Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReferral Comment.Zoning.211 W Hopkins AveFrom:Bob Narracci To:Amy Simon Cc:Jim Pomeroy Subject:RE: Referral comments needed Date:Tuesday, October 13, 2020 9:50:25 AM Attachments:image001.png Good Morning Amy, The one item I have a comment on pertains to the proposed non-egress lightwell on the proposed new residence. My understanding is that the applicant is requesting an HPC setback variance for this lightwell. Typically, when a lightwell protrudes into a setback it is limited in size to an interior dimension of 3 feet x 3 feet for building code. My ask is that if HPC approves the setback variance to accommodate this lightwell, that the HPC motion also indicate that the setback variance be specifically for a lightwell of up to L x W interior dimensions, if larger than the normally allowable 3 foot x 3 foot interior dimension – as is presently proposed. Amanda also had a question about the proposed attic space and what portion is countable as FA. I was referencing the language that, “Areas of an attic level with thirty vertical inches or less between the finished floor level and the finished ceiling shall be exempt, regardless of how that space is accessed or used.” The plan she was showing, Sheet A2.3 in the application, shows a bar and a towel cabinet on either side of the attic space at the top of the stairs before going out the door to the roof top deck. These areas where the bar and towel cabinet are proposed are partly greater than 30” in height – so I think the area taller than 30” counts even though there appear to be built in cabinets/bar. She is going to explore this further with her team. Amanda also asked whether or not the front porch on the proposed residence will be exempt even though the roof over the porch is deeper than 4 feet. I told her that the front porch will still be exempt as it meets the requirements for a front porch. Thank you, Bob Bob Narracci, AICP Community Development Department Zoning Administrator 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 P: (970) 429-2754 www.cityofaspen.com   Pitkin County’s Recovery Plan for COVID-19 to make Aspen safer and healthier means we all must follow the five commitments of containment: 1. I will maintain six feet of distance from anyone not in my household 2. I will wash my hands often 3. I will cover my face in public 4. I will stay home when I’m sick 5. I will seek testing immediately and self-report if I experience symptoms More at https://covid19.pitkincounty.com/ Notice and Disclaimer: This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error and then delete it. Further, the information or opinions contained in this email are advisory in nature only and are not binding on the City of Aspen. If applicable, the information and opinions contained in the email are based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The opinions and information contained herein do not create a legal or vested right or any claim of detrimental reliance. From: Amy Simon <amy.simon@cityofaspen.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 4:00 PM To: Bob Narracci <bob.narracci@cityofaspen.com>; Bonnie Muhigirwa <bonnie.muhigirwa@cityofaspen.com>; David Coon <david.coon@cityofaspen.com>; David Radeck <david.radeck@cityofaspen.com>; Denis Murray <denis.murray@cityofaspen.com>; Hailey Guglielmo <hailey.guglielmo@cityofaspen.com>; Jim Pomeroy <jim.pomeroy@cityofaspen.com>; Nick Thompson <nick.thompson@cityofaspen.com> Subject: Referral comments needed Hello all, Attached is a long-awaited application for historic designation of a 1956 Pan Abode cabin located at 211 W. Hopkins Avenue. Designation of properties constructed in Aspen after World War II is voluntary only and there has been off and on discussion for years that this one would be demolished. Hopefully not! If you are interested, here is a little info about Pan Abodes: http://www.aspenmod.com/places/211-w-hopkins/ The property is still owned by the family that built the cabin. They are under contract with a developer who will preserve the cabin (removing a small later addition.) They are not adding a basement below it, so it will remain a very small structure. Behind it they propose to construct a new detached home. This density is permitted on a landmarked property. They are asking for a few special incentives related to the designation. These are outlined in the application but include a floor area bonus/deck area bonus, parking reduction, setback variations, tree removal permits and tree mitigation fee waivers. If you have any comments, please email them to me by Thursday, October 14th, so I can troubleshoot with the applicant and work your preliminary thoughts into the review process. Thank you! (Parks, thankd for your preliminary comments. I’ll follow up with you.)