The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.205 S Mill St.0022.2006.AHPC- 205 S. Mill St Ste 226 Cert No Neg 273707338004 Case 0022.2006.AHPC i ' 4 \141 l flf) 6 'bl-~, klf094Â«\~ ~ 64 1 4 fulk bliu Allg - P 1 I. 0. City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0022.2006.AHPC PARCEL ID NUMBER 2737-073-38-004 PROJECT ADDRESS 205 S. Mill St., Suite 226 PLANNER Sara Adams CASE DESCRIPTION Certificate of No Negative Effect REPRESENTATIVE Jeffrey Halferty DATE OF FINAL ACTION 4/11/07 CLOSED BY Amy DeVault .. 131 111 - - 2 -'_ _ 1 De Edit Record Navigate Form Reporti Format Lab Melp Â§46 0 4/ (1 -?A 4 - .4 . 9 Main Sub Fermits Royting Statu. Custom Fields Fee Summam Fee; Pa:cels RÂ·. tir,0 H,:tory Actions ; Petmit Type Â·j~ itc A.ptn Hootic Land Use 20:04 Permit Lt f.0.1.Â·2.23*6.AH>,- i Addess ' Â·~ Â·Â·Â·~' { Apt/suite 1226 City ~AS PEN State iCO~3 Zip 31611- U 2I PemÂ·Al Intormation 1 , Maste, PES,mit Routupg Queue lahpc06 Applied *423/2006 mÂ¥ Aoject ' Status pending App,oved ~ 3 Description CERT NO NEG EFFECT. MINOR. C ]NE- 4 FINAL HPC Issued : i FAal j 1 S i.jbnwited JEFFREY HALFERT,* 920+4535 Clock Rur Fring Day: : 0 Expkes 'LI:/201-007 owner Last Name VANDERRA -: Ast Name GIL 205 S MILL '31 ASPEN CO 81611 ew~Uâ‚¬â‚¬XÂ£**Â«,~ Phone l970 544.4644 4 0 wner Is Applicant? 1 Appheart Last Name VANDERRA First Name;GIL 1205 S MILL ST IASPEN CO 81611 Pi~one 1970} 541464 Cutt # 26910 1,2 ndef Last Name 1 :1 First Name Â· Phone 1 j V,e V Record 2 ot 2 'I'""""'t"'i&-~ i"iii"mm--mv.â€žm.~mm~-.um.iâ€ž.uâ€žm.mâ„¢Mâ€ž6â€¢wâ€ž*w42.~#u~ 7no %09Pol driojg qeli h , 1.2 ... .. Ill.IM : HARVEY' S ELECTRIC ~~ FAX NO. : ~Illh Apr. 25 2006 10: 15AM Pl ...:i ~ jiBEw- INC. 82 Coneios . P.O. Box 1012 Alamosa, CO 81101 (719) 589-9144 To: CÂ·,47 of A.SPE-'f Fax: 9 10-9 20-5 4 39 24 4-Fw, i D EN )SE FROM -C Date: 4-2.5.-8 G UIMA Re: El Ec-+ r , c-, f R eD >J tr.?l: fles: 4-, 6-/ WE HAVE A NEW FAX NUMBER THAT IS 719.589.0665 7~7 .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 205 SOUTH MILL STREET, SUITE 226, LOTS D - I, BLOCK 81, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 12, SERIES OF 2007 PARCEL ID: 2737-073-38-004. WHEREAS, the applicant, Gil Vanderra, represented by Jeffrey Halferty Designs, has requested Minor Development and Commercial Design Review for the property located at 205 S. Mill Street, Suite 226, Lots D-I, Block 81, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, the procedure for a Minor Development Review is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC reviews the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for approval of Commercial Design Review, HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine, per Section 26.412 of the Municipal Code, that the project conforms to the following criteria: 1, The proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial Design Standards or any deviation from the Standards provides a more-appealing pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. Unique site constraints can justify a deviation from the Standards. Compliance with Section 26.412.070, Suggested Design Elements, is not required but may be used to justify a deviation from the Standards. 2. For proposed development converting an existing structure to commercial use, the proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial Design Standards, to the greatest extent practical. Amendments to the *ade of the building may be required to comply with this section. 3. For properties listed on the Inventory of Historic S ites and Structures or located within a Historic District, the proposed development has received Conceptual Development Plan 4Lr 92 0. 0 approval from the Historic Preservation Commission, pursuant to Chapter 26.415. This criterion shall not apply if the development activity does not require review by the Historic Preservation Commission; and WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission is authorized pursuant to Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.575.030.D to reduce the pedestrian amenity requirement by any amount, such that no more than half the requirement is waived, as an incentive for well-designed projects having a positive contribution to the pedestrian environment. The resulting requirement may not be less than 10%. WHEREAS, Sara Adams, in her staff report dated April 11,2007 performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found the review standards and the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and Commercial Design Standards have been met; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on April 11, 2007, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application for Minor Development and Commercial Design Review met the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and the Aspen Municipal Code Commercial Design Standards review criteria, and approved the application by a vote o f 4 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC approves the application for Minor Development of the property at 205 S. Mill Street, Suite 226, Lots D-I, Block 81, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, with the following conditions; 1. Plastic screening will not be used in the winter season to enclose the deck area. Any screening will require HPC approval before installation and purchase. 2. 50% of the Pedestrian Amenity cash in lieu fee is waived; the applicant will pay $5,289.40 for Pedestrian Amenity cash in lieu to the City for pedestrian improvements downtown. 3. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by LIPC staff and monitor, or the full board. 4. The conditions o f approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 5. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. 6. The red colored slate scheme and saddle colored treks are approved as illustrated in Exhibit I. 7. The area beneath the deck will be brick, matching the existing brick fa~ade of Suite 226. 8. The storage gate will be approved by staff and monitor. 9. The curved beams that tie back into the building will be steel or wrapped in steel/metal for approval by staff and monitor. 10. If the applicant chooses to omit the tall 18+ foot columns from the design, then staff and monitor will review and approve new drawings o f the deck without the columns. 11. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this 4 - approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 205 South Mill Street, Suite 226 Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice o f final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 11th day of April 2007. Approved as to Form: Jim True, City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Michael Hoffman, Vice Chairman ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk .. 0 0 . . . . jeffrey halferty desig 215 S. Monarch Ste 202 aspen,c 0.816 970.920.4535 970.925.6035 FAX Issue: 06.28.06 BRUNELLESCHI'S 205 SOUTH MILL STREET #226 SENERAL CONTRACTOR ASPEN, COLORADO. 81611 PROJECT Brunalleschi's 205 5. Mill Street # 226 Aspen, Colorado.81611 h -1 21 2,30 MAR 3 0 2007 A- EN BUILD!NG DEPARTMENT SHEET GLOVER Â® 2006 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF J.H. DESIGN P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF JH DESIGN .... . 0 . 0 0 - jeffrey holferty -NEW STEEL HANDRAIL desig /~ MATCH EXISTINS SLATE 215 S. Monarch Ste 202 Eg~0<2- HORIZONTAL STEEL RAILING aspen,c 0.816 205 SOUTH MILL STREET #226 970.920.4535 970.925.6035 FAX XISTINe KINDOÂ»1 - MATCH EXISTINS BRICK ape Â¢ eraln Store Front nd of bildIng - rÂ» Issue: / 1 4 i ~- NIZPN HINIP RAIL -4 e..._ 06.28.06 U- 0 0 4 24" pinters *3 -1 UP SLATE T) MATCH EXISTINS TO ENTRANCE 211.576 sf 28'-4~" TING SIDEMALK ISTING ASPENS TING SIDEMALK EXISTINS A S [\ /] PROPOSED PLAN I eENERAL CONTRACTOR 205 SOUTH MILL STREET #226 24'-5~" 12" 6LUE LAM Â»lOOP BEAM LUE LAM MOOD BEAM EXISTING BUILPINS END OF BUILDING f PPED STEEL PAINTED BLACK ~ 0 NEW FRENCH DOOR * DETERMINE LOCATI EXISTINS WINDO , / \ / \ / \ =11 MAR \ TOI EXISTIN HAND RAILS ~ 3 0 2007 \ TCH EXISTI SLATE * NEK RAILING STEEL 1 1 = SCALE: Oil- WENT BUILDING DEER 0 1/4" = 1'0" 5 MOOP PECKINS PROJECT NER DECK AREA FRAMINe A . Brunalleschib lei 9 STORAGE ACCESS 205 S. Mill Street # 226 Aspen, Colorado.81611 O STOM PLANTERS 9 ATE TO MATCH EXISTINe -1 A 5 DESCRIPTION in I -An' 1 1 It N el 23/" PROPOSED ELEVATIONS, BRI TO MATCH EXISTING FLANS, AND DETAILS PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION 2-16" PROPOSED hEST ELEVATION A-Ffmvd - SHEET 2Â£sibh Aol.0 Â® 2006 1~4 (*FloNS THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF J.H. DESIGN P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRIUEN PERMISSION OF JH DESIGN . . . . 0 . . - "lii A MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Sara Adams, Historic Preservation Planner RE: 205 South Mill Street, Minor Review and Commercial Design Review- continued Public Hearing DATE: April 11,2007 SUMMARY: The subject property is located at 205 South Mill Street, within the Commercial Core Historic District, and currently houses Brunelleschi's Pizza half a story above sidewalk level. Jimmy's Restaurant and Bar is located above Brunelleschi's with an outdoor balcony sitting directing on top o f Bruno' s pizza. The applicant proposes to add a new outdoor dining deck that will project over the concrete sidewalk replacing the restaurant's current street level outdoor seating. New French doors are also proposed for access onto the deck. This application is two parts: Minor Development review will deal with whether or not the deck is an appropriate feature within the context of historic downtown; and Commercial Design Review will address the "Building Relationship to Primary Street" and "Pedestrian Amenity" requirements of the Commercial Design Standards. On June 28,2006, HPC reviewed the proposal for a 170 square foot deck and recommended the applicant continue to redesign the proposal paying close attention to the stairs and pushing the deck away from the Grape and Grain storefront to the west. The application has been delayed since the June meeting while the applicant worked with the Building Department to determine if the permanent deck would increase the bathroom load and necessitate additional bathrooms for the restaurant. The Building Department resolved the bathroom quantity issue at Mill Street Plaza and has instructed Staff to proceed with the application. 1-IPC continued the application again on December 13, 2006 and instructed the applicant to restudy the following: tie the posts back into the building: materials. planting: and the west - screen door. HPC favored the proposed Plan I, and did not rule out the possibility of waiving up to 50% of the Pedestrian Amenity cash-in-lieu requirement. The application before HPC is for a 211.576 square foot deck. Staff is still not in favor of a deck in this location; however, staff finds that the applicant has met the requests made by HPC at the December 13,2006 meeting and recommends approval. APPLICANT: Gill Vanderra, represented by Jeffrey Halferty Designs. PARCEL ID: 2737-073-38-004. 1 .. ADDRESS: 205 S. Mill Street, Suite 226, Lots D-I, Block 81, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: CC, Commercial Core. MINOR DEVELOPMENT The procedure for a Minor Development Review is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. If the application is approved, the HPC shall issue a Certificate of Appropriateness and the Community Development Director shall issue a Development Order. The HPC decision shall be final unless appealed by the applicant or a landowner within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 26.316. Staff Response: Current condition: Brunelleschi's Pizza Restaurant sits a half story above the sidewalk, which creates a challenging setting within the downtown area. Staff finds that the current seating area at the sidewalk level softens a blank wall and creates the effect of a ground level entrance. According to the Design Guidelines "the Commercial Core Historic District should continue to develop as a pedestrian- oriented environment. Streets, sidewalks and pathways should encourage walking, sitting and other pedestrian activities; buildings should be visually interesting..." The current solution at Brunelleschi's takes a "pedestrian awkward" fagade and creates the illusion of a ground level with the outdoor seating area, which complies with the Historic Design Guidelines and the Commercial Design Standards in the Municipal Code. Proposal: The proposed deck is about 5 feet above the sidewalk, which is not conducive to the pedestrian- oriented goals of the downtown historic district by orienting the lower portion of the deck at eye level of pedestrians; however the applicant proposes a slate landscape box and a variety of plantings in front of the deck to soften the facade and create interest at the pedestrian level during all seasons. The applicant responded to HPC's concerns regarding the proximity of the deck to Grape and Grain by cutting off the corner of the deck, introducing a 135 degree angle at the corner, and uulliry ths_entire west-â€žside of the deck 2 feet from the property line, as required by the Building Codlrhe deck is tied back into the building with 18+ feet tall brick and metal columns and curved wooden beams, as recommended by HPC. Staff was originally concerned with the overall height of the deck columns and the vertical emphasis, but finds that this is necessary for the half story storefront. Staff finds that the shorter brick columns help ground the structure and create a "human scale" that is necessary along the sidewalk. 2 .. The applicant reduced the size of the west metal screen door to a width of about 2 feet 8 inches, and proposes wood trellis at the base of the deck behind the planting. Relevant Design Guidelines are: 13.8 Maintain the alignment of facades at the sidewalk's edge. . Place as much of the fa~ade of the building at the property line as possible. . Locating an entire building front behind the established storefront line is inappropriate. â€¢ Where a portion of a building must be set back from the sidewalk, use landscaping elements to define the sidewalk edge. 13.12 Rectangular forms should be dominant on Commercial Core facades. â€¢ Rectangular forms should be vertically oriented. 13.16 Develop the ground floor level of all projects to encourage pedestrian activity. ' Consider using storefronts to provide pedestrian interest along the street. Storefronts should maintain the historic scale and key elements such as large display windows and transoms. â€¢ Large storefront display windows, located at the street level, where goods or services are visible from the street, are particularly encouraged. â€¢ The primary building entrance should be at street level. "Garden level" entrances are inappropriate. t~,1. the proposed brick will match existing brick on the Bruno's faQade, and the proposed slate tile 4 The proposal references existing materials on the north fagade of the Mill Street Plaza Building: imitates Jimmy's fa~ade. The proposed railing is metal and simple. Staff finds that the proposed materials are appropriate for the context and will help integrate the deck into the existing built fabric. Nok- i %[4-t Staff is concerned about future additions to the deck, specifically the potential for_nlastii screenintgrotect_diners in the wintertime. Condition of approval #1 below addresses this concern by requiring the applicant to submit a proposal to HPC in the event that they desire to use the space in the wintertime and need plastic "walls". Staff finds that the guidelines are generally met in this proposal. COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW AND PEDESTRIAN AMENITY SPACE An application for Commercial Design Review may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied based on conformance with the following criteria: 1. The proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial Design Standards or any deviation from the Standards provides a more-appealing pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. Unique site constraints can justify a deviation from the Standards. Compliance with Section 26.412.070, Suggested Design Elements, is not required but may be used to justify a deviation from the Standards. 2. For proposed development converting an existing structure to commercial use, the proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial Design Standards, to the greatest extent practical. Amendments to the fa~ade of the building may be required to comply with this section. 3 .. 3. For properties listed on the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures or located within a Historic District, the proposed development has received Conceptual Development Plan approval from the Historic Preservation Commission, pursuant to Chapter 26.415. This criterion shall not apply if the development activity does not require review by the Historic Preservation Commission. Staff Response: The Commercial Design Standards are attached to this memo as "Exhibit B." They are in many ways similar to LIPC's own guidelines- the relevant Commercial Standards are A4 and A5 regarding the "Building Relationship to Primary Street." Adding a deck to the Mill Street Plaza building will accentuate the less than desirable relationship of this section of the building to grade. The goal of both HPC and Commercial Design Guidelines is to focus activity and features at the street level. A4. Commercial buildings shall be developed with the first floor at, or within two (2) feet above, the level of the adjoining sidewalk, or right-of-way i f no sidewalk exists. "Split-level" retail frontage is prohibited. A5. Commercial buildings incorporating a setback from a primary street shall not incorporate a substantial grade change between the building faâ„¢le and the public right-of- way. "Moats" surrounding buildings are prohibited. The Mill Street Plaza building is required to provide an area equal to 25% of the site as a pedestrian amenity. This amenity can be provided on the site, or can be addressed through a comparable improvement made in the downtown area, or a cash in lieu payment. The concrete area between Brunelleschi building fa~ade and the property line along East Hopkins Avenue is considered to contribute to the requirement that 25% of the footprint of the entire Mill Street Plaza must provide a pedestrian amenity. The proposed deck will reduce the amount of pedestrian amenity that exists at Mill Street Plaza. The maximum height for a pedestrian feature located above finished grade to still qualify as a pedestrian amenity is 4 feet. Up to hal f of the obligation can be waived by P&Z or HPC as described below: Reduction of Requirement. The Planning and Zoning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission, as applicable, may reduce the pedestrian amenity requirement by any amount, such that no more than half the requirement is waived, as an incentive for well-designed projects having a positive contribution to the pedestrian environment. The resulting requirement may not be less than 10%. On-site provision shall not be required for a reduction in the requirement. A mix of uses within the proposed building that enliven the surrounding pedestrian environment may be considered. During the December 13, 2006 HPC meeting, the Commission seemed amenable to granting up to a 50% waiver in Pedestrian Amenity cash in lieu fees for good quality design that have a positive contribution to the pedestrian environment, which equals $5,289.40 [105.788 square feet (50% of the proposed deck) * $50]. The cash payment is used for important pedestrian improvements downtown and would be a loss to the City. 4 .. DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: â€¢ approve the application, â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or â€¢ continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the application for Minor Development of the property at 205 S. Mill Street, Suite 226, Lots D-I, Block 81, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, with the following conditions; 1. Plastic screening will not be used in the winter season to enclose the deck area. Any screening will require HPC approval before installation and purchase. 2. A waiver of 50% of the Pedestrian Amenity cash in lieu fee is waived; the applicant will pay $5,289.40 for Pedestrian Amenity cash in lieu to the City for pedestrian improvements downtown. 3. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by LIPC staff and monitor, or the full board. 4. The conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 5. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies o f the HPC resolution applicable to this project. 6. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 205 South Mill Street, Suite 226 5 .. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date o f publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. Exhibits: Resolution # of 2007 A. Relevant Design Guidelines B. Commercial Design Standards C. Minutes from June 28,2006 and December 13,2006 LIPC Meeting D. Application Exhibit A- Relevant Historic Preservation Design Guidelines for Brunelleschi's Pizza 13.8 Maintain the alignment of facades at the sidewalk's edge. . Place as much of the faQade of the building at the property line as possible. â€¢ Locating an entire building front behind the established storefront line is inappropriate. . Where a portion of a building must be set back from the sidewalk, use landscaping elements to define the sidewalk edge. 13.12 Rectangular forms should be dominant on Commercial Core facades. ~ Rectangular forms should be vertically oriented. ' The fa*ade should appear as predominantly flat, with decorative elements and proj ecting or setback "articulations" appearing to be subordinate to the dominant form. 13.16 Develop the ground floor level of all projects to encourage pedestrian activity. â€¢ Consider using storefronts to provide pedestrian interest along the street. Storefronts should maintain the historic scale and key elements such as large display windows and transoms. ' Large storefront display windows, located at the street level, where goods or services are visible from the street, are particularly encouraged. . The primary building entrance should be at street level. "Garden level" entrances are inappropriate. Exhibit B: Commercial Design Standards. The following design standards shall apply to commercial, lodging, and mixed-use development: A. Building Relationship to Primary Street. 6 .. A street wall is comprised of buildings facing principal streets and public pedestrian spaces. Consistent street walls provide a sense of a coherent district and frame an outdoor room. Interruptions in this enclosure can lessen the quality of a commercial street. Corner buildings are especially important, in that they are more visible and their scale and proportion affects the street walls of two streets. Well-designed and located pedestrian open spaces can positively affect the quality of the district, while remnant or leftover spaces can detract from the downtown. A building' s relationship to the street is entirely important to the quality of the downtown pedestrian environment. Split-level retail and large vertical separations from the sidewalk can disrupt the coherence of a retail district. The following standards shall apply: 1. Building facades shall be parallel to the adjoining primary streets. Minor elements of the building fagade may be developed at irregular angles. 2. Building facades along primary streets shall be setback no more than the average setback of the adjoining buildings and no less than the minimum requirement of the particular zone district. Exempt from this provision are building setbacks accommodating On-Site Pedestrian Amenity, pursuant to Section 26.575.030. 3. Building facades along primary streets shall maintain a consistent setback on the first and second story. 4. Commercial buildings shall be developed with the first floor at, or within two (2) feet above, the level of the adjoining sidewalk, or right-of-way if no sidewalk exists. "Split- level" retail frontage is prohibited. 5. Commercial buildings incorporating a setback from a primary street shall not incorporate a substantial grade change between the building faQade and the public right-of-way. "Moats" surrounding buildings are prohibited. B. Pedestrian Amenity Space. Creative, well-designed public places and settings contribute to an attractive, exciting, and vital downtown retail district and a pleasant pedestrian shopping and entertainment atmosphere. Pedestrian amenity can take the form of physical or operational improvements to public rights- of-way or private property within commercial areas. On parcels required to provide pedestrian amenity, pursuant to Section 26.575.030 - Pedestrian Amenity, the following standards shall apply to the provision of such amenity. Acceptance of the method or combination of methods of providing the Pedestrian Amenity shall be at the option of the Planning and Zoning Commission, or the Historic Preservation Commission as applicable, according to the procedures herein and according to the following standards: 1. The dimensions of any proposed on-site pedestrian amenity sufficiently allow for a variety of uses and activities to occur considering any expected tenant and future potential tenants and uses. 2. The pedestrian amenity contributes to an active street vitality. To accomplish this characteristic, public seating, outdoor restaurant seating or similar active uses, shade trees, solar access, view orientation, and simple at-grade relationships with adjacent rights-of-way are encouraged. 3. The pedestrian amenity, and the design and operating characteristics of adjacent structures, rights-of-way, and uses, contributes to an inviting pedestrian environment. 7 .. 4. The proposed amenity does not duplicate existing pedestrian space created by malls, sidewalks, or adjacent property, or such duplication does not detract from the pedestrian environment. 5. Any variation to the Design and Operational Standards for Pedestrian Amenity, Section 26.575.030(F) promote the purpose ofthe pedestrian amenity requirements. 6. The Planning and Zoning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission, as applicable, may reduce the pedestrian amenity requirement by any amount, such that no more than half the requirement is waived, as an incentive for well-designed projects having a positive contribution to the pedestrian environment. The resulting requirement may not be less than 10%. On-site provision shall not be required for a reduction in the requirement. A mix of uses within the proposed building that enliven the surrounding pedestrian environment may be considered. F. Design and Operational Standards for Pedestrian Amenity Pedestrian amenity. on all privately-owned land in which pedestrian amenity is required, shall comply with the following provisions and limitations: 1. Open to View. Pedestrian amenity areas shall be open to view from the street at pedestrian level, which view need not be measured at right angles. 