The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About#landuse case.HP.707 N 3rd St.0014.2008.AHPCZ.07 N. THIRD 0014.2008.AHPC 2735.121.09.004 MAJ. DEV. HPC. APP 00.---Ill....I-- ....... __~r -Â»fâ€ž- ljL (f, 1 4 0 til le P 7 . . . 0 . . .. . .W -Z}â€¢2~3=' U L. j. 1 , I â€¢a ,-1,- ".. - // esign Inc. 1, CO 81611 Fax 970.925.8392 nents and plans is and specifications right of the Architect gn any other work nor on for any use n permission. Written edence over scaled trifyed at the job site. icy shall be brought :hltect prior to fle ence ird St. '00 /ED 2008 SPEN LOPMENT oecd Plan nued Proposal Prawings e ER '. 1 \\ h\\ 1. \ SITE PLAN I I -: -. . I. IN\/ ....\\\ . . 0 0 . . 0 . , 1 1 Â¢ Â«12 3 4, . I Milwvn ' - ... . 0 T Â· Â·- -=191 - l~~02:77*'.mt:~2 $~ 0. Â¢1 --- e: --LB**,-I:*1.*, '..2311 8 ,32 1:7- t, 4% a,/Aill"i/m=<4*~le'Illigi#inxili dii:2/55/4 4 IFNE,# M>*4*8yl~4206Â» AWZI 43,2.- d,"6.Lmm n</tdÂ£'r'*1, 449,7/224* fimr:7 4 tifilÂ«*ilÂ»'.*9145,r,I~.~~eLW..~.~,I ~~7 .e ~ 4204. i,&2$1118 -44*#Ast-â€¢ -01- f#,tifi%14' /es'â‚¬ Zqg 2~M, *93/-7 2%49. AF,~1'i 81 3H/#/i ~ 13<Mib 2~/%/ 1â€¢41/7838 -245~ '06 i F 3.-3% L,4~4&2> : A .- I. 1.1%' fle# 79Â£4*quis##WjÂ«1148** - * - â‚¬4. A . . .... .: - . 1 - e - . ,/247.4~~7Â·Â·~, /~Â·g~'43 ~tiel ... - -k . . 4'.*' ./ .-I ..... . ... I ...... - 6 - . 0 - '4 11 11 a , . ..... e . .. . 1 . 1 1 . , . ... 1 1 - 0 1 . . I- . - 0 .... . - .. . I ..1 .- . . 1 ... 4 -*.0 ... I. lili A; I 1 . 4 . ... ' 11 -I ... -- . .* I ;I. i -- - - : - A . . 0 . . . MINDOWS Loewen-OF Mood Frame UNIT AREA PlINPORS UNIT AREA VERIFY HEADER HT./'R.O. Aluminun Glad TYP. ruslang Brown (84 ft.) U-VALUE - (84. ft) . U-VALUE ---__ 1 9Â·wx 9,1 Awn/ng 35 17 e.0.11.- 108'. 1 ' .38 B.O.H.- 107'-0" S'wx 5'-Sh DouNe Hung 3'wx 51-qh Double Hung .38 1 8 BON.-105'-a 3'wx ah Awning .35 B.O.H.- 101'-0" 9'wx 5=qh Double Hung .38 1 4 B.oÂ·H.- 108'-C 9'wx 3'h AwnIng 55 B.O.H.-101'-0" S'w* 9-ah Double Hung 7-ew x 2'-ah AwnIng .35 .38 20 8.034.- 106'-8' B.O.H.-107'-0' eilleepie Avenue 2'-BW x 2'-Sh Awning .35 2-6 1/2'Lux 9'h Awning 35 21 B.O.H.-106'-8" B.O.H.-107'-0" S'wx 15'-qh Double Hung .98 22 B.O.H.-106'-8' 9'w x 9'-4h Awning 5.0.H.-107'-0" .93 2-8wx W- lh Double Hung .3 8 23 B.O.H.- 106'-8" .95 3'w x 9'-*h Awning B.O.H.- 108'-4" 0 2'-aux 5'- 1 h DouD/0 Hung .38 24 8,0,H,4 06'-8" mu x e'-411 Awn/ng .35 5.0.14.-108'-4" 4 2'-Blux 51-1 h Double tung .38 25 rew X 41-all Casement .33 S.O.H.-108'-4" O.H.- 106'-8" 2'-5wx 15'- 1h Double Hung .36 2-6wx4-$ 2.ment 35 Al Beyer Design Inc. 10 5.0.14,108" 1 2 3 4 41ON, Mill B-11 â€¢Aspen, CO 81611 26 B,O.H.-106'.8" 2'-ew* 6-Sh Double Hung .38 11 B.O.H.-107'-cl" 1 ~i. Phone 970.925.8339 â€¢ Fax 970.925.8392 2'-aw* 5-5Â¥, Double Hung 49 46 12 6.01,107'-9" All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans B.O.H,-108'-2" N 1 9 1-Swx 6'-clh Double Hung .9 8 1 1 1 1 indicated by these drawings and speclf~cations are the property and copyright of the Architect 3'lux 5'-511 moub/0 +0Â¥ 98 1 1 1 4 and shall neither be used on any other work nor 14 8.0.H, 108'-1' be used by any other person for any use 1 5 sux 5.-eh Poub/e Hung .38 | 1 i 1 whatsoever without written permission. Written B.O.H.- 108'- 1" ~ ~ ~ ~ dimensions shall take precedence over scaled 9'lux 5'-31 Double Hung .38 dimensions and shall be verliyed at the job site. 16 8.0.14.-108'- 1" i I Any dimensional descrepancy shall be brought 21'-10 | | 1 commencement of work. 38' k 5'-11" M 10' EXISTING OFF STREET PARKING 24'-3" to the attention of the Architect prior to 1 1 REQUEST HPOMAIVER OF THE RES DESIGN STANDARDS I i ~ REQUIRING 2 PARKINS SPACES ON SITE. PROPERTY LINE - GRAIG 24,-30 Residence '. BL 1 1" moco h<â‚¬< A 7'-4 1/2' 9 2' 92'-8 1/2, .60 dihe : 3'-2" l42-8If~IL-8" T 1 2, f] 1 .1 0 U.1 J Jill) 707 N. ard St. .9 ---------4 â‚¬ ASPEN, CO A --------------------4% 0 |-12--NEâ‚¬i â‚¬-- - _-1--FIEW-JELIâ‚¬~~ -IniJ fÂ·-3- p...../Oju...../L.-co u- - .4. : -- -- -- - -- 4 A SETBACK --- ----- . I. ' C J = 5 1 1 .% 3..'54.1,~~-,~~1 0 00 1 .- m 1 - ENÂ¢Â®-C- 1 0 L - --- -4-/ I . 1 1 11 1 1.1-4-1,1-14.-:1 1 ~f* 1.~. 2' ; 41 /+ 31 7' 6 9'- 11" L. 91 4 â€ž tÂ¢~ , ;0 1 1 Una , 1 01 1 lilli-i!4 1. 11 KITCHEN Island expose Framing to | - E.0-M't" h Table verlfw orl#lat Entry Ul -- 11 1 1 1 : ir' :rqfgn door looktion--- - 1 g.14: e: 11;h' Â·,1= 1 RESTORE 4-Nial M i 1 â€ž '' - ~ ' ORIGINAL 11 LI'll,i 11'll!..2 1 L===J i L=Â£1 6=U rkMAIN LEVEL 1 YARD I - 9.1 It- 1.11 ik 1 ~ ENTRY *~ ' i iâ€ž 1 1 Â§ \ =a.W 1 1 m APP ANDOR/DOOR ~ \ stop _ STAIRS 0 -___- stereenv Gabinct [c ~ ,- (Per Fratmed evide nce) I ~ 4 10Â©1 1/4 beam above Existing Ceiling .1 h , 49 ------ 1 1 ------------- -14 --9--1 - I Up --3 post ' ------ â€ž93 -42*-d/=1 -+ B upper level ' rbÂ«o - 'R, 1 1 1 6,6 3 1 -~Stove~.~ ' ln Â· d U h N /21 1 1 ' 0 W Fo. 6-=- 1 1 1--+ 1 0 58' 'L f' Â· -1 ' 11...... [=Cr~MUDI;ROOM === ~ Pantry 2 in 3 4/'3 9 1 xj EN+RY Â£ open framed wallâ€¢ ~ in ~ p \ 1~ I "- 0 I LIVING 1 4 111 1 T m 9 7,0 h 92'- 6 1/n, 1.11 . ~ ~ at pantry interior * /~14'r.....C,n 1 fal. Are pIaâ€ž) 0 4 - 1 I kE T h\ --4 4 ~~4 0 4---- --- -1 ---------------5 Book *helvae | 3,â€¢ ,j 10 -- --- 4 4 H-H-EÂ·Ph-I+H-HU-[Â·H--1-H-:rÂ¢4441-[-I-liz-~ ! IÂ·.14 -fi-; [ coate h r 1 h FRONT YARD RECEIVED windowÂ® Ip--~~~ Low Ceiling 1 - (Bath Above) 2 BIook 411 L f-- ----31Â«J------- -1 -----j 3 th _ SETBACK __ __ ,/ 9 1 --- --7- ---------- ~0 - - - --C.------- - X- ------/.- --- ----- # M - ~~~Â» ~ Stair Hall k '' 1:&0 k 91 k -1-1 E .P;- ~g * MA O 5 2008 111 8, * - . .. CJ 4 - 1 - -- - - 3 M. Closet 1 h.1// 1 - 1 ..., OIl -- -- . Â·1 r---9- 1 I__Il-1 N- C .. 9 1 /2. fri-wee or..' r 01 / -- - -- -4 D CITY OF ASPEN 61/2, /9~door- ik 4 g,!1Ff~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 61/2'140. 9'-51/2' 1461/2. 50-2" 4.7" 9'-2" &2'-51/4. 11'-k Closet , . 9'-21/4.. # eÂ·-->1 0/.Â· 9 1/2... 1 0'-B 1/2. 61/2"241~6~2'-'8" ~La'~ 4 1/2 Rall W.1 mount %/ 1 . i /1-Â»1//\ \17 1 \ L 1-_ _ - _ _ _ _1 ~ -1 M. BR ----I -- --- 1 ---- - 1- -- Â£* 16041 --------- ---~-------~--- J, a A------*--- -Â« 24-Â» "Li'*9. 6- - - EXISTINd 3 1 Lf, ~~< -,1 Laundry OFFICE . 424 1 GARDEN B MECH, 3 - C)T.ap. 1 06Â·-o" 1 9- 1 0 SHED 1 - 'Amoom 4 ~ ' 3~AIR~ b 1 1 1 [2 3 3 1 . q /3. i..utull"ill:1111.- .El.~, 1 01; F. 7 \U/ h REVISIONS 1, I L- (4)511/64- f 7 0. ! 1 - - 1 1- . I * VERIFY 2 ~ 1 2/14/08 Proposed Plan j GATE I 3/10/OB Continued Proposal ..Â«reuse orlgt ial M. 50 tri Bath cabinetry Ili , 3'- 1 ' g 5'141' 61/2. . i - Restore top 1 â€¢ 1 2 -1 9 1 -- 1 .1 STEPS 30141 N m 4/24/05 Final Drawings 1 0 1 81'F--1 -- // 3,-4 1/2. , 2' 8" 2' 8" 3'-4" . 3' 7 1/2' 0 * St . 5-5" 4 3' 8% . 1 8" E Tub o 3'><5' / .. . .. :: 3' 8'.. m 111 1 / ..0,11 1 h - Shower E 1 -10 7 L. ' 2.DEN TERRAGE BELOW ' ' - / 1 / %4~17 1 2 -I-trrp t, TI - 1|91 litlÂ·tin,1 flf-litÂ·I I 4Â·ti-tÂ·tt ZÂ£~j_[tr, 1 --i ' /1 E 34'-2'4 / r 4 3.1 1 - -- -- - 4 -- -- -- --- .- -- -- I. E -------4----- -------M----- --- W------- 12 / ..turA 1 / -1 ICQ. 6 ..4-7 6' -1-24161~ 1 2.4:2226Â£- -21....1Â»*214:1---1-=1Â¥rÂ»Lifi 7-3 i.imSB -l -j>4-uoi ,-.-13 67'uff~F-7il ~ A-i, ~1 - PROJECT NUMBER . 4' 5'- 11" . 31 '' 5'-3" ' Â· -- \4-AL, 4 ..* 2' SETBACK (Fbr new Subgrade r.- 7 b In 41 , . in VARIÂ»ICE Retaining wall and Terrace) 4 4 h DRAWN BY: S.S., A.B. .. PROPERÂ¥Y LINE ~ , r . CHECKED BY: A.B. 4 ..1 481 /*3 it---7 ISSUE DATE: 4/29/08 A I SHEET TITLE AND NUMBER 0 Z fÂ» MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN El) w e SCALE: 1 /40' . 1 '-O â€ž House is moved * 5'- 11 North and 24' East from existing location. S New location conforms to Res Design Standardsâ€ž (existing location does not) MAIN LEVEL 10' Front Yard Setback 6'-8 Side Yard Setback ........ r i q'- 101/2. 1 1'-1 10 PROPERTY LINE . 1 1 -, L L - 123,16 P.441 41JON 3Nll AllJZI,IOhld 6 1 n~Ii 9-61'2' ...... ININDOPIS Loewen-OF Aood Frame UNIT ABEEA VERIFY HEADER HT./IR.O. Aluminun Clad Typ. Tuscang Brown (94. fU U-VALUE 3 / custom Triangular .98 Gillespie Avenue 2'-Swx 5'h Casement .95 9 1 5.0.14.116'-S" 92 custom Triangular .3 8 2'ew>< 5'-alh Double Hung .38 99 5.0.H.-117'-10" 34 28Wx 5-ch Double Hung .38 B.O.H.â€¢117'- 10* 2'6Wx 5'-qh Double Hung .98 35 B.O.H.-11 1-10' 96 Gustom Triang ~S~ Al Beyer Design Inc. 5, custom â„¢a-ar 1 2 3 4 .Se 1 1 1 41 ON. Mill B-11 â€¢ Aspen, CO 81611 3 8 custom Triangular 38 119 4(3-) 1 ' Phone 970.925.8339 â€¢ Fax 970.925.8392 3 ~ custom Trtangular All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans | Indicated by these drawings and specifications 1 1 are the property and copyright of the Architect i and shall neither be used on any other work nor be used by any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. Written dimensions shall take precedence over scaled ~ ~ 3'- 11" M commencement of work. 21'-10" | | Any dimensional descrepancy shall be brought dimensions and shall be verifyed at the job site. 4'-215/16, 2 8'- 41 1/16Â· to the attention of the Architect prior to 24'-3" 1 1 1 1 PROPERTY LINE . 1 1 1 CRAIG 24'-S" A Residence 'f 1'-6". '0 i 0 1 1 707 N. ard St. 1\ ASPEN, CO SETBACK 1- \\ 1 1 1 0 A + 1 I mUI 1 11/2.~2 i 32 1 ) 1 1 1 C % i 1 1/2,12 Roof Below - - - -A < Vaulted Ceiling Below -IX r ~ ment TrueÂ® carries roof | 1 El 3 1 1 EX~STING , EXIS~r|ble 1 8 i d 1 YARD C , 1) 1 12:12 ' 12:12 | | | Vell)( r-m / 1 1 4 1 1 .be *11// 1\ N fom 4Â¢46' \ 1.- ex#oecd Beam ' 1 ./ 1,1 1 4, -' 'â€¢- 1 L:. .-___r-_ _ -.--14+......~=:.gws:-;.stit~t,Na' ?zereXhst.:Â»e~- 7.iÂ·:Â·2:3Â«ry.J3*06.Â»â‚¬,Â»22.~Â»liVeÂ»f.Â·2 .*%2:.Y,E'24/ 1 . B 1 1 1 It, \ A a , // 21 22 \ I . ' 4' 1- 1 ' il - 1 + ..--- -\ .- ---] - .. ..U ---- 7---Â« -Â§172-5. .Velux r-=:~ 2 A \ 1464f1711Â·--7/6-.-----.--0-N+--- --6.,i 1 t--7 ' 1 9,!11 2 el \1 4-------4--2 686 1*2â‚¬1 / / F 7 /- --\ : ; 4 fom 4646 -/- /21 . .t~ 1 1 A I ~'El $ 0 . ) 1 . 6 1 , r I 1 I / c,UPPER LEVEL ~ 1 1 ,---Pr IN 1 1 / r ~ 440.F. 110'-7 3/4" W tr I 1 11/10*95 46 .....:2.-3 folte..46 Roof Below :- 47 7.0,4,- 108'-22 / 1.-.. -.. 6 - . - 1 ~ / , ~ 1 - 11#ATH=Â·:Â·=y/% - 1 | 2â€ž6 floor Joistâ‚¬ 6 1 0 K- - *-. -# .-84.--\ 0 011 KALLS BELOM 1- tâ€ž / - i L .......49559 ' - EXISTING G U A 1 ' in Z. 1= 1 ----1* fit --27~" ian-4 10=--5 3 12:12 4.--9 1. /91 - RECEIVED 1 L---6 0 ~ii 4: -yl 1 1.352- 11~11 11-,n,-11 , 11 7 1 1 '. .-- -~- ----- -- --4 /1 MAY 0 5 2008 0 -4---*.----- ----- ------- -- 7 . 11 1 1.4 1 J COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF ASPEN /1 + v f 1 I W--=A ri m .i ~- <_ -fil I-- el 1 3 'Â§ i i -1 ./ 1 1 v 1 1 1 WALLS BELOK A THERMAL SOLAR PANELS ~ 1 *- REVISIONS I i I 2/1 4/06 Proposed Plan 1 011 1 ill 3/10/08 Continued Proposal 1 "ti I 4/29/08 Final Drawings el 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 E E ---------- ------------------------------------------ 11 %0 iA PROJECT NUMBER PROPERTY LINE DRAWN BY: S.S., A.B. CHECKED BY: A.B. <9 0-3 <<921 V ~Â»/,f A ISSUE DATE: 4/24/08 I O SHEET TITLE AND NUMBER Z ~-x UPPER LEVEL/ ROOF PLAN 2 SCALE: 1 /4" . 1'-0 A-3 S UPPER LEVEL . . 0 . . 0 . . 5'-61/1 4 11'-11Â» PROPERTY LINE 11'-11" xi & I e K,35Â·Â·2â€¢1'r 123Â·49 P.441 41-ION Roof Below Gillespie Avenue Al Beyer Design Inc. 41ON, Mill B-11 â€¢Aspen, CO 81611 i 1 1 1 Phone 970.925.8339 â€¢ Fax 970.925.8392 /-6 1 4/3-9 1 t4 1 1 1 All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans Indicated by these drawings and specifications I are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be used by any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. Written dimensions shall take precedence over scaled dimensions and shall be verifyed at the job site. . 21'- 10" ~ ~ ' ~ to the attention of the Architect prior to 24'-3" Any dimensional descrepancy shall be brought 98' M k 5'-11" 0, 10' commencement of work. 1 1 1 PROPERTY LINE '' '~ 1 1 Ill GRAIG 1 1 1 1 292 1 1 1 1 = <50 Residence e KYâ‚¬ 8 , 4 . 24'-3' 6 5'-119 / 4 9 h / -IQ111 1 <lf}lf) 107 N. ard St. ASPEN, CO K- ----------------------------------- SETBACK v p v pr, p 9 .9 'I. I 1 1 \\Iii \1\1//*fil\IiI//\\IiI\ 97 Ill in CloSet #lb K /2 6|-51/18' 41/2~ , A" P 1'-01/2.E- 11'- 10" 31/2... L ** . For'ch - .. ~ Above E~ - 1 - '= 491 - - 111 1 I m Z -m 92~ r - 1 . b - 3 1 - 1 -1 r-- 1 h ,5'ath #1'B---21-J .5, P 0Â£ Ill 1 1 O - 3 1 1 12 -- showar acu 1 4 v I - . te AJ 1 1 1 - --~ 0, .. ., . /,Cl ~t- --x-v. ~ - -I.- /x.FTeJ -- -.- - - - i ~lv 2 1 m ' 7 L 3.=1 U C.Fi), ~ - ~ --- -/ I it -41-- --- r--- --- ... - .9 E-t-2..I~7 5 CD 1 1/0 1 - '' ,.1 '..0 1/2Â· 15'-3"/18' 6'-81/2Â» '. 5'- 11" 1 '-01/21 . f L -r 0 m 1 4 . 1.- 0 2 -10 02/ p -- r 1 9 4.1 1 P U- *RED ROOM - RECEIVED --- ------- ----4 G L 1 - #- -* -#+ . - -# - -- 2 2 9 . V '7 7. I I 7 1..P L~/T.O. Slab- 84'-4 9 b V . Al /O A 0 - = - ------~-fiftvjjikil I L_l.-â€žr- l- - ----------------------- --------f-- -- - 82'-1" 1 9 Z TV MAY 0 5 2008 1 1 CITY OF ASPEN : typ. - D i 4 0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT . Storage GUEST BR . UPI T.O. Slab - 89'-4 -12 Sloped 1/2 Flali Raillne PC ) 10' -~r--r-r-r-r---r-r- -r-thr-> ~ U 7 10 - 7 ---7 -- Gloest /4,-1 - I. . w-C- ~0 - I.J. 4 : r~4 I I 1 i I i stgrale Melow â€¢;air, FRONT YARD SETBACK - Ill1111111 '- i|||| lITI'll Egress 1 7 111!1111!111 Alndow , ,-i I 1' ~E!, -- FT r f. F -. I N REVISIONS E -1 4 PJ- , .1 ,.1Â·111........__.....,i':!i 'i'~'' Lim li,i , 111' --- Fl:71 GUEST BATH * - 2/14/05 Proposed plan imt .,M * a 1 12*-1- -1- -lil#*-1- - - 1- 1- T~ - - -- - 1- 3/10/08 Continued Proposal ie*Jps lup 1 1 ~ '' .1/2â€¢ 11~2â€¢ ' I " I ' I 1 1 W 4/24/08 Final Drawings 7 '. 42'-6. .~ 17* 6'-8 2'-8" ~. ,. 1-2" . 1, 2'-110'I 91 2'-6" . I I 4(-8'E . 0 o Egries 6% , 0- 11 ., .. , 0 I 1 0- GARDEN TERRACE SLOPED 1 - Lkj V ' GRADE -- 4 674 1 4 L- - -J - PROJECT NUMBER I. 28' . 4'-8" 4 2%-e- 10 1' 4 in h 2' SETBAGK (For new Subgrade DRAWN BY: S.S., A.B. VARIANCE Retaining wall and Terrace) PROPERTY LINE 4 4 I I CHECKED BY: A.B. 4-0-9 <A ISSUE DATE: 4/2 4/08 A I SHEET TITLE AND NUMBER 0 Z c, BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A E SCALE: 1 /4" - 1'-O A-4 S BASEMENT ........ 4 3 2 * 1 A BÂ©* ftp + E (t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i ! 1 1 J 1 1 1 1. Elk -Raised Profile 'Weatheredwood- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 40wr. Asphalt Shingles , 1 1.Elk -Rateed Profile heatheredwood"- 1 1 40'Ar. Asphalt Shingles 2.Cold-Rolled Standing Beam Metal Roof i 1 1 1 1 e ; 1 1 2. Cold-Rolled Standing Seam Metal Roof /1 \ 1 ' Al Beyer Design Inc. 1 410 N. Mill B-11 â€¢ Aspen, CO 81611 ' Phone 970.925.8339 â€¢ Fax 970.925.8392 1 1 1 1 1. 12~11 I I .1 All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans 1 1 12 i indicated by these drawings and specifications / *1 E-31113@ H Nit N 712 ~ are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be used by any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. Written 12 EnÂ·i-Â· ---.-'-'-.--+-12--~~-~~~~~''-<' '"+.+.-- ---- dimensions shall take precedence over scaled / dimensions and shall be verifyed at the job site. 27 - 1/ \ Any dimensional descrepancy shall be brought i - ] -- 14~k[-_~,i_~1-#_1_.1._1_L I L L 11 il 1-K-~11 4-1 - ---- T 1 1 , 1 1 --- -- ----- --- commencement ofwork. to the attention of the Architect prior to 4 n -_ _ - ETTT 6 -4 I 1 1-9 itu {-_i --f~-fl' . --- ----------- - -ffiffolf'poff--41 4'--i<-5,1-{_l- I~~ - Â»- - i ~ TIL J--4 -- E-flf[ FI- i__ I 1 T -r - .... -[- [ T -i. -- . ---â€ž.,-- 1 2,-4-- i. - t--l'= -F~ - i' k MUU--- IT'I -[[~F -LIi El....I_11 1 [I- [1-Ii IlL___11 ~~__.....I~ 9 4 --[ F -1- 11-1- 7-I-1 i T ] f 2 11.-~ I [T-f -1.~-[-1~-l- -~ ---------- --------~-- ---- --- f U-li t] Tl 1-'-1, li li -Filil -L -1 .f--MT~ni'-triT-1 - -1- 1 6- -1- -9 VE 10-] -1-- a Lf ' ATIFI 1[-1 1[1- -T 1[ -[ .f--111 GRAIG i f.. 11 fl- 1. r I T--11 1-[-3 1--ETT.LTL 11-11 1 - ____ -- -~--f-- --- -_Fillill-13 ~- 111 ~F~-FitilIT]-- - 1.1 12- (- 1 F. L l-Y-3.1 .-i-I II I 17 -1' -1- [-J IT- ELI11. i ~J [ 3-I-~ 9TILT: L 1 7 ~81, i r~ 5 -L ' Residence _________~_ ~~~~~~~__~_~~~~~___~____ ~~~~~~~_~_~~_ ~~~_~~____ ____ {034 Â£~-fiT_Lt'li~ hi+11---IF -'r-l-dI ~93'32,1-fk E- .- 12[IZE] - _' _ ~~~~~~~ w ~ 1 --rÂ£- 2 | 707 N. Brd St. ASPEN, CO 3. Stone Veneer - match existing 4, Cedar shake/shingle elding 3. Stone Veneer - matoh existing 4.Gedar shake/ehingle e IdIng 1.MBR addition wood elding stevie footing/Fnd. of original structure. (would like to reuse exleting roof shakes) stone Footing/frld. of original structure. (Reuse exteting roof ehakee) matches original historic sid Â®_NORTHELEVATION <n Â»IEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /4", 1'-0 4-424*4"-nu----4-- E A 1 9) el-2 1 ~ IT i 1 1 2 + 34 1 Ill 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 : Ill i I I 1. Elk -Raised Profile Â»Aeatheredwood- ' ' 1 1 1 1 1 40yr. Asphalt Shingles i 1 1.Elk -Raised Profile Â»Weatheredwood'- 2. Gold-Rolled Standing Seam Metal Rool ' 401;r. Asphalt Shingles -I x I I t. 11 Li i , 1 Lul . 3 1 ~ J~2*zab'- , r~---1-Â» t~-L--I - - ~dit-i-f- n. 29Â£i~ ~ 9-1-11 . Thermal Solar Manele 1 1 1 4-j--1-+4444172 -4- - -- CE'-Ljox 72._- [\ 1 1 RECEIVED MAY 0 5 2008 n. 4 1 12 1797 /1~ '41-*I 1-- T,/ 1/1.ilf,9-1 11-'~ & Lf,).27,11 1 ..]ti~iÂ»IrtÂ»irI,3317.ittiff-~ i ~ I l J 4 \.-LÂ·-1-Â·,-173-1-r-4-1 -_1-1-1 L._1~-17.44~4~1.. 12[~~ Â· 4 | LI! 1-1.71 F.\11.,T'r 1 ..% 1 1111. T I .t,3 ,fl J. p.-'Â·1 1-ir--f Il-LIPLE~r--L Ilr 6 11 -4-1 - L iT..~.1, L. 1...a , -_ I. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1 1 Li 11\I~Juj _~ftrÂ·6Â·Â·fuitiftÂ»4 -i ~1-u~-4-1>. nr-- I ---_ --____I_~ . 1 1 1 1 '1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 11!1 f lililli'11 1.- 4-3,1 -1~~ ~~ f---- FTEMEMEMEM3 ' 2/14/08 Proposed Plan 2 11 lilli .- - 11 1- 1 11*il 11* 11 4/24/06 Final Drawings * ~:2~~-----~~2 < 2=Er----1||| MA ||~1~ '-FI---'[-_'~T. 'l - f 1---1 - - Continued Proposal 11~ 1 - L F l 112~- ~ _ _ 1. T ' A N-1 Â·1--1-1 rÂ·Â·-Â£!- T-1 9, 1 1.r-L..T T T-I~Â·-1-Â·Â·LÂ·T~-1-[Ij-J-]ri~-4111rfi__7_~ T-11-j~-125Â·j tit-!..i~JO~~'(1Â·I- liff FE]-1-]- 1-1-ifi-r [-F] _ -162_-7-1 - --- J ......[El. ... 7 [. 0 [23 CI] 0 [23 C. D J r..7.=7-1 7.=Jan 3 - =====-. - - -- - ---- - 1 i| 11 1 ~1 '1' 3 11; _ 4.....clÂ·I-/---I.. rrumÂ·ri- .-' CD O CD .-3 .... m CO li i _ PROJECT NUMBER eMBR addition wood elding 4.cedar shake/shingle stding DRAWN BY: S.S., A.B. 3.MBR addltion wood elding 4. Cedar shake/ehingle siding 5. Stone Veneer - match existing matches original historic eldIng (would like to reuse existing roof sh matches original historlo elding (Reuse existing roof shakee) stone footing/frld. of original structure. 2 N ;11 11 CHECKED BY: A.B. c--, EAST ELEVATION i=-- ' =-4 )1 1 11 SCALE:-1/4"--1LQ A . fl~ 8/ '=-11 .10 1-111 4@ 111 L. .-i..... TYPICAL ROOFS: ISSUE DATE: 4/29/08 1. Original Roorf- Elk or 64 FNeathered Mood 40 wear Composite Shingles over Ice+Mater Shield over y . 4> . I-1 over CoX pIg over rafters w/ e" min. (R-42) rigid spray Insulation. 2. Lower Sheds- and MBR 12: 12 Roof- Cold Rolled Standing Beam Metal over Ice+water Shield y over cox ply overrafters per Struct. w/e"min. (R-42) rigid spray insulation. SHEET TITLE AND NUMBER TYPICAL SOFFITS: Match Existing at original structure cn SOUTH ELEVATION TYPICAL FASCIA: Match existing/ original (Verify existing quarbles are original- remove If not) SCALE: 1 /4" - 1'-0 < TYPICAL FLASHING: Match existing TYPICAL EXT. MALLS: 2. Horizontal Mood Slding duplicating original horizontal eldlng over 5 1/2" core Bps panels 4. Cedar ehakes/ or shinglee. Reuse existing roof shakee. 1. Stone Veneer - match existing stone footing/fnd. of original structure. ELEVATIONS . . . . . . 0 . 1 4 3 2 1 + 1 + 2 + 3 4 1 1 1 Ill : 1 6 1 1 er Design Inc. â€¢ Aspen, CO 81611 8339 â€¢ Fax 970.925.8392 1, arrangements and plans ;e drawings and specifications and copyright of the Architect be used on any other work nor ither person for any use out written permission. Written take precedence over scaled ;hall be verifyed at the job site. descrepancy shall be brought of the Architect prior to of work. 