HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.209 E Bleeker St.0320.2017 (131).ARBK Revised 11-30-14
CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
SUFFICIENCY REVIEW REQUIREMENTS
If the project will increase impervious area (this includes enlarging a driveway, adding hard surface
patios, increasing the footprint of the house, etc.), disturb >200SF of exterior area (this includes
grading, even if a structure or hard surface isn’t added), or add or repair snowmelt then an
engineering review will be required as part of the Building Permit or Landscape and Grading Permit
Application review process. All permit applications that must receive an engineering review are
required to schedule and participate in a Pre-Application Meeting with the Development Engineer.
The sufficiency checklist below and any necessary supporting documents should be completed prior
to this meeting, as they will be reviewed during the meeting. The Development Engineer’s
signature on this checklist is required in order to submit a Building Permit Application.
Project Address: ___________________________________________________________________
Project Common Location/Common Name:_____________________________________________
Parcel ID Number: _________________________________________________________________
Owner and Phone Number: ________________________________________________________
Contact and Phone Number and e-mail address: __________________________________________
1. How much land will be disturbed? _________ acres = __________sq.ft.
If one acre or more is disturbed, a CDPHE Construction General Permit is required.
Yes, Notice of Coverage has been included in the CMP. _________
No, A statement that Notice of Coverage is not required has been included in the CMP._________
2. How much impervious area will be disturbed? _________ sq.ft. Added? _________ sq.ft.
3. What is the estimated total impervious area of the site (not just the addition)?_________sq.ft.
4. What type of permit is being sought (Building or Landscape/Grading)?__________________
5. What sub-basin (see Secion 1.5 of URMP) is the project located within? __________________
6. What level of project is this – Minor or Major?_______________________________________
In general, the project is considered “Minor” if 200 – 1000 sq ft of disturbance/work and “Major”
if > 1000 sq ft of disturbance/work.
Sufficiency Checklist
209 East Bleeker Street N/A273707320002
Cutthroat Cathedral, LLC / [Need phone number]Andy Fromm / afromm@smg.com0.14 6,000
200 +/-4,1604,360BuildingAspen MountainMajor
01/08/2018
Revised 11-30-14
The following information is required for the engineer’s review. Please indicate if these documents
have been completed and are attached. If any of these documents are not applicable, please provide
an explanation in the space provided.
Included N/A
7. Minor Grading and Drainage Plan and Report
8. Major Grading and Drainage Plan and Report
9. Compliant City of Aspen Survey
10. Soils Report
11. Excavation Stabilization Plan
12. Construction Management Plan (CMP)
13. Public Improvement Requirements
14. Floodplain Development Requirements
15. Mudflow Analysis
I hereby declare the engineering information submitted in this sufficiency review for this
project is sufficient for City of Aspen Building Permit Application submittal.
____________________________________ _____________________
Applicant’s Signature Date
____________________________________ _____________________
City of Aspen Development Engineer’s Signature Date
X
X
X
XThe only required public improvement is the additionof a sidewalk which has been included on the plans.
This is a "major" project; therefore,items under #8 (below) are included.
This project is wholly outside ofany delineated floodplains.This project is wholly outside of anydelineated mudflow hazard areas.X
01/08/2018