HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.boa.19930527CITY OF ASPEN
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
MAY 27,1993
SECOND FLOOR MEETING ROOM
A G E N D A
I. CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
II. CASE #93-3
CHAIKOVSKA/PETERS
III. CASE #93-4
SNOW QUEEN LODGE
IV. CASE #93-5
LESLIE RUDD
V. CASE #93-6
ASPEN EAST CONDO
CITY OF ASPEN
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
DATE. 19 CASE #
APPLICANT 4�111 rvjs;� AmA pnPHONE C2 177
MAILING ADDRESS Mal K (V
OWNER PHONE
MAILING ADDRESS (tm"
V)
LOCATION OF PROPERTY
(Street, Block Number and Lot Number)
WILL YOU BE REPRESENTED BY COUNCIL? YES NO
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Below, describe clearly the proposed variance, including all
dimensions and justification for the variance. (Additional paper
may be used if necessary.) The building permit application and
any other information you feel is pertinent should accompany this
application, and will be made part of this case.
I-
.?.n A�k�eA �.e-tt�r
Applicant's Signature t4t I
REASONS FOR DENIAL OF BUILDING PERMIT, BASED ON THE ASPEN CITY
CODE, CHAPTER 24. AN OPINION CONCERNING THIS VARIANCE WILL BE
PRESENTED TO THE BOARD BY THE ZONING DEPARTMENT STAFF.
DATE PERMIT DENIED
OFFICIAL
DATE OF APPLICATION HEARING DATE
605 EAST MAIN STREET
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
TELEPHONE 3031925-4755
FACSIMILE 3031920-2950
March 19, 1993
Bill Drueding
Aspen Pitkin County Planning
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
RE: 334 WEST HALLAM
This letter is a request for a Site Coverage Variance for the landmark designated
residence at 334 West Hallam.
As we have previously discussed, this structure would not qualify for a building permit
due to the practical difficulty created by trying to balance the floor area ratio with the
historic property's porches and overhangs.
The total allowable site coverage is 3,105 s.f. (34.5%) broken out as follows:
Building 2,700.0 s.f. ( 30% of a 9,000 s.f. lot)
Porch/Overhang Exemption 405.0 s.f. (4.5% of a 9,000 s.f. lot)
( 15% of 2,700 s.f.)
The proposed site coverage on this project is 3,277.4 s.f. (36.4%) broken out as
follows:
Buildings (footprint) 2,699.0 s.f. (30%)
Porches/Overhangs 578.4 s.f. (6.4%)
The on -grade porches of the residence contain 414.8 s.f..
As you can see, the residence and on -grade porches conform to the floor area
dimensional requirements.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CASE #93-3
CHAI KOVSKA/ PETERS
BEFORE THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE
VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW:
Pursuant to the. Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as
amended, a public hearing will be held in the Council Room, City
Hall, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may
be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said
Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 24, Official Code of
Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited
to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you
cannot appear personally at such meeting, you are urged to state
your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such
variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious
consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and
others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request
for variance.
Particulars of the hearing and requested variance are as follows:
Date and Time of Meeting:
Date: MAY 27, 1993
Time: 4:00 p.m.
Owner for Variance:
Appellant for Variance:
Name: CHAIKOVSKA/PETERS BILL POSS, ARCHITECT
Address: 800 NORTH STATE, CHICAGO, ILL.
Location or description of property:
334 WEST HALLAM
BLOCK 42, LOT K, L AND M
Variance Requested: PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN R-6 ZONING CATEGORY.
ALLOWABLE SITE COVERAGE IS 30% OR 21700 SQUARE FEET. 405 SQUARE
FEET OF OVERHANGS IS EXEMPT FROM CALCULATION.. SEC 5-201(D)(6)
ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 24. APPLICANT APPEARS TO BE
REQUESTING A 173 SQUARE FOOT SITE COVERAGE VARIANCE TO INCREASE THE
STRUCTURE SIZE.
Will applicant be represented by counsel: Yes: No: X
The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment
130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611
Remo Lavagnino, Chairman Jan Carney Deputy City Clerk
March 19, 1993
Page Two
The practical difficulty has been to satisfy the historic preservation guidelines for
restoration of this landmark, retaining its historic porches and overhangs and
conforming to the site coverage and floor area ratio requirements.
I have attached a copy of a memo supporting this variance request from the Historic
Preservation Committee.
