Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSigned_Recorded NOA_75 Prospector_WirelessJanice K. Vos Caudill Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder 534 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 (970)429-2716 Number of Documents Recorded: I �tTr{IN Transaction Receipt Print Date: 02/09/2021 01:04:20 PM COUNTIJ Transaction #650100 Transaction Type: Recording Receipt #2021000927 Cashier: Patty Nadon Cashier Date: 02/09/2021 01:04:19 PM Reception#673401 - APPROVAL - 24pg(s) Recording Surcharge: $3.00 Recording Fee: $125.00 $128.00 Total Fees $128.00 Received: Escrow Account Change Escrow Account: ASPEN CITY OF (COMM DEV) (New Balance: $324.00) Presented by: ASPEN CITY OF (COMM DEV) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 $128.00 $0.00 RECEPTION#: 673401, R: $128.00, D: $0.00 DOC CODE: APPROVAL Pg 1 of 24, 02/09/2021 at 01:04:19 PM Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO NOTICE OF APPROVAL AN ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL FOR THE UPGRADE OF AN EXISTING WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY AT THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: ASPEN HIGHLANDS CONDO PHI, COMMON AREA, CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO, COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE RITZ CARLTON CLUB AT 0039 AND 0075 PROSPECTOR ROAD. Parcel ID:273514213130 APPLICANT: Lorelei Foronda, M0, LLC on behalf of AT&T with the consent of the Aspen Highlands Condo Association Land Use Application Number: LPA-20-127 SUBJECT & SITE OF APPROVAL: Upgrade of an existing wireless telecommunications facility located at 75 Prospector Road, Aspen, CO 81611 LAND USE REQUEST AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: 26.505.090 - Wireless Communications Facilities and Equipment If a proposed wireless communications equipment upgrade meets specific review criteria, the application can be reviewed administratively. The Community Development Director is the final review authority. SUMMARY: The applicant requests approval to upgrade existing wireless telecommunications equipment located on the roof of the building at 75 Prospector Rd., also lmown as The Ritz -Carlton Club Aspen. The upgrade consists of replacing, adding and modifying antennas, and installing related cable lines and accessory equipment, located in an internal equipment room. All equipment upgrades would occur in an area of the roof that currently contains wireless telecommunication and mechanical equipment. New equipment is proposed, and all proposed equipment will be confined to the currently leased area. All proposed equipment complies with the applicable review criteria in the code. STAFF EVALUATION: Pursuant to Section 26.505.080, Wireless Communications Facilities and Equipment, proposed equipment must comply with a number of review standards. The proposed upgrades to the existing telecommunication equipment comply with all applicable review criteria of the Land Use Code. The proposed upgrades to existing wireless equipment will continue to use areas on the roof and within the building that have traditionally been used for wireless telecommunication and Page 1 of 2 mechanical equipment. The proposed equipment does not increase the visual impact of the equipment. The height of the new equipment will be the same as the equipment being replaced. DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the Administrative Application for Wireless Communication Equipment to be consistent with the review criteria (Exhibit B) and thereby APPROVES the request with the following building permit requirements as conditions of approval: 1) Building permit requirements for roof -mounted and internal equipment upgrades to be submitted