The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutcoa.lu.sm.Gordon exemption 273501307017.90A-89CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 9 14 89 DATE COMPLETE:PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. 2735-013-07-017 90A-89 STAFF MEMBER-- ('zz_ PROJECT NAME: Gordon Exem tion from Stream Mar in ReviewProjectAddress: 1100 Black Birch DriveLegalAddress: I. t 10. Black Birch Estates APPLICANT: Sheldon Gordon Applicant Address: REPRESENTATIVE: Stan Mathis Representative Address/Phone: P. O. Box 1984 Aspen. CO 81612 0-1434 PAID: YES NO AMOIINT: X50.00 NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED: 1 -~ sefS TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: /+~~5 2 STEP: P&Z Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING:YES NO VESTED RIGHTS:YES NO CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING:YES NO VESTED RIGHTS:YES NO Planning Director Approval: ~' Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: Date: S~J REFERRALS: - City Attorney City Engineer Housing Dir. Aspen Water City Electric Envir. Hlth. Aspen Consol. S.D. DATE REFERRED: Mtn. Bell Parks Dept. Holy Cross Fire Marshall Building Inspector Roaring Fork Energy Center INITIALS: School District Rocky Mtn Nat Gas State Hwy Dept(GW) State Hwy Dept(GJ) Other FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED--~INITIAL:~ City Atty ~ City Engineer ~.ZOning Env. HealthHousingOther: FILE STATUS AND IACATION:_ ~~v /C~JCw~-1"`~ MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Drueding, Zoning Officer FROM: Leslie Lamont, Planner RE: Gordon Stream Margin Exemption DATE: September 29, 1989 SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to build an entryway at thefrontdoorofasinglefamilyhome. The home is within 100 feetofthe100yearfloodline. The applicant has applied for aStreamMarginExemption. Staff recommends denial of theexemption. The applicant must submit an application for StreamMarginReview. REFERRAL COMMENTS: Please see attached comments from theEngineeringDepartment. FINDINGS: Pursuant to Section 7-504 the following standardsapplyforStreamMarginExemption: 1. The development does not add more than ten percent (10~j tothefloorareaoftheexistingstructureorincreasetheamountofbuildingareaexemptfromfloorareacalculationsbymorethantwenty-five percent (25%). RESPONSE: The proposed entry is approximately 176 square feetwhichisapproximately4$ of the existing floor area. 2. The development does not require the removal of any tree forwhichapermitwouldberequiredpursuanttoSection13-76 or theapplicantreceivesapermitpursuanttosaidsubsection. RESPONSE: No trees shall be removed for the entry. 3. The development is located such that no portion of theexpansion, remodeling or reconstruction will be any closer to thehighwaterlinethanistheexistingdevelopment. RESPONSE: The addition is proposed for the northern side of thehousewhichisperpendiculartoCastleCreek. It is no closer tothehighwaterlinethantheexistingdevelopment. 4. The development does not fall outside of an approved buildingenvelope, if one has been designated through a prior review. RESPONSE: The entry will extend beyond the existing residence. 5. The development is located completely outside of the SpecialFloodHazardAreaandmorethanonehundredfeet (100') measured horizontally, from the high water line of the Roaring Fork Riveranditstributarystreamsortheexpansion, remodeling orreconstructionwillcausenoincreasetotheamountofgroundcoverageofstructureswithintheSpecialFloodHazardArea. RESPONSE: The addition will increase the ground coverage byapproximately90feet. According to the FEMA map the flood plainextendsupintotheparcelandgoesrightthroughthemiddleofthehome. Because of this discrepancy between the applicant'smapandtheactualFEMAmap, the applicant must submit a map thatshowstherelationoftheproposedadditiontothefloodplainandmustdeterminewhethertheadditionwillchangethebasefloodelevation. it is recommended that the applicant submit anapplicationforacompleteStreamMarginReview. in addition, there are two hot tubs that were built on site,without Stream Margin Review, that are well within the floodplain. One of the tubs is over the property line. The applicanthasagreedtoremovethosetubsasaconditionofStreamMarginApproval. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Director denytheStreamMarginExemption. It is necessary for a Stream MarginReviewapplicationtobesubmittedshowingthetrue100yearfloodplain, a base flood elevation certificate, and an elevationoftheproposedentrysoreviewcandetermineiftheentrywillincreasethebasefloodelevation. 2 hereby deny the above Stream Margin Exemption with conditions, pursuant to Section 7-504 A. of the Aspen Land Use Code. Am Mar a um, PlanningDifor 11/gordonsm 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Leslie Lamont, Planning Office FROM: Jim Gibbard, Engineering Department DATE: September 29, 1989 RE: Gordon Exemption from Stream Margin Review The Engineering Department recommends against granting anexemptionbecausethisdevelopmentiswithinthefloodplainboundarynotoutsideastheapplicanthasindicated. jg/Gordon cc: Chuck Roth Bob Gish CASEIAAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 9/14/89 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. 2735-013-07-017 90A-89 STAFF MEMBER• a-~ PROJECT NAME: Gordon Exemption from Stream Margin ReviewProjectAddress. 