HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sm.Gordon.A8-91CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
DATE RECEIVED: 2 6 91 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO.
DATE COMPLETE: :245-O18-a~-OI'] A8-
CTLFF MF.MRF.Re~
PROJECT NAME: Gordon Stream Margin Review ~l.Ohc~~~
Project Address: 1100 Black Brich Drive, Aspen, CO
Legal Address: Lot 10 Black Birch Estates, Aspen, CO
APPLICANT: Sheldon M. Gordon
Applicant Address: 1310 Montana Ave..Ste.A,Santa Monica,CA
REPRESENTATIVE:
Representative
Asnen,Co 81612 920-1434
PAID: YESxx NO AMOUNT: $780 NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED 1
sets of plans-in file)
TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: ~ 2 STEP:
P&Z Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: ES NO
VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO
CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO
VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO
Planning Director Approval: Paid:
Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: Date:
REFERRALS:
City Attorney
City Engineer
I 1 ~~ Housing Dir.
ll`7 Aspen Water
2 ~ City Electric
Envir.Hlth.
Aspen Con.S.D.
DATE REFERRED: 3 /~~
Mtn Bell School District ~ Y"'
Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn NatGas a L
Holy Cross State HwyDept(GW)
L
Fire Marshall State HwyDept(GJ) jBuildingInspector~c. ~~,
Roaring Fork '\ OtherT ~ 1`~"~~
Energy Center ~,_ ~/-~- ~
p~~ _ ~,~„ ~-_,
9 ~ INITIALS : ~Q ~T g~, _ Jet
A'pytc
FINAL ROUTING: DACE ROUTED: INITIAL:
City Att ity Engineer Zoning _Env. Health
Housing ther•
a ~
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION:
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Comm ssion
FROM: Leslie Lamont, Planner
RE: Sheldon Gordon Stream rgin Review & Conditional Use
Review
DATE: April 16, 1991
SDI~Il4ARY: The applicant proposes to expand an existing single
family home within the 100 year floodplain of Castle Creek. The
applicant also proposes to provide a 420 square foot attached
accessory dwelling unit. Pursuant to Section 7-504 Stream Margin
Review is required for the expansion and conditional use review
is required for the accessory dwelling unit. The Planning
Department recommends approval with conditions.
APPLICANT: Sheldon M. Gordon, represented by Stan Mathis
LOCATION: 1100 Black Birch Drive, Lot 10 Black Birch Estates,
Aspen
ZONING: R-15, PUD
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Stream margin approval for the expansion
of a single family home within the 100 year floodplain and
conditional use review for an accessory dwelling unit.
REFERRAL COMMENTS: The Engineering Department has made the
following referral comments:
Having received the floodplain study, HEC-2 analysis by Schmueser
Gordon Meyer, Inc. for the applicant, the engineering department
has the following comments:
1. The National Flood Insurance Program's (NFIP) Flood Insurance
Rate Map (FIRM) shows the existing and proposed development to be
within the 100 year floodplain, placing it in a Special Flood
Hazard Area (SFHA). Exhibit-4 of SMG's study shows the existing
and proposed development to be outside the SFHA. It appears that
the applicant has demonstrated that the structure and parcel were
inadvertently included in the SFHA, which would qualify for a
FEMA map amendment process. It is staff's recommendation that
prior to the issuance of any building permit this Department
shall receive a Letter of Map Amendment (COMA) from FEMA.
2. If ground water is encountered during construction and must
be discharged, the applicant must obtain an industrial waste
discharge permit from the Colorado Division of Water Quality.
