Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.hpc.20020916ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF, SEPTEMBER 16, 2002 Chairperson, Rally Dupps called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Commissioners present: Jeffrey Halferty, Teresa Melville, Neill Hirst and Michael Hoffman. Staff present: Historic Preservation Planner, Amy Guthrie 950 MATCHLESS DRIVE - VARIANCE, PH Amy said this project was reviewed and approved in the spring. Once under construction there was an error on the site plan. The project is exactly the same in plan and elevation; however a mistake was made in calculating how close they came to the property line. A side-yard setback variance was given. Staff is recommending approval. There is no adjoining property owner that will be affected by this. Klm Raymond and Alan Becker were sworn in. Kim said the house is blocked up and the footings are in. It was determined that we were almost on the property line instead of being two feet back from it. It was a miscalculation ora drafting error. Alan said it is difficult to see the property line due to all of the trees etc. At first we thought it was an error in lifting the house but a surveyor checked it and the house in the air is exactly where it is supposed to be. We called the surveyor to pin the comers of the walls and that is when we found out we were on the property line. Michael inquired about the ownership of the property and it is a right-of- way that belongs to the city. Jeffrey asked how far over the property line the footer was poured. Kim said we are 25 inches from the property line. Rally asked what other variances were granted for this property? Amy said the 500 square foot FAR bonus, a side yard setback in this same area plus a combined side yard variance. It would end up being about a one-foot variance. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF, SEPTEMBER i6, 2002 Klm said she hoped ~he HPC would giVe them the 0 lot line. We are 60 or 80 feet below the allowable FAR. Jeffrey said this variance will help the historic resource and mistakes occur. He also felt that the variance would not hinder that corner. Michael said this change is diminimous and he can accept the revision. MOTION: Jeffrey moved that HPC amend the final approval regarding the variance adjustment and approve Resolution #33, 2002; second by Michael. Yes vote: Jeffrey, Rally, Teresa, Michael, Neill MOTION: Jeffrey moved to adjourn; second by Rally. All in favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 5:30 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 2