1. Open to Sky. Pedestrian amenity areas shall be open to the sky. Temporary and seasonal coverings, such as umbrellas and retractable canopies are permitted. Such non-permanent structures shall not be considered as floor area or a reduction in pedestrian amenity on the parcel. Trellis structures shall only be permitted in conjunction with commercial restaurant uses on a designated Historic Landmark or within (H) Historic overlay zones and must be approved pursuant to review requirements contained in Chapter 26.415 - Development Involving the Aspen Inventory of Ilistoric Landmark Sites and Structures or Development within a Irlistoric District. Such approved structures shall not be considered as floor area or a reduction in pedestrian space on the parcel. 3. No Walls/Enclosures. Pedestrian amenity areas shall not be enclosed. Temporary structures, tents, air exchange entries, plastic canopy walls, and similar devices designed to en-close the space are prohibited, unless approved as a temporary use, pursuant to Section 26.450. Low fences or walls shall only be permitted within or around the perimeter of pedestrian space if such structures shall permit views from the street into and throughout the pedestrian space. 4. Prohibited Uses. Pedestrian amenity areas shall not be used as storage areas, utility/trash service areas, delivery area, parking areas or contain structures of any type, except as specifically provided for herein. Vacated rights-of-way shall be excluded from pedestrian amenity calculations. 5. Grade Limitations. Required pedestrian amenity shall not be more than four (4) feet above or two (2) feet below the existing grade of the street or sidewalk which abuts the pedestrian space, unless the pedestrian amenity space shall follow undisturbed natural grade, in which case there shall be no limit on the extent to which it is above or below the existing grade ofthe street. 8 .. 6. Pedestrian Links.In the event that the City of Aspen shall have adopted a trail plan incorporating mid-block pedestrian links, any required pedestrian space must, if the city shall so elect, be applied and dedicated for such use. 7. Landscaping Plan. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Community Development Director shall require site plans and drawings of any required pedestrian amenity area. including a landscaping plan, and a bond in a satisfactory form and amount to insure compliance with any pedestrian amenity requirements under this title. 8. Maintenance of Landscaping. Whenever the landscaping required herein is not maintained, the Chief Building Official, after thirty (30) days written notice to the owner or occupant of the property, may revoke the certificate of occupancy until said party complies with the landscaping requirements o f this section. 9. Commercial Activity. No area of a building site designated as required pedestrian amenity space under this section shall be used for any commercial activity, including, but not limited to, the storage, display, and merchandising of goods and services; provided, however, that the prohibition of this subsection shall not apply when such use is in conjunction with permitted commercial activity on an abutting right-of-way or is otherwise permitted by the City. For outdoor food vending in the Commercial Core District, also see Section 26.470.040(B)(3), Administrative Growth Management Review. 10. Commercial Restaurant Use. The provisions above notwithstanding, required pedestrian amenity space may be used for commercial restaurant use if adequate pedestrian and emergency vehicle access is maintained. 9 1 1 3 -1 - 04 21_40 tÂ»4Â·4,4 Â¢ 4 4-NÂ¢ 641 44/Â»\ -& bdf/F cl/{4 - ij. A" 9/ ily'- -- - vt & SAM ~~t V 49 4Â»-6 1 54/. 1 9 11 SLU-- (Â»2 Yvift oup Â»Â«i /4 4% A 4 6-0 4 o~~jÂ»i. .. ni Trex Origins ..Dqm,2 11'11 . i illi. 4 ILLI . 11 % -2 ; = ,. ..2. " ... . . n -4 . j 4,1 - - $ -- .. 5 - 01 ' - -- - 9 - - V-- - -X 7- fi i I- it_~ 4-k---- . l rr... - I . ..6/ - ...4 4 f' .2.3, 11 3 Â· f:. I * Â¢ 9- 'f .4 0,14., ty.. 2 :. .h Trex Originsâ„¢ Decking --7,Ii The power of simplicity. Nothing else can give you Origins colors include: what Trex Origins can: ' i- 1 This is the original TrexÂ® style that ~ revolutionized the decking industry. â€¢ A simple, clean 4-2*j~~ The smooth surface and refined contemporary look lillli/21 a~ profile of Trex Origins will give your ~ deck a sleek, contemporary look. Trex â€¢ A smooth, Ehiprofile WINCHESTER GREY SADDLE ~~ Origins bends and shapes to create anA surface 1~ spectacular curves and distinctive 7~~~4~ â€¢ A price that delivers a great value 2 JI patterns you couldn't possibly achieve A-2~ ~ '' ~Q with wood. For a stunning, modern â€¢ Mix and match colors for design - :-EJ*; ~ ~~ outdoor living space like no other flexibility ER' -_ t. .11~ r-Emmr---1 1, r. .. I 4 1. .9/'./~p~~.Vf 11* ' -// Trex AccentsÂ® - . : 2 4 -- --*.1 2;...- 1 1.' . I . - Â«Â»-4 \44 -. f 144 12 . Trex AccentsÂ® Decking 4/Bil The grain is subtle. The beauty isn't. Here's why so many people Accents colors include: ask for Accents: ~~ There's nothing like the understated beauty ofa subtle wood grain. . A sukik,natuaLYMned lal Accents offers you the warm, natural Efiln Pattern N,,,,,,1 look ofwood, but with the carefree, i~~ ease of Trexf Best ofall, Accents â€¢ A soft, comfortable surface WIND-ESTER GFEY SAMLE ~ 4<fi16Al/4~ grain pattern on one side and a â€¢ Two unique finishes for illlllli is reversable, with a subtle, wood design flexibility - smooth, refined look on the other. -25-4- The possibilities are endless, not â€¢ Four deep, rich colors - -. the maintenance. MADEIRA WOODLAND E*3(14ht .. McNICHOLS Talicaâ„¢ Decorative Metal UD i D UU 0 0 Talia Specifications 0 e , rittit:if-4-%'**~ ft!* A#2*,<*43*hij A 4%444Â·g*RÂ· 014â‚¬/y , Aesthetic appeal p Unique textures and patterns Physical requirements (strength, Architecturally inspired , Versatility open area, environment, design, etc.). . Style & functionality , Variety of opening sizes Strength Â£ Unique design Snesity: McNICHOLS Talicaâ„¢ and product number. See chart and ..4...Jic 't...1 ...,4 -9 111.--,1 - 1, - individual product pages. P --30' - 41.-: ' i b:YOD,i,Â·,fiLE,Atwpi, ' -'- 4-1- Â· - i Â·1 1,!Li Matertal type: Stainless Steel 316 , Architectural panels ~ Partitions ~ Ceiling panels Infill panels Stle: Woven , Decorative accents . Signage , FacadeS . Store fixtures Quantity: Number of sheets or cut to Furniture . Exhibits size pieces as required. Â· Grilles, screens & vents 322 End alÂ·Ellarimr An Architectural Sales Consultant is ready to discuss your individual needs. '. ./. .1.,7'I'. I.-li.'., 4. I 1 11..,911. 1.1 -, 1 . -0 1. Product Open Weight Materlat Number Area Tvpe To see other available products, per SIR 2100 64% 1.07# SS-316 visit www. racnichcÂ·ts.com. 2120 6% 1.05# SS-316 11 1 1 ' ; 3 1 1 "t~T- :- 1 '~ -Â·-=Â·,; /*.2 /.pÂ·.=./....:a /2- -ki.A b kiIi 1/ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 : 1 t: 3 ! . 1-1.1 IT I.Â· ft r i 1, 4 1 A h 4 + A U L 1 1 w 1. L t. 9 lilli ! 11 it 1 1! K 6-.- 4-.- -- A-.-= i~,a...... -.=:-~A...=- 4,~ ... ......... .....~ u 1.,1 1 ' I 1 ~[ j il 1 1 , 1 - t-7=3.14.r Â·..1 - 1 111 - 1 -112 - 2.----i ....i--.2l?U:La.--4;I==.-4-,i- =-2 *.-A.J.=%. 1.-J;-- 4 . B :4 111 1 , i.tl,!1 1 + 1 1 ..i A.Â· + .., . -Â· - .....rÂ· ;;.,;gl.....4.4,t.3~;22~1.â€¢*J,2=Â£11~11.L.,2. lili!'!!141 al 1 It I it ~ 1: fil f '- i illi 12 " u 'Ifi T }j - r Il f 1 1; 11 1-1.11.-11 .1.1 1 1/ 1. 1 U 'l &-/ I r 1. 7 M Â¥ (11 0 ..IA L_L'_1_H McNICHOLS CO. == e www.mcnichols.corn â€¢ 1-800-237-3820 ll . McNICHOLS Talicaâ„¢ Decorative Metal 00 25 UU e 0 Talicaâ„¢ 2100 @ e 634/-126 $ r.J-5... -, 1 C 'Â·Arin: 69;--7 1-' 1-1-1. 11 mum.Â£Â·4 - F-1 -4 1 i / 1 1 i 11 .1- 1.--- 4 1.11 L 1.1. . 11 0 .11 i. 1 - 4 1 + 4 1 1 PT h l 5 Fl 1 1% 1 1 12 d 1 11 iÂ· --j,j.. ~i-. 'Â·M~ -'' -Ill 4" 1 1 11 1! N H h 11 11 1 1 1!04 1, 4'1 .,1 -1 -11 1 4 k t: IL 74Â« N Â· 11 I 7 711 T 1 1 -Ft i f: 4---il.-~-=t- 4*=4.--4 T U 1 i i / Â· # 14 fi IN --*~ - ~=-=5--7 2--4--I42E-:-1:tn r-79-3.11.--4-1,Â»b.14 - ...711'. :c; 1 /1 , p Â·~ 11 1 11 1 IF f i I 1. 1 5 1i '1 1 I i i i 4 2 _.-il __ L____id ..._.~. _ il . .- 1 -9*ir --' A-. -~-,-4.:ti._ .-. 1 :~ 2.~ : * Lâ€ž_..._._...1 v ..p_..1 1 r.1 11 r 31 4 11 6 1:1 .i i i fl f i. 11 8 I 4 i 11 1.1 11 1: 11 51 1 g 1 If 11 1 11 E 9 if F ji T 11 k ill ! 1111,1111111111 11|111|11111111 111111jlt'11111 11101111111111 11]111'111'111[ 11'111'lli'lili 'lliti'l INCHES 1 2 3 4 6 CM, 1| 2| i 31 , 4| , 51 61. 71. 81 9| 10I 1ll 12| , 13l ,14~ 15 I 16] I11I!IIIII111IlI.II1IIHi1II1jt111111tiIt111|IIii|.11I|1;II.11 I|I1I.II1II|IIII|I1II|tI1t|t111|I11III1.I1tIlII11IJ.I1tI1II+I11$ItIIVInI111I1|I1It|IIII|tttI11.II|i Â©2006 MINICHOLS CO. All rights reserved. t'4 -1 -4 . ti~,fie.ihi~4-9-6 21{*li_' 1 ~ , ' ' -T- -""N"/:1-.~,0~28Â¢MRWF iProduct No.: Talica 2100 Material: Stainless Steel Type 316 Weight per SF: 1.07# Open Area: 64% Additional Tahcaâ„¢ Decorative Product sizes are shown on the reverse sioe. McINICHOLS CO. <29 7,- e www.mcnichols.com â€¢ 1-800-237-3820 26 -0 I ==11 .. Sara Adams From: Johnny Ivansco Oohnnyivansco@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 4:55 PM To: Sara Adams Subject: brunos proposed deck My name is Johnny Ivansco and I am one of the owning partners in Of Grape & Grain. My store is next to the proposed deck of Brunelleshci's pizza parlor. I am against this deck for four reasons. 1) The deck will obscure the views of our store front, except when a potential customer is exactly in front of our store. 2) If the proposed deck is built, and the above mentioned restaurant was to go out of business, as we know in this town happens, the permanant structure will remain. 3)The structure (with no roof) will remain partially unused during the winter months. 4)The deck with its depth, will obscure also the Katie Reed house, which is a Historical building. I am out of town on Wednesday, so I hope you will take my reasons for not allowing the deck into consideration. Thankyou, sincerely Johnny Ivansco Mortgage rates near historic lows. Refinance $200,000 loan for as low as $771/month* https://www2.nextag.com/goto.jsp?product=100000035&url=% 2fst.jsp&tm=y&search=mortgage_text_links_88_h27f8&disc=y&vers=689&s=4056&p=5117 EXHIBIT [-T] 1 . 0. Land Use Application THE CITY OF ASPEN PROJECT: Name: OrÂ·-1, 04,490 ec' rk- dep /fl /1 , i , 7-.* 92,6 . Location: (Indicate street address, lot & block number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel ID# (REQUIRED) .4-73,7 29 y e 71 1: det APPLICANT: , Name: , 4 t, t , /0 nd, rl- Â» .. Address: 0*06 5 M I vu Aâ‚¬.200 6â‚¬ 9.' 6,1 I Phone #: Â¥,40 4-4 +0 +LP _Fax#:-E-mail:. REPRESENTATIVE: Name: 74* n %, Address: /9 ED < ~15'/101 (64/ rre 3+4 Â« L Phone #: 92â‚¬5 - 49 65_Fax#:~ E-mail:__bk-2<.CpMn--0 99Â£,I (~ 4 , tinet TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): Historic Designation D Relocation (temporary, on or off-site) Certificate of No Negative Effect ~ Demolition (total demolition) Certificate of Appropriateness U Historic Landmark Lot Split -Minor Historic Development -Major Historic Development -Conceptual Historic Development 0 -Final Historic Development -Substantial Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: i (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) A t kid 1/Â«./ PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.j 40 ADO \10 er r*v AOâ‚¬*Ic_ t RETAIN FOR PERSÂ».NENTRECORD Ell mb m . 0. FEES DUE: $ General Information Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with your application. This information will help us review your plans and, if necessary, coordinate with other agencies that may be involved. YES NO 0 Does the work you are planning include exterior work; including additions, demolitions, new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration? H ~ Does the work you are planning include interior work; including remodeling, rehabilitation, or restoration? L] Ni Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this time? [3 + In addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No Negative Effect and a building permit, are you seeking to meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standardsfbr Rehabilitation or restoration of a National Register of Historic Places property in order to qualify for state or federal tax credits? ca g If yes, are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in conjunction with this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are eligible. Owner-occupied residential properties are not.) 4 If yes, are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check all City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use: Ed Rehabilitation Loan Fund E] Conservation Easement Program [J Dimensional Variances H Increased Density L] Historic Landmark Lot Split 0 Waiver of Park Dedication Fees U Conditional Uses 0 Exemption from Growth Management Quota System E] Tax Credits I. 0. Dimensional Requirements Form (Item #10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project: IN-1 WI U.Â»e *1 1 Applicant: 1 ku, Pr, i Itt Project Location: ij i./ 4 An i 91- ' fen 0 8161\ Zone District: 6 4. Lot Size: H A Lot Area: NA (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: fi X proposed: 9.11 pouta ~240 / Number of residential units: Existing: 111;%,~ Proposed: Number of bedrooms: Existing: ~X i> Proposed: Proposed % of demolition: DIMENSIONS: (write n/a where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: Existing: WiA Allowable: Proposed: Height Principal Bldg.: Existing: ~0 ~ Allowable: Proposed: Accessory Bldg.: Existing:~,Il ' Allowable: Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing: ~4 k - Required: Proposed: % Site coverage: Existing: h N Required: Proposed: % Open Space: Existing.-, 1 \. A - Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: ~ Required: Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing: ~ Required: Proposedl Combined Front/Rear: Indicate N, S. E, W Existing: '~ Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: t,/ Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: U Required: Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: ~ Required: Proposed: Distance between Existing:~\< Required: Proposed: buildings: Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued: Variations requested (identify the exact variances needed): 05/08/2006 10:23 97092551.- DAVIS HORN PAGE 02/02 Davis Hornjus- PLANNING & REAL ESTATE CONSULTING ~ 6-19*0 4 _~ June 27.2006 Historic Preservation Commission City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Brunelleschi's Deck Dear HiStOIiC Preservation Commission Members: Davis Horn Incorporated owns an office condominium unit located in the Park Central Building across Monarch Street from Brunelleschi's. Restaurant. We have received a public notice for the hearing addressing a new deck to be constructed on the north side of the Mill Street Plaza (205 South Mill Street) to serve Brunelleschi's. We regularly walk by the proposed location of the deck. The south side of Hopkins Avenue is a dead space without any areas of interest to pedestrians. The Avenue is dead. WC SUppOIt the request to develop the deck outside the restaurant because it will add life to the Avenue. We understand the City staff is recommending denial of the deck application because the deck will be more than four feet above the existing grade of the Hopkins Avenue sidewalk. It does not make sense to construct a deck which is less than four feet above the sidewalk because it will be infeasible for the wait person staff to serve the deck. Please approve the deck as proposed by Gill Vanderra. We think the deck will be an excellent pedestrian amenity which will add life to Hopkins Avenue and improve the pedestrian experience. Sincerely, DAVIS HORN INCORPORATED GLENN HORN ALICE DAVIS ALICE DAVIS AICP $ GLENN HORN AICP 215 SOUTH MONARCHST Â· SUITE 104 Â·ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Â·970/925-6587Â·FAX: 970/925-5180 adavis@rof.net ghorn@rof.nel CITY OF AS]~OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTYM~ARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and (-7,/4// 1' /. l/5~lvi.)â‚¬f-,2-4/0- /~/3/c.Â·12//-es-<4' 1- (hereinafter APPLI~ANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for RL:,0 Cd.,2 4 .* F 0-cek â‚¬ 2 0 5- . S ... w 11. ,44.' i f *0 -z E b (hereinafter, THE PR(jJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because ofthe size, nature or scope ofthe proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings an(For approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT' S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staffto complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration ofthe CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ which is for hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $220.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT Â· / By: By. 6~i'~ ~/*A- 4772/11+ ~ *3/'upt t,kic x. 5 t Chris Bendon Community Development Director Date: /1, pr. D- 1.rde, G Bill To Mailing Address and Telephone Number: 2 of Â· S . Ant / 1 1. 0- d 9.1 4 A i 41 4 5 2 ttic g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc 1 1 o , 5-Ll (l- -, 4 ./.c 02/01/06 RETAIN FOR PERMANENT RECORD 0. 0. M & W PROPERTIES SUITE 301A 205 SOUTH MILL STREET ANÂ·rnoNY J. MAZZA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 AREA CODE 970 FRANK J. WOODS, III TELEPHONE 925-8032 FAX 925-6995 April 21, 2006 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Please be advised that the undersigned is the owner and landlord of the Mill Street Plaza Building, Aspen, Colorado. Mill Street Plaza Associates, LLC hereby grants its approval for the proposed deck to be built by our tenant, Hootenanny, LLC and Gilbert Vanderaa, d/b/a Brunell's Pizza & Pasta. Said deck will be attached to tenant's space in the Mill Street Plaza Building, on Hopkins Avenue. Thank you. yee truluyrt ~---*riffiony J. Mazza MILL STREET PLAZA ASSOCIATES, LLC I .f 0 4 Plant and Botanical List We will implement a creative blend of the following plants -Columbines, Multi-color -Mexican lavender, Fragrance and evergreen -Rosemary bushes, Fragrance, and perennial -Decorative native grasses, Height and texture -Miniature evergreens, Juniper and pines . . ~ QUALITY FBX BRICK BY ROBINSON BRICK.COMPANY ASTM and FBX How do you know when >Â·ou are gettinc the best quality brick? Clieck the staildard 10 which the brick js ..... manufactured. Robin,on Brick Company's standards exceed ASTM (216, which is the standard specification forfucing brick. But we go further tliati that. All ofour brick is produced to Grade SW (Severe Weather), :.: : which guarantees a stronger, more durable brick that lasts longer and requires less maintenance than it's tower. grade counterpart. Grade MW (Moderate Wbather). Robinson Brick Company also produces only ty.pe FBX brick, which maintains strict requirements on wa&le. chips. cracks and warpage. - The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) is tile world's leader in the development of voluntary consensus standards formaterial, products, systems. and services. ASTM 0216 isthe standard . . specification for Facing Brick. Grades of ASTM (216 There are two grades for this standard specification: Severe Weather (SW) and Moderate Weather (MW). The Weathering Index by which these grades are defined is based on the product of the average annual number of freezing cycle days and the average winter rainfall in inches. Robinson Brick Company produces Grade SW Brick. The Grade S~W Advitlltilge J~ ~*~' Key m Severe Weathering i Moderate Weathering * Negligible Weathering ~se G~e SW~ = sÂ®nm ~ and moredurable, they lasi loncer and v -==0~*~ Grade Requirements For Face Exposure require less maintenance than Grade MW. Vi 0,leathenng Index , In addition, Oracle SW has greater weather -:'19 ExposÂ·je .Lesslhantft;.': 50&,100 .1004Â¤Ft Gre#id . - resistance, lower absorption rates, and higher '~ In Verlicalsur:aces 3.-;.ffÂ·.MW'. fFi-i:{~<ip .~ : Â·S'0/ ' t. jl SW=Aff.-4 Â·:- compressive strenglh than lower grade brick. \Aeaeging Regions - ~li444, j - Moderate . '., .. Sheref F - 7 ..Fi - . Robinson Brick Company produces brick that is above and beyond standard FBX brick to enhance the appearance and quality of finished walls. Type FBX can save on construction costs since mmimal waste. chips, cracks, and warpage is allowed. Clearly, PBX is superior to its counterpart, FBS. FBX BAck Allows <12<,nskleratioIe EDS Bria .Amms Up to 10% - including excess chippage W,L~ te Up to 20% - including excess chippage 1/5' (3.2mm) edge: 1,4" (6.4mul) corner Clill': 5/16" (7.9rnm) edge. 1/2" (12.7mrn) comer - Cra'Â·ki None seen from 20 feet (6.lm) away None seen from 15 feet (4.6m) away 5/16" (7.9mm) from each other 12ngih V:Eation 1/2" (12.7mm) from each other 1/16" (1.6min) for under 8" (203mm) dimension W'Â»lge 3/32" (2.4min) for under 8" (203mm) dimension 4 ME*J EU-1 64Â£_ TE) KAA-IDâ‚¬01 -ffig-1146~ 501Â«-. . Â·Â·. ..-,I . .-:. .. T\1 ~ ~ + 'fi,*lif ~ Robinson Brick Company's New Traditionsâ„¢ line oftumbled New:Tradition- S+~ ~ ~.trurr brick products looks as if it has been around forhundreds of 2.......ir.)' years, exhibiting rustic surface characteristics. Available iii a ~--- ~ - large selection of colors, this brick provides a traditional look with old-fashioned appeal. Color Name Body Color Texture Â·; Coating Overall Absorption Absorption Saturation Initinl Rate Compressive Â· Â·Â·,Â·Â·di, , ~ Â·Â· i Tone L Â· 24 hr ,Â·Â· 5 hr C<,efficient . (g/mit,/3(jin') Â· Strength Â·Â·Â· Ll.Â· D - - euld 1 9.1 boil i S. 1 , i KPSI) Cambridgeâ„¢ Red/Orange Tumble Clay Slip Dark 5.0 to 7.0 8.0 to 9.5 .65 to .78 14.0 to 26.0 8.0 to 10.5 Chesapeakeâ„¢ Tan.Earth rfones Tumble Clay Sl* Light 5.5 to 7.5 8 D to 10.0 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 7.0 to 93 Confetti" Red/Huff Tumble Clay Slip Light 5.5 to 73 8.0 To 10.D .65 10.78 16.0 to 23.0 7.3 to 10-0 Culpeperâ„¢ Red Tomble Clay S]* Daz-k 5-0 to 7.0 8.010 9.5 -6510 .78 14.0 to 26.0 8010 105 Dartmouth"M Red Turnble Clay Slip Dark 50 to 7.0 8 0 to 9.5 .65 to .73 12.0 to 24.0 8.0 to 10.5 Fossilbedâ„¢ Grey/Buff Tumbie Clay Slip Light 5.5 to 7.5 8.0 to 10.0 .65 to .78 16.0 to 280 8.0 to 10.5 Greymohrri GreÂ¥/Buff Tumble Clay SI* Light 53 to 73 8.0 to 10.0 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 7.0 to 93 Mesquite.M Red Tumble Clay Slip Dark 50 to 7.0 75 10 9.5 .65 to .76 16.0 10 280 8.0 10 105 Old Charlestonâ„¢ Tan/Buff Tumble Clay Slip Light 6-0 to 8.0 83 to 11.0 .65 to .78 16.0 to 36.0 6.2 io 92 Old Chicaeocommonâ„¢ Tan/Buff Turnble Powder Light 6.0 10 8.0 83 10 11.0 .65 to .78 20.0 10 40-0 62 to 9-2 Old Chestnutâ„¢ Orange Tumble None Dark 5.0 to 7.0 73 io 9.5 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 6.5 to 83 Old ])elau'are TM Orange Tumt;je Clay Slip Dark 53 to 73 83 to 10.5 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 70 to90 Old Georgetownâ„¢ Red Tumble Clay Slip Dark 5.0 to 7.0 7.5 to 9.0 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 8.0 to 10.0 : Old Stoneybrookâ„¢ Red Tumble Clay Slip Dark 5.0 to 7.0 75 to 9.5 .65 to .78 16.0 0 28.0 7.5 to 10.0 Old Tularosaii Red Tumble Clay Slip Dark 5.0 to 7.0 73 to 9.5 .65 zo .78 12.0 to 24.0 8.0 to 10.5 Portsmouthâ„¢ Red/Orange Tumble Clay S]ip Dark 5.0 to 7.0 7.5 to 9.5 .65 to .78 12.0 to 24.0 7.5 to 93 Saintcloudâ„¢ Grey-/Buff Titnible Clay Slip Light 5.5 to 8.0 8.0 to 11.0 65 0 7% 16.0 to 40.0 6.2 to 10.5 Santarosaâ„¢ Red/Buff Tumble Clay Slip Dark 53 to 7.5 8.0 to 10.0 .65 to .78 16.0 10 28.0 7.5 to 10.0 Sonomaâ„¢ Red Tumble Clay Slip Dark 5.0 to 7.0 73 to 9.5 .65 to .78 14.0 to 26.0 8.Oto 103 -Â·~~'~:--~~- Welishire"M Orange Tumble Clay Slip Dark 5.5 to 7.5 8.0 to 10.0 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 7.0 to 9.0 Waterbrook" Dark Red Tunible Clay Slip Dark 3.0 to 7.0 73 to 9.5 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 80 to 10.5 -:Â·-3- WatertonTM Dark Red Tumble None Dark 5.0 to 7.0 8.0 40 9.5 65 to.78 16.O to 28.0 8.0 to 10.5 Note: Due lo the ruslie sttrface characieristies of the -New Traditions line of products,some chipping and flaking is possible. - -. . 771. ., Robinson Brick Company s Designer LikE,Fies--- im= muluuct, - -~ 1 Designer Classics L Â· lit a wide array ofcolors with clean, straight edges, for a look that - Â·Â· ~~ ~ '~~ is crisp. sophisdeate:d, and always stylish. Coler Name " T Body Ci,tur Texture Coating Surface OverÂ·Ail Abyarption klÂ».orplion Saturation Knitial Rale Compressive Cliar. Tone 24 hr 5 hr Coefficieitt twinin.SOin-) Strength cold 1 '2 b boil 1 91 i KPSI) - - Ballparkm Red Smooth None Smooth Dark 5.0 to 7.0 8.0 to 9.5 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 8.01011.0 Barnwoodâ„¢ Medium Grey Rercll LL Texture Dark 5.0 0 7.0 73 to 93 .65 io -78 140 10 26.0 8.0 to 10.5 None Birchâ„¢ Buff Reroll Clay Slip Rustic Light 6.0 to 8.0 8.5 to 11 .65 to.78 14.0 to 34.0 6.2 to 9.0 BrimstoneTM Red Reroll Clay Slip Rustic Dark 5.0 to 70 7.5 to 9.5 .65 to .78 12.0 to 24.0 8.0 to 10.5 Carbondaldâ„¢ Tan/Earth Tones Reroll Clay Sl* Rustic Light 53 t07.5 8.0 to 10.0 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 7.5 to 10.0 CharlestonTM Tan/Buff Light Roller Clay Slip Rustic Light 6.0 to 8.0 8.5 to 11 65 to .78 16.0 to 36.0 62 to 9.0 Chicagocommonâ„¢ Tanmuff Sniooth Powder Smooth Light 53 to 7.5 8.() to 10.0 .65 to .78 160 to 28.0 6.5 to 9.0 Chestoittâ„¢ Orange Sillooib None Smooth Dal 5.0 to 7.0 7.5 to 9.5 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 6.5 to 8.5 Danburyâ„¢ Red/Orange Reroll Clay Slip Rustic Dark 5.0 to 7.0 7.5 to 9.0 .65 to .78 12.0 to 24.0 8.5 to 10â€ž5 . DelawareÂ·- Oratige Smooth Ciay Siip Rustic Dal 53 to 7.5 8.5 w 10.5 .65 to .78 16.0 to 26.0 10 209 0 Dower Grer-- Buff R.eroU Clay Slip Rustic Light 53 to73 8.0 & 10.0 .65 to .78 1631 to 28.0 6.510 9 0 ~ ~ 7- Georgetown" Red/Orange Light Roller C.lay Slip Lt. Texture Dark 5.0 to 7.0 7.5 to 9.0 .65 to .78 12.0 to 24.0 8.5 to 10.0 Heritage 441â„¢ Red Ripple Clay Slip Rustic Dark 5.0 to 7.0 7.5 to 9.5 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 7.5 to 9.5 Heritage Antiqueâ„¢ Red Ripple Clay Slip Rustic Dark 5.0 to 7.0 7.5 to 9.5 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 7.5 to 10.0 -- --- Old Chicagoâ„¢ Dark Red Grain Clay Slip Lt. Trxturâ‚¬ D.Ek 5.0 10 7.0 7.5 to 9.5 .65 u).78 16.0 to 28.0 7.5 to 10.0 QuickbilverIM BUff Reroil ClaY Slip Rusiic Light 5.5 to 7.5 8.010 10.0 65 to.78 16.0 to 28.0 73 10 10.0 Scrubbrushâ„¢ Buff Tan Reroll None Lt. Texture Dark 5.5 to 7.5 8.0 to 10.0 .65 to.78 16,0 to 28.0 7.5 to 10.0 Stoneybrookâ„¢ Red Reroll Clay Slip Rustic Dark 5.0 to 7.0 7.5 to 9.5 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 73 to 10.1 Thundercloudâ„¢ G rey Reroll Clay Slip Rustic Light 5.0 to 7.0 7.5 to 10.0 .65 to.78 14.0 to 34.0 6.2 to 9.0 r" 1 T. Red . 1 Ularesa Light Roller Clay Slip Rustic Dark 5.0 to 7.0 7.5 to 9.5 .65 to .7-8 12.0 to 24.0 8.0 to 10.6 Waterlodgeâ„¢ Dark Red Light Roller Clay Slip Lt. Texture Dark 5.0 lo 7.0 8.0 to 9.5 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 8.5 to 11.0 â€¢ 1 11 Architectural Classics . Robinson Brick Company'.s Architectural Classicsâ„¢ line Â·- +~.~.