dogwood) - 1.0 0 0 1 \ 0/ + + rl e /+ + 43 + + +++ +++++++ + + ++++ +++++ 11 1 11 72 Comus sencea 0 (Redtwig Dogwood) V. 2 - 11 8 Clematis Jackmanii (Jackman 1 1 Clematis)@6 0 c 11 -11 - - -- - U PLANT LIST LANDSCAPE PLANTING NOTES - I -- 1 The base sheet is based on the Schmueser Gorden Meyer Survey 0 Legend BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME QTY. SIZE COMMENTS - RECIDUOUS--TREES-_~ on the plans, contact the landscape architect for direction as to how to proceed (Viginia Bluebells) @ u - 2 Refer to civil engineers utility plans for the utility locations Should site conditions vary from what is shown 220 Mertensia virginica SO 26 Spirea vanhoutai Populus tremuloides Aspen 21 2"-2 1/2"cal Spacing as shown 12.0 c (Vanhoutte Spirea) (7 Existing Tree 3 Verify locations of pertinent site improvements installed under other sections If any part of this plan SHRUBS ® -- cannot be followed due to site conditions, contact landscape architect forinstructions pnorto commencing - Cornus sencea Red Twig Dogwood . 208 5 gal . < 30" o c (apyx_) __ - O work Filipendula vulgans Meadowsweet 69 5 gal 18" o c 4 Exact locations of plant materials to be approved by the landscape architect in the field pnor to installation Pachysandra myrsinetis Mountain Lover 163 5 gal 24" o c Landscape architect reserves the right to adjust plants to exact location in field 4 1 No Planting Zone --- Picea abies 'nidifomlis' Bird Nest Alberta Spruce 130 5 gal 30" o c 5 Verify plant counts and square footages Quantities are provided as owner information only If quantities on ., ISSUE DATE August 10, 2000 Potentilla fruticosa 'Goldfinger' Potentilla 75 5 gal Spacing as shown plant list differ from graphic indications, then graphics shall prevail : a REVISIONS Rosa woodsii Wood Rose 100 5 gal Spacing as shown - - 6 Contact the local underground utility services for utility location and identification .4 0 .3 # DATE DESCRIPTION O - Spiraea vanhouttei Vanhoutte Spiraea 51 5 gal 30" oc 3 8-8-00 Pricing Set 7 Perform excavation in the vicinity of underground utilities with care and by hand, if necessary The - - - Vines/Climbers GROUNDCOVERS/ PERENNIALS contractor bears full responsibility for this work and disruption or damage to utilities shall be repaired y 8-18-00 100% CD Set immediately at no expense to the owner 11 ~ Achillea 'Coronation Gold' Yarrow 327 1 gal 18 "00 4 8-24-00 CD Set Final 637 SF 8 Trees shall bear same relation to finished grade as it bore to existing 17 -1 / \ Ajuga genevensis Bugleweed 70 1 gal 18"oc L \ 136 5 SF 9 Trees to be planted a minimum of 4 feet from face of building, or pavement, except as approved by i Existing Canopy Extents --- --- - --- ------ - - - -- -- --- - Alcea rosea 'nigra' Hollyhock 27 1 gal 24" o c landscape architect i 3 93 69 SF - Aquilegia caerulea Columbine (Colorado Blue) 713 1 gal 12" o c 10 Provide matching forms and sizes for plant materials within each specie and size designated on the 616 7 SF drawings -- - 1 (*33 r e w .) 00 'p C + 1 - - - - , / 1. - /1.. -- - 1,11'll'1111,11111'111111111,1~lill'll'll -1 + k - 'i'fill'i'11"'jil/'lii) i, i'i,d,iliilli'~il,~i,;lll;il;'i, (9 - . - w - 430 00 0( + j- -2-1 + -1 + - - ------ + -5*3 ++ ~ U.al 200 Nepeta sp / (Male Fern) -f 0 C (Vanhoutte Spirea) 'C 17 \ \ 0 , L I ' t + 1 \, ' 0 0 0 Un 1-11, + + Arcostaphylos uva-ursi Kinnikinnik 323 1 gal 18"oc I I 629 9 SF 11 Prune newly planted trees only as directed by landscape architect Astilbe salicifolia Star Astilbe 762 1 gal 12"oc 659 1 SF 12 Align and equally space in all directions shrubs so designated per these notes and drawings 4 - _ _ ~ __~~_ ___ _ __~ _ __~~ ~ * ~ DRAWN GCT REVIEWED RWS Celastrus scandens Bittersweet 80 1 gal 18" o c 13 Finish grades of shrub areas and lawns shall be 1 1/2 inches below ad~acent paving or header (Check 156 - -S E _ _.-- - _. --_ mulch depth and if seeded or sodded lawns) P Clematis Jackmanii Jackman clematis - 65 1 gal Spacing as shown Planting 14 Provide specified edging as divider between planting beds and lawn areas 4 Dicentna eximia 'Snowdriff White Fringed Bleeding Heart 71 1 gal 18"oc 0 -1 Plan 138-5. S F . _ . -- --- . -- 15 Provide burlap wrapping tosecond branch with 50%overlap Dryoptens felix-mas Male Fem 770 1 gal 24" o c 4 h 16 Culand remove burlap from topl/30fball Gallium odoratum Sweet Woodruff 362 1 gal 12"oc f 313 1 SF 17 Landscape Architect to review plant materials at source or by photographs prior to digging or shipping of y . Hosta 'Royal Standard' Hosta or Plantain L-ily 412 1 gal 18"oc plant materials 806 SF - -- - ------ - - - - - - -- --- - PROJECT NUMBER 2338 Mertensia virginica Virginia Bluebells 480 1 gal 18" o c 4 0 1 2 MO? 429 SF 7 Nepeta sp Cat nlp 200 1 gal 12"oc 167 7 SF Vinca minor Dwarf Per'iwinkle 186 1 aal 12" o c 167 7 SF E 171 - Viola odorata Garden Violet 170 1 gal 18" o c 333 SF NORTH 0 5 10 20 Soleirolia soleirolii Irish Moss 15 Flats 6"oc E 1"=10'-00" 58 SF : D GRASSES/ TURF 1· SHEETNUMBER Poa pratensis Kentucky Blue Grass L7.01 Native Meadow Grasses (show on plan) 2,868 5 SF SF ©COPYRIGHT DESIGWOR KSHOP INC ope]0100 'uedsv m 0 I®l@l®l@l®l@l®l@l@l@ \ DESIGNWORKSHOP 1 Landscape Architecture · Land Planning LANDSCAPE PLANTING NOTES Urban Design . Tourism Planning \\ 1 1 \\ 1. The base sheet is based on the Schmueser Gorden Meyer Survey. Legend Albuquerque • Aspen • Denver • Jackson 2. Refer to civil engineer's utility plans for the utility locations. Should site conditions vary from what is shown h \ \ \ ·~ ' ·1 \ N on the plans, contact the landscape architect for direction as to how to proceed. Sao Paulo . Santa Fe . Tempe . Lake Tahoe• \ 11 \ Vail 1%\\ \ \ @ , C.) \ \ Existing Tree 3. Verify locations of pertinent site improvements installed under other sections. If any part of this plan cannot be followed due to site conditions, contact landscape architect for instructions prior to commencing 120 East Main Street \ \ work. Aspen, Colorado 81611 4. Exact locations of plant materials to be approved by the landscape architect in the field prior to installation. (970) 925-8354 Landscape architect reserves the right to adjust plants to exact location in field. Facsimile (970) 920-1387 \ , \\ % I No Planting Zone 1 ' plant list differ from graphic indications, then graphics shall prevail. 5. Verify plant counts and square footages: Quantities are provided as owner information only. If quantities on WWW.D ESIGNWORKSHO P.CO M 6. Contact the local underground utility services for utility location and identification. A Vines/Climbers 7. Perform excavation in the vicinity of underground utilities with care and by hand, if necessary. The contractor bears full responsibility forthis work and disruption or damage to utilities shall be repaired immediately at no expense to the owner. 8. Trees shall bear same relation to finished grade as it bore to existing, / h \ L Existing Canopy Extents 9. Trees to be planted a minimum of 4 feet from face of building, or pavement, except as approved by \ 1 / ··\ 1 I landscape architect. \/ 1\ 302 Astilbe salicifolia \ drawings. \ 10. Provide matching forms and sizes for plant materials within each specie and size designated on the \\ \ h (Star astilbe) \ \ Proposed Soft Path Extension, Position of 11. Prune newly planted trees only as directed by landscape architect. \ Entrance/Exit to be determined by Landscape 1 Architect in the Field 12. Align and equally space in all directions shrubs so designated perthese notes and drawings. \\. \ 4. \ . 13. Finish grades of shrub areas and lawns shall be 1 1/2 inches below adjacent paving or header. (Check mulch depth and if seeded or sodded lawns) \ 1 741 4% 14. Provide specified edging as divider between planting beds and lawn areas. \ t ' ' 15. Provide burlap wrapping to second brainch with 50 % overlap. Native Meadow Grasses - 16. Cut and remove burlap from top 1/3 oflball. 17. Landscape Architect to review plant materials at source or by photographs priorto digging or shipping of plant materials. ' 1 \ . \ \ 1 \ \ 1 1 1 \ \ \ \\\ Existing Wooden Fence to I I be Removed \ 1 . I. i I \ \ Existing Chain Link Fence to I ,/1 - \ I \\ be Painted Black \ \ \ il .% \ 713 Aquilegia caerulea (Colorado Blue Columbine) iL\\:1 0- \ ill A \ 327 Achillea "Coronation Gold" (Yarrow) \\\ , Retaining Wall . \I \\ \\ \\\\ \ I \V 1 ht\., \ 11. /. : \\\ 1 . / : \ \\ Native Meadow Grass Seed 1 k « Native Meadow Grass Seed \ I I I » \ · 1/1 \\\ \/1 . i \ 1 »L .\ k \\ 400 Dryopteris filix-mas \<\hh 4\ \% N N N = ~1 ~0 (Male Fem) \ \ \ I \\i\ 0 90 Dryopteris filix-mas ; \. 750 Dryopteris filix;mas (Male Fern) ~ . - \,~(Male Fern) , \ . 4 1. #r , ISSUE DATE: August 10,2000 1 / \ :--4-- . ..- ' REVISIONS # DATE DESCRIPTION \ 1 \34 1 \ 1 N IN 8-8-00 Pricing Set 8-24-00 CD Set Final --- I 1 ~·~·i - 8-18-00 100% CD Set 7 Clematis Jackmanii (Jackman . % - Clematis)@6 o.c , »4-94/ *- ~ ~-~ -~ - . 4 Comus sericea ' 1 \~~~1 ' r / \ ; I N ., N h. \ . h. .... I..\ \ 000.2-/,- # IN - (Red Twig Dogwood) / \ h .. \ . N 1 12' f, ~ Match Line h ~ - h / \ .- Match Line , - - _ _ ---777 ---- - / - kM- I -- h £ 02-22--122 --- -~ ~ · \_ Pine . . 0-* ' ./.·., Need|e~ ' -- DRAWN: GCT REVIEWED: RWS \ \ I I ... . \ \ .. \ L. I ..I-/1 \\ I .... U.. .... -*. ... ~ -V...+- - ... .--I.- -, -- .~ --.- ... -- . .. / . \ so[ 77 . .. a -- . . I-' \ . ~... : :' \ / 1 E. V~- %. % - --I . , 1\\\4 N h ... \ . 6\ 1\ --- t' , / \ -.*. --I--- ./ W Planting Plan / 1 1. Li .., 6 ,\ L /8 ,// '"'it of SO / 4 .- . .) ..1 l . ul m.h\.h . N 1/ -7 »k - ~ ... -· , PROJECT NUMBER: 2338 1 · 1 -1/ '.& 600 Vinca ' --4~~*----'~v-- -= -- --- ~-4 ~~ tPerivvinkl~lP. Jj:f~·-~·.- L Pine - - -- --1------ /I1 Needle~ f . 0~· 2.... a Needleil ~ 6 - 1, 1 4-GQodS-0 00) -th NORTH 0 5 10 20 -< 1"=10'-00" -- . . fi) 0 ----- -- - ~~ -~ ~~-~ - pA-ee (3 0 C - - SHEET NUMBER m 0 ' i 6.- & FT--1[-1[-IrIET-1 5.-~-- -1-LU~>3- I <6331 -Fbrt>-'~~' ~~ ..~~. / . 1 1 ....1.-.- - - B--- -„.1..... .... -„., /'f,Vill'll!1lt'll'~l!11~~bl'jill'lill''FET;T'*6--- ----~CE).26-)-.42 CE)..(i) Ci, -7.-rrtirE 3 1 IL-ILI_]EJUU -<~r <IDF+1 - - 444*jil'lf;~~'4#iMMDA L7.02 ' ~ 1 An An.+Acto - 1 -UU P. < 1 '+9 I .· ~· ~. - 1-G;Zes,·65<44 0-~---9-h -.- - 1 ph/,1,1.0 11.,11.1.rel 82 1 -· T r--11--1 @ 0 ~ (Kinnikinni@@ 18"0.c. I @ @4 ® @ ® 1 @ 1 0 1 0 ©COPYRIGHTDESIGWORKSHOPINC 3SAOH 31 + opeioloo 'ueds¥ , r ' 11 t?.9 1. . 04 f~-13~f* ..1 4 4 9<·-r -,7 11- .1. ? ~11 'Ff'.1,1, 1. . ..111 1 ...,.. & ./ &/ - I .:'-: I OIl . 1 .1 1 . *3/ :11 - ... :S :21 1 ¢004 - q- 1 : . 1 1 ./ -2 - 1 - . , . I / 1 - r 1.1- 1 - 1 0 2*44£ le.AIL» 1. 1 . /. 1 -- 1 ' . i. 1* , , L 1 - 1. 1- - 3.- 1 1 '. , ~~~ - - ' ' i~12#4- 2,All- 1 0 - / ./Z - I \21\ XiI\ 5, / --i~ YA 3 sEAri / , ,%1./. I » 4 . 'Il k 11 £ :4 - , _ . 3%:Fl,8.7 -9 0 4/litulti 0,6 NatLeR~ 806:rEP T 2 -rk> 'SM. 4(0 43'*M·~t'Ca 150'2\¥IMPS¢>Al SACet.E TYPE 7 1*4248'4 c <h ' .' 2 .-- - :]l lullf 7 · 2,2< 4 3 2- 90 M. 8 , ' __DT JOIST- HAkidag 52 54 p 1 n.#~f~%:f V#n/ el 5 '1 - - I- 1 02- 4/ I 1,1 I. - r--- . -- %0% 420 , - 'A l {/2 1 116 - - f ''14.4.1 m . .2.)44. IPECK.-(4"15814:ING) €I 0 r Pr> - Ill 1 1 -- i -1L1" . . .1.. \ it I,- L 1 - f=ar' AL \ 1 1 / 1141 14 W*xeD , ' i , I .*3. 1 */11 1 - 6 /VU d. ex¥ 18 4-- %'~M.SOLYS || ' 61 - . 11 3-1 +L A-L-4,42*6 \ 'k- . 1 111, , . 1 -4 E-T .J'r SM, 061 -- 1 - - .. I? C i .. . - r - 1, 11.- . ¥1 / ; » BEAK STEEL '. BLAi=14 Ar / . GROOT <>14 FOOTIMA bu It 6 3*f STD, PIPC COL. . ... - -- I.- ./1- & 3"£542"¢S. 'SLAB lb; 4 L t. 2- 44'*M.9. - \' r.h.% L r L ze AN! I . Al .¢ 1 . 1 1£ 1 1-- - 7.1 I 6 TREN< 14 80141 r= T-a , glsrlwa 671~APE / 1 [E Pos,T 02 EA; L h if \ m 1 L BUST *ENCE 1 v 4 1 1 U s-rEEL FEALCE 9,9 ./ Z.- - ' DO! ' I 1.0 ' j aL 19 MAMMEEED :UT# EARTH 4 ~ , co -cy ... 13,6 2-: / -r' 1 I . 1 11$ 1 . DEC K . PLA!4 -'.. b 3 4 . ED -O i.\40 . 2 164 40614. pt€E Z.,/ + 11 4-- ]-C, 9 4 (22) -- LAT:618 Frig -r¥2.13£ ' CIALL HOLE wiTH CON¢:RE·rED -..1--I---r--- ---I.-1. 1, 1 , 1 11 -0 .1 . 1]L G. 91 3. E %~ . -A ~- - 4%% " , SECT I O ki A- A ' 1 - 1 4/ # -11 + 1 /1 + 1024 1 1 1 9 - -6<0 t ZL Col / · /. u X i \1, CONC· SLAB/ S* ¢30*/Ce. SLAB 7 (Te©REE E#01.- 1 r M 1 44-*. 1.- / 71... 1.- 1 ' , D 4, 1 I - 1 4 -/4 01 t, 1 m 1 ..' W - 6.-. 1 . /5/ '1, ' h~\POGIC=InE _. i EXTERIO= FLY %146.u 7 - 2% 6 WooD SEAT -~ 4 0 -- ' - . A.r Z r /7 W -1 ®N =f ' -Wim>tee Nt 301:1 , . CD '144* -7 - '1: \ 24 0- ' -1-- .2,<4 ' K...4 ·2* 4 De,CK 7 2> Af M .,3;57:77\¥'t ,- i j Zrl 21% 1-2x 4, , 2>, 4 VER:t 3-,1 9 ''/11€. 1 :. 42 2 -411 . 1 0 , St 1-t .· 49«> ~, .pi / 1 - A \\ :\c \ . vie 313" 49 1 1 . . .1 I , : 10 1.-1 1. JU/E+ 1~ GOWL. SLotl O --- 4 -,-721 k - -'-- » 9.' 1 1 4.11 . 1 1.1 , 1 , 111 -~ \\67 - , . 3.1, f % 1 M N 19 4 2 2¥· y,:4 .,>*»24, - 11*104 824'0.¢21, r 1-4 . 0 0 I h. - 1 ..0 9 . / / . 1. ....\\0/:-1 '41 - 'I'k -1 -. 0~ 0 43 .t:'° - * ./ .1 ' . Awe *14&91 " - - - 4„_*Ft= ' ' 9.---1. 1 1, + gar »'... 1-- , N F 10 - 0 1 i, ' 1 P-:r'. , C ' r - I , 4*8%44 5 - cti- M. 1 •7,**M. L.-4-7-T ..#' - - , 04 1 . .L . I 5 h' 4: w I '' .' ' FIN GE. 1 - .- EARTH 154)114 -0/ - / n n,-14-Jt·m ..7 & , 1 L. 4 ' 0 ~- 2<40 VERT. 248*"O, 4, ' 1 -/.di '16'fr 4,5%9/<37 /f©'C v.y'.Afv,„vi. /(411- 1 1 1 0 /1 /1 i , 8 34* O,0 11. 1% 41 r.1.. .11 --'rl .1. -Il' . I ."...- - 1 , . I '. 4 .1 FRAMI-NG PLAN SECTIC)4 13-15--6~ , SECTIOk! C-C IL¢,4 (%.*r 1, -* !*6 40/ MOTEL ' -- 0 1/ 'Le. f '1106 t 9 114 ' -' I I U L , 8. N * 3 - 171 TEXTUE:ED 4-OUL. '€.- 4 M , 2 .TIXTUKED. 1'11<\ all 1 E~ ve r r A , 2. *tr 4 + t -' 1 2 iL- 144 FREBRELii COLIC, TOPPIWS Al 2,60001 1.- R . 1.1 4' il· 1- /ZVA'*4#4 , 1 .Il -' I-% 3 10| ALL WOOD TO BE DOUG>LAS F MEL (COAST REfioN) Ve- 1500 ps., $ STEEL SEAMS * COLOMWS SHALL SE A-34, STEEL Wy= 3&124 1' 14 , COAJCKE-rE SHALL. SE MADE W Irk; 1-YPE I PORTLAND CEMENT , STONE *412<GATE, ANI> SHALL DIVELOP 3000 l?St <Ple©DANS. wr . 12'Eld,©IMEME,LT JEO 3% AS»1 46·153 aRADE 60- * ~ FA }AIT STEEL BEA!15 WjTH BLACE ASPHAL..r BASE RUST W I - I. 1 . - . A 9 - E 1 . 1,¢ ' -PED,fle,ir PAINT. 1 11, .1 lu.-A . ti I -'75-4,1 ~ ... A . - ., 1 • .?3*. 1• - , 1 AN *i, r:,4411'C,-4, r .. . . I Ir- '1 t. I '.4. 1 1,79- ¥ 1 4. , '211* 1 '' ·f**41 W . ' * i.,4-,fliN-:12,1. -ita,4,4 . '1 S MEET .... -- C 1 1 2 1 .-SECTLLD KI D- drawn · ·· 19, PAT I O DECK 1 1 - - ~ ..% 4 1.- 09* TJ D j ->IT. MK.6, PAE PCZE.5 KLES'DENCE checked benedict associates inc. 1 ~ F.. -/t'.- 1 11. 1 4 - 1 1 0 Fe aiaarchitects·planners·engineers/box40 aspen colorado 81611/303·925·3481 date 4 ASPEN COLOK,ADO r- 1-73. . I '' '-... ... -2 - 1 - - 1~ 32££,Sy/14 0131=1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 - (970) 920-5090 City of Aspen Land Use: 104I Deposit 113 p©, - 1042 Flat Fee 1043 HPC 1046 Zoning and Sign Referral Fees: 1 1163 City Engineer 1205 Environmental Health 1190 Housing Building Fees: 1071 Board of Appeals 1072 Building Permit ~ 1073 Electrical Permit ~ 1074 Energy Code Review L 1075 Mechanical Permit ~ 1076 Plan Check 1077 Plumbing Permit 1078 Reinspection Other Fees: 1145 Copy GIS Maps 1481 Housing Cash in Lieu 1383 Open Space Cash in Lieu 1384 Park Dedication 1468 Parking Cash in Lieu Performance Deposit 1268 Public Right-of-way 1164 School District Land Ded. TOTAL 1OR.99 - NAME: 49-\ le 44 'c,:k. e ·; e ADDRESS/PROJECT: 4 1-1 ,\ i 1% c.- , PHONE: CHECK# HI, 2 CASE/PERMIT#: All -9, # OF COPIES: DATE: -'i - '°-- INITIAL: (\1 £ 1 P OV ~,-~- 2' SQUARE STEEL POST BEYOND *4 WRE MESH INALL 4 '/·23>0 i IN44 - 9,CERS -/12 S~ -0~-73· 6-•- (2) Fs TOP AND BOTTOM 1; 14' 0 -/ r DECKING BENT ON RADIUS ' 44 1/7 TO 3/4' ™ICI*SS 3 - #5'8 AT 18' ~ EACH WAY 94 ~>,i -1 7 i-fr E- - n.3< m = 4-/9,l- --1 /- - a 72 T}EADED ROD , ~[Af/<44'14 UU Uulr , F0UNDAT6N p POLE HOUSE ·t . \/14 4 / 414 North Strwt Aspen, Colorodo 3 ~Ik,8 4/ 1 \ \ 4 --I . '9Pr (4) 15 IRTIOL BARS -g 4 Q m 4Z N 12' dio PIER TIED #1 - < lk31/4 l ~ La=31/4 ~ 10'-0 CENTER TO CENTER WITH #3 ENS AT 12' oc ~ M€SSlRE 11UJED r ~~~~~~|~~~!r'!7 NA)01{l,W PIER SPACNG \ERTICALLY ARCHITECTS 1 ./ / 1-4 RADUS ~ _ - -- | ' The Emernonn Group/Archlt,cts ~- CONCRETE WALL ' P.O. Box 4602 0 -6 5 0 - Npen, CO 81612 15'-0' 15,-1 p Wa GAMER BEMI -- ~ (970) 925-2266 \ /41 9 9 3" 1 LE CONCRETE WALL ~ 12~ CONCRETE PER BELOW GRADE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 1<L & A of Colorado .~ OVERLOOK FRAMING PLAN r7 OVERLOOK DECK SECTION- CONCEPTUAL TYPICAL SCREEN WALL PLAN rs-h SCREEN WALL SECTION n Golden, CO 80401 805 14th Street 1 03 (41 (303) 384-9915 1/2, = ILD• - 1 1/2· = 1'-Dr - MECHANICAL ENGINEERS Beaudin Gonze Cormjlting Engineers P.O. 80* 39 Vil, CO 81658 (970) 949-8108 €1-4 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS € , --- (2) 16'3 TOP AND BOTTOM Office of Dan Kiley East Form Charlotte, Vermont 05445 (802) 425-2141 INTERIORS 4 »4 5*0 er b 18 - (2) #69 TOP UD BMTOW 20 FIfth Avenue, #158 - #5's AT 18' oc EACH WAY . / New York, NY 10011 (212> 475-3679 2 P // t STRUCTURAL CONSULTANT 9 & TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT - 15'8 AT 18~ oc EACH WAY . 7 Eng'ineerrlg Venturee Inc / 45. 1 1-- 4 7 101btrn Street 3'-0' , TOP OF SWk' awlington , Wrmont 05401 ..1 (802) 8634225 Ell - 11 - - 1 ~ 9'4" CANTILEVER OF REQ) ~ 1 ~.r i - 13'-O· SETBACKFROMIOPOFSLOPE #5 HOOKED DOES -*.~ ALTER!~TE HOOK • 01 + .V. . t .11 =i=m"... &%3*Er DIRECTIONS 1 2 -l 1_ 1 1 f --9.-07_CANTILEVER 0 15'3 CONTINUO. 7.i i CANTILEVERED SCREEN WALL ELEVATION A 15'-0" SET BACK 4 1. F 1 FROM TOP OF- SLOPE , ~ ' 48 & la"=1'-0" CANTILEVERED CANTILEVER WALL PLAN - SCREEN WALL SECTION - SCREEN WALL SECTION - ~5~ <6j (7j j ,6- 2% !4 BLACK MEEL M A 44 ~ i ~r-©£1" &1·ACK ,STEEL MEW 45'FROM TOP OF SLOPE --1 / / r--2'• F BLACK 5rtEL POSf (TYM 1 11--r· 4. BLACK snrrt wfrre) | 1-- 4 ' 4' BLACK STEEL MES. 1 1 1 r-CONCKETE \all . + '': ~ ~ '-~ ~ TV- ~ -~ if l l ~1-1 12 1 I ' it· , 1 1 , 't- 2% 2 F05T (}3BYONIA ~ 3- r BLACK 31-EEL PUMG F- 4• 4 Sral 6111.1.5 ~ / 24' f?,i '..9 I I . .C ·'·kl 1 A-1 1. , '' P H'" 1! 1 1 'blt' ' "---12'•tr CONCRET~ p'Ele .---J„ . DRY-LAID LOCAL STONE - ~ - C 1, 1 .'llb 1 1 7.-1 , .1 2 , - UNDISTURBED SLOPE 3-~ --6-flf:.11 , 15 1 , ' 1 t.· f \1 // \11/1 L_J· t. L . 1 LAWN I === . 1,1 / 0, 14.- , P/Ar- M :~ GRADE -2 2 17 / I.*:Wik /&,~ . -~kul,4.Ult.UW, *- 02' 51.ACK STEEL BEAM AT GKADE -~ ~r-G.€ 2. BLACK STEEL BEAM 10.-0. -j<\ 1 )/t,/~:0qi*wig-ritall,STI).2 luE ME MEMEME!1| DAIE ISSUED FOR - I ·5\ 1 1 . *012 1 ...4 - 5/13/98 BSUED FOR REWER iticONIC'trTE FIE,9 AT I:-4 C.C..A v #ViVOLM 1.-4-CONCRETE PIER ··-7 1\\\ f A}Eli) 48* 11- 5/15/98 P+Z REVIEW 1.4 4 ...+ 7. ...h EAST PROPERTY LINE FENCE ELEVATION rph' . ..4 GARMISCH STREET GATE ELEVATION 311 ~ STONE WALL SECTION ripj A.-0 1~4"=1'-04 3/4"=1'-0" nTLE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE f EAST PROPERTY LINE FENCE SECTION A 1/2 "-1'-0" STRUCTURAL PLANS AND DETAILS ....# NO. 435 LA-STR-100 4/ L-- *9 S: \SDSKPAOJ\98330-PO+LE\DWG\la-ski Tue May 12 16' 42: 39 1998 Engineering Ventures Inc. - 5'-6' MNIUM .DZ-.SI 77*-N MEMORANDUM 64(bil_E TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Ef THRU: Stan Clauson. Community Development Director » - i. Sk¥4*.ve -'. 1, L 'jul- &4 */VIVWS Julie Ann Woods. Deputy Director O\,4 '124 ~ FROM: Christopher Bendon, Planner f AA#./1 U\IWV, RE: 414 North First Street -- Hallam Lake Bluff ESA and Special Reviews DATE: June 2, 1998 SUMMARY: The applicant, Johnathan Lewis and Roberto Posada. are proposing landscape improvements as part of the redevelopment ofthe former Paepke Estate. A few of these improvements are within the Hallam Lake Bluff Environmentally Sensitive Area and require a Special Review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The area of concern for the Planning and Zoning Commission is the slope to Hallam Lake and the area with 15 feet of the top-of-slope. The overall landscape plan must gain approval from the HPC. There are three primary elements of the plan and a series of general concerns about the development for discussion. The three primary elements are the dry laid stone walls, the larger fence walls, and the observation deck. These items are fully discussed in the staff comments section of this memo. Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this Hallam Lake Bluff Review and Special Review, with conditions. PRIMARY STAKEHOLDERS: Staff distributed the landscape plan to the City Engineer and the Parks Department. In addition, staff sent a copy to ACES and the Given Institute, and notified the HPC Project Monitors of the application. APPLICANT: Johnathan Lewis and Roberto Posada. Represented by the Office of Dan Kiley, Landscape Architects. LOCATION: 414 North First Street. ZONING: R-6 with Hallam Lake Bluff ESA overlay. 