Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.apz.06-2021RECEPTION#: 677186, R: $58.00, D: $0.00 DOC CODE: RESOLUTION Pg 1 of 10, 06/03/2021 at 08:42:36 AM Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO RESOLUTION NO.06 (SERIES OF 2021) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIATIONS FOR A PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT D AND E, BLOCK 48, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. COMMONLY KNOWN AS 225 WEST SMUGGLER STREET Parcel No. 2735-124-17-007 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Continental Holdings LLC, 15 E. 26`h St., Suite 602, New York, New York 10010 requesting approval for Residential Design Standard Variations for the property at 225 W. Smuggler St.; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval of a Residential Design Standard Variation to the Articulation of Building Mass (Section 26.410.030.B.1) and Window Placement (Section 26.410.030.E.2) standards; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and took and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on May 181, 2021; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets the applicable review criteria and that the approval of the request is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approves Resolution No. 06, Series of 2021, by a six to one (6-1) vote, granting approval of the Residential Design Standard Variations as identified herein. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission: Section 1: Residential Design Standard Variation Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the following requests for variations (Chapter 26.410.020.C, Variations)" Pagel of 3 A. Articulation of Building Mass (Section 26.410.030.B.1): for an overall building width of seventy-nine feet (79'), measured from the front most wall to the rear most wall, with the following design requirements: a. A five foot (5') stepdown on the west fagade shall occur at a maximum sidewall ' depth of forty-five feet (45'), as depicted in Exhibit A. b. A minimum thirteen -foot (IY) step down on the east fagade shall occur at a maximum sidewall of fifty feet (50'), as depicted in Exhibit A. B. Window Placement (Section 26.410.030.E.2): for up to a two foot (2') wide twenty-one foot six inch (21'6") tall window on the front fagade of western most portion of the glass stair enclosure, as depicted in Exhibit A. Issuance of this variation does not alter the applicability or intent of the Residential Design Standards as applied to development activities within the City of Aspen. All other dimensional standards including height and setbacks shall be met. Section 2• All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such site development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 3• This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4• If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED by the Commission at a Regular Meeting on May 18a`, 2021. Approved as to form: Kitharine John , Assistant City Attorney Attest: aiv- Cindy K1 , Deputy City Clerk Page 2 of 3 Exhibits• Exhibit A: Approved Plans Exhibit B: Signed RDS Checklist Page 3 of 3 YANAIEHRLICH - -- - R H E E - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- Ep EP C H A N E Y =4 ---- ----- -- ARCH I T E C T S 10865 Washington Blvd Culver City CA 90232 eyrc.com ----- ------------------ mP 0 310 838 9700 F 310 838 9737 I I I - tM, =1-47 ----------- : ------ I I TT M I 1 1: ---------- ---------- T -A I L-L --------------- : <E1 ................. T ---- i ------ ------------ ---------- - ----- L=J ** - --------------- ........... Y ..... ...... ........ . ................................... ... ......... ..... ........ ............. .... .. ................. . .................... ................ ............... . ................ .. ............ ..................... ............. .................... .......... . ......... - — --------- ....................... . . . . . . .......... . . .. ................... ......... . . ... ..... . ............. ........... . . ............................ . ........ .............. ............... ......... --- .. ............ . ............ ... .... ............ .. ......... . . ............................. . ..... ........ ........ ...... ......... .. ............... .......... .............. .. ...... ....................... .. . ......... ... ....... ....... .. ......... :* . ........ ..... .... ........ :,: ... ..... ... . . . ............. . .... .. . . .......... .............. ..... yl -Y.CH YANAII R H E E �---------------------T--1----T-- --------------------------- I------------� •P.K j 1 I _ CHANEY A R C H I T E C T S , 10865 Washington Blvd Culver City CA 90232 \i eyrc.com ------ \ 310 838 9700 F 310 838 9737 i I e__._. I I I to � I, I ;• .I i 1 --.