Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
ExhibitD Application.202 E Main.20210512
EXHIBIT D - APPLICATION City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2020 ATTACHMENT 2 - Historic Preservation Land Use Application PROJECT: APPLICANT: Name: Address: Phone #: Fax#: E-mail: REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Address: Phone #: Fax#: E-mail: TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Name: Location: (Indicate street address, lot & block number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) Historic Designation Certificate of No Negative Effect Certificate of Appropriateness Minor Historic Development Major Historic Development Conceptual Historic Development Final Historic Development Relocation (temporary, on or off-site) Demolition (total demolition) Substantial Amendment Historic Landmark Lot Split City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet General Information Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with yourapplication. This information will help us review yourplans and, if necessary, coordinate with other agencies that maybe involved. YES NO ❑ Does the work you are planning include exterior work; including additions, demolitions, new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration? X ❑ Does the work you are planning include interior work, including remodeling, rehabilitation, or restoration? ❑ IN Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this time? ❑ In addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No Negative Effect and a building permit, are you seeking to meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation or restoration of a National Register of Historic Places Property in order to qualify for state or federal tax credits? ❑ ❑ If yes, are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in Conjunction with this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are eligible. Owner -occupied residential properties are not.) ❑ ❑ If yes, are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check all City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use. ❑ Rehabilitation Loan Fund N Dimensional Variances ❑ Tax Credits ❑ Increased Density ❑ Conservation Easement Program ❑ Waiver of Park Dedication Fees ❑ Conditional Uses ❑ Historic Landmark Lot Split City of Aspen 1 130 S. Galena Street. 1(970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2020 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena Street. | (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March, 2020 ATTACHMENT 3 - Dimensional Requirements Form (Item #10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project: Applicant: Project Location: Zone District: Lot Size: Lot Area: (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high-water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: Proposed: _______________________________ Proposed % of demolition: ____________________________________% DIMENSIONS: (write N/A where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: Height Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Principal Bldg.: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Accessory Bldg.: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Front/Rear: Indicate N, S, E, W Existing: Required: Proposed: _______________ Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: Distance between buildings Existing: Required: Proposed: Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued: Variations requested (identify the exact variances needed): PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Sarah Yoon, sarah.yoon@cityofaspen.com DATE: February 9, 2021 PROJECT LOCATION: 202 E. Main Street REQUEST: Final Major Development and Setback Variations DESCRIPTION: 202 E. Main Street is a designated historic landmark on a 3,000 sf lot in the Mixed- Use (MU) Zone District within the Main Street Historic District. The owner received Conceptual Major Development approval by HPC for a single-family residence via Resolution #18, Series of 2019, and an extension of this approval was granted in 2020. According to Resolution #19, Series of 2020 the applicant must submit a complete application for Final Review prior to April 9, 2021. The Conceptual Development approval was given to demolish the non-historic addition and relocate the history home on a new basement. The mass and scale of the new addition was approved and situated to the rear of the historic home. Two compliant on-site parking spaces were included in the approved design. As part of the approval, a 500 sf floor area bonus and setback variations for the historic home and the new addition were granted. Major Development is a two-step process, requiring the approval of Conceptual Design and Final Design. The applicant proposes minor changes to the Conceptual design for the purposes of constructability and may need to request setback variations for updated features such as the lightwell. The Final Design review will also consider landscape, lighting and building materials. HPC will use the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and the Land Use Code Sections that are applicable to this project to assist with their determinations. RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS: Section Number Section Title 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.415.070.D Historic Preservation – Major Development 26.415.110.C Setback Variations 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.710.180 Mixed-Use Zone District (MU) For your convenience – links to the Land Use Application and Land Use Code are below: Land Use Application Land Use Code Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Review by: Staff for completeness and recommendations HPC for decisions Public Hearing: Yes, at HPC Final Review Neighborhood Outreach: No Referrals: Staff will seek referral comments from the Building Department, Zoning, Engineering and Parks regarding any relevant code requirements or considerations. There will be no Development Review Committee meeting or referral fees. Planning Fees: $1,950 for 6 billable hours of staff time. (Additional/ lesser hours will be billed/ refunded at a rate of $325 per hour.) This fee will be due at Conceptual and Final submittal. Referral Agencies Fee: $0. Total Deposit: $1,950. APPLICATION CHECKLIST: Below is a list of submittal requirements for HPC Final review. Please email the entire application to sarah.yoon@cityofaspen.com. The fee will be requested after the application is determined to be complete. Completed Land Use Application and signed Fee Agreement. Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application. Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. HOA Compliance form (Attached). List of adjacent property owners for both properties within 300’ for public hearing. An 8 1/2” by 11” vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. A written description of the proposal (scope of work) and written explanation of how the proposed development and any requests for variations or benefits complies with the review standards and design guidelines relevant to the application. A proposed site plan. Stormwater Mitigation plan for the site. Scaled drawings of all proposed structure(s) or addition(s) depicting their form, including their height, massing, scale, proportions and roof plan; and the primary features of all elevations. Supplemental materials to provide a visual description of the context surrounding the designated historic property including photographs and other exhibits, as needed, to accurately depict location and extent of proposed work. For Final Review, the following items will need to be submitted in addition to the items listed above: Drawings of the street facing facades must be provided at ¼” scale. Final selection of all exterior materials, and samples or clearly illustrated photographs. Samples are preferred for the presentation to HPC. A lighting plan and landscape plan, including any visible stormwater mitigation features. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY Date: December 15, 2020 Subject: Attached Title Policy 202 E. MAIN ST., LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY for 202 EAST MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 Enclosed please find the Owner's Title Insurance Policy for your purchase of the property listed above. This title policy is the final step in your real estate transaction, and we want to take a moment to remind you of its importance. Please review all information in this document carefully and be sure to safeguard this policy along with your other legal documents. Your owner's policy insures you as long as you own the property and requires no additional premium payments. Please feel free to contact any member of our staff if you have questions or concerns regarding your policy, or you may contact Commercial Title Dept. at (303) 850-4158 or As a Colorado-owned and operated title company for over 50 years, with offices throughout the state, we take pride in serving our customers one transaction at a time. We sincerely appreciate your business and welcome the opportunity to assist you with any future real estate needs. Not only will Land Title be able to provide you with the title services quickly and professionally, but you may also be entitled to a discount on title premiums if you sell or refinance the property described in the enclosed policy. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to work with you on this transaction. We look forward to serving you again in the future. Sincerely, Land Title Guarantee Company OWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE ANY NOTICE OF CLAIM AND ANY OTHER NOTICE OR STATEMENT IN WRITING REQUIRED TO BE GIVEN TO THE COMPANY UNDER THIS POLICY MUST BE GIVEN TO THE COMPANY AT THE ADDRESS SHOWN IN SECTION 18 OF THE CONDITIONS. COVERED RISKS SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE CONDITIONS,OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation, (the "Company"), insures, as of Date of Policy and, to the extent stated in Covered Risks 9 and 10, after Date of Policy, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance, sustained or incurred by the Insured by reason of: 1. Title being vested other than as stated in Schedule A. 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title; This covered Risk includes but is not limited to insurance against loss from a. A defect in the Title caused by b. The lien of real estate taxes or assessments imposed on the Title by a governmental authority due or payable, but unpaid. c. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. The term "encroachment" includes encroachments of existing improvements located on the Land onto adjoining land, and encroachments onto the Land of existing improvements located on adjoining land. 3. Unmarketable Title. 4. No right of access to and from the Land. 5. The violation or enforcement of any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to if a notice, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records setting forth the violation or intention to enforce, but only to the extent of the violation or enforcement referred to in that notice. 6. An enforcement action based on the exercise of a governmental police power not covered by Covered Risk 5 if a notice of the enforcement action, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records, but only to the extent of the enforcement referred to in that notice. 7. The exercise of the rights of eminent domain if a notice of the exercise, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records. 8. Any taking by a governmental body that has occurred and is binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without Knowledge. 9. Title being vested other than as stated in Schedule A or being defective 10. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the Title or other matter included in Covered Risks 1 through 9 that has been created or attached or has been filed or recorded in the Public Records subsequent to Date of Policy and prior to the recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred in defense of any matter insured against by this Policy, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions. Issued by: Land Title Guarantee Company 3033 East First Avenue Suite 600 Denver, Colorado 80206 303-321-1880 Senior Vice President Copyright 2006-2020 American Land Title Association - All rights reserved. - The use of this form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. - All other uses are prohibited. - Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY Adopted 6-17-06 forgery, fraud, undue influence, duress, incompetency, incapacity, or impersonation;(i) failure of any person or Entity to have authorized a transfer or conveyance;(ii) a document affecting Title not properly created, executed, witnessed, sealed, acknowledged, notarized, or delivered;(iii) failure to perform those acts necessary to create a document by electronic means authorized by law;(iv) a document executed under a falsified, expired, or otherwise invalid power of attorney;(v) a document not properly filed, recorded, or indexed in the Public Records including failure to perform those acts by electronic means authorized by law; or (vi) a defective judicial or administrative proceeding.(vii) the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the Land;(a) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land;(b) the subdivision of land; or(c) environmental protection(d) as a result of the avoidance in whole or in part, or from a court order providing an alternative remedy, of a transfer of all or any part of the title to or any interest in the Land occurring prior to the transaction vesting Title as shown in Schedule A because that prior transfer constituted a fraudulent or preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws; or (a) because the instrument of transfer vesting Title as shown in Schedule A constitutes a preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws by reason of the failure of its recording in the Public Records (b) to be timely, or(i) to impart notice of its existence to a purchaser for value or to a judgment or lien creditor.(ii) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITION OF TERMS The following terms when used in this policy mean: 2. CONTINUATION OF INSURANCE The coverage of this policy shall continue in force as of Date of Policy in favor of an Insured, but only so long as the Insured retains an estate or interest in the Land, or holds an obligation secured by a purchase money Mortgage given by a purchaser from the Insured, or only so long as the Insured shall have liability by reason of warranties in any transfer or conveyance of the Title. This policy shall not continue in force in favor of any purchaser from the Insured of either (i) an estate or interest in the Land, or (ii) an obligation secured by a purchase money Mortgage given to the Insured. 3. NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GIVEN BY INSURED CLAIMANT The Insured shall notify the Company promptly in writing (i) in case of any litigation as set forth in Section 5(a) of these Conditions, (ii) in case Knowledge shall come to an Insured hereunder of any claim of title or interest that is adverse to the Title, as insured, and that might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to(1) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land;(i) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land;(ii) the subdivision of land; or(iii) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. (iv) Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8.(2) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters(3) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant;(a) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (b) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant;(c) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10); or(d) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title.(e) Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (4) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or(a) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy.(b) Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. (5) "Amount of Insurance": The amount stated in Schedule A, as may be increased or decreased by endorsement to this policy, increased by Section 8(b) or decreased by Sections 10 and 11 of these Conditions. (a) "Date of Policy": The date designated as "Date of Policy" in Schedule A.(b) "Entity": A corporation, partnership, trust, limited liability company, or other similar legal entity.(c) "Insured": The Insured named in Schedule A.(d) The term "Insured" also includes(i) successors to the Title of the Insured by operation of law as distinguished from purchase, including heirs, devisees, survivors, personal representatives, or next of kin; (A) successors to an Insured by dissolution, merger, consolidation, distribution, or reorganization;(B) successors to an Insured by its conversion to another kind of Entity;(C) a grantee of an Insured under a deed delivered without payment of actual valuable consideration conveying the Title(D) if the stock, shares, memberships, or other equity interests of the grantee are wholly-owned by the named Insured.(1) if the grantee wholly owns the named Insured,(2) if the grantee is wholly-owned by an affiliated Entity of the named Insured, provided the affiliated Entity and the named Insured are both wholly- owned by the same person or Entity, or (3) if the grantee is a trustee or beneficiary of a trust created by a written instrument established by the Insured named in Schedule A for estate planning purposes (4) With regard to (A), (B), (C), and (D) reserving, however, all rights and defensed as to any successor that the Company would have had against any predecessor Insured. (ii) "Insured Claimant": An Insured claiming loss or damage.(e) "Knowledge" or "Known": Actual knowledge, not constructive knowledge or notice that may be imputed to an Insured by reason of the Public Records or any other records that impart constructive notice of matters affecting the Title. (f) "Land": The land described in Schedule A, and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term "Land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenue, alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is insured by this policy. (g) "Mortgage": Mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law.(h) "Public Records": Records established under state statutes at Date of Policy for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge. With respect to Covered Risk 5(d), "Public Records" shall also include environmental protection liens filed in the records of the clerk of the United States District Court for the district where the Land is located. (i) "Title": The estate or interest described in Schedule A. "Unmarketable Title": Title affected by an alleged or apparent matter that would permit a prospective purchaser or lessee of the Title or lender on the Title to be released from the obligation to purchase, lease, or lend if there is a contractual condition requiring the delivery of marketable title. (j) liable by virtue of this policy, or (iii) if the Title, as insured, is rejected as Unmarketable Title. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Insured Claimant to provide prompt notice, the Company's liability to the Insured Claimant under the policy shall be reduced to the extent of the prejudice. 4. PROOF OF LOSS In the event the Company is unable to determine the amount of loss or damage, the Company may, at its option, require as a condition of payment that the Insured Claimant furnish a signed proof of loss. The proof of loss must describe the defect, lien, encumbrance, or other matter insured against by this policy that constitutes the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. 5. DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OF ACTIONS (a) Upon written request by the Insured, and subject to the options contained in Section 7 of these Conditions, the Company, at its own cost and without unreasonable delay, shall provide for the defense of an Insured in litigation in which any third party asserts a claim covered by this policy adverse to the Insured. This obligation is limited to only those stated causes of action alleging matters insured against by this policy. The Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of the Insured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Insured as to those stated causes of action. It shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel. The Company will not pay any fees, costs, or expenses incurred by the Insured in the defense of those causes of action that allege matters not insured against by this policy. (b) The Company shall have the right, in addition to the options contained in Section 7 of these Conditions, at its own cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding or to do any other act that in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the Title, as insured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Insured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this policy, whether or not it shall be liable to the Insured. The exercise of these rights shall not be an admission of liability or waiver of any provision of this policy. If the Company exercises its rights under this subsection, it must do so diligently. (c) Whenever the Company brings an action or asserts a defense as required or permitted by this policy, the Company may pursue the litigation to a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and it expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to appeal any adverse judgment or order. 6. DUTY OF INSURED CLAIMANT TO COOPERATE (a) In all cases where this policy permits or requires the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding and any appeals, the Insured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide defense in the action or proceeding, including the right to use, at its option, the name of the Insured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, the Insured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid (i) in securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or proceeding, or effecting settlement, and (ii) in any other lawful act that in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the Title or any other matter as insured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Insured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligation to the Insured under the policy shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation, with regard to the matter or matters requiring such cooperation. (b) The Company may reasonably require the Insured Claimant to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and to produce for examination, inspection, and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by the authorized representative of the Company, all records, in whatever medium maintained, including books, ledgers, checks, memoranda, correspondence, reports, e-mails, disks, tapes, and videos whether bearing a date before or after Date of Policy, that reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Insured Claimant shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, inspect, and copy all of these records in the custody or control of a third party that reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All information designated as confidential by the Insured Claimant provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the Insured Claimant to submit for examination under oath produce any reasonably requested information, or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in this subsection, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this policy as to that claim. 7. OPTIONS TO PAY OR OTHERWISE SETTLE CLAIMS; TERMINATION OF LIABILITY In case of a claim under this policy, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Insurance. To pay or tender payment of the Amount of Insurance under this policy together with any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment or tender of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of this option, all liability and obligations of the Company to the Insured under this policy, other than to make the payment required in the subsection, shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation. (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Insured or With the Insured Claimant. 8. DETERMINATION AND EXTENT OF LIABILITY This policy is a contract of indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Insured Claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of matters insured against by this policy. (a) The extent of liability of the Company for loss or damage under this policy shall not exceed the lesser of To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Insured Claimant any claim insured against under this policy. In addition, the Company will pay any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay; or (i) To pay or otherwise settle with the Insured Claimant the loss or damage provided for under this policy, together with any costs, attorneys' fees, and expensed incurred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of either of the options provided for in subsections (b)(i) or (ii), the Company's obligations to the Insured under this policy for the claimed loss or damage, other than the payments required to be made, shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation. (ii) the Amount of Insurance; or(i) the difference between the value of the Title as insured and the value of the Title subject to the risk insured against by this policy.(ii) (b) If the Company pursues its rights under Section 5 of these Conditions and is unsuccessful in establishing the Title, as insured, (c) In addition to the extent of liability under (a) and (b), the Company will also pay those costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred in accordance with Sections 5 and 7 of these Conditions. 9. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY (a) If the Company establishes the Title, or removes the alleged defect, lien, or encumbrance, or cures the lack of a right of access to or from the Land, or cures the claim of Unmarketable Title, all as insured, in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused to the Insured. (b) In the event of any litigation, including litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals, adverse to the Title, as insured. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to the Insured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Insured in settling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company. 10. REDUCTION OF INSURANCE; REDUCTION OR TERMINATION OF LIABILITY All payments under this policy, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses, shall reduce the Amount of Insurance by the amount of the payment. 11. LIABILITY NONCUMULATIVE The Amount of Insurance shall be reduced by any amount the Company pays under any policy insuring a Mortgage to which exception is taken in Schedule B or to which the Insured has agreed, assumed, or taken subject, or which is executed by an Insured after Date of Policy and which is a charge or lien on the Title, and the amount so paid shall be deemed a payment to the Insured under this policy. 12. PAYMENT OF LOSS When liability and the extent of loss or damage have been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions, the payment shall be made within 30 days. 13. RIGHTS OF RECOVERY UPON PAYMENT OR SETTLEMENT (a) Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this policy, it shall be subrogated and entitled to the rights of the Insured Claimant in the Title and all other rights and remedies in respect to the claim that the Insured Claimant has against any person or property, to the extent of the amount of any loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses paid by the Company. If requested by the Company, the Insured Claimant shall execute documents to evidence the transfer to the Company of these rights and remedies. The Insured Claimant shall permit the Company to sue, compromise, or settle in the name of the Insured Claimant and to use the name of the Insured Claimant in any transaction or litigation involving these rights and remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Insured Claimant, the Company shall defer the exercise of its right to recover until after the Insured Claimant shall have recovered its loss. (b) The Company's right of subrogation includes the rights of the Insured to indemnities, guaranties, other policies of insurance, or bonds, notwithstanding any terms or conditions contained in those instruments that address subrogation rights. 14. ARBITRATION Either the Company or the Insured may demand that the claim or controversy shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Land Title Association ("Rules"). Except as provided in the Rules, there shall be no joinder or consolidation with claims or controversies of other persons, Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the Insured arising out of or relating to this policy, any service in connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision, or to any other controversy or claim arising out of the transaction giving rise to this policy. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is in excess of $2,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Insured. Arbitration pursuant to this policy and under the Rules shall be binding upon the parties. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court of competent jurisdiction. 15. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS POLICY; POLICY ENTIRE CONTRACT (a) This policy together with all endorsements, if any, attached to it by the Company is the entire policy and contract between the Insured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this policy, this policy shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim or loss or damage that arises out of the status of the Title or by any action asserting such claim shall be restricted to this policy. (c) Any amendment of or endorsement to this policy must be in writing and authenticated by an authorized person, or expressly incorporated by Schedule A of this policy. (d) Each endorsement to this policy issued at any time is made a part of this policy and is subject to all of its terms and provisions. Except as the endorsement expressly states, it does not (i) modify any of the terms and provisions of the policy, (ii) modify any prior endorsement, (iii) extend the Date of Policy, or (iv) increase the Amount of Insurance. the Amount of Insurance shall be increased by 10%, and(i) the Insured Claimant shall have the right to have the loss or damage determined either as of the date the claim was made by the Insured Claimant or as of the date it is settled and paid. (ii) 16. SEVERABILITY In the event any provision of this policy, in whole or in part, is held invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, the policy shall be deemed not to include that provision or such part held to be invalid, but all other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. 17. CHOICE OF LAW; FORUM (a) Choice of Law; The Insured acknowledges the Company has underwritten the risks covered by this policy and determined the premium charged therefor in reliance upon the law affecting interests in real property and applicable to the interpretation, rights, remedies, or enforcement of policies of title insurance of the jurisdiction where the Land is located. Therefore, the court or an arbitrator shall apply the law of the jurisdiction where the Land is located to determine the validity of claims against the Title that are adverse to the Insured and to interpret and enforce the terms of this policy. In neither case shall the court or arbitrator apply its conflicts of law principles to determine the applicable law. (b) Choice of Forum; Any litigation or other proceeding brought by the Insured against the Company must be filed only in a state or federal court within the United States of America or its territories having appropriate jurisdiction. 18. NOTICES, WHERE SENT Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing required to be given to the Company under this policy must be given to the Company at: 400 Second Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612)371-1111. ANTI-FRAUD STATEMENT: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), it is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado division of insurance within the department of regulatory agencies. This anti-fraud statement is affixed to and made a part of this policy. Order Number: ABS62011855 Policy No.: OX62011855.3047981 Amount of Insurance: $3,100,000.00 Property Address: 202 EAST MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 1. Policy Date: November 12, 2020 at 5:00 P.M. 2. Name of Insured: 202 E. MAIN ST., LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 3. The estate or interest in the Land described in this Schedule and which is covered by this policy is: A Fee Simple 4. Title to the estate or interest covered by this policy at the date is vested in: 202 E. MAIN ST., LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 5. The Land referred to in this Policy is described as follows: LOT 1, MAIN STREET VICTORIANS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 9, 2012 IN PLAT BOOK 100 AT PAGE 92, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Copyright 2006-2020 American Land Title Association. All Rights Reserved The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule A This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following: 1. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 2. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 6. EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES, IF ANY. 7. RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 1887 IN BOOK 59 AT PAGE 174 AS RECEPTION NO. 21651, PROVIDING AS FOLLOWS:"THAT NO TITLE SHALL BE HEREBY ACQUIRED TO ANY MINE OF GOLD, SILVER, CINNABAR OR COPPER, OT TO ANY VALID MINING CLAIM OR POSSESSION HELD UNDER EXISTING LAWS. 8. TERMS, AGREEMENTS, PROVISIONS, CONDITIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 62, SERIES 1976, DESIGNATING SUBJECT PROPERTY AS HISTORIC STRUCTURES AND SITE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE IX OF CHAPTER 24 OF THE ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE RECORDED DECEMBER 9, 1976 IN BOOK 321 AT PAGE 57 AS RECEPTION NO. 189908. 9. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION #5, SERIES OF 2012 RECORDED MARCH 29, 2012 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 587831. 10. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN ORDINANCE #14 (SERIES OF 2012) RECORDED MAY 16, 2012 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 589107. 11. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION AGREEMENT FOR MAIN STREET VICTORIANS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT RECORDED NOVEMBER 09, 2012 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 593851. 12. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF MAIN STREET VICTORIANS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT EXEMPTION RECORDED NOVEMBER 09, 2012 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 593852. 13. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION #18, SERIES OF 2019 RECORDED OCTOBER 25, 2019 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 659920. Old Republic National Title Insurance Company (Schedule B) Order Number: ABS62011855 Policy No.: OX62011855.3047981 14. MATTERS DISCLOSED ON IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT PREPARED BY HIRED GUN SURVEYING, CERTIFIED JUNE 04, 2020, JOB NO. 1106127 SAID DOCUMENT STORED AS OUR IMAGE 27944937 A: FENCELINE ARE NOT COINCIDENT WITH THE PROPERTY LINES B: ENCROCHMENT OF THE OVERHANG AREA, EAST AND WEST SIDES OF THE UNIT/BUILDING, ROCK WALL ON WEST SIDE OF PROPERTY, FRONT PORCH AND REAR SHED AREA ONTO THE 5' SIDE AND REAR SETBACK LINES TO THE NORTH, EAST AND WEST. C: RIGHTS FOR UTILITIES WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A RECORDED EASEMENT D: ENCROACHMENT OF ROCK WALL ONTO THE 10' SETBACK AREA IN THE SOUTH. 15. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RECORDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 668915. 