1 ,M , PREVIOUS ACTION: The Commission has not previously considered this application. REVIEW PROCEDURE: Hallam Lake Bluff ESA. The Planning and Zoning Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or deny this application at a meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: Top-of-Slope. The applicant has defined the top-o f-slope at elevation 1001, as defined in the application drawings. Based on the site section provided by the applicant. this top-of- slope appears to be correctly located. All areas below and within 15 feet of this line are then within the 'no development zone.' The Hallam Lake standard; do allow development in this area as long as it is approved by the Commission. The standards for this review are attached as Exhibit A. The dry-laid stone walls. There are several short dry-laid stone walls proposed within the ' no development zone.' As proposed. these walls will be approximately 18-24 inches high and in conformance with the progressive height limit from the top-of-slope. Planning staff and the City Parks Department both consider these walls acceptable. ACES raised no concerns over these features. The fence walls. There is a long wall along the north-western portion o f the property to be rehabilitated and a new wall to be constructed (replacing a wooden fence) along the eastern border of the property. The rehabilitation project should be fairly simple and is not expected to significantly affect the ESA. The new wall on the east side is designed to be almost 30 feet long and six feet high constructed with concrete. The structure would be within the 'no development area' but in compliance with the progressive height limit. The structure could be partially suspended if necessary to limit the amount of disturbance near the top-of-slope. The Parks Department does not consider the wall to be necessary and wants the wall to be removed from the plans. The area could be planted with greater vegetation to achieve the intended goals of privacy. Also, the proposed wall would be in close proximity to a very large tree. No formal comments were available at the time of this memo but may be included in the packet if received by the time of publication. Planning staff has asked for a member o f the Parks Department to be present during the meeting to address their concerns. Philosophically, this wall represents a separation between the Given Institute and the Lewis/Posada house. These two properties were once part of the original Paepke estate and are now held and function separately. 2 b . Planning staff understands the design rationale behind the fence wall and feels the structure could be a nice amenity to the project providing privacy and defining an outdoor room. The proposed structure will be replacing a existing wooden fence and is proposed within the height limit. The structure should not significantly detract from the Hallam Lake ESA and should not significantly detract from the view from ACES. Planning staff. however, suggests a medium to dark gray or slate color be used, rather than an off-white. to minimize the visibility of the structure from below. Also. to the extent possible, the structure should be supported with pier footings rather than a trench footing. Footings should not be placed within the dripline of existing trees. Cantilevering the structure may look rather odd, and is not recommended as a condition by Planning staff. Cajitilevered ~ The observation deck. 77 The existing deck is within the 'no development area.' Just as with similar cases of existing encroachments in ESAs, planning staff has informed the applicant that the structure may be maintained, rehabilitated, and even reconstructed, but not enlarged or moved to another location. The applicant is proposing to reconstruct the deck and has provided the proposed design and materials to be used. This design and proposed material are acceptable to staff. However, both Planning staff and the Parks Department are concerned about the construction process. The location of the deck presents a potential for bank stabilization problems and interference with the surrounding vegetation, especially if heavy machinery is used. Considering staff' s concerns, the applicant has investigated using fewer support piers and manual construction techniques. Staff is satisfied that the applicant shares the same concerns about the possible construction impacts and will use an appropriate construction method. A condition of approval has been included describing this process. The applicant may wish to amend this condition based on further information about construction methods. General Comments. Lighting. Outdoor lighting for this site should be low, downcast. and not used to ® accent architectural or landscape features. No lighting should be used below or within 15 feet of the top-of-slope. This includes no lighting on, or of, the observation deck, trees, and the flagpole. The Commission should make this a condition of approval and recommend the same condition to the HPC. Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." Agency referral comments have been included as Exhibit "B." The application has been included as Exhibit "C." 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval o f this Hallam Lake Bluff Review with the following conditions: 1. The top-of-slope is approved at the elevation 1001, as shown in the application drawings (false datum). 2. The placerhent and design of the dry-laid stone walls is approved as proposed in the detailed drawings of this application. 3. The observation deck may be reconstructed in its present location and footprint, but cannot be expanded or reconstructed in a second location. 4. Prior to any demolition or redevelopment of this observation deck, the applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department a scaled plan and section drawing of the existing deck prepared by a registered Architect or Engineer. 5. For the purpose of maintaining the integrity o f the Hallam Lake Bluff slope and to minimize the visual impacts from construction, the applicant shall observe the following construction process for the observation deck: a. Silt fencing shall be erected on the down-slope side of the deck prior to construction activity and shall remain in place until completion and sign-off by the Building Inspector. b. Existing vegetation within the construction area shall be tied back to prevent damage. c. All demolition. digging for foundation supports, and construction shall be accomplished manually, not with the aid of mechanical equipment. In the event mechanical equipment is necessary, the Parks Department shall be notified and placement of the equipment shall be approved by the Parks Department. d. The applicant shall limit the number of support piers to a practical minimum, as determined by an Architect or Engineer. e. After construction, all disturbed soils shall be stabilized and/or revegetated to the approval of the Parks Department. f. All representations made by the applicant's representative to the Commission concerning the process, timing, and materials for construction shall be considered conditions of approval. 6. The rehabilitation ofthe north-western wall is approved. 7. The construction of the 6 foot fence wall on the east boundary line is approved as proposed with the following conditions: a. Pier footings shall be used and located to minimize disturbance to surrounding vegetation. b. A medium to dark gray or slate, or similar color, shall be used to minimize the visibility ofthe structure from Hallam Lake. 8. No other landscape improvements or changes to the terrain, except those mentioned herein, are approved. The applicant shall gain approval for any revegetation below or with 15 feet of the top-of-slope from the Parks Department. 9. Any pool or hot tub shall be drained to the sanitary sewer and not over the slope. 4 10. Outdoor lighting shall be low, downcast, and not used to accent architectural or landscape features. No lighting shall be used below or within 15 feet of the top-of-slope. There shall be no lighting on, or of, the observation deck. trees, and the flagpole. The Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends this condition of approval to the Historic Preservation Commission for any further reviews necessary. 11. Any changes to the design or representation made to staff or the Commission in this application for development within the ESA area must be formally accepted as an amendment to this ESA approval. 12. Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record this Planning and Zoning Resolution with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder located in the Courthouse Plaza Building. There is a per page recordation fee. In the alternative, the applicant may pay this fee to the City Clerk who will record the resolution. 13. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the Hallam Lake Bluff Review for the Lewis/Posada residence, 414 North First Street, with the conditions outlined in the Community Development Department memo dated June 2, 1998." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Comments Exhibit B -- Referral Agency Comments Exhibit C -- Development Application 5 Exhibit A Staff Comments Hallam Lake Bluff review standards. No development shall be permitted within the Hallam Lake Bluff ESA unless the commission makes a determination that the proposed development meets all of the following requirements: 1. No development, excavation or fill, other than native vegetation planting, shall take place below the top of slope. Staff Finding: The existing observation deck may be reconstructed in its exact location and footprint. All vegetation below the top-of-slope must be approved_by the Parks Department. 2. All development within the fifteen-foot setback from the top of slope shall be at grade. Any proposed development not at grade within the fifteen-foot setback must be approved by special review pursuant to Section 26.64.040(D). Staff Finding: There are improvements proposed within this area. Please refer to the Special Review criteria. 3. All development outside the fifteen-foot setback from top of slope shall not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the zoning officer utilizing that definition set forth at Section 26.04.100. Staff Finding: All proposed development, except for the reconstruction of the observation deck, meets this standard. 4. A landscape plan shall be submitted with all development applications. Such plan shall include native vegetative screening of no less than fifty (50) percent of the development as viewed from the rear (slope) of the parcel. All vegetative screening shall be maintained in perpetuity and shall be replaced with the same or comparable material should it die. Staff Finding: A landscape plan has been submitted. The existing vegetation covers a substantial portion of the site and is not proposed to be removed. 5. All exterior lighting shall be low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the nature preserve or located down the slope. Staff Finding: Staff has included a condition of approval for outdoor lighting. 6. No fill material or debris shall be placed on the face of the slope. Historic drainage patterns and rates must be maintained. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained down the slope. Staff Finding: Staff has included this as a condition o f approval. 7. Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect, or engineer shall be submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope, and pertinent elevations above sea level. . Staff Finding: A site section has been included in the application drawings. Special Review. Hallam Lake Bluff ESA encroachment into fifteen-foot setback from top of slope or height limit. Whenever a special review is for development above or below grade within the fifteen-foot setback from top of slope as identified on a site specific section drawing or above the height limit established by the ESA, the development application shall be approved only if the following conditions have been met: 1. A unique condition exists on the site where strict adherence to the top of slope setback will create an unworkable design problem. Staff Finding: The existing observation deck may be reconstructed as of right. Appropriately, staff is concerned about the aesthetics and construction process of the development and has worked with the applicant to arrive at a construction method which should minimize, to the extent possible, construction impacts from the redevelopment. There does not exist an unworkable design problem which dictates low rock walls and a 6 foot high fence wall along a portion o f the boundary line. However, staff believes these improvements are in character with the overall design for the property and, while not mandatory, do contribute positively to the overall scheme. The Commission, however, may find these improvements unnecessary and unacceptable. There is not, in the opinion of staff. an unworkable design problem created by the top-of-slope. The Commission is entirely within their authority to deny these improvements within the 'no development area.' 2. Any intrusion into the top of slope setback or height limit is minimized to the greatest extent possible. Staff Finding: These intrusions have been minimized. 3. Other parts of the structure or development on the site are located outside the top of slope setback line or height limit to the greatest extent possible. Staff Finding: This standard has been met. The majority of improvements on this site are located far outside the 'no development area.' 4. Landscape treatment is increased to screen the structure or development in the setback from all adjoining properties. Staff Finding: The low stone walls are not expected to be visible from Hallam Lake. The observation deck is existing. The fence wall will probably be visible from Hallam Lake in profile, but is not expected to substantially disrupt the view. Staff has suggested using a more muted color for the fence wall. 6 6 . MEMORANDUM To: Chris Bendon, Planner Thru: Nick Adeh, City Enginee~/A ~ From: Chuck Roth. Project Engineer Og. Date: May 28, 1998 Re: 414 North First Street - Hallam Lake and Special Review for Landscaping The Development Review Committee has reviewed the above referenced application at their May 20,1998 meeting, and we have the following comments: 1. Fence/Wall - There was a discrepancy between the information shown on the drawing and the language in the application concerning whether a fence or a wall is proposed. The applicant has entered a legal agreement with a neighbor (David Levy) concerning walls and fences, but the application makes no reference to that agreement and whether the terms are being met. 2. Landscaping -The Parks Department indicated that the landscaping is incorrect and that they will be specific in their review memo. 3. Observation Deck - The proposed observation deck replacement is considerably larger than the original, existing deck. The applicant needs to verify with the planners if the enlarged deck is acceptable. 4. Work in the Public Right-of-wav - Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and development in public rights-of-way adjacent to private property, we advise the applicant as follows: The applicant must receive approval from city engineering (920-5080) for design of improvements, including landscaping, within public rights-of-way, parks department (920-5120) for vegetation species and for public trail disturbance, and streets department (920-5130) for mailboxes, street and alley cuts, and shall obtain permits for any work or development, including landscaping, within public rights-of-way from the city community development department. DRC Attendees Staff: Rebecca Schickling, Stephen Ellsperman, Ross Soderstrom 98M126 1 QuIt f CIa LAND USE APPLICATION - PROJECT: g g <7 ¤ 17,7 Cr - 4.-4 4 -L Name: POLE House (Lewis-Posada Residence, Aspen) MAY i 8 1998 Location: 414 N. First Street, Aspen, CO | (Indicate street address, lot & block number. legal description whe,i©a@bkilirixt¢P' J 1/\. 411,1.1141 OPUENT APPLICANT: Name: Jonathan Lewis and Roberto Posada | Address: 414 N. First Street, Aspen, CO 81611 Phone #: (970) 920-2724 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Office_of Dan Kiley Address: Box 250, Garen Road, Charlotte, VT 05445 Phone #: (802) 425-2141 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ~1 Conditional Use El Conceptual PUD I) Conceptual Historic Devt. ~ Special Review g Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) C] Final Historic Development U Design Review Appeal U Conceptual SPA El Minor Historic Devt. ] GMQS Allotment E Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) m Historic Demolition ] GMQS Exemption E Subdivision El Historic Designation E ESA -8040 Greenline, Stream m Subdivision Exemption (includes E Small Lodge Conversionl Margin. Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansioh Mountain View Plane E Lot Split m Temporary Use El Other: ~ Lot Line Adjustment C] Text/Map Amendment EXISIING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) Single family residence and gardens with 300 sq. ft. observation deck. PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Renovation of observation deck; addition of landscape elements, I including low stone walls which fall within the Hallam Lake Bluff ESA. Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ N/A n Pre-Application Conference Summary ] Attachment # 1, Signed Fee Agreement ] Response to Attachment #2, Dimensional Requirements Form 1 Response to Attachment #3, Minimum Submission Contents U Response to Attachment #4, Specific Submission Contents ~ Response to Attachment #5, Review Standards for Your Application D . OFFICE OF DAN KILEY -ANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS AND DLANNERS · EAST FARM · CHARLOTTE · VERMONT · 05445 - TELEPHONE 802-325-2141 · FACSIMILE. 802-425-3288 RESPONSE TO SPECIAL REVIEW STANDARDS PROPERTY: Jonathan Lewis and Roberto Posada 414 North First Street Aspen, CO. 81611 15 MAY 1998 1. Two elements of the proposed development are located within the fifteen-foot setback from top of slope. a) Dry-laid stone walls. These walls are intended to provide a degree of spatial definition to the inner lawn area, as well as to provide seating that blends with the land. Their height and placement should render the walls not visible from below. We propose to augment native vegetation in any areas of the slope where it is sparse, to ensure that the effect is achieved entirely in line with the natural character of the hillside, and to avoid any visual impact on the Hallam Lake area, b) Screen wall at east property line. This wall is intended to replace the existing fence line which currently delineates the property line. Its placement is generated by a desire to screen the northeast corner of the Lewis-Posada outdoor living area from the nearby Givens Institute decking. The wall has been designed to minimize visual and physical impact on both properties, as well as to limit its visibility from A.C.E.S. below. To this end the wall is just eight inches in section; in elevation a large portion of its face will be obscured by existing evergreens or new vine growth. 2. The screen wall and particularly the low stone walls should not present significant visual and minimal structural impact on top of slope conditions. Both elements will be well screened by existing native vegetation and trees on the north (Hallam Lake) side. The narrow width of the screen wall and the low height of the stone walls have been selected to minimize visual intrusion. Upon request a mock up of both elements can be fabricated to exhibit the suitability of their scale and dimensions at the proposed locations. 