HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.hpc.20251022AGENDA
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION
COMMISSION
October 22, 2025
4:30 PM, City Council Chambers -
3rd Floor
427 Rio Grande Place
Aspen, CO 81611
I.ROLL CALL
II.MINUTES
II.A Draft Minutes - 9/23/25
III.PUBLIC COMMENTS
IV.COMMISSIONER MEMBER COMMENTS
V.DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
VI.PROJECT MONITORING
VII.STAFF COMMENTS
VIII.CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT ISSUED
IX.CALL UP REPORTS
X.SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR AGENDA ITEMS
XI.SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT
XII.OLD BUSINESS
XII.A Certificate of Appropriateness for Major Development Final Review and Permitted
Use Variance for 337 Lake Ave.
minutes.hpc.20250923_DRAFT.docx
HPC Memo.337 Lake Ave.Final.pdf
Draft HPC Resolution # 12 , Series of 2025.pdf
Exhibit A. Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings.pdf
Exhibit B. Variance Criteria Staff Analysis.pdf
Exhibit C. Conceptual Application Referral Comments.pdf
Exhibit D. Final Application Referral Comments.pdf
1
1
XIII.NEW BUSINESS
XIV.ADJOURN
XV.NEXT RESOLUTION NUMBER
Exhibit E. Final Application.pdf
TYPICAL PROCEEDING FORMAT FOR ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS
(1 Hour, 15 Minutes for each Major Agenda Item)
1. Declaration of Conflicts of Interest (at beginning of agenda)
2. Presentation of proof of legal notice (at beginning of agenda)
3. Applicant presentation (10 minutes for minor development; 20 minutes for major
development)
4. Board questions and clarifications of applicant (5 minutes)
5. Staff presentation (5 minutes for minor development; 10 minutes for major
development)
6. Board questions and clarifications of staff (5 minutes)
7. Public comments (5 minutes total, or 3 minutes/ person or as determined by the Chair)
8. Close public comment portion of hearing
9. Applicant rebuttal/clarification (5 minutes)
10. Staff rebuttal/clarification (5 minutes)
End of fact finding. Chairperson identifies the issues to be discussed.
11. Deliberation by the commission and findings based on criteria commences. No further
input from applicant or staff unless invited by the Chair. Staff may ask to be recognized if
there is a factual error to be corrected. If the item is to be continued, the Chair may
provide a summary of areas to be restudied at their discretion, but the applicant is not to
re-start discussion of the case or the board’s direction. (20 minutes)
12. Motion. Prior to vote the chair will allow for call for clarification for the proposed
resolution.
Please note that staff and/or the applicant must vacate the dais during the opposite
presentation and board question and clarification session. Both staff and applicant team
will vacate the dais during HPC deliberation unless invited by the chair to return.
Updated: March 7, 2024
2
2
REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 23RD, 2025
Vice - Chair Raymond opened the regular meeting of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission at
4:30pm.
Commissioners in attendance: Kim Raymond.
Absent were Roger Moyer, Barb Pitchford, Jodi Surfas, Dakota Severe, Duncan Clauss and Kara
Thompson.
Staff present:
Luisa Berne – Assistant City Attorney
Mike Sear – Deputy City Clerk
Ms. Berne noted for the record that due to a scrivener’s error during the June 25th, 2025 HPC meeting,
the 623 / 625 East Hopkins Ave. item had been continued to this date. Since then, the application had
been withdrawn and thus did not need to be further continued.
____________________
Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk
3
Page 1 of 6
427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5000 | cityofaspen.com
Memorandum
TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission (HPC)
FROM: Gillian White, Historic Preservation Officer, Principal Planner
THROUGH: Dan Folke, Planning Director
MEETING DATE: October 22, 2025
RE: 337 Lake Ave. – Certificate of Appropriateness for Major Development
Final Review, Residential Design Standards, Temporary Use Variance
APPLICANT/OWNER:
Aspen West AJ,
LLC
Representative:
Sara Adams,
BendonAdams,
LLC
Location:
337 Lake Ave.
Aspen, CO 81611
Legal Description:
Lot B, Daggs
Historic Landmark
Lot Split, Aspen,
Pitkin County,
Colorado
Parcel
Identification
Number:
2735-121-35-002
Current Zoning &
Use:
R-6 – Residential
Proposed Use:
Residential
SUMMARY:
The applicant requests a Certificate of Appropriateness for Major
Development at 337 Lake Avenue for the purpose of constructing a new,
detached, one-story, single-family residence on the vacant parcel created
out of a Historic Landmark Lot Split per Ordinance #47, Series of 2005.
The applicant is also requesting a permitted use variance for temporary
construction staging.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Historic Preservation Staff recommend Approval of Resolution #12, of
Series 2025, for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Major Development
Final Review for 337 Lake Avenue.
Figure 1. 337 Lake Ave. – Site Location Aerial Image
4
Page 2 of 6
427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5000 | cityofaspen.com
BACKGROUND:
Located in the Medium Density Residential (R-6) Zone District between Hallam Lake and Aspen
Meadows on the north side of Aspen’s West End neighborhood, the property referred to as 337
Lake Ave. is a 6,000-square-foot parcel that is currently vacant. 337 Lake Ave. and 335 Lake
Ave. were included in the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmarks as a single parcel in 2001,
under the address of 640 N. Third St, per Ordinance #18, Series of 2001. HPC Resolution #45,
Series of 2005, and Ordinance #47, Series of 2005, created the Daggs Historic Landmark Lot
Split Subdivision Exemption (Book 80, Page 97, Reception #427631). The Historic Landmark
Lot Split resulted in Lot A (335 Lake Ave.), which contains a circa 1889 AspenVictorian Miner’s
Cottage, and Lot B (337 Lake Ave.) the subject property of this request.
Pursuant to Ordinance #47, Series of 2005, both lots created as part of the Daggs Historic
Landmark Lot Split must conform to the requirements of their underlying zone district. The
Ordinance and associated plat states that Lot B has an allowed floor area of 1,700 sq. ft.
Variations provided for in Section 26.415.110(c)(1)a-c are not applicable to Lot B, as it does not
contain the historic structure. The maximum potential buildout for the two parcels created by the
lot split is not to exceed three units, which may be composed of a duplex and a single-family
home. The Ordinance also states that any lot for which development is proposed shall be subject
to affordable housing mitigation, which in the City of Aspen Municipal Land Use Code includes
Growth Management Residential Development review per Section 26.470.090(a).
Figure 2. 337 Lake Ave. on the 1896
Willits Map Figure 3. Northeast corner of Block 102, City and Township of
Aspen (Poley, H. S., 1990-1899)
5
Page 3 of 6
427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5000 | cityofaspen.com
REQUEST OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC)
The Applicant is requesting the following land use approval(s):
• Certificate of Appropriateness for Major Development (Section 26.415.070(d)): for the
construction of a new structure within a historic property, the extent of which exceeds the
parameters set forth for minor development per the City of Aspen Land Use Code Section
26.415.070(c).
• Residential Design Standards (RDS) (Section 26.410)
• Authorized Variances (Section 26.314.030)
The HPC is the final review authority for Certificate of Appropriateness for Major Development
and permitted use variance.
PROJECT SUMMARY:
The applicant proposes to construct a one-story, stand-alone, single-family dwelling with a
basement on a vacant lot. In addition to the detached dwelling, the proposed project includes a
patio, side-yard fencing, new vehicular paving, and landscaping. Additionally, the applicant is
requesting a permitted use variance for temporary construction staging.
The applicant presented the conceptual design at an HPC public hearing on January 22, 2025,
where the HPC voted four to zero (4-0) to approve the proposal via Resolution 1 of Series 2025.
The request was brought before City Council for a notice of call-up on March 11, 2025, where
Council upheld the HPC’s decision.
Fig. 4. Existing lot as seen from Lake Ave. Figure 5. Rendering of proposed dwelling.
6
Page 4 of 6
427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5000 | cityofaspen.com
STAFF EVALUATION
The application (LPA-24-106) for Certificate of Appropriateness Major Development at 337 Lake
Ave. deserves commendation for its general approach to satisfying the City’s intent to “draw a
reasonable balance between private property rights and the public interest in preserving the
City's cultural, historic, and architectural heritage” as set forth in Aspen Land Use Code Chapter
26.415.
Major Development:
As detailed in Exhibit A, the application satisfies most of the applicable Historic Preservation
Design Guidelines. The previously determined maximum floor area condition, as a result of the
historic lot split, has aided in the satisfactory review of many of the Guidelines. This was
Figure 6. East elevation of conceptual design showing Lot A (left, existing historic resource) and Lot B (right,
proposed structure)
Figure 7. East elevation of final design showing Lot A (left, existing historic resource) and Lot B (right,
proposed structure)
7
Page 5 of 6
427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5000 | cityofaspen.com
particularly the case for Guidelines 1.7 and 1.11, where the limited floor area allowed for more
open space and the preservation of specific trees.
The proposed new building remains subordinate to the neighboring historic resource in both size
and scale, while still relating to the historic context by way of materials and form. Although
Guideline 11.3 calls for new construction to appear similar in scale with the existing historic
resource, the allowable floor area demands the proposed structure be smaller in scale. Staff find
the proposal to be acceptable for this project and appreciate the refined nature of the design.
At the time of Conceptual Review, all applicable HP Design Guidelines were met with the
exception of those related to final site elements such as fencing and lighting, which include
Guideline 1.10, 1.14, 1.19, 1.20, and 12.3. These details have been submitted with the final
design and staff’s review found that these remaining applicable Guidelines have been met.
Guideline 1.10 calls for built in furnishings to not be intrusive or degrade the integrity of the
neighborhood, site, or existing historic landscape. The proposed built-in grill is located behind
the structure and is not negatively impacting the existing site or neighborhood context.
Guideline 1.14 calls for visual impacts of landscape lighting to be minimized; the proposed
landscape lighting is a mix of recessed step lighting and 1” diameter cylindrical path lighting,
both of which meet Guideline 1.14.
Guideline 1.19 calls for new fences to have a transparent quality, allowing views into the yard
from the street; the proposed new 42” fence is located at the rear of the property along the alley,
resulting in views from Lake Ave. being maintained. A 72” fence is located on the north side of
the structure to screen mechanical equipment.
Guideline 1.20 calls for fences taller than 42” to be designed so as not to block public views of
important features of designated resources; the only fence taller than 42” is being used to screen
mechanical equipment and is not blocking any views.
Guideline 12.3 calls for exterior lighting to be simple in character with appropriate form, finish,
and scale; the proposed lighting is simple and modest in design, and the fixtures meet this
Guideline.
Please refer to Exhibit A for staff analysis of all applicable Guidelines.
Residential Design Standards:
The submitted final application meets all Residential Design Standards.
Permitted Use Variance:
The applicant has updated their application to request a variance from the permitted use for 337
Lake Ave. to allow for the currently vacant lot to be used for construction staging for the ongoing
restoration work at 335 Lake Ave. In accordance with applicable criteria related to this request,
the applicant has provided notice to surrounding properties, both properties are under the same
8
Page 6 of 6
427 Rio Grande Place, Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5000 | cityofaspen.com
ownership, and using the vacant lot for construction staging minimizes disruption of normal
neighborhood activities. Staff find this variance request to be minimal and reasonable in this
instance.
Please refer to Exhibit B for staff analysis of the applicable variance criteria.
REFERRAL COMMENTS
The application was referred out to other City departments who have requirements that will affect
the permit review. As this project qualifies as a Major Engineering Review, the Engineering
Department provided several comments that are to be responded to/met at the time of permit.
The Building and Parks Department reviewers did not have any comments or concerns related
to this final proposal.
The combined referral comments from the conceptual application are included as Exhibit C and
combined referral comments from the final application are included as Exhibit D.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommend that the HPC approve Resolution #12, Series of 2025 for the request for a
Certificate of Appropriateness for Major Development Final Review and permitted use variance
for 337 Lake Ave.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution #12, Series of 2025
Exhibit A – Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Staff Findings
Exhibit B – Variance Criteria Staff Analysis
Exhibit C – Conceptual Application Referral Comments
Exhibit D – Final Application Referral Comments
Exhibit E – Final Application
9
HPC Resolution #12, Series of 2025
Page 1 of 4
RESOLUTION # 12,
(SERIES OF 2025)
A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC)
GRANTING A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR MAJOR
DEVELOPMENT FINAL REVIEW AND VARIATION FOR THE PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 337 LAKE AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT B, DAGGS
HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
PARCEL ID: 2735-121-35-002
WHEREAS, the applicant, Aspen West AJ, LLC, represented by Sara Adams, BendonAdams
LLC, has requested HPC approval for Certificate of Appropriateness Major Development, Final
Review and a Permitted Use Variance for the property located at 337 Lake Avenue, Lot B, Daggs
Historic Landmark Lot Split, Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado; and
WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that “no building or structure shall
be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated
historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the
Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established
for their review;” and
WHEREAS, for approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for Major Development, the HPC
must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to
determine the project’s conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design
Guidelines per Section 26.415.070(d) of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections.
The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain
additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and
WHEREAS, this property is subject to Residential Design Standards, of which the conceptual
plans comply; and
WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for compliance
with the applicable review standards and recommended approval of a Certificate of
Appropriateness for Major Development Final Review; and
WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the Permitted Use Variance
request with the applicable review criteria and recommended approval; and
WHEREAS, the HPC reviewed the project on October 22, 2025. The HPC considered the
application, the staff memo and public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the
review standards and granted approval by a vote of X to X (x-x).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That HPC hereby approves a Certificate of Appropriateness for Major Development Final Review
and a Permitted Use Variance for 337 Lake Avenue, Lot B, Daggs Historic Landmark Lot Split,
Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado as follows:
10
HPC Resolution #12, Series of 2025
Page 2 of 4
Section 1: Conditions of Approval
1. A Construction Staging Plan for 337 Lake Ave. shall be approved as part of the building permit for
the redevelopment of 335 Lake Ave.
2. No activity or disturbance of any kind shall extend beyond the limits of the building envelope and
an agreed upon vehicular access path from N. 3rd Street to the building envelope.
3. Vehicular access to the building envelope will be determined at a site visit with the Parks
Department to ensure access has the most minimal impact on the site. Vehicular access shall not
exceed 15’ in width. The extents of vehicular access boundaries and the building envelope shall be
shown on all Construction Staging documents included in the building permit review.
4. Construction staging is permitted on 337 Lake Ave. as long as a valid permit is in effect for 335
Lake Ave.
5. The City of Aspen Parks, Community Development, and Engineering Departments must inspect
and approve the restoration of 337 Lake Ave. prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for
335 Lake Ave. Restoration and use of 337 Lake Ave. for construction staging conditions are
outlined below.
Section 2: Engineering Department
All activity on 337 Lake Ave. must comply with Title 21 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, and all
adopted regulations of the City of Aspen Engineering Department. The following conditions shall be met
prior to issuance of a building permit for any permits for 335 or 337 Lake Ave.:
1. Construction Management Plan: The Applicant shall submit a CMP to the Engineering Department
that includes all activity on 335 and 337 Lake Ave. The CMP shall be approved prior to building
permit issuance.
2. Revegetation Plan: An approved revegetation plan shall be approved by the Parks Department for
337 Lake Ave. prior to building permit issuance.
3. Erosion Control Plan: An erosion and sediment control plan must be included in the CMP for both
properties.
4. Drainage: The site drainage shall comply with all rules and regulations as deemed necessary by the
Engineering Department.
Section 3: Parks Department
All activity on 337 Lake Ave. must comply with all adopted regulations of the City of Aspen Parks
Department. The following conditions shall be met prior to issuance of a building permit for any permits
for 335 or 337 Lake Ave.:
1. A site visit is required with the City of Aspen Parks Department and Applicant prior to building
permit issuance to discuss all anticipated activity on 337 Lake Ave.
2. Revegetation Plan: An approved revegetation plan shall be approved by the Parks Department for
337 Lake Ave. prior to building permit issuance.
3. Tree Protection Plan: A tree protection plan and any required tree removal permits must be
approved prior to building permit issuance.
4. No activity or storage of material is allowed within the Tree Protection Fencing.
5. The Parks Department and Applicant shall meet on-site prior to building permit issuance to
determine the most appropriate vehicular access to the approved Building Envelope. The vehicular
access path shall not exceed 15’ in width. The vehicular access path and extents of the building
envelope shall be depicted on all Construction Staging Plan documents.
Section 4: Material Representations
11
HPC Resolution #12, Series of 2025
Page 3 of 4
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development
proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented
before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation Commission, or the
Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same
shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or
an authorized authority.
Section 5: Existing Litigation
This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any
action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as
herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
Section 6: Severability
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason
held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed
a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions thereof.
Section 7: Vested Rights
The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested
for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any
failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the
forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to
properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180
days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested
property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section
26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan
shall not result in the creation of a vested property right.
No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to
obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published
in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a
notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation
of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following
form:
Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan,
and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the
Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining
to the following described property: 337 Lake Ave.
Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and
approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of
Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval.
The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the
period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date
12
HPC Resolution #12, Series of 2025
Page 4 of 4
of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section
26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution
and the Aspen Home Rule Charter.
APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 22nd day of October
2025.
Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content:
__________________________________ ____________________________________
Luisa Berne, Assistant City Attorney Kara Thompson, Chair
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Mike Sear, Deputy City Clerk
13
Page 1 of 8
Exhibit A
Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Criteria
Staff Findings
26.415.070.D – Certificate of Appropriateness for Major Development
1) The review and decision on the issuance of a certificate of appropriateness for major
development shall begin with a determination by the Community Development
Director that the proposed project constitutes a major development. A major
development includes one or more of the following activities:
a. The construction of a new structure within a historic district; and/or
b. Alterations to more than three (3) elements of a building façade including its
windows, doors, roof planes or materials, exterior wall material, dormers,
porches, exterior staircase, balcony or ornamental trim; and/or
c. The expansion of a building increasing the floor area by more than two
hundred and fifty (250) square feet; and/or
d. Any new development that has not been determined to be minor
development.
14
Page 2 of 8
Relevant Historic Preservation Design Guidelines & Findings
The applicant requests a Certificate of Appropriateness for Major Development at 337 Lake Avenue
for the purposes of constructing a new one-story, single family detached dwelling.
Chapter 1: Site Planning and Landscape Finding
1.1 All projects shall respect the historic development pattern or context of the
block, neighborhood or district.
• Building footprint and location should reinforce the traditional patterns of the
neighborhood.
• Allow for some porosity on a site. In a residential project, setback to setback
development is typically uncharacteristic of the historic context. Do not design a
project which leaves no useful open space visible from the street.
Met
1.4 Design a new driveway or improve an existing driveway in a manner that
minimizes its visual impact.
• If an alley exists at the site, the new driveway must be located off it.
• Tracks, gravel, light grey concrete with minimal seams, or similar materials are
appropriate for driveways on Aspen Victorian properties.
