The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.boa.082125AGENDA ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT August 21, 2025 4:30 PM, City Council Chambers 3rd Floor - City Hall 427 Rio Grande Place I.ROLL CALL II.COMMENTS III.MINUTES III.A Draft Minutes - 6/19/25 & 8/7/25 IV.DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST V.PUBLIC HEARINGS V.A Resolution #03, Series of 2025, Dimensional Variance Request, 835 East Durant Avenue VI.OTHER BUSINESS VII.BOARD REPORTS VIII.ADJOURN minutes.boa.20250619_DRAFT.docx minutes.boa.20250807_DRAFT.docx Memo.835 E Durant St.pdf BOA Resolution #03, Series of 2025_Denying Request.pdf BOA Resolution #03 Series of 2025_Approving Request.pdf Exhibit A - Existing and Proposed Floor Plans.pdf Exhibit B - Variance Review Criteria, Staff Findings.pdf Exhibit C - Application.pdf TYPICAL PROCEEDING FORMAT FOR ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS 1) Conflicts of Interest (handled at beginning of agenda) 2) Provide proof of legal notice (affidavit of notice for PH) 3) Staff presentation 4) Board questions and clarifications of staff 5) Applicant presentation 1 1 6) Board questions and clarifications of applicant 7) Public comments 8) Board questions and clarifications relating to public comments 9) Close public comment portion of bearing 10) Staff rebuttal/clarification of evidence presented by applicant and public comment 11) Applicant rebuttal/clarification End of fact finding. Deliberation by the commission commences. No further interaction between commission and staff, applicant or public 12) Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed among commissioners. 13) Discussion between commissioners* 14) Motion* *Make sure the discussion and motion includes what criteria are met or not met Revised January 9, 2021 2 2 REGULAR MEETING ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT JUNE 19TH, 2025 Chairperson Sandler opened the meeting of the Aspen Board of Adjustment at 4:42 p.m. Commissioners in attendance: Rick Head, Ashley Feddersen, Tim Sack and Andrew Sandler. Commissioners not in attendance: Jim Farrey and Collin Frank Staff present: Sophie Varga, Zoning Administrator Jeff Barnhill, Senior Planner Kate Johnson, City Attorney Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk Staff Comments: None Commissioner comments: None Minutes: Mr. Head motioned to approve the minutes from 3/6/25; 4/17/25, 5/8/25; 6/5/25. Ms. Feddersen seconded. Roll call vote: Mr. Sack, yes; Mr. Head, yes; Ms. Feddersen, yes; Mr. Sandler, yes. 4-0 vote, motion passes. Declaration of Conflicts of Interest: None PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution #2, Series of 2025 – 835 East Durant Avenue – Dimensional Variance Request Applicant Presentation – Chris Bendon – Bendon Adams Mr. Bendon began his presentation by describing the property and introducing Mr. Joe Spears from S2 Architects, who is the architect on the project, and Ms. Nathalie Crick, who is on the HOA. He continued by describing more details of the building including layout and square footage. He then described the existing conditions, noting that it was originally built slightly askew to the property lines. He mentioned that they were not sure why this had occurred. He showed a diagram of the building on the property and pointed out the difference between the building and property lines. He said that one of their proposals was to square off the existing roof forms that currently extend further into the setback. He mentioned that if the proposed third floor was made to conform with the current property lines and setbacks it would end up being askew from the existing first and second floors that were not built in line with them. He noted that the application requested two variances. One 26-inch side yard variance along the west side, creating a 34-inch setback. The other is a 46-inch side yard variance that would create a setback of 14 inches. These both mimic the existing conditions going straight up and would not further encroach into the setbacks. Mr. Bendon moved on to the three criteria that a decision would need to be based on and noted that these were included in the application and the staff memo. He went over each of them and explained their reasoning that they had all been met. Mr. Bendon then turned the presentation over to Mr. Spears to go over the design. Mr. Spears mentioned that there were locals living in the building and they had a real budget and did not want to scrape and replace. He noted that part of the existing roof forms would not be removed and were to become part of the new third floor. 3 REGULAR MEETING ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT JUNE 19TH, 2025 Ms. Crick said that she felt the design was consistent with the structure. She also noted that they had been in the design and planning process for about seven years and were very pleased with what Mr. Spears had produced. She felt it was very logical to do what was proposed and reduce the amount of demolition. Mr. Bendon finished by confirming that the board members had received the public comment emails that were sent from neighbors. The members all confirmed this. Mr. Sack asked if there was any additional square footage planned on the existing first or second floors. Mr. Bendon said no. Ms. Feddersen asked if the residents and HOA were ready to move forward with this design. Mr. Spears said yes. Staff Presentation – Sophie Varga – Zoning Administrator Ms. Varga began her presentation by going over some background of the building as well as the application proposal to add the third story. She then showed a few pictures of the existing conditions of the proposed new design. She reiterated that in the proposed design, the third floor would be in the setbacks. She reviewed the zoning setback requirements. She noted that the proposal will reduce the required 5-foot setbacks to a 1 foot 2-inch setback on the east side and a 2-foot 10-inch setback on the west side. She then went over the three review criteria for dimensional variances and noted that all three must be met to be granted. She reviewed staff findings on the criteria as outlined in Exhibit B of the staff memo and noted that staff find that all three criteria are not met. Ms. Varga concluded by stating that staff is recommending denial of the application as it does not meet the criteria. Mr. Sack felt that the applicant team had done a very thorough job in finding solutions to update this building. He also felt the new design was in line with the community and that with the efficiency and low demolition percentage of the project it was worth approving. Ms. Feddersen felt the support of the neighbors was important. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mr. John Newhouse introduced himself and noted that he was a member of the HOA. He described the process of collecting feedback from all members of the HOA to help guide the design and proposal. He said that the HOA felt the requested variance was within reason. Before the board discussion, Mr. Sack asked if there had been any other buildings that had been in a similar situation being set slightly askew to the setbacks. Mr. Bendon felt that with how old town is, there were probably numerous other similar examples. BOARD DISCUSSION: Mr. Sandler began the board discussion by saying that he felt the code was very important but there was also the spirit of the code. He felt that this request was within the spirit of the code and where we want to go as a town regarding esthetics and reducing the amount of waste in the landfill. Mr. Head noted that he always tried to support staff and that he was not in support of the variance request. He did not feel the applicant had demonstrated that they have been denied any 4 REGULAR MEETING ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT JUNE 19TH, 2025 reasonable use of the property or that their rights have been denied as compared to other similar properties. He felt that zoning laws had been created, in part by Mr. Bendon, and that they have been charged with abiding by them. He also felt that this was just a convenience to the applicant to use the existing structure which currently encroaches in the side yard setbacks. While he felt that the design looked great, they were not charged with aesthetics. He felt that this was just a proposal to expand a non-conforming use. Ms. Feddersen liked the proposal and agreed that many buildings in town will need to be updated. She also felt that if there was a stack of letters from neighbors opposing the proposal, she might feel different, but since they only had letters of approval, she was supportive. She appreciated the reduction in demolition and recycling most of the materials. Mr. Sandler again spoke about the spirit of the code and felt the applicant had demonstrated that with the time and effort that was put into this. MOTION: Mr. Sandler motioned to approve Resolution #2, in approval of the variance request, Mr. Sack seconded. Ms. Johnson noted that under the Code an approval from the Board of Adjustment had to be at least four votes in favor. If less than four votes are in favor, there is no action, but it is not considered a denial. She noted that it seemed that an approval of four votes was not possible at the moment and she suggested that the item be continued to a date certain. Mr. Sack asked Mr. Head if there was any way of adjusting his perspective on this. He reiterated his thoughts of why he was in support. Mr. Head appreciated Mr. Sack’s comments but said that he was not changing his mind. Roll call vote: Mr. Sack, yes; Mr. Head, no; Ms. Feddersen, yes; Mr. Sandler, yes. 3-1; Motion fails. No action taken. Mr. Sandler motioned to continue the hearing to August 7th at 4:30pm. Ms. Feddersen seconded. Roll call vote: Mr. Sack, yes; Mr. Head, yes; Ms. Feddersen, yes; Mr. Sandler, yes. 4-0; Motion passes. PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution #3, Series of 2025 – 202 Lone Pine Rd. - Setback Variance for Trash Enclosure Applicant Presentation: Ms. Allison Agley – Mocklin Homeowners Association, LLC Ms. Agley introduced herself and said that she would let Mr. Barnhill make the presentation. Staff Presentation: Jeff Barnhill – Senior Planner Mr. Barnhill began his presentation by going over some of the details of the property and he detailed the variance request to construct a new trash enclosure. He noted that the current property has two roll away dumpsters sitting in the parking area. He showed some pictures of the current conditions. He then listed the required setbacks for this type and size property as outlined in the staff memo. Next, he noted the variance requests of a 3-foot front yard setback where 15- feet is required and a 1.5-foot side yard setback where 5-feet is required. Mr. Barnhill addressed the variance criteria and noted that staff felt that the proposed enclosure makes the existing condition better. He mentioned that the enclosure of trash is a reasonable use of the property, and the request was the minimum variance necessary to enclose the trash. 5 REGULAR MEETING ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT JUNE 19TH, 2025 Mr. Barnhill finished by stating that staff recommends the BOA approve this request. