HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.134 Maple Ln.0138.2019 (16).ARBKFrom:James Foerster
To:John Barker
Subject:Fwd: 134 Maple Lane
Date:Thursday, August 29, 2019 2:45:40 PM
Attachments:image001.png
---------- Forwarded message ---------From: PJ Murray <pj.murray@cityofaspen.com>
Date: Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 4:44 PMSubject: RE: 134 Maple Lane
To: James Foerster <james@raftinginaspen.com>
Hi James,
I have discussed this project again with staff and if the disturbance area is less than 1000sf and
less than 50% of the building it will be a minor. You will need to show that the WQCV can betreated for this portion of the house, which we already discussed will be done in the canoe
treatment system out front.
When you submit for permit, please include a letter of permission from you neighbor thatwork can be done on their property to achieve your project.
The three-year threshold will not be triggered for this project as 1000sf or more is not being
disturbed.
Let me know if you have any other questions.
Thanks,
PJ
08/29/2019
PJ Murray
Civil Engineer
Engineering
130 South Galena St.
Aspen, CO 81611
p: 970.920.5056
www.cityofaspen.com
From: James Foerster <james@raftinginaspen.com> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 8:49 AMTo: PJ Murray <pj.murray@cityofaspen.com>Subject: Re: 134 Maple Lane
Hi PJ,
The current plan ( i think i left it with you) shows a total disturbance area of around 950 sf(cant remember exactly). This includes disturbance area on our neighbors property and access
areas as well. The plan is to remove and replace the remaining trailer with traditional stickbuild framing. Yes some walls will change including an exterior wall adjacent to our
neighbors property. The entire project amounts to less than 50% of the building.
This plan is exactly the same as our first (approved) plan. To be clear our first permit was abuilding permit not a remodel permit, this new permit would be the same. Let me know what
the stormwater manager says.
Talk soon,
08/29/2019
James
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 1:57 PM PJ Murray <pj.murray@cityofaspen.com> wrote:
Hi James,
Note 2 at the bottom of Table 1.1 from Chapter 1 of the URMP outlines the 3-year threshold
for projects triggering a major with cumulative minor projects. Also, the reroofing policy,attached, has a 3-year hold period. It would be 3 years from issuance of CO on the first
remodel permit. The code isn’t specific enough to say if the permit can be submitted prior tothe 3-year date from CO or does construction just need to wait that long. I’ll clarify with the
stormwater manager tomorrow when she is back in the office.
In my notes from our meeting I thought the proposed project is over the 1000sf threshold fora minor which includes a new roof for the existing area and an increase of roof in some
places. Are walls on the interior of the house changing as well?
Thanks,
PJ
PJ Murray
Civil Engineer
Engineering
130 South Galena St.
Aspen, CO 81611
p: 970.920.5056
08/29/2019
www.cityofaspen.com
From: James Foerster <james@raftinginaspen.com> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 2:25 PMTo: PJ Murray <pj.murray@cityofaspen.com>Subject: Re: 134 Maple Lane
Hi PJ,
Sorry for the late reply... been out of town for a little while.
Can you send over the section of code that outlines the exact specification of when the 3yrcumulative disturbance area policy starts and ends... I assume it is from CO, but does thismean we cannot submit for a permit until after 3 yrs from the excact date of CO? or can wesubmit since the permit process takes so long, and not start construction until after the 3 yrsfrom CO. I assume this is outlined in the code just don't know where exactly this is.
Our first permit was issued as a Minor Engineering review... this was a remove and replaceof less the 50% of the building and less that 1000 Sq Ft of Disturbance... The proposed newplans are exactly the same... remove and replace less than 50% of the building and less than1000 sq ft of disturbance area. We have reviewed all of the trigger tables in the engineeringpolicy.. what would push us into the major?
Thanks for the info,
James Foerster
134 Maple Lane
08/29/2019
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 4:40 PM PJ Murray <pj.murray@cityofaspen.com> wrote:
Hi James,
Staff and I discussed the proposed work for 134 Maple Lane we met about last week andI have a few questions for you before I can offer clarification on permitting.
As part of the City’s reroofing policy, disturbance areas for projects within a 3-yearperiod are cumulative. The previous remodel on this property received a CO inOctober 2016 so any work done on property this year would be added to theprevious disturbance area, likely triggering a full major engineering review.Can you provide more information on what is proposed for the interior remodelaspect of this project? The information I currently have is pointing towards a majorengineering review (which requires a full civil plan, professional engineer, drainagereport, WQCV treatment, detention, etc.) so clarifying the internal work will helpdetermine if this is a major or minor.
Thanks,
PJ
PJ Murray
Civil Engineer
Engineering
130 South Galena St.
Aspen, CO 81611
p: 970.920.5056
www.cityofaspen.com
08/29/2019
--
James Foerster
www.raftinginaspen.com
(970) 456 - 6287 (Work)
(970) 319 - 7155 (Personal)
100 Smuggler Mountain Road
Aspen, CO 81611
FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK!
--
James Foerster
www.raftinginaspen.com
(970) 456 - 6287 (Work)
(970) 319 - 7155 (Personal)
08/29/2019
100 Smuggler Mountain Road
Aspen, CO 81611
FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK!
--
James Foersterwww.raftinginaspen.com
(970) 456 - 6287 (Work)(970) 319 - 7155 (Personal)
100 Smuggler Mountain Road Aspen, CO 81611
FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK!
08/29/2019