1100 Black Birch Drive Legal Address: Lot 10 Black Birch Estates ' APPLICANT: Sheldon Gordon '' Applicant Address: REPRESENTATIVE: Stan Mathis Representative Address/Phone: P. O. Box 1984 Ashen. CO 81612 0-1434 PAID: YES NO AMOUNT: S50.00 NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED: 1 -'~ seas 5TYPEOFAPPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: P&Z Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING:YES NO VESTED RIGHTS:YES NO CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING:YES NO VESTED RIGHTS:YES NO Planning Director Approval: a' Paid: S6~"~Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: Date: REFERRALS: ---- -- --- -- _ -_ City Attorney Mtn. Bell School DistrictCityEngineerParksDept. Rocky Mtn Nat GasHousingDir. Holy Cross State Hwy Dept(GW)Aspen Water Fire Marshall State Hwy Dept(GJ)City Electric Building InspectorEnvir. Hlth. Roaring Fork OtherAspenConsol. Energy Center S.D. -~ r,Q' DATE REFERRED: ~"~ ~/ ~ INITIALS: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED• INITIAL: - City Atty City Engineer Zoning Env. HealthHousingOther: FILE STATUS AND IACATION: MEMORANDUM TO: City Engineer FROM: Leslie Lamont, Planning Office Gordon Exemption from Stream Margin Review DATE: September 25, 1989 Attached for your review and comments is an application from StanMathisforExemptionfromStreamMarginReview. Please review this material and return your comments to me assoonasyoucan. This is an internal staff review. Thank you. September 14, 1989 City of Aspen Planning & Zoning Dept 201 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 Attn: Leslie Lamont Dear Leslie, SEP 14 Please accept this application for a stream margin review exemption for the entry addition to Sheldon Cordon's house @ 1100 Black Birch Drive, City of Aspen. As you can see the entry addition meets the requirementsoftheCityofAspenzoningcodeSec7-504 (B) for exemption from stream margin review. Attached are the architectural floor plans (2) showing the proposed entrycircledinred), a check for $50.00, and 2 copies of the survey of the subject property. Please call it you have any questions. Th Stan Mathis 5T.1\ hi9~fIIS aRCHIT~;CTI'RE 1D PI.:41NI.~C Post Office Box 1984 Aspen Colorado 81612 303/920-1434 ATTACfII~SENT 4 Review Standards: Development Application for Exemption from Stream Margin Review The expansion, remodeling or reconstruction of an existing development shall be exempt from stream margin review if the following standards are met: 1. The development does not add more than ten percent l0$) to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the amount of building area exempt from floor area calculaitons by m re han twent fiv~ pert ~~ r g%j/'/nVL+yc 'l'_~r°~i5 1~ Q~~~ S. W idt~ o o p CbV 2. The d velopment does of re re the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Section 13-76 or the applicant receives a permit pu~~rsu~~aly~nt to said s~u~bs~ec~-tion; and+ NQ'('(L~ (C~'~/ui m~ 3. Th~e~dvelnt~is~ l~oc~ated such that noP portion of the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will be any closer to the high wat ine thgn is the-~((~~exist'ndevepment;lf,,and.'(~}~~~dw W~t~ ~ ~GfFPG~~ 4. The evelopment oes not fall outside of an approved building envelope, i on has been esigna t7h~rough a priore ' ew;o and .~~U~op+wt.~ (S ~'Ny+^Q4~p~V' 5. The development is located completely outside of the one hundred (100) year floodplain or the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will cause no increase to the amount of 1gLrou pgr/erage o~~ $truct~res witytin the floodplain.. AI'L' ~ gyp„, a.J~ SAS G / ~ ~O. L o~ v»~r~+dl QoUC~i~~(~pp rr~~tt~~'1~rf w~f( i~W`/~~ wf" A~rrAa~arr 1 usE c~orr ~ w 1) Project Name ~ •+ WOK Q 2) Project - indicate street address, of & lock rnmber, legal chi-r-;z ion mete ammiri at0) !~ 3) Present Zonin4 ~'~ J 4) IDt Size `/Q_~~ ~ 5) A~ I~t' t /~ ~ A '~ aa.....,.,. & Pkwile ~ ~~QIO.{4 ~ 6f v Representative's Name, Aririnxc & Alone 7) Z~+pe of Appli t~in (Please d~ec]c all t2~at apply) : Oonditional Use SPA ~ Fii-storic Dev. Special Review Final SPA Final Hictnric Dev. 88040 c;reenline Cbayoeptual A]D Mimr Historic Dev. V S-tc,eam Maigin Final AlD Hi ctnri c D~lition Nfamtain .View Plane _ Subdivision Historic Desiccation iniimi~atioR _ 'i1e]ct/MaP.AID~I~t Q"1.~ Allotment Iot Spl it/Iat IaIle ~~ °n ncl-~m*+h g) nxcriTr+r; on of FSci ct; r~r Uses (nmbPr aryl type of Asti ct; n~ str~res: amnooomate so. ft. ; n~bPS' of bechvoms; any pRevlous apprcwals granted to the 9) 10) Hav~ you attac3yad the following? R~0[LSe t0 AttdChment 2, Minimim Sy~l-misel.Q1 OorIteIlts to Attac3m~ent 3, Specific ~~>~iscion Cmtents Response to Attadment 4, Review Standazds for Your Application September 1, 1989 City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, ,CO 8161,1 Pitkin County Planning Office To Whom Zt May Concern: I hereby authorize Stan Mathis to speak to you on my behalf regarding the cordon subdivision, at 1105 Black Birch Drive. rdon 11611 San Vi412 EasSti59th St New York, NYi10022 9 20 2?593-006313-826-7800 MEMORANDUM TO: City Engineer FROM: Leslie Lamont, Planning Office RE: Gordon Exemption from Stream Margin Review DATE: September 25, 1989 Attached for your review and comments is an application from Stan Mathis for Exemption from Stream Margin Review. Please review this material and return your comments to me as soon as you can. This is an internal staff review. Thank you.