Â· represents thevery best in architectural brick choices. r â‚¬ Color Name Body Color Texture Coating Surface Overall Absorption Al,Norption Satnration Initial Rate Compressive Char. Tkme 24 hr 5 hr Coeflicient (g/mia,03#in') Strength i.,Ad (.9.) ' 1,1,/1 1 .4-3 (KPS[j Autumn Leaf Grainâ„¢ Dark Red Grain None Lt. Texture Dark 5.0 to 7.0 8.0 to 9.5 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 83 to 11.0 Autumn Leaf Mattâ„¢ Dark Red Matte None Rustic Dark 5.0 to 7.0 8-0 to 9.5 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 83 to 11.0 : . ai- Autumn Leaf Sarinâ„¢ Dark Red S~nooth None Smoob Dark 5.0 to 7.0 8.0 to 9.5 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 83 to 11.0 Belawesty'M Omnge/Tan Re-roll Clay Slip Rustic ]Dark 6.0 to 8.0 8.5 10 103 -6510.78 18.0 10 30.0 6-5 to 8-0 BuckwheatTâ€¢ Tan,/Earth Grain Clav Slip Lt. Texture Dark 53 to 7.5 8.0 to 10.0 .65 to .73 16.0 to 28.0 73 to 10.0 ButlemutiM Tan/Earth Smooth None Smooth Light 6.0 to 8.0 8.5 to 11.0 .65 to .78 20.0 to 40.0 6.2 to 9.0 Cat>ernet" Red Grain Clay Slip Lt. Texture Dark 5.0 to 7.0 7.510 9.5 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 7.5 to 10.0 --:.-Â·=-3, Ca,junâ„¢ Red Re-roll Clay Slip Rustie DÂ·ark S.0 Â» 7.0 7.5 0 9.5 .65 to .78 16.0 #,28.0 7.5 to 1(3.0 Coffeebeanâ„¢ Red Grain None Lt. Texture Dat-k 5.0 to 7.0 8.0 to 9.5 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 8.0 to 10.5 Colonial Grainâ„¢ Red/Orange Grain None Lt Texture Dark 5.0 to 7.0 8.0 to 93 -65 10 .78 16.0 to 28.0 83 1011.0 Colonial Mattâ„¢ Red/Orance Matte None Smooth Dark 5.0 to 7.0 8.0 to 9.5 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 8-5 toll.0 Colonial Satin" Red/Oninge Smooth None Smooth Ditrk 5.0 to 7.0 8.0 to 9.5 .65 to .78 16.0 1028.0 8.5 toll.0 . Colorado Roseâ„¢ Rose Grain SÂ·and Slip Lt. Tixture Dad 50 to 7.0 7.5 to 9.5 .65 to .78 12.0 to 24.0 S.0 to 10.5 Cooperstownâ„¢ Red Grain None Lt. Texture Dark 5.0 to 7.0 8.0 to 9.5 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 8.0 to 10.5 Evening ShadeTM Dark Red Re-roll Clay Slip Rustie Dail 5.0 to 7.0 7.5 to 9.5 .65 to .78 12 0 to 240 9.0 to 10.5 :. ..:, . Greystoneâ„¢ Red Re-roll Clay Slip Rustic Dark 5.0 to 7.0 8.0 to 10.0 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 7.0 to 9.5 LexinetonIM Red/Orange Ripple Clay Slip Rustic Dark 50 to 7.0 7.5 to 9.0 .65 to .78 120 to 24.0 8.5 to 10.0 Hickory Aunumn Goidâ„¢ Red Bark Clay Slip Rustic Dark 5.0 to 7.0 7.5 to 9.5 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 7.5 to 10.0 Imperial 20 Satinm Ivory Smooth None Smooth Ligh 6.0 to 8.0 8.5 to 11.0 .65 to .78 20.0 to 40.0 6.0 to 9.0 Imperial 30 Grainâ„¢ Grey Grain None Lt. Texture Light 6.0 to 8.0 8.5 to 11.0 .65 10.78 20.0 to 40.0 6.0 to 90 Imperial 30 Satinâ„¢ Grey Smooth None Smooth Light 6.0 to 8.0 8.5 to 11.0 .65 to .78 20.0 to 40.0 6.0 to 9.0 Imperial 33 Satinâ„¢ Omv Sniooth None Smooth Light 6.0 to 8.0 8.5 toll.0 .65 to .78 20.0 to 40.0 6.0 to 9.0 . Imperial 41 Grainm Tan/Earth Tones Grain None Lt. Texture Light 53 to 7.5 8.0 to 10.0 .65 to .78 160 to 280 7.0 to 9.5 -= Imperial 50 Satinâ„¢ Grey Sniooth None Smooth Light 6.8 to 8.0 8.5 to 11.0 .65 to .78 20.0 to 40.0 6.() to 9.0 Ivory Grainâ„¢ Ivorv Grain None Lt. Texture Light 6.0 to 8.0 8.5 to 11.0 .65 to .78 20.0 to 40.0 6.0 to 9.0 Larlrierâ„¢ Red)'Orange Smooth N one Smooth Dark 5.0 to 7.0 7.5109.0 65 to .78 12.0 to 24.0 8.5 to 10.0 Mandarinâ„¢ Red,Orange Grain None LI. Te.xture Datt 50 10 7.0 73 to 9.0 -65 ID.78 12-0 to 24-0 83 10 11-0 Mendowhillsâ„¢ Red/Orange Smooth None Lt. Texture Dar-k 5.0 to 7.0 7.5 to 9.5 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28 -0 6.5 to 8.5 Mission Autumn Goldâ„¢ Brown/Gold Grain Clay Slip Li. Texture Dark 5-0 to 7.0 7.5 to 9.5 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 7.5 to 10.0 Mission Greyâ„¢ Pink/Buff Grain Clay SI* Lt. Texture Light 5.5 to 7.5 8.0 to 10.0 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 7.5 to 10.0 -- - MonterevT" Brown/Gold Grain Clav Slip Lt. Textuie Dark 5.5 to 7.5 8.0 m 10 -0 .65 to .78 160 to 280 7.5 to 10.0 Pear].M Ivory Re-roll Clay S]ip Rustic Light 6.0 10 8.0 8.5 to 11.0 .65 to .78 14.0 to 34.{) 6.2 to 9.2 Rosopink 1 5 Grainâ„¢ Tail Grain None Lt. Textuir Light 53 to 7,5 8.0 to 10.0 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 7.010 9.5 Whitestoneâ„¢ Red Re-roll Clap Slip Rustic Light 5.0 to 7.0 7.5 to 8.5 .65 to .78 16.0 to 28.0 7.5 to 10.0 Please visit our website for specific cleaning instructions available by brick type. ROBINSON BRICK I COMPANY I RobinsonBrick.com Details on Trex Origins Page l of 2 --3_- ,-- - ,- 7-o...~ ~-iÂ¥-=.---34-ZL, --1*.Â·1â‚¬.JAZPT~,-1-W.947&~i~ --=~ ,~-- -1.---J =-:.3.-2 1---2 -142.=-' ----~it-=19~'-phlf-~4 ./"11/r '1: - r - 41 . 655*LI.9. - -- Product Information Product Information What Is TrexÂ®? TREX ORIGINS TM Decl<ing Trex BrasiliaÂ® Versatile Tax Origins gives you unprecedented freedom to create decks that go beyond what Trex Contours m you dreamed possible. Combine colors, curves and patterns. if you can dream it, well help you build it. Trex AccentsÂ® Tax Originsâ„¢ Railing Systems Fencing 11.-1.. ~ :h L -, . FAQs Request Information How to Buy Trex Home ' ~ 3~*YE The original smooth Trex surface, for deck designs with a clean, contemporary feel. Let your imagination wander with spectacular curves and colors. There is nowhere Trex Origins can't take you. Colors f>91%41 flf.tiÂ·~ . .:-- .~1.- i ~ .-: al:... Â¢1.242-kÂ»y>:03.7 , .. . Eâ‚¬*h-*223 41-,'f?â‚¬.'i- Winchester #Saddle Madeira Woodland Grey Brown Note: 5/4x6 profile available in Winchester Grey and Saddle only. Other profiles available in all colors. Profiles 5/4*,5 2*4 I j.1.1. l____Jl -5- 5 r 3154 1*12 2%4 - - 1.75- 5 -1-<1-Jk ..4. "-- k- 1.75= 1 7.21. tl.375" http://www. trex.com/products/decking/origins/default.asp 3/28/2007 .. ... m Trex Origins TM tte 4 ' 1.11 111 2/ 4 L . 'E.. 4 / . f , y..F*r B 43:, 4 4 Â·Â· 5 --1 Al'. * I - le,- 3 -44 , 4: t.4 //, -I V. . t *ft, *Â·-,4 2 - - : : :f* -t *M 1~*~~L-~~.~1-~... 4- 4.6*4 Â·Â»-91-EN*e~e. 3Â¥Â· 1f ~ b Â·W#klasi/i,/5,20~1*1 1.---11â‚¬ ~ . -. i liA V -rÂ£ ..r' '*-aRM -1.- .XJ ' --.,*'+ .v I E **4464*3;t.. * 2 4~Â¥4Â·- iÂ·> w k < r :ILL; ....!.1 .i Â·L~ p'Pg, J-i"".~~6944.dif .1 4 ~f~F'-t,,. - 1 13 -t.. , Â· 59't J. r 2 - f-2 ic f .i e . 4 .. 40': A ' 9 pr . 7.~-5 -- 1. -- & 16*:2.. -'F~I.,4,~.i' *1 rbx..2,,L .-,4 4Â·~'*:,fÂ»gÂ©3~4Â·Â·9 22$1,4~AÂ·%~Aft~.4.'&:R-Â¢Â°%,4Â·~.i ~.~~1,~f ~ ~ -.N ../.1 '........+ ~-' ~..' 1' Â·_ Â·+-~1Â·.~j.j'.Â·~Â· .2 Â·~' t I. I I . *ill .'.. ~/ Â·.Â· kÂ· . 81.Â·:>A'12 9%Â·Â·~Â· ~~ 4'rtÂ·,s â‚¬~Â·1.-t.2 ~.LE.Â·-43>11,4,~.pl,?.12/07/i49<3Â·~I;tgiâ‚¬~Â·~~31,1.*- ~.,.' dÂ·Â·~.Â·~~Â·.Â·.Â·1Â·: ~. 4Â·:Tl: -I 'd'-': p%.-'. .7 -*â€¢ail.~ ...AL.i-1#8*14 . -:=13,23.. t~~..1.(62 6.4.)k 1 9.,ityt.v .~ 1 ,.'-- .~ Trex Originsâ„¢ Decking -~~ The power of simplicity. Nothing else can give you -- Origins colors include: what Trex Origins can: This is the original TrexÂ® style that - -- 24*91142 y, revolutionized the decking industry. â€¢ A simple, clean 415:Nme.a M c- 4 ..4 . 'â€¢.1~ The smooth surface and refined contemporary look â‚¬12% .~ profile of Trex Origins will give your 'lullilli/ Ihilillill ---12:L~ ..-:,-=v!-, deck a sleek, contemporary look. Trex â€¢ A smoorh, solid profile UNCHESTER GREY SADDLE ' - ' and surface Origins bends and shapes to create ,~ ,*~..t- -IN.'4*j&~ patterns you couldnÂ°t possibly achieve .... .- Â£.I,.. 3.:4;?i,- spectacular curves and distinctive â€¢ A price that delivers a great value .6 -Â» 1-.Ng:,2193 ,:,-4 -;12&2'-dI with wood. For a stunning, modern â€¢ Mix and niatch colors for design '- -al,"2n0//1-id. -. %(*~:''*12%2~ outdoor living space like no other. flexibility r 4, C.F.-~Fal/#~7/8/1.- $422~ .?-44Â¢,f>f.4%31-1 Swin~111~ Terrace #x Fren~~Lrrace Doorc French Terrace Doors and Transoms Rough mm 1559 3011 1725 3343 Opening inches 61 3/8 1181/2 67 15/16 131 5/8 Unit 2 - I mm 1529 2981 3695 3313 O.S.M. inches 60 1/4 117 3Â·8 66Â· 3/4 130 7/16 Glass mm 531 531 614 614 4 ~ Size inches 20 7/8 20 7/8 24 3/16 24 3/16 C\J 8 85 g 2 121/El DICE]ICE]ICE] IEEE+EBI ICE'CE]ICE]IC]I e V 61 N - â€ž FDT2 1504 FDT4 3004 FDT2 1604 FDT4 3204 r--71 010.010 g g\ EVER 010 En 91 - 20 0 â€ž ./ FDT2 1506 FDT4 3006 FDT2 1606 FDT4 3206 ----- --- j.-71 Â· - -*.--1- I---Ill. .-+I--- 20 f 19- 1 + u O 7 'IN I ~n 7~0 - - 1 - - FD21520 FD4 3020 FD21620 FD4 3220 LRA or LAR *FLARF or *FLRAF LRA or LAR FLARF or *FLRAF 10= 11'24 CO LO W 11 1-' I 1 r - P 7 1 , 1 6 977 r -Ii-**I --I--.*-- --I- ==17= -%---I FD2 1521 FD4 3021 FD21621 FD4 3221 LRA or LAR *FLARF or *FLRAF LRA or LAR *FLARF or *FLRAF TIL 21 04 N N g 54 E =tar- 1 1/ 12 - u 71 FD2 1524 FD4 3024 FD21624 FD4 3224 LRA or LAR *FLARF or *FLRAF LRA or LAR *FLARF or *FLRAF Note: Operation viewed from OUTSIDE iNote: "A" - Active Follows hinging destination EXAMPLE: FIEÂ®[El '".i r Â£ 'FIXED' J LEFT ACTIVE ' ' RIGHT PASSIVE' 'FIXED 00 +h. trou.Cfr.. Vld 9%:'.1 S :.* 61 'Complete with screen. All Two wide French Terrace doors are jamb hinged 0. 1005/C Dwg = (anl0699 Printed in Canada Look to us. Subject to Change Without Notice Page L4 Effective July 1, 2002 AC0702 951/4 80 3/8 7/16 161/2 94 1/2 , ,, j a I % 1 -,8 16 . ' ''f, ,Â·.' 791/2: f:.<:~ ' l'/,23 5/8.' '''f'.1 2420 2085 2040 2400'; 2065 , RD.Â·, 0'â€ž'~' '2020 Â«' 'f ' '~~600 1647 79 3/4 665/8 64 7/8 19 PARTS (26j IDENTIFICATION swinging terrace door unit 5 3 f f 14 Â«/ i NO. DESCRIPTION O 1 HEAD BRICKMOULD 4 2 HEAD JAMB .4.: 3 ASTRAGAL MAIN POST * *1 4 ASTRAGAL NON HANDED- *--~ ~~~~~~ 2 MAIN POST * 5 WEATHERSTRIP 1 6 SIDE BRICKMOULD k. 11, 7 SIDE JAMB *2 (D----- ~14Â« LL / 8 STRIKE PLATE t=*04$*V ' / 9 WOOD BLOCK FIXED a 949Â« A- L Â»29> PANELSHIM 0*â€ž49 10 STRIKE (OPTION FOR AUTOMATIC) ~- - 11 STRIKE LATCH **%: 03 1 1Â«2~ 12 GLAZINC STOP %* Wt 13 SEALED UNIT 14 FOAM GASKET GLAZING TAPE 1' 15 TD DOOR SWEEP i.ty 16 DUST PLUG 17 HANDLE 3 }941 18 HINGE (ADJUSTABLE) -<21 24 -Â«6 19 THERMAL BREAK 1//P 1 ~ 20 SILL 21 TD SILL NOSING *. 22 SILL CLADDING 23 SIDE JAMB 04 24 FIXED SASH 25 OPERATING SASH (34 C-21 ..1 1 ' #04<~0<- Â»42*t~ 14 4 hlk) fr#44j41.4,/4/.Tr.-Sc.*4i#.Si~tr#.li~/~E-*IERRGLIT./. li ar- ' :,-40 ) 131 f 16-- 1 -1--3:2?=figgf484,3 T"A â€¢ THIS DRAWING IS NOT TO SCALE, FOR PARTS IDENTIFICATION ONLY Dwg # 3dparttd ; 31 -Rk -7 liÂ·~. 6? ~ -\ 1,Â«034,=8.- 1 i 0~ Sliding ratio & 3 Sliding Patio Door and Transoms Rough mm 970 1820 3588 1270 .~ 2420 Opening inches 381/4 71 5/8 1411/4 50 L 95 1/4 Unit b .mm 950 . 1800 ; 3568 1250 ' 2400 O.S.M. f inches 37 1/2 70 7/8 140 ;A .1 01 1.....1 .94 1/2 Glass mm 788 788 788 1088 1088 Size inches 31 1/16 31 1/16 3-1 1/16 4213/16 42 13/16 =cr:-1, m * 2 9 1 - [1 - -11 j [1 -91 HIll -11-- -11 F 11 1 1,I P Ir-- ---111 WPT1 0903 WPT2 1803 WPT4 3603 WPT1 1203 WPT2 2403 Z 84.0 FTIJ] 11 H 1/ 11 H Ill -11- - 1 1 lilli I " 1 Er LO N i WR 0904 WPT2 1804 WPT4 3604 WPT11204 WPT2 2404 -7-- -n 1 0121 =- 4 ali E 1 WP1 0920F WP21820 WP4 3620 WP11220F WP2 2420 Fixed Sidelite OF-- FO - FO OF - Fixed Sidelite OF-- FO 0 35 W21 0968F WP21868 WP4 3668 WP11268F WP2 2468 Fixed Sidelite OF-- FO - FO OF - Fixed Sidelite OF-- FO WP1 0921F W?2 1821 WP4 3621 WP1 1221 F WP2 2421 Fixed Sidelite OF-- FO - PO OF - Fixed Sidelite OF-- FO r- t WP1 0924F WP2 1824 WP4 3624 WP1 1224F WP2 2424 Fixed Sidelite OF-- FO - FO OF -- Fixed Sidelite OF-- FO For sizes and combinations not shown contact"Loewen Windows'' For masonary opening add the following to unit dimensions: Units with Brick Mould 76 mm (3") to width and 38 mm (1 1/2') to height , Metal Clad units add 10 mm (3/8") to width and 5 mm (1/47 to the height Dwg 9 K0299 Subject to Change Without Notice Look to us. Printed in Canada Effective July 1, 2002 Page Kl AC0702 95 831/4 81 7/8 801/8 161/2 121/2 86 3/8 74 9/16 71 3/8 111/2 2415 2115 2080 2035 2400 ' .2100 . ,;,4 2, 44 ' ' 1, 2065 941/2 ' ,. 3 82 3/4 .,Â· .:81.5/16 2194 1894 1859 - 0 HOFfll) TYPI#~I HOLLOW METAL WINDOW-ELEVATIONS ~ ARCMHECTURAL FRODUCTS INC ~ 6)(4Xy) (D@Xy) I7U Oxim Jll 8 8 01 8% 3 4 2 (t (1) Â® (1)(i) Cgi) , (1)(Â© CURVED ON PLAN iÂ»xy) 90' CORNER PLAN VIEW 1 8 9 PLAN VIEW (19~ (3 09 (i)(IXT) 0*0 Â© 2 0 (210 (30)* (1)(0 FYIXT) (F)(ip) Â® O 4 .7 2 /\ /\ 43 y Â© / PROJECT , 8 3 Â©@ / OUT , 9 0 60 / VENTILATOR \ 53 \ 0) @)(9) , \ 1 ~ ' 1~ 9 SIN 1 DOOR 'i /1 QI)(g) 1 1 IF \ m n / - / / I / \ \ / \ 1. 8 47 / OPE // 1 - 5|Mi L.*2- 1-5 1-9+16 I \1 I .1 \ Dia (=,Al OPrt ON :' DOUBLE DOOR 1 I /J / / I / I Â£ U 23*L- 1~0 MATEÂ·t~ ./1 11 \/ \/ h / 1 / 5% 161-1Al k 'A LA[DON3 I / I / {/4 214.LL-Dl#'4-4~ (1)(1) PAGE NO. SH-1 Glaser Stainles=Steel Railing Components 4 CENTER POST BRACKETS GS30934 and GS30858 are inserted into the pipe and locked i For use with 116" Sch. 10 Stainless Steel Pipe (1.66" OD, into place by tjghtening the set screw. You will have to drill a GS21650, GS3093 and GS30931 are "drive-on" fittings - ,109" Wall). hole into the post to access the screw and it will be visible after fabrications. El R. 4 , apply some epoxy to interior of pipe than insert the bracket The upper portion of the GS30856 and GS30858 may be removed to access the into the pipe ball portion that is mounted directly to the underside bf the handrail. - 3 1/.0 4 .' 10- , "g 1* f #4 1. E '':.-0. + 1& ah. ' 1 I- Adjustable fGS2165o Adjustable GS30933 Adjustable GS30934 Adjustable GS30858 + 01081. pouo&Ur cocling<- Â·.'if.-~143. C & fln m A#b vulott-CIA 4 -- I. -- ....' ,-1 . . 12.1 - + 59-k F*AS>'16 - - p-,53 + 9-.-2- --- lul AE+l ?;2-a :0#j... -0/r. - Ad Fl Al*>4 --i wri... rit- - .:Er< Â· 1 3 --Z ... .'-5.-Z: 1 r. - -1 r 11 0, 't"I :lt{Ealit:'i' 11 1 GS30931 Adjustable GS30856 F- - .&,if ~ POST CAPS 25 4 f#6 4 1 .L n...4 - - 4- *6 1 I - 31 i.= .4 a.%1, ... Il ... .. . .....2 -F-Â·2â‚¬ id le' -I . - Pipe OD Wall Stainless Pipe OD Wall Stainless 1%" 1.66" .109" GS21615 1%" 1.66" .109" GS21581 1 3 . I I . k. -' -. ./.- 1.* . ... . - =i 1 i 9.- - -0.,11 1 - 471 11 .M. .. 1]21~ ~ ' -4 lij 6 1 L 1 : i .' I Ul &-12Â· iÂ·* 1 / nil -_.,Ii,iâ€¢'914521&1967 9 ANGLE BARRECEIVER BAR RECEIVER f U ' - vÂ·-~r.--w.q~wn,V....*Â·.2 For 14mm (46") Round Bar For 14mm (%6") Round Bar 3% Me 1 1 - - :-- Â·V.--*F=~' Act> 4 â€¢ A.<PL-1-*7 -.Â·' - MR*/ 9*f< .41* ~Ill b 91 9- - 1 r i. 3 2 ~...... Â· - b '1.---i -,â‚¬1 ... "1- --- 4 ~ ' e ~~ -, .,/*" Use for 26Â° ... -1-. - Â©Ot to 34Â° angles ..21 -f-, ...141.1,2-2,-,-'i i * 1.O'LI *- 44 Pipe Stainless _1'.Ii U. , 1 + Pipe OD Stainless OD 1 94" 1.66" GS30779 1 V 1.66" GS30778 Wagner / Braun Â· 888.243.6914 Â· 414.214.0444 Â· FAX: 414.214.0450 Â· www.shopwagner.corn 67 mismER r ~l a~~rgi~Â·:4~ ~j*71.- JP..1 .~~*FS>ra~t.rr~ = Te=5% rgE E 6 --El,921 j .4422*1<12 an-lateâ‚¬L-*Ar; 9111:eD&*264.21*a~>E2E242 w.. 2--- CarzE~maesi~a~E~E~==2-=m.:. -1.1 .g .. Slate to match The Slate will match the existing tile on both jimmies and the jewelry store next door; this will be the material for the post bases and caps, Due to a variance in color we are waiting to determine the exact stone species until we have samples in Thanks I. Specification for Glue-lam Semi Arch Trusses Species will be Cedar and the beam will be a slightly arched 6" by 12" This will be stained a weathered gray color to compliment stain and of coarse sealed __- -_______1716-Elu_-10*L -- 4.306- ~ 42 0 // i ~\~/14Â»-ovy (_0 2 ---191 (Ar-- -30.- 1\4 57-Ztt 5 LATE- Z Plat 1 1 EA-Oy/- 1,3 F'le=~4 4 4--1 \ j 1Â· 03 .-. --' --Il-'.Il....Ill.-.Il.-./.I-.*.- ....----/ I./.Â£- -F .... jeffrey halferty desig 215 S. Monarch Ste 202 aspen,c 0.816 970.920.4535 970.925.6035 FAX Issue 06.28.06 BRUNELLESCHI'S 205 SOUTH MILL STREET #226 4 ASPEN, COLORADO. 81611 bENERAL CONTRACTOR PROJECT ar.ne'leschi s 205 S. MiN Street * 228 Aspen. Colorado Blell SHEET LOVER THE 1/FOAMATIO' AND DESIGN *rTE,Ir CONLI,INEO ON '.5 PROPEFIrf OF r/FOR-TOi 6~Â¥ . USED ~T}OUT THE PRIOA MUTEN PE*=. oF . DESiGN 0 0 0 0 jeffre y holferty ~--blDN STEEL HANDAAIL d esig ~F MATOM EXISTINe SLATE 215 S. Monarch Ste 202 P~~HORIZONTAL STEEL MIA,Lrhe aspen,c 0.816 205 S//)T,4 MILL STREET /22/ 970.920.4535 Ilk= 970.925.6035 FAX 191]Ne .INPOn ~ MATCH EXIST!he BRICK ap' 0 ers hÂ·, Stor~ Fr-t nd of /,1/19 ./ Issue: NE. HAND RAIL - e- 06.28.06 0 0 â€¢24 plont,re */ LS,-ATE TO MATCH EXIST!14ks n, ENTRANCÂ·I 2115-76 â€¢f 28-g TINe SIPE,â€¢lALK ISTINS .sptle liNe SIDEr,ALK EXISTINS 4 ~ PROPOSED PLANI GENERAL CONTRACTOR 205 ILITH MILL Sâ„¢EET â€¢226 3-5~Â· 2 6LUE LAM #000 BEAM ~ 122 LUE LAM ~000 BEAH EXISTI,W BUILDINI END OF BUILDIhe $ STEEL 91/1-ED al-ACK o 0 0 9 &49$1Â£LZE,1 axisTINI .INDO \ /\ 1\ /\ /\ / \ TCH EXISTI HAND -1.S ~ ~ 0~ * ZIPX WL.7 STEEL / \ TCH exisT, SLATE / SCALE: / bL 1/4" = 1'0- % C< 1 NER JECK AREA ~ A WOOD PIC.KING PROJECT rAG 1 5-E -66 205 5. Mill Street # 226 Brunalleschi's TOM PLAN-ERS : Aspen, 6010,080 B eli TE TO MATCH EXISTING 79 _ DESCRIPTION in 2/ A : 4,4 I 5.1 TO MATCH EXISTIhe PfOPOSED ELEVATIONS, PLANS, AND DETA'LS PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION 21-16 PROPOSED REST ELEVATION - SHEET A. 1.0 0 2000 DIE ~I.-Wl ANO DES.B i~re,ir cowTAINED 01 'WS DOCU-ENT IS THE p,Ioperry . J I DE~GN PC /0 PA,er Or â„¢15 INFO'.... *. EDE USED WITHOUT â„¢E PRIOR , *NITTE. PER.HSSON oF . DESIGN .. . ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 28,2006 . Chairperson, Jeffrey Halferty called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Commissioners in attendance: Michael Hoffman, Alison Agley, Derek Skalko. Jason Lasser was seated at 5: 12 p.m. Sarah Broughton, was excused. Staffpresent: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer Sara Adams, Historic Preservation Planner Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk MOTION: Derek moved to approve the minutes of May 24, 2006; second by Alison. All in favor, motion carried. Public Comments: Les Holst thanked the HPC for the job that they are doing. His group is trying to get the City to understand that what drives the City is the historic character. Every time a house is let go you have done major damage to our community. He handed out binders with comments made from tourists. Disclosures Jeffrey will recuse himself on 205 S. Mill Street - Brunelleschi's Derek will recuse himself on 135 W. Hopkins WILLOUGHBY PARK/LIFT 1 PARK/SKIER'S CHALET STEAKHOUSE - MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) DEMOLITION AND VARIANCES MOTION: Derek moved to continue the public hearing and conceptual development of Willoughby Park/Lift l Park/Skier's Chalet Steakhouse to July 12% second by Jason. All infavor. motion carried 5-0. MOTION: Derek moved to continue the public hearing and conceptual development of 114 Neale Ave. to July 12th ; second by Jason. All in favor, motion carried 5-0. 205 S. MILL STREET, BRUNELLESCHI'S - MINOR REVIEW AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING A ffidavit of posting - Exhibit I 1 .t6 *1/ 4,41. o ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION . 1 MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 2006 Letter from Davis Horn - Exhibit II - Summary - The south side of Hopkins ,- Ave. is a dead space and the Horn's support the deck, The deck will be an excellent pedestrian amenity. Jeffrey recused himself. Michael chaired. John Olson, builder Travis Terry, represented Jeffrey Halferty designer Sara said the subject property is in the commercial core and the proposal is for a 170 square foot outdoor dining deck that would be five feet high and project out of the half story level. The purpose is for ease of the Waite staff to access the outdoor area. The application is in two parts, minor development and commercial design review. Minor Development Review - Staff found according to our guidelines that the emphasis should be at the storefront first floor level. Having the deck at five feet is on in compliance with the guidelines. Staff also pointed out that the set of steps that leads into the Mill Street plaza will be somewhat compromised with the deck projecting out. We looked into dropping the deck height but that triggered an accessibility requirement. Commercial Design Review and Pedestrian Amenity Space - The two guidelines that staff questioned are A4 A5 regarding the building relationship to the primary street. The goal is to promote activity at street level. The space between the fagade and the property line counts toward the Mill Street Plaza's pedestrian amenity and having the deck at five feet does not qualify. The maximum height is four feet. HPC could allow them to pay a cash-in-lieu payment which would be $50 per square foot which equals $8,500. or waive the payment. Staff recommends denial of the project. John Olson said he did remodeling work for the previous owner and never got paid for $250,000. Frank Woods and Tony Maza own the building and an arrangement was made that the rent would be paid by John and in exchange he would receive ownership of the restaurant. John said he was led to believe that a deck was possible. Gill Vanderaa Ill was interested in starting up a restaurant. The deck has a huge effect whether or not this restaurant makes it and it is vital to the success of the space. 2 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 2006 We are not in the same situation as other restaurants that have outside dining on Main Street such as Asie, Gusto or the Hotel Jerome. They are all on ground level. It is difficult at ground level, the way it is now because waiters have to negotiate the steps. . John said he feels most of the guidelines have been met and he is willing to work with the HPC to come up with a design that is acceptable to the board. Travis Terry said with Jimmy's deck and all the other design issues with flower boxes etc. it the deck is detailed out appropriately it could be its own vocal point. Another option is that it could be detailed out to be a temporary structure and only there in the summer. Michael said the guideline is basic consistency with the Historic District. Amy pointed out that Sarah mentioned the guideline that first floors should be store fronts and upper levels have secondary activities. Vice-chair Michael Hoffman opened the pubic hearing. ... Jay Mason stated that he hopes the HPC would consider working with the applicant to find a solution to make the restaurant more profitable. The way it is set up now you have waiters walking up and down with hot food and glass ware and it is only a matter of time that an accident will happen. A nice looking deck would add to the streetscape. That north fa,ade as it is now is very cold. Vice-chair Michael Hoffman closed the public hearing portion of the meeting. Board comments: Derek said according to the codes it seems simple to deny the project but he feels very strongly for supporting this application. Regarding the dual access of the stairs they might be in violation. The space is a vacant space and is especially evident in the winter. Derek hoped the board would allow some kind of deck to actually produce some sort of vitality. This is a peculiar gituation as there is no where else in the City that exists like this. He would not want to go to a removable deck but would entertain it before denying the application. Regarding the stairs, possibly they could be utilized in a better way. 3 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 2006 Alison said the building already doesn't meet a lot of our guidelines. We are looking at a space that is already setback from the sidewalk. We have a condition that the restaurant is at hal flevel. It is hard to address our guidelines with this building because it is oddly shaped. A far as knowing that space, a deck would be a good addition. Having the windows open with a deck would give it a good relationship to the street that the building doesn't have now. Three or four businesses have been in the space that were not successful due to some of these issues. Jason said he is thinking of the functionality of the space. How many tables can fit on the deck and how would that increase the restaurant business. What would be the experience of people walking by and what are the impacts to Grape & Grain. They would look out at a five foot tall metal mesh with a railing on top of it. A shadow line would be put in front of the Grape & Grain. Maybe you could privatize the one section of the stairs that abuts up against the north end of the building. Jason felt that the deck would work better if it went all the way across the top of the stairs. Right now there is solid glass with operating windows above which restricts the experience outside. Maybe the windows should be changed to doors. Functionally you probably won't get more than two or three tables. Maybe there is a way to use a dumb waiter. Michael said we are all sympathetic to the business and owners of the building and the way it contributes or doesn't contribute to the streetscape and community downtown. Michael summarized by saying that the proposed design doesn't meet the guidelines. Maybe a different solution would work. The bigger problem is how does this building relate to the historic district as a whole. Michael said he is willing to continue the application to allow the applicant to re-design the proposal. John said the space is weird and it is an access that is not used. He will re- design and possibly the deck can be pushed further away from the Grape & Grain. John also stated that he will get support from his neighbors. Jason said support from the neighbors would be good and going across the stair would work better. A thought might be that the deck be six feet instead of five feet tall. Alison said we need to focus on what could happen below the deck. 4 0 - ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 2006 John said they are going to implement shifting the deck over away from the Grape & Grain and incorporate some of Derek's suggestions. MOTION: Derek moved to continue the minor development review and public hearing on 205 S. Mill Street until August gth; second by Jason. Roll call vote: Jason, yes; Derek, yes; Alison, yes; Michael, yes. Motion carried 4-0. 423 N. SECOND STREET - MINOR REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING Jeffrey was seated. David Rybak, architect Jim & Betty MeManus Affidavit of posting - Exhibit I Sara said the subject house is 2 !/2 residential Victorian built in the 1880's and heavily altered from its original form. It is located on the corner of Smuggler and N. Second St. The original primary entrance is oriented toward the alley. A variety o f windows and a wrap around porch were added throughout the years and they contribute to the declining integrity of the building. What is before the HPC are alterations that were denied by staffbased on non-compliance with our guidelines. The applicant is proposing: 1. New windows in the north and west gables. 2. Three skylights in the northwest side of the cross gable. 3. Metal chimney along the north gable transition. 