The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFile Documents.134 Maple Ln.0138.2019 (31).ARBKFrom:James Foerster To:John Barker Subject:Fwd: 134 Maple Lane Date:Thursday, August 29, 2019 2:45:40 PM Attachments:image001.png ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: PJ Murray <pj.murray@cityofaspen.com> Date: Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 4:44 PM Subject: RE: 134 Maple Lane To: James Foerster <james@raftinginaspen.com> Hi James, I have discussed this project again with staff and if the disturbance area is less than 1000sf and less than 50% of the building it will be a minor. You will need to show that the WQCV can be treated for this portion of the house, which we already discussed will be done in the canoe treatment system out front. When you submit for permit, please include a letter of permission from you neighbor that work can be done on their property to achieve your project. The three-year threshold will not be triggered for this project as 1000sf or more is not being disturbed. Let me know if you have any other questions. Thanks, PJ 08/29/2019 PJ Murray Civil Engineer Engineering 130 South Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 p: 970.920.5056 www.cityofaspen.com From: James Foerster <james@raftinginaspen.com> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 8:49 AM To: PJ Murray <pj.murray@cityofaspen.com> Subject: Re: 134 Maple Lane Hi PJ, The current plan ( i think i left it with you) shows a total disturbance area of around 950 sf (cant remember exactly). This includes disturbance area on our neighbors property and access areas as well. The plan is to remove and replace the remaining trailer with traditional stick build framing. Yes some walls will change including an exterior wall adjacent to our neighbors property. The entire project amounts to less than 50% of the building. This plan is exactly the same as our first (approved) plan. To be clear our first permit was a building permit not a remodel permit, this new permit would be the same. Let me know what the stormwater manager says. Talk soon, 08/29/2019 James On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 1:57 PM PJ Murray <pj.murray@cityofaspen.com> wrote: Hi James, Note 2 at the bottom of Table 1.1 from Chapter 1 of the URMP outlines the 3-year threshold for projects triggering a major with cumulative minor projects. Also, the reroofing policy, attached, has a 3-year hold period. It would be 3 years from issuance of CO on the first remodel permit. The code isn’t specific enough to say if the permit can be submitted prior to the 3-year date from CO or does construction just need to wait that long. I’ll clarify with the stormwater manager tomorrow when she is back in the office. In my notes from our meeting I thought the proposed project is over the 1000sf threshold for a minor which includes a new roof for the existing area and an increase of roof in some places. Are walls on the interior of the house changing as well? Thanks, PJ PJ Murray Civil Engineer Engineering 130 South Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 p: 970.920.5056 08/29/2019 www.cityofaspen.com From: James Foerster <james@raftinginaspen.com> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 2:25 PM To: PJ Murray <pj.murray@cityofaspen.com> Subject: Re: 134 Maple Lane Hi PJ, Sorry for the late reply... been out of town for a little while. Can you send over the section of code that outlines the exact specification of when the 3yr cumulative disturbance area policy starts and ends... I assume it is from CO, but does this mean we cannot submit for a permit until after 3 yrs from the excact date of CO? or can we submit since the permit process takes so long, and not start construction until after the 3 yrs from CO. I assume this is outlined in the code just don't know where exactly this is. Our first permit was issued as a Minor Engineering review... this was a remove and replace of less the 50% of the building and less that 1000 Sq Ft of Disturbance... The proposed new plans are exactly the same... remove and replace less than 50% of the building and less than 1000 sq ft of disturbance area. We have reviewed all of the trigger tables in the engineering policy.. what would push us into the major? Thanks for the info, James Foerster 134 Maple Lane 08/29/2019 On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 4:40 PM PJ Murray <pj.murray@cityofaspen.com> wrote: Hi James, Staff and I discussed the proposed work for 134 Maple Lane we met about last week and I have a few questions for you before I can offer clarification on permitting. As part of the City’s reroofing policy, disturbance areas for projects within a 3-year period are cumulative. The previous remodel on this property received a CO in October 2016 so any work done on property this year would be added to the previous disturbance area, likely triggering a full major engineering review. Can you provide more information on what is proposed for the interior remodel aspect of this project? The information I currently have is pointing towards a major engineering review (which requires a full civil plan, professional engineer, drainage report, WQCV treatment, detention, etc.) so clarifying the internal work will help determine if this is a major or minor. Thanks, PJ PJ Murray Civil Engineer Engineering 130 South Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 p: 970.920.5056 www.cityofaspen.com 08/29/2019 -- James Foerster www.raftinginaspen.com (970) 456 - 6287 (Work) (970) 319 - 7155 (Personal) 100 Smuggler Mountain Road Aspen, CO 81611 FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK! -- James Foerster www.raftinginaspen.com (970) 456 - 6287 (Work) (970) 319 - 7155 (Personal) 08/29/2019 100 Smuggler Mountain Road Aspen, CO 81611 FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK! -- James Foerster www.raftinginaspen.com (970) 456 - 6287 (Work) (970) 319 - 7155 (Personal) 100 Smuggler Mountain Road Aspen, CO 81611 FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK! 08/29/2019