HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.boa.19930225CITY OF ASPEN
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
FEBRUARY 25, 1993
4:00 P.M.
SECOND FLOOR MEETING ROOM
A G E N D A
I. CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
II. MINUTES
OCTOBER 30, 1992
FEBRUARY 18, 1993
III. CASE #93-1
JERALD BARNETT (CONT)
IV. ELECTION OF OFFICERS
V. ADJOURN
A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FEBRUARY 25, 1993
Vice Chairman Charlie Paterson called meeting to order at 4: 10 PM.
Answering roll call were Rick Head, Ron Erickson, Bill Martin and
Charlie Paterson. Remo Lavagnino was excused.
MINUTES
FEBRUARY 18, 1993
OCTOBER 30, 1992
After corrections:
Rick made a motion to approve minutes of February 18, 1993 .
Bill seconded the motion with all in favor.
Minutes of October 30, 1992 were again tabled to next business
meeting as only 2 members present had been at that meeting.
CASE #93-1
JERALD BARNETT
CONTINUED
Gretchen Greenwood, Architect for the applicant: I just want to
reiterate the zoning situation and then I would like to go into the
changes in response to the Board's comments that we have made in
the last week and also revisions to our variance requests because
of the public comments we received from Mrs. Paepcke's
representative.
I would begin with the allowable FAR and what our proposed FAR is.
The allowable site coverage. Our allowable FAR on this site is
4, 080. We are going to be taking the entire project to our
allowable FAR. We are going to our allowable FAR. We are going
for our maximum build-out on this site. It is our desire that this
property never will have to come back in for any kind of variance.
The allowable site coverage is 2,762 . We are not increasing. We
are decreasing this because we are using existing foot prints of
the building. That is the same as I presented to you last week.
As I stated in the application we are going for a setback variance
along the north and south and along the east and west. Because of
the comments last week we have changed that and we are going for
even more of a minimal variance. In analyzing it we felt that
there are more solutions.
We are going to be moving the building forward and over in order
that we have the required setback along the north side and along
the south. So we are now in conformance with our required front
and rear yard setbacks. And it is required to have a minimum of
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CASE #93-1
JERALD BARNETT
BEFORE THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE
VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW:
Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as
amended, a public hearing will be held in the Council Room, City
Hall, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may
be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said
Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 24, Official Code of
Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited
to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you
cannot appear personally at such meeting, you are urged to state
your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such
variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious
consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and
others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request
for variance.
Particulars of the hearing and requested variance are as follows:
Date and Time of Meeting
Date: FEBRUARY 18, 1993
Time: 4:00 p.m. SECOND FLOOR MEETING ROOM
Owner for Variance: Appellant for Variance:
Name: JERALD BARNETT GRETCHEN GREENWOOD & ASSOC.
Address: 201 N. MILL #207
Location or description of property:
120 FRANCIS STREET
Variance Requested: SECTION 5-201(D.4 & D.5) ASPEN LAND USE CODE.
IN THE R-6 ZONING CATEGORY TOTAL FRONT AND REAR SETBACKS MUST BE
30 FEET, MINIMUM OF 10 FEET. SIDE YARD SETBACK MUST BE A TOTAL OF
15 FEET, MINIMUM OF 5 FEET. APPLICANT APPEARS TO BE REQUESTING A
1 FOOT 6 INCH SIDE YARD AND TOTAL OF 13 FEET 6 INCH. ALSO A 1 FOOT
REAR YARD SETBACK VARIANCE TO AN EXISTING STRUCTURE FOR AN ENLARGED
ROOF LINE.
Will applicant be represented by counsel: Yes: No: X
The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment
130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611
Remo Lavagnino, Chairman Jan Carney Deputy City Clerk
AFFIDAVIT OF.NOTICE BY POSTING OF A
County of Pitkin j } VARIANCE HEARING BEFORE THE CITY OF
ss. ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Pursuant
State of Colorado } to Section 6-205(E)(b) of the Muni-
cipal Code)
The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and says as
follows:
I� Gretchen Greenwood being or
representing an Applicant before the- Pitkin County Board of
Adjustment, personally certify that the attached photograph
fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the
variance hearing on -this matter in. a conspicuous place on the
subject property (as -it could be seen from the nearest public
way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously
from the day of , 19
to the / day of 19
(Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the
hearing date).
pplicant's S` a re
(Attach photograph here)
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this,=5'M day of J-x k1-,/_1e.2L- ,
19 , by Lz)'Aad
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
My Commission expires:
4-Notary Public' s S ignature
Address � �� �� S-14) 0
Address: 120 Francis Street, Aspen, Colorado
Legal Description: Lots M-P Block 55
Zonong: R-6
Lot Size: 9092 Sq. Ft.
Allowable F.A.R. 4080 Sq. Ft.
Proposed F.A.R. 4080 Sq. Ft.
Allowable Site Coverage: 2762.43 Sq. Ft.'`
Existing Site Coverage: 3082.0 Sq. Ft. No change
Required Front/Rear Yard Setback:
Existing Front/Rear Yard Setback:
Proposed Front/Rear Yard Setback:
Required Side Yard Setback:
Existing Side Yard Setback:
Proposed Side Yard Setback:
Total: 30'-0", Minimum of
10'-0" Front and Back
Total: 31'-4" combined,
Front: 22'-0"
Back: 9'-4" nonconforming
Total: 30'-0" with a minimum
of 10'-0" at rear,
conforming
Minimum of 10'-0" each side -
total of 30'-0" for both side
yards
West: 8'-6" nonconforming
East: 0'-0" nonconforming
West: 10'-0" conforming
East: 0'-0" to 32'-0"
nonconforming/conforming
Variances Required: East side yard setback for both buildings,
and total combined side yard setback.
Required Height Limit: 25'-0" to the midpoint of a sloped roof,
with a 5'-0" maximum to the peak.
Existing Height Limit: 20'-3" to the peak from grade.
Proposed Height Limit: 25'-8" to the peak from grade.
(5'-5" higher than existing roof.)
Roof Peak Height Comparisons
(Feet Above Grade)
Existing 120 Francis Street:
Proposed Main House:
Proposed Guest House:
Mrs. Paepke's roof:
West neighbor:
East neighbor:
George Vicenzi Victorian:
20.1 feet
25.8 feet
22.0 feet
36.3 feet
33.2 feet
31.5 feet
33.5 f eet