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None BOARD DISCUSSION: The members did not have any questions for staff and were in support of the request. MOTION: Mr. Sandler motioned to approve Resolution #2, Series of 2025. Ms. Feddersen seconded. Roll call vote: Mr. Sack, yes; Mr. Head, yes; Ms. Feddersen, yes; Mr. Sandler, yes. 4- 0; All in favor, motion passes. ADJOURN: Mr. Sandler motioned to adjourn the meeting. Ms. Feddersen seconded. Roll call vote: Mr. Sack, yes; Mr. Head, yes; Ms. Feddersen, yes; Mr. Sandler, yes. 4-0; All in favor, motion passes. _____________________ Mike Sear, Deputy Clerk 6 REGULAR MEETING ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT August 7TH, 2025 Chair Sandler opened the meeting of the Aspen Board of Adjustment at 4:30 p.m. Commissioners in attendance: Andrew Sandler Commissioners not in attendance: Tim Sack, Collin Frank, Ashley Feddersen, Linda Manning and Rick Head. Staff present: Sophie Varga, Zoning Administrator Daniel Folke, Planning Director Kate Johnson, City Attorney Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk Mr. Sandler noted that they were here to continue the agenda item for 835 East Durant Avenue. Ms. Johnson noted for the record that there was no quorum present and the only action that could be taken by Mr. Sandler would be to continue the meeting and agenda item to a date certain. Mr. Sandler continued the meeting to August 21st, 2025, for consideration of the agenda item. Mr. Sandler then adjourned the meeting. _____________________ Mike Sear, Deputy Clerk 7 MEMORANDUM TO: City of Aspen Board of Adjustment FROM: Sophie Varga, Zoning Administrator THROUGH: Ben Anderson, Community Development Director MEMO DATE: April 28th, 2025 MEETING DATE: August 21st, 2025 RE: 835 East Durant Avenue, Dimensional Variance Review REQUEST OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: The Board of Adjustment (BOA) is asked to review, consider, and deny a request for dimensional variances, reducing the minimum setback requirements in the Residential Multi-Family (RMF) Zone District: • Along the west, a 26-inch side yard variance to allow a setback of 34 inches (5 feet to just less than 3 feet) • Along the east, a 46-inch side yard variance to allow a setback of 14 inches (5 feet to just more than 1 foot) This request is for the construction of an additional level for six of the dwelling units and a change in the roof line, as shown in Exhibit A. No other development is permitted within the established R/MF setbacks other than threose projections defined within Section 26.575.020.e.5, Allowed Projections into Setbacks. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND: 835 East Durant Avenue is in the RMF Zone District and is subject to five-foot setbacks on all sides. The property is developed with two multi-family buildings, constructed at a slight angle to the property lines when they were developed in the mid-sixties. The buildings encroach into the setback. The current configuration of the existing buildings create a non-conformity related to setbacks. One building contains six dwelling units, the second contains the other five, for a total of eleven dwelling units on the property. The property is condominiumized. The applicant proposes to build an additional floor for six of the units. The applicant also proposes to adjust the main level roof line from a mansard roof to a flat roof. To proceed, the proposal would require a Dimensional Variance for setback variances. 8 Staff Memo, 835 East Durant Avenue Dimensional Variance – Board of Adjustment Page 2 of 3 Staff finds the application does not meet the applicable review criteria and recommends denial of the request. The Board of Adjustment is the final decision-making authority for this review. STAFF DISCUSSION: The criteria for receiving a variance are strict. The criteria and staff responses can be found in Exhibit B. A property owner must demonstrate that reasonable use of the property has been withheld by the City and can only be achieved by the City providing a variance. In situations where all, or practically all, reasonable use of a property is made impossible by development regulations, the City is able to grant a variance to avoid a “regulatory taking”. The property owner must demonstrate that their rights, as compared with owners of similar properties, have been deprived. In considering these criteria, the Board of Adjustment must consider unique conditions inherent to the property which are not the result of the Applicant’s actions and are not applicable to other parcels, buildings, or structures in the zone district. Reasonable use of the property has not been withheld by the City of Aspen. The eleven units on the property can remain and the mansard roof can remain in place without a setback variance. No unique conditions or circumstances prohibit the development of a structure that meets underlying setback requirements. While the presence of the setbacks related to the existing development may limit expansion as desired, it does not constitute a hardship. It is reasonable for property owners in the RMF Zone District to develop multi-family residential buildings while complying with the setback regulations established for all development by the Land Use Code. Referral Comments: Staff referred this request to the Building, Engineering, Parks, and Zoning Departments for a cursory review of the proposed residence. Parks and Building had no comments on the proposal. There are two resolutions in the packet – one written in the affirmative, one in the negative. The following conditions are integrated into the resolution approving the variance request. These conditions will be reviewed at building permit. Engineering: • This development will trigger a major level engineering review. A full construction mitigation plan, ECU Calculator, stormwater drainage plan, utilities plan, public improvements plan, and drainage report are required. More may be required at the time of permit. Figure 1: Property Location 9 Staff Memo, 835 East Durant Avenue Dimensional Variance – Board of Adjustment Page 3 of 3 o This project may be subject to the Urban Runoff Management Plan Chapter 7: Mudflow. Proposed site improvements may dictate a full mudflow analysis. o This project will be required to install sidewalk along Durant. Consult parks on the best alignment around existing trees on Durant. • A water line upgrade may be necessary for the purposes of fire suppression. Continue to work with the Water Department and Engineering Department for alignment and sizing of any new water lines. • An electric transformer upgrade may be necessary for the purpose of supplying adequate electricity. Continue to work with the Electric Department and the Engineering Department for alignment and sizing on a potential new transformer. Zoning: • All calculations will be reviewed at building permit, including net livable area, floor area, and height. • The proposal must comply with underlying zoning for all dimensional requirements not impacted by the variance. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the variance request. Two draft resolutions are provided, one approving the request and one denying the request. The request is written to expire after twelve months from the date of approval. The Board of Adjustment may grant a one-time extension for an additional twelve months, for a total of twenty-four months. The applicant must demonstrate good cause showing that an extension is necessary PROPOSED MOTION (All motions are proposed in the affirmative): “I move to approve BOA Resolution #03, Series of 2025, denying setback variances at 835 East Durant Avenue.” EXHIBITS: Draft BOA Resolution #03, Series of 2025, Denying Variance Request Draft BOA Resolution #03, Series of 2025, Approving Variance Request Exhibit A – Existing and Proposed Plans Exhibit B – Variance Review Criteria, Staff Findings Exhibit C – Application 10 835 East Durant Avenue BOA Resolution #03, Series 2025 Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION #03 (SERIES OF 2025) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DENYING A DIMENSIONAL VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 835 EAST DURANT AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: UNITS 1-11 AND COMMON AREA ASPEN TOWNHOUSES "EAST" CONDOMINIUMS, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF RECORDED OCTOBER 20, 1965 IN PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 49, AND FIRST AMENDMENT THERETO RECORDED JULY 9, 1982 IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 70 AND AS FURTHER DEFINED AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR ASPEN TOWNHOUSES "EAST" CONDOMINIUMS RECORDED OCTOBER 20, 1965 IN BOOK 216 AT PAGE 260. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Parcel ID No: 2737-182-58-802 WHEREAS, the subject property is in the Residential Multi-Family (R/MF) Zone District and is improved with two multi-family buildings located within the five (5) foot side-yard setbacks along the eastern and western property lines. WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application for 835 East Durant Avenue, (the Application) from Aspen Townhouses East Condominium Association (Applicant), represented by Chris Bendon, BendonAdams, requesting setback variances pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.314, for the construction of an additional level for six of the dwelling units and a change in the roof line, as shown in Exhibit A; and, WHEREAS, all code citation references are to the City of Aspen Land Use Code in effect on the day the application was deemed complete - January 13, 2025, as applicable to this Project; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on August 21st, 2025, the Board of Adjustment reviewed the application and approved Resolution #03, Series of 2025, by a xx to xx (xx - xx) vote, denying Dimensional Variance Review, as identified herein. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Section 1: Variance Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Board of Adjustment denies the setback variance requests as represented in Exhibit A. Section 2: Existing Litigation This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. 11 835 East Durant Avenue BOA Resolution #03, Series 2025 Page 2 of 2 Section 3: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. FINALLY, approved this 21st day of August, 2025. Approved as to form: Approved as to content: __________________________ ______________________________ Luisa Berne, Assistant City Attorney Andrew Sandler, Chair Attest: _______________________________ Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk Exhibits: Exhibit A: Proposed Plans 12 835 East Durant Avenue BOA Resolution #03, Series 2025 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION #03 (SERIES OF 2025) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPROVING A DIMENSIONAL VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 835 EAST DURANT AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: UNITS 1-11 AND COMMON AREA, ASPEN TOWNHOUSES "EAST" CONDOMINIUMS, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF RECORDED OCTOBER 20, 1965 IN PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 49, AND FIRST AMENDMENT THERETO RECORDED JULY 9, 1982 IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 70 AND AS FURTHER DEFINED AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR ASPEN TOWNHOUSES "EAST" CONDOMINIUMS RECORDED OCTOBER 20, 1965 IN BOOK 216 AT PAGE 260. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Parcel ID No: 2737-182-58-802 WHEREAS, the subject property is in the Residential Multi-Family (R/MF) Zone District and is improved with two multi-family buildings located within the five (5) foot side-yard setbacks along the eastern and western property lines. WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application for 835 East Durant Avenue, (the Application) from Aspen Townhouses East Condominium Association (Applicant), represented by Chris Bendon, BendonAdams, requesting setback variances pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.314, for the construction of an additional level for six of the dwelling units and a change in the roof line, as shown in Exhibit A; and, WHEREAS, all code citation references are to the City of Aspen Land Use Code in effect on the day the application was deemed complete – January 13, 2025, as applicable to this Project; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on August 21st, 2025, the Board of Adjustment reviewed the application and approved Resolution #03, Series of 2025, by a xx to xx (xx - xx) vote, granting approval for Dimensional Variance Review, as identified herein. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Section 1: Variance Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Board of Adjustment hereby approves the following requests: • 26-inch side yard setback variance along the west property line, reducing the setback requirement from 5 feet to 34 inches. • 46-inch side yard setback variance along the east property line, reducing the setback requirement from 5 feet to 14 inches. This approval is for the construction of an additional level for six of the dwelling units and a change in the roof line, as shown in Exhibit A. No other improvements shall be permitted within 13 835 East Durant Avenue BOA Resolution #03, Series 2025 Page 2 of 3 established setbacks other than those projections defined within Land Use Code Subsection 26.575.020.E.5, Allowed Projections into Setbacks. Section 2: Referral Departments The Applicant shall apply for all applicable building permits prior to redevelopment. The following conditions apply at the time of building permit. Engineering: • This development will trigger a major level engineering review. A full construction mitigation plan, ECU Calculator, stormwater drainage plan, utilities plan, public improvements plan, and drainage report are required. More may be required at the time of permit. o This project may be subject to the Urban Runoff Management Plan Chapter 7: Mudflow. Proposed site improvements may dictate a full mudflow analysis. o This project will be required to install sidewalk along Durant. Consult parks on the best alignment around existing trees on Durant. • A water line upgrade may be necessary for the purposes of fire suppression. Continue to work with the Water Department and Engineering Department for alignment and sizing of any new water lines. • An electric transformer upgrade may be necessary for the purpose of supplying adequate electricity. Continue to work with the Electric Department and the Engineering Department for alignment and sizing on a potential new transformer. Zoning: • All calculations will be reviewed at building permit, including net livable area, floor area, and height. • The proposal must comply with underlying zoning for all dimensional requirements not impacted by the variance. Section 3: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department and the Board of Adjustment, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 4: Existing Litigation This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5: Expiration: Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.314.070, the subject variance shall expire 12 months from the date of the approval unless development has commenced as illustrated by the submission of a building permit or an extension is granted. The subject variance is not a Site-Specific Development Plan (SSDP), is not vested, and will not receive a Development Order. 14 835 East Durant Avenue BOA Resolution #03, Series 2025 Page 3 of 3 Section 6: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. FINALLY, approved this 21st day of August, 2025. Approved as to form: Approved as to content: __________________________ ______________________________ Luisa Berne, Assistant City Attorney Andrew Sandler, Chair Attest: _______________________________ Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk Exhibits: Exhibit A: Proposed Plans 15 7 9 4 5 7 9 4 5 7 9 4 6 7 9 47 7 948 7 9 4 47946 7 9 4 8 7 947 7948 7 9 4 6 DN GENERAL NOTES -PLANS 100'-0" = XXXX.XX' 1. GRID LINES AND DIMENSIONS ARE TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD AND/OR FACE OF CONCRETE U.N.O. DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS ARE DIMENSIONED AS ROUGH OPENINGS. 2. REFER TO A6 SERIES FOR BUILDING ASSEMBLIES 3. FLOOR ELEVATION CALLOUTS INDICATE FINISH FLOOR MATERIAL HEIGHT U.N.O. 4. DOOR CALLOUTS ARE ON PLAN AND ELEVATION ONLY 5. SEE ENLARGED STAIR PLANS FOR RISE AND RUN INFORMATION 6. REFER TO BUILDING ASSEMBLIES FOR THERMAL INSULATION REQUIREMENTS 7. WINDOWS TO BE DELIVERED W/NFRC STICKERS 8. REFER TO MECH PLANS FOR SNOWMELT AND PIPING INFORMATION 9. REFER TO MECH DRAWINGS FOR ALL VENTILATION SYSTEMS 10. ALL GLASS SHOWER ENCLOSURES TO BE 1/2" TEMPERED GLASS AND SHALL MEET IRC SECTION R308.4 REQUIREMENTS. 11. CARBON MONOXIDE AND SMOKE DETECTORS INDICATED ON RCP'S. 12. FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITIONS SHALL OCCUR DIRECTLY UNDER THE CENTERLINE OF THE DOOR LEAF. 8 6 5 4 3 F G H J KEDCBA 2 1 7 MECH MECH MECH SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK ENTRY PATIO ENTRY PATIO ENTRY PATIO EN T R Y P O R C H PARKING AREA LAWN UNIT 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT 4 UNIT 5 UNIT 6 UNIT 7 UNIT 8 UNIT 9 UNIT 10 UNIT 11 MECH OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OV E R H E A D DURANT STREET S W E N D S T A3.0 1 A3.1 1 A3.0 2 A3.12 A3.1 3 A3.14 16' - 2"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"16' - 2" 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 7' - 0"25' - 8" 15 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " SECTION 2 SECTION 1 DRAWING DATE: 215 S. MONARCH SUITE G-102 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 p I 970.544.4856 f I 970.544.4856 ISSUE DATE ISSUE NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA2.1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED 09.26.2024 AT E R E M O D E L 83 5 E D U R A N T 3/16" = 1'-0" MAIN LEVEL - EXISTING/DEMO1 16 7 9 4 5 7 9 4 6 7 9 47 7 948 7946 7 9 4 8 7 947 7948 7 9 4 6 GENERAL NOTES -PLANS 100'-0" = XXXX.XX' 1. GRID LINES AND DIMENSIONS ARE TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD AND/OR FACE OF CONCRETE U.N.O. DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS ARE DIMENSIONED AS ROUGH OPENINGS. 2. REFER TO A6 SERIES FOR BUILDING ASSEMBLIES 3. FLOOR ELEVATION CALLOUTS INDICATE FINISH FLOOR MATERIAL HEIGHT U.N.O. 4. DOOR CALLOUTS ARE ON PLAN AND ELEVATION ONLY 5. SEE ENLARGED STAIR PLANS FOR RISE AND RUN INFORMATION 6. REFER TO BUILDING ASSEMBLIES FOR THERMAL INSULATION REQUIREMENTS 7. WINDOWS TO BE DELIVERED W/NFRC STICKERS 8. REFER TO MECH PLANS FOR SNOWMELT AND PIPING INFORMATION 9. REFER TO MECH DRAWINGS FOR ALL VENTILATION SYSTEMS 10. ALL GLASS SHOWER ENCLOSURES TO BE 1/2" TEMPERED GLASS AND SHALL MEET IRC SECTION R308.4 REQUIREMENTS. 11. CARBON MONOXIDE AND SMOKE DETECTORS INDICATED ON RCP'S. 12. FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITIONS SHALL OCCUR DIRECTLY UNDER THE CENTERLINE OF THE DOOR LEAF. 8 6 5 4 3 F G H J KEDCBA 2 1 7 PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PARKING AREA LAWN DURANT STREET S W E N D S T SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK FP DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK A3.0 1 A3.1 1 A3.0 2 A3.12 A3.1 3 A3.14 16' - 2"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"16' - 2" 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 7' - 0"25' - 8" 15 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " UNIT 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT 4 UNIT 5 UNIT 6 UNIT 7 UNIT 8 UNIT 9 UNIT 10 UNIT 11 SECTION 2 SECTION 1 DRAWING DATE: 215 S. MONARCH SUITE G-102 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 p I 970.544.4856 f I 970.544.4856 ISSUE DATE ISSUE NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA2.2 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED 09.26.2024 AT E R E M O D E L 83 5 E D U R A N T 3/16" = 1'-0" SECOND LEVEL - EXISTING/DEMO1 17 7 9 4 5 7 9 4 6 7 9 47 7 948 7946 7 9 4 8 7 947 7948 7 9 4 6 GENERAL NOTES -PLANS 100'-0" = XXXX.XX' 1. GRID LINES AND DIMENSIONS ARE TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD AND/OR FACE OF CONCRETE U.N.O. DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS ARE DIMENSIONED AS ROUGH OPENINGS. 2. REFER TO A6 SERIES FOR BUILDING ASSEMBLIES 3. FLOOR ELEVATION CALLOUTS INDICATE FINISH FLOOR MATERIAL HEIGHT U.N.O. 4. DOOR CALLOUTS ARE ON PLAN AND ELEVATION ONLY 5. SEE ENLARGED STAIR PLANS FOR RISE AND RUN INFORMATION 6. REFER TO BUILDING ASSEMBLIES FOR THERMAL INSULATION REQUIREMENTS 7. WINDOWS TO BE DELIVERED W/NFRC STICKERS 8. REFER TO MECH PLANS FOR SNOWMELT AND PIPING INFORMATION 9. REFER TO MECH DRAWINGS FOR ALL VENTILATION SYSTEMS 10. ALL GLASS SHOWER ENCLOSURES TO BE 1/2" TEMPERED GLASS AND SHALL MEET IRC SECTION R308.4 REQUIREMENTS. 11. CARBON MONOXIDE AND SMOKE DETECTORS INDICATED ON RCP'S. 12. FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITIONS SHALL OCCUR DIRECTLY UNDER THE CENTERLINE OF THE DOOR LEAF. 8 6 5 4 3 F G H J KEDCBA 2 1 7 PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PARKING AREA LAWN DURANT STREET SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" S W E N D S T A3.0 1 A3.1 1 A3.0 2 A3.12 A3.1 3 A3.14 16' - 2"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"16' - 2" 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 7' - 0"25' - 8" 15 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT DECK BELOW DECK BELOW DECK BELOW DECK BELOW DECK BELOW DE C K DE C K DE C K B E L O W DE C K B E L O W DE C K B E L O W SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT DECK BELOW UNIT 1 UNIT 3 UNIT 5 UNIT 6 ROOFROOF UNIT 9 UNIT 10 ROOF ROOF SECTION 2 SECTION 1 DRAWING DATE: 215 S. MONARCH SUITE G-102 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 p I 970.544.4856 f I 970.544.4856 ISSUE DATE ISSUE NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA2.3 THIRD/ROOF FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED 09.26.2024 AT E R E M O D E L 83 5 E D U R A N T 3/16" = 1'-0" THIRD/ROOF LEVEL - EXISTING/DEMO1 18 2' - 2" EXISTING UPPER LEVEL EXISTING MAIN LEVEL EXISTING CRAWLSPACE PROPOSED THIRD LEVEL 7' - 1 1 " 7' - 1 1 " 8' - 6 " 3' - 1 0 " 5' - 0" PR O P E R T Y L I N E SE T B A C K L I N E 5' - 0" 2' - 1" 7' - 1 1 " 7' - 1 1 " 3' - 1 0 " EXISTING UPPER LEVEL EXISTING MAIN LEVEL EXISTING CRAWLSPACE PR O P E R T Y L I N E SE T B A C K L I N E 5' - 0" PR O P E R T Y L I N E SE T B A C K L I N E 2' - 2" 5' - 0" PR O P E R T Y L I N E 2' - 2" EXISTING UPPER LEVEL EXISTING MAIN LEVEL EXISTING CRAWLSPACE EXISTING UPPER LEVEL EXISTING MAIN LEVEL EXISTING CRAWLSPACE PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL 7' - 1 0 " 7' - 1 0 " 4' - 6 " 4' - 6 " 7' - 1 0 " 7' - 1 0 " 7' - 6 " SE T B A C K L I N E ADDITIVE PROPOSED ELEMENT IN THE SETBACK TO SQUARE OFF THE EXISTING MANSARD AND GABLE ROOF, IN THE SAME PLANE AS GLABLE & BUMPOUT ALREADY PROJECTS. WE PROPOSE TO KEEP THE BUMPOUT AND GABLE FRAMING INTACT AND INSTALL ADDATIVE FRAMING TO FLUSH EVERYTHING OUT. NEW THIRD FLOOR PROPOSED TO STACK WITH EXTERIOR WALLS BELOW TO MAKE STRUCTURE EFFICIENT AND LIMIT DEMO OF EXISTING FRAMING EXISTING GABLE ROOF PROJECTION INTO SETBACK EXISTING MANSARD PROJECTION INTO THE SETBACK AT SECTION LINE NOTE: (PROJECTIONS ARE ALLOWED UP TO 1'-6" INTO THE SETBACK WITHOUT APPROVAL) ADDITIVE PROPOSED ELEMENT IN THE SETBACK TO SQUARE OFF THE EXISTING MANSARD, IN THE SAME PLANE AS MANSARD ALREADY PROJECTS NEW THIRD FLOOR PROPOSED TO STACK WITH EXTERIOR WALLS BELOW TO MAKE STRUCTURE EFFICIENT AND LIMIT DEMO OF EXISTING WITHIN SETBACK AT SECTION LINE 2' - 2" EXISTING MANSARD PROJECTION INTO THE SETBACK AT SECTION LINE NOTE: (PROJECTIONS ARE ALLOWED UP TO 1'-6" INTO THE SETBACK WITHOUT APPROVAL) 3' - 2" 3' - 0" 3' - 3" EXISTING WALL BUMPOUT INT SETBACK DRAWING DATE: 215 S. MONARCH SUITE G-102 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 p I 970.544.4856 f I 970.544.4856 ISSUE DATE ISSUE NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA9.2 SECTION DIAGRAMS 12.10.2024 AT E R E M O D E L 83 5 E D U R A N T SECTION 1 SECTION 2 EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING PHOTOS PROPOSED RENDERING Exhibit 9 19 7 9 4 5 7 9 4 6 7 9 47 7 948 7946 7 9 4 8 7 947 7948 7 9 4 6 UP UP DN UP UP UP UP UPUP UP UP UP UP UP GENERAL NOTES -PLANS 100'-0" = XXXX.XX' 1. GRID LINES AND DIMENSIONS ARE TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD AND/OR FACE OF CONCRETE U.N.O. DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS ARE DIMENSIONED AS ROUGH OPENINGS. 2. REFER TO A6 SERIES FOR BUILDING ASSEMBLIES 3. FLOOR ELEVATION CALLOUTS INDICATE FINISH FLOOR MATERIAL HEIGHT U.N.O. 4. DOOR CALLOUTS ARE ON PLAN AND ELEVATION ONLY 5. SEE ENLARGED STAIR PLANS FOR RISE AND RUN INFORMATION 6. REFER TO BUILDING ASSEMBLIES FOR THERMAL INSULATION REQUIREMENTS 7. WINDOWS TO BE DELIVERED W/NFRC STICKERS 8. REFER TO MECH PLANS FOR SNOWMELT AND PIPING INFORMATION 9. REFER TO MECH DRAWINGS FOR ALL VENTILATION SYSTEMS 10. ALL GLASS SHOWER ENCLOSURES TO BE 1/2" TEMPERED GLASS AND SHALL MEET IRC SECTION R308.4 REQUIREMENTS. 