4. Arched top window. Sara said the new easement window proposed in the north attic gable is for egress for a habitable space. The attic will be opened up. The recommended minimum opening for an egress window is 5.7 square feet and they are proposing 8 square feet. Staff recommends that the window be reduced in size. Staff also recommends that the HPC discuss the alignment o f the door in order achieve a better streetscape alignment. There is also an arched top window being proposed. Adding a window on top of an historic window within the west gable would really compromise the integrity of the historic structure. Staff finds that the M circular window does not comply with guidelines 3.1 and 3.2 of the guidelines. Moving to the roof, the applicant proposes to add three brown aluminum glad skylights to the northwest side of the cross gable. They will be visible from the street facing 5 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 13, 2006 Chairperson, Jeffrey Halferty called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Commissioners in attendance: Alison Agley, Brian MeNellis and Sarah Broughton. Michael Hoffman was excused. Staffpresent: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer Sara Adams, Historic Preservation Planner Kathy Strickland, Chie f Deputy City Clerk Jeffrey will be stepping down for 205 S. Mill Street. Sara said staff is pursuing demo by neglect on 125 W. Main St. 408 E. COOPER (ASPEN SPORTS) MINOR DEVELOPMENT - VIEW PLANE, COMMERCIAL DESIGN - PH MOTION: Sarah moved to continue the public hearing and minor development on 408 E. Cooper until Feb. 28,2007; second by Alison. All in favor, motion carried. 205 S. MILL (BRUNELLESCHI'S) MINOR DEVELOPMENT - COMMERCIAL DESIGN - CONT'D PUBLIC HEARING Jeffrey recused himself. Sarah chaired. Sara stated the review is for a deck outside Brunelleschi's and also Commercial Design Review. In June the applicant proposed a 170 square foot deck. At that time staff brought up concerns that the Building Department had; a bathroom load and all of those issues have been resolved. Overall, staff finds that the design guidelines are not met and the commercial review design standards are not met and recommend denial of the project. Staff requested that the proximity of the deck to Grape and Grain storefront be pulled away from that side. Staff interpreted HPC's comments to mean pulling the whole deck away from that side of Grape and Grain. What is proposed does not comply with the International Building Code (IBC) which requires at least two feet of distance from the property line to a deck. There are two proposals. One proposal cuts off part o f the stair and the deck has been increased in size and spans across the entire front of the fagade. The other proposal maintains the existing stair configuration and the deck 1 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 13, 2006 slides behind it and it also spans the whole width of the fava(ie. There is also a two tiered brick landscape box in front of the deck to soften the fagade. Staff is also questioning the functioning of the wooden posts that are placed around the perimeter of the deck. In the drawing they have strings of lights that are strung along. Guideline 13.16 is not met which is really about encourage pedestrian activity down in the commercial core. Commercial Design Standards: The goal is to encourage pedestrian activity and the deck enhances the awkward half story fa~ade of the building and doesn't encourage pedestrian activity. Pedestrian amenity - The applicant will have to pay cash and lieu and HPC can waive some of the cash in lieu. The cash in lieu is to be used for street side improvements and staff finds it appropriate for the applicant to pay. We have tried to work with the applicant to find a solution but it is a very challenging store front and having a deck emphasizes the half story. Staff recommends denial. John Olson Travis Terry, represented Jeffrey Halferty Designs John thanked the HPC for the job that they do. He inherited the restaurant and he and Gill Vanderaa are trying to find ways to improve the spot. At the last meeting John thought everyone was coming to an agreement for an approved plan. John presented different drawings of decks to the HPC. If HPC has a design that will work tell us and we will be happy to do it. If you want us to pull further away from the Grape and Grain we can do that. Our preference is the one that takes up part of the staircase which will give wheel chair access to the deck. In terms of the pedestrian activity I disagree with Sara. What we would like to see happen here is to have the deck be something that has a lot ofenergy when people walk by. There is a14 foot wide window/door and the energy from inside would flow through the doors to the outside. With the current seating on the street level there is no ability to do that. The upper floor does not connect to the street level. Deliveries come out of the same door that people are trying to enter. Gill has brought a family place to the restaurant. If it was brought outside via the deck on the north racing wall it would be great. Gill said he has been running the restaurant for a year and moving food upstairs and down is a nightmare. 2 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 13, 2006 Alison asked about the pedestrian amenity. Sara said anything over four feet tall does not qualify as a pedestrian amenity. The deck is about five feet or SO. Gill said the height is related to wheel chair access. Sarah Broughton opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. The public hearing portion of the meeting was closed. Alison said this is an existing condition that is not great. 1 he stepped planting could work but it needs a little refinement. What is there now is not much of a pedestrian amenity, The deck would enhance the sidewalk. In looking at the options coming in two feet from the Grape & Grain is good. Plan 2 would be preferable. Brian said he walks by this establishment all the time and he notices it as a dead space. The applicant has strange circumstances to work with. Possibly a stepped down deck would work. Vitality is needed on the south side of the street and anything that can be done will be better than what is existing. Brian said he is concerned with the materials and doesn't want it to look like a foreign object stuck on the wall of the building. It should look like a permanent structure and compliment the existing faqade. Planters could soften the streetscape. Brian said he would be interested in what type of plantings is recommended because in the winter planting beds can be nothing more than sinks. Plan 1 is more open and has a flow to the interior. Sarah concurred with many of the comments. The space is dead and the seating is awkward. This is an improvement over what is currently there. Plan 1 and the fanning out are successful. The terrace beds are a nice compromise to the five foot height difference which will also become seat walls, thus enhancing the pedestrian amenity. The applicant is making the most of an awkward situation. Possibly the posts should come back and tie back into the building to help the setback to the Grape & Grain building. This will be a welcomed addition to the street. Gill Vanderaa, owner of the business said with the way the space is situation there is a lot of wasted space. Gill requested tha6HPC consider some kind of relief regarding the cash-in-lieu. 3 . ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 13, 2006 Sara said HPC is allowed to waive no more than half for well designed projects that have a positive contribution to the pedestrian environment. Sarah said she would like more information on the west facing screened door. The second issue is the materials and we need to see some kind of resolution on the posts. Alison and Brian also agreed. John Olson requested a site visit. L Outstanding issues to be addressed at the next meeting. Plan 1 OK Address the west screen door Material selection Waive up to 50% OK Planter plan - plants Posts Tie back to the building. MOTION: Alison moved to continue 205 S. Mill until Feb. 2#h; second by Brian. All infavor, motion carried 3-(). 134 W. HOPKINS - MINOR DEVELOPMENT - VARIANCES - DEMOLITION - FAR BONUS Jeffrey Halferty was seated. Sara stated that the main issues really hinged on HPC granting the FAR bonus. The applicant has been working with staff on a rehabilitation aspect to grant the bonus which is required to build the rear addition which is 138 square feet. There are two options proposed. There isa l 980's addition to the rear of the residence that doesn't exactly comply to the guidelines because you cannot really determine where the historic resource ends and where the 80's addition begins. The applicant is proposing replacing the horizontal siding on the 1980's addition with vertical siding that will get tied into the proposed new rear addition. In option #2 they are proposing a wainscoting element that is like a horizontal siding on the bottom and vertical on top to distinguish new from old. Staff is in favor of the vertical siding option because it is a simpler approach for distinguishing between new and old construction. The roof height has been dropped on the storage shed from 14 feet to 10 1/12 feet and changed the form from a shed roof to a flat roof. Staff finds that appropriate for a functional storage shed. 4 O 0 Â®rs MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer FROM: Sara Adams Historic Preservation Planner RE: 205 South Mill Street, Minor Review and Commercial Design Review- continued Public Hearing DATE: December 13,2006 SUMMARY: The subject property is located at 205 South Mill Street, within the Commercial Core Historic District. and currently houses Brunelleschi's Pizza half a story above sidewalk level. Jimmy's Restaurant an Bar is located above Brunelleschi's with an outdoor balcony sitting directing on top of Bruno's pizza (see Exhibit C for photographs). The applicant proposes to add a new outdoor dining deck fhat will project over the concrete sidewalk replacing the restaurants current street level outdoor seating (refer to Exhibit B for current photographs). New French doors are also proposed for access onto the deck. This application is two parts: Minor Development review will deal with whether or not the deck is an appropriate feature within the context of historic downtown; and Commercial Design Review will address the "Building Relationship to Primary Street" and "Pedestrian Amenity" requirements ofthe Commercial Design Standards. On June 28,2006, I IPC reviewed the proposal for a 170 square foot deck and recommended the applicant continue to redesign the proposal paying close attention to the stairs and pushing the deck away from the Grape and Grain storefront to the west, 1 he application has been delayed since the June meeting while the applicant worked with the Building Department to determine if the permanent deck would increase the bathroom load and necessitate additional bathrooms for the restaurant. The Building Department resolved the bathroom quantity issue at Mill Street Plaza and has instructed Staffto proceed with the application. Staff recognizes that the Mill Street Plaza building presents architectural and pedestrian challenges, and finds that the proposed deck does not mitigate the awkward half story fagade on Hopkins Avenue, but rather it enhances the disjointed street experience in the block. Staff recommends that HPC deny the application for minor development because it does not comply with the pedestrian-oriented goals for the Commercial Core Historic District. APPLICANT: Gill Vanderra. represented by Jeffrey Halferty Designs. .Suikilipus -1 Â· CAJN*UAQ 9,+{fl PARCEL ID: 2737-073-38-004. (02'At@ ADDRESS: 205 S. Mill Street, Suite 226, Lots D-I, Block 81, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. 1 .. ZONING: CC, Commercial Core. MINOR DEVELOPMENT The procedure for a Minor Development Review is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with tile design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report ami the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. If the application is approved, the I-IPC shall issue a Certificate of Appropriateness and the Community Development Director shall issue a Development Order. The HPC decision shall be jinal unless appealed by the applicant or a landowner within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 26.316. Staff Response: Brunelleschi's Pizza Restaurant sits a half story above the sidewalk. which creates a challenging setting within the downtown area. Staff finds that the current seating area at the sidewalk level softens a blank wall and creates the effect of a ground level entrance. According to the Design Guidelines "the Commercial Core Historic District should continue to develop as a pedestrian- oriented environment. Streets, sidewalks and pathways should encourage walking, sitting and other pedestrian activities. buildings should be visually interesting.. ." Staff finds that the current solution at Brunelleschi's takes a "pedestrian awkward fagade and creates the illusion of a ,, ground level with the outdoor seating area, which complies with the Historic Design Guidelines and the Commercial Design Standards in the Municipal Code. Adjacent to the current seating area is a set of steps leading into the interior courlyard of Mill Street Plaza. There are two proposals in front of HPC: 1.) The deck spans the length of the front *ade adjacent to the current stair configuration 2.) A portion of the existing steps are demolished atid a longer deck spans the length of the front fagde. The applicant responded to HPC's concerns regarding the proximity of the deck to Grape and Grain by cutting off the corner of the deck; however, Staff interpreted HPC's comments to mean bringing the entire deck away from Grape and Grain' s property line. As proposed, the deck projects out along the properly line, which does not comply with the International Building Code Section 704.2 (Exhibit D) that requires at least 2 feet of distance from the property line. Staff recommends that the deck be pulled away from the west properly line to comply with the IBC. With the understanding that the deck needs to be reduced 2 feet on the west, Staff finds that Proposal 2 is more simplistic and reasonable. The proposed deck is about 5 feet above the sidewalk, which is not conducive to the pedestrian- oriented goals of the downtown historic district by orienting the lower portion of the deck at eye 2 . 4 level of pedestrians. The Design Guidelines recommend that emphasis is placed at the storefront (ground) level o f buildings within the Commercial Core to enhance pedestrian character. Relevant Design Guidelines are: 13.8 Maintain the alignment of facades at the sidewalk's edge. . Place as much of the fa~ade of the building at the property line as possible. ~ Locating an entire building front behind the established storefront line is inappropriate. â€¢ Where a portion of a building must be set back from the sidewalk, use landscaping elements to define the sidewalk edge. 13.12 Rectangular forms should be dominant on Commercial Core facades. â€¢ Rectangular forms should be vertically oriented. 13.16 Develop the ground floor level of all projects to encourage pedestrian activity. â€¢ Consider using storefronts to provide pedestrian interest along the street. Storefronts should maintain the historic scale and key elements such as large display windows and transoms. â€¢ Large storefront display windows. located at the street level, where goods or services are visible from the street. are particularly encouraged. â€¢ The primary building entrance should be at street level. "Garden level" entrances are inappropriate. The applicant proposes a two tiered brick landscape box in front of the deck to soften the facade and create interest. Staff would like an explanation of the types of landscaping proposed for the boxes and the projected state of the boxes for the long winter season. Staff also questions the function of the vertical wooden posts placed around the perimeter of the deck. Staff finds that the Design Guidelines. specifically 13.16. are not met with either proposal for the deck. COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW AND PEDESTRIAN AMENITY SPACE An application for Commercial Design Review may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied based on conformance with thejollowing criteria: 1. The proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060. Commercial Design Standards or any deviation from the Standards provides a more-appealing pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. Unique site constraints can justify a deviation from the Standards. Compliance with Section 26.412.070, Suggested Design Elements, is not required but may be used to justify a deviation from the Standards. 2. For proposed development converting an existing structure to commercial use, the proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial Design Standards, to the greatest extent practical. Amendments to the fai~a(le of the building may be required to comply with this section. 3. For properties listed on the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures or located within a Historic District, the proposed development has received Conceptual Development Plan approval from the Historic Preservation Commission, pursuant to Chapter 26.415. This 3 .. criterion shall not apply if the development activity does not require review by the Historic Preservation Commission. Staff Response: The Commercial Design Standards are attached to this memo as "Exhibit B." They are in many ways similar to HPC's own guidelines. Staff questions the project's compliance with standard A4 and A5 regarding the "Building Relationship to Primary Street:' Adding a deck to the Mill Street Plaza building will accentuate the less than desirable relationship of this section of the building to grade. The goal o f both HPC and Commercial Design Guidelines is to focus activity and features at the street level. Staff finds that adding a deck five feet above the sidewalk will not satisfy these goals. A4. Commercial buildings shall be developed with the lirst floor at. or within two (2) feet above, the level of the adjoining sidewalk, or right-of-way if no sidewalk exists. "Split-level" retail frontage is prohibited. A5. Commercial buildings incorporating a setback from a primary street shall not incorporate a substantial grade change between the building fagade and the public right-of- way. "Moats" surrounding buildings are prohibited. The Mill Street Plaza building is required to provide an area equal to 25% of the site as a pedestrian amenity. This amenity can be provided on the site. or can be addressed through a comparable improvement made in the downtown area. or a cash in lieu payment. 1Jp to half of the obligation can be waived by P&Z or HPC as described below. In the past. a property owner could be exempted from having to provide on-site open space. but would still have to make a cash-in-lieu payment. Since then, the City has adopted the Commercial Design Review process that LIPC is discussing and has created an opportunity for waiver of the cash-in-lieu payment as well. The language is as follows: Reduction of Requirement. The Planning and Zoning Conimission or Historic Preservation Commission, as applicable, may reduce the pedestrian amenity requirement by any amount. such that no more than half the requirement is waived, as an incentive for well-designed projects having a positive contribution to the pedestrian environment. The resulting requirement may not be less than 1094. On-site provision shall not be required for a reduction in the requirement. A mix of uses within the proposed building that enliven the surrounding pedestrian environment may be considered. The concrete area between Brunelleschi building fai:ade and the property line along East Hopkins Avenue is considered to contribute to the requirement that 25% of the footprint of the entire Mill Street Plaza must provide a pedestrian amenity. The proposed deck will reduce the amount of pedestrian amenity that exists at Mill Street Plaza. The maximum height for a pedestrian feature located above finished grade to still qualify as a pedestrian amenity is 4 feet. Therefore, to build the proposed deck at roughly 225 square feet (Proposal 2), a cash-in-lieu payment of $50 per square foot or $11.250 is required to be used for streetscape improvements. 4 .. Staff is not in support of waiving the cash-in-lieu payment that is due to cover the reduction in pedestrian amenity space. The cash payment is used for important pedestrian improvements downtown and would be a loss to the City. DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: â€¢ approve the application, â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or â€¢ continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that 1-1PC deny the application for Minor Development of the property at 205 S. Mill Street, Suite 226, Lots D-1, Block 81, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. Exhibits: Resolution # of 2006 A. Relevant Design Guidelines B. Commercial Design Standards C. Photographs I). IBC Section 704.2 E. Minutes from June 28,2006 HPC Meeting F. Application 5 .. Exhibit A- Relevant Historic Preservation Design Guidelines for Brunelleschi's Pizza 13.8 Maintain the alignment of facades at the sidewalk's edge. â€¢ Place as much of the fa*ade of the building at the property line as possible. â€¢ Locating an entire building front behind the established storefront line is inappropriate. m Where a portion of a building must be set back from the sidewalk. use landscaping elements to define the sidewalk edge. 13.12 Rectangular forms should be dominant on Commercial Core facades. â€¢ Rectangular forms should be vertically oriented. â€¢ The faQade should appear as predominantly flat. with decorative elements and projecting or setback 'articulations" appearing to be subordinate to the dominant form. 13.16 Develop the ground floor level of all projects to encourage pedestrian activity. â€¢ Consider using storefronts to provide pedestrian interest along the street. Storefronts should maintain the historic scale and key elements sucli as large display windows and transoms. â€¢ I.arge storefront display windows, located at the street level. where goods or services are visible from the street. are particularly encouraged. â€¢ The primary building entrance should be at street level. "Garden level" entrances are inappropriate. 6 0 . Exhibit B: Commercial Design Standards. The following design standards shall apply to commercial, lodging, and mixed-use development: A. Building Relationship to Primary Street. A street wall is comprised of buildings facing principal streets and public pedestrian spaces. Consistent street walls provide a sense of a coherent district and frame an outdoor room. Interruptions in this enclosure can lessen the quality of a commercial street. Corner buildings are especially important. in that they are more visible and their scale and proportion affects the street walls of two streets. Well-designed and located pedestrian open spaces can positively affect the quality of the district, while remnant or leilover spaces can detract from the downtown. A building's relationship to the street is entirely important to the quality of the downtown pedestrian environment. Split-level retail and large vertical separations from the sidewalk can disrupt the coherence of a retail district. The following standards shall apply: 1. Building facades shall be parallel to the adjoining primary streets. Minor elements of the building fai;ade may be developed at irregular angles. 2. Building facades along primary streets shall be setback no more than the average setback of the adjoining buildings and no less than the minimum requirement of the particular zone district. lixempt from this provision are building setbacks accommodating On-Site Pedestrian Amenity, pursuant to Section 26.575.030. 3. Building facades along primary streets shall maintain a consistent setback on the first and second story. 4. Commercial buildings shall be developed with the first floor at, or within two (2) feet above, the level of the adjoining sidewalk, or right-of-way if no sidewalk exists. "Split- level" retail frontage is prohibited. 5. Commercial buildings incorporating a setback from a primary street shall not incorporate a substantial grade change between the building 1*ade and the public right-of-way. "Moats" surrounding buildings are prohibited. B. Pedestrian Amenity Space. Creative, well-designed public places and settings contribute to an attractive, exciting, and vital downtown retail district and a pleasant pedestrian shopping and entertainment atmosphere. Pedestrian amenity can take the forin of physical or operational improvements to public rights- of-way or private property within commercial areas. On parcels required to provide pedestrian amenity. pursuant to Section 26.575.030 - Pedestrian Amenity, the following standards shall apply to the provision of such amenity. Acceptance of the method or combination of methods of providing the Pedestrian Amenity shall be at the option of the Planning and Zoning Commission, or the Historic Preservation Commission as applicable, according to the procedures herein and according to the following standards: 1. The dimensions of any proposed on-site pedestrian amenity sufficiently allow for a variety of uses and activities to occur considering any expected tenant and future potential tenants and uses. 2. The pedestrian amenity contributes to an active street vitality. To accomplish this characteristic public seating, outdoor restaurant seating or similar active uses, shade 7 00 - trees, solar access, view orientation. and simple at-grade relationships with adjacent rights-of-way are encouraged. 3. The pedestrian amenity, and the design and operating characteristics of adjacent structures, rights-of-way, and uses, contributes to an inviting pedestrian environment. 4. The proposed amenity does not duplicate existing pedestrian space created by malls, sidewalks, or adjacent property. or such duplication does not detract from the pedestrian environment. 5. Any variation to the Design and Operational Standards for Pedestrian Amenity, Section 26.575.030(F) promote the purpose of the pedestrian amenity requirements. 6. The Planning and Zoning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission, as applicable. may reduce the pedestrian amenity requirement by any amount, such that no more than half the requirement is waived, as an incentive for well-designed projects having a positive contribution to the pedestrian environment. The resulting requirement may not be less than 10%. On-site provision shall not he required for a reduction in the requirement. A mix of uses within the proposed building that enliven the surrounding pedestrian environment may be considered. F. Design and Operational Standards for Pedestrian Amenity Pedestrian amenity, on all privately-owned land in which pedestrian amenity is required, shall comply with the following provisions and limitations: \. Open to View. Pedestrian amenity areas shall be open to view from the street at pedestrian level, which view need not be measured at right angles. 1. Open to Sky. Pedestrian amenity areas shall be open to the sky. Temporary and seasonal coverings, such as umbrellas and retractable canopies are permitted. Such non-permanent structures shall not be considered as floor area or a reduction in pedestrian amenity on the parcel. Trellis structures shall only be permitted in conjunction with commercial restaurant uses on a designated Historic Landmark or within (Ii) Ilistoric overlay zones and must be approved pursuant to review requirements contained in Chapter 26.415 - Development Involving the Aspen Inventory of I-Iistoric Landmark Sites and Structures or Development within a Historic District. Such approved structures shall not be considered as floor area or a reduction in pedestrian space on the parcel. 