by the licensed general contractor for the project: • Completed, permit application packet, submitted through the City of Aspen's permit portal. Please contact the City's building department with any questions. • A letter, signed and stamped by a structural engineer, verifying that the building can handle the additional load of the proposed equipment. • Existing and proposed scaled drawings o Proposed drawings must show compliance with 2015 IMC Section 306 and 2015 IBC Section 1015.6 APPROVED BY: 1. Digitally signed by Phillip Phillip Supino``Data:2021.02.08 2/8/21 14:44:31-07'00' Phillip Supino Date: Community Development Director Attachments: Exhibit A — Approved plans and excerpt from EME report (recorded) Exhibit B — Review Criteria (not recorded) Exhibit C —Application (not recorded) Page 2 of 2 gig p t m � su v m c> y I co € & ;NO `8s SIP, U� o$ R v 3 � t r� �S�gQgmg�$�BuF a Z All \\\20 F?�z F F ■ ■ 4k`z g €F�' ap $m LAryo 'F43R �����mm �JJ���4fig'!qr� f mzom b£m=T�£,9 N D D C N A RN D m C o Z O m -0 d £ �ma p mmq m�gohs p to D O A o y n wPu HE 7 1 - 5V ' P -.m D m 5 €ggF y k�&£sa dam O p p 7 QHI�€ 'nvp o iJ 20 g � �8 g R� lk € p ° O '.. m„ A 9$ 1oa y^ �. � a�ot2 m:ale m gm8 O m 8§� ai 9 # 1 C Z.-0 8 IS m m A w coo m mo7 9°m2 P� _ems y Or m O m m O A m O W Z N' ,TI C � � �% $ R 5q w ��iXm = S •! S v 1% A Y 5�� ;� 5 i i QY W � v BF 6 D v ai wxE .� OA �Pm o s o o "�7 1 m Z Z m '� e3 2 NN La ^eiy a�Psi 0 � Tlrp1 R�� >'yJn�, m N ug u m y W p _ o my,, �n ^^050 �..QaS� mz2 f a t£ Hog _ el/ 90 z �W O N Fci All B S No v f p r3 P p .8 P g mgggx s¢ spay �� s sAark a as s s s 5 s€ a s _� �s dosRD > g s 9oe= Ef q g a ��A F� g m$ oaf erg m o� am ��M �€m � �m � € �� � e ar A� � ��� goo 0 0- A> set s s� � s �� ^R a a a � by � s w5 aIn s � peg pifq�s ��% s a �� € g � q ��u -Rq dq�� 1 �Q y o u j Q om a a 'Fig g Virp Tog a' z_ T s s qs g ❑C N �' � u �'w 'm P ,'u f Y N - ,'o :^ P � P u f Y N �s ao a� � s F 912 4 9999 € gigTN $ ;22 g yego cl n e,sa, o z m CO Z 8 a N[NR �09 -SM r a ?n `\ m Z m 2 0, p t',o sa'a S: ur a �$ Z C) 0 ER � zm ��s C �o Q1 o O O a+/1/V„.. SN /rty� 90 y m O O fiAAA o� E«< @- Nr a . sss 6601 a 9 P. F.. ^ %rg n« n y FT s T" =—R..mzm�� oa � �nm s 68aa„=a � llii�� !�II a ®��� s o g�ae Ao.......... maQ a$sssm ;asss m 9 3 y FPgooa� g>< 9 fan f::rA6m� 8mmm I l l l l l l l l l i AMR W A; g�€�N $$$ ggA�mrso>;mzr m inF� c y O =�oo�y-fin p z PMmo y ? rl rmuz. c i 3 n m m^7 8 p 4 949 5 E m Ae 4Q£sa32pA€ v m a S Aa�Q A4��F$��9s Z = S m94g9F-9 czo��J Oo�a4>'"oa \ g YnA Po O� nP D PF Po 9� ytn eo \ mQ� os A F� 0 o,P Po 9O\ AR v c S22 6� N 6� "F �c v 0 ' D lDi� f SUem R A w B m=sn m rnmm m Z m 2 z A ry o �2= ol D O m z � , •� tea..' -. k.. � a��� .- _ � � r'' �:. �.uv `E' f ,+. 9� w a w m m m a z i 1 m o— m xv ci R R m R aA� 4 R R a AAo �A� a� r-o• a• p_p 2 ___PNm gz mN_ __4n - _____ Yg ^^-9 ,� Sm R_ 8w — — ____ _____ _ _ - - 61i �v"�'-$£' 94 a4 sss P �fv z9 2"s ss mR „� m R oER >8R v120 pp 9 5 n m w z �., 'Hcmat6 m' t z$ l / m Z m 2 -?•.yo 'ate Sx§`" n ai m•� ama9P 3 aE� N N S O o �`, e�vd';'�m" 20.�8 a - F �p90 zw y pvrn a o oZ m s rt D rn qua s o Z o m o o m 8sg� m r A mme� m gm mf a _ K � K�' �� Z 8 •-I��i i ®� RM ®i I EH 51 HUMID UPI L'a�[®li 04 Qms a= ag ki ::ice Il,i e Paz- 31 PUN b a Ui' S n __ m m � Z � 3 ^. NErvq•��09 m�em2 �o �� f ?a t HP09 o ass°, UP z a7 nurv; ,ryaAga-, ;§;§ JJ;)\ I;I«£ „/ !\ \\(� vi, � (} ) \ } \ \ )� ! � § � \§/ \§) § ) § ! ) ! , ! ) , f } -~ {{�; _ ( \r / \\ - ;=m !2; ' ; `` - A f / Of ) a , a �� \/(\ # z ! .w !