Having reviewed the above application, and having made a site
inspection, the Engineering Department has the following
comments:
3. The applicants development plan indicates there is new site
development in the form of grade changes, retaining walls, a berm
and a ditch. The following shall apply:
a. Any new site work must be addressed in the demonstration
discussed in number 1. It is unclear if the depicted ditch
is existing or new. The ditch was not visible on our site
inspection due to winter ground conditions. It is staff's
recommendation that the applicant either label the ditch on
development plan as "existing ditch" or furnish more
information on what is to be constructed. (NOTE: the ditch
no longer exists).
b. No vegetation is to be removed or slope grade changes
made that produce erosion and sedimentation of the stream
bank.
c. The applicant must make a statement indicating there
will be no disturbance of vegetation between the building
envelope and the river. The engineering department
recommends that no native vegetation be permitted to be
removed between the building footprint and the edge of the
river.
d. The applicant should be required to plant any regraded
area inside the building envelope river with species in
keeping with the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan as well as
existing plants in the area.
4. Copies of all necessary federal and state permits relating to
work within the one hundred (100) year floodplain shall be
provided.
The proposed development site plan does not depict:
a. off-street parking
b. the building envelope
c. the high water line
d, elevation reference marks for the 100 year floodplain
line. It is recommended that these marks be referenced from
those used by FEMA. This property lies between two cross
sections A and B on FIRM map panel 203 of 325.
6. Certification from a registered professional engineer or
architect in the State of Colorado shall be submitted for public
recordation, verifying full and accurate compliance with the
requirements in Section 7-141 (c) 9. of the Municipal Code.
7. The applicant is requested to grant a fisherman's easement
for the river for a width of five feet along the bank adjacent to
the property.
8. Conditional use - the applicants development plan did not
indicate the size or number of bedrooms for the accessory
dwelling unit. One parking space shall be provided on site if
the unit contains two (2) bedrooms and one (1) additional space
shall be required for each additional two (2) bedrooms in the
unit.
9. A construction site drainage plan and procedure must be
submitted for engineering department approval prior to the
issuance of an excavation or building permit. The construction
procedures employed must be such that ~ runoff from rain or
snowmelt be permitted to drain to the river from. contact with
disturbed earth. The construction procedure to be used will in
no way impact the stream.
10. Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and
development in the public rights-of-way, staff would like the
following condition of approval:
The applicant shall consult city engineering (920-5080) for
design considerations of development within public rights-
of-way and shall obtain permits for any work or development
within public rights-of-way from city streets department
920-5130).
STAFF COMMENTS:
Stream Margin: Pursuant to Section 7-504 C a development is
required to undergo Stream Margin Review if it is within 100 feet
from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River and its
tributary streams, or within the one hundred year floodplain.
The applicable review standards are as follows:
1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development
which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase
the base flood elevation (BFE) on the parcel proposed for
development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering
study prepared by a professional engineer registered to
practice in the State of Colorado which shows that the base
flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not
limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site
which compensate for any base flood elevation increase
caused by the development.
RESPONSE: According to the FEMA maps this parcel is entirely
within the 100 year floodplain or within the Special Flood Hazard
Area (SFHA). The applicant's engineer, in the process of
demonstrating that the BFE would not be raised with the new
development, has produced a revised map indicating a readjusted
100 year floodplain line putting the building's footprint outside
of the SFHA. This change, if correct, requires a FEMA map
amendment process. This is typically a 30 day process, provided
FEMA accepts the map amendment. Until the amendment process is
completed, the Engineering Department cannot approve new
development on this parcel. If the amendment application is
denied the Department will consider the reasons for denial and
work with the applicant to address FEMA's concerns.
2. Any trail on the parcel designated on the Aspen Area
Comprehensive Plan: Pazks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Plan
map is dedicated for public use.
RESPONSE: According to the Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trail
Plan a trail is proposed to cross Castle Creek over to Picnic
Point. On the Aspen Meadow Final SPA Development Plan several
bridges are identified crossing Castle Creek and the Roaring Fork
River. These bridges all touch down on Meadow property or the
Rio Grande trail. It would be redundant to require a trail
easement on this parcel.
3. The recommendations of the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan
are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the
greatest extent practicable.
RESPONSE: The Roaring Fork Greenway Plan does not specifically
make a recommendation regarding this parcel. However the Plan
does recommend that the banks of the river be preserved as a
greenway. A fisherman's easement is recommended in the river and
along the banks of the river. In addition the applicant shall be
required to plant any regraded area inside the building envelope
and river with species in keeping with the Greenway Plan as well
as existing plants in the area.
