HomeMy WebLinkAboutExhibit C.4 Forestry_Conceptual.2022.0427SHEET TITLE
INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM
PROJECT NO:
MODEL FILE:
DRAWN BY:
COPYRIGHT:
SHEET 34
Z007
Jeffrey H Woodruff
312_W_Hyman_04082022.pln
Project No. 116
/U
s
e
r
s
/
j
e
f
f
r
e
y
w
/
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
/
C
l
o
u
d
H
i
l
l
D
e
s
i
g
n
/
3
1
2
W
H
y
m
a
n
/
3
1
2
_
W
_
H
y
m
a
n
_
0
4
0
8
2
0
2
2
.
p
l
n
Powder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A
Tarrab Mees
Forestry
312 W Hyman Ave
312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q,
Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/
Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen
312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO
81611 USA
Account # R000145
Parcel ID # 273512464006
Landscape Architect (At Final)
Contractor
Structural Engineer
As per contractor
Civil Grading and Drainage
Boundaries Unlimited (At Final)
COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21
Cloud Hill Design, LLC
Snowmass Snowmass CO
81654 USA
COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22
COA- HPC Approval03/23/22
28.5 sq ft
1,196 sq ft
12
.
2
7
'
2.62'
1.3
4
9
'
307.5 sq ft
32.25 sq ft
E
EG
OS
W
1
2
3 4 5
678
9
10
1112131415
16
79
0
4
7903
790
2
7901
7901
7901
79
0
1
79
0
2
7902
7
9
0
3
79
0
3
7
9
0
4
Grav
e
l
o
f
f
alley
A
A
B
B
C
C
D
D
E
E
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
1.55
5
'
2.40
6
'
5.00'
5'
11.6
8
'
8.167'10.167'10'4.25'
9'
11
.
7
4
9
'
19
.
2
5
'
12
.
2
7
'
4.095'307.5 sq ft
32.25 sq ft
Proposed fence at the 5' side
setback and 5' rear setback,
lined on the South with shrubs,
see landscaping plan
St Moritz
R
e
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
w
a
l
l
(
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
and under
r
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
)
E
EG
OS
W
1
2
3 4 5
678
9
10
1112131415
16
79
0
4
7903
790
2
7901
7901
7901
79
0
1
79
0
2
7902
7
9
0
3
79
0
3
7
9
0
4
Grav
e
l
o
f
f
alley
301.25 sq ft
32 sq ft
E
EG
OS
W
1
2
3 4 5
678
9
10
1112131415
16
79
0
4
7903
790
2
7901
7901
7901
79
0
1
79
0
2
7902
7
9
0
3
79
0
3
7
9
0
4
Grav
e
l
o
f
f
alley
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
1 First Floor Forestry NW
Z007 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
2 First Floor Forestry NE
Z007SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
3 First Floor Forestry Angled
Z007
North West Garage/Trash Enclosure
Strengths:
Aligned with existing site disturbance, the railroad tie retaining wall
Leaves the largest open space in the backyard
No/little impact to trees #3, #4 and #5 and no impact to Aspens along East property line
Does not interfere with existing utilities (maybe gas, but not electric)
Benefits to house across alley (north), views to Shadow Mountain
Minor negative to St Moritz, but ridge line is 12'-6" and grade steps down 3' grade (from the
property line to the NE corner of the garage) and 6' retaining wall, so impact is negligible to St
Moritz
Distance between the Garage and the Residence is 11', goes to 12' with the 2.5' side setback
Keep all trees, gravel between the alley and the garage
Distance between the property line and Tree #1 is 15', if the neighboring retaining wall is plum
and does not encroach on the West property line.
Weaknesses:
Minimal impacts to Trees #1 and #2, development, both permeable and hardscape in the Tree #1
drip-line
13' from retaining wall to tree #1 (layout assumes less than 5' setback or additional/variance to
combined side setback in R6. If the retaining wall was plum this measurement would be 15'
Impact to existing utilities, gas, which runs to the West and South of tree #1
Difficult entry, entry from the East due to grade changes at the alley
Drainage
Angled Garage/Trash Enclosure
Strengths:
Protects Tree #1, impact to Tree #2 and likely Tree #3
No/little impact to trees #4 and #5 and no impact to Aspens along East property line
Benefits to house across alley (north), views to Shadow Mountain
Minor negative to St Moritz, but ridge line is 12'-6" and steps down 3' grade and 6' retaining
wall, so impact is extremely negligible to St Moritz
Weaknesses:
Does not meet residential design standards, not 90 degrees to the alley
Reduces usable backyard space, creates unused triangles on the lot
Interferes with existing utilities (maybe gas and electric)
Distance between the South West Corner of the Garage and the North East corner of the building
is less than 5'
We create a dead space, unused on the lot of 102 Sq Ft (the North East triangle, goes un-used), so
~2% of the lot space is a void/unusable square footage
it creates other impacts-
The triangulation of the rectangle- negatively impacts utilities, decreases distance to
residence (so it appears like a larger, continuous building on the lot) and fragments
the outdoor / back yard continuity (continuous space is interrupted and the yard
appears smaller and less occupiable/usable)
North East Garage/Trash Enclosure
Strengths:
Protects Tree #1 and Tree #2
No impact to St Moritz, ridge line is 12'-6" and steps down 3'+ grade and 6' retaining wall, so
impact is extremely negligible to St Moritz
Weaknesses:
Impact to tree #3, tree #4 and #5 and impact to Aspens along East property line
Reduces usable backyard space, with garage enjoying a wonderful view to Shadow Mountain
Interferes with existing utilities (catv, telephone and electric; impacts to the neighbors to the
North and East, concrete pad is for at least four residences/multi-family+)
Distance between garage and main residence is 4'-0", does not meet residential design standards
for R-6 Zoning
SHEET TITLE
INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM
PROJECT NO:
MODEL FILE:
DRAWN BY:
COPYRIGHT:
SHEET 35
Z008
Jeffrey H Woodruff
312_W_Hyman_04082022.pln
Project No. 116
/U
s
e
r
s
/
j
e
f
f
r
e
y
w
/
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
/
C
l
o
u
d
H
i
l
l
D
e
s
i
g
n
/
3
1
2
W
H
y
m
a
n
/
3
1
2
_
W
_
H
y
m
a
n
_
0
4
0
8
2
0
2
2
.
