Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.208 E Main St.0195.2019.ARBK0195 Page: 2 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: 208 Main-Architectural Plans Changer Order 2 082619.pdf Page Index: 2 10'-4 27/32" 10'-4 27/32" (1) Page: 11 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: 208 Main-Architectural Plans Changer Order 2 082619.pdf Page Index: 11 9'-8 27/32" 9'-8 27/32" (1) Page: 11 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: 208 Main-Architectural Plans Changer Order 2 082619.pdf Page Index: 11 9'-9 3/8" 9'-9 3/8" (1) Page: 1 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: 208 Main-Architectural Plans Changer Order 2 082619.pdf Page Index: 1 Before resubmitting responses to these comments, please schedule a meeting with the zoning officer to review your responses. Before resubmitting responses to these comments, please schedule a meeting with the zoning officer to review your responses. (1) Page: 3 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: 208 Main-Architectural Plans Changer Order 2 082619.pdf Page Index: 3 Please explain the difference in Interior residential floor area on this level. It appears that the deck is getting smaller, with an alcove being given over to the residence. This change should be making the FA increase rather than decrease. Please explain the difference in Interior residential floor area on this level. It appears that the deck is getting smaller, with an alcove being given over to the residence. This change should be making the FA increase rather than decrease. (1) Page: 3 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: 208 Main-Architectural Plans Changer Order 2 082619.pdf Page Index: 3 Since these are stacked stairs, the only level that should have exempt stairs is on the top story. Since these are stacked stairs, the only level that should have exempt stairs is on the top story. (1) 185.79 sq 1. RESIDENTIAL LOWER LEVEL 10 ' - 4 2 7 / 3 2 " RECLAIMED WOOD SIDING SAMPLE TO BE REVIEWED APPROVED BY HPC STAF PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 9' - 8 2 7 / 3 2 " EXISTING 9' - 9 3 / 8 " Before resubmitting responses to these comments, please schedule a meeting with the zoning officer to review your responses. 1 B 2 CA D 16 x 10" x 7 1/2" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 UP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 C10SIDE SETBACK LINE W/DW/DW/D APPROVEDSET BACK AC UNIT(BEHIND SETBACK) HIS SECTION OF TRASH ENCLOSUREHAS TO CANTILEVER OVER THEFOUNDATION WALL BELOW 689.64 sq ft78.93 sq ft RESIDENTIAL 02 Please explain the difference in Interior residential floor area on this level. It appears that the deck is getting smaller, with an alcove being given over to the residence. This change should be making the FA increase rather than decrease. B C D 16 x 10" x 7 1/2" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 UP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 C10SIDE SETBACK LINE APPROVEDSET BACK AC UNIT(BEHIND SETBACK) 689.64 sq ftft 1,099.00 sq ftCOMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL 02 Since these are stacked stairs, the only level that should have exempt stairs is on the top story. Z-013: The link is widened so the patio gets smaller. At the same time we moved the Exterior West wall... so the residential square footage decreases. Z-013: This was approved at Permit. Updated the stairs which added 44 sf to the residential area. 10/31/2019 Page: 2 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: 208 Main-Architectural Plans Changer Order 2 082619.pdf Page Index: 2 These walls do not match your sections and nor do they match walls 13-16 directly across the basement. Please make these walls match your other drawings and then recalculate your Subgrade % and FA These walls do not match your sections and nor do they match walls 13-16 directly across the basement. Please make these walls match your other drawings and then recalculate your Subgrade % and FA (1) Page: 2 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: 208 Main-Architectural Plans Changer Order 2 082619.pdf Page Index: 2 This wall configuration does not match up with your structurals. Please have walls match up on different drawings. This wall configuration does not match up with your structurals. Please have walls match up on different drawings. (1) Page: 2 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: 208 Main-Architectural Plans Changer Order 2 082619.pdf Page Index: 2 This wall shifting in does not match up with your drawings on z-100 or 101, nor your detail 3 on S5.1. Please have all of your drawings match each other This wall shifting in does not match up with your drawings on z-100 or 101, nor your detail 3 on S5.1. Please have all of your drawings match each other (1) Page: 9 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: 208 Main-Architectural Plans Changer Order 2 082619.pdf Page Index: 9 What is changing here? What is changing here? (1) Page: 3 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: 208 Main-Architectural Plans Changer Order 2 082619.pdf Page Index: 3 Why did the commercial FA on his level decrease? Why did the commercial FA on his level decrease? (1) Page: 2 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: 208 Main-Architectural Plans Changer Order 2 082619.pdf Page Index: 2 Your proposed elevations show the top of this wall as being above grade. Please amend your exposed wall drawings and calculations. Your proposed elevations show the top of this wall as being above grade. Please amend your exposed wall drawings and calculations. (1) N 21.72 sq ft 146.75 sq ft 185.79 sq ft 1.3.2. RESIDENTIAL LOWER LEVEL 74.99 sq ft 24.13 sq ft 34.91 sq f18.54 sq ft Ft) SCA 1 EX Z-012 These walls do not match your sections and nor do they match walls 13-16 directly across the basement. Please make these walls match your other drawings and then recalculate your Subgrade % and FA C D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 12.14. 15. 13. 16. q ft 382.89 sq ftCOMMERCIAL IAL This wall configuration does not match up with your structurals. Please have walls match up on different drawings. B C D 14 15 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 12. 9 10.8.14. 15. 7. 7.11. 13. 16. 828.96 sq ft 382.89 sq ftCOMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL R AREA This wall shifting in does not match up with your drawings on z-100 or 101, nor your detail 3 on S5.1. Please have all of your drawings match each other B C 16 x 10" x 7 1/2" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 UP HALL BEDROOM 2 004 WINDOW WELL T.O. SLAB 90'-0" C013 01(E)F 02(E)F 5 01 002 02 02 19'-3" 3'-1/2" 6" 10'-4 1/2"6"5'-4"3 1/2"11'-6 1/2" 16'-8" 8"8" 3/4" 3 1/2" 3'-3" 3 1/2" 8" 11'-1" 10"3'-6" APPROVEDSET BACK 4A5.1 5A5.1 001 What is changing here? B 2 A 3 N 689.78.93 sq ft RESID0.00 1,099.00 0.00 1,099.00 Commercial 67.76 1099.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1166.76 rcial: 1,500 Sq. Ft.) 2571.26 02 02 02 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 PROPOSED MA Z-013 Why did the commercial FA on his level decrease? 3 REAR SETB PROPERTY BOUNDARY ALLEY 5' 5' N 21.72 sq ft 146.75 sq ft 185.79 sq ft 1.3.2.4. RESIDENTIAL LOWER LEVEL 74.99 sq ft Commercial 568.61 3.24 3.24 1539.89 1543.13 1 ed Wall Area (Sq Ft) 0 0 74.99 21.73 21.25 0 0.72 17.26 SCALE: 1/8" 1 EXISTIN Z-012 Your proposed elevations show the top of this wall as being above grade. Please amend your exposed wall drawings and calculations. Z-012: Updated wall and updated FA calculation. FA Calculation are also updated as a result of the next comment. A2.0: Only the windows. Z-013: When building began the existing conditions of the Historic Home were confirmed on site. Z-012: Updated diagram and chart to show exposed wall section. The wall moved 7" to the East side. Detail 3 on S5.1 has been updated. Clarification by Structural engineer in separate sheet. A2.0 and A5.1 (section 3): Updated the lower level in architectural to match with Structural. Updated the FA calculations accordingly. 10/31/2019