11. CARBON MONOXIDE AND SMOKE DETECTORS INDICATED ON RCP'S. 12. FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITIONS SHALL OCCUR DIRECTLY UNDER THE CENTERLINE OF THE DOOR LEAF. 8 6 5 4 3 F G H J KEDCBA 2 1 7 ENTRY ENTRY BEDROOM OFFICE BEDROOM CLOSET BEDROOM BATH BATH MECH BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM MECH MECH ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM CLOSET SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" BATH BATH PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK ENTRY PATIO ENTRY PATIO ENTRY PATIO BEDROOM BEDROOM ENTRY ENTRY BATH BATH BEDROOM BEDROOM EN T R Y P O R C H PARKING AREA LAWN UNIT 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT 4 UNIT 5 UNIT 6 UN I T 7 UN I T 8 UN I T 9 UN I T 1 0 UN I T 1 1 ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY BEDROOM BEDROOM CLOSET BATH BEDROOM BEDROOM MECH BEDROOM BEDROOM BATH BATH OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OV E R H E A D DURANT STREET S W E N D S T A3.0 1 A3.1 1 A3.0 2 A3.12 A3.1 3 A3.14 16' - 2"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"16' - 2" 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 7' - 0"25' - 8" 15 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " DRAWING DATE: 215 S. MONARCH SUITE G-102 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 p I 970.544.4856 f I 970.544.4856 ISSUE DATE ISSUE NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA2.1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING/DEMO 07.24.2024 AT E R E M O D E L 83 5 E D U R A N T 3/16" = 1'-0" MAIN LEVEL - EXISTING/DEMO1 Exhibit A: Existing and Proposed Plans The purpose of this exhibit is limited to understanding the relationship of the existing and proposed structures to the setbacks. 20 7 9 4 5 7 9 4 6 7 9 47 7 948 7946 7 9 4 8 7 947 7948 7 9 4 6 UP DN DN DN DN DN DN DN DN DN DN DN GENERAL NOTES -PLANS 100'-0" = XXXX.XX' 1. GRID LINES AND DIMENSIONS ARE TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD AND/OR FACE OF CONCRETE U.N.O. DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS ARE DIMENSIONED AS ROUGH OPENINGS. 2. REFER TO A6 SERIES FOR BUILDING ASSEMBLIES 3. FLOOR ELEVATION CALLOUTS INDICATE FINISH FLOOR MATERIAL HEIGHT U.N.O. 4. DOOR CALLOUTS ARE ON PLAN AND ELEVATION ONLY 5. SEE ENLARGED STAIR PLANS FOR RISE AND RUN INFORMATION 6. REFER TO BUILDING ASSEMBLIES FOR THERMAL INSULATION REQUIREMENTS 7. WINDOWS TO BE DELIVERED W/NFRC STICKERS 8. REFER TO MECH PLANS FOR SNOWMELT AND PIPING INFORMATION 9. REFER TO MECH DRAWINGS FOR ALL VENTILATION SYSTEMS 10. ALL GLASS SHOWER ENCLOSURES TO BE 1/2" TEMPERED GLASS AND SHALL MEET IRC SECTION R308.4 REQUIREMENTS. 11. CARBON MONOXIDE AND SMOKE DETECTORS INDICATED ON RCP'S. 12. FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITIONS SHALL OCCUR DIRECTLY UNDER THE CENTERLINE OF THE DOOR LEAF. 8 6 5 4 3 F G H J KEDCBA 2 1 7 PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PARKING AREA LAWN DURANT STREET S W E N D S T SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" BEDROOM BEDROOM BATHBATH KITCHEN KITCHEN LIVING FP FP LIVING DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM KITCHEN KITCHEN KITCHEN KITCHEN FP FP FP FP BATH BATH LIVING LIVING BATH BATH LIVING LIVING KITCHEN KITCHEN BATH BATH LIVING KITCHEN BATH BEDROOM BEDROOM BATH BATH BEDROOM KITCHEN KITCHEN LIVING LIVING DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK LIVING LIVING REF REF REF REF REF REF REF REF REF REF REF A3.0 1 A3.1 1 A3.0 2 A3.12 A3.1 3 A3.14 16' - 2"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"16' - 2" 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 7' - 0"25' - 8" 15 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " DRAWING DATE: 215 S. MONARCH SUITE G-102 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 p I 970.544.4856 f I 970.544.4856 ISSUE DATE ISSUE NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA2.2 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING/DEMO 07.24.2024 AT E R E M O D E L 83 5 E D U R A N T 3/16" = 1'-0" SECOND LEVEL - EXISTING/DEMO1 21 7 9 4 5 7 9 4 6 7 9 47 7 948 7 9 4 6 7946 7 9 4 8 7 947 7948 7 9 4 6 DN GENERAL NOTES -PLANS 100'-0" = XXXX.XX' 1. GRID LINES AND DIMENSIONS ARE TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD AND/OR FACE OF CONCRETE U.N.O. DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS ARE DIMENSIONED AS ROUGH OPENINGS. 2. REFER TO A6 SERIES FOR BUILDING ASSEMBLIES 3. FLOOR ELEVATION CALLOUTS INDICATE FINISH FLOOR MATERIAL HEIGHT U.N.O. 4. DOOR CALLOUTS ARE ON PLAN AND ELEVATION ONLY 5. SEE ENLARGED STAIR PLANS FOR RISE AND RUN INFORMATION 6. REFER TO BUILDING ASSEMBLIES FOR THERMAL INSULATION REQUIREMENTS 7. WINDOWS TO BE DELIVERED W/NFRC STICKERS 8. REFER TO MECH PLANS FOR SNOWMELT AND PIPING INFORMATION 9. REFER TO MECH DRAWINGS FOR ALL VENTILATION SYSTEMS 10. ALL GLASS SHOWER ENCLOSURES TO BE 1/2" TEMPERED GLASS AND SHALL MEET IRC SECTION R308.4 REQUIREMENTS. 11. CARBON MONOXIDE AND SMOKE DETECTORS INDICATED ON RCP'S. 12. FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITIONS SHALL OCCUR DIRECTLY UNDER THE CENTERLINE OF THE DOOR LEAF. 8 6 5 4 3 F G H J KEDCBA 2 1 7 PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PARKING AREA LAWN DURANT STREET SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" S W E N D S T A3.0 1 A3.1 1 A3.0 2 A3.12 A3.1 3 A3.14 16' - 2"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"16' - 2" 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 7' - 0"25' - 8" 15 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " TUB BEDROOM SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHTSKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT DECK BELOW DECK BELOW DECK BELOW DECK BELOW DECK BELOW DECK BELOW DE C K B E L O W DE C K B E L O W DE C K B E L O W DE C K B E L O W DE C K B E L O W DRAWING DATE: 215 S. MONARCH SUITE G-102 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 p I 970.544.4856 f I 970.544.4856 ISSUE DATE ISSUE NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA2.3 THIRD/ROOF FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING/DEMO 07.24.2024 AT E R E M O D E L 83 5 E D U R A N T 3/16" = 1'-0" THIRD/ROOF LEVEL - EXISTING/DEMO1 22 7 9 4 5 7 9 4 5 7 9 4 6 7 9 47 7 948 7 9 4 47946 7 9 4 8 7 947 7948 7 9 4 6 DN GENERAL NOTES -PLANS 100'-0" = XXXX.XX' 1. GRID LINES AND DIMENSIONS ARE TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD AND/OR FACE OF CONCRETE U.N.O. DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS ARE DIMENSIONED AS ROUGH OPENINGS. 2. REFER TO A6 SERIES FOR BUILDING ASSEMBLIES 3. FLOOR ELEVATION CALLOUTS INDICATE FINISH FLOOR MATERIAL HEIGHT U.N.O. 4. DOOR CALLOUTS ARE ON PLAN AND ELEVATION ONLY 5. SEE ENLARGED STAIR PLANS FOR RISE AND RUN INFORMATION 6. REFER TO BUILDING ASSEMBLIES FOR THERMAL INSULATION REQUIREMENTS 7. WINDOWS TO BE DELIVERED W/NFRC STICKERS 8. REFER TO MECH PLANS FOR SNOWMELT AND PIPING INFORMATION 9. REFER TO MECH DRAWINGS FOR ALL VENTILATION SYSTEMS 10. ALL GLASS SHOWER ENCLOSURES TO BE 1/2" TEMPERED GLASS AND SHALL MEET IRC SECTION R308.4 REQUIREMENTS. 11. CARBON MONOXIDE AND SMOKE DETECTORS INDICATED ON RCP'S. 12. FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITIONS SHALL OCCUR DIRECTLY UNDER THE CENTERLINE OF THE DOOR LEAF. 8 6 5 4 3 F G H J KEDCBA 2 1 7 MECH MECH MECH SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK ENTRY PATIO ENTRY PATIO ENTRY PATIO EN T R Y P O R C H PARKING AREA LAWN UNIT 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT 4 UNIT 5 UNIT 6 UNIT 7 UNIT 8 UNIT 9 UNIT 10 UNIT 11 MECH OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OV E R H E A D DURANT STREET S W E N D S T A3.0 1 A3.1 1 A3.0 2 A3.12 A3.1 3 A3.14 16' - 2"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"16' - 2" 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 7' - 0"25' - 8" 15 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " SECTION 2 SECTION 1 DRAWING DATE: 215 S. MONARCH SUITE G-102 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 p I 970.544.4856 f I 970.544.4856 ISSUE DATE ISSUE NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA2.1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED 09.26.2024 AT E R E M O D E L 83 5 E D U R A N T 3/16" = 1'-0" MAIN LEVEL - EXISTING/DEMO1PROPOSED 23 7 9 4 5 7 9 4 6 7 9 47 7 948 7946 7 9 4 8 7 947 7948 7 9 4 6 GENERAL NOTES -PLANS 100'-0" = XXXX.XX' 1. GRID LINES AND DIMENSIONS ARE TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD AND/OR FACE OF CONCRETE U.N.O. DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS ARE DIMENSIONED AS ROUGH OPENINGS. 2. REFER TO A6 SERIES FOR BUILDING ASSEMBLIES 3. FLOOR ELEVATION CALLOUTS INDICATE FINISH FLOOR MATERIAL HEIGHT U.N.O. 4. DOOR CALLOUTS ARE ON PLAN AND ELEVATION ONLY 5. SEE ENLARGED STAIR PLANS FOR RISE AND RUN INFORMATION 6. REFER TO BUILDING ASSEMBLIES FOR THERMAL INSULATION REQUIREMENTS 7. WINDOWS TO BE DELIVERED W/NFRC STICKERS 8. REFER TO MECH PLANS FOR SNOWMELT AND PIPING INFORMATION 9. REFER TO MECH DRAWINGS FOR ALL VENTILATION SYSTEMS 10. ALL GLASS SHOWER ENCLOSURES TO BE 1/2" TEMPERED GLASS AND SHALL MEET IRC SECTION R308.4 REQUIREMENTS. 11. CARBON MONOXIDE AND SMOKE DETECTORS INDICATED ON RCP'S. 12. FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITIONS SHALL OCCUR DIRECTLY UNDER THE CENTERLINE OF THE DOOR LEAF. 8 6 5 4 3 F G H J KEDCBA 2 1 7 PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PARKING AREA LAWN DURANT STREET S W E N D S T SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK FP DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK A3.0 1 A3.1 1 A3.0 2 A3.12 A3.1 3 A3.14 16' - 2"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"16' - 2" 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 7' - 0"25' - 8" 15 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " UNIT 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT 4 UNIT 5 UNIT 6 UNIT 7 UNIT 8 UNIT 9 UNIT 10 UNIT 11 SECTION 2 SECTION 1 DRAWING DATE: 215 S. MONARCH SUITE G-102 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 p I 970.544.4856 f I 970.544.4856 ISSUE DATE ISSUE NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA2.2 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED 09.26.2024 AT E R E M O D E L 83 5 E D U R A N T 3/16" = 1'-0" SECOND LEVEL - EXISTING/DEMO1PROPOSED 24 7 9 4 5 7 9 4 6 7 9 47 7 948 7946 7 9 4 8 7 947 7948 7 9 4 6 GENERAL NOTES -PLANS 100'-0" = XXXX.XX' 1. GRID LINES AND DIMENSIONS ARE TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD AND/OR FACE OF CONCRETE U.N.O. DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS ARE DIMENSIONED AS ROUGH OPENINGS. 2. REFER TO A6 SERIES FOR BUILDING ASSEMBLIES 3. FLOOR ELEVATION CALLOUTS INDICATE FINISH FLOOR MATERIAL HEIGHT U.N.O. 4. DOOR CALLOUTS ARE ON PLAN AND ELEVATION ONLY 5. SEE ENLARGED STAIR PLANS FOR RISE AND RUN INFORMATION 6. REFER TO BUILDING ASSEMBLIES FOR THERMAL INSULATION REQUIREMENTS 7. WINDOWS TO BE DELIVERED W/NFRC STICKERS 8. REFER TO MECH PLANS FOR SNOWMELT AND PIPING INFORMATION 9. REFER TO MECH DRAWINGS FOR ALL VENTILATION SYSTEMS 10. ALL GLASS SHOWER ENCLOSURES TO BE 1/2" TEMPERED GLASS AND SHALL MEET IRC SECTION R308.4 REQUIREMENTS. 