Met
1.5 Maintain the historic hierarchy of spaces.
• Reflect the established progression of public to private spaces from the public
sidewalk to a semi-public walkway, to a semi private entry feature, to private
spaces.
Met
1.6 Provide a simple walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front
entry on residential projects.
• Meandering walkways are not allowed, except where it is needed to avoid a tree
or is typical of the period of significance.
• Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building
style and install them in the manner that they would have been used historically.
For example on an Aspen Victorian landmark set flagstone pavers in sand, rather
than in concrete. Light grey concrete, brick or red sandstone are appropriate
private walkway materials for most landmarks.
• The width of a new entry sidewalk should generally be three feet or less for
residential properties. A wider sidewalk may be appropriate for an AspenModern
property.
Met
1.7 Provide positive open space within a project site.
• Ensure that open space on site is meaningful and consolidated into a few large
spaces rather than many small unusable areas.
• Open space should be designed to support and complement the historic building.
Met
15
Page 3 of 8
1.8 Consider stormwater quality needs early in the design process.
• When included in the initial planning for a project, stormwater quality facilities can
be better integrated into the proposal. All landscape plans presented for HPC
review must include at least a preliminary representation of the stormwater
design. A more detailed design must be reviewed and approved by Planning and
Engineering prior to building permit submittal.
• Site designs and stormwater management should provide positive drainage away
from the historic landmark, preserve the use of natural drainage and treatment
systems of the site, reduce the generation of additional stormwater runoff, and
increase infiltration into the ground. Stormwater facilities and conveyances
located in front of a landmark should have minimal visual impact when viewed
from the public right of way.
• Refer to City Engineering for additional guidance and requirements.
Met
1.10 Built-in furnishings, such as water features, fire pits, grills, and hot tubs,
that could interfere with or block views of historic structures are inappropriate.
• Site furnishings that are added to the historic property should not be intrusive or
degrade the integrity of the neighborhood patterns, site, or existing historic
landscape.
• Consolidating and screening these elements is preferred.
Met
1.11 Preserve and maintain historically significant landscaping on site,
particularly landmark trees and shrubs.
• Retaining historic planting beds and landscape features is encouraged.
• Protect historically significant vegetation during construction to avoid damage.
Removal of damaged, aged, or diseased trees must be approved by the Parks
Department.
• If a significant tree must be removed, replace it with the same or similar species
in coordination with the Parks Department.
• The removal of non-historic planting schemes is encouraged.
• Consider restoring the original landscape if information is available, including
original plant materials.
Met
16
Page 4 of 8
1.12 Provide an appropriate context for historic structures. See diagram.
• Simplicity and restraint are required. Do not overplant a site, or install a
landscape which is overtextured or overly complex in relationship to the historic
resource, particularly in Zone A. In Zone A, new planting shall be species that
were used historically or species of similar attributes.
• In areas immediately adjacent to the landmark, Zone A and Zone B, plants up
42” in height, sod, and low shrubs are often appropriate.
• Contemporary planting, walls and other features are not appropriate in Zone A.
A more contemporary landscape may surround new development or be located
in the rear of the property, in Zone C.
• Do not cover areas which were historically unpaved with hard surfaces, except
for a limited patio where appropriate.
• Where residential structures are being adapted to commercial use, proposals to
alter the landscape will be considered on a case-by-case basis. The residential
nature of the building must be honored.
• In the case of a historic landmark lot split, careful consideration should be given
so as not to over plant either property, or remove all evidence of the landscape
characteristics from before the property was divided.
• Contemporary landscapes that highlight an AspenModern architectural style are
encouraged.
Met
1.13 Additions of plant material to the landscape that could interfere with or block
views of historic structures are inappropriate.
• Low plantings and ground covers are preferred.
• Do not place trees, shrubs, or hedgerows in locations that will obscure, damage,
or block significant architectural features or views to the building. Hedgerows are
not allowed as fences.
• Consider mature canopy size when planting new trees adjacent to historic
resources. Planting trees too close to a landmark may result in building
deteriorate or blocked views and is inappropriate.
Climbing vines can damage historic structures and are not allowed.
Met
1.14 Minimize the visual impacts of landscape lighting.
• Landscape and pathway lighting is not permitted in Zone A (refer to diagram) on
Aspen Victorian properties unless an exception is approved by HPC based on
safety considerations.
• Landscape, driveway, and pathway lighting on AspenModern properties is
addressed on a case-by-case basis.
• Landscape light fixtures should be carefully selected so that they are compatible
with the building, yet recognizable as a product of their own time.
• Driveway lighting is not permitted on Aspen Victorian properties.
• Landscape uplighting is not allowed.
Met
17
Page 5 of 8
1.18 When building an entirely new fence, use materials that are appropriate to
the building type and style.
• The new fence should use materials that were used on similar properties during
the period of significance.
• A wood fence is the appropriate solution in most locations.
• Ornate fences, including wrought iron, may create a false history are not
appropriate for Aspen Victorian landmarks unless there is evidence that a
decorative fence historically existed on the site.
• A modest wire fence was common locally in the early 1900s and is appropriate
for Aspen Victorian properties. This fence type has many desirable
characteristics including transparency, a low height, and a simple design. When
this material is used, posts should be simply detailed and not oversized.
Met
1.19 A new fence should have a transparent quality, allowing views into the yard
from the street.
• A fence that defines a front yard must be low in height and transparent in nature.
• For a picket fence, spacing between the pickets must be a minimum of 1/2 the
width of the picket.
• For Post-WWII properties where a more solid type of fence may be historically
appropriate, proposals will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.
• Fence columns or piers should be proportional to the fence segment.
Met
1.20 Any fence taller than 42” should be designed so that it avoids blocking
public views of important features of a designated building.
• A privacy fence should incorporate transparent elements to minimize the possible
visual impacts. Consider staggering the fence boards on either side of the fence
rail. This will give the appearance of a solid plank fence when seen head on. Also
consider using lattice, or other transparent detailing on the upper portions of the
fence.
• A privacy fence should allow the building corners and any important architectural
features that are visible from the street to continue to be viewed.
• All hedgerows (trees, shrub bushes, etc.) are prohibited in Zones A and B.
Met
1.22 When a new retaining wall is necessary, its height and visibility should be
minimized.
• All wall materials, including veneer and mortar, will be reviewed on a case by case
basis and should be compatible with the palette used on the historic structure.
Met
1.24 Preserve historically significant landscapes with few or no alterations.
• An analysis of the historic landscape and an assessment of the current condition
of the landscape should be done before the beginning of any project.
• The key features of the historic landscape and its overall design intent must be
preserved.
Met
18
Page 6 of 8
1.25 New development on these sites should respect the historic design of the
landscape and its built features.
• Do not add features that damage the integrity of the historic landscape.
• Maintain the existing pattern of setbacks and siting of structures.
• Maintain the historic relationship of the built landscape to natural features on the
site.
• All additions to these landscapes must be clearly identifiable as recent work.
• New artwork must be subordinate to the designed landscape in terms of
placement, height, material, and overall appearance. Place new art away from
significant landscape features.
• Avoid installing utility trenches in cultural landscapes if possible.
Met
1.26 Preserve the historic circulation system.
• Minimize the impact of new vehicular circulation.
• Minimize the visual impact of new parking.
• Maintain the separation of pedestrian and vehicle which occurred historically.
Met
1.27 Preserve and maintain significant landscaping on site.
• Protect established vegetation during any construction.
• If any tree or shrub needs to be removed, replace it with the same or similar
species.
• New planting should be of a species used historically or a similar species.
• Maintain and preserve any gardens and/or ornamental planting on the site.
• Maintain and preserve any historic landscape elements.
Met
• Chapter 11: New Buildings on Landmarked Properties Finding
11.1 Orient the new building to the street.
• Aspen Victorian buildings should be arranged parallel to the lot lines, maintaining
the traditional grid pattern.
• AspenModern alignments shall be handled case-by-case.
• Generally, do not set the new structure forward of the historic resource. Alignment
of their front setbacks is preferred. An exception may be made on a corner lot or
where a recessed siting for the new structure is a better preservation outcome.
Met
11.2 In a residential context, clearly define the primary entrance to a new
building by using a front porch.
• The front porch shall be functional, and used as the means of access to the
front door.
• A new porch must be similar in size and shape to those seen traditionally.
Met
11.3 Construct a new building to appear similar in scale and proportion with the
historic buildings on a parcel.
• Subdivide larger masses into smaller “modules” that are similar in size to the
historic buildings on the original site.
• Reflect the heights and proportions that characterize the historic resource.
Met/Not
Met
19
Page 7 of 8
11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building.
• The primary plane of the front shall not appear taller than the historic structure. Met
11.5 The intent of the historic landmark lot split is to remove most of the
development potential from the historic resource and place it in the new
structure(s).
• This should be kept in mind when determining how floor area will be allocated
between structures proposed as part of a lot split.
Met
11.6 Design a new structure to be recognized as a product of its time.
• Consider these three aspects of a new building; form, materials, and
fenestration. A project must relate strongly to the historic resource in at least two
of these elements. Departing from the historic resource in one of these categories
allows for creativity and a contemporary design response.
• When choosing to relate to building form, use forms that are similar to the historic
resource.
• When choosing to relate to materials, use materials that appear similar in scale
and finish to those used historically on the site and use building materials that
contribute to a traditional sense of human scale.
• When choosing to relate to fenestration, use windows and doors that are similar
in size and shape to those of the historic resource.
Met
11.7 The imitation of older historic styles is discouraged.
• This blurs the distinction between old and new buildings.
• Overall, details shall be modest in character.
Met
Chapter 12: Accessibility, Architectural lighting, Mechanical Equipment, Service
Areas, and Signage Finding
12.3 Exterior light fixtures should be simple in character.
• The design of a new fixture should be appropriate in form, finish, and scale with
the structure.
• New fixtures should not reflect a different period of history than that of the affected
building, or be associated with a different architectural style.
• Lighting should be placed in a manner that is consistent with the period of the
building, and should not provide a level of illumination that is out of character.
• One light adjacent to each entry is appropriate on an Aspen Victorian residential
structure. A recessed fixture, surface mounted light, pendant or sconce will be
considered if suited to the building type or style.
• On commercial structures and AspenModern properties, recessed lights and
concealed lights are often most appropriate.
Met
20
Page 8 of 8
12.4 Minimize the visual impacts of utilitarian areas, such as mechanical
equipment and trash storage.
• Place mechanical equipment on the ground where it can be screened.
• Mechanical equipment may only be mounted on a building on an alley façade.
• Rooftop mechanical equipment or vents must be grouped together to minimize
their visual impact. Where rooftop units are visible, it may be appropriate to
provide screening with materials that are compatible with those of the building
itself. Use the smallest, low profile units available for the purpose.
• Window air conditioning units are not allowed.
• Minimize the visual impacts of utility connections and service boxes. Group them
in a discrete location. Use pedestals when possible, rather than mounting on a
historic building.
• Paint mechanical equipment in a neutral color to minimize their appearance by
blending with their backgrounds.
• In general, mechanical equipment should be vented through the roof, rather than
a wall, in a manner that has the least visual impact possible.
• Avoid surface mounted conduit on historic structures.
Met
21
Exhibit A
Permitted Use Variance – Review Criteria
26.314.040 – Variances
B. In order to authorize a variance from the permitted uses of Title 26, the appropriate decision-
making body shall make a finding that all of the following circumstances exist:
1. Notice by publication, mailing and posting of the proposed variance has been provided
to surrounding property owners in accordance with Subparagraphs 26.304.060(e)(3)a.—
c.
Staff Response: Adequate noticing was provided for the request – staff finds this
criterion to be met.
2. A variance is the only reasonable method by which to afford the applicant relief, and to
deny a variance would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship such that the property
would be rendered practically undevelopable, as distinguished from mere
inconvenience.
Staff Response: Staging the construction equipment at 337 Lake Ave. for the restoration
of the historic resource at 335 Lake Ave. minimizes the impact on the surrounding
neighborhood and staff see this as a reasonable request.
3. The temporary off-site storage or construction staging can be undertaken in such a
manner so as to minimize disruption, if any, of normal neighborhood activities
surrounding the subject parcel.
Staff Response: Staging the construction equipment at 337 Lake Ave. for the restoration
of the historic resource at 335 Lake Ave. minimizes the impact on the surrounding
neighborhood and staff see this as a reasonable request.
4. If ownership of the off-site parcel subject to the proposed variance is not vested in the
applicant, then verified written authorization of the parcel's owner must be provided.
Staff Response: Both properties are under the same ownership.
5. Adequate provision is made to restore the subject parcel to its original condition upon
expiration of the variance, including the posting of such financial security as deemed
appropriate and necessary by the appropriate decision-making body to ensure such
restoration.
Staff Response: A condition of approval is included that requires the Applicant to
address all impacts of the construction staging, including a revegetation plan. Approval
by the City of Aspen Engineering and Parks Departments for all impacts to 337 Lake
Ave., will be required prior to building permit issuance for 335 Lake Ave.
22
Memorandum
TO: Sara Adams, BendonAdams
FROM: Gillian White, Historic Preservation Officer
DATE: November 12, 2024
PROJECT: LPA-24-106, Major Development - Conceptual HPC Review, Development of
New House on Vacant Lot at 337 Lake Avenue
COMMENTS:
These comments are not intended to be exhaustive, but an initial response to the Land Use
application submitted for review. Other requirements may be requested at time of permit.
Engineering:
1. This project will qualify as a major level Engineering Review. A full drainage report and
civil plans will be required at the time of permit.
a. Ensure all utility crossing minimums are maintained.
2. A Permanent Revocable Encroachment License will be required prior to Certificate of
Occupancy for the retaining wall and stairs in the Right of Way.
3. The fence should not block the curb stop and should always be accessible.
4. This appears to be shown as two separate units, each unit needs its own service lines for
utilities.
5. Show routing of green roof to storm system in permit documents.
6. Mech room should be located in the rear to reduce distance between the potable water
entry to the structure and the meter and backflow prevention assembly. Water Distribution
Standard 5.8.1 require all meters to set as close as possible to the point where the service
enters the building.
7. Curb cuts should be a minimum of 25ft away from an adjacent curb cut. There is currently
only approximately 22ft. Amend the driveway location.
8. If any snowmelt is proposed, it is not permitted over the water main.
Historic Preservation:
1. Preliminary material representations are requested when available.
2. Sheet LX-01 shows the retaining wall partially on 335 Lake Ave property – are you only
demolishing to the property line?
3. Please include photo of the existing retaining wall.
Building: No Comments.
Parks: No Comments.
Zoning: No Comments.
23
Memorandum
TO: Gillian White, gillian.white@aspen.gov
Community Development Department
FROM: Kyla Smits, Kyla.smits@aspen.gov
Engineering Department
DATE: September 29, 2025
SUBJECT: Engineering Department Referral Comments
PROJECT: LPA-25-102, 337 Lake Ave – Major HP Development Final
COMMENTS:
These comments are not intended to be exhaustive, but an initial response to the project packet
submitted for the purpose of the Historical Preservation Committee meeting. Other requirements may
be requested at time of permit.
1. This project will qualify as a major level Engineering Review. A full drainage report and civil plans
will be required at the time of permit.
a. Ensure all utility crossing minimums are maintained.
2. A Permanent Revocable Encroachment License will be required prior to Certificate of Occupancy
for the retaining wall and stairs in the Right of Way.
3. Water Distribution Standard 5.8.1 requires all meters to set as close as possible to the point
where the service enters the building.
4. If any snowmelt is proposed, it is not permitted over the water main.
5. The conceptual CMP plans are sufficient for Land Use. Final CMP approval will be at building
permit.
24
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gillian White, Historic Preservation Officer
FROM: Owen Palcsik, Planner Technician
DATE: 09/25/2025
RE: Zoning Referral Comments – LPA-25-102 – 337 Lake Avenue
Please respond to the following before board approval:
1. Please demonstrate compliance with Sec. 26.512, Outdoor Lighting, in the form of a
completed Outdoor Lighting Compliance Calculator that aligns with the Lighting Plan for
the parcel.
A variety of other requirements may be necessary for building permit submittal and zoning
review.
25
300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611
970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM
Gillian White
Aspen Historic Preservation Commission
May 28, 2025
Revised September 17, 2025
Re: 337 Lake Avenue – HP Major Development Final Application and Request
for Temporary Construction Staging
Dear Gillian and HPC,
Please accept this application for Major Development Final Review of the vacant property located
at 337 Lake Avenue, Lot B of the Daggs Historic Landmark Lot Split. This 6,001 sf property is under
the purview of the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC). The owners, Abby and Jon, propose to
construct a small studio residence with a basement. The project conforms to both the R-6 zone
district and the specifications in the lot split subdivision agreement (Exhibit J.2). HPC granted
Conceptual Major Development approval in January 2025 via Resolution 1-2025 (Exhibit J.4). City
Council did not call up the project.
Background
337 Lake Avenue was created in 2005 through the historic landmark lot split incentive – Lot A (335
Lake Avenue) contains the 1880s historic landmark and is 5,706 sf; and Lot B (subject property) is
vacant and 6,001 sf. The total allowable floor area plus the 500 sf floor area bonus for historic
restoration was allocated to the newly created lots through the lot split process – Lot A is permitted
2,542 sf of floor area plus a 500 sf bonus for a total of 3,042 sf; and Lot B is permitted 1,700 sf of
floor area. The allocation of floor area between the lots clearly indicates a desire for Lot B to be
developed with a small residence.
Figures 1 & 2: Historic 335 Lake (left) and proposed 337 Lake (right).
26
Page 2 of 3
335 Lake Avenue recently received Minor Development approval from HPC for a remodel of the
existing home, and a building permit is under review.
Proposal
A one story studio residence with basement is proposed on the vacant lot. The home complies with
the underlying R-6 zone district, Residential Design Standards, and is about 600 sf below the
maximum floor area of 1,700 sf and about 10 ft below the maximum height of 25 ft. The primary
roof form is a gable and horizontal siding is proposed. The house sits on its own fee simple lot, but
clearly pulls inspiration from the adjacent historic landmark through the prominent front porch,
simple forms, and material application. Modern architectural details, front porch, and fenestration,
and a flat green roof distinguish the new building as a product of its own time. Historic Preservation
Design Guidelines are addressed in Exhibit A.
The project team worked closely with the City Forester early in the design process to identify trees
to preserve and trees to remove. Coordination with the Forester to establish a tree setback
informed the site plan during conceptual review, and another meeting this past winter was
conducted to review the cottonwoods along Lake Avenue and an appropriate location for the sewer
line. A more developed storm water management plan and landscape plan are included in the
design set and all design criteria are addressed in Exhibit A. Residential Design Standards are
addressed in Exhibit K. A physical model and material samples will be presented at the public
hearing.