4. No vegetation is removed or slope grade changes made
that produce erosion and sedimentation of the stream bank.
RESPONSE: The application proposes to build a berm between the
home and the river. According to the application no vegetation
will be removed nor slope grade changes will be made that would
encourage erosion or sedimentation. A construction site
drainage plan and procedure must be submitted for engineering
department approval prior to the issuance of an excavation or
building permit. The construction procedures employed must be
such that no runoff from rain or snowmelt be permitted to drain
to the river from contact with disturbed earth. The construction
procedure to be used will in no way impact the stream.
4
t
5. To the greatest extent practicable, the proposed
development reduces pollution and interference with the
natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary.
RESPONSE: The application states that the "proposed addition
does not interfere with the natural stream course changes."
See above response.
6. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water
Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of
a water course, and a copy of said notice is submitted to
the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
RESPONSE: The development does not require the alteration of the
river or relocation of the watercourse.
7. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is
altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his
heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood
carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished.
RESPONSE: Not applicable.
8. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state
permits relating to work within the one hundred (100) year
floodplain.
RESPONSE: A map amendment process is required of the applicant
prior to the issuance of any building permits. The amendment
process will determine whether the building's footprint is within
the 100 year floodplain. The applicant shall work with the
Engineering Department during the amendment process with FEMA.
An amendment must be accepted prior to the issuance of any
building permits.
Conditional IIse Review: The applicant purposes to convert an
existing garage to a 42o square foot attached accessory dwelling
unit (adu).
Pursuant to Section 5-508 an attached accessory dwelling unit
adu) shall be deed restricted to resident occupancy, shall not
be less than 300 square feet, and is subject to a conditional use
review. In addition, this dwelling unit will be 100 above grade
and complies with the standard established through Ordinance 60
Cottage In-Fill) that a maximum of 250 square feet of floor area
or 50~ of the floor area, whichever is less, shall be exempt from
the total allowable floor area calculations. Therefore 210
square feet of floor area is a bonus for providing an accessory
dwelling unit.
The following standards for a conditional use review are as
5
r
follows:
A. The conditional use is consistent with the purposes,
goals, objectives and standards of the Aspen Area
Comprehensive Plan, and with the intent of the Zone District
in which it is proposed to be located; and
RESPONSE: The provision of a deed restricted accessory dwelling
unit is consistent with the City's goals to provide a greater
inventory of employee housing.
B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with
the character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and surrounding land uses, or
enhances the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development; and
RESPONSE: The accessory dwelling unit will be located within a
converted garage. The total allowable floor area for the site
will not be increased due to the provision of an adu except for
the 210 square foot bonus for the provision of an accessory
dwelling unit 100 above grade. The area is residential in
character with which an adu is consistent.
C. The location, size, design and operating characteristics
of the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects,
including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and
vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery,
noise, vibrations and odor on surrounding properties; and
RESPONSE: The adu is proposed within the structure of the
existing garage which shall be converted. A new 2-car garage is
proposed on the site.
D. There are adequate public facilities and services to
serve the conditional use including but not limited to
roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police,
fire protection, emergency medical services, hospital and
medical services, drainage systems, and schools; and
RESPONSE: Public facilities already serve this site.
E. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to
meet the incremental need for increased employees generated
by the conditional use; and
RESPONSE: The provision of a deed restricted unit will add to
the supply of affordable housing within the City:
F. The proposed conditional use complies with all addi-
tional standards imposed on it by the Aspen Area
Comprehensive Plan and by all other applicable requirements
of this chapter.