3. No Walls/Enclosures. Pedestrian amenity areas shall not be enclosed. Temporary structures, tents, air exchange entries, plastic canopy walls. and similar devices designed to en-close the space are prohibited. unless approved as a temporary use. pursuant to Section 26.450. Low fences or walls shall only be permitted within or around the perimeter of pedestrian space if such structures shall permit views from the street into and throughout the pedestrian space. 4. Prohibited Uses. Pedestrian amenity areas shall not be used as storage areas, utility/trash service areas, delivery area, parking areas or contain structures of any type, except as specifically provided for herein. Vacated rights-of-way shall be excluded from pedestrian amenity calculations. 5.Grade Limitations. Required pedestrian amenity shall not be more than four (4) feet above or two (2) feet below the existing grade of the street or sidewalk which abuts the 8 0. 0. pedestrian space, unless the pedestrian amenity space shall follow undisturbed natural grade, in which case there shall be no limit on the extent to which it is above or below the existing grade of the street. 6. Pedestrian Links. In the event that the City of Aspen shall have adopted a trail plan incorporating mid-block pedestrian links, any required pedestrian space must, if the city shall so elect, be applied and dedicated for such use. 7. Landscaping Plan. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Community Development Director shall require site plans and drawings of any required pedestrian amenity area, including a landscaping plan, and a bond in a satisfactory form and amount to insure compliance with any pedestrian amenity requirements under this title. 8. Maintenance of Landscaping. Whenever the landscaping required herein is not maintained, the Chief Building Official, alter thirty (30) days written notice to the owner or occupant of the property. may revoke the certificate of occupancy until said party complies with the landscaping requirements of this section. 9. Commercial Activity. No area of a building site designated as required pedestrian amenity space under this section shall be used for any commercial activity, including, but not limited to, the storage display, and merchandising of goods and services; provided, however, that the prohibition of this subsection shall not apply when such use is in conjunction with permitted commercial activity on an abutting right-of-way or is otherwise permitted by the City. For outdoor food vending in the Commercial Core District, also see Section 26.470.040(B)(3) Administrative Growth Management Review. 10. Commercial Restaurant Use. The provisions above notwithstanding, required pedestrian amenity space may be used l'or commercial restaurant use if adequate pedestrian and emergency vehicle access is maintained. 9 .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION DENYING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW FOR 205 SOUTH MILL STREET, LOTS D- 1, BLOCK 81, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. SERIES OF 2006 WHEREAS, the applicant, Gill Vanderra, represented by Jeffrey Halferty Designs has requested Minor Development approval and Commercial Design Standard Review for the property located at 205 S. Mill Street. Suite 226. Lots D-1, Block 81, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Aspen Municipal Code states that no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged. altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic properly or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review. An application for a building permit cannot be submitted without a Development Order; and WIIEREAS, the procedure for a Minor Development Review is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the i WC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue. approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC reviews the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project' s conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The 1-1PC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for approval oi Commercial Design Review, 1-1PC must review the application. a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine, per Section 26.412 of the Municipal Code, that the project conforms with the following criteria: 1. The proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial Design Standards or any deviation from the Standards provides a more-appealing pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. Unique site constraints can justify a deviation from the Standards. Compliance with Section 26.412.070, Suggested Design Elements, is not required but may be used to justify a deviation from the Standards. 2. For proposed development converting an existing structure to commercial use, the proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, .. Commercial Design Standards, to the greatest extent practical. Amendments to the fagde of the building may be required to comply with this section. 3. For properties listed on the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures or located within a Historic District, the proposed development has received Conceptual Development Plan approval from the I listoric Presen'ation Commission. pursuant to Chapter 26.415. This criterion shall not apply if the development activity does not require review by the Historic Preservation Commission: and WHEREAS, Sara Adams, in her staff report dated December 13, 2006 performed an analysis of the application based on the standards and found that the 'City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines were not met; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting of December 13. 2006. the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application after a duly noticed. public hearing. took testimony, found the application to not meet the pertinent standards with a vote of THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the HPC denies the request for Minor Development and Commercial Design Review for the property located at 205 S. Mill Street. Suite 226. Lots D-I. Block 81. City and Townsite ofAspen, Colorado. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 13th day of December 2006. Approved as to Form: David I Ioefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Michael Hoffman, Vice Chairman ATTEST: Kathy Strickland. Chief Deputy Clerk I. EXHIBIT ~4 ..1 . 1 1 . 1 . - Outdoor summer seating at . 4 i im,+,it--- ,..,.. ~~tÂ·. Bruno's looking down Hopkins 1 1 FB,ik--z**4-., 1*avig.miffir1,u1FY 4 I' 2 Avenue toward Grape and * ints ~ 2,19*v 11 9141"0 R,= - .P :11'Ul . :7 . ...43 Â¥ t. 9 -,2001,1. -' y 9 .1 .. . .... 1 1 . . Grape and Grain storefront. a * - contemporary interpretation of a historic storefront. - 'i ?Â·.'44; Â· :' I --1*71 3'1 -i, /2.~164 /""'~~ R au=. Al":falit 4 I A.'r .1 10. -, I , /8.1 . . Â·. Ai,2-%- Â· -- . - 7 2 4:. D-t J - L-n:-6:7 -1' Front facade of Mill Street 4..t. . -4 ./ ~---Ii -3. : Plaza, looking at Bruno's .Â·4 . '-13 9 ground seating and Jimmy's .-1 mill.MIZZ . 3-U:44:-1 "'* 4,40 second floor balcony seating. ~t > E.yrk L -2 1 1.:'.f ... -..EL=-2...L> 17/18 .a~1,97--W,--'Â·- - -44-12-Â·Cthâ€¢ Â· #fl- L Â· A.W.A/-:7- Â·NADE-*- - 1 Vift *Â·=u: -22 ~-$ : %, ~ * $,44. - AFFU*301 -t t. -G. 1' .. FIRE~RESISTANCE-RATED CONSTRUCTION E)(HIN-r- 0 4. Engineering analysis based on a comparison of building Exception: Type V construction shall be allowed for R-3 occu- element designs having fire-resistance ratings as deter- pancies, as applicable in Section 101.2. mined by the test procedures set forth in ASTM E 119. 704.3 Buildings on the same lot. For the purposes of deter- 5. Alternative protection methods as allowed by Section ruining the required wall and opening protection and roof-cov- 104.11. ering requirements, buildings on the same lot shall be assumed ~ 703.4 Noncombustibility tests. The tests indicated in Sections to have an imaginary line between them. 703.4.1 and 703.4.2 shall serve as criteria for acceptance of Where a new building is to be erected on the same lot as an ex- building materials as set forth in Sections 602.2, 602.3 and isting building, the location of the assumed imaginary line with 602.4 in Type I, II, III and IV construction. The term relation to the existing building shall be such that the exterior "noncombustible" does not apply to the flame spread charac- wall and opening protection of the existing building meet the teristics of interior finish or trim materials. A material shall not criteria as set forth in Sections 704.5 and 704.8. be classified as a noncombustible building construction mate- Mal if it is subject to an increase in combustibility or flame Exception: Two or more buildings on the same lot shall ei- spread beyond the limitations herein established through the eft therbe regulated as separate buildings or shall be considered fects of age, moisture or other atmospheric conditions. as portions of one building if the aggregate area of such buildings is within the limits specified in Chapter 5 for a sin- 703.4.1 Elementary materials. Materials required to be gle building. Where the buildings contain different occu- noncombustible shall be tested in accordance with ASTM E pancy groups or are of different types of construction, the 136. area shall be that allowed for the most restrictive occupancy 703.4.2 Composite materials. Materials having a structural or construction. base of noncombustible material as determined in accor- dance with Section 703.4.1 with a surfacing not more than 704.4 Materials. Exterior walls shall be of materials permitted 0.125 inch (3.18 mm) thick that has a flame spread index not by the building type of construction. greater than 50 when tested in accordance with ASTM E 84 704.5 Fire-resistance ratings. Exterior walls shall be fire-re- shall be acceptable as noncombustible materials. sistance rated in accordance with Tables 601 and 602. The fire-resistance rating of exterior walls with a fire separation dis- tance of greater than 5 feet (1524 mm) shall be rated for expo- SECTION 704 sure to fire from the inside. The fire-resistance rating of exterior EXTERIOR WALLS walls with a fire separation distance of 5 feet ( 1524 mm) or less 704.1 General. Exterior walls shall be fire-resistance rated and shall be rated for exposure to fire from both sides. have opening protection as required by this section. 704.6 Structural stability. The wall shall extend to the height l4.2 Projections. Comices, eave overhangs,~ext-erior balco- required by Section 704.11 and shall have sufficient structural 2igiand similar architectural appendages extending beyond the stability such that it will remain in place for the duration of time ~ floor area shall conform to the requirements of this section and indicated by the required fire-resistance rating. Section 1406. Exterior egress balconies and exterior exit stair- 704.7 Unexposed surface temperature. Where protected ~ ways shall also comply with Sections 1013.5 and 1022.1. Pro- openings are not limited by Section 704.8, the limitation on the jections shall not extend beyond the distance determined by the rise of temperature on the unexposed surface of exterior walls following two methods, whichever results in the lesser projec- as required by ASTM E 119 shall not apply. Where protected tion: openings are limited by Section 704.8, the limitation on the rise Â®~ 1. A point one-third the distance to the lot line from an as- of temperature on the unexposed surface of exterior walls as re- sumed vertical plane located where protected openings quired by ASTM E 119 shall not apply provided that a correc- are required in accordance with Section 704.8. tion is made for radiation from the unexposed exterior wall 2. More than 12 inches (305 mm) into areas where openings surface in accordance with the following formula: are prohibited. 704.2.1 Type I and II construction. Projections from walls A.=A+(AfXFO j (Equation 7-1) ofType I or II construction shall be of noncombustible mate- rials or combustible materials as allowed by Sections 1406.3 where: and 1406.4. Ae = Equivalent area of protected openings. 704.2.2 1*pe III, IV or V construction. Projections from A = Actual area of protected openings. walls of Type III, IV or V construction shall be of any ap- Af = Area of exterior wall surface in the story under consid- proved material. eration exclusive of openings, on which the tempera- 704.2.3 Combustible projections. Combustible projec- ture limitations of ASTM E 119 for walls are exceeded. tions located where openings are not permitted or where 60 = An "equivalent opening factor" derived from Figure protection of openings is required shall be of at least 1-hour 704.7 based on the average temperature of the unex- fire-resistance-rated construction, Type IV construction or posed wall surface and the fire-resistance rating of the as required by Section 1406.3. wall. 2003 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODEÂ® 87 .... jeffrey holferty desi 215 S. Monarch Ste 2 aspen,c 0. 8 1 970.920.4535 970.925.6035 FAX Issue 06.28.06 BRUNELLESCHI'S 205 SOUTH MILL STREET #226 GENERAL CONTRAOTOR ASPEN, COLORADO. 81611 PROJECT Brunelleschrls 205 5. Mill Street # 2: Asperi, Oolorado.81611 SHEET DOVIE Â® 2006 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINE ON THil DOCUWIEN~ 15 THE PROPEmY OF J.H. DESIGN PC NO PART OF THIS lgATION M,Y SE USED mTHOLrr THE PRI[ worr-!Fl DCUU,tqln),1 .C 14 'CON .... jeffrey halferty desi 215 S. Monarch Ste 2 aspen,c 0. 8 1 970.920.4535 970.925.6035 FAX 205 SOUTH MILL STREET East Hopkins Street ISSUe 06.28.06 9. ID 0 L Brunot -0 113 open R 12 D 0 t.fl SENERAL CONTRAOTOR ANCY 1/ J i . lite Plan Not to Boale &R# ~[~ Proposed Area of Development AOMEN'S RESTR//M --n__~â€¢TRY f 0 MENS RESÂ·Impr SCALE: 1/4" = 1'0 PROJECT 83 {2 10 Brunalleschr's 205 5. Mill Street # 2- Aspen, Golorado.51611 DESCRIPTION EXISTINS RESTROOME DITE PLAN SHEET A. 1.0 Â® 2000 â„¢E 1NFORMAnON AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINE ON THIS DC]CUWE% I THE PROPERrY OF J.H DE.IN PC NO PART DF 114!S INFOFNAT1ON % BE USED *11â„¢OUT THE PRI{ WRIT[EN PER)/1-1. OF JH DESiGN Bouth Monarch Street .... jeffrey f 0 4 f [E53*TH MILLI 61'REEII â€¢2226 holferty desi 215 S. Monarch Ste 2 end /9 building aspen,c 0. 8 1 r-EXISTINe INC>Oken 970.925.6035 FAX r- EXTENKIOR AAL-L 970.920.4535 1 0 < TO ENTRANCE UP - EXISTINe STAIR I IssueÂ· 1 <Pt> ~.1 ~ 06.28.06 UP D TO ENTRANCE / //-1/ISTINI ASPENS rÂ·EXISTNS BIDE,NALK EXIEÂ·rINS AEFF~NS 49 40 ~ EXISTING PLAN 205 sOUTH MILL BTREET #226 eENERAL CONTRAOTOE 205 SOUTH MILL STREET â€¢226 ~- EXISTINe ,NNDO)4 - EXTEFIOR IALL /1,7 â€žd ~P * 1 fil 111 / / / 111 / / / it_21 111 / / / 1 111 / / 111 / / / 1 % ~ % /- NER HAND RAIL 2/9711 / /1 lin " / /1 111 / 9 111 / / / / / 1 f A-> - m / / 111 / / / 1 11 1 / / 111 / / / / 111 / / /1 . / I / 1 b UP TO ENTRANCE 4-6 7'-3. x I STIble S[DE~AL.K / |9-kxiSTINS ASPENS rEXISTIble 51/EAALK EXISTING SCALE- Vj b 1/4" = 1'0" PROJECT Brunelleschi's 205 9. MIll Street # 2- Aspen, Colorado.81611 DESCRIPTION EXISTINe AND 99.OPOSED CONDITION ~ PROPOSED Â°-AN 205 SDIJ'H MILL S"rREE- *226 SHEET A.2.0 Â® 2008 THE INFOR*ION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINI ON THG DOCUI,IENT G THE PROPEW[Y OF J.H DESIGN P.C NO PART OF THIS INFORWArK)N MAY EE USED W[THOUT THE PRI( jeffrey holferty desi 215 S. Monarch Ste 2 ospen,c 0. 8 1 970.920.4535 970.925.6035 FAX IssueÂ· 06.28.06 205 SOUTH MILL 57'IKEET *226 F EXISTINe AINDD~ Of//-11 Il|| Â· ~ 116.op' 4 6/al Store Front f ' z 73 *)' z ~ / ~ ~ ,F 'end of bullaing / / )1 / // ' / / Al /1 0 1 , 1 ~/ ' F- NE/, HAND /All - /\ 3 / 11 1\ // / C 1 , Â£ 3 7~ 1 ~31 <ft L ; /1/1 mol 11 111 1// Â£ / / 1 1 lum D.9 C - -C . '//18 4 24Â· 01/ete, - 111 0oy on 94bo <3(I))0~(3 (60096%0/ SENERAL CONTRAOTON I. 224.518 Bf TO ENTRANGE rEXISTINe SICEIALK / 1/-XXISTINS ASFENS rEXISTINS SIDErIALK EXISTINe AS NS ~ PROPOSED PLAN 2 205 SOUTH MILL STREET *226 SCALEÂ· 1/4" = 1 '0" PROJECT Brunelleschrb 205 5. Mill Street # 25 Aspen, Golorado.&1611 DESCRIPTION EXISTINS AND PROPOSED CONDITION SHEET A.2.1 Â® 2006 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAIN[ ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPENTY OF J H ./.1/N P.C NO PART OF THIS INFOR,anON MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PAM WRITTEN ..ISSION OF J. DESGN .... jeffrey halferty desi 215 S. Monarch Ste 2 aspen,c 0. 8 1 970.920.4535 970.925.6035 FAX ~r- END OF BUILD IN16 17'-3' p j < 0 8~~~,EMINE -NATION 3-8 3-8 3-11,1 06.28.06 E ISTINe I NDOM NER FfENGH DOORS , -A / < \ \ T \ . 4 -7- MATCH EXISTING AND RAILS i rÂ·I--11- I I n 'll j - 1 .Fl I H---lf--I 1 Il ~~ ~ ~ 37 1 ITmi 11 111 i 0- WEA DZ<* AREA Â¥9AMS I \11111111111111 lilli 1 f dll-LLIJLIMLI_LLI_1 -I_LLI_11_-I_LLILLI_11 4 fri-t MPA#%% 4 /1-1 -1-Irt-1+191*44~14 t-1 -1 f ~ NER PEEK COLUMNS 3 tlE[ LIZI L IE[ ICIZ[ III [I17 21 1 Ell L IE[ El J I , : 421-4 4-1-4 +-14-H+H-1 -19 t-1-1 +14+-14+4+P i JECILIDILIZILIZILIZI CIE[ EIZLIZIEZIE[Elin I +1-1--41- 1-4 +-1-++1+H-1 -1--1-1-1-+ f-1-P+1+ 4-1-+ f Tri-T T- 1-T 1--1-Tri-[ 7 1-1 -1-1 91-Tri--1 71-Tri-[ T PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATIONI GENERAL CONTRACTOR EXISTIN6 BUILDINS ~--EXISTING BUILDIN6 4'-4" 4'-4" 4'-4" POSTS , P./15 Â» I + PILINe TO MA-OH EX STI Ns-~ ~ RAILING TO MA-0-1 EX.STING 4 9 lili 11 4 mi lili 111 , _LUELLU - " ulaillul[)1014 H + H 9Â·k-1--Me14Â¤Glp H+ H IDIDICÂ©1 - DIDIOIEJIEJIEJIEI #<Lies DocK -tH-tt-1-th 9 9 Htklte-1-PH-PH+H-1- H IDII]1Â¤ ~n ' ||1 DIOIDIOIOIDIE] +H+H+H [-1+H+H+H+H+H+H ~v TriTHEM MTOTETRTUTEITM SCALE: 1/C = 1'0 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION PROPOSED REST ELEVATION PROJECT Brunelleschi's 205 5. MUI Street # 25 Aspen, Colorado.Blell DESCRIPTION PROPOSED CLEVATIOh SHEET A.3.0 @ 2006 THE INFORMAT1ON AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAIN! I ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPENTY OF J H DESIGN PC, NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION 6t,Y GE LISED WrEHOUT THE PRK WRiTTEN PERMISSION OF JH DESIGN .... jeffre y halferty desi 215 S. Monarch Ste 2 aspen,C 0. 8 1 205 BOUTH MILL STREET *226 970.920.4535 970.925.6035 FAX EXISTING ENCOM J Slope 4 .... Store Flint nd of bullÂ¢11/g - Issue A M NEW HAND RAIL- 2 06.28.06 . I 0 0 13 4 24" planter* dke 0 0 0 000 UF TO E Â·rRANCE Ill.576 . 2q'-2~ ' XISTINe SIDEWALK XISTINI ASPENS XISTINS SIOBNALK EXISTive NS - ~ PROÂ©OSED PLAN I SENERAL GONTRACTOR 205 9/Un+ MILL STREET â€¢226 28 4 ISTINI BUILDINS END OF BUILDIMS /4-22' 1-21 3Â·-/6 #PARN :0 TION , 4-4" EX ille MINPO 1 / \. / \ , . , \ 1 \ / \ ATCH Ex Ie iNe HAND; RAILS 1 4 RAILINe TO WATOA EXISTINe SCALE: 1/4" = 1 10 0/ 3 - m PROJECT NER PECK AREA FRAMINI in Brunelleschi's - - 7 : 205 5. Mill Street Â¢ 21 Cue-0/ PLAN-ERS * Aspen, Colorado.Blell -401 I " 1 - 11 1 I fill 2 DESCRIPTION -Irl I '1 491FF et PROPOSED ELEVATIOK PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION PROPOSED AEST ELEVATION SHEET - 6.3.1 Â® 2000 I THE INF(JRMAION AND DESICN INTENT CONLy.1 ON THIS DOCUÂ»ENT IS THE PROPERâ„¢ OF J.H. DESIGN PC NO PART OF THI INFORMAT,ON MAY BE USED ~r HOUT THE PRI( WRITTEN PERMISSION OF JH DESIGN 4 1 L .... ieffrey holfert~esi 205 SOUTH WILL STREET #226 215 S. Monorch Ste 2 I aspen,co.81 970.920.4535 rEXISING WINDOW 970.925.6035 FAX / ' u~ Grope & Grain Store Front i 11 11 --Tnind of building 1 1 1 / /&< / /'(1 // \'\V / /<Ax / '1" 34 < .1 \ 1 NEW HAND RAIL / / / / ur- N. / / 1,/ // \ / // h/ 6/ h\ / / 1 04 111 < // 06.28.06 , 7# IJ / < // / / f ,/101 Pmong'-OFiÂ«00*039>r~.036Â°6 0~18 & 24 pionters / UP 224.598 / TO ENTRANCE re)(ISTi NG SIDEWALK XISUNG ASPENS dISING SIDEWALK EXIS11NG ASP I 9 0 [\ /1 PROPOSED PLAN 2 205 SOUTH 1,11,1 STREET #226 GENERAL CONTRACTOR 294-Oi jr-EXISTING BUILDING F END OF BUILDING 5-9Â» 5 9-2;Â» 9*-2~ 1 1 6~~k"BM & fl 3'-71- ,â€¢ 4-01 I E.13 INC WINDOW' r 1 .--e-k".-,r / \ ~ MATCH EXISTI*G HAND RAILS w Ut. F r- RAILING TO MATCH EXISTING 2 1 X T y' 11 11 - 111 11 111 - -Ta .1 -;81 Ir-- 1[1 Ill g# - 410 ! 61= NEW DECK AREA R.liNG 11 SCALE CUSTOM PLANTERS : 1/4- = 1'0- 1 - 1 PROJECT '0 Brunelleschi's 205 S. Mill Street # 22 f.-04 Aspen, Colorado.81611 DESCRIPTION PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONDITIONS SHEET A.2.1 0 2006 a ....6 ....ENT IS Dâ‚¬ CROPERn. OF . H DESIGN PC NO PART . THI Â»,FORMATION PER.I.!ON Of ./ DEIGN . ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 2006 Letter from Davis Horn - Exhibit II - Summary - The south side of Hopkins Ave. is a dead space and the Horn' s support the deck. The deck will be an excellent pedestrian amenity. Jeffrey recused himself. Michael chaired. John Olson, builder Travis Terry, represented Jeffrey Halferty designer Sara said the subject property is in the commercial core and the proposal is for a 170 square foot outdoor dining deck that would be five feet high and project out of the half story level. The purpose is for ease of the Waite staff to access the outdoor area. The application is in two parts, minor development and commercial design review. Minor Development Review - Staff found according to our guidelines that the emphasis should be at the storefront first floor level. Having the deck at five feet is on in compliance with the guidelines. Staff also pointed out that the set of steps that leads into the Mill Street plaza will be somewhat compromised with the deck projecting out. We looked into dropping the deck height but that triggered an accessibility requirement. Commercial Design Review and Pedestrian Amenity Space - The two guidelines that staff questioned are A4 A5 regarding the building relationship to the primary street. The goal is to promote activity at street level. The space between the fagde and the property line counts toward the Mill Street Plaza's pedestrian amenity and having the deck at five feet does not qualify. The maximum height is four feet. HPC could allow them to pay a cash-in-lieu payment which would be $50 per square foot which equals $8,500. or waive the payment. Staff recommends denial of the proj ect. John Olson said he did remodeling work for the previous owner and never got paid for $250,000. Frank Woods and Tony Maza own the building and an arrangement was made that the rent would be paid by John and in exchange he would receive ownership o f the restaurant. John said he was led to believe that a deck was possible. Gill Vanderaa III was interested in starting up a restaurant. The deck has a huge effect whether or not this - r restaurant makes it and it is vital to the success of the space. 2 . ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 28. 2006 We are not in the same situation as other restaurants that have outside dining on Main Street such as Asie, Gusto or the Hotel Jerome. They are all on ground level. It is difficult at ground level, the way it is now because waiters have to negotiate the steps. John said he feels most of the guidelines have been met and he is willing to work with the HPC to come up with a design that is acceptable to the board. Travis Terry said with Jimmy's deck and all the other design issues with flower boxes etc. it the deck is detailed out appropriately it could be its own vocal point. Another option is that it could be detailed out to be a temporary structure and only there in the summer. Michael said the guideline is basic consistency with the Historic District. Amy pointed out that Sarah mentioned the guideline that first floors should be store fronts and upper levels have secondary activities. Vice-chair Michael Hoffman opened the pubic hearing. Jay Mason stated that he hopes the HPC would consider working with the applicant to find a solution to make the restaurant more profitable. The way it is set up now you have waiters walking up and down with hot food and glass ware and it is only a matter of time that an accident will happen. A nice looking deck would add to the streetscape. That north fagacle as it il, .tiow is very cold. Vice-chair Michael Hoffman closed the public hearing portion of the meeting. Board comments: Derek said according to the codes it seems simple to deny the project but he feels very strongly for supporting this application. Regarding the dual access of the stairs they might be in violation. The space is a vacant space and is especially evident in the winter. Derek hoped the board would allow some kind of deck to actually produce some sort of vitality. This is a peculiar situation as there is no where else in the City that exists like this. He would not want to go to a removable deck but would entertain it before denying the application. Regarding the stairs, possibly they could be utilized in a better way. 3 - ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 2006 Alison said the building already doesn't meet a lot of our guidelines. We are looking at a space that is already setback from the sidewalk. We have a -A\,I condition that the restaurant is at half level. It is hard to address our guidelines with this building because it is oddly shaped. A far as knowing \r that space, a deck would be a good addition. Having the windows open with a deck would give it a good relationship to the street that the building doesn't have now. Three or four businesses have been in the space that were not successful due to some o f these issues. Jason said he is thinking of the functionality of the space. How many tables cefl can fit on the deck and how would that increase the restaurant business. What would be the experience of people walking by and what are the impacts to Grape & Grain. They would look out at a five foot tall metal (Al/Nn mesh with a railing on top of it. A shadow line would be put in front of the Grape & Grain. Maybe you could privatize the one section of the stairs that abuts up against the north end of the building. Jason felt that the deck would work better i f it went all the way across the top of the stairs. Right now there is solid glass with operating windows above which restricts the experience outside. Maybe the windows should be changed to doors. Functionally you probably won't get more than two or three tables. Maybe there is a way to use a dumb waiter. Michael said we are all sympathetic to the business and owners of the building and the way it contributes or doesn't contribute to the streetscape and community downtown. Michael summarized by saying that the proposed design doesn't meet the guidelines. Maybe a different solution would work. The bigger problem is how does this building relate to the historic district as a whole. Michael said he is willing to continue the application to allow the applicant to re-design the proposal. John said the space is weird and it is an access that is not used. He will re. adesign and possibly the deck can be pushed further away from the Grape & fl .Grain. John also stated that he will get support from his neighbors. Jason said support from the neighbors would be good and going across the stair would work better. A thought might be that the deck be six feet instead of five feet tall. Alison said we need to focus on what could happen below the deck. 4 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 2006 John said they are going to implement shifting the deck over away from the .Grape & Grain and incorporate some of Derek's suggestions.