11. CARBON MONOXIDE AND SMOKE DETECTORS INDICATED ON RCP'S. 12. FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITIONS SHALL OCCUR DIRECTLY UNDER THE CENTERLINE OF THE DOOR LEAF. 8 6 5 4 3 F G H J KEDCBA 2 1 7 PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PARKING AREA LAWN DURANT STREET SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" S W E N D S T A3.0 1 A3.1 1 A3.0 2 A3.12 A3.1 3 A3.14 16' - 2"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"16' - 2" 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 7' - 0"25' - 8" 15 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT DECK BELOW DECK BELOW DECK BELOW DECK BELOW DECK BELOW DE C K DE C K DE C K B E L O W DE C K B E L O W DE C K B E L O W SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT DECK BELOW UNIT 1 UNIT 3 UNIT 5 UNIT 6 ROOFROOF UNIT 9 UNIT 10 ROOF ROOF SECTION 2 SECTION 1 DRAWING DATE: 215 S. MONARCH SUITE G-102 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 p I 970.544.4856 f I 970.544.4856 ISSUE DATE ISSUE NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA2.3 THIRD/ROOF FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED 09.26.2024 AT E R E M O D E L 83 5 E D U R A N T 3/16" = 1'-0" THIRD/ROOF LEVEL - EXISTING/DEMO1PROPOSED 25 2' - 2" EXISTING UPPER LEVEL EXISTING MAIN LEVEL EXISTING CRAWLSPACE PROPOSED THIRD LEVEL 7' - 1 1 " 7' - 1 1 " 8' - 6 " 3' - 1 0 " 5' - 0" PR O P E R T Y L I N E SE T B A C K L I N E 5' - 0" 2' - 1" 7' - 1 1 " 7' - 1 1 " 3' - 1 0 " EXISTING UPPER LEVEL EXISTING MAIN LEVEL EXISTING CRAWLSPACE PR O P E R T Y L I N E SE T B A C K L I N E 5' - 0" PR O P E R T Y L I N E SE T B A C K L I N E 2' - 2" 5' - 0" PR O P E R T Y L I N E 2' - 2" EXISTING UPPER LEVEL EXISTING MAIN LEVEL EXISTING CRAWLSPACE EXISTING UPPER LEVEL EXISTING MAIN LEVEL EXISTING CRAWLSPACE PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL 7' - 1 0 " 7' - 1 0 " 4' - 6 " 4' - 6 " 7' - 1 0 " 7' - 1 0 " 7' - 6 " SE T B A C K L I N E ADDITIVE PROPOSED ELEMENT IN THE SETBACK TO SQUARE OFF THE EXISTING MANSARD AND GABLE ROOF, IN THE SAME PLANE AS GLABLE & BUMPOUT ALREADY PROJECTS. WE PROPOSE TO KEEP THE BUMPOUT AND GABLE FRAMING INTACT AND INSTALL ADDATIVE FRAMING TO FLUSH EVERYTHING OUT. NEW THIRD FLOOR PROPOSED TO STACK WITH EXTERIOR WALLS BELOW TO MAKE STRUCTURE EFFICIENT AND LIMIT DEMO OF EXISTING FRAMING EXISTING GABLE ROOF PROJECTION INTO SETBACK EXISTING MANSARD PROJECTION INTO THE SETBACK AT SECTION LINE NOTE: (PROJECTIONS ARE ALLOWED UP TO 1'-6" INTO THE SETBACK WITHOUT APPROVAL) ADDITIVE PROPOSED ELEMENT IN THE SETBACK TO SQUARE OFF THE EXISTING MANSARD, IN THE SAME PLANE AS MANSARD ALREADY PROJECTS NEW THIRD FLOOR PROPOSED TO STACK WITH EXTERIOR WALLS BELOW TO MAKE STRUCTURE EFFICIENT AND LIMIT DEMO OF EXISTING WITHIN SETBACK AT SECTION LINE 2' - 2" EXISTING MANSARD PROJECTION INTO THE SETBACK AT SECTION LINE NOTE: (PROJECTIONS ARE ALLOWED UP TO 1'-6" INTO THE SETBACK WITHOUT APPROVAL) 3' - 2" 3' - 0" 3' - 3" EXISTING WALL BUMPOUT INT SETBACK DRAWING DATE: 215 S. MONARCH SUITE G-102 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 p I 970.544.4856 f I 970.544.4856 ISSUE DATE ISSUE NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA9.2 SECTION DIAGRAMS 12.10.2024 AT E R E M O D E L 83 5 E D U R A N T SECTION 1 SECTION 2 EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING PHOTOS PROPOSED RENDERING Exhibit 9 PR O P O S E D PR O P O S E D EX I S T I N G PROPOSEDPROPOSEDEXISTING 26 Exhibit B –Variance Review Staff Findings Board of Adjustment 835 East Durant Avenue Dimensional Variance – Review Criteria Page 1 of 2 Sec. 26.314.040(a): In order to authorize a variance from the dimensional requirements of Title 26, the appropriate decision-making body shall make a finding that the following three (3) circumstances exist: 1. The grant of variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and policies of this Title and the Municipal Code; and Staff findings: The purpose statement of the Land Use Code includes establishing and enforcing clear and consistent regulations to regulate the impacts of development on the neighbors, environment, and City, while balancing the legitimate rights and reasonable expectations of property owners. It’s reasonable for property owners, such as those at 835 East Durant Avenue, to develop multi-family residential buildings in the Residential Multi-Family (RMF) Zone District. The property owners are able to fulfill this expectation while complying with the underlying zoning regulations, upholding the goal of upholding and enforcing clear and consistent regulations. Staff finds the criterion not met. 2. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building or structure; and Staff findings: Staff finds that reasonable use of the parcel exists in its current configuration, currently developed with two townhouse buildings with a total of eleven dwelling units. The property is developed with multi-family residential buildings, and is zoned for multi-family residential buildings. Staff finds the criterion not met. 3. Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship, as distinguished from mere inconvenience. In determining whether an applicant's rights would be deprived, the Board shall consider whether either of the following conditions apply: a. There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel, building or structure, which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions of the applicant; or b. Granting the variance will not confer upon the applicant any special privilege denied the terms of this Title and the Municipal Code to other parcels, buildings or structures, in the same zone district. Staff findings: There are many nonconforming structures within the RMF Zone District. Staff recognizes that it may be more difficult to construct the additional story outside of the setback. Staff also recognizes that the applicant desires a different roof line on the main level. This difficulty and desire constitutes an inconvenience, not a hardship. Other 27 Exhibit B –Variance Review Staff Findings Board of Adjustment 835 East Durant Avenue Dimensional Variance – Review Criteria Page 2 of 2 parcels, buildings, and structures in the same zone district are subject to, and constructed to, underlying setbacks. Staff finds the criterion not met. 28 300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM December 23, 2024 Sophie Varga Zoning Administrator City of Aspen 457 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 RE: East Aspen Townhomes – 835 East Durant Avenue Setback Variance Request Ms. Varga: Please accept this application requesting side yard setback variances for 835 East Durant Avenue. The requested variances will enable development of a third floor on each existing building along with architectural projections into the setback areas. The Aspen Townhouses East property consists of eleven residences within two buildings. The property is located in the Residential Multi-Family (R/MF) Zone District and is approximately 15,000 square feet. The above rendering shows the architectural vision for the property. Below is a picture of the existing architectural style. The residences were initially built as two-story units, with a ground floor and an upper floor (no basements) in a townhome configuration. The property was developed by Harry Uhlfelder pursuant to City of Aspen building permit no. 824C, issued May 28, 1965. A Certificate of Occupancy was issued on February 16, 1966. A condominium map for the property was filed October 20, 1966, and amended once on July 2, 1982, to accommodate a partial third floor of Unit 5. Please see reference documents. 29 Aspen Townhomes East Page 2 300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM Numerous building permits for various upgrades to individual units are on file with the City. The property has not had a wholesale update since its original development. The property was developed facing south. Entrances to the units are along the Deane Street side of the property. The property is also bounded by Durant Avenue and South West End Street. The proposal includes creating a better pedestrian orientation along the two primary streets. The picture to the right shows the existing conditions as viewed from Durant Avenue. The initial layout of the buildings appears to have had a slight skew. The buildings are close, but not quite parallel with the property lines. The map to the right highlights the existing “skew” to the buildings, comparing the required setback lines with the existing building footprints. 30 Aspen Townhomes East Page 3 300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM For the eastern building, the existing setback varies from 5 feet to 3.4 feet. Each building also has a roof overhang of approximately 26 inches further encroaching into the setback. The west setback is currently 34 inches where 5 feet (60 inches) is required. The eastern setback is currently 14 inches where 5 feet (60 inches) is required. The map to the right highlights the existing encroachment of the eastern building into the setback. The proposal is to expand the buildings with a third floor using the current extent of the structures and building straight upwards. The mansard roof elements will be “squared-off” and continue to function as architectural projections into the setback areas. This application requests two side yard variances: 1) Along the west, a 26-inch side yard variance to allow a setback of 34 inches. 2) Along the east, a 46-inch side yard variance to allow a setback of 14 inches. This request for setback variances is submitted on behalf of the Aspen Townhouses East Homeowners Association. Victoria Thomas is the President of the Homeowners Association. BendonAdams is authorized to submit this application and represent the interests of Aspen Townhouses East Aspen Homeowners Association before the City of Aspen. Architectural plans are provided by S2 Architects; Joseph Spears, Principal. All plans should be considered conceptual in nature and subject to modification prior to building permit submission. We look forward to your review and will make ourselves available for any questions or concerns you have. We can also arrange a site visit at your request. Kind Regards, Chris Bendon, AICP BendonAdams LLC Attachments: 1. Review criteria 2. Application form 3. Agreement to pay 4. HOA form 5. Authorization 6. Proof of ownership 7. Pre-App summary 8. Site improvement survey 9. Architectural plans 10. 1965 permit 11. Condo plat 31 Exhibit 1 Review Criteria page 1 Response to Review Standards: Section 26.314.040.A – In order to authorize a variance from the dimensional requirements of Title 26, the appropriate decision-making body shall make a finding that the following three (3) circumstances exist: 1. The grant of variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and policies of this Title and the Municipal Code. Response – Title 26 of the Municipal Code (known as the Land Use Code) provides zoning limitations and development standards for properties in the City of Aspen. The purpose of Title 26, stated in 26.104.020 includes the analysis of various development factors “and the legitimate rights and reasonable expectations of property owners.” The property is zoned for multi-family development and the owner has a legitimate and reasonable expectation to be able to develop according to the zoning limitations and according to the manner in which the buildings were originally developed. Adding a third floor along the same vertical plane as the existing building is consistent with the permitted building and is consistent with the purpose of the RMF Zone District. 2. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building or structure. Response – The application proposes to utilize the existing conditions of the property and not further encroach into setbacks. The existing condition along the west side of the property is a 34- inch setback. The existing condition along the east side of the property is a 14-inch setback. These setback dimensions will remain and make for the minimum variance needed to make possible the reasonable use of the parcel and of the buildings. The applicant has taken special care to design the third floor of the building and modernize the architectural projections to utilize the existing encroachment dimensions home within the zoning requirements and to request setbacks which are the minimum necessary. The proposal is a reasonable outcome and respectful of the neighborhood conditions. It will enable reasonable use of the property. The applicant is intending to redevelop the property with a new home in essentially the same position and orientation as the current home. Occasionally 3. Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship, as distinguished from mere inconvenience. In determining whether an applicant's rights would be deprived, the Board shall consider whether either of the following conditions apply: 32 Exhibit 1 Review Criteria page 2 a) There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel, building or structure, which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions of the applicant. b) Granting the variance will not confer upon the applicant any special privilege denied by the terms of this Title and the Municipal Code to other parcels, buildings or structures, in the same zone district. Response – Literal enforcement of the setbacks would disallow the third floor to utilize the existing structure of the first and second floors. This would introduce significant structural complications and be inconsistent with the manner in which the City originally permitted the structure. Enabling the property to expand using conventional structural systems will enable the applicant to enjoy development rights in-line with those of neighboring parcels in the RMF zone district. 