In addition to Final Design Review, HPC is asked to consider a request to temporarily use the vacant
337 Lake Avenue property as “temporary construction material storage and staging ” for the 335
Lake remodel project for a period of 32 months. The Code allows HPC to grant a temporary use
variance to allow “off-site” construction storage and staging. Staging on the property next to the
historic home at 335 Lake avoids negative impacts on the neighborhood, traffic flow to the Aspen
Meadows, and results in a significantly faster construction timeframe - a benefit to the entire
community. Locating an excavator on the 337 Lake property to repair and excavate a deeper
basement allows the historic home to be underpinned, rather than lifted. Underpinning is HPC’s
preferred method to excavate a basement in order to avoid unintended consequences to historic
material associated with lifting the house. All trees will be protected on the 337 Lake property
during staging for 335 Lake, and construction of the 337 Lake project is expected to begin about 16
months after 335 starts and a building permit is issued. Review criteria and construction
management site plan are included as Exhibit A.2.
Kind Regards,
Sara Adams, AICP
BendonAdams, LLC
27
Page 3 of 3
Exhibits
A Review Criteria
A.1 Historic Preservation Design Guidelines
A.2 Temporary Variance for Construction
Staging
B. Land Use Application
C. Pre-application summary
D. Authorization to represent
E. Proof of ownership
E.1 Title commitment
E.2 Statement of authority
F. Agreement to Pay
G. HOA form
H. Vicinity Map
I. Mailing list
J. Past approvals
J.1 Ordinance 47-2005 approving the historic lot split
J.2 Subdivision agreement
J.3 Subdivision plat
J.4 HPC Resolution 1-2025
K. Residential Design Standard Checklist
L. Drawing set including survey and civil drawings
28
Exhibit A.1
HP Design Review
Sec. 26.415.060.A Approvals Required
Any development involving properties designated on the aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and
Structures, as an individual property or located within the boundaries of a Historic District, unless
determined exempt, requires the approval of a development order and either a certificate of no negative
effect or a certificate of appropriateness before a building permit or any other work authorization will be
issued by the City. HPC shall provide referral comments for major projects to rights of way located within
the boundaries of a Historic District.
Response: Applicable Design Guidelines are addressed below:
Streetscape
1.1 All projects shall respect the historic development
pattern or context of the block, neighborhood or
district.
Response – The building faces Lake Avenue similar to
the adjacent landmark. Open space and porosity are
maximized in the site plan – the proposed site coverage
is 15% where 50% is the maximum allowed.
1.2 Preserve the system and character of historic
streets, alleys, and ditches.
Response – No change to historic streets is proposed.
1.3 Remove driveways or parking areas accessed
directly from the street if they were not part of the
original development of the site.
Response – No change to access.
1.4 Design a new driveway or improve an existing driveway in a manner that minimizes its visual impact.
Response – Access to the property is from Third Street via cobble stone tracks that transition to grass
pavers to accommodate the required surface parking space.
1.5 Maintain the historic hierarchy of spaces.
Response – A simple walkway from Lake Avenue to the entry porch is proposed to reflect the traditional
transition from public to private space.
1.6 Provide a simple walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry on residential
projects.
Response – A simple concrete walkway with steps and a handrail is proposed from Lake Avenue to the
front entry- there is significant grade change between the property and Lake Avenue and a metal handrail
is needed for safety. The width of the walkway is three feet. Large cottonwoods in the right of way
necessitate a jog in the walkway to accommodate tree roots and the required sewer line per the Parks
Proposed site plan at 337 Lake (top) compared to
historic resource at 335 Lake (bottom).
29
Exhibit A.1
Design Review Criteria
Department. A dry stack stone retaining wall to replace the existing wall is proposed along Lake Avenue
which will be coordinated with the Engineering Department and will match the adjacent retaining wall at
335 Lake.
1.7 Provide positive open space within a project site.
Response – Open space is provided around the new home to create usable outdoor areas and passive
landscaped areas. Two rain gardens are located on the north and south of the gable roof volume, and
hardscape is limited to the south side yard. A back patio with trellis is proposed facing Third Street.
1.8 Consider stormwater quality needs early in the design process.
Response – Civil plans are included in drawing set, sheets C1- C4. The civil plans show utility lines, storm
drains and inlets, the proposed rain gardens, and the proposed green roof. Two underground storm water
treatment systems are proposed in the south side yard. Access lids will be solid and covered with sod to
avoid any visual impacts as viewed from either street.
1.9 Landscape development on AspenModern landmarks shall be addressed on a case by case basis.
Response – n/a.
1.10 Built-in furnishings, such as water features, fire pits, grills, and hot tubs, that could interfere with or
block views of historic structures are inappropriate.
Response – A built in grill is proposed on the stone patio on the rear of the new home.
1.11 Preserve and maintain historically significant landscaping on site, particularly landmark trees and
shrubs.
Response – Existing cottonwoods in the right of way along Lake Avenue, and significant trees along the
west property line are preserved and protected per the Parks Department’s specifications. A revised tree
removal plan that reflects Parks’ recent direction on tree removals is included as Sheet LX-01. Proposed
new trees are shown on Sheet LX-03.
1.12 Provide an appropriate context for historic structures. See
diagram.
Response – A simple landscape is proposed around the new house as
shown on Sheets LX-03 - 06 of the drawing set. A mix of native
perennials, shrubs, and grasses are proposed around the new home and
along the Third Street fence line. The design team proposes planting
only by the new home to maintain the current openness of the lot and
to reflect traditional planting patterns. Historic maps depict the lot as
containing 335 Lake Avenue before it was moved as part of the historic
landmark lot split in 2005. The proposed landscape plan honors the
history of the lot with restrained native planting. Landscape and
hardscape create a subtle link between 337 Lake and 335 Lake that is
further expressed through the architecture of 337.
Historic Willits Map.
30
Exhibit A.1
Design Review Criteria
Proposed trees and shrubs.
Proposed perennial mix at
right.
31
Exhibit A.1
Design Review Criteria
1.13 Additions of plant material to the landscape that could interfere with or block views of historic
structures are inappropriate.
Response – Plants do not obscure the view of the new building or the adjacent landmark.
1.14 Minimize the visual impacts of landscape lighting.
Response – Landscape lighting is not proposed at this time. Pathway lighting is proposed along the front
walkway from Lake Avenue to illuminate the steps and the jogs in the path as shown below. The light
fixture is 15” maximum height and 1” in diameter, similar to the pathway lights approved at 335 Lake.
A lighting plan and proposed fixtures are on Sheet EL0.01 – 0.06 and EL1.00.
1.15 Preserve original fences.
Response – n/a.
1.16 When possible, replicate a missing historic fence based on photographic evidence.
Response – n/a.
1.17 No fence in the front yard is often the most appropriate solution.
• Reserve fences for back yards and behind street facing façades, as the best way to preserve the
character of a property.
Response – No fence is proposed in the front yard. Fencing is proposed in the south side (existing fence)
and rear yard (new fence facing Third Street).
1.18 When building an entirely new fence, use materials that are appropriate to the building type and
style.
Response – The existing south side fence is proposed to remain. The rear fence facing Third Street will be
42” tall wood fence with horizontal boards. A detail of the fence and gate are provided on Sheets LX-04
and LX-05. This wood fence matches the adjacent fence at 335 Lake, and a vehicular gate is proposed
Proposed outdoor lighting plan. Blue arrows indicate the stairs and where the pathway jogs 90 degrees.
32
Exhibit A.1
Design Review Criteria
1.19 A new fence should have a transparent quality, allowing views into the
yard from the street.
Response – The rear fence is 42” in height and is horizontal wooden boards
of varying width. The low height of the fence and ½” spacing between boards
allows views from the street into the rear yard.
1.20 Any fence taller than 42” should be designed so that it avoids blocking
public views of important features of a designated building.
Response – This property does not contain a designated building. The
adjacent landmark at 335 Lake is not blocked by the proposed rear fence.
1.21 Preserve original retaining walls
• Replace only those portions that are deteriorated beyond repair.
Any replacement materials should match the original in color,
texture, size and finish.
• Painting or covering a historic masonry retaining wall or covering is not allowed.
• Increasing the height of a retaining wall is inappropriate.
Response – n/a.
1.22 When a new retaining wall is necessary, its height and visibility should be minimized.
• All wall materials, including veneer and mortar, will be reviewed on a case by case basis and should
be compatible with the palette used on the historic structure.
Response – The existing red sandstone retaining wall in the right of way is proposed to be replaced with
a grey dry stack stone wall.
1.23 Re-grading the site in a manner that changes historic grade is generally not allowed and will be
reviewed on a case by case basis.
Response – The site is relatively flat – regrading is not anticipated at this time.
1.24 Preserve historically significant landscapes with few or no alterations.
Response – Existing cottonwood trees in the right of way along Lake Avenue are protected and preserved
per the Parks Department’s specifications.
1.25 New development on these sites should respect the historic design of the landscape and its built
features.
Response – A simple landscape with traditional plant species is proposed as explained above.
1.26 Preserve the historic circulation system.
Response – A surface parking space is proposed off Third Street. Simple cobble stone tracks and grass
pavers are proposed to minimize the impact of the new curb cut.
Detail of wood fence approved at 335.
33
Exhibit A.1
Design Review Criteria
Venting and Gutters
1.27 Preserve and maintain significant landscaping on site.
Response – All new plantings are simple and reference historically used native species as described above.
Significant cottonwood trees are preserved and protected per Parks Department direction.
7.4 New vents should be minimized, carefully, placed and painted a dark color.
Response – Two roof vents with metal shrouds are proposed on the gable roof. Both vents are setback
from the street facing façade and are painted matte black. Elevations on Sheet A3.01 show the expected
heights of both vents.
7.10 Design gutters so that their visibility on the structure is minimized to the extent possible.
Response – Gutters and downspouts, painted matte black, are proposed for the gable roof portion of the
home. A detail of the gutter style is provided on Sheet A8.00, and the roof plan on Sheet A2.02 shows
locations of the gutters. Downspouts are setback from building corners to not be visible from the street
and to drain into the proposed rain gardens.
34
Exhibit A.1
Design Review Criteria
New Buildings on Landmarked Properties
11.1 Orient the new building to the street.
Response – The new building is oriented to Lake Avenue and is aligned with the historic landmark while still
respecting the tree root protection area and meeting the “build to requirement” in the Residential Design
Standards.
11.2 In a residential context, clearly define the primary entrance to a new building by using a front porch.
Response – A recessed front porch with 3’6” cantilevered metal roof provides primary entry into the home.
The historic landmark has a 65 sf recessed front porch, and the new home proposes a similarly sized recessed
rectangular front porch.
11.3 Construct a new building to appear similar in scale and proportion with the historic buildings on a
parcel.
Response – The new building is a simple one story gable form that transitions into a flat green roof toward
the rear of the property. The new building is 19’2” wide compared to the primary front module of the
landmark which is 20’ 8” wide. The building is one story and significantly shorter than the adjacent
landmark.
11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building.
Response – The front façade of the new building is not taller than the historic structure.
11.5 The intent of the historic landmark lot split is to remove most of the development potential from the
historic resource and place it in the new structure(s).
Response – n/a. The lot split was approved in 2005 at which time floor area and the FAR Bonus were
allocated. 337 Lake Avenue was allocated 1,700 sf of floor area with the intention of developing a small
home on this lot.
Comparison of Lot A (historic) and Lot B (new) front facades.
35
Exhibit A.1
Design Review Criteria
11.6 Design a new structure to be recognized as a product of its time.
Response – The new structure is recognized as a product of its own time in the size and application of the
fenestration and solid to void ratios on the building facades. The gable roof form relates to surrounding
historic landmarks. Primary material is horizontal stained wood siding with either a concrete foundation or
metal flashing. A treated cedar shingle roof is proposed for the gable portion to match the landmark, and
a green roof is proposed on the flat portion of the home. A metal trellis, metal window and door systems,
metal gutters and downspouts, and metal shroud around roof vents are proposed to minimize the material
palette. Concrete is proposed for site walls, the exterior stair to the basement, and the rain gardens. A
metal mesh guardrail is proposed along the exterior stairs. Physical samples will be provided at the public
hearing. Materials are labelled on the elevations on Sheet A3.01.
Modern architectural details like eave depth, cantilevered metal porch roof, and the flat green roof viewed
from Third Street, distinguish this home as new construction that fits into the neighborhood. Historic
photographs below illustrate traditional forms and details along Lake Avenue.
11.7 The imitation of older historic styles is discouraged.
Response – The new home is modest in character and is clearly a product of its own time as expressed
through architectural details, fenestration size and placement, and the treatment of the wood siding
(stained dark).
220 Lake Avenue, 1978. Aspen Historical Society. Lake Avenue streetscape with prominent street facing
gables. Aspen Historical Society.
Proposed material palette.
36
Exhibit A.1
Design Review Criteria
12.3 Exterior light fixtures should be simple in character.
• Lighting should be placed in a manner that is consistent with the period of the building, and should
not provide a level of illumination that is out of character.
Response – An exterior lighting plan is included as Sheet EL1.00 and cut sheets for each fixture are provided
as Sheets EL0.01-0.06. One light is proposed at each entry. Lights are proposed along the pathway where
necessary (as discussed above in Chapter 1) and are proposed along the exterior stair for safety. The lighting
plan is minimal and all lights are downcast.
EL1 – 2” aperture
entry light recessed in
porch soffit; EL2 – light
within trellis; EL3 –
lights at stairway near
Lake Avenue; EL4 - !”
diameter surface
mounted light at
basement door; EL5 –
three pathway lights
at critical locations;
EL6 – cast in concrete
step light along
exterior stairs to
basement; EL7A – 1”
surface mounted
downlight at side door.
Lighting and Mechanical
Historic home at 335 Lake (left) and proposed new home at 337 Lake (right).
37
Exhibit A.1
Design Review Criteria
12.4 Minimize the visual impacts of utilitarian areas, such as mechanical equipment and trash storage.
Response – The mechanical equipment will mostly be located in the basement. Required outdoor
units are conceptually located in the side yard with a 6’ tall wood screen (detail on Sheet LX-05).
This small area is significantly setback from the front façade and plantings are proposed to further
screen the area. This property has two street facing yards – utilizing the side yard for mechanical
equipment is the least impactful option. We coordinated the location with the City Forester to ensure
significant tree roots are not impacted.
Location of above grade mechanical equipment. The area is fully screened and has been vetted with Parks.
38
Lot A
5,706 sq ft ±
0.131 Acres ±
Lot B
6,001 sq ft ±
0.138 Acres ±
MARTIN CONDO ASSOC
COMMON AREA
ASPEN CO 81611
Parcel No. 273512127800
E A ALTEMUS PARTNERSHIP LLLP
PO BOX 5000
ASPEN CO 81612
Parcel No. 273512108003North Third Street65.0' R-O-WLake Avenue75.0' R-O-WSALTER/LUBAR
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
Plat Book 88, Page 67
Unit B
MARTIN CONDOMINIUMS
Plat Book 22, Page 51
Unit A
MARTIN CONDOMINIUMS
Plat Book 22, Page 51
T1
T2
Gas
ac ac ac ac
T4
T3
T5
T7 T8
T6
T9
T10 T11 T12 T14
T15
T16
T20
T21
T22
T23
T24
T25
T26T27T28T29T30T31T32T33T34T35T36
FF=7884.88'
FF=7884.21'
FF Garage
7884.24'
Ridge El=7904.86'Ridge El=7907.69'Covered
StoneSteps
ww
ww ww
ww
Electrical Transformer
Electric
Meter
5/8" Rebar &
Red Plastic Cap
LS No. 25947
5/8" Rebar &
Red Plastic Cap
LS No. 25947
Site Benchmark
Elev.=7883.90'
5/8" Rebar &
Red Plastic Cap
LS No. 25947
5/8" Rebar
5/8" Rebar &
Yellow Plastic Cap
LS No. 9184
5/8" Rebar &
Yellow Plastic Cap
LS No. 9184
Edge of
Asphalt
Light Pole
Storm Grate
Mail Box
Stone
Stone
Stone
Stone
Stone Stone
2 Story
Frame House
Posted Address:
638 N. 3rd St.
2 Story
Frame House
w/ Basement
Address: 335 Lake Ave.
Concrete
Driveway
Top Back
Curb
Edge of Asphalt
Flow Line Curb
Electric
Box
CoveredDeckCovered
Stone
Planter
Planter
Planter Stone
Retaining
Walls
Upper Level
Deck
Upper Level
Deck
FenceAdjoining
House
Fence Storm Inlet
Rim El.=7874.2'
Storm Inlet
10.21'
11.45'
T13 T17 T19
T18
LEGEND
Found Monument
Electric Meter
Telephone Pedestal
Cable Pedestal
Electrical Transformer
Window Well
Sewer Clean-out
Storm Inlet
Light Pole
Fir Tree
Aspen Tree
Deciduous Tree
ww
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
LOT A & B
DAGGS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION RECORDED AT PLAT BOOK 80, PAGE 97.
CITY OF ASPEN
COUNTY OF PITKIN
STATE OF COLORADO
EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY
LOT A & B DAGGS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION
COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO
U.S. SURVEY FEET USED
NOTES
1.) DATE OF THE FIELD SURVEY WAS MAY 30, 2023.
2.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND/ OR REQUIREMENTS AS NOTED OR
SHOWN IN THE RECORDS OF THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER.
3.) ELEVATIONS ARE BASED UPON CITY OF ASPEN BENCHMARK GPS 9 (NAVD 88).
4.) NO TITLE COMMITMENT WAS PROVIDED FOR THIS SURVEY.
5.) CONTOUR INTERVAL IS ONE FOOT.
6.) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON DAGGS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION RECORDED
AT PLAT BOOK 80, PAGE 97.
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I, SCOTT R. BLACKARD, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, AND THAT THIS SURVEY IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
__________________________________
SCOTT R. BLACKARD P.L.S. 38342
email: sblackard11@gmail.com
EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY
LOT A & B DAGGS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION
COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO
TREE TABLE
Office trailer
Loading and drop off area.
Staging area
Haul off dumpster and
trash sorting area.
Lay-down and storage
re-vegetate this area
after construction.
Lay-down and storage
re-vegetate this area
after construction.
2 Portable
Toilets
Access gate with lock.