�\ ' : G k o2l D Z Z� m D m m z v �•,A m 4 m < O x m m y- 1 � I I @@I £o N � A � niE � ➢ �� I2 C3$JN r N aa.o• L � A O .ZI s 1 y tas]'co G) 3 A � ua• mSS � o N ta.w• #� 5r�"' xs.s• � � i z �® fN� � z z uy�i arZi N u1 ➢ }� xl I O 6 Aq3a amine A za.a' S = JII < F N � m r b v n r➢n 25 7 c < I I E n s. k eo m W 12 e.x• V N N Q D 'D (Dits9 O ffi " n " p mil c W. y aOn [n A w s O Z d co inz" 5tfErrgJ 1 4 d>".4 4^ go g F " �n 1 m cT—i Z = O n O O ,o90 o. A �! �io' w,' aco 'n°r zm 3 PP Z$ ay OO2r �:,, +'> � agoR s s og °/b V SP yrt, y m m Z W .: Oa "cm9G 3 "{ 9 y �y® m �$ ry.. OOm jnm ) )) \§ ~ ) §„ 51 \ w � �»--�� , /4 " \ ! ; { � _ § | PIN. fig �t (). t # r� / / m§� @& § \ ©� / r` \ ) j \ \§ / §{g7sOM gj :k§NN1 9 /|4 § R• > e# mis § \ P\ \ MY� ) { /\ |r { ! § 3 | ( NU _�-zo . `%!!• !/§r 1A IT a % ;E / ( \� 6/& , /§,m A j _ a_ q ) \\{( !;. B ?{:<© AT&T Radio Frequency Safety Survey Report Prediction RFSS Site Name: Aspen Highlands FAM 10148150 USID: 113891 Site ID: COL04136 Address: 75 Prospector Road Aspen, Colorado 81611 County: Pitkin Latitude: 39.18160280 Longitude:-106.85698060 EBI Project Number: 6220005855 Report Information: Report Writer: Christopher Ilgenfritz Report Date: November 13, 2020 M-RFSC Name: Shad Rydalch Site Structure Type: Rooftop PACEM MRUTH039693/ MRUTH039696/ MRUTH039698 Prepared For: AT&T Mobility, LLC c/o MD7, LLC 10590 West Ocean Air Drive, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92130 CDs: 10148150_FCD_REVO_ 10.26.20 RF DS: 10148150_RFDSCO L04136-As pen-H igh lands_2020-LTE-Next- Carrier LTE RS067V 3755AOSX I J_10148150 1 13891 1 1-14-2019 Prel Compliance Statement: AT&T Mobility Compliance Statement: Based on the information collected, AT&T Mobility will be Compliant with FCC Rules and Regulations at the nearest walking surface if recommendations in the Compliance Summary are implemented. AA nsulti environmental I engineering I due diligence AT&T Proprietary (internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: Aspen Highlands Site FA: 10 148 150 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Site USID: 113891 1 EnviroBusiness Inc. (dba EBI Consulting) has been contracted by AT&T Mobility, LLC to conduct radio frequency electromagnetic (RF-EME) modeling for AT&T Site COL04136 located at 75 Prospector Road in Aspen, Colorado to determine RF-EME exposure levels from proposed AT&T wireless communications equipment at this site. As described in greater detail in Appendix A of this report, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has developed Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Limits for general public exposures and occupational exposures. This report summarizes the results of RF-EME modeling in relation to relevant FCC RF-EME compliance standards for limiting human exposure to RF- EME fields. This document addresses the compliance of AT&T's transmitting facilities independently and in relation to all collocated facilities at the site. I.I SITE SUMMARY Recommended Mitigation at the Site: Access Point(s): o To reduce the risk of exposure and/or injury, EBI recommends that access to the rooftop or areas associated with the active antenna installation be restricted and secured where possible. W Signage at AT&T Mobility Sectors: o A: Yellow CAUTION 2 signs posted below the antennas above the sloped roof. o B: Yellow CAUTION 2 signs posted below the antennas above the sloped roof. o C: Yellow CAUTION 2 signs posted below the antennas above the sloped roof. Barriers at AT&T Mobility Sectors: A, B, and C: Barriers are not recommended for this site because the sloped roof significantly limits access by unauthorized persons to areas directly in front of the antennas. However, EBI recommends that AT&T and the landlord take additional measures to ensure that persons accessing the sloped roof (for example, roofers or other maintenance workers) are informed of areas where RF levels exceed the FCC general public limit and made aware that these areas must be avoided to maintain compliance with FCC requirements. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: Aspen Highlands Site FA: 10148150 Predictive Modeling Results: Site USID: 113891 2 The maximum predictive power density generated by the antennas is approximately 5,782.36 percent of the FCC's general public limit (1,156.47 percent of the FCC's occupational limit) at the main sloped roof level. At ground level, the maximum predictive power density generated by the antennas is approximately 0.56 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.1 12 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: Aspen Highlands Site USID: 1 13891 Site FA: 10 148 150 3 2.0 SIGNAGE AND MITIGATION PLAN Yellow CAUTION 2 signs posted below the antennas above the sloped roof. Existing Sign Proposed Sign r I Installed Sign 1 ® m a Yellow CAUTION 2 signs posted below[.. the antennas above the sloped roof. Yellow CAUTION 2 signs posted below the antennas above the sloped roof. AT&T NOTICE 2 Sign AT&T WARNING I Band 2A Signs AT&T NOTICE Small Cell Signs AT&T CAUTION Small Cell Signs I l I__ Cartier Color Code Q ATT Q Unknown 10 foot grid size AT&T CAUTION 2— Rooftop Sign AT&T CAUTION 2B — Tower Sign AT&T CAUTION 2C— parapet Sign AT&T TRILINGUAL NOTICE Sign AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the A I & I companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. N— O - m V P Ant ft C S C C C C C >;' D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D➢ D D Operator F F i i F F 4 00 M M ' z m z m z m z m z m z m z m o n n n n n n n — n n n n n n _ n n — n n — n n n n n n — n n — n n — n n Antenna Male n n n n n n n < m m m m m m Z Z Z Z �n �n ui in �n ui P �n P v; P v� UI � m r M m r � m r � A A P A P X x )( A A P A A X )( A P P F A X X C WW C C W C W= C r = W C WW C C C W= C r = a a o>>> a z a Antenna Model 56 O C C O A p O D O O z y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 O p 0 0 p i i O O O O O O O O O O d y� to 0 0 0 `� W N O W V1 V O V O V— O �0 p� W O O O O O O 00 O O O O O O O � p 0 0 0 0 0 00 O Frequency (MHz) [vo Z-- o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z.; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Azimuth (deg.) �n an Mechanical �.' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Downtilt (deg.) �. Horizontal -' P — P P — P VI P — P N P — P O P UI P W P P P A P E P O P N P P P P t P P P O P 4� P P P P �? P Beamwidth , (Degrees) A P Aperture (fe) et Power Input (Watts) Transmitter Count = a=>— a=>= o 0 o w N a= o 0 o w N a= o 0 o w N Antenna Gain to N P to to N P (n In N to N In to V w V w V Y (Qn� O w L— In w V In V V In .P W O w 1— N w N V N V> In In O N (dBd) Total.ERP V •O O — �U W •D N L. OV '(Watts) T v A p V V O V P V OJ O Total EIRP N P w� N N W N /�/ il�n N d A W d 'P W P UI N d P VI \�•attS) W W VI 0 VI N P N N IJ Z m Z Z D Z M m Z O D RO RO 0 0 m m Z S S p n m � m w w w " N a -Di N � y � 3 � 7 m � N n w p „ c O � � � © Y m � � w O Z ^ Do �^ Ro r w C O h m a -4 N O m M S 6 T m a o m f ^- n M G vpi � `1 w c c m � rOr o m CL N w � D� a� Vq n 90 a S A m m O m '° O ro w w 3 � w o w N a 3 � A 6 m 1? 0=Q Z C v n � � O = � O Z f � N !^ w R N — w dQ Z A A M 0 d V A t i4 .P w N — O `O DD V O� In .A w N — i=•1 c c c c c c c C DDDD�D'y :O w V Ln w 'O 'o O In V _ ;p O In n'7b O O rnma.o.o.rnmrno.mo.m w w w w w w N N N N N N w -' in in in in in in in in in in in in V+ in N2 O � i�l to in In cn Ln i i Ln in in in .A w ? in : ef...... 0,3 y,N Oct on o. V V V V V V 4 91 o of to 10 000000000.00100�o f N m a` .o .O .o ZO OD V ao V ao �00000000:ooloolo �.:�C•i N Mpo90 mma.000000 — .p.2 m Site Name: Aspen Highlands Site USID: 113891 Site FA: 10 148 150 7 4.0 WORST -CASE PREDICTIVE MODELING In accordance with AT&T's RF Exposure policy, EBI performed