16. DEED OF TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 10, 2020, FROM 202 E. MAIN ST., LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO FOR THE USE OF FIRST WESTERN TRUST BANK TO SECURE THE SUM OF $2,170,000.00 RECORDED NOVEMBER 12, 2020, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 670455. SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS FURTHER SECURED IN ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS RECORDED NOVEMBER 12, 2020, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 670456. ITEM NOS. 1 THROUGH 3 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS ARE HEREBY DELETED. ITEM 4 OF THE PRE-PRINTED EXCEPTIONS IS DELETED AS TO ANY LIENS OR FUTURE LIENS RESULTING FROM WORK OR MATERIAL FURNISHED AT THE SPECIFIC, DIRECT REQUEST, AND WITH THE ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF ROCKING LAZY J PROPERTIES, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AND DELLA PEGOLOTTI. OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY FOR ANY LIENS ARISING FROM WORK OR MATERIAL FURNISHED AT THE SPECIFIC, DIRECT REQUEST, AND WITH THE ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF 202 E. MAIN ST., LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. Old Republic National Title Insurance Company (Schedule B) Order Number: ABS62011855 Policy No.: OX62011855.3047981 RECEPTION#: 670455, R: $58.00, D: $0.00, 11/12/2020 at 02:44:30 PM, Pgs 1 of 10, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO DEED OF TRUST THIS DEED OF TRUST is dated November 10, 2020, among 202 E Main St., LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, whose address is 2610 E Cedar Ave, Denver, CO 80209 ("Grantor"); FIRST WESTERN TRUST BANK, whose address is Cherry Creek Office, 233 Milwaukee Street, Denver, CO 80206 (referred to below sometimes as "Lender" and sometimes as "Beneficiary"); and the Public Trustee of Pitkin County, Colorado (referred to below as "Trustee"). CONVEYANCE AND GRANT. For valuable consideration, Grantor hereby irrevocably grants, transfers and assigns to Trustee for the benefit of Lender as Beneficiary all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in and to the following described real property, together with all existing or subsequently erected or affixed buildings, improvements and fixtures; all easements, rights of way, and appurtenances; all water, water rights and ditch rights (including stock in utilities with ditch or irrigation rights); and all other rights, royalties, and profits relating to the real property, including without limitation all minerals, oil, gas, geothermal and similar matters, (the "Real Property") located in Pitkin County, State of Colorado: LOT 1, MAIN STREET VICTORIANS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 9, 2012 IN PLAT BOOK 100 AT PAGE 92, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. The Real Property or its address is commonly known as 202 E Main Street, Aspen, CO 81611. The Real Property tax identification number is 273707399001. CROSS-COLLATERALIZATION. In addition to the Note, this Deed of Trust secures all obligations, debts and liabilities, plus interest thereon, of either Grantor or Borrower to Lender, or any one or more of them, as well as all claims by Lender against Borrower and Grantor or any one or more of them, whether now existing or hereafter arising, whether related or unrelated to the purpose of the Note, whether voluntary or otherwise, whether due or not due, direct or indirect, determined or undetermined, absolute or contingent, liquidated or unliquidated, whether Borrower or Grantor may be liable individually or jointly with others, whether obligated as guarantor, surety, accommodation party or otherwise, and whether recovery upon such amounts may be or hereafter may become barred by any statute of limitations, and whether the obligation to repay such amounts may be or hereafter may become otherwise unenforceable. Grantor presently assigns to Lender (also known as Beneficiary in this Deed of Trust) all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in and to all present and future leases of the Property and all Rents from the Property. In addition, Grantor grants to Lender a Uniform Commercial Code security interest in the Personal Property and Rents. THIS DEED OF TRUST, INCLUDING THE ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND THE SECURITY INTEREST IN THE RENTS AND PERSONAL PROPERTY, IS GIVEN TO SECURE (A) PAYMENT OF THE INDEBTEDNESS AND (B) PERFORMANCE OF ANY AND ALL OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS DEED OF TRUST. THIS DEED OF TRUST IS GIVEN AND ACCEPTED ON THE FOLLOWING TERMS: GRANTOR'S REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES. Grantor warrants that: (a) this Deed of Trust is executed at Borrower's request and not at the request of Lender; (b) Grantor has the full power, right, and authority to enter into this Deed of Trust and to hypothecate the Property; (c) the provisions of this Deed of Trust do not conflict with, or result in a default under any agreement or other instrument binding upon Grantor and do not result in a violation of any law, regulation, court decree or order applicable to Grantor; (d) Grantor has established adequate means of obtaining from Borrower on a continuing basis information about Borrower's financial condition; and (e) Lender has made no representation to Grantor about Borrower (including without limitation the creditworthiness of Borrower). GRANTOR'S WAIVERS. Grantor waives all rights or defenses arising by reason of any "one action" or "anti -deficiency" law, or any other law which may prevent Lender from bringing any action against Grantor, including a claim for deficiency to the extent Lender is RECEPTION#: 670455, 11/12/2020 at 02:44:30 PM, Pgs 2 of 10, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 2 otherwise entitled to a claim for deficiency, before or after Lender's commencement or completion of any foreclosure action, either judicially or by exercise of a power of sale. PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE. Except as otherwise provided in this Deed of Trust, Borrower and Grantor shall pay to Lender all Indebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust as it becomes due, and Borrower and Grantor shall strictly perform all their respective obligations under the Note, this Deed of Trust, and the Related Documents. POSSESSION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPERTY. Borrower and Grantor agree that Borrower's and Grantor's possession and use of the Property shall be governed by the following provisions: Possession and Use. Until the occurrence of an Event of Default, Grantor may (1) remain in possession and control of the Property; (2) use, operate or manage the Property; and (3) collect the Rents from the Property. Duty to Maintain. Grantor shall maintain the Property in tenantable condition and promptly perform all repairs, replacements, and maintenance necessary to preserve its value. Compliance With Environmental Laws. Grantor represents and warrants to Lender that: (1) During the period of Grantor's ownership of the Property, there has been no use, generation, manufacture, storage, treatment, disposal, release or threatened release of any Hazardous Substance by any person on, under, about or from the Property; (2) Grantor has no knowledge of, or reason to believe that there has been, except as previously disclosed to and acknowledged by Lender in writing, (a) any breach or violation of any Environmental Laws, (b) any use, generation, manufacture, storage, treatment, disposal, release or threatened release of any Hazardous Substance on, under, about or from the Property by any prior owners or occupants of the Property, or (c) any actual or threatened litigation or claims of any kind by any person relating to such matters; and (3) Except as previously disclosed to and acknowledged by Lender in writing, (a) neither Grantor nor any tenant, contractor, agent or other authorized user of the Property shall use, generate, manufacture, store, treat, dispose of or release any Hazardous Substance on, under, about or from the Property; and (b) any such activity shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations and ordinances, including without limitation all Environmental Laws. Grantor authorizes Lender and its agents to enter upon the Property to make such inspections and tests, at Grantor's expense, as Lender may deem appropriate to determine compliance of the Property with this section of the Deed of Trust. Any inspections or tests made by Lender shall be for Lender's purposes only and shall not be construed to create any responsibility or liability on the part of Lender to Grantor or to any other person. The representations and warranties contained herein are based on Grantor's due diligence in investigating the Property for Hazardous Substances. Grantor hereby (1) releases and waives any future claims against Lender for indemnity or contribution in the event Grantor becomes liable for cleanup or other costs under any such laws; and (2) agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Lender against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, penalties, and expenses which Lender may directly or indirectly sustain or suffer resulting from a breach of this section of the Deed of Trust or as a consequence of any use, generation, manufacture, storage, disposal, release or threatened release occurring prior to Grantor's ownership or interest in the Property, whether or not the same was or should have been known to Grantor. The provisions of this section of the Deed of Trust, including the obligation to indemnify and defend, shall survive the payment of the Indebtedness and the satisfaction and reconveyance of the lien of this Deed of Trust and shall not be affected by Lender's acquisition of any interest in the Property, whether by foreclosure or otherwise. Nuisance, Waste. Grantor shall not cause, conduct or permit any nuisance nor commit, permit, or suffer any stripping of or waste on or to the Property or any portion of the Property. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Grantor will not remove, or grant to any other party the right to remove, any timber, minerals (including oil and gas), coal, clay, scoria, soil, gravel or rock products without Lender's prior written consent. Removal of Improvements. Grantor shall not demolish or remove any Improvements from the Real Property without Lender's prior written consent. As a condition to the removal of any Improvements, Lender may require Grantor to make arrangements satisfactory to Lender to replace such Improvements with Improvements of at least equal value. Lender's Right to Enter. Lender and Lender's agents and representatives may enter upon the Real Property at all reasonable times to attend to Lender's interests and to inspect the Real Property for purposes of Grantor's compliance with the terms and conditions of this Deed of Trust. Compliance with Governmental Requirements. Grantor shall promptly comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations, now or hereafter in effect, of all governmental authorities applicable to the use or occupancy of the Property, including without limitation, the Americans With Disabilities Act. Grantor may contest in good faith any such law, ordinance, or regulation and withhold compliance during any proceeding, including appropriate appeals, so long as Grantor has notified Lender in writing prior to doing so and so long as, in Lender's sole opinion, Lender's interests in the Property are not jeopardized. Lender may require Grantor to post adequate security or a surety bond, reasonably satisfactory to Lender, to protect Lender's interest. Duty to Protect. Grantor agrees neither to abandon or leave unattended the Property. Grantor shall do all other acts, in addition to those acts set forth above in this section, which from the character and use of the Property are reasonably necessary to protect and preserve the Property. DUE ON SALE - CONSENT BY LENDER. Lender may, at Lender's option, declare immediately due and payable all sums secured by this Deed of Trust upon the sale or transfer, without Lender's prior written consent, of all or any part of the Real Property, or any interest in the Real Property. A "sale or transfer" means the conveyance of Real Property or any right, title or interest in the Real Property; whether legal, beneficial or equitable; whether voluntary or involuntary; whether by outright sale, deed, installment sale contract, land contract, contract for deed, leasehold interest with a term greater than three (3) years, lease -option contract, or by sale, RECEPTION#: 670455, 11/12/2020 at 02:44:30 PM, Pgs 3 of 10, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 3 assignment, or transfer of any beneficial interest in or to any land trust holding title to the Real Property, or by any other method of conveyance of an interest in the Real Property. If any Grantor is a corporation, partnership or limited liability company, transfer also includes any restructuring of the legal entity (whether by merger, division or otherwise) or any change in ownership of more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the voting stock, partnership interests or limited liability company interests, as the case may be, of such Grantor. However, this option shall not be exercised by Lender if such exercise is prohibited by federal law or by Colorado law. TAXES AND LIENS. The following provisions relating to the taxes and liens on the Property are part of this Deed of Trust: Payment. Grantor shall pay when due (and in all events prior to delinquency) all taxes, special taxes, assessments, charges (including water and sewer), fines and impositions levied against or on account of the Property, and shall pay when due all claims for work done on or for services rendered or material furnished to the Property. Grantor shall maintain the Property free of all liens having priority over or equal to the interest of Lender under this Deed of Trust, except for the lien of taxes and assessments not due and except as otherwise provided in this Deed of Trust. Right to Contest. Grantor may withhold payment of any tax, assessment, or claim in connection with a good faith dispute over the obligation to pay, so long as Lender's interest in the Property is not jeopardized. If a lien arises or is filed as a result of nonpayment, Grantor shall within fifteen (15) days after the lien arises or, if a lien is filed, within fifteen (15) days after Grantor has notice of the filing, secure the discharge of the lien, or if requested by Lender, deposit with Lender cash or a sufficient corporate surety bond or other security satisfactory to Lender in an amount sufficient to discharge the lien plus any costs and attorneys' fees, or other charges that could accrue as a result of a foreclosure or sale under the lien. In any contest, Grantor shall defend itself and Lender and shall satisfy any adverse judgment before enforcement against the Property. Grantor shall name Lender as an additional obligee under any surety bond furnished in the contest proceedings. Evidence of Payment. Grantor shall upon demand furnish to Lender satisfactory evidence of payment of the taxes or assessments and shall authorize the appropriate governmental official to deliver to Lender at any time a written statement of the taxes and assessments against the Property. Notice of Construction. Grantor shall notify Lender at least fifteen (15) days before any work is commenced, any services are furnished, or any materials are supplied to the Property, if any mechanic's lien, materialmen's lien, or other lien could be asserted on account of the work, services, or materials. Grantor will upon request of Lender furnish to Lender advance assurances satisfactory to Lender that Grantor can and will pay the cost of such improvements. PROPERTY DAMAGE INSURANCE. The following provisions relating to insuring the Property are a part of this Deed of Trust. Maintenance of Insurance. Grantor shall procure and maintain policies of fire insurance with standard extended coverage endorsements on a replacement basis for the full insurable value covering all Improvements on the Real Property in an amount sufficient to avoid application of any coinsurance clause, and with a standard mortgagee clause in favor of Lender. Grantor shall also procure and maintain comprehensive general liability insurance in such coverage amounts as Lender may request with Trustee and Lender being named as additional insureds in such liability insurance policies. Additionally, Grantor shall maintain such other insurance, including but not limited to hazard, business interruption, and boiler insurance, as Lender may reasonably require. Policies shall be written in form, amounts, coverages and basis reasonably acceptable to Lender and issued by a company or companies reasonably acceptable to Lender. Grantor, upon request of Lender, will deliver to Lender from time to time the policies or certificates of insurance in form satisfactory to Lender, including stipulations that coverages will not be cancelled or diminished without at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to Lender. Each insurance policy also shall include an endorsement providing that coverage in favor of Lender will not be impaired in any way by any act, omission or default of Grantor or any other person. Should the Real Property be located in an area designated by the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency as a special flood hazard area, Grantor agrees to obtain and maintain flood insurance, if available, within 45 days after notice is given by Lender that the Property is located in a special flood hazard area, for the full unpaid principal balance of the loan and any prior liens on the property securing the loan, up to the maximum policy limits set under the National Flood Insurance Program, or as otherwise required by Lender, and to maintain such insurance for the term of the loan. Flood insurance may be purchased under the National Flood Insurance Program, from private insurers providing "private flood insurance" as defined by applicable federal flood insurance statutes and regulations, or from another flood insurance provider that is both acceptable to Lender in its sole discretion and permitted by applicable federal flood insurance statutes and regulations. Application of Proceeds. Grantor shall promptly notify Lender of any loss or damage to the Property. Lender may make proof of loss if Grantor fails to do so within fifteen (15) days of the casualty. Whether or not Lender's security is impaired, Lender may, at Lender's election, receive and retain the proceeds of any insurance and apply the proceeds to the reduction of the Indebtedness, payment of any lien affecting the Property, or the restoration and repair of the Property. If Lender elects to apply the proceeds to restoration and repair, Grantor shall repair or replace the damaged or destroyed Improvements in a manner satisfactory to Lender. Lender shall, upon satisfactory proof of such expenditure, pay or reimburse Grantor from the proceeds for the reasonable cost of repair or restoration if Grantor is not in default under this Deed of Trust. Any proceeds which have not been disbursed within 180 days after their receipt and which Lender has not committed to the repair or restoration of the Property shall be used first to pay any amount owing to Lender under this Deed of Trust, then to pay accrued interest, and the remainder, if any, shall be applied to the principal balance of the Indebtedness. If Lender holds any proceeds after payment in full of the Indebtedness, such proceeds shall be paid to Grantor as Grantor's interests may appear. Grantor's Report on Insurance. Upon request of Lender, however not more than once a year, Grantor shall furnish to Lender a report on each existing policy of insurance showing: (1) the name of the insurer; (2) the risks insured; (3) the amount of the policy; (4) the property insured, the then current replacement value of such property, and the manner of determining that value; RECEPTION#: 670455, 11/12/2020 at 02:44:30 PM, Pgs 4 of 10, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 4 and (5) the expiration date of the policy. Grantor shall, upon request of Lender, have an independent appraiser satisfactory to Lender determine the cash value replacement cost of the Property. LENDER'S EXPENDITURES. If any action or proceeding is commenced that would materially affect Lender's interest in the Property or if Grantor fails to comply with any provision of this Deed of Trust or any Related Documents, including but not limited to Grantor's failure to discharge or pay when due any amounts Grantor is required to discharge or pay under this Deed of Trust or any Related Documents, Lender on Grantor's behalf may (but shall not be obligated to) take any action that Lender deems appropriate, including but not limited to discharging or paying all taxes, liens, security interests, encumbrances and other claims, at any time levied or placed on the Property and paying all costs for insuring, maintaining and preserving the Property. All such expenditures incurred or paid by Lender for such purposes will then bear interest at the rate charged under the Note from the date incurred or paid by Lender to the date of repayment by Grantor. All such expenses will become a part of the Indebtedness and, at Lender's option, will (A) be payable on demand; (B) be added to the balance of the Note and be apportioned among and be payable with any installment payments to become due during either (1) the term of any applicable insurance policy; or (2) the remaining term of the Note; or (C) be treated as a balloon payment which will be due and payable at the Note's maturity. The Deed of Trust also will secure payment of these amounts. Such right shall be in addition to all other rights and remedies to which Lender may be entitled upon the occurrence of any Event of Default. WARRANTY; DEFENSE OF TITLE. The following provisions relating to ownership of the Property are a part of this Deed of Trust: Title. Grantor warrants that: (a) Grantor holds good and marketable title of record to the Property in fee simple, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances other than those set forth in the Real Property description or in any title insurance policy, title report, or final title opinion issued in favor of, and accepted by, Lender in connection with this Deed of Trust, provided, however, to the extent any such Real Property description, title insurance policy, title report or final title opinion includes any reference to or any document referencing "statutory exceptions", Grantor shall nonetheless warrant and forever defend the title to the Property against all such statutory exceptions, and (b) Grantor has the full right, power, and authority to execute and deliver this Deed of Trust to Lender. Defense of Title. Subject, to the exception in the paragraph above, Grantor warrants and will forever defend the title to the Property against the lawful claims of all persons. In the event any action or proceeding is commenced that questions Grantor's title or the interest of Trustee or Lender under this Deed of Trust, Grantor shall defend the action at Grantor's expense. Grantor may be the nominal party in such proceeding, but Lender shall be entitled to participate in the proceeding and to be represented in the proceeding by counsel of Lender's own choice, and Grantor will deliver, or cause to be delivered, to Lender such instruments as Lender may request from time to time to permit such participation. Compliance With Laws. Grantor warrants that the Property and Grantor's use of the Property complies with all existing applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations of governmental authorities. Survival of Representations and Warranties. All representations, warranties, and agreements made by Grantor in this Deed of Trust shall survive the execution and delivery of this Deed of Trust, shall be continuing in nature, and shall remain in full force and effect until such time as Borrower's Indebtedness shall be paid in full. CONDEMNATION. The following provisions relating to condemnation proceedings are a part of this Deed of Trust: Proceedings. If any proceeding in condemnation is filed, Grantor shall promptly notify Lender in writing, and Grantor shall promptly take such steps as may be necessary to defend the action and obtain the award. Grantor may be the nominal party in such proceeding, but Lender shall be entitled to participate in the proceeding and to be represented in the proceeding by counsel of its own choice, and Grantor will deliver or cause to be delivered to Lender such instruments and documentation as may be requested by Lender from time to time to permit such participation. Application of Net Proceeds. If all or any part of the Property is condemned by eminent domain proceedings or by any proceeding or purchase in lieu of condemnation, Lender may at its election require that all or any portion of the net proceeds of the award be applied to the Indebtedness or the repair or restoration of the Property. The net proceeds of the award shall mean the award after payment of all reasonable costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees incurred by Trustee or Lender in connection with the condemnation. IMPOSITION OF TAXES, FEES AND CHARGES BY GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES. The following provisions relating to governmental taxes, fees and charges are a part of this Deed of Trust: Current Taxes, Fees and Charges. Upon request by Lender, Grantor shall execute such documents in addition to this Deed of Trust and take whatever other action is requested by Lender to perfect and continue Lender's lien on the Real Property. Grantor shall reimburse Lender for all taxes, as described below, together with all expenses incurred in recording, perfecting or continuing this Deed of Trust, including without limitation all taxes, fees, documentary stamps, and other charges for recording or registering this Deed of Trust. Taxes. The following shall constitute taxes to which this section applies: (1) a specific tax upon this type of Deed of Trust or upon all or any part of the Indebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust; (2) a specific tax on Borrower which Borrower is authorized or required to deduct from payments on the Indebtedness secured by this type of Deed of Trust; (3) a tax on this type of Deed of Trust chargeable against the Lender or the holder of the Note; and (4) a specific tax on all or any portion of the Indebtedness or on payments of principal and interest made by Borrower. Subsequent Taxes. If any tax to which this section applies is enacted subsequent to the date of this Deed of Trust, this event RECEPTION#: 670455, 11/12/2020 at 02:44:30 PM, Pgs 5 of 10, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 5 shall have the same effect as an Event of Default, and Lender may exercise any or all of its available remedies for an Event of Default as provided below unless Grantor either (1) pays the tax before it becomes delinquent, or (2) contests the tax as provided above in the Taxes and Liens section and deposits with Lender cash or a sufficient corporate surety bond or other security satisfactory to Lender. SECURITY AGREEMENT; FINANCING STATEMENTS. The following provisions relating to this Deed of Trust as a security agreement are a part of this Deed of Trust: Security Agreement. This instrument shall constitute a Security Agreement to the extent any of the Property constitutes fixtures, and Lender shall have all of the rights of a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code as amended from time to time. Security Interest. Upon request by Lender, Grantor shall take whatever action is requested by Lender to perfect and continue Lender's security interest in the Rents and Personal Property. In addition to recording this Deed of Trust in the real property records, Lender may, at any time and without further authorization from Grantor, file executed counterparts, copies or reproductions of this Deed of Trust as a financing statement. Grantor shall reimburse Lender for all expenses incurred in perfecting or continuing this security interest. Upon default, Grantor shall not remove, sever or detach the Personal Property from the Property. Upon default, Grantor shall assemble any Personal Property not affixed to the Property in a manner and at a place reasonably convenient to Grantor and Lender and make it available to Lender within three (3) days after receipt of written demand from Lender to the extent permitted by applicable law. Addresses. The mailing addresses of Grantor (debtor) and Lender (secured party) from which information concerning the security interest granted by this Deed of Trust may be obtained (each as required by the Uniform Commercial Code) are as stated on the first page of this Deed of Trust. FURTHER ASSURANCES; ATTORNEY -IN -FACT. The following provisions relating to further assurances and attorney -in -fact are a part of this Deed of Trust: Further Assurances. At any time, and from time to time, upon request of Lender, Grantor will make, execute and deliver, or will cause to be made, executed or delivered, to Lender or to Lender's designee, and when requested by Lender, cause to be filed, recorded, refiled, or rerecorded, as the case may be, at such times and in such offices and places as Lender may deem appropriate, any and all such mortgages, deeds of trust, security deeds, security agreements, financing statements, continuation statements, instruments of further assurance, certificates, and other documents as may, in the sole opinion of Lender, be necessary or desirable in order to effectuate, complete, perfect, continue, or preserve (1) Borrower's and Grantor's obligations under the Note, this Deed of Trust, and the Related Documents, and (2) the liens and security interests created by this Deed of Trust as first and prior liens on the Property, whether now owned or hereafter acquired by Grantor. Unless prohibited by law or Lender agrees to the contrary in writing, Grantor shall reimburse Lender for all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the matters referred to in this paragraph. Attorney -in -Fact. If Grantor fails to do any of the things referred to in the preceding paragraph, Lender may do so for and in the name of Grantor and at Grantor's expense. For such purposes, Grantor hereby irrevocably appoints Lender as Grantor's attorney -in -fact for the purpose of making, executing, delivering, filing, recording, and doing all other things as may be necessary or desirable, in Lender's sole opinion, to accomplish the matters referred to in the preceding paragraph. FULL PERFORMANCE. Upon the full performance of all the obligations under the Note and this Deed of Trust, Trustee may, upon production of documents and fees as required under applicable law, release this Deed of Trust, and such release shall constitute a release of the lien for all such additional sums and expenditures made pursuant to this Deed of Trust. Lender agrees to cooperate with Grantor in obtaining such release and releasing the other collateral securing the Indebtedness. Any release fees required by law shall be paid by Grantor, if permitted by applicable law. EVENTS OF DEFAULT. Each of the following, at Lender's option, shall constitute an Event of Default under this Deed of Trust: Payment Default. Borrower fails to make any payment when due under the Indebtedness. Other Defaults. Borrower or Grantor fails to comply with or to perform any other term, obligation, covenant or condition contained in this Deed of Trust or in any of the Related Documents or to comply with or to perform any term, obligation, covenant or condition contained in any other agreement between Lender and Borrower or Grantor. Compliance Default. Failure to comply with any other term, obligation, covenant or condition contained in this Deed of Trust, the Note or in any of the Related Documents. Default on Other Payments. Failure of Grantor within the time required by this Deed of Trust to make any payment for taxes or insurance, or any other payment necessary to prevent filing of or to effect discharge of any lien. Default in Favor of Third Parties. Should Borrower or any Grantor default under any loan, extension of credit, security agreement, purchase or sales agreement, or any other agreement, in favor of any other creditor or person that may materially affect any of Borrower's or any Grantor's property or Borrower's ability to repay the Indebtedness or Borrower's or Grantor's ability to perform their respective obligations under this Deed of Trust or any of the Related Documents. False Statements. Any warranty, representation or statement made or furnished to Lender by Borrower or Grantor or on Borrower's or Grantor's behalf under this Deed of Trust or the Related Documents is false or misleading in any material respect, either now or at the time made or furnished or becomes false or misleading at any time thereafter. Defective CoIlateral ization. This Deed of Trust or any of the Related Documents ceases to be in full force and effect (including RECEPTION#: 670455, 11/12/2020 at 02:44:30 PM, Pgs 6 of 10, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 6 failure of any collateral document to create a valid and perfected security interest or lien) at any time and for any reason Death or Insolvency. The dissolution of Grantor's (regardless of whether election to continue is made), any member withdraws from the limited liability company, or any other termination of Borrower's or Grantor's existence as a going business or the death of any member, the insolvency of Borrower or Grantor, the appointment of a receiver for any part of Borrower's or Grantor's property, any assignment for the benefit of creditors, any type of creditor workout, or the commencement of any proceeding under any bankruptcy or insolvency laws by or against Borrower or Grantor. Creditor or Forfeiture Proceedings. Commencement of foreclosure or forfeiture proceedings, whether by judicial proceeding, self-help, repossession or any other method, by any creditor of Borrower or Grantor or by any governmental agency against any property securing the Indebtedness. This includes a garnishment of any of Borrower's or Grantor's accounts, including deposit accounts, with Lender. However, this Event of Default shall not apply if there is a good faith dispute by Borrower or Grantor as to the validity or reasonableness of the claim which is the basis of the creditor or forfeiture proceeding and if Borrower or Grantor gives Lender written notice of the creditor or forfeiture proceeding and deposits with Lender monies or a surety bond for the creditor or forfeiture proceeding, in an amount determined by Lender, in its sole discretion, as being an adequate reserve or bond for the dispute. Breach of Other Agreement. Any breach by Borrower or Grantor under the terms of any other agreement between Borrower or Grantor and Lender that is not remedied within any grace period provided therein, including without limitation any agreement concerning any indebtedness or other obligation of Borrower or Grantor to Lender, whether existing now or later. Events Affecting Guarantor. Any of the preceding events occurs with respect to any Guarantor of any of the Indebtedness or any Guarantor dies or becomes incompetent, or revokes or disputes the validity of, or liability under, any Guaranty of the Indebtedness. Adverse Change. A material adverse change occurs in Borrower's or Grantor's financial condition, or Lender believes the prospect of payment or performance of the Indebtedness is impaired. Insecurity. Lender in good faith believes itself insecure. Right to Cure. If any default, other than a default in payment, is curable and if Grantor has not been given a notice of a breach of the same provision of this Deed of Trust within the preceding twelve (12) months, it may be cured if Grantor, after Lender sends written notice to Borrower demanding cure of such default: (1) cures the default within twenty (20) days; or (2) if the cure requires more than twenty (20) days, immediately initiates steps which Lender deems in Lender's sole discretion to be sufficient to cure the default and thereafter continues and completes all reasonable and necessary steps sufficient to produce compliance as soon as reasonably practical. RIGHTS AND REMEDIES ON DEFAULT. If an Event of Default occurs under this Deed of Trust, at any time thereafter, Trustee or Lender may exercise any one or more of the following rights and remedies: Election of Remedies. Election by Lender to pursue any remedy shall not exclude pursuit of any other remedy, and an election to make expenditures or to take action to perform an obligation of Grantor under this Deed of Trust, after Grantor's failure to perform, shall not affect Lender's right to declare a default and exercise its remedies. Accelerate Indebtedness. Lender shall have the right at its option without notice to Borrower or Grantor to declare the entire Indebtedness immediately due and payable, including any prepayment penalty which Borrower would be required to pay. Foreclosure. Lender shall have the right to cause all or any part of the Real Property, and Personal Property, if Lender decides to proceed against it as if it were real property, to be sold by the Trustee according to the laws of the State of Colorado as respects foreclosures against real property. The Trustee shall give notice in accordance with the laws of Colorado. The Trustee shall apply the proceeds of the sale in the following order: (a) to all costs and expenses of the sale, including but not limited to Trustee's fees, attorneys' fees, and the cost of title evidence; (b) to all sums secured by this Deed of Trust; and (c) the excess, if any, to the person or persons legally entitled to the excess. UCC Remedies. With respect to all or any part of the Personal Property, Lender shall have all the rights and remedies of a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code. Collect Rents. Lender shall have the right, without notice to Borrower or Grantor to take possession of and manage the Property and collect the Rents, including amounts past due and unpaid, and apply the net proceeds, over and above Lender's costs, against the Indebtedness. In furtherance of this right, Lender may require any tenant or other user of the Property to make payments of rent or use fees directly to Lender. If the Rents are collected by Lender, then Grantor irrevocably designates Lender as Grantor's attorney -in -fact to endorse instruments received in payment thereof in the name of Grantor and to negotiate the same and collect the proceeds. Payments by tenants or other users to Lender in response to Lender's demand shall satisfy the obligations for which the payments are made, whether or not any proper grounds for the demand existed. Lender may exercise its rights under this subparagraph either in person, by agent, or through a receiver. Appoint Receiver. Lender shall have the right to have a receiver appointed to take possession of all or any part of the Property, with the power to protect and preserve the Property, to operate the Property preceding foreclosure or sale, and to collect the Rents from the Property and apply the proceeds, over and above the cost of the receivership, against the Indebtedness. The receiver may serve without bond if permitted by law. Lender's right to the appointment of a receiver shall exist whether or not the apparent value of the Property exceeds the Indebtedness by a substantial amount. Employment by Lender shall not disqualify a person from serving as a receiver. Receiver may be appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction upon ex parte application RECEPTION#: 670455, 11/12/2020 at 02:44:30 PM, Pgs 7 of 10, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 7 and without notice, notice being expressly waived. Tenancy at Sufferance. If Grantor remains in possession of the Property after the Property is sold as provided above or Lender otherwise becomes entitled to possession of the Property upon default of Borrower or Grantor, Grantor shall become a tenant at sufferance of Lender or the purchaser of the Property and shall, at Lender's option, either (1) pay a reasonable rental for the use of the Property, or (2) vacate the Property immediately upon the demand of Lender. Other Remedies. Trustee or Lender shall have any other right or remedy provided in this Deed of Trust or the Note or available at law or in equity. Sale of the Property. In exercising its rights and remedies, Lender shall be free to designate on or before it files a notice of election and demand with the Trustee, that the Trustee sell all or any part of the Property together or separately, in one sale or by separate sales. Lender shall be entitled to bid at any public sale on all or any portion of the Property. Upon any sale of the Property, whether made under a power of sale granted in this Deed of Trust or pursuant to judicial proceedings, if the holder of the Note is a purchaser at such sale, it shall be entitled to use and apply all, or any portion of, the Indebtedness for or in settlement or payment of all, or any portion of, the purchase price of the Property purchased, and, in such case, this Deed of Trust, the Note, and any documents evidencing expenditures secured by this Deed of Trust shall be presented to the person conducting the sale in order that the amount of Indebtedness so used or applied may be credited thereon as having been paid. Attorneys' Fees; Expenses. If Lender forecloses or institutes any suit or action to enforce any of the terms of this Deed of Trust, Lender shall be entitled to recover such sum as the court may adjudge reasonable as attorneys' fees at trial and upon any appeal. Whether or not any court action is involved, and to the extent not prohibited by law, all reasonable expenses Lender incurs that in Lender's opinion are necessary at any time for the protection of its interest or the enforcement of its rights shall become a part of the Indebtedness payable on demand and shall bear interest at the Note rate from the date of the expenditure until repaid. Expenses covered by this paragraph include, without limitation, however subject to any limits under applicable law, Lender's attorneys' fees whether or not there is a lawsuit, including attorneys' fees and expenses for bankruptcy proceedings (including efforts to modify or vacate any automatic stay or injunction), appeals, and any anticipated post -judgment collection services, the cost of searching records, obtaining title reports (including foreclosure reports), surveyors' reports, and appraisal fees, title insurance, and fees for the Trustee, to the extent permitted by applicable law. Grantor also will pay any court costs, in addition to all other sums provided by law. Rights of Trustee. To the extent permitted by applicable law, Trustee shall have all of the rights and duties of Lender as set forth in this section. NOTICES. Any notice required to be given under this Deed of Trust, including without limitation any notice of default and any notice of sale shall be given in writing, and shall be effective when actually delivered, when actually received by telefacsimile (unless otherwise required by law), when deposited with a nationally recognized overnight courier, or, if mailed, when deposited in the United States mail, as first class, certified or registered mail postage prepaid, directed to the addresses shown near the beginning of this Deed of Trust. All copies of notices of foreclosure from the holder of any lien which has priority over this Deed of Trust shall be sent to Lender's address, as shown near the beginning of this Deed of Trust. Any party may change its address for notices under this Deed of Trust by giving formal written notice to the other parties, specifying that the purpose of the notice is to change the party's address. For notice purposes, Grantor agrees to keep Lender informed at all times of Grantor's current address. Unless otherwise provided or required by law, if there is more than one Grantor, any notice given by Lender to any Grantor is deemed to be notice given to all Grantors. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. The following miscellaneous provisions are a part of this Deed of Trust: Amendments. This Deed of Trust, together with any Related Documents, constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties as to the matters set forth in this Deed of Trust. No alteration of or amendment to this Deed of Trust shall be effective unless given in writing and signed by the party or parties sought to be charged or bound by the alteration or amendment. Annual Reports. If the Property is used for purposes other than Grantor's residence, Grantor shall furnish to Lender, upon request, a certified statement of net operating income received from the Property during Grantor's previous fiscal year in such form and detail as Lender shall require. "Net operating income" shall mean all cash receipts from the Property less all cash expenditures made in connection with the operation of the Property. Caption Headings. Caption headings in this Deed of Trust are for convenience purposes only and are not to be used to interpret or define the provisions of this Deed of Trust. Merger. There shall be no merger of the interest or estate created by this Deed of Trust with any other interest or estate in the Property at any time held by or for the benefit of Lender in any capacity, without the written consent of Lender. Governing Law. This Deed of Trust will be governed by federal law applicable to Lender and, to the extent not preempted by federal law, the laws of the State of Colorado without regard to its conflicts of law provisions. This Deed of Trust has been accepted by Lender in the State of Colorado. Choice of Venue. If there is a lawsuit, Grantor agrees upon Lender's request to submit to the jurisdiction of the courts of Denver County, State of Colorado. Joint and Several Liability. All obligations of Borrower and Grantor under this Deed of Trust shall be joint and several, and all references to Grantor shall mean each and every Grantor, and all references to Borrower shall mean each and every Borrower. RECEPTION#: 670455, 11/12/2020 at 02:44:30 PM, Pgs 8 of 10, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 8 This means that each Grantor signing below is responsible for all obligations in this Deed of Trust. Where any one or more of the parties is a corporation, partnership, limited liability company or similar entity, it is not necessary for Lender to inquire into the powers of any of the officers, directors, partners, members, or other agents acting or purporting to act on the entity's behalf, and any obligations made or created in reliance upon the professed exercise of such powers shall be guaranteed under this Deed of Trust. No Waiver by Lender. Lender shall not be deemed to have waived any rights under this Deed of Trust unless such waiver is given in writing and signed by Lender. No delay or omission on the part of Lender in exercising any right shall operate as a waiver of such right or any other right. A waiver by Lender of a provision of this Deed of Trust shall not prejudice or constitute a waiver of Lender's right otherwise to demand strict compliance with that provision or any other provision of this Deed of Trust. No prior waiver by Lender, nor any course of dealing between Lender and Grantor, shall constitute a waiver of any of Lender's rights or of any of Grantor's obligations as to any future transactions. Whenever the consent of Lender is required under this Deed of Trust, the granting of such consent by Lender in any instance shall not constitute continuing consent to subsequent instances where such consent is required and in all cases such consent may be granted or withheld in the sole discretion of Lender. Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds any provision of this Deed of Trust to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable as to any circumstance, that finding shall not make the offending provision illegal, invalid, or unenforceable as to any other circumstance. If feasible, the offending provision shall be considered modified so that it becomes legal, valid and enforceable. If the offending provision cannot be so modified, it shall be considered deleted from this Deed of Trust. Unless otherwise required by law, the illegality, invalidity, or unenforceability of any provision of this Deed of Trust shall not affect the legality, validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Deed of Trust. Successors and Assigns. Subject to any limitations stated in this Deed of Trust on transfer of Grantor's interest, this Deed of Trust shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, their successors and assigns. If ownership of the Property becomes vested in a person other than Grantor, Lender, without notice to Grantor, may deal with Grantor's successors with reference to this Deed of Trust and the Indebtedness by way of forbearance or extension without releasing Grantor from the obligations of this Deed of Trust or liability under the Indebtedness. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Deed of Trust. Waive Jury. All parties to this Deed of Trust hereby waive the right to any jury trial in any action, proceeding, or counterclaim brought by any party against any other party. Waiver of Homestead Exemption. Grantor hereby releases and waives all rights and benefits of the homestead exemption laws of the State of Colorado as to all Indebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust. DEFINITIONS. The following capitalized words and terms shall have the following meanings when used in this Deed of Trust. Unless specifically stated to the contrary, all references to dollar amounts shall mean amounts in lawful money of the United States of America. Words and terms used in the singular shall include the plural, and the plural shall include the singular, as the context may require. Words and terms not otherwise defined in this Deed of Trust shall have the meanings attributed to such terms in the Uniform Commercial Code: Beneficiary. The word "Beneficiary" means FIRST WESTERN TRUST BANK, and its successors and assigns. Borrower. The word "Borrower" means Joshua L Whalen and Kathryn M Whalen and includes all co-signers and co -makers signing the Note and all their successors and assigns. Deed of Trust. The words "Deed of Trust" mean this Deed of Trust among Grantor, Lender, and Trustee, and includes without limitation all assignment and security interest provisions relating to the Personal Property and Rents. Environmental Laws. The words "Environmental Laws" mean any and all state, federal and local statutes, regulations and ordinances relating to the protection of human health or the environment, including without limitation the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 9601, et seq. ("CERCLA"), the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-499 ("SARA"), the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. Section 1801, et seq., the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 6901, et seq., or other applicable state or federal laws, rules, or regulations adopted pursuant thereto. Event of Default. The words "Event of Default" mean any of the events of default set forth in this Deed of Trust in the events of default section of this Deed of Trust. Grantor. The word "Grantor" means 202 E Main St., LLC. Guarantor. The word "Guarantor" means any guarantor, surety, or accommodation party of any or all of the Indebtedness. Guaranty. The word "Guaranty" means the guaranty from Guarantor to Lender, including without limitation a guaranty of all or part of the Note. Hazardous Substances. The words "Hazardous Substances" mean materials that, because of their quantity, concentration or physical, chemical or infectious characteristics, may cause or pose a present or potential hazard to human health or the environment when improperly used, treated, stored, disposed of, generated, manufactured, transported or otherwise handled. The words "Hazardous Substances" are used in their very broadest sense and include without limitation any and all hazardous or toxic substances, materials or waste as defined by or listed under the Environmental Laws. The term "Hazardous Substances" RECEPTION#: 670455, 11/12/2020 at 02:44:30 PM, Pgs 9 of 10, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 9 also includes, without limitation, petroleum and petroleum by-products or any fraction thereof and asbestos. Improvements. The word "Improvements" means all existing and future improvements, buildings, structures, mobile homes affixed on the Real Property, facilities, additions, replacements and other construction on the Real Property. Indebtedness. The word "Indebtedness" means all principal, interest, and other amounts, costs and expenses payable under the Note or Related Documents, together with all renewals of, extensions of, modifications of, consolidations of and substitutions for the Note or Related Documents and any amounts expended or advanced by Lender to discharge Grantor's obligations or expenses incurred by Trustee or Lender to enforce Grantor's obligations under this Deed of Trust, together with interest on such amounts as provided in this Deed of Trust. Specifically, without limitation, Indebtedness includes all amounts that may be indirectly secured by the Cross -Col lateral ization provision of this Deed of Trust. Lender. The word "Lender" means FIRST WESTERN TRUST BANK, its successors and assigns. Note. The word "Note" means the promissory note dated November 10, 2020, in the original principal amount of $2,170,000.00 from Borrower to Lender, together with all renewals of, extensions of, modifications of, refinancings of, consolidations of, and substitutions for the promissory note or agreement. NOTICE TO GRANTOR: THE NOTE CONTAINS A VARIABLE INTEREST RATE. Personal Property. The words "Personal Property" mean all equipment, fixtures, and other articles of personal property now or hereafter owned by Grantor, and now or hereafter attached or affixed to the Real Property; together with all accessions, parts, and additions to, all replacements of, and all substitutions for, any of such property; and together with all proceeds (including without limitation all insurance proceeds and refunds of premiums) from any sale or other disposition of the Property. Property. The word "Property" means collectively the Real Property and the Personal Property. Real Property. The words "Real Property" mean the real property, interests and rights, as further described in this Deed of Trust. Related Documents. The words "Related Documents" mean all promissory notes, credit agreements, loan agreements, environmental agreements, guaranties, security agreements, mortgages, deeds of trust, security deeds, collateral mortgages, and all other instruments, agreements and documents, whether now or hereafter existing, executed in connection with the Indebtedness. Rents. The word "Rents" means all present and future rents, revenues, income, issues, royalties, profits, and other benefits derived from the Property. Trustee. The word "Trustee" means the Public Trustee of Pitkin County, Colorado. GRANTOR ACKNOWLEDGES HAVING READ ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THIS DEED OF TRUST, AND GRANTOR AGREES TO ITS TERMS. GRANTOR: 202 E MAIN ST., LLC 40 BY 40 H GS, LLC, Member of 202 E Main St., LLC ngs, By: 11t4_ - RECEPTION#: 670455, 11/12/2020 at 02:44:30 PM, Pgs 10 of 10, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 10 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF 00101ra* ) SS COUNTY OF i ) This record was acknowledged before me on , 20 ZL by Kathryn M Whalen, Manager of 40 By 40 Holdings, LLC, Member of 202 E Main St., LLC and Joshua L Whalen, Manager of 40 By 40 Holdings, LLC, Member of 202 E Main St., LLC. LaserPro, Ver. 19.4.10,036 Copr. Finastra USA Corporation 1997, 2020. All Rights Reserved. - CO C:\LASERPRO\CFI\LPL\G01.FC TR-11181 PR-167 WW Developments Josh and Katy Whalen of 2610 E Cedar Ave Denver, CO, 80209 Project Site: 202 E Main St. Aspen, CO 81611 Authorized Representative: Boss Architecture 2546 15 th St. Denver, CO 80211 303-377-6322 Josh and Katy Whalen give Boss Architecture the authority to work on the behalf of Josh and Katy Whalen, dba WW Developments, for the project listed at 202 E Main St, Aspen, CO, 81611. Kathryn M. Whalen, Manager of 40 By 40 Holdings, LLC, member of 202 E. Main St., LLC, and Joshua L. Whalen, Manager of 40 By 40 Holdings, LLC member of 202 E. Main St., LLC Please feel free to reach out should you have any questions or comments. Thank you in advance. Josh Whalen C. 414.758.7854 halen c.312-753-Blft: Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications +thin the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeo-r;ner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Name. v W' `�� u_N Property D.:ner,-I'l: Email: , Phone No.: f�St/ Address of 202 E Main gireet, Aspen, CO 8161 Property: (subject of application) i certify as follows: (pick one) ® This property is not subject to a homeowmers association or other form of private covenant. ❑ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowmers association or covenant beneficiary. ❑ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeov:ner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a p ocument Owner signature: date:,, 2 Owner printed _ Uos`t,-t1-4 or. Attorney signature. date: Attorney printed name. Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. Mineral estate ownership is not included in this mailing list. Pitkin County does not maintain a database of mineral estate owners. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or data obtained on this web site. This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the margins such that they no longer line up on the labels sheet. Print actual size. From Parcel: 273707399001 on 02/19/2021 Instructions: Disclaimer: http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com MONARCH BUILDING LLC WOODY CREEK, CO 81656 PO BOX 126 CARVER RUTH A REV TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 116 S ASPEN ST 360 HEXAGON LLC OVERLAND PARK , KS 66210 9401 INDIAN CREEK PKWY STE 800 JBC PREFERRED PROPERTIES LLC DELRAY BEACH, FL 33483 1005 BROOKS LN KRIBS KAREN REV LIV TRUST ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 9994 EAST BLEEKER DUPLEX CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 232 E BLEEKER ST 227 EAST BLEEKER LLC ASPEN, CO 81611-2568 312 AABC #D 227 EAST MAIN LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 312 AABC #D WHITMAN RANDALL A MIAMI BEACH, FL 331404230 2817 LAKE AVE MTK TRUST AUSTIN, TX 78703 1 NILES RD CITY OF ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 130 S GALENA ST LE VOTAUX II CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA 117 N MONARCH ST PEARCE BERNARD D ASPEN, CO 81611 216 E MAIN ST JBC PREFERRED PROPERTIES LLC DELRAY BEACH, FL 33483 1005 BROOKS LN MC2 PARTNERS LLC CHICAGO, IL 60610 30 W OAK ST #7B WHITMAN RANDALL A MIAMI BEACH, FL 331404230 2817 LAKE AVE NUNN RONALD FAMILY LP BRENTWOOD, CA 94513 10500 BRENTWOOD BLVD 232 EAST MAIN STREET LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 625 E MAIN ST UNIT 102B #401 HOGUET CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA 118 E BLEEKER ST ASPEN COMM UNITED METHODIST CHURCH ASPEN, CO 81611 200 E BLEEKER ST 303 EAST MAIN LLLP ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 8016 HOGUET CONSTANCE M NEW YORK, NY 10065 333 E 68TH ST 120 EAST MAIN PARTNERS LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 120 E MAIN ST HODES ALAN & DEBORAH AVENTURA , FLA 33180 19951 NE 39TH PLACE ICONIC PROPERTIES JEROME LLC HOUSTON, TX 77077 1375 ENCLAVE PKWY OTIS REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 602 W HALLAM 201 EAST MAIN STREET LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 625 E MAIN ST UNIT 102B #401 CARLS REAL ESTATE LLC ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 1365 PEARCE RICHARD B ASPEN, CO 81611 216 E MAIN ST ICONIC PROPERTIES JEROME LLC HOUSTON, TX 77077 1375 ENCLAVE PKWY 120 EAST MAIN PARTNERS LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 120 E MAIN ST RODNEY JOHN W BASALT , CO 81621 20 RIVER OAKS LANE 1543 LLC DENVER, CO 80202 1543 WAZEE ST #400 HOFFMAN JOHN L & SHARON R TRUST KANSAS CITY, MO 64108 411 E 63RD ST ASPEN CORNER OFFICE LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 200 E MAIN ST 209 EAST BLEEKER LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 625 E HYMAN AVE #201 BTRSARDY LLC PALO ALTO , CA 94306 PO BOX 61239 208 MAIN LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 312 AABC #D HOGUET CONSTANCE M NEW YORK, NY 10065 333 E 68TH ST JAFFE JONATHAN & KAREN LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651 88 EMERALD BAY 517 426426426 515 130 204 517 104 507 213 301 301 406 301 301 205 205 205 205 318 304 308 406406 205 205 205 205205 205 205205 204 204 204 204 204 428420400 400 400 400 400 400400 400 205 205 411 411 411 314 314 314 314 301 301 301301 308 308 308304 304 220 212 200 230 435 400 404 415413 411 465 457 449 445431 407 411 117 234 303 309 315 319 107 105 103 101 316 302 301 328320 312 300 121 422 420 112 106 119 325 107 105 111 120 222 215 215 215 215 215 210 210 210 215 215 215 215 215 215 215 215 215 215 210 210210 210 305305 305 125 125 125125 109306 306 306 100100 118 120118 108108 100 201 105 129 121113 105 125 201 221 134 220 214208 116 123 121109 306 200 210 204 204 104104 108 108 108 108 108 124124 124124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 127 127 127127127127 204 123 121 119 117 113 111 107 135 205 150 130 140 160 437 427 435 199 434 434 434434434434 222 222 233 233233 233 233 132 220 220220 220220220 220 220 210 210 122132134 200 212 211 211 205 200 135 200 205 213 215217 233 400 400 400400 415 415 415 415 201 201 201 201 201 201201 201 201 201 355 355355355355 355 230 230 230230 230 230 230 117 117 322 324 203 203 215 217 204 202 120 225 210 214 232 212 218219 223 216 232 227 209 300 306 310 330 420 229 231233 227 103 101 150 118118 200 101 101101 101101 100 100100 114 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110110 110110 110 122 122 122132 132132132132 131 119 125 126 134 200 131 127 123 101 120 125 130 120 128 200 202 208 114 117 105101 121129 100 110 114 129 201 221 410 412 412412414233 214222 212 201215229235 208110 232 222216 134 124 215 100 S G A L E N A S T E MAIN S T S A S P E N S T S G A R M I S C H S T S A S P E N S T E HYMA N A V E S G A R M I S C H S T S A S P E N S T E HOPK I N S A V E S G A R M I S C H S T S G A R M I S C H S T N G A L E N A S T S 1 S T S T W HOP K I N S A V E N 1 S T S T W MAIN S T S 1 S T S T N 2ND ST N 2 N D S T W BLEE K E R S T S 1 S T S T S 1 S T S T S 1 S T S T S 1 S T S T W HYM A N A V E N G A R M I S C H S T N 1 S T S T N 1ST STW HALLAM ST N M O N A R C H S T RIO G R A N D E P L N M I L L S T E BLEE K E R S T N M I L L S T N M O N A R C H S T N M I L L S T E MAIN S T S M O N A R C H S T S M I L L S T S M O N A R C H S T S G A L E N A S T E HOPK I N S A V E S M I L L S T E HOP K I N S A V E S M O N A R C H S T S G A L E N A S T S M O N A R C H S T E MAIN S T S M I L L S T S M O N A R C H S T S M I L L S T N 1 S T S T N A S P E N S T E BLEE K E R S T S A S P E N S T S G A R M I S C H S T E HALL A M S T N 1 S T S T W BLEE K E R S T N A S P E N S T N G A R M I S C H S T W BLEEK E R S T S A S P E N S T N G A R M I S C H S T N A S P E N S T N G A R M I S C H S T W MAIN S T N A S P E N S T E MAIN S T N MILL ST N M I L L S T Date: 3/4/2021 Geographic Information Systems This map/drawing/image is a graphical representation of the features depicted and is not a legal representation. The accuracy may change depending on the enlargement or reduction. Copyright 2021 City of Aspen GIS Legend Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) Emissions Inventory Boundary (EIB) City of Aspen Greenline 8040 Stream Margin Hallam Bluff ESA Parcels Roads Zoomed In 0 0.03 0.060.01 mi When printed at 11"x17" 4 Scale: 1:2,218 ArcGIS Web Map202 E. Main Street VICINITY MAP PARCEL: 273707399001 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1, PLAT OF THE MAIN STREET VICTORIANS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION, SITUATED ON LOTS L AND M, BLOCK 73, CITY AND TOWNSHIP OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO ISP PLAT OF THE MAIN STREET VICTORIANS YPC 3819' �S. R o W STREET G PS-5 Legend INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED 0 INDICATES MONUMENT LS 33645 NOTICE: According to Colorado law you must commence any legal action based upon any defect in this survey within three years after you first discover such defect. In no event may any action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more than ten years from the date of the certification shown hereon. HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION SITUATED ON LOTS L AND M. BLOCK 73 CITY AND TOWNSHIP OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO SCALE : 1 " = 10' 0 ft. 10 ft. 20 ft. HIRED GUN SURVEYING 2816 PRIMROSE COURT MONTROSE, COLORADO 81401 (970) 964-6105 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PLAT OF THE MAIN STREET VICTORIANS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION SITUATED ON LOTS L AND M BLOCK 73 CITY AND TOWNSHIP OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE "I, STEVEN A. YELTON, HEREBY CERTIFY TO JOSHUA WHALEN, KATY WHALEN AND LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, ORDER NUMBER: ABS62011855-3 DATED OCTOBER 9, 2020 AND THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO; THAT THIS PLAT IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE AS LAID OUT AND SHOWN HEREON; THAT THIS PLAT WAS MADE BY ME FROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY OF THE REAL PROPERTY PERFORMED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ON OCTOBER 12, 2020. THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL BUILDINGS, IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND ENCROACHMENTS BY OR ON THE REAL PROPERTY ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN, AND THAT THIS PLAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF AN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT AS SET FORTH IN C.R.S. §38-51-102(9). " STEVEN A. YELTON PLS. # 33645 DATE: 2-18-2021 DATE SURVEYED: 6-4-2020 DATE DRAFTED: 6-4-2020 REVISED: 2-18-21 DATA FILE NAME: 1106127 DRAWN BY: SY BOSS.architecture 2546 15th street denver colorado 80211 303-377-6322 p 303-377-6326 f www.BOSSarchitecture.com Attn: Sarah Yoon, Historic Preservation Planner Community Development Department 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 RE: 202 E. Main Street – Final Major Development Review Dear Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, Thank you for your time reviewing our application and for your consideration for Final Major Development Review for 202 East Main Street. This property is located in the Main Street Historic District, is zoned Mixed Use (MU), but abides by the R-6 guidelines for single family residences. The property is a 3,000 SF lot and is subject to both a 20% FAR reduction due to it being in the MU district, and another 20% FAR reduction for the change from commercial to residential use, giving it an allowed 1,920 SF of floor area. With the approved 500 SF FAR bonus granted at conceptual review, the total allowable FAR is 2,420 SF. As previously reviewed, this commercial property will become a single family residence. Since conceptual approval, 202 E. Main Street has been purchased by new owners. We have worked with the previous owner and architect, Jake Vickery, and received the previously approved drawing files from him and continued the design process where he left off. At conceptual review there were a few conditions to final approval that we have continued to develop and address in this submission. As we have developed the project there have been minor changes to the design. Our proposed revisions address specific challenges on site, due to grading and stair locations. While we took the approved shell of the project, we have revised the connector piece, and have relocated the front window well (at the historic resource) which was previously in question. The stair design submitted at conceptual review was not constructible as drawn and would not meet building code. This required us to stretch the connector from 5’-0” to 6’-3” long. The proposed window well in the SW corner of the property also could not be built in that location due to the limits of constructing a new foundation wall and shoring. We have proposed an alternate location for the second window well that is entirely screened by the resource. As we have developed the design, we have worked closely with Sarah Yoon, Historic Preservation Planner, to ensure the changes we were making did not alter the approved “conceptual mass and scale” of the addition. We have included our correspondence with her in this submission regarding these changes. As we developed the submission for final approval, there has been a considerable amount of time spent on the preservation plan and understanding the historic resource’s condition and details. We were able to secure several historic photos of the property, courtesy of Aspen Historical Society, to inform the design and material selection. Please see below our design narrative for the final major development review at 202 E. Main Street. BOSS.architecture 2546 15th street denver colorado 80211 303-377-6322 p 303-377-6326 f www.BOSSarchitecture.com Land Use Code and Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines – Per Sec. 26.304.030 and Sec. 26.415.070.D.4 HPC Final development plan review, please see attached our application which includes the following: 1. Completed Land Use Application and signed Fee Agreement 2. Pre-application conference summary 3. Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company 4. Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant 5. HOA Compliance form 6. List of adjacent property owners within 300’ for public hearing 7. An 8 ½”x11” vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen 8. Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. 9. A written description of the proposal (scope of work) and written explanation of how the proposed development and any requests for variations or benefits complied with the review standards and design guidelines relevant to the application. (this document) 10. Proposed site plan 11. Stormwater mitigation plan for the site (re: Civil drawings) 12. Scaled drawings of all proposed structure(s) or addition(s) depicting their form, including their height, massing, scale, proportions and roof plan, and the primary features of all elevations. 13. Supplemental materials to provide a visual description of the context surrounding the designated historic property including photographs and other exhibits, as needed, to accurately depict location and extent of proposed work. 14. Drawings of the street facing facades provided at ¼” scale 15. Final selection of all exterior materials, and samples or clearly illustrated photographs. 16. A lighting plan and landscape plan, including any visible stormwater mitigation features. Sec. 26.415.080 – Demolition of designated historic properties or properties within a historic district As previously approved at concept submission, the non-historic portions of the house will be demolished. Per the 1904 Sanborn Map, the original extents of the house are clearly shown and will be preserved. There are no proposed changes to the demolition approved at conceptual major development review on October 9, 2019. Sec. 26.415.090 – Relocation of designated historic properties As previously reviewed at concept submission, and per the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines 9.1- 9.8, the historic house will be temporarily relocated on site. The BOSS.architecture 2546 15th street denver colorado 80211 303-377-6322 p 303-377-6326 f www.BOSSarchitecture.com relocation is to allow for demolition of the existing basement, installation of new shoring, and installation of a new basement foundation. The house will then be moved back to its original location and set on a new foundation with the same relationship to existing grade. We have worked closely with Bill Bailey House Movers, KL&A Engineering (structural engineers), B&Y Drilling (shoring) and Okeanos Construction (General Contractor) to develop a moving plan and construction sequence. See attached documentation regarding these specifics. Careful consideration has been taken to ensure minimal disturbances to neighboring properties, with site excavation to occur only at the rear (north side/alley side) of the property. Conversations with neighbors have begun as this project moves into building permit submission. Sec. 26.415.110 – Benefits - (c) Variations – As previously approved at concept submission, this project uses setback variations to create a development that is more consistent with the character of the historic property. Per HPC Resolution #18, series of 2019, dated October 9, 2019, previously approved setback variations are listed below: • 2' setback reduction on the west and east sideyard above and below grade, for the addition • 5' setback reduction on the east sideyard above and below grade, for historic house and basement • 2' setback reduction on the west sideyard above and below grade, for the historic house and basement • Up to a 5' west sideyard setback reduction for the lightwells • 5' setback reduction on the west and rear sideyard, for the proposed trash enclosure We first want to note that the approved setback reductions need to be revised for the historic house. The 5’ setback reduction should apply to the west sideyard, and the 2’ setback reduction should apply to the east sideyard (above and below grade). Th e variations above seem to have been recorded incorrectly at concept review. Updating this setback reduction would then match the conditions of the existing historic resource’s location. The only proposed design change to this setback variation is in regard to the sideyard setback reductions for the lightwells. The conceptual plan proposed a lightwell in the SW corner of the property that could not be constructed as previously drawn, due to the limits of shoring along the property line. We propose a new location for the south west lightwell to exist aligned with the connector volume. Both proposed lightwells occur adjacent to the new connector, are hidden behind the historic resource, and encroach less on the setbacks. Per the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines 9.6- this new lightwell location minimizes the visual impact of the lightwell. Both proposed lightwells do not face Main Street and are entirely shielded from street view by the historic resource. The lightwells still require a BOSS.architecture 2546 15th street denver colorado 80211 303-377-6322 p 303-377-6326 f www.BOSSarchitecture.com railing for protection in these locations but are now not visible from the street and is allowed per guideline 9.6. The east lightwell fits within the approved “2’ setback reduction for the west and east sideyard above and below grade, for the addition”. The west lightwell would require up to a 4’ west sideyard setback reduction, as it is currently drawn approximately 1’-0” from the property line. See attached plans and elevations for details. Sec. 26.415.110 – Benefits - (f) Floor Area Bonus – Per HPC Resolution #18, series of 2019, dated October 9, 2019, “HPC hereby grants a 500 sq. ft. Floor Area Bonus for the approved design presented at the HPC meeting with a revised garage, but not including the new dormer.” This proposal has removed the dormer but has proposed a new skylight in its place. While the skylight is located on the historic resource- per Historic Preservation Design Guidelines 7.3- the visual impact of the skylight is minimal. The skylight sits behind the ridge of the historic roof, on the shed roof portion and is not visible from Main Street or the alley. The skylight is proposed as it can be easily removed, and the original roof could be restored with little impact. The garage has been revised to fit the two required parking spots. A small reduction in the loggia depth was required to fit the lengths of the two spaces. See attached plans and elevations for details. Sec. 26.575.020 – Calculations and Measurements The proposed design complies with the methods listed for measuring floor area, maximum building height, setbacks and other dimensions provided in this section. This project meets these restrictions except for the side yard setback encroachments and requested setback variances listed above. During the design process we have reviewed specific FAR questions with Aspen Zoning department and zoning enforcement officers. See attached drawings: site plan, floor plans, elevations and FAR calculations for details. Sec. 26.575.050 – Fence Materials The design proposes a new fence to be constructed to match the metal fence shown in historic photographs. This proposed fence would be constructed out of metal, be a maximum of 30” tall, and have a transparent quality. See attached landscape plan for details. BOSS.architecture 2546 15th street denver colorado 80211 303-377-6322 p 303-377-6326 f www.BOSSarchitecture.com Sec. 26.575.150 – Outdoor lighting The architectural lighting on the house has been carefully considered. We propose replacing the (1) existing light on the exterior porch, with a similar downlight, and propose adding (2) exterior lights to the garage elevation (alley side). In addition, we have proposed step lights for the roof deck. All of the proposed lights are dark-sky compliant and are fully shielded. No additional landscape lighting is proposed. See attached architectural lighting plans for details. Sec. 26.710.180 – Mixed Use (MU) The proposal meets the restrictions of the MU district, in permitted use (single family residence), minimum gross lot area, minimum lot width, front yard setback, rear yard setback, maximum height and FAR. As mentioned previously the project complies with these limitations listed in this section, except for the side yard setback encroachments and requested setback variances listed above. Due to the restrictions of a residential property in the MU district, the proposed residence meets the reduced allowable floor area restrictions of an equivalent-sized lot in the R-6 district (20% reduction), with an additional 20% reduction of allowable FAR due to the change in use from existing commercial to single family residential. Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines As the proposal has moved into final submission please see below the specific comments addressing the Historic Preservation Guidelines with regard to material selection, fenestration details and preservation plan. Chapter 1 – Site Planning and Landscape Design The proposed project respects the historic context, historic building footprint, and the resource’s relation to finished grade shall be preserved. Garage access remains from the alley and is not visible from Main Street. A simple, 3’-0” wide, light-grey concrete walkway is proposed connecting the sidewalk along Main Street directly to the historic front porch. The wood steps and wood decking at the front porch are to be repaired. The existing sidewalk in the front yard, and in the right of way will be rebuilt and installed as a new floating sidewalk. The small front yard is maintained as open space, while addressing specific stormwater quality needs. (1.1-1.7) Stormwater management has been carefully considered for this site. Two rain gardens and a green roof are proposed to eliminate the need for any dry-well. Sopris Engineering, the civil engineer on the project, has met with City Engineering to discuss the stormwater management on the property. One rain garden is proposed for the southwest side of the front yard to provide water quality treatment of the southern roof of the historic landmark. The second rain garden is a raised planter proposed at the east side of the addition. This will accept runoff from both the north historic roof and the addition. (1.8) BOSS.architecture 2546 15th street denver colorado 80211 303-377-6322 p 303-377-6326 f www.BOSSarchitecture.com All built-in furnishings and features are located on the roof deck and are not visible from Main Street. (1.10) Landscape design has been carefully considered to work with the stormwater management goals of the project, as well as respect the existing context. There have been several conversations between the Parks Department and Forestry regarding the trees on site. The spruce tree was determined to be in poor condition, as previously discussed and will be removed. Further conversations regarding the cottonwood trees located in the right of way have also continued. The landscape architects, Bluegreen, with Aspen Tree Service, have met with the Parks Department and have conducted air spading and resistograph drilling analysis of the trees on site. The western cottonwood tree was determined to be in poor condition and has been recommended for removal. The east ern cottonwood tree was determined to be in fair health and will remain on site. Additional tree root assessment was completed by Aspen Tree Service to evaluate the trees’ root structure. After analysis and discussion with City Forestry, it was found that excavation and site development can occur on the property, to the north of the cottonwood tree, with a proper tree protection plan in place. In addition, landscape design and planting selection has been carefully considered. Open lawn and low-height shrubs and perennials are proposed. There is no landscape lighting proposed for this project. (1.11-1.14) A new fence is proposed for the front yard that replicates a missing historic fence. Based on photographic evidence, a fence will be rebuilt that was originally located around the front yard of the house. This fence is transparent, metal and would be 30” maximum in height as to not distract from the historic resource. (1.15-1.20) The existing rock wall along the southwest corner is non-historic and is in poor condition. The wall will be rebuilt with a simple concrete retaining wall, along the west property line, adjoining the neighbors, and will be minimally visible only from the west. The site will be regraded to match the existing grades to ensure the relationship from grade to the historic house remains. No significant landscaping changes are proposed for the site. (1.21-1.27) Refer to architectural site plan, civil plans, tree assessment reports and landscape plans for details. Chapter 2 – Building Materials Where possible this proposal will preserve the existing and historic building materials. The clapboard siding will be repaired in place. Where existing siding on the historic resource does not match, we will replace this siding with matching clapboard siding (NE corner). During basement demolition, any existing unpainted masonry will be salvaged for reuse and be installed around the foundation wall and at the new chimney. The historic chimney will be reconstructed to match its original design and height, and the new proposed fireplace exhaust will be routed to this chimney. (2.1-2.6) Refer to plans, elevations and renders for details. BOSS.architecture 2546 15th street denver colorado 80211 303-377-6322 p 303-377-6326 f www.BOSSarchitecture.com Chapter 3 – Windows All historic windows are to remain and to be preserved. The non-historic windows will be removed (one at the SW corner of the front porch, and two at the NE corner of the resource). These are not historical windows, as they are made of vinyl material and should be removed. One missing historic window (on the east elevation) will be installed and will be built to match as closely as possible the existing historic double-hung windows. We propose to restore this original opening that was enclosed in the past. Where they occur, the exterior storm windows will be removed and replaced with new interior storm windows. Trim and casing details will match as closely as possible to the details shown on the historic photo documentation. (3.1-3.8) Refer to plans, elevations and renders for details. Chapter 4 – Doors On the historic resource, all doors are to be restored and repaired as needed, with details preserved as they exist. Stain glass panels are to remain. No changes are proposed to the location of the two entry doors at the front porch. The primary door is located on the south facing elevation and will be used as the primary egress door. The other entry door, on the east elevation, will be sealed shut and pinned in place. This work will be reversible, so that the door can be used in the future if necessary. Both doors are to remain in their original location, with no changes proposed. Doors are to maintain their relationship to finish floor elevation of the historic front porch. (4.1-4.7). Refer to plans, elevations and renders for details. Chapter 5 – Porches and Balconies No changes are proposed to the historic front porch. The porch floor is to be rebuilt after relocation, with similar wood decking material. New wood will need to be installed at ceiling of the front porch. All new materials will match the historic building materials. The (2) front steps will be rebuilt to meet building code restrictions. All decorative features at the porch’s posts are to be repaired as needed. The front (south) elevation of the porch is to be restored to the wood trim details evident in the historic photographs. No new guards or railings are proposed. (5.1- 5.6) Refer to plans, elevations and renders for details. Chapter 6 – Architectural Details On the historic resource, all important architectural details will be repaired where possible, and only replaced when necessary due to material decay. The clapboard siding will remain, and the decorative wood trim will match in proportion evident in the historic photograph documentation. We will preserve all key architectural details including: trim at the windows, water table skirtboard, building corner trim, and front porch details. (6.1-6.5) BOSS.architecture 2546 15th street denver colorado 80211 303-377-6322 p 303-377-6326 f www.BOSSarchitecture.com Refer to plans, elevations and renders for details. Chapter 7 – Roofs On the historic resource, the original form of the roof is preserved. We propose to remove the existing asphalt shingles and replace them with wood shake shingles that match the proportion of the roof shingles visible in the historic photographs. The eave depth and roof details will remain. In addition, there are a number of historic roof details that are not currently present. With the new roof, we propose to restore these details including the valley flashing and the ridge trim evident in the historic photographs. (7.1-7.2, 7.7-7.9) The proposed new skylight minimally impacts the existing roof. The proposed skylight is completely shielded from view from Main Street by the resource, and is shielded from view from the alley, by the addition. The skylight is proposed to sit on the low-slope shed roof portion of the roof behind the gable. The skylight’s minimal construction also allows it to be removed without significant damage to the historic resource, so it could be reversed at a future time. (7.3) Any new vents or exhaust required on the historic resource shall be located behind the gabled ridge line and will not be visible from Main Street. They will also be carefully placed and painted a dark color. (7.4) The original chimney will be restored and rebuilt to match the design and proportion of the chimney shown on historic photographic documentation. The historic chimney will be reused as the exhaust for the new fireplace will be rerouted to the historic chimney. Any new brick used to rebuild the chimney will match the historic brick in color and proportion. (7.5) Gutter and downspout design has been thoughtfully considered to allow for minimal impact on the historic resource. On the east portion of the house, a downspout is located at the SE corner of the building, as far away from the decorative porch posts as possible. A downspout for the SW corner of the resource is located away from the prominent building corner. The third downspout is mounted on the addition which collects the water from the north side of the historic shed roof, the flat roof at the connector piece and transfers water to the proposed rain garden. All downspouts to be round and painted to blend into the house. All gutters to be half- round and painted to blend into the roof. (7.10) Refer to plans, elevations and renders for details. Chapter 8 – Secondary Structures This section is not applicable as there are no historic secondary structures on the property. Chapter 9 – Excavation, Building Relocation and Foundations As previously discussed, we propose to move the historic resource temporarily on the site. The relocation is to allow for demolition of the existing basement, installation of new shoring, and BOSS.architecture 2546 15th street denver colorado 80211 303-377-6322 p 303-377-6326 f www.BOSSarchitecture.com installation of a new basement foundation. The house will then be moved back to its original location, set on the new foundation, with the same relationship to existing grade. (9.1-9.4, 9.7- 9.8) The new foundation will incorporate a brick ledge to give the appearance that the historic resource’s foundation is brick. The existing foundation brick has been painted and is in disrepair. During demolition any unpainted brick will be salvaged for reuse. Any new brick that will be installed will match the historic brick in proportion and color. (9.5) The proposed lightwells for this project have been located behind the historic resource and their placement minimizes any visual impact of the lightwells. From Main Street neither east nor west lightwell will be visible. The proposed lightwells will require a railing per building code specifications, but these will no longer be visible from the street. (9.6) Refer to plans, elevations and renders for details. Chapter 10 – Building Additions As seen in the 1904 Sanborn Map, the existing additions are not historic and will be removed. (10.1-10.2). The new proposed addition and connector have been sensitively designed for the historic resource to be the focus of the property, the entry point, and the predominant structure as viewed from Main Street. The new addition has been designed to be a product of its own time. The addition sits behind the historic resource and has greater side-yard setbacks to ensure the historic resource is the dominant volume on the site. (10.3-10.6). While the form of the building departs from the historic house, the addition relates to the historic resource in both materials and fenestration, two of the three aspects required of the addition. (10.6) We have proposed a subtle material difference between the historic resource and the new addition. While the historic resource has a typical 4.5” tall clapboard siding, we propose a tongue & groove wood siding, that matches the 4.5” dimension, that we consider a “modern interpretation of a historic style”. (10.6) The fenestration on the new addition matches the proportions of the windows that exist on the historic resource. There are 2 typical sizes of windows on the historic resource – a typical double hung window, roughly 2’-6” wide by 6’-6” tall, and a fixed window roughly 1’-10” wide by 2’-11” tall. The windows on the addition proportionally match the historic window dimensions. For the taller, rectangular windows at the addition, we propose to include a simulated divided light at these locations to reflect the double-hung historic window. The use of the connector to link the addition to the historic resource remains. The connector is one story tall and slips underneath the historic roof’s eave. While the previous 5’-0” long connector was approved, we have lengthened the connector from 5’-0” to 6’-3” long to make the geometry of the egress stairs work. The width remains minimal to allow passage between the BOSS.architecture 2546 15th street denver colorado 80211 303-377-6322 p 303-377-6326 f www.BOSSarchitecture.com historic resource and the addition, and allows for two egress lightwells, one either side of the connector. (10.9) The addition remains at the rear of the property, set back as far from the historic resource as possible, with a simple roof form. The only other proposed change to the addition from conceptual massing was the modification of the exterior stair from Level 2 to the Roof Deck. The previous version was much larger and visible from the alley. We propose a much smaller footprint for a spiral stair that would be screened from the alley. Refer to plans, elevations and renders for details. Chapter 11 – New Buildings on Landmarked Properties This section is not applicable. Chapter 12 – General Design Guidelines There are no proposed changes to the front porch in terms of accessibility. (12.1) Overall site lighting is minimal and simple in character. There is no proposed landscape lighting. The existing light on the historic resource’s front porch is not original and is in disrepair. We propose to replace this light with a similar ceiling mounted light that is dark sky compliant and fully shielded. (12.2-12.3) Due to the very tight site constraints we have thoughtfully proposed the location for the AC Units on the new addition. No AC units will be mounted on the historic resource. Any proposed vents on the historic resource will be located discretely, roof terminated when possible, or located within our brick foundation wall. Working with our mechanical engineers we have selected AC units with specifications that meet the Aspen Noise Ordinance restrictions. The proposed AC units have been grouped together, wall mounted as tightly as possible and will be painted a neutral color to blend in with the siding. We believe we have placed these to have the least visual impact as possible, as they will not be visible from Main Street, are only visible from the alley, and are also not visible from the east neighboring property. (12.4) There are no other awnings, signs or lighting included in this proposal. (12.5-12.9) Refer to plans, elevations and renders for details. In addition to addressing the City of Aspen’s Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, we have also provided a response to the previous conceptual approval resolution. Response to HPC Resolution #18, series of 2019, dated October 9, 2019 Listed below are the resolution items that needed to be addressed with final submission. Please see notes listed beneath each bullet point addressing these items. BOSS.architecture 2546 15th street denver colorado 80211 303-377-6322 p 303-377-6326 f www.BOSSarchitecture.com 1.) HPC herby grants a 500 sq. ft. Floor Area Bonus for the approved design presented at the HPC meeting with a revised garage, but not including the new dormer. • Response: Garage and loggia have been revised to accommodate two parking spots as required. The dormer has been removed, but a 6”-curb skylight has been proposed in its place. Please see drawing details and renders for the proposed new skylight, and documentation listed above regarding this new proposal as it relates to the Historic Guidelines. 2.) Design curb heights around the lightwells to be 6" or less, and work with the Building Department and staff to discuss a flat grate option around the lightwells. • Response: Final grading around the two lightwells is 6” maximum. Refer to civil grading plans and exterior elevations for these details. The lightwells do require a railing per building code, but the lightwells have been relocated to be fully screened behind the historic resource. The railings will not be visible from the street, and therefore should comply with the Historic Guidelines. 3.) The following setback variations are approved: • 2' setback reduction on the west and east sideyard above and below grade, for the addition • 5' setback reduction on the east sideyard above and below grade, for historic house and basement • 2' setback reduction on the west sideyard above and below grade, for the historic house and basement • Up to a 5' west sideyard setback reduction for the lightwells • 5' setback reduction on the west and rear sideyard, for the proposed trash enclosure • Response: The approved setback reductions need to be revised for the historic house. The 5’ setback reduction should apply to the west sideyard, and the 2’ setback reduction should apply to the east sideyard (above and below grade). The variations above seem to have been recorded incorrectly at concept review. Updating this setback reduction would then match the conditions of the existing historic resource’s location. No other proposed design changes to the previously approved setback variations, except for the sideyard setback reduction for the lightwells. The west lightwell requires a 4’ setback reduction from the west property line, and the east lightwell requires a 2’ setback reduction, which is already included for the addition. See site plans attached for more details and above text for reference. 4.) Continue to discuss the design of the storm water mitigation system with all relevant City Departments for compliance. Final design to be reviewed by HPC at Final Design Review. • Response: Storm water mitigation has been a major consideration for Final Design. Sopris Engineering, the civil engineer, has proposed a solution that will not require locating a dry well on site. With a combination of the green roof and two rain gardens, the storm water mitigation system has been thoughtfully BOSS.architecture 2546 15th street denver colorado 80211 303-377-6322 p 303-377-6326 f www.BOSSarchitecture.com designed for the constrained site. Sopris Engineering has met with the City Engineering department several times to review this proposal. See attached civil and landscape plans for details. 5.) Work closely with staff and monitor regarding the preservation plan and identifying areas for additional documentation and investigative demolition, to be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. • Response: Additional research has been completed by the design team to identify significant historic details on the resource, both existing and missing. See attached historic photograph documentation that has been the basis for the preservation plan. We commit to continue working with staff and monitor to ensure the historic resource is preserved and restored as accurately as possible. 6.) Provide necessary agreements from neighboring properties for site excavation stabilization prior to submission of Building permit. • Response: 202 E. Main Street property owner has engaged in conversations with both adjacent property owners. Our basis of design is to locate all shoring within our property as discussed with B&Y Drilling and Okeanos Construction. If any neighbor agreements are required for construction, we will receive these prior to building permit submission. 7.) Provide details of the relocation plan, outlined by a structural engineer and housemover, at Final. The applicant will be required to provide a financial security of $30,000 until the house is set on the new foundation. The financial security is to be provided with the building permit application. • Response: As noted above, we have coordinated many meetings with the design team regarding the house relocation. Bill Bailey House Movers, KL&A Engineering (structural engineers), B&Y Drilling (shoring) and Okeanos Construction (General Contractor) have developed a moving plan and construction sequence. See attached proposals and documentation regarding these specifics. The required financial security will be provided with the building permit application. 8.) A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. • Response: Per Resolution #19, Series of 2020, the HPC granted a 6 month extension of the conceptual approval for 202 E Main Street, dated September 9, 2020. Our deadline to file a final development application related to Resolution #18, Series of 2019 is April 9, 2021. BOSS.architecture 2546 15th street denver colorado 80211 303-377-6322 p 303-377-6326 f www.BOSSarchitecture.com Material Specifications: Please refer to the attached drawings and submitted material visual supplementation for proposed material selections. We propose 3 materials for the addition, all black to keep the material palette simple– the tongue and groove Accoya wood siding (for building facades), black metal panels (for screen and flashing or trim details) and concrete at the foundation walls and window wells. The flat roof at the connector will be black TPO, and the green roof and black roof trim at the addition will cover any roof membrane material. The connector is primarily a glass volume and any element that is not glazing will be a black metal trim, to blend in with the fenestration. We have provided images of specific materials as well as examples of installation of the proposed building materials. Since this submission is fully digital, the appearance of the renders may vary between each reviewer’s screen. Please let us know if there are any questions on these materials, and if necessary we can provide finish samples to the HPC board. Thank you for your time reviewing this submission and for consideration for our Final Design Application. We look forward to working with the HPC board and the city as this restoration project moves forward to construction. Sincerely, Chris Davis, BOSS Architecture Kevin Stephenson, BOSS Architecture Ana White, BOSS Architecture Dave Rittinger, BOSS Architecture RESOLUTION #18,SERIES OF 2019 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, RELOCATION,SETBACK VARIATION,AND FLOOR AREA BONUS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 202 EAST MAIN STREET, LOT 1, MAIN STREET VICTORIANS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 9, 2012 IN PLAT BOOK 10o AT PAGE 92, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2737-073-99-001 WHEREAS, the applicant, Rocking Lazy J Properties, LLC, represented by Jake Vickery, has requested HPC approval for Major Development, Relocation, Setback Variations, and Floor Area Bonus for the property located at 202 East Main Street, Lot 1, Main Street Victorians Historic Landmark Lot Split Subdivision Exemption According to the Plat thereof recorded November 9, 2012 in Plat Book loo at Page 92, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for approval of Relocation, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.090.C, Relocation of a Designated Property; and WHEREAS, for approval of Setback Variations, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.110.C, Setback Variations; and WHEREAS, for approval of Floor Area Bonus, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.11o.F, Floor Area Bonus; and WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards and recommends approval with conditions; and I IIIIII Hill IIIIIIIIII IIIII IIIII IIIIIIIII III IIIIIIII IN Hill 1111111111111 HPC Resolution #,8 Series of 201 RECEPTION#: 659920, R: $23.00, D: $0.00 9 DOC CODE: RESOLUTION Page 1 of 3 Pg 1 of 3, 10/25/2019 at 10:11:41 AM Janice K.Vos Caudill, Pitkin County,CO WHEREAS, HPC reviewed the project on August 28, 2019 and October 9, 2019. HPC considered the application, the staff memo and public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote of 6 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby approves Conceptual Major Development, Relocation, Setback Variations, and Floor Area Bonus for 202 E. Main Street, Lot 1, Main Street Victorians Historic Landmark Lot Split Subdivision Exemption, according to the Plat thereof recorded November 9, 2012 in Plat Book loo at Page 92, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO as follows: Section 1: Conceptual Major_ Development Review, Relocation, Setback Variations, and Floor Area Bonus. HPC hereby approves Conceptual Major Development, Relocation, and Setback Variations, and a Floor Area Bonus as proposed with the with the following conditions: 1.) HPC herby grants a 500 sq. ft. Floor Area Bonus for the approved design presented at the HPC meeting with a revised garage, but not including the new dormer. 2.) Design curb heights around the lightwells to be 6" or less, and work with the Building Department and staff to discuss a flat grate option around the lightwells. 3.) The following setback variations are approved: 2' setback reduction on the west and east sideyard above and below grade, for the addition 5' setback reduction on the east sideyard above and below grade, for historic house and basement 2' setback reduction on the west sideyard above and below grade, for the historic house and basement Up to a 5' west sideyard setback reduction for the lightwells 5' setback reduction on the west and rear sideyard, for the proposed trash enclosure 4.) Continue to discuss the design of the storm water mitigation system with all relevant City Departments for compliance. Final design to be reviewed by HPC at Final Design Review. 5.) Work closely with staff and monitor regarding the preservation plan and identifying areas for additional documentation and investigative demolition, to be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 6.) Provide necessary agreements from neighboring properties for site excavation stabilization prior to submission of Building permit. 7.) Provide details of the relocation plan, outlined by a structural engineer and housemover, at Final. The applicant will be required to provide a financial security of 30,000 until the house is set on the new foundation. The financial security is to be provided with the building permit application. HPC Resolution #18, Series of 2019 Page 2 of 3 8.) A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one 1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. Section 2: Material_Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 3: Existing_Litigation This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 91h day of October,2019. Approved as t orm: Approved as to Content: ncle ryan, Assistant City Attorn y retchen Gr ood, Chair T T: Nicole Henning, Deputy City Cler HPC Resolution #18, Series of 2019 Page 3 of 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION GRANTING A SIX MONTH EXTENSION OF THE CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL FOR A PROJECT AT 202 EAST MAIN STREET, LOT 1, MAIN STREET VICTORIANS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 9, 2012 IN PLAT BOOK 100 AT PAGE 92, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION #19, SERIES OF 2020 PARCEL ID: 2737-073-99-001 WHEREAS, on August 14, 2020, Rocking Lazy 3 Properties LLC, owner of 202 E. Main Street, Lot 1, Main Street Victorians Historic Landmark Lot Split Subdivision Exemption, according to the plat thereof recorded November 9, 2012 in Plat gook 100 at Page 92, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, requested a six month extension of the Conceptual design approval granted by the Historic Preservation Commission through Resolution # 1 S, Series of 2019. According to Section 26.415.070.D.3.c.3, of the Municipal Code, application for a final development plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date of approval of a conceptual development plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the conceptual development plan; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070.D.3.c.3, of the Municipal Code allows the Historic Preservation Commission, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, to grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a conceptual development plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date; and WHEREAS, Sarah Yoon, in her staff report to HPC dated September 9, 2020, recommended that a one-time extension be granted; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on September 9, 2020, the Historic Preservation o a Commission considered the request and granted a six month extension to the deadline to submit U a final development application. The vote of the members was 3 to 0. a 20 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: o6 N V That HPC hereby extends the deadline to file a final development application related to o a Resolution # 18, Series of2019 from October 9, 2020 to April 9, 2021. a N v APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 9" day of September, co U) o 2020. oLU0> 0, w a `o v retche nwood, Chair W o a � Approved as to Form: n / r amen R. True, City Attorney202 East Main Street HPC Resolution # 19. Series of 2020 ATT X cs Cra iam, Deputy City Clerk 202 East Main Street HPC Resolution # 19, Series of 2020 A CO V E R S H E E T 0.0 BO S S AS P E N A R C H i t e c t u r e © 25 4 6 1 5 TH S T R E E T DE N V E R , C O L O R A D O 8 0 2 1 1 US A 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 2 | P 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 6 | F WW W .b o s s AR C H . C O M . CH R I S TO P H E R . D A V I S KE V I N .S T E P H E N S O N 0326 2021 OWNER:202 E MAIN ST. LLC 2610 E CEDAR AVE. DENVER, COLORADO 80209 LOCATION:202 E. MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (FINAL HPC SUBMITTAL) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWING INDEX A0.0 A1.0 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS A2.0 A1.1 A2.1 A2.2 LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS A2.3 C-1 ISSUES AND REVISIONS CIVIL DRAWINGS L100 A3.0 A3.1 A3.2 A3.3 A3.4 A1.2 PROJECT TEAM SYMBOLS.legend LEVEL ELEVATION ROOM NAME X / AX.XSECTION ELEVATION X / AX.X vicinity.MAP south.ELEVATION building code & zoning info C-2 C-3 ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS E1.0 L300 L400 east.ELEVATION north.ELEVATION L000 L001 L002 L800 79 0 0 DN A ar c h i t e c t u r a l si t e p l a n 1 : 50 site plan1 1.0 BO S S AS P E N A R C H i t e c t u r e © 25 4 6 1 5 TH S T R E E T DE N V E R , C O L O R A D O 8 0 2 1 1 US A 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 2 | P 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 6 | F WW W .b o s s AR C H . C O M . CH R I S TO P H E R . D A V I S KE V I N .S T E P H E N S O N 0326 2021 OWNER:202 E MAIN ST. LLC 2610 E CEDAR AVE. DENVER, COLORADO 80209 LOCATION:202 E. MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (FINAL HPC SUBMITTAL) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION North UP DN DN UP UP DN UP DN DN DN UP DN A FA R CA L C U L A T I O N S 1 : 50 site plan0 1.1 BO S S AS P E N A R C H i t e c t u r e © 25 4 6 1 5 TH S T R E E T DE N V E R , C O L O R A D O 8 0 2 1 1 US A 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 2 | P 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 6 | F WW W .b o s s AR C H . C O M . CH R I S TO P H E R . D A V I S KE V I N .S T E P H E N S O N 0326 2021 OWNER:202 E MAIN ST. LLC 2610 E CEDAR AVE. DENVER, COLORADO 80209 LOCATION:202 E. MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (FINAL HPC SUBMITTAL) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1/8" = 1'-0" basement far calcs1 1/8" = 1'-0" basement wall calcs.5 1/8" = 1'-0" level 1 far calcs2 1/8" = 1'-0" level 2 far calcs3 1/8" = 1'-0" roof level far calcs4 North North North North EAST WALLS WEST WALLS SOUTH WALLS NORTH WALLS W. WDW WELL E. WDW WELL A SI T E S U R V E Y 1" = 10'-0" site survey1 1.2 BO S S AS P E N A R C H i t e c t u r e © 25 4 6 1 5 TH S T R E E T DE N V E R , C O L O R A D O 8 0 2 1 1 US A 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 2 | P 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 6 | F WW W .b o s s AR C H . C O M . CH R I S TO P H E R . D A V I S KE V I N .S T E P H E N S O N 0326 2021 OWNER:202 E MAIN ST. LLC 2610 E CEDAR AVE. DENVER, COLORADO 80209 LOCATION:202 E. MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (FINAL HPC SUBMITTAL) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION North UP DN DN GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS UP UP DN UP DN DN GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS A ar c h i t e c t u r a l fl o o r p l a n s 1 : 1/4" basement plan1 2.0 BO S S AS P E N A R C H i t e c t u r e © 25 4 6 1 5 TH S T R E E T DE N V E R , C O L O R A D O 8 0 2 1 1 US A 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 2 | P 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 6 | F WW W .b o s s AR C H . C O M . CH R I S TO P H E R . D A V I S KE V I N .S T E P H E N S O N 0326 2021 OWNER:202 E MAIN ST. LLC 2610 E CEDAR AVE. DENVER, COLORADO 80209 LOCATION:202 E. MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (FINAL HPC SUBMITTAL) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION North STAIR LIVING ROOM GYM MECH. ROOM LAUNDRY BASEMENT BATHROOM 1 BASEMENT BEDROOM 1WC BASEMENT BEDROOM 3 BASEMENT BEDROOM 2 BASEMENT HALL BASEMENT BATH 2 MECH. ROOM 1 : 1/4" level 1 plan2 North STAIR KITCHEN LIVING ROOM ENTRY DINING ROOM POWDER ROOM MUD ROOM GARAGE FRONT PORCH DN UP DN A ar c h i t e c t u r a l fl o o r p l a n s 1 : 1/4" level 2 plan3 2.1 BO S S AS P E N A R C H i t e c t u r e © 25 4 6 1 5 TH S T R E E T DE N V E R , C O L O R A D O 8 0 2 1 1 US A 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 2 | P 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 6 | F WW W .b o s s AR C H . C O M . CH R I S TO P H E R . D A V I S KE V I N .S T E P H E N S O N 0326 2021 OWNER:202 E MAIN ST. LLC 2610 E CEDAR AVE. DENVER, COLORADO 80209 LOCATION:202 E. MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (FINAL HPC SUBMITTAL) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION North 1 : 1/4" roof plan4 North ROOF DECK STAIR MASTER BEDROOM HALL MASTER CLOSET MASTER BATHROOM WC STAIR UP UP DN UP DN DN GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS A ar c h i t e c t u r a l li g h t i n g p l a n s 1 : 1/4" level 1 plan - lighting5 2.2 BO S S AS P E N A R C H i t e c t u r e © 25 4 6 1 5 TH S T R E E T DE N V E R , C O L O R A D O 8 0 2 1 1 US A 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 2 | P 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 6 | F WW W .b o s s AR C H . C O M . CH R I S TO P H E R . D A V I S KE V I N .S T E P H E N S O N 0326 2021 OWNER:202 E MAIN ST. LLC 2610 E CEDAR AVE. DENVER, COLORADO 80209 LOCATION:202 E. MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (FINAL HPC SUBMITTAL) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION North STAIR KITCHEN LIVING ROOM ENTRY DINING ROOM POWDER ROOM MUD ROOM GARAGE FRONT PORCH proposed fixture 'a' surface mount at porch proposed fixture 'b' wall sconce at garage DN A ar c h i t e c t u r a l li g h t i n g p l a n s 1 : 1/4" roof plan - lighting6 2.3 BO S S AS P E N A R C H i t e c t u r e © 25 4 6 1 5 TH S T R E E T DE N V E R , C O L O R A D O 8 0 2 1 1 US A 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 2 | P 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 6 | F WW W .b o s s AR C H . C O M . CH R I S TO P H E R . D A V I S KE V I N .S T E P H E N S O N 0326 2021 OWNER:202 E MAIN ST. LLC 2610 E CEDAR AVE. DENVER, COLORADO 80209 LOCATION:202 E. MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (FINAL HPC SUBMITTAL) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION North ROOF DECK proposed fixture 'c' step lights at roof deck A ex t e r i o r e l e v a t i o n s 1 : 1/4" proposed east elevation1 3.0 BO S S AS P E N A R C H i t e c t u r e © 25 4 6 1 5 TH S T R E E T DE N V E R , C O L O R A D O 8 0 2 1 1 US A 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 2 | P 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 6 | F WW W .b o s s AR C H . C O M . CH R I S TO P H E R . D A V I S KE V I N .S T E P H E N S O N 0326 2021 OWNER:202 E MAIN ST. LLC 2610 E CEDAR AVE. DENVER, COLORADO 80209 LOCATION:202 E. MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (FINAL HPC SUBMITTAL) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION T.O. EXISTING HISTORIC ROOF 118'-3 5/8" T.O. FIN. FLOOR 100'-0" = 7900.72' T.O. SLAB (BASEMENT) 87'-6" T.O. FIN. FLOOR (EXIST.) 101'-3" T.O. SLAB (BASEMENT) 83'-9" T.O. ADDITION ROOF 120'-3" T.O. FIN. FLOOR (SECOND LEVEL) 106'-3" T.O. SLAB (GARAGE) 96'-10 1/2" T.O. ROOF DECK 117'-1" A ex t e r i o r e l e v a t i o n s 3.1 BO S S AS P E N A R C H i t e c t u r e © 25 4 6 1 5 TH S T R E E T DE N V E R , C O L O R A D O 8 0 2 1 1 US A 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 2 | P 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 6 | F WW W .b o s s AR C H . C O M . CH R I S TO P H E R . D A V I S KE V I N .S T E P H E N S O N 0326 2021 OWNER:202 E MAIN ST. LLC 2610 E CEDAR AVE. DENVER, COLORADO 80209 LOCATION:202 E. MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (FINAL HPC SUBMITTAL) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 : 1/4"3 1 : 1/4" proposed south elevation historic resource2proposed north elevation historic resource 1 : 1/4" T.O. EXISTING HISTORIC ROOF 118'-3 5/8" T.O. FIN. FLOOR 100'-0" = 7900.72' T.O. SLAB (BASEMENT) 87'-6" T.O. FIN. FLOOR (EXIST.) 101'-3" T.O. SLAB (BASEMENT) 83'-9" T.O. ADDITION ROOF 120'-3" T.O. FIN. FLOOR (SECOND LEVEL) 106'-3" T.O. SLAB (GARAGE) 96'-10 1/2" T.O. ROOF DECK 117'-1" T.O. EXISTING HISTORIC ROOF 118'-3 5/8" T.O. FIN. FLOOR 100'-0" = 7900.72' T.O. SLAB (BASEMENT) 87'-6" T.O. FIN. FLOOR (EXIST.) 101'-3" T.O. SLAB (BASEMENT) 83'-9" T.O. ADDITION ROOF 120'-3" T.O. FIN. FLOOR (SECOND LEVEL) 106'-3" T.O. SLAB (GARAGE) 96'-10 1/2" T.O. ROOF DECK 117'-1" A ex t e r i o r e l e v a t i o n s 3.2 BO S S AS P E N A R C H i t e c t u r e © 25 4 6 1 5 TH S T R E E T DE N V E R , C O L O R A D O 8 0 2 1 1 US A 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 2 | P 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 6 | F WW W .b o s s AR C H . C O M . CH R I S TO P H E R . D A V I S KE V I N .S T E P H E N S O N 0326 2021 OWNER:202 E MAIN ST. LLC 2610 E CEDAR AVE. DENVER, COLORADO 80209 LOCATION:202 E. MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (FINAL HPC SUBMITTAL) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION T.O. EXISTING HISTORIC ROOF 118'-3 5/8" T.O. FIN. FLOOR 100'-0" = 7900.72' T.O. SLAB (BASEMENT) 87'-6" T.O. FIN. FLOOR (EXIST.) 101'-3" T.O. SLAB (BASEMENT) 83'-9" T.O. ADDITION ROOF 120'-3" T.O. FIN. FLOOR (SECOND LEVEL) 106'-3" T.O. SLAB (GARAGE) 96'-10 1/2" T.O. ROOF DECK 117'-1" 1 : 1/4" proposed west elevation41 : 1/4" T.O. EXISTING HISTORIC ROOF 118'-3 5/8" T.O. FIN. FLOOR 100'-0" = 7900.72' T.O. SLAB (BASEMENT) 87'-6" T.O. FIN. FLOOR (EXIST.) 101'-3" T.O. SLAB (BASEMENT) 83'-9" T.O. ADDITION ROOF 120'-3" T.O. FIN. FLOOR (SECOND LEVEL) 106'-3" T.O. SLAB (GARAGE) 96'-10 1/2" T.O. ROOF DECK 117'-1" A ex t e r i o r e l e v a t i o n s 3.3 BO S S AS P E N A R C H i t e c t u r e © 25 4 6 1 5 TH S T R E E T DE N V E R , C O L O R A D O 8 0 2 1 1 US A 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 2 | P 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 6 | F WW W .b o s s AR C H . C O M . CH R I S TO P H E R . D A V I S KE V I N .S T E P H E N S O N 0326 2021 OWNER:202 E MAIN ST. LLC 2610 E CEDAR AVE. DENVER, COLORADO 80209 LOCATION:202 E. MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (FINAL HPC SUBMITTAL) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION T.O. EXISTING HISTORIC ROOF 118'-3 5/8" T.O. FIN. FLOOR 100'-0" = 7900.72' T.O. SLAB (BASEMENT) 87'-6" T.O. FIN. FLOOR (EXIST.) 101'-3" T.O. SLAB (BASEMENT) 83'-9" T.O. ADDITION ROOF 120'-3" T.O. FIN. FLOOR (SECOND LEVEL) 106'-3" T.O. SLAB (GARAGE) 96'-10 1/2" T.O. ROOF DECK 117'-1" 1 : 1/4"6 1 : 1/4" proposed north elevation new addition5proposed south elevation new addition 1 : 1/4" T.O. EXISTING HISTORIC ROOF 118'-3 5/8" T.O. FIN. FLOOR 100'-0" = 7900.72' T.O. SLAB (BASEMENT) 87'-6" T.O. FIN. FLOOR (EXIST.) 101'-3" T.O. SLAB (BASEMENT) 83'-9" T.O. ADDITION ROOF 120'-3" T.O. FIN. FLOOR (SECOND LEVEL) 106'-3" T.O. SLAB (GARAGE) 96'-10 1/2" T.O. ROOF DECK 117'-1" A ex t e r i o r e l e v a t i o n DE T A I L S 1 : 3/4" historic resource window detail1 3.4 BO S S AS P E N A R C H i t e c t u r e © 25 4 6 1 5 TH S T R E E T DE N V E R , C O L O R A D O 8 0 2 1 1 US A 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 2 | P 30 3 . 3 7 7 . 6 3 2 6 | F WW W .b o s s AR C H . C O M . CH R I S TO P H E R . D A V I S KE V I N .S T E P H E N S O N 0326 2021 OWNER:202 E MAIN ST. LLC 2610 E CEDAR AVE. DENVER, COLORADO 80209 LOCATION:202 E. MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (FINAL HPC SUBMITTAL) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 : 3/4" historic resource chimney detail3 historic resource watertable detail21 : 3/4" historic resource proposed vent detail4 nts historic resource archive photos, courtesy of aspen historical society5 1 : 1 1/2" CIRCA 1890 CIRCA 1930 WINTER, 1942 UP UP DN UP DN DN xxxxx x x x x x x x x x x >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xwl xwl xwl xwl xwl xwl xwlxwl XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XGAS XGAS XGAS XGAS XGAS XGAS XGAS XGAS XGAS XGAS XGAS XGAS XGAS XG A S XG A S XG A S XG A S XG A S XG A S XG A S XG A S XG A S XG A S XG A S XG A S XGAS XEL XEL XEL XGAS XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XSA XSA XSA XSA XSA XSA XSA XSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSA XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XELXELXELXEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XT V XT V XT V XT V XT V XT V XT V XT V XT V XT V XT V XT V XT V XT V XT V >>>>>>>>>>>> sa svc sa svc sa svc UEL UE L UE L UE L UE L UE L UE L UE L UEL UELUELUELUELUELUEL GAS GA S GAS XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XWL T E L TEL TEL TEL TEL TEL T V TV TV TV TV TV >>>>>>>>>>>> W L SV C WL SVC WL SVC >>> WL SVC WL SVC W L S V C W L SV C >>>> > > > 208 E MAIN ST. (UNDER CONSTRUCTION) MA I N S T . (S T A T E H I G H W A Y 8 2 ) AL L E Y B L O C K 7 3 (2 0 - F T R O W ) 200 E MAIN ST. EXISTING WINDOW WELL 2' MILLING AT ASPHALT FULL DEPTH PATCH FULL DEPTHASPHALT PATCH FOR CONSTRUCTION OF REPLACED CURB & GUTTER REPLACE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER PERCOA STANDARDS PROPOSED RG #1; RE. TO C-3 FOR ADDITIONAL INFO PROPOSED RG#2 (RAISED PLANTER); RE. TO C-3 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REPLACE EXISTING WALK W/ VALLEY FLOWLINE TO DRAIN TO THE SOUTH PROPOSEDGAS METERPROPOSED ELEC METER EXISTING COA ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER LOCATED BEHIND 200 E. MAIN. RE-USE (2) EXISTING LUGS & EXTEND SECONDARY SERVICE TO 202 E. MAIN STREET AS SHOWN HEREIN EXISTING GAS SERVICE TAP LOCATION. SIZE OF SERVICE LINE TO BE CONFIRMED & COORDINATE WITH BLACK HILLS ENERGY ON RE-ROUTING SERVICE TO PROPOSED METER EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL #205 CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH CENTURYLINK ON EXTENDING TELEPHONE SERVICE TO PROPOSED RESIDENCE PROPOSED 2-WAY SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT EXISTING SEWER SERVICE TO BE ABANDONED AT MAIN PER ACSD STANDARDS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/SHORING WORK (TAP 7-FT± DOWNSTREAM OF MH A-10A-2 PER ACSD) EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE RIM: 7896.4± 10" INV OUT: 7889.3± (PER SURVEY PERFORMED BY OTHERS) CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM SIZE & DEPTH OF EXISTING SEWER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION & COORDINATE WITH ACSD ON TAPPING NEW 4" SEWER SERVICE AT MAINLINE (INVERT AT MAINLINE: -7± BELOW EXISTING GRADE) CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH COMCAST ON EXTENSION OF PROPOSED CABLE SERVICE FEED TO 208 E MAIN STREET CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE EXISTING MAIN & COORDINATE WITH CITY OF ASPEN WATER DEPARTMENT ON TAPPING NEW 2" TYPE K COPPER SERVICE TO 202 E MAIN STREET PORCH FULL DEPTH SAW CUT FULL DEPTH SAW CUT PROPOSED 2" CURB STOP PER COA STANDARDS 208 E. MAIN STREET CURRENTLY SHARES WATER SERVICE WITH 202 E MAIN STREET x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/ BLACK HILLS ENERGY ON ABANDONING EXISTING GAS SERVICE & METER AS REQ'D CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/ CENTURY LINK ON ABANDONING EXISTING TELE. AS REQ'D CONTRACTOR ABANDONING EXISTING SECONDARY ELEC. SERVICE & METER MATCH EXISTING ASPHALT ALONG TIE-IN MILLING LINE (TYP) LIMITS OF BELOW GRADE STRUCTURE (TYP) ROOFRIDGE LINES EGRESS WELL EGRESS WELL LANDSCAPE WALL TO RE-ESTABLISH HISTORIC GRADES AT HISTORIC LANDMARK 5' SIDEWALK (COA FLOATING SIDEWALK DETAIL AS REQ'D TO PROTECT EXISTING COTTONWOOD) CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE EXISTING WATER SERVICE AND RE-ROUTE AS NECESSARY TO MINIMIZE PLACEMENT AND IMPACTS TO 202 E. MAIN STREET. RE-ALIGNMENT OF WATER SERVICE MAY REQUIRE INSULATION TO PROTECT IT FROM POTENTIAL FROST DURING EXCAVATION OF 202 E MAIN STREET. 