33 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTIVATIVE: Description: Existing and Proposed Conditions Review: Administrative or Board Review Lodge Pillows Free Market dwelling units Essential Public Facility square footage FEES DUE: $ Pre-Application Conference Summary Signed Fee Agreement HOA Compliance form All items listed in checklist on PreApplication Conference Summary Name: Address: Phone#: email: Address: Phone #: email: Name: Project Name and Address: Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) BendonAdams 300 So. Spring St #202; Aspen, CO 81611 970.925.2855 chris@bendonadams.com x x x x Have you included the following? Required Land Use Review(s): Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) required fields: Net Leasable square footage Affordable Housing dwelling units na na na na 11, existing Request for west and east sideyard variances Aspen Townhouses East Variance Request; 835 East Durant Avenue2737-182-58-802 Aspen Townhouses East Condominium Association 835 East Durant Avenue, Unit #1; Aspen, CO 81611 970.948.1341 tory@torythomas.net 4,425 Exhibit 2 34 Exhibit 3 35 Exhibit 4 36 Exhibit 5 37 Customer Distribution Prevent fraud - Please call a member of our closing team for wire transfer instructions or to initiate a wire transfer. Note that our wiring instructions will never change. Order Number: Q62017717 Date: 11/20/2024 Property Address: 835 E DURANT AVE., ASPEN, CO 81611 For Closing Assistance For Title Assistance Land Title Roaring Fork Valley Title Team 533 E HOPKINS #102 ASPEN, CO 81611 (970) 927-0405 (Work) (970) 925-0610 (Work Fax) valleyresponse@ltgc.com Seller/Owner ASPEN TOWNHOUSES EAST CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION Delivered via: No Commitment Delivery Exhibit 6 38 Estimate of Title Fees Order Number: Q62017717 Date: 11/20/2024 Property Address: 835 E DURANT AVE., ASPEN, CO 81611 Seller(s): ASPEN TOWNHOUSES "EAST" CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, A COLORADO NONPROFIT CORPORATION, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR ALL OWNERS Buyer(s): Thank you for putting your trust in Land Title. Below is the estimate of title fees for the transaction. The final fees will be collected at closing. Visit ltgc.com to learn more about Land Title. Estimate of Title Insurance Fees "TBD" Commitment $279.00 TOTAL $279.00 Note: The documents linked in this commitment should be reviewed carefully. These documents, such as covenants conditions and restrictions, may affect the title, ownership and use of the property. You may wish to engage legal assistance in order to fully understand and be aware of the implications of the documents on your property. Chain of Title Documents: Pitkin county recorded 10/20/1965 at book 216 page 260 Plat Map(s): Pitkin county recorded 10/25/1960 at book 3 page 49 Pitkin county recorded 07/09/1982 at book 13 page 70 39 Copyright 2006-2024 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Property Address: 835 E DURANT AVE., ASPEN, CO 81611 1.Effective Date: 11/08/2024 at 5:00 P.M. 2.Policy to be Issued and Proposed Insured: "TBD" Commitment Proposed Insured: $0.00 3.The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: FEE SIMPLE 4.Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in: ASPEN TOWNHOUSES "EAST" CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, A COLORADO NONPROFIT CORPORATION, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR ALL OWNERS 5.The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: COMMON AREA, ASPEN TOWNHOUSES "EAST" CONDOMINIUMS, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF RECORDED OCTOBER 20, 1965 IN PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 49, AND FIRST AMENDMENT THERETO RECORDED JULY 9, 1982 IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 70 AND AS FURTHER DEFINED AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR ASPEN TOWNHOUSES "EAST" CONDOMINIUMS RECORDED OCTOBER 20, 1965 IN BOOK 216 AT PAGE 260. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule A Order Number:Q62017717 40 ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part I (Requirements) Order Number: Q62017717 All of the following Requirements must be met: This proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company may then make additional Requirements or Exceptions. Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured. Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company. Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or both, must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records. THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY, AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT HERETO. 41 This commitment does not republish any covenants, condition, restriction, or limitation contained in any document referred to in this commitment to the extent that the specific covenant, conditions, restriction, or limitation violates state or federal law based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, handicap, familial status, or national origin. 1.Any facts, rights, interests, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 2.Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 3.Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 4.Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date of the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6.(a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 7.(a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 8.ANY AND ALL MINERAL RIGHTS RETAINED IN INSTRUMENTS RECORDED MAY 29, 1891 IN BOOK 93 AT PAGE 121, AND RECORDED APRIL 8, 1891 IN BOOK 98 AT PAGE 500, RECORDED JULY 15, 1891 IN BOOK 105 AT PAGE 39 AND RECORDED FEBRUARY 18, 1894 IN BOOK 131 AT PAGE 81. 9.CONDOMINIUM DECLARATIONS, WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANT OR RESTRICTION BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS OR NATIONAL ORIGIN UNLESS AND ONLY TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT (A) IS EXEMPT UNDER CHAPTER 42, SECTION 3607 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE OR (B) RELATES TO HANDICAP BUT DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST HANDICAPPED PERSONS, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 20, 1965, IN BOOK 216 AT PAGE 260. 10.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF BY-LAWS RECORDED OCTOBER 20, 1965 IN BOOK 216 AT PAGE 269. 11.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION RECORDED OCTOBER 20, 1965 IN BOOK 216 AT PAGE 276. 12.EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND ALL MATTERS AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY RECORDED OCTOBER 25, 1960 IN PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 49 AND RECORDED JULY 9, 1982 IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 70. 13.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF EASEMENT GRANTED TO COMCAST OF COLORADO/FLORIDA INC. RECORDED AUGUST 4, 2011 AS RECEPTION NO. 581671. ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: Q62017717 42 14.ANY AND ALL INTERESTS OF THE OWNERS OF INDIVIDUAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS, DEEDS OF TRUST, MORTGAGES, LIENS, JUDGMENTS, OR ANY OTHER OUTSTANDING OBLIGATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE INDIVIDUAL UNIT OWNERSHIP OF THE ASPEN TOWNHOUSES EAST CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION. ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B, Part II (Exceptions) Order Number: Q62017717 43 Land Title Guarantee Company Disclosure Statements Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that: Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document. Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2 requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued. Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given: The Subject real property may be located in a special taxing district.(A) A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction will be obtained from the county treasurer of the county in which the real property is located or that county treasurer's authorized agent unless the proposed insured provides written instructions to the contrary. (for an Owner's Policy of Title Insurance pertaining to a sale of residential real property). (B) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. (C) The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. (A) No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. (B) The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic's and material-men's liens. (C) The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium.(D) If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. (E) 44 This notice applies to owner's policy commitments disclosing that a mineral estate has been severed from the surface estate, in Schedule B-2. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance, and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado Division of Insurance within the Department of Regulatory Agencies. Note: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-3, notice is hereby given of the availability of a closing protection letter for the lender, purchaser, lessee or seller in connection with this transaction. Note: Pursuant to CRS 24-21-514.5, Colorado notaries may remotely notarize real estate deeds and other documents using real-time audio-video communication technology. You may choose not to use remote notarization for any document. That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and (A) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. (B) 45 Joint Notice of Privacy Policy of Land Title Guarantee Company Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurancy Company This Statement is provided to you as a customer of Land Title Guarantee Company as agent for Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. We want you to know that we recognize and respect your privacy expectations and the requirements of federal and state privacy laws. Information security is one of our highest priorities. We recognize that maintaining your trust and confidence is the bedrock of our business. We maintain and regularly review internal and external safeguards against unauthorized access to your non-public personal information ("Personal Information"). In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from: applications or other forms we receive from you, including communications sent through TMX, our web-based transaction management system; your transactions with, or from the services being performed by us, our affiliates, or others; a consumer reporting agency, if such information is provided to us in connection with your transaction; and The public records maintained by governmental entities that we obtain either directly from those entities, or from our affiliates and non-affiliates. Our policies regarding the protection of the confidentiality and security of your Personal Information are as follows: We restrict access to all Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products and services to you. We may share your Personal Information with affiliated contractors or service providers who provide services in the course of our business, but only to the extent necessary for these providers to perform their services and to provide these services to you as may be required by your transaction. We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion. Employees who violate our strict policies and procedures regarding privacy are subject to disciplinary action. We regularly assess security standards and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to Personal Information. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT STATED ABOVE OR PERMITTED BY LAW. Consistent with applicable privacy laws, there are some situations in which Personal Information may be disclosed. We may disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission; when we are required by law to do so, for example, if we are served a subpoena; or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you. Our policy regarding dispute resolution is as follows: Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to our privacy policy, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration 46 Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. 