HomeMy WebLinkAboutGreen Belt Line Researchq $ k V R ._' £
° NOTICE OF APPROVALVr
� `
FOR AN INSUBSTANTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AME"NDMEl
TO LOT 2, THE PITKIN RESERVE, SITUATED IN THE SE'�4 OF SECTION 1 &
NE'/a OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 S, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6Tn P.M.,
CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO;
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 64 PITKIN WAY
Parcel ID:2735-014-070-02
APPLICANT: CK Pitkco Associates
1900 Market Street, Philadelphia PA 19103
(970)948-2226
REPRESENTATIVE: Julie Maple, Poss Architecture + Planning
300 E. Hyman Ave. Aspen, CO 81611
970-925-4755
SUBJECT &
SITE OF APPROVAL: Insubstantial Planned Development (PD) Amendment at 64
Pitkin Way, Aspen CO 81611
ZONING: Low -Density Residential (R-30) and
Planned Development (PD)
SUMMARY:
The applicant requests an Insubstantial Planned Development (PD) Amendment to the
Pitkin Reserve PUD. The amendment will adjust an existing building envelope to include
areas of the existing building projecting beyond the current building envelope and to
allow for an addition. The building envelope area will not be increased as a result of this
amendment, nor will the dimensional allowances, including floor area or height, be
increased or reduced as a result of this request.
STAFF EVALUATION:
The building envelope adjustment will not result in an increase in allowed floor area or
height. The use of Lot 2 as a single family home will not be affected by a building
envelope adjustment. The new envelope will include areas that are outside the current
building envelope as shown in Figure I and the non -conformity will be brought into
compliance.
The amended plat must be submitted prior to building permit submittal; however, this
will result in creating a non -conformity due to the trellis structure projecting beyond the
existing depicted in Figure I and Figure 2 and the and proposed building envelope as
shown in Exhibit A.
. '�
N
COLUMN (TYP.I
t � % mmxacoxmnans�aa m
aa &
Existing
I ` Building Trellis (columns highlighted
Envelope a ®4" " by blue circles) protecting -/
beyond envelope. The new
building envelope will not 1
TRENCH include this area and the
Fw-k
r R I I trellis will be demolished. I
6AA1Nn
i
IB aOINO ENVEOPE Small comer of building outside the
- xoiEcr BENtxnnaBK existing building envelope to be
FOUNDNO.SREMR J/ included in new envelope.
/ WIILECAP I `f
OAMONATION J814.00
h' h V (/<
Figure 1. Existing Site Condition
Figure 2. Trellis, Existing Condition.
To satisfy the Applicant request to amend the building envelope, the following condition
has been included as a part of this approval:
L The trellis may remain throughout the natural life of the element'. Prior to
receiving a Certificate of Occupancy for any building permit, the non -conforming
trellis must be removed and any structure, as defined in Section 26104.100,
Definitions, as amended; shall be contained within the amended building
envelope.
Amending the building envelope is otherwise considered a minor change. The building
envelope is above the Green Belt Line. The Green Belt Line was shown in the Amended
Plat of the Pitkin Reserve Subdivision (Book 14 Page 92). The Green Belt Line was not
shown on the Second Amended Plat (Book 16 Page 15); however, d
shown above the Green Belt Line as shown in Exhibit? there "is` no net increase in the
building envelope area. Staff finds the review criteria for an Insubstantial PD
Amendment are met, as described in Exhibit C.
DECISION:
The Community Development Director finds the Administrative Application for an
Insubstantial PD Amendment as noted above and the draft plat depicted in Exhibit
A to be consistent with the review criteria (Exhibit C) and thereby, APPROVES the
request.
APPROVED BY:
Chris Bendon, Community Development Director Date
Attachments:
Exhibit A — Draft Plat (to be recorded as a final plat under separate recordation number)
Exhibit B — Building Envelope and Green Belt Line (not recorded)
Exhibit C — Insubstantial PD Amendment Review Criteria (not recorded)
Exhibit D — Application (not recorded)
64 Pitkin Way Building Envelope Adjustment
Exhibit C — Insubstantial Planned Development Review Criteria
26.445.110. Amendments. Amendments to an approved Project Review or to an approved
Detailed Review shall be reviewed according to the standards and procedures outline below.
Amendments to Planned Unit Development and Specially Planned Area approvals (pre- Ordinance
36, 2013, approvals) shall also proceed according to the standards and procedures outline below
and the Community Development Director shall determine the type of procedure most -applicable
to the requested amendment.
A. Insubstantial Amendments. An insubstantial amendment to an approved Project Review
or an approved Detailed Review may be authorized by the Community Development Director.