RESPONSE: This application shall comply with the dimensional
requirements of this zone district and all other applicable
requirements of this chapter including the total allowable floor
area for this zone district with the 210 square feet of bonus.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the stream margin
and conditional use for the attached accessory dwelling unit
subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for the
remodel of the residence or the conversion of the garage into an
accessory dwelling unit the applicant shall provide a deed
restriction to the Housing Authority for approval and shall
record the document with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorders
Office and Planning Department. The restriction shall state the
accessory unit meets the housing guidelines for such units, meets
the definition of Resident Occupied Unit, and shall be rented for
periods of six months or longer.
2. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the FEMA map
amendment process shall be completed. If the amendment
application is denied the Engineering Department will consider
the reasons for denial and work with the applicant to address
FEMA's concerns.
3. Prior to the issuance of any building permits the Engineering
Department shall receive a Letter of Map Amendment (COMA) from
FEMA.
4. If ground water is encountered during construction and must
be discharged, the applicant shall obtain an industrial waste
discharge permit from the Colorado Division of Water Quality.
5. No vegetation is to be removed or slope grade changes made
that produce erosion and sedimentation of the stream bank.
6. There will be no disturbance of vegetation between the
building envelope and the river. No native vegetation shall be
permitted to be removed between the building footprint and the
edge of the river.
7. The applicant shall plant any regraded area inside the
building envelope and river with species in keeping with the
Roaring Fork Greenway Plan as well as existing plants in the
area.
8. Certification from a registered professional engineer or
architect in the State of Colorado shall be submitted for public
recordation, verifying full and accurate compliance with the
7
requirements in Section 7-141 (c) 9. of the Municipal Code.
9. The applicant shall grant a fisherman's easement for the
river for a width of five feet along the bank adjacent to the
property.
10. Prior to the issuance of an excavation or building permit, a
construction site drainage plan and procedure shall be submitted
for engineering department approval. The construction procedures
employed must be such that no runoff from rain or snowmelt be
permitted to drain to the river from contact with disturbed
earth. The construction procedure to be used will in no way
impact the stream.
11. The applicant shall consult city engineering (920-5080) for
design considerations of development within public rights-of-way
and shall obtain permits for any work or development within
public rights-of-way from city streets department (920-5130).
Engineering Referral Comments, 3/27 & 4/9
Site Plan
r
To: Leslie Lamont, Planning Department
From: Rob Thomson, Project Engineer(~~
Date: March 27, 1991
Re: Gordon Stream Margin Review and Conditional Use review
Having reviewed the above application, and having made a site
inspection, the Engineering Department has the following
comments
1. The proposed development is in a special flood hazard area.
The application was incomplete in that there was insufficient
information submitted in the application for a complete review.
The applicant should provide the following:
a. A demonstration that the proposed development will not
increase the base flood elevation. This shall be
demonstrated by an engineering study, HEC-II analysis,
prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice
in the State of Colorado which shows the base flood
elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to,
proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site which
compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by
development. The study should not only include no increase
at the new cross sections but also at the nearest existing
cross sections located upstream or downstream.
b. A demonstration, or a description of proposed
construction techniques to be used, that all new
construction or substantial improvements will be anchored to
prevent floatation, collapse, or lateral movement of any
structure to be constructed or improved .
c. A verification and recordation of the actual elevation
in relation to mean sea level to which any structure is
constructed. Verification may be submitted on a standard
FEMA Elevation Certificate or other appropriate standard
forms. It is recommended by the engineering department that
the elevation be certified after the structure is built as a
condition of receiving a certificate of occupancy or zoning
compliance.
d. A demonstration that the structure will have the lowest
floor, including basement, elevated to at least two (2) feet
above the base flood elevation.
rt" ,.-1
r
2. The applicants development plan indicates there is new site
development in the form of grade changes, retaining walls, a berm
and a ditch. The following shall apply:
a. Any new site work must be addressed in the demonstration
discussed in number 1. ~ It is unclear if the depicted ditch
is existing or new. The ditch was not visible on our site
inspection due to winter ground conditions. It is staff's
recommendation that the applicant either label the ditch on
development plan as "existing ditch" or furnish more
information on what is to be constructed.
b. No vegetation is to be removed or slope grade changes
made that produce erosion and sedimentation of the stream
bank.
c. The applicant must make a statement indicating there
will be no disturbance of vegetation between the building
envelope and the river. The engineering department
recommends that no native vegetation be permitted to be
removed between the building footprint and the edge of the
river.
d. The applicant should be required to plant any regraded
area inside the building envelope river with species in
keeping with the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan as well as
existing plants in the area.