'RAIG isidence 1 7 N. ard St. SPEN, CO MECH ~ROOM ~ T.O. 4100' F EVED 0 5 2008 OF ASPEN 7 DEVELOPMENT Proposed Plan Continued Proposal Final Drawings ER 3., A.B. l.5. 1 u If "* rf ISSUE DATE: 4/24/08 11 ~ ~ - --- ----- --- ---------- -- Il - 1 1 W' 1 1 1 1 ~ i. . 1 1 -â€ž SHEET TITLE AND NUMBER 1, 5 ~:- 4 -J 1 ' Â»=====T-- -- :1 In 1 1 W 1, A- 6 - I it--4-1 ,--11 44 ...1 BASEMENT rk . P 1 " 1,1 E Ii:1 : : 1.*~1 T.O.ConGStab-84'-4~ cl.' SECTIONS rh SECTION <* SECTION ~Â·~/; SCALE: 9/ 1 6",1'-O C J SCALE: 9/16",1'-0 . . . . . . 0 . -2, - - S K S M / ./ K - 43% T 1 a 1-- S a 7. E - =.- 0. . - - - -- - 0 %%%3+F 0 - g = )=.--- .. a - - A ~ . I == C E '= ii i I - ., : 1 . #. 0. -.. 4),1,11&231.IFF+,Qvf,v, akiA *Aunim.. ....Â·. ........w â€¢ ...Â·â€¢Â·..Â·.'re.Â· . Â·.w,v.Â·.Â·.Â·.w.Â·.Â·,w,Â· Â· 4 0 1 0 . ....0 i./.Yâ€¢Y 'i, iwii'i iâ€¢A *'i'*i'i ,'i'*W . #.', *ii,4, ,â€¢,Yâ€¢,0,â€¢.Y ./'.'i'r...Y.'i........i,â€¢i. ..................... E = S - - .. e . e .. ... I li~ 3- i , . 0 .. -0 . I I 0 0 0 . - 1/ -a Â£ $ - -1 --- 11 / 1/Jimm~- mi * m -lu *.74' ....4 , - .... '*V,V,* M - -~i - - %= , .- 0 2 . t. -> $ ..I:. ; M = |1 2 .= I 2 3 2 - == 323 - sEE E E - f... -*9=2 = 1 - E = - - -- /2 imall/El-/1/.1-/I~, - 2 .. 0 ill â€¢77:Â·m,mwmm,w.Â·.1.; ,Â·,Â·,Â·,Â·,.,., .. A.*'â€ž.- . 4:M:m:;M:,:M:m:;A,b;:,:m:e. -., ...,',. â€ž.â€ž.i.w. m:M:â€ž~:, ,+ ~~~ ;;,~04~;1,~;~'lli,~M*;,;;0'*9;",;4;,il;~';;,w,',; â€žâ€ž,,**w -â€žâ€žâ€žâ€žâ€ž, â€ž,, f â€ž-Fâ€ž â€ž4,;- - ,;~;;~7;; , ,,70,;;~;~Q,;1,5; , x 1 .1.1.1.. '. . ...11 ..1.....1..., ..-1..1, .......1 , .. 0 i 'll/// --. 2 - M - I. &1cn-=-M - - =-ase==-ame= - I - - N= - - g - I ./ li * 2 g . S = = . 2 - + - 5 - - 0 . 1 .. -, 0 P . - 0 6 6 6 66 1 *.- l S - C EE En -M=-- EE =2222=*Evi -- 0 0 -"- 1! :: . . EE 2 ,.. : . 1: -- :E = I - rdIQIQI 1'289â€¢ Xe.92 Â£Â£*mj.wm.u.lue.tÂ«Â«DE*Â»>Ii)>EEÂ«Â«*)1*XoÂ»Xetâ€¢Â»Â»MO>Â»IÂ«â€¢' 4 . ..O M , THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0014.2008.AnPC PARCEL ID NUMBER 2737-121-09-004 PROJECT ADDRESS 707 N. Third PLANNER Sara Adams CASE DESCRIPTION Final Review - Major Dev Ref: 0005.2008.AIIPC REPRESENTATIVE Al Beyer Design, Inc; DATE OF FINAL ACTION 5/14/2008 CLOSED BY Angela Scorey .4 4 *lK.C.4 -43 <N 2â‚¬Fâ‚¬eANCE To 707 N.Thad Â»N* 00(4 ~30Â©y.Â»pc FoR -1-Ths -Â«wess 145(1 ~4 Â· 01 - 004 Eile Edit Record Navigate Form Reporis Format Lab Belp @ 43 i 4140 61.1 -3 J. 14 4 , *1021*4 010 il â‚¬1 ~1 13 d . J laÂ®[ba 914 ~pii~ Maluation I Custom Fields | actions ~ Fees | Parces | Fee Summarg | Sub termits | Attachments | Routing Status |Routing lIN Permit Type ~ Permit # ~0014,2008.AHPC Address |707 N THIRD -g] Apt/Suite ~ City ~ASPEN state RE-El Zip ~81611 .21 Permit Information : Master Permit ~0005.2008.AHPC -~ Routing Queue ~aslu07 Applied |05/05/2008 _| | Project | -2,~ Status |pending Approved | Description ~ MAJOR HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT - HPC IN REFERENCE TO 0005.2008.AHPC. RELOCATION, 3' SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK Final | 16* 1* Submitted ~AL BEYER 925-8339 Clock @W~ Days [~-- Expires |04/30/2009 11 Nit 2~ Owner -1 Last Name KRAIG CAROL G -g.~ First Name ~CRAIG CAROL G PO BOX 18 WOODY CREEK CO 81656 Phone ~ -- 12 Owner Is Applicant? Applicant 44, Last Name ~CRAIG CAROL G -~ First Name ~CRAIG CAROL G PO BOX 18 - ~ WOODY CREEK CO 81656 4#Â· Phone ~ Cust # ~28070 -1 =.1 #,f jf j i. Lender ~ Last Name | g.~ First Name ~ Phone ~ Enter the proiect name AspenGold(bl ~ p Record: 2 of 2 3%1 1 1 A 1/1- 64 *044 ov Div ' t?L 0006.10%. AlÂ® w. .7. r- =qp04 [ sdno,9 qe31 .. Jen n,-Or CRAIG RESIDENCE Sec f 904 644 toi Meeting Agenda , i Prepared by Mt. Daly Enterprises, LLC ~A* 4-0 Â£~ft-Lt/ <~0/h June 24,2009 1. Entrance Walkway - has this already been detailed? 2. Area Outside of Fence: a. Third Street - beautiful planting around ditch b. Gillespie - wild grasses with narcissus and perhaps other flowers 3. Area Inside of Fence along Third Street: Woodland Garden 4. Graveled Area with Retaining Wall along Face of House: Flagstone Steppers in gravel 5. Hedge between Neighbor to West: a. Shrubs: Rocky Mountain Maple, Red Twig Dogwood, Blue Mist Spirea b. Grass: Karl Foerster Grass 6. Path to Lower Area - flagstone on sand or on concrete? 7. Fence: a. Historic Fence across front building along Third Street and side along Gillespie b. Existing Fence across back of property - should it be replaced? c. New fence to west of house - new 6' board fence 8. Pathway from Gillespie to house: Flagstone on sand 9. Sideyard Garden and Lawn Area a. Aspen tree near corner of house (too much shade?) b. Circular Patio of flagstone c. Garden areas: sunny border garden surrounding patio and shade garden near back door. Color preference? d. Areas beneath existing trees - what will the City allow? 10. Maintenance 97-Fl ~1194 14- /TUVIPLEP PAVER PRIVE STRIPS + 09 ----IiiÂ©*er---.---------UN /LASTONE PATÂ¥\ ,LON BRON / @RASSES / & WILPFLOWERS 1'-4 LOÂ¥\/ BRON BRAMES E R i !1 13 TALL MISTORK FENDE t / EXISTNe / L'% f $ 4417 / 2 2#7 (MAVEL) oARPEN "' " '~ " ~~ E + 99 34' eARPEN ==,~ i 2 *.<t PRYSTAk 1 / E ARPEN --- , 1/ 1 >-METAL - E 0 4 H " || 6*~Pffs I'P qp, Ik I C]' E + 104 29 1 Epe#Ne *IRUDS ~ 0 1 E Z 111 - f IRREELLAR \ -- -- 1403, i -4) X 'Pt) <Il' DIAMETER ~ 06;NE POÂ©fl E AMUR MAPLE | FLABSTONIE PATIO j 4- 954 / BARDEN - 82 R. 1 1 - if I L \1 / Ik~ . 0% LAWN tv f X 2'x.' STRIP ~ -,11 -KETAI - 1 DRIAN; Â« PA111 al - - U %-METAL EP@INe ~ BARPEN \LIt 9'9Â·Sf . V--7 i. Epethe FAT eATE rLY I+ frE 10230 V X â‚¬8JNEL ~*~ 3 \14.2 eARPEN ~ + 00?54 + 9904' ~==ILiiI2332zzz~Ne 1 + N 11 '- I U 1 4 f j r.-%%~\ E. 32.1= 1 .t =4 LeoÂ·-3 ) 1 LOWER FATIO 5-AIRS (// 61 1 eARPEN ~-4 - 1 '.. MERD BARPENS-- I - - - - - - I EXFSTIN@ 3 ,-â„¢ \ 4 BRAVE 1. eRAVEL =97(2 413,01,1-V -17 r--, ,-n --n r--, rn ,rn Lut ...2 \0 - 271 1" $ A S S S 2 .4. 4 , 91 MI 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 L=..) C-P Cm-' C--7 iv-* 4â€ž-A~ 14 - 14 '~ VII6I~Pe ~EX. NtleMPOR FENDE Â£ PILAN 12 1 DOeNOOD OR SMORT MISTORIC FENCE FENDE TO MATCM EX. 1 DRAEAPPLEI ROCKY MOUNTAIN MAPLE MEPefE NEIâ‚¬*le,O'R INDE L-1.0 :13*. 9 . 0 . Sara Adams Mjwt- MON Lt MN 4 From: Sara Adams Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 11:33 AM To: 'Al Beyer'; Doug Throm; Mike McKie; scott slogan; Jennifer Craig Subject: RE: HPC monitor meeting Hi Al, I met with the 2 HP Monitors last night about some of the items below. Our response is in red. Could you please send over an elevation showing the proposed gates for the fence that allow access to the garage? HPC will probably want to see what it could look like. Thanks for the landscape plan. My information is due to HPC a week from today (3/19), so it will be great if you could send the elevation of the gate over by next Wednesday. The project really looks great so far! Thanks! Sara -----Original Message----- From: Al Beyer [mailto:abd@sopris.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:10 PM To: Sara Adams; Doug Throm; Mike McKie; scott slogan; Jennifer Craig Subject: HPC monitor meeting Sara, Per our meeting today here are some pictures to review parts of the discussion. Hopefully you can give us the go ahead for the following: 1.low roofs to be "weathered galvalume" standing seam roof per site sample. 12" centers 1" ribs. New addition low roof to be gray or black membrane. New 12:12 roof to be the standing sean metal. Original house roofs to be asphalt shingles that look like cedar shingles per original plans. Approved. 2. we are now requesting to not install a window or door on the north wall of the front porch. There is no opening there now and The Owner has decided she prefers that to adding more north facing fenestration. There is no concrete evidence on site that a door or window had been installed in the past so any added options there are as much a guess as leaving the wall solid. See attached picture Approved. 3.exterior siding at the new bedroom addition to be the reclaimed materials from the original house floor per sample reviewed on site. The connector link south side to be sheathed with siding to match original house between shingles at the south addition and reclaimed wood at MBR addition. See attached views showing the intentions. Upper gable areas to have scalloped shingles to match original gable. Approved. 4.flashing skirt below the siding at the new addition to match the roof metal "weathered galvalume" Approved. Other notes of record: A. we still need to show you a drawing of the proposed entry door but the plan remains to keep it modest in style per earlier discussions. B. The decorative corbels remain a bit of a mystery as to their authenticity so it seems like we will probably keep them but will wait for your further - discussion. For now we will preserve them. Still working on this C.reviewed tree removal at proposed garage site. Per an earlier comment from HPC about looking at the trees in the proposed garage area we received a 1 .. tree removal permit after consulting with Chris Foreman (City Forester) so this is not an obstacle to the garage proposal. D.Overall a good review of the progress and an unseasonably fine Spring day. I think this covers most of the points. It would be great to get an approval on the roofing choices as soon as possible so we can get things dried in further. Thanks! A1 2 .t Sara Adams From: Al Beyer [abd@sopris.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:10 PM To: Sara Adams; Doug Throm; Mike McKie; scott slogan; Jennifer Craig Subject: HPC monitor meeting Attachments: no 2nd door at porch.png; south elevation materials.png; north elevation materials.png El Nal 61,/1 LdO tEl no 2nd door at south elevation north elevation porch.png (992... materials.png ... materials.png Sara, Per our meeting today here are some pictures to review parts of the discussion. Hopefully you can give us the go ahead for the following: <low roofs to be "weathered galvalume" standing seam roof per site sample. 12" centers 1" ribs. New addition low roof to be gray or black membrane. New 12:12 roof to be the standing seam metal. Original house roofs to be asphalt shingles that look like cedar shingles per original plans. /. I 2. we are now requesting to not install a window or door on the no#~( ilii of th<- front porch. There is no opening there now and The Owner has decided she prefers that to adding more north facing fenestration. There is no concrete evidence on site that a door or window had been installed in the past so any added opptioils there aFe as much a guess as leaving the wall solid. See attached picture *tw (41* - W [ l 3.exterior siding at the new bedroom addition to be the reclaimed materials from the original house floor per sample reviewed on site. The connector link south side to be sheathed with siding to match original house between shingles at the south addition and reclaimed wood at MBR addition. See attached views showing the intentions. Upper gable areas to have scalloped shingles to match original gable. ~* , 4. flashing skint below the siding at the new addition to match the roof metal "weathered galvalume" --7 Other notes of record: A. we still need to show you a drawing of the proposed entry door but the plan remains to keep it modest in style per earlier discussions. B. The decorative corbels remain a bit of a mystery as to their authenticity so it seems like we will probably keep them but will wait for your further discussion. For now we will preserve them. C.reviewed tree removal at proposed garage site. Per an earlier comment from HPC about looking at the trees in the proposed garage area we received a tree removal permit after consulting with Chris Foreman (City Forester) so this is not an obstacle to the garage proposal. D.Overall a good review of the progress and an unseasonably fine Spring day. I think this covers most of the points. It would be great to get an approval on the roofing choices as soon as possible so we can get things dried in further. Thanks! A1 1 -6 VA A AL .0 /1 A 1,11 -A .. 4 3 1 %14 - * un Ult 070UV~ ABC D E J Ans,ae of cure- note curb to match existing ht on IE I lides v curÂ·b on .est lidia) ... 5'-11.I slope roof / 1/4- / per ft . 4 . ........ % 4 V / 4 a- , Â« 1 Eli -Raised Profile Â·rleat"redwood'- - i 40yr ASOhalt Shlngles Â·t ........,4-/per E. 7 finside of curD- note curb tamatshexistlng ' 1 1 Elk -â€¢a,920 Profilde~tnere=00.- ,/ Mt on N E 5 sides. no orb on /at s,de) 1 2 Low Profile St-ding *am Metal qocf ' 40yr Asphait Shingles 1 61 . 1 11 11 1 - t lili Profile Stalling leal Met/l Roof .Lk 2/ . 1 ~2/ \ 1 11 Ft"NX ~ Al Beyer Design Inc 11 I' 410 N. Mill B-11 â€¢Aspen, CO 81611 1 - - Phone 970.925.8339 â€¢ Fax 970,925,8392 11 1 1. 11 21// --\\ [ 1 1 All designs.ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings and specifications \ are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor i. :. ILLEÂ» MI--1 i : whatsoever without wnrten permission~ Wfltten be used by any other person for any use Elli - dimensions shall take precedence over scaled :-- 1 2 8 1 -= ..................... ... . 1 . 1 4 1 1 1 2= [622.1 Any dimensional descrepancy shall be brought 1 121 litEL:L#-:- -' ' 113/| | i ' corn~nencernent of work to the attention 0( the Architect prior to !1 I * i . 1 I ' dimensions and shall be ve/fyed at the job site, 1 10 2- E- 1-1 1 -2 kIL i i, - i' 1 ., . i i - ----1 E- 1 - ' CRAIS 12*/ 1 .'........'...............M M.M.MIMM........ ... 'U......'...~.......'.9'........------,= j / 1 ~ \ - i || r ,r-- ---1 r.7.-7-1 1-MetaLFI,Ghingekirt Residence 7 Met' F....9 ... ' | 3 Vert "i /"d Sidirg ,, 11 1 1 1 1 0 11 3 5.Ine veneer - match e.,5ti,4 B vertic..00/ Siding stoy footimg/fna of orig,nal/tructure 1 ,~ 1 1 1 - ....11 1 ;1 1: 11 1 1 1 1 'i'~| '' Â·~ 101 N.ardet. rl, 1, ASPEN, CO r :1-1.--1, i ./ sq |t I i i[ 3 6.83 -~.1: 53. Et | ' -r,all area above grade, 1 . 7 4 -(wal: area above grade) | ; [ 1~ Reauted 4 | | 1 ' 1 1~ : III 1 ;~ 6:gh=": ;;1 1 ;11 4 1 1 1 1 '-~ NORTH ELEVATION N- SCALE: 1 /4- - 1'-0 FN -h FNEST ELEVATION 3 SCALE: 1 /4" = 1'-0 1 PUB Al 2 34 31 0. d : 1 Elk -0,6-1 Profile,Neatheredwood-- ('4 ) ie.: Exi9ting .indow to remain V *agr Aspnal: Sh~ngles rverly replacement optons I f not Â· Permit â€¢ 006 2 2008 ARBK 1 Ill -Falled Profle .eathers' .... Ilignal to historic structure) , 2 -ow Profiler 1-max ; Stand" Searn Metal Roof ~ 40yr *sphalt Shingle. Parcel ID/273512109004 ~ v,rifgMer.'.EEÂ·/Â·4'~r.- +-- ....# 1 1 .* ..1 ~1- ,-i== 11 ....al solar ...1/ // Ii : 11 1 1- 132 - 3 \. 0 , , : 1 1 / r \ 132 1 V 1 f 1 1 1 -1 - 1 . 1 1-:- :E=Â«72221- ~i~'~ -Im-1 ~ .%4---%#. - 1 222 4 ' .*17.7 - I I Il! 1 U . - I __ - 1 0 J li:li Iii V I.F. ~ ~ , i~ . ~~ i ~ REVISIONS m 1 Ilwl 11 111 1 H Ptit -il lili I I 2/14/05 Proposed Plan Fa , 1 111-1 111, 4/2 q/OB Final Drawings : 111!ir;' 1|| U~ilt,lze 3/,0/05 Continued Fropesal 3 Ve.J'al ./0/ 5,3,ne 1__- - Â· ~ ~ ~ U- fits'.to 1 - = 1/26/08 60/1 : ,-Â©Peng 5/23/08 Permit original sk ' -~ 2' - ' .- ~ -- - - Â©41 and tri -FFZK!- 1 0 1 - Metal Flash,ng Sk,rt 4 ked/r snale/shiâ€¢gle i ling â€¢4 <Dectar snaka/shinfe siding 5 Stone /enew - match evating ~ : 1 ' 112-----Il--- (Reum.e ex!Btlftg rec' snakes) stone footing/fid of or,ginal st,uoture 5 /erticat........ 4 --1 -1 ' rwould like /0 -euse ex,itim' roof shake PROJECT NUMBER 1. -1 1 1 4 ------ il GB 1 4 1 DRAWN BY: S.S. A.5 11 11' 1 1 F .7-1.- 93 8 id@ r.-1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 .,.~aa verify *mr 1 1 CHECKED BY: A.5 11 d 1 1 1 a ' ' *JJ Construc.tkon 1:, 4 . : 1 1 ~ ~: /4 ' E i . -/ W/~a[1:I:: above gr/te) 1 A 1 1 Â· ' ISSUE DATE: 1/26/08 1 I r. L 270 f ft. above /ade SHEET TITLE AND NUMBER A SOUTH ELEVATION * EAST ELEVATION ~ 75' SCALE: 1 /4* - 1'-0 TYPICAL FOOFSÂ· 1. Original Foof Elk or eq. Reathered load 40 gear Composit' 5/ingles over Ice./ater Shield over SCALE: 1 /44" - 1'-0 over Cpx ply over rafters w/ 6- mli (R-4/3 rigidl spray .sulat,or A-5 2 Lower Sneds- arld Me/ 12.12 /0/f- Low =rofile ( 1- max) Stareing Seam Metal (Verify color and material with H/C Morutor) over laeÂ«later Shield over C.Dx ply over rafters per Strit w/ 6 min (R-42) rgds/ray insulation. TrPICAL EXT YNALLS. 2 vertical ylood Siding over *TS Felt/ or Ty,vek (rle hope to reuse orig. subfloor decking boards) l oedar Shakes/ Shi/gles over *15 Pelt/ or /Vvek ELEVATIONS 5 Stone Veneer at Fou/dation- match existing stone footing/fid. /* c/gial structure *=Irc (or sim.J shingle style panels /Â·" 111 VIF 7. Metal Flashing Skirt extend 1' min. below finished grade) rn - - ... 4.2:i.Â£:r fâ‚¬*fÂ·I A B C D E 43 2 1 .lope roof / 1/4"/per f[ (,n~de of nurl- note curD to match existing Mt cn N E"ides no ourb " Aest side) 3.6.'. 1 Elk -Raised Prole ./.theredwood 40. /sphalt Shingles # 946 -00Â£ 4 Trit zi . 4 (insideof Gue-notecurb tomatchexisting / 1 Elk -Raised Prof le ".el:nere'wood - ,/Mt on' E 9 sides,ocuitcn.ests,de) 2 Low Profile 5tand~ng Beam Metal Accof , 4/Ir A.phal. 5.1ngles 2 Low Profile 'tan'ing leam Metal loof L AIm / 1 11 9 -Â«Â»12 Al Beyer Design Inc \ : I 12 \TI 1 1[33 ~ \ 410 N. Mill B-11 â€¢ Aspen. CO 81611 - . Phone 970.925.8339 â€¢ Fax 970.925.8392 / 1 12 .2 k I AJ' designs, Ideas, arrangements and plans --- indicated by these drawings and speciflcations 1 - . . . are the property and copynght of the Architect 'Tr -cm = 1 -- 4 - - -p 125 Faaa//7Es, be used by any other person for any use | | Â· ' 1 1 i|~i~ whatsoever without wntten permission. Wntten and shall neither be used on any other work nor m: 11 : gi S E : =-- dimensions shall take precedence over scaled dimens ons and shall be verifyed at the Job site. 11 1 1 1 Any dimensional descrepancy shail be brought I !0 1 M 11. to the attention of the Arcnitect prior to commencement of work Â·'' - I.. ' 1 :D i 11-11 1 ' a_-' L_-I: 10_]11- : Ev#: nÂ·d "In J- 15 :- 1 ,Â· J Â· -= 1 I: ~~ ~41â€ž1 â€ž9â€žâ€žM.~.~MMN. 1111 1 1 f .L_ CRA16 - I I . .. --- -1 . ---7 1-MetafF[,shing*kir~ Residence 7 Metai Flallir:..rt 11 1 6 H 3 Vertical ,'Moodetding 5. Stone Veneer - matchexi5trng 3 Vert Gal Mood Sidng I '"- 7 - - -i '1 , 1 1 stone Foot:~//fnd. 04 or[ginai /trÂ·woture I~------2222222-2- ------------3 9 #v Lu___,1, 1 lili 1 1 1 ::: 112 101 N.ardet. 1 1 1 1 ASPEN, CO 1 1 -2----31 1 02 .41''t Â·.,1 ..6/'t 1 1 -- 111 . -1-+ -(u,/are' a.... grill> 1 1.------/ L------J ' 1 .aa area Â®ove graae' \ i I Tri~ ' , 11 1 1 1 1 1 - NORTH ELEVATION N FNEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /4" - 1'-O 441 ' SCALE. 1 /4 - 1'-0 30 5 4 1 0 34 1 Elk -/liled ..rofill ./.thered:Â¢<. ExistÂ·ng wrndow to remain 40. Aechat ..inge' t v Permit # 0062 2005.AREK (verify replacement options if not 1 Elk -Palle' Prof le 7(lathered ./Cd origilal to .storic ..uctwre) 2 Low Profile f Â·-max) landing Beam Metal *OF Verify MateÂ· a. ark Lolor . 1 4Oyr AsÂ¢halt St,Ing~el Parcel IE)#273512104004 1 : 1 1 Thermal Se!ar Pane!9 F .'.W........ ...............'.'. 4.. ... // X\\\ ...ri u. ~. \ /// 1 It \1 1 I/ i- I 2 7,4 1 \ ~..~ ~ 0 . / 11\ 12 07 /2 11 AN \ 1 1: i 1 W - IL 1 1 1 1 j V /,0 - , 4 9% 4 4 -1 IJ r J 5 1 1 1 i n. Hi _ 1 1 "~ ;I i, I li i REVISIONS i I ./ m f. IM] hi t w i I | - - 2/14/08 Proposed Flan 1 L-J ,1, I .--- _-- |0 ~ :1. i v,p ..._________* 16 Ila I Â·1 i i 3/10/08 Continued Fropesal l.-~1 i ' ---------- w-- , 1 ',7 - - fÂ·ts into ' unit size 4/229/03 Final Drawings 5/23/08 Permit .. 3 ver. cal .00/151/1.0 -L __, . ~ ' - 7/26/08 0 0 ' A ' original sk Id al/tr 1 1 . ./.i: , i ", '~ A 7 Metal Flashing Skirt , El > 44 cedar 'Make/shingle siding 5 Stone Veneer -maton existing (Reuse asting red shakes, scone foctfng/Fri or orig~na[ struoture ..ertical./06...g ' 5 "v EVE (Uould"ketoreu5~â„¢~7'roo,shake -i~ 4 6.dar shake/shingle 31/1/9 PROJECT NUMBER 1 I . 1 11 : N !L :: . 