Also enclosed is a roof plan with site coverage calculations and floor plans with floor
area ratio calculations to assist with your review.
Please call if you have any questions regarding this request.
Sincerely,
WJP/kc
Encl. 1. Roof Plan w/Site Coverage Calculations
2. Floor Plans w/Floor Area Calculations
3. HPC Memorandum, 05/29/92
4. Site Plan
HPC0322.Itr
Roxanne Eflin
May 28, 1992
Page two
In summary, please write a letter to the Board of Adjustment supporting a variance
request of 200 s.f.; thereby allowing total site coverage of 3305 s.f. (36.7%) for 334
West Hallam.
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
f �
Kim Weil
605 EAST MAIN STREET
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
TELEPHONE 3031925-4 755
FACSIMILE 3031920-2950
May 28, 1992
Roxanne Eflin
Historic Preservation Planner
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: 334 West Hallam
Dear Roxanne:
We would like to request that you write a letter supporting a site coverage variance
request for the above referenced property. As you are aware, 334 West Hallam is a
landmarked designated residence and is eligible for the National Historic Register.
Marta Chaikovska and Frank Peters, the present owners, would like to renovate the
structure but have been unable to secure a building permit due to an overage in site
coverage..
The total site coverage allowed for the property is 3105 s.f. (34.5%), broken out as
follows:
Building 2700 s.f. (30%)
Porches/Overhangs Exemption 405 s.f. (4.5%)
The proposed site coverage on the project is 3305 s.f. (36.7%), broken out as follows:
Buildings 2699 s.f. (30%)
Porches/Overhangs 605 s.f. (6.7%)
As you can see the overage, of only 200 s.f. (2.2%); is attributed to porches and
overhangs. These are elements which we feel add important character to the structure
and should remain in place. A variance of 200 square feet seems appropriate in this
case given the historic nature of the structure.
RECEIVED
MEMORANDUM
J U N 0 4 1992
To:
Aspen Board of
Adjustment
BILL FOSS AND ASSOCIATES
ASPEN, COLORADO
cc:
Aspen Historic
Preservation Committee
cc:
Bill Drueding,
Zoning Officer
From:
Roxanne Eflin,
Historic Preservation Officer
Re:
334 W. Hallam:
HPC endorsement supporting
site coverage
variance request
Date: May 29, 1992
----------------------------------------------------------------
On May 27, 1992, at their regular meeting, the Aspen Historic
Preservation Committee voted unanimously to endorse the applicant's
site coverage variance request of 2.2% (200 sq. ft.) for the
landmark property at 334 W. Hallam, known as the Eugene Wilder
House.
Section 7-605 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations states:
Variances: The Board of Adjustment shall not take.any action
on a development application for a variance pursuant to
Article 10, in the H, Historic Overlay District or development
affecting a historic landmark, without receiving a written
recommendation from the HPC.
The HPC finds that the variance is minor in nature (200 sq. ft. or
2.2%), and is necessary due to the numerous porches and overhangs,
which give this structure its historic character. The remodeling
activity has been previously approved and vested by the HPC. The
HPC is unable to grant site coverage variations, except in cases
involving detached accessory dwelling units ("Cottage Inf ill").
Please consider this the HPC's positive recommendation in support
of your approval for the site coverage variance as proposed.
AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY POSTING OF A
County�of Pitkin } VARIANCE HEARING BEFORE THE CITY OF
} ss . ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ( Pursuant
State of Colorado } to Section 6-205 (E) (b) of the Muni-
cipal Code)
The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and says as
follows:
I , 561. P55 , being or
representing an Applicant before the. Pitkin County Board of
Adjustment, personally certify that the- attached photograph
fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the
variance hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place on the
subject property (as -it could be seen from the nearest public
way) and
that the
said sign
was posted
and visible continuously
from the
/V
day of
A/4/
, 1999 ,
to the
a70
day of
/y'V'
, 19 p3 -
(Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the
hearing date).
217
Ap icant's Signature
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this a7 day of �y
19 93 , by V44. R55
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
My c mmissxpires : /! 9
Notary P#blic's Signature
Address
EL I SA J UL I EN
NOTARY PUBLIC
31300 HWY 82 #11'/1
ASPEN CO 81611
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CASE #93-4
SNOW QUEEN LODGE
BEFORE THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE
VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW:
Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as
amended, a public hearing will be held in the Council Room, City
Hall, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may
be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said
Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 24, Official Code of
Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited
to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you
cannot appear personally at such meeting, you are urged to state
your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such
variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give , serious
consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and
others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request
for variance.
