HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.731 S Mill St.0103.2019 (2).ARBK
ELEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL | Sly 040918 Mill
1
Client Job Name
Sly
Property Address
731 S Mill St. #2D
Aspen, CO 81611
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 - Scope of Work
2.0 - Sampling Requirements
3.0 - Sampling Methodology
4.0 - Laboratory
5.0 - Suspect Materials Sampled
6.0 - Table of Results
7.0 - Description of Sampling Area
8.0 - Conclusion
- Lab Report
- Certifications
Asbestos Samples Analyzed: 5
Positive Asbestos Samples: 2
_____________________________________________
Asbestos Sampling Report
Date: 04/10/2018
Date of Inspection: 04/09/2018
Client:
Margi Crawford
731 S Mill St. #2D
Aspen, CO 81611
Attn:
Margi Crawford
Building Inspector:
Joshua Johnson
CDPHE #18401
189 County Rd. 135
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
josh@elementenv.co
(970)274-3139
04/18/2019
ELEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL | Sly 040918 Mill
2
1.0- This was an inspection for suspect ACM (Asbestos Conta ining Material) for a bathroom
remodel. Element Environmental conducted a visible inspection for visible materials
that would be impacted during the remodel. This inspection was limited to the areas
found in the Description of the Sampling Area 7.0. Although sampling is destructive in
nature, this was a non -invasive inspection. It was of materials that were accessible. If
other suspect materials become visible/apparent during demolition or construction
activities, work in that area should be halted and more sampling/testing must take
place, per Colorado regulations. Any suspect materials that were not tested are to be
assumed to contain asbestos.
2.0- A limited bulk sampling of from all suspect materials was conducted in accordance with
Colorado State Requirements. The minimum number of samples per homogenous areas
are as follows:
2.1- Surfacing Materials- <1,000 sq.ft.- Minimum of 3 samples
1,000 sq.ft.- 5,000sq.ft.- Minimum of 5 samples
>5,000 sq.ft. Minimum of 7 samples
2.2- Miscellaneous materials- Minimum of 2 samples
2.3- Thermal Systems Insulation (TSI)- Minimum of 3 samples
3.0- The purpose of the inspection is to identify materials that are homogenous. A
homogeneous area is defined as one which shares suspect material, texture, color,
location, and/or apparent time of construction. The materials are segregated into
separate homogenous areas. The size is determined and then samples are taken. The
samples are taken in a random numerical sequence.
4.0- Josh Johnson, a Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment cer tified building
inspector, certification number: 18401, performed the inspection. Samples taken were
sent to CEI Labs in Cary, North Carolina. The samples were analyzed by PLM (Polarized
Light Microscopy) analysis. Per the CDPHE Regulation any sample that is found by a lab
to be trace, or <1% asbestos, is considered to be ACM material. This material would still
be a regulated material by CDPHE. The sample must have an additional “point count”
performed to be considered less than 1% and not be regulated by the CDPHE. The lab’s
documents with analyses and findings are found below .
04/18/2019
ELEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL | Sly 040918 Mill
3
5.0- SUSPECT MATERIALS SAMPLED
• Joint Compound
• Texture
• Drywall
• Tape
• Mastic
6.0- TABLE OF RESULTS
HOMOGENOUS
AREA
DESCRIPTION OF
AREA
CATEGORY&
FRIABILITY
NUMBER OF
SAMPLES
APPROXIMATE
SQ.FT.*
ACM
CATEGORIES
% AND TYPE OF
ASBESTOS FOUND
(A) Bathroom Ceiling Roll
Texture
S/N/A 3 ~40 sq.ft. N/A No Asbestos Detected
(B) Mastic on Drywall
System
M/N 2 ~140 sq.ft. N/A 2% Chrysotile in 2 of 2
Samples
Key:
ACM Categories:
S- Surfacing
M- Miscellaneous
T- Thermal Systems Insulation
N- No
Y- Yes
N/A- Not Applicable
1- Damaged or significantly damaged thermal system
insulation ACM
2- Damaged friable surfacing ACM
3- Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACM
4- Damaged or significantly damaged friable
miscellaneous ACM
5- ACM with potential for damage
6- ACM with potential for significant damage
7- Any remaining friable ACM or friable suspected ACM
*Square footage is estimated and not for bidding purposes
7.0- DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLING AREA
• Bathroom Ceiling Roll Texture
• Mastic on Drywall System in Bathroom
04/18/2019
ELEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL | Sly 040918 Mill
4
8.0- CONCLUSION
The areas on the Table that are in Black did not contain asbestos.
The areas on the table in Red contained asbestos:
• The Mastic on the Drywall System under the tile
This material is considered non-friable. If the mastic will be rendered friable by mechanical means, then
the removal of it is regulated by the CDPHE. If not, then the removal of it is regulated by OSHA. You must
consult your landfill to see if they will accept it and how it must be pre pared. It may need to be
segregated from the other materials so that the landfill may accept it. Element Environmental
recommends that an abatement contractor remove this material to ensure that the workers are trained
and that the materials are handled correctly.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions with my information below.
Sincerely,
Josh Johnson
04/18/2019
ELEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL | Sly 040918 Mill
5
04/18/2019
ELEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL | Sly 040918 Mill
6
04/18/2019
ELEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL | Sly 040918 Mill
7
04/18/2019
ELEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL | Sly 040918 Mill
8
04/18/2019