1 1 DRAWN BY. 5 5, A B It 1 i a Â·Â·i[ 32 g I rr '11 Ill , 6 ' 0-t"L verify wair , CHECKED BY: A.8 Â·Â· 4 Construction < 11, 60 94 F. 1 1 1 : / - 1 1 -(waN area aÂ©ovegra~e; 'i -1 ..... .. :r , ISSUE DATE: 7/26/03 11 1 1 / -1 1 2 70.. ft above grade SHEET TITLE AND NUMBER A SOUTH ELEVATION -~. EAST ELEVATION 75 SCALE 1 /4- - 1'-O TÂ¥FICAL ROOFSÂ· 1. or,ginal foof- Elk or /4. rleathered lood 40 year Composite eringles over Ice.late- Shield over SCALE: 1 /4- - 1-0 over Cpx ply over rafters w/ eÂ· m,r. (R-42) rigid sprag Asulat or A-5 2 L/Luer Sheds- and MB/ 12.12 foof. Low =+042 (1" max) Stanaig Beam Mecal (Verfy color and material with HFC 2-0/tor) over ke.P'tater Shield over (Dx plg over rafters ser St, Lt 1,/ 6' mirl (92-42) r gia sprag insulation. TFICAL EXT FNALLe 2 Vertical rlood aiding over *Â·5 Felt/ or Tyvek (rls hooe to -865 0/11. subtoor deciing boards) 4.Cedar Shakes/Shingles over *15 Felt/ or Tgvek ELEVATIONS 2 Stone Veneer at Foundation- match existing stone Coot ng/frd c; 0- g.rial structure :ZInc(or Im.) shingle style panels 2 wx 1 h VIF 7 Metal =lashing Skirt (extend l' min. below *hled grade) m 1 -9,4. 06 , I I ./ 0,3 L.oewer! A N,[20*Â¥5 5- . 42 â€¢Â· - . v ,-4Â»' 9./' 04' 9./1 loeu}en ANDORS 0,4,9 03/ I 01 / ' 39/ 28 DOORS ... 4 .- - 1~ AME' -D'.=14 21.7 .0/Â·Toy-5 .0 I -103'-1 (64#0 - ' )...Ld & . fs' f. '6 2 o 1 7 3 lux D Â· " """""/ 1/2 2 1 ... 1 -ah ......... ,~REA, 15 3 w. 5 -59 5>ewl/Â£ lung le' D 2 Re,?se EXist'Ag NA 90/.101-5 H]etor c EitiÂ·, P.Or Historic 2"019 1 - ... 14 3 w. 2 -In 'u#v,92 Aluminum ' ad _ 3 *+W.I 8 162 nood?:rame. 4 - Ea~239 1>,c 20 20 Ux 2 3, AÂ« ~ -- ....'01-3 3 20 Ak,minurr C ad 21 2 -3. xi'-Sh AIling - # ~toodframe ....10.-8 - 6 *.-I..02./.Â·19 172 22 2-'W"-51 A-ing lorÂ·.10--3 ....106-3 71 7 3..5-9, rowie'ung !72 8 23 2-0//3-0/ ....0 30,Â·Â·107-I .O.-10. 1/44 -, - 1.-lu?.3-Â·K leutte'wrg ..'Â·Juli x 1 -3 1/2/ AIR/g 30...0.-4. 135 .... 5/~-~0.-1//4 45 Â¢1 2-lu./5-/ louÂ©~eMLI'l - 4/ x 1 -/ 1/2, A.Ing 80â€ž.103-At': (match Melderht 195 65 Al Beyer Design Inc. 10 ""5-11! Jau=le.furig 'ofÂ·lis=or,cner:M 4 25 80..10.-1 3/4 side doull hung,) 195 45 25 2-ew' 1-3 1/2, Au,r,ung i Painted _j .00 - , O.-4.I . 42/â€¢-101-1.3/4 .cod ~rame Phone 970.925.8339 â€¢ Fax 970.925.8392 11 7- 8// 5-1, ........g 195 2 7 " 28' Awning ~ ~ .l=-~ Gillespie Avenue 410 N. Mill 811â€¢ Aspen, CO 81611 eow - 1 0.-40 SOH.101-0 I a ....> b -IM ....e ./.g IT ; . 2/5 4 1 <Dil / I i '.4 800-1"-0 verify 13 "" 6 -" r,oubje +4"9 indicated by these drawwogs and specifications 17 f SOM- 103-0>* Verify All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans - are the property and copynght of the Architect 1 4 2-36* 8 _.M Pout,/e"Wrg and shall neither be used on any other work nor BO~~105-4'r 1/ be used by any other person for any use 3'w' 5-5..0/22 'un/ dimensons shall take precedence over scaled Aluminum Glad 2- 15 eOH.10.-5- 18.2 whatsoever without written perm ission. Written Aocd .rame -1 dimensons and shall be ve/yed at the Job site. 16 3Â»< 5 -IM ..../e 'ung 162 SCH- 10-1-5 1 2 3 4 Anylimensional descrepancy shall be brought to the attent on of the Architect prior to commencement of work. 4 / 3 32' ~ ~ F... 24'-3 " " I I I I -. .. ..0 1 1 12'-83 RETAIN OFF STREET PARKINe PER HFC Recommendation N~PROP ....ER- / Survey eller Mark .7/7-25 ..... CRAIS PROPERTY LINE Residence I. .AD ncte erigna, Mistoric,naow,~*empt m : 8- h .; i > - I From Inergg,ode calc/ :,%Q , 3-2/_2-5 ,, 2 3 , 5-11 4 39RE 70-1 N.ardet. 14'-1 \ ASPEN, CO \ 1 1 3 -5 At " ---- 1 SETBACK ...: fi__4 E- + A .! . 49: L. REAR YARD e, SETBACK I ~ . 2-4 . 4' , 8-8' '_ 3Â·- 1 r ~ 3' 1 3-4" . ~~ . 4 I 5 >-- m I i 1 I . ~ - MAIN LEVEL , â‚¬> 'U- , ....0-0 Â£ I D 2-'-r ./ 1 M < .I" 1: 8 , 0.-0-- 1819 5 .te Elevation r I h i E lillia . el .~ i i f Â·4~ i loid (surveyÂ©enchmark-781725) _1- 4-ILA I M' -tr- ----- / 0 1 ' ati KITCHEN E*pÂ©Be Pra.Ming to < | YARD 8 ~cor ocation '1 verify or ginal Ent. 1 .: - Â· -k , 7.- - Â· 6. I-- 6========= 1 8 + ' 1:,2 Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· ... ST I P.5 exÂ£>495Â¢#DÂ¢~M,move Pest F~. 'B U 1 -- 1 10- 11 /9 * . 13'-6 3,2 L/ted 26 Exi.ill Dew. DF 6 -83/4. 5 5 . 11 Permit # 0062.2005.ARBI< -- ' Parcel IP/2-73512109004 01 Kindow eayout revised m 40 1 - ....................... .... .. .. _22 7 --------- -0-, -LÂ»7~~1 .9 1 -CU--,r- M er.....er ..2- I'. 6*-â€¢ Pantry : 2 - 2 -â€ž.4-- .pen rramel wail U , 1 - 111 6 .pE L..... .6-8/,34.-/.-611"rj . 3 6-,, ;,~,UOROOM 99=+pÂ·--: (alaâ€¢rs.,ace) LIVINS note.orlginainistoric'Indows'xempt iny h - ENTRY a"1-1 ~1 1 4 B 93=:6==A El 1 1 . from energy code calos pl ..1.- -/11 - Y -1 - a I 1 1 ~ . . 1.-I' -I notes o. A- 1 . , ;7~ ae>o~sneiva - --~ 9., ry: cy .wAR 1: I -Move' 7 + 1 1 6 8. cent'red -- 4 ' L.'U ceiling ' 3,1.Lf<$ e \ fl tl . 1 1 . .Â· -_-11..... -3Â· I , 9 ., 5 -4Â· 1 6 '.4/./ _ .. i i' PROJfÂ·'ARD - ' /---/ el . leats SETBACK -- -- 1 + Stair Hall 7- alzzl------ , I.-Ile<~Il I i liNder I. ~~ CkD~e: 1 - 5'~ , 3-6 ~,5' ~ 5-1 i -11, 3-2 N ... 1.1.55:I. 51 -,; 3**771 -'3 3 , 3'-21/4-'... 4,- 94/2 1 101-q!/2- 5 "1*1. 1 '-3% 2.-8 .1'-8 , #1 1 (r, [13 2 1 , Laundry '~ OFFICE : I . EXISTIN~ : L â€¢ere = . 4 , ER 1 .1,0.41, 1,2.arcoN.evarl,Â¢411 1 0 11 -4 1 SHED j 1 Bath ...... .00. I 2 ' Vt 1 *20- f I i , , - , 0 N I : . &0.0 1 n .1, eARPEA '~ Froposed 1=!an~ 1 i REVISIONS St"r 0 , - 6 h 3/10/08 Continued Proposal h r-: 4 ~ 1 - -_u_______ _-1 eli shoter i i ' 134 :* 8 1 1 4/2 405 Final Drawings 1 - 22321-22 11 ...~----""~ -'5 R,/-7/ li f 5/23/03 Permit *0: 052 I . 1 . ~11 --- 1. M closet - 11 1 9-EPS DÂ·DAN 1/26/03 C..O '; i GATE . 2 TZ,2-11 E . Hang'. 1 : rt--1-, ' . ' ry--1-11/2~ 411,2-9 , 2'-8~. L :-8' . 3-4- .. 3, 71'2 ., 5 ,, 3'-6- 4 3 82, . 3 8,0 3 8-'. 1 t~ 1 1 1/F ..0& 11:11 - /1 U 11 P - i 1 1 1, 1,1- -'.L ____g_ .. dlÂ·?3 ..1 GARDEN TERRACE BELOPI ' 1 34-2 1, m / . ' .lon... 1 i RI~er,4 1 - M, 1 - .1 -13 / @M ..: -2@ 1. '-\440% ~ ~~ b PROJECT NUMBER I . % Ll. I 1 ~ P"'4 Ha" 14 Â¥E> U 1 9 . 0 5 1"/, 3'-5 ,/2- .,.,5 1/2 10'-21/=. , 2'-8 ,/Â· 4' 68, 4'. 2-3" , l'j rt DRAWN BY: SS,AB in 2Â· SETBACK (For new Subgrade 1 21 1 41 1 2 2' >, m in VARIANCE Retaining wall and Terrace) 12.12 over.Ing CHECKED BY: A.B i â€¢ 1, PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE ISSUE DATE: 7/26/08 -4 -2- 1 N k 2 9 4 % SHEET TITLE AND NUMBER Z A- E 'j MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN '- SCALE: 1 /4 - 1'-O A-2 9 NOTE Exter'or dimensions are to exter,or face of conc foundat.on wall, which .s the same as exterior face of framing Field verify variations at nistoric structure. MAIN LEVEL .... PROPERTY LINE '' ./,G . C/1 ./ North Third Stree /,9 1/' 4'-6 5'-21/2.-- -4 SETBACK .. That HPC hereby grants approval for Major Development (Final) with the following conditions: 1. The style and color of the retaining_wall_proposed for the sunken terrace will be approved by Staff and monitor priono purchase and installation. A mock up of the color and style will be provided the field prior to approval. 2. The color and materials of the roofs will be approved by Staff and monitor prior to purchase and installation. 3. The front entry door on the front porch will be approved by Staff and monitor. 4. ~.,_ExistiREFoundatioismne will be salvaged for use on the historic home foundation. A new foundation material for the additions will be reviewed and approved by Staff and C monitor. '* The foundation color, style and height will be approved by Staff and monitor. A profile Â£ of the foundation in relation to the wall frame will be submitted to Staff and monitor for )[pproval. 4-mock-uofthe colorandskle_will be provided the field prior to approval. Staff and monitor will review and approve the removal of gingerbread details in the field. Any information indicating historic locations of windows or doors discovered during ~ ~_000/~ construction will be reported t~ HPC staff and monitor for review. 8. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the ~ 9. The applicant shall document, using photographs and drawings, all historic elements prior information is available. to restoration and relocation of the building. 10. A construction plan with detailed phases for the development of this lot shall be submitted with the building permit application for approval by HPC Staff. The historic home shall be secured, stabilized and protected during construction, and rehabilitation of the historic home shall be in the primary phase of development. 11. A structural report demonstrating that the building can be moved and/or information about how the house will be stabilized from the house mover must be submitted with the building permit application. The applicant must provide information as to whether or not the existing floor structure will be maintained and the pro's and con's of the decision for review and approval by staff and monitor. 12. A bond or letter of credit in the amount of $30,000 to insure the safe relocation of the structure must be submitted with the building permit application. 13. A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application. 14. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being ~ 5. The conditions of approval, both Conceptual and Final HPC Resolutions, are required to reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, or the full board. be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 16. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 707 NORTH THIRD STREET, LOT 6 and M of LOT 7, BLOCK 100, HALLAM'S ADDITION, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 8, SERIES OF 2008 PARCEL ID: 2735-121-09-004. WHEREAS, the applicant, Carol Craig, 707 N. Third Street, Aspen, CO represented by Al Bayer Design Inc. 410 N. Mill Street, Aspen, CO, requests Major Development (Final) for the property located at 707 North Third Street, Lot 6 and M of Lot 7, Block 100, Hallam's Addition, City of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, The property is listed on the "Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures;" and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Final Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project' s conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.4.of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Sara Adams, in her staff report dated May 14, 2008 performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended that the project be approved with conditions; and WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on May 14, 2008, the Historic Preservation Commission found the application was consistent with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and other applicable sections of the Municipal Code and approved Resolution No.7, Series of 2008, by a (6 - 0) vote, a Certificate of Appropriateness for an addition to the historic home, Relocation and Setback variances located on the property at 707 North Third Street, Lot 6 and M of Lot 7, Block 100, Hallam's Addition, City of Aspen, Colorado; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 13- 1 \ f - ~IAA ~ N &4-1 rn .. 17. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. 18. HPC recommends to the Engineering and Parks Departments that the on-street parking spaces are reduced to two head in spaces with one of the spaces meeting Code dimensional requirements for a handicapped space. HPC recommends that the existing gravel be replaced with sod and the two spaces that are maintained shall have gravel. LIPC recommends against curb and gutter. 19. The applicant is required to submit a list of the mailing labels with the notarized affidavit for proof of public notice by 5pm on May 15, 2008. 20. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 707 North Third Street. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. .. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 14th day of May 2008. Approved as to Form: James R. True, Special Counsel Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Michael Hoffman, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 0 0 Sara Adams From: Jay_Maytin [Jay_Maytin@shamrockfoods.com] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 10:50 AM To: Sara Adams Subject: Fw: 707 N Third Sara, I hope you had a blast at your sisters wedding. Welcome home! anyway, this is really the first project for me being used as the Moniter. So I do have some questions or thoughts 1. I don't really have problem with moving th house back. I think because they are moving it from its original location that would be fine since it matches the house to the south. staffs thoughts on that would be requested 2. I think by changing the material of siding we may want to look at that as a commisson. Shingle to wood does seem to raise an eyebrow for me, and I wonder how the commisson would feel about that. 3. I don't have any problems with the change in excavation or plans created by the change 4. The windows from the plans are okay with me. Being that they are on the addition I feel that it works with our guidelines again I am new at this so sorry if I am being conservative. Jay ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sara Adams" <Sara.Adams@ci.aspen.co.us> To: "Jay_Mayt:in" <Jay_Maytin@shamrockfoods.com> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 8:57 AM Subject: FW: 707 N Third Hi Jay, You are the project monitor for 707 North Third Street. Please review the proposed changes (images are attached). I don't think that the changes impact the historic resource. FYI- regarding number 4 below- three double hung windows were approved by HPC for the north fagade, which faces Gillespie Street. They are proposed a band of more contemporary windows. I think that the double hung windows work better with the historic home, but the new addition is very set back from the street and I doubt that you will really see the windows. Let me know what you think or if you would like any more information. Thanks! Sara -----Original Message----- From: Al Beyer [mailto:abd@sopris.net] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 7:39 PM To: Sara Adams Cc: Jennifer Craig; Michael Craig; Doug Throm Subject: 707 N Third Sara, We submitted permit drawings dated 5-23-08 a couple of months back. I 1 8 - assume they will be working their way through the line up to yoM' attention soon. These drawings had a couple of minor variations from the HPC Final approvals that merit noting: 1. we set the house back 12'-8 from the Third Street side instead of the 10' approved. This was done voluntarily because we felt it improved the feeling of yard to the East. The 12'-8 figure aligns the recessed fagade with the existing building to the south. We assumed this would be seen as a favorable change by HPC. 2.The HPC drawings called for shingle siding on the new non-historic addition. The contractor did not like trying to reuse the old brittle shingles so we are hoping to use reclaimed flooring boards instead as vertical siding. The intent to use reclaimed materials is still there just a different material which will set the addition apart from the historic original structure. (we still are trying to use some reclaimed shingles on the south walls outside the office laundry addition, but these may end up being new material if we can't salvage enough good stuff from the existing roof) Since the permit drawings were issued we have a couple of added changes which will be coming in as a Change Order at some point: 3.The City Forester really wants to limit the impact of the construction on the big cottonwood trees adjacent to this property and requested a zero overdig on the east and north sides. To make such a dig practical we have reduced the basement footprint to accommodate a section of crawl space along those sides. This change means a smaller lightwell at the NW corner, revised basement plan along with some minor window revisions on the south basement wall. 4.Carol has decided that she really likes the existing windows in her existing bedroom addition so we have revised the north fagade of her new bedroom to be more similar to her existing fenestration style. Attached are plans and sections delineating the new proposals. They are all consistent with the HPC final approval spirit and will hopefully be seen as acceptable. Please let me know if you have any questions or require more info. Thanks! Al Beyer PS. I don't believe we ever heard back on the floor detail we sent 5/16/08 This is the detail we included in the permit drawings so your approval there will cover. 2 Sara Adams From: Al Beyer [abd@sopris.net] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 7:39 PM TO: Sara Adams CC: Jennifer Craig; Michael Craig; Doug Throm Subject: 707 N Third Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red Attachments: Picture 2.png; Picture 1.png; Craig tree rev3.pdf; Craig A-5 rev.pdf; Craig A-2 rev.pdf 3 5 ti~ 6 -W Picture 2.png (669 Picture 1.png (933 Craig tree rev3.pdf Craig A-5 rev.pdf Craig A-2 rev.pdf KB) KB) (789 KB) (303 KB) (803 KB) Sara, We submitted permit drawings dated 5-23-08 a couple of months back. I assume they will be working their way through the line up to your attention soon. These drawings had a couple of minor variations from the HPC Final approvals that merit noting: 1. we set the house back 12'-8 from the Third Street side instead of the 10' approved. This was done voluntarily because we felt it improved the feeling of yard to the East. The 12'-8 figure aligns the recessed fagade with the existing building to the south. We assumed this would be seen as a favorable change by HPC. ( 2)The HPC drawings called for shingle siding on the new non-historic addition. The -ebntractor did not like trying to reuse the old brittle shingles so we are hoping to use reclaimed flooring boards instead as vertical siding. The intent to use reclaimed materials is still there just a different material which will set the addition apart from the historic original structure. (we still are trying to use some reclaimed shingles on the south walls outside the office laundry addition, but these may end up being new material if we can't salvage enough good stuff from the existing roof) Fdo *4 +Ar Since the permit drawings were issued we have a couple of added changes which will be coming in as a Change Order at some point: U)Â· The City Forester really wants to limit the impact o f the construction on the big cottonwood trees adjacent to this property and requested a zero overdig on the east and north sides. To make such a dig practical we have reduced the basement footprint to accommodate a section of crawl space along those sides. This change means a smaller lightwell at the NW corner, revised baslment plan along with some winor window revisions on the south basement wall. ~AMANY , U-- U- di,f Â»f /4 Carol has decided that she really likes the existing windows ln her existing bedroom La<idition so we have revised the north fagade of her new bedroom to be more similar to her existing fenestration style. kemv Attached are plans and sections delineating the new proposals. They are all consistent with the HPC final approval spirit and will hopefully be seen as acceptable. Please let me know if you have any questions or require more info. Thanks! Al Beyer PS. I don't believe we ever heard back on the floor detail we sent 5/16/08 This is the detail we included in the permit drawings so your approval there will cover. 1 DFM .. 1. *09 0 + t/ Or e I tnt- 4 . 4, -4-&1,3 tki UPi 1/ IL ink,(0/F 11 119,11 PeÂ«As (3 Â¥rlÂ¢>oy- /.12$4 4,4 U / F\42' 11/:2<1 4 41-:S. 0-116 l 03 22!,4 i h KICU, WOOA Â·*1 1.- ;Epi/21113[744 1 5jau ' 4 < 14 <5 lows WA 1 \3 i jr 44 4 4 ' --ag.,-4/.--I...... t: -ri---Â·-----*-~~~ ~Â· - -~~~ - 1.,FliINJ -reiiv~ t t 1/2 *'r 4 Ne uu 12 loor FÂ¥& vt#%9 i . 1 Â£ 1 Wr---- 5%44 5 k'V+ 603 vA . b.'i 1 --r,".:4=*r 4 --4_ 6(07./-414 Â¥ 1 1:? . 0 . . Â· i 8. il i Â· C- n ew-, A' 2 Z.-*4442- ~ 4. 1,--~.111.~fllf-,r. 1.}. ~ ~2 STD NE 9 r NE g f 7 L- Â¥k,LÂ»:~N 22,4 N) i J U g '<Apti s. MAX. J ' '0Yviti< 1 1, ..--9.' ......U24**Â¢.48*2,4mq,4-,4 \9% li 1 1 f. 1 1 1 4. ** i f (.4/ + . Â©ef: *,4 (A f f,Ji\\ 40 6 Aftd - 3\Ou)4 -Â« 1. 