Particulars of the hearing and requested variance are as follows:
Date and Time of Meeting:
Date: MAY 27, 1993
Time: 4:00 p.m.
Owner for Variance: Appellant for Variance:
Name: NORMA DOLLE & LARRY LEDINGHAM LARRY LEDINGHAM
Address: BOX 4901, ASPEN, CO. 81612
Location or description of property:
PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE (LP) LODGE PRESERVATION ZONING CATEGORY.
SIDE YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT IS 5 FEET. SEC.5-216 (D)(5) ASPEN
LAND USE CODE. APPLICANT APPEARS TO BE REQUESTING A 3.6 FOOT SIDE
YARD VARIANCE FOR A RUN OF 36 FEET TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION.
Variance Requested:
Will applicant be represented by counsel: Yes: No: X
The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment
130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611
Remo Lavagnino, Chairman Jan Carney Deputy City Clerk
CITY OF ASPEN
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT.
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
DATE 19 CASE # q3
APPLICANT �n_O_Lo PHONE'
MAILING ADDRESS
OWNER
UT Wva. f,)o I I e / re -
MAILING ADDRESS
PHONE �i ---> S- - F
LOCATION OF PROPERTY
(Street/ Block Number and Lot I
WILL YOU BE REPRESENTED BY COUNCIL? YES NO
------------
)er)
Below, describe clearly. the proposed variance, including, all
dimensions and justification for the variance. (Additional paper
may be used if necessary.) The building permit application and
-any other information you feel is pertinent should accompany this
application, and will be made part of this case.-
f.
Applicant's Signature
--------------------------------------- V V ------- --------
REASONS FOR DENIAL OF -BUILDING PERMIT, BASED ON THE ASPEN CITY
CODE, CHAPTER 24. AN ' OPINION CONCERNING THIS VARIANCE WILL BE
PRESEFED TO THE BOA". BY THE ZONING DE"ARTMENT STAFF.
A
Sip`� rz
DATE PERMIT DENIED OFFICIAL
DATE OF APPLICATION HEARING DATE
/N /1, -:7 / /
2
SV'L
We-S 7-
N'�
05-27-f•1993 01:06PM
8
DIPLOMATE AMERICAN BOARD
OF PLASTIC SURGERY
May 27, 1993
FROM ARLINGTON PLASTIC SURGERY TO
DA'VID L. RASMUSSEN, M.D., P. A.
Bill Drueding
City of Aspen. Board of Adjustment
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: Case #93-4
Snow Queen Lodge Request
Date of Meeting: May 27, 1993
13039205197 P.02
MEMBER, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE
SURGEONS, INC.
My wife and I appreciate the attached identification received regarding
Case #93-4, Snow Queen Lodge. We own a town home at 103 East Hyman and
reside in that residence ten months of any given calendar year. we
rong object to c„lr, anting a 3.6 foot side yard variance for a run of
feet to the owners of Snow Queen. Lodge. The basis for our objections
-Axe as follows:
1. The reasons for the five foot set back requirement have not changed
since their inception (ie. public safety/aesthetics).
2. The block that Snow Queen Lodge resides in is a satisfactory mitt of
residential and LP zoning. If the LP presence is allowed to
gradually exceed it's allowed space, over time the character of the
block will change. This will adversely affect the ambiance and
aesthetics; of the neighborhood and residences life ours. Bascially,
we do not need more crowding.
3. If the LP - residential balance is allowed to tilt in favor of LP
the property values of the residences in the block will most cer-
tainly depreciate.
4. Another addition to Snow Queen will bring more demand for, on the
street parking which is already very limited and continues to be a
problem for the city and property owners.
5. We certainly understand the desire for any entrepreneur to improve
his business by capital investment and expansion. howevers this
should not be allowed to happen at the expense of -one's neighbors
or at the expense of the character of Aspen.
ARLINGTON PLASTIC SURGERY ASSOCIATION
10 17 W. RANDOL MILL, ROAD
ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76012
469-1 163 a 469-9388 a 277-1 061
05-27--1993 01 : 06PM
FROM ARLINGTON PLASTIC SURGERY TO 13039205197 P.03
May 27, 1993
Page 2
Lastly, we both appreciate the difficult task the City of Aspen Board of
Adjustment has in determining patterns of change and growth in our city.