- MOTION: Derek moved to continue the minor development review and public hearing on 205 S. Mill Street until August 9th; second by Jason. Roll call vote: Jason, yes; Derek, yes; Alison, yes; Michael, yes. Motion carried 4-0. 423 N. SECOND STREET - MINOR REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING Jeffrey was seated. David Rybak, architect Jim & Betty McManus Affidavit of posting - Exhibit I Sara said the subject house is 214 residential Victorian built in the 1880's and heavily altered from its original form. It is located on the corner of Smuggler and N. Second St. The original primary entrance is oriented toward the alley. A variety o f windows and a wrap around porch were added throughout the years and they contribute to the declining integrity of the building. What is before the HPC are alterations that were denied by staffbased on non-compliance with our guidelines. The applicant is proposing: 1. New windows in the north and west gables. 2. Three skylights in the northwest side of the cross gable. 3. Metal chimney along the north gable transition. 4. Arched top window. Sara said the new easement window proposed in the north attic gable is for egress for a habitable space. The attic will be opened up. The recommended minimum opening for an egress window is 5.7 square feet and they are proposing 8 square feet. Staff recommends that the window be reduced in size. Staff also recommends that the HPC discuss the alignment of the door in order achieve a better streetscape alignment. There is also an arched top window being proposed. Adding a window on top of an historic window within the west gable would really compromise the integrity of the historic structure. Staff finds that the 1/2 circular window does not comply with guidelines 3.1 and 3.2 of the guidelines. Moving to the roof, the applicant proposes to add three brown aluminum glad skylights to the northwest side o f the cross gable. They will be visible from the street facing 5 EXHIBI I B - ~~~ 4436Â·*~ ' ~ ,~ a.-7 ~.....li-- - , 11/'1 Â¥ft Outdoor summer seating at V - Bruno's looking down Hopkins 1 I<Â· Avenue toward Grape and - Grain. e Â·4 11./- 1 1, 1-1' ..1 k. 121 . .- T 4/412 , 2 hAÂ¥ ' Â«Â«fÂ¥- -- .,"'61 es V lft- 2~*,1 -â€ž13 4.-E=,= Al=' 20.2 207:<0, Grape and Grain storefront: a 31Â·. tr 1 . I :Â·L Q -4~ contemporary interpretation of a . historic storefront. 1. - D I 42/2 -6 ' 4 'r -- 2*% .1 01 -11*7 â‚¬ 21 L.jELa___0 - 4... - Front facade of Mill Street '4 Plaza, looking at Bruno's IJ__ *. r.- ground seating and Jimmy's r *IL 1 ' ' second floor balcony seating. - 1 4 , Â»23_ 1 . =904Â»Â»/{ 61441 i 6 Uqwvt LÂ¥14 Ph bkÂ»Â·frvi J -. 4 1 311-ow[[3 1 C 9. 1 --"%42 bE,fiti- Â«00(OUL' I- /2â‚¬Â»/94 t*fAU-â‚¬ 1 THE CITY OF AspEN INvt*VIAO: UpZqJDS. +A/,Pl,fk~ CA pwv(#8 li)Â°1[oew(3201.Cm 1 - 130 SOUTH GALENASTREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611-1975 Sara Adams From: Sara Adams Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 10.06 AM To: 'John Olson'; Jeffrey Halferty CC: brandy dobbin; Travisbillterry@Yahoo. Com Subject: RE: bruno's drawings Maybe I am not understanding this email- but, just to be clear, you guys need HPC approval before you submit for a building permit. Call me if you have any questions or would like to go over revised drawings. I will need your new drawings, if you are planning to resubmit anything per my email yesterday after our staff meeting, by March 300 Sara From: John Olson [mailto:john@johnolsonbuilder.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 9:42 AM To: Sara Adams; Jeffrey Halferty Cc: brandy dobbin; Travisbillterry@Yahoo. Com Subject: RE: bruno's drawings Morning every one. At this time, I know Gil just wants to get it approved. Summer is coming and that deck needs to get a building permit last week. Jeff, I think you need to talk to Gil and get something submitted for permit ASAP. Thanks every body for helping out. John From: Sara Adams [mailto:saraa@ci.aspen.co.us-] Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 4:23 PM To: Jeffrey Halferty Cc: John Olson; brandy dobbin; Travisbillterry@Yahoo. Com Subject: RE: bruno's drawings Hi Jeffrey, etc: I took your drawing to staff meeting and everyone thinks that there is a significant improvement. There are a few concerns: they thought that the material was a little too heavy (thick brick columns) and emphasized verticality. They are also concerns about its use in the winter, and want me to put into the Resolution that plastic "walls" will not be permitted in the winter time. Let me know what your team thinks about these ideas. Thanks, Sara From: Jeffrey Halferty [mailto:jhdesign@sopris.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 10:51 AM To: Sara Adams Cc: john@johnolsonbuilder.com; brandy dobbin; Travisbillterry@Yahoo. Com Subject: Re: bruno's drawings Sara, thanks a lot that april 11th meeting is fine with us. For the planting schedulewe will propose native perinials flowers for spring and summer.(like cache cache and 3/16/2007 campo) and deciduous small trees with winter growth for the winter. thanks jh ----- Original Message ----- From: Sara Adams To: Jeffrey Halferty Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 8:25 AM Subject: RE: bruno's drawings Hi Jeffrey: I am taking your revised drawings to our staff meeting tomorrow morning. This item was continued to April 11 E we cannot change the date after an item is opened and continued at a public meeting. I hope that April works for you. I will get you staff comments ASAP. Oh- also, HPC mentioned at the last meeting that they would like to know what type of plants are proposed for the boxes- they expressed concern about the appearance in the winter. Thanks, Sara From: Jeffrey Halferty [mailto:jhdesign@sopris.net-] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 12:58 PM To: Sara Adams Subject: Fw: bruno's drawings Hi Sara, we are ready please take a look. Any agenda, He needs to build this spring thanks no presure jh thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: Brandy Dobbin To: travisbillterry@yahoo.com ; kffrey Halferty Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 10:17 AM Subject: bruno's drawings I have attached the updated plans. Please give feedback so I can wrap these drawings up. thanks, Brandy Jeffrey Halferty Design 215 S. Monarch ste 202 Aspen, CO 81611 970.920.4535 p 970.925.6035 f 303.915.6901 c 3/16/2007 Sara Adams From: Jeffrey Halferty Ohdesign@sopris.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 10:51 AM To: Sara Adams CC: john@johnolsonbuilder.com; brandy dobbin; Travisbillterry@Yahoo. Com Subject: Re: bruno's drawings Sara, thanks a lot that april 11th meeting is fine with us. For the planting schedulewe will propose native perinials flowers for spring and summer.(like cache cache and campo) and deciduous small trees with winter growth for the winter. thanks jh ----- Original Message ----- From: Sara Adams To: Jeffrey Halferty Sent: Wednesday, March 14,2007 8:25 AM Subject: RE: bruno's drawings Hi Jeffrey: I am taking your revised drawings to our staff meeting tomorrow morning. This item was continued to April 11th; we cannot change the date after an item is opened and continued at a public meeting. I hope that April works for you. I will get you staff comments ASAP. Oh- also, HPC mentioned at the last meeting that they would like to know what type of plants are proposed for the boxes- they expressed concern about the appearance in the winter. Thanks, Sara From: Jeffrey Halferty [mailto:jhdesign@sopris.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 12:58 PM To: Sara Adams Subject: Fw: bruno's drawings Hi Sara, 3/14/2007 we are ready please take a look. Any agenda, He needs to build this spring thanks no presure jh thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: Brandy Robbin To: travisbillterry@yahoo.com ; Jeffrey Halferty Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 10:17 AM Subject: bruno's drawings I have attached the updated plans. Please give feedback so I can wrap these drawings up. thanks, Brandy Jeffrey Halferty Design 215 S. Monarch ste 202 Aspen, CO 81611 970.920.4535 p 970.925.6035 f 303.915.6901 c 3/14/2007 Jeffrey halferty BRb-JL des, 1 F 7-761+ 2*6-- 1*1]E 215 S Monoret Ste 2 11 1 970 925 6035 FAX ospen,c 081 970920 4535 1 â€¢f~ F MA,5-1)6 - â€ž ms ' ./1/ StÂ©il r,oâ€žt Issue 06 28 08 - i >. / / f Â¢y //j wh .4145 . IN . / . / / t .4 1, StA. 10 -:,4 2*,ST,â€¢6 I T. pre# 21' ./. I' 2*u) / pAISTI- AyfEd 9Â¢Â·STINÂ® 'PeÂ»LK -Â«Â»3 1 49 ~I~ PROPOSED PLAN I 6ENERAL CONTRACTOR X,5 5OLrTH 1411.6 6â„¢Eer â€¢226 . ,--12' %. LAM - meÂ»4 -42 .UE 'Â»4 ,OCD SE,~M I %./ISTIW =IL/1$ *.0=~H O- .c 1 f blf_49-73-f~1~ ..rol e,isr~* SL... I ,â‚¬M R,0..INS S-EL .../...........ILS I SCA,E 9VI *1471-Mrn ' I **41*EÂ¢ tal 1 [Ur reorm DES,-IN~ PROJECT '*Zzlri Bruna ./.i'/ r. M 8 9~- s.oâ€že. -- 205 5 Mill Street * 2: t*M um . o AspeA, Colorado 81611 'I, _g~J -/ iÂ·Â·7 kula'./#7'~70'070'?t; 45jit~ T~HA~wl- r " /4 DESCRIPTION Il fl PROPOSED ELEVATIOK PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION ../ PROPOSED PNEST ELEVATION SHEET A.3.0 0 20)8 2207*2. 0 0 4 4 1 jeffre y holferty desig 215 S. Monorch Ste 202 aspen,c 0.816 970.920.4535 970.925.6035 FAX ls,ueÂ· 06.28.06 BRUNELLESCHI'S 205 SOUTH MILL STREET #226 GENERAL CONTRACTOR ASPEN, COLORADO. 81611 PROJECT Brural'aschib 205 9 Mill Street â€¢ 226 Aspen, Colorado 516 SnEET QOVER THE NPONAT~,1 AND OESIGN NTENT CONt,NEO , 0. "Ars OCCL,41ENT S THE PROPgry OF J 4 XEON I.C. NO IF.. C. TWI NFOR669 ,~Y BE JSED ~7â€žÂ©UT TH[ eqi. *95-EN PERgs,ON OF . .5/N 0 0 4 4 jeffre y holferty ~NEI STEEL HANDRAIL d esig ~ ~ MATCH EXISTIN,5 SLATE 215 S. Monarch Ste 202 g:;44- HORIZONTAL STEEL ~AIL[N6 aspen,c 0.816 2/5 SGUTH MILL- 5-REE r *22Â® 970.920.4535 970.925.6035 FAX -XISTI% .iNUM r MATCH EXISTÂ·he BRICK< aps Â¢ aralr, Stora .orrt br,d Of kil//9 Issue: T | L /3 HAO <All- 2. 06.28.06 0.-- 0 18 â€¢ 24Â· Plor,t,re .1,0 SLATE TO MATCH EXISTINe TO ENâ„¢Â»ICE 21516 / 2.-46 DISTINIe SIDE/NALK ISTINe 'SPE,e TIN/ SjornALK EXJSTINIS A \ ~ PROPOSED PLAN I SENEQAL CONTRACTOR 205 SOUTH MIL- 9â„¢EET *226 24 -56. 2Â· ILUE LAM 0100/ BEAM ~12 LUE LAM ~00[2 BEAM EXISTiNS BUIL-DI~ END OF eU,LOINe 37221. PAINTED 51.ACK 0 0 0 0 NER FRENC,1 000 1 DETERMINE LOCATI EXISTING MINDO \ /\ \ / \ TCH EXISTI HAND GILS / \ Ill ./.ri SLATE " het RAIL-Ile STEEL â€¢ SCALE: T 1/4" = 1'0" 9 -rl I - mi 9 1 PROJECT MOP PEGIV NEY'I DECK AREA FRAMINe m Bru~ellesch's STOICAIE ADGESS 205 5. Mel Street * 226 TOM PLANTERS . , Aspen. Colorado 31611 S TE TO MATCH EXISTINe -21 04 - DESCRIPTION -91 1 ' 1 ' 1 1 N PROPOSED ELEVAT ONS, 8~1 TO MATOH EXISTIW 1-=El PLANS. AND DE-AI LS PROPOSED FRONIT ELEVATION 2'.]aÂ· PROPOSED AEST ELEVATIONI SHEET Â® 2006 THE INFOq),ATIOH AND DESK;~ INTENT co,rrl~â‚¬[} ON 'HIS 00Cu,ENT IS rHE PROPERâ„¢ Of J I DES4GN PC NO PART OF % 1â€¢troR-'loN MAÂ¥ aE USED Wm,OUT THE PRIOR wy?,TTE. PER'!SSION OF .DESIGN . Page 1 of 2 Amy Guthrie From: Amy Guthrie Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 12:33 PM To: 'gilbertvanderaa@hotmail.com' Subject: Deck Gil- sorry it has taken me so long to get back to you about your proposed new deck at the restaurant. Ezra Louthis mentioned that you are a friend of his, so I got your email address from him because it will make more sense in writing. Your project requires two reviews; Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) Minor Development (because the site is within a historic district) and Commercial Design Review. These reviews can take place simultaneously in front of HPC. HPC Minor Development will deal with whether or not the deck is an appropriate feature within the historic context of downtown. There is definitely a desire within their guidelines (which they use to make decisions) to focus activity and features at the street level. Mill Street Plaza would probably not be approved today to the extent that your end o f the building has a blank wall at sidewalk level and the business a half-story up in the air. They may or may not find that adding a deck aggravates this situation. Commercial Design Review requires all commercial projects to include certain elements, many of which you will be exempt from because you aren't creating an all new building. The most important part that will apply is "Pedestrian Amenity." The area that is between your building face and the property line along E. Ilopkins is considered to contribute to the requirement that 25% of the footprint of the entire Mill Street Plaza site must provide a pedestrian amenity. We have a definition of what a pedestrian amenity means and Mill Street Plaza probably does not comply now with that 25% requirement. The deck that you propose will reduce the amount of pedestrian amenity that exists at the site. That's because a pedestrian amenity is something that is supposed to take place at the sidewalk level, or not more than 4 feet above it. The proposed deck is 5 feet off the ground and so in order to build it, and therefore reduce the on-site pedestrian amenity, you'll need to pay a cash-in-lieu fee of $50 per square foot (looks like your deck has a foot print of about 175 square feet, so the fee would be about $8,750 to be used for streetscape improvements and the like downtown.) If you can get the deck down to no more than 4 feet above the sidewalk level, then might be able to meet the definition of"pedestrian amenity" and avoid the fee, however HPC will have to determine that your deck fully complies with the way pedestrian amenity is defined, and you cannot, for instance have a storage area underneath it. You can read more about the requirements for pedestrian amenity in the City's Land Use Code. Click on this link and then scroll down to get to Section 26.575.030. http://www.aspenpitkin.com/pdfs/depts/38/coaspent26-500.pdf I do not know if there are any building code implications to your deck that have not been fully resolved, so that is something to confirm with Jeffrey. Please let me know if you have questions. I can get you information on how to file the necessary applications. HPC does not have any agenda time available before May 24th as of today. Sorry that this 5/9/2006 . Page 2 of 2 isn't more simple. Amy Guthrie City of Aspen Historic Preservation Officer 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 (p) 970-429-2758 (f) 970-920-5439 www.aspenpitkin.com 5/9/2006 4 4 .. . 4 E>:ISTINe BUILDING 41.-4" # 1 * - PNOODEN --7 POSTS ~ 1 -4 RAIL INe TO MATCH EXISTIble --~~ 1 I 1 1111 1 lili 1 lili = mi 1 9 1 1111 1 I mil- 4 1 HI 1 1 ~ iL-!1ULL- / / MET'*-11**H--t 1- IDIOIt - / S ASâ‚¬ESS DOOR +H+H+1- \ IDIDIC +H+H+1- ~ TRITE-ITT- " EAST ELEVATION . I. .. /,EXIsTINS BUILDINS 4'-4,1 4'...4â€ž , 1 F- MOODEN POSTS EP ~--TA,ILING TO MATOH EXISTINS i , 1 1 IN I 1 1111 1 1 tHi I 1 1111 1 I lili I 1 lili 1 1 1 "1 1 -11 L.1 1 Ul L-11 1-11 L.11 L 71+ H -9Â»-MR,141)Mp#Ht }-{ + p ]IDIDIOIOIDIE 44-H+H+H+H+H+P 3IOIDIOIDIDIE -1+H+H+H+H+HI+P 7-TnTn-TnTrITI-}Tr REST ELEVATION 4'-e" 5'-0" 0 0 0 j - 1 ' LA'itiv -j l 0 f 'j : -..4, . I. . /*u . t-1 1. 1,1.jt 0 0 -= 04 17'-3 " 1 , , S 3'-1~" 3'--14. 5'-5. 3'-B" 6 : :: I , NEW FRENCH DOORS /-- DETERMINE LOCATION - -1-- - ,--MATCH EXISTING HAND RAILS / 1 11 u ' 10 /lili 1 1 It 11 \ lilli I 1 11 11 \ 111 . 1111 1 1 1 1 11 : 111 / lili 1 4 1 1 1 11 = .. 111 -/ 11" 1 - 41-4. 1 It 11 \ 111./ 1111 1 * /1 1 1 11 \111/ 1111 I r- NER PECK AREA FRAMING ' e |-1 1 1 1-1 1_1.1 111 1.1.1 LI_ _1 -1 LI _L LI_L LI_L 1_1-1 L 4 fbERT++M#+-1-4 -1-1- -1-9*MIR+4=MP#+ 1-Itt r- NEW DECK COLUMNS J tiE[ II[ Ell LIE[ Eli ZIX EllI Eli[ Eli[ Ell E / 4 -1-14 4-14 -1-14 +-14 -1-1- -1-+ 1-1-1- t-1-1- 1-14 1-14 + 9 1 Ell EIZ[ III LIZ[ Eli ZIZIEE[ Eli[ II[ Eli[ E m 4 -1-14 1-14 4-1-4 -1--1-1- 1-1- -14 +-1-1- 1-1-1- 4-14 1-1-+ f 7 -[-1-T T-1-T T-1-T T-1-T T-17 -1-r T-1-T 1-1 -1- 1-1-T 1-1-T r PROPOSED FRONT Fl EVATION .. A 'I.* *-- -. 444/ e W /Alt t f 1 1 < 1 1 - A 40 . 2j 4 1/i 1 1. r LJ h N< X 32 4\ ./ . -4.lk/,4..'-mtâ€¢~f~~! f Kew< 4 6 .. 6..2,3 -1...,-........a---- tÂ«.4--il--.........1.-L-..-1.- ---4* 17 4 9 Â£......., ... .1.-â‚¬-I -- Ult--- \ P. <1/4.C=itit............../.-0- I I _---r- ...-4.-- C j - 0 0 0 0 F end oÂ¥ building r-EXTERIOR kNALL 1 . 11 51 / 11 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . / 1 1 1 < p NER HAND RAIL 1 1 1 \ 1 1 11 / X /9 1 7 1 1 / Ill /// 1 1 1 I / 1 1 1 1 1 1 Nb 41-eli Il'-3. 1 , I A , 4 jeffrey A PA PROPOSED PLAN halferty E design I /7 215 s. monarch suite 202 aspen, co 81611 t=:. 2 4k .- 970.9204535(0) 1 970.925 6035(f) ~ jhdesign@sopris.net ~ 0 0 0 . Important 134, i Jeffrey halferty message deâ€¢lg 215 & Monarch Ste 202 aspen,c 0.81 6 ~70 il- 1 Fc 970.925.6035 FAX 970.020.4535 9 fliaft - <Whz,W#- 06 For , rfi From : Time Date Phone ; -Â©33oK-% 77 06.28.06 OURGENT! Message 14 4 0.0 r -hil-=41./2.01.~ 9,779 U.)02*u- - /Us.1- 7 <a- u. ,â€¢u.* u., el ... 208 SOUTH ILL STEXT 1228 0*01 /-13 i uc- 6=~,-1. W i 7~l Â£0 41-7-5,3 9/t - 1 rn=â„¢0 -Â®M 1 T*zÂ·i, i 1 00\ N U/'0.4-Na,0 0 " 11 1 ' .- / /-9 / / I. 14<n\Â£4*r p G,/97.V '2144 , 7, ) I. 1 3'-7 5,0 gr, ,-71 A bv i SA <opost-it, , / I U Brand 0 - 0 1 , 1 1 63 8,1. 9 0 + - .1 48 - 1 15[Ulper-1 .1 / ' 9 a a W pli""' 30//4 - 379 <06Â¥,3 *actky~ -Â·|i Ong (-)090090060)046~Ar GENERAL CONTRACTOR IP nual,1 -f TO ENmANCE pme =DEâ€¢ux 1 12-1.16 0-- 70 3IPWILK EXnlWO (6) ~~ PROPOSED PLAN 2 208 SOUP All SNOIT 0220 0 31 11 4 SCALE: 1/4' - 1'0- p.wect Brunelleschfs 205 & MWI Street # 226 Aspen, Colorado.81611 DESCRFT,ON EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONDITIONS DEC 0 5 2613 A.2.0 L. 0 8 0 . Jeffrey halferty desle ~ F Md of bul-g 215 & Monarch Ste 202 $ aspen,c 0.81 6 970.020.4535 LI ~- Or-R -1. 970.925.6035 FAX 11 I / 10 ENTRANCE - EXISâ„¢Q STA' 6--7 -\ / 06.28.06 Up TO ENTRANCE Of- U ASPEIG FE.)Slple ZE-LK DISTIO n 1 l ~ EXISTING PLAN 205 SOUTH -1. STRUT #28 GENERAL CONTRACTOR 206 SOUTH hal STREET 1226 r - of bul.g r-EXETÂ»10 *M / F DITERIOR WALL 1 1 . 2 11 - 1-' , 1 .- 1 1 mil l / / Â»\ .11 / / / 1. "1 . / J. I / 1. I I ' m,- '. IWE) Ra /1/ 1 / m ' ' I /1. 1 -1 1 / 1. ./ I /1. / â€ž7~~>, ~ ' ' ' '~ / 1 1 1. I / 1. \ .1 / / / 1. mi . / .1 / ,. m . / 1. UP TO El,1RANCE Â£-* 1 .r L 03- r-= -61 SCALE: 1/4~ - 1'0- PRNECT Brunelleschfs 205 S. Mill Street # 228 Aspen, Colorado.81611 DESCRIPTKON EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONDITIONS ~4~ PROPOSED PLAN 205 SOUTH *L Sm[ET 1228 A.2.0 2--ril~/E-- dh jeffrey holferty design 24Â·- c.- 215 & MonorenaÂ» 202_ aspen,c 0.8161 970.020.4535 970.925.6035 FAX r 08 oF .li*,11 1-Ul. 17-3' . 1-4. 06.28.06 , -7 ~ ~ ~ ~- 1*101 Dalple RAIS . \ 7 -1 \ 44/ / 1 1 . i Unnu| | ~~~ FRA-O : 4 i 1 1.LULL.1.1-Lt.LL.LLE JICCIErE[rEErn 1 +#HI~fld#â€¢Ill'EHÂ·k~ +rHÂ·â€¢1~%-1*H-tit F NEW DECX CA,11- 1 ILCI[Ir[IrCIr[ 1.EllmIInEC[Il , Itb# j i [IrCIrcror[II:O [nIZEII:[II]ZII:IZIn il T Tr-r TrirlÂ·Trrr rr -I, ri,rrr Trr n-rn . PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION GENERAL CONâ„¢ACTOR ,-DOSâ„¢O BULDING DISTWO BULDING 4'-4. , ~ 4'-4~ 4'-4* r- .000EN POSTS $ 1 H %1 9 RAILNG TO MATCH DOSnNG n F -1.110 TO WATCH EXEâ„¢0 LÂ« Â· i 1 e -- 4 - ILL.1-LL.1-1 L.1 " 10-LU-LUJULO H+H-kÂ·H IMMIqH-+ ./. IMIMINI , 2 DIDIOIDIOIDI H+H+H+H+H+H+ 0Â¢65 000â€¢ 1+ H-+H-1-1-1 UOIDICI - ~I ~IDIOIDIDIOID 14Â·H+H+H +H+H+H+H+H+ ~. ~tr,Tr-171-1 - MT~]71-ITI--ITI-IT[]T SCIJ# 1/4= - 1'0~ PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION PRal ECT Brunelleschl's 205 & Mill Street # 226 Ampen. Colorado. 81611 DESCRIPTION PROPOSED ELEVAIONS A.3.0 11-- talgl. 0 0 0 . Jeffrey holferty deslc 215 & Monarch Ste 202 f 11 206 SOUTH -1- SIMIT 1228 aspen.c 0.81 6 970.020.4535 970.925.6035 FAX 1 00$1'10 -Dol / / 1 1 /*J / =1- Of .... 4: I I / I T l, / / h Uâ€¢ 1 1 1/ 1 / / 1 120 IWO RAL /4 (0<1: ' l.' | ~ F ..28,06 -A /1/ /1/ b I - ' -1 ,/,j( }> f/, 7 i/4 iÂ¥ /al / 3.-Z--1 V V 94.'1' ' 't -@A .4- 1 Inoct; m-gonerlr-~tj*6 (ti-;a.--'.. UP TO DT~WICI 211.378 d W-21' 03-- ~~ PROPOSED PLAN 1 GENERAL CONlPACTOR 206 SOUTH 11 5-IT 1221 ~-0 luu- : r uÂ® c. m..10 . , W-21' . r.4 0 /1 U /n r IN//AN/6 /*#*-/d ,-4. 4. 4'-O, f.- ,1-1 - \ / \ 4 / 1 IATCH E=~6 1-m RAL. 4 4 r NAUIS TO -Tal I 'r \ - 1/4' - 10' f Â¥ , El PROJECT - Brunelleschis -DECK ARCA FRAI.10 Q - /7' V/1 /8///Ar A Wirilk/ 205 S. MIll Street # 226 CUST- PLANTDIS 4. 6 -WeD:~2*021-~Â·~ Ampern, Colorado.81611 , 7 h ,%1/0/7/IM/1/li - DESCRPTION / 14 ti~~~~~i~~~i~~~~'~'~'~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ Y~ -gztl- PROPOSED ELEVATIONS PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION A.3.0 . .... STORASE ENTRY WOMEN'S RESTROOM ~ L---3 i 0 4 MEN'S REST~T- 93=9 * r ~040 r 7 J - 6 30---1 EX 5- \(3 92*TROOVE Dll ( 3 22 -, 0 ''T 1 -1 ... jeffrey holfert~*sign 215 S. Monorch St, 202 aspen,co.81611 970.920.4535 970.925.6035 FAX 205 SOUTH MILL STREET East Hopkins Street 06,28.06 AJ Bruno's L = 3 lf) - ameRAt- CCe,TRACTOR Alley Site Plan : Not to Scale p& Proposed Area of Development ~ BILU SOLE: F '1~ Â» /It 1/40 - 'V PRO=f Brvn,11~KNO 205 S. Mll Str-t 0 226 * Colorado.81*11 oac-noN EXISTINS RESTROOMS SITE FLAN A.I.o &1~Gl- IbiA 00 00 4 4 7-,:: 207 gr 17'-3" f , , 5'-7~ 11 8'-al 3'-13" 3'-74" *:: 44 4 : / ' ' f. ~ DETERMINE L<~CATION - HEA FRENCH DOORS /1 = Ii) f 1 r-MATCH EXISTING HAND RAILS / 1 ki u \ ill $ n" 1 1 1 1 11 \ /1 1111 1 1 1 1 11 \ 111 / lili 1 - 1 1 1 11 k 111 / lili 1 u 1 1 11 .. 111 / 11# 1 1 It 11 -# til / 1111 1 ~ 1 1 it 1 .\111/ 1 IN 1 7 NER DECK AREA FRAMING L / L -1 1 1-1 Ll_1- 1-1.1 1.1-1 1 1_ _1 -1 LI-1 Ll_L Ll_L 111 L 4 ~-14%~4L-tME#1-4 -1--1- -1 3-t'33%?P#HE t-[4 -1- F NER DECK COLUMNS Z[ Ali[ EIZ[ LIC[ III Eli _14 LI_L LI_1 LE[ Eli[ E / = 41-14 4-1-4 -P[-4 -]-14 -1-1- -1-1- .1-1-1- 1-1-1- t--1-1- 1-14 + 9 I[ IZIn LIZ[ ELE[ III Eli 213 212[ IZIE[ DE[ Eli[ E m 4 -1-14 -1-1-4 9-1-1- +-1-1- 1Â·-1- -1-1- t-14 -P-1 4 1-1-1- t--1-1- t- 7 T-1-T -1-1-T 1-1--[ T-171-3- -17 r-1-r 1-1-T r171-TT T PROPOSED FRONT Fl FVATION 0 0 4 4 F end of building r--EXTERIOR FNALL 1 1 4 H / lili . I) 1 j 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i / /// p NER HAND RAIL 1 f 1 X / / d -1 / i 1 9 / / ' 1 U ,// i 1 1 i / i 1 1 I .// 1 1 Xi 1 k 1 11'-3" 4 4 t 1 # ' jeffrey 83 PROPOSED PLAN halferty E design 215 s. monarch sujte 202 .//2/ f ;/%-9 /-3 <Â«7 ~ aspen, CO 81611 970.920.4535 (0) j 970.925 6035 (f) jhdesign@sopris.net 00 - . 4 ~EXISTINS BUILDINS 4 4'-4" 4'-4" 5 /1 + - i--I- - r- FÂ©ODEN ~ POSTS EP r--RATING TO MATGH EXISTINe , 11" 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 m I I lili I 1 1 Ill I 1 lili 1 1 lili 1 2 L Ul Ul LJ L Ul l_11 L -1 + H -Itt-MR-$44Mp#HH H + p OIDIOIDIC]IDIE H+H+H!+1-1+ 1-1+ H+ p DIDIE]IDIE]IDIE 3+H+H+H+H+H+P 3TnTr-]TniTI--ITI--ITr AEST ELEVATION 5'..O" 4'-6" 00 4 4 EXISTINS EUILDINS 41-4,1 4 .t Â¢ Â¢ - PNOODEN -7 POSTS ~ 1, RAILINe TO MATCH EXISTING -n~ 4 I 1 lilli 1 111 1 1 1 mil 1 lili i 1 HI 1 1 , 1 III 1 11 1 I mil 1 1 Ul Ul L " ~ f 'â‚¬-*4=1%*HI-K t- / IDIOID - = ACâ‚¬ESS POOR +H+H+1- 9 IDIOIC m \ +H+H+1-- ## Tn-En T]- k..4 EAST ELEVATION t .1-7 . MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer Joyce Allgaier, Deputy Planning Director FROM: Sara Adams, Historic Preservation Planner RE: 205 South Mill Street, Minor Review and Commercial Design Review- Public Hearing 1)ATE: June 28,2006 SUMMARY: The subject property is located at 205 South Mill Street, within the Commercial Core Ilistoric District, and currently houses Brunelleschi's Pizza half a story above sidewalk level. The applicant proposes to add a new 170 square foot outdoor dining deck that will project over the concrete sidewalk replacing the restaurants-current street level outdoor seating. New French doors are also proposed for access onto the deck; their exact location is to be determined. This application is two parts: Minor Development review will deal with whether or not the deck is an appropriate feature within the context of historic downtown; and Commercial Design Review will address the "Building Relationship to Primary Street" and "Pedestrian Amenity" requirements of the Commercial Design Standards. Staff recommends that HPC deny the application for minor development because it does not comply with the pedestrian-oriented goals for the Commercial Core historic district. rl /7,-r - 2 0 4 , 4 0 138 0 (Bace 241 44] ..Vl 1 i. '9 --708 'W,-Uy.Â¢H If '.. 4 4 * 2-**. 7- 9 Kino#Dwg AMEN- 4 4\*U#4. , m *.C; A.11*1 3 , 4,2,1 1,9 . (Â©bu,Effi~kfi36[414 FF-V(EW, 2 <"3.1.,1,/ t.-3 1- 1.21 $ 4-10,1 166,1,226,- 1911 . ' .....1 1. .,_ . ~a>~ .,h.x~. , . ~ ;01 Brunelleschi 's Pizza, 1 ..>4. i Â·Â· -1,9 current condition without outdoor seating on sidewalk. 1 .. APPLICANT: Gill Vanderra, represented by Jeffrey Halferty Designs. PARCEL ID: 2737-073-38-004. ADDRESS: 205 S. Mill Street, Suite 226, Lots D-I, Block 81, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: CC, Commercial Core. MINOR DEVELOPMENT The procedure for a Minor Development Review is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. If the application is approved, the HPC shall issue a Certificate of Appropriateness and the Community Development Director shall issue a Development Order. The HPC decision shall be final unless appealed by the applicant or a landowner within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 26.316. Staff Response: Brunelleschi's Pizza Restaurant sits a half story above the sidewalk, which creates a challenging setting within the downtown area. Staff finds that the current seating area on the concrete softens a blank wall and creates the effect of a ground level entrance. The proposed deck is 5 feet above the sidewalk, which is not conducive to the pedestrian- oriented goals of the downtown historic district. The design guidelines recommend that emphasis is placed at the storefront first level of buildings within the Commercial Core to enhance pedestrian character. Adjacent to the current seating area is a set of steps leading into the interior courtyard of Mill Street Plaza. Unusable negative space will be created between the proposed deck and the steps adding to the confusion of the area. Relevant Guidelines are: , cmf'/pwj sh'l kâ‚¬ Ckt-fimt Rkt- lt\*1 o Slt 00 4*) 402(1~ LA Atillq-- Rap . 40\U kit jorFA 44Â®0- 1*1- #f#0 At* A 2 .. 13.8 Maintain the alignment of facades at the sidewalk's edge. â€¢ Place as much o f the fagade of the building at the property line as possible. ' Locating an entire building front behind the established storefront line is inappropriate. â€¢ Where a portion of a building must be set back from the sidewalk, use landscaping elements to define the sidewalk edge. 13.12 Rectangular forms should be dominant on Commercial Core facades. â€¢ Rectangular forms should be vertically oriented. 