Project Access Gates
Construction Fence
Vehicle Tracking Pad
Appendix H
PARKING RESERVATIONS (3 spaces)CMP plan with staging at 337 Lake
39
Lot A
5,706 sq ft ±
0.131 Acres ±
Lot B
6,001 sq ft ±
0.138 Acres ±
MARTIN CONDO ASSOC
COMMON AREA
ASPEN CO 81611
Parcel No. 273512127800
E A ALTEMUS PARTNERSHIP LLLP
PO BOX 5000
ASPEN CO 81612
Parcel No. 273512108003North Third Street65.0' R-O-WLake Avenue75.0' R-O-WSALTER/LUBAR
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
Plat Book 88, Page 67
Unit B
MARTIN CONDOMINIUMS
Plat Book 22, Page 51
Unit A
MARTIN CONDOMINIUMS
Plat Book 22, Page 51
T1
T2
Gas
ac ac ac ac
T4
T3
T5
T7 T8
T6
T9
T10 T11 T12 T14
T15
T16
T20
T21
T22
T23
T24
T25
T26T27T28T29T30T31T32T33T34T35T36
FF=7884.88'
FF=7884.21'
FF Garage
7884.24'
Ridge El=7904.86'Ridge El=7907.69'Covered
StoneSteps
ww
ww ww
ww
Electrical Transformer
Electric
Meter
5/8" Rebar &
Red Plastic Cap
LS No. 25947
5/8" Rebar &
Red Plastic Cap
LS No. 25947
Site Benchmark
Elev.=7883.90'
5/8" Rebar &
Red Plastic Cap
LS No. 25947
5/8" Rebar
5/8" Rebar &
Yellow Plastic Cap
LS No. 9184
5/8" Rebar &
Yellow Plastic Cap
LS No. 9184
Edge of
Asphalt
Light Pole
Storm Grate
Mail Box
Stone
Stone
Stone
Stone
Stone Stone
2 Story
Frame House
Posted Address:
638 N. 3rd St.
2 Story
Frame House
w/ Basement
Address: 335 Lake Ave.
Concrete
Driveway
Top Back
Curb
Edge of Asphalt
Flow Line Curb
Electric
Box
CoveredDeckCovered
Stone
Planter
Planter
Planter Stone
Retaining
Walls
Upper Level
Deck
Upper Level
Deck
FenceAdjoining
House
Fence Storm Inlet
Rim El.=7874.2'
Storm Inlet
10.21'
11.45'
T13 T17 T19
T18
LEGEND
Found Monument
Electric Meter
Telephone Pedestal
Cable Pedestal
Electrical Transformer
Window Well
Sewer Clean-out
Storm Inlet
Light Pole
Fir Tree
Aspen Tree
Deciduous Tree
ww
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
LOT A & B
DAGGS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION RECORDED AT PLAT BOOK 80, PAGE 97.
CITY OF ASPEN
COUNTY OF PITKIN
STATE OF COLORADO
EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY
LOT A & B DAGGS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION
COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO
U.S. SURVEY FEET USED
NOTES
1.) DATE OF THE FIELD SURVEY WAS MAY 30, 2023.
2.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND/ OR REQUIREMENTS AS NOTED OR
SHOWN IN THE RECORDS OF THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER.
3.) ELEVATIONS ARE BASED UPON CITY OF ASPEN BENCHMARK GPS 9 (NAVD 88).
4.) NO TITLE COMMITMENT WAS PROVIDED FOR THIS SURVEY.
5.) CONTOUR INTERVAL IS ONE FOOT.
6.) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON DAGGS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION RECORDED
AT PLAT BOOK 80, PAGE 97.
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I, SCOTT R. BLACKARD, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, AND THAT THIS SURVEY IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
__________________________________
SCOTT R. BLACKARD P.L.S. 38342
email: sblackard11@gmail.com
EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY
LOT A & B DAGGS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION
COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO
TREE TABLE
TPZ for these areas to be adjusted
as necessary with permission by
Parks department to allow for
construction in this area.
Loading and drop off area.
Haul off dumpster and
trash sorting area.
Access gate with lock.
Project Access Gates
Construction Fence
Appendix H
PARKING
RESERVATIONS
/ Temp
Encroachment (12
spaces)
Haul off dumpster and
trash sorting area.
Lay-down and storage
Office
ToiletsTCP/One-Way Road Closed 8-5pm M-F As RequiredEmergency access will be allowed.TCP/One-Way Road Closed 8-5pm M-F As RequiredEmergency access will be allowed.Staging area
CMP plan if no staging at 337 Lake
40
Lot A
5,706 sq ft ±
0.131 Acres ±
Lot B
6,001 sq ft ±
0.138 Acres ±
MARTIN CONDO ASSOC
COMMON AREA
ASPEN CO 81611
Parcel No. 273512127800
E A ALTEMUS PARTNERSHIP LLLP
PO BOX 5000
ASPEN CO 81612
Parcel No. 273512108003North Third Street65.0' R-O-WLake Avenue75.0' R-O-WSALTER/LUBAR
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
Plat Book 88, Page 67
Unit B
MARTIN CONDOMINIUMS
Plat Book 22, Page 51
Unit A
MARTIN CONDOMINIUMS
Plat Book 22, Page 51
T1
T2
Gas
ac ac ac ac
T4
T3
T5
T7 T8
T6
T9
T10 T11 T12 T14
T15
T16
T20
T21
T22
T23
T24
T25
T26T27T28T29T30T31T32T33T34T35T36
FF=7884.88'
FF=7884.21'
FF Garage
7884.24'
Ridge El=7904.86'Ridge El=7907.69'Covered
StoneSteps
ww
ww ww
ww
Electrical Transformer
Electric
Meter
5/8" Rebar &
Red Plastic Cap
LS No. 25947
5/8" Rebar &
Red Plastic Cap
LS No. 25947
Site Benchmark
Elev.=7883.90'
5/8" Rebar &
Red Plastic Cap
LS No. 25947
5/8" Rebar
5/8" Rebar &
Yellow Plastic Cap
LS No. 9184
5/8" Rebar &
Yellow Plastic Cap
LS No. 9184
Edge of
Asphalt
Light Pole
Storm Grate
Mail Box
Stone
Stone
Stone
Stone
Stone Stone
2 Story
Frame House
Posted Address:
638 N. 3rd St.
2 Story
Frame House
w/ Basement
Address: 335 Lake Ave.
Concrete
Driveway
Top Back
Curb
Edge of Asphalt
Flow Line Curb
Electric
Box
CoveredDeckCovered
Stone
Planter
Planter
Planter Stone
Retaining
Walls
Upper Level
Deck
Upper Level
Deck
FenceAdjoining
House
Fence Storm Inlet
Rim El.=7874.2'
Storm Inlet
10.21'
11.45'
T13 T17 T19
T18
LEGEND
Found Monument
Electric Meter
Telephone Pedestal
Cable Pedestal
Electrical Transformer
Window Well
Sewer Clean-out
Storm Inlet
Light Pole
Fir Tree
Aspen Tree
Deciduous Tree
ww
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
LOT A & B
DAGGS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION RECORDED AT PLAT BOOK 80, PAGE 97.
CITY OF ASPEN
COUNTY OF PITKIN
STATE OF COLORADO
EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY
LOT A & B DAGGS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION
COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO
U.S. SURVEY FEET USED
NOTES
1.) DATE OF THE FIELD SURVEY WAS MAY 30, 2023.
2.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND/ OR REQUIREMENTS AS NOTED OR
SHOWN IN THE RECORDS OF THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER.
3.) ELEVATIONS ARE BASED UPON CITY OF ASPEN BENCHMARK GPS 9 (NAVD 88).
4.) NO TITLE COMMITMENT WAS PROVIDED FOR THIS SURVEY.
5.) CONTOUR INTERVAL IS ONE FOOT.
6.) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON DAGGS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION RECORDED
AT PLAT BOOK 80, PAGE 97.
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I, SCOTT R. BLACKARD, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, AND THAT THIS SURVEY IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
__________________________________
SCOTT R. BLACKARD P.L.S. 38342
email: sblackard11@gmail.com
EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY
LOT A & B DAGGS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION
COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO
TREE TABLE
Dumpsters
TPZ for these areas to be adjusted
as necessary with permission by
Parks department to allow for
construction in this area.Crane Access / Loading Area.Site Fence & Access
Gates
Construction Fence
Appendix H
PARKING
RESERVATIONS
/ Temp
Encroachment (12
spaces)
Haul off dumpster and
trash sorting area.
Lay-down and storage
Office
ToiletsTCP/One-Way Road Closed 8-5pm M-F As RequiredTCP/One-Way Road Closed 8-5pm M-F As RequiredEmergency access will be allowed.Crane Access / Loading Area.CMP plan if no staging at 337 Lake
Deliveries
41
Exhibit A.2
Construction Staging Variance
Sec. 26.413.030 Authorized Variances
Variances may only be granted from the following requirements of this Title 26:
(a) Dimensional requirements. Response – n/a.
(b) Permitted uses, but only to allow for the temporary off-site location or storage of materials,
structures or equipment pursuant to building construction or construction staging.
Response – HPC is asked to grant a variance for temporary construction staging for the 335 Lake
Avenue project, on the 337 Lake Avenue property. Both properties are under single ownership.
(b) In order to authorize a variance from the permitted uses of Title 26, the appropriate decision-
making body shall make a finding that all of the following circumstances exist:
(1) Notice by publication, mailing and posting of the proposed variance has been provided to
surrounding property owners in accordance with Subparagraphs 26.304.060(e)(3)a.—c.
Response – Notice will be provided prior to the public hearing in accordance with Section
26.304.060
(2) A variance is the only reasonable method by which to afford the applicant relief, and to deny a
variance would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship such that the property would be
rendered practically undevelopable, as distinguished from mere inconvenience.
Response – The requested variance to temporarily stage construction materials, the temporary
construction office, and equipment at 337 Lake avoids an unnecessary hardship as described below.
335 Lake is a historic property with approval to expand the existing basement. HPC strongly prefers
underpinning the historic resource in order to preserve historic framing and siding, and to limit
unintended consequences associated with lifting the historic home. Underpinning is not a viable
option without the use of an excavator on the 337 Lake property, which requires a variance for
temporary construction staging.
Requiring all construction staging to occur on the 335 Lake property extends the construction by
about 8 months and greatly impacts the neighborhood – for example, an extra sound barrier was
going to be added around 337 Lake to further limit construction noise.
The only other option for this project is to stage partially on property and partially in the right of
way (ROW) through a ROW permit which extends the construction timeframe; increases
construction impacts with more workers, truck trips, etc.; interrupts the neighborhood; and
adversely impacts traffic for neighbors and for visitors to the adjacent Aspen Meadows campus.
Two construction management site plans are included that compare the impacts of staging at 337
versus only using 335 and the right of way. Not allowing construction staging, storage of materials,
and other construction activities on the vacant 337 Lake property creates an unnecessary hardship
for the owner to complete the project and underpin the resource, and creates unnecessary hardship
for the entire neighborhood.
42
Exhibit A.2
Variance for Temporary Construction Staging
(2) The temporary off-site storage or construction staging can be undertaken in such a manner so
as to minimize disruption, if any, of normal neighborhood activities surrounding the subject
parcel.
Response – The offsite storage and staging at 337 Lake does not disrupt the neighborhood activities;
and in fact, it avoids construction staging in the right of way which interrupts the neighborhood and
significantly extends the construction timeframe.
(4) If ownership of the off-site parcel subject to the proposed variance is not vested in the
applicant, then verified written authorization of the parcel's owner must be provided.
Response – The “offsite” parcel at 337 Lake is owned by Aspen West AJ LLC which also owns 335
Lake Avenue.
(5) Adequate provision is made to restore the subject parcel to its original condition upon
expiration of the variance, including the posting of such financial security as deemed
appropriate and necessary by the appropriate decision-making body to ensure such
restoration.
Response – Upon substantial completion of the 335 Lake remodel project, 337 Lake will begin
construction for the HPC approved project. The variance is requested for 32 months which is the
expected duration for construction of the 335 Lake project..
43
LAND USE APPLICATION PACKET
Name: __________________________________________________________________________________
Location: ________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
(Indicate street address, lot & block number or metes and bounds description of property)
Parcel ID #: ______________________________________________________________________________
PROJECT:
Name: __________________________________________________________________________________
Address: ________________________________________________________________________________
Phone # : _______________________ E-mail: __________________________________________________
APPLICANT:
Name: __________________________________________________________________________________
Address: ________________________________________________________________________________
Phone # : _______________________ E-mail: __________________________________________________
REPRESENTATIVE:
EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.)
PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.)
City of Aspen | City Hall, 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 | (970) 920-5000
LAND USE APPLICATION FORM Exhibit B
44
City of Aspen | City Hall, 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 | (970) 920-5000
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM
LAND USE APPLICATION PACKET
Project: __________________________________________________________________________________________
Applicant: ________________________________________________________________________________________
Project Location: ___________________________________________________________________________________
Zone District: _____________________________________________________________________________________
Lot Size: _________________________________________________________________________________________
Gross Lot Area:________________________________ Net Lot Area:_________________________________________
For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high-water mark, easements, and steep
slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.
Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued:
Variations requested (identify the exact variations being requested):
45
City of Aspen | City Hall, 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 | (970) 920-5000
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM
LAND USE APPLICATION PACKET
Commercial net leaseable: Existing: _____________ Proposed: _____________
Number of Lodge Pillows: Existing: _____________ Proposed: _____________
Number of Lodge Units: Existing: _____________ Proposed: _____________
Number of residential units: Existing: _____________ Proposed: _____________
Number of Free-Market residential units: Existing: _____________ Proposed: _____________
Number of Affordable residential units: Existing: _____________ Proposed: _____________
Proposed % of demolition: ________________ %
DIMENSIONS:
Write N/A where no requirements exists in the zone district.
Floor Area: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________
Height
Principal Building: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________
Accessory Building: Existing:_____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________
On-Site Parking: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________
% Site Coverage: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________
% Open Space: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________
Front Setback: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________
Rear Setback: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________
Combined Front/Rear: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________
Indicate N, S, E, W
Side Setback: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________
Side Setback: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________
Combined Front/Rear: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________
Distance between Buildings: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________
46
LAND USE APPLICATION PACKET
TYPE OF APPLICATION
ESA Review (Stream Margin, 8040 Greenline, View
Plane, or Hallam Lake Bluff)
Non Conformities
Pre-Development Topography
Temporary Use
Accessory Dwelling Unit/Carriage House
Dimensional Variance
Growth Management Review
Outdoor Vending
Planned Development Review
Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit
Establishment of Zoning or Rezoning
Subdivision Review Condominiumization
Approval Documents
Special Review
Wireless Facilities
Residential Design Standard Review
Conditional Use Review
Historic Designation
Certificate of Appropriateness
Minor Historic Development
Major Historic Development (select one below)
Conceptual Development
Final Development
Relocation (temporary, on or off-site)
Demolition (total demolition)
Substantial Historic Preservation Amendment
Historic Landmark Lot Split
Establishment of Transferable Development Rights
(TDRs)
Other
City of Aspen | City Hall, 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 | (970) 920-5000
HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEWS
47
PRE-APPLICATION SUMMARY
DATE: June 30, 2023
PLANNER: Kirsten Armstrong - Principal Planner, Historic Preservation, kirsten.armstrong@aspen.gov
REPRESENTATIVE: Sara Adams, AICP, sara@bendonadams.com
PROJECT LOCATION: 337 Lake Avenue; Lot B, Daggs Historic Landmark Lot Split
PARCEL ID: 2735-121-35-002
REQUEST: Historic Preservation – Major Development Review
DESCRIPTION: In 2005, a historic landmark lot split regarding the current subject property was approved by
the Historic Preservation Commission (Resolution #45, series of 2005) and City Council (Ordinance #47,
series of 2005). The Historic Lot Split Subdivision Exemption Plat and the Subdivision Exemption Agreement
for the Daggs Historic Landmark Lot Split were recorded in 2006, Book 80, Page 97 and Reception #427631,
respectively. The Daggs Historic Landmark Lot Split Subdivision Exemption created Lots A and B out of the
original parcel for 640 N. Third Street, consisting of Lots 4, 5, and 6 (Less the southerly 3.2’ of Lot 6) Block
102, Hallam’s Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen. Lot A is a 5707 sq. ft. lot containing an
AspenVictorian landmark. Lot B, to the north of Lot A, is a vacant 6,000 sq. ft. lot, and is the subject of this
request. Both are located in the R-6 zone district. Both parcels are designated historic and are subject to
development review by the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission.
The owner would like to develop Lot B with new construction. Pursuant to Ordinance #47, Series of 2005,
both lots created as part of the Daggs Historic Landmark Lot Split must conform to the requirements of their
underlying zone district. The Ordinance and associated plat states that Lot B has an allowed floor area of
1,700 sq. ft. Variations provided for in Section 26.415.110.C.1.a-c are not applicable to Lot B, as it does not
contain the historic structure. The maximum potential buildout for the two parcels created by the lot split is not
to exceed three units, which may be composed of a duplex and a single-family home. The Ordinance also
states that any lot for which development is proposed shall be subject to affordable housing mitigation, which
in the 2023 City of Aspen Municipal Land Use Code includes Growth Management Residential Development
review per Section 26.470.090.A.
The scope of work qualifies as Major Development, which is a two-step process, requiring the approval of
Conceptual Design and a Final Design. Conceptual Design review will consider mass, scale and site plan..
Following Conceptual, staff will inform City Council of the HPC decision, allowing them the opportunity to
uphold or to “Call Up” aspects of the design approval for further discussion. This is a standard practice for all
significant HPC projects. Following the Notice of Call Up, HPC will conduct Final Design review to consider
landscape, lighting and materials.
The Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and the Land Use Code Sections that are applicable to this
project will be used to evaluate the proposal. This property is subject to Residential Design Standard Review
(RDS).
RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS:
Section Number Section Title
26.304 Common Development Review Procedures
26.410 Residential Design Standards (RDS)
26.415.070.D Historic Preservation – Major Development
26.470.090.A Growth Management, Administrative Applications
26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements
26.710.090 Medium-Density Residential (R-6)
Exhibit C
48
For your convenience – links to the Land Use Application and Land Use Code are below:
Application Packet Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Municipal Code
REVIEW BY:
• Staff for completeness and recommendations
• HPC for decisions. City Council for Notice of Call Up.
PUBLIC HEARING:
• Yes, at Conceptual and Final
PLANNING FEES: $1,950 for 6 billable hours of staff time. (Additional/ lesser hours will be billed/
refunded at a rate of $325 per hour.) This fee will be due at Conceptual and
Final submittal.
REFERRAL FEES: $0. Staff will seek referral comments from the Building Department, Zoning,
Engineering and Parks regarding any relevant code requirements or
considerations. There will be no Development Review Committee meeting
or referral fees.
TOTAL DEPOSIT: $1,950 at Conceptual and Final (additional/lesser planning hours are
billed/refunded at a rate of $325/hour).
APPLICATION CHECKLIST:
Below is a list of submittal requirements. Please email the entire application as one .pdf to
kirsten.armstrong@aspen.gov. The fee will be requested after the application is determined to be
complete.
Completed Land Use Application and signed Fee Agreement.
Pre-application Conference Summary (this document).
Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur,
consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an
ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing
the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts
and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the
Development Application.
Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states
the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the
applicant.
HOA Compliance form.
List of adjacent property owners within 300’ for public hearing.
An 8 1/2” by 11” vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen.
Site improvement survey, no more than a year old, showing all existing conditions including
topography and vegetation, certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of
Colorado.
49
APPLICATION CHECKLIST CONTINUED:
A written description of the proposal (scope of work) and written explanation of how the proposed
work complies with the relevant Historic Preservation Guidelines and any other relevant land use
code at Conceptual and Final.
