HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.council.009-99 RESOLUTION NO. ~
SERIES OF 1999
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO,
APPROVING A 1999 SUPPLEMENTAL BLrDGET FOR THE PITKIN COUNTY 1/2 CENT
TRANSIT SALES AND USE TAXES
WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council, the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners
and the Town Council of Snowmass Village (the "Parties") have previously identified general
elements of their Comprehensive Valley Transportation Plan (the "Plan") which are eligible for
funding from the Pitkin County one-half cent transit sales and use tax; and
WHEREAS, by intergovernmental agreement dated September 14, 1993, the Parties
agreed:
a. to conduct regular public meetings to continue to refine and agree upon
proposed projects and transportation elements consistent with or complimentary to
the Plan; and
b. that all expenditures and projects to be funded from the County-wide one-
half cent transit sales and use tax shall be agreed upon by the Parties and
evidenced by a resolution adopted by the governing body of each party; and
WHEREAS, in November of 1993 Pitkin County voters authorized the issuance of up to
$13,650,000 of revenue bonds for the puxpose of improving the public mass transportation
system! in the Roaring Fork Valley (the "Revenue Bond Authorization ") if such improvements
are authorized by agreement between the Parties; and
WHEREAS, at a public meeting held on January 14, 1999, the parties considered the
1999 expenditure of $138,025 for the 1999 EOTC Entrance to Aspen work program and up to
$1,200~000 in additional funding for the Roaring Fork Railroad Holding Authority (RFRHA)
Corridor Investment Study (CIS)which will be paid back in 1999 when the proceeds from a
federal grant for this work are received; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to voter approval the use tax had to be used fncst for the acquisition
of the rail right-of-way and then for other transit projects; and
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to approve the attached 1999 supplemental budget with the
understanding that upon the successful acquisition of the rail right-of-way in 1997, the one-half
cent use tax revenues became available for other transit projects on an equal footing with projects
funded by the one-half cent sales tax revenues; and
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen wishes to ratify the approvals given at the January 14
meetingi by adoption of this resolution.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Aspen,
Colorado, that the attached 1999 one-half cent transit sales and use tax supplemental budget, with
conditions, is hereby approved.
1/2% Transit Sales and Use Tax
1999 Supplemental Expenditures
1999 EOTC Entrance to Aspen Work Program $ 138,025
1999 RFRHA CIS Temporary Funding (to be repaid) $I ,200,000
Total Supplemental Expenditures $1,338,025
Conditions:
a) A description of the 1999 EOTC Entrance to Aspen Work Program is attached as Exhibit
"A" and is contingent upon additional funding from the City of Aspen as described within
Exhibit "A", and
b) The additional, temporary funding for the RERHA CIS will not be released until RFRHA has
received a letter from the Federal Transit Agency formally approving the grant for 49 USC
5309 Discretion~xy Capital Assistance. Further, said additional, temporary funding will only
be distributed to RFRttA in monthly task order amounts of approximately $300,000 until the
federal revenues are received by RFRHA, at which time the additional temporary EOTC
funds will be repaid by the proceeds of the federal grant.
RESOLVED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 8th day of February, 1999, by the
City Council for the City of Aspen, Colorado.
I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is
a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen,
Colorado, at a meeting held February 8, 1999.
Kathryn ~.~och, City Clerk
RLR-02/03/99-h:\transp\valley\work\HLFCTggC.DOC
Entrance to Aspen
Work Program Objectives
1999
Overall Work Program Goal: To give Elected Officials the option to go to the voters
in November 1999 for authorization to build the Entrance to Aspen light rail system as
the first leg of a valleywide transit system.
I. Technical Analysis
Objective: To continue to answer questions raised by the public and Elected Officials
about the Entrance to Aspen transit system. To maintain project momentum,
responding tO opportunities created by other projects in the valley, and keeping the
public involved and informed.
H. Design Refinement
Objective: To further develop a design level understanding Of station areas, alignment,
rail vehicle options, landscape and urban design features, and pedestrian amenities
along the proposed transit route.
III. Financing
Objective: To answer any remaining questions about the costs, benefits and funding
opportunities for the Entrance to Aspen rail system, including capital, operating,
maintenance, user fares/fees, and lifecycle costing. To integrate and synthesize
financial information about the Entrance to Aspen link with information about the link
from Glenwood Springs.
IV. Public Information
Objective: To bring up the level of information and awareness in the public and to
respond to questions/concerns so that upper valley residents can understand that
whatever the valley trhnsit solution is, the ETA preferred alternative is the right answer
for Brush Creek Road to Aspen.
V. Visual Communication
Objective: To make this project tangible to people. What does it look like? How does
it "feel"? What are the alternatives? What are the opportunities to integrate art with
the transit architecture? How might a coordinated way finding program enhance safety
and the visitor's experience, while remaining consistent with community character?