13.16 Develop the ground floor level of all projects to encourage pedestrian activity. â€¢ Consider using storefronts to provide pedestrian interest along the street. Storefronts should maintain the historic scale and key elements such as large display windows and transoms. â€¢ Large storefront display windows, located at the street level, where goods or services are visible from the street, are particularly encouraged. â€¢ The primary building entrance should be at street level. "Garden level" entrances are inappropriate. Staff pursued dropping the height of the deck to a level that is favorable to pedestrian traffic, but discovered that the deck would not comply with accessibility standards. We have also been informed by the Building Department that a formal deck may trigger bathroom requirements due to increasing capacity of the restaurant which the restaurant may or may not be able to accommodate. COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW AND PEDESTRIAN AMENITY SPACE An application joiÂ· Commercial Design Review may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied based on conformance with the following criteria: 1. The proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial Design Standards or any deviation from the Standards provides a more-appealing pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. Unique site constraints can justify a deviation from the Standards. Compliance with Section 26.412.070, Suggested Design Elements, is not required but may be used to justify a deviation from the Standards. 2. For proposed development converting an existing structure to commercial use, the proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial Design Standards, to the greatest extent practical. Amendments to the fai~ade of the building may be required to comply with this section. 3. For properties listed on the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures or located within a Historic District, the proposed development has received Conceptual Development Plan approval from the Historic Preservation Commission, pursuant to Chapter 26.415. This criterion shall not apply if the development activity does not require review by the Historic Preservation Commission. Staff Response: The Commercial Design Standards are attached to this memo as Exhibit B." They are in many ways similar to HPC's own guidelines. Staff questions the project's compliance with standard A4 and A5 regarding the "Building Relationship to Primary Street." Adding a deck to the Mill Street Plaza building will accentuate the less than desireable relationship of this section of the building to grade. The goal of both HPC and Commercial 3 GOP& 44 6* Adivi~Shlit-- UW. Design Guidelines is to.folivilland features at the street level. Staff finds that adding a - deck five feet above the sidewalk will not satisfy these goals. A4. Commercial buildings shall be developed with the first floor at, or within two (2) feet above, the level o f the adjoining sidewalk, or right-of-way if no sidewalk exists. "Split-level" retail frontage is prohibited. A5. Commercial buildings incorporating a setback from a primary street shall not incorporate a substantial grade change between the building faGade and the public right-of- way. "Moats" surrounding buildings are prohibited. The Mill Street Plaza building is required to provide an area equal to 25% of the site as a pedestrian amenity. This amenity can be provided on the site, or can be addressed through a comparable improvement made in the downtown area, or a cash in lieu payment. Up to half of the obligation can be waived by P&Z or HPC as described below. In the past, a property owner could be exempted from having to provide on-site open space, but would still have to make a cash-in-lieu payment. Since then, the City has adopted the Commercial Design Review process that HPC is discussing and has created an opportunity for waiver of the cash-in-lieu payment as well. The new language is as follows: Reduction of Requirement. The Planning and Zoning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission, as applicable, may reduce the pedestrian amenity requirement by any amount, such that no more than half the requirement is waived, as an incentive for well-designed projects having a positive contribution to the pedestrian environment. The resulting requirement may not be less than 10%. On-site provision shall not be required for a reduction in the requirement. A mix of uses within the proposed building that enliven the surrounding pedestrian environment may be considered. 14.kÂ¢t' Mwit-t- 43 Uhtkibvdl +D PJ. 1#*i. 6 4 41ntki RED U *b Knt--lvwiA~ ' rhe concrete area between Brunelleschi building faitade' and the property line along East Hopkins Avenue is considered to contribute to the requirement that 25% of the footprint of the entire Mill Street Plaza must provide a pedestrian amenity. The proposed deck will reduce the amount of pedestrian amenity that exists at Mill Street Plaza. The maximum height to qualify as a pedestrian amenity is 4 feet. Therefore, to build the proposed deck at 170 square feet, a cash- in-lieu payment of $50 per square foot or $8 500, is required to be used for streetscape improvements. 00* te lA[ MEV\ 01{76 8.91 W~vivt D &\,1 Â®ht , Staff is not in support of waiving the cash-in-lieu payment that is due to cover the reduction in pedestrian amenity space. The cash payment is used for important pedestrian improvements downtown and would be a loss to the City. Metal mesh is proposed to enclose the area beneath the deck. "Design and Operational Standards for Pedestrian Amenity" prohibits the use of this space to contain "structures of any type" , so it will be empty and lack visual interest to pedestrians. 4 .. DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: â€¢ approve the application, â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or â€¢ continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC deny the application for Minor Development of the property at 205 S. Mill Street, Suite 226, Lots D-I, Block 81, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. Exhibits: A. Relevant Design Guidelines B. Commercial Design Standards C. Application 5 4/ I. Exhibit A- Relevant Historic Preservation Design Guidelines for Brunelleschi's Pizza 13.8 Maintain the alignment of facades at the sidewalk's edge. â€¢ Place as much ofthe fagade of the building at the property line as possible. ~ Locating an entire building front behind the established storefront line is inappropriate. â€¢ Where a portion of a building must be set back from the sidewalk, use landscaping elements to define the sidewalk edge. 13.12 Rectangular forms should be dominant on Commercial Core facades. â€¢ Rectangular forms should be vertically oriented. ' The fagade should appear as predominantly flat, with decorative elements and projecting or setback "articulations" appearing to be subordinate to the dominant form. 13.16 Develop the ground floor level of all projects to encourage pedestrian activity. â€¢ Consider using storefronts to provide pedestrian interest along the street. Storefronts should maintain the historic scale and key elements such as large display windows and transoms. â€¢ Large storefront display windows, located at the street level, where goods or services are visible from the street, are particularly encouraged. â€¢ The primary building entrance should be at street level. "Garden level" entrances are inappropriate. 6 .. Exhibit B: Commercial Design Standards. The following design standards shall apply to commercial, lodging, and mixed-use development: A. Building Relationship to Primary Street. A street wall is comprised of buildings facing principal streets and public pedestrian spaces. Consistent street walls provide a sense of a coherent district and frame an outdoor room. Interruptions in this enclosure can lessen the quality of a commercial street. Corner buildings are especially important, in that they are more visible and their scale and proportion affects the street walls of two streets. Well-designed and located pedestrian open spaces can positively affect the quality of the district, while remnant or leftover spaces can detract from the downtown. A building's relationship to the street is entirely important to the quality of the downtown pedestrian environment. Split-level retail and large vertical separations from the sidewalk can disrupt the coherence of a retail district. The following standards shall apply: 1. Building facades shall be parallel to the adjoining primary streets. Minor elements of the building fagade may be developed at irregular angles. 2. Building facades along primary streets shall be setback no more than the average setback of the adjoining buildings and no less than the minimum requirement of the particular zone district. Exempt from this provision are building setbacks accommodating On-Site Pedestrian Amenity, pursuant to Section 26.575.030. 3. Building facades along primary streets shall maintain a consistent setback on the first and second story. 4. Commercial buildings shall be developed with the first floor at, or within two (2) feet above, the level of the adjoining sidewalk, or right-of-way if no sidewalk exists. "Split- level" retail frontage is prohibited. 5. Commercial buildings incorporating a setback from a primary street shall not incorporate a substantial grade change between the building fagade and the public right-of-way. "Moats" surrounding buildings are prohibited. B. Pedestrian Amenity Space. Creative, well-designed public places and settings contribute to an attractive, exciting, and vital downtown retail district and a pleasant pedestrian shopping and entertainment atmosphere. Pedestrian amenity can take the form of physical or operational improvements to public rights- of-way or private property within commercial areas. On parcels required to provide pedestrian amenity, pursuant to Section 26.575.030 - Pedestrian Amenity, the following standards shall apply to the provision of such amenity. Acceptance of the method or combination ofmethods ofproviding the Pedestrian Amenity shall be at the option of the Planning and Zoning Commission, or the Historic Preservation Commission as applicable, according to the procedures herein and according to the following standards: 1. The dimensions of any proposed on-site pedestrian amenity sufficiently allow for a variety of uses and activities to occur considering any expected tenant and future potential tenants and uses. 2. The pedestrian amenity contributes to an active street vitality. To accomplish this characteristic, public seating, outdoor restaurant seating or similar active uses, shade 7 .. trees, solar access, view orientation, and simple at-grade relationships with adjacent rights-of-way are encouraged. 3. The pedestrian amenity, and the design and operating characteristics of adjacent structures, rights-of-way, and uses, contributes to an inviting pedestrian environment. 4. The proposed amenity does not duplicate existing pedestrian space created by malls, sidewalks, or adjacent property, or such duplication does not detract from the pedestrian environment. 5. Any variation to the Design and Operational Standards for Pedestrian Amenity, Section 26.575.030(F) promote the purpose of the pedestrian amenity requirements. 6. The Planning and Zoning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission, as applicable, may reduce the pedestrian amenity requirement by any amount, such that no more than half the requirement is waived, as an incentive for well-designed projects having a positive contribution to the pedestrian environment. The resulting requirement may not be less than 10%. On-site provision shall not be required for a reduction in the requirement. A mix of uses within the proposed building that enliven the surrounding pedestrian environment may be considered. F. Design and Operational Standards for Pedestrian Amenity. Pedestrian amenity, on all privately-owned land in which pedestrian amenity is required, shall comply with the following provisions and limitations: 1. Open to Fiew. Pedestrian amenity areas shall be open to view from the street at pedestrian level, which view need not be measured at right angles. 2. Open to Sky. Pedestrian amenity areas shall be open to the sky. Temporary and seasonal coverings, such as umbrellas and retractable canopies are permitted. Such non-permanent structures shall not be considered as floor area or a reduction in pedestrian amenity on the parcel. Trellis structures shall only be permitted in conjunction with commercial restaurant uses on a designated Historic Landmark or within (H) Historic overlay zones and must be approved pursuant to review requirements contained in Chapter 26.415 - Development Involving the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures or Development within a Historic District. Such approved structures shall not be considered as floor area or a reduction in pedestrian space on the parcel. 3. No Walls/Enclosures. Pedestrian amenity areas shall not be enclosed. Temporary structures, tents, air exchange entries, plastic canopy walls, and similar devices designed to en-close the space are prohibited, unless approved as a temporary use, pursuant to Section 26.450. Low fences or walls shall only be permitted within or around the perimeter of pedestrian space if such structures shall permit views from the street into and throughout the pedestrian space. 4. Prohibited Uses. Pedestrian amenity areas shall not be used as storage areas, utility/trash service areas, delivery area, parking areas or contain structures of any type, except as specifically provided for herein. Vacated rights-of-way shall be excluded from pedestrian amenity calculations. 5. Grade Limitations. Required pedestrian amenity shall not be more than four (4) feet above or two (2) feet below the existing grade of the street or sidewalk which abuts the 8 I . pedestrian space, unless the pedestrian amenity space shall follow undisturbed natural grade, in which case there shall be no limit on the extent to which it is above or below the existing grade of the street. 6. Pedestrian Links. In the event that the City of Aspen shall have adopted a trail plan incorporating mid-block pedestrian links, any required pedestrian space must, if the city shall so elect, be applied and dedicated for such use. 7. Landscaping Plan. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Community Development Di-rector shall require site plans and drawings of any required pedestrian amenity area, including a landscaping plan, and a bond in a satisfactory form and amount to insure compliance with any pedestrian amenity requirements under this title. 8. Maintenance of Landscaping. Whenever the landscaping required herein is not maintained, the Chief Building Official, after thirty (30) days written notice to the owner or occupant of the property5 may revoke the certificate of occupancy until said party complies with the landscaping requirements of this section. 9. Commercial Activity. No area of a building site designated as required pedestrian amenity space under this section shall be used for any commercial activity, including, but not limited to, the storage, display, and merchandising of goods and services; provided, however, that the prohibition of this subsection shall not apply when such use is in conjunction with permitted commercial activity on an abutting right-of-way or is otherwise permitted by the City. For outdoor food vending in the Commercial Core District, also see Section 26.470.040(B)(3), Administrative Growth Management Review. 10. Commercial Restaurant Use. The provisions above notwithstanding, required pedestrian amenity space may be used for commercial restaurant use if adequate pedestrian and emergency vehicle access is maintained. 9 .. GUARANTY OF LEASE REFERENCE IS MADE to that certain Standard Retail Lease dated as of the day of November 28 , 2()()5, by and between MILL STREET PLAZA ASSOCIATES, LLC , therein and herein referred to as "Landlord," and HOOTENANNY, LLC , herein and herein referred to as "Tenant." FOR VALUE RECEIVED, and in consideration for and as an inducement to Landlord entering into said Lease, the undersigned, Gilbert Vanderaa , as "Guarantor," hereby unconditionally guarantees to Landlord, its successors and assigns, the full performance and obsen'ance of all the covenants, conditions and agreements provided in said Lease to be performed and observed by Tenant, its heirs, successors, subtenants and assigns, and expressly agrees that the validity of this agreement and the obligations of the Guarantor hereunder shall in no wise be terminated, affected or impaired by reason of any or aU of the following, all of which may be given or done at any time rvithout notice to or the consent of Guarantor: (a) the assertion by Landlord against Tenant of any rights and remedies resened to Landlord pursuant to the provisions of said Lease; 03) the waiver by Landlord of, or the failure of Landlord to enforce, any of the terms, covenants or conditions of said Lease; (c) the granting of any indulgence, forbearance, or extension of time to Tenant; (d) the receipt, application, or release by Landlord of any security given for the performance and observance of any covenant, condition, or term of said Lease; Ce) the release or discharge ot Tenant in any creditors', receivership, bankruptcy or other proceedings; (t) the impairment, limitation, or modification of the liability of Tenant or the estate of Tenant in bankruptcy, or of any remedy for the enforcement of Tenant's liability under said Lease, resulting from the operation of any present or future provision of the National Bankruptcy Act or other statute or from the decision of any court; (g) the reiection or disaffirmance of said Lease in any such proceeding; (h) the assignment or transfer of said Lease by either Landlord or Tenant; (i) any sublease by Tenant of all or any part of the Premises; (D any disability or other such defense of Tenant; (k) the cessation from any cause whatsoever of the liability of Tenant; and (1) the modification of said Lease, but in the case of such modification, Guarantor's liability shall be deemed modified in accordance with the terms of such modification. Guarantor hereby waives its rights under any statute or principle of law which would otherwise require the knowledge or consent of a guarantor to any of the foregoing in order for the guarantor to remain liable. Guarantor rvaives presentment for payment, demand for payment, protest and notice of protest, notice of default in the payment of rent, however referred to in said .. Lease, and any other amounts contained or reserved in said Lease, and notice of a breach of nonperformance of any of the covenants, conditions or agreements contained in said Lease, diligence of collection, and any and all formalities which may be legally required to charge Guarantor with liability. Guarantor agrees that its liability under this agreement and guaranty (which is a guaranty of payment as well as collection) shall be primary, and that in any right or action which shall accrue to Landlord under said Lease, Landlord may, at its option, proceed against Guarantor without having commenced any action or proceeding, or having obtained any judgment, against Tenant, and. without having made a demand or having given any notice of nonpayment or nonperformance to Tenant, and regardless of Landlord's failure to assert against Tenant any rights or remedies reserved to Landlord in the Lease. If Guarantor is not the only Guarantor of the obligations of Tenant guaranteed herein, Guarantor hereby zvaives its rights under C.R.S. Â§13-50-]02 and Â§13-5()-103 in the event that any of the other guarantors of the obligations of Tenant guaranteed herein are released from ally of their obligations assumed pursuant to a separate guaranty. All demands, notices or other communications hereunder intended for Guarantor shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to Guarantor as follows: Gilbert Vanderaa 212 South Cleveland Aspen, Colorado 81611 or at such other address as may be designated by Guarantor by written notice given to Landlord in the manner specified in the Lease. Any demand, notice or other conimunication hereunder intended for Guarantor and given by Landlord in the manner set forth in this paragraph shall be effective (whether or not, and regardless of when, actually received) three business days after deposit in the United States mail. Guarantor further agrees to pay Landlord's reasonable attorneys' fees and all costs and other expenses incurred iii any collection or attempted collection or in any negotiations relative to the obligations hereby guaranteed or enforcing this Guaranty of Lease against the undersigned, individually or jointly. This agreement and guaranty shall apply to said Lease, any extension or renewal thereof, and any holdover term following said Lease or extension or renewal thereof, and it shall not be changed, modified, discharged, or terminated orally or in any manner except by an agreement in writing signed by Guarantor and Landlord. As a further inducement to Landlord to make and enter into the Lease and in consideration thereof, Landlord and Guarantor covenant and agree that in any action or proceeding brought on, under or by virtue of this Guaranty, Landlord and Guarantor shall and do hereby wairze trial by jury. This Guaranty is made in and shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado. Guarantor understands and agrees that the federal and state courts located in the State of Colorado shall have subject matter jurisdiction to entertain any action brought to enforce or collect upon this Guaranty and, by execution hereof, voluntarily submits to the personal jurisdiction of such courts. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed this 28TH day of Movember , 2005. GUARANTOR: Printed klne: Gilbert Vanderaa Title: ,â‚¬,2--- /5-,1.02* 1 2. .. 0 . 0 . jeffrey halferty design 215 & Monarch Ste 202 aaper,c 0.810 11 970.920.4535 970.926.8036 FAX Issue: 06.28.00 BRUNELLESCHI'S 205 SOUTH MILL STREET #226 SENERAL DONTR.ACTOR ASPEN, COLORADO. 81611 PROJECT Brunelleschib 205 5 Mill Street # 226 Aspen, Coloroao.aieii SHEET QOVER THE WORhâ€¢ATION ANC 001- IN'TENT CONâ„¢NED ON â„¢15 DOCuuE- 12 THE PROÂ¤ERD Dr N DESIGN PC NC PAR- Or THIS 1NFURâ€¢.ATION WAv 85 USED ~1HOÂ·Jl ~HE PROP WRITTEN PER'/SION OF . 03/6 . 0 . jeffrey hallerty design 215 & Monarch Ste 202 aspeac 0.81011 970.920.4636 970.926.8036 FAX ISSUE: 08.28.06 East Hookins Street % Q) L U) 1 _C -1-J =ENERAL GONTRACTOR 0 205 SOUTH MILL STREET w AlleS Dite Plan Â· Not to Scale ~ F Proposed Area of Development SCALE 1/4 = 1'0 PROJECT Brunellesch's 205 5. MIN Street # 226 Aspen,Colorado 516 DESCRIFTION SITE PLAN SHIEET A.1.0 2 2006 THE iNrDR~AllON IC DE%'llENT CONWNED 0. TMÂ·S DOCU~EN' 5 THE PROPERTY Dr h DES' Â· ..C .C P.- 07 THIS INFORMATIOk K E USED NT,lOUT THE IEOR ,'RITEN PERWISSION OF Jh D.. South Monarch Street L hallerty Jollrey 25-5bm .ILL STR-Â¥-*226 ~ de,lon 111 51 i 1 215 & Monarch Ste 202 aspeac O.81611 970.920.4536 2,(I BT~N6 .IN>e,â€¢e 1 ~ 970.825.6035 FAX L /-EXTERIOR /ALL 1 - Il ' 11 ' 4 P : 10 Err AMEE ! - EXISTING STAIR ~ %7 \/ i +lue. /\ \ 1 \ 08.28.06 /1 \ \ : 1 f TO ENTRANDE //71 '~MISTIN& S PEnALK EXSTIN6 A*7~~~~---\\\\\ 1 / 1 ~ Exie Ne PLAN Sil.1 205 SOUTH MILL STREET â€¢226 GENERAL CONTRACTOR Irm 205 SOUTH MIll 5-â„¢Er ~226 F end of culldIng r-EXISTINe MIND/A / r-EXTERIOR AALL 1 1 111 / / /ii 111/ / / H Ill / / 11 / / 1 11 111 / 1 11 iiI / / /1! ,Â·-'Â·, Ii,~.tC RAIL / 11/ - 111 / / /11 h 111 / / /11 p / ././ 111 1 1!1 / / I / 1 / 41% \ ./ / / 1 \ 111 / / / Id \ 111 / / H '/ / /li \ 111 + 11 I up ~ T. ENT~.NCE 11'-3â€¢ ~STING SIDErIALK ~ SCALEÂ· 1/4- . 1'0- PROJECT Brunalleschib 205 3. M Street * 226 Aspen, Colorado.51611 DESCRIPTION EXISTINS AND ~ PROPOSED FL,AN PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2(5 90.7-~ 41- STR557 â€¢226 SHEET Â® 2006 'HE INFâ„¢-nON *. DESSN INTE. CON. NED ON THIS ./*ENT 15 TIE PROPER' OF J P DESIGN ~ C NO PiE Or MS INFOR'.106 6Ay BE U5ED ~r'NOUT ./ PRIOR WRGIEN PERÂ¥!5510' Or . DESIGN . . 0 . jeffrey halferty design 215 & Monarch Gte 202 aspe n,c 0.81611 970.920.4536 970.926.8035 FAX F Ele O~ wl.PINe 1--3 ' '' 3-4 ~sue: 3-2 I I ... 5Â·-72 M F EXISTING Â»1!101 le' .FIC' i.oe ' / *2-re,MINE -OCATioN \ 08.28.06 // -In B -+IAT" EXISTNe HAND *]LS r -2 H ' 11' 44 ---,---N , 2 - /1 9 9 111 111 + Il 1 Ill 111 /-NER/EUK AREA FRAVINS * 11 N'111111111111 lilli p / 1.1-1_1 LIU L LL 1.1.-11 1- -1-L LU LIL LU LLL 4 + 10-1'*Tt+MIE*+-1-4 +-1- -1--Irk-fÂ·E'I+MP#+ +-19 4 r NE: PECk COLUMNS I 1 20 213 rIC III rIZ ZIX EIN Ellrin Ell 4 , i' Â· 4 +10 +19 +14 -H+H- -19 +14 Al-k Â·H+H+H I | 19 in 1 -12(I LE: 2 In IECI LIZ 211 Ell IZIJ Ell In ]I ~ 1 1 4 +-1-t + 14 +-1-4 +--14 4-1- -14 +14 +I-k +-14 +-14 â‚¬ ' Trl-Tri-Tri-Tri-TTI-- -11 T-INT-l-Tri-Tri-Tli PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION SENERAL CONTRACTOR EXISTIK6 BUILDIN6 77!916 BUILDINS 4'-4 ' 4 -4" f t 1.1 ,/ \ f '' 1 \ RAILINS TO MAT'CH EXIS'rIN* 7 -~~--- ~ ~ | ~ - pt//DEN n / ~ POSTS J ~ , ~ /091 m MOODEN * 54 7 - 9 , / Fell-INS To MATCH EXISTINe 11 ~11 01 -ny 111 4 1 - 101211.J N.~ 1 H / / - 1*.1-K H 11 1 w -1 L.I J. U.1 LliLI_L U 1 4 IOIDIC r H+H -17+-f*-4+Me*+ H+H ALâ‚¬E.5 30. +H+1-1+H 2 11 41 DIOZOIDIOIDIÂ¤I 1 IDIDIE I 11 IDIDIOIDIOIDIO O N +H+H+H 11 1 6 " H+H+H+H+H+H+H N TUITOTM T nTATE-rn-POTDTrl 1 ~-1+H+H+H+H+H+H SCALE: PROPOSED EAST ELEVATiON PROPOSED PNEST ELEVATION 1/C = 1'0- PROJECT Brunellesch'ls 205 5. MIll Street # 226 Aspen, Colorado.81611 DESCRIPTION PROPOSED ELEVATI ONS SHEET A.3.0 0 = ~HE INrORMADON #D DE5#GN IN1Â£. c~1~NED 04 M. DOCU~ENT I THE PROPERTÂ·Â¥ O/ J I DESIGN PC NO .m OF 7,1!S r,4: OR*TION .â€¢Â¥ BE LISED â€¢Â·â„¢al TKE pâ€¢,il WRI-[6 ....:SSID. 0, . DESIGN 111 049%Â»-79Â« Issue: Â°MY,VAD#,h-Mt ht~~44\9 0&28.08 08.0208 BRUNELLESCHI'S 205 SOUTH MILL STREET #226 0. 0. SENERAL CONTRACTOR ASPEN, tOIsORADw. 81611 2C~ST MAIN STREET JOHN OLSON BUILDERS ASPEN,COLORADO.Blell 410.425.1474 PROJECT Brunelleschl's 205 5. Mill Street # 226 1 Aspen, Colorado.81611 't 1 t' 1 . SHEET COVER ~ ONTHIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF Â® 2006 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED J.H. DESIGN P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRIUEN PERMISSION OF JH DESIGN UBIee**Jell"4 A'Jitel 808â€¢ 19048 40-0,1 1 9,8 -A 1 1 Issue: 0&2&08 08.0208 East Hopkins Street S L cD 0 0 0 .I . SEKERAL CONTRACTOR 3 0 -Il=EOLSON BUILDERS â€¢ 205 *OUTH M I LL STREET . 0 cn 0 2(O'EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN,COLORADO.Blell q-10.425.7474 Alley Site Plan : Not to Scale NORTH 1/ Ill 44 Proposed Area of Development SCALE: 1/4" = 1'0" PROJECT Brunelleschl's 205 5. Mill Street # 226 Aspen, Colorado.81611 DESCRIPTION SITE PLAN SHEET A.1.0 Â® 2006 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENTIS THE PROPERTY OF J.H. DESIGN P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF JH DESIGN 1.e*;Je 11.. Ae'lle' 40-0. 1 918 205 SOUTH MILL STREET #226 XJSTING MINDOM rape 4 eraln Store Front nci oF building / NEW HAND RAIL IE 4 24" planters Issue: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0&28.08 UP 224.548 sf TO ENTRANCE 08.0208 TINS SIDEMALK ISTINe ASPENS TINe SIDEMALK EXISTING ASP S ~~ PROPOSED PLAN 2 205 SOUTH MILL STREET #226 0 . . . . 0 0 . .... . a OLSON BUILDERS GENERAL CONTRACTOR 200 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN,COLORADO.81611 470.425.7474 END OF BUILDINe XISTINS BUILDINe 11'-4411 11 3'--411 NEW FRENCH DO DETERMINE LOG ON 3'-7~" 11 41-03,1 EXISTINS WINDO \ /\0 /\ \ = / \ 2 P \ TCH EXISTI HAND RAILS * 4 ILING TO MATCH EXISTINe '0 - = 1 -=101 rn (10 NER DECK AREA FRAMING 0 0 I 0 0 - -101 0 0 Â¤ CUSTOM PLANTERS - . SCALE: 91 Y 0 rl 1/4" = 1'0" -rl -Ha -i- ~ PROJECT h N 121-02111 Brunelleschis 205 5. Mill Street # 226 Aspen, Colorado.