An existing and proposed site plan showing property boundaries, setbacks and parking.
Scaled floor plans and elevations of the proposed structure(s) clearly depicting form, height,
mass/scale and roof plan. If possible, a project model is appreciated, to assist the HPC in their
analysis.
An accurate representation of all building materials and finishes to be used in the development.
Please include relevant cut-sheets for all materials for review.
Supplemental materials to provide a visual description of the context surrounding the designated
historic property including photographs and other exhibits, as needed, to accurately depict
location and extent of proposed work.
For Conceptual, the following will need to be submitted in addition to the items listed above:
A preliminary stormwater design.
For Final Review, the following items will need to be submitted in addition to the items listed above:
Drawings of the street facing facades must be provided at ¼” scale.
Final selection of all exterior materials, and samples or clearly illustrated photographs. Samples
are preferred for the presentation to HPC.
A lighting plan and landscape plan, including any visible stormwater mitigation features.
Disclaimer:
The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based
on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or
may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right.
50
Exhibit D
51
Customer Distribution
Prevent fraud - Please call a member of our closing team for wire transfer
instructions or to initiate a wire transfer. Note that our wiring instructions will
never change.
Order Number: Q62017442 Date: 08/13/2024
Property Address: 337 LAKE AVENUE, ASPEN, CO 81611
For Closing Assistance For Title Assistance
Land Title Roaring Fork Valley
Title Team
533 E HOPKINS #102
ASPEN, CO 81611
(970) 927-0405 (Work)
(970) 925-0610 (Work Fax)
valleyresponse@ltgc.com
Seller/Owner
ASPEN WEST AJ LLC
Delivered via: No Commitment Delivery
BENDONADAMS LLC
Attention: ERIN WACKERLE
300 S SPRING STREET SUITE 202
Aspen, CO 81611
(406) 531-0806 (Cell)
(970) 925-2855 (Work)
erin@bendonadams.com
Delivered via: Electronic Mail
Exhibit E.1
52
Estimate of Title Fees
Order Number: Q62017442 Date: 08/13/2024
Property Address: 337 LAKE AVENUE, ASPEN, CO 81611
Seller(s): ASPEN WEST AJ, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Buyer(s):
Thank you for putting your trust in Land Title. Below is the estimate of title fees for the
transaction. The final fees will be collected at closing. Visit ltgc.com to learn more about
Land Title.
Estimate of Title Insurance Fees
"TBD" Commitment $279.00
TOTAL $279.00
Note: The documents linked in this commitment should be reviewed carefully. These
documents, such as covenants conditions and restrictions, may affect the title, ownership and
use of the property. You may wish to engage legal assistance in order to fully understand and
be aware of the implications of the documents on your property.
Chain of Title Documents:
Pitkin county recorded 10/19/2022 under reception no. 690992
Plat Map(s):
Pitkin county recorded 08/18/2006 at book 80 page 97
53
Copyright 2006-2024 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing
as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the
American Land Title Association.
Property Address:
337 LAKE AVENUE, ASPEN, CO 81611
1.Effective Date:
07/26/2024 at 5:00 P.M.
2.Policy to be Issued and Proposed Insured:
"TBD" Commitment
Proposed Insured:
$0.00
3.The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is:
FEE SIMPLE
4.Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in:
ASPEN WEST AJ, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
5.The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
LOT B, DAGGS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF RECORDED AUGUST 18, 2006 IN PLAT BOOK 80 AT PAGE 97 AS RECEPTION NO. 527634.
COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO.
ALTA COMMITMENT
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
Schedule A
Order Number:Q62017442
54
ALTA COMMITMENT
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
Schedule B, Part I
(Requirements)
Order Number: Q62017442
All of the following Requirements must be met:
This proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this
Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company may
then make additional Requirements or Exceptions.
Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured.
Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company.
Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or both,
must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records.
THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY, AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT HERETO.
55
This commitment does not republish any covenants, condition, restriction, or limitation contained in any
document referred to in this commitment to the extent that the specific covenant, conditions, restriction,
or limitation violates state or federal law based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender
identity, handicap, familial status, or national origin.
1.Any facts, rights, interests, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records but that could be
ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land.
2.Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records.
3.Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that
would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public
Records.
4.Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by
law and not shown by the Public Records.
5.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the
public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date of the proposed
insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this
Commitment.
6.(a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that
levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public
agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown
by the records of such agency or by the Public Records.
7.(a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the
issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water.
8.RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM
SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN
UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JUNE 07, 1888, IN BOOK 55 AT PAGE 2.
9.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE# 18, SERIES OF 2001 RECORDED AUGUST 16,
2001 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 457607.
10.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION# 20, SERIES OF 2001 RECORDED AUGUST
16, 2001 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 457608.
11.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION
COMMISSION RECORDED JANUARY 17, 2003 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 477482.
12.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT DEED RESTRICTION
RECORDED OCTOBER 21, 2005 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 516549.
13.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION# 40, SERIES OF 2005 RECORDED OCTOBER
27, 2005 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 516762.
14.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT
RECORDED NOVEMBER 21, 2005 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 517646.
15.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION AGREEMENT RECORDED
AUGUST 18, 2006 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 527631.
16.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE# 47, SERIES OF 2005 RECORDED AUGUST 18,
2006 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 527632.
ALTA COMMITMENT
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
Schedule B, Part II
(Exceptions)
Order Number: Q62017442
56
17.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE RECORDED
MARCH 15, 2007 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 535454.
18.EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND ALL OTHER MATTERS AS SHOWN ON PLAT OF SUBJECT
PROPERTY RECORDED AUGUST 18, 2006 IN PLAT BOOK 80 AT PAGE 97.
19.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN REVOCABLE
ENCROACHMENT LICENSE RECORDED JUNE 28, 2012 AS RECEPTION NO. 590247 AND AGREEMENT
TO SHARE REVOCABLE ENCROACHMENT LICENSE RECORDED JULY 31, 2015 AS RECEPTION NO.
622009.
20.CLAIMS OF RIGHT, TITLE AND/OR INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY BETWEEN THE BOUNDARY LINES AND
THE FENCES AS DEPICTED ON THE SURVEY PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY, DATED SEPTEMBER 21,
2022, JOB NO. 210578 WHETHER SAID CLAIMS ARISE BY ABANDONMENT, ADVERSE POSSESSION OR
OTHER MEANS.
SAID DOCUMENT STORE AS OUR ESI 40895826
ALTA COMMITMENT
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
Schedule B, Part II
(Exceptions)
Order Number: Q62017442
57
Land Title Guarantee Company
Disclosure Statements
Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that:
Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the
clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least
one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform, except that,
the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or
filing information at the top margin of the document.
Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2 requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters
which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for
recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title
Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents
from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued.
Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of
Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following
conditions:
No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or
agreed to pay.
Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given:
The Subject real property may be located in a special taxing district.(A)
A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction will be obtained from the county treasurer of the county in
which the real property is located or that county treasurer's authorized agent unless the proposed insured provides
written instructions to the contrary. (for an Owner's Policy of Title Insurance pertaining to a sale of residential real
property).
(B)
The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of
County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor.
(C)
The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a
condominium or townhouse unit.
(A)
No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of construction on the land
described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months.
(B)
The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic's and
material-men's liens.
(C)
The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium.(D)
If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within
six months prior to the Date of Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include:
disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor;
payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any
additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company.
(E)
58
This notice applies to owner's policy commitments disclosing that a mineral estate has been severed from the surface
estate, in Schedule B-2.
Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or
information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may
include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance, and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance
company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for
the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award
payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado Division of Insurance within the Department of
Regulatory Agencies.
Note: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-3, notice is hereby given of the availability of a closing
protection letter for the lender, purchaser, lessee or seller in connection with this transaction.
Note: Pursuant to CRS 24-21-514.5, Colorado notaries may remotely notarize real estate deeds and other documents
using real-time audio-video communication technology. You may choose not to use remote notarization for any
document.
That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the
surface estate and that there is substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other
minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and
(A)
That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's
permission.
(B)
59
Joint Notice of Privacy Policy of
Land Title Guarantee Company
Land Title Insurance Corporation and
Old Republic National Title Insurancy Company
This Statement is provided to you as a customer of Land Title Guarantee Company as agent for Land Title Insurance
Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company.
We want you to know that we recognize and respect your privacy expectations and the requirements of federal and state
privacy laws. Information security is one of our highest priorities. We recognize that maintaining your trust and confidence
is the bedrock of our business. We maintain and regularly review internal and external safeguards against unauthorized
access to your non-public personal information ("Personal Information").
In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from:
applications or other forms we receive from you, including communications sent through TMX, our web-based
transaction management system;
your transactions with, or from the services being performed by us, our affiliates, or others;
a consumer reporting agency, if such information is provided to us in connection with your transaction;
and
The public records maintained by governmental entities that we obtain either directly from those entities, or from
our affiliates and non-affiliates.
Our policies regarding the protection of the confidentiality and security of your Personal Information are as follows:
We restrict access to all Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information in
order to provide products and services to you.
We may share your Personal Information with affiliated contractors or service providers who provide services in the
course of our business, but only to the extent necessary for these providers to perform their services and to
provide these services to you as may be required by your transaction.
We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to protect your
Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion.
Employees who violate our strict policies and procedures regarding privacy are subject to disciplinary action.
We regularly assess security standards and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to Personal
Information.
WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT
IS NOT STATED ABOVE OR PERMITTED BY LAW.
Consistent with applicable privacy laws, there are some situations in which Personal Information may be disclosed. We
may disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission; when we are required by law to do so, for
example, if we are served a subpoena; or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your
Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is
needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you.
Our policy regarding dispute resolution is as follows: Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to our privacy
policy, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration
60
Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction
thereof.
61
Commitment For Title Insurance
Issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
NOTICE
IMPORTANT—READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE INSURANCE
POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS
COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT.
THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION
OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF
THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION, ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF
THE COMPANY, AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSED INSURED.
THE COMPANY’S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT. THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE
CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY OTHER PERSON. .
COMMITMENT TO ISSUE POLICY
Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and the Commitment Conditions, Old Republic National Title Insurance
Company, a Minnesota corporation (the “Company”), commits to issue the Policy according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is
effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A for each Policy described in Schedule A, only when the Company has entered in Schedule A both the
specified dollar amount as the Proposed Policy Amount and the name of the Proposed Insured. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met
within 6 months after the Commitment Date, this Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end.
COMMITMENT CONDITIONS
1. DEFINITIONS
2. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment to Issue Policy, Commitment terminates
and the Company’s liability and obligation end.
3. The Company’s liability and obligation is limited by and this Commitment is not valid without:
4. COMPANY’S RIGHT TO AMEND
The Company may amend this Commitment at any time. If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or
other matter recorded in the Public Records prior to the Commitment Date, any liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5. The
Company shall not be liable for any other amendment to this Commitment.
5. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY
i. comply with the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements;
ii. eliminate, with the Company’s written consent, any Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; or
iii. acquire the Title or create the Mortgage covered by this Commitment.
6. LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT
“Knowledge” or “Known”: Actual or imputed knowledge, but not constructive notice imparted by the Public Records.(a)
“Land”: The land described in Schedule A and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term “Land” does not include any
property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues,
alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is to be insured by the Policy.
(b)
“Mortgage”: A mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law.(c)
“Policy”: Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to be issued by the Company
pursuant to this Commitment.
(d)
“Proposed Insured”: Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment.(e)
“Proposed Policy Amount”: Each dollar amount specified in Schedule A as the Proposed Policy Amount of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this
Commitment.
(f)
“Public Records”: Records established under state statutes at the Commitment Date for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters
relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge.
(g)
“Title”: The estate or interest described in Schedule A.(h)
the Notice;(a)
the Commitment to Issue Policy;(b)
the Commitment Conditions;(c)
Schedule A;(d)
Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and(e)
Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and(f)
a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.(g)
The Company’s liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in the interval between the
Company’s delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Commitment and the delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from the Proposed
Insured’s good faith reliance to:
(a)
The Company shall not be liable under Commitment Condition 5(a) if the Proposed Insured requested the amendment or had Knowledge of the
matter and did not notify the Company about it in writing.
(b)
The Company will only have liability under Commitment Condition 4 if the Proposed Insured would not have incurred the expense had the
Commitment included the added matter when the Commitment was first delivered to the Proposed Insured.
(c)
The Company’s liability shall not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in good faith and described in Commitment
Conditions 5(a)(i) through 5(a)(iii) or the Proposed Policy Amount.
(d)
The Company shall not be liable for the content of the Transaction Identification Data, if any.(e)
In no event shall the Company be obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Commitment unless all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements
have been met to the satisfaction of the Company.
(f)
In any event, the Company’s liability is limited by the terms and provisions of the Policy.(g)
Only a Proposed Insured identified in Schedule A, and no other person, may make a claim under this Commitment.(a)
Any claim must be based in contract and must be restricted solely to the terms and provisions of this Commitment.(b)
Until the Policy is issued, this Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject
matter of this Commitment and supersedes all prior commitment negotiations, representations, and proposals of any kind, whether written or oral,
express or implied, relating to the subject matter of this Commitment.
(c)
62
7. IF THIS COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT
The issuing agent is the Company’s agent only for the limited purpose of issuing title insurance commitments and policies. The issuing agent is not the
Company’s agent for the purpose of providing closing or settlement services.
8. PRO-FORMA POLICY
The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro-forma policy illustrating the coverage that the Company may provide. A pro-forma
policy neither reflects the status of Title at the time that the pro-forma policy is delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is it a commitment to insure.
9. ARBITRATION
The Policy contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Proposed Policy Amount is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of
either the Company or the Proposed Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. A Proposed Insured may review a copy of the arbitration rules at
http://www.alta.org/arbitration.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Land Title Insurance Corporation has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown
in Schedule A to be valid when countersigned by a validating officer or other authorized signatory.
Issued by:
Land Title Guarantee Company
3033 East First Avenue Suite 600
Denver, Colorado 80206
303-321-1880
Craig B. Rants, Senior Vice President
This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not
valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II
—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.
Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are
prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
The deletion or modification of any Schedule B, Part II—Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation to provide coverage beyond the
terms and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy.
(d)
Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing and authenticated by a person authorized by the Company.(e)
When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment will end and the Company’s only liability will be under the Policy.(f)
63
Exhibit E.2
64
65
Exhibit F
66
abbywinkelried@gmail.com 973-943-7020
Exhibit G
67
415 411
406
420
411415
329
335401
337
600
701
340
320
620
315
330
350
312
311
314
710707
300
330
400
360
0 0.01 0.030.01
mi
FLegend
Aspen Address
Parcels
Source: City of Aspen GIS
Vicinity Map Exhibit H68
Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius
Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web
site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to
ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic
system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. The
information maintained by the County may not be complete as to
mineral estate ownership and that information should be
determined by separate legal and property analysis.
Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning
the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this
site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and
reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the
user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and
liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or
data obtained on this web site.
This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be
printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to
page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the
margins such that they no longer line up on the labels
sheet. Print actual size.
From Parcel: 273512135002 on 05/29/2025
Instructions:
Disclaimer:
http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com
Exhibit I
69
315 LAKE LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
315 LAKE AVE
320 LAKE LLC
NEW YORK, NY 10028
151 E 85TH ST #C
330 GILLESPIE TRUST
SAN ANTONIO, TX 78231
4114 POND HILL RD #201
400 & 410 LAKE AVE LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
101 S MILL #200
420 WEST NORTH LLC
SEATTLE, WA 98103
3518 FREMONT AVE N #508
707 NORTH THIRD STREET LLC
CUMBERLAND, RI 02864
200 SCENIC VIEW DR
AR GILLESPIE VENTURES LLC
GOLDEN, CO 80403
5713 SECREST CR
ASPEN CTR FOR ENVIRON STUDIES
ASPEN, CO 81611
100 PUPPY SMITH ST
ASPEN RESIDENCE SBLMSL LLC
MILWAUKEE, WI 53202
833 E MICHIGAN ST #1500
ASPEN WEST AJ LLC
GARDEN CITY, NY 11530
PO BOX 7138
BART ASPEN LLC
NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130-6036
601 POYDRAS ST FL 24
BERGER BARBARA QPRT #1
ASPEN, CO 81611
600 E HOPKINS AVE #202
BERGER BRUCE C QPRT #1
ASPEN, CO 81611
600 E HOPKINS AVE #202
BERGER ILYSE D 1998 TRUST
ASPEN, CO 81611
600 E HOPKINS AVE # 202
BERGER SETH P
ASPEN, CO 81611
600 E HOPKINS AVE # 202
BRAND NEW DAY LLC
NASHVILLE, TN 37205
1203 CANTERBURY DR
CAD ASPEN LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
710 N 3RD ST
D STREET PARTNERS LLC
MIDLAND, TX 79702
PO BOX 10703
DURAND LOYAL & BERNICE ASPEN REV TRUST
ASPEN, CO 816111256
415 PEARL CT
E A ALTEMUS PARTNERSHIP LLLP
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 5000
EFH HOLDINGS LP
LOS ANGELES, CA 90049
801 BRAMBLE WY
ELEVATE DEVELOPMENT & DESIGN #002 LLC
SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615
PO BOX 5223
GILLESPIE LLC
NORTHBROOK , IL 60062
401 HUEHL RD # 1A
HUNT WILLIAM O JR MARITAL INCOME TRUST
LOS ANGELES, CA 90049
801 BRAMBLE WY
KDR TRUST
CARBONDALE, CO 816238812
5329 COUNTY RD #100
LAKE AVENUE PARTNERS LLC
SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092
690 S PEYTONVILLE AVE
MARTIN CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81611
COMMON AREA
MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC
ASPEN, CO 81611
225 MUSIC SCHOOL RD
NORTH THIRD STREET LLC
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596
500 YGNACIO VALLEY RD #360
OAK LODGE LLC
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 7951
70
PEACHES TRUST
SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101
200 E CARRILLO ST #300
PEARL COURT LLC
CORAL GABLES, FL 33156
5299 HAMMOCK DR
PETERSON JAMES D & HENSLEY R
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 1714
PINES DAVID & ARONELLE S REV TRUST
URBANA, IL 618014964
403 W MICHIGAN AVE
WOOD DUCK LLC
ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112
9033 E EASTER PL #112
71
Exhibit J.1
72
73
74
75
76
Exhibit J.2
77
78
79
80
81
Exhibit J.3
82
Exhibit J.4
83
84
Residential Design Standards
Administrative Compliance Review Applicant Checklist
Standard Complies Alternative
Compliance N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes
B.1.Articulation of Building Mass
(Non-flexible)
B.2.Building Orientation
(Flexible)
B.3.Build-to Requirement
(Flexible)
B.4.One Story Element
(Flexible)
C.1.Garage Access
(Non-flexible)
C.2.Garage Placement
(Non-flexible)
C.3.Garage Dimensions
(Flexible)
Instructions: Please fill out the checklist below, marking whether the proposed design complies with the applicable standard as written or is requesting Alternative Compliance (only
permitted for Flexible standards). Also include the sheet #(s) demonstrating the applicable standard. If a standard does not apply, please mark N/A and include in the Notes section why
it does not apply. If Alternative Compliance is requested for a Flexible standard, include in the Notes section how the proposed design meets the intent of the standard(s). Additional
sheets/graphics may be attached.
Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the
applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review.
Address:
Parcel ID:
Zone District/PD:
Representative:
Email:
Phone:
Page 1 of 2
Exhibit K
85
Standard Complies Alternative
Compliance N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes
C.4.Garage Door Design
(Flexible)
D.1.Entry Connection
(Non-flexible)
D.2.Door Height
(Flexible)
D.3.Entry Porch
(Flexible)
E.1.Principle Window
(Flexible)
E.2.Window Placement
(Flexible)
E.3.Nonorthogonal Window Limit
(Flexible)
E.4.Lightwell/Stairwell Location
(Flexible)
E.5.Materials
(Flexible)
Residential Design Standards
Administrative Compliance Review Applicant Checklist
Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the
applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review.
Page 2 of 2 86
WEST END GARDEN HOUSE
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FINAL
REVIEW SET
337 Lake Avenue
Aspen, CO 81611
05/12/2025
DRAWING INDEX - HPC
GENERAL
G0.00GENERAL NOTES AND PROJECT INFORMATION
G0.01NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT
G0.02EXTERIOR MATERIALS
G0.03SUBGRADE CALCULATIONS
G0.04FLOOR AREA CALCAULATIONS AND BUILDING HEIGHT
DIAGRAM
SURVEY
.SURVEY
CIVIL
C1COVER SHEET
C2SITE LAYOUT
C3UTILITIES PLAN
C4CONCEPTUAL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
LANDSCAPE
LX.01TREE PROTECTION AND REMOVAL PLAN
LX.02MATERIALS PLAN
LX.03LANDSCAPE PLAN
LX.04MATERIAL PALETTE
LX.05SITE DETAILS
LX.06PLANTING PALETTE
LX.07PLANTING PALETTE
DRAWING INDEX - HPC
ARCHITECTURE
A1.00 SITE PLAN
A1.01 LOT A AND B ADJACENCY PLAN AND ELEVATION
A2.01 BASEMENT & MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLANS
A2.02 ROOF PLAN
A3.01 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A8.00 EXTERIOR DETAILS
LIGTHING
EL0.01 LIGHTING CUTSHEETS
EL0.02 LIGHTING CUTSHEETS
EL0.03 LIGHTING CUTSHEETS
EL0.04 LIGHTING CUTSHEETS
EL0.05 LIGHTING CUTSHEETS
EL0.06 LIGHTING CUTSHEETS
EL1.00 SITE LIGHTING PLAN
87
1. GRID LINE REFERENCE
GENERAL SYMBOLS LEGEND
ELEVATION
NAME
---
AX.XX
X
AX.XX
X
2. LEVEL / DATUM REFERENCE
3. EXTERIOR ELEVATION REFERENCE
5. BUILDING SECTION REFERENCE
4. INTERIOR ELEVATION REFERENCE
7. DETAIL SECTION REFERENCE
8. CALLOUT/DETAIL REFERENCE
9. REVISION REFERENCE
10. ROOM REFERENCE
AXXX
X
AX.00
Drawing Number
Sheet Number
Drawing Number
Sheet Number
---
AX.XX
X6. WALL SECTION REFERENCE
Drawing Number
Sheet Number
#
#
#
#
Drawing Number
Sheet Number
Drawing Number
Sheet Number
Drawing Number
Sheet Number
#
D001
W#
11. ASSEMBLY REFERENCE
12. WINDOW REFERENCE
13. DOOR REFERENCE
14. NORTH ARROW
AX.XX
X
#
100
ROOM NAME
X#
MATERIALS LEGEND
WOOD BLOCKING
(SHIM)
WOOD FRAMING
(CONTINUOUS)
FINISHED WOODPLYWOOD
BATT INSULATIONRIGID INSULATION
GRAVELEARTH
ALUMINUMSTEEL
MASONRY (CMU)BRICK
MINERAL WOOL
INSULATIONFOAM INSULATION
LOCATION MAP
NOT TO SCALE
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
SITE
SITE project:stamp/seal:
sheet:
title:
checked by:
drawn by:
project manager:
principal architect:
revisions:
job no.:WEST END GARDEN HOUSE337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO 81611337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO 81611GENERAL NOTES AND
PROJECT INFORMATION
G0.00
23002
EW, EH
TK
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
05/12/2025
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
FINAL REVIEW SET
KT, MK
ABBREVIATIONS
@AT
ØDIAMETER
#POUND OR NUMBER
(E)EXISTING
(N)NEW
ABANCHOR BOLT
ABVABOVE
ACCACCESS
ACOUSACOUSTICAL
ACPASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING
ACTACOUSTIAL CEILING TILE
ACS PNLACCESS PANEL
ADAREA DRAIN
ADAAMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES
ADJADJUSTABLE
AFFABOVE FINISHED FLOOR
AGGRAGGREGATE
AIBAIR INFILTRATION BARRIER
ALTALTERNATE
ALUMALUMINIUM
APPROXAPPROXIMATE
ARCHARCHITECTURAL
APSHASPHALT
AUTOAUTOMATIC
BDBOARD
BITUMBITUMINOUS
BLDGBUILDING
BLKGBLOCKING
BMBEAM
BOBOTTOM OF
BOTBOTTOM
BRGBEARING
BSMTBASEMENT
BURBUILT UP ROOFING
CABCABINET
CBCATCH BASIN
CEMCEMENT
CERCERAMIC
CIPCAST-IN-PLACE
CJCONTROL JOINT
CLGCEILING
CLKCAULKING
CLOCLOSET
CLRCLEAR
CMUCONCRETE MASONRY UNIT
CNTRCOUNTER
COLCOLUMN
CONCCONCRETE
CONNCONNECTION
CONSTRCONSTRUCTION
CONTCONTINUOUS
CONTRCONTRACTOR
CORRCORRIDOR
CPTCARPET; CARPETED
CRSCOLD ROLLED STEEL
CSKCOUNTERSUNK
CTRCENTER
CU FTCUBIC FEET
CTCERAMIC TILE
DBLDOUBLE
DEMODEMOLITION
DETDETAIL
DIADIAMETER
DIMDIMENSION
DLDEAD LOAD
DNDOWN
DRDOOR
DR OPNGDOOR OPENING
DSDOWNSPOUT
DSPDRY STANDPIPE
DTDRAIN TILE
DWDISHWASHER
DWGDRAWING
EEAST
EAEACH
EJEXPANSION JOINT
ELELEVATION
ELECELECTRICAL
ELEVELEVATOR
ENCLENCLOSURE
EQEQUAL
EQUIPEQUIPMENT
ESTESTIMATE
EFEXHAUST FAN
EXISTEXISTING
EXPEXPANDED; EXPANSION
EXP BTEXPANSION BOLT
EXPOEXPOSED
EXTEXTERIOR
EWEACH WAY
FAFIRE ALARM
FBFLAT BAR
FDFLOOR DRAIN
FEFIRE EXTINGUISHER
FECFIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET
FF ELFINISH FLOOR ELEVATION
FHFIRE HYDRANT
FHCFIRE HOSE CABINET
FIN FLRFINISH FLOOR
FFFINISH TO FINISH
FINFINISH
FLASHFLASHING
FLRFLOOR; FLOORING
FLUORFLUORESCENT
FOCFACE OF CONCRETE
FOFFACE OF FINISH
FOICFURNISHED BY OWNER-INSTALLED BY
CONTRACTOR
FOMFACE OF MASONRY
FOSFACE OF STUDS
FPFIREPROOF
FPLFIREPLACE
FRFRAME
FTFOOT OR FEET
FTGFOOTING
FURRFURRING
FUTFUTURE
FWFULL WIDTH
PROJECT DIRECTORY
CLIENT:
ARCHITECT:
GEOTECH:
K+A/ KUMAR & ASSOCIATES
5020 COUNTY ROAD 154
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601
T: 970.384.4844
CONTACT: STEVEN L. PAWLAK, P.E.
SPAWLAK@KUMARUSA.COM
CONTRACTOR:
HANSEN CONSTRUCTION INC.
310 AABC
ASPEN, CO 81611
T: 970.920.1558 EXT. 108
CONTACT: TIM O'CONNELL
TOCONNELL@HANSENCONST.COM
PLANNING CONSULTANT:
CIVIL:
ROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 CO-133
CARBONDALE, CO 81623
T: 970.340.4130
CONTACT: ANTHONY ALFINI
ANTHONYA@RFENG.BIZ
LANDSCAPE:
DESIGN WORKSHOP
22860 TWO RIVERS ROAD, SUITE 102
BASALT, CO 81621
T: 970.925.8354
CONTACT: MIKE ALBERT
MALBERT@DESIGNWORKSHOP.COM
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:
KL&A ENGINEERS & BUILDERS
1717 WASHINGTON AVE
GOLDEN, CO 80401
T: 303.384.9910
PRINCIPAL: DAN DOHERTY
CONTACT: MEGAN SKODACK
MSKODACK@KLAA.COM
MEP:
BG BUILDINGWORKS
222 CHAPEL PLACE, SUITE AC-201
AVON, CO 81620
P.O. BOX 9650
AVON, CO 81620
T: 970.949.6108
CONTACT:PETER B. MORABITO
PBMORABITO@BGBUILDINGWORKS.COM
LIGHTING:
NITEO
1932 1ST AVE, SUITE 605
SEATTLE, WA 98101
T: 206.456.4554 EXT. 104
CONTACT: ERIK CROWELL
ERIK@NITEOLIGHTING.COM
ENVELOPE CONSULTANT:
WISS, JANNEY, ELSTNER ASSOCIATES, INC.
3609 S WADSWORTH, SUITE 400
LAKEWOOD, CO 80235
T: 303.914.4300
CONTACT: SCOTT R. SONDRUP
SSONDRUP@WJE.COM
INTERIOR:
VICTORIA HAGAN
5 COLUMBUS CIRCLE
19TH FLOOR
NEW YOR, NY 10019
T: 212.888.1178
CONTACT: VICTORIA HAGAN
VHAGAN@VICTORIAHAGAN.COM
BENDONADAMS
335 LAKE AVE
ASPEN, CO 81611
SURVEY:
THE SEXTON SURVEY COMPANY
P.O BOX 912
SILT, CO 81652
T: 970.456.3081
CONTACT: SCOTT R. BLACKARD
SBLACKARD11@GMAIL.COM
OLSON KUNDIG
159 SOUTH JACKSON STREET, SUITE 600
SEATTLE, WA 98104
T: 206.624.5670
F: 206.624.3730
PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT: TOM KUNDIG
CONTACT: ERICA WILLIAMS
ERICA@OLSONKUNDIG.COM
EKRAM HASSEN
EKRAMH@OLSONKUNDIG.COM
BENDONADAMS
300 S SPRING ST #202
ASPEN, CO 81611
T: 970.925.2855
CONTACT: SARA ADAMS
SARA@BENDONADAMS.COM
GENERAL NOTES
1.CODES: ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM APPLICABLE LAND USE AND BUILDING CODES AS
AMENDED BY AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION.
2.DO NOT SCALE DIMENSIONS FROM DRAWINGS. USE CALCULATED DIMENSIONS ONLY.
NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IF ANY CONFLICTS EXIST.
3.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO INITIATING THE WORK. NOTIFY
THE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES.
4.VERIFY ALL ROUGH-IN DIMENSIONS FOR EQUIPMENT. PROVIDE ALL BUCK-OUT,
BLOCKING, BACKING, AND JACKS REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATIONS.
5.DIMENSIONS ARE TO EXTERIOR FACE OF CONCRETE / WOOD FRAMING UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
6.EXTERIOR WALL FRAMING 2x6 WOOD STUDS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
7.INTERIOR WALL FRAMING 2x6 WOOD STUDS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
BUILDING CODE / ZONING SUMMARY
PROJECT ADDRESS:337 LAKE AVENUE
ASPEN, CO 81611
ASSESOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:273512135002
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:SUBDIVISION: DAGGS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT
LOT: B
APPLICABLE CODES:TITLE 8 AMENDMENTS TO ALL CODES EXCEPT
ENERGY
2021 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE ADAPTED
APPENDICES C, E, P
2021 ASPEN ENERGY CODE
2021 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE
2021 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE
2021 INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE
2021 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE
2021 INTERNATIONAL SOLAR ENERGY PROVISIONS
2023 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE
AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION:CITY OF ASPEN
PHYSICAL ADDRESS:ASPEN CITY HALL
427 RIO GRANDE PLACE
ASPEN, CO 81611
PHONE:970.920.5000
LOT SIZE:6,001 SQFT
LAND USE DESIGNATION:R-6 ZONE DISTRICT
DENSITY:MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW ONE STORY, SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE.
HEIGHT:ALLOWED: 25 FT
PROPOSED: 14 FT 3 IN
YARD SETBACKS:FRONT: 10 FT
SIDE: 5 FT
REAR: 10 FT
ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE:COMPLIANCE PER 2021 ASPEN RESIDENTIAL ENERGY
CODE PRESCRIPTIVE REQUIREMENTS TABLE
402.1.3 -INSULATION MINIMUM R-VALUE AND
FENESTRATION REQUIRMENTS BY COMPONENT FOR
CLIMATE ZONE 7.
ci = continuous insulation.
a. R-values are minimums. U-factors and SHGC are
maximums. Where insulation is installed in a cavity that is
less than the label or design thickness of the insulation, the
installed R-value of the insulation shall be not less than the
R-value specified in the table.
b. The fenestration U-factor column excludes skylights. The
SHGC column applies to all glazed fenestration.
c. R-10 insulation shall be provided under the full slab area of
a heated slab in addition to the required slab edge insulation
R-value for slabs as indicated in the table. The slab-edge
insulation for heated slabs shall not be required to extend
below the slab.
d. The first value is cavity insulation; the second value is
continuous insulation. Therefore, as an example, “13 + 5”
means R-13 cavity insulation plus R-5 continuous insulation.
e. Mass walls shall be in accordance with Section R402.2.5.
The second R-value applies where more than half of the
insulation is on the interior of the mass wall.
Vertical fenestration shall also comply with R402.3.6 and
R402.3.7.Doors may have a U-factor of 0.28 or less.