5. Copies of all necessary federal and state permits relating to
work within the one hundred (l00) year floodplain shall be
provided.
6. The proposed development site plan does not depict:
a. off-street parking
b. the building envelope
c. the high water line
d. elevation reference marks for the 100 year flood plain
line. It is recommended that these marks be referenced from
those used by FEMA. This property lies between two cross
sections A and B on FIRM map panel 203 of 325.
7. Certification from a registered professional engineer or
architect in the State of Colorado shall be submitted for public
recordation, verifying full and accurate compliance with the
requirements in Section 7-141 (c) 9. of the Municipal Code.
8. The applicant is requested to grant a fisherman's easement
for the river for a width of five feet along the bank adjacent to
the property.
r.. ,
i _,e~
9. Conditional Use - the applicants development plan did not
indicate the size or number of bedrooms for the accessory
dwelling unit. One parking space shall be provided on site if
the unit contains two (2) bedrooms and one (1) additional space
shall be required for each additional two (2) bedrooms in the
unit.
10. A construction site drainage plan and procedure must be
submitted for engineering department approval prior to the
issuance of an excavation or building permit. The construction
procedures employed must be such that no runoff from rain or
snowmelt be permitted to drain to the river from contact with
disturbed earth. The construction procedure to be used will in
no way impact the stream.
11. Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and
development in the public rights-of-way, staff would like the
following condition of approval:
The applicant shall consult city engineering (920-5080) for
design considerations of development within public rights-
of-way and shall obtain permits for any work or development
within public rights-of-way from city streets department
920-5130).
cc Chuck Roth, City Engineer
Jim Gibbard, Project Engineer
rt/memo91.21
MEMORANDUM
To: Leslie Lamont, Planning Department
From: Rob Thomson, Project Engineer ~S~
Date: April 9, 1991
Re: Gordon Stream Margin Review and Conditional Use Review
Amendment Number One
Having received the floodplain study, HEC-2 analysis by Schmueser
Gordon Meyer, Inc. for the applicant, the engineering department
has the following comments:
1. The National Flood Insurance Program's (NFIP) Flood Insurance
Rate Map (FIRM) shows the existing and proposed development to be
within the 100 year floodplain, placing it in a Special Flood
Hazard Area (SFHA). Exhibit-4 of SMG's study shows the existing
and proposed development to be outside the SFHA. It appears that
the applicant has demonstrated that the structure and parcel were
inadvertently included in the SFHA, which would qualify for a
FEMA map amendment process. It is staff's recommendation that
the Letter Of•Map Amendment (COMA) from FEMA be received prior to
issuance of any permit.
2. If ground water is encountered during construction and must
be discharged, the applicant must obtain a industrial waste
discharge permit from the Colorado Division of Water Quality.
cc Chuck Roth, City Engineer
Jim Gibbard, Project Engineer
rt/memo91.32
0~ 4b
I ~
N oc I ~
U
O l ~~
o
Via;.;: °~. /
z u ~
o. /_..
a /
w
i~ _ ~__- o
jO
I
4 I
IpI O
l
I1I
1
I '..
C
m ~
v
cs
i6
t __-r L
m z~2f
I s Y o
j1
dPA~
i_
March 12, 1991
Mr. Bracken Raleigh
Stan Mathis Architects
P.O. Box 1984
Aspen, CO 81612
RE: Sheldon Gordon Floodplain Study
Aspen. Colorado
Dear Bracken:
1001 Grand Avenue, Suite 2-E
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
303) 9451004 (303) 9255727
Fax (303) 9455948
This letter is intended to provide a report on a floodplain analysis recently performed by SGM
for the above-mentioned property. This letter will also serve as a transmittal for four exhibits
pertaining to the floodplain analysis performed for the Sheldon Gordon property. The first of
these exhibits (11" x 17" format) is a 1:100 scale map depicting the floodplain study area.
