The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.401 Castle Creek Rd.0084.2009.ASLUAspen Valley Hospital Phase 2 Project Final PUD Application City Council Hearing #2 June 7, 2010 May 8, 2008 Key MFP Objectives •Contemporary standards of design and function •20-year minimum life (time horizon) •Cost and space efficiency •Good neighbor –Traffic –Noise/light mitigation –View corridors –Architectural integration into the surroundings Key MFP Objectives •Energy efficient and environmentally sensitive –Best use of natural light, views and topography –Sustainable and reusable materials –LEED standards for design and construction •Enable efficient and accessible quality healthcare –Co-location of professional services –Access/parking accommodations –Patient flow and zoning –Privacy SPANDREL GLASS BALCONY SCREENS BALCONY SCREENS 1 10 7 6 2 9 11 5 4 3 8 2 1 3 4 2 VIEW #1 – CC ROAD & MEADOWOOD DRIVE VIEW #2 – MEADOWOOD DRIVE VIEW #3 – MEADOWOOD DRIVE VIEW #4 – MEADOWOOD DRIVE VIEW #5 – MEADOWOOD DRIVE VIEW #6 - HEATHER LANE SERVICE/FIRE TRUCK LOOP EMPLOYEE HOUSING SENIOR LIVING ADDITION FOOTPRINT STRUCTURED PARKING MAIN ENTRANCE - REALIGNED NEW BUS STOP AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS From Heather Lane From Primrose Meadow From Hall House From Hall House ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL EXPANSION By LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Alex J. Ariniello, P.E., PTOE Traffic Analysis Update June 7, 2010 Items Addressed •Employee Generation and Impacts –Housing –Parking –Traffic •Formal Traffic Study •Parking Demand •Site Plan Alternative –Expanded Assisted Living –Additional Affordable Housing Traffic Study Procedures •Collect Traffic Data •Evaluate Existing Conditions •Determine New Trips •Project Background Traffic •Combine Site Traffic with Background Traffic •Analyze Impacts •Recommend Mitigation Measures AVH Traffic Study Data Collection •CDOT Traffic Data •July, 2006 Traffic Counts •July, 2006 Employee/Staff Traffic/Parking Survey •July, 2008 Traffic Counts •March, 2009 Traffic Counts •March-April, 2009 Medical Office Employee & Patient Travel Survey Existing Traffic Alternate Mode Use How did you arrive at our office? 5.5% 2.1%0.0% 0.7% 3.4% 14.5% 73.8% car bus bike foot taxi carpool other Hospital Employee Survey Aspen Medical Office Employees and Patients Did you travel through the roundabout? 43.8% 56.2% yes no Aspen Medical Offices Survey Employees and Patients March 2009 Where do you live? 3.4%4.8%0.7% 5.5% 11.0%49.0% 13.8% 6.9% 4.1% 0.7% Aspen Smass Vlg Woody Creek Smass Basalt El Jebel Cdale Glenwood Redstone other 68% 26% 6% Hospital Employees Where do you live? Down Valley Aspen Castle Creek Road Trip Generation ESTIMATED TRAFFIC GENERATION Aspen Valley Hospital Alternate Modes Vehicle - Trips Generated Reduction Average AM Peak-Hour PM Peak-Hour Generating Category Quantity Daily Peak-Hour Weekday In Out In Out sting Hospital 1,504 67 21 28 59 al Hospital Expansion 48.4 Employees 7%20%234 9 3 4 9 al Medical Office Space 27.0 KSF(4)7%20%907 39 10 20 55 al Meeting Space 3.563 KSF(4)7%20%36 4 1 1 4 al Affordable Housing 22 DU's 40%40%77 1 5 5 2 al Asssited Living 11 DU's 7%20%27 1 0 1 1 al Expansion 1,282 54 20 30 70 al 2,786 121 41 58 129 Trip Distribution Trip Assignment Total 2016 Traffic Parking Demand •Parking Demand Related to: –Staff On-site: 0.75 parked vehicles/emp. –Medical Office: 3.50 parked vehicles/KSF –Patient Stations: 0.75 parked vehicles/station Aspen Valley Hospital Master Plan Parking Demand Projection Peak Period Parked Vehicles Phase Phase Demand Component Existing 2 3 4 Rate Source Existing 2 3 4 Staff (Maximum on-site) 158 170 182 185 0.75 parked vehicles per employee (1) 119 128 137 139 Medical - Dental Office 9.0 17.7 17.7 3.5 parked vehicles per KSF (2) 32 62 62 Patient Stations 99 126 147 162 0.75 parked vehicles per station (3) 74 95 110 122 193 254 309 322 Vacancy Factor (5%) 1.05 1.05 1.05 Total Spaces Needed 266 324 338 Notes: (1) Based on Employee Survey conducted at Aspen Valley Hospital in August, 2006 (2) Source: Parking Generation, 3rd Edition, 2004 published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (3) Source: HLM & LSC estimate Site Access Improvements New Access on Castle Creek Road •Add Southbound Right-Turn Deceleration Lane Site Access Improvements •Castle Creek Road/Doolittle Lane –Extend Bus Drop-off Area –Address Passenger Loading Area –Address Bike-Pedestrian Safety Issues –Provide Pedestrian Crossings/Connections to Hospital Entrances Site Plan Alternative •Objectives –10 Additional Assisted Living Units –18-22 Additional Affordable Housing Units –Parking/circulation accommodations –Protection of View Corridors –Space Preservation for longer term •Previews/Feedback –Whitcomb Terrace residents and Senior Center –Meadowood HOA Board AVH Clinical Area Re- allocated to MOS = 3,000 NSF nical Area Re- d to MOS = SF nical Area Re- d to MOS = SF