The decisions must be difficult but necessary in order to keep Aspen the
best place to lave in our country. We love our home in Aspen and enjoy
being in the city very much. Thank you for giving our objection con-
sideration.
Sincerely Fours,
David L. Rasmussen
Rita M. Rasmussen
I
F
t�►S�
AFFIDAVIT OF.NOTICE BY POSTING OF A
County;of Pitkin } VARIANCE HEARING BEFORE THE CITY OF
} ss. ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Pursuant
State of Colorado } to Section 6-205(E)(b) of the Muni-
cipal Code)
The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and says as
follows:
I,--��i�� ���� ah-� , being or
representing an Applicant before the Board of
Adjustment, personally certify that the attached photograph
fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the
variance hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place on the
subject property (as -it could be seen from the nearest public
way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously
f rom the day of VVI cam _ , 19
to the Z '7 -f- _ day o f CC 4 19
(Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the
hearing date).
Appl;�6aA I Si ature
r 1I�1, i .4
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this *27 day of 117aV ,
19.by %MfI'/�ii�
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
My Commission expires: 4/7/97
lrallv aAaq
Notar Public s Signature
4.
Address�J
v ��
This creates several problems:
(1) Building a second story 3.6 feet inside the existing`" wall
means we would have to put much more time and money into
supporting the wall from below.
* (2) If we start 3.6 feet inside the existing wall, we are left
with 12 feet of interior width for an apartment area to be used
as a living room, dining room, and kitchen. We are not saying
that this can't be done, but we want to make this a comfortable
unit and it makes more sense physically and economically to have
the extra 3.6 feet.
* (3) We want to make this project look good and fit in with the
existing structure. Aesthetically, it makes sense to follow the
existing lines of the lodge. If we proceed with the present codes
it will break up the continuity of the structure and draw
attention in a negative manner.
This property doesn't generate much income, but we still need to
improve our lodge to keep up with the changing times. We also
have to justify these upgrades monetarily, so we want to get the
most improvement for our money. Being a small place, we have a
limited area in which to make these improvements and that area
happens -to encroach on a set -.back. We hope that you can
appreciate our situation and approve this variance.
Respectfully Yours,
G�_t_ e�717
Owners; Snow Queen Lodge
SNOW QUEEN LODGE
Lodge Improvements & Proposed Employee Addition
Request for set -back variance te-1 line for
36 feet in length on West side of lot.
The Snow Queen Lodge is a Victorian Bed & Breakfast built circa
1886. It has been operating as a B & B since the early 1970's and
is located in the Lodge Preservation zone. it is our
understanding that this zone was created to insure that small
lodges could upgrade their facilities with greater ease; The
purpose is to keep these small, quaint places in business rather
than losing them to condominiums or single family residences. In
keeping with this idea, we wish to make several improvements to
keep our small lodge running as an integral part of the Aspen
community.
We are dealing with a situation where we have 10 feet between
our lodge and the property line on one side and 1.4 feet, on the
other side.(See enclosed drawings). The problem we are running
into is that the area of the lodge where we want to make these
improvements encroaches on the 5 foot set -back between
properties.
The following is a list of the proposed improvements:
* First, we want to add a private bathroom on to an existing room
and the only viable entrance is against the outer wall which
encroaches on the property line. If we put the entrance to the
bath anywhere else, we will have to remove an existing kitchen.
You may ask, what's the importance of a private bath? It seems
that the type of guest that comes to Aspen these days has
changed. The majority of our guests request a private bath and if
they can't get it they try somewhere else.
Our other improvement in the set -back area is a deed restricted
employee unit which would start behind the proposed bathroomand
continue to the North. The existing wall on the West side of ',the
property is 1.4 feet inside the property line. Therefore,''';
to
conform to current code, we would have to build the addition 3.6
feet inside the existing wall.
DEPOSITED THIS_
ul CAP 16I29 T COUNTY CLERK'S
PAGE AS RE
COMPLIES WITH SE
THE STATE
PAF 1
1r
6D6,
MPED ON AN
U op,�'R r sR4-'Fr
9
SECTION /2 ?1-7 TOWN
COUNTY CLERK AND
LEGEN
• FOUND PROPERTY CORM
BASIS OF BEARINGS I
ON THE EAST LINE OF
AND TRANSFERRED BY
SHOWN HEREON
ELEVATIONS ARE BASE[
OF 100.0 A$ SHOWN.
