Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutInformation Update 101425AGENDA INFORMATION UPDATE October 14, 2025 5:00 PM, I.Information Update I.A Building Electrification Code Updates Follow-up Memo I.B Information Only Memorandum - Continued Stage Two Water Shortage Declaration Building_Electrification_Code_Updates_Work_Session_Follow- Up_Memo_10.1.25.docx Stage_Two_Information_Only_Memo_October_14_Council_Meeting FINAL.docx 1 1 FOLLOW-UP MEMORANDUM CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION WORK SESSION MEETING DATE: September 29, 2025 FOLLOW-UP MEMO DATE: October 6, 2025 AGENDA TOPIC: Building Electrification Code Update PRESENTED BY: Bonnie Muhigirwa, Chief Building Official Tessa Schreiner, Environmental Health & Sustainability Manager COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Rachael Richards, Councilmembers Christine Benedetti, John Doyle, Bill Guth (via Zoom), Sam Rose ______________________________________________________________________ WORK SESSION DISCUSSION SUMMARY: The purpose of this work session was to receive Council direction on possible amendments to city code regarding electrification of the built environme nt. These potential amendments aim to a) deliver on Council’s previously established science- based greenhouse gas emissions reductions b) prepare Aspen for compliance with State of Colorado building and energy codes minimum requirements and c) respond to customer desires in both commercial and residential properties to pursue electrification for their mechanical systems. Council provided direction on a series of specific policy questions in two categories: 1) removing barriers to electrification in existing City code and 2) preparing for state building and energy code updates in 2026 for both new and existing buildings. The following was the majority of Council’s direction on each policy question, for which staff will return to Council over the next year with proposed changes to relevant sections of Aspen’s Municipal code. 1. Removing barriers to electrification in existing City code  Propose adjustments to height and setback restrictions to accommodate high efficiency electric equipment. 2  Propose changes to site planning requirements for new or redeveloped construction to accommodate electric equipment space needs.  Propose options to allow transformers in the right-of-way in certain circumstances.  Minority opinion cautioned against adding layers to permitting processes that could add additional burden, review time, and decrease efficiency. 2. Preparing for state building and energy code updates in 2026 for both new and existing buildings  Move forward with drafting an all-electric code with exceptions for new construction.  Provide policy options for limiting electric capacity for residential buildings.  Pursue above-state minimum buildings and energy codes for major renovations by providing partial electrification policy options.  Minority opinion expressed concern about limiting electric capacity while moving towards electrification requirements.  Minority opinion highlighted the need to maintain diverse energy sources for capacity, resiliency and cost. Feedback from Council included requests that staff provide the following for each topic:  List and analyze pros and cons for various policy options for each topic as well as project-specific examples to illustrate potential outcomes.  Conduct comprehensive stakeholder outreach to ensure staff captures all perspectives on the potential benefits and consequences of each proposed code change.  Explore opportunities for funding to incentivize and offset costs of electric equipment.  Consider differing needs across property types (e.g., commercial, residential, historical, affordable housing etc.). Additional comments included:  Bring back detailed considerations for transformer policies. This may include mapping current and future locations based on potential need, as well as cost- sharing policy and installation options (e.g., subgrade). NEXT STEPS: Staff will engage subject matter experts and conduct in-depth stakeholder outreach to develop options for each policy direction above and analyze their potential outcomes. To support this work, the City has received a $30,000 grant from the Colorado Energy Office to research and analyze partial electrification policy options for major renovations. 