1 4 17314143 U 4~01 4 NDA N i ' r 1 '4 ,;t \45'21. 11 11 1 P /* 74- 9 1 ~j Mort t P Elk 1% f 59*L/VT{AL 1494 518N E vildE fit 'to '- SUPPOMic;,96 X148- Houst. 5'F giEK:PY> Lik,E. \Ti t, 1 * 4 1 h)01- r %, 8- Ultâ‚¬? 4 VE.IUME.'Al Al Rever Dpâ‚¬irin Inr Â· 41 0 Al orth NA ill Ktrppt â€¢ R. 11 . A cn p n r nlnrorln R 1 6 1 1 . (1 -7 r) -O -> C-Q 2 70 . E-.., A70 (310 000.0 .. Sara Adams From: Al Beyer [abd@sopris.net] Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 5:56 PM To: . Sara Adams Subject: 707 N third Attachments: Craig Floor 5-16.pdf Craig Floor 5-16.pdf (1 MB) Sara, Attached is a detail we would like to use which expresses the stone veneer blow the floor system and nearly flush with the exterior wall as we discussed in the meeting. I think this accomplishes the historic look we all want to have. The veneer will be reused original plus some similar stone to blend in if needed. There will be no more than 12" of veneer exposed so the house will stay at a similar to historic elevation relative to the grade. Let me know if you have any issues. Happy Weekend... Thanks! A1 1 Eop Sara Adams From: Al Beyer [abd@sopris.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 4:31 PM To: Sara Adams CC: scott slogan Subject: 707 N third street Attachments: Craig revised Basement Plan.pdf; Craig revised elevations.pdf; Craig tree rev3.pdf, Craig Permit A-5.pdf rih 111 7741 TAI 42 Craig revised Craig revised Craig tree rev3. pdf Craig Permit Basement Plan.pd... elevations.pdf ... (1 MB) A-5.pdf (421 KB) Sara, See the attached drawings for the revisions we made in order to reduce the size of the excavation per Parks dept. request. (included are the original elevations page as well for easy comparison) The basic change is a smaller basement space because of a stepped excavation/crawl space along the east and north sides of the building. To accommodate the revised basement plan the lower windows on the south side have been rearranged from the permit version (#'s 45-49 and D-3). The reduced space resulted in a reduced light well on the west side and the deletion of window #44. Otherwise the main building looks the same as the approved version. Another minor revision is the shape of the windows on the rear addition (#1-5). Carol requested window forms that mimicked her original bedroom windows in the original addition. So, we changed from the double hung style units to more vertically reading casements and she felt much better. We also the windows on the south elevation of the master bedroom portion to bring in more light there. All in all the building is much the same as before. We just want to be sure we are still ok before ordering the window package. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks! Al Beyer 1 Fof a~ POF .0~OF .1,~PDF ruhADO. $ I .....lic '<>2wen *DOnS .e4~â€¢ *rMâ€ži W -*':4*# TOTALS ~* , ,. , / i".en POD/S f. I K...... *I . + %-,Md'. Â£23 -p g 7 3~ ..1,1"0â€ž.rs' r.'3 2 m . .4 41 /0.-leÂ·' ....... - 'W.D . :3,4,Â¢Â®'.-0 Â·52 â€¢~ ,49,~00* â€¢76 J.. '2. 42 eceÂ·â€¢7 1. 43 #*.7-0 2 'e i .oâ€¢i,g.x,crr,pr- 2,/ 20., 0,4 â€ž - .vt... DOOR TOTALS m flum Cle 45 Za/r-vt Â¥rt- '542 '01 1 802 0-â€¢,-O .ood.ra.I 4. 12: * ..'*I M//ES6 . 47 . 8....4. I.'I ........r' r.2 Mt' Pig~MI,M-U~2*2-Ft Al Beyer Design Inc. *Il,~Ccl.Â£a I ./Â·110/Mill.Hâ€¢/.pÂ©nill 81611 40 M..4.0 I 4/ le - Gillespie Avenue , Ph-970 92% 8339 â€¢ Fa~ 970925 8392 ....â€¢I o so :24=7 B ..&19ns,,dea~ ,~rangernen,$ andplans CS 62 I 2.2 % IndV....%.......Killi,uril " ./thepr.pe~Tyandropy.Ihin#thr:./.el \ Ilds.Ilne,th*.balâ€¢ed./.90Â¢1~erworknof i be u.ed by,ny 'the. pe~ollrin, wie 1 2 34 ~atweve,-th.~w.Ttt-per,â„¢slon =) dmw~ills sh:11 t.. llcede..... scaled *r-* ion$ - sh' . *.led I' the,ob site 4 5 2 Ap, Irne.*-1 .triepancy Nh~ u b,mgh- td the attentwin af 'he Ar~hi~e~:1 â€žin, t{. c.....le,â€¢wnt of wn. SI 4 0 P~OPERT-Â·r L,NE CRAIG Residence f , ... r '.' Boy-2- =IN= ./. -10-1 N Brd St ASPEN, 60 A SETBACK ..: . A â€¢ 21 -opf. +, lil : ' // 5-4'- ' craw, spaa Â· t t - .>LÂ·Â·Â·- Vi Z Ell 2- 1 Lâ€¢':-e ~ Ct r Z ip Â· 1 H 7-----~ 5 aÂ·e.~, r . t, 2/6. rÂ«-- 8 Â· ' %8 r I L 47 -2 32 367,1 i./.WHME,9 1 â€ž 'fl' 2 Â· EE= ///mi./1// 4 -'......'4 iâ€¢It =ars..21351210'004 . 1 .. 11 4 - 32 RESP ... .5 511 . Ffâ‚¬*3 p 1 . I t. 1 . % . 22*01 5 " . ... 'DOM . #Fflf*diff] : 1"# I eAve~Jvt ~' â€ž re...89 I *24'fg 0 ...1 - ID LI Closet . 1 're..... Wir,l..*<&1--~=~=~<--~~- ~ lilli al - f, 28 0 -777-1 -1 N 7 2 1.111,1 1.1 1 -, SETBACK E/â€¢t9I - 4 0 112Â£Â£Â£1.1 Â®u R I FRINT./.0 1 11 1 rn n h ..1.IONS /J GUEST BATH ' 1*1 1 1 01 ''1 - 2, 4/08 Froposed Plan 3/ 0/0/ Continued eropos/1 Aindowe lecon#*red , i i , i i 4/: 9/0 lilli Prawngs 9 3 .-â‚¬ sles. /'fe..t i./.1..' ' 1 5/: 3/03 Fermit 3.- - 1-1 F [--1 . 1 2-8- ~ 2-S ~~~ 2~ 4 44 ,, ~I ., 1/: 6/0/ .0.1 2-2 ' , 3 -2- 6,, 2 -~- â€ž . I .' " 6ARPSN TIRRICE . r s.oPEC GRAPE 6 .2 % [M-r.IL. ' 1 9 1---- h PROJECT NUM.ER A / 2...... (Fcr new 9-gra- DRAWN . 55/6 VARIANOI Retainingwalland Terraoe' PROPERÂ·er LINg 28 , 34.2 0, CHEC<ED B. Al A Â· ISSUI DATE ./ 12/0/ 2 3 4 SHEE-/TLEAND NUMBER BASEMENT LEVEL FLOO~K FLAN '-E 3 SCALE 1/4- Â· 1 -0 A-4 9*MENT 12 . 10. ~NE! A Lh13.10~.1 PIKe>â€¢â€¢Eâ€¢KTÂ·r liE North Third Stree .. 14 19. W D-TO 0 ft - i "2,10 3011* fl#YA uyÂ¥* > 41'<4Â£ 4491, .. RECEPTION#: 549816, 06/02/2008 at 11:35:41 AM, 1 OF 4, R $21.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (III'C) APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 707 NORTH THIRD STREET, LOT 6 and M of LOT 7, BLOCK 100, HALLAM'S ADDITION, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 8, SERIES OF 2008 PARCEL ID: 2735-121-09-004. WHEREAS, the applicant, Carol Craig, 707 N. Third Street, Aspen, CO represented by Al Bayer Design lne. 410 N. Mill Street, Aspen, CO, requests Major Development (Final) for the property located at 707 North Third Street, Lot 6 and M of Lot 7, Block 100, Hallam's Addition, City of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, The property is listed on the "Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures;" and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Final Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.4.of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections, The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Sara Adams, in her staff report dated May 14, 2008 performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended that the project be approved with conditions; and WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on May 14, 2008, the Historic Preservation Commission found the application was consistent with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and other applicable sections o f the Municipal Code and approved Resolution No.7, Series of 2008, by a (6 - 0) vote, a Certificate of Appropriateness for an addition to the historic home, Relocation and Setback variances located on the property at 707 North Third Street, Lot 6 and !4 of Lot 7, Block 100, Hallam's Addition, City of Aspen, Colorado; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: .. That HPC hereby grants approval for Major Development (Final) with the following conditions: 1. The style and color of the retaining wall proposed for the sunken terrace will be approved by Staff and monitor prior to purchase and installation. A mock up o f the color and style will be provided the field prior to approval. 2. The color and materials of the roofs will be approved by Staff and monitor prior to purchase and installation. 3, The front entry door on the front porch will be approved by Staff and monitor. 4. Existing foundation stone will be salvaged for use on the historic home foundation. A new foundation material for the additions will be reviewed and approved by Staff and monitor. 5. The foundation color, style and height will be approved by Staff and monitor. A profile of the foundation in relation to the wall frame will be submitted to Staff and monitor for approval. A mock up of the color and style will be provided the field prior to approval. 6. Staff and monitor will review and approve the removal of gingerbread details in the field. 7. Any information indicating historic locations of windows or doors discovered during construction will be reported to HPC staff and monitor for review. 8. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 9. The applicant shall document, using photographs and drawings, all historic elements prior to restoration and relocation of the building. 10. A construction plan with detailed phases for the development of this lot shall be submitted with the building permit application for approval by HPC Staff. The historic home shall be secured, stabilized and protected during construction, and rehabilitation of the historic home shall be in the primary phase o f development. 11. A structural report demonstrating that the building can be moved andjor information about how the house will be stabilized from the house mover must be submitted with the building permit application. The applicant must provide information as to whether or not the existing floor structure will be maintained and the pro's and con's of the decision for review and approval by staff and monitor. 12. A bond or letter of credit in the amount of $30,000 to insure the safe relocation of the structure must be submitted with the building permit application. 13. A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application. 14. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by IIPC staff and monitor, or the full board. 15. The conditions of approval, both Conceptual and Final HPC Resolutions, are required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 16. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. .. 17. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. 18. HPC recommends to the Engineering and Parks Departments that the on-street parking spaces are reduced to two head in spaces with one of the spaces meeting Code dimensional requirements for a handicapped space. HPC recommends that the existing gravel be replaced with sod and the two spaces that are maintained shall have gravel. HPC recommends against curb and gutter. 19. The applicant is required to submit a list of the mailing labels with the notarized affidavit forproof of public notice by 5pm on May 15,2008. 20. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 ('Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation o f a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 707 North Third Street. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. .. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 14th day of May 2008. Approved as to Form: james R. True, Special Counsel l Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 1Â¥lichael Hoffman, Chair ATTEST: kathy StrieQ<and, Chief Deputy Clerk 0 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Aspen City Council FROM: Sara Adams. Preservation Planner RE: 707 North Third Street DATE: May 19.2008 Section 26.415.120.13 of the Municipal Code, A. 4 <y 1,~ 9~ im.. - :/*'*%...,&.'*Â£'.-./ 4, i/.- 1.y 4: Â¢ Appeals, Notice to City Council and Call Up, ~ /fal/2,/il.2 12 states that following the adoption of a resolution . ... ./4\ v-Ii-/-----/.WM. approving. appror ing with conditions or %::... ~: - 3.-*46--k-- 74 3 disapproving a development application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Minor Development of a designated property, the H PC shall promptly notify the City Council of its action to allow the City Council an opportunity 1 *:' '6, 2,-: .. to avail itself of the Call Up procedure. The City a Council may order Call Up of these actions of ?41 -' 'i"' -rl &,4,2.41&'....Di.4.Â¢ the HPC within thirty (30) days of the decision. Consequently. no associated permits can be issued during the 30-day call up period. The HPC granted Final Approval for the relocation of the historic home located at 707 North Third Street, on the corner of Third and Gillespie. The home will be located atop a new basement and foundation and a modest one story rear addition was approved. Extensive rehabilitation of the front porch and removal of a non-historic addition was approved. HPC found that the Ilistoric Preservation Design Guidelines and the Residential Design Standards were met. A south side yard setback variance of 2 feet. where 5 feet is required and 3 feet are provided, was granted for a retaining wall (for a subgrade terrace). City Council has until .june 13 2008 to call up I IPC s decision. .. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070, ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 707 Rocr{Â·1 -53wd 5~20 , Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, A-AJ9152 A 5 66-261 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) ofthe Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: V Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy ofthe publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. 94-4 9 6- / 1 1 Signature The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this 2 day of JUA,f E , 200Â«by .,4 /\,15 â‚¬1,4 Sco-2121;7 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL My commission expires: 061 (0/ 20\ b 1 Notice is hereby given to the general public of the I approval of a site specific development plan, and LK 6/41- the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertain 1 Ing to the following described property: 707 North Notary Public 1 Third Street, Lot 6 and 1/2 of Lot 7, Bjock 100, Hal I I lam's Addition, City of Aspen, Colorado through a Resolution of the Aspen Historic Preservation 1 Commission numbered 8, Series of 2008. The ap I proval is to relocate the historic home east atop a basement and construct a small one story rear ad I dition. A south side yard setback variance of two ' I feet (2'), where three feet (3') is provided and five ATTACHMENTS: k-$" I feet (5') is required. was granted. For further information contact Sara Adams, at the . Aspen Community Development Dept. 130 S. Ga / LAURA E lena St., Aspen, Colorado (970) 429-2778. COPY OF THE PUBLICATION : MEYER i | City of Aspen Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on June 1, ~ I 2008. (1611748) ..9 OF COJ My Commission Expires 08/10/2010 .. P5 5%42 material for the new addition. Staff requests that the applicant provide a mock up in the field of the style and color of stone proposed for the foundation for approval by staff and monitor. A *0 profile detail of the foundation to ensure that the foundation wall does not proiect beyond the wall of the home is recommended. The applicant repr{Â§62the structure will be located-----3 slightly above the existing elevation. Staff requests n#)re information about exlctly how high (Ang above the existing elevation the house is proposed Y 449-3495* )~~~- DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: VE- -fhe HPC may: ,-+ 1-00{ * #}*44 441*PWOVW,- \ â€¢ approve the application, ~ /~~~ â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or ~\_._<fr-Â·/6 continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessarv NwA J,1 to make a decision to approve or deny. *14 c 441-0 4 %.42 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC grant Major Development final approvaljA~ '3~Wl for the property located at 707 North Third Street, Lot 6 and 14 of Lot 7, Block 100, Hallam's ) Addition, City of Aspen, Colorado with the following conditions; 4Â£-mwy'? C *ihil- 14 Â»uvu yfirhe material of the walldway will be approved by btaff and monitor prior to purchase and installation. â‚¬142. The style and color of the retaining wall proposed for the sunken terrace will be approved by Staff and monitor prior to purchase and installation. A mock up of the color and style C--*will be provided the field prior to approval. < f. The light fixtures will biapproved by Staff and monitor prior to purchase and-*WAR<fish~ ~~g installation. 00Â»Â»Al 71)36Â£ The new fence and gate will be apbroved Wy Staff and monitor pdor to purchase and installation. \Oa\. 41' 86[4li Lf ,44% Â£+AR- 644 (/lk- OW-5. The coloro f the asphaltÂ· roo*vill be apprdved by Staff and monitor prior to purchase and 49 installatio]I> k ha-kÂ¥13,1 8Â¥tz! The front entry door on the front porch will be approved by Staff and monito.~ ~l The window well beneath the front porch is not approved. 6,2. Existing foundation stone will be salvaged for use on the historic home foundation. A new foundation material for the additions will be reviewed and approved by Staff and ~*onitor. -Â»441 Â¢\MikiH iwll dy.(10. j he foundation color, style and height will be approved by Staff and monitor. A profile 4_,df the foundation in relation to the wall frame will be submitted to Staff and monitor for approval A mock up of the color and style will be provided the field prior to approval. U141?j Staff and monitor will review and approve the removal of gingerbread details in the field. iÂ¥ Any information indicating historic locations of windows or doors discovered during construction will be reported to HPC staff and monitor for review. 13. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. &1 5 941 %1Â¥Ylkept 1 ht DIWIO & 54 hal-M 1- 4045 ,2 Â¢64 1 he'j,1/r P6 . 1 14. The applicant shall document, using photographs and drawings, all historic elements prior to restoration and relocation of the building. 15. A construction plan with detailed phases for the development of this lot shall be submitted with the building permit application for approval by HPC Staff. The historic home shall be secured, stabilized and protected during construction, and rehabilitation of the historic home shall be in the primary phase of development. 16. A structural report demonstrating that the building can be moved and/or information about how the house will be stabilized from the house mover must be submitted with the building permit application.- The applicant must provide information as to whether or not -- --- the existing floor structure will be maintained and the pro's and con's of the decision for review and approval by staff and monitor. 17. A bond or letter of credit in the amount of $30,000 to insure the safe relocation of the structure must be submitted with the building permit application. 18. A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application. 19. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, or the full board. 20. The conditions of approval, both Conceptual and Final HPC Resolutions, are required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 21. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 22. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty, license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. 23. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation ofa vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of 6 e yrIL MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Sara Adams, Historic Preservation Planner THRU: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 707 N. Third Street- Major Development (Final) - Public Hearing DATE: May 14,2008 SUMMARY: 707 North Third Street is a circa 1890 miner's cabin situated in its original location on the corner of Gillespie Street and North Third Street in Aspen's West End neighborhood. The residence has been altered over time including the addition of a wrap around porch and a dormer on the south elevation that obscures the original hipped roof form. A few small scale additions were added to the north, west and the south sides o f the resource. On April 23, 2008, HPC adopted Resolution 5, which granted conceptual approval, relocation approval and a side yard setback variance for the subgrade terrace. As a condition of approval, HPC required line drawings to be submitted for Final Review of the project. The applicant requests Major Development Final Review approval for the proposed project. Staff finds that the Design Guidelines are met and recommends that HPC grant Final Review approval with conditions. APPLICANT: Carol Craig, 707 N. Third Street, Aspen, CO represented by Al Bayer Design Inc. 410 N. Mill Street, Aspen, CO. PARCEL ID: 2735-121-09-004. ADDRESS: 707 North Third Street, Lot 6 and h of Lot 7, Block 100, Hallam's Addition, City of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6, Medium Density Residential. MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the Final level, is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of 1 .. Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. Staff Response: Landscape Plan: The applicant proposes to maintain the existing wooden picket fence and most of the existing mature landscape on the site. A walkway from the street to the entry porch is proposed. Staff recommends that the material for the walkway be approved by Staff and monitor. A small hedgerow is proposed to obscure the subgrade terrace. Staff finds that this is appropriate. A walkway to the subgrade terrace from the street is not proposed on the site plan. A new fence and gate is indicated on the site plan in front of the sunken terrace. Staff requests more information regarding the style, material and type of fence and gate proposed for review and approval by Staff and monitor. Staff finds that the Design Guidelines below are met: 1.9 Maintain the established progression of public-to-private spaces when considering a rehabilitation project. u This includes a sequence of experiences, beginning with the "public" sidewalk, proceeding along a "semi-public" walkway, to a "semi-private" porch or entry feature and ending in the "private" spaces beyond. i Provide a walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry. Meandering walkways are discouraged, except where it is needed to avoid a tree. o Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style. Concrete, wood or sandstone may be appropriate for certain building styles. 1.11 Preserve and maintain mature landscaping on site, particularly landmark trees and shrubs. o Protect established vegetation during construction to avoid damage. Replacement of damaged, aged or diseased trees must be approved by the Parks Department. i If a tree must be removed as part of the addition or alteration, replace it with species of a large enough scale to have a visual impact in the early years of the project. Staff recommends that a mock up in the field of the style and color of the retaining wall proposed for the sunken terrace be approved by Staff and monitor. Parking: No variance is need for the pre-existing non-conformity that there is no parking onsite. However, an encroachment license is necessary to maintain City owned Right of Way as gravel parking for the property owner. The existing gravel is inappropriate in the streetscape. Staff recommends that sod be re-established with parallel on-street parking. The Engineering and Parks Departments have authority over this issue; however the HPC may make a recommendation. 2 .. Lighting: The applicant proposes a wall mount light fixture beside the entry door on both the main and rear porches. Recessed can lights are also proposed for the ceilings of both porches. HPC has approved one recessed can light on the primary porch so as not to flood the porch with light. Design Guideline 14.6 emphasizes an intensity similar to that used traditionally. Staff finds that there is more flexibility with lighting on the rear porch, for that reason the recessed cans are appropriate on the secondary facade, as long as the lighting meets the Land Use Code. A specific light fixture is not proposed; therefore Staff recommends that Staff and monitor approve the light fixtures. 14.6 Exterior lights should be simple in character and similar in color and intensity to that used traditionally. o The design of a fixture should be simple in form and detail. Exterior lighting must be approved by the HPC. o All exterior light sources should have a low level of luminescence. Fenestration: The proposed fenestration for the new additions are simple and compatible with the historic resource. The applicant proposes double hung windows to replace the north addition on the historic resource. Staff finds that the style and proportions are appropriate and meet Guideline 11.9 below: 11.9 Use building components that are similar in size and shape to those of the historic properly. u These include windows, doors and porches. u Overall, details should be modest in character. Flat skylights are proposed for the flat portion of the historic resource. Staff finds that the proposed configuration of three skylights that are flush on the flat roof improves the existing skylights; and therefore is appropriate in this case. The applicant mentions a transom window above the front door that is not illustrated in the drawings. Staff recommends that Staff. and monitor review the transom i f it is included in the design. Materials: The applicant proposes to reuse the wooden roof shingles from the historic resource as siding on the contemporary additions. Reusing materials meets many community goals and distinguishes the historic resource from the new additions. An asphalt roof is proposed for the historic resource and a standing seam metal roof is proposed for the rear bedroom addition, both of which are appropriate. Staff recommends that Staff and monitor approve the color of the asphalt roof. The applicant also proposes solar panels on the south side of rear bedroom addition. The solar panels are represented as laying flush with the gable roof pitch and do not distract from the historic resource. Staff commends the applicant for proposing an alternate form of energy and recommends approval. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. 1 The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. 3 .. The existing home contains some gingerbread details that are not illustrated in the line drawings. It is unknown whether the details are original or a later addition. Staff recommends a site visit with Staff and monitor during construction to determine whether the details are original. Entry Porch: The applicant proposes to reconstruct the front porch in a style similar to a typical Victorian era modest porch, which meets Guideline 5.5 below. A metal standing seam roof is proposed for the front porch and simple columns. Staff recommends asphalt siding for the porch roof to maintain consistency with the rest of the historic home. 5.5 If porch replacement is necessary, reconstruct it to match the original in form and detail. o Use materials that appear similar to the original. o While matching original materials is preferred, when detailed correctly and painted appropriately, alternative materials may be considered. o Where no evidence of the appearance of the historic porch exists, a new porch may be considered that is similar in character to those found on comparable buildings. Keep the style and form simple. Also, avoid applying decorative elements that are not known to have been used on the house or others like it. o When constructing a new porch, its depth should be in scale with the building. o The scale of porch columns also should be similar to that of the trimwork. u The height of the railing and the spacing of balusters should appear similar to those used historically as well. The applicant proposes to reuse the existing southern entry door for the primary front door. Staff recommends that Staff and monitor approve the door on site. Open risers are proposed for the steps leading up to the front porch. Staff recommends that the stairs maintain a closed configuration with wooden riser planks. A railing is not illustrated in the drawings. Staff requests more information as to whether a railing is required for the entry porch. A mud scraper/grate is proposed in the center of the front porch floor to provide light to a subgrade window well beneath the front porch. The lightwell proposed during Conceptual review in this location was denied by HPC. At this time, the applicant proposes a window well beneath the front porch. Three windows are proposed for the subgrade level to access the light from the mud scraper/grate. As mentioned during the March 12, 2008, Staff finds that a light well or window well beneath the historic front porch is inappropriate. The applicant proposes to recreate a historic style front porch for the primary fa~ade, while at the same time adding a window well beneath the front porch that is distracting from the historic resource and unnecessary in terms o f egress. HPC held a lengthy discussion during the March 12, 2008 Conceptual review that concluded in a lightwell beneath the front porch being inappropriate. 9.7 A lightwell may be used to permit light into below-grade living space. â€¢ In general a lightwell is prohibited on a wall that faces a street. â€¢ The size of the lightwell should be minimized. Foundation: HPC approved the relocation of this house onto a new foundation. The applicant indicates that the stone will match the existing stone foundation. Staff recommends that the applicant salvage the existing stone for the historic home and propose a different foundation 4 .. material for the new addition. Staff requests that the applicant provide a mock up in the field of the style and color of stone proposed for the foundation for approval by staff and monitor. A profile detail of the foundation to ensure that the foundation wall does not project beyond the wall of the home is recommended. The applicant represents that the structure will be located slightly above the existing elevation. Staff requests more information about exactly how high above the existing elevation the house is proposed. DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: â€¢ approve the application, â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or â€¢ continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC grant Major Development final approval for the property located at 707 North Third Street, Lot 6 and 92 of Lot 7, Block 100, Hallam's Addition, City of Aspen, Colorado with the following conditions; 1. The material of the walkway will be approved by Staff and monitor prior to purchase and installation. 2. The style and color of the retaining wall proposed for the sunken terrace will be approved by Staff and monitor prior to purchase and installation. A mock up of the color and style will be provided the field prior to approval. 3. The light fixtures will be approved by Staff and monitor prior to purchase and installation. 4. The new fence and gate will be approved by Staff and monitor prior to purchase and installation. 5. The color of the asphalt roof will be approved by Staff and monitor prior to purchase and installation. 6. The porch roof will be asphalt. 7. The front entry door on the front porch will be approved by Staff and monitor. 8. The window well beneath the front porch is not approved. 9. Existing foundation stone will be salvaged for use on the historic home foundation. A new foundation material for the additions will be reviewed and approved by Staff and monitor. 10. The foundation color, style and height will be approved by Staff and monitor. A profile of the foundation in relation to the wall frame will be submitted to Staff and monitor for approval A mock up of the color and style will be provided the field prior to approval. 11. Staff and monitor will review and approve the removal of gingerbread details in the field. 12. Any information indicating historic locations of windows or doors discovered during construction will be reported to HPC staff and monitor for review. 13. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 5 .. 14. The applicant shall document, using photographs and drawings, all historic elements prior to restoration and relocation o f the building. 15. A construction plan with detailed phases for the development of this lot shall be submitted with the building permit application for approval by HPC Staff. The historic home shall be secured, stabilized and protected during construction, and rehabilitation of the historic home shall be in the primary phase of development. 16. A structural report demonstrating that the building can be moved and/or information about how the house will be stabilized from the house mover must be submitted with the building permit application. The applicant must provide information as to whether or not the existing floor structure will be maintained and the pro's and con's of the decision for review and approval by staff and monitor. 17. A bond or letter of credit in the amount of $30,000 to insure the safe relocation of the structure must be submitted with the building permit application. 18. A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application. 19. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, or the full board. 20. The conditions of approval, both Conceptual and Final HPC Resolutions, are required to be printed on the cover sheet o f the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 21. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 22. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. 23. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of 6 .. three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 707 North Third Street. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. Exhibits: A. Historic Preservation Design Guidelines B. Minutes C. Application Exhibit A: Relevant Historic Preservation Desij:n Guidelines for 707 North Third Street, Maior Development Conceptual Review 1.3 A new replacement fence should have a "transparent" quality allowing views into the yard from the street. u A fence that defines a front yard is usually low to the ground and "transparent" in nature. o On residential properties, a fence which is located forward of the front building facade may not be taller than 42" from natural grade. (For additional information, see the City of Aspen's "Residential Design Standards".) o A privacy fence may be used in back yards and along alleys, but not forward of the front facade of a building. ci Note that using no fencing at all is often the best approach. o Contemporary interpretations of traditional fences should be compatible with the historic context. 1.4 New fence components should be similar in scale with those seen traditionally. o Fence columns or piers should be proportional to the fence segment. 1.5 A side yard fence which extends between two homes should be set back from the street-facing facade. u This setback should be significant enough to provide a sense of open space between homes. 1.6 Replacement or new fencing between side yards and along the alley should be compatible with the historic context. o A side yard fence is usually taller than its front yard counterpart. It also is less transparent. A side yard fence may reach heights taller than front yard fences (up to six 7 .. feet), but should incorporate transparent elements to minimize the possible visual impacts. o Consider staggering the fence boards on either side of the fence rail. This will give the appearance of a solid plank fence when seen head on. o Also consider using lattice, or other transparent detailing, on the upper portions of the fence. 1.9 Maintain the established progression of public-to-private spaces when considering a rehabilitation project. u This includes a sequence of experiences, beginning with the "public" sidewalk, proceeding along a "semi-public" walkway, to a "semi-private" porch or entry feature and ending in the "privatel' spaces beyond. u Provide a walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry. Meandering walkways are discouraged, except where it is needed to avoid a tree. u Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style. Concrete, wood or sandstone may be appropriate for certain building styles. 1.11 Preserve and maintain mature landscaping on site, particularly landmark trees and shrubs. o Protect established vegetation during construction to avoid damage. Replacement of damaged, aged or diseased trees must be approved by the Parks Department. o If a tree must be removed as part of the addition or alteration, replace it with species of a large enough scale to have a visual impact in the early years of the project. 1.12 Preserve and maintain historically significant planting designs. u Retaining historic planting beds, landscape features and walkways is encouraged. 1.13 Revisions or additions to the landscape should be consistent with the historic context of the site. o Select plant and tree material according to its mature size, to allow for the long-term impact of mature growth. 1 Reserve the use of exotic plants to small areas for accent. u Do not cover grassy areas with gravel, rock or paving materials. 1.14 Additions to the landscape that could interfere with historic structures are inappropriate. u Do not plant climbing ivy or trees too close to a building. New trees should be no closer than the mature canopy size. o Do not locate plants or trees in locations that will obscure significant architectural features or block views to the building. u It is not appropriate to plant a hedge row that will block views into the yard. 1.15 Minimize the visual impacts of site lighting. o Site lighting should be shielded to avoid glare onto adjacent properties. Focus lighting on walks and entries, rather than up into trees and onto facade planes. 3.3 Preserve the historic ratio of window openings to solid wall on a facade. o Significantly increasing the amount of glass on a character-defining facade will negatively affect the integrity of a structure. 5.5 If porch replacement is necessary, reconstruct it to match the original in form and detail. 3 Use materials that appear similar to the original. u While matching original materials is preferred, when detailed correctly and painted appropriately, alternative materials may be considered. u Where no evidence of the appearance of the historic porch exists, a new porch may be considered that is similar in character to those found on comparable buildings. Keep the 8 .. style and form simple. Also, avoid applying decorative elements that are not known to have been used on the house or others like it. o When constructing a new porch, its depth should be in scale with the building. u The scale of porch columns also should be similar to that of the trimwork. i The height of the railing and the spacing of balusters should appear similar to those used historically as well. 7.9 New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color and texture similar to those used traditionally. u Replacement materials should be similar to those used historically on comparably styled buildings. i If a substitute is used, such as composition shingle, the roof material should be earth tone and have a matte, non-reflective finish. u Flashing should be in scale with the roof material. u If copper Hashing is to be used, it should be treated to establish a matte, non-reflective finish. 9.7 A lightwell may be used to permit light into below-grade living space. â€¢ In general a lightwell is prohibited on awall that faces a street. â€¢ The size of the lightwell should be minimized. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. u The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. 11.2 In a residential context, clearly define the primary entrance to a new building by using a front porch. . The front porch should be functional, in that it is used as a means of access to the entry. ~ A new porch should be in similar size and shape to those seen traditionally. â€¢ In some cases, the front door itself may be positioned perpendicular to the street; nonetheless, the entry should still be clearly defined with a walkway and porch that orients to the street. 