3. Standard is met. 4. Standard is met. We hope that these thoughts are useful in clarifying the design intent for the Lewis-Posada property. Please contact the Office of Dan Kiley if more information is needed. Contact: Jane Amidon or Peter Meyer Office of Dan Kiley 250 Garen Road Charlotte, VT 05445 802.425.2141 OFFICE OF DAN KILEY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS EAST FARM CHARLOTTE VERMONT· 05445 TELEPHONE· 802-425-2141 · FACSIMILE. 802-425-3288 RESPONSE TO HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW STANDARDS (ATTACHMENT 5) PROPERTY: Jonathan Lewis and Roberto Posada ' 414 North First Street Aspen, CO. 81611 15 MAY 1998 1. Standard is met. - 2. Two elements of the proposed development are located within the fifteen-foot setback from top of slope. a) Dry-laid stone walls. These walls are 18"-24" high and are set approximately 18"-24" back from top of slope. At this dimension, the walls are beneath the 45 ° angle extended from grade at top of slope. Since the walls are dry-laid stone, they will not require a footing and can be built on grade. On the walls' north (Hallam Lake) side, native vegetation will grow against and obscure the stone work. b) Screen wall at east property line. The wall is six feet high and is set back six feet from top of slope. It is eight-inch thick concrete, and is supported by twelve-inch diameter piers up to ten feet on center. If required to avoid grade disturbance in the setback zone, the nine feet of wall which extend over the zone can be cantilevered. The overall length of wall will be detennined on site in reference to existing trees. 3. Standard is met. 4. Standard is met. 5. Standard will be met when site lighting plan is developed. 6. Standard is met. 7. Standard is met. We hope that these thoughts are useful in clarifying the design intent for the Lewis-Posada property. Please contact the Office of Dan Kiley if more information is needed. Contact: Jane Amidon or Peter Meyer Office of Dan Kiley 250 Garen Road Charlotte, VT 05445 802.425.2141 h /· I V 1,· p. I 46 , rts-Uk= U 1. 3 . . 5,7 . . 1 1 I ./ ./ . , /.. - -*. 9 2>- A n . 2- 1 -2- ! OVERLOOF . A ./ 1 \ tl' _ U h EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION ATs :<24'tfJ' :ti ,..,Alti :1,!U,f f A e . - r I I 1 2 1 . / ¥ r -r ; < r79 - I . V 'h .. 4 . 9 43 , • L . . r- L., 3 1 .1 -11 , i. 2 .4 - R U 1 GIVEN INSTITUTE PROPERTY . t 0. . - ¢ rk- 5 I' . . 7- 7 c 7 . 1, 4 1 <:. - ·.1 L ' I I y/ - 6 ~ ~·.1 DECK ' . ·· ,..: t.&54.-?.7.F / IL' ,- 4 j. T . 1, ... 6 , /4 ¥- 1 ..... ' V. , 1 -' 1- I , I &Jurv.j; 13;.. 12 poi,4.9-'- -1.. 7 v.v -'VV STREET ' UV -: ' ..iR-- 1.Fi ,1. ov' ' -- --2. NORTH ELEVATION . -e --, -4" 1 , 1 ,-- 9,/ \ . 4 '.1 . 5I. r 0' D -- 4 | 1 j , ./ 0 1 ' 0 .., , 0 1 1 4.... 0 .0 0 . I . . I . 4 - 0 . . . D . . . L. 4 1. D , . . .. . 1, \ f +4 MATCH LINE 1.--f- \ Al,4/$. \ l \ \ \ \ . I \ \ 6 \ NQIES \ \ \ . 1 , 1. ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. \ \ 1-1 \ 2. TREE PROTECTION FOR ALL EXISTING TREES ALONG DRIP LINE PERIMETER AT MINIMUM. \ 4 - 3. PLANTS FROM EXISTING HISTORIC GARDENS TO BE RELOCATED IN BEDS ON SITE. \ 4. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS WILL BE VIA GARMISCH STREET. SEE ARCHITECT'S DRWGS. 5. SEE LA 400 FOR PAVING PLAN. \ -0 .. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ I I . \\ ..\ C I\.\ I. 4 . I . \ 4. t :... \ L I. I 094 /4/ 1 ... \ I \\.I \ ./. 1 .. CONC WALL (EXIST.) - ,\ \ \\ .\ I. \ . 10# I \\\ EXISTING WALL m BE REMEDIATED AS NECESSARY \\\\ I I. \ 1\ \ ... . 1 - EXISTING GATE ~ 11&#fir--80 40111149: .. . I I 1/\\ \ \ \ N ./.- I -. 1-_. cHA,NUNK O -j, \ . \ ~ \ \ N · -- - -/ / 4- \\ \2 0/.\ ' \ \\ \.... .\ --- -1- - -- - -/ --4220, & I .....\\.\. -r - / I -0 - \ \ \\ N . .- -- / / -- \ \ N , I - r , I ./' - N... \\. \~ -I-, , - ...\ \ \ I. I \ I .. .. --- p ----- - - - \ .-. PROPERTY LINE --- EXISTNG *ATE ' - 0 ' 0 . \ -- /0\ ,$19 . : 1 2 -14-4 2 f «1 2 . :I~ 2 22 0 1 »2 711 2 - i -33 \ --- --- --- . 1001 / - - -- ---- - I , / -. 7 - -. .-- ---- - -- --- - 1 1 13\ . . \ I -.4 , I. I. I. I. \\ \\ \\ . . \ -~ -- -- - \ -- / . ..0/.- . ..... --. } i \ '-I - / -- - Ill . / -. - - -- --- 0. -. j / 1 \ \ -. ----- I / - £ r U lo i ,+0... i-005.4 \: . - -- M \ g -- - -- -- - - 1 \ \ \ \\ \ U., - -- -I- - /:\ Ii--- - . - - -I , 15' SETBACK 4.'OyRELLIS 1007.31 . \ h N - I $ -- - --- -- -/ --- , N k *\.\1 i N --- - -- . 7, ,- 1- - - * - - - / € I /21 4 -I» -2 --- 2 - : - -- - - ./ - 3 3.--4- - . --- / , 54 ./ / C -- . c -- --- - -~ -·- - *- - - - -:' ,r -- _ 1 -- - - d -- - %- , VA.. - - / --- -- -- -Ii-- ---- - - / / -- -0 - / - ~ -\.\ ...4 - h -9%43 - - ---- -/, 1 - -~ ARBOR GATE: 2%>X -~ \ ~,~ , 4©· ~ EXISTING DRA~AGE PAir*NS ANAATIVE VEGETAnON ~rYP)--·~- f-~- --- -1 - - - \ ~7\ ----- ~ ~002 , [•; ~4 /4~ ~ ' , -··- ·.--.~baSTUY-OPATUWAYSTOBEREMEDIATEDAS,nECESSAR¥_ 1- -~_-_---_-_~- - - - - - - P#-- - - -1 - , - It - ---- 7- .-I . --- - 1.. . . I W --* , - € I . : -I I -1 - --- ----- - - .I * - - '' 1 / 0 - - - - _ - _ F - - - ./- EXISTI!10 OVERUXYK -- _ - - - ~ 7 -- -/__ - IO·BERECQNSTRUCTEq- ,_ _ - ~ ---- - \\\ - r 1 -- -- / h 2 0. 1 / TOP OF SLOPE /\ -2 - - - - DRY-UDSTONE WALL - -11 -/ /2,»-4--TERRACE oF STONE PIECES / ON GRADE,24' 11EIGHT (TYP) --- _ 2 f -<-- -.------ - - - - -- f ---4--- · - ' SET ON GRADE 4 +10013 1-- ----1 --- -- 1 r** rl i -,-·-.--·.1- r···--··· -·-* /' f ' - . 1 vt--- 1 L--- -----v-«5- 46-----4 -- -----_-e:..- - U --# --1 --44---p- ,«4 0 4/ i . \ 1 y SETBACK -- J -- ---- · 0--lt I - 1 1 , FFE +98.8 i 3 6 . / 2% 1,0, 1 N - / / / 0 ' f N -M- 0 1 ** li . Iva 8 -- WALL 'kILJ 1 1~:8*dIT~U~~004< ~ --- --- R- L - / i i 1 1 O 1 ~- 1 --- 1 7 3 i 'J ~~~~~ O I --- L-/ Z---- -/---/ , 1-1 0 - 1 2 /:/ I / 2/ . / i. O '1 .44& Lizj , I ; 0 F' 'L..2 r-·~ ----- 1 L, i - ~ l L_~-----111-$100 · j ' 0 1 4,1- , I I i ; FFE +100.27 +1013.52 ... N , U , 1 1 f \5--r ' . ~ THESE ELEMENTS PEND[NG APPROVAL / / / , / v 1 ' -1 +1002.3 . 4 / 1003 1 \ ' / i?'1· il l 4 1 /0 \ \ I e / / I i / ' ' .-.7 1 6966/F-- 0 -. . 0.- .. . r • .N . 0 0 . . 1\ : f:1 - , -- 0 -L -~,42, I \ 1 1 1 . \G NEW ASPEN (TYP) i » - - I j # /1 - I - - \'% ·J / 0 0 . , +1003.3 4,\124*ki \ 11 1 / 0 r-- EXISTING TREE m'P) \ •, i J j . j , e ./ 0 < --7 F 1,1 - 0/< - TREE CANopy 0-Yp) 4 / ............,-r - , gGATE +~id FFE +100.27 r ----:-: v, -7 . 3/ 1 .. m BE RECONSTRUCTED //F - EXISTING WOOD FENCE / T--1 it · 1. . , I I , /l ) 1 / 1 1 2 BRUMRfoous ; f E-» 1 ./ -R ---1 00 l ,, ~ - o j 9 ' , 0 <- ' . , 1 i ; O, -00 , it·23 ,- 1 -- . . /., 83 0 On / O 0 00 0 1 # .-JI 0 0 - C o--3 , € .... . 0 / 1, 0 0 0 . , . '.' ./-I 6 o , h/FIR o 0 . / • ...\- ... - , 0 ' 13, . ..........r , lu 4#*' . L +T.O.W. 6'-C- OFF GRADE (TYP) ir"h // f N RIGHT-OF-WAY .Ln -/ 1--vr LA:1100 OARMISH STREET EXT. k> 1 GRADING PLAN 1"=200-0" €5 1 HaI. NORTH FIREr Wr,ZEX THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER A017-98 PARCEL ID NUMBER 2735-124-18-005 PROJECT ADDRESS 414 N. 1St St. PLANNER Chris Bendon CASE DESCRIPTION ESA, Special Review REPRESENTATIVE Dan Kiley DATE OF FINAL ACTION 12/20/00 CLOSED BY Amy DeVault PARCEL ID:.2735-124-18-005 DATE RCVD: '03-10-98 # COPIES:~1 CASE NOI 4017-98 CASE NAME:.414 N 1st ESA & Special Review PLNR:i~*- ji-ie--C#b PROJ ADDR:,414 N 1st CASE TYP:[ESA,- §/cial Review J STEPS: 6ne-- OWN/APP::Lewis, Jonathan & ADR' C/S/Z: PHN:, REP:!Kiley, Dan ADR: 250 Garen Road C/StZ:i Charlotte, VT 0544 PHN: (802) 425-214 FEES DUE.: 1080 FEES RCVDN 1 080 STAT: E-- REFERRALS REF: BY+ DUE: 1 MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED 11 i 111 -1 1 1 - DATE OF FINAL ACTION: 1 ---- - --- -- CITY COUNCIL:i REMARKS PZ:; 4 - -- BOA: 1 CLOSED:~RTUE BY: ~ c,UIArl DRAC PLAT SUBMITD: ~--- - PLAT (BK,PG):1 ADMIN:| .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW FOR THE LEWIS/POSADA RESIDENCE, 414 NORTH FIRST STREET, CITY OF ASPEN. Parcel No. 2735-124-18-005 Resolution #98 - 09 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Johnathan Lewis and Roberto Posada. owner and applicant, for landscape and physical improvements to their property located at 414 North First Street; and, WHEREAS, the subject improvements which full within 15 feet of the top-of- slope of the Hallam Lake Bluff are within the review authority o f the Planning and Zoning Commission, pursuant to Section 26.68 Environmentally Sensitive Areas; and. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission may approve development within the Hallam Lake Bluff Environmentally Sensitive Area in conformance with the review criteria set forth in Section 26.68.060: and. WHEREAS, the City Engineer. the C ity Parks Department, the Community Development Department, the Given Institute. and the Aspen Center for Environmental Studies (ACES) reviewed the proposal and recommended approval with collditions; and WHEREAS, during a regular meeting on June 2, 1998, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved by a 5-1 vote the Hallam Lake Bluff Review for the Lewis/Posada residence with the conditions recommended by the Community Development Department, as amended by the Commission during the meeting. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: That the Hallam Lake Bluff Review for the Lewis/Posada Residence, 414 North First Street, is approved with the following conditions: 1. The top-of-slope is approved at the elevation 1001, as shown in the application drawings (false datum). 2. The placement and design of the dry-laid stone walls is approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. as proposed in the detailed drawings of this application, subject to final review by the Historic Preservation Commission. 3. The observation deck may be reconstructed in its present location and footprint subject to final review by the Historic Preservation Commission, but cannot be expanded or reconstructed in a second location. 4. Prior to any demolition or redevelopment of this observation deck, the applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department a scaled plan and section drawing of the existing deck prepared by a registered Architect or Engineer. 11111'l lilli 111111 lilli 111111111111111111 lilli ll'l lili 418197 06/17/1998 11:49A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 1 of 4 R 21.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO ®30. @oii- C 5. For the purpose of maintaining the integrity of the Hallam Lake Bluff slope and to minimize the visual impacts from construction, the applicant shall observe the following construction process for the observation deck: a. Silt fencing shall be erected on the down-slope side of the deck prior to construction activity and shall remain in place until completion and sign-off by the Building Inspector. b. Existing vegetation within the construction area shall be tied back to prevent damage. c. All demolition. digging for foundation supports, and construction shall be accomplished manually. not with the aid of mechanical equipment. In the event mechanical equipment is necessary, the Parks Department shall be notified and placement of the equipment shall be approved by the Parks Department. d. The applicant shail limit the number of support piers to a practical minimum, as determined by an Architect or Engineer. e. After construction. all disturbed soils shall be stabilized and/or revegetated to the approval of the Parks Department. f. All representations made by the applicant's representative to the Commission concerning the process, timing, and materials for construction shall be considered conditions of approval. 6. Reconstruction of the footpaths. in cooperation with the City Parks Department and ACES, is approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, subject to final review by the Historic preservation Commission. with the following conditions. a. Silt fencing shall be erected on the down-slope side of the paths prior to construction activity and shall remain in place until completion and sign-off by the City Parks Department. b. Existing vegetation within the construction area shall be tied back to prevent damage. c. All demolition, digging for foundation supports. and construction shall be accomplished manually. not with the aid of mechanical equipment. In the event mechanical equipment is necessary, the Parks Department shall be notified and placement of the equipment shall be approved by the Parks Department. d. The applicant shalllimit the number of reinforcing timbers to a practical minimum. e. After construction. all disturbed soils shall be stabilized and/or revegetated to the approval of the Parks Department. f. All representations made by the applicant's representative to the Commission concerning the process, timing, and materials for construction shall be considered conditions of approval. 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 418197 06/17/1998 11:49A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 2 of 4 R 21.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO 7. The construction ofthe 6 foot fence wall on the east boundary line is approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. subject to final review by the Historic Preservation Commission. as proposed with the following conditions: a. Pier footings shall be used and located to minimize disturbance to surrounding vegetation. b. A medium to dark gray or slate. or similar color, shall be used to minimize the visibility of the structure from Hallam Lake. c. Silt fencing shall be erected on the down-slope side of the deck prior to construction activity and shall remain in place until completion and sign-off by the City Parks Department. d. Existing vegetation within the construction area shall be-tied back to prevent damage. e. All demolition, digging for foundation supports. and construction shall be accomplished manually. not with the aid of mechanical equipment. In the event mechanical equipment is necessary, the Parks Department shall be notified and placement of the equipment shall be approved by the Parks Department. f. The applicant shall limit the number of support piers to a practical minimum, as determined by an Architect or Engineer. g. After construction. all disturbed soils shall be stabilized and/or revegetated to the approval of the Parks Department. h. All representations made by the applicant's representative to the Commission concerning the process, timing, and materials for construction shall be considered conditions of approval. 8. No other landscape improvements or changes to the terrain, except those mentioned herein, are approved. The applicant shall gain approval for any revegetation below or with 15 feet of the top-of-slope from the Parks Department. 9. Any pool or hot tub shall be drained to the sanitary sewer and not over the slope. 654 10. Outdoor lighting shall be low, downcast, and not used to accent architectural or landscape features. No lighting shall be used below or within 15 feet of the top-of- slope. There shall be no lighting on. or of, the observation deck, trees, and the flagpole. The Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends this condition of approval to the Historic Preservation Commission for any further reviews necessary. 11. Any changes to the design or representation made to staff or the Commission in this application for development within the ESA area must be formally accepted as an amendment to this ESA approval. 12. Before issuance of a building permit. the applicant shall record this Planning and Zoning Resolution with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder located in the Courthouse Plaza Building. There is a per page recordation fee. In the alternative, the applicant may pay this fee to the City Clerk who will record the resolution. 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 418197 06/17/1998 11:49A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 3 of 4 R 21.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO 13. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval. unless otherwise amended by other conditions. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on June 2,1998. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING CO1VIMISSION: \ 9 L// City Attorney Sara Garton, Chair ATTEST: A A- ~fackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 418197 06/17/1998 11:49A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 4 of 4 R 21.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO A~es • *4 t' -i· i. 1 . Po,t-it®fax Note 7671 Date '· ~ ~ From/1 L ve,fe*~41/1 %4),4.4 .'I. - co.~Demt. CO. Phone # Phone # *0 €37- 1 4, 3 I . .r Fax # qge cai Fax # Design Workshop, Inc. Memorandum Landscape Architecture Land Planning To: Chris Bendon Urban Design Tourism Planning From: Gyles Thornely Date: September 25,2000 Project Name: PO+LE Residence Proj ect #: 2338 S ubj ect: Documents for Your Files Chris. based on your conversation with Richard Shaw on September 158, I enclose the following plans for you files. • Layout Plan • Lighting Plan • Grading Plan • Stamped Structural Drawings o f the Observation Deck • Original Benedict Observation Deck Drawings. It is my understanding that no further HPC Review is required for the Landscape Plans, Should you require any further Details relating to this matter please call, Regards Gyles/' Neel '-p 4~04 br Gr dl« 9 901 Wolt 45 are, ob Awt 7/Annkt . 012 19 cmpirwi· CAA F•112 *7 446•H OA #17»W,( 6.1+ DESIGNWORKSHOP Albuquerque • Aspen • Denver • Jackson Hole • Phoenix · Santa Fe • Tahoe • Vail · Santa Cruz • Santiago • Slo Paulo 120 East Main Street. Aspen, Colorado 81611 · (te]) 970-925-8354 · (fax) 970-920-1387 www.design workshop.com u -. .-- p' CASE NUMBER A017-98 PARCEL ID # 2735-124-18005 CASE NAME 414 N 1 st ESA & Special Review PROJECT ADDRESS 414 N 1 st PLANNER Chris Bendon CASE TYPE ESA, Special Review OWNER/APPLICANT Lewis, Jonathan & Posada, Roberto REPRESENTATIVE Kiley, Dan DATE OF FINAL ACTION CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION Approved Reso. 8-98 ADMIN ACTION BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 12/20/00 BY Chris Bendon 1 _0* 1.16.0 ftk«j,Oll I, R~(47 44 led - 4 i * MN#*bv #c Ch. det 12414 1€-» -_- 0-t ---M~~_ 900 kil>_1 5DZ€ ___-_- a# 04(4 69\aza_06~,a-~- e.«y r- 44- 1 - l -- - 61( 6 h/4 ibb 3-06 - 1404-- 44*1 +66 fill &** Pk°91 0* - 1%* (*1% u~A Alwk 44 , w fl'kih ZNY,ph/le gruf c#411* -----4- 7--l IL Alt - r«Act ME V)%99 i 004 1%14 4 1-24 dvd aFf 1(29 - 11 1 . July 29,1998 Jane Amidon O ffice of Dan Kiley East Farm 0 - Charlotte, VT 05445 ASPEN · PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Re: 414 North First Street Dear Ms. Amidon: As you requested this letter summarizes a meeting between Michael Ernemann, Stan Clauson. and myself held earlier this month. Please let me know if I can further clarify any of these items. Landscape Plan. The landscape plan was reviewed by staff and approved with the inclusion of the construction detail submitted to the Parks Department and the exclusion of a few items specified on the plan. I made a few clarifying comments on the plan and excluded the 'concrete segments' specification for the low walls on the Hallam Lake side of the property which were not represented to the Planning and Zoning Commission during their review. I have included a copy of the plan for your reference. The approval includes the perimeter walls as drawn. Observation deck. The materi·als to be used on the observation deck need final approval by the Historic Preservation Commission. This was a condition of the Hallam Lake Bluffreview. I have received your materials and have scheduled the review for August 26th. This as ' minor' development which does not require a public hearing. Flag pole. , The proposed flagpole should be within the 25 foot height limit of the zone district unless otherwise approved by the HPC. I noted this on the landscape plan. The proposed 40 foot pole will also be addressed at the August 26th meeting. Street R.O.W. Design. We understand you may have some interest in proposing a design for the areas within the street right-of-way in front of the property. We generally thought this could be a great benefit to both the property owners and the City. Also, a project like this may ease some of the anxiety of the past. John Bennett. the Mayor of Aspen, has expressed some interest in recognizing the property and its history with a plague or a bench of some sort. If this is done, it should be near or after completion of the project. 