47 Commitment For Title Insurance Issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company NOTICE IMPORTANT—READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE INSURANCE POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT. THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION, ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMPANY, AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSED INSURED. THE COMPANY’S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT. THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY OTHER PERSON. . COMMITMENT TO ISSUE POLICY Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and the Commitment Conditions, Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, a Minnesota corporation (the “Company”), commits to issue the Policy according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A for each Policy described in Schedule A, only when the Company has entered in Schedule A both the specified dollar amount as the Proposed Policy Amount and the name of the Proposed Insured. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within 6 months after the Commitment Date, this Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end. COMMITMENT CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS 2. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment to Issue Policy, Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end. 3. The Company’s liability and obligation is limited by and this Commitment is not valid without: 4. COMPANY’S RIGHT TO AMEND The Company may amend this Commitment at any time. If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter recorded in the Public Records prior to the Commitment Date, any liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5. The Company shall not be liable for any other amendment to this Commitment. 5. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY i. comply with the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; ii. eliminate, with the Company’s written consent, any Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; or iii. acquire the Title or create the Mortgage covered by this Commitment. 6. LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT “Knowledge” or “Known”: Actual or imputed knowledge, but not constructive notice imparted by the Public Records.(a) “Land”: The land described in Schedule A and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term “Land” does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is to be insured by the Policy. (b) “Mortgage”: A mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law.(c) “Policy”: Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to be issued by the Company pursuant to this Commitment. (d) “Proposed Insured”: Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment.(e) “Proposed Policy Amount”: Each dollar amount specified in Schedule A as the Proposed Policy Amount of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (f) “Public Records”: Records established under state statutes at the Commitment Date for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge. (g) “Title”: The estate or interest described in Schedule A.(h) the Notice;(a) the Commitment to Issue Policy;(b) the Commitment Conditions;(c) Schedule A;(d) Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and(e) Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and(f) a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.(g) The Company’s liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in the interval between the Company’s delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Commitment and the delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from the Proposed Insured’s good faith reliance to: (a) The Company shall not be liable under Commitment Condition 5(a) if the Proposed Insured requested the amendment or had Knowledge of the matter and did not notify the Company about it in writing. (b) The Company will only have liability under Commitment Condition 4 if the Proposed Insured would not have incurred the expense had the Commitment included the added matter when the Commitment was first delivered to the Proposed Insured. (c) The Company’s liability shall not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in good faith and described in Commitment Conditions 5(a)(i) through 5(a)(iii) or the Proposed Policy Amount. (d) The Company shall not be liable for the content of the Transaction Identification Data, if any.(e) In no event shall the Company be obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Commitment unless all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the Company. (f) In any event, the Company’s liability is limited by the terms and provisions of the Policy.(g) Only a Proposed Insured identified in Schedule A, and no other person, may make a claim under this Commitment.(a) Any claim must be based in contract and must be restricted solely to the terms and provisions of this Commitment.(b) Until the Policy is issued, this Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Commitment and supersedes all prior commitment negotiations, representations, and proposals of any kind, whether written or oral, express or implied, relating to the subject matter of this Commitment. (c) 48 7. IF THIS COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT The issuing agent is the Company’s agent only for the limited purpose of issuing title insurance commitments and policies. The issuing agent is not the Company’s agent for the purpose of providing closing or settlement services. 8. PRO-FORMA POLICY The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro-forma policy illustrating the coverage that the Company may provide. A pro-forma policy neither reflects the status of Title at the time that the pro-forma policy is delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is it a commitment to insure. 9. ARBITRATION The Policy contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Proposed Policy Amount is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Proposed Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. A Proposed Insured may review a copy of the arbitration rules at http://www.alta.org/arbitration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Land Title Insurance Corporation has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A to be valid when countersigned by a validating officer or other authorized signatory. Issued by: Land Title Guarantee Company 3033 East First Avenue Suite 600 Denver, Colorado 80206 303-321-1880 Craig B. Rants, Senior Vice President This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II —Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. The deletion or modification of any Schedule B, Part II—Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation to provide coverage beyond the terms and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy. (d) Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing and authenticated by a person authorized by the Company.(e) When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment will end and the Company’s only liability will be under the Policy.(f) 49 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PRE-24-118 DATE: December 2nd, 2024 PLANNER: Sophie Varga, sophie.varga@aspen.gov, 970-429-2778 PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS: 835 East Durant Avenue – Setback Variance PARCEL ID #: 273718258802 REPRESENTATIVE: Chris Bendon, chris@bendonadams.com DESCRIPTION: The subject site is located in the Residential Multi-Family (RMF) Zone District and is developed with a multi-family residence. The existing structure projects into the setback. The applicant proposes to add a second floor, in line with the floor below. A setback variance is required. The applicant has represented that the addition will comply with underlying height and floor area regulations. The development in the setback requires a Dimensional Variance before the Board of Adjustment. RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS: Section Number Section Title 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.314 Variances 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.710.090 Residential Multi-Family (RMF) For your convenience – links to the Land Use Application and Land Use Code are below: Land Use Application Land Use Code REQUIRED LAND USE REVIEW(S): •Dimensional Variance REVIEW BY: •Staff for determination of complete application and recommendation •Board of Adjustment for decision PUBLIC HEARING: •Yes, Board of Adjustment PLANNING FEES: $1,950 for 6 billable hours of staff time (additional/lesser hours will be billed/refunded at a rate of $325.00 per hour) REFERRAL AGENCY FEES $975.00 – Parks Flat Fee $1,500 – Engineering Flat Fee Exhibit 7 50 TOTAL DEPOSIT: $4,425.00 APPLICATION CHECKLIST: Please email the following as a single PDF to CDEHAdmins@aspen.gov. Please include PRE- 24-118 in the subject line. Completed Land Use Application, including signed fee agreement and HOA Compliance Form. Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application. Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. A vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. Site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel, certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approval associated with the property. This should include existing and proposed site plans, floor plans, and any other necessary depictions of the proposed project. Written responses to all review criteria outlined in Land Use Code Section 26.314.040. Once the application is deemed complete by staff, the following will then need to be submitted: Total deposit for review of the application. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 51 Exhibit 8 52 7 9 4 5 7 9 4 6 7 9 47 7 948 7946 7 9 4 8 7 947 7948 7 9 4 6 UP UP DN UP UP UP UP UPUP UP UP UP UP UP GENERAL NOTES -PLANS 100'-0" = XXXX.XX' 1. GRID LINES AND DIMENSIONS ARE TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD AND/OR FACE OF CONCRETE U.N.O. DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS ARE DIMENSIONED AS ROUGH OPENINGS. 2. REFER TO A6 SERIES FOR BUILDING ASSEMBLIES 3. FLOOR ELEVATION CALLOUTS INDICATE FINISH FLOOR MATERIAL HEIGHT U.N.O. 4. DOOR CALLOUTS ARE ON PLAN AND ELEVATION ONLY 5. SEE ENLARGED STAIR PLANS FOR RISE AND RUN INFORMATION 6. REFER TO BUILDING ASSEMBLIES FOR THERMAL INSULATION REQUIREMENTS 7. WINDOWS TO BE DELIVERED W/NFRC STICKERS 8. REFER TO MECH PLANS FOR SNOWMELT AND PIPING INFORMATION 9. REFER TO MECH DRAWINGS FOR ALL VENTILATION SYSTEMS 10. ALL GLASS SHOWER ENCLOSURES TO BE 1/2" TEMPERED GLASS AND SHALL MEET IRC SECTION R308.4 REQUIREMENTS. 11. CARBON MONOXIDE AND SMOKE DETECTORS INDICATED ON RCP'S. 12. FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITIONS SHALL OCCUR DIRECTLY UNDER THE CENTERLINE OF THE DOOR LEAF. 8 6 5 4 3 F G H J KEDCBA 2 1 7 ENTRY ENTRY BEDROOM OFFICE BEDROOM CLOSET BEDROOM BATH BATH MECH BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM MECH MECH ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM CLOSET SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" BATH BATH PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK ENTRY PATIO ENTRY PATIO ENTRY PATIO BEDROOM BEDROOM ENTRY ENTRY BATH BATH BEDROOM BEDROOM EN T R Y P O R C H PARKING AREA LAWN UNIT 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT 4 UNIT 5 UNIT 6 UN I T 7 UN I T 8 UN I T 9 UN I T 1 0 UN I T 1 1 ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY BEDROOM BEDROOM CLOSET BATH BEDROOM BEDROOM MECH BEDROOM BEDROOM BATH BATH OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OV E R H E A D DURANT STREET S W E N D S T A3.0 1 A3.1 1 A3.0 2 A3.12 A3.1 3 A3.14 16' - 2"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"16' - 2" 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 7' - 0"25' - 8" 15 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " DRAWING DATE: 215 S. MONARCH SUITE G-102 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 p I 970.544.4856 f I 970.544.4856 ISSUE DATE ISSUE NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA2.1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING/DEMO 07.24.2024 AT E R E M O D E L 83 5 E D U R A N T 3/16" = 1'-0" MAIN LEVEL - EXISTING/DEMO1 53 7 9 4 5 7 9 4 6 7 9 47 7 948 7946 7 9 4 8 7 947 7948 7 9 4 6 UP DN DN DN DN DN DN DN DN DN DN DN GENERAL NOTES -PLANS 100'-0" = XXXX.XX' 1. GRID LINES AND DIMENSIONS ARE TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD AND/OR FACE OF CONCRETE U.N.O. DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS ARE DIMENSIONED AS ROUGH OPENINGS. 2. REFER TO A6 SERIES FOR BUILDING ASSEMBLIES 3. FLOOR ELEVATION CALLOUTS INDICATE FINISH FLOOR MATERIAL HEIGHT U.N.O. 4. DOOR CALLOUTS ARE ON PLAN AND ELEVATION ONLY 5. SEE ENLARGED STAIR PLANS FOR RISE AND RUN INFORMATION 6. REFER TO BUILDING ASSEMBLIES FOR THERMAL INSULATION REQUIREMENTS 7. WINDOWS TO BE DELIVERED W/NFRC STICKERS 8. REFER TO MECH PLANS FOR SNOWMELT AND PIPING INFORMATION 9. REFER TO MECH DRAWINGS FOR ALL VENTILATION SYSTEMS 10. ALL GLASS SHOWER ENCLOSURES TO BE 1/2" TEMPERED GLASS AND SHALL MEET IRC SECTION R308.4 REQUIREMENTS. 11. CARBON MONOXIDE AND SMOKE DETECTORS INDICATED ON RCP'S. 12. FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITIONS SHALL OCCUR DIRECTLY UNDER THE CENTERLINE OF THE DOOR LEAF. 8 6 5 4 3 F G H J KEDCBA 2 1 7 PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PARKING AREA LAWN DURANT STREET S W E N D S T SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" BEDROOM BEDROOM BATHBATH KITCHEN KITCHEN LIVING FP FP LIVING DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM KITCHEN KITCHEN KITCHEN KITCHEN FP FP FP FP BATH BATH LIVING LIVING BATH BATH LIVING LIVING KITCHEN KITCHEN BATH BATH LIVING KITCHEN BATH BEDROOM BEDROOM BATH BATH BEDROOM KITCHEN KITCHEN LIVING LIVING DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK LIVING LIVING REF REF REF REF REF REF REF REF REF REF REF A3.0 1 A3.1 1 A3.0 2 A3.12 A3.1 3 A3.14 16' - 2"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"16' - 2" 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 7' - 0"25' - 8" 15 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " DRAWING DATE: 215 S. MONARCH SUITE G-102 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 p I 970.544.4856 f I 970.544.4856 ISSUE DATE ISSUE NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA2.2 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING/DEMO 07.24.2024 AT E R E M O D E L 83 5 E D U R A N T 3/16" = 1'-0" SECOND LEVEL - EXISTING/DEMO1 54 7 9 4 5 7 9 4 6 7 9 47 7 948 7 9 4 6 7946 7 9 4 8 7 947 7948 7 9 4 6 DN GENERAL NOTES -PLANS 100'-0" = XXXX.XX' 1. GRID LINES AND DIMENSIONS ARE TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD AND/OR FACE OF CONCRETE U.N.O. DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS ARE DIMENSIONED AS ROUGH OPENINGS. 2. REFER TO A6 SERIES FOR BUILDING ASSEMBLIES 3. FLOOR ELEVATION CALLOUTS INDICATE FINISH FLOOR MATERIAL HEIGHT U.N.O. 4. DOOR CALLOUTS ARE ON PLAN AND ELEVATION ONLY 5. SEE ENLARGED STAIR PLANS FOR RISE AND RUN INFORMATION 6. REFER TO BUILDING ASSEMBLIES FOR THERMAL INSULATION REQUIREMENTS 7. WINDOWS TO BE DELIVERED W/NFRC STICKERS 8. REFER TO MECH PLANS FOR SNOWMELT AND PIPING INFORMATION 9. REFER TO MECH DRAWINGS FOR ALL VENTILATION SYSTEMS 10. ALL GLASS SHOWER ENCLOSURES TO BE 1/2" TEMPERED GLASS AND SHALL MEET IRC SECTION R308.4 REQUIREMENTS. 11. CARBON MONOXIDE AND SMOKE DETECTORS INDICATED ON RCP'S. 12. FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITIONS SHALL OCCUR DIRECTLY UNDER THE CENTERLINE OF THE DOOR LEAF. 8 6 5 4 3 F G H J KEDCBA 2 1 7 PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PARKING AREA LAWN DURANT STREET SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" S W E N D S T A3.0 1 A3.1 1 A3.0 2 A3.12 A3.1 3 A3.14 16' - 2"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"16' - 2" 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 7' - 0"25' - 8" 15 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " TUB BEDROOM SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHTSKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT DECK BELOW DECK BELOW DECK BELOW DECK BELOW DECK BELOW DECK BELOW DE C K B E L O W DE C K B E L O W DE C K B E L O W DE C K B E L O W DE C K B E L O W DRAWING DATE: 215 S. MONARCH SUITE G-102 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 p I 970.544.4856 f I 970.544.4856 ISSUE DATE ISSUE NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA2.3 THIRD/ROOF FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING/DEMO 07.24.2024 AT E R E M O D E L 83 5 E D U R A N T 3/16" = 1'-0" THIRD/ROOF LEVEL - EXISTING/DEMO1 55 7 9 4 5 7 9 4 5 7 9 4 6 7 9 47 7 948 7 9 4 47946 7 9 4 8 7 947 7948 7 9 4 6 DN GENERAL NOTES -PLANS 100'-0" = XXXX.XX' 1. GRID LINES AND DIMENSIONS ARE TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD AND/OR FACE OF CONCRETE U.N.O. DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS ARE DIMENSIONED AS ROUGH OPENINGS. 2. REFER TO A6 SERIES FOR BUILDING ASSEMBLIES 3. FLOOR ELEVATION CALLOUTS INDICATE FINISH FLOOR MATERIAL HEIGHT U.N.O. 4. DOOR CALLOUTS ARE ON PLAN AND ELEVATION ONLY 5. SEE ENLARGED STAIR PLANS FOR RISE AND RUN INFORMATION 6. REFER TO BUILDING ASSEMBLIES FOR THERMAL INSULATION REQUIREMENTS 7. WINDOWS TO BE DELIVERED W/NFRC STICKERS 8. REFER TO MECH PLANS FOR SNOWMELT AND PIPING INFORMATION 9. REFER TO MECH DRAWINGS FOR ALL VENTILATION SYSTEMS 10. ALL GLASS SHOWER ENCLOSURES TO BE 1/2" TEMPERED GLASS AND SHALL MEET IRC SECTION R308.4 REQUIREMENTS. 11. CARBON MONOXIDE AND SMOKE DETECTORS INDICATED ON RCP'S. 12. FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITIONS SHALL OCCUR DIRECTLY UNDER THE CENTERLINE OF THE DOOR LEAF. 8 6 5 4 3 F G H J KEDCBA 2 1 7 MECH MECH MECH SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK ENTRY PATIO ENTRY PATIO ENTRY PATIO EN T R Y P O R C H PARKING AREA LAWN UNIT 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT 4 UNIT 5 UNIT 6 UNIT 7 UNIT 8 UNIT 9 UNIT 10 UNIT 11 MECH OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OV E R H E A D DURANT STREET S W E N D S T A3.0 1 A3.1 1 A3.0 2 A3.12 A3.1 3 A3.14 16' - 2"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"16' - 2" 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 7' - 0"25' - 8" 15 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " SECTION 2 SECTION 1 DRAWING DATE: 215 S. MONARCH SUITE G-102 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 p I 970.544.4856 f I 970.544.4856 ISSUE DATE ISSUE NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA2.1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED 09.26.2024 AT E R E M O D E L 83 5 E D U R A N T 3/16" = 1'-0" MAIN LEVEL - EXISTING/DEMO1 56 7 9 4 5 7 9 4 6 7 9 47 7 948 7946 7 9 4 8 7 947 7948 7 9 4 6 GENERAL NOTES -PLANS 100'-0" = XXXX.XX' 1. GRID LINES AND DIMENSIONS ARE TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD AND/OR FACE OF CONCRETE U.N.O. DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS ARE DIMENSIONED AS ROUGH OPENINGS. 2. REFER TO A6 SERIES FOR BUILDING ASSEMBLIES 3. FLOOR ELEVATION CALLOUTS INDICATE FINISH FLOOR MATERIAL HEIGHT U.N.O. 4. DOOR CALLOUTS ARE ON PLAN AND ELEVATION ONLY 5. SEE ENLARGED STAIR PLANS FOR RISE AND RUN INFORMATION 6. REFER TO BUILDING ASSEMBLIES FOR THERMAL INSULATION REQUIREMENTS 7. WINDOWS TO BE DELIVERED W/NFRC STICKERS 8. REFER TO MECH PLANS FOR SNOWMELT AND PIPING INFORMATION 9. REFER TO MECH DRAWINGS FOR ALL VENTILATION SYSTEMS 10. ALL GLASS SHOWER ENCLOSURES TO BE 1/2" TEMPERED GLASS AND SHALL MEET IRC SECTION R308.4 REQUIREMENTS. 11. CARBON MONOXIDE AND SMOKE DETECTORS INDICATED ON RCP'S. 12. FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITIONS SHALL OCCUR DIRECTLY UNDER THE CENTERLINE OF THE DOOR LEAF. 8 6 5 4 3 F G H J KEDCBA 2 1 7 PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PARKING AREA LAWN DURANT STREET S W E N D S T SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK FP DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK A3.0 1 A3.1 1 A3.0 2 A3.12 A3.1 3 A3.14 16' - 2"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"16' - 2" 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 7' - 0"25' - 8" 15 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " UNIT 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT 4 UNIT 5 UNIT 6 UNIT 7 UNIT 8 UNIT 9 UNIT 10 UNIT 11 SECTION 2 SECTION 1 DRAWING DATE: 215 S. MONARCH SUITE G-102 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 p I 970.544.4856 f I 970.544.4856 ISSUE DATE ISSUE NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA2.2 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED 09.26.2024 AT E R E M O D E L 83 5 E D U R A N T 3/16" = 1'-0" SECOND LEVEL - EXISTING/DEMO1 57 7 9 4 5 7 9 4 6 7 9 47 7 948 7946 7 9 4 8 7 947 7948 7 9 4 6 GENERAL NOTES -PLANS 100'-0" = XXXX.XX' 1. GRID LINES AND DIMENSIONS ARE TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD AND/OR FACE OF CONCRETE U.N.O. DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS ARE DIMENSIONED AS ROUGH OPENINGS. 2. REFER TO A6 SERIES FOR BUILDING ASSEMBLIES 3. FLOOR ELEVATION CALLOUTS INDICATE FINISH FLOOR MATERIAL HEIGHT U.N.O. 4. DOOR CALLOUTS ARE ON PLAN AND ELEVATION ONLY 5. SEE ENLARGED STAIR PLANS FOR RISE AND RUN INFORMATION 6. REFER TO BUILDING ASSEMBLIES FOR THERMAL INSULATION REQUIREMENTS 7. WINDOWS TO BE DELIVERED W/NFRC STICKERS 8. REFER TO MECH PLANS FOR SNOWMELT AND PIPING INFORMATION 9. REFER TO MECH DRAWINGS FOR ALL VENTILATION SYSTEMS 10. ALL GLASS SHOWER ENCLOSURES TO BE 1/2" TEMPERED GLASS AND SHALL MEET IRC SECTION R308.4 REQUIREMENTS. 11. CARBON MONOXIDE AND SMOKE DETECTORS INDICATED ON RCP'S. 12. FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITIONS SHALL OCCUR DIRECTLY UNDER THE CENTERLINE OF THE DOOR LEAF. 8 6 5 4 3 F G H J KEDCBA 2 1 7 PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PARKING AREA LAWN DURANT STREET SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" S W E N D S T A3.0 1 A3.1 1 A3.0 2 A3.12 A3.1 3 A3.14 16' - 2"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"15' - 10 1/4"16' - 2" 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 16 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 7' - 0"25' - 8" 15 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 " 15 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SK Y L I G H T SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT DECK BELOW DECK BELOW DECK BELOW DECK BELOW DECK BELOW DE C K DE C K DE C K B E L O W DE C K B E L O W DE C K B E L O W SKY LIGHT SKY LIGHT DECK BELOW UNIT 1 UNIT 3 UNIT 5 UNIT 6 ROOFROOF UNIT 9 UNIT 10 ROOF ROOF SECTION 2 SECTION 1 DRAWING DATE: 215 S. MONARCH SUITE G-102 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 p I 970.544.4856 f I 970.544.4856 ISSUE DATE ISSUE NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA2.3 THIRD/ROOF FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED 09.26.2024 AT E R E M O D E L 83 5 E D U R A N T 3/16" = 1'-0" THIRD/ROOF LEVEL - EXISTING/DEMO1 58 2' - 2" EXISTING UPPER LEVEL EXISTING MAIN LEVEL EXISTING CRAWLSPACE PROPOSED THIRD LEVEL 7' - 1 1 " 7' - 1 1 " 8' - 6 " 3' - 1 0 " 5' - 0" PR O P E R T Y L I N E SE T B A C K L I N E 5' - 0" 2' - 1" 7' - 1 1 " 7' - 1 1 " 3' - 1 0 " EXISTING UPPER LEVEL EXISTING MAIN LEVEL EXISTING CRAWLSPACE PR O P E R T Y L I N E SE T B A C K L I N E 5' - 0" PR O P E R T Y L I N E SE T B A C K L I N E 2' - 2" 5' - 0" PR O P E R T Y L I N E 2' - 2" EXISTING UPPER LEVEL EXISTING MAIN LEVEL EXISTING CRAWLSPACE EXISTING UPPER LEVEL EXISTING MAIN LEVEL EXISTING CRAWLSPACE PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL 7' - 1 0 " 7' - 1 0 " 4' - 6 " 4' - 6 " 7' - 1 0 " 7' - 1 0 " 7' - 6 " SE T B A C K L I N E ADDITIVE PROPOSED ELEMENT IN THE SETBACK TO SQUARE OFF THE EXISTING MANSARD AND GABLE ROOF, IN THE SAME PLANE AS GLABLE & BUMPOUT ALREADY PROJECTS. WE PROPOSE TO KEEP THE BUMPOUT AND GABLE FRAMING INTACT AND INSTALL ADDATIVE FRAMING TO FLUSH EVERYTHING OUT. NEW THIRD FLOOR PROPOSED TO STACK WITH EXTERIOR WALLS BELOW TO MAKE STRUCTURE EFFICIENT AND LIMIT DEMO OF EXISTING FRAMING EXISTING GABLE ROOF PROJECTION INTO SETBACK EXISTING MANSARD PROJECTION INTO THE SETBACK AT SECTION LINE NOTE: (PROJECTIONS ARE ALLOWED UP TO 1'-6" INTO THE SETBACK WITHOUT APPROVAL) ADDITIVE PROPOSED ELEMENT IN THE SETBACK TO SQUARE OFF THE EXISTING MANSARD, IN THE SAME PLANE AS MANSARD ALREADY PROJECTS NEW THIRD FLOOR PROPOSED TO STACK WITH EXTERIOR WALLS BELOW TO MAKE STRUCTURE EFFICIENT AND LIMIT DEMO OF EXISTING WITHIN SETBACK AT SECTION LINE 2' - 2" EXISTING MANSARD PROJECTION INTO THE SETBACK AT SECTION LINE NOTE: (PROJECTIONS ARE ALLOWED UP TO 1'-6" INTO THE SETBACK WITHOUT APPROVAL) 3' - 2" 3' - 0" 3' - 3" EXISTING WALL BUMPOUT INT SETBACK DRAWING DATE: 215 S. MONARCH SUITE G-102 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 p I 970.544.4856 f I 970.544.4856 ISSUE DATE ISSUE NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA9.2 SECTION DIAGRAMS 12.10.2024 AT E R E M O D E L 83 5 E D U R A N T SECTION 1 SECTION 2 EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING PHOTOS PROPOSED RENDERING Exhibit 9 59 Exhibit 10 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 Exhibit 11 70 71 72 73