3' SIDEWALK (COA FLOATING SIDEWALK DETAIL AS REQ'D TO PROTECT EXISTING COTTONWOOD) (I M P E R V I O U S D R I V E W A Y A P R O N ) EXISTING COTTONWOOD TO BE REMOVED EXISTING COTTONWOOD TO BE PROTECTED LANDSCAPING EDGER APPROX. LOCATIONOF EXISTING 6" WATER MAIN WALL MOUNTED AC UNIT (BY OTHERS) IRRIGATION BACKFLOW PREV. & APPURTENANCES (BY OTHERS) OPRIS ES NGINEERING, LLC. CIVIL CONSULTANTS JOB NO. DATE: 502 MAIN STREETCARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704-0311 FAX: (970)-704-0313 DATE REVISION C-1 DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 1 \ 3 1 0 0 4 - 2 0 2 E M A I N S T \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ 3 1 0 0 4 P L O T . D W G - M a r 1 9 , 2 0 2 1 - 9 : 1 7 a m CONCEPTUAL SITE & UTILITY PLAN MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R NORTH 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 05 5 10 5 202.5 31004.01 03-26-2021 20 2 E . M A I N S T R E E T AS P E N , C O CO N C E P T U A L S I T E & U T I L I T Y P L A N HP C F I N A L A P P R O V A L NOTE: THESE PLANS ARE CONCEPTUAL OR ILLUSTRATIVE IN NATURE. PRECISE INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED AS PART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION, AND IN SITUATIONS WHERE THE FINAL HPC PLANS AND APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT DIFFER, THE APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT SHALL RULE. EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING WATER MAINXWLXWL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING GAS EXISTING TELEPHONE XGAS XGAS EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EXISTING CABLE XUT XUT XEL XEL XTV XTV XSA XSA PROPOSED LEGEND EXISTING LEGEND PROPOSED SAWCUT PROPOSED FULL DEPTH ASPHALT PROPOSED 2" MILLING & ASPHALT OVERLAY PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED WATER SERVICEWLSVC PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MAIN PROPOSED GAS PROPOSED TELEPHONE GAS PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC PROPOSED CABLE TEL TEL UE TV TV sa svc EXISTING ASPHALT EXISTING CONCRETE 3-26-2021 FINAL HPC SUBMITTAL PROPOSED WATER QUALITY TREATMENT RAIN GARDEN UP UP DN UP DN DN xxxxx x x x x x x x x x x >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xwl xwl xwl xwl xwl xwl xwlxwl 79 0 0 >>>>>>>>>>>> XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XWL >>>>>>>>>>>> W L SV C WL SVC WL SVC >>> WL SVC WL SVC W L S V C W L SV C >>>> > > > 208 E MAIN ST. (UNDER CONSTRUCTION) MA I N S T . (S T A T E H I G H W A Y 8 2 ) AL L E Y B L O C K 7 3 (2 0 - F T R O W ) T C : 0 0 . 0 5 T C : 0 0 . 0 2 TC: 99.50 TC: 99.50TC: 99.41 T C : 9 9 . 9 9 TC: 00.53 TC: 99.66 ME: 99.7'± FG: 98.72 FL: 96.58 FL: 97.14FL @ HP: 00.71 FL: 00.55 FG: 00.43 FG: 00.75 FG: 00.60 FG: 00.57 FG: 97.57 FG: 97.36 FG: 97.06 FG: 97.07 TOP PORCH: 01.76 FG: 97.11 FG: 00.68 200 E MAIN ST. EXISTING WINDOW WELL TC: 99.25 DRAINAGE FLOW LINEALONG BOTTOM EDGE OFEXISTING CONCRETE WALK 2.5± PROPOSED REPLACEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK W/ FORMED FLOWLINE TC-FL @ HP:99.650.5% 5.4% 1. 9 % 1 4 . 9 % 4.2%11.1%6.0% 4.2% 4.1% TC: 97.14 TC: 97.14 TC: 97.20 TC: 97.20 COLLECT RUNOFF FROM ADDITIONAND DISCHARGE IN PLANTER RAINGARDEN #2. PROVIDE SCOUR PROTECTION AT OUTFALL DS DS EX. TC: 99.3'±EX. TC: 99.3'±EX. TC: 99.3'±EX. TC: 99.4'±EX. TC: 99.5'±EX. TC: 99.2'± EX. TC: 97.6'± EX. TC: 97.1'± FG: 97.76 FG: 97.55 FG: 97.14 FG: 97.38 FG: 97.50 FG: 97.29 FG: 97.16FG: 98.95 DRAINAGE SWALE BETWEENEX. SIDEWALK AND PROPOSED EDGE OF BUILDING FG: 99.43 FG: 99.22 FG: 99.01 FG: 99.03FG: 99.54 ME: 99.6'± 0.5% 2.5%2.5%11.6%10.0%1.4% 5. 0 % 7. 2 % 8. 6 % DS 3.7% 1.8% 1.2% ME: 99.4'±ME: 99.4'± ME: 00.0'±ME: 00.1'±ME: 99.2'± ME: 99.7'± ME: 99.3'± ME: 99.2'± ME: 98.7'± ME: 98.8'± TRENCH FORNEW WATERSERVICE TAP PROPOSED LANDSCAPE RAIN GARDEN #1 (RG #1) FG @ FOOTPRINT: 7899.60METAL EDGER AROUND PERIMETER FOR CONTAINMENT & TO AVOID 3:1 SIDE SLOPES. TOP OF EDGER TO MATCH FINAL GRADES. RIM: 97.11 MATCH EXISTING ASPHALT ALONG TIE-IN MILLING LINE (TYP) SHORT LANDSCAPE WALL TO RE-ESTABLISH HISTORIC GRADES AT RESIDENCE (SET TOP OF WALL 2" ABOVE 202 E MAINSTREET'S FINAL GRADES 2.0% SHALLOW SWALE TO DIRECT SURFACETOWARDS RG #1 SHALLOW GRASS LINED SWALE TOPROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM STRUCTURES. FINAL GRADES ALONGPROPERTY LINE TO BE CONFIRMED UPON THE COMPLETION OF 208 E MAIN STREETIMPROVEMENTS FG: 99.60 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE RAIN GARDEN #2 (ELEVATED PLANTER 30" MAX. HEIGHT)TOP OF PERIMETER WALL: 7899.5 PORCH (ELEV: 7901.76) UTILITY TRENCH:FULL DEPTH SAWCUT ASPHALT & FULL DEPTH ASPHALT PATCH EXISTINGBUILDING ME: 96.9'± ME: 96.8'± EX. CONC. WALKWAY EX. CONC. STEPS FINAL GRADES ALONG PROPERTY LINE TO BE CONFIRMED UPON COMPLETION OF 208 E. MAIN STREET IMPROVEMENTS & PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR 202 E MAIN STREET PROJECT 7900.0 7900.5 7901.0 7898. 0 789 9 . 0 7 9 0 0 . 0 7897. 5 7898 . 5 789 9 . 5 790 0 . 5 7897 . 0 7 8 9 7 . 5 7 8 9 8 . 0 7 8 9 8 . 5 79 0 0 . 0 7899. 5 79 0 0 . 5 INLET @ FACE OF PLANTER TO INTERCEPT FLOWS FROM GRASS SWALE 1.5% 2.0%2.1% TC: 97.85 TC: 97.85 FG: 99.00 (2) 7.5"± RISERS 4.6% TC: 00.04 1.1% FG: 98.75 FL: 97.00 FL: 96.86 TC: 99.97 TC: 00.26 TC: 00.47 FG: 99.60 FG: 99.91FG: 99.77 FG: 99.77 3.3% 3" INV: 99.60 TW: 99.50 EXISTING COTTONWOODTREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING COTTONWOOD TREE TO BE PROTECTED EGRESS WELL (DRAIN TO GRAVEL ENVELOPE BELOW FOOTERS) EGRESS WELL (DRAIN TO GRAVEL ENVELOPE BELOW FOOTERS) 78 9 7 . 0 EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING WATER MAINXWLXWL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING GAS EXISTING TELEPHONE XGAS XGAS EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EXISTING CABLE XUT XUT XEL XEL XTV XTV XSA XSA OPRIS ES NGINEERING, LLC. CIVIL CONSULTANTS JOB NO. DATE: 502 MAIN STREETCARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704-0311 FAX: (970)-704-0313 DATE REVISION C-2 DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 1 \ 3 1 0 0 4 - 2 0 2 E M A I N S T \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ 3 1 0 0 4 P L O T . D W G - M a r 1 9 , 2 0 2 1 - 9 : 1 2 a m CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN PROPOSED LEGEND EXISTING LEGEND MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R DRAINAGE DIRECTION/SLOPE SPOT ELEVATION EXAMPLE: TOP OF CONCRETE @ 7900.00' = BOW = BOTTOM OF WALLEOA = EDGE OF ASPHALTEX = EXISTING GRADE FFE = FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION FG = FINISHED GRADE FL = FLOW LINEHP = HIGH POINT LP = LOW POINT ME = MATCH EXISTING RIM = RIM ELEVATIONTBC = TOP BACK OF CURB TC = TOP OF CONCRETE 7890.5 = 90.50' 2.0% TC:00.00' SPOT ELEVATION LEGEND NORTH 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 05 5 10 5 202.5 31004.01 20 2 E . M A I N S T R E E T AS P E N , C O CO N C E P T U A L G R A D I N G P L A N HP C F I N A L A P P R O V A L NOTE: THESE PLANS ARE CONCEPTUAL OR ILLUSTRATIVE IN NATURE. PRECISE INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED AS PART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION, AND IN SITUATIONS WHERE THE FINAL HPC PLANS AND APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT DIFFER, THE APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT SHALL RULE. PROPOSED SAWCUT PROPOSED FULL DEPTH ASPHALT PROPOSED 2" MILLING & ASPHALT OVERLAY PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED WATER SERVICEWLSVC PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MAIN PROPOSED GAS PROPOSED TELEPHONE GAS PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC PROPOSED CABLE TEL TEL UE TV TV sa svc EXISTING ASPHALT EXISTING CONCRETE PROPOSED CONTOUR (1-FT) PROPOSED CONTOUR (0.5-FT)7900.5 7901.0 03-26-2021 3-26-2021 FINAL HPC SUBMITTAL PROPOSED WATER QUALITY TREATMENT RAIN GARDEN EXISTING CONTOUR (1-FT INTERVAL) DN >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xwl xwl xwl xwl xwl xwl xwlxwl 79 0 0 >>>>>>>>>>>> XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XWL >>>>>>>>>>>> W L SV C WL SVC WL SVC >>> WL SVC WL SVC W L S V C W L SV C >>>> > > > 208 E MAIN ST. (UNDER CONSTRUCTION) MA I N S T . (S T A T E H I G H W A Y 8 2 ) AL L E Y B L O C K 7 3 (2 0 - F T R O W ) 200 E MAIN ST. EXISTING WINDOW WELL BASIN 1a ROOF DRAINAGE COLLECTED IN GUTTER W/ DOWNSPOUT. FLOWS TO BE CONVEYED TO RG #1 VIA SURFACE FLOW BASIN 2 (ROOF DRAINAGE TO BE DIRECTED TO RG #2; RE. TO ARCH. PLANS) PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN #2 RAISED PLANTER (30" MAX. FROM FG) W/ UNDERDAIN; RE. TO RAIN GARDENSUMMARY TABLE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROPOSED LANDSCAPE RAIN GARDEN (RG #1); RE. TO RAIN GARDEN SUMMARY TABLE FORADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHED ROOF SHED ROOF FLAT ROOF 7900.0 7900.5 7901.0 7898. 0 7899 . 0 7 9 0 0 . 0 7897. 5 7898 . 5 789 9 . 5 790 0 . 5 7897 . 0 7 8 9 7 . 5 7 8 9 8 . 0 7 8 9 8 . 5 79 0 0 . 0 7899. 5 79 0 0 . 5 PROPOSED INLET GRATEINTEGRATED INTO FACE OF PLANTER & CONNECTED TO 6" DRAIN PIPEROUTED THROUGH PLANTER BASIN 1b ROOF DRAINAGE COLLECTED IN GUTTER W/ DOWNSPOUT. FLOWS TO BE CONVEYED TO RG #1 VIA SHALLOW 3" ROOF DRAIN PROTECT EXISTINGCOTTONWOOD TREE EXISTINGCOTTONWOOD TREETO BE REMOVED DS DS AREA TO SURFACE DRAIN TOWARDS ALLEY OVERLANDSCAPE GROUND COVER AREA TO SURFACE DRAIN TOWARDS ALLEYOVER LANDSCAPE GROUND COVER (FLOWS TO PASS ALONG WEST SIDE OF TRASH ENCLOSURE) AREA TO SURFACE DRAIN TOWARDS ALLEY 13 3 ± s f I M P E R V I O U S G A R A G E A P R O N & T R A S H E N C L O S U R E (R E Q U E S T I N G V A R I A N C E F R O M W Q T R E A T M E N T ) 33± SF OF SIDEWALK TO BEREPLACED ON SUBJECT PROPERTY (REQUESTING WQ TREATMENT VARIANCE) 6" DRAIN PIPE & 4"UNDERDRAIN TO DAYLIGHT AT NORTH FACE OF PLANTER 4" UNDERDRAIN W/ CLEANOUT 6" DRAIN PIPE TO BE ROUTEDTHROUGH PLANTER INSTALL AREA INLETS & SETRIM 4.5" ABOVE FINAL GRADE ROOFPLANTER ROOFPLANTER ROOF PLANTER DS 16± SF OF INFILTRATION AREA FOR RAIN GARDEN (IE. NO IMPERMEABLE LINER WITHN THIS AREA) CONNECT DOWNSPOUT TO 3" SHALLOW BURY DRAIN LINE &ROUTE TO RG #1 (HEAT TAPE RECOMMENDED) DAYLIGHT 3" SHALLOW BURY DRAIN LINE INTO RG #1. PROVIDE RODENT SCREEN &OUTFALL PROTECTION DOWNSPOUT TO DAYLIGHT @SURFACE. FLOWS TO BE ROUTED TO RG #1 VIA OVERLAND FLOW FLOWS ROUTED IN LANDSCAPE SWALE &PASSED THROUGH DRAIN PIPE INSTALLED WITHIN RG #2 (RAISED PLANTER) ROOFTOPPATIO EGRESS WELL (DRAIN TO GRAVEL ENVELOPE BELOW FOOTERS) EGRESS WELL (DRAIN TO GRAVEL ENVELOPE BELOW FOOTERS) 78 9 7 . 0 OPRIS E NGINEERING, LLC. CIVIL CONSULTANTS 31004.01JOB NO. DATE: 502 MAIN STREETCARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704-0311 FAX: (970)-704-0313 DATE REVISION C-3 DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 1 \ 3 1 0 0 4 - 2 0 2 E M A I N S T \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ 3 1 0 0 4 P L O T . D W G - M a r 1 9 , 2 0 2 1 - 9 : 1 6 a m NORTH CONCEPTUAL WATER QUALITY PLAN 20 2 E . M A I N S T R E E T AS P E N , C O CO N C E P T U A L W A T E R Q U A L I T Y P L A N HP C F I N A L A P P R O V A L 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 05 5 10 5 202.5 PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR (0.5-FT INTERVAL) PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR INTERVAL (1-FT INTERVAL) PROPOSED STORM SEWER 7900 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SWALE>>>> PROPOSED FLOW ARROW POST DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE BASIN POST DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE LEGENDRAIN GARDEN DESIGN SUMMARY TABLE NOTE: THESE PLANS ARE CONCEPTUAL OR ILLUSTRATIVE IN NATURE. PRECISE INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED AS PART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION, AND IN SITUATIONS WHERE THE FINAL HPC PLANS AND APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT DIFFER, THE APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT SHALL RULE. EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING WATER MAINXWLXWL EXISTING LEGEND PROPOSED SAWCUT PROPOSED FULL DEPTH ASPHALT PROPOSED 2" MILLING & ASPHALT OVERLAY PROPOSED CONCRETE EXISTING ASPHALT EXISTING CONCRETE NOTES: 1. FINAL WATER QUALITY TREATMENT DESIGN & CALCULATIONS TO BE PROVIDED IN SUPPORT OF FUTURE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. 2. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA OF SITE: 2,130± sf 3. POST DEVELOPMENT IMPERVIOUS AREA: 1,908± sf 4. APPROX. 170± SF OF IMPERVIOUS AREA WILL LEAVE SITE UNTREATED AS NOTED ON THE PLAN 03-26-2021 3-26-2021 FINAL HPC SUBMITTAL 7900.50 PROPOSED WATER QUALITYTREATMENT RAIN GARDEN EXISTING CONTOUR (1-FT INTERVAL) ELECTRICAL LEGEND (NOT ALL SYMBOLS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT) O RECESSED OR SURFACE DOWNLIGHT &I WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE Aa RECESSED FLUOR. LIGHT FIXTURE Aa SURFACE FLUOR. LIGHT FIXTURE FIXTURE DESIGNATIONS: UPPER CASE - FIXTURE TYPE LOWER CASE - SWITCH DESIGNATION ® SHADING ON FIXTURE INDICATES EMERG. BATTERY BACKUP FLUORESCENT STRIP FIXTURE TRACK LIGHT AS NOTED OR SCHEDULED WALL WASHER POLE -MOUNTED FIXTURE POST (BOLLARD) FIXTURE ® STEP LIGHT ® CEILING OR WALL MOUNTED EXIT LIGHT EMERGENCY BATTERY LIGHTS DUPLEX RECEPTACLE @ 18" UNLESS NOTED �USB DUPLEX RECEPTACLE @ 18" UNLESS NOTED W/ 2 USB PORTS DOUBLE DUPLEX RECEPTACLE @ 18" UNLESS NOTED QQ FLUSH FLOOR DUPLEX RECEPTACLE ® E)E'IeCHALTA(a®BPEB-SWITCHED @ 18" UNLESS NOTED POP-UP RECEPTACLE ® TELE-POWER POLE MULTI -OUTLET PLUG STRIP J®D JQ-1 JUNCTION BOX IN FLOOR, CEILING OR IN WALL V COMPUTER/TELEPHONE OUTLET IN FLOOR OR WALL TELEVISION OUTLET TELEPHONE BACKBOARD CONDUIT RUN CONCEALED IN WALL OR ABOVE CEILING --0- CIRCUIT HOMERUN — — — CONDUIT RUN BELOW FLOOR OR GRADE ] CONDUIT STUB -UP - CAP & MARK LIGHT SWITCH AT 46" UNLESS NOTED SUBSCRIPTS: 2 = 2-POLE SWITCH 3 = 3-WAY SWITCH 4 = 4-WAY SWITCH M = MOTION -OPERATED SWITCH K = KEY -OPERATED SWITCH TO = THERMAL OVERLOAD SWITCH P = SWITCH WITH PILOT LIGHT ❑D DIMMER SWITCH W/ WATTAGE ❑M CEILING MOUNT MOTION SENSOR 0 PUSHBUTTON CONTROL STATION PC PHOTOELECTRIC CELL FTSI TIME SWITCH QT THERMOSTAT AT 60" UNLESS NOTED e FDIVIISIONN11�5/EQUIPMENT COCATIU�SQSI�M ICE EQUIPMENT QS QS -1 SPEAKER IN CEILING OR WALL E-I VOLUME CONTROL AT 60" UNLESS NOTED OM OM -I MICROPHONE OUTLET IN FLOOR BOX OR WALL <C -I CALL -IN SWITCH © PROGRAM BELL ❑I INTERCOM QQ CLOCK �A AMPLIFIER 24" 24" F. REF, 202 E. MAIN RESIDENCE Demand Load Calculations (Optional ac Per NEC Article 220 Parts ABBREVIATIONS AC -ABOVE COUNTER Quantity Volt -Amps Demand Total VA AFF -ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR General AFG ABOVE FINISHED GRADE AHJ AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION Dwelling unit Square footage 4000 AL ALUMINUM General & Lighting (1st 3 KVA) 4000 SF X 3 X 100% = 12000 Cu -COPPER Kitchen EC - ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR EM -EMERGENCY Small Appliances 2 EA X 1500 X 100% = 3000 GC - GENERAL CONTRACTOR Refrigerator 1 EA X 1500 X 100% = 1500 Undercounter Refrigerator 2 EA X 1500 X 100% = 3000 GFID - GROUND FAULT INTERRUPTER Dishwasher 3 EA X 1200 X 100% = 3600 MC MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR NIC NOT IN CONTRACT Icemaker 1 EA X 1200 X 100% = 1200 NL NIGHT LIGHT Oven/Range (Re:table220.55) 1 EA X 8000 X 100% = 8000 NTS NOT TO SCALE Wine Fridge 1 EA X 1000 X 100% = 1000 PC PLUMBING CONTRACTOR REF -REFERENCE Disposal 1 EA X 1000 X 100% = 1000 UG -UNDERGROUND Microwave 2 EA X 1200 X 100% = 2400 UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE Laundry &Spa Appliances UTP UNSHIELDED TWISTED PAIR WP WEATHER PROOF Clothes Washer 1 EA X 1500 X 100% = 1500 XFMR -TRANSFORMER Clothes Dryer 1 EA X 5000 X 100% = 5000 +18" - MOUNTING HEIGHT TO CENTERLINE Steam Shower 3 EA X 8000 X 100% = 24000 OF DEVICE AFF OR AFG Roof Deck hot tub 1 EA X 8000 X 100% = 8000 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM Infrared Sauna 1 EA X 1500 X 100% = 1500 FACP FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL Misc Equipment & Appliances ANN 1 FIRE ALARM ANNUNCIATOR PANEL Humidifiers 4 EA X 1500 X 100% = 6000 TOTAL 82700 0 FIRE ALARM PULL STATION ❑Q ALARM HORN OR SPEAKER First 10 at 100% Demand 0 ❑Q' COMBINATION HORN/STROBE OR SPEAKER/STROBE Remaindderer at 40% Demand 29080 0 • H THERMAL HEAT DETECTOR General Load Total 39080 • I SMOKE/IONIZATION DETECTOR •P PHOTOELECTRIC SMOKE DETECTOR Mechanical Equipment • H/P HEAT/PHOTOELECTRIC SMOKE DETECTOR Fan Coils 6 EA X 1500 X 100% = 9000 MS AR DUCT DETECTOR Condensing Unit o -16500 Boilers 2 EA X 500 X 100% = 1000 Q SPRINKLER SYSTEM FLOW SWITCH Pumps 4 EA X 620 X 100% = 2480 01+ SPRINKLER SYSTEM TAMPER SWITCH Exhaust Fans 4 EA X 40 X 100% = 160 ED STROBE Heat Trace 500 LF X 12 X 100% = 6000 QD SMOKE/FIRE DAMPER CONNECTION Add'I 25% Largest Mech. Load 1 LS X 13500 X 25% = 3375 "I REMOTE INDICATOR LIGHT Heating & AC Load Total 38515 SECURITY SYSTEM Solar & Continuous Equipment DC CONTACT DOOR SWITCH IN JAMB OR HINGE Electric Car Chargers 1 EA X 12000 X 125% = 15000 POD INTRUSION MOTION DETECTOR AS SPECIFIED, CORRIDOR/ROOM Solar PV Equip. 20 EA X 360 X 125% = 9000 CORR TOTAL 101595 �K KEY -OPERATED ACCESS SWITCH mod] SURVEILLANCE CAMERA For 240V, 1-Phase, 3 Wire Service 101595 (VA) / 240 = 423 AMPS DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT SYMBOLS —� DISCONNECT SWITCH --J-\-- FUSES CIRCUIT BREAKER CURRENT TRANSFORMER TRANSFORMER METER ® MAGNETIC MOTOR STARTER ❑� DISCONNECT SWITCH 1� PANELBOARD OR LOAD CENTER, FLUSH OR SURFACE MOUNTED SWITCHBOARD, MOTOR CONTROL CENTER OR DISTRIBUTION BOARD ❑T TRANSFORMER GROUND 0 CIRCUIT BREAKER QM MOTOR OUTLET FA-T-S-1 AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH --T . — . UP AC UNIT UNIT AMP PART #MCT26XX MAIN CTS AND SWITCH. 12" DEEP X 33" WIDE X �TO UTILITY TRANSFORMER 72"HEIGHT. PROVIDE 6" ON EITHER SIDE. MAINTAIN 6' FROM GAS REGULATOR. MAIN GAS MET, Illla�il>�IIIII III I I YP �. DN uP �I II III PARTIAL MAIN LEVEL. ELECTRICAL PLAN I INTERIOR POWER PANEL LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED n / PANEL C In / PANEL I ILIV/ B IPANEL I VA ITVSS MOUNTED OVER I POWER PANELS EXISTING UTILITY TRANSFORMER PAD MOUNTED LOCATED BEHIND 200 E. MAIN. REUSE 2 EXISTING LUGS PER UTILITY COORDINATION ESTABLISHED WITH RON AT ASPEN UTILITY 1/29/21 PANEL PANEL B C MAIN 600A, 120/240V, 1 P, 3W 22kAIC ELECTRICAL ONE -LINE DIAGRAM_ NO SCALE NOTE: PROVIDE SHORT CIRCUIT BRACING TO MEET FAULT CURRENT LEVELS NOTED ON ONE -LINE AS "X AFC", WHERE X IS IN AMPS. SERIES RATED CIRCUIT BREAKER COMBINATIONS ACCEPTABLE; SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S SERIES RATINGS WITH SHOP DRAWING REVIEW. T RUN POSSIBLE. IER OF 3 WITH NO SHARP STALL TVSS - EQUIPMENT. CD N Q0 00 W (5 �--' -0 U) U) M (a �--+ U C0 O 0U W U U) C C 42) O 0 C Q C:) U o-�E 0) a�a)Na1 O � -0 a) ' ' .� N�ti (D W QNrn U^, • 06 .. W CU C)(-0 C �LLu�� � W u �J2 Lu L/j (1) U Np W M t�:: (=) 't O CCO C cr < 00 L G � X X O Go d- ��- Q,� ECG• ASS/ONX- E Ca ■ Z W O � � U Z W LU 0- U) ) CN Q O CN AEC PROJECT #: 21007.00 DATE: ISSUE: 03/26/21 HPC FINAL SUBMISSION Drawn By: Checked By: SOH AEC ELECTRICAL PRE PLAN SCALE 1/4" = 11-0" 1,80 1 of 1 Q COPYRIGHT 2021 ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING cONSULTANTS.INC. landscape architectarchitect bluegreen sam baucum 300 south spring street suite 202 aspen, colorado 81611 t 970 429 7499 civil engineer sheet index landscape drawings context map final hpc submittal fi n a l h p c s u b m i t t a l 0 3 2 6 / 2 0 2 1 boss architects ana white 2546 15th street denver, colorado 80211 t 303 377 6322 sopris engineering jesse swann 502 main street suite A3 carbondale, colorado 81623 t 970 704 0311 client name/title date north owner reviewed and approved L000 L100 L400 L800 L001 cover planting plan details notes tree mitigation plan L002 notes L300 layout & materials plan L000 cover 03/26/2021 final hpc submittal 202 e main aspen bl u e g r e e n 30 0 s o u t h s p r i n g s t r e e t l s u i t e 2 0 2 l a s p e n , c o l o r a d o 8 1 6 1 1 l t 9 7 0 4 2 9 7 4 9 9 l f 9 7 0 4 2 9 9 4 9 9 ww w . b l u e g r e e n a s p e n . c o m a s p e n , c o l o r a d o 20 2 e m a i n s t date l issue PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION © copyright bluegreen L001 notes 03/26/2021 final hpc submittal SCOPE OF WORK CONTROL OF WORK LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITY TO THE PUBLIC EARTHWORK EROSION AND DUST CONTROL LAYOUT AND CONTROL OF MATERIALS 1. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL WORK BY THE SUBCONTRACTORS. 2. WATERPROOFING OF SUBGRADE AND OTHER ARCHITECTURAL SPACES BELOW AND/OR ADJACENT TO IMPROVEMENTS DESIGNED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS TO BE ADEQUATELY DESIGNED AND DETAILED BY OTHERS TO PERMANENTLY REPEL ALL WATER SOURCES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO: PRECIPITATION, SNOW MELT, SURFACE RUNOFF, SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE, GROUND WATER, IRRIGATION, ROOF RUNOFF, GROUND WATER AND PLUMBING LEAKS. 3. STRUCTURAL DESIGN TO SUPPORT IMPROVEMENTS DESIGNED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND LOCATED ABOVE, BELOW AND/OR ADJACENT TO SUBGRADE AND OTHER ARCHITECTURAL SPACES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN SHOULD BE ADEQUATELY DESIGNED TO SUPPORT ALL POSSIBLE LOADS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO: BACKFILL, COMPACTION, PLANTINGS, HARDSCAPE, RETAINING AND FREESTANDING SITE WALLS AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS/EQUIPMENT/ACTIVITY. 4. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTED WORK FOR WHICH CONSTRUCTION SERVICES WERE NOT PERFORMED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AT JOB SITE AND NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND GENERAL CONTRACTOR OF DIMENSIONAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK. 2. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROPRIATE AGENCIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, LINES AND STRUCTURES PRIOR TO EXCAVATION OR TRENCHING. DAMAGE SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES NOT SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE DRAWING SET. THE CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY THE EXACT LOCATION OF UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE EXTREME CAUTION WHEN WORKING OVER OR NEAR EXISTING GAS AND ELECTRICAL LINES. 3. 'CONTRACT DOCUMENTS' INCLUDE THE LANDSCAPE DRAWING SET, LANDSCAPE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS MANUAL AND LANDSCAPE LASIS. 4. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT HAS PROVIDED DESIGN INTENT BUT DOES NOT DEFINE THE APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES UTILIZED OR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO CARRY OUT THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 5. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES. IN CASE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES, GRAPHICALLY SHOWN MATERIAL QUANTITIES SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE. 6. A SYSTEM OF DIAGRAMMATIC SYMBOLS, HATCHES AND NOTATIONS IS USED IN THESE DRAWINGS. REVIEW NOTATIONS CAREFULLY AND REQUEST CLARIFICATION FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT REGARDING ANY UNCLEAR NOTATION OR DISCREPANCY PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. 7. PROVIDE SLEEVES AS REQUIRED FOR DRAINAGE, IRRIGATION AND ELECTRICAL LINES. IRRIGATION AND ELECTRICAL SLEEVES AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO PAVING AND LANDSCAPE WORK. UTILITY SLEEVES ARE REQUIRED IN ALL PLANT BEDS ISOLATED BY PAVEMENT OR ANY OTHER STRUCTURES. 8. SPECIAL CONSIDERATION IS GIVEN TO THE DESIGN AND INTENDED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARCHITECTURE, PLANTING AREAS AND PAVING SYSTEMS. PAVEMENT JOINTING, PAVERS, STONE, FINISHES AND GRADES HAVE BEEN STRICTLY COORDINATED DURING THE DESIGN PROCESS. CONSTRUCTION OF THESE SYSTEMS MUST BE STRICTLY COORDINATED. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 9. CONTACT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICTS IN GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS OR OTHER CONSULTANT DRAWINGS. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE PLACEMENT OF FLATWORK PENETRATIONS TO ENSURE COORDINATION OF SURFACE FIXTURES, SUCH AS DRAINS AND LIGHTS. NOTIFY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF FLATWORK. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS TO VERIFY FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS. NOTIFY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS TO VERIFY DRAIN LOCATIONS OVER STRUCTURE. NOTIFY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE CIVIL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS TO VERIFY UTILITY AND OTHER DRAIN LOCATIONS. NOTIFY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 14. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO KEEP ALL ITEMS DESIGNED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR IMPLEMENTATION IN PROPER WORKING ORDER THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST COMPLY WITH PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS AND GOVERNING BODIES/AGENCIES RULES AND REGULATIONS AND LAND USE APPROVAL CONDITIONS AT ALL TIMES. 2. WORK PERFORMED WITHOUT APPROVAL OF LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS AND GOVERNING BODIES/AGENCIES AND/OR NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS IS SUBJECT TO REMOVAL AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS NOT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS AND GOVERNING BODIES/AGENCIES STANDARDS. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES NECESSARY TO PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS FROM DAMAGE AND ANY SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND STRUCTURES DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR RECONSTRUCTED SATISFACTORY TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 5. ALL BARRICADING AND TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES OR METHODS USED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS AND GOVERNING BODIES/AGENCIES STANDARDS. PROVIDE ADEQUATE TIME FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ABOVE JURISDICTIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. 1. THESE NOTES SUPPLEMENT THE CIVIL ENGINEERING DOCUMENT SET. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND CIVIL ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 2. LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SHOWN ON PLANS AND CROSS-SECTIONS SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND DESIGNATED ON-SITE PRIOR TO ANY EARTHWORK. 3. THE PROJECT LIMIT OF CONSTRUCTION AND ALL EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN IS TO BE CLEARLY DEFINED BY STURDY, WEATHERPROOF FENCING AT A MINIMUM OF FOUR (4) FOOT HEIGHT. 4. EXISTING TREES TO BE PRESERVED SHALL BEAR SAME RELATIONSHIP TO FINISHED GRADE AS THEY BEAR TO PRE-CONSTRUCTION GRADE. 5. EXISTING TREES & VEGETATION TO BE PRESERVED SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH STURDY, WEATHERPROOF FENCING AT A MINIMUM FOUR (4) FOOT HEIGHT INSTALLED NO CLOSER TO THE TREE TRUNK THAN ITS DRIPLINE. THIS FENCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN WORKING ORDER DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. MAINTAIN TREE PROTECTION ZONES FREE OF WEEDS AND TRASH. 6. NO WORK SHALL BE CONDUCTED WITHIN THE DRIPLINE, UNLESS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ALL WORK APPROVED WITHIN THE DRIPLINE SHALL BE COMPLETED BY HAND. PROTECT ROOT SYSTEMS FROM PONDING, EROSION OR EXCESSIVE WETTING. 7. SOIL ANALYSIS MUST BE PERFORMED BY A QUALIFIED SOIL-TESTING LABORATORY ON IMPORTED OR MANUFACTURED TOPSOIL. A WRITTEN ANALYSIS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. THIS REPORT MUST STATE PERCENTAGES OF ORGANIC MATTER; GRADATION OF SAND, SILT, AND CLAY CONTENT; CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY; NATURE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL; PH; AND MINERAL AND PLANT NUTRIENT CONTENT OF THE SOIL. 8. IMPORTED TOPSOIL IS TO BE OBTAINED FROM NATURALLY WELL-DRAINED CONSTRUCTION OR MINING SITES WHERE TOPSOIL OCCURS AT LEAST 4 INCHES DEEP. DO NOT OBTAIN FROM AGRICULTURAL LAND, BOGS OR MARSHES. 9. PROPOSED ELEVATIONS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS ARE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DIRECT ROUGH GRADE WORK TO ALLOW FOR SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL AND OTHER FINISHED CONDITIONS AS DESCRIBED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 10. ALL FINISHED GRADES SHALL MEET AND BLEND SMOOTHLY WITH EXISTING GRADES AT THE PROJECT LIMIT. 11. ALL FINISHED GRADES SHALL BE WITHOUT LOW SPOTS OR POCKETS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SET FLOW LINES ACCURATELY AND PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) PERCENT OR MAXIMUM OF FIFTY (50) PERCENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 12. ALL FINISHED GRADES SHALL PRESENT SMOOTH TRANSITIONS BETWEEN TOES AND TOPS OF SLOPES. 13. THE MAXIMUM SLOPE OF SOD TO BE 33% IN AREAS DESIGNATED AS " LAWN," UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 14. ALL MANHOLES, VALVE BOXES, UTILITY BOXES AND PEDESTALS, AND OTHER APPURTENANCES SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO FINISH GRADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS AND GOVERNING BODIES/AGENCIES OR UTILITY RULES AND REGULATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15. DEFINITION OF COMPACTION: PROCTOR DRY DENSITY. 16. SOIL COMPACTION BENEATH PAVEMENTS, STEPS, WALLS AND LIGHT FOUNDATIONS SHALL BE 95% PROCTOR DENSITY MINIMUM, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 17. GRADING AND EXCAVATION WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED DURING DRY AND NON-FREEZING WEATHER CONDITIONS. 18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL FOR REUSE ON-SITE. SOIL SHALL BE SCREENED TO REMOVE ROCKS AND BOULDERS. 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REUSE ANY STRUCTURAL SOIL FOUND ON SITE. 20. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES. 21. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN TEMPORARY DRAINAGE DEVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION. 22. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONTROL POINTS, FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS AND PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FORMWORK INSTALLATION. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL 1. VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT, AND/OR MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE PARKED OR STORED IN AREAS OF EXISTING VEGETATION, INCLUDING WITHIN THE DRIPLINE OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. 2. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS TO BE STORED UNDER SECURED TARPS OR SHEETING TO PROTECT AGAINST WIND, RAIN AND SNOW DAMAGE. 3. CONSTRUCTION WASTE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PLANT MATERIAL, BUILDING MATERIALS, DEMOLISHED MATERIALS, PACKAGING, LEFTOVER PAINT AND CONCRETE SLURRY, SHOULD BE PROPERLY REUSED, RECYCLED, DISPOSED OF LEGALLY OFF-SITE OR IN DESIGNATED WASH-OUT AREAS DETERMINED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 4. RECYCLING AND TRASH BINS TO BE PROVIDED ON SITE. SEPARATE BINS FOR CARDBOARD, CO-MINGLED, AND OTHER RECYCLABLE/REUSABLE MATERIALS IDENTIFIED BY THE LOCAL JURISDICTION SHALL BE MAINTAINED. ALL BINS TO BE WILDLIFE-PROOF. 5. ON-SITE FUEL STORAGE FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT IS DISCOURAGED. CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT USED ON SITE TO BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO ASSURE CONTAMINATION CONCERNS FROM OILS AND GREASES ARE ELIMINATED. NO TOXIC MATERIALS SHALL BE STORED ON-SITE. 1. LAY OUT AND VERIFY DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS TO REVIEW AND APPROVE ALL LAYOUTS CONTAINED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE DIMENSIONS FROM REDUCED DRAWINGS. 3. DIMENSIONS REFERRED TO AS "EQUAL" INDICATE SPACING WHICH IS EQUIDISTANT MEASURED TO THE CENTERLINES. 4. MEASUREMENTS ARE TO THE FINISHED FACE OF BUILDINGS, WALLS OR OTHER FIXED SITE IMPROVEMENTS. DIMENSIONS TO CENTERLINES ARE IDENTIFIED AS SUCH. 5. INSTALL INTERSECTING ELEMENTS AT 90-DEGREE ANGLES, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. MAINTAIN HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT OF ADJACENT ELEMENTS AS INDICATED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A FULL-SCALE MOCKUP OF ALL PAVING SYSTEMS AND RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 7. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE FLATWORK MEETS VERTICAL STRUCTURES, SUCH AS WALLS, CURBS, STEPS, AND OTHER HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL ALSO BE PROVIDED AT MATERIAL CHANGES. EXPANSION JOINT MATERIALS/METHODS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 8. CONTROL JOINTS SHOULD BE SPACED NO GREATER THAN TEN (10) LINEAR FEET MAXIMUM, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. EXPANSION JOINTS SHOULD BE SPACED NO GREATER THAN FORTY (40) LINEAR FEET MAXIMUM, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADVISE ON OTHER JOINTS AS NEEDED TO MINIMIZE CRACKING. THIS INFORMATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 9. ALL STEPS SHALL HAVE FOURTEEN (14) INCH TREADS AND SIX (6) INCH RISERS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 10. HOLD TOP OF WALLS & FENCES AND ALL SITE FURNISHINGS LEVEL UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT INSTALL WORK LOCATED ON TOP OF ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES WITHOUT FIRST REVIEWING ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 12. SAMPLES OF SPECIFIED MATERIALS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT. 1. THESE NOTES SUPPLEMENT THE CIVIL ENGINEERING DOCUMENT SET. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND CIVIL ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 2. PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY DISTURBANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ALL SESC MEASURES AS SHOWN ON THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND AS REQUIRED BY ANY GOVERNING AGENCIES. 3. ALL SESC MEASURES TO BE MAINTAINED DAILY. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT SOIL LOSS TO WIND AND WATER EROSION. 5. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO CONDUCT ALL EXCAVATION, FILLING, GRADING, AND CLEANUP OPERATIONS IN A MANNER SUCH THAT SEDIMENT GENERATED BY WIND OR WATER IS NOT DISCHARGED INTO ANY STORM SEWER, DRAINAGE DITCH, RIVER, LAKE, AIR OR UNDERGROUND UTILITY SYSTEM. 6. WATER FROM TRENCHES AND OTHER EXCAVATION TO BE PUMPED INTO A FILTRATION BAG TO REMOVE SEDIMENTS FROM THE WATER. 7. NORTH AMERICAN GREEN SC-150 OR EQUIVALENT EROSION CONTROL FABRIC IS REQUIRED ON ALL DISTURBED SLOPES GREATER THAN 33% UNTIL PROJECT AREA IS REVEGETATED PER THE PLANTING PLAN. 8. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ONSITE WATERING TO REDUCE FUGITIVE DUST LEAVING THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 9. SOIL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO BE PROVIDED FOR ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURES WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS. 10. CONSTRUCTION STAGING AND PHASING SHALL OCCUR, WHERE APPLICABLE, TO MINIMIZE SOIL DISTURBANCE TIME, THEREBY REDUCING THE OPPORTUNITY FOR SOIL EROSION. 11. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs) SHALL BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO MEET ANY OTHER UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS. 12. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST INSTALL A MUD TRACKING PAD/WASHING PAD AT THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES TO MINIMIZE MUD DETACHMENT FROM TRUCK TIRES. 1-1/2 INCH SCREENED ROCK TO BE PLACED ON MIRAFI 140-N FILTER FABRIC. ADDITIONAL CLEAN GRAVEL TO BE ADDED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION AS NEEDED. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ABIDE BY CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH BY LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS AND OTHER GOVERNING BODIES/AGENCIES. 14. IF SITE WORK IS DELAYED DUE TO ANY CIRCUMSTANCE; THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT PREPARED PLANT BEDS FROM EROSION. bl u e g r e e n 30 0 s o u t h s p r i n g s t r e e t l s u i t e 2 0 2 l a s p e n , c o l o r a d o 8 1 6 1 1 l t 9 7 0 4 2 9 7 4 9 9 l f 9 7 0 4 2 9 9 4 9 9 ww w . b l u e g r e e n a s p e n . c o m a s p e n , c o l o r a d o 20 2 e m a i n s t date l issue PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION © copyright bluegreen L002 notes 03/26/2021 final hpc submittal SEEDING/ FERTILIZER/ SOIL CONDITIONER/ SODDING PLANTING AND TRANSPLANTING 1. PLANT MATERIAL IS TO BE HEALTHY SPECIMENS FREE FROM DISEASE OR DAMAGE, AND IS TO BE MAINTAINED IN EXCELLENT CONDITION WHILE ON THE JOBSITE. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL INSPECT PLANT MATERIAL UPON ARRIVAL TO JOBSITE AND WILL REJECT PLANT MATERIAL THAT DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS DESCRIBED WITHIN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 2. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS TO BE STORED UNDER SECURED TARPS OR SHEETING TO PROTECT AGAINST WIND, RAIN AND SNOW DAMAGE. 3. STOCKPILED PLANT MATERIAL TO BE PLACED IN THE SHADE AND PROPERLY HAND-WATERED UNTIL PLANTED. 4. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WILL PERIODICALLY INSPECT PLANT MATERIAL STOCKPILED AND/OR PLANTED ON SITE DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. PLANT MATERIAL NOT MEETING THE STANDARDS CONTAINED WITHIN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE REPLACED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 5. PROVIDE MATCHING SIZES AND FORMS FOR EACH PLANT OF THE SAME SPECIES UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES. IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES, GRAPHICALLY SHOWN QUANTITIES SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE. 7. ALL MATERIALS USED SHALL CONFORM TO THE GUIDELINES ESTABLISHED BY THE CURRENT AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK, PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. 8. ALL TREES MUST BE SOURCED FROM A REGION COMPARABLE IN CLIMATE TO THE HIGH ROCKIES (I.E. WY,ID, CO, UT, MT) 9. TREES TO BE HEALTHY, FREE OF DISEASE AND PESTS, AND SINGLE-STEMMED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 10. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED PLUMB AND PER THE SPECIFICATIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. ANY NECESSARY STAKING AND/OR OTHER SUPPORTS MATERIALS/METHODS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRUNE EXISTING AND/OR NEW TREES ONLY PER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DIRECTION. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE THE LOCATIONS OF ALL TREES AND B&B SHRUBS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 13. ALL ROOT-WRAPPING MATERIALS THAT ARE NOT BIO-DEGRADABLE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE ROOT BALL. ROOT BALLS SHALL BE FREE OF WEEDS. 14. SPECIFIED PLANT MATERIAL SIZES SHALL BE CONSIDERED MINIMUM SIZES. 15. FINISH GRADE OF PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE ONE (1) INCH BELOW ADJACENT FLATWORK UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. 16. ALL VEGETATION PROPOSED FOR INSTALLATION OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE TO BE NATIVE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PLANTING PROPOSED TO OCCUR OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE IS FOR RESTORATION PURPOSES ONLY OR IS SPECIFIC TO UTILITIES RESTORATION. 17. SIX (6) INCH TOPSOIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL LAWN, TURF, AND NATIVE PLANTING ZONES. EIGHTEEN (18) INCH PLANT MIX SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 1. ALL NEWLY REGRADED OR OTHERWISE DISTURBED SLOPES ARE TO BE REVEGETATED. 2. MINIMUM SIX (6) INCHES OF TOPSOIL TO BE PLACED IN AREAS TO RECEIVE SEED, TURF AND NATIVE PLANTING. TOPSOIL TO BE GOOD CLEAN ORGANIC SOIL (FREE OF WEEDS AND ROCKS). 3. SEED MIXTURES AND FERTILIZER SHALL BE APPLIED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GOVERNING JURISDICTIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. ALL SEED MUST BE CERTIFIED WEED FREE. NO SEED CAN CONTAIN ANY SPECIES ON THE CITY, COUNTY OR STATE NOXIOUS WEED LISTS. SEED MIX SUPPLY SHALL HAVE THE CERTIFIED SEED (BLUE TAG) OR SOURCE IDENTIFIED SEED (YELLOW TAG) ATTACHED. ONLY SEED WITH A COMPLETE ANALYSIS LABEL ON THE BAG AND A CURRENT GERMINATION TEST CONDUCTED BY AN ACCREDITED LABORATORY WILL BE ACCEPTED. 5. SEEDING SHALL OCCUR IN THE EARLY SPRING AND LATE FALL. SEEDING SHALL NOT BE PERFORMED WHEN THE GROUND IS FROZEN. FOR WARM SEASON SPECIES, SEEDING IN LATE SPRING OR EARLY SUMMER IS MORE LIKELY TO ACCOMPANY TEMPERATURES WARM ENOUGH TO SUPPORT GERMINATION. SEED THE SITE AS SOON AS FINAL GRADING AND TOPSOIL PLACEMENT HAVE OCCURRED TO MINIMIZE EROSION AND WEED ESTABLISHMENT ON THE PROJECT. DURING PERIODS OF TIME WHEN SEEDING CANNOT BE ACCOMPLISHED, SOILS SHALL NOT REMAIN UNPROTECTED. 6. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, HAND BROADCAST OF SEED SHALL BE USED ON ALL SLOPES, INCLUDING THOSE THAT ARE STEEP (GREATER THAN 33%), EXTREMELY ROCKY, REMOTE OR INACCESSIBLE. SEED RATE WILL VARY PER SEED MIXTURE SPECIFIED. BROADCAST SEEDING REQUIRES DOUBLE OR TRIPLE THE SEEDING RATE OF DRILL SEEDING, AND CALIBRATION OF SEEDING RATES IS LESS PRECISE THAN WITH DRILL SEEDING. SOILS TO BE RAKED OR HARROWED TO ELIMINATE CRUSTING BEFORE ACCEPTING BROADCAST SEED. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO ENSURE UNIFORM COVERAGE (EVEN SEED APPLICATION RATES) OVER THE AREA. SEEDING SHALL NOT OCCUR DURING WINDY WEATHER. 7. HAND RAKE SEED INTO TOPSOIL NO MORE THAN 3/4 INCH DEEP TO COVER. SOIL / SEED CONTACT IS CRITICAL FOR GROWTH. 8. DRILL SEEDING, WHEN INDICATED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, MAY OCCUR ON SLOPES OF 33% OR FLATTER BUT NOT IN AREAS OF EXTREMELY ROCKY SOILS. SEED TO A DEPTH OF 1/4 TO 1/2 INCH. DRILL TUBE SPACING SHOULD BE SIX (6) TO SEVEN (7) INCHES. SEEDING SHOULD BE CONDUCTED ALONG THE CONTOUR OF THE SLOPE TO AVOID EROSION FROM WATER FLOWING DOWN DRILL FURROWS. SEEDING RATE INDICATED IN THE DRAWINGS IS CONSIDERED A MINIMUM RATE. 9. HYDROSEEDING, WHEN INDICATED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, SHALL BE SPRAYED ON A ROUGHENED SLOPE USING A HYDROSEEDING MACHINE AND SHALL BE USED TO REACH AREAS THAT ARE INACCESSIBLE BY BROADCAST METHODS. USE SHALL BE LIMITED TO STEEP (GREATER THAN 33%), INACCESSIBLE SLOPES IN AREAS WITH ADEQUATE AND DEPENDABLE MOISTURE DURING THE GROWING SEASON. HYDROMULCHING MUST OCCUR AS A SEPARATE PROCESS AFTER HYDROSEEDING. DO NOT MIX SEED AND MULCH TOGETHER IN ONE WATER APPLICATION PROCESS AS THIS WILL PREVENT SEEDS FROM COMING INTO CONTACT WITH THE SOIL. 10. SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE OF WEEDS TO ALLOW THE DESIRED VEGETATION TO THRIVE WITHOUT THE CROWDING TENDENCIES OF AGGRESSIVE WEEDS. 11. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHOULD RECEIVE AN ORGANIC FERTILIZER IN LIMITED APPLICATION FOLLOWING INSTALLATION. TYPE AND APPLICATION RATE AND METHOD OF APPLICATION TO BE SPECIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 12. EXCESS FERTILIZER SHALL BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY OFF-SITE. IT SHALL NOT BE DISPOSED OF IN STORM DRAINS AND/OR DRYWELLS. SOIL AMENDMENT CRITERIA AND PREPARATION IRRIGATION 1. TOPSOIL OF GRASSES (INCLUDING TURF), SHRUBS, PERENNIALS, AND ANNUALS SHALL BE A SANDY LOAM TO A DEPTH OF AT LEAST 6 INCHES (6") CONTAINING AT LEAST 5 PERCENT (5%) ORGANIC MATTER BY VOLUME. TOPSOIL TO BE GOOD CLEAN ORGANIC SOIL (FREE OF WEEDS AND ROCKS). 2.TREE SOIL SHOULD HAVE A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 FEET (3'). BOTH TOPSOIL AND SUBSOIL LAYERS SHALL BE SANDY LOAM. THE TOP SOIL SHALL BE AT LEAST 6 INCHES (6") AND HAVE 5 PERCENT (5%) ORGANIC MATTER BY WEIGHT AND SUBSOIL SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE TO THREE PERCENT (1 - 3%) ORGANIC MATTER BY WEIGHT. 3. A MINIMUM OF FOUR (4) CUBIC YARDS OF ORGANIC MATTER SOIL AMENDMENT PER ONE‐THOUSAND SQUARE FEET OF LANDSCAPED AREA SHALL BE REQUIRED AS NECESSARY TO MEET THE 5 PERCENT (5%) ORGANIC MATTER SPECIFICATION. 4. SOIL AMENDMENT ORGANIC MATTER SHALL CONSIST OF EITHER CLASS I AND CLASS II COMPOST. 5. AMENDMENT SHALL BE TILLED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF SIX INCHES (6"). 6. SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN TWO‐TENTHS OF A FOOT (2/10TH') OF THE GRADING PLAN. 7. SITE SHALL BE FREE OF ROCKS AND DEBRIS OVER ONE INCH (1") DIAMETER IN SIZE. ROCKS AND DEBRIS 0.5 INCH (0.5") TO ONE INCH (1") SHALL NOT EXCEED 5 PERCENT (5%) BY VOLUME AND GRAVEL 0.6 INCH (0.6") TO 1.25 INCHES (1.25") SHALL NOT EXCEED 5 PERCENT (5%) BY VOLUME. PARTICLES SUCH AS CONCRETE, BRICK, GLASS, METAL, WOOD OR PLASTIC GREATER THAN ONE INCH (1") SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED. THE TOTAL VOLUME OF THESE MATERIALS SMALLER THAN ONE INCH (1") SHALL NOT EXCEED 5 PERCENT (5%). 8. SITE SHALL BE FREE OF DIRT CLODS OVER THREE‐QUARTER INCH (3/4") DIAMETER IN SIZE. DRYLAND SEED AREAS MAY CONTAIN DIRT CLODS UP TO TWO INCH (2") DIAMETER IN SIZE. 9. STOCKPILING - STRIPPING AND STOCKPILING OF INDIGENOUS SOIL (TOPSOIL) SHALL BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION (EXCEPT AS WAIVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN). THE REPLACEMENT OF THIS SOIL, PLUS ADDITIONAL SOIL AMENDMENTS, ARE CRITICAL TO SUCCESSFUL PLANT MATERIAL ESTABLISHMENT, ONGOING HEALTH, AND EFFICIENT USE OF WATER THROUGH THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT. 10. THE SOIL SHALL HAVE NO HERBICIDES, HEAVY METALS, BIOLOGICAL TOXINS OR HYDROCARBONS THAT IMPACT PLANT GROWTH OR EXCEED THE EPA'S STANDARDS FOR SOIL CONTAMINANT. 1. REFERENCE IRRIGATION SHEETS IR100 - IR103 FOR IRRIGATION PLAN AND DETAILS. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION IS INCLUDED IN NOTES BELOW. 2. ALL NEW TREES AND SHRUBS TO RECEIVE DRIP-TYPE IRRIGATION. 3. ALL REVEGETATED AREAS TO RECEIVE SPRAY-TYPE IRRIGATION FOR FIRST TWO GROWING SEASONS MINIMUM. 4. ALL PERENNIAL BEDS TO RECEIVE SPRAY-TYPE IRRIGATION. 5. ALL SPRAY-TYPE IRRIGATION TO BE DIRECTED AWAY FROM STRUCTURES. 6. INSTALL SPRAY HEADS ALONG SIDEWALKS ON POP-UP RISERS. 7. LOCATE HEADS SO THEY ARE PROTECTED FROM TRAVEL AND DO NOT CAUSE WATER TO FALL ON PAVERS, MASONRY OR OTHER ARCHITECTURAL SURFACES. 8. ADJUST HEAD LOCATION IF SPRAY IS DETRIMENTAL TO OR BLOCKED BY TREE, SHRUB OR STRUCTURE, MAINTAINING EVEN COVERAGE OF PLANTING AREAS. 9. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE SIZE AND LOCATION OF SLAB PENETRATIONS FOR IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT WITH THE MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS. 10. INSTALL MAIN LINES TO SLOPE AT 1% MINIMUM TO MANUAL DRAIN VALVES LOCATED AT LOW POINTS OF THE MAIN SYSTEM. 11. INSTALL 3/4 INCH POLYETHYLENE LATERAL LINES TO SLOPE AT 1% MINIMUM TO AUTOMATIC DRAIN VALVES LOCATED AT LOW POINTS OF LATERAL SYSTEMS. 12. TRENCHES TO BE OF SUFFICIENT DEPTH TO PROVIDE 18 INCHES OF COVER OVER LATERAL LINES. SLEEVED LINES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF 24 INCHES. TRENCHES ARE TO BE BACKFILLED WITH MATERIAL FREE OF ROCKS GREATER THAN 3/4 INCH IN DIAMETER. 13. INSTALL BACKFLOW PREVENTER(S) IN COORDINATION WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. BACKFLOW PREVENTERS SHALL BE INSTALLED PLUMB AND SQUARE WITH ADJACENT PAVEMENT EDGES OR STRUCTURES. COLOR, BLACK. 14. CONTROL VALVE BOX AND HEAD BOX LOCATIONS TO BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. COLOR, BLACK. 15. THE FINAL LOCATION AND EXACT POSITIONING OF THE CONTROL STATION SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 16. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED FLUSH WITH FINISH GRADE. ALIGN VALVE BOXES WITH ADJACENT PAVEMENT EDGES OR STRUCTURES. VALVE BOXES TO BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES FROM AND PARALLEL TO CURBS AND WALKS. GROUPED VALVES TO BE EQUALLY SPACED AND PARALLEL. CONCEAL ALL BOXES IN PLANTING BEDS WHERE POSSIBLE AND COVER WITH MULCH. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE INTEGRAL PLASTIC WITH BOLT DOWN LID; COLOR, BLACK. 17. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN A SET OF "AS-BUILT" DRAWINGS THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION AND DELIVER THESE DRAWINGS TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. 18. EXCAVATIONS TO BE BACKFILLED TO PROCTOR DRY DENSITY, MINIMUM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR SETTLED TRENCHES FOR ONE YEAR AFTER COMPLETION OF WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANT THAT THE SYSTEM WILL REMAIN FREE FROM DEFECTS IN MATERIAL AND WORKMANSHIP FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER COMPLETION OF WORK. 19. EXERCISE EXTREME CARE IN EXCAVATING AND WORKING NEAR EXISTING UTILITIES AND IN EXISTING TREE ROOT ZONES. THE CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY THE LOCATION AND CONDITION OF ALL UTILITIES AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO UTILITIES. DAMAGE CAUSED BY OR DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK IS TO BE REPAIRED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. FIELD ADJUST SPRINKLER LOCATIONS SO AS TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH UTILITIES (FIRE HYDRANTS, TRANSFORMERS, ETC). 20. FLUSH AND ADJUST SPRINKLER HEADS FOR OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE. THIS SHALL INCLUDE THROTTLING THE FLOW CONTROL AT EACH VALVE TO OBTAIN THE OPTIMUM OPERATING PRESSURE FOR EACH SYSTEM. 21. IRRIGATION SYSTEM ARE TO BE COMPLETELY DRAINED ANNUALLY TO PROTECT PIPES FROM BURSTING PRIOR TO FREEZING TEMPERATURES. 22. PROVIDE CONDUIT/SLEEVES AS REQUIRED FOR IRRIGATION LINES THROUGH PAVEMENT AND OTHER HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS. COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF WORK TO ENSURE ALL ISOLATED PLANTING AREAS RECEIVE ACCESS TO THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. MULCHING DESCRIPTION/ DETAIL SPECIFICATION SIDEWALK SITE FLATWORK DRIVEWAY FLATWORK MASTER FINISH SCHEDULE UNDYED CONCRETE; SAND FINISH UNDYED CONCRETE; SAND FINISH UNDYED CONCRETE; BROOM FINISH PER CITY OF ASPEN STANDARDS reference documents site survey (pdf and AutoCAD files) land use approvals geotechnical report other other architectural drawings (pdf and AutoCAD files) re c e i v e d hoa documents and design guidelines no t r e c e i v e d 1. ORGANIC MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT ONE (1) CUBIC YARD PER EIGHTY (80) SQUARE FEET AT A DEPTH OF FOUR (4) INCHES, AND AS APPROPRIATE TO EACH SPECIES. IT SHALL BE APPLIED TO THE SOIL SURFACE, NOT AGAINST THE PLANT STEM OR HIGH AGAINST THE BASE OF TRUNKS TO MINIMIZE DISEASE. ORGANIC MULCH MATERIAL INCLUDES BARK AND WOOD CHIPS. AVOID MULCH CONSISTING OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SUCH AS PALLETS. MULCHING SHOULD BE REPEATED ANNUALLY DURING THE AUTUMN TO A FOUR (4) INCH DEPTH. 2. INORGANIC MULCH INCLUDES ROCK, GRAVEL, OR PEBBLES. ROCK MULCH SHALL HAEV A MINIMUM DEPTH OF TWO (2) INCHES. 3. MULCH OR PLANTING BED DRESSING SHALL BE PLACED IN ALL PLANTING AREAS AS SPECIFIED. 4. THE SITE MUST BE MULCHED WITH WEED-FREE MULCH (HAY OR HYDROMULCH) AFTER SEEDING. 5. HYDROMULCH MUST BE APPLIED SEPARATELY FOLLOWING SEED APPLICATION. DO NOT OVERSPRAY AS THIS MAY RESULT IN EROSION. AN ORGANIC TACKIFIER SHALL BE ADDED TO THE SLURRY TO ENHANCE THE DURABILITY OF THE APPLIED MULCH COVER. APPLY AT A RATE OF 3,000 LBS PER ACRE (3360 KG/HA). ADD AN ORGANIC-BASED TACKIFIER AT THE RATE OF 150 LBS PER ACRE TO PREVENT EROSION. 6. HAY MULCH MUST BE WEED-FREE. HAY TO BE “CRIMPED” INTO THE SOIL SURFACE BY HAND ON STEEP SLOPES. ON FLAT SURFACES A MODIFIED DISC PLOW MAY BE UTILIZED TO DRIVE THE HAY STEMS INTO THE SOIL TO REDUCE SURFACE WIND SPEEDS AND SOIL DESICCATION. APPLY AT THE RATE OF 3,000 TO 4,000 LBS PER ACRE (3360-4480 KG/HA). ADD AN ORGANIC-BASED TACKIFIER AT THE RATE OF 150 LBS PER ACRE TO PREVENT EROSION. 7. FINE GRADE MULCH WITH INTEGRATED SOIL CONDITIONER SHALL BE USED IN AREAS PROXIMATE TO ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES TO RETURN NUTRIENTS TO THE SOIL, REDUCE MAINTENANCE AND MINIMIZE EVAPORATION. MINI-NUGGET TYPE DECORATIVE BARK MULCH MAY BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH SOIL CONDITIONER WHEN SPECIFIED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. MAXIMUM MINIMUM MISCELLANEOUS NOT IN CONTRACT NOMINAL NOT TO SCALE ON CENTER OPPOSITE POINT OF BEGINNING POINT OF CURVATURE PEDESTRIAN PERFORATED PROPERTY LINE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PAVEMENT QUANTITY RADIUS REFERENCE REVISION, REVISED RIGHT OF WAY SQUARE FOOT (FEET) SIMILAR SPECIFICATIONS SQUARE STATION STANDARD TO BE DECIDED TOP OF CURB THICK TOPOGRAPHY TOP OF PAVEMENT/PAVER TOP OF RAMP TOP OF STEP TOP OF WALL TYPICAL VARIES VEHICULAR VERIFY IN FIELD WIDTH WITH WITHOUT WEIGHT YARD (YARDS) MAX MIN MISC NIC NOM NTS OC OPP POB POC PED PERF PL PVC PVMT QTY R RE REV ROW SF SIM SPECS SQ STA STD TBD TC THK TOPO TP TR TS TW TYP VAR VEH VIF W W/ W/O WT YD ARCHITECTURE AVERAGE BALLED AND BURLAPPED BOTTOM OF CURB BOTTOM OF WALL CALIPER CUBIC FOOT (FEET) CAST IN PLACE CONTROL JOINT CENTERLINE CONCRETE CONTINUOUS CUBIC DEGREE DEMOLISH, DEMOLITION DIAMETER DETAIL DRAWING EACH EXPANSION JOINT ELEVATION ENGINEER EQUAL EQUIPMENT EXISTING EXPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION FINISHED GRADE FINISH FLOW LINE FOOT (FEET) GAUGE GENERAL CONTRACTOR HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE HORIZONTAL HIGH POINT HEIGHT INCH (INCHES) IRRIGATION JOINT LENGTH LOW POINT LIGHT ARCH AVG B&B BC BW CAL CF CIP CJ CL CONC CONT CU DEG DEMO DIA DTL DWG EA EJ EL ENG EQ EQUIP EXIST EXP FFE FG FIN FL FT GA GC HDPE HORIZ HP HT (H) IN IRR JT L LP LT SITEWORK ABBREVIATIONS bl u e g r e e n 30 0 s o u t h s p r i n g s t r e e t l s u i t e 2 0 2 l a s p e n , c o l o r a d o 8 1 6 1 1 l t 9 7 0 4 2 9 7 4 9 9 l f 9 7 0 4 2 9 9 4 9 9 ww w . b l u e g r e e n a s p e n . c o m a s p e n , c o l o r a d o 20 2 e m a i n s t date l issue PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION © copyright bluegreen SITE WALL ARCHITECTURAL UNDYED CONCRETE CONC. WALK 79 0 0 PROPERTY LINE 10 ' S E T B A C K 5' SETBACK PROPERTY LINE 5' SETBACK RE A R S E T B A C K TREE REMOVAL SUMMARY EX. CONIFER TO BE REMOVED SYMBOL TYPE SIZE QTY. EX. DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED 11" CAL. 28" CAL. TOTAL MITIGATION VALUE FOR REMOVED TREES: NOTES: 1. TREES REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RESIDENCE AND/OR IN RESPONSE TO POOR HEALTH. 2. FOR PRESERVATION OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, REFER TO THIS SHEET. 3. EXISTING TREE(S) TYPE, LOCATION, SIZE AND CALIPER BY OTHERS; REFER TO SURVEY. 4.ALL EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED ARE REPRESENTED HERE, INCLUDING THOSE NOT MEETING THE 4"/6" CALIPER STANDARD (I.E. NOT REQUIRING MITIGATION). TREE MITIGATION SUMMARY TOTAL MITIGATION VALUE OF PROPOSED NATIVE TREES (REFER TO PLANTING PLAN): TOTAL MITIGATION VALUE FOR REMOVED TREES: 1 1 LEGEND TOTAL REMAINING: EX. DECIDUOUS TO REMAIN EX. CONIFER TO REMAIN 30" CAL. N/A 1 N/A $ 4,274 $ 0 $ 4,274 $ 4,274 MITIGATION VALUE TBD $4,274 N/A N/A L100 03/26/2021 final hpc submittal bl u e g r e e n 30 0 s o u t h s p r i n g s t r e e t l s u i t e 2 0 2 l a s p e n , c o l o r a d o 8 1 6 1 1 l t 9 7 0 4 2 9 7 4 9 9 l f 9 7 0 4 2 9 9 4 9 9 ww w . b l u e g r e e n a s p e n . c o m a s p e n , c o l o r a d o 20 2 e m a i n s t date l issue PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION © copyright bluegreen 0 2.5 5 scale north tree mitigation plan 1 L100 TREE PROTECTION FENCE SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" NOTE: 1. ADDITIONAL PROTECTION OUTSIDE AT TREE DRIP LINE MAY BE REQUIRED (EX. 12 IN. OF MULCH). 2. FENCE MAY BE CONTINUOUS TO PROTECT MULTIPLE TREES 3. MAINTAIN FENCE THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. 4. REFER TO LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS AND GOVERNING BODIES/AGENCIES FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. EXISTING TREE(S) TO REMAIN CHAINLINK FENCING TO BE PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED AT TREE DRIP LINE EXISTING GRADE TO REMAIN NO DISTURBANCE WITHIN TREE DRIPLINE TR E E D R I P L I N E TR E E D R I P L I N E EXTENTS OF TREE PROTECTION FENCING FOR EXISTING COTTONWOOD (RE. DETAIL 1/L100) TO BE COORDINATED WITH CITY FORESTER IN CONJUNCTION WITH TREE PROTECTION PLAN APPROVED BY CITY FORESTER. TREE #SPECIES DIAMETER (IN.) 1 2 CONIFER 11 TREE TABLE SUGGESTED MITIGATION VALUE $4,274 DECIDUOUS 30 TBD 12 5' SETBACK 5' SETBACK 5' SETBACK CONC. WALK 79 0 0 PROPERTY LINE 10 ' S E T B A C K 5' SETBACK PROPERTY LINE 5' SETBACK RE A R S E T B A C K UP UP DN UP DN DN GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS SETBACK LINE LEGEND CONCRETE FLATWORK PROPERTY LINE PLANTING EXTENTS GRAVEL MAINTENANCE EDGE RAISED RAIN GARDEN PLANTER RAIN GARDEN PROPOSED FENCE PROPOSED CONCRETE WALL L300 03/26/2021 final hpc submittal bl u e g r e e n 30 0 s o u t h s p r i n g s t r e e t l s u i t e 2 0 2 l a s p e n , c o l o r a d o 8 1 6 1 1 l t 9 7 0 4 2 9 7 4 9 9 l f 9 7 0 4 2 9 9 4 9 9 ww w . b l u e g r e e n a s p e n . c o m a s p e n , c o l o r a d o 20 2 e m a i n s t date l issue PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION © copyright bluegreen 0 2.5 5 scale north layout & materials plan 7'-1"24'-5" 2' - 6 " 14'-6" 3' - 0 " 29'-3" 6" 9" 4'-0" RAIN GARDEN RAISED RAIN GARDEN PLANTER, 30" MAX HT CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE APRON AT GARAGE CONCRETE FLATWORK RAIN GARDEN PLANTER CONCRETE SITE WALL CONCRETE APRON AT GARAGE CONCRETE SITE WALL 30" FENCE RE 4/L800 8" GRAVEL MAINTENANCE EDGE 2 L8 0 0 3 L800 5 L8 0 0 1 L8 0 0 TRASH AND RECYCLING ENCLOSURE 5' SETBACK 5' SETBACK 5' SETBACK 79 0 0 PROPERTY LINE 10 ' S E T B A C K 5' SETBACK PROPERTY LINE 5' SETBACK RE A R S E T B A C K UP UP DN UP DN DN GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS LEGEND PER PLAN31B&B SPACING CORNUS ALBA 'SIBIRICA'Ca RED TWIG DOGWOOD SHRUBS TREES ABBR. EXISTING TREES QUANTITYSIZEBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESYMBOL NOTES 1. TRANSITIONS BETWEEN PERENNIAL MIXES WILL BE SOFT TRANSITION ZONES. PERENNIALS GROUND COVER SOD *ALL PERENNIALS 24" OR UNDER 30-36" HEIGHT PER PLAN85 GALPINUS MUGHO 'WHITE BUD'Ra WHITE BUD DWARF MUGHO PINE 24-36" 363 SF 482 SF 5' SETBACK 5' SETBACK PROPERTY LINE RE A R S E T B A C K DN GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS L400 03/26/2021 final hpc submittal bl u e g r e e n 30 0 s o u t h s p r i n g s t r e e t l s u i t e 2 0 2 l a s p e n , c o l o r a d o 8 1 6 1 1 l t 9 7 0 4 2 9 7 4 9 9 l f 9 7 0 4 2 9 9 4 9 9 ww w . b l u e g r e e n a s p e n . c o m a s p e n , c o l o r a d o 20 2 e m a i n s t date l issue PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION © copyright bluegreen 0 2.5 5 scale north planting plan GRAVEL MAINTENANCE EDGE GROUND LEVEL PLANTER RE ROOF PLANTING PLAN ROOF PLANTING PLAN L800 03/26/2021 final hpc submittal bl u e g r e e n 30 0 s o u t h s p r i n g s t r e e t l s u i t e 2 0 2 l a s p e n , c o l o r a d o 8 1 6 1 1 l t 9 7 0 4 2 9 7 4 9 9 l f 9 7 0 4 2 9 9 4 9 9 ww w . b l u e g r e e n a s p e n . c o m a s p e n , c o l o r a d o 20 2 e m a i n s t date l issue PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION © copyright bluegreen details 1 L800 SIDEWALK-FLOATING (FOR DEVELOPMENT NEAR TREES) SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 3'-0" OR 5'-0" (RE. TO PLANS) 6" 4" EPOXY COATED GREASED SMOOTH DOWELS 12" ON CENTER. 2' MIN. LENGTH CENTERED ON JOINT SIDEWALK PLAN VIEW SIDEWALK CROSS SECTION CONCRETE SIDEWALK 4" EPOXY COATED GREASED SMOOTH DOWELS 12" ON CENTER. 2' MIN. LENGTH CENTERED ON JOINT 4" COMPACTED GRANULAR MATERIAL. ADJUST THICKNESS AS REQUIRED TO MISS ROOTS EXISTING SOIL. HAND OR AIR SPADE EXCAVATION 5 L800 CONCRETE WALL - RETAINING SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 1' - 3 " (M A X . ) 2" 1' - 6 " (M I N . ) UNDISTURBED SUB-GRADE OR 95% COMPACTED FILL; PER GEOTECH EXPANSION JOINT CONCRETE SIDEWALK RE. TO CIVIL ENGINEERED FILL CONCRETE RETAINING WALL RE. TO CIVIL 8" 1 IN. CHAMFER 18" PLANTING MIX PROPOSED PLANTS; RE: PLANTING PLAN NOTE: 1. REFER TO CIVIL GRADING PLAN FOR SPOT ELEVATIONS. 2. REFER TO CIVIL FOR DRAINAGE CONNECTIONS. 2 L800 RAISED PLANTER SECTION - RAIN GARDEN #2 SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 6" 30 " M A X . RE . T O C I V I L 1/2" MIN STEEL; BLACKENED STEEL FINISH, TO BE APPROVED BY LA PROPOSED PLANTS; RE: PLANTING PLAN UNDISTURBED SUB-GRADE OR 95% COMPACTED FILL; PER GEOTECH IMPERMEABLE LINER TIEBACK REINFORCEMENT 18" OC OR AS NEEDED SIOUX CHIEF PLANTER DRAIN, SET INLET RIM 4.5" ABOVE FINAL GRADE OF PLANTER; RE. TO CIVIL 2'-6" 4" PVC PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN; DRAIN CONNECTION RE CIVIL 6" PVC SOLID DRAIN ROUTED THROUGH PLANTER; DRAIN CONNECTION RE CIVIL ARCHITECTURAL WALL INSTALL INLET GRATE IN FACE OF PLANTER & CONNECT TO 6" DRAIN PIPE RAIN GARDEN #2; RE: CIVIL 3 L800 RAISED PLANTER ELEVATION - RAIN GARDEN #2 SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 6" RAIN GARDEN #2; RE: CIVIL 30 " M A X . RE . T O C I V I L 1/2" MIN STEEL; BLACKENED STEEL FINISH, TO BE APPROVED BY LA PROPOSED PLANTS; RE: PLANTING PLAN PLANTING MIX IMPERMEABLE LINER TIEBACK REINFORCEMENT 18" OC OR AS NEEDED SIOUX CHIEF PLANTER DRAIN, SET INLET RIM 4.5" ABOVE FINAL GRADE OF PLANTER; RE. TO CIVIL 4" PVC PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN; DRAIN CONNECTION RE CIVIL 6" PVC SOLID DRAIN ROUTED THROUGH PLANTER; DRAIN CONNECTION RE CIVIL INSTALL INLET GRATE IN FACE OF PLANTER & CONNECT TO 6" DRAIN PIPE UNDISTURBED SUB-GRADE OR 95% COMPACTED FILL; PER GEOTECH NOTE: 1. REFER TO CIVIL GRADING PLAN FOR SPOT ELEVATIONS. 2. REFER TO CIVIL FOR DRAINAGE CONNECTIONS. 4 L800 FENCE DESIGN INTENT SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 30 " M A X H T SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission 202 E. MAIN STREET HPC - FINAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT SUBMISSION SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission 2005.036.0004 Print, Digital Aspen Historical Society One digital image of a house located at 208 E. Main St. circa 1890s (currently 202 E. Main). There is a man and woman standing on and in front of the porch on the right and holding a baby in her arms. There is a fence around the yard, plants growing up around the windo, a stained glass window on the left and a baby carriage on the right. Pictured to the right side is the neighbors house. The individuals are unknown although according to the 1892 and 1893 directories the Alexanders resided here and later in the 1900s was Mary and Jimmie McKenna. Description Aspen Historical SocietyCopyright P:\PP5\IMAGES\055\20050360004.jpg02/16/2021 11:59:29 2005.036.0007 Print, Digital Aspen Historical Society One digital image of three people standing on the porch of the right side of a house located at 208 E. Main St. (currently 202 E. Main) in Aspen, Colorado. Taken in the winter 1942 when the man in the middle, Joe Blossom, was just heading off to his tour in WWII. The lady on his right is his aunt, Mary McKenna, whose house they are at and the woman on his left is his mother, Fabian Monaghan Blossom-Moffitt, who lived in Grand Junction at the time, according to newspaper articles. Blossom-Moffitt, Fabian Monaghan McKenna, Mary Blossom, Joe Description People Aspen Historical SocietyCopyright P:\PP5\IMAGES\055\20050360007.jpg02/16/2021 12:00:21 2005.036.0006 Print, Digital Aspen Historical Society One digital image of Mary McKenna standing in front of the left side of her house at 208 E. Main St. (currently 202 E. Main) in Aspen, Colorado. Taken circa 1930s. Taken in the fall or early spring- there is no snow but the plants are withered looking. McKenna, Mary Description People Aspen Historical SocietyCopyright P:\PP5\IMAGES\055\20050360006.jpg02/16/2021 11:59:57 HISTORIC PHOTOS IMAGES COURTESY OF ASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY Winter, 1942Circa 1890’s Circa 1930’s SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission 1963.092.0002 Map .F. One color 1904 Sanborn map of the City of Aspen, showing streets, houses and mines. Published by the Sanborn Map Company in May 1904. Meant to go along with insurance for properties. Includes added info about population 5000, prevailing winds S.E. & N.W. water facilities (3 distinct water systemes supplied by Castle Creek & Hunter Creek, gravity system; average presure 100 lbs per sq inch, 2 settling tanks on Castle Creek with a capacity of 80,000 gallons each located 225' above grade of Center street. 3 settling tanks on Hunter Creek with a capacity of 50,000 gallons each located 245' above grade of Center Street, 6.5 miles of 4", 6", 8", 10" & 12" water pipes, 63 D. Hydrants), number of steam and hand engines, 4 independent hose carts and 2 hook & ladder trucks. Fire Dept info: 2 paid men, 3 companies volunteers with a membership of 75 men. Gamewell Fire Alarm System, 10 stations, General alarm bell. At Engine house 1- 2 horse combination H & L truck & hose wagon, 1 hand H & L truck, 4 independent hose carts with 600- 2.5" hose in poor condition, At W. Main St. Hose House 2100'- 2.5" hose in poor condition at engine house. To have 500'- 2.5" hose, new, after May 10th 1904. 2 horses. Streets not paved. Public lights: electric 63.92.1 is another original copy of this map, but cut into more pieces. Description CHHome Location P:\PP5\IMAGES\186\19630920002-6.JPG02/16/2021 1 0 : 3 8 : 3 2 HISTORIC RESOURCE 1904 SANBORN MAP SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission EXISTING STREET CONTEXT 202 E. MAIN ST.200 E. MAIN ST.208 E. MAIN ST.216 E. MAIN ST. SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission 2005.036.0004 Print, Digital Aspen Historical Society One digital image of a house located at 208 E. Main St. circa 1890s (currently 202 E. Main). There is a man and woman standing on and in front of the porch on the right and holding a baby in her arms. There is a fence around the yard, plants growing up around the windo, a stained glass window on the left and a baby carriage on the right. Pictured to the right side is the neighbors house. The individuals are unknown although according to the 1892 and 1893 directories the Alexanders resided here and later in the 1900s was Mary and Jimmie McKenna. Description Aspen Historical SocietyCopyright P:\PP5\IMAGES\055\20050360004.jpg02/16/2021 11:59:29 2005.036.0004 Print, Digital Aspen Historical Society One digital image of a house located at 208 E. Main St. circa 1890s (currently 202 E. Main). There is a man and woman standing on and in front of the porch on the right and holding a baby in her arms. There is a fence around the yard, plants growing up around the windo, a stained glass window on the left and a baby carriage on the right. Pictured to the right side is the neighbors house. The individuals are unknown although according to the 1892 and 1893 directories the Alexanders resided here and later in the 1900s was Mary and Jimmie McKenna. Description Aspen Historical SocietyCopyright P:\PP5\IMAGES\055\20050360004.jpg02/16/2021 11:59:29 2005.036.0004 Print, Digital Aspen Historical Society One digital image of a house located at 208 E. Main St. circa 1890s (currently 202 E. Main). There is a man and woman standing on and in front of the porch on the right and holding a baby in her arms. There is a fence around the yard, plants growing up around the windo, a stained glass window on the left and a baby carriage on the right. Pictured to the right side is the neighbors house. The individuals are unknown although according to the 1892 and 1893 directories the Alexanders resided here and later in the 1900s was Mary and Jimmie McKenna. Description Aspen Historical SocietyCopyright P:\PP5\IMAGES\055\20050360004.jpg02/16/2021 11:59:29 CLAPBOARD SIDING T&G ACCOYA WOOD SIDING Horizontal T&G ACCOYA WOOD SIDING Vertical METAL PANEL/ TRIM/ SCREEN Powder-coated black CONCRETE FOUNDATIONNEW WINDOWS Black frames, clear glass with simulated divided lites NEW SKYLIGHT Black frame, clear glass CEDAR ROOF SHINGLES Color & Proportion BRICK (FOUNDATION & CHIMNEY) CORNER TRIM (Historic Photo) ROOF DETAILS (Historic Photo) 2005.036.0004 Print, Digital Aspen Historical Society One digital image of a house located at 208 E. Main St. circa 1890s (currently 202 E. Main). There is a man and woman standing on and in front of the porch on the right and holding a baby in her arms. There is a fence around the yard, plants growing up around the windo, a stained glass window on the left and a baby carriage on the right. Pictured to the right side is the neighbors house. The individuals are unknown although according to the 1892 and 1893 directories the Alexanders resided here and later in the 1900s was Mary and Jimmie McKenna. Description Aspen Historical SocietyCopyright P:\PP5\IMAGES\055\20050360004.jpg02/16/2021 11:59:29 FISH SCALE SIDING (Historic Photo) WINDOW TRIM (Historic Photo) HISTORIC RESOURCE ADDITION ZINC-COLORED FLASHING SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission CLAPBOARD SIDINGCEDAR ROOF SHINGLES BRICK (FOUND. WALL)BRICK (CHIMNEY)ZINC-COLORED FLASHING T&G ACCOYA WOOD SIDINGMETAL PANELS / TRIM METAL TRIM (ROOF)METAL SCREEN (BLACK)NEW WINDOWS - TYP. EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION - MATERIALS SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission CLAPBOARD SIDING CLAPBOARD SIDING CEDAR ROOF SHINGLES CEDAR ROOF SHINGLES BRICK (FOUND. WALL)BRICK (FOUND. WALL) BRICK (CHIMNEY)BRICK (CHIMNEY)ZINC-COLORED FLASHING NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION - MATERIALS (HISTORIC RESOURCE) SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION - MATERIALS (HISTORIC RESOURCE) NEW EGRESS WINDOWS - TYP. (NOT VISIBLE FROM GRADE ON HISTORIC RESOURCE) CONCRETE FOUNDATION AT WINDOW WELLS NEW SKYLIGHT 2005.036.0004 Print, Digital Aspen Historical Society One digital image of a house located at 208 E. Main St. circa 1890s (currently 202 E. Main). There is a man and woman standing on and in front of the porch on the right and holding a baby in her arms. There is a fence around the yard, plants growing up around the windo, a stained glass window on the left and a baby carriage on the right. Pictured to the right side is the neighbors house. The individuals are unknown although according to the 1892 and 1893 directories the Alexanders resided here and later in the 1900s was Mary and Jimmie McKenna. Description Aspen Historical SocietyCopyright P:\PP5\IMAGES\055\20050360004.jpg02/16/2021 11:59:29 FISH SCALE SIDING (Historic Photo) SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission CLAPBOARD SIDING CEDAR ROOF SHINGLES BRICK (FOUND. WALL)BRICK (CHIMNEY)ZINC-COLORED FLASHINGT&G ACCOYA WOOD SIDING METAL PANELS / TRIMMETAL TRIM (ROOF)NEW WINDOWS - TYP. WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION - MATERIALS SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission METAL TRIM (ROOF)METAL TRIM (ROOF)NEW WINDOWS - TYP.NEW WINDOWS - TYP.METAL SCREEN (BLACK) METAL RAILING METAL RAILING T&G ACCOYA WOOD SIDING CONCRETE FOUNDATION CONCRETE FOUNDATION SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION- MATERIALS (ADDITION) NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION- MATERIALS (ADDITION) SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission IMAGE PRECEDENTS ACCOYA WOOD SIDING INSPIRATION SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission IMAGE PRECEDENTS FORM & WOOD SIDING INSPIRATION SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission IMAGE PRECEDENTS SCREEN & SIDING INSPIRATION SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission IMAGE PRECEDENTS WHITE-PAINTED VICTORIANS SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission SOUTH ELEVATION RENDER VIEW FROM MAIN ST. SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission SOUTH ELEVATION RENDER VIEW FROM SE CORNER SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission FRONT PORCH RENDER VIEW FROM SE CORNER SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission EAST ELEVATION RENDER VIEW FROM SE CORNER SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission EAST ELEVATION RENDER SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission EAST ELEVATION RENDER VIEW FROM NE CORNER SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission NORTH ELEVATION RENDER VIEW FROM ALLEY SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission NORTH ELEVATION RENDER VIEW FROM ALLEY SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission NORTH ELEVATION RENDER VIEW FROM ALLEY SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission NORTH ELEVATION RENDER VIEW FROM ALLEY SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission WEST ELEVATION RENDER VIEW FROM NW CORNER AT ALLEY SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission WEST ELEVATION RENDER SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission WEST ELEVATION RENDER VIEW FROM SW CORNER, MAIN ST. SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission SOUTH ELEVATION RENDER VIEW FROM SW CORNER, MAIN ST. SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission SOUTH ELEVATION RENDER VIEW FROM MAIN ST. SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission AERIAL VIEW VIEW FROM SOUTH EAST SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission VIEW OF ROOF DECK & PROPOSED SKYLIGHT VIEW FROM SOUTH EAST SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission VIEW OF ROOF DECK VIEW FROM EAST SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission AERIAL VIEW VIEW FROM THE SOUTH AT ALLEY SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission 202 E. MAIN STREET HPC - FINAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT SUBMISSION TEMPORARY RELOCATION PLAN SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission UP DN DN UP DN DN 1/8" = 1'-0" basement North UP DN DN UP DN DN 1/8" = 1'-0" basement North UP DN DN UP DN DN 1/8" = 1'-0" basement North UP DN DN UP DN DN 1/8" = 1'-0" basement North PROPOSED MOVE #1 Move historic resource to the north property line to allow for shoring and grade beams to be installed along the south side of the new basement. House is held back 1’-0” from the north property line to accommodate for cribbing beam length. PROPOSED MOVE #2 Move historic resource to the south property line to allow for shoring to be installed along the north side of the new basement. House cribbing to sit on the south shoring grade beams. House held back 1’-0” from the south property line to accommodate for cribbing beam length. This position allows for all excavation to occur on the alley-side of the property. Foundation walls to be poured while the house is in this location. SUPPLEMENTARY VISUAL PRESENTATION 202 E. MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 HPC - Final Major Development Submission UP DN DN 1/8" = 1'-0" basement North UP DN DN UP DN DN 1/8" = 1'-0" basement North PROPOSED MOVE #3 Move historic resource back to the original house location on to the new basement foundation. RELOCATION PLAN See attached documentation from Bill Bailey House Movers, KL&A, Inc., structural engineers, and Okeanos Construction, General Contractor, for relocation plan proposal and construction sequencing details. Also attached is the “Tree Assessments” and “Tree Root Assessment” reports from Aspen Tree Service in regards to the two Cottonwood trees located in the right-of-way. Per Aspen Tree Service’s recommendations, after inspection and meeting with City Forestry, a tree protection plan will be in place prior to any redevelopment activity. Bailey House Movers � w� i • . #J Grand Junction, Colo. 81503 PROPOSAL SUBMn7ED Ta I JOB NAME ADDRESS DATE Page 4 1 _ of pages w 970 434 9763 c 970 216 8141 baileyhousemover@gmail.com JOB 9 gv e hereby submit specifications and estimates for: Moving one single story structure (approx 25.5' X 44') . Owner/Contractor will., 1_ Remove any rock or brick fireplaces and or chimneys. 2. Remove any sheet - rock and or plaster from the building. 3_ The method to pick the house .up is called the Micro -Lam Method_ using. 2" X 10" m1cro4ams, attach micro -lams to all walls inside of the house with 4" timberJoks 2- -per stud. Position bottom of micro -lam 30" above top of floor- 4. Take siding off up just past bottom ofmicro-lams,. 