3 Additionally, staff are pursuing a $2 million grant with regional partners, which if successful, would support policy development for all-electric with exemptions code options, stakeholder engagement, and incentives. Staff will return in several sessions over 2026 for Council consideration of proposed policies and code changes. CITY MANAGER NOTES: 4 1 INFORMATION ONLY MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Steve Hunter PE,PH Special Project Engineer Cole Langford, Utilities Business Services Manager Megan Killer, WELS Plans Review Technician THROUGH: Erin Loughlin Molliconi PE, Utilities Director Ryan Loebach PE, Deputy Utilities Director Tyler Christoff PE, Deputy City Manager MEMO DATE: 10/03/2025 RE: Continued Stage Two Water Shortage Declaration PURPOSE: This memorandum is for informational purposes only. No action is requested of Council. This memo is to inform Council of the City of Aspen Drought Response Committee’s recommendation to continue the current Stage Two Water Shortage Declaration. SUMMARY: Aspen’s municipal water supply comes from Castle and Maroon Creeks. Unlike many community supplies, the Aspen water system has very little water storage, relying primarily on direct streamflow. This system does not allow for the controlled release of water to match water demand. Instead, it depends on the consistent release of water from snowmelt. During drier than normal years, runoff conditions may not match the timing of the City’s typical demands and reductions in typical water usage may be necessary. During these conditions, the City’s water policy enables Council to enact its Water Shortage Ordinance by selecting an appropriate water shortage stage. The City adopted its water shortage policy through an Ordinance of the Municipal Code on July 14, 2020, via resolution #061. City Council declared a Stage One water shortage on June 10, 2025 via Resolution #81, Series of 2025. This was elevated to a Stage Two water shortage on August 12, 2025 via Resolution #112, Series of 2025 . The City’s Drought Response Committee is made up of members from Parks, Utilities, Environmental Health, Communications, and City Manager’s office. The Committee reviewed the latest drought data for Aspen and the Roaring Fork watershed and agreed on recommending remaining in a Stage Two water shortage. In accordance with the City’s Drought Mitigation and Response Plan we are matching our water restrictions with current 5 2 drought conditions and forecasts. Weather, climate, and snowpack are highly variable and may change in a relatively short period of time. Current Drought Conditions As of October 2, 2025, the US Drought Monitor (Figure 1) for Aspen and Pitkin County remain in Severe (D2) and Extreme (D3) drought categories. The drought monitor is one of multiple drought indicators the city uses to determine local drought conditions. Pitkin County has experienced its 2nd driest year to date (Jan – Aug 2025) in 131 years of record with a precipitation deficit of 6.84 inches from normal. Beneficial monsoonal moisture and cooler temperatures have helped but not changed Aspen’s drought conditions. NOAAs Climate Prediction Center forecast drought persists in all Western Colorado with 55% probability of higher than normal temperatures and 40% probability for below average precipitation for October, November, and December 2025 (Figure 2). Figure 1. US Drought Monitor: Colorado released 10-02-2025 Figure 2. NOAA Seasonal Temperature & Precipitation Forecast Oct, Nov, Dec 2025 The Water Shortage Ordinance allows for escalating restrictions based on the Stage of drought observed. A Stage Two Water Shortage is designed to incur a 10% to 15% reduction in system wide water use and a 15% to 25% reduction on outdoor water use. 6 3 Restrictions are required for customers. Public facilities are directed to implement water use restrictions for public parks, golf courses and other public uses, such as street washing. Additionally, the City participates in a regional effort to establish consistent drought and water conservation messaging. The City’s Stage Two language aligns with the regional messaging, with allowances for stricter water conservation measures based on local conditions. FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Rate surcharges for monthly water rates for Stage Two water shortage are 1.50 in billing tier III and 1.75 in tier IV of the standard rates for metered water customers. A rate surcharge for the Buttermilk Metro District bulk water two-tier rate is proposed for 1.625 for tier II. A surcharge of 1.50 for bulk water/fill stations and pressurized and non-pressurized raw water services. Billing Tier Proposed Stage Two Water Shortage % Surcharge Tier I 0% Tier II 0% Tier III 50% Tier IV 75% Billing Tier Buttermilk Metro District Proposed Stage Two Water Shortage % Surcharge Tier I 0% Tier II 62.5% One-Tier Rate Structure (Bulk Water / Fill Stations) Proposed Stage Two Water Shortage % Surcharge Tier I 50% Raw Water Rate Structure (Pressurized) Proposed Stage Two Water Shortage % Surcharge Pressurized 50% Non-pressurized 50% Table 1: Proposed Stage Two Water Shortage Surcharges NEXT STEPS: The City’s Drought Response Committee will continue to monitor and evaluate 2025 drought conditions as we progress through the remainder of 2025. The Committee will meet again in 7 4 late October/early November to reevaluate conditions and update council on recommendations for water shortage changes as needed. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: None ATTACHMENTS: None 8