HomeMy WebLinkAbout205 W. Main Street_Presentation_11.16.22205 W. Main Street
Conceptual Major Development | Relocation| GMQS | Certificates of Affordable Housing Credits |
Special Review | Transportation & Parking Management
11111
CITY OFASPEN
PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION
PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION
NORTH 10’
EAST 10’
PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION
CONDITION
RELATED TO
RELOCATION
To relocate the house on the site, the Applicant shall provide a financial security deposit of $30,000 at the time of permit issuance. The submission shall include details on how the relocation will occur. Upon making a determination that the home was successfully placed on the new foundation, staff shall return the deposit to the Applicant.
CONDITION
RELATED TO
RESTORATION
The over-framed roof
condition at the rear of the
historic house, must be
removed along with the non-
historic additions.
CONDITIONS
RELATED TO SITE
PLAN
•The width of the front walkway and step
leading to the Victorian shall be narrowed to
approximately three (3) feet . Landscaping
should be simplified, and the delineation of
private outdoor space for adjacent dwelling
units should be clarified. A revised site plan
shall be included at Final Review to represent
these changes.
•The built-in BBQ represented in the shared
courtyard cannot be located between a street
and a structure. It will need to be
repositioned, eliminated, or made movable to
meet this requirement.
CONDITIONS
RELATED TO SITE
PLAN
•The westernmost piece of the carport roof
must be redesigned to eliminate any setback
violation.
•The footprint of the proposed lightwell at
southwest corner of the Victorian shall be
reduced or broken into two lightwells without
negatively impacting those spaces. Lightwells
around the historic resource shall be covered
with grates, not railings. Lightwells and
similar features abutting the historic
structures shall have a curb height of six (6)
inches or less to minimize visual and/or
physical impacts to the historic resource.
CONDITION
RELATED TO
STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT
A fully developed stormwater
management plan shall be
provided before an
application is accepted for
Final Review.
Response to HPC Direction
Original Proposal
Option 1
(Per HPC Feedback)
Option 2
Alternative
Response to HPC Direction
Original Proposal
Option 1
(Per HPC Feedback)
Option 2
Alternative
Response to HPC Direction
Original Proposal
Option 1
(Per HPC Feedback)
Option 2
Alternative
Proposed Development
Bldg. A
(Landmark)Bldg. B
(New Bldg.)
Bldg. C
(New Bldg.)
Parking Area
2 Units4 Units
3 Units
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Affordable Housing Credits Generated
23.8 FTEs
APCHA Standards
Unit Type Mitigation Standard
One Bedroom 1.75 FTEs
Two-Bedroom 2.25 FTEs
Three-Bedroom 3.00 FTEs
Proposed Certificates (within new buildings) Total
One Bedroom 1 unit x 1.75 FTEs 1.75 FTEs
Two Bedroom 3 Units X 2.25 FTEs 6.75 FTEs
Three Bedroom 3 Units x 3.00 FTEs 9 FTEs
Total Proposed 17.5 FTEs
Proposed Development
Bldg. A
(Landmark)
Beds Lower
Level (sf)
1st Level
(sf)
2nd Level
(sf)
Total
(sf)
Min.
(sf)
Difference
(sf)
% Below
Grade
Unit 1 3 482 415 276 1,173 1,200 27 below 41%
Unit 2 2 428 394 X 822 900 78 below 52%
Bldg. C
(Addition)
Beds Lower
Level (sf)
1st Level
(sf)
2nd Level
(sf)
3rd Level
(sf)
Total
(sf)
Min.
(sf)
Difference
(sf)
% Below
Grade
Unit 7 2 442 422 X X 864 900 36 below 51%
Unit 8 3 X X 1,176 X 1,176 1,200 24 below X
Unit 9 3 X X X 1,048 1,048 1,200 152 below X
Unit 6 2 X X X 866 866 900 34 below X 1 561561 139 below700Unit 6
(Option 1)
Unit 6 2 X X X 866 866 900 34 below X 1 641641 59 below700Unit 6
(Option 2)
Special Review for Subgrade Area
•Significant storage space is located outside the unit
More than 50% of livable area per dwelling unit may be
located below grade if:
External Storage
Location External
Storage
Units
External
Storage
Unit Size
Total
External
Storage
Basement 3 11 sq. ft. 33 sq. ft.
Level 1 2 13 sq. ft. 26. sq. ft.
Level 2 2 18 sq. ft. 36 sq. ft.
Level 3 2 21 sq. ft 42 sq. ft.
Total 9 X 137 sq. ft.
•Above average natural light, i.e., more windows than
required by code,
Special Review for Subgrade Area
More than 50% of livable area per dwelling unit may be
located below grade if:
Window Wells
Key
Unit 2 52% below grade
Unit 3 52% below grade
Unit 4 54% below grade
Unit 7 51% below grade
•Efficient, flexible layout with limited hall and staircase
space is provided.
Special Review for Subgrade Area
More than 50% of livable area per dwelling unit may be
located below grade if:
•Availability of site amenities, such as pool or proximity
to park or open space is provided.
Special Review for Subgrade Area
More than 50% of livable area per dwelling unit may be
located below grade if:
205
4 min
0.2 miles
ZlJklt1d
000
Transportation & Parking
The Mixed- Use Zone District requires one parking unit
per residential dwelling unit.
A total of nine parking units are required.
Sixty percent of parking mitigation must be met with off-
street parking.
A total of 5.4 on-site parking spaces are required.
The remainder of parking mitigation may be met through cash-
in-lieu or via a combination of cash-in-lieu and off-street
parking. 2 3 4 5 6 71
Special Review for Floor Area
A Floor Area of 1:1 within the MU zone district is allowed by-right.
A Floor Area Ratio up to 1.25:1 may be approved for Affordable Housing via Special Review
The applicant requests the following Floor Area Ratio:
Option 1: 1:01:1 for total of 7,586 sq. ft. or 86 > by-right
Option 2: 1:02:1 for total of 7,667 sq. ft. or 167 > by-right
Special Review for Floor Area
The applicant demonstrates that the proposed
development will not have adverse impacts on
surrounding uses or will mitigate those impacts, including
but not limited to the effects of shading, excess traffic,
availability of parking in the neighborhood or blocking of
a designated view plane.
The mass, height, density, configuration, amount of open
space, landscaping and setbacks of the proposed
development are designed in a manner which is
compatible with or enhances the character of surrounding
land uses and is consistent with the purposes of the
underlying zone district.
Staff finds this criterion to be met.
2000 & 2012 Aspen Area Community Plan
Our housing policy should bolster our economic and social diversity, reinforce variety, and
enhance our sense of community by integrating affordable housing into the fabric of our
town. A healthy social balance includes all income ranges and types of people. Each project
should endeavor to further that mix and to avoid segregation of economic and social
classes…”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of:
•Conceptual Major Development
•Relocation
•Growth Management
•Certificates of Affordable Housing Credits
•Transportation & Parking Management
•Special Review for Subgrade Living Area
•Special Review for Floor Area
Staff recommends denial of:
•Special Review to waive fee -in-lieu for
parking