11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building. â€¢ The primary plane of the front should not appear taller than the historic structure. â€¢ The front should include a one-story element, such as a porch. 11.5 Use building forms that are similar to those of the historic property. â€¢ They should not overwhelm the original in scale. 11.9 Use building components that are similar in size and shape to those of the historic property. o These include windows, doors and porches. o Overall, details should be modest in character. 11.10 The imitation of older historic styles is discouraged. o This blurs the distinction between old and new buildings. u Highly complex and ornately detailed revival styles that were not a part of Aspen's history are especially discouraged on historic sites. 14.6 Exterior lights should be simple in character and similar in color and intensity to that used traditionally. u The design of a fixture should be simple in form and detail. Exterior lighting must be approved by the HPC. u All exterior light sources should have a low level of luminescence. 14.7 Minimize the visual impacts of site and architectural lighting. 9 .. Unshielded, high intensity light sources and those which direct light upward will not be permitted. Shield lighting associated with service areas, parking lots and parking structures. Timers or activity switches may be required to prevent unnecessary sources of light by controlling the length of time that exterior lights are in use late at night. Do not wash an entire building facade in light. Avoid placing exposed light fixtures in highly visible locations, such as on the upper walls of buildings. o Avoid duplicating fixtures. For example, do not use two fixtures that light the same area. 14.8 Minimize the visual impact of light spill from a building. o Prevent glare onto adjacent properties by using shielded and focused light sources that direct light onto the ground. The use of downlights, with the bulb fully enclosed within the shade, or step lights which direct light only on to walkways, is strongly encouraged. 3 Lighting shall be carefully located so as not to shine into residential living space, on or off the property or into public rights-of-way. 10 00 00 0 .. three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 707 North Third Street. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. Resolution Series of 2008 Exhibits: A. Ilistoric Preservation Design Guidelines B. HPC Minutes from March 12, 2008 C. Application Exhibit A: Relevant Historic Preservation Desi*n Guidelines for 707 North Third Street, Major Development Conceptual Review 1.3 A new replacement fence should have a "transparent" quality allowing views into the yard from the street. u A fence that defines a front yard is usually low to the ground and "transparent" in nature. o On residential properties, a fence which is located forward of the front building facade may not be taller than 42" from natural grade. (For additional information, see the City of Aspen's "Residential Design Standards".) o A privacy fence may be used in back yards and along alleys, but not forward of the front facade of a building. o Note that using no fencing at all is often the best approach. cl Contemporary interpretations of traditional fences should be compatible with the historic context. 1.4 New fence components should be similar in scale with those seen traditionally. o Fence columns or piers should be proportional to the fence segment. 1.5 A side yard fence which extends between two homes should be set back from the street-facing facade. o This setback should be significant enough to provide a sense of open space between homes. 1.6 Replacement or new fencing between side yards and along the alley should be compatible with the historic context. 3 A side yard fence is usually taller than its front yard counterpart. It also is less transparent. A side yard fence may reach heights taller than front yard fences (up to six 7 .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 707 NORTH THIRD STREET, LOT 6 and M of LOT 7, BLOCK 100, HALLAM'S ADDITION, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2008 PARCEL ID: 2735-121-09-004. WHEREAS, the applicant, Carol Craig, 707 N. Third Street, Aspen, CO represented by Al Bayer Design Inc. 410 N. Mill Street, Aspen, CO, requests Major Development (Final) for the property located at 707 North Third Street, Lot 6 and M of Lot 7, Block 100, Hallam' s Addition, City of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, The property is listed on the "Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures;" and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Final Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.4.of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Sara Adams, in her staff report dated May 14,2008 performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended that the project be approved with conditions; and WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on May 14, 2008, the Historic Preservation Commission approved Resolution No._, Series of 2008, by a C_-_) vote, a Certificate of Appropriateness for an addition to the historic home, Relocation and Setback variances located on the property at 707 North Third Street, Lot 6 and 14 of Lot 7, Block 100, Hallam's Addition, City of Aspen, Colorado; and, WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on May 14, 2008 the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and other applicable sections of the Municipal Code and approved the application with conditions by a vote of to .. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants approval for Major Development (Final) with the following conditions: 1. The material of the walkway will be approved by Staff and monitor prior to purchase and installation. 2. The style and color of the retaining wall proposed for the sunken terrace will be approved by Staff and monitor prior to purchase and installation. A mock up of the color and style will be provided the field prior to approval. 3. The light fixtures will be approved by Staff and monitor prior to purchase and installation. 4. The new fence and gate will be approved by Staff and monitor prior to purchase and installation. 5. The color of the asphall roof will be approved by Staff and monitor prior to purchase and installation. 6. The porch roof will be asphalt. 7. The front entry door on the front porch will be approved by Staff and monitor. 8. The window well beneath the front porch is not approved. 9. Existing foundation stone will be salvaged for use on the historic home foundation. A new foundation material for the additions will be reviewed and approved by Staff and monitor. 10. The foundation color, style and height will be approved by Staff and monitor. A profile of the foundation in relation to the wall frame will be submitted to Staff and monitor for approval A mock up of the color and style will be provided the field prior to approval. 11. Staff and monitor will review and approve the removal of gingerbread details in the field. 12. Any information indicating historic locations of windows or doors discovered during construction will be reported to HPC staff and monitor for review. 13. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 14. The applicant shall document, using photographs and drawings, all historic elements prior to restoration and relocation of the building. 15. A construction plan with detailed phases for the development of this lot shall be submitted with the building permit application for approval by HPC Staff. The historic home shall be secured, stabilized and protected during construction, and rehabilitation of the historic home shall be in the primary phase of development. 16. A structural report demonstrating that the building can be moved and/or information about how the house will be stabilized from the house mover must be submitted with the building permit application. The applicant must provide information as to whether or not the existing floor structure will be maintained and the pro's and con's of the decision for review and approval by staff and monitor. 17. A bond or letter of credit in the amount of $30,000 to insure the safe relocation of the structure must be submitted with the building permit application. 18. A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application. .. 19. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, or the full board. 20. The conditions of approval, both Conceptual and Final HPC Resolutions, are required to be printed on the cover sheet o f the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 21. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 22. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. 23. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. LIowever, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 707 North Third Street. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of .. referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 14th day of May 2008. Approved as to Form: James R. True, Special Counsel Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Michael Hoffman, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 0 - i-J#BTE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 12, 2008 Chairperson, Michael Hoffman called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Commissioners in attendance: Alison Agley, Jay Maytin and Nora Berko, Sarah Broughton, Brian McNellis and Ann Mullins, were excused. Staffpresent: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer Sara Adams, Historic Preservation Planner Jim True, Special Counsel MOTION: Alison moved to approve the minutes of Feb. 1301 and Feb. 27% second by Jay. All in favor, motion carried. 202 N. Monarch Street - Major Development - Conceptual, Variances and Residential Design Standards MOTION: Alison made the motion to continue the public hearing and conceptual development, variances for 202 N. Monarch Street until March 26,2008; second by Jay. Att in favor, motion carried. 707 N. Third Street - Conceptual, Relocation and Variances Public notice - Exhibit I Sara presented the board with some background information. 707 N. Third was built around 1890 and the cabin is on the corner of Gillespie and North Third Street. It has a few alterations. It was originally a hipped roof and a dormer was bumped out. A wrap around porch was added and a few small additions were added. The applicant proposes to relocate the residence east of the property toward North Third Street all the way up to the ten foot setback and a little bit to the south. There is also a proposal to excavate a large basement and reduce the size of the non-historic additions and enlarge the one-story addition at the rear for a bedroom. The maj ority o f these improvements are sub-grade. Keeping the mass below grade and away from the resource is great. Site planning: Staff is a little concerned about the walkout terrace which is along the south elevation. The reason for our concern is we feel that the relationship o f the historic home to grade is jeopardized. It is almost like a huge trench even though it is not visible from the street. Another concern is the window well that is proposed beneath the front porch. At night time if there is light 1 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 12, 2008 coming from the sub-grade it would make the front porch kind off glow from underneath. It is a good innovative solution to hide a window well under a porch but not necessarily the front porch. Parking: There is no parking proposed and the City does require two parking spaces for the primary unit and one space for the ADU. There needs to be some parking proposed on-site or they need to ask for a waiver from HPC. Mass and scale: We think that the one-story mass proposed for the rear bedroom addition is very modest and meets our design guidelines. There is a linking element that connects the gabled roofbedroom with the historic home. It is successful in breaking up the development. The two additions that exist are proposed to be reduced a little. Reducing the size and changing the materials is great as it meets our guidelines a little closer. As a suggestion maybe there is a way to keep reducing the additions or omit them and incorporate that space into the new addi tion to increase the integrity of the new home. They are going to be picking up the house and this might be a good opportunity to restore some of the historic form. Relocation: The applicant proposes to shift the building 23 feet to the east to the front yard setback. Staff is not opposed to relocation but we cannot support it right now because the overall proposal does not meet our design guidelines. Overall the applicant should restudy the sub-grade space, the large terrace, light well and restudy the relationship o f this home to the home to the south which is also historic. Possibly the house could be shifted forward to the setback instead of bringing it all the way up to the ten foot setback that is required in the R-6 zone district. Affordable Housing: HPC has the authority to grant variances from design standards for ADU's through special review i f the property is an historic landmark. Regarding the ADU staff is not in favor o f having a sub-grade ADU space especially with the large terrace that would be jeopardizing the historic resource. The sub- grade space does not promote the unit's livability. The entrance to the ADU negatively impacts the historic resource with the large walkout sub-grade terrace. Criterion #3 is met because it is compatible with the neighborhood but criterion 1 and 2 are not met. Staff feels there should be parking for the 2 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 12. 2008 ADU on-site as there is no parking on the West End. We're not concerned about the attachment of the ADU to the primary residence. There is a door that joins the ADU to the primary residence and we recommend that door be taken out and making it a wall so that there is specific ADU space with its own entrance. Design standard #6 relates to the setback variances and #7 discusses roof designs. There is a roo f design over the entrance o f the ADU and staffis opposed as it adds more mass and is a weird feature that sticks out from grade o f the historic resource. Staff is opposed to that variance. We commend the applicant for proposing the ADU and it is great that the voluntarily propose to have the ADU. Setback variances: Staff finds that criteria B is not met. The setbacks do not enhance the historic property. They are asking for three feet on the north side and three feet on the south side. Staff is concerned about the retaining wall distance to the historic resource. Al Beyer, architect; Scott Slogan, associate. Doug Throm, contractor; Carol Craig, owner. Al Beyer said they reviewed the plans and feel they can pull the setback back so that they do not need a variance on the Gillespie Street side. 1n doing so the light well on the other side gets reduced. Al pointed out that they are leaving 700 square feet on the table and no maxing out their FAR. The owner loves her yard and intends to keep it. Most of the houses in the West End are maximized with additions to the back. What we are arguing is it is a better thing for HPC to take livable space and put it subterranean. The light well will make the space decent to live in. We can take off the ADU if that becomes an issue. Isn't this a better preservation of an historic resource than the chunk of building right beside and behind it? Right now we have a small one-story space in the back and the house when people drive by will look like the same old house. The owner would like to keep her existing parking space on the side where she walks through the gate and go to house that way as opposed to putting the parking in the yard. HPC has the ability to waive parking. This is an historic lot that has never had parking on-site and it is not accessed by an alley. In terms o f moving the building, the pipes freeze and we have a radon issue and there is no insulation and the heat system is shot. We have to pick the building up, dig out a basement and put it on an actual foundation. We only want to move the house once. The dormer was added in the 60's. We will move the light well from the front 3 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 12,2008 porch to the covered walkway on the west side that faces the back yard. We are willing to pull things off the table to make everything work well. We can get rid of the setback on the Gillespie side and the light well gets reduced. We can take the ADU away which gets rid o f the extra parking space that we have to provide on site. The only variance we are requesting is for the light well on the south side for the sunken terrace. Nora inquired about the additions. The bump out was in the 60's. The back bedroom was late 60's. If the ADU is not provided the space becomes part of the primary residence. Sara explained that the lot is about 5,000 square feet and you cannot have two dwelling units on it. You have to have a 6,000 square foot lot in order to have two dwelling unit. Al Beyer said the idea was down the line if we wanted live in care-giving we might as well have a legal place for them to live. Amy said this ADU is a little different because it is voluntary. If an ADU was required to be provided the City wants the kind ofunit that we think is livable above grade, detached or give us the money and we will build one ourselves. Michael asked i f the applicant has to meet all of the ADU requirements. Sara said she interprets that the three conditions need to be met. Amy pointed out that there are several design standards that need waived in order to build this ADU. Nora said the applicant is providing housing within walking distance to town and you are reducing density. Michael asked Jim if the HPC had the authority to be innovative. Jim said HPC has fiexibility but you need to be in compliance with the criteria. Al said what is key to the space whether it is an ADU or livable space is the light well. That light well allows the space to be livable and keeps it from being in the back yard. Every project is allowed 2,400 square feet o f FAR and if the basement is 100% below grade it doesn't count against your FAR. Whatever percentage of wall is above grade then that percentage o f your basement space counts as floor area. By making the light well as big as possible I'm taking up FAR that aren't going to go in the back yard in the future. 4 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 12, 2008 Michael said one of staff's issues is the walk out terrace. Al said it was 7 1/6 feet by around 24 feet without the slope and that has been reduced to 5 feet. Nora said if the terrace is landscaped in a certain way it could become a terrace garden bringing in light. Could that mitigate some of the problems? Sara said our main issue is that you are taking away the relationship of the historic resource to the ground in a huge way. It is the length of the historic resource. That is something that we feel is going to compromise the architectural integrity. It is great that the mass is below grade but the reality is there is 700 square feet that remain above grade and the possibility of a 500 square foot bonus that this property would be eligible for. In the future they could be putting that mass in the back yard and still have the sunken terrace. Nora said the applicant is not maximizing the property and she is trying to figure a way to keep the ADU sub-grade. Jay said what you are asking is can we count that FAR as part of the project which would alleviate the ability to build another structure on the property in the future. Al said putting a project out there that has a light well to make sub-grade space livable is a good solution. In the code you would have to change how FAR is calculated on the lot. Jay asked if any trees would be removed. At said there is a good size Aspen tree in the front that will have to be removed. The rest can remain. Amy pointed out that she would argue for the light well if there wasn't all this pressure that is going to come to us again ten years down the road requesting 700 square feet of FAR and possibly a FAR bonus. You need to look at the light well and decide if it is appropriate for the historic building not trying to think you are protecting the building from other development because that development is still out there. Amy said there are ideas to tweak the light well, whether it is moving the staircase so that it is oriented a different way so the ground doesn't slope right-away. Jay said he would like to see a restudy of attaching the light wells to the addition rather than attaching them to the historic structure. You are putting a light well on two sides ofthe historic structure. Possibly a light well can be moved to the master bedroom or where the hallway is. Jay said a very prominent part of the historic house is also facing Gillespie Street. 