130 SOUTH G.ALENA STREET · ASPEN, COLORADO 81611-1975 PHONE 970.920.5090 FAx 970.920.5439 Printed on Recycled Paper .. We are interested in what your initial thoughts are for this space and how it may function. . · We did talk about the desire to recognize the traditional grid o f the West End and the possible need to maintain a limited amount of street parking in the area. Very truly yours, 4 +4 Christopher Bendon. Planner - City of Aspen MEMORANDUM TO: Michael Ernemann, The Ernemann Group FROM: Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning DirectokjAC) DATE: July 16,1999 RE: 414 N. First Street, P.O.L.E. We have reviewed the meeting minutes provided by Hansen Construction from the HPC monitor's June 3rd site visit, as well as jeffrey Halferty's memo of July 10th, Hansen th Construction's response of July 13, and revised elevations of the carriage house provided by The Ernemann Group. It is agreed that the June 3rd meeting minutes are accurate in regard to restoration of the carriage house. We would like to clarify that when the chimney is rebuilt it must match the original appearance. We understand that all of the exterior siding from the east wall has been removed and is in storage. Once the new addition and window replacement are completed, original siding will be reinstalled on all areas of the original wall that remain exposed. Please confirm that the original siding on the north, south, and west sides of the building will also be retained. In regard to the egress windows on the north and south sides of the building, the permit set indicated a easement window would be installed on the south and that a double hung window, sized for egress, would be installed on the north. Subsequently a decision was made by the design team to use a easement window on both the north and south sides. The HPC monitors suggest that on the south fa~ade, which is visible to the public, mullions be added to the easement window so that it has the appearance of a two over two window. Please continue to keep us informed of any project monitoring issues that come up during the course of this project. Chris Bendon (920-5072) is the contact person in the Planning Office. He is on vacation for the next week, so questions should be direct to me at 920- 5062 temporarily. Ce: Suzannah Reid, HPC Chair Jeffrey Halferty, HPC Mike Gundrum, Hansen Construction .JUL. 14.1999'3 2: 38PFF·Z .fl.#l]NOD) rU & LAMUUbl NO. 6215 3 p.2 2 mooting..6 PO+LE House CON.Tll OT;DN Sy.*t HPC On-811* Roview Z ...... HPCo 6/389 1.6.11.11 PO+LE House 1 anh M.Rded Mike Gundrum FIG] i Hansen Conskucion, Inc, Y Randy Jacobsen [RJ] Hansen Conaucion, Inc. Y Jemey Halerty WHI Hi®fics< Prclervamon Commly Y Jortaotart L./Robsm P. [JOR] .lonmthan Lewis / Roberto Posa Y 11.11# Duct®kon Mon by al= an• dul Stulad 00001 WINDOW TRIM REPI.*CEMENT. NEW Con#rmed the dlreotio? recelved during previous HPC on#le review, thatell exterlor winclow trim would be removed and replaced with new material to match the ¢on le oflhe origlnl tlim. 00002 CHIMNEY SUPPORT: NEW Per prior approval from HPC, the brick structure above the roof had been removed and th« bricks stored on site. Thl8 decision was based on the condition ofthe»hlmney and feor that the exilting chimney would fall and Greate at safety hazard during restoration work. Regarding the rebujld40 of th[a chimney, it was agreed that the support for the chlmney would be re-built due to the lack of current strudural support. Per discussion wIth the building department •rld structural englne•r, the chimney will be supporle¢from the new roof strugture Th, existing bricks wil then be used to rebuild the exposed porlian of the chlmney bbove the roof. 00003 EAST WALL SIDING REMOVAL: NEW Confirmed that the existing sidhg on the east aid• of the carriage house will be removedlo allow for the construction of the new structure on this skle, along with the window replacement and ch•nney restructuring.: Enough of the existing siding will be saved to allow for it to be re-Installed on the upper portion of the ea,st wall, which will rernain *xposed above the new imt level structure HPC directed us le install new aiding on the new Mrst level seucture to dearly delineate 11,0 new *om the old. 00004 ROOF RE-FRAME: NEW At our last meeting wl¢ HPC, they Indicated they would like t© see us keep th, Idating roof structur» in place as apposed to the previously approved plan to rerrloue the exiatin,1 roof and replace with a new stesl truss roof system[ Since this last meeting, the structural en#eer has devised g plan to Matucture the exating roor trom the Inte,jor util[zing i new wood Dugs system. The new structure will be "sistered" in next to 1,¢ existing structure while allowing the existing strucke to remain In place. During this process, th• roof will be re-leveled and squared It wal; noted that some blocking which has been added to #le roof,vertlme may have to be removed andtor cut to allow for the new traming ho be inst,Ned, but the existing roofratters will remain undisturbed The removal of the existing colle, lies was approved to allow for the inst,Ilation of the new root trusses. P 00.02awse F 07&820.*#; ~ M. 90, 1103 An»n, CO 01612 rage lot 2 JUL. 14.19999 2: 38PP&1, HANbiN FU & LEHOUSE NO. 6246 3 P.3 j meeting millutes PO+LE House COACTRUCTION Subject HPCOn-Slte Review 1 bil D•=/10• Acdon 82 .Mul D- due Smned _ .... 00005 NEWWINDOWFRAMING: NEW We revilwed the need to re.frame the windows an the east south and norm aides. This is requled Nnce the north end south windows have been resized for egress and the east windows were approved for replacement since thesewindaws are not historic. HPC said they would like to discuss this with staff and confirm. 00008 HPC CONFIRMATION: NEW Jeff Hafferv will issue us a memo re-contirming the agreed upon disell•010118 Submm,0 by Wi-n Con.trucioz lne, //A 28*M 6 e,6,um Pm,gmll//FWM/.3030 ~0.00*10403*poll, CO/Ell th-an ' Page 2 of 2 i I 1*Ase JUL. 12.1999 11:02AM NO.558 P.2 jeffrey halferty design 215 S Monargh St suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-4535 (970) 925-4990 Fax Memo DATE. 7/10/99 TO: Historic Preservation Commission Attn: Chris Bendon, Planner Amy Guthrie, H.P.C Staff Suzannah Reid, H.P.C Chairman FROM: Jeffrey H.P.C. Monitor f~Cy---~ U RE: Pole House Renovation / Restufation 411 N, First Site VisR Carriage. House Issues COMMENTS: I did a site visit a few weeks ago and we did a walk through of the carriage house. The apAlicant had asked me to do a walk though the cemage house to nush out some exterior conditions needing to be addressed, I would like some direction from staff so the construction can commence without delaying their aggressive schedule. 1. We have allowed them make interior structural improvements to the under caniage or the roof. There was discussion of adding additional steel bracing to insure its rudity. The work was in progress. 2. The next iswe was temporary removal of "historic siding' for construction of the shed / elevator (east side of carriage house)- There is an H.P.C- approved removal of fion-historid windows. My suggestion was to leave the historic siding material above the new structure. if any siding needs to be removed to rough in the opening, I suggested to carefully limit the siding for removal, to properly rack the matenal on steepers and tam it properly. Once the work has been compl«ed replace the "historic siding meterial' atter the window has been installed. Any new construction is to have 'new wood siding ' as discussed in our previous meetings. 3- The next issue was removal of a 'historic window° in the North gable on the North side of the carriage howse. The General contractor advised me that it was now an egress window for a sleeping [oft in lhe attic- The building department pennit set has the window noted to be enlarged to be code compliant for egress requirements. f suggested doing an elevation study (north and south sides of the carriage house) to see the window size difference, recommendation; to be reviewed by slaff and monitor. CCI H.P.C, Hanson Construction, Ernemann Group JUL. 14.19993 2:28Prl MAINAP,14 fU & LBUUUba NO. 62353 P. 1 1 PO•LE House &01'STNUGTIOR RE: Clarification of GO Nlte To Historical Preservation Cornmittee Cate July 13,1 399 215 8. Monarth St, Suite:'02 Job 1 1280 Aspen, CO 81611 rm,t/ 01964 Albi Jemey Halferty 90: S, Hansen, M. Ememen Towl#*P.,1 _.~ pt.. (970) 920-4636 J. Lewis, R, Posada r. (970) 9254990 R•malks: Jeltrey. Michael Ememann provided us wIth a copy of your 7/10/99 merno regarding the PO+LE Houee Renovation / Restoration and your site visit of 6/3/99. Within item #2 you discuss the temporaly removal of "historic siding" on the east side of the carriage house. Withln your memo you seem to be indicating that we are ta limit the removal of slding on this side to only that equired to install the new window, However, if you recall the entire discussion on the site on June 3, 1999, we discussed and agreed to the need for removing all siding from the east side to allow for not only thi new window Installation, but also the addition of the new structure onto the back of the carriage house and the requirem•nt to r,frame the chimney structure. Based on this direction, Hansen Construction proceeded to remove this siding last week. The removal was done with all efforts to preserve the siding to the greatest extent poomible, All of the skiing wae saved and is currently stored and protected on alle. It remains Hansen Construction's intent to replace the hletoric aiding on the original portion 09 the east side after the new construction is complete. Also, per our discussion on-site, the new addition ta the east Bide is to receive new siding to clearly designate the separation from historic to new aiding. We hove gane back and reviewed our notes again from our meeting and this direction ie clearly indicated. Therefore, If you could please look at your notes, we believe that they should help to clarify this matter and confirm the discussion and decision to rernave all of the sicire from the east 6ide. As you are aware, the reason we had requested a meetjng with the HPC wan to receive clarification and make sure we were proceeding exactly as the HPC required. Therefore, we would like to clarify thie matter ss soon as possible, again in an efren to remain clear on the requirements of the HPC, I have elso included a copy of our rninutin from the meeting to make sure that we are clearon the other items dscuseed during the June 3, 1989. Please contad me at 920-7237 if you have any questions. Thank you, Mike Gundrul>~7 'll c.-~ . ~ my: Mike Gundrurn e. 8- Hansen, M. Ememn p,70.=115• Falu2*3058 ~ P.O. 90*1040Aspen, CO *1812 J, l-10, R. P/01 // L ' . 9. 1. h 1 1 N·. m I -T---T-- -F--,r~, I i iii i; 1 1 i :i , / jr#·Cl..fl 1 1 1 -i -- --/ It-Il- i i H 3--1 - -~-~-1-- -T.3 1 10944-14EI-Fl *431-ll.-~ /froff-1 E Fur[*-4--- t.r- _-L_i___ T--f*RETTrf TT-~~ t · _1 11.. ..Lilljd _T[UIUN]114.4-~-110__LUUU=-U oii»U L- EE«=tab=nu39' - W.--------il--.--~l- F-- i-rrlor-=1 If I 1 lei k~kin i [--1 L.__1 L--__1 1 /L._.J I L--1 L.-2 L .3 L_-_11 3 - 9 ELEJE]1 - - iL]L][I]' 1 ----1 Ell| 7--; i 11 00001 00001 000[3 = ELLE] b - I.1--I -/ -il--~-UIJ 1 -0 eq WEST ELEVATION IM'-ru WINDOWS AS IN PLACE PRIOR TO REMODEL 2.1 JUL 13 '99 10:27AM ERNEMANN GROUP 13 '99 10:26AM ERNEMANN GROUP P --)11111111(111!!I'll!111.1 /kf: 1 EjELL « 04.917.-L: ~ Ill__ -- L 7 ..r- 4 2_33]3 ' :' *1--5 44 1 ---- 4>99.34 -m ir-----1-~--7. ~ r«ft>ft IL c IC ic C.1 . i~ d j i.44 ---„.. i 9%4,4 .-12.. --1---.d 3 '64 -. k.-„=Ca . I i I 1 ··k -- V* 7-_.21 I ' HOLE l i l l i l l l : l it 11<1{jj 111 , -1. -F-- li3 111; 1 i 2-1 , , u.._L, L .1 1 11 1Illil:11]il .Ill 1-== 4> -'.4 liti -1- , 11 e L. » .., ---- 1 1, 1 » h „-H-1 --7 E==. 1_ 1 W I !1 '1 1 1 1. - lilill ill 111111~ 1 Fe=:7 .----L-Ill 1 1 -7--1-r--T Iri i! 1 b H El 1. i &1 i i LJ f--J F-l l--1 - 1.4 , --1 Elip».U--fl [-- -- '1.21 0.-11 1--·-·1 E---rEL -== -- ---=t.-23=== mt- . y 0/Alt.-1 ,~fi liil f[-41 *flut. ,*aut_. il , 1 -11[fE« ------ /*lul-J-L- 11 1.- __it_LU/\ 1 /*LI L.Lt N.-L_ 12=rt _11 LLI-L i]--1\ -- 1 - : tel-J Fl.---I-Ill-. - - --.-I'........0-.Il.- it - /~riv - GLASS BLOCK 111 · -1 -LIZZLEE ·Ea- 1 - 1, Et r „ --0 .1 , 4 d' 3 - SOUTH ELEVATION #441(0' WINDOWS AS IN PLACE PRIOR TO REMODEL ' 7-,1 E , lit] 11 iltli 2-2.1 202/ W.*r 2:1 4----:I I '.LI.1 0---...4 · t -4 1-1 E'ErEEE--5.-i ·£-LAB-6-1-·"~6 4 w - 4*AL--1 U ]0940 · 1 1\sy. 1 ~ 1-1 il-4 11 i -·441£,4'~~ /* I.LI -Ill I E filliN>i~ <*[1_.11-Llit-J Il & . :1 di 1 I i~~A~~ £#11,6~ L - v 4 ·*-- 1' - L._ · 1 -I-- 1 1 :rl-3 , I..- . - fl . - _UL.--4 -1ZZ~ L SOUTH ELEVATION 10=147 WINDOWS AS PER NEW M. REI LLEY SHOPS EL 1 1 1 piliz -[1]--j' 7-4-- 1 .,2 .kai 404»91-1..:2eth. /0221_U-1 -li_L.*4 1 /*mul/ -A..m-- ii 123&-0 '6' !' i lk-- -fPir= 1 inl-~12/A R.*T Li.U_-: :1 ~ :1 ...1,4,Lf ..4 41-'41.11_ il ~ i _11-1-Lk]-4\ ILL].Lil._ HA+M _11 ll]_7~_1». ~AdEAL.1- :11 It:Ill. 1 1 t1---/ - 1 UL]] -- 11-1 · 127 - 1 - 1 -- - -0 -4 NORTH ELEVATION 1//-14)' WINDOWS AS IN PLACE PRIOR TO REMODEL 6.V JUL 13 '99 10:28AM ERNEMANN GROUP 4--4 t----f t Ar.,;0ff i:i UW,- , Y-if- r?*i.X 2 -Ul.11-liAX '090 LiU-L i 1 -4.1-Ali)~6~ 4**ili 2 1JJ,44-WI~~ ~ '17 - -- ---· . · 1 -1: !.1 it NORTH ELEVATION 1.,514 WINDOWS AS PER NEW M. REILLEY SHOPS 29 - (104 3 FOLE 0 - 3-rm j 0 - Unit f 9 - «10 .....V . , . . . .0 . · - - 2/:- -tr ... . . +Il. .- I k . . - 4.- h - 4 I . - * c I . ... .4-- .:1 J - ..e f .' I I - I .. , A· ·· ED<ISTJ BRICK CWIr*Er- MeEPAINT - · ./ 1 - I ':... '* ... $ I ..4 I - 305+ - ': K - J .. - . . .. 44.1 44.1 -V - .1-----.---------------Il--- lili L 1 1 11 ...2 1 - 1 1 1 1 - 1 t. I /1 1 2 \ 1 1 I .--1 1 1 --1 1 1--fl-------- *------*-I-*--Ill-i-.-~--il- , 1 -iaT-9-3/4 ill--3-4--2--1 - ---'.--Ii----- --- 1 1 , 1 -W.0. FLUD. 0 - .-9.- -973 i ·10,2 i 241 r*L l.1233 ----- , -- - i 36*ts - 01/At--Af~3 - -f. --- - 'RESTORE AS NECEMARY I ./ - u)25 1- 644 QMS ___ ___ RUM- AL·\ EAN-- - GATE 4 WALL PER LAN, DRAWINGS UOUSE - - -- - -- - £2416_r ------ar-----A-- *---I-* . pt.4+DI , 1 T.O. PLUD. ' --- -------- --- -- - 5 ruu- 6 5 99-5-74 1 TIL FUA - -- I-- - -- .. f .,r: - ~ ' ' 5'rEIS•-- , '81*Al--15 - go »-2% ....27'r- - ... SKATER ROT- --IE_«MIA- 2- 1 )4=2 r'+~ tount SE.L-cwu ' . ff· - ..~- ' I z.. r. Str 04= 15~00%0,15 Mo-e-»6 Ensrl,Ae·br, $-... 1 -- < PRECAST CO D CONS. VE!€ER . . .. . _ ..rn red caciw ev- butt wall shlrgl- with 7 5 - A- _ _RJOR INSU.ATED RNIS4 SYSTEM £ 1. F.S.): ,. Flaxlrock 3 pal camanlitioul -ooth Antlh leal i over watar proof ,ambrae ever corcrate wall. 1 . 1 - 1 I 1- . . PRECAST CONCRETE PA,€LS; rETAL ROOF, PASCAA 2 3 5/8' X It 5/8' X B 5/8' euelo•, precat concra 4 SOFFIT _ 1 x 16' nooble. Blocko guil bs Bal a vena-· • · ' gul.al mall li- and a.rowall horizontal relrercarns 1 . T- -1- 1 1 Pal,IRED CONC WALL METAL WALL PANELS: NBU WOOD SWINOLES 1 . 1 .. It X 2.40 Cohial stz~) 24 Ga. pr--ath,red "Ail MTL ROOF. FASCIA ulth corcealed clipt Provlds all matching Inelcks ~ . ¢fjOFFIT \41-- PETAL ROOFING PANEL SWINGLES: E ST. BEVELED UJOOC> cl'PL Provicia all naohing, raeclas. K,Fflls mci Clo 18" X 24" (*h<Bal elze,) 24 Ga. pr.-u.athar.d "Astr - il / 14 Aac.mpn,RALCONCRETE, 74<' Architactural pculd In place concrats 1,1 30'* 1 Illi lili 1 with WIC" polyethylans 01-ls laninated to In,tbit 1 11 1 1 1 j 1 -1 i Lrj.-_L_-J.-t__L . _1- I-L-I_t__1_ ~ ~ 1 ----- Joint Ir-ts. ald utood ke,uags with watar Ught g UELIZ .... - lilli , 1 1 ! 1 1 1 .1 1 | ll*bl~(*£$ 4 : -_- __.1- i - 1 T--MTZ- 1 Milil 411 nau wlnebus ad sxtartor door® by "Wopes k -J - All nau Wopas wInclow ard Wop- *<terlor door P Iii iii / f 3\1 . All extiling wirdow® mci extarlor doors *hall ba ¢ C -----------*-------------------- 1 -©-1 r TEn . -= - ----__].if~ty 1-=,-1=-rr...... 1 .*fowurE-"71 7-j -i-i\. f ¢ -3-7 - :4\ - I-- - -. I- - I--I-.- I.I. i- -1 - 1 - I. - - -- - -- - - 1 -14-~411_4. --1 }11 - 1 + ' .. OPEN -- --- OPEN --- 11 4.-k-lr_fl!-to ' 1 1 ' b ' 1 + i ' 1 I. 1 1 - 1 i 1 1 1 11 : f~* --- - 1 1. 21-_ILIOI-*CrUCE_ 14.3 -UZZLE- __.------- -----_--__--___---- -- 1 21-UAO L -+---- - --+ - -*- --/ --- ------- - 12'%14/154-2, . - 04 , / - - ---- ----- - * - -- -- --- -- -- --------- CA:>909' -2 LIZZL-T--- - -- L J--:, --I- --- - 1 - 22 Q - -5 01- * ... OPEN . __ OPEN _ __ __ -- ~ - _ AO¢ 1 7-0»611* eurr) > . g --- 6 rlic,go . ~,Al-15) . -\ -- 5<Le,- am-(15 0.04.-;,64 **PY#~=d& )40¢ r,+0011.1.. - - - I - - - - T.O. PUYUD. --- - - - - - - - - - - --Ii--TE#2281&<im'f<ji.Ii/L:,STr/'f.2-*fl- 1 - .1- 1.- - I 1 91 .1 ' A % METAL CANOF,~ j.,It : Ct, . 1.11 ·,'·1~ -f (.--, ' «u«L ~ - , . .....:- 5. f ..4 . ... 1,08 -L .... .' . NEW OPENINdi IN MEMORANDUM TO: Suzannah Reid, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission .. THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Dire FROM: Christopher Bendon. Planner ~ Jan RE: 414 North First Street - Demolition and Reconstruction of Carriage House Chiinney DATE: July 28,1998 SUMMARY: The "PoLe House," 414 North First Street, has a small carriage house which has been temporarily moved for construction of a basement. The carriage house contains a brick chimney from the interior Roor level to approximately 2-3 feet above the ridge o f the structure. There is severe damage to the mortar and the structural integrity of this upper portion is in question. I he chininey may not withstand the stresses in-herent in moving the structure back to its original location which presents a safety threat as well as a potential loss of the historical construction. The applicant is proposing to document the chimney (there is some ornamental fluting), deconstruct the chininey and clean the bricks. and reconstruct the element after moving the structure. Staff visited the site with the HPC Monitors for the project. Staff and the HPC Monitors present at the site visit agreed the reconstruction is necessary and believe it can be accomplished without diminishing the historical qualities o f the carriage house. The meter used for reconstruction, however, needs to be proposed and approved. Staff recommends the HPC 1Monitors for the project approve the demolition and reconstruction of the carriage house chimney as proposed, with three conditions, APPLICANT: Roberto Posada aiid Jonathan Lewis. REVIEW PROCEDURE: The Project Moiiitors may approve. approve with conditions, or deny the request. In the alternative. the Monitors may request a review by the full Commission. 1 STAFF COMMENTS: The HPC Monitors for the project. Suzannah Reid. Jeffery Halferty. and Gilbert Sanchez, were notified of the request to remove the upper portion of the chimney and visited the site on .lilly 23rd. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the HPC Project Monitors approve the demolition and reconstruction of the carriage house cliimney at the Lewis/Posada Residence with the following conditions: 1. Prior to demolition, the carriage house chiniftey shall be photographically documented in its present state. Copies oftlie photos shall be submitted to the Planning Office. 2. After tlie carriage house is moved to its final location, the applicant shall reconstruct the chimney in the same nianner using the same materials. 3. Prior to reconstruction of the Chininey, the applicant shall gain approval for the mortar to be used. APPROVAL: I hereby approve the demolition and reconstruction of the carriage liouse chimney at the Lewis/Posada Residence, 414 North First. with the above three conditions. date: 01 419 6 Suzatiki Rettl, for and ott behalf of, Jeffery 1-Ialferly aild Gilbert Sanchez, Project Monitors ACCEPTANCE: I, as a person being or represe~ic applicant. do hereby agree to the conditions of this approval. ilft\l date: Repre~liting Ro ~~d Jonathan Lewis, bner 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director 574 Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Director O\A Apt 1 7 11 0 FROM: Christopher Bendon, Planner I A A CA /1 Uy W V ) RE: 414 North First Street -- Hallam Lake Bluff ESA and Special Reviews DATE: June 2,1998 SUMMARY: The applicant, Johnathan Lewis and Roberto Posada, are proposing landscape improvements as part of the redevelopment of the former Paepke Estate. A few of these improvements are within the HaIlam Lake Bluff Environmentally Sensitive Area and require a Special Review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The area of concern for the Planning and Zoning Commission is the slope to Hallam Lake and the area with 15 feet of the top-of-slope. The overall landscape plan must gain approval from the HPC. There are three primary elements of the plan and a series of general concerns about the development for discussion. The three primary elements are the dry laid stone walls, the larger fence walls, and the observation deck. These items are fully discussed in the staff comments section ofthis memo. Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve this Hallam Lake Bluff Review and Special Review, with conditions. PRIMARY STAKEHOLDERS: Staff distributed the landscape plan to the City Engineer and the Parks Department. In addition, staff sent a copy to ACES and the Given Institute, and notified the HPC Project Monitors ofthe application. APPLICANT: Johnathan Lewis and Roberto Posada. Represented by the Office of Dan Kiley, Landscape Architects. LOCATION: 414 North First Street. Post-it® Fax Note 7671 162--------77r~ I To -r-,pages ] From 1 1 L · 0---| ZONING: R-6 with Hallam Lake Bluff ESA overlay. Phone # Fax# 1 PREVIOUS ACTION: The Commission has not previously considered this application. REVIEW PROCEDURE: Hallam Lake BluffESA. The Planning and Zoning Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or deny this application at a meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: Top-of-Slope. The applicant has defined the top-of-slope at elevation 1001, as defined in the application drawings. Based on the site section provided by the applicant, this top-of- slope appears to be correctly located. All areas below and within 15 feet of this line are then within the 'no development zone.' The Hallam Lake standards do allow development in this area as long as it is approved by the Commission. The standards for this review are attached as Exhibit A. The dry-laid stone walls. There are several short dry-laid stone walls proposed within the 'no development zone.' As proposed, these walls will be approximately 18-24 inches high and in conformance with the progressive height limit from the top-of-slope. Planning staff and the City Parks Department both consider these walls acceptable. ACES raised no concerns over these features. The fence walls. There is a long wall along the north-western portion of the property to be rehabilitated and a new wall to be constructed (replacing a wooden fence) along the eastern border of the property. The rehabilitation project should be fairly simple and is not expected to significantly affect the ESA. The new wall on the east side is designed to be almost 30 feet long and six feet high constructed with concrete. The structure would be within the 'no development area' but in compliance with the progressive height limit. The structure could be partially suspended if necessary to limit the amount of disturbance near the top-of-slope. The Parks Department does not consider the wall to be necessary and wants the wall to be removed from the plans. The area could be planted with greater vegetation to achieve the intended goals of privacy. Also, the proposed wall would be in close proximity to a very large tree. No formal comments were available at the time of this memo but may be included in the packet if received by the time of publication. Planning staff has asked for a member of the Parks Department to be present during the meeting to address their concerns. Philosophically, this wall represents a separation between the Given Institute and the Lewis/Posada house. These two properties were once part of the original Paepke estate and are now held and function separately. 2 Planning staff understands the design rationale behind the fence wall and feels the structure could be a nice amenity to the proj ect providing privacy and defining an outdoor room. The proposed structure will be replacing a existing wooden fence and is proposed within the height limit. The structure should not significantly detract from the Hallam Lake ESA and should not significantly detract from the view from ACES. Planning staff, however, suggests a medium to dark gray or slate color be used, rather than an off-white, to minimize the visibility of the structure from below. Also, to the extent possible, the structure should be supported with pier footings rather than a trench footing. Footings should not be placed within the dripline of existing trees. Cantilevering the structure may look rather odd, and is not recommended as a condition by Planning staff. Cantilevered ~ The observation deck. 47- The existing deck is within the 'no development area.' Just as with similar cases of existing encroachments in ESAs, planning staff has informed the applicant that the structure may be maintained, rehabilitated, and even reconstructed, but not enlarged or moved to another location. The applicant is proposing to reconstruct the deck and has provided the proposed design and materials to be used. This design and proposed material are acceptable to staff. However, both Planning staff and the Parks Department are concerned about the construction process. The location of the deck presents a potential for bank stabilization problems and interference with the surrounding vegetation, especially if heavy machinery is used. Considering staff' s concerns, the applicant has investigated using fewer support piers and manual construction techniques. Staff is satisfied that the applicant shares the same concerns about the possible construction impacts and will use an appropriate construction method. A condition of approval has been included describing this process. The applicant may wish to amend this condition based on further information about construction methods. General Comments. Lighting. Outdoor lighting for this site should be low, downeast, and not used to accent architectural or landscape features. No lighting should be used below or within 15 feet of the top-of-slope. This includes no lighting on, or of, the observation deck, trees, and the flagpole. The Commission should make this a condition of approval and recommend the same condition to the HPC. Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." Agency referral comments have been included as Exhibit "B." The application has been included as Exhibit "C." 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this Hallam Lake Bluff Review with the following conditions: 1. The top-of-slope is approved at the elevation 1001, as shown in the application drawings (false datum). . -7 -' l».2.>64 /444 964e 9.1-t 2. The placement and design of the dry-laid stone walls is approvedas proposed in the detailed drawings ofthis application. 941(d- 1 641 C€NI¢~> tl1 11» ·t-UE c-<.4 64 10 Nud revi·4..4 3. The observation deck may be reconstructed in its present location and footprint, but 1-4>L «C . cannot be expanded or reconstructed in a second location. 4. Prior to any demolition or redevelopment of this observation deck, the applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department a scaled plan and section drawing of the existing deck prepared by a registered Architect or Engineer. 5. For the purpose of maintaining the integrity ofthe Hallain Lake Bluff slope and to minimize the visual impacts from construction, the applicatlt shall observe the following construction process for the observation deck: a. Silt fencing shall be erected on the down-slope side of the deck prior to construction activity and shall remain in place until completion and sign-off by the Building Inspector. b. Existing vegetation within the construction area shall be tied back to prevent damage. c. All demolition, digging for foundation supports, and construction shall be accomplished manually, not with the aid of mechanical equipment. In the event mechanical equipment is necessary, the Parks Department shall be notified and placement of the equipment shall be approved by the Parks Department. d. The applicant shall limit the number of support piers to a practical minimum, as determined by an Architect or Engineer. e. After construction, all disturbed soils shall be stabilized and/or revegetated to the approval ofthe Parks Department. f. All representations made by the applicant's representative to the Commission concerning the process, timing, and materials for construction shall 114 be considered conditions of approval. (g) The rehabilitation of the pf(Cwestern wall is,prtived. 94¥411 4 4€\lk-ect hl ~\-L %·rts %1-p->44 7. The construction of the 6 foot fence wall on the east boundary line is approved'as ,£6 t >'DI- 63 *kifi>l~.2 7 1 # -Zf-4 . 94- VV *L- proposed'with the following conditions: C t>ttoe a. Pier footings shall be used and located to minimize disturbance to surrounding vegetation. b. A medium to dark gray or slate, or similar color, shall be used to minimize 0/ ·09 W. pACCI~the visibility ofthe structure from Hallam Lake. 7..lk ner+4 -e•,La .4 '811 4.t.Ce *·~U. *A•*0 Pt ?W14 .r- 8. No other landscape improvements or changes to the terrain, except those mentioned herein, are approved. The applicant shall gain approval for any revegetation below or with 15 feet of the top-of-slope from the Parks Department. 3 9. Any pool or hot tub shall be drained to the sanitary sewer and not over the slope. 4 . 0. 4 01**Guan· 0.4 1»30 -71 pul* 04,19fvw j'eld 4(/47 9-1%1~ 0 .1 4 9 f,4,14*1 -41 11"19 -7~1,1 Ally U.¥334 -P 717/1~wy,2 .,l ' > 5«2. ap~ gs <121+ (b '9?·W, 90%'M *Am 11/ fide/Q 12'-1.4,-7 9 , "alle »11- 9-t'-11 4 ork \-1- 0--·tzy¥ 0-44-4 -31*7 41 a.9-3,4714 /~Wl/49 qi ty) (939 f i 9 4% 9 -? 3?nudt t.':/ , 61,-414-29 *-39 r 17*2~4LCE~ -9iift 10. Outdoor lighting shall be low, downcast, and not used to accent architectural or landscape features. No lighting shall be used below or within 15 feet of the top-of-slope. There shall be no lighting on, or of, the observation deck, trees, and the flagpole. The Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends this condition of approval to the Historic Preservation Commission for any further reviews necessary. 11. Any changes to the design or representation made to staff or the Commission in this application for development within the ESA area must be formally accepted as an amendment to this ESA approval. 12. Before issuance ofa building permit, the applicant shall record this Planning and Zoning Resolution with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder located in the Courthouse Plaza Building. There is a per page recordation fee. In the alternative, the applicant may pay this fee to the City Clerk who will record the resolution. 13. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. A ill m. · g~00'u RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the Hallam Lake Bluff Review for the Lewis/Posada residence, /- 1 JJ\ - 414 North First Street, with the conditions outlined in the Community Development Department memo dated June 2,1998." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Comments Exhibit B -- Referral Agency Comments Exhibit C -- Development Application 5 Exhibit A Staff Comments Hallam Lake Bluff review standards. No development shall be permitted within the Hallam Lake Bluff ESA unless the commission makes a determination that the proposed development meets all of the following requirements: 1. No development, excavation or fill, other than native vegetation planting, shall take place below the top of slope. Staff Finding: The existing observation deck may be reconstructed in its exact location and footprint. All vegetation below the top-of-slope must be approved by the Parks Department. 2. All development within the fifteen-foot setback from the top of slope shall be at grade. Any proposed development not at grade within the fifteen-foot setback must be approved by special review pursuant to Section 26.64.040(D). Staff Finding: There are improvements proposed within this area. Please refer to the Special Review criteria. 3. All development outside the fifteen-foot setback from top of slope shall not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the zoning officer utilizing that definition set forth at Section 26.04.100. Staff Finding: All proposed development, except for the reconstruction of the observation deck, meets this standard. 4. A landscape plan shall be submitted with all development applications. Such plan shall include native vegetative screening of no less than fifty (50) percent of the development as viewed from the rear (slope) of the parcel. All vegetative screening shall be maintained in perpetuity and shall be replaced with the same or comparable material should it die. Staff Finding: A landscape plan has been submitted. The existing vegetation covers a substantial portion of the site and is not proposed to be removed. 5. All exterior lighting shall be low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the nature preserve or located down the slope. Staff Finding: Staff has included a condition of approval for outdoor lighting. 6. No fill material or debris shall be placed on the face of the slope. Historic drainage patterns and rates must be maintained. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained down the slope. Staff Finding: Staff has included this as a condition of approval. 7. Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect, or engineer shall be submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope, and pertinent elevations above sea level. Staff Finding: A site section has been included in the application drawings. Special Review. Hallam Lake Bluff ESA encroachment into fifteen- foot setback from top of slope or height limit. Whenever a special review is for development above or below grade within the fifteen-foot setback from top of slope as identified on a site specific section drawing or above the height limit established by the ESA, the development application shall be approved only if the following conditions have been met: 1. A unique condition exists on the site where strict adherence to the top of slope setback will create an unworkable design problem. Staff Finding: The existing observation deck may be reconstructed as of right. Appropriately, staff is concerned about the aesthetics and construction process of the development and has worked with the applicant to arrive at a construction method which should minimize, to the extent possible, construction impacts from the redevelopment. There does not exist an unworkable design problem which dictates low rock walls and a 6 foot high fence wall along a portion of the boundary line. However, staff believes these improvements are in character with the overall design for the property and, while not mandatory, do contribute positively to the overall scheme. The Commission, however, may find these improvements unnecessary and unacceptable. There is not, in the opinion of staff, an unworkable design problem created by the top-of-slope. The Commission is entirely within their authority to deny these improvements within the 'no development area.' 2. Any intrusion into the top of slope setback or height limit is minimized to the greatest extent possible. Staff Finding: These intrusions have been minimized. 3. Other parts of the structure or development on the site are located outside the top of slope setback line or height limit to the greatest extent possible. Staff Finding: This standard has been met. The majority of improvements on this site are located far outside the 'no development area.' 4. Landscape treatment is increased to screen the structure or development in the setback from all adjoining properties. Staff Finding: The low stone walls are not expected to be visible from Hallam Lake. The observation deck is existing. The fence wall will probably be visible from Hallam Lake in profile, but is not expected to substantially disrupt the view. Staff has suggested using a more muted color for the fence wall. 43, la MEMORANDUM To: Chris Bendon, Planner Thru: Nick Adeh, City EngineevA,~7 i From: Chuck Roth, Project Engineer (ig. Date: May 28,1998 Re: 414 North First Street - Hallam Lake and Special Review for Landscaping The Development Review Committee has reviewed the above referenced application at their May 20,1998 meeting, and we have the following comments: 1. Fence/Wall - There was a discrepancy between the information shown on the drawing and the language in the application concerning whether a fence or a wall is proposed. The applicant has entered a legal agreement with a neighbor (David Levy) concerning walls and fences, but the application makes no reference to that agreement and whether the terms are being met. 2. Landscaping - The Parks Department indicated that the landscaping is incorrect and that they will be specific in their review memo. 3. Observation Deck - The proposed observation deck replacement is considerably larger than the original, existing deck. The applicant needs to verify with the planners if the enlarged deck is acceptable. 4. Work in the Public Right-of-way - Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and development in public rights-of-way adjacent to private property, we advise the applicant as follows: The applicant must receive approval from city engineering (920-5080) for design of improvements, including landscaping, within public rights-of-way, parks department (920-5120) for vegetation species and for public trail disturbance, and streets department (920-5130) for mailboxes, street and alley cuts, and shall obtain permits for any work or development, including landscaping, within public rights-of-way from the city community development department. DRC Attendees Staff: Rebecca Schickling, Stephen Ellsperman, Ross Soderstrom 98M 126 1 AoR ip *pht. 14 15% Memorandum 1.--f v TO: Chris Bendon, Community Development FROM: Rebecca Schickling, Assistant Parks Director DATE: May 29, 1998 RE: 414 N. 1st St. - POLE House CC: Stephen Ellsperman, City Forester We have reviewed the landscape plan submitted by the Office of Dan Kiley on behalf of the Lewis -Posada Residence. The application proposes several landscape elements including renovation of the existing observation desk. Upon review of the criteria for Special Review for the ESA for Hallam Lake we offer the following concerns and comments. The dry-laid stone walls which fall within the 15 foot set back bluff area are acceptable on the condition that NO excavation or trenching occur to lay the walls. The proposed screen wall on the east property line is of some concern to us partly as to why this wall is necessary. There is significant vegetation back in this corner and must not be disturbed if a screen wall is constructed. Upon talking with the landscape architect, the screen wall designed has been altered some to accommodate vegetation and view plane issues with Hallam Lake, however, any construction of a fence or other structure in this area is required to be hand dug and constructed. Additionally, Tom Cardamone of ACES suggests a few conifers be planted to block the visibility of the wall from Hallam Lake. The submitted plans for the reconstruction of the observation deck proposed 9-10 sonotube piers to support the deck. Jane Amidon, of Dan Kiley's office has stated that the design of the deck has been reviewed by a structural engineer and that number will be reduced to 4-5 piers. The piers must be hand dug and vegetation protected during construction. While the final details of the landscape plan have not been worked out yet, the submitted plan shows numerous Aspen trees to be planted within the root zone of the existing trees. No new excavation for trees or other landscape elements will be allowed within the undisturbed root zone of the existing trees. Additionally, the applicants have expressed some desire to improve the walking trail down to Hallam Lake. The existing foot path is adequate as is and is not permitted to be improved. There is minimal erosion on the slope and the little amount there is may be due to some vegetation cutting that was done on the slope last year. This ardshould be left undisturbed and the trail remain as a "back-country foot path". 95 -4.