LOT DIMENSIONS FROM
OF ASPEN
NO TITLE WORK WAS FU
PERFORMED BY THIS SU
--8 WOOD FENCE
94.0 SPOT ELEVATION
POSTED ADDRESS IS
AT TIME OF SURVEY
51
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CASE #93-5
BEFORE THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE
VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW:
Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as
amended, a public hearing will be held in the Council Room, City
Hall, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may
be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said
Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 24, Official Code of
Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited
to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you
cannot appear personally at such meeting, you are urged to state
your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such
variance,, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious
consideration. to the opinions of surrounding property owners and
others affected in deciding whether to grant -or deny the request
for variance.
Particulars of the hearing and requested variance are as follows:
Date and Time of Meeting:
Date: MAY 27, 1993
Time: 4:.00 p.m.
Owner for Variance:
Name: LESLIE G. RUDD
314 S. Galena St. Ste. 202
Aspen, Colo.
Address:
Location or description of property
300 W. Hallam St., Aspen, Colo.
Appellant for Variance:
LESLIE G . RUDD
Variance Requested:
A six foot rear yard setback variance to exceed rquird depth by 24
iches for a therapy pool.
Will applicant be represented by counsel: Yes: No: X
The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment
130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611
Remo Lavagnino, Chairman Jan Carney Deputy City Clerk
CITY OF ASPEN
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT.
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
May.12,
Leslie -(�. Rudd
19 93
CASE # 9-
PHONE
925-5001
MAILING ADDRESS 314.South Galena Street, Suite 202, Aspen, CO 81611
OWNER Leslie G. Rudd — PHONE
925-5866
MAILING ADDRESS
314.South Galena Street, Suite 2029 Aspen, CO 81611
LOCATION OF -PROPERTY
.-300 West Hallam' Street, Aspen, CO 81611
(Street, Block Number and Lot Number)
WILL YOU BE REPRESENTED BY COUNCIL? YES_____
.Below, describe clearly the proposed variance, including- all
dimensions and justification for the variance. (Additional paper
may be used if necessary.) The building permit application and
-any other information you feel is pertinent should accompany this
application, and will be made part'of this case.
Property is located in the R-C Zoning category. Chapter 24 Section 3-101(A)(5)
Aspen Muncipal Code: slabs, patios wb.ich- do. not exceed 30 inches above or .below
grade are permitted into required , setbacks. Applicant ig requesting - a six foot
rear yard setback variance to exceed required depth by 74 inches for a therapy
pool. See attached drawings.
Applicant's Signature
REASONS FOR .DENIAL OF BUILDING PERMIT. BASED ON- THE ASPENCE CITY
CODE, CHAPTER24. AN OPINION CONCERNING THIS
BE
PRESENTED TO THE BOARD BY THE ZONING DEPARTMENT TAFF*. c,
_... , &C_��,� t� . � d Q _.- (0 . _. C
/3 0c/ 04/ v J- _ U, '��7� a C� �/v' � C�J CC
Vie.
OFFICIAL
DATE PERMIT DENIED
DATE OF APPLICATION HEARING DATE
DATE.
APPLICANT
CITY OF ASPEN
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT.
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
May 12,
19 93
CASE # 92-14
Leslie�- Rudd PHONE * 925-5001
MAILING ADDRESS 314 South Galena Street, Suite '202, Aspen, CO 81611
OWNER Leslie G. Rudd PHONE 925-5866
0 MAILING ADDRESS
'
is 314.South Galena Street, Suite 202, Aspen,
CO 81611
LOCATION OF PROPERTY .*300 West Hallam Street, Aspen, CO 81611
(Street, Block Number and Lot Number)
WILL YOU BE REPRESENTED BY COUNCIL? YES. NO=
Below,, describe . clearly the proposed variance, including all
dimensions and justification for the variance. (Additional paper
may be used if necessary.) The building permit application and
-any other information you feel is pertinent should accompany -this
application, and will be made part,of this case.
Property is located in the R-C Zoning category. Chapter 24 Section 3-101(A)(5)
Aspen Muncipal Code: slabs, patios which- do. not exceed 30 inche's above or below
gra
de are permitted into required -setbacks. Applicant ig requesting -a six foot
g rear yard setback variance to exceed required depth by inches for a therapy
pool. See attached drawings.
inc
Applicant's Signature
-----------------------------------------------------------------
REASONS FOR DENIAL OF BUILDING PERMIT BASED ON -THE ASPEN CITY
CODE,. CHAPTER 24. AN OPINION CONCERNING THIS VARIANCE WILL BE
PRESENTED TO THE BOARD By THE ZONING DEPARTMENT STAFF'.