The second exhibit is the hydraulic calculations (HEC-2 run) for the existing conditions (i.e.,
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA] run). The third exhibit is the hydraulic
calculations for the detailed study. The fourth exhibit is a detailed floodplain map (24" x36"
format) which details the location of the floodplain on the Sheldon Gordon property.
The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of an addition to the existing Sheldon
Gordon house located within a mapped floodplain location on Castle Creek. Previous
preliminary analyses have indicated that the majority of the Sheldon Gordon property is found
to be not inundated with the 100-year flood event from Castle Creek. However, when
reviewing the planimetric information derived by FEMA, the property is shown to be totally
inundated by the 100-year flood. The approach to our work, therefore, not only addressed
the effect of development upon the Castle Creek floodplain but, also, addressed
inconsistencies in the floodplain mapping which currently exists.
The information utilized for this detailed floodplain study is as follows:
1. Work maps from the FEMA study.
2. Hydraulic calculations from the FEMA study.
3. 1 " = 50' scale mapping (by Cooper Aerial Surveys).
4. Site specific topo map for the Sheldon Gordon property by Sidney Lincicome.
The approach to our study was to formulate a hydraulic model that was equivalent to the
model utilized by FEMA for development of the floodplain in this area. Once we obtained a
model that was equivalent to the FEMA model, we furthered our calculations to include
detailed topographic information specific to the Sheldon Gordon property. Once having made
these two runs, we could derive a comparison between the existing and proposed conditions.
Exhibit 2 (attached) is the mathematical model generated (complete with numerical results)
of the existing conditions. Exhibit 3 (attached) is a copy of the hydraulic model for the
proposed conditions. This model, as well, has the numerical results shown. Exhibit 1
attached) identifies the cross sections (and their locations) for which the hydraulic model was
established. You will note that the models were inclusive of the first four cross sections from
the FEMA study. The second model (Exhibit 2) includes two additional cross sections
identified as Sections 1.1 and 1.2. These cross sections are observed both on Exhibit 1 and
in further detail on Exhibit 4.
March 12, 1991
Mr. Bracken Raleigh
Page 2
The conclusions reached for the effect of the development within the floodplain of Castle
Creek are shown on Exhibit 4. In general, the schematic presentation of the effect is that the
development will have no effect on the floodplain of Castle Creek. We have found that the
channel of Castle Creek along the east property line of the Sheldon Gordon property is capable
of containing the flood from the 100-year event entirely. However, we have also found that
approximately 500 feet upstream of the Sheldon Gordon property, there is a location along
Castle Creek that possibly may overtop during the 100-year flood event. Therefore, we are
observing the floodplain line as mapped by FEMA shown along (or beyond) the western
property line of the Sheldon Gordon property.
It is most likely that, during a 100-year flood event, the Sheldon Gordon property may
effectively become an island. There is a possibility that the existing garage would be flooded
with shallow water from the overflow of Castle Creek. This overflow floodwater from Castle
Creek appears not to be critical in conveying the 100-year flood. In fact, review of various
other topographic maps generated in this area indicates that the overtopping of the bank
approximately 500 feet upstream of the property may or may not exist during the 100-year
event. It is important to note that the floodplain analysis performed by SGM specific of this
project assumed that the full 100-year flood event would be flowing in the channel east of
the Sheldon Gordon property. Therefore, the overflow channel is not considered as an
important factor in conveying the 100-year peak flows around the Sheldon Gordon property.
In summary, our floodplain analysis has identified that the proposed construction will have no
effect upon the 100-year floodplain of Castle Creek. Minor flooding could be expected along
the west side of the property due to an overflow of the banks upstream of the property.
Therefore, anticipation of shallow floodwaters along the west side of the property should be
considered when designing elements of the structure in this area.