p
l
n
Powder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A
Tarrab Mees
Forestry Site Coverage
312 W Hyman Ave
312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q,
Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/
Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen
312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO
81611 USA
Account # R000145
Parcel ID # 273512464006
Landscape Architect (At Final)
Contractor
Structural Engineer
As per contractor
Civil Grading and Drainage
Boundaries Unlimited (At Final)
COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21
Cloud Hill Design, LLC
Snowmass Snowmass CO
81654 USA
COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22
COA- HPC Approval03/23/22
488.75 sq ft
392.75 sq ft
760.25 sq ft
680.25 sq ft
271.75 sq ft
464.75 sq ft
1,046.5 sq ft
1
2
3 4 5
678
9
10
1112131415
16
Grav
e
l
o
f
f
alley
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 First Floor- Tree
Z008
Site Total 5,976+- SF
Tree Protection Zone/Pervious Space
North/East Trees 680.25 Sf
East Tree 271.75 SF
South State Tree 760.25 SF
West Tree 464.75 SF
Tree Site Coverage 2,177.00 SF
Tree Site % 36.43%
Impervious Site Coverage
Chalet 1210.75 SF
Garage 307.5 SF
Enclosure 32.25 SF
Build out site 1550.75
Build out site % 25.95%
Pervious Open Space
North 1064.50
South East 488.75
South West 392.75
Open Space 1,946
Open Space% 32.56%
Pavers/skirt
~5.50 %
SHEET TITLE
INTEGRATED DESIGN TEAM
PROJECT NO:
MODEL FILE:
DRAWN BY:
COPYRIGHT:
SHEET 36
Z009
Jeffrey H Woodruff
312_W_Hyman_04082022.pln
Project No. 116
/U
s
e
r
s
/
j
e
f
f
r
e
y
w
/
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
/
C
l
o
u
d
H
i
l
l
D
e
s
i
g
n
/
3
1
2
W
H
y
m
a
n
/
3
1
2
_
W
_
H
y
m
a
n
_
0
4
0
8
2
0
2
2
.
p
l
n
Powder Day Skiiing, LLC, David A
Tarrab Mees
Forestry Site Coverage
312 W Hyman Ave
312 W Hyman Ave Lots P+Q,
Block 46 Aspen CO 81611 USA/
Pitkin County UGB, City of Aspen
312 W Hyman Ave Aspen CO
81611 USA
Account # R000145
Parcel ID # 273512464006
Landscape Architect (At Final)
Contractor
Structural Engineer
As per contractor
Civil Grading and Drainage
Boundaries Unlimited (At Final)
COA- HPO Site Visit08/22/21
Cloud Hill Design, LLC
Snowmass Snowmass CO
81654 USA
COA- HPC Conceptual02/26/22
COA- HPC Approval03/23/22
1,210.75 sq ft
488.75 sq ft
392.75 sq ft
760.25 sq ft
680.25 sq ft
271.75 sq ft
464.75 sq ft
1,046.5 sq ft
12
.
2
7
'
2.62'
307.5 sq ft
32.25 sq ft
E
EG
OS
W
1
2
3 4 5
678
9
10
1112131415
16
79
0
4
7903
790
2
7901
7901
7901
79
0
1
79
0
2
7902
7
9
0
3
79
0
3
7
9
0
4
Grav
e
l
o
f
f
alley
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 First Floor Forestry NW
Z009
North West Garage/Trash Enclosure
Strengths:
º Aligned with existing site disturbance, the railroad tie
retaining wall
º Leaves the largest open space in the backyard
º No/little impact to trees #3, #4 and #5 and no impact to
Aspens along East property line
º Does not interfere with existing utilities (maybe gas, but not
electric)
º Benefits to house across alley (north), views to Shadow
Mountain
º Minor negative to St Moritz, but ridge line is 12'-6" and
grade steps down 3' grade (from the property line to the NE
corner of the garage) and 6' retaining wall, so impact is
negligible to St Moritz
º Distance between the Garage and the Residence is 11', goes
to 12' with the 2.5' side setback
º Keep all trees, gravel between the alley and the garage
º Distance between the property line and Tree #1 is 15'-7", if
the neighboring retaining wall is plum and does not encroach
on the West property line.
Weaknesses:
º Minimal impacts to Trees #1 and #2, development, both
permeable and hardscape in the Tree #1 drip-line
13' from retaining wall to tree #1 (layout assumes less than 5'
setback or additional/variance to combined side setback in
R6. If the retaining wall was plum this measurement would be
15'
º Impact to existing utilities, gas, which runs to the West and
South of tree #1
º Difficult entry, entry from the East due to grade changes at
the alley
º Drainage