\\ MEMORANDUM TO: Historic Preservation Commission f 1 THRU: Stan Clauson. Community Development Directorbr / FROM: Christopher Bendon. Planner '~ I~,M RE: 414 North First Street -- Minor Development Review Observation Deck Materials Flag Pole Location and Height 4 fr*p +4 2 Landscape Wall Materials DATE: August 26, 1998 R *¥107 bead 04 04 4 SUMMARY: The applicants, Johnathan Lewis and Roberto Posada, have applied for a Minor Development Review for three site features: the observation deck materials, a flag pole. and a series of low landscape walls near the bluff. h/Ie Observation Deck. The applicant gained Hallam Lake Bluff Review approval for the location and size of the observation deck. The Planning and Zoning Commission in the approval conditioned the final design approval by the HPC. The observation deck will be visible from the Hallam Lake area and the intent behind the condition of HPC approval was to ensure the materials used would be compatible with, and not ~ significantly detract from, this view.from-below. (V<~ Landscape walls. The landscape walls were also part of this Hallam Lake Bluff Review approval. These walls, however, were represented as dry-laid stone walls during this review. The applicant is now proposing sections of pre-cast concrete, instead of the stone, with the locations and approximate dimensions of the features remaining the same. Staff asked the P&Z if this change in materials would represent a substantial enough of a change to require an additional review by the Commission. The Commission responded by asking staff to take the request to the most appropriate Board but not to review the request administratively. Because the only change proposed is of the materials to be used for these walls, staff felt the most appropriate Board would be the HPC. The main concern here is the compatibility ofthe material with respect to the overall character of the house and site features. The primary structure does incorporate this same material in several locations, especially on the ~*31;,w. 47 Flag pole. The applicant has also proposed a flag pole of approximately 40 feet in height toward the rear ofthe property on axis with the Garmish Street R.O.W. The Community Development Director has determined the review for any site feature on a landmark property taller than the 25 foot zoning height limit should be reviewed by the HPC as a Minor Development. The concerns over this feature are that 1) it be compatible and complimentary to the house and the property in general, and 2) that 1 . I the pole material itself not generate any ancillary effects, such as loud clanking noises. Staff has included a condition that the flag not be illuminated. The flag pole is slightly higher than the peak of the house (38') and substantially lower than many ofthe surrounding trees. It is also well within the Hallam Lake Bluff progressive height limitation. Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commission approve the Minor Development Review for these three items, with conditions. PIUMARY STAKEHOLDERS: ACES. Staff contacted Tom Cardomone concerning the changes and invited him to the HPC hearing. APPLICANT: Johnathan Lewis and Roberto Posada. LOCATION: 414 North First Street. REVIEW PROCEDURE: Minor Development. The Historic Preservation Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for Minor Development of a historic resources at a meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff comments have been included as Exhibit "A." A site plan and site section showing the landscape walls and the ilag location and height will be presented at the meeting. A color cut sheet showing the detail of the metal tubing to be used on the observation deck does not duplicate well and will be presented at the meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commission approve the Minor Development with the following conditions: 1. The proposed metal tubing for the observation deck is hereby approved. 2. The landscape walls may be constructed with pre-cast concrete segments. Any substantial change to the location or dimensions of these walls may require an amendment to the Hallam Lake Bluff Review. 3. The flag pole is approved in its proposed location. It shall be wooden and shall not be greater than 40 feet in height. No lighting ofthe flags is permitted. 4. The applicant shall record this Historic Preservation Commission Resolution with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder located in the Courthouse Plaza Building. There is a per 2 € I .. page recordation fee. In the alternative, the applicant may pay this fee to the City Clerk who will record the resolution. 5. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval. unless otherwise amended by other conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the Minor Development Review for the flag pole, the observation deck materials, and the landscape wall materials for the Lewis and Posada Residence. 414 North First street, with the conditions outlined in the Community Development Department memo dated August 26.1998." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Comments 3 40 14 4it U r 1 *11 1 -11 I --I--1. . -*.4- -- 4 1 6/P 1, 912 /4 04 071-t)€t. 4 [fll _ 86 9*P "1 .1.- ~VWMA\vn ~Y€24 - 1 (* °f 11§y~ ij·k %94:p- V 14 94 * 44 6 9 4 31° - 4% 44 A ggi tvilt- 14 44 - 8 »,4 # 1 ~ I I. 48 MO k 61 1 4 9% ~lift 4 lift 99 wl tly, 810- <pAN &4 -345, 4 41- abid noms u»5 - 9* 444· \4,1+4 -12,60 - iA»ll ~8(6 -~ul<c~ ckiwy 0*1% *fli P BI I fievi· 2 0«-0 - /1.-\ *110 UU U#INS UNiv# *-4~- 64 -/wr~% 50 0-2 (b n#/6 024446261 /3 04¢ £4 W Wort JAM* 10 491 (79'twt QuBer- ; 6 drip 1 1 holf +M- mok 64' k »11- "*H 4 41. N ujuAL ke 4 4- aw i0144 gi# 41140 veb 10 10~ 424 4® 40 9*494,6-4{. .. Uk 34 giw Ool-F~ - re« kf- WN k 44 4 54 4, 3-9 @105- 6 k b k. F 04 1J fli 424 4 0*la Ea LU- AL LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: RECEIVEL Name: POLE House (Lewis-Posada Residence, Aspen) MAY 1 8 1998 Location: 414 N. First Street, Aspen, CO (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description wbefRAA®Mprfl-#/ npAAENT APPLICANT: Name: Jonathan Lewis and Roberto Posada Address: 414 N. First Street, Aspen, CO 81611 Phone #: (970) 920-2724 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Office of Dan Kiley Address: Box 250, Garen Road, Charlotte, VT 05445 Phone #: (802) 425-2141 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): El Conditional Use El Conceptual PUD El Conceptual Historic Devt. Ild Special Review I) Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) U Final Historic Development U Design Review Appeal [3 Conceptual SPA E Minor Historic Devt. El GMQS Allotment El Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) [3 Historic Demolition El GMQS Exemption £ Subdivision El Historic Designation ~3 ESA -8040 Greenline, Stream U Subdivision Exemption (includes U Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane U Lot Split C Temporary Use U Other: L] Lot Line Adjustment U Text/Map Amendment EXISIING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) Single family residence and gardens with 300 sq. ft. observation deck. PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Renovation of observation deck; addition of landscape elements, including low stone walls which fall within the Hallam Lake Bluff ESA. Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ N/A 2 Pre-Application Conference Summary g Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement g Response to Attachment #2, Dimensional Requirements Form El Response to Attachment #3, Minimum Submission Contents El Response to Attachment #4, Specific Submission Contents ~] Response to Attachment #5, Review Standards for Your Application 1 - [@®8®ER[t]UL]880 1 C. CONSTRUCTION Date Friday, April 24,1998 To Historical Preservation Committee c/o Mitch Hass From Mike Gundrum x4~2 . Reference 414 N. First Street, PO+LE House The following information is being provided pursuant to items No. 1 and 2 of the HPC's Resolution for 414 N. First Street, Aspen CO, which calls for the carriage house, (garage) to be temporarily moved and then relocated after a new foundation has been constructed. Item No. 1 - Structural Report Attached is a letter from SK Peightal Engineers, Ltd., dated March 5,1998, which addresses the structural integrity of the carriage house. Item No. 2 - Relocation Plan, Including $30,000 Irrevocable Letter of Credit Attached is a copy of a $30,000 Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit No. S987038 from the Northern Trust Bank of Florida, dated April 16, 1998. Attached is a site map, which indicates the limits of the carriage house structure, which is to be relocated, along with the area to which the carriage will be temporarily moved to until such time as the new foundation is complete. It is estimated that this process will require approximately three months from the time the carriage house is removed from the existing foundations, the new foundation work is performed, and then the carriage house is placed back onto the new foundations. This process shall include the following procedures. 1. Selective demolition of the interior finish materials, (i.e. cabinets, plumbing fixtures, dry wall, interior doors, etc.) to lighten the overall weight of the existing structure. 2. Horizontal members (micro-lams) will be added to the inside and outside of the north and south walls. These members will be through-bolted and bolted to the existing wall studs to create rigid-horizontal beams. 3. Holes approximately 18"xl 8" will be cut into the existing walls just below the horizontal beams and approximately 18" from the corners of the building on both the north and south facing walls, (see attached sketch). P 970.920.1558 F 970.920.3038 | P.O. Box 10493 Aspen, CO 81612 1 [El@El]*EmE[-LIBB[E CONSTRUCTION 4. Four steel beams will be placed perpendicularly (running north-south) through the structure just below the horizontal beams, two through the 1 8"x18" openings and the other two through the existing window openings. 5. Diagonal cross bracing will be added to the interior from the mid-point of the structure extending to the exterior walls to secure the diaphragm integrity of the structure, both at the 1St and 2nd floor levels. 6. Horizontal members (micro-lams) will be added to the inside and outside of the west wall across the garage door openings. These members will be through-bolted and bolted to the existing wall studs to create rigid-horizontal beams. 7. All sill plate bolts / nails will be removed to free the existing structure from its foundation. 8. A second set of steel beams will be installed beneath and perpendicular to the first set of steel beams referred to in item #4. Two additional 18"xl 8" holes will be cut on east wall to accommodate these beams. 9. Through the use of blocking, hydraulic jacks and wheels, the structure will be raised and removed from the existing foundations and moved to the temporary storage area indicated on the attached site plan. 10. The structure will be placed on blocking, secured and stored in this location as the demolition and reconstruction of the garage foundations occur. 11. Upon completion of the new foundations, the structure will be moved to the new foundation and set in place again with the use of hydraulic jacks, blocking and wheels. 12. The structure will then be aligned, plumbed (racked) and bolted to the new foundations. 13. All of the steel beams, horizontal beams, and interior bracing will be removed. 14. The openings cut into the north and south walls will be repaired utilizing existing siding from the main house. 15. The exterior will then be restored and the interior finish work completed per the approved building plans and HPC's Resolution. P 970.920.1558 F 970.920.3038 ~ P.O. Box 10493 Aspen, CO 81612 ~~ 03/05/98 THU 14:23 FAX 970 927 0597 S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS .001 1. S KPEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd .. i. STRUCTUKAL CONSULTANIS March 5, 1998 Jerry Cavaleri Hansen Construction P.O. Box 10493 Aspen, Colorado 81612 fax 920-3038 Re: Remodel 414 First Street Aspen, Colorado Dear Jerry, This letter is in follow-up to our recent telephone discussions, regarding the carriage house of the above referenced project. Questions have been raised as to the feasibility of moving this structure. It is my opinion that this existing wood structure is in sound enough condition to lift, move, and be placed on a new foundation. Preparation for this moving process is essential, and has been discussed in general terms on page two of my 3-14-97 letter to Mr. Michael Ernemann- Both temporary bracing, and the services of an experienced house mover is important. When and if desired my office can make detailed recommendations for this bracing work. Please call with any questions. Sincerely, /2-3«402--------Ill Stephen K. Feightal, PE president 97018 L3 SKI) / kIs 76 Sunset Drive • Unit #4 • Basalt. CO • 81621 • (970) 927-9510 • Fax: (970) 927-0597 Northern Ttu st Bank of Florida 700 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida 33131-2881 Tel.: (305) 789-1300 Telex: I.T.T. 441180 • S.W.I.F.T. CNOR US3M April 16, 1998 To: (Beneficiary) City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Gentlemen, We hereby issue our Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit No.S987038 in your, the beneficiary's, favor for the account of Jonathan Lewis and Roberto Posada, 4649 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 304, Coral Gables, Florida 33146, up to the aggregate amount of United States Dollars Thirty Thousand and 00/100 (US$30,000.00) available by your draft(s) at sight drawn on us, Et. E bearing the number and the date of this credit and the name of our bank. . Your draft(s) must be accompanied by the following documents: - - 1. The original of this Letter of Credit, and all amendments, - - =-t if any. 2. A written notification from the Planning Director of the City il of Aspen stating that: "The owners, Jonathan Lewis and Roberto Posada, of the Property located at 414 North First Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611, have failed to perform the i'Q required maintenance, protection, preservation or restoration obligat-ions for said property as contained in the approval of the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee dated Wi-0 February 11, 1998." Partial drawing(s) are permitted. This bank represents and warrants to the City of Aspen that it has the full authority and power to issue this Letter of Credit to the City of Aspen, in the total amount and for the period of time stated herein; said author-ity being pursuant to the laws of the United States, or the State or Territory which governs the - establishment and regulation of this bank, this bank's charter, by-laws and other applicable rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. We hereby agree with you that draft(s) drawn under and in compliance with the terms of this Letter of Credit will be duly honored if presented at our office located at 700 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida 33131, on or before August 16, 1998, the expiration date. Page 1/2 Northern Trust of Florida Corporation and Northern Trust Bank of Florida N.A. M-2020A are wholly owned subsidiaries of Northern Trust Corporation, Chicago. . Irrevocable Lett=i of Credit No.S987038 Page 2/2 This Letter of Credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (1993 Revision), I.C.C. Publication No.500. /in ryruly, Rog-_ _- --indes Second V.ice President Northern Trust of Florida Corporation and Northern Trust Bank of Florida N.A. M-2020A2 are wholly owned subsidiaries of Northern Trust Corporation, Chicago. 1.-*i• U .' f MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission P THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director tr- Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Directo/hrk % h FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation officer RE: 414 N. First Street, ESA and Special Review DATE: March 17, 1998 SUMMARY: As part of a renovation of the former Paepke house, the applicant proposes a revitalization of the gardens which have been such a significant element of the property for many decades. The landscape plan preserves all of the existing trees on the property, and adds new trees and landscape elements. Because the property is within the Hallam Lake overlay, ESA review is required. None of the proposed development conflicts with the ESA review standards except for a series of low walls and a flagpole, which are proposed to be within the 15 foot "no build zone" at the top of the slope. This review focuses solely on those elements of the plan. Staff recommends approval of the low walls, but not the flagpole location as proposed. Please note that the observation deck, which is an existing non-conformity, is intended to be maintained. The applicant has the right to demolish and rebuild the deck with new materials as long as the non-conformity is in no way expanded. APPLICANT: Jonathan Lewis and Roberto Posada, represented by the Office of Dan Kiley, landscape architects. LOCATION: 414 N. First Street. ZONING: R-6, Historic Landmark. CURRENT LAND USE: Detached single-family residential. LOT SIZE: +/- 1.5 acres. REFERRAL COMMENTS: No City agencies expressed concerns with the proposed development. The application was forwarded to Tom Cardamone, of A.C.E.S., who expressed no concerns with the proposed stone walls. In regard to the flagpole, Mr. Cardamone did suggest that the flags themselves, which will be eyecatching and which 1 A cbit A will flap in the wind may be disconcerting to wildlife, and could potentially have a scarecrow kind of effect. REVIEW PROCEDURE: 26.68.060 Hallam Lake Bluff review. Hallam Lake Bluff review standards. No development shall be permitted within the Hallam Lake Bluff ESA unless the commission makes a determination that the proposed development meets all of the following requirements: 1. No development, excavation or fill, other than native vegetation planting, shall take place below the top of slope. Response: No land disturbance is proposed below the top of slope. 2. All development within the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of slope shall be at grade. Any proposed development not at grade within the fifteen (15) foot setback must be approved by special review pursuant to section 26.64.040(D). Response: Two elements of the proposal, the dry-laid stone walls and the flagpole lie within the fifteen foot setback area. Special Review criteria are addressed below. 3. All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from top of slope shall not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the zoning officer utilizing that definition set forth at section 26.04.100. Response: No new development exceeds the height of the 45 degree angle from the top of slope. 4. A landscape plan shall be submitted with all development applications. Such plan shall include native vegetative screening of no less than fifty (50) percent of the development as viewed from the rear (slope) of the parcel. All vegetative screening shall be maintained in perpetuity and shall be replaced with the same or comparable material should it die. Response: The renovated house will maintain the current footprint, with a small area of expansion which is set back towards the alley. A significant group of existing evergreens block all but a slight view of the house. 5. All exterior lighting shall be low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the nature preserve or located down the slope. Response: The applicant represents that all exterior lighting shall be low and downcast, with no lights directed towards the nature preserve or located down the slope. 2 6. No fill material or debris shall be placed on the face of the slope. Historic drainage patterns and rates must be maintained. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained down the slope. Response: The applicant represents that no filI material or debris shall be placed on the face of the slope. 7. Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect, or engineer shall be submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope, and pertinent elevations above sea level. Response: Said drawings have been submitted and reviewed by the City Engineering Department. 