theoretical modeling using RoofMasterTm software to estimate the worst -case power density at the site rooftop and ground -level and nearby rooftops resulting from operation of the antennas. For this report, EBI utilized antenna and power data provided by AT&T and compared the resultant worst - case MPE levels to the FCC's occupational/controlled exposure limits outlined in OET Bulletin 65. The assumptions used in the modeling are based upon information provided by AT&T and information gathered from other sources. An unknown carrier also has antennas on the rooftop. Information about these antennas was included in the modeling analysis. Per AT&T's corporate policy, the FCC's general population limits are applicable to all rooftop sites, regardless of the level of access control. Based on worst -case predictive modeling, the worst -case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's general public limit within approximately 46 feet of AT&T's Sector A, B, and C antennas at the main sloped roof level. Modeling also indicates that the worst -case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's occupational limit within approximately 18 feet of AT&T's Sector A, B, and C antennas at the main sloped roof level. Modeling also indicates that the worst -case emitted power density may exceed ten times the FCC's occupational limit within approximately I foot of AT&T's Sector A, B, and C antennas at the main sloped roof level. At the nearest walking/working surfaces to the AT&T antennas on the main sloped roof level, the maximum power density generated by the AT&T antennas is approximately 5,782.35 percent of the FCC's general public limit (1,156.47 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). The composite exposure level from all carriers on this site is approximately 5,782.36 percent of the FCC's general public limit (1,156.47 percent of the FCC's occupational limit) at the nearest walking/working surface to each antenna. Based on worst -case predictive modeling, there are no areas at ground/street level related to the proposed AT&T antennas that exceed the FCC's occupational or general public exposure limits at this site. At ground/street level, the maximum power density generated by the antennas is approximately 0.56 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.1 12 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). There were also worst -case predicted exposures above the general public MPE in front of the unknown carrier antennas. Modeling indicates that the AT&T contribution to these areas is greater than 5% of the general public MPE and, as such, under FCC regulations, AT&T is responsible for these predicted exceedances. Microwave dish antennas are designed for point-to-point operations at the elevations of the installed equipment rather than ground -level coverage. Based on AT&T's RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document, dated October 28, 2014, microwave antennas are considered compliant if they are higher than 20 feet above any accessible walking/working surface. There are no microwaves installed at this site. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: Aspen Highlands Site USID: 113891 Site FA: 10 148 150 9 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: Aspen Highlands Site USID: 113891 Site FA: 10148150 12 Note that the areas shown in purple are where AT&T antennas contribute more than 5% of the FCC's general exposure RF limit. These do overlap areas in front of other carrier antennas exceeding the FCC's general exposure RF limit as shown in Figure I. Under FCC regulations, AT&T is therefore responsible for predicted exceedances of another carrier's antennas. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved.