HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.183 Red Mountain Rd.0038.2018 (51).ARBK
ELEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL | Rothberg 053117 Shady
1
Property Address
54 Shady Lane
Aspen, CO 81611
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 - Scope of Work
2.0 - Sampling Requirements
3.0 - Sampling Methodology
4.0 - Laboratory
5.0 - Suspect Materials Sampled
6.0 - Table of Results
7.0 - Description of Sampling Area
8.0 - Conclusion
- Lab Report
- Certifications
ASBESTOS SAMPLES ANALYZED: 19
POSITIVE SAMPLES: 0
_____________________________________________
Asbestos Sampling Report
Date: 06/02/2017
Date of Inspection: 05/31/2017
Client:
Rothberg Development
822 Bonita
Aspen, CO 81611
Attn:
Adam Rothberg
Building Inspector:
Joshua Johnson
CDPHE #18401
189 County Rd. 135
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
josh@elementenv.co
(970)274-3139
2/21/18
ELEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL | Rothberg 053117 Shady
2
1.0- This was an inspection for suspect ACM (Asbestos Containing Material) for a complete
demolition. Element Environmental conducted an inspection for materials that would be
impacted during the demolition. This inspection was a full inspection for demolition of
the single family home. If other suspect materials become visible/apparent during
demolition or construction activities, work in that area should be halted and more
sampling/testing must take place, per Colorado regulations. Any suspect materials that
were not tested are to be assumed to contain asbestos.
2.0- A limited bulk sampling of from all suspect materials was conducted in accordance with
Colorado State Requirements. The minimum number of samples per homogenous areas
are as follows:
2.1- Surfacing Materials- >1,000 sq.ft.- Minimum of 3 samples
1,000 sq.ft.- 5,000sq.ft.- Minimum of 5 samples
>5,000 sq.ft. Minimum of 7 samp les
2.2- Miscellaneous materials- Minimum of 1 sample
2.3- Thermal Systems Insulation (TSI)- Minimum of 3 samples
3.0- The purpose of the inspection is to identify materials that are homogenous. A
homogeneous area is defined as one which shares suspect material, texture, color,
location, and/or apparent time of construction. The materials are segregated into
separate homogenous areas. The size is determined and then samples are taken. The
samples are taken in a random numerical sequence.
4.0- Josh Johnson, a Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment certified building
inspector, certification number: 18401, performed the inspection. Samples taken were
sent to CEI Labs in Cary, North Carolina. The samples were analyzed by PLM (Polarized
Light Microscopy) analysis. Per the CDPHE Regulation any sample that is found by a lab
to be trace, or <1% asbestos, is considered to be ACM material. This material would still
be a regulated material by CDPHE. The sample most have an additional “point count”
performed to be considered less than 1% and not be regulated by the CDPHE. The lab’s
documents with analyses and findings are found below.
2/21/18
ELEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL | Rothberg 053117 Shady
3
5.0- SUSPECT MATERIALS SAMPLED
• Drywall
• Tape
• Joint Compound
• Texture
• Carpet
• Mortar
• Duct Tape
6.0- TABLE OF RESULTS
HOMOGENOUS
AREA
DESCRIPTION OF AREA CATEGORY
&
FRIABILITY
NUMBER OF
SAMPLES
APPROXIMATE
SQ.FT.
% AND TYPE OF
ASBESTOS FOUND
(A) Orange Peel Texture
Upstairs
S /N/A 5 ~1,500 sq.ft. No Asbestos Detected
(B) Orange Peel Texture
Downstairs
S /N/A 5 ~1,500 sq.ft. No Asbestos Detected
(C) Orange Peel Texture in
detached Bedroom
S /N/A 3 ~800 sq.ft. No Asbestos Detected
(D) Carpet Throughout M /N/A 2 ~1,200 sq.ft. No Asbestos Detected
(E) Block Mortar M /N/A 2 ~1,500 sq.ft. No Asbestos Detected
(F) Duct Tape M /N/A 1 ~20 sq.ft. No Asbestos Detected
Key:
S- Surfacing
M- Miscellaneous
T- Thermal Systems Insulation
N- No
Y- Yes
N/A- Not Applicable
2/21/18
ELEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL | Rothberg 053117 Shady
4
7.0- DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLING AREA
• This was an inspection for a single-family home to be demolished.
8.0- CONCLUSION
All of the samples were found to be negative for asbestos.
The roof was the only material that was not tested. It was not tested so as not to cause any leaks. It is to
be assumed to be ACM material until it can be tested. Tar Impregnated is non-friable. You must consult
your landfill to see if they will accept it and how it must be prepared. It may need to be segregated from
the other materials so that the landfill may accept it. It is recommended that an abatement contractor
remove these materials to ensure that they are handled safely. It must be removed by non-mechanical
and care must be taken to not render it friable. The removal of it is regulated as a Class II removal under
CFR 1926.1101 OSHA regulations
If you have any questions feel free to call or email me.
Josh Johnson,
2/21/18
ELEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL | Rothberg 053117 Shady
5
2/21/18
ELEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL | Rothberg 053117 Shady
6
2/21/18
ELEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL | Rothberg 053117 Shady
7
2/21/18
ELEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL | Rothberg 053117 Shady
8
2/21/18
ELEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL | Rothberg 053117 Shady
9
2/21/18
ELEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL | Rothberg 053117 Shady
10
2/21/18
ELEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL | Rothberg 053117 Shady
11
2/21/18
ELEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL | Rothberg 053117 Shady
12
2/21/18