26.64.040 Review standards for special review. No development subj ect to special review shall be permitted unless the commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all standards and requirements set forth below. Hallam Lake Bluff ESA encroachment into fifteen (15) foot setback from top of slope or height limit. Whenever a special review is for development above or below grade within the fifteen (15) foot setback from top of slope as identified on a site specific section drawing or above the height limit established by the ESA, the development application shall be approved only ifthe following conditions have been met: 1. A unique condition exists on the site where strict adherence to the top of slope setback will create an unworkable design problem. Response: Strict adherence to the top of slope setback will not create an unworkable design problem, however, the impact of the dry-laid stone walls will be negligible given their height of 24-30 inches. The flagpole has a more significant impact and should not be approved in its proposed location. 2. Any intrusion into the top of slope setback or height limit is minimized to the greatest extent possible. Response: As stated above, the stone walls will be nearly invisible from Hallam Lake. Native vegetation is proposed to be planted along the lake side of the walls to further eliminate their visibility. The proposed flagpole will significantly exceed the height limit in its proposed location. In addition, by their nature, the flagpole and flags will have high visibility and will create an intrusion within the protected Hallam Lake overlay area. 3 3. Other parts of the structure or development on the site are located outside the top of slope setback line or height limit to the greatest extent possible. Response: The house as renovated will maintain the same location as the current structure. All other elements of the landscape plan are in compliance with the ESA requirements. 4. Landscape treatment is increased to screen the structure or development in the setback from all adjoining properties. Response: Vegetation will be added along the backside (Hallam Lake side) of the proposed walls. The flagpole is not screened by existing or proposed vegetation. STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: Community Development staff finds that the application should be approved in terms of the dry-laid stone walls, but not the flagpole, with the following conditions: 1. The dry-laid stone walls are approved as proposed. 2. The flagpole is not approved within the 15 foot setback area. An alternative location on the property, where the flagpole is above the top of slope, outside of the 15 foot setback area, under the height limit established by the 45 degree angle from the top of the slope, and screened from view from Hallam Lake is acceptable. The location must be presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission for review and must also be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. 3. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the ESA and Special Review for 414 N. First Street with the conditions as outlined in the Planning Office Memo dated March 17, 1998." EXHIBITS: A. Staff memo dated March 17, 1998 B. Application. 4 MAY-15-98 FRI 11:34 OFFICE OF DAN KILEY FAX NO. 35 P, 02 LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: FOLE House (Lewis-Posada Residence, .Aspen) Location: 4 14 N. ·First Street, Aspen, CO (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) APPUCANT: Manie: Jonathan Lewis and Roberto Posada Address: 4 14 N. First Street. Aspen, CO 8.1611 Phone #: (970) 920-2724 REPRESENTAnVE: Name: Office e.f Dan Kiley Address: Box 250, Garen Road, Charlotte, VT 05445 Phone #: (802) 425-2141 TYPE OF APPUCATION: (please check all that apply): Condjtional Use m Conceptual PUD .... El Conceptual Historic Devt Special Review· U Final PUD (& PUD AmendmAnt) O Final Historic Development Design Review Appeal U Conceptual SPA U Minor Historic Devt. OMOS Allotment Il Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) I Historic Demolition GMQS Exemption O Subdivision O Historic Designation ESA - 8040 Grcenline, Stream Q · Subdivision Exemption (includes U SmalILodge Conversion/ Margin. Hal[am Lake Bluff condominiumization) / Expansion Mountain View Plane U Lot Split El Temporary Use C Other: E Lot Line Adjustment [3 Text/Map Amendment - EXISIING CONDITIONS: (desoription of existing buildings.uses, previous approvals, etc.) Single family residence and gardens with 300 sq. ft. ah.servarion elerk- PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Renovatioo of observation deck; addition of landscape elements, -111,11 4 £ 1 ow stone walls which fall within the Hallam Lake Bluff ESA, Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ N/A E Pre-Abplication Confbrenee Summary E Attachment # 1, Signed Fee Agreement C Response to Attachment #2, Dimensional Requirements Folm C] Response to Attachment #3, Minimum Submission Contents .... £ Response to Attachment #4, Specific Submission Contents ~ Response to Attachment #5, Review Standards for Your Application 000090 MAY-15-98 FRI 11:35 OFFICE OF DAN KILEY FAX NO, 35 P. 03 0,~ 0, DIA, 15&111 - 4,1,VIX;C,PE AF;£;~4ITEK,TBANE) F·LANMAS - CAST rAnlvl , CHAFIDi-rE · via=a*JNT - 00446 113..EMHONS 802-42$-2741 Ka;353®,LE. 2¢e·ARE~-1288 RESPONSE TO HALLAM LAKE BLEFF REVIEW STANDARDS WrrACHMENT 0 PROPERTY: Jonathan L,cnis and Roberto Posada 414 Notlh First Street .,/ Asixu, CO. 81611 15 MAY 1998 1. Standard is mel 2. Two elements ofthe pIopo®ed depelopment am located within the ftneca-foot setbagk ftom top of slope. a) Dry-taid stonc walls. Thege walIs are 18*-24*high ar¥! are set approximately lt-24* back frran top of slope At this dimension, the wans are beneath the 45° angle extendcd from grade at top of slope. Since the walls am dzy-laid stone, they will not require a footing and can be built on grade. On the walls' north (Ha]Lam Lake) side, native vegetation will grow against and obscure the stone work. b) Scmen wallateast proportyline. The wallis six fect high and is set back six feet fromtopof slope. It is eight-inch thick comrete, and is supported by twelve>·inch diamcier piers up tO ten fbet on center. If required to avoid grade distmbance inthc sctbaok zone, theninefsel of wall whiGhextendover the zone callbe cantikvcred. The overalllengthofwallwillbcdclermincdon site in reference toexisting trccs. 3. Standard is mel 4. Standard is nit 5. Standard will be Inct when site lighting plan is developed 6. Standard is met. 7. Standard is met We hope that thess thoughts are useful in glaIifying the dcsign intent fbrlhe Lewis-Posada propeity. Please contact the Offic© of Dan Kiley if mot¢ information is needed. Contact: Jane Amidon or Peter Metr Office of Dan Kiley 250 Garen Road Charlotte. VT 05445 802.425.2141 . 1/ MAY-15-98 FRI 11:35 OFFICE OF DAN KILEY FAX NO, 35 P. 04 O™CE OF DAN |U.EY, t.,MX<*IZAAC*,TECTS All:) Pl-F#*35, EAST FARM · CHARLOTTE· VERMONf - ©>445. TELEPH[NNE 302-425·2141 · F#*3&'MLE· 8(22·425€3288 RESPONSE TO SPECIAL REVIEW STANDARDS PROPERTY: Jonathan lowis and Roberto Posada 414 Noxth First Street Aspen, CO. 81611 15 MAY 1998 1. Two dements of the proposed development are located within the fifteen-foot setback from top of stope. a) Dty-laid stone walls. These walls are intended to provide adegree of spatial definition to the inner lawn. area, as well as to piuvide seating thai blends with the land- Their height and placement should rcndcr 1he walls not visible frombelow. We propose to augment native vegetation in anyareasof the slope whetu it is sparse, to ensure that the cffect is achie¥ed entirely in line with the natural character of the hillside, and to avoid any visual impact on the Ballam Lake area. b) Scmen wall at east property line. This 41 is intended to replace the existing fence line which carrently delincatcs the property line. Its placement is generated by a desire to screen the northeast corner of the Lewis-Posada outdoor living area from the nearby Givens Institute decking. The wall has becn designed to minimizE visual and physical impact on both properties, as uell as to limit its visibility from A.C.E.S. below. To thisend thownitis just eight inches in section; in elevation a large portion of its face will be obscued by existing evergreens or new vine growth. 2. The scrcen #111 and parbculaily the low stone walls should not present significant visual and minimal structuralimpacton topof slope conditions. Both clemcats will be welt screened by existing native vegetation and trees on the north (Hanam Lake) side. The narrow width of the sacen wall and the low height of the stone walls have been selected to minimim visual intrusiom Upon request a modE up ofboth dements can be fabricated to exhibit the suitability oftheir scale and dimensions at the proposed locations. 3, Standard is met 4. Standard is met W© hop© that th¢s© thoughts arc useful in ©tari*ing th© design intent for th¢ Izils.Posada p,op©re. Please contact the Omcc of Dan Kiley if more information is needed. Contact: Jane Amidon or Peter Meyer Office of Dan Kiley 250 Gar©n Road Charlotte,.VT 05445 802.425.2141 MAY-15-98 FRI 11:34 OFFICE OF DAN KILEY FAX NO. 35 P, 01 OFFICE OF DAN KILEY Chariette. Vermout USA ®et 802.425.2141 fan 802 425 328# DATE: 15 May 1998 TO- Christopher Bendon clo Ronda Harris Aspen / Pitkin Community Development FAX# 970. 130, 9111 FROM: Jane P. Amidom PAGES: 3 PROJECr: JONA'IHANLEWISAND ROBERTO POSADA 414 NORTH FIRST STREET ASPEN, CO Land Use Application and Rcspome to Hallam Lake Blufr Rcvicw Stanchrds to ibllow, Drawing set Fedexed 5/14/98. JAN-26-1998 13:35 FROM ASPEN/P ITKIN COM DEV TO 9-18024253288-090 P.12 ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees (Please Print Clearly) CITY OF .ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and Jonathan Lewis & Roberto Posada (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for PoLe House, 414 N. First St., Aspen, C0 (hereinafter. THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of.Aspen Ordinance No. 43 (Series of 1996) establishes a fee structure for land use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determinadon Of appiicaton CompleteneSS. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree thai because ofthe size. nature or scope of the proposed project it is nott posible at this time to ascertain the fuil extent of The costs involved in processing Ille application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree thar it is in the interest ofthe parties to allow APPLICANT to make payment of an iniIial deposir and to thereeter permit addirional coSts to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLIC.ANT agress he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional paymems upon notification by the CrrY- when chey are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it Will be bene€red through the greater certainry of recovering its full costs to pmcess APPLICANT'S appiicmion 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree rhat it is impracticabie for CITY- 3'taffro complere processing or present sufficienz information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the planning Commission and/or City Council to make iegaily required findings for project approval, uniess current biilings are paid in full prior 'o decision. 3. Therefore. APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITVs waiver of its right to collect tbil fees prior to a determination of application completeness. APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit ill the amount of S 1 .080 which is for _6 hours of Planning stafftime. and if actual recorded Costs exceed the initial deposit .APPUCANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above. including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days ofthe billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds ibr suspension of processing. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT U Signature: , 0 . $ ;, . 1 •-7 ·· C . , 2_ 9 L 0 I-J ATUrz 5 6 Date: Community Development Director Printed Name: City of Aspen Mailing Address: OFFICE OF DAN KILEY · LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS · EAST FARM · CHARLOTTE · VERMONT · 05445 · TELEPHONE 802-425-2141 · FACSIMILE: 802-425-3288 18 February 1998 To Whom It May Concern, The Office of Dan Kiley, 250 Garen Road, Charlotte, Vermont 05445 (802) 425-2141 is authorized to act on our behalf in matters of site design and construction administration ofour property at 414 N. First Street, Aspen, CO. Sincerely, Jonathan Lewis Roberto Posada A .1 1 t,- 'JI- i.h .FC K 51 940 -}1· 12 E <0 Date FROM : HEAD ST BARTH PHONE NO. : 0598278340 FEB. 19 1998 08:44PM Pl FEB-18-98 WED 18:04 OFFICE OF DAN KILEY FAX NO. 35 P.03 17*.,ge l/Sula~,L*10,113,#CA;29/10(V*01*bal,dil~a-PAIPU#*dM#luorm ,-0,7.0044·11,~to.,«8Wvgllm ·MOgall MOP•NI·alb 18/4/•uat, 1998 To Whe••11)4 0-41:6 Th• Omo•o#D.Kiley, 1500-,No~a~08- Verx-t OS445 (902)421-1141 £•mah=*- ..tcna.b.h.lf inmililintal&W,1-100-=- •a-1-tood=, , )*414}1.Flmal-,CA,placa 1£0£Efor:CyADA. ./EU .00 199% tod (20 S IM37 * 93@V11 1 W A#CR 940 CAO AI • AT .* [Od 910 S I M31 * S3&IV11 I W 6/56 999 SOC GS:St 86.02'835 WTI COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: 05/21/96 at 08:30 A.M. Case No. PCT10914 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: (a) ALTA Owner's Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ 3,450,000.00 PremiumS· 2,958.00 Proposed Insured: Rate:RE-ISSUE RATE JONATHAN LEWIS and ROBERTO POSADA (b) ALTA Loan Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ PremiumS Proposed Insured: Rate: Tax Certificate $20.00 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: PETER NITZE, JULIUS LEWIS AND PAULA ZURCHER, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF ELIZABETH H. PAEPCKE 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN, State of COLORADO and is described as follows: See Attached Exhibit "A" Countersigned at: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E. HOPKINS This Commitment is invalid ASPEN, CO. 81611 unless the Insuring 970-925-1766 Provisions and Schedules 970-925-6527 FAX A and B are attached. 1-02 220 SIM33 + 632&31:A 6956 955 SOE 62:51 ZE:t. 2--- Page 18, ASPEN DAILY NEWS, Friday, April 17, 1998 n Letter . 6 AI<virl D & UP.ari. r.6. ~~1 The effort integrity, concern and caution with which everyone ~v involved proceeded was absolute. Over the period of a year 1,} 1,1 1 MI)NALD GAR fill D· rE!.1'1'111}Nf. ANDREWV Ilti<111 - VIC'1(,RIAN NOWARI: Ittjll-I'ING 19701 925.1936 and a half, we worked closely with the City and the HPC. MATrHEWC FORGUSON• 4:14, C {31.{ )R A DO R 1 61 i 11·"'.lit . Allf,INI:¥N IRP,TIS *IRRARO Bartic/1,10<01 net , DAVIDE 1.1:NY{) 934.1008 , 601 1.,1,%141'YMAN AVENUF 11.1 E ( (,1 All our meetings were intense and thoughtful. Further, Aot MICINEL 1 11[RRON"' recognizing the importance of the property to Aspen, we .... voluntarily postponed our final meeting to allow for special, additional notice to the Mayor, City Council, Grassroots HAND DELIVERY Television, The Aspen Times and the Aspen Daily News. erty"); Meeting No one bothered to attend. ' Amy Margerum April 7, 1998 City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Colorado 81611 Re: 414 North First Street (the "Subject Prop Aspen, At this February 11, 1998 meeting the Historic Scheduled for Tuesday, April 7,1998 Preservation Commission of the City of Aspen 1. unanimously approved the proposed redevelopment This letter confirms~*that we have scheduled a meeting between the Owners erty of our home. The final project included demolition of p C. Dear Amy: and the City (the "Parties ) to discuss the Subject Prop for Tuesday, April 7, 1998, at 2.30 p.m. at the office of Garfield & Hecht The following the main structure on the site due to its deteriorating individuals shall attend on behalf of the Owners: Jo~athan Lewis, Michael condition. The process resulted in what Council Ememann, Steve Hansen, and Dave Lenyo and Andy I lecht of Garfield & Hecht, Member and former HPC Chair Jake Vickery has Amy May called an "exemplary project." Jake Vickery, Rachel Richards, Amy Margerum, Guthrie and John P,C. Worcester shall attend on behalf of the City. As we discussed, either Party disclose to the press that the meeting is scheduled; but the discussions shall remain Following final approval, nobody called for strictly confidential unless our clients agree in writing to disclosure of specific review of the HPC's unanimous decision. The City has established without question that we matters to the press. The representatives of the City can disclose the details of the CM followed their prescribed process completely. confidentiality agreement that the details of the discussions shall not be disclosed ' discussions to Council only in executive session subject to the same to third parties without consent of the Owners. , nor If we had not, they never would have issued the demolition permit. Belated posturing by those who ignored the process has followed. The Owners' willingness to meet with the City at this point is not intended should it be deemed, to be a waiver or release of any right to proceed immediately the They The Mayor went directly to the press and the current approvals, permits and construction schedule. also are not . , created a media maelstrom which has agreeing to reopen the approval process or to an extension of any appeal periods. Further, the City agrees that the Owners are not waiving any rights based on final approvals that they have already received in connection with the Project. We look forward to meeting with you later this afternoon. provoked hystelia and uninformed vicious attacks, first on our planned home and now on our characters. Sincerely yours, , will] the Project. Stated differently, by attending the meeting, the Owners are not committing to forbearing from immediately proceeding with the Project based on GARFIELD & HECHT, P.C. On Monday, April 6, 1998 the City 1 4 Al k. complied with its obligation to issue the City-approved demolition permit. David L. L©.Zft-~ Although the approvals were final and complete and our construction - schedule was in place, the Mayor and City Council ' April 14,1998 continued to request that we meet with the City to discuss voluntary, but · this, despite the fact that we have spent almost two years working within still unidentified, alternative ways to develop our private property. All of Dear Neighbors: the City's framework to design a home that deeply respects the historical , We are writing to address the recent events regarding our home at 414 North First significance of the site. Contrary to recent suggestions, the City had no Street, that we feel, have been misrepresented to the public by the City of Aspen and discretion to delay or withhold the permit regardless of whether or not we - reported by the press. We have purchased this space to tell the true story. agreed to meet with the City. The permit had no conditions to its use, and we never agreed not to use it. It is a tragedy that the Mayor and other City officials created an atmosphere of distrust and divisiveness. Consequently, the City has failed completely to provide a fair and Because of the air of mistrust created by the Mayor's and certain City equitable framework on which we as citizens can rely. The Mayor and Council Officials' previous conduct and statements, we were worried that our Members have now reached a new low by distorting the April 7, 1998 meeting and willingness to meet would be distorted and represented as a "promise" or r follow-up events in order to obscure their failed participation in this process. an "agreement" that we would stop our project. We were also concerned that City officials would mischaracterize the discussions that might take Considerable background is necessary to put these events in context. Our desire place. On April 7, 1998, we met and talked with City officials to hear their is not to engage in a verbal battle with public officials and politicians about the concerns about the approved plans for our home. Prior to the meeting, we ' effectiveness of their process. We desire only to be heard so that we can go forward - . sent the attached letter to the City in which we wrote that "our willingness thoughtfully, as we have consistently done, on our home and to create