5 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 12,2 008 Al said the light well that we are talking about is on the south side of the building and you can't see it at all. It is on the south side between the two buildings. Alison said pulling the office addition back off the corner of the historic resource is helpful for positioning it. Michael outlined the issues: Walkout terrace or rather the extended light well. Alison said it is back off the corner of the historic resource. I understand what Al is trying to do but it is a 32 foot light well. Nora said this is a project that keeps the scale where it belongs and addresses a need that the applicant has. The light well is not even seen and is discrete. Michael pointed out that density in the West End is a huge problem. Staffs concern is that the light well or rather the sunken terrace degrades from the historic resource. Does HPC agree with staff' s assessment? Jay agrees with staff. Nora, Alison, Michael did not agree with staff. Michael said the next issue is the window well that the applicant is moving to the west side which is under the deck. Sara said it is not on the primary faQade but it is against the historic resource. Jay said he would like to do a site-visit. Michael said another issue is the parking. An encroachment license needs to be applied for. Sara said typically the Engineering Dept. doesn't allow parking in the right-of-way especially in the West End. They would either have to have on-site parking on the property or ask for a waiver of two parking spaces from HPC. Al said Engineering wants to put in curb and gutter everywhere. HPC has the right to waive the parking and that is what we are requesting. Al said this house has always had head in parking on the side and it is an historic part of this house. Amy explained that they do not have on-site parking and except for the ADU, I don't think this project triggers to provide parking. They have a pre- existing condition; however they don't have approval to park head in on the city right-of-way. HPC may not need to grant a parking variance. 6 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 12,2008 Michael addressed the next issue which is the bump out on the kitchen and the office. They have reduced the sizes and are they acceptable. Jay said if alternations occur it is his feeling that they should go back to the original state, at least that is the way the guidelines are interpreted. If they alter the 1970's addition the way he interprets it, it would be appropriate to have the applicant restore the building. Alison said on Gillespie i f the addition was removed you could read the historic resource more clearly. Jay said the design proposed is more complimentary to the historic building but reading the guidelines if you alter the existing addition then it should be put back to the original. Michael said the ultimate goal is to restore the original. Alison pointed out that the addition on the south side is fine. It is difficult with guideline 10.3 because the upper addition of the dormer was from a different time, although this is not a primary fagade. Amy said on the south side Al isn't changing anything except some windows. On the north side they are changing things. Al said i f we are penalized for reducing the kitchen and the office we will just keep it. Amy said i f they keep the addition on the north they need a variance to do so. One way or another the board has to "bless" the north addition. Al pointed out that the guidelines say place an addition and we are not dealing with placing an addition, we are dealing with something that is already there. Michael said as it relates to the south addition that it is six feet and we applaud you pulling it back and we are asking you to pull it back four more feet. Sara said guideline 10.2 has to do with existing conditions: A more recent addition that is not historically significant maybe removed. Al said he is opposed to pulling the south addition back four more feet because there is a dormer addition and this piece parks below it in a symmetrical manor and if you pull it back it doesn't work. Alison said she has no problem with the addition being six feet back. Michael agreed. 7 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 12,2008 Michael asked how the HPC felt about the north side. Amy said when they cut down the north side it will be a new addition and it is not the thing that is grandfathered in. Michael said on the Red Mountain side we would not approve the project with that addition. Michael said relocation is the next issue. Staff said we might agree to that but the rest of the plan doesn't work and even if we did we don't think it should go to the setback line. It should be even with the other structures on the street. Sara said she didn't mean exactly in line but to have a better relationship with the adjacent historic resource. Alison said ten feet is required and she has no problem moving it to the ten foot line. Jay agreed. Michael said the ADU request is offthe table. Al said the bump out is very , important as it effects the variance request. There is a 3'4" bump out and we will keep it the way it is and ask for the variance. The variance on the south side is to add space for a sub-grade light well. Jay said you could propose acceptance with the following conditions: No setbacks, Bump out on Gillespie be kept in the same foot print that it is now or gone completely. Approve the light wells or not approve them. Approve the garden terrace or not and you can approve the other additions based on the information given tonight. Relocation, approve or not approve. Parking not on site. Michael asked our attorney if they can take action tonight. Jim said yes but there was no public notice for the parking and that can be handled at final. Nora said what i f we approved the project with the condition of a variance on the south side being tweaked to the garden level and a variance on the north side. Jay said his concern is that the structure will be 3' 8" away from the neighboring historic structure. MOTION: Jay moved to continue 707 N. Third with a site visit to be scheduled until April 2 31 Motiondies for lackofasecond, Nora said there are only two things that she is not clear about. One is how you access to the garden level going to be handled and the northern bump out. I am having issues with guideline 10.3 and 10.8. We have a real 8 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 12, 2008 opportunity here to act on something that we believe in which is reduction of density, restoration of an historic resource, housing people who work and live in town and improving the livability of a space. Those are my Aspen Area Community Guidelines that I am thinking about. Alison said she agreed. Jay commented that you have to go with the integrity o f the guidelines and some are very clear i.e. 10.3. Michael said we already discussed this and came to the conclusion that they met the guidelines on the south side with the long light well. Nora said she would propose an approval with the condition to talk about the north side. Alison said what is difficult is the kitchen bump out on the north side and to put a condition on it is hard because it is part of the mass and scale. Carol Craig, owner said removing the addition is a big mistake because the kitchen is so little anyway. She appreciates every speck of space in the kitchen. MOTION: Alison moved to approve 707 N. Third Street, major development conceptual with the condition of removing the addition to the north side of the house and restoring the historic side. When the light well is moved to the west side ofthe house to make sure it complies with the code. New location can be reviewed at final. Setback variance for the south is being granted and relocation is being approved. The ADU is being removed from the program. Motion second by Jay. Nora said the space is small and the variance should be granted. Jay said with the preservation of the structure the north should go back to the way it was, guideline 10.3. I f we are altering the north it should be returned to the original state. Chairperson, Michael Hoffman opened the public hearing. Carol Craig said has been very interesting to listen to but I think you are crazy. You are making so much out of nothing. To me this isn't even a major project. This has been a 2 14 hour meeting and as far as I can see you haven't gotten anywhere. 1fworse comes to worse I willleave everything 9 . ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 12, 2008 the way it is and put a roof on. You can do whatever you want, I am leaving. Chairperson, Michael Hoffman closed the public hearing. Michael said the architect does not like the requirement for the restoration of the north wall. Alison said we let them move the house to where they wanted; we are allowing the terrace to the other side. The only issue is the kitchen. Jay said we have bent our guidelines to make this work. Alison also pointed out ifthe house wasn't on a corner it would be a different discussion. Nora said the only other solution is to give a variance on the north side. Alison said Al is pushing the envelope with our guidelines and he wants us to look at them differently which will cause more discussion. Vote: Jay, yes, Nora, yes; Alison, yes; Michael, yes. Motion carried 4-0. Al asked for clarification. Alison said you got everything except the little bump out on the kitchen. Al asked if the HPC had the legal authority to remove the bump out. Jim said absolutely. Jim said the applicant has the right to file a 106 action to court ifyou don't think the HPC has the authority. Amy said this is a major project and we all appreciate that she isn't maxing it out. You are picking up the house, digging a basement, moving the house. The board decided allowing the addition on the north wasn't appropriate. Al said he is upset for Carol. She has this and she took something that was falling apart and she is trying to make it better. She is trying to all the right things and the one thing that she wanted was the space that existed. If HPC has the authority why didn't ask for all the dormers to come off instead of just the north side. Amy said i f that was the one thing she wanted then give up the light well and get the house out of the setback. Jim said anybody who made the motion in favor of the project can make a motion to reconsider the decision. 10 *--- ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 12, 2008 MOTION: Jay made the motion to reconsider the decision of the previous motion; second by Nora. All in favor, motion carried. MOTION: Jay made the motion to continue the public hearingfor 707 N. Third until April 23; second by Alison. All in favor, motion carried. MOTION: Michael moved to adjourn; second by Jay. All in favor, motion carried. M,Epting *ljourneÂ¢atd:45 p.m. F a.i(~ked.,n LE Who-1 1-Lt_~~~~j i~athleen J. Stri~land, Chief Deputy City Clerk 11 .. ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 70 7 8 - .14.wr-A El-reek , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Ned H 0-4 /4, e 52 ry-1 ,154_ STATE OF COLORADO ) County of Pitkin ) 1, A- e â‚¬ â‚¬1 A S co C E--9 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the.Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: ~ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official t paper or a paper of general circulation in the City o f Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy Of the publication is attached hereto. . Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 200 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) .. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part ofa general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area ofthe proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signaire The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowleÂ®ed before me this 2% day 4 Af /1 l , 2001, by 3,Â«~3 -*a- 9- PUBLIC NOTjCE RE: 707 N. THIRD STREET- MAJOR WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL DEVELOPMENT (FINAL REVIEW) 4 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, May 14, 2008 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, City My commission expires: 0%1 le) J Il)\ b Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Carol Craig, owner of 707 N. Third Street, Lot 6 and the North 1/2 of Lot 7, Block 100, Hallam's Ad dition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, Colocado. The applicant's mailing address is P.O. Box 18, Notary Plibiic flikAL. Al 0/YA--- Woody Creek, CO 81656. HPC IS asked to grant final approval to allow an existing miner's cottage on the subject site to be relocated on the property /ex as part of construction of a basement and a mod- est one story addition. #41.. ..0,% For further information, contact Sara Adams at the City of Aspen Communitv Development Depart- ment, 130 S. Galena &t., Aspen, CO, (970) 429-2778, saraa@ci.aspen,co,us. s/Michaet Hoffman ~ \ MEYER N# v 1 Chair, Aspen Historic Preservation Commission VSÂ·.0 Â·9# Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on April 27, ~ ATTACHMENTS: -44/*' Â·Â·Â·'*98 2008.(1453440) 3%3=;:07 COPY OF THE PUBLICATION My Commission Exoirei 08/10/2010 PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED B Y MAIL 4 0; r-EXHIBIT--~ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 707 N Â· 111100 er , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: MAH 44 , 200-6- STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) 1, EL=,06'li. 4=(04 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City o f Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) ofthe Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: 4 Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. 1 Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the 27 day of AfelL , 200 g>, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph Of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) 0 . Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area ofthe proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Â«4,Â©30>sÂ» Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged be fore me this 19 day of /11Â£7 9 , 200.g by ficv 7 7 569 2/1 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL 4..10 f JONATHAN 1 My commission expires: IJAJ/~2 f- i FELDMAN i -1=NL- r /0./..W- 1 ~00~>14otary Public My Comm n Exptes 131109 J ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL .. â‚¬ PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 707 N. THIRD STREET- MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (FINAL REVIEW) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, May 14,2008 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, City Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Carol Craig, owner of 707 N. Third Street, Lot 6 and the North '/2 of Lot 7, Block 100, Hallam's Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. The applicant's mailing address is P.O. Box 18, Woody Creek, CO 81656. HPC is asked to grant final approval to allow an existing miner's cottage on the subject site to be relocated on the property as part of construction of a basement and a modest one story addition. For further information, contact Sara Adams at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429-2778, saraa@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Michael Hoffman Chair, Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on April 27,2008 City of Aspen Account 7/il 1 --- -i- A bdp.' ' I 1 - 1 2 . a. - - 4*~I- - -6 41 ri r ' 4,1 1 , ek'' -1 . . 1.0, 1,42 A 6 PUBLIC NOTICE 2 bATE WEDNESDAW, 49 14,2005 f 1 - .. Â» ~ TIME 9 00% 4 1 4 1 PbO â‚¬600Â·111 â‚¬,ALENA Or. ~ PLACE CtNCoub~ALC.BEECâ€¢V UNL ~ PURPOSE CONGICâ‚¬K AN AMUCA-noN 4 ~ ' CA~Allter) 54 CARDL CUIA. r)~NER.re 707 NoRTN - TMAD * loT 6 + ME NOR'al '/2 CF LOT 7 SUXIC |00, 11AUAM's ArtirloW C.114 ADID 10#JAIWrE OV APEN (f) TUE - AWLJUNTS MAILIâ€¢lit ADVRES, 8 Po eck & NOT,4 02[w (0 ~ BV,6. 14{. a *61Â©ID 6*111' FINAL AwfwAi TO AUD#v 0,1 UIST]In UmEIL@l\NE ON TUE SUEâ€¢*Cr WoPErNTDEE a:lbulED * 1 1 01 8 PART oF (D,GTRwmoN rfiA Ul:Nr Eâ‚¬VNV AbbrA . 1 1 3 THE I OR TI CON f DEPA Wi (970)92 0 1,% 9 j - â€¢ 1 ....4 , A *. lei .. 9.91 .. 0, . I.Â· ' AMERY SALADIN AML INVESTMENT 11 LLC ASPEN FAMILY INVESTMENTS LLC EBRAHIMI FRANCESCA 430 PARKSON RD 8401 VISTA LN HOUSE B21 BURNSIDE, 9 S BAY RD HENDERSON, NV 89015 PRESCOTT, AZ 86305 HONG KONG CHINA, BART QUAL PER RES TRST BELL 26 LLC BERGER BRUCE 909 POYDRAS ST 20TH FL PO BOX 1860 600 EAST HOPKINS - #202 NEWORLEANS, LA 70112 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHATFIELD CROSSINGS INC CHAMBERS MERLE C CURTIS JAMES L C/O DWORMAN DARRYL 440COOK ST STE 200 300 E HYMAN AVE 65 W 55TH ST STE 4A DENVER, CO 80205-5832 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10019 DURAND LOYAL 111 DR & BERNICE DAGGS JAMES K & ELLEN G E A ALTEMUS PARTNERSHIP LLLP BLACK 715 WMAIN ST STE 101 PO BOX 5000 4314 FAWN CT RT 1 ASPEN, CO 81611-1659 ASPEN, CO 81612 CROSS PLAINS, WI 53528 EFH HOLDINGS LP FRAZER WILLIAM R & JANE Z TRST HERNANDEZ CECIL M & NOELLE C PO BOX 8770 433 W GILLESPIE PO BOX 1045 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 KOLBE EMILY E HUNT ELLEN 12.8066% KESSLER HOWARD C/O HOOTENANNY LLC PO BOX 8770 1453 FLAT ROCK RD 205 S MILL ST #226 ASPEN, CO 81612 NORBERTH, PA 19072 ASPEN, CO 81611 KREPACK HOWARD & VIVIAN TRUSTEES LEFEBER HOPE LEYDECKER SUZANNE LYNNE 50% 1453 FLAT ROCK RD 710 N THIRD ST UNIT A 817 N ROXBURY DR NORBERTH, PA 19072 ASPEN, CO 81611 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 LUBAR SHELDON B & MARIANNE S LUNDGREN DONNA MARION BRANDON L & ANGELA M 700 N WATER ST #1200 PO BOX 6700 849 HARBOR OAK LN MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4206 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 CLEARWATER, FL 33756 MUSTANG HOLDINGS LLC MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC NITZE WILLIAM A C/O WAYNE HENRY 2 MUSIC SCHOOL RD 1537 28TH ST NW 1601 ELM ST STE 4000 ASPEN, CO 81611-8500 WASHINGTON, DC 20007 DALLAS, TX 75201 NORTH 4TH STREET ASSOC OAK LODGE LLC 87.1934% ODOM JOHN A JR TRUSTEE 50% C/O MIKE CONVISOR C/O WILLIAM O HUNT ODOM LORRIE FURMAN TRUSTEE 50% PO BOX 11 PO BOX 7951 11490 W 38TH AVE ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 WHEATRIDGE, CO 80033 I. RAPPAPORT KURT & JULIETTE PETERSON JAMES D & HENSLEY R PINES DAVID & ARONELLE S TRST TRUSTEES 50% PO BOX 1714 PO BOX 576 9034 BURROUGHS RD ASPEN, CO 81612 TESUQUE, NM 87574 LOS ANGELES, CA 90046-1405 RICHARDS ANN K SALTER JAMES 60% STUNDA STEVEN R 1537 28TH ST NW 500 NORTH ST 602 N 4TH ST WASHINGTON, DC 20007 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611-1212 VANDERAA GILBERT T 111 WOOD DUCK REALTY CORP UHLFELDER NAOMI C/O HOOTENANNY LLC C/O LUCY ALMODOVAR PO BOX 1165 205 S MILL ST #226 645 FIFTH AVE 8TH FLOOR ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEWYORK, NY 10022 YUE ROSINA LEE PO BOX 17147 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 â€ž.I rc .