An insubstantial amendment shall meet the following criteria:
1. The request does not change the use or character of the development.
Stafffinding: The building envelope adjustment will not result in any additional building
envelope area nor increase the available floor area allocated to Lot 2. The envelope
adjustment will not impact the use of the lot nor effect the character of the Pitkin Reserve
Subdivision. The Green Belt Line was removed and replaced with building envelopes in
the Second Amendment. The intent of establishing building envelopes was to keep
v,
development above the Green Belt Line and prevent encroachment of improvements
towards the Rio Grande Trail and Roaring Fork River. The building envelope may be
adjusted, however, the envelope adjustment must be above the Green Belt Line. The
building envelope adjustment is above the Green Belt, Line as shown in Exhibit B. Staff
finds this criterion met.
2. The request is consistent with the conditions and representations in the project's original
approval, or otherwise represents an insubstantial change.
Stafffinding: The building envelope adjustment is intended to capture the structure on Lot
2. The amended envelope will capture areas of the structure that were not included in
existing building envelope of the building and allow for an addition to the subjectproperty.
The building envelope adjustment will improve on an existing legally established non-
conforming condition. Stafffinds this criterion met.
3. The request does not require granting a variation from the proj ect's allowed use(s) and does
not request an increase in the allowed height or floor area.
Staff Finding: A use variation is not required for the building envelope adjustment. There
will not be an increase in allowed floor area nor an increase of allowed height. Stafffinds
this criterion met.
4. Any proposed changes to the approved dimensional requirements are limited to a technical
nature, respond to a design parameter that could not have been foreseen during the Project
Review approval, are within dimensional tolerances stated in the Project Review, or
otherwise represents an insubstantial change.
Stafffinding: A building envelope adjustment will not increase in the approved dimensional
standards for Pitkin Reserve and is considered an insubstantial change. Stafffinds this
criterion met.
Pg. 1 of 2
64 Pitkin Way Building Envelope Adjustment
Exhibit C — Insubstantial Planned Development Review Criteria
5. An applicant may not apply for Detailed Review if an amendment is pending.
Staff Finding: No amendments are pending for the subject property. Staff finds Phis
criterion met.
Pg. 2 of 2
r/
P
2 y
F
a
EK
ll
ab
u
�f
N O
p a g
Z � Q
W
w
h = U
F
0 s d
OLij
w
o
6Y
ci
e�'
oz
O�Fo� a m
/ •>
a 6
M
„wo=
°
o
q_
vi
$
€g3ee$s
e
3
\
6
"sag
j
ees,�
`€k
4:¢9BE
zef2
Z ¢ $
s
o
b
¢
>
N i V E B
°o�
LU
ZNQ
u
Z
Z N ? �_
oW=OI 4 i
9
NLL
jM\1�
� O
N
a
N
woo
y U
Zo.
= 6
W6
2
O
I—ot— o
%°
v ] U
`
I
lw
tlfT
k3 Y—JE�3:
3I
5z
S
y a
I) 'ICI
F a $§
C
yy5
gg
g ..7 § F ? se E
4
"u o39 a s-b Ca_F3 3a
IN
qq 3nIN
a 38 s$a o. _ 8 6E 8 xYi i e
1'3
i��
INN Y
/ �sli4i$S:55 F�f 6�555f 4°; S: E�4I§5
dm °Y i]i ii Pji lea vi �I%ikgkig
i y _,31SS933s,g335,i9":'i,�S':�H4
q s8
\ � t
t
4 Y
°de
e =-c
9
9
d �
�
a
a
L p
e
W
Lu
=o
J
(n
F a
z �a
W
"z
O
Sao„a
r
S /
W,zoa
ow
y ym
un g
5 'eB
g& tl92_2!u
=
pj
21
\/ d
357 \
B?i
V
a9
3�
4e f�9a
% L�@
i €69f�
e`�a
a s `o z C€o = 4 `EqE sa11lI
$i�¢Ja IN
WN
E F. 4 9 E
not
z minw �$ 3nC i i Ulu
ill
Q Emig B[ o PH ® tin
— 's x ?o — o agars a 1 L 1 R F>
o s g S 9 e a 3 o g
PRIM 0 1 s t� M G s� W L 8PUH.q ' 3 ..
IM
_W MIS; € E oB Q 1 : � aGw £ S w is€�y` R sY o
= '"m° um2^. �o o °y IN i g 90 i gy S eu oG
x o 0 2a SIN 11"so9 oW �a�_go SDI
0 3 _3 S £ _�
I
a
0 opium
z d K o
W ��O a A
`°o s sg /r Pw
LI
LU
cn o J
..W
o�d5
NN
0
S Z
N i BE ho
O z w s n,/ /,i /`✓ e
------------
/ lV/
8e
� 0 ae3w�%S 64 m 43 1
-
e
-
$
-
W so atz,6
s o 6Gipli a= s '_i_� x a
ao° o@ a s„ 1
e a oeRws e o e '� ¢€`¢_
$ 's ..0 s � `e x 's 6 s m k 'e €¢ eK=.�>z 1III ? = =e €
®I�JlII�a
II
.:III®��