ABBREVIATIONS
GAGAUGE
GALVGALVANIZED
GCGENERAL CONTRACTOR
GLGLASS
GLAMGLUE-LAMINATED
GRGRADE
GWBGYPSUM WALL BOARD
GYPGYPSUM
HBHOSE BIB
HCHOLLOW CORE
HDOHIGH DENSITY OVERLAY
HDRHEADER
HDWDHARDWOOD
HDWHARDWARE
HMHOLLOW METAL
HORIZHORIZONTAL
HPHIGH POINT
HRHOUR
HRHOUR
HTHEIGHT
HVACHEATING/VENTILATING/AIR CONDITIONING
HWHOT WATER
HWTHOT WATER TANK
IDINSIDE DIAMETER
ININCH
INCLINCLUDED
INSULINSULATION
INTINTERIOR
INVINVERT
JBJUNCTION BOX
JFJOINT FILLER
JTJOINT
KITKITCHEN
KOKNOCKOUT
LAMLAMINATE; LAMINATED
LAVLAVATORY
LBSPOUNDS
LFLINEAR FEET (FOOT)
LHLEFT HAND
LLLIVE LOAD
LOCLOCATION
LPLOW POINT
LTLIGHT
MASMASONRY
MATLMATERIAL
MAXMAXIMUM
MBMACHINE BOLT
MCMEDICINE CABINET
MDFMEDIUM DENSITY FIBERBOARD
MDOMEDIUM DENSITY OVERLAY
MECHMECHANICAL
MEMBMEMBRANE
MEZZMEZZANINE
MFRMANUFACTURER
MINMINIMUM
MIRMIRROR
MISCMISCELLANEOUS
MOMASONRY OPENING
MTDMOUNTED
MTLMETAL
MULMULLION
NNORTH
N/ANOT APPLICABLE
NONUMBER
NOMNOMINAL
NRNOISE REDUCTION
NTSNOT TO SCALE
NICNOT IN CONTRACT
OAOVERALL
OCON CENTER
ODOUTSIDE DIAMETER; OVERFLOW DRAIN
OFFOFFICE
OHOVERHEAD
OHWMORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK
OPNGOPENING
OPPOPPOSITE
OSBORIENTED STRAND BOARD
OCCOCCUPANTS
OLFOCCUPANT LOAD FACTOR
PBDPARTICLE BOARD
PCCPRECAST CONCRETE
PCFPOUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT
PERFPERFORATED
PERPPERPENDICULAR
PLPLATE
PLAMPLASTIC LAMINATE
PLASPLASTER
PLWDPLYWOOD
PNLPANEL
PNTPOINT
PRPAIR
PRCSTPRECAST
PSFPOUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT
PSIPOUNDS PER SQUARE INCH
PTPRESERVATIVE TREATED
PTNPARTITION
PVCPOLYVINYL CHLORIDE
RRISER
RARETURN AIR
RADRADIUS
RDROOF DRAIN
REFREFERENCE
REFRREFRIGERATOR
REGREGISTER
REINFREINFORCED
REMREMAINDER
REQREQUIRED
RESILRESILIENT
REVREVISION(S); REVISED
RHRIGHT HAND
RMROOM
ABBREVIATIONS
ROROUGH OPENING
RWLRAIN WATER LEADER
SSOUTH
SAFSELF-ADHERED FLASHING
SAMSELF-ADHERED MEMBRANE
SCSOLID CORE
SCHEDSCHEDULE
SDSMOKE DETECTOR
SECTSECTION
SGSAFETY GLAZING
SHVSHELF; SHELVING
SHRSHOWER
SHTSHEET
SHT MTLSHEET METAL
SHTGSHEATHING
SIMSIMILAR
SOGSLAB ON GRADE
SPECSPECIFICATION
SQ FTSQUARE FOOT (FEET)
SQ INSQUARE INCH(ES)
SSTSTAINLESS STEEL
STDSTANDARD
STLSTEEL
STORSTORAGE
STRUCTSTRUCTURAL
SUSPSUSPENDED
SYMSYMETRICAL
TTREAD
T>ONGUE AND GROOVE
TELTELEPHONE
TERTERRAZZO
TGTEMPERED GLASS
THKTHICK
TOTOP OF
TOBTO OF BEAM
TOCTOP OF CONCRETE; CURB
TOFTOP OF FLOOR; FOOTING; FRAME
TOMTOP OF MASONRY
TOPTOP OF PARAPET; PAVEMENT
TOPOTOPOGRAPHY
TOSTOP OF SLAB; STEEL
TOWTOP OF WALL
TSTUBE STEEL
TSTATTHERMOSTAT
TYPTYPICAL
UNOUNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE
VBVINYL BASE
VENVENEER
VERTVERTICAL
VESTVESTIBULE
VGVERTICAL GRAIN
VIFVERIFY IN FIELD
VTVINYL TILE
WWEST
W/WITH
W/OWITHOUT
WCWATER CLOSET
WDWOOD
WDWWINDOW
WFWIDE FLANGE
WF BMWIDE FLANGE BEAM
WGWIRED GLASS
WHWATER HEATER
WLWATER LINE
WLDWELDED
WPWATERPROOF
WPMWATERPROOF MEMBRANE
WRWATER RESISTANT
WSCTWAINSCOT
WSGWIRE SAFETY GLASS
WTRWATER
WWFWELDED WIRE FABRIC
WWMWELDED WIRE MESH
WTWEIGHT
no.:date:description:
88
project:stamp/seal:
sheet:
title:
checked by:
drawn by:
project manager:
principal architect:
revisions:
job no.:WEST END GARDEN HOUSE337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO 81611337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO 81611NEIGHBORHOOD
CONTEXT
G0.01
23002
EW, EH
TK
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
05/12/2025
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
FINAL REVIEW SET
KT, MK
no.:date:description:
89
project:stamp/seal:
sheet:
title:
checked by:
drawn by:
project manager:
principal architect:
revisions:
job no.:WEST END GARDEN HOUSE337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO 81611337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO 81611EXTERIOR MATERIALS
G0.02
23002
EW, EH
TK
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
05/12/2025
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
FINAL REVIEW SET
KT, MK
PROPOSED BUILDING MATERIALS
CEDAR SHAKE ROOFSTAINED WOOD SIDING (DARK)CONCRETE BASE CLADDING MESH SCREEN GUARDRAILROOF STEEL PLATECEDAR SOFFIT WOOD
no.:date:description:
STEEL WINDOW SYSTEM, FRAMES PAINTED BLACK
90
42133.8
4
558 SF
65'-0"
B A.5
3
93 SF
10'-10 1/2"
4 3.8
2
48 SF
5'-7 1/4"
100'-0"
MAIN FLOOR
89'-6"
BASEMENT
AA.5
98'-1"
BO MAIN FLOOR
1
72 SF
8'-4"
2 133.8
6
429 SF
59'-4 3/4"
81 SF
100'-0"
MAIN FLOOR
89'-6"
BASEMENT
BAA.5
98'-1"
BO MAIN FLOOR
5
165 SF
19'-2 1/2"
SUBGRADE CALCULATIONS
1
2
3
4
TOTAL WALL AREA
EXPOSED WALL AREA
UNEXPOSED WALL AREA
% OF EXPOSED WALL AREA (EXPOSED/TOTAL)
WALL ELEVATIONS WALL AREA (SQ FT)EXPOSED WALL AREA (SQ FT)
72
48
93
558
1,446
6%
0
0
0
0
81
UNEXPOSED WALL AREA (SQ FT)
72
48
93
558
1,365
% OF UNEXPOSED WALL AREA (UNEXPOSED/TOTAL)94%
5 165 0 165
6 510 81 429
SUBGRADE LEGEND
BELOW GRADE
ABOVE GRADE
GRADE ABOVE STRUCTURAL CEILING
6
5
4
3
21 project:stamp/seal:
sheet:
title:
checked by:
drawn by:
project manager:
principal architect:
revisions:
job no.:WEST END GARDEN HOUSE337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO 81611337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO 81611SUBGRADE
CALCULATIONS
G0.03
23002
EW, EH
TK
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
05/12/2025
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
FINAL REVIEW SET
KT, MK
no.:date:description:
91
UP
DN
1202 SF
BASEMENT
FIREPLACE ABOVE
912 SF
MAIN LEVEL
52 SF
EXEMPT
PORCH
EXEMPT
PATIO
(BELOW
TRELLIS)
TRELLIS ABOVE
ROOF ABOVE
18 SF
GRILL
81 SF
EXTERIOR
STAIR
EXEMPT
PATIO
383 SF
340 SF
76 SF
EXEMPT
PATIO
FLOOR AREA LEGEND
FLOOR AREA
EXEMPT FLOOR AREA
DECK
FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS
TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA = 1,700 SF
DECK EXEMPTION = 255 SF (15% OF ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA)
BASEMENT LEVEL = 72 SF (FLOOR AREA * EXPOSED WALL % (1,202 * 0.06))
MAIN LEVEL = 912 SF
TOTAL DECK = 113 SF ((81 SF (EXT STAIR) + 269 (TRELLIS) - 255 SF) + 18 SF (GRILL))
TOTAL = 1,097 SF (72 SF + 912 SF + 113 SF)
EXISTING GRADE
MAXIMUM ALLOWED
BUILDING HEIGHT
15'-6"PROPOSED HEIGHT:
1/3 POINT FROM
EAVE TO RIDGE
PROPOSED GRADE25'-0"SITE COVERAGE
LOT AREA = 6,001 SF
MAIN LEVEL AREA = 912 SF
SITE COVERAGE PERCENTAGE = 15% (912 SF / 6,001 SF)project:stamp/seal:
sheet:
title:
checked by:
drawn by:
project manager:
principal architect:
revisions:
job no.:WEST END GARDEN HOUSE337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO 81611337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO 81611FLOOR AREA
CALCAULATIONS AND
BUILDING HEIGHT
DIAGRAM
G0.04
23002
EW, EH
TK
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
05/12/2025
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
FINAL REVIEW SET
KT, MK
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 BASEMENT
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 MAIN LEVEL
no.:date:description:
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"3BUILDING HEIGHT DIAGRAM
92
93
C1Cover SheetPROPERTY DESCRIPTIONLOCATION:337 LAKE AVENUEOWNER:STEVEN L BLACKPARCEL NUMBER:273512135002AREA:6,001 SQUARE FEETLEGAL DESCRIPTION:SUBDIVISION: DAGGS HISTORICLANDMARK LOT SPLIT Lot: BZONING:MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-6)WEST END RESIDENCE337 LAKE AVENUE | ASPEN, COCHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2023-53NOT FORROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE, CO 81623
RFENG.BIZ | (970) 340-4130AWAJAKWEST END RESIDENCE
GARDEN HOUSE
337 LAKE AVENUE
ASPEN, COOf 41 HPC FINAL REVIEW SET 05.12.25 JAKHPC SUBMITTAL94
CHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2023-53NOT FORROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE, CO 81623
RFENG.BIZ | (970) 340-4130AWAJAKWEST END RESIDENCE
GARDEN HOUSE
337 LAKE AVENUE
ASPEN, COOf 41 HPC FINAL REVIEW SET 05.12.25 JAK
C2Site Layout95
C3Utilities PlanCHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2023-53NOT FORROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE, CO 81623
RFENG.BIZ | (970) 340-4130AWAJAKWEST END RESIDENCE
GARDEN HOUSE
337 LAKE AVENUE
ASPEN, COOf 41 HPC FINAL REVIEW SET 05.12.25 JAK
96
FFE +82.29
+82.27
+82.18
+81.10
+74.56+74.59+74.76
+80.70
+7874.43FFE +82.29+82.27TW +7878TW +86.03+82.00+82.00LL FFE+73.79FFE +82.29+82.278382LP +82.12+82.271.5%2.0%1.5%1.5%+82.1+80.90+80.90
1.9%CHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:2023-53NOT FORROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE, CO 81623
RFENG.BIZ | (970) 340-4130AWAJAKWEST END RESIDENCE
GARDEN HOUSE
337 LAKE AVENUE
ASPEN, COOf 41 HPC FINAL REVIEW SET 05.12.25 JAK
C4Conceptual Grading &Drainage Plan97
T4 -10"
T3 - 16"
T8 - 20"
T6 - 24"
T10 - 6"
T11 - 6"T12 - 8"T14 - 8"
T15 - 4"
T16 - 4"
T22 - 24" May 12, 2025 - 5:23pm\\aspvmactive\aspen\PROJECTS_A-L\7302-335 337 Lake Avenue\D-CAD\02. Sheets\DW-7302-HPC Submission_337.dwgC
ISSUE DATE:
SHEET NUMBER
REVIEWED:
PROJECT NUMBER:
DRAWN:
1
REVISIONS
7302
2 3 4 5 6 7
A
B
C
D
E ASPEN, COC O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C.
F
8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
May 12, 2025 - 5:23pm\\aspvmactive\aspen\PROJECTS_A-L\7302-335 337 Lake Avenue\D-CAD\02. Sheets\DW-7302-HPC Submission_337.dwgEP, XL MA
05/12/2025
DESIGN WORKSHOP
Landscape Architecture · Land Planning
Urban Design · Tourism Planning
Aspen · Austin · Chicago · Denver · Houston
Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Raleigh
W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M
LX-01
22860 Two Rivers Road #1
Basalt, CO 81621
(970) 925-8354
337 LAKE AVENUETREE PROTECTION
AND REMOVAL
PLAN
NORTH 0
ORIGINAL SCALE:
5'10'20'
1"=10'
TREE REMOVAL CHART
T3
T4
T6
T8
T10
T11
T12
T14
T15
T16
T22
TREE SURVEY# TREE TYPE D.B.H
FIR
ASPEN
FIR
FIR
ASPEN (DEAD)
ASPEN
ASPEN
ASPEN
ASPEN
ASPEN
DECIDUOUS
16"
10"
24"
20"
6"
6"
8"
8"
4"
4"
24"
TREE PROTECTION FENCE, TYP.
CRITICAL ROOT ZONE, TYP.
EXISTING CURB TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING WALL TO BE REMOVED
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
HPC FINAL
REVIEW SET
98
DN
Oct 02, 2025 - 10:04am\\aspvmactive\aspen\PROJECTS_A-L\7302-335 337 Lake Avenue\D-CAD\02. Sheets\DW-7302-HPC Submission_337.dwgC
ISSUE DATE:
SHEET NUMBER
REVIEWED:
PROJECT NUMBER:
DRAWN:
1
REVISIONS
7302
2 3 4 5 6 7
A
B
C
D
E ASPEN, COC O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C.
F
8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Oct 02, 2025 - 10:04am\\aspvmactive\aspen\PROJECTS_A-L\7302-335 337 Lake Avenue\D-CAD\02. Sheets\DW-7302-HPC Submission_337.dwgEP, XL MA
05/12/2025
DESIGN WORKSHOP
Landscape Architecture · Land Planning
Urban Design · Tourism Planning
Aspen · Austin · Chicago · Denver · Houston
Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Raleigh
W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M
LX-02
22860 Two Rivers Road #1
Basalt, CO 81621
(970) 925-8354
337 LAKE AVENUEMATERIALS
PLAN
NORTH 0
ORIGINAL SCALE:
5'10'20'
1"=10'
VEHICULAR PAVING - COBBLE STONE
STONE PAVER TYPE 2 - SAND SET
STONE STEP
DRY STACK STONE WALL
MATERIAL
WOOD FENCE
VEHICULAR PAVING
CONCRETE PAVER, TYP.
CONCRETE STEP, TYP.
IMPROVED DRY STACK
STONE WALL
WOOD FENCE (42" HEIGHT)
LEGEND
STONE PAVER TYPE 1 - MORTAR SET
GUARDRAIL PER ARCH
HANDRAILPA
PA
PA
PA
PA PA
PA
CONCRETE STEP
CONCRETE PAVER
CONCRETE BOARD FORM WALL
EXISTING WOOD FENCE
STONE PAVER TYPE 1, TYP.
STONE PAVER TYPE 2, TYP.
CONCRETE BOARD
FORM WALL
GRILL AND
COUNTER
HANDRAIL
CONCRETE PAD
ROOFLINE, TYP
RE: ARCH
PA
CONCRETE PAD (6" OR LESS OF
EXCAVATION WITHIN DRIPLINE OF TREE)
RAIN GARDEN WITH
CONCRETE CURB
RAIN GARDEN WITH
CONCRETE CURB
STONE STEPS
ADJACENT LOT CURB CUT
PA
N. THIRD STREETLAKE AVEADJACENT LOT CURB CUT
PA
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
HPC FINAL
REVIEW SET
VEHICULAR PAVING - GRASS PAVE
WOOD FENCE (72" HEIGHT)25'-0"18'-0"8'-6"99
DN
DN
UP
LEGEND
GREEN ROOF (HATCH)
PROPOSED DECIDUOUS SHRUB
PERENNIALS MIX (HATCH)
PROPOSED DECIDUOUS TREE
Oct 02, 2025 - 10:04am\\aspvmactive\aspen\PROJECTS_A-L\7302-335 337 Lake Avenue\D-CAD\02. Sheets\DW-7302-HPC Submission_337.dwgC
ISSUE DATE:
SHEET NUMBER
REVIEWED:
PROJECT NUMBER:
DRAWN:
1
REVISIONS
7302
2 3 4 5 6 7
A
B
C
D
E ASPEN, COC O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C.
F
8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Oct 02, 2025 - 10:04am\\aspvmactive\aspen\PROJECTS_A-L\7302-335 337 Lake Avenue\D-CAD\02. Sheets\DW-7302-HPC Submission_337.dwgEP, XL MA
05/12/2025
DESIGN WORKSHOP
Landscape Architecture · Land Planning
Urban Design · Tourism Planning
Aspen · Austin · Chicago · Denver · Houston
Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Raleigh
W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M
LX-03
22860 Two Rivers Road #1
Basalt, CO 81621
(970) 925-8354
337 LAKE AVENUELANDSCAPE
PLAN
NORTH 0
ORIGINAL SCALE:
5'10'20'
1"=10'
PLANT
CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
TREES
MS-5 Malus x `Spring Snow`Spring Snow Crabapple
PP-10 Picea pungens Colorado Spruce
PT Pinus thunbergii Japanese Black Pine
PT-4 Populus tremuloides Quaking Aspen
SHRUBS
BM-5 Buxus microphylla japonica 'Winter Gem'Winter Gem Japanese Boxwood
CI-5 Cornus sericea `Isanti`Isanti Red Twig Dogwood
CB-5 Cornus sericea 'Baileyi'Bayley's Red Twig Dogwood
CA-10 Cotoneaster acutifolius Peking Cotoneaster
PO-5 Physocarpus opulifolius Ninebark
RP-1 Rubus parviflorus Thimbleberry
SB-5 Spiraea betulifolia Birchleaf Spirea
SJ-3 Spiraea japonica 'Froebelii'Froebelii Japanese Spirea
SV-5 Syringa vulgaris Common Purple Lilac
VD-5 Viburnum dentatum 'Blue Muffin'Blue Muffin Arrowwood Viburnum
ORNAMENTAL GRASSES
HS-1 Helictotrichon sempervirens Blue Oat Grass
GROUND COVERS
PR-4 Petrosedum rupestre 'Blue Spruce'Blue Spruce Stonecrop
PERENNIALS
AM-1 Achillea millefolium Common Yarrow
AP-1 Aegopodium podagraria 'Variegatum'Variegated Bishop Weed
AXM-1 Allium x `Millenium`Millenium Ornamental Onion
EP-1 Echinacea purpurea 'PAS702918'PowWow® White Coneflower
LA-1 Leucanthemum x superbum `Alaska`Alaska Shasta Daisy
NF-1 Nepeta x faassenii Catmint
SP-1 Salvia nemorosa Meadow Sage
TM-4 Thymus praecox Mother of Thyme
SOD/SEED
TBN Turf sod BioNative Drought Tolerant Fescue Blend
PLANTING KEY LEGEND
PERENNIAL MIX, TYP.
HPC FINAL
REVIEW SET
EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN, TYP.
PROPOSED CONIFEROUS TREE
PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL GRASS
TURF (HATCH)
EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN, TYP.
METAL EDGER, TYP.
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN, TYP.
REINFORCED GRASS PAVING
N. THIRD STREETLAKE AVE100
May 12, 2025 - 5:12pm\\aspvmactive\aspen\PROJECTS_A-L\7302-335 337 Lake Avenue\D-CAD\02. Sheets\DW-7302-HPC Submission_337.dwgC
ISSUE DATE:
SHEET NUMBER
REVIEWED:
PROJECT NUMBER:
DRAWN:
1
REVISIONS
7302
2 3 4 5 6 7
A
B
C
D
E ASPEN, COC O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C.
F
8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
May 12, 2025 - 5:12pm\\aspvmactive\aspen\PROJECTS_A-L\7302-335 337 Lake Avenue\D-CAD\02. Sheets\DW-7302-HPC Submission_337.dwgEP, XL MA
05/12/2025
DESIGN WORKSHOP
Landscape Architecture · Land Planning
Urban Design · Tourism Planning
Aspen · Austin · Chicago · Denver · Houston
Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Raleigh
W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M
LX-04
22860 Two Rivers Road #1
Basalt, CO 81621
(970) 925-8354
337 LAKE AVENUEMATERIAL
PALETTE
MATERIALS
VEHICULAR PAVING - GRANITE COBBLE
HANDRAIL
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
HPC FINAL
REVIEW SET
CONCRETE PAVER:
-CONCRETE PAVER TYPE 1 AND 2
-CONCRETE STEPS
DRY STACK STONE WALL
STONE PAVER:
-STONE PAVER TYPE 1 AND 2
WOOD FENCE AND GATE
VEHICULAR PAVING - REINFORCED GRASS PAVING
101
Oct 01, 2025 - 2:41pmF:\PROJECTS_A-L\7302-335 337 Lake Avenue\D-CAD\02. Sheets\DW-7302-HPC Submission_337.dwgC
ISSUE DATE:
SHEET NUMBER
REVIEWED:
PROJECT NUMBER:
DRAWN:
1
REVISIONS
7302
2 3 4 5 6 7
A
B
C
D
E ASPEN, COC O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C.
F
8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Oct 01, 2025 - 2:41pmF:\PROJECTS_A-L\7302-335 337 Lake Avenue\D-CAD\02. Sheets\DW-7302-HPC Submission_337.dwgEP, XL MA
05/12/2025
DESIGN WORKSHOP
Landscape Architecture · Land Planning
Urban Design · Tourism Planning
Aspen · Austin · Chicago · Denver · Houston
Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Raleigh
W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M
LX-05
22860 Two Rivers Road #1
Basalt, CO 81621
(970) 925-8354
337 LAKE AVENUEMATERIAL
PALETTE
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
HPC FINAL
REVIEW SET2WOOD FENCE TYPE 2
1/2"=1'-0"
1 WOOD FENCE TYPE 1
1/2"=1'-0"
WOOD FENCE BOARD
WOOD FENCE BOARD
1'-0"6'-6"1
8"5"FINISHED SURFACE,
SEE PLANS3'-6" MAX.WOOD FENCE BOARD
112" TYP.112" TYP.SONOTUBE, RE:
STRUCTURAL
2X2 HOLLOW METAL
POST EMBEDDED
INTO CONCRETE
FINISHED SURFACE,
SEE PLANS
1'-0"4"6'-6"
SONOTUBE, RE:
STRUCTURAL
WOOD FENCE BOARD
1'-0"6'-6"1
8"5"6'-0" MAX.WOOD FENCE BOARD112" TYP.112" TYP.FINISHED SURFACE,
SEE PLANS
1'-0"4"6'-6"
2X2 HOLLOW METAL
POST EMBEDDED
INTO CONCRETE
SONOTUBE, RE:
STRUCTURAL
2X2 HOLLOW METAL
POST EMBEDDED
INTO CONCRETE
WOOD FENCE BOARD
2X2 HOLLOW METAL
POST EMBEDDED
INTO CONCRETE
FINISHED SURFACE,
SEE PLANS
102
May 12, 2025 - 5:13pm\\aspvmactive\aspen\PROJECTS_A-L\7302-335 337 Lake Avenue\D-CAD\02. Sheets\DW-7302-HPC Submission_337.dwgC
ISSUE DATE:
SHEET NUMBER
REVIEWED:
PROJECT NUMBER:
DRAWN:
1
REVISIONS
7302
2 3 4 5 6 7
A
B
C
D
E ASPEN, COC O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C.