DATE PERMIT DENIED OFFICIAL
HEARING DATE
DATE OF APPLICATION
rtoT6
F�
kL
0
t
'
Mvf{wMt%,mr*� _
------'-
' .
�
� � |
| i
| | |
. /
/
V:-
Mo1w
EXHIBIT YTArr
Robert H. and Judy Ley Allen
4545 Post Oak Place, Suite 251
Houston, TX 77027
Ellen Kohner
Box 8691
Aspen, CO 81612
Maurice B. Tobin, John F. Tobin
and Dorette Fleischmann
212 West Francis
Aspen, CO 81611
James P.S. Griffith
3417 Milam Ave, Suite A
Houston, TX 77002
Felicia M. Lee
302 North 2nd Street
Aspen, CO 81611
George F. Robinson
Box 5243
Denver, CO 80217
Marilyn Gallant
617 Vine Street, Suite 1430
Cincinnati, OH 45202
Marjorie P. Jenkinson
403 West Hallam Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Galardi Group, Inc.
.4440 Von Karman
New Port Beach, CA 92660
Larry and Susan Becker
1762 Cass Lake Front
Keigo Harbor, MI 48033
John A. and Ann F. Scheid
500 South Arroyo Blvd.
Pasadena, CA 91105
Vivienne Jones
Box 317
Aspen, CO 81612
Sally Allen Poty i n
320 West B1 eeker
Aspen, CO 81611
William Greenwood
Box 4778
Aspen, CO 81612
John Hal 1
Unavailable
Esther M. Schiff
Box 3238
Aspen, CO 81612
George A. Vincenzi
Box 2238
Aspen, CO 81612
Beryl Arthur and Mary
Elizabeth Erickson
Box 1207
Aspen, CO 81612
Ruth Eppl er
150 N . Ocean Blvd.
Palm Beach, FL 33480
William D. and Patricia A. Hutzley
100 Cold Indian Springs
Ocean, NJ 07712
Richard Horwitz.
85 Stonewood Drive
Moreland Hills, OH 44022
Ph,i 1 1 i p N. and Susan J. West
3116- Robin Hood Lane
South Bend, IN 46614
Esther A. Benninhoff
233 West Hallam Ave.
Aspen, CO 81611
Sharon M. Prior
Box 656
Aspen, CO 81611
Jack and Wendy Barker
Box 3379
Aspen, CO 81612
Eugene Siegel
310 West B.l eeke.r.
Aspen, CO 81611.
C. M. Clark
Box 566, 300 West Bl eeker
Aspen, CO 81612
Merrill Ford
323 West Francis Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Joel D. and Stephanie B. Sax
3021 Bro.okdal e Road
Studio City, CA 91604
Josef and Margarete A. Uhl
Box 122
Aspen, CO 81612
Helmut J. and Brunhilde P. Scholoffer
Box 941
Aspen, CO 81612
Christopher H. Smith
Box 130
Snowmass, CO 81654
Frank E. Peters and
Marta Chaikovska
Box 9698
Aspen, CO 81612
Leslie J. Rudd
Box 968
Wichita, KS 67201
County; of Pitkin
�
State of Colorado
AFFIDAVIT OF, NOTICE BY POSTING OF A
} VARIANCE HEARING BEFORE THE CITY OF
} ss. ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Pursuant
} to Section 6-205 (E) (b) of the Muni-
cipal Code)
The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and says as
follows:
I,
Leslie G. Rudd
, being or
representing an Applicant before the Pitkin County Board of
Adjustment, personally certify that the. attached photograph
fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the
variance hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place :.on the
subject property (as -it could be seen from the nearest public
way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously
from the 17 th day o f May , 19 93 ,
to the 27th day of May 19 93 .
(Must be posted for at least ten //(10 l full days before the
hearing date) .
PINE'S STONE CO.
4((Nw000 S�RIN45
CO(OPADO
(303) 945.2940
.pplican� l s Signature
Leslie G. Rudd
Subscribed and sworn -to before me
this day of May.
19 93 , by -
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
MY Commission expires:
Notary Public's Signature
Address
• ' *� A
N