--------------1-- --- -------- ------- ' ------� L L j _..................................... _......... . .._.......... - .... r ......_.--::::::::.._. _--- ........... _.__..................... __.:...... .:.::.::_::_:::::: ...._... _.._...._...-..... _ .. ......................._...._. _......_._.__.._.... _....._. ._. .. _.__........ — -- -- _--_—_— _ I«..._'_'_•___..._..._._......_ ...................._.._.._... _.._..._...... ................... ... ..........._..._......... _....._.__. _._._... ..........._.....__.._...._._.._... ................_.._.. N �� •� �_. aoaa a � 0000�aoo���. ........ EHRLICH YANAI ------------------- ........... 7; ---------------- RHEE CHANEY ARCHITECT S 1086.5 Washington Blvd Culver City CA 90232 eyrccom 0 310 838 9700 F 310 838 9737 HE -A ................. ..... .......... 1HL IA . ...... L------- L ------- J -------- : ----------------- -------------------------------------------------------- --- .......... ......... . L L L ..... ...... ........ . . . ...................... ...... ......................... ....... ..... .................... .... ......... . ............. .. ....... ... ...... . ........ .... .. ....... ..................... ... ......... :'... ... ......... ........................... ............. ... ........... . ... .................. ....... .......... ... ........... ........... ........... ............... . ........... ...... ....... ................... ....................... ... ..... . . . . ........... . ............. - ............................. ...... ........ .......... ... ..... ........... ............ ....... .. ... ......... .. ...... ....... .. ............. ..... .... . .... . .. ............. ..... .................... ........................... .................. .......... .............. ........ ... .. .......... ... .... ... ....... ........................ ... ..... ----------- C W L EHRLICH YANAI RHEE CHANEY A R C H I T E C T S 10865 Washington Blvd Culver City CA 90232 eyrc.com 0 310 838 9700 F 310 838 9737 608 10 Q �? o Io , �o � "I I © I' .............. .......... .... EHRLICH YANAI RHEE .. . . ....................... ..... ...... . .... C H A N E Y ARCHITECTS 10865 Washington 81vd Culver City CA 90232 eyrccom 0 310 838 9700 OF 310 838 9737 .......... . .............. ............... ... ......... ........... ................ ............ ............... ... .... ...... Q� 4� Q� Q Q w Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Staff Checklist - Single Family and Duplex Address: 225 Smuggler Parcel ID:273512417007 Zone District/PD: R-6 Approved: Representative: Carson Davis edavis@eyre.eom (Approved plans/elevations attached) Email: .540-392-1293 Digitally signed by Garrett Larimer Garrett Larimer DN: CN=Garrett Larimer Date: 2021.05.19 17:36:45-06'00' Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. - Alternative Does Not - Standard Complies Compliance Comply N/A _ Sheet #(s)/Notes B.1.Articulation of Building Mass Variation approved Via Resolution No. 6, Series of 2021. (Non -flexible) ✓ B.2.Building Orientation (Flexible) B.3.Build-to Requirement (Flexible) BA.One Story Element (Flexible) Strong orientation provided. Mail level front most wall within 5' of front setback and measures more than 60% of the overall building width. Open front porch provided - 8' tall, 7'6" deep, over 50 sq. ft., and 20% of overall building width (8'). C.1.Garage Access I �[_F_I Garage access from alley. (Non -flexible) C.2.Garage Placement Garage access from alley. (Non -flexible) C.3.Garage Dimensions Garage faces the alley and is not visible from a street. (Flexible) ✓ Page 1 of 2 Val w Approved: pp Residential Design Standards �~ �`�'° Administrative Compliance Review Staff Checklist D¢CmoFA-m% Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Standard Complies Alternative Doesn"� N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes 91 Compliance Comply CA.Garage Door Design 2' Separating element proposed to appear as two separate garage (Flexible) V doors. DA.Entry Connection Street facing front door proposed. (Non -flexible) D.2.Door Height 8' front entry door shown. No other street facing doors exist on main (Flexible) level. D.3.EntryPorch Entry porch measures less than one story. (Flexible) ✓ E.1.Principle Window F Principle window proposed on main level, east of front door. (Flexible) E.2.Window Placement Variation approved Via Resolution No. 6, Series of 2021. (Flexible) E.3.Nonorthogonal Window Limit No non -orthogonal windows proposed. (Flexible) i I E.4.Li htwell/Stairwell Location No lightwells are proposed between the front most facade and the (Flexible) street. E.5.Materials Materials are used true to their characteristics and consistently onall (Flexible) sides. Stone as base with metal and wood. i Page 2 of 2