to meet with the City at this point is not intended, nor should it be deemed, , a real tribute to those who have served all of us so well. to be a waiver or release of any right to proceed immediately with the , Projed. Stated differently, by attending the meeting, [we] are Dgl In 1996, we submitted a land use application requesting approval for development committing to forbearing from immediately proceeding with the Project of our home and property at 414 North First Street. A process which began with based on the current approvals, permits and construction schedule." . zero expectations ultimately ended up with the approvals necessary to allow us to , rebuild a wonderful and comfortable home which would respect and celebrate the Curiously, no City official or recent news report mentions the letter that Lyster/Brown/Paepcke legacies before us. We personally attended the many work was hand delivered to the City the day of the meeting and was discussed sessions and site visits in addition to the properly noticed public hearings to at the meeting, although parts of earlier letters were printed extensively insure that the final produd would respect the historic significance of the property. in the papers. ASPEN DAILY NEWS, Friday, April 17, 1998, Page 19 to Our Neighbors The City also agreed and understood that the discussions in that meeting were We assure all our friends and neighbors that we will continue to actively ~ to be confidential unless both parties agreed to disclose them. We wanted to contribute to and participate in the Aspen community we have chosen as make certain that any reports about the meeting would be accurate. After our home, despite the Mayor's cruel and completely inappropriate words. delivering this letter, we felt safe that no City official could later claim that he or she felt "betrayed" or "misled" if we went forward with our project. Moving into the future is inevitable. It is particularly awkward and precarious now Please don't confuse movement, evolution and progress as disrespect or All our fears came true. The Cit~s promises and agreements meant nothing: thoughtless capitalism. This is a home, It will continue to be a home. Nothing 1. We learned that the City had broken its promise of confidentiality and nobody, not even a bulldozer demolishing some portion of the home to when we read distorted accounts of our meeting in the local make way for a new adaptation can take the Lysters; Browns' or Paepckes' newspapers. contributions and influences away from the community or the land. 2. We were shocked to read assertions that we promised to stop the project - a fiction directly contradicted by the letter hand delivered to Not even the misplaced anger of the heirs to these great and worthy people the City the day of our meeting. can take the souls of their predecessors or the experiences of the hundreds that visited with them upon this land. These are the people and experiences 3. City officials have said that a "written offer" had been made to move that embody this town, its history and its future. a portion of the house when such an idea had never developed into a concrete proposal. Instead, after almost two years of City It has been said that the reason the heirs sold the house at 414 North First participation in the approval process, the City told us that it was Street was to raise money to pay their estate taxes. Since they have other beginning to explore the possibility of moving the house. It was an property in the area that they could have sold instead, we must assume that invitation to delay and be plotted against by the very people elected this property was the least important to them. It is strange that they express and appointed to protect our rights. The City had not even identified their outrage now after choosing to sell a part of the garden to build a any specific site to which the house could be relocated. In fact, the speculative home, the home itself and its historical contents at a garage sale. City had not yet even contacted a moving company or a general - contractor to determine the feasibility or cost of moving and We care deeply about and respect greatly the historical significance of our reconstructing the structurally unstable house. Nobody suggested to property. We are truly committed to this community and to continuing its us what effect such a move would have on our design, our approvals, great institutions. We have worked carefully with the HI'C to save, nurture, or construction schedule. The "possible" move was a political mirage and protect the living, breathing trees and gardens that define the land so that could have meant years of not building the home that we and the beautifully The community should know that 60% of the building, its massing Historic Preservation Commission had just spent almost two years and its scale are being soundly reconstructed for future generations lo continue appropriately determining was the best design to preserve and to interact with as they round Triangle Park. We are anxious to offer our home protect the historic integrity of the property. and historic gardens as a place where those who are truly interested can discuss the vibrant issues facing our community in Aspen's pure light. 4. Most disturbingly, City officials have failed to disclose to you that certain members of the City Council contemplated filing a lawsuit How can our Mayor stand before you and implore you to condemn us? against us to stop the very same project it had already approved, How can we allow our City's representatives and elected officials to ignore unless we agreed to their 'voluntary,' but unarticulated, options. the very procedures they are charged with prescribing and overseeing? Although we knew a lawsuit would be frivolous because it was the City itself that unanimously approved the plans, we could not allow The home we have planned will be an asset to the community as we move the construction of our home to be needlessly delayed for years as a into the 21st century Some people may never understand those of us that result of a City sponsored lawsuit driven by political motives. stand up for our rights and refuse to be cut down at the knees by politicians Prior to the removal of the main structure, we continually requested that by their own admission are "asleep at the wheel". that the City simply and honestly commit that it would take no legal action to do away with our already approved plans. Instead, we were This is a town that was founded, settled and re-energized by people unequivocally told that certain members of City Council were pmfoundly aware of their rights and freedoms. This is a town that should considering taking legal action to stop the projed unless we agreed to celebrate individuals who stand up to ineffective politicians who are only some undefined plan to keep the house "as is." At best, we were told interested in photo opportunities and their select few. in response to our questions that City Council had not yet directed the City Attorney to take any action and that a formal vote was We know we did the right thing. We know that the City was not dealing necessary, but that executive sessions were already scheduled by the with us in good faith. It is for this reason that we wrote letters to protect our City Council to discuss further action. This response, after we were reputations and the truths on which we have always and will always rely. very dear that we had a construction schedule in place and that this was a matter of extreme urgency to us, indicated that the city was far Once again, the property at 414 North First Street is at the center of all that more interested in obstructing and delaying our plans than with is and should be important to Aspen. The hearts and souls of so many of the ... reaching a timely and reasonable resolution. extraordinary and worthy people before us reside upon this land. In the spirit of their vision and their memory we must urge our neighbors to be alert, get Now it would appear the City is poised to retaliate against us by the facts and to reject out of hand false allegations made against us by those ~ manufacturing reasons not to issue our building permit. If this is the "old who seem determined to protect their reputations at our expense. Aspen" the Mayor so proudly says he is defending, we think it is time for a new Aspen. Sincerely, Sadly, the Mayor publicly questions how we can live in Aspen. We, like every .,* citizen, have the right to live in Aspen-peacefully and without harassment and intimidation. The recent actions of the Mayor and the City are a far „4.*St.... AODMTIODUADA greater threat to the Aspen Idea than the sensitive reconstruction of our home. ~ Jonathan Lewis Roberto Posada A government that ignores its own laws is tyrannical, Page 20, ASPEN DAILY NEWS, Friday, April 17, 1998 |NTERNATIONAL ~ CASH ~ Ft~ThgAss~~d P~ of his crew mates Mir's cosmonauts prep are SAVER to install new engine I e After a series of breakdowns last MOSCOW - The two Russian year, the space station has been cosmonauts on the Mir will resume running without any serious problems Turkey..~ work on the installation of a new in recent months. Ground controllers thruster engine Friday when they make decided it was a good time to carry out their fourth trip this month outside the a series of maintenance jobs on the space station. space station. Speeial 7ml~~p Nikolai Budarin detached and government commission on space said The team of Talgat Musabayev and In another development Thursday, a abandoned the old engine last a lack of funding for the space Saturday, the first part of a three-stage industry could force Russia to close process that should help keep the 12- down the Mir space station as early as With every filled Cash Saver Card year-old space station running August, the ITAR-Tass news agency smoothly. Save 99¢ per lb. reported. The engine keeps the Mir's solar This year's proposed space budget panels pointing toward the sun so they of $600 million will not be enough to Example: energy. The old engine, which had and other space programs, the report can absorb the maximum amount of cover the costs of maintaining the Mir 20 Cards Save $19.80 and has to be replaced. immediately be reached for comment 10 Cards Save $9.90 been in operation since 1992, ran out said, citing unidentified sources. of fuel during a previous spacewalk Space officials could not Offer good April 17-30 or While Supplies Last preparatory work for installing the previously expressed confidence that Friday's spacewalk will involve Thursday night. However, they have new engine. In the final stage, the they will be able to keep the Mir in engine will be put in place during a operation until at least next year. spacewalk next Wednesday, space The Russian space program has officials said. suffered sharp cutbacks since the C C AUUMMi 9CLARKS 925=2757 completed three of the five planned officials have managed to come up 4 liN*11*Al/~ The two cosmonauts have already Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, but 300 North Mill spacewalks this month, an unusually with funds to keep the Mir going, in Open 7am to 12 Midnight American Andrew Thomas, the from the United States and other heavy schedule. part by renting space to astronauts third man on board, will film the work countries. ri: p.·2< The 'Mattierfede Lif ~ ASPEN SPORTS €luding & atu~rdaa Wigfit AND THE I U OBERMEYER v 1-f 1 W..F 50% Wf Concept Shop , 90Latol4 would like to thank you for a Great Season! 11.- "11- L .naL: E 50% Off - 2~, ~ r !1'9 . ·Iii ·. 314 E. 11>man Ave.. Aspen • Reservatiomi: 925-77(H) The ONLY Portable, Heated, Walkway and Driveway Covering System A three foot wide rubber mat L- which melts ice and snow. fRIDAY, SATURDAY & SUNDAYOMIY Just roll it out, and plug it in. · 50 + As seen at Gwyn's High Alpine Restaurant, Snowmass h - 30% - 50% Off SKIS, BOOTS & BINDINGS < -=-- F T1"rii' Sidewalks - Decks - Entryways 408 E. Cooper Avenue Mall • 925-6331 .2 + 4?4'. • -ASPEN .lili,~ 1 41 *-Ill, 303 E. Durant Avenue • 925-6332 Offered locally by -'15*rE-- dplsrnRIs Snowmass Center • 923-3566 1-·~~4~a- Snowmass Village Mall • 923-6111 .C,k Willow Creek Management Services "Don't go out without us!" ..1 ..11 Dellve„,22-412' ASPEN DAILY NEWS, Friday, April 17, 1998, Page 17 NATIONAL Judge throws out lawsuit by lying would-be doctor From The Associated Press around and sued the university for defamation and argued. But "that doesn't make what Princeton did invasion of privacy, seeking unspecified damages. right." HARTFORD, Conn. - A judge threw out a lawsuit The judge threw out the case on the fourth day of the Dean Nancy Malkiel had testified that Princeton was Thursday by a Princeton graduate and would-be doctor trial after testimony was over but before the case had obligated to alert the medical schools about his lies. who sued his alma mater for alerting medical schools gone to the jury. "All of us want the best doctors we can have in • that he had lied about his academic achievements and Nobay said he was extremely disappointed. He said society. It's up to us to see to it that the people entering . 1 background. he had not decided whether to appeal. Princeton the medical profession are competent, confident and "Simply put, it'i not outrageous to tell truthful lawyers had no comment. trustworthy," she said. statements about someone's fitness to practice Nobay graduated from Princeton in 1989. He was Nobay, 30, a computer science teacher from New medicine to those who have a need to know," U.S. accepted to Vanderbilt University's medical school in Haven, admitted that he was not, in fact, a Merit District Judge Dominic Squatrito said. 1991, and to Georgetown, Tufts and Dartmouth in Scholar and that a family of lepers had not helped send The graduate, Rommel Nobay, had admitted he told 1994. But the applications were rejected or withdrawn him to school. He also acknowledged that he doesn't numerous lies and half-truths in applying to Princeton after the schools were notified of discrepancies by his know whether he has any black blood. and later to medical school. He claimed that he was Princeton adviser, Jane Y. Sharaf. His attorney said Nobay had lied and told half-truths part black and a National Merit Scholar and that a "Princeton, one could argue, did a public service. out of insecurity and fear. But he said the issue was family of lepers had donated half their beggings to That's the defense," Nobay's lawyer, Norm Pattis, whether Princeton respected his right to privacy. , support his dream. When Princeton exposed his lies and wrecked his . chances of getting into medical school, he turned LAST DAYS OF THE SEASON GET A WARMER FEELING INSIDE ' With your --1--*Ii-j(-T-i LAST DAYS OF THE SALE! 0 high output, - _ __E_-cz~.- *r---2-2 energy-efft- EL U.--Ii-- -=- - U • cient Dovre -- ---F- -7-- 1 -U~-- - - -- Sapphire --2=:14 gas stove, you'll be +I -. ALL CLOTHING ~-212-2Ell 0NLII--~----- all winter 1-p- long. And, _ . with our direct vent ·- - . .. 1 technology, 7 70% or you can put ---7 t-- £-- - .1* e 24~acti-l-1.- / / cally anywhere Comfy youneed to turn on the heat. Cozy ALL EQUIPMENT Come see for yourself at: INTEGRITY 218 Cody Lane, Basalt PLUMBING & HEATING 927-2474 - 50% ..''- 1 DOVRE® ATTENTION FRIDAY, SATURDAY, & SUNDAY I De€orators and Contractors YEAH, BA 0 BY! We're not iust a carpet store we carry the largest selection of H..dwood Laminates and 1- -\ UFF·i L -22 Vinyl for 41/. Il ae *,p· , · 4 >'6:§:i·:bliN>.>§ ~2 residential ..d ¢*fe¢ 1.>I>*81 'Clwit,NhIV- commerical use - .....19 In=Stock ..4.5.03:82.3 .: jififf 2*·£%/ . . I ....mi 8.112 F». € Guaranteed Berbers Installations Still $4 99 .. sq. ft. PERFORMANCE SKI Bill Rinaldi's + frt. ASPEN FLOORCOVERING 927-2447 • 227 Cody Lane, B.alt Quality Installations Since 1978 408 SOUTH HUNTER - 925-8657 Ample Parking r ... .. 4 C \ ~·····--·- MATCH LINE 1 + \ / \ =4£ - 2 \ /\ \ 7 1 \ \ \ r \ MQIES \ 1. ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. \\\\ , 2. TREE PROTECTION FOR ALL EXISTING TREES ALONG DRIP LINE PERIMETER AT MINIMUM. T \C, /*/ 3. PLANTS FROM EXISTING HISTORIC GARDENS m BE RELOCATED IN BEDS ON SITE. \. -· 4, TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS WILL BE VIA GARMISCH STREET. SEE ARCHITECT'S DRWGS. \ \ - < , 5. SEE LA 400 FOR PAVING PLAN. 1 \ 1 \ L \ \ \ POLEHOUSE 414 North Arst Street. Aspen, Colorado \ \ Aaa,rECTS I.\ The Ememann Group/Architects P.O. Box 4602 \ I\ Aspen, CO 81612 I \ \ I I. \ I I .\ (970) 925-2266 \\ CONC WALL (EXIST.) -: 3:: 4/0/9 401 ... I. I \ I ..\ EXISTING WAL.L TO BE REMEDLATED AS NECESSARY h. I I I - I I EXISTING GATE ~ (303) 38+9915 - -2/.:/:21./F.:..2/. f . -/. 4-~ 't-j~ 2:/:.:::: '0 STRUCTURAL ENGIhEERS KL & A of Colorado \ ' Ult.8.?U-006.80 .9 1//:/::lilli lili::/ .....\ /\.....\ Golden, CO 80401 70 . fl\ -F - 80514th Street L. e#kINumc 1 13 .0 I. I. ..... ... ....:....:.J ..... ':I . ~·rs-~ ./.// ,--- I \ I .. . - . \. -4NCE I. \ I.\\ ..- 993' - - - - . I .\ \. ...\ ,-. ....\. 1 / - -- ... PROPERTY UNE --- -- - EXIS-HNG 9 ..-. - ~ECHAMCALENGIhEERS ----4-- O I - - - - I - 0< 1 . 1 13\ 11.- 2 -142- c f -2-:2 -i : -0 1 -i-~- :1-9--1. 1~- -0 : 0.2:. --- -_ -_ _- _ - ---- -- - -- Beaudln Ganze Consulting Engineers - --I P.O. Box 39 ---- - - ~-+ -- +I- -- . ... 4 h \ N . . - - ---- - - -<.4 Vall, CO 81658 ---- . - - 1 /,2~\ i 1 1 /IN \ - --- - 970) 949-6108 -*. --- . C ~ ip, to M rt.o.w. fooj,31 , (. 13' SETBACK , ;rIO~RELUS 1007.31 ~, _ _____ -- -- $, / 1 . / / 1&- - -. - : / i I -- - - - M -- -I. -A -)41 -- _ ~-- ~~ ~ - ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ UP' ~- ~ ~ ~~~ -~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ -1---------------- / 1 - , A-- ) ~.ARBOR GATE='. 2 N \ -- 4 -4 \ - -- LANDSCAPEAAa-UTECTB - / I -4 - -- ~ m ~ - -·· 3 BaSTING DRAINAGE PATr£RNS AND NATIVE VEGETATIO 1 - i-- - - .Ii Office of Dan Kiley \ O 1002; '. ; 1 ;-42 -~- ' ,.u.---= . trisTING PATHWAYS TO BE REMEDIAIED AS NEC:79 i-_<6 - ~ --- ------- - East Farm I ''h ' iq i 1 i - - · 1 < Charlotte, VT 06445 1 - - - 1- I.- I.. I - , ,/ .1 j / , \ - - __~37- EXISTINGOVERLOOK-----\ --_~ _ - ---- (802) 425-2141 -\ --- 7 - »BERECQNSTRUCTED _-- 1 - 4 I ./1 i i --4 - *\ ~Slf--ff -2.~If >79 --- - - - -- -- /»DRY-LAIDS'TONE W~U- --- -- ···· ···· ·~_ / ~~~~- '-~R--41,2--\ - -- , -- 1. // -01 TOP OF SLOPE 1 / 1 i - t..1 //*.' 1 -. ii// Ch -~-- ~*'-----0 Z--7~440 2- ~ _ //2 - ON GRADE. 24- HEIGHT CrYP) - -- - i -· - - -tfido -, 3 0 3 - - -- t.1·.A~ -TERRACE OF STONE PIECES INTEFOORS 1 f \ « , - - - - 1 1 £ /-7-T -1 SET ON GRADE 24/0.0 ---**1~~..0/"'/ \A=-1 -X«h» -- -2 ----- - -- 0- /(~06 -- DI-2 4-=---A----, L.~----~~·2¥ i,2-U-,1-j:+2EM , - /t-X- /062 - --.-~--i- - -6-~1 1 -- - -- • 1 - -/,- i!~ --. 13' SETBACK David Schaefer , 1 -Na ./ 11 -- WALL 1 i . 1 KV in. \ , -- ----/---7---- 3..'--1\ 3,- 1 m +98.8 -3 - 1 7 -~ 20 Fifth Avenue C - --*- - , , ,1 JC j 1 q.o.1-RELUS pogi <4 . :x -1----30---14~ , it.O.W. 1006.21 -, -- , -- - / #158 - ........ -- -L- - ------- h 0/ 0 1 -4 -- New York, New York 10011 i 1 .....1 / I 7L--*--I/' - ----' 6 p -00 -- ' 11 4 (212) 475-3679 , 11 .\\ ~ A O i r--1 ' ~ -- l. L / C. o \1 4. riel r.'' 1 --- 1 - 1 • FFE +100.27 +10)3.52 i 014 0 ~ ;M \ 4 0 3 /1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 THESE ELEMENTS PENDING APPROVAL / / T +1002.3 I i / q i ' 3, r. 1003 - 4-, 'b.\ \ 'll, 1 / / i ",/iri-, +995, \ / / \ t\/ 1., -. *- . .... . . . . . . I \ . I .--. . : 11 - / -_ % N \ ~ ......: 1/qbj 1 . -. •--- [El .' ' 471.4*POLE #ki \~ NEW ASPEN (TY!) \ % 1,-./ . . I -7 , +1003.3 \ 1, '4 - 1 1 f/~- ~~13'1'ING TREE (TYP) 6 9 - / . /1 Li : , 4 : , ' : j. 1 6««/1/ .: ' b GATE +~~33 FFE +100.27 .1- .i /|i - 1 e ~ ~1 1 TREE CANOPY (TYP) EXISTING WOOD FENCE It 0 ~~ni£&52 1608.38 1 1 // 6 0 C :51 3 r u / 9/ ,/EPI - 0 4 .29<76 TO BE RECON&TRUCTED 0 0 - 1 1 , i '' . -- I . ' - 4.7 2, 1 0 , O 0 1 / : 412* / I I. 1 0 t\Gh - , 1 1 .' 1 0,0, . , ,/28?0 0 0 &-l / / , 0 0 1/: :00'0 - 00 .' 1 -32 -- 6 0 0 1 - I. :---3 1 000 , 4 0 · /1 , 0 .. --4 j · -nr-1~ i o ... • \ //GAT, RIGHT-OF-WAY .C-.~ +T.O.W. 670,FORADErrYP) 0 LA«90 OARMISH STREET EXT. k> . 1 GRADING PLAN 1"=20'-0" DATE ISSUED FOR 2/25/98 LAND USE APP 3/20/98 OVERLOOK 5/15/98 LP+Z REVIEW TrrLE GRADING PLAN No. LA 200 iNfl Hol v}v Lti