-: , .41.3,1 414Â» . VIR.2#72. ~tâ‚¬~2~ 'f~ ~/~1 /1~~ 7 ~4~'~ Ur,â„¢ 3* CR.Â¥Â¢ '.2.JMIC, 9- .'' 1.- .., 1â‚¬*1 -:. 'Billi .4* & -a m Y ' - I erÂ£ dU' ... I - .32-71 ,Â· 6 4 4 4 32.- .f 0,9;,t â‚¬r . A D. * Â· Â£ I 44.: .... 1** i*-8 I. . 0 Â· 3.0 > 1 -2- ..1.4- . -1. .14: A, 1 -4 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1' .04 - S . 21/7 i li .. 4 2,â‚¬,tttl . .f 4 7;.E:X~Al/7 0.<97 ,:. ..37 4 'M~'C. . .0 221 f. 1 ' t. .... ;â€¢D' ~.4 .-2. i: 1 7 74 1 , r 04<.93.~/~ /'1+ 4 4 .4 .#4 4 4. - ' /1 \ .f I 2,1, 41//AP 1.. 2 - 7 $ % - 00:' >,p Â». ~' ~0*~ I . .1 .:, kb %W 1 ; %- - 2,~,2/W# I . / ~7 .11-5 4 I 1 + .4.k-,4 1 +51. . tz.1 , 41 --.4.-4- % KA- 2. A.A.* -, 7-- . r . , '47 1 . 21 4. -1 - 11' . ''SW 1 ~~1-1/tr 4,41 f 4.41 ' D. .... . i Â£ 3.~;rÂ«. A- 3- -4-1 'f.,1,--4~14-â€¢.0 p-'llk1/k / -9 p - 9 9yt.~ Â·4' 9 , -- 1 99=0 - . t. ; 1-A/-1 , 9 ill Vod, I.A f,4 '' - . I---- - i D-re-, - Â¢1 ---- - - * 1~Â·I'll I 4,1~ # .- -1:r 94.1 -. r : liW Â·-' ~'~ 1. 4 , 1Â· 3 1- ' J :... 1,Â·. 42Â· 4 Â·Â· - ,. ..aid-â‚¬:0'~I,!r,~ '.* . '' .4'~~Â·~~ ~ %~. P. 48 Gx.*46: .*'5 2 r. .5.-he I 1~f~ , 4f . 199-- .. . 11 -/.. 41 a , .. ... '92 2.2 :.:1.- 14*1~ I $ * A ~ . te w -2:jf~ =- tte*~e- 1 li~,1... ".... . 3..1, th 1 .. 03662+ ~ -L- 4 â€¢, 11 ... . Ve ~ m ~ ~.,45 , '7 *. t. â‚¬ i - I. 0 9 - t~ Â¥~~~J r *- qy i 4* 442 I.in 1 r .. t :# 7 # i 4 1 *- ==13â€¢ M '1//9Â¥~Â°f-* . , 49.. 34. . l /1 ': '-- - -1/96 Ij . -4 1 1 -< + L.r...24~ i e i - Â· 2-L N.L.4/%55#I - 5â€¢r r rrl, tÂ¥*1 t -1 - 1. - lilli r-,1,4-.,-*--4 k. 1/'tailil 1 WL_ ly 23- , . A.**1 11/""law'- - I ~34..~I U -r'-V'efâ‚¬NÂ·...Â· Â·w:-hall--- 6895&.Â¥Â·t 3- 13#;,t,~,~ 1/lill" J. F:\ * / 1-4 47/lill 2*2 ' 30~|~Im prill~* 4'11 [ C-=mi- i WÂ¥.6 1/.-'I 1.0* 1 f. â‚¬31,7.- . 9.4,.19'4.41.7..4,40 -25.P:IV J 'L 3 . 'I ...): ~2 ~2. A, Â¥, g : 1~ & .*in~ ~.~'2: 99 .L#*"- 1/ E, .. < .... 1*16UE -'it . 7.*cj +Â·L-- . ~f' : 4 , . 12. 4%Â»5â‚¬ 4+4~2&"/'///14/~.#4& -.-: '12 1/IriwtÂ£#.IE- - '*%? t . - 3 D. ~py 602 4.1 -r n ' 1-314/*I 7 2 -- ': t , - 4Â· .211.. . 1 I. 5 *- 40 6 y, &<C U 4 . , It 0,4: 3 . /' - ~/ 1 -Â£91 // -//pq#796 kt.~, Clf % 91= 7 3~3(..re".."spiq/:' ' 4 'Â· â€¢ 6 ..y 16:.mod El . r.1.- Â¥ 91 , 77Â·- I ./1 '21= 1 - 4 t .........r/M.*.Il....... #4......... r 12 . 7 :r 11â‚¬: .1 J. dÂ¢. Â· "r'Â¢ 4 ' -~V-Ut' ' 4 -7-Â·'>, ~ 11mT/*3<Merl 11~ t 6/ .-I YMMI-F=Â£ rjo Â¥ 1 .6. Â¥ r " "0 1 . g --1--1 . i f U â‚¬11 IN p ,-v ' 7 +4' ...4 ' mmil/*F//. I . mic. , I . M 1 .1 ty' Â¥ - 1- -,râ€¢ 0.- Â· .... 0- .0 RtprEN * . ' r. ' B . Jt . 4 ...1 r 4 * .p AUFF / :.Flf J, ' 1 . ..... *= 1 Â¥ f . 1 4-7.49 . ..1 .4.'ll-'""V .. 4- Â·' e ~ L r 1 F W + /6 r- -- /- , f /: . i. 4 ( , ..4,1 . . '44:1 --* 11 r..4.~ r - 1 irl - - 2.014 f 22 1 ~~-~ / 1.M'. - * *.I--16.ifil ' L.. m, 0 7 9 v S .'.......'. .#-- -- . -1 I :. t ':'.I:~ ~' Â·' ..' I:. # . ... ....r *. -1 7*: t-4-/f * 'uht" Â· 34. /- r r.- + . e y 5. . Weatheredwood 5/2/U8 3:34PM .- i .. ... In . I . . 9.-4 Fr "14* ''=, , - I Â» 10 * 7% 94 -4 : *I'. : Iâ€¢/ 2 4:0 , 4; ..Â·ft.Â·. 4, b . e - :2 -'â‚¬-5 kti .~ -' 6 17 .M I Â·Â· .. . I ./ .4 $ 44 7 â€¢ ~44-44 i'l-' ~ r 4Â·Al http://www.elkcorp.com/images/products/swatches/raised_profile/weatheredwood.cfm Page 1 of 1 ..1 +/h folki 74 ./.-L__1_1. 1 E $ . 4,4 4% , A , 1 ' r tf , -ly . C . -' : 4 . I A - ..LÂ£\ 4 4<Criei , . AN + ov 1 4 ' 4 f U 2 , 4.. d r . p r. 4 %4 aÂ» A: 1 71 - ' 3 4, I I. 2 1...I- - &= 4 â‚¬1 -9. 2~ 2.1- ' . 90 ~ AL <Irou-1 41\ lAA- 2- ' 34 1 6 . 14 . 1 . ..4 t' %4 . 9Â»1 t. + I B 4 I?* , L 1 342 Â» Â¥ 4 9 45. . râ‚¬ . rÂ¥, . 4 t'Â· 'h Â·* ji is 'Â· I'. 0 r . '.4 : t. 4 1.-/* & 1.. 6, 64.4 . 24. -., 44 1 t U 1 3 i ..4 1 74 1 4. I ' Al 41.thic ,< 5/0 . a -9 I ..1 / h 1 .. 5 : 4 V . -r-9 IN/- 2. f. - h 9 1 p / 4 r. @12~4 -1 1 -b' â€¢~ ,-~li uic - I - . r' N 1__. 1-1 LT ': C-r-:LI' r '' 1- 1 1 1. ..4.- \ 1 .r .il e- 7.4 1 ' 1 . k i LO-~ 4442, RECEIVED =-24:te/'ll- r g L - Al Beyer Design Inc. MAY 0 3 2008 CITY OF ASPEN 410 N. Mill 8-11 â€¢ Aspen. CO 81611 Phone 970.925,8339 â€¢ Fax 970.925.8392 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - All des,gns. ideas. arrangements and plans indcated by these chwIngs and specifications are the property and copyright of the Architect 4 ' and shall nether be used on any other work nor Â· be used by any other person for any use ' dimensions shall take precedence over scaled 421-1 cmen/ors and shall be venfyed at the Job stte ABb - Â«2- =229-2~: 12 _. 4 -Â· -d _In 1- - - r . Any amensional descrepancy shall be brought to the attention of the Architect pnor to - commencement of work. rh NORTH ELEVATION GILLESPIE Â«scALE: 1/4"-1'-0 - CRAIG Residence 707 N. Brd St. ASPEN, CO 7,7 Â·w '- -4-- E -1 X -- - UH - y 2 - .*- â€ž. CIE[IJ 'b y .- Â®gAST ELEVATIONTH RE-3-TEET Â®0 'NEST ELEVATION - ~ SCALE: 1/4"- 1'-0 SCALE: 1/4"- 1'-0 Ignme#"IMMEMI. REVISIONS 2/14/08 Proposed Plan - - Â·11--ip 3,10/05 Continued Proposal ~321-1 d. .9.# PROJECT NUMBER of uoi-, RE- EMB 8 2 42 2 DRAWN BY: S.S., AB CHECKED BY: A.B. -f'ILE w-" ,~ ~ - ISSUE DATE: 4/2 q /08 4 *f*- . ...Fl//Il- ~2~4, /-2 2,0 :rsâ‚¬ ;0141,7:. *Â»>: c , ~4 'CE Â« 1 SHEET TITLE AND NUMBER ~ SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" - 1'-0 ELEVATIONS 0 0 MAJOR DEVELOPMENT FINAL REVIEW FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO RESIDENCE AT 707 NORTH THIRD STREET ASPEN, COLORADO This application is for Major Development Final, Relocation, and 3' South Side Yard Setback for a sub-grade retaining wall. The scope of work includes relocation, remodel, and an addition to the existing structure on the property legally know as Lot 6 and the North h of Lot 7, Block 100, Hallam Addition. The parcel ID # is 273512109004. The lot contains 5,000 square feet of area and is zoned R-6. The attached location map shows the property at the corner of South Third Street and Gillespie Avenue just South of the Music Tent parking lot. The property is listed on Aspen's Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. This application is being submitted for Carol Craig, the Owner of the property. Al Beyer Design Inc. is the authorized Owner's Representative. HPC has granted Major Development Conceptual approval. This process resulted in the current design, which meets the design guidelines and the Owner's needs. The procedure to accomplish this project includes 1.) Major Development/Conceptual and 2.) Major Development Final. The proposed improvements include moving the original house to the East portion of the lot and placing it on a new basement foundation. Existing additions to the house will be improved but not expanded except at BR wing. Existing additions along the South and East sides will be partially stripped away to expose more of the original structure. The North 70's era kitchen expansion will be completely removed. An existing bedroom addition to the rear will be replaced with a slightly bigger version over a basement below. The idea is to place much of the allowable area below grade and keep above grade improvements subordinate to the small-scale original architecture. An 8' wide sunken terrace along the southern side brings needed light to the basement level. This area, hidden behind a low hedge, is indiscernible from the street. A _.well hidden below the.entry porch, provides mi*mal extra light, and ventilation. From the~ exterior this new porch will appear as an exact replica of an histofic porch with an included mud- scraping grate. A new door and windows have been added to the original structure in the presumed original locations based on similar historic homes of this character. A re-roof of the existing structure is included in the scope of work, which includes replacing bubble style skylights on the upper flat roof with new smaller profile units hidden from view. The existing FAR on the property is 1,755sf, all of it above grade. The new plans contain * 1,780 sf total above existing grade and 1,489 sf (446 sf FAR) on Basement level. Total FAR for the new project is 2,229 sf, versus 2,960 sf of allowable FAR leaving 731 sf of allowed but un- built FAR. Final plans, elevations and views are included in this application to more clearly represent the proposed improvements. RECEIVED MAY 0 5 2008 ~4 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT r. 0 0 HPC CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW From the introduction to the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines: " Note that not every guideline will apply to each project, and that some balancing of the guidelines must occur on a case-by-case basis. The HPC must determine that a sulTicient number of the relevant guidelines have been adequately met to approve a project proposal. We emphasize that these are only guidelines, are not applicable in all cases, and need to be weighed with the practicality of the measure. Following is a reference to each of the applicable Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and a response to them for this project. Chapter 1 FENCES 1.1 The existing fence will be maintained 1.9 The established progression of public-to-private spaces will be maintained 1.11 Most of the mature landscaping will be maintained on site. The project will impact a few relatively new aspen trees on site. 1.15 Site lighting will be shielded and will not impact adjacent properties. Chapter 2 MATERIALS 2.1 Original building materials will be preserved and protected from deterioration. 2.5-2.8 Portions of the building newly exposed will be patched where existing siding exists or repaired with siding to match the original materials and shapes. At this time it is unclear whether some of the decorative scroll/corbel at the roof eave work is original or part ofa later faux addition. If found to be original, they will be maintained. I f not the Owner will decide whether to 1 keep or remove these elements. Chapter 3 WINDOWS 3.1 Existing original windows (there are 3 known total) will be preserved. 3.3-3.7 New windows within the original structure will match the historic ratio of wall to window openings, will be similar in design using similar materials, and will honor historic proportions. Chapter 4 DOORS 4.5 A new door will be installed in the presumed original location. This is based on evidence that the existing northern front door (on East Faqade) replaced an original window (compare 1980 photo to present). The new entry doorway will reuse the current southern entry door, which appears to be quite old with.Rossiblatransom-unit abgxsÂ· The call will be made during construction when the original framing (hopefully intact) can be exposed to see what was there initially. The North wall ofthe Living Room space has a window shown with the presumption of one there originally. If it is found to have been an original door instead, an appropriate replica door will replace that window. 0 . Chapter 5 PORCHES 5.1,5.5 A probable Original porch was removed prior to 1980 and the existing porch is a later addition not completely in character with original vintage. The proposed front porch will be rebuilt in a smaller footprint that does not extend northward of the fagade and will be a better replica of what an original porch would have looked like.-Thisnew-Porch witdiscretely cover a ~ - Jight, ventilation. and egress well below: From the exterior there will be no evidence of the well, ~ ~ ~ which gains light and air via small spaces in the deck boards and lattice surround. (The well will ~ be well, willfully indiscernible.) Access from the well is via a mud scraper/ grate set flush in the ~ porch deck. The new porch will use materials, scale, & details similar to what the original may 1 ' have been. 5.3 The new porch will remain open. Chapter 7 ROOFS 7.1 The currently unaltered forms of the original roof will be maintained including the eaves. Later dormer additions also remain but are not increased in stature. The original roof form is better seen because of the reductions of lower additions. 7.2 Original cave depth is preserved and enhanced by the reduction of lower level additions. 7.3 The current skylights are domed bubbles visible from the curb. Replacement skylights wil-Lbc nnoticeable. 7.4 The Original chimney was replaced in the past by a large metal vent. A new smaller metal vent will replace the older cousin. 7.7 No new upper roof dormers are planned, Lower root's remain subordinate to upper roofs. 7.8-7.10 The current roof is in need ofrepairs so will be stripped and re-roofed with materials similar to original. It is assumed the roof was wood shingle originally so new cedar shingles or asphalt shingles that match the same texture and color are proposed.If evidence exists that a metal roof may have been original that could become an option. Lower roofs will be low profile metal in an earth tone finish. The upper flat roof will be replace with an unseen from the street, meinbrane material. Chapter 9 ...LOCATIONS-FOUNDATIONS 9.1 The existing structure is shifted approx. 24' East and 6' North to the proposed location setback 10' from the Third Street property line. This places the house in a more visible location in compliance with the Residential design Standards (the existing location does not comply). Currently the house has no real foundation or crawl space. The floor has sagged some 10" in the center and the pipes freeze every winter. Moving the structure onto a real foundation will help preserve it, offer the chance of a level floor and allow for properly functioning utilities. 9.4 The new location maintains an historic orientation. 93,Theneignwillbe modest te_mgtch-thuriginal model stectgE: 9.6 The structure will be located slightly above the existing elevation to keep it out of the dirt.~98) /*Idl ? 9.7 The front porch covers a well, which is set back from the front fagade of the house and is allowed by the Residential Design Standards. Since the well is hidden this should be a non- issue. The sunken Terrace on the South side is set further back from the front fagade and is hidden from street view by a low hedge setback behind the street facing faâ„¢le of the original structure. This low hedge is similar to other historic plantings in the neighborhood. The sunken 4 . . Terrace area has been greatly minimized from earlier designs (and reduced again in this final form). It is an important feature ofthe project. Without the extra feeling of light and space created by the terrace, the basement areas would end up above grade in the back yard, which faces Gillespie. Allowing a larger light well in this case is a small price to trade for a larger yard. This concept also keeps new development from becoming 2 stories, which further preserves the historic feel of the property. It would be easy to argue that such a light well is not the standardized norm but di fficult to convince that the result of this tactic does not enhance the overall historic feel and scale in this location. It is worth noting also that a reduction in the light well would result in more available FAR which is what a typical developer may desire. In this case Carol Craig would prefer a nicer back yard to enjoy her retirement an-d have a separate- apartment (for a future caregived, which does not intrude on her personal space. Chapter 10 BUILDING ADDITIONS 10.1,10.2 The existing additions are perhaps 40 years old but are not significant. This proposal reduces the extent of those additions and renders them more modestly than the current form. By reducing the footprint of the existing SE porch area, the original building form is more pronounced. A similar result occurs to the NE corner when that porch is replaced with a smaller more appropriate version. The existing bump out on the NW side is reduced but maintained in a form that relates to other historic additions in the area. 10.3 The new addition employs a gable roof above lower shed forms, which is consistent with the original structure. No historic features are covered by the new project that is not already covered by previous additions. 10.4 The new addition is a very traditional form but stands as a new structure separate from the original structure. 10.6 The new structure is respectfully subordinate to the modest scale of the original structure. 10.7 The new addition is connected by a one story element at least 10' long. 10.8 The Addition is placed to rear portion of the property behind the original structure. 10.1 1 All materials employed on the new addition will be refrained from insubordination. 10.14 Eave lines and roof forms of existing and new additions are in character with the original structure. Chapter 14 GENERAL GUIDELINES 14.7 At this time the only exterior lighting planned is_recessed in the perch soffits to minimizm visual impacts. If it is deemed more appropriate a simple wall mounted fixture may be installed <bythe front door. - 14.14 Service areas will remain screened from the street. 14.17 At this time a driveway is not planned for the project, as the Owner is content with the existing historic parking situation. The addition ofa driveway is feasible (and provisions have been considered in this design) but would require the undesired removal of some large trees. The property has no record of off-street parking so it is historically appropriate to maintain the existing conditions in this circumstance. . 0 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS REVIEW Following are references to and Applicant responses to the relevant Residential Design Standards: A. SITE DESIGN 1. Front Fagade faces and is parallel to North Third Street 2. Per RDS at least 60% of the front fagade shall be within 5' of the minimum front yard setback. Placing the East gable fa~ade and setback 10' from the East property line achieves this standard. In the current location the existing house location does not meet the Standards. B. BUILDING FORM 1. At least 10% of the total square footage is located in the secondary mass, which is linked by a subordinate element. D. BUILDING ELEMENTS 1. The building has a street oriented entrance and principal window and includes a porch of 50 or more square feet. 2. The covered entry porch is a street facing one-story element, which is greater than 20% of the building width. 4. All light wells are entirely recessed behind the street facing facades. E. CONTEXT 1. Materials will be consistently applied on all sides and used true to their nature. Exterior sheathing and roofing will not be highly rellective. RELOCATION NOTES The existing structure does not have a serviceable foundation. It makes good sense to place the structure over a new foundation that meets the Residential Design Standards and anticipates impacts of future development on the adjacent property. This configuration allows space for an accessible bedroom addition to the rear of the lot and leaves room for a future carport or garage. The side yard setback variance requests facilitate the success of the project and are minor in nature. Shifting the house north a bit provides better solar access. The structure has been inspected by ABD Inc., Throm Const. and Bailey Movers. It is sufficiently sound for the move. CONCLUSION The applicant has submitted all of the requested materials and responded to all applicable standards of the Aspen Land Use Code pursuant to direction given by City Staff. Sufficient evidence has been provided to demonstrate the project's compliance with those standards. Additional information can be provided if required by contacting Al Beyer Design Inc. abd@,spris.net 925-8339 Thanks you for your time and kind consideration of this project!