F
8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
May 12, 2025 - 5:13pm\\aspvmactive\aspen\PROJECTS_A-L\7302-335 337 Lake Avenue\D-CAD\02. Sheets\DW-7302-HPC Submission_337.dwgEP, XL MA
05/12/2025
DESIGN WORKSHOP
Landscape Architecture · Land Planning
Urban Design · Tourism Planning
Aspen · Austin · Chicago · Denver · Houston
Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Raleigh
W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M
LX-06
22860 Two Rivers Road #1
Basalt, CO 81621
(970) 925-8354
337 LAKE AVENUEPLANTING
PALETTE
TREES
Malus x 'Spring Snow'
SHRUBS
Spring Snow Crabapple
Picea pungens
Colorado Spruce
Buxus microphylla japonica 'Winter Gem'
Winter Gem Japanese Boxwood
Cornus sericea 'Baileyi'
Bayley's Red Twig Dogwood
Spiraea betulifolia
Birchleaf Spirea
Spiraea japonica 'Froebelii'
Froebelii Japanese Spirea
Pinus thunbergii
Japanese Black Pine
Populus tremuloides
Quaking Aspen
Cotoneaster acutifolius
Peking Cotoneaster
Syringa vulgaris
Common Purple Lilac
Physocarpus opulifolius
Ninebark
Viburnum dentatum 'Blue Muffin'
Blue Muffin Arrowwood Viburnum
Rubus parviflorus
Thimbleberry
Cornus sericea 'Isanti'
Isanti Red Twig Dogwood
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
HPC FINAL
REVIEW SET
103
PLANTING
PALETTE
PERENNIALS
Echinacea purpurea 'PAS702918'
PowWow® White Coneflower
Salvia nemorosa
Meadow Sage
Helictotrichon sempervirens
Blue Oat Grass
Nepeta x faassenii
Catmint
May 12, 2025 - 5:13pm\\aspvmactive\aspen\PROJECTS_A-L\7302-335 337 Lake Avenue\D-CAD\02. Sheets\DW-7302-HPC Submission_337.dwgC
ISSUE DATE:
SHEET NUMBER
REVIEWED:
PROJECT NUMBER:
DRAWN:
1
REVISIONS
7302
2 3 4 5 6 7
A
B
C
D
E ASPEN, COC O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C.
F
8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
May 12, 2025 - 5:13pm\\aspvmactive\aspen\PROJECTS_A-L\7302-335 337 Lake Avenue\D-CAD\02. Sheets\DW-7302-HPC Submission_337.dwgEP, XL MA
05/12/2025
DESIGN WORKSHOP
Landscape Architecture · Land Planning
Urban Design · Tourism Planning
Aspen · Austin · Chicago · Denver · Houston
Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Raleigh
W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M
LX-07
22860 Two Rivers Road #1
Basalt, CO 81621
(970) 925-8354
337 LAKE AVENUEGROUND COVERS
Aegopodium podagraria 'Variegatum'
Variegated Bishop's Weed
Petrosedum rupestre 'Blue Spruce'
Blue Spruce Stonecrop
ORNAMENTAL GRASSES
Allium x 'Millenium'
Millenium Ornamental Onion
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
HPC FINAL
REVIEW SET
Achillea millefolium
Common Yarrow
Leucanthemm x superbum 'Alaska'
Alaska Shasta Daisy
Thymus praecox
Mother of Thyme
104
5'-0"
FACE OF BUILDING
421
B
A
10'-0"10'-0"SETABACK)10'-0"(15'-0" COMBINED5'-0"PROPERTY LINE
SIDE SETBACK
SIDE SETBACKREAR SETBACKFRONT SETBACK3
GREEN ROOF
CEDAR SHINGLES
METAL TRELLIS
337 LAKE AVENUE
HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT
LOT B
LOT SIZE: 6,001 SF
ZONE DISTRICT R-6
METAL FIREPLACE
1'-6"
METAL CANOPY
3.8
A.5
CANOPY IN SETBACK
BUILD-TO REQUIREMENT -
SEC. 26.410.030.(B)(3)C
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
PARKING SPACE
3RD STREETLAKE AVE.8'-6"36'-1 1/4"
MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE,
SEE LANDSCAPE
RAIN GARDEN,
SEE LANDSCAPE
RAIN GARDEN,
SEE LANDSCAPE
18'-0"project:stamp/seal:
sheet:
title:
checked by:
drawn by:
project manager:
principal architect:
revisions:
job no.:WEST END GARDEN HOUSE337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO 81611337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO 81611SITE PLAN
A1.00
23002
EW, EH
TK
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
05/12/2025
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
FINAL REVIEW SET
KT, MK
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1SITE PLAN
no.:date:description:
NOTE: REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS
FOR LANDSCAPE RELATED INFORMATION.
105
PROPERTY LINE
337 LAKE AVENUE
HISTORIC LANDMARK
LOT SPLIT
LOT B
LOT SIZE: 6,001 SF
ZONE DISTRICT R-6
337 LAKE AVENUE
HISTORIC LANDMARK
LOT SPLIT
LOT A
LOT SIZE: 5,706 SF
ZONE DISTRICT R-63RD STREETLAKE AVE.LOT BLOT A
project:stamp/seal:
sheet:
title:
checked by:
drawn by:
project manager:
principal architect:
revisions:
job no.:WEST END GARDEN HOUSE337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO 81611337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO 81611LOT A AND B
ADJACENCY PLAN AND
ELEVATION
A1.01
23002
EW, EH
TK
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
05/12/2025
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
FINAL REVIEW SET
KT, MK
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1LOT A AND B ADJACENCY PLAN NOTE: REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS
FOR LANDSCAPE RELATED INFORMATION.
no.:date:description:
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2LOT A AND B ADJACENCY ELEVATION (EAST)
106
DN
UP
A3.01
1
A3.01
2
A3.01
3
A3.01
4
20'-0"49'-9 1/4"19'-2 1/2"421
B
A
3
102
KITCHEN
100
ENTRY
103
LIVING /
BEDROOM
101
POWDER
METAL GUARDRAIL
RETAINING WALL
GAS FIREPLACE
EDGE OF METAL PLATE
CANOPY ABOVE
EDGE OF ROOF ABOVE
METAL TRELLIS ABOVE
4 3/4"10'-10 1/2"8'-4"4 3/4"15'-4"3'-10 1/2"4'-4 3/4"19'-0"1'-0"3.8
A.5
EL 100'-0"
7'-9"1'-4"5'-6"1'-4"23'-7 1/2"3'-10"5'-7 1/4"9"9"F3F2
F5
R1
4 3/4"22'-10"26'-1 3/4"
4 3/4"
4 3/4"
A3.01
1
A3.01
2
A3.01
3
A3.01
4 421
B
A
3
001
BASEMENT
65'-0"19'-2 1/2"003
MECH.
ROOM
CONCRETE SLAB
CONCRETE FOUNDATION, TYP.10'-10 1/2"8'-4"11'-0 3/4"48'-4"5'-7 1/4"4'-8 3/4"EL 89'-6"
3.8
A.5
F1
52'-5 3/4"12'-6 1/4"project:stamp/seal:
sheet:
title:
checked by:
drawn by:
project manager:
principal architect:
revisions:
job no.:WEST END GARDEN HOUSE337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO 81611337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO 81611BASEMENT & MAIN
LEVEL FLOOR PLANS
A2.01
23002
EW, EH
TK
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
05/12/2025
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
FINAL REVIEW SET
KT, MK
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2MAIN FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1BASEMENT PLAN
no.:date:description:
107
A3.01
1
A3.01
2
A3.01
3
A3.01
4 421
B
A
3
23'-2 3/4"25'-9"
48'-11 3/4"19'-2 1/2"METAL PLATE CANOPY
CEDAR SHINGLESMETAL TRELLISGREEN ROOF
3.8
A.5
METAL SHROUD AROUND
KITCHEN EXHAUST,
PAINTED MATTE BLACK
METAL FIREPLACE
METAL ROOF9 3/4" TYP. SPACE BETWEEN
METAL SHROUD AROUND
VENT PIPES, PAINTED
MATTE BLACK
METAL GUTTER AND
DOWNSPOUT, PAINTED
MATTE BLACK
METAL GUTTER AND
DOWNSPOUT, PAINTED
MATTE BLACK project:stamp/seal:
sheet:
title:
checked by:
drawn by:
project manager:
principal architect:
revisions:
job no.:WEST END GARDEN HOUSE337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO 81611337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO 81611ROOF PLAN
A2.02
23002
EW, EH
TK
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
05/12/2025
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
FINAL REVIEW SET
KT, MK
no.:date:description:
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1ROOF PLAN
108
100'-0"
MAIN FLOOR
89'-6"
BASEMENT
4213
CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF
STAINED WOOD SIDING
METAL WINDOW & DOOR SYSTEM, TYP.
METAL TRELLIS
BOARD-FORM CONCRETE
SITE WALL
METAL FASCIA
3.8
25'-9"23'-2 3/4"16'-0 1/4"
48'-11 3/4"
CONCRETE OR METAL
FLASHING, TBD
METAL PLATE ROOF
CANOPY AT ENTRY
METAL SHROUD AROUND
VENT PIPES, PAINTED
MATTE BLACK
METAL GUTTER AND
DOWNSPOUT, PAINTED
MATTE BLACK
100'-0"
MAIN FLOOR
89'-6"
BASEMENT
BA
METAL WINDOW &
DOOR SYSTEM, TYP.
STAINED WOOD SIDING, BEYOND
METAL FASCIA
METAL TRELLIS
A.5
19'-2 1/2"MAX. ALLOWED 25'-0"12'-0"GREEN ROOF
ASSEMBLY
METAL GUTTER AND
DOWNSPOUT, PAINTED
MATTE BLACK18"-24"100'-0"
MAIN FLOOR
89'-6"
BASEMENT
B A
METAL PLATE ROOF
CANOPY AT ENTRY
1/3 POINT FROM
EAVE TO RIDGE
METAL WINDOW & DOOR
SYSTEM, TYP.
STAINED WOOD SIDING
10'-0"3'-5"4'-1"8'-0"A.5
MAX. ALLOWED 25'-0"15'-6"10'-10 1/2"8'-4"
19'-2 1/2"
4 3/4"4 3/4"
CONCRETE OR METAL
FLASHING, TBD 3'-0"4'-0"METAL GUTTER AND
DOWNSPOUT, PAINTED
MATTE BLACK
METAL SHROUD AROUND
KITCHEN EXHAUST,
PAINTED MATTE BLACKMETAL SHROUD
AROUND VENT PIPES,
PAINTED MATTE
BLACK
100'-0"
MAIN FLOOR
89'-6"
BASEMENT
42 13
DOORS TO BASEMENT,
SHOWN DASHED
STAIR TO BASEMENT,
SHOWN DASHED
METAL MESH GUARDRAIL
CONCRETE
RETAINING WALL
METAL TRELLIS
METAL WINDOW
SYSTEM, TYP.
STAINED WOOD
SIDING
CEDAR SHINGLES
METAL FIREPLACE
3.8
5'-7 1/4"20'-1 3/4"23'-2 3/4"16'-0 1/4"
48'-11 3/4"
BOARD-FORM CONCRETE
SITE WALL
CONCRETE OR
METAL FLASHING,
TBDSEE LANDSCAPEHEIGHT LESS THAN 6'-0"METAL SHROUD AROUND
KITCHEN EXHAUST,
PAINTED MATTE BLACK
METAL GUTTER AND
DOWNSPOUT, PAINTED
MATTE BLACK
3'-0"project:stamp/seal:
sheet:
title:
checked by:
drawn by:
project manager:
principal architect:
revisions:
job no.:WEST END GARDEN HOUSE337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO 81611337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO 81611EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A3.01
23002
EW, EH
TK
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
05/12/2025
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
FINAL REVIEW SET
KT, MK
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"3 WEST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 EAST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"4NORTH ELEVATION
no.:date:description:
109
110'-0"
BO CEILING
B
METAL GUTTER, PAINTED MATTE
BLACK
ROOF
GABLE ROOF BEYOND
METAL FASCIA
METAL WINDOW & DOOR SYSTEM
WALL BEYOND
METAL DOWNSPOUT BEYOND,
PAINTED MATTE BLACK project:stamp/seal:
sheet:
title:
checked by:
drawn by:
project manager:
principal architect:
revisions:
job no.:WEST END GARDEN HOUSE337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO 81611337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO 81611EXTERIOR DETAILS
A8.00
23002
EW, EH
TK
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
05/12/2025
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
FINAL REVIEW SET
KT, MK
no.:date:description:
SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"1 ROOF EDGE AND GUTTER DETAIL AT LIVING - SOUTH
110
project:stamp/seal:sheet:title:checked by:drawn by:project manager:principal architect:revisions:job no.:1932 1ST Ave. Suite 605Seattle, WA 98101niteolighting.com206.456.4554WEST END GARDEN HOUSE
337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO, 8161123002EW, EHTKNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONHISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONFINAL REVIEW SETKT, MKno.:date:description:05/12/2025CITY OF ASPENOUTDOOR LIGHTINGCODE COMPLIANCEEL0.00A111
Outdoor Lighting Compliance Statement
Per Section 26.512.040, a signed Outdoor Lighting Compliance Statement (this form) is required: (1) as a permit
submission document for the Performance method; (2) prior to Certificate of Occupancy for either the
Performance or Prescriptive methods.
Address
Parcel ID #
Purpose of Form: (pick one)
Submission – Performance Method. Proceed to A.
Certificate of Occupancy. Proceed to B.
A.Submission – Performance Method.
I certify that the outdoor lighting luminaire type, quantity, and output at the subject property meets
the requirements of Chapter 26.512 – Outdoor lighting.
B. Certificate of Occupancy. I certify as follows: (pick one)
The outdoor lighting luminaire type, quantity, and output at the subject property meets the requirements of
Chapter 26.512 – Outdoor lighting and has not changed from the approved permit documents.
Prescriptive Method Only: The outdoor lighting luminaire type, quantity, and output at the subject property
has changed from the approved permit documents and the revised lighting plan meets the requirements of
Chapter 26.512 - Outdoor lighting. I have included an updated City of Aspen Outdoor Lighting Permit
Submission Tool and updated supporting documents per 26.512.040(b) to show compliance with Chapter
26.512 - Outdoor Lighting.
Performance Method Only: The outdoor lighting luminaire type, quantity, and output at the subject property
has changed from the approved permit documents and the revised lighting plan meets the requirements of
Chapter 26.512 - Outdoor lighting. I have included a revised lighting calculation plan to show compliance
with Chapter 26.512 -Outdoor Lighting.
I understand this policy and I understand that any lighting plans &/or installations that do not meet the
requirements of Chapter 26.512 will be treated as a violation of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. I understand
that this document is a public document.
Architect, Electrical Engineer, Contractor, or Lighting Designer Signature:
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Printed name: Date:
____________________________________ __________________________
335 LAKE AVE, ASPEN
273512135001
Angelina Fernandez 10/02/2025
■
■
112
LIGHTING CUTSHEETSEL0.01project:stamp/seal:sheet:title:checked by:drawn by:project manager:principal architect:revisions:job no.:1932 1ST Ave. Suite 605Seattle, WA 98101niteolighting.com206.456.4554WEST END GARDEN HOUSE
337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO, 8161123002EW, EHTKNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONHISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONFINAL REVIEW SETKT, MKno.:date:description:05/12/2025113
LIGHTING CUTSHEETSEL0.02project:stamp/seal:sheet:title:checked by:drawn by:project manager:principal architect:revisions:job no.:1932 1ST Ave. Suite 605Seattle, WA 98101niteolighting.com206.456.4554WEST END GARDEN HOUSE
337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO, 8161123002EW, EHTKNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONHISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONFINAL REVIEW SETKT, MKno.:date:description:05/12/2025114
LIGHTING CUTSHEETSEL0.03project:stamp/seal:sheet:title:checked by:drawn by:project manager:principal architect:revisions:job no.:1932 1ST Ave. Suite 605Seattle, WA 98101niteolighting.com206.456.4554WEST END GARDEN HOUSE
337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO, 8161123002EW, EHTKNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONHISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONFINAL REVIEW SETKT, MKno.:date:description:05/12/2025115
LIGHTING CUTSHEETSEL0.04project:stamp/seal:sheet:title:checked by:drawn by:project manager:principal architect:revisions:job no.:1932 1ST Ave. Suite 605Seattle, WA 98101niteolighting.com206.456.4554WEST END GARDEN HOUSE
337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO, 8161123002EW, EHTKNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONHISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONFINAL REVIEW SETKT, MKno.:date:description:05/12/2025116
LIGHTING CUTSHEETSEL0.05project:stamp/seal:sheet:title:checked by:drawn by:project manager:principal architect:revisions:job no.:1932 1ST Ave. Suite 605Seattle, WA 98101niteolighting.com206.456.4554WEST END GARDEN HOUSE
337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO, 8161123002EW, EHTKNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONHISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONFINAL REVIEW SETKT, MKno.:date:description:05/12/2025117
LIGHTING CUTSHEETSEL0.06project:stamp/seal:sheet:title:checked by:drawn by:project manager:principal architect:revisions:job no.:1932 1ST Ave. Suite 605Seattle, WA 98101niteolighting.com206.456.4554WEST END GARDEN HOUSE
337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO, 8161123002EW, EHTKNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONHISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONFINAL REVIEW SETKT, MKno.:date:description:05/12/2025118
project:stamp/seal:sheet:title:checked by:drawn by:project manager:principal architect:revisions:job no.:1932 1ST Ave. Suite 605Seattle, WA 98101niteolighting.com206.456.4554WEST END GARDEN HOUSE
337 Lake Avenue Aspen, CO, 8161123002EW, EHTKNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONHISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONFINAL REVIEW SETKT, MKno.:date:description:05/12/2025SITE LIGHTING PLANEL1.00EL6EL1EL7AEL2EL4EL5EL3EL5EL5NOT TO SCALE1SITE LIGHTING PLAN119