HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRAFT Resolution.211 W Hopkins AveHPC Resolution #__, Series of 2020
Page 1 of 2
RESOLUTION #__, SERIES OF 2020
A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
GRANTING ASPENMODERN HISTORIC DESIGNATION, CONCEPTUAL MAJOR
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW INCLUDING RELOCATION AND VARIATIONS FOR
THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 211 WEST HOPKINS AVENUE, LOTS F AND G,
BLOCK 53, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN
PARCEL ID: 2735-124-63-003
WHEREAS, the applicant, Matt Joblon, 205 S. Detroit Street , Suite 400, Denver, CO 80206,
with the consent of property owner Vaughan Capital Partners, LP has requested HPC approval
for AspenModern Historic Designation, Conceptual Major Development, Relocation and
Variations for the property located at 211 W. Hopkins Avenue, Lots F and G, Block 53, City and
Townsite of Aspen; and
WHEREAS, the AspenModern designation process is described at Section 26.415.025 and
Section 26.415.030 of the Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that “no building or structure
shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a
designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted
to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures
established for their review;” and
WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application,
a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project’s
conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section
26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC
may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain
additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and
WHEREAS, for approval of Relocation, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen
Municipal Code Section 26.415.090.C, Relocation of a Designated Property; and
WHEREAS, for approval of Setback Variations, the application shall meet the requirements of
Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.110.C, Setback Variations; and
WHEREAS, HPC reviewed the project on October 28, 2020, considered the application, the
staff memo and public comments, and found the consistent with the review standards and
granted approval with conditions by a vote of __ to __.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
Section 1: Approvals
HPC hereby approves the proposed project with the following conditions:
HPC Resolution #__, Series of 2020
Page 2 of 2
1. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one
(1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an
application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the
Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole
discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for
a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written
request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date.
Section 2: Material Representations
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation
presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation
Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development
approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by
other specific conditions or an authorized authority.
Section 3: Existing Litigation
This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of
any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended
as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
Section 4: Severability
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason
held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be
deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions thereof.
APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 28th day of October, 2020.
Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content:
__________________ __________________________________
Katharine Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Gretchen Greenwood, Chair
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Wes Graham, Deputy City Clerk