&1611 PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION PROPOSED REST ELEVATION - DESCRIPTION PROPOSED PLAN AND ELEVATIONS SHEET A.2.0 Â® 2006 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENTIS THE PROPERTÂ¥ OF J.H. DESIGN P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF JH DESIGN US'...1,011.4 Ae'llet 40= 918 205 SOUTH MILL STREET #226 i I XISTINS MINDOFI -I Cd Z rape Â¢ era in Store Front nd of building Ti!Â® - Issue: 0 - / NER HAND RAIL 9 08.28.08 0&02.08 O 0 18 4 24" planters Â«iks 0 0 0 000 r UP TO EN NOE 211.576 9 2q'-23" TING SIDEWALK ISTINS ASPENS TINS SIDEWALK EXISTING ASP 5 ~ PRO*ED PLAN 1 . e . . eENERAL CONTRACTOR 205 SOUTH MILL STREET #226 .. . . ~HN OLSON BUILDERS 200 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN,COLORADO.Blell 470.425.7474 28'-9" XISTINS BUILDING END OF BUILDINS i , 4,-22â€ž at 1-2ill 3'-7~" NEK FRENCH DO DETERMINE LOG, ON EXI Ne ENDO 3'-7~" 41-01 \ \ \ \ / \ TCH ExIeTI HAND RAILS 4 4 / ILING TO MATCH EXISTINe SCALE: 1/4" = 1'0" a - P - J 2101 m PROJECT NEW DECK AREA FRAMING in 21 Brunelleschl's 0 : - -101 0 0 205 5. Mill Street # 226 CUSTOM PLANTERS - 9 o Â°!tr. Aspen, Colorado.81611 -2101 - g DESCRIPTION in = -Ny -Int u ' PROPOSED PLAN 2'-0~" AND ELEVATIONS PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION PROPOSED REST ELEVATION - SHEET A.2.Ob Â® 2006 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENTISTHE PROPERTY OF J.H. DESIGN P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF JH DESIGN uBI.e*;J.lI.. A0,ltel .. 75.00' PU LEGEND & NOTES A O PREVIOUSLY FOUND PROPERTY CORNER PLS 25947 1959 OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN WAS USED FOR 1"-10 THE POSITION OF THIS PROPERTY H 9,*â€žâ€žâ€žâ€žzg BEAR I NGS BASED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 75 (CI TY MONUMENT) 0 10 20 AND THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 88 (L.S. 16129) N 75Â°09'll-W C] UTILITY BOX CITY MONUMENT NORTHEAST EA S 7 40 9 WATER VALVE CORNER BLOCK 75 GAS METER HORIZONTAL CONTROL ZONE DISTRICT: CC. COMMERCIAL CORE. THERE ARE NO SETBACKS. SANITARY SEWER. GAS. ELECTRIC. PHONE. AND TV ARE LOCATED IN THE ALLEY CITY WATER IS LOCATED IN EAST HOPKINS AVENUE Bl~Â¢Ii INS CURB TO CUAS 'L. :ECORD 4 V E NOE 1 GAS METER POSTED ADDRESS: 205 SOUTH MILL STREEET AND 325 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE I ELECTRIC SERVICE TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE. INC. CASE NO. PCTI 2436C2 CONC. WALK CONC. *ALK DATED: 10/28/97 ~ ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT ~ KEY TO EXCEPTION NUMBER IN THE ABOVE TITLE COMMITMENT BOOK 384 AT PAGE 115 4 S AIRS UP THERE IS NO ONSITE PARKING 29.4 41.iNGS ~ BUILDING HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE 36,7 BUILDINGS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ALLEY ARE WITHIN 25 OF THIS PORPERTY 11.6 \__1 $ THERE IS NO VISIBLE STORM SEWER ON TH IS PROPERTY S 75Â°09 STAIRS 180.93 SEE SEPERATE DOCOMENT FOR FLOOR AREA AND PARKING TABULATIONS m IO 0 59 4 9 8 1 24 --- 2 STORY ING WITH BASEMENT r \ 8U/L 1 0 00 - STAIRS 1 STORY BUILDING l 8 CONC WA LBELOW GRAD WALL 0.2* EAST OF ~ ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT 41Â»"NG8 BOOK 384 AT PAGE 110 PROPERTY LINE ~ 65.3 ~ HAND\CAP ACCESS UP 73 -5 WALL O.7' SOUTH oF Â«440~ PROPERTY LINE LEVE| 0 k KATIE REED PLAZA CONC A CONDOM INIUM & 4 1*AL K DISK 16129 NORTHEAST 0* O 2 l 6% r 344.52 0 u BUILDING ENCROACHES 0 WITH BASEMENT 2 -40 DRY WELL ?@ ~ CORNER BLOCK 88 0.4- BLDG. TO BLDG. OPEN TO \ e k 0 GARDEN LEVEL k r l / / 1 1 '9 BUILDING 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 O 46 0 6/ / . 7 1 CONC. WALK J. 1 ' D . /. i 65 ./.. 2 73.4 ~1.58' Â£12 - il - 1 1 00 65 .14 1 Â§6 3 BOOk 424. 1 17792- l m 2 STORY BUILDING WITH BASEMENT ~ P '81: FOUND 25947 a I Â¥ 1 1 r :0 1 k SUILD ING ENCROACHES +t ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 20 2 41 OR \MTO ALLEY O.t 47 ~ 4 1 CÂ»' L-/ 2 92 0 2 4.0 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ATTACHED TO INT 180.8 - * 20 1 /- 1 THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS CERTIFICATION 2 1 10'~ l l 2 5 b4 FIELD SURVEYED DURING Ad A.G. L.1 , 2006 AND IS ACCURATE Q BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN AND THAT THERE ARE NO THE EXTERIOR WALL ENCROACHES A - sooâ€¢ . ~ A 0 0 DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD, BOUNDARY LIAE CONFLICTS, ENCROACHMENTS, EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME N 75Â°09 180.93 11 Â·* 3 C.0 APPURTENANCES, AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPL I ED TO THE THE ALLEY 0.7' I 1 - 1 0, EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVE~ROUND SURVEYOR. ARE EXCEPTED. TH I S SURVEY I S VO I D UNLESS WET STAMPED W I TH TME-' SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW. ALLEY l Dklib:Alit, r~Co . '19.4 8 JOWN-M, HONORtH P.L.S. 25947 20. 90 . PAFGo LOCK INTO MILL ST. O.2' ~ \~>A .fly# BU I LD I NG ENCROACHE 1 PUBLIC R 0 8 1 .W. RECORD 0 / 4,28,2/Ji L Ar.p..tÂ«' Â· Â«47/,7/1&0*B . PHONE CATV,ELECTRIC SERVICES AND R~MOTE WATER METER ~ IMP ROVEMENT SURVEY BUILDING ENCROACHES oF INTO ALLEY 0.5 LOTS 0, E, F G H AND I BLOCK 81, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLOAAD6, DESCR I ~ED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 81 BEING IDENTICAL 44.k L-1 TO THE NORTHEAST OF LOT I (A BRASS DISK STAMPED PLS 25947) : THENCE N 75Â°09 11-W 180.93 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF 86 LOTS D- 1, CONTIGUOUS WITH THE SOUTHERLY R.O.W. OF HOPKINS AVENUE TO THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF LOT D: THENCE S 14Â°50'49'W 100.00 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF LOT D TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT D AND THE NORTHERLY R.0,W. OF THE ALLEY OF BLOCK 81: THENCE S 75Â°09'11'E 180.93 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF LOTS D-1, CONTIGUOUS WITH THE NORTHERLY R.O.W. OF SAID ALLEY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT I TO THE WESTERLY R.O.W. OF MILL STREET: THENCE N 14Â°50'49-E 100.00 ALONG THE SAID R.O.W. OF MILL STREET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 18,093 SO. FT. â€¢/- C 0.415 ACRES ./-) PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT ON THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. THE SHEET 1 OF 1 CERTIFICATION IS VOID IF NOT VET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE DATE JOB 3/06 15109A SURVEYOR. - 1 11 11 ~ .I~~ 21 CURB TO C RECORD LEGEN.D & NOTES 1'-10 THE POSITION OF THIS PROPERTY O PREVIOUSLY FOUND PROPERTY CORNER PLS 25947 1959 OFF ICIAL MAP OF THE CITYOF ASPEN WAS USED FOR N 9â€ž~w,sâ€žâ€ž,z1 BEARINGS BASED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 75 (CITY MONUMENT) AND THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 88 (L.S. 16129) N 75Â° 09' I I -W 0 10 20 UTILITY BOX CITY MONUMENT NORTHEAST CORNER BLOCK 75 GAS METER HORIZONTAL CONTROL ZONE DISTRICT: CC. COMMERCIAL CORE. THERE ARE NO SETBACKS. EAST HOP SANITARY SEWER. GAS. ELECTRIC, PHONE. AND TV ARE LOCATED IN THE ALLEY CITY WATER IS LOCATED IN EAST HOPKINS AVENUE 75.00' PUB~,c~ I N S * WATER VALVE POSTED ADDRESS: 205 SOUTH MILL STREEET AND 325 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE uk: :6.8 4 1'.E.N U E 7 GAS METER gl ELECTRIC SERVICE . TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. CASE NO. PCTI 2436C2 9 CONC. WALK ,,',0 CONC. *ALK SEE SEPERATE DOCOMENT FOR FLOOR AREA AND PARKING TABULAT I ONS DATED: 10/28/97 ~ ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT ~ KEY TO EXCEPT ION NUMBER IN THE ABOVE TITLE COMMITMENT BOOK 384 AT PAGE 115 4 THERE IS NO ONSITE PARKING S AIRS UP ~ BUILDING HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE 29.4 ~4/Nes 36.7 BUILDINGS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ALLEY ARE WITHIN 25 3 75.09. G THERE IS NO VISIBLE STORM SEWER ON TH IS PROPERTY OF THIS PORPERTY 0 11.8 2 STORY ING WITH BASEMENT STAIRS N 180.93 R9O 1 - . 4 -- 3.8 1 13 1 STORY BUILDING BUIL~ 1 00 --0 BUILDING BELOW l 8 ... --- ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT WALL 0.2- EAST OF 4Â»1Â¥/NGS --- (--) BOOK 384 AT PAGE 110 PROPERTY L\NE :i HANDICAP ACCESS STAIRS UP 73.5 WALL O.7' SOUTH OF SAAhcli PROPERTY LINE KATIE REED PLAZA ' 1 CONC. WALK 1 A CONDOM INIUM Â¥ / * 2 0 l 22 W WI TH BASEMENT < 34452 ~0 BUILDING ENCROACHES 2 DISK 16129 NORTHEAST - l / / 1 INTO MILL ST. 0.2 Q CORNER BLOCK 88 0,4' BLDG. TO BLDG. - DRY WELL ? ~ < < 2 1 i l OPEN TO k & 4 GARDEN LEVEL 2 / / 1 3, / 0 1 . O 7 1.1 0 0 1 1 1 CONC. WALK 1 1 WALK . D GRADel 1 SS.21 /4 1 1 0 0 2 4201 8 17-92 -- BOOK 424, PAGE 846 l. 1 1 82 9 2 0 P 0 * 0 POUND 25947 4 j al 1 1 *ul i i / i .n lo 40 . 1 1 - BUILDING ENCROACHES ~7 Â» ~ 1 / l g '> 1 2 STORY BUILDING WITH BASEMENT ~ INTO ALLEY 0.2 CÂ»' to k H l ~2 180,93Â· 2 25 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ATTACHED TO 0 64 THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS CERTIFICATION l 4 FIELD SURVEYED DURING h A Ae /.\ - , 2006 AND IS ACCURATE 1 101--4 l ~ I - 21 b BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN, AND THAT THERE ARE NO THE EXTERIOR WALL ENCROACHES INTO THE ALLEY 0.7 RECORD 2 DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD, BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS, ENCROACHMENTS, 50 0 EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME N 75Â°09 180.8 11 w 2 APPURTENANCES, AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE 4 EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN . UNDERGROUND UT ILITIES WITH NO ABOVE~ROUND SURVEYQRÂ·"ARE EXCEPTED. THIS SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED < WITH .~ME<SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW. ALL E Y l '444 114.3~ .3 I ...9 DATky.â„¢14486 ~95 BLOCK : JOIM-M.. HOIVbRTH -P.L.S. 25947 20.go - PAVED BU I LD I NG ENCROACHE - ~ INTO MILL ST. 0.2 C 1 PUBLIC R,0.*. 8 1 '4, ", ./9 0 / dohn,â€¢Uâ€¢ PHONE,CATV,ELECTRIC SERVICES AND REMOTE WATER METER J IMPROVEMENT SURVEY BUILDING ENCROACHES OF INTO ALLEY 0.5 LOTS D, E F G, H AND I BLOCK 81, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN 2'2 COUNTY, C61-0~AD0, DESCR 1 6ED AS FOLLOWS: 14.9 ,-P. BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 81 BEING IDENTICAL \24.21 L= 22 TO THE NORTHEAST OF LOT I (A BRASS DISK STAMPED PLS 25947) : 241 THENCE N 75Â°09-11-W 180.93 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF LOTS D-1, CONTIGUOUS WITH THE SOUTHERLY R.O.W. OF HOPKINS AVENUE TO THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF LOT D: THENCE S 14Â°50'49-W 100.00 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF LOT D TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT D AND THE NORTHERLY R.O.W. OF THE ALLEY OF BLOCK 81: THENCE S 75Â°09'11'E 180.93 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF LOTS D-1, CONTIGUOUS WITH THE NORTHERLY R.O.W. OF SAID ALLEY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT I TO THE WESTERLY R.O.W. OF MILL STREET: THENCE N 14Â°50'49-E 100.00 ALONG THE SAID R.O.W. OF MILL STREET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 18,093 SQ. FT. ./- C 0.415 ACRES ./-) PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT ON THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 BASED UPON ANY DEFECT 1N TH I S PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN CERTIFICATION IS VOID IF NOT WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE DATE JOB YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. THE SURVEYOR. SHEET 1 OF 1 3/06 15109A Gyno 3 NO igatils ayobaw PUBLIC R 0 RECORD LEGEND & NOTES A O PREVIOUSLY FOUND PROPERTY CORNER PLS 25947 1959 OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN WAS USED FOR THE POSITION OF THIS PROPERTY 1--10 hi 9â€žâ€žâ€žâ€ž;â€žâ€ž~g AND THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 88 (L.S. 16129) N 75*09'll W BEARINGS BASED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 75 (CITY MONUMENT) 0 10 20 C] UTILITY BOX A CITY MONUMENT NORTHEAST GAS METER CORNER BLOCK 75 ZONE DISTRICT: CC. COMMERCIAL CORE. THERE ARE NO SETBACKS. HORIZONTAL CONTROL EAST HOP SANITARY SEWER. GAS. ELECTRIC. PHONE. AND TV ARE LOCATED IN THE ALLEY CITY WATER IS LOCATED IN EAST HOPKINS AVENUE 75,00 - K INS 4 VENUE G WATER VALVE CURB TO CURB 50 8 POSTED ADDRESS: 205 SOUTH MILL STREEET AND 325 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE 7 GAS METER % ELECTRIC SERVICE TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE. INC. CASE NO. PCTI 2436C2 CONC *Alk coNC. .4Â£~ SEE SEPERATE DOCOMENT FOR FLOOR AREA AND PARKING TABULATIONS DATED: 10/28/97 ~ ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT ~ KEY TO EXCEPT ION NUMBER IN THE ABOVE T I TLE COMMITMENT BOOK 384 AT PAGE 115 4 THERE IS NO ONSITE PARKING 0 AIRS UP 29.4 ~ BUILDING HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE 44/488 36.7 Â· BUILDINGS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH S I DE OF THE ALLEY ARE WITHIN 25 0 9 OF THIS PORPERTY 0 0 THERE IS NO VISIBLE STORM SEWER ON THIS PROPERTY 5 75Â°09 180.93 9 0 11.6 O 9 1 I . 4 - N 13.: . ! 13 1 . i i Suid l ING WITH BASEMENT S AIRS N STAIRS 1 STORY 1 1 8 BELOW GRAD WALL 0.2' EAST OF 4./Nes --- ( ~) BOOK 384 AT PAGE 110 ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT PROPERTY L\NE . ~ '' HAND\CAP ACCESS UP 73.5 WALL 0.7 SOUTH 09 QUAe.~ PROPERTY LINE Legm .1 ~ KATIE REED PLAZA ' e ~ CONC . WALK A CONDOM INIUM %4 5 m. 1 0 02 y 2 344-4 2. 8 1 / BUILDING WITH BASEMENT ~ Elli BU I LD I NG ENCROACHES e INTO MILL ST. O.2 1 1 DISK 16129 NORTHEAST CORNER BLOCK 88 0.4' BLDG. TO BLDG. - < - 2 1 0 OPEN TO GARDEN LEVEL 0 4 . 1 1 1 311 00 # 0 7 L Â· 0 4.â€¢ r -7 CONC. WALK i D CONC ALK . . . 1 . , BUIL61 NG . 1 I l 73.4 1 k Â· 35 i. 2 - 1,4 1- :1 3 / SOOK 424 1792' ' I cm' 0 9m 82 0 2 STORY BUILDING 0 0 , PAGE 846 1 p FOUND 25947 /4 Â· 3 0 j i I BUILDING ENCROACHES - G INTO ALLEY 0.2 . T <27Â» - / / ~ l 4 of 4 _ 1 WITH BASEMENT ~ 0 2 EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF * AECHAN/CAL EQU/PA,ENT ENCROACHES 0.7' WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW E /6 r | 1 i l- 1 6% THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS CERTIFICATION ATTACHED TO THE EXTERIOR WALL THE ALLEY RECORD 1 io.-J . I - 0 BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN AND THAT THERE ARE NO b 4 FIELD SURVEYED DURING : 4 1,2 /. '- , 2006 AND IS ACCURATE 2 DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD, BOUNDARY L I~E CONFLICTS ENCROACHMENTS, - m AY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR ~NOWN TO ME N 75Â°09 180.93 INTO '80.8 460 404 318 ~ 1- 11 Â·- O CO APPURTENANCES AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE 4- p r EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVE~ROUND SURVEYOR ARE ~XCEPTED. THIS SURVEY I S VOI D UNLESS WET STAMPED ALLEY DAT~:, B JOUXM., HOWORTH P.L.S. 25947 20. 90. 440 LOCK 8 BU I LD I NG ENCROACHE < j INTO MILL ST. 0.2' .. PUBLIC R.O.1, 1 4 2.4Â·4 0 / 5.t'Â°Â©ator" 10 0. 4 Le.9.Â» on' Iilf' PHONE,CATV,ELECTRIC SERVICES IMPROVEMENT SURVEY AND REMOTE WATER METE -- BUILDING ENCROACHES OF INTO ALLEY 0.5 32 LOTS D, E F G HAND I BLOCK 81, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, ckoU6, DESCR I ~ED AS FOLLOWS: r BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 81 BE ING I DENT I CAL 64. b \-1 TO THE NORTHEAST OF LOT I (A BRASS DISK STAMPED PLS 25947) : THENCE N 75Â°09'11-W 180.93 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF LOTS D- 1 CONTIGUOUS WITH THE SOUTHERLY R.O.W. OF HOPKINS AVENUE T6 THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF LOT D: THENCE S 14Â°50'49 W 100.00 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF LOT D TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT D AND THE NORTHERLY R.O.W. OF THE ALLEY OF BLOCK 81: THENCE S 75Â°09'11-E 180.93 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF LOTS D-1, CONTIGUOUS WITH THE NORTHERLY R.O.W. OF SAID ALLEY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT I TO THE WESTERLY R.O.W. OF MILL STREET; THENCE N 14Â°50'49 E 100.00 ALONG THE SAID R.O.W. OF MILL STREET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 18,093 SQ. FT. ./- C 0.415 ACRES ./-) PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 NOT I CE: ACCORD I NG TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT ON THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN JOB YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. THE DATE CERTIFICATION IS VOID IF NOT WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE SHEET 1 OF 1 SURVEYOR. 3/06 15109A STORY .00 OOT 1 3 3 pi JL~~ , . . f-==M7'.1 loiDa 6 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 20 1 9.MILL fir-4~22,4 , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: , 200-,6. STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, dem.et 1MLâ„¢,07-9 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: L~0' publication of notice: By fae publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days priortothepublic hearing. A copy ofthepublicationis attached hereto. 4-posting ofnotice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the i 3 day of , 200 6 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph ofthe posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners ofproperty within three hundred (300) feet ofthe property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) .. M I A- Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision ofthis Title, or whenever the text ofthis Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal ofthis Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Sig~fire The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this /VOT of Ju.) EL . 200* b> Sesckn Yu_ Love 1 \ -Â·- WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL 9 LAtÂ§MIEIN' R,. 50'LAN 1 NOTARY PUBLE ~ My commission expires: 2-k2// 0,7 i BrATE OP COLORADO.] Not*Emic ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL .. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 205 S. MILL STREET, BRUNELLESCHI'S- MINOR HPC REVIEW AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN STANDARDS REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, June 28,2006 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, City Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Gil Vanderaa, of 205 S. Mill Street, #226, Aspen, CO 81611, affecting the property located at 205 S. Mill Street, Lots D-I, Block 81, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. HPC is asked to grant Minor Development and Commercial Design Review approval for a new outdoor dining deck. Variances are requested from the following Commercial Design Standards: "Building Relationship to Primary Street" and "Pedestrian Amenity Space." For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429-2758, email address: amyg@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Michael Hoffman Vice Chair, Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on June 11, 2006 City of Aspen Account Impression antibourrage et & sdchage rapids - www.avery.com ~ AVERYÂ® 5160Â® Utilisez le gabarit 5160Â® 1-800-GO-AVERY ~ 316 EAST HOPKINS LP 1000 EAST HOPKINS LLC 303 EAST MAIN LLLP RYANCOINC 215 S MONARCH SUITE 104 PO BOX 8016 1220 N STADEM DR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 TEMPE, AZ 85281-1857 AEP FAMILY LLL 3.9389931% 407 EAST HYMAN PROPERTY LTD 409 EAST HYMAN LLC C/O ANDREW V HECHT GARFIELD & 511 RACE ST 1322 NEIL AVE HECHT PC ASPEN, CO 81611-1599 COLUMBUS, OH 43201 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 AMI MILLER ALEXANDER JUDY L TRUSTEE ALH HOLDING COMPANY INC FLYNN PATRICK 2121 NW FRONTAGE RD #254 435 E MAIN ST PO BOX 2385 VAIL, CO 81657 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT B & K ASSOCIATES BALDWIN HARLEY A 11 420 E HOPKINS AVE 308 S MILL ST 205 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BANK OF ASPEN BENTLEYS AT THE WHEELER BERGMAN CARL R & CATHERINE M C/O EPROPERTY TAX-DEPT 303 PO BOX 10370 PO BOX 1365 PO BOX 4900 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85261-4900 BLAU JEFF T BRINING ROBERT BUSH ALAN DAVID 181 E 65TH ST 215 S MONARCH ST STE 203 0046 HEATHER LN NEW YORK, NY 10021 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611-3342 CARLSON BRUCE E TRUST CC ASPEN LLC CENTRE OF ASPEN LLC 54.6248989% PO BOX 3587 75-5706 HANAMA PL #104 PO BOX 1247 ASPEN, CO 81612 KAILUA-KONA, HI 96740 ASPEN, CO 81612 CHARLIES COW COMPANY LLC CHERI ROBIN CITY OF ASPEN 315 E HYMAN AVE 215 S MONARCH #105 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 COMCOWICH WILLIAM L CLARK FAMILY TRUST COTTONWOOD VENTURES I LLC TRUSTEE OF ROBERT BARNARD TRUST PO BOX 362 419 E HYMAN AVE P O BOX 1374 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 COTTONWOOD VENTURES 11 LLC CROSSLAND R H JR REV TRUST CRYSTAL PALACE CORPORATION ATTN JANA FREDERICK 100 ELK RUN DR #129 PO BOX 32 300 CRESCENT COURT STE 1000 BASALT, CO 81621 ASPEN, CO 81612 DALLAS, TX 75201 A~33/\V-09-008-L Â®09 LS 31VldIAI31 Â®/ClaAÂ¥ asn Â®09 L5 Â®All BAV ~~ LUO)*-18Ae'MAAM Bulluud eau afpnug Due luer Impression antibourrage et & sdchage rapide imini/'ll www.avery.com ~ AVERYÂ® 5160Â® Utilisez le gabarit 5160Â® 1-800-GO-AVERY ~ DAVIDSON DONALD W DAVIS HORN INCORPORATED DENSON JAMES D 864 CEMETERY LN 215 S MONARCH #104 PO BOX 1614 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 TUBAC, AZ 85646 DOLE MARGARET M DUVIKE INC ELLIS DIANA ROQUE C/O FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PO BOX 2238 P O BOX 5743 CEDARIDGE ASPEN, CO 81612 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90209 PO BOX 8455 ASPEN, CO 81612 F & M VENTURES LLC ELLIS DIANA ROQUE TRUSTEE FEDER HAROLD L & ZETTA F C/O MORRIS & FYRWALD RE 13320 MULHOLLAND DR 985 CASCADE AVE 415 E HYMAN AVE BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 BOULDER, CO 80302-7550 ASPEN, CO 81611 FREDRICK LARRY D FOOTLOOSE MOCCASIN MAKERS INC FORGE PARTNERSHIP ROBERTS JANET A 240 S MILL ST STE 201 PO BOX 2914 215 S MONARCH ST #Glol ASPEN, CO 81611 BASALT, CO 81621 ASPEN, CO 81611 GALENA PLAZA LLC 30.3845777% GILBERT LEONE 2.7624071% GOLDEN ARTS CONNECTION LLC CO/ RONALD GARFIELD ESQ CO/ RONALD GARFIELD ESQ ASPEN INTERNATIONAL ART DBA 601 E HYMAN AVE 601 E HYMAN AVE 213 S MILL ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GOLDSTEIN PETER & ALAN GOODING RICHARD L GRAND FINALE LTD 150 METRO PK#2 4800 S HOLLY ST PO BOX 32 ROCHESTER, NY 14623 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111 ASPEN, CO 81612 GRAND SLAM HOLDINGS LLC GRANITE TRUST LLC 61.668% GRIFFITH LARRY R C/O CARL B LINNECKE CPA PC C/O KATIE REED MANAGEMENT 19794 ESCADA CT 215 S MONARCH ST #101 210B S MONARCH ST REDDING, CA 96003 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HANSEN STEVE 11.8169824% HALL CHARLES L 49% HART GEORGE DAVID & SARAH C CO/ RONALD GARFIELD ESQ 230 S MILL ST PO BOX 5491 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 ASPEN, CO 81611 HILLIS OF SNOWMASS INC HINDERSTEIN FAM REVTRUST HOFFMAN JOHN & SHARON 170 E GORE CRK P O BOX 1576 210 W 5TH ST APT 211 i VAIL, CO 81657 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 KANSAS CITY, MO 64105-1166 HOLTZ ABEL & FANA HYMAN MALL COMMERCIAL CONDOS I IFTNFS LLC C/O FLEISHER COMPY ATTN: D LLC 210 E HYMAN AVE STE 202 , VOLTMER 290 HEATHER LN ASPEN, CO 81611-2909 0326 HWY 133 ST 220 ASPEN, CO 81611 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 i *113AV-09-008-L Â®09 L5 31VldIAI31 Â®AjaA\1 asn Â®0915 Â®AllaAV ~ LUO)*.laAE AAN\AA 5uiluu,1 eei-1 afonlug Due uler Impression antibourrage et & suchage ra~e lim:milli www.avery.com ~-~ AVERYÂ® 5160Â® Utilisez le gabarit 5160Â® 1-800-GO-AVERY~ JMS LLC JOHNSON PETER C & SANDRA K JW VENTURES LLC 210 E HYMAN AVE STE 202 51 OVERLOOK DR 917 E HYMAN ASPEN, CO 81611-2909 ASPEN, CO 81611-1008 ASPEN, CO 81611 KANTZER TAYLOR MICHAEL FAMILY KATIE REED INVESTORS LLC KANDYCOMINC TRUST #1 PARTNERS IN KATIE REED LLC 766 SINGING WOOD DR 6501 VISTA DEL MAR 210 B S MONARCH ARCADIA, CA 91006 PLAYA DEL REY, CA 90293 ASPEN, CO 81611 KATIE REED INVESTORS LLC 33.332% KAUFMAN GIDEON I KELLY PROPERTIES INC C/O GARFIELD & HECHT PC 315 E HYMAN AVE STE 305 PO BOX 8429 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 KREVOY SUSANNE SEPARATE PROP LIMELITE INC LEVY LAWRENCE F & CAROL TRST ATTN DALE PAAS OR SUE WOOLERY 980 N MICHIGAN AVE #400 2311 LA MESA DR PO BOX 131 CHICAGO, IL 60611 SANTA MONICA, CA 90402 BASALT, CO 81621 LINDNER FRITZ & ERIKA L TRUSTEES LOMA ALTA CORPORATION MEEKER RICHARD J AND ALLISON D 66966 TEN PEAKS CT P O BOX 886 0752 MEADOWOOD DR BEND, OR 97701-9277 LANCASTER, TX 75146-0886 ASPEN, CO 81611 MORRONGIELLO CHARLES MONARCH BUILDING LLC MOTHER LODE INVESTORS LLC MORRONGIELLO LYDIA P O BOX 126 620 E HYMAN AVE #1E 18 SCHOOL LN WOODY CREEK, CO 81656 ASPEN, CO 81611 LLOYD HARBOR, NY 11743 MTN ENTERPRISES 806 MSJ PROPERTIES LLC 50% OBRIEN MAUREEN C/O HILLIS OF SNOWMASS 302 E HOPKINS 1370 MAIN ST 170 GARE CRK DR ASPEN, CO 81611 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 VAIL, CO 81657 OSA TRUST 50% OBRIEN MAUREEN ORR ROBERT L C/O KREVOY SUSANNE BELZBERG 215 S MONARCH ST G102 500 PATTERSON RD 2311 LA MESA DR ASPEN, CO 81611 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 SANTA MONICA, CA 90402 PARAMOUNT INVESTMENTS INC PARK CENTRAL CONDO ASSOC PARK CENTRAL PARTNERS LLC C/O WILLIAM POPE 215 S MONARCH ST STE 203 210 E HYMAN AVE #8 540 W SMUGGLER ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 PARTNERS IN KATIE REED LLC 5% PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS PETERSON BROOKE A 50% C/0 GARFIELD & HECHT PC ASSOC 302 E HOPKINS AVE 601 E HYMAN AVE 301 E HYMAN AVE #108 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 AMBAV-09-008-L Â®09 L5 31VldIAI31 Â®XleA\1 3Sn Â®09 L5 Â®AllaAV ~ tuo)*JeAe'AAMAA - Buqu!Â·Id Bald aBpnuls pue luer Impression antibourrage et & sdchage ra~e millimil www.avery.com ~ AVERYÂ® 5160Â® Utilisez le gebarit 5160Â® 1-800-GO-AVERY~ SILVER SLAM COMMERCIAL LLC RACZAK JOSEPH S & JANET L SEGUIN WILLIAM L C/O NELSON LINDEN 215 S MONARCH ST STE 106 PO BOX 4274 2100 E MAPLE RD #200 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009 SLAM RESIDENTIAL LLC SSM LAND AQUISITION CO LLC THE ISIS BUILDING LLC 1495 MAPLE WAY #100 2121 KIRBY DR #99 205 S MILL ST # 301A BIRMINGHAM, MI 48084 HOUSTON, TX 77019 ASPEN, CO 81611 TRUE JAMES R VAIL FINE ART GALLERY INC WALD JANET 215 S MONARCH #102 PO BOX 1953 9762 BURNLEY PL ASPEN, CO 81611 EDWARDS, CO 81632 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 WHEELER BLOCK BUILDING LLC WHEELER SQUARE - CASPER FAMILY WENDELIN ASSOC TKG MANAGEMENT INC C/O LLC 150 METRO PARK 1001 CHERRY ST STE 308 315 E HYMAN ROCHESTER, NY 14623 COLUMBIA, MO 65201 ASPEN, CO 81611 WHITMAN WENDALIN WHITMAN WENDALIN WILLIAMS DEXTER M 51% 210 E HYMAN AVE #101 PO BOX 472 230 S MILL ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 WITEK ROBERT J WOODS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP YOUNG BARBARA A 215 S MONARCH #G-103 PO BOX 11468 210 E HYMAN - #9 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ATBAV-09-008-L Â®09:5 31V-1dIA!31 Â®AlleAV esn Â®0915 Â®AllaAÂ¥ ~ luo)*.laAe'MMAA I'll"lill/ Bunuud ea.1:1 06pnlus pue Luer - *000 i IttÂ¢- .BE : i. R .*./ 1/. .. 1 *~/-"F'~ L f 2 - 4 - . 1 , -5-6- L- d . . I. 'r 4 -74 . I 1- l.iem / Â·Â·1Â¥ .