5. Buy parking (5 connected spaces) for movers truck and trailer as close as possible to the alley by job location on North Aspen str. If the house is on movers beams and crib for more than 120 days there will be a $101day rental fee. Please don't put retainage in your contract because I don't buy materials for the house. Mover will use sequencingas -outlined by Ana White/Boss Architecture_ Using this sequencing plan will increase the timeline for the mover and one more piece of equipment will be needed. Updated bid is shown below- e propose hereby to furnish material and labor — complete in accordance with the above specifications for the slim of: __-- $50.000.00 Dollars with payments to be made as follows: he_daV wnrkctarts - $95r00.0_00 is due- set on the new foundation. Any alteration ordeviation from above specifications involving extra costs Respectfully vMl be executod only upon written order, and will became an extra charge submitted — - BiIJI Bailey over and above the estimate. Al{ agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents, or delays beyond our contra. Note —this proposal may be w#idrawn by us if not accepted whin 12Q days. The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payments will be made as outlined above. lee tan ce of rapazal Signature Date of Acceptance A-RCMQ17-3eGO 011-11 Signature Page 1 of 1 KL&A, Inc. 1717 Washington Avenue, Suite 100 Golden, Colorado 80401 Telephone: (303) 384-9910 March 12, 2021 Josh Whalen 202 E Main St LLC 2610 E Cedar Ave Denver, CO 80209 Re: Aspen HPC Resolution #18, Series of 2019 Dear Mr. Whalen, KL&A has reviewed the proposed development for the property located at 202 E Main St in Aspen, CO for structural feasibility. For the purposes of this letter, the project scope was described in the following files: • 202 E Main Street – HPC Approved Plans • 210203 – ASPEN plans Throughout this review, KL&A has engaged in multiple conversations with BOSS Architecture, Sopris Engineering, LLC (Civil), Kumar & Associates, Inc. (Geotech) Okeanos Construction (GC), B&Y Drilling, Inc. (Shoring), and Bailey House Movers regarding the feasibility of the proposed development. It is KL&A’s understanding that the existing historic structure will be temporarily relocated on site as necessary for the installation of a temporary shoring system around the perimeter of the below grade level of the proposed development. New foundations will be constructed to support the soil loads as well as the structure above. Given the anticipated construction sequence provided by Okeanos Construction, and the input provided by the various consultants listed above during our team meetings, our current opinion is the proposed development is structurally feasible. Sincerely, Megan Skodack, PE Structural Engineer PO Box 552 Woody Creek, CO. 81656 805-252-9161 stevel@okeanosconstruction.com Josh Whalen March 19, 2021 202 E. Main St. LLC 2610 E Cedar Ave Denver, CO 80209 RE: Aspen HPC Resolution #18, Series of 2019 Dear Mr. Whalen, Okeanos Construction has been working with KL & A Engineers, BOSS Archi tecture, Sopris Engineering, Kumar & Associates, B & Y Drilling and Bailey House Movers to come to an agreed upon process of moving the existing historical building on the current location. This process will facilitate the installation of the micro pile shoring system. By following this sequence of moving the building to each side of the property it will also allow us to complete the installation of the proposed building basement area. Our process is as follows: • Okeanos Construction will perform the demolition of the non- historical portions of the existing structure to prepare for the first move of the historical building. At all times, Okeanos Construction will take every precaution to save, protect and not damage any part of the historical building while construction is underway. • Bailey House Movers and Okeanos Construction will lift and move the historical building to the North end of the property. This move will give access of the Southern section of the property and allow the installation of the perimeter Micro Pile System by B & Y Drilling. • Once the shoring systems is complete on the S outh section, we will move the historic building back to the edge of the southern property boundary. The grade on the North section of the property will be brought up to a level that will allow B & Y Drilling to install the micro pile shoring around the rest of the perimeter. • After the shoring is complete, Okeanos Construction will then be able to excavate out for the new basement and install per approved plans. The historic building will remain on the south section of the property and will be supported on the new micro piles according to approved engineered plans. This will allow us to excavate under the building and install the new basement in that section. • Once the new basement is complete the building will move back North to the final installation area. We feel this is the best construction sequencing to complete the m icro p ile s horing and basement installation while also protecting the historic structure. Sincerely Steve Leu Owner Okeanos Construction 202 E Main Street- Engineering Letter HPC Final Application March 26, 2021 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970)704-0311• Fax (970)704-0313 S OPRI S E NGIN EERING • LLC civi l consultants 202 E Main Street LLC 2610 E Cedar Ave Denver, CO 80209 RE: 202 E Main Street-Conceptual Engineering Report Sopris Engineering, LLC Job No. 31004.01 Dear 202 E Main Street LLC, Sopris Engineering, LLC (SE) has prepared this letter to summarize the Civil Engineering requirements and recommendations for the potential redevelopment of 202 E. Main Street located in Aspen, CO. This letter is specific to utility extensions, conceptual site grading and stormwater mitigation recommendations in support of Final Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) application. Conceptual Civil Plans have been provided as an attachment for illustrative support of this document. Background & Existing Conditions The subject property is located at 202 E Main Street in Aspen, CO (Parcel ID# 273707399001) and is a designated historic landmark which consists of a one-story miner’s cottage. A non-historic addition is also located to the rear of the property. Per Ordinance #14, Series 2012 Aspen City Council granted approval for a Historic Lot Split between 202 E. Main and 208 E. Main Street which created two separate 3,000 sf parcels. Based on our review of the existing conditions survey and several site visits, the existing ground cover includes a grass lawn area and a couple of concrete walkways at the south end of the property. The north side of the property consists of gravel parking area and gravel side yard. The total existing impervious area has been estimated at 2,130+/- sf which includes the historic landmark, addition, gravel and concrete surface areas. The front yard slopes to the south towards Main Street while the remaining portion of the site tends to drain to the alley which borders the north side of the property. Aside from a couple of gutters that discharge directly to the ground at the southern end of the historic landmark no other stormwater improvements were observed during our site visit or indicated on the existing conditions survey. According to Figure 3.1 of the City’s Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP) the underlying soils likely consist of Type B Soils which have moderate infiltration rates. Kumar & Associates performed a geotechnical investigation and outlined their findings within a report dated February 22, 2021. A copy of this report has been included as an attachment to this letter. To confirm the use of infiltration based water quality treatment (ie. dry wells, bio swales, rain gardens, etc.) Kumar & Associates also performed a percolation test which yielded infiltration rates of about 2 minutes per inch (equivalent inverted units of 30 inches per hour) which exceeds the City’s minimum allowable infiltration rates for water quality treatment facilities. The subject property falls within Drainage System 3, Basin 19 as described within the City’s Surface Drainage Master Plan (SDMP), dated November 2001 prepared by WRC Engineering, Inc. Drainage System 3 consists of street curb and gutter, roadside ditches and a network of storm sewer pipes to include a mainline that runs along Garmisch Street. The nearest storm drain inlet is located at the southeast corner of N. Aspen Street and Main Street intersection. Although this inlet is approximately 5-ft deep its location makes it impractical to connect any future onsite drainage pipes from the subject property. 202 E Main Street- Engineering Letter HPC Application March 26, 2021 Page 2 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970)704-0311• Fax (970)704-0313 S OPRI S E NGIN EERING • LLC civi l consultants According to Figure 7.1a of the City’s URMP the subject property falls outside Aspen Mountain’s mudflow zone, however it should be noted that the City is in the process of updating mudflow studies and regulations which may influence any potential mudflow requirements for the subject property. Lastly, the subject property falls within Zone X as identified on FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel #08097C0354E, effective date August 15, 2019. Zone X includes areas determined to be outside the 500-year flood plain. Proposed Improvements The project will include removal of the non-historic addition, construction of a new above grade addition at the rear of the historic landmark, a full basement, an interior renovation of the historic structure, a garage located off the alley on the north side of the property, an improved access walk off Main Street’s sidewalk, landscaping, stormwater mitigation infrastructure and utility service upgrades. In addition, replacement of the narrow sidewalk located at the southwest corner of the site is also proposed. This sidewalk falls partially on 200 E. Main Street’s property and is used as egress to access the east entrances of 200 E. Main Street and does not serve the subject property. Therefore, additional coordination with 200 E. Main Street on the replacement of this existing sidewalk will be required as the design progresses and a written agreement will likely be required as part of any future building permit application. Site Utilities Coordination with the various utility providers has taken place to verify layouts, routing, and feasibility of serving the proposed improvements. This section describes our findings and preliminary utility plans have been included within the attached civil drawings for illustrative support. Additional details and finalized design will be submitted when a building permit application is pursued. Water Service & Fire Flow Analysis The City of Aspen Water Department is the provider of potable water for the subject property. Currently the site is served by a ¾-inch water service that extends from a 6-inch cast iron mainline pipe that runs along Main Street. According to the City of Aspen records the ¾-inch service is shared with 208 E. Main Street which is consistent with the information provided on the existing conditions survey and the existing service has a leak. Depending on the severity of the leak and timing of improvements the existing service line may require repair prior to the proposed redevelopment work. According to the attached letter prepared by FlameOut Fire Protection, Inc. a new 2” type K copper service line is anticipated for 202 E Main Street to provide domestic and fire flow to the redeveloped residence. Final fire flow calculations demonstrating the proposed water service size, as well as confirmation that the next size down does not work, will be required in support of any future building permit application. In addition, the work associated with providing a new water service will occur in Colorado Department of Transportation’s (CDOT) right-of-way and therefore a CDOT permit will be required for this work. Lastly, and as noted above, the existing service to 202 E. Main Street is shared with 208 E. Main Street. 208 E. Main Street is currently undergoing redevelopment however it is not clear whether or not the improvements include a new water service to the property. Therefore, further coordination and evaluation of the existing service to 208 E Main Street will be necessary as the design progresses towards building permit application to include possibly re-aligning 208 E Main Street’s existing service to avoid the excavation that will be required on the subject property. In addition, insulating the re-aligned service may also be required to protect the line from freezing while 202 E Main Street has an open excavated site. 202 E Main Street- Engineering Letter HPC Application March 26, 2021 Page 3 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970)704-0311• Fax (970)704-0313 S OPRI S E NGIN EERING • LLC civi l consultants Sanitary Sewer Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District (ACSD) is the supplier of sanitary sewer service to the subject property and surrounding area. An existing collector line exists in the alley to the north of the subject property. A shared service line is in place that currently serves 202 E Main Street. This line also served 208 E Main Street prior to the redevelopment of that property. The location of 208’s abandonment is not known and for purposes of conceptual design it is assumed that a new service line will be required with the re- development of 202 E Main Street. Accordingly, the existing sewer service and shared service line will need to be located, abandoned and capped per ACSD specifications prior to commencing any shoring activity. The final size of the service line will be determined by the project mechanical engineer based on anticipated daily average and peak flows generated from the proposed improvements. A small injector pump is anticipated in order to lift below grade spaces up to the District’s system within the alley. The location and design of this injector system will be performed by the project MEP with associated details being provided in support of any future building permit application. City of Aspen Electric currently serves the subject property via a single phase 120/240V transformer located at the west end of Alley Block 73, adjacent to N. Aspen Street. Based on discussions with City of Aspen Electric this existing transformer has adequate capacity to serve an additional 600-800 amps. The electrical engineer has performed preliminary demand load calculations and is estimating a 432 amp service to serve the project. There is also a 120/208 3-phase transformer located within Alley Block 73 just to the east of the subject property if 3-phase power is determined to be necessary as the design progresses. Comcast Cable service is currently extended from the existing mainline that runs along Alley Block 73. Any future upgrades in service will be extended from this mainline. Cable service is anticipated to be routed below grade directly to the development’s mechanical room and distributed internal to the residence as necessary. Lumen (CenturyLink) Telephone service is currently provided from existing pedestal #205 which is located immediately north of Alley Block 73. If service upgrades are required then new conduits and service lines will be extended from this same pedestal. Black Hills Gas is the provider of natural gas in the area. Based on discussions with Black Hills the property is currently fed off a 2-inch steel main that runs along Alley Block 73 and they do not have any concerns with serving the proposed re-development. Final sizing and/or upgrades to the existing service line will be determined in support of any future building permit application. A Conceptual Site & Utility Plan has been included within the application (C1) for illustrative support. A final plan with associated details will be submitted when a building permit application is pursued. Stormwater Mitigation Requirements and Recommendations Based on the proposed improvements and overall limits of disturbance this project will be classified as a “Major” project as defined within the City’s Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). Accordingly, conceptual design and integration of stormwater mitigation infrastructure, with a strong emphasis on water quality treatment, has been performed in support of the HPC Final submission to demonstrate that the project has a viable solution/strategy for complying to the City’s stormwater regulations. This section summarizes the recommendations for providing water 202 E Main Street- Engineering Letter HPC Application March 26, 2021 Page 4 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970)704-0311• Fax (970)704-0313 S OPRI S E NGIN EERING • LLC civi l consultants quality treatment along with a request to forgo water quality treatment for some isolated impervious areas as further described below. Integrating water quality treatment infrastructure for this project comes with numerous challenges given the historic nature of the project, the small lot size, minimal side yard setbacks, existing structures located on the east and west, lack of existing storm system to connect to as well as an existing cottonwood tree located within the City’s right-of- way. After careful evaluation two rain gardens were integrated into the overall site design. Rain Gardens (RG) are landscaping areas designed to capture and filter and/or infiltrate the water quality capture volume from a tributary drainage basin. The soil matrix and plantings remove pollutants through a variety of physical, biological and chemical treatment process. A description of each of the proposed rain gardens is provided below: RG #1: This rain garden is proposed along the south side of the residence and within the southwest lawn area. This rain garden is integrated into the overall landscaping and will provide water quality treatment for the southern roof of the historic landmark. Roof runoff will be captured in gutters and downspouts. The southwest downspout will daylight at the surface where flows will be conveyed into the treatment area via overland flow. To reduce conveyance of stormwater across the access walk the southeast downspout will be routed below grade and discharge directly into the treatment area. Given the shallow bury of this drain pipe heat tape is recommended. In addition, the eastern half of this rain garden is in close proximity to the proposed structure and existing neighboring structure. Therefore this portion of treatment area will consist of an impermeable liner and underdrain system to protect these structures. The underdrain system will be directed to the southwest and away from any structures where it will then infiltrate into the underlying soils. The available area for infiltration is adequate to drain the water quality capture volume within the allotted time as specified within the City’s URMP. Flows that exceed the water quality capture volume will simply overtop along the southern edge and be conveyed over the surface to Main Street’s curb/gutter system. RG #2: This rain garden is a raised planter proposed along the eastern side of the addition. Given the proximity to the proposed structure and existing structure to the east, an at-grade rain garden would require an impermeable liner and an underdrain system. At this location however there is nowhere to route the underdrain pipe without integrating a dry well. Therefore, a raised planter was integrated into the design to allow the underdrain pipe to daylight at the surface. This rain garden will accept runoff from the northern portion of the historic landmark as well as the addition via gutters, internal roof drains and downspouts. Collected stormwater runoff will infiltrate through the grow media and get collected within an underdrain pipe which was designed to daylight at the north end of the planter. A drain pipe will also be installed within the planter. This drain pipe will serve two purposes. It will provide a conduit to direct surface runoff from the south end of the planter and it will be used to connect a few area inlets within the planter to convey flows that exceed the water quality capture volume. Collected flows will be routed in the drain pipe which will daylight at the north end of the planter where flows will be directed towards the alley which is consist with existing drainage patterns for the northern portion of the site. It should be noted that since this planter will be located within a setback the height will be limited to 30- inches, measured from final grade per Section 26.575.020 5I of the City’s Municipal Code. This was considered in the design of this treatment area and the 30-inch criteria is adequate to accommodate the anticipated storage volume, required grow/treatment media and an underdrain system as described above. By incorporating raised planters on the roof of the addition and narrowing the access walk down to 3-ft the overall impervious area will be reduced 10% as compared to existing conditions. This reduction of impervious area was 202 E Main Street- Engineering Letter HPC Application March 26, 2021 Page 5 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970)704-0311• Fax (970)704-0313 S OPRI S E NGIN EERING • LLC civi l consultants achieved through narrowing the entrance walk down to 3-ft and incorporating raised planters on the roof of the addition. In addition, the proposed rain gardens will provide water quality for 91% of the onsite impervious area. However given the numerous site complexities as noted above there are a few isolated areas where providing water quality treatment is not feasible without incorporating a dry well into the stormwater mitigation design. These areas are limited to a small sliver of sidewalk that is being replaced that serves as egress for the neighboring lot and the impervious entrance to each of the garage bays which includes an area for the trash enclosure. In total the amount of impervious area that will go untreated is approximately 170 sf. This was presented to Engineering staff and determined to be acceptable and a good compromise given the intricate design and integration of water quality treatment for the project. Accordingly, they suggested that this variance shall be noted in the final Resolution for future reference. The delineated water quality basins, locations of the rain gardens and sizing summary tables are provided on C3 of the attached plan set. Final design and locating of stormwater mitigation infrastructure will be performed in support of any future building permit application. Conclusion Based on our evaluation of the existing site conditions and proposed development the project has a viable option for providing water quality treatment and utilities are available to serve the proposed improvements on the subject property. The design of all onsite stormwater mitigation infrastructure, water quality treatment facilities, and utility service extensions will be further analyzed as the project design progresses with final designs being provided with any future building permit application. If you have any questions or need any additional information please don’t hesitate contacting our office. Sincerely, SOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC Jesse K Swann, PE Project Manager Encl: Civil HPC Final Plan Set Kumar Geotechnical Report Flameout Fire Protection, Inc Letter (Preliminary Water Service Size) UP UP DN UP DN DN xxxxx x x x x x x x x x x >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xwl xwl xwl xwl xwl xwl xwlxwl XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XS A XGAS XGAS XGAS XGAS XGAS XGAS XGAS XGAS XGAS XGAS XGAS XGAS XGAS XG A S XG A S XG A S XG A S XG A S XG A S XG A S XG A S XG A S XG A S XG A S XG A S XGAS XEL XEL XEL XGAS XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XSA XSA XSA XSA XSA XSA XSA XSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSAXSA XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XE L XELXELXELXEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XEL XT V XT V XT V XT V XT V XT V XT V XT V XT V XT V XT V XT V XT V XT V XT V >>>>>>>>>>>> sa svc sa svc sa svc UEL UE L UE L UE L UE L UE L UE L UE L UEL UELUELUELUELUELUEL GAS GA S GAS XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XWL T E L TEL TEL TEL TEL TEL T V TV TV TV TV TV >>>>>>>>>>>> W L SVC WL SVC WL SVC >>> WL SVC WL SVC W L S V C W L SV C >>>> > > > 208 E MAIN ST. (UNDER CONSTRUCTION) MA I N S T . (S T A T E H I G H W A Y 8 2 ) AL L E Y B L O C K 7 3 (2 0 - F T R O W ) 200 E MAIN ST. EXISTING WINDOW WELL 2' MILLING ATASPHALT FULLDEPTH PATCH FULL DEPTHASPHALT PATCH FORCONSTRUCTION OFREPLACED CURB &GUTTER REPLACE EXISTINGCURB & GUTTER PERCOA STANDARDS PROPOSED RG #1; RE. TOC-3 FOR ADDITIONAL INFO PROPOSED RG#2 (RAISED PLANTER); RE. TO C-3 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REPLACE EXISTING WALK W/ VALLEY FLOWLINE TODRAIN TO THE SOUTH PROPOSEDGAS METERPROPOSEDELEC METER EXISTING COA ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER LOCATED BEHIND 200 E. MAIN. RE-USE (2) EXISTING LUGS & EXTEND SECONDARY SERVICE TO 202E. MAIN STREET AS SHOWN HEREIN EXISTING GAS SERVICE TAPLOCATION. SIZE OF SERVICE LINE TO BE CONFIRMED & COORDINATE WITHBLACK HILLS ENERGY ON RE-ROUTING SERVICE TO PROPOSED METER EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL #205CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH CENTURYLINK ON EXTENDING TELEPHONE SERVICE TO PROPOSEDRESIDENCE PROPOSED 2-WAYSANITARY SEWERCLEANOUT EXISTING SEWER SERVICE TO BE ABANDONED ATMAIN PER ACSD STANDARDS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/SHORING WORK (TAP 7-FT± DOWNSTREAM OF MH A-10A-2 PER ACSD) EXISTING SEWER MANHOLERIM: 7896.4±10" INV OUT: 7889.3± (PER SURVEY PERFORMED BY OTHERS) CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM SIZE & DEPTH OF EXISTING SEWER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION & COORDINATE WITH ACSD ON TAPPING NEW 4" SEWER SERVICE AT MAINLINE (INVERT AT MAINLINE: -7± BELOW EXISTING GRADE) CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH COMCAST ON EXTENSION OF PROPOSEDCABLE SERVICE FEED TO 208 E MAIN STREET CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE EXISTING MAIN & COORDINATE WITH CITY OF ASPEN WATERDEPARTMENT ON TAPPING NEW 2" TYPE KCOPPER SERVICE TO 202 E MAIN STREET PORCH FULL DEPTHSAW CUT FULL DEPTHSAW CUT PROPOSED 2" CURB STOPPER COA STANDARDS 208 E. MAIN STREET CURRENTLY SHARESWATER SERVICE WITH 202 E MAIN STREET x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/ BLACK HILLS ENERGY ONABANDONING EXISTING GASSERVICE & METER AS REQ'D CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/CENTURY LINK ON ABANDONINGEXISTING TELE. AS REQ'D CONTRACTOR ABANDONING EXISTING SECONDARY ELEC. SERVICE & METER MATCH EXISTING ASPHALT ALONG TIE-IN MILLING LINE (TYP) LIMITS OF BELOW GRADE STRUCTURE (TYP) ROOFRIDGELINES EGRESS WELL EGRESS WELL LANDSCAPE WALL TO RE-ESTABLISH HISTORIC GRADESAT HISTORIC LANDMARK 5' SIDEWALK(COA FLOATING SIDEWALK DETAIL AS REQ'D TO PROTECT EXISTING COTTONWOOD) CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE EXISTING WATER SERVICE AND RE-ROUTE AS NECESSARY TO MINIMIZE PLACEMENT AND IMPACTS TO 202 E. MAIN STREET. RE-ALIGNMENT OF WATER SERVICE MAY REQUIRE INSULATION TO PROTECT IT FROM POTENTIAL FROST DURING EXCAVATION OF 202 E MAIN STREET. 3' SIDEWALK (COA FLOATING SIDEWALKDETAIL AS REQ'D TO PROTECT EXISTING COTTONWOOD) (I M P E R V I O U S D R I V E W A Y A P R O N ) EXISTING COTTONWOOD TO BE REMOVED EXISTING COTTONWOODTO BE PROTECTED LANDSCAPING EDGER APPROX. LOCATIONOF EXISTING 6"WATER MAIN WALL MOUNTED AC UNIT (BY OTHERS) IRRIGATION BACKFLOW PREV. & APPURTENANCES (BY OTHERS) OPRIS ES NGINEERING, LLC. CIVIL CONSULTANTS JOB NO. DATE: 502 MAIN STREETCARBONDALE, CO 81623(970) 704-0311FAX: (970)-704-0313 DATE REVISION C-1 DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 1 \ 3 1 0 0 4 - 2 0 2 E M A I N S T \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ 3 1 0 0 4 P L O T . D W G - M a r 1 9 , 2 0 2 1 - 9 : 1 7 a m CONCEPTUAL SITE & UTILITY PLAN MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R NORTH 1 inch = ft.( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 05 5 10 5 202.5 31004.01 03-26-2021 20 2 E . M A I N S T R E E T AS P E N , C O CO N C E P T U A L S I T E & U T I L I T Y P L A N HP C F I N A L A P P R O V A L NOTE: THESE PLANS ARE CONCEPTUAL OR ILLUSTRATIVE IN NATURE. PRECISE INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED ASPART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION, AND IN SITUATIONS WHERE THE FINAL HPC PLANS ANDAPPROVED BUILDING PERMIT DIFFER, THE APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT SHALL RULE. EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING WATER MAINXWLXWL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING GAS EXISTING TELEPHONE XGAS XGAS EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EXISTING CABLE XUT XUT XEL XEL XTV XTV XSA XSA PROPOSED LEGEND EXISTING LEGEND PROPOSED SAWCUT PROPOSED FULL DEPTH ASPHALT PROPOSED 2" MILLING & ASPHALT OVERLAY PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED WATER SERVICEWLSVC PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MAIN PROPOSED GAS PROPOSED TELEPHONE GAS PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC PROPOSED CABLE TEL TEL UE TV TV sa svc EXISTING ASPHALT EXISTING CONCRETE 3-26-2021 FINAL HPC SUBMITTAL PROPOSED WATER QUALITYTREATMENT RAIN GARDEN REDUCED FOR ATTACHMENT TO REPORT UP UP DN UP DN DN xxxxx x x x x x x x x x x >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xwl xwl xwl xwl xwl xwl xwlxwl 79 0 0 >>>>>>>>>>>> XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XWL >>>>>>>>>>>> W L SVC WL SVC WL SVC >>> WL SVC WL SVC WL S V C W L SV C >>>> > > > 208 E MAIN ST. (UNDER CONSTRUCTION) MA I N S T . (S T A T E H I G H W A Y 8 2 ) AL L E Y B L O C K 7 3 (2 0 - F T R O W ) T C : 0 0 . 0 5 T C : 0 0 . 0 2 TC: 99.50 TC: 99.50TC: 99.41 T C : 9 9 . 9 9 TC: 00.53 TC: 99.66 ME: 99.7'± FG: 98.72 FL: 96.58 FL: 97.14FL @ HP: 00.71 FL: 00.55 FG: 00.43 FG: 00.75 FG: 00.60 FG: 00.57 FG: 97.57 FG: 97.36 FG: 97.06 FG: 97.07 TOP PORCH: 01.76 FG: 97.11 FG: 00.68 200 E MAIN ST. EXISTING WINDOW WELL TC: 99.25 DRAINAGE FLOW LINEALONG BOTTOM EDGE OFEXISTING CONCRETE WALK 2.5± PROPOSED REPLACEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK W/ FORMED FLOWLINE TC-FL @ HP:99.650.5% 5.4% 1. 9 % 1 4 . 9 % 4.2%11.1%6.0% 4.2% 4.1% TC: 97.14 TC: 97.14 TC: 97.20 TC: 97.20 COLLECT RUNOFF FROM ADDITIONAND DISCHARGE IN PLANTER RAINGARDEN #2. PROVIDE SCOURPROTECTION AT OUTFALL DS DS EX. TC: 99.3'±EX. TC: 99.3'±EX. TC: 99.3'±EX. TC: 99.4'±EX. TC: 99.5'±EX. TC: 99.2'± EX. TC: 97.6'± EX. TC: 97.1'± FG: 97.76 FG: 97.55 FG: 97.14 FG: 97.38 FG: 97.50 FG: 97.29 FG: 97.16FG: 98.95 DRAINAGE SWALE BETWEENEX. SIDEWALK AND PROPOSEDEDGE OF BUILDING FG: 99.43 FG: 99.22 FG: 99.01 FG: 99.03FG: 99.54 ME: 99.6'± 0.5%2.5%2.5%11.6%10.0%1.4% 5. 0 % 7. 2 % 8. 6 % DS 3.7% 1.8% 1.2% ME: 99.4'±ME: 99.4'± ME: 00.0'±ME: 00.1'±ME: 99.2'± ME: 99.7'± ME: 99.3'± ME: 99.2'± ME: 98.7'± ME: 98.8'± TRENCH FORNEW WATERSERVICE TAP PROPOSED LANDSCAPE RAIN GARDEN #1 (RG #1)FG @ FOOTPRINT: 7899.60METAL EDGER AROUND PERIMETER FORCONTAINMENT & TO AVOID 3:1 SIDE SLOPES. TOPOF EDGER TO MATCH FINAL GRADES. RIM: 97.11 MATCH EXISTING ASPHALT ALONG TIE-IN MILLING LINE (TYP) SHORT LANDSCAPE WALL TO RE-ESTABLISHHISTORIC GRADES AT RESIDENCE (SET TOP OF WALL 2" ABOVE 202 E MAINSTREET'S FINAL GRADES 2.0% SHALLOW SWALE TODIRECT SURFACETOWARDS RG #1 SHALLOW GRASS LINED SWALE TOPROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROMSTRUCTURES. FINAL GRADES ALONGPROPERTY LINE TO BE CONFIRMED UPONTHE COMPLETION OF 208 E MAIN STREETIMPROVEMENTS FG: 99.60 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE RAIN GARDEN #2(ELEVATED PLANTER 30" MAX. HEIGHT)TOP OF PERIMETER WALL: 7899.5 PORCH(ELEV: 7901.76) UTILITY TRENCH:FULL DEPTH SAWCUT ASPHALT& FULL DEPTH ASPHALT PATCH EXISTINGBUILDING ME: 96.9'± ME: 96.8'± EX. CONC.WALKWAY EX. CONC. STEPS FINAL GRADES ALONG PROPERTY LINE TO BECONFIRMED UPON COMPLETION OF 208 E. MAIN STREET IMPROVEMENTS & PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR 202 E MAIN STREET PROJECT 7900.0 7900.5 7901.0 7898. 0 7899 . 0 7 9 0 0 . 0 7897. 5 7898. 5 789 9 . 5 790 0 . 5 7897 . 0 7 8 9 7 . 5 7 8 9 8 . 0 78 9 8 . 5 79 0 0 . 0 7899. 5 79 0 0 . 5 INLET @ FACE OF PLANTERTO INTERCEPT FLOWSFROM GRASS SWALE 1.5% 2.0%2.1% TC: 97.85 TC: 97.85 FG: 99.00 (2) 7.5"± RISERS 4.6% TC: 00.04 1.1% FG: 98.75 FL: 97.00 FL: 96.86 TC: 99.97 TC: 00.26 TC: 00.47 FG: 99.60 FG: 99.91FG: 99.77 FG: 99.77 3.3% 3" INV: 99.60 TW: 99.50 EXISTING COTTONWOODTREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING COTTONWOODTREE TO BE PROTECTED EGRESS WELL (DRAIN TO GRAVEL ENVELOPE BELOW FOOTERS) EGRESS WELL (DRAIN TO GRAVEL ENVELOPE BELOW FOOTERS) 78 9 7 . 0 EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING WATER MAINXWLXWL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING GAS EXISTING TELEPHONE XGAS XGAS EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EXISTING CABLE XUT XUT XEL XEL XTV XTV XSA XSA OPRIS ES NGINEERING, LLC. CIVIL CONSULTANTS JOB NO. DATE: 502 MAIN STREETCARBONDALE, CO 81623(970) 704-0311FAX: (970)-704-0313 DATE REVISION C-2 DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 1 \ 3 1 0 0 4 - 2 0 2 E M A I N S T \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ 3 1 0 0 4 P L O T . D W G - M a r 1 9 , 2 0 2 1 - 9 : 1 1 a m CONCEPTUALGRADING PLAN PROPOSED LEGEND EXISTING LEGEND MEMBER UTILITIESFOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUNDBEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATECALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE Know what's below.before you dig.Call R DRAINAGE DIRECTION/SLOPE SPOT ELEVATION EXAMPLE: TOP OF CONCRETE @ 7900.00' = BOW = BOTTOM OF WALLEOA = EDGE OF ASPHALTEX = EXISTING GRADEFFE = FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONFG = FINISHED GRADEFL = FLOW LINEHP = HIGH POINTLP = LOW POINTME = MATCH EXISTINGRIM = RIM ELEVATIONTBC = TOP BACK OF CURBTC = TOP OF CONCRETE 7890.5 = 90.50' 2.0% TC:00.00' SPOT ELEVATION LEGEND NORTH 1 inch = ft.( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 05 5 10 5 202.5 31004.01 20 2 E . M A I N S T R E E T AS P E N , C O CO N C E P T U A L G R A D I N G P L A N HP C F I N A L A P P R O V A L NOTE: THESE PLANS ARE CONCEPTUAL OR ILLUSTRATIVE IN NATURE. PRECISE INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED ASPART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION, AND IN SITUATIONS WHERE THE FINAL HPC PLANS ANDAPPROVED BUILDING PERMIT DIFFER, THE APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT SHALL RULE. PROPOSED SAWCUT PROPOSED FULL DEPTH ASPHALT PROPOSED 2" MILLING & ASPHALT OVERLAY PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED WATER SERVICEWLSVC PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MAIN PROPOSED GAS PROPOSED TELEPHONE GAS PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC PROPOSED CABLE TEL TEL UE TV TV sa svc EXISTING ASPHALT EXISTING CONCRETE PROPOSED CONTOUR (1-FT) PROPOSED CONTOUR (0.5-FT)7900.5 7901.0 03-26-2021 3-26-2021 FINAL HPC SUBMITTAL PROPOSED WATER QUALITYTREATMENT RAIN GARDEN EXISTING CONTOUR (1-FT INTERVAL) REDUCED FOR ATTACHMENT TO REPORT DN >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xwl xwl xwl xwl xwl xwl xwlxwl 79 0 0 >>>>>>>>>>>> XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XW L XWL >>>>>>>>>>>> W L SVC WL SVC WL SVC >>> WL SVC WL SVC WL S V C W L SV C >>>> > > > 208 E MAIN ST. (UNDER CONSTRUCTION) MA I N S T . (S T A T E H I G H W A Y 8 2 ) AL L E Y B L O C K 7 3 (2 0 - F T R O W ) 200 E MAIN ST. EXISTING WINDOW WELL BASIN 1a ROOF DRAINAGE COLLECTED IN GUTTER W/DOWNSPOUT. FLOWS TO BE CONVEYED TORG #1 VIA SURFACE FLOW BASIN 2 (ROOF DRAINAGE TO BE DIRECTED TO RG #2; RE. TO ARCH. PLANS) PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN #2 RAISED PLANTER (30" MAX. FROM FG) W/ UNDERDAIN; RE. TO RAIN GARDENSUMMARY TABLE FOR ADDITIONALINFORMATION PROPOSED LANDSCAPE RAIN GARDEN (RG #1); RE. TO RAINGARDEN SUMMARY TABLE FORADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHED ROOF SHED ROOF FLAT ROOF 7900.0 7900.5 7901.0 7898. 0 7899 . 0 7 9 0 0 . 0 7897. 5 7898. 5 789 9 . 5 790 0 . 5 7897. 0 7 8 9 7 . 5 7 8 9 8 . 0 78 9 8 . 5 79 0 0 . 0 7899. 5 79 0 0 . 5 PROPOSED INLET GRATEINTEGRATED INTO FACE OF PLANTER & CONNECTED TO 6" DRAIN PIPEROUTED THROUGH PLANTER BASIN 1b ROOF DRAINAGE COLLECTED IN GUTTER W/DOWNSPOUT. FLOWS TO BE CONVEYED TORG #1 VIA SHALLOW 3" ROOF DRAIN PROTECT EXISTINGCOTTONWOOD TREE EXISTINGCOTTONWOOD TREETO BE REMOVED DS DS AREA TO SURFACE DRAINTOWARDS ALLEY OVERLANDSCAPE GROUND COVER AREA TO SURFACE DRAIN TOWARDS ALLEYOVER LANDSCAPE GROUND COVER (FLOWS TO PASS ALONG WEST SIDE OF TRASH ENCLOSURE) AREA TO SURFACEDRAIN TOWARDS ALLEY 13 3 ± s f I M P E R V I O U S G A R A G E A P R O N & T R A S H E N C L O S U R E (R E Q U E S T I N G V A R I A N C E F R O M W Q T R E A T M E N T ) 33± SF OF SIDEWALK TO BEREPLACED ON SUBJECT PROPERTY (REQUESTING WQ TREATMENT VARIANCE) 6" DRAIN PIPE & 4"UNDERDRAIN TO DAYLIGHTAT NORTH FACE OF PLANTER 4" UNDERDRAIN W/ CLEANOUT 6" DRAIN PIPE TO BE ROUTEDTHROUGH PLANTERINSTALL AREA INLETS & SETRIM 4.5" ABOVE FINAL GRADE ROOFPLANTER ROOFPLANTER ROOFPLANTER DS 16± SF OF INFILTRATION AREA FOR RAIN GARDEN (IE. NO IMPERMEABLE LINER WITHN THIS AREA) CONNECT DOWNSPOUT TO 3"SHALLOW BURY DRAIN LINE &ROUTE TO RG #1 (HEAT TAPE RECOMMENDED) DAYLIGHT 3" SHALLOW BURYDRAIN LINE INTO RG #1. PROVIDE RODENT SCREEN &OUTFALL PROTECTION DOWNSPOUT TO DAYLIGHT @SURFACE. FLOWS TO BE ROUTEDTO RG #1 VIA OVERLAND FLOW FLOWS ROUTED IN LANDSCAPE SWALE &PASSED THROUGH DRAIN PIPE INSTALLEDWITHIN RG #2 (RAISED PLANTER) ROOFTOPPATIO EGRESS WELL (DRAIN TO GRAVEL ENVELOPE BELOW FOOTERS) EGRESS WELL (DRAIN TO GRAVELENVELOPE BELOW FOOTERS) 78 9 7 . 0 OPRIS E NGINEERING, LLC. CIVIL CONSULTANTS 31004.01JOB NO. DATE: 502 MAIN STREETCARBONDALE, CO 81623(970) 704-0311FAX: (970)-704-0313 DATE REVISION C-3 DRAWING NO. TITLE G: \ 2 0 2 1 \ 3 1 0 0 4 - 2 0 2 E M A I N S T \ C I V I L \ C I V I L D W G S \ P L O T \ 3 1 0 0 4 P L O T . D W G - M a r 1 9 , 2 0 2 1 - 9 : 1 8 a m NORTH CONCEPTUALWATER QUALITYPLAN 20 2 E . M A I N S T R E E T AS P E N , C O CO N C E P T U A L W A T E R Q U A L I T Y P L A N HP C F I N A L A P P R O V A L 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 05 5 10 5 202.5 PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR (0.5-FT INTERVAL) PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR INTERVAL (1-FT INTERVAL) PROPOSED STORM SEWER 7900 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SWALE>>>> PROPOSED FLOW ARROW POST DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE BASIN POST DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE LEGENDRAIN GARDEN DESIGN SUMMARY TABLE NOTE: THESE PLANS ARE CONCEPTUAL OR ILLUSTRATIVE IN NATURE. PRECISE INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED ASPART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION, AND IN SITUATIONS WHERE THE FINAL HPC PLANS ANDAPPROVED BUILDING PERMIT DIFFER, THE APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT SHALL RULE. EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING WATER MAINXWLXWL EXISTING LEGEND PROPOSED SAWCUT PROPOSED FULL DEPTH ASPHALT PROPOSED 2" MILLING & ASPHALT OVERLAY PROPOSED CONCRETE EXISTING ASPHALT EXISTING CONCRETE NOTES: 1. FINAL WATER QUALITY TREATMENT DESIGN & CALCULATIONS TO BE PROVIDED IN SUPPORT OFFUTURE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. 2. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA OF SITE: 2,130± sf 3. POST DEVELOPMENT IMPERVIOUS AREA: 1,908± sf4. APPROX. 170± SF OF IMPERVIOUS AREA WILL LEAVE SITE UNTREATED AS NOTED ON THE PLAN 03-26-2021 3-26-2021 FINAL HPC SUBMITTAL 7900.50 PROPOSED WATER QUALITYTREATMENT RAIN GARDEN EXISTING CONTOUR (1-FT INTERVAL) REDUCED FOR ATTACHMENT TO REPORT 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 phone: (970) 945-7988 fax: (970) 945-8454 email: kaglenwood@kumarusa.com www.kumarusa.com Office Locations: Denver (HQ), Parker, Colorado Springs, Fort Collins, Glenwood Springs, and Summit County, Colorado SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED BASEMENT ADDITION 202 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO PROJECT NO. 21-7-136 FEBRUARY 22, 2021 PREPARED FOR: 202 E MAIN ST, LLC ATTN: JOSH WHALEN 2610 EAST CEDAR AVENUE DENVER, COLORADO 80209 josh@kineticmedicalgroup.com Kumar & Associates, Inc. ® Project No. 21-7-136 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ....................................................................................... - 1 - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ................................................................................................ - 1 - SITE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................... - 1 - FIELD EXPLORATION ............................................................................................................ - 1 - SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................. - 2 - FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS .............................................................................. - 2 - DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................ - 3 - FOUNDATIONS .................................................................................................................... - 3 - FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS ....................................................................... - 4 - FLOOR SLABS ...................................................................................................................... - 5 - UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM ..................................................................................................... - 6 - DRYWELL ............................................................................................................................. - 6 - SURFACE DRAINAGE ......................................................................................................... - 6 - LIMITATIONS ........................................................................................................................... - 7 - FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 2 - LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 3 – SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 4 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS TABLE 2 - PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS Kumar & Associates, Inc. ® Project No. 21-7-136 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed basement addition to an existing residence located at 202 East Main Street, Aspen, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our proposal for geotechnical engineering services to 202 E Main St, LLC dated January 13, 2021. A field exploration program consisting of an exploratory boring was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed basement addition will be within most of the lot area and about 12 feet deep. The existing historic residence will be removed for the basement construction then replaced along with other 2-story addition areas. Ground floors will be slab-on-grade. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The subject site was developed with a single-story residence at the time of our field exploration. The project site is relatively flat and gently sloping down to the north at a grade of about 5% or less. Vegetation consists of landscaped bushes, trees and lawn. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on February11, 2021. One exploratory boring was drilled off the alley at the location shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface - 2 - Kumar & Associates, Inc. ® Project No. 21-7-136 conditions. The boring was advanced with 4-inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck-mounted CME-45B drill rig. The boring was logged by a representative of Kumar & Associates, Inc. A second proposed boring in the front, south side was not accessible to the drill rig at the time of our study. Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1⅜ inch and 2-inch I.D. spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Log of Exploratory Boring, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS A graphic log of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site is shown on Figure 2. The subsoils, below about 4 feet of mixed clay and sand fill soils, consist of about 3 feet of stiff sandy clay overlying dense, slightly silty to silty sand and gravel with cobbles to the drilled depth of about 16 feet. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the boring included natural moisture content and density and gradation analyses. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on a sample of sandy clay, shown on Figure 3, indicate low to moderate compressibility under conditions of loading and wetting. The results of gradation analyses performed on small diameter drive samples (minus 1½-inch fraction) of the coarse granular subsoils are shown on Figure 4. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table 1. Free water was not encountered in the boring at the time of drilling and the soils were slightly moist to moist. FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS The fill soils encountered in the upper 4 feet are variable density and unsuitable for support of the proposed addition. The underlying silty sand and gravel soils possess moderate bearing capacity and typically low settlement potential. At basement excavation depth, we expect the subgrade to consist of the sand and gravel subsoils. Spread footings should be suitable for - 3 - Kumar & Associates, Inc. ® Project No. 21-7-136 foundation support of the basement addition. We should observe the building excavation for bearing conditions and the need to sub-excavate fill and clay soils. The City of Aspen requires an engineered excavation stabilization plan if proposed foundations are within 15 feet of a neighboring structure or public travel way. The plan is not required if excavations are less than 5 feet below existing grades or further than 15 feet from travel ways and less than 15 feet deep. Slope bracing through use of a variety of systems such as soil nails, micro-piles or drilled soldier pile and lagging should be feasible at the site. A shoring contractor should provide design drawings to support the proposed excavation slopes. Other City requirements may also be applicable. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory boring and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building addition be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural granular soils. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 3,500 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 42 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist - 4 - Kumar & Associates, Inc. ® Project No. 21-7-136 lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) The existing fill, clay soil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the relatively dense natural granular soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then be moistened and compacted. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site granular soils. Walls taller than 12 feet should be designed to resist a uniform horizontal earth pressure of 25H in psf for wall height H in feet. Cantilevered retaining structures (if any) which are separate from the addition and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 40 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site granular soils. Backfill should not contain organics, debris or rock larger than about 6 inches. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill placed in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall - 5 - Kumar & Associates, Inc. ® Project No. 21-7-136 backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.50. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 400 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be a granular material compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil and fill, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab- on-grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4-inch layer of free- draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2-inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on- site granular soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. We recommend vapor retarders conform to at least the minimum requirements of ASTM E1745 Class C material. Certain floor types are more sensitive to water vapor transmission than others. For floor slabs bearing on angular gravel or where flooring system sensitive to water vapor transmission are utilized, we recommend a vapor barrier be utilized conforming to the minimum - 6 - Kumar & Associates, Inc. ® Project No. 21-7-136 requirements of ASTM E1745 Class A material. The vapor retarder should be installed in accordance with the manufacturers’ recommendations and ASTM E1643. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet, drywell or sump and pump. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1½ feet deep. DRYWELL Drywells and bio-swales are often used in the Aspen area for site water runoff detention and disposal. The natural granular soils encountered below the fill and clay soils are typically relatively free draining and should be suitable for surface water treatment and disposal. The results of percolation testing performed in Boring 1, presented in Table 2, indicate an infiltration rate of about 2 minutes per inch (equivalent inverted units rate of 30 inches per hour). The groundwater and bedrock depths are generally known to be relatively deep in this area and should not affect the drywell design. If a drywell is used, it should have solid casing down to at least basement floor level with perforations below that level and located at least 10 feet from the building foundation. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the addition has been completed: - 7 - Kumar & Associates, Inc. ® Project No. 21-7-136 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 2½ inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be covered with filter fabric and capped with at least 2 feet of the on-site finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at least 5 feet from foundation walls. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory boring drilled at the location indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory boring and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we -8- should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on -site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. SLP/kac cc: Boss Architecture — Ana White (ana(wbossarch.com Kumar & Associates, Inc. Project No. 21-7-136 Kumar & Associates Kumar & Associates Kumar & Associates Kumar & Associates TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Project No. 21-7-136 SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT NATURAL DRY DENSITY GRADATION PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SOIL TYPE BORING DEPTH GRAVEL SAND LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC INDEX (%) (%) (ft) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (psf) 1 4 21.4 101 74 Sandy Clay 10 and 15 combined 3.1 36 51 13 Silty Sand and Gravel TABLE 2 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS PROJECT NO. 21-7-136 HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN) WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL (INCHES) DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN./INCH) B-1 120 2 26 22 4 0.5 22 18½ 3½ 0.6 18½ 17 1½ 1.3 17 15½ 1½ 1.3 15½ 14½ 1 2 14½ 13½ 1 2 13½ 12½ 1 2 12½ 11½ 1 2 Note: The percolation test was conducted in the completed 4-inch diameter borehole on February 11, 2021. FLAMEOUT FIRE PROTECTION, Inc. P.O. Box 1296 Basalt, CO 81621 Phone (970) 927-4933 spencer@flameoutfire.net flameoutfire.net February 17, 2021 Boss Architecture 2546 15th Street Denver, CO 80211 OWNER: 202 Main St, LLC. 2610 Cedar Drive Denver, CO 80209 RE: Residence 202 E Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 Attn: Ana White It is my recommendation that a 2” water service (piping) be installed into the new residence to adequately supply the required pressure and gallons per minute (gpm) for the new fire sprinkler system as well to meet the secondary domestic use. My recommendation is based on current water flow information supplied by Aspen Fire District and preliminary hydraulic fire sprinkler calculations. We assume the fire hazard per NFPA 13D, applicable code per the IFC and Aspen Fire District Amendments. Smaller water supply piping will be inadequate for this project. **DISCLAIMER**: The above statement is to establish water source pipe sizing only. In no way should this be used solely to determine any fire sprinkler design or to be used for any approvals for fire sprinkler system design Best Regards, Spencer Boothe Vice President Flame Out Fire Protection, Inc. Tree Assessments 202 E. Main Street Aspen, Colorado Prepared By: Chris Forman ISA Board Certified Master Arborist #RM-2352BM February 26, 2021 15450 Hwy 82, Carbondale CO 81623 (970) 963-3070 1 | Page SUMMARY Bluegreen Landscape Architects, representatives of the property at 202 E. Main Street in Aspen, CO, asked Aspen Tree Service (ATS) to conduct an assessment of 2 narrowleaf cottonwoods (Populus angustifolia) located in the right of way adjacent to his property. In addition, they asked for an assessment of one other tree on the property, a subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa) growing in the front lawn area of the site. The cottonwood trees show visible windows of internal decay in their trunks and within their canopies. The subalpine fir has been severely pruned, resulting in the loss of approximately 70% of its canopy. On February 21, 2021, ATS performed the evaluations of the trees. I conducted inspections from the ground using binoculars, diameter tape, a sounding mallet, resistograph, and iPhone camera. Cottonwood tree #1, the furthest to the west in the right of way, is in overall Poor condition and is suggested for removal within the next 6 months. Cottonwood tree #2 is in Fair condition and is suggested that pruning is conducted within the next 3-6 months to address existing hazards within its canopy. Tree #3 is a subalpine fir in Poor condition and is suggested for removal prior to redevelopment efforts begin on the property. Any and all recommendations provided in this report pertaining to the cottonwood trees on the right of way must be approved by the City Forester. He may or may not support these suggestions based upon his professional evaluation of the trees. The removal suggestion for the subalpine fir must also be approved by the City Forester or his designee through the City of Aspen’s tree removal process. INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND The property located at 202 E. Main Street in Aspen, CO has 2 mature cottonwood trees within the City Right of Way, adjacent to the southern property boundary. In addition, there is one subalpine fir within the property boundary at this address. These trees are listed on the inventory sheet attached to this report (Attachment A). The property owner’s development team indicated to the owner that these cottonwood trees are overmature and potentially have health/structural issues, which led to the development team reaching out to ATS to perform an inspection of the trees. Since the trees are in the right of way, I contacted the City Forester to obtain approval to access the trees for my evaluations. He agreed to this request, and joined me during the site assessments on February 23, 2021. I conducted a ground-based inspection of the 2 mature cottonwoods, and shared my initial findings with the City Forester while we were on site together. The trees are owned by the City of Aspen, therefore any management decisions for treatment must be approved by the City of Aspen Forester or his designee. SITE DESCRIPTION The site is located along Main Street in Aspen, Colorado. The cottonwoods are growing in a 5’ planting strip between the sidewalk and Main Street. The fir tree is located in the irrigated turf comprising the front yard, between the sidewalk and the single-story commercial building on site. This is a very busy part of Aspen, with frequent vehicular and pedestrian traffic. There are parking spaces along Main Street, within the drip lines of the cottonwood trees. 2 | Page ASSIGNMENT Aspen Tree Service has been asked by the property owner to provide the following services and deliverables: • Evaluate the aforementioned cottonwoods for structural condition and overall health/vigor • Utilize resistance drilling technology to investigate internal decay • Capture data on the one other tree within the property boundaries • Create a report of findings L IMITS OF THE ASSIGNMENT Soil excavation was not done to inspect any root issues below grade. Pruning records were not readily available to determine if any previous work had been done to the trees in the right of way. Pruning has occurred in the past as evidenced by old pruning wounds, but determining previous pruning prescriptions were not defined as part of this assignment. The trees were dormant at the time of this assessment, therefore leaf size and color were not factored into any conclusions of overall health. PURPOSE & USE OF REPORT The purpose of this report is to provide current information regarding the overall health and structural integrity of the cottonwood trees and to provide basic information pertaining to the fir tree within the property boundary. It is intended to be used by the property owner and development team as an informative reference for development planning. The findings in this assessment can help guide the property representatives’ conversations with the City of Aspen Parks Department should the owner request these trees to be pruned, removed, or other arboricultural management action. OBSERVATIONS TREE OBSERVATIONS The cottonwood trees identified in this report have diameters at breast height (DBH) of 28 inches (west tree, #1) and 30 inches (east tree, #2). They are mature trees growing within the irrigated turf area of the City Right of Way, between the sidewalk and curb along Main Street. Tree #1 has a large open window of decay at the base of its trunk on the north side of the tree. The open window comprises approximately 35-40% of the circumference of the trunk and measures 2 ½ feet in height, 14 inches in width. Reaction wood has developed as a result of this decay pocket. The tree’s canopy is comprised of a central leader with 3 large scaffold branches extending to the north and south. Canopy growth to the east has been suppressed by the adjacent cottonwood. Significant dieback within the canopy of this tree was noted, as well as several broken/hanging branches measuring 3-4 inches in diameter. One of the main scaffold branches growing to the north is 60% dead and has a decay pocket evidenced by a bird hole approximately half way out the branch from the trunk on the west side of the branch. Another large decay pocket exists in the central leader of this tree, just above the highest scaffold branch growing out to the south over Main Street. A large codominant branch, approximately 12 inches in diameter, was removed at this location on the tree sometime in the past. It is unknown if the decay at this location was caused by the pruning wound or if the decay existed prior. 3 | Page Tree #2 has a large open window of decay at the base of its trunk on the north side as well. The open window is not as severe as tree #1, but measures approximately 20 inches in height, 15 inches wide, and comprises about 20% of the trunk’s circumference. Reaction wood is evident around this wound. This tree has 2 main stems forming the canopy. These 2 codominant stems form a union approximately 15’ above grade. The northern stem has been suppressed by the upper canopy of the tree, and has a drooping growth habit with the majority of leaf growth located at the extremities of its branches. The southern codominant stem forms the upper canopy of the tree and has a pocket of decay, similar to tree #1. This decay pocket is approximately 45-50’ above grade, just above the only large scaffold branch extending to the south. As with tree #1, a pruning wound exists at this point of decay, and may or may not have caused the decay. Wound wood has formed around this decay pocket to support the tree canopy growing above this defect. Tree #3 is a subalpine fir with a diameter of 11 inches. This tree has been limbed up, with the lower 60-70% of the tree’s height void of any live branches. TESTING AND ANALYSIS Measurements were taken for tree sizes using a diameter tape and trunk wounding was measured with a standard tape measure. Areas of the trunk with body language indicating possible internal decay was sound tested with a mallet. I measured decay with the resistograph in the trunk where the open windows of decay exist. I drilled the tree 3 times at sites listed above. The azimuth of the drillings was recorded and shown in the attached readings located in the Photos section of this report. Three drillings at each site was adequate to provide a cross section of internal decay. DISCUSSION There are many targets within the footprint of the cottonwood trees should they, or any of their parts, fail. Pedestrian and vehicular traffic, along with residential parking and the adjacent homes are all located within the tree’s canopy. The canopy growth is normal for this species and age class of narrowleaf cottonwood in Aspen, CO, when adjacent to other mature trees. Trunk defects, decay, dieback, and poor branch attachments are the main points of concern for the 2 cottonwoods. After the sound testing described above, I utilized a resistograph to further investigate the presence of internal decay just above grade level in both cottonwoods. This tool drills a small diameter (1.5mm) hole into the tree and measures the resistance of the wood fiber as it penetrates further into the tree. Three drill tests were taken at the base of tree #1 and 2 drill tests were taken at the base of tree #2. Drilling towards the center of the tree as accurately as possible was the focus for each site to achieve an accurate measurement. A needle positioned on top of this tool provides a graphical depiction on graph paper of the tree’s resistance to the drilling procedure. The needle travels higher on the graph paper when solid wood is present. The needle drops to lower levels on the graph paper when decay is encountered. The needle falls to the very bottom of the graph paper when there is zero resistance, as with open cavities in the tree. Tree #1 Drill Test The drill locations were approximately 12 inches above grade, with tests taken at azimuths of 45, 270, and 360 degrees. The tree’s diameter measures 30.5 inches at the point where drill testing was conducted. Graphical 4 | Page depictions for each drill test are shown on individual sheets of graph paper as seen in the photos section of this document. The first drill test was done from an azimuth of 45 degrees. The resistograph output shows the first 1.5 inches of drilling to have very little resistance, which is to be expected as it penetrates the bark layer of the tree. Once through the bark layer, the drilling resulted in about 6 inches of sound wood before hitting an internal decay pocket. This decay pocket is shown by the resistograph needle dropping to the bottom of the graph paper and continuing at this very low resistance trajectory for 6 more inches towards the center of the tree. At this point, drilling was stopped and the drill needle was removed from the tree. The second drill test was done from an azimuth of 270 degrees. The same process was repeated as described above with very similar results. The only difference was that this drill test resulted in a 2-inch thick bark layer and 6.5 inches of sound wood before the needle fell to the bottom of the graph and continued at that level into the pith of the tree. The third drill test was done from an azimuth of 360 degrees. The same process was repeated as described above with very similar results. The only difference was that this drill test resulted in 8.5 inches of sound wood before the needle fell to the bottom of the graph and continued at that level. Though drill testing resulted in significant internal decay, the formation of reaction wood and the tree’s limited canopy does not indicate the tree is likely to fail due to this structural defect under normal weather conditions. Canopy and Overall Health Information This tree has significant dieback within the canopy as noted in previous section(s). The decay pocket in the scaffold branch growing out to the north, towards the commercial building, is approximately 60% dead with visible decay pockets. The decay pocket in the main stem within the canopy is a likely point of failure. A significant amount of the tree’s canopy exists above this point. Reducing the amount of weight in the upper canopy is not a viable option due the limited amount of live foliage in the canopy as a whole. The amount of pruning needed to reduce the hazard would have detrimental impacts to the tree’s already declining overall poor health status. There are several broken/hanging branches in the canopy of this tree, hanging over the sidewalk and parking spaces along Main Street. This tree is declining in health as evidenced by the amount of dieback in the canopy, and is in overall poor condition. This tree is no longer an asset to the landscape and community forest, and is in fact, in its current condition a hazard to the targets within its dripline. Tree #2 Drill Test The drill locations were approximately 12 inches above grade, with tests taken at azimuths of 95 and 270 degrees. The tree’s diameter measures 34 inches at the point where drill testing was conducted. Graphical depictions for each drill test are shown on individual sheets of graph paper as seen in the photos section of this document. The first drill test at this location was done from an azimuth of 95 degrees. Drill testing resulted in about 1.5 inches of bark layer, 12 inches of sound wood, then decay for the next 3 inches (maximum drill length). The second drill test was done from an azimuth of 270 degrees. The same process was repeated as described above with very similar results. The only difference was that this drill test resulted in 11 inches of sound wood before the needle fell to the bottom of the graph and continued at that level for another 4 inches. 5 | Page The amount of reaction/sound wood vs. the amount of internal decay in this tree does not indicate that tree failure is likely at this defect in the trunk under normal weather conditions. Canopy and Overall Health Information This tree has a codominant structure within the canopy as noted in previous section(s). This defect can be a problem over time with the formation of bark inclusion at the point of codominance. Bark inclusion is not a point of concern at this point and the upright nature of the codominant stems lessens the likelihood of stem failure at this defect. The branch tips of the north codominant stem are heavy and growing downward, away from the overarching upper canopy of the tree. The decay pocket in the main stem within the canopy is a likely point of failure. A significant amount of the tree’s canopy exists above this point. Reducing the amount of weight in the upper canopy, above the decay pocket, is a viable option to reduce the likelihood of failure within the canopy. There are several broken/hanging branches in the canopy of this tree, hanging over the sidewalk and parking spaces along Main Street. This tree is a typical overmature narrowleaf cottonwood that will likely begin to decline in health over the next 5-10 years. This tree is in overall fair condition. It is a likely candidate for retrenchment pruning within 5 years, or at minimum, minor reduction pruning in the codominant stems to reduce the likelihood of structural failure within the canopy. Tree #3 This is an 11-inch diameter subalpine fir in the front yard of the property. This tree has been ‘limbed up’ significantly and has drastically diminished the aesthetic and overall health of the tree. Subalpine fir trees have a growth habit such that live branches and foliage extend from the top all the way to ground level. This tree has lost about 60-70% of its canopy and will decline in overall health due to this drastic pruning. The tree is in poor condition. CONCLUSSIONS The cottonwood trees in the right of way have several defects within their trunks and canopies. Tree #1 is in poor condition and is currently a liability within the community forest. Tree #2 is in fair condition and will likely decline in overall health within the next 5-10 years under normal weather conditions. Tree #3 is a subalpine fir on private property and is in poor condition due to the excessive pruning it has received. RECOMMENDATIONS Tree #1 should be considered for removal within the next 6 months. Pruning to address the defects may result in a reduction in risk factors, but the tree will negatively respond to the amount of pruning required to address the issues within its canopy. The tree will likely rapidly decline in overall health, making the pruning a less than worthwhile expense. Tree #2 should be scheduled for crown reduction and deadwood pruning within the next 3-6 months to reduce the likelihood of branches impacting targets within the tree’s dripline. I would advise a monitoring plan be developed for this tree that would incorporate annual inspections for structural integrity within the canopy and trunk. In addition to annual inspections, an assessment of the tree after major wind and/or snow loading events is advised. Tree #3 should be removed based upon its current condition and inability to recover from the drastic pruning measures it has suffered. All recommendations pertaining to the cottonwood trees within the right of way are suggestions based upon my findings are not to be implemented without the consent of the City Forester or his designee. All removals suggested in this report must be approved by the City Forester through the City of Aspen Tree Removal Permit Process. 6 | Page PHOTOS Photo 1. Cottonwood trees evaluated in right of way 7 | Page Photo 2. Cottonwood #1; dying branch to north, decay in trunk in canopy 8 | Page Photo 3. Cottonwood #1; Decay in trunk; location of resistograph drilling 9 | Page Photo 4. Cottonwood #2; Codominant growth; heavy branch tips; decay in stem within canopy 10 | Page Photo 5. Cottonwood #2; Decay in trunk, location of resistograph drilling 11 | Page Photo 6. Subalpine fir, tree #3; Excessive pruning. Photo courtesy of Google Street View 12 | Page Photo 7. Resistograph drilling results for Tree #1 Bark Sound Wood Decay 13 | Page Photo 8. Resistograph drilling results for Tree #2 Bark Sound Wood Decay 202 E. Main Street Tree Inventory Aspen Tree Service February, 2021 Tree ID#Species # of Stems DBH Mitigation Value Suggested Mitigation Value Condition Comments 1 Narrowleaf cottonwood 1 28 $ 27,694.80 $ - Poor Declining health; dead/dying scaffold branches; decay in main stem in canopy 2 Narrowleaf cottonwood 2 30 31,292.50$ 15,646.25$ Fair Codominant growth habit; decay in main stem in canopy 3 Subalpine fir 1 11 $ 4,274.32 $ - Poor Severely limbed up Page 1of 1 Attachment A March 19, 2021 Sheri Sanzone 300 South Spring Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: 202 E. Main Street Tree Root Assessments Dear Sheri: This letter is in response to the evaluations of the 2 narrowleaf cottonwood trees (Populus angustifolia) located within the right of way at 202 E. Main Street in Aspen. Specifically, this letter speaks to the pneumatic excavation (air spading) conduced on March 12, 2021 to evaluate the root structure of these 2 trees and how they may influence redevelopment activities at 202 E. Main Street. We air spaded 2 trenches on the north side of the public sidewalk, one on the east side of the walkway leading into the property, the other on the west side of the same walkway. Both trenches ran parallel to the public sidewalk and both were within 12-15 inches from the northern edge of the sidewalk. Each trench was 7-10 feet in length. The soils were somewhat frozen, but our excavation efforts were able to removed soil to a depth of 12 inches. Photos of the trenches are attached to this letter report. Once the trenches were created, I conducted an inspection of the exposed roots. The eastern most trench revealed several small diameter fibrous roots and only one root measuring 1” in diameter. The western trench showed similar fibrous root masses, though 3 roots were exposed that measured 2 inches in diameter. After the inspection, the trenches were filled in with topsoil to original grade. The City Forester, David Coon, was present during my inspection of the exposed trenches. We agreed that excavation north of the excavated trenches would not be detrimental to the structural integrity of either of the 2 cottonwood trees within the right of way. If excavation along the trenched area is required by future development, I suggest creating a tree protection plan for the 2 cottonwoods. This plan would define supplemental irrigation regimes, growth regulator treatment prior to excavation, plant health care visits for insect/disease detection, physical protection measures to prevent mechanical wounding and/or soil compaction, and root pruning measures to reduce desiccation. In summary, the 2 trenches exposed sections of the root systems of the cottonwood trees located on the adjacent right of way. Based upon my inspection, coupled with the City Forester’s comments while on site, excavation at or north of the air spaded trenches could be possible with appropriate tree preservation efforts in place. Sincerely, Chris Forman Board Certified Master Arborist #RM-2352BM Photo 1. East and west trenches created along the north edge of the public sidewalk Photo 2. East trench showing small diameter fibrous roots with (1) larger root measuring approximately 1” diameter. Photo 3. West trench showing (3) larger roots measuring 2-2.5” diameter along with smaller fibrous roots Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 08:23:47 Mountain Daylight Time Page 1 of 7 Subject:RE: 202 E Main Street Aspen - HPC development applica<on Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 1:34:26 PM Mountain Standard Time From:Sarah Yoon To:Ana White CC:Chris Davis, Kevin Stephenson, Dave RinĀ ger AFachments:image028.png, image029.png, image030.png, image035.png, image036.png, image037.png, image042.png, image043.png, image044.png, image049.png, image050.png, image051.png, image004.png, image005.png, image006.png, image003.png, image007.png, image008.png, image009.png, image010.png, image011.png, image012.png, image013.png, image014.png, image015.png, image016.png, 202EMain_MajorDevelopment_2021.pdf Hello Ana, First, I have aWached the preapplica<on summary for the Final Design Review. To be clear, we will need to declare the applica<on complete prior to Friday, April 9th, 2021. I would suggest genĀ g the applica<on to staff at least 1 week in advance of this deadline date in case staff iden<fies missing items in the applica<on. The following comments are in response to your ques<ons from our last conversa<on: Fenestra<on Changes to the historic home: given the projects scope for restora<on and its <e to the bonus, staff finds feels the ask for crea<ng new openings, such as the skylight, may be a difficult discussion. Maintaining an exis<ng non-historic condi<on is possible but new openings on a historic resource may be a challenge. Changes to the connector, window well, loggia feature, stairs: since these changes are associated with constructability and do not alter the approved mass and scale of the addi<on, it is s<ll within the scope of Final Review. Sunken interior space of the historic home: so long as the exterior condi<ons of the historic home maintain the historic grade to founda<on rela<onship, this will not be an issue. Curb heights along the connector: it will not be necessary to pull up the curb heights for this feature to give the connector the visual appearance of a single story due to the site condi<ons. Exterior material changes to addi<on: as we discussed, it will be important to maintain the rela<onship of material and fenestra<on for the addi<on since the form clearly deviates from the historic home. This is not to say that material and fenestra<on need to replicate the historic house but they need to relate using metrics such as dimensions and ra<os. Please see Design Guideline 10.6 for more detailed language. Thank you and let me know if you have any ques<ons, -Sarah- Sarah Yoon Community Development Department Historic Preservation Planner 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 Office: 970.920.5144 Cell: 970.319.0720 www.cityofaspen.com www.aspencommunityvoice.com www.aspenvictorian.com www.aspenmod.com To promote the health and safety of our staff and community and to minimize the spread of COVID-19, Community Development staffare conducting business by email and phone and are only available in person by appointment. Contact information for our entire staffand how best to get the services you need can be found on our website: cityofaspen.com/177/Community-Development. Thank you foryour understanding. Pitkin County’s Recovery Plan for COVID-19 to make Aspen safer and healthier means we all must follow the five commitments of containment: 1. I will maintain six feet of distance from anyone not in my household 2. I will wash my hands often 3. I will cover my face in public 4. I will stay home when I’m sick 5. I will seek testing immediately and self-report if I experience symptoms More at https://covid19.pitkincounty.com/ Notice and Disclaimer: This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error and then delete it. Further, the information or opinions contained in this email are advisory in nature only and are not binding on the City of Aspen. If applicable, the information and opinions contained in the email are based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The opinions and information contained herein do not create a legal or vested right or any claim of detrimental reliance. From: Ana White <ana@bossarch.com> Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 8:33 AM To: Sarah Yoon <sarah.yoon@cityofaspen.com> Cc: Chris Davis <chris@bossarch.com>; Kevin Stephenson <kevin@bossarch.com>; Dave RinĀ ger <dave@bossarch.com> Subject: Re: 202 E Main Street Aspen - HPC development applica<on Good morning Sarah, We hope you had a nice weekend ! Page 2 of 7 We wanted to follow up on the proposed changes for 202 E Main St. Do you know when we might expect city comments back? Any update would be appreciated as we keep pushing the project forward. Thank you, Ana -- From: Ana White <ana@bossarch.com> Date: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 at 6:53 PM To: Sarah Yoon <sarah.yoon@cityofaspen.com> Cc: Chris Davis <chris@bossarch.com>, Kevin Stephenson <kevin@bossarch.com>, Dave RinĀ ger <dave@bossarch.com> Subject: Re: 202 E Main Street Aspen - HPC development applica<on Dear Sarah, Please see aWached revised plans and 3D proposed images for 202 E Main St. Our proposed revisions come from certain challenges on site- mainly due to grading, and stair loca<ons. Our plans show in detail the changes made from the previously submiWed documents by Jake Vickery. A few technical points to note: 1. The proposed window well in the SW corner of the property cannot be built to meet egress code in that loca<on due to the limits of shoring. We have proposed an alternate loca<on for this window well, that is en<rely screened by the resource. 2. The house’s main stair in the ini<al proposal does not actually work as drawn. To accommodate actual grade and the split level living condi<on, we have had to adjust the width of the connector to make this stair meet building code. We have maintained all finish floor eleva<ons and maximum building height and only changed the width of the connector (from 5’-0” to 6’-3”). 3. Due to the stair challenges we are proposing a new stair to the roof, that we believe is less visible, and as a spiral staircase, takes up considerably less room than the original proposed stair. 4. Loggia at garage has also been updated to accommodate a full-length car spot as recommended by the HPC in their review comments. 5. None of the changes we are proposing effect any of the setbacks or maximum building height limita<ons. The FAR for the property is well under the maximum limit. 6. There are a number of addi<onal details that we’re proposing that are labeled on the plans and shown on the 3D model images for your review. The aWached images show the exis<ng resource with the proposed changes, and material tests for the new addi<on. While we know the final HPC mee<ng requires material and window details, we hope these images can be a conversa<on starter with you and the HPC board. All materials proposed are directly related to the materials found on the historic resource. Please let us know if you have any ques<ons while reviewing and we look forward to speaking with you on Friday. Thanks, Ana + BOSS architecture team -- From: Sarah Yoon <sarah.yoon@cityofaspen.com> Date: Monday, January 25, 2021 at 10:48 AM To: Ana White <ana@bossarch.com> Cc: Chris Davis <chris@bossarch.com>, Kevin Stephenson <kevin@bossarch.com>, Jeff Halferty <jeffreyhalfertydesign@gmail.com> Subject: RE: 202 E Main Street Aspen - HPC development applica<on Hi Ana, If you can send me the preliminary informa<on you are working on, I will take a closer look with staff to see if it exceeds the scope of the original approval. Please note that the Conceptual approval locks in the overall mass/form and site planning for the project. Thank you, -Sarah-