HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.hpc.07.2025111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
RECEPTION#: 711529, R: $43.001 D: $0.00
DOC CODE: RESOLUTION
Pg 1 of 7, 08/29/2025 at 02:19:19 PM
RESOLUTION #07, Ingrid K. Grueter, Pitkin County, CO
(SERIES OF 2025)
A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC)
APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW —
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN, HISTORIC PRESERVATION MAJOR DEVELOPMENT —
CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW, DEVELOPMENT IN
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS — MOUNTAIN VIEW PLANE REVIEW,
GROWTH MANAGEMENT QUOTA SYSTEM, AND TRANSPORTATION AND
PARKING MANAGEMENT — SPECIAL REVIEW FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 305 SOUTH MILL STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS H AND I, BLOCK
829 CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
PARCEL ID: 273 5-182-20-003
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from,
305-7 Mill St., LLC (applicant), represented by Garrett Larimer of Kraemer Land Planning, for
the following land use review approvals:
• Commercial Design Review —Conceptual Design, pursuant to City of Aspen Land Use
Code Section 26.412.040(b);
• Historic Preservation Major Development —Conceptual Development Plan Review,
pursuant to City of Aspen Land Use Code Section 26.415.070(d)(3);
• Development in Environmentally Sensitive Areas -Mountain View Plane Review, pursuant
to City of Aspen Land Use Code Section 26.435.050(fl;
• Growth Management Quota System (GMQS), pursuant to City of Aspen Land Use Code
Section 26.470.060(b); and
• Transportation and Parking Management —Special Review, pursuant to City of Aspen Land
Use Code Section Section 26.515.080; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received referral comments from
the City of Aspen Engineering Department, Building Division, and Zoning Division; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.304.060(b)(1) —Common Development Review
Procedures —Combined Reviews, the procedures for reviewing required development approvals
have been combined into a conceptual review by the HPC during a duly noticed public hearing
after considering the application, recommendations by Community Development Department
staff, and referral agencies; and
WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for
compliance with the applicable code sections, standards, and guidelines, and, finding it mostly
consistent therewith, recommended approval of the application with conditions; and
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public meeting on July 9th 2025, the HPC reviewed the
project, including the application, staff memo, and public comments, and voted 4 to 0 in support
of a motion to approve the application with conditions;
HPC Resolution #07, Series of 2025
Page 1 of 3
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN HISTORIC
PRESERVATION COMMISSION THAT:
Section 1: Approval:
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the
Historic Preservation Commission hereby approves the Commercial Design Review — Conceptual
Design, Historic Preservation Major Development Conceptual Development Plan Review,
Development in Environmentally Sensitive Areas Mountain View Plane Review, Growth
Management Quota System, and Transportation and Parking Management — Special Review for the
purposes of enclosing the southeast courtyard, the northeast pergola, the space between the pergola
and the arch on the east side of the building, and the back -of -house area toward the northwest comer
of the property to create interior space; erecting a roof over the northwest comer of the property; and
altering existing fenestration, material, and forms at the property located at 305 South Mill Street,
Lots H and 1, Block 82, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado, including the
following.- *
1. Offsetting the transportation impact (5.6 additional trips) of the increase to net leasable
space by making a $33,600 contribution to WE -Cycle;
2. Providing 413 square feet of on -site Pedestrian Amenity space and $109,462.65 cash -in -
lieu of 1,095 square feet of Pedestrian Amenity;
3. Increasing solid waste capacity by 3.5 cubic yards, including the addition of cardboard
recycling shelves and a 1.5-cubic-yard dumpster for trash, to serve the project.
With the following conditions:
1. The height of the proposed enclosed pergola, including the louvered roof, must not
exceed 11 feet 2 inches;
2. No new addition or roof north of the arch may exceed 12 feet in height;
3. The HPC shall review materials during Major Development and Commercial Design
— Final Design Reviews;
4. The HPC shall review exterior lights during Major Development and Commercial
Design — Final Design Reviews;
5. For HPC review during Major Development and Commercial Design — Final Design
Reviews, the proposed project must satisfy its parking requirement (1.3 634 parking
spaces) by providing off-street parking, shared parking spaces, cash -in -lieu payment,
additional mobility measures, or a combination thereof-, and
6. The project must mitigate for 4.14 full-time equivalents (FTEs) (6.40798 FTEs at the
commercial mitigation rate of 65%) generated by the 1,363.4-square-foot increase of
net leasable area by providing affordable housing, with minor adjustments to be
negotiated at building permit submission.
HPC Resolution #07,, Series of 2025
Page 2 of 3
Section 2: Material Representations
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation
presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation
Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development
approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by
other specific conditions or an authorized authority.
Section 3: Existinst Litization
This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of
any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended
as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
Section 4: Severability
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason
held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be
deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions thereof.
APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 9th day of July 2025.
Ap roved as to Form:
�uisa Be e, Assistant City Attorney
ATTEST:
i Sear, Deputy City Clerk
Approved as to Content:
Kim Raymond, HVC Vice Chair
HPC Resolution #07, Series of 2025
Page 3 of 3
p 9
u
0
o 0
z 0 ci
COOOZZ8[LCLZ# (11 19D"dVd
L L 9 L 8 OD 'N 3d SV 'iS IIIW S 9 OC
oij (Illm
LD
Z
Z
.8/1 Fq ez L*, .9*,Lt
C>
C%O)
LL, t !2
L"
2 0
U-
0
0
ch:f
co
z
to
O