I hope this information serves its intended purpose. If you have any questions or comments,
please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC.
v' !'yy
Je f rey S. Simonson, P.E.
JSS:Iec/91009
Enclosures
GORDON MEYER, INC.
i.
i.. i9gY 1459
e" r~ ki 1cN5u; nuwST :485 t
ASV Lit-t .-',u^i -:~E ir:34:46 t
itttttttttttitttttktttttttttttttttttttttttitttttttttit
X X XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXX
X X X X X % X
z zz z z
zzzzzzz zzzz z zXZZZ XXXZz
X Xz z z
X X X X X X
X X XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX
1
03-08-41 12:34:4b
I itt tt tttttt#tttt ttttttttt ttttttiltt itt t ttt ttttttt
EC1 AFI fA4 OATID tit 7b l~0ATE0 PWY 1494
E4ROR C~ft - 0(,02,03,04,05,06
100IFICATIIM! - 50,51,52,53,54,55,Sb
IERI-PC-XT tcRSI6V At~.ST 1485
tttttt#tttitttttttttttttttttttttttittttttttttttttt
FAEf 1
EXHIBIT-2
THI5 RLN EXE[X1TE0 03-09-41
d
I I _ .T^_ J I
ail l'n1:I r Ya..p [
I ...:i 4~(I-G1U_ 4t ~.i Gw,9-~u;5 t
tttttttttttttttttttTXtttftttttttttttttt
FLLG~JN ~:VS;k~N .'LGUJY_riiN ~]T_;hV r
1 iiftEl","n iiril NiN9 i4iR SInT METRIC ii'd'ih5 ,3
C. 2. 0. 4. .60(a04 .64 .0
J2 P&f,Or IFL4T 'r'rtf~5 X5ECV XSECH EN idLGC 1i41
1.400 .000 .060 .600 .~ .QCa .000
ti_Ei -~
0, n45.8ck1 .u~
Clii~iM iTkaCE
14 ,4(a .000
J3 4WtIA~E COBE5 f~'i SIR~RY FRINTfXIt
ISO.O46 .000 .~0 .000 .000 .000 .(~ .UOO .OUO .64a
r 1
S<.1
100 1~045 1~340 OOU D00 0~000 000
9T i.Ofa 5100.000 000 0 OOO O~000 4xa 000 OCa
XI 123.000 18.0 215.000 320.000 OW 000 CaO oca IXa OOp
nao.ooo oo0 7750.490 14a.a~n5o.640 146.000 n48.caa 180.4a0 n4b.ooo 2so.a00
n4a.ooo z6o.aoo n4z.4oo zlo.ooo n4o.ooo z75.oo0 7739.(x0 280.000 1139.000 31a.aa0
n4o.~o 329.0 n4z.aco 345.aca n4z.ooo 40o.oca na4.~9 420.066 nab.9oo 410.x60
n4e.ooo 4es.aao 7750.x00 490.0x0 nbo.aa,szo.6oo a4o 600 6ao
T 1.000 134a.f~000 000 a0 000 060 aa 600
XI 1.0x0 15.000 234.044 zea.ooo 2ao.a4a 166.0 15a.0a6 aw aa aoa
mu.9~aca nbo.~30.x66 77`,,8.4a0 4o.ao6 77`.,6.64a 55.~a 77s4.aa 19.oca
715z.~6 laa.ooo 7750.060 14s.aa9 7750.099 zza.ooo n4e.a~239.x40 na4.64o 2~.a66
SR n44.4Kq 274.OCa 7750.(a9 280.1 1750.U(a 415.000 7752.000 43x.049 nb6.0a1 480.000
XI 2.4~13.4 380.400 430.000 390.000 400.0 425.090 OOU 0+~1 0~
neo.oo6 600 mo.aa6 19.x00 nb6.o0o 59.o1a nsb.99o 1b4.aa 77sb.o0o 3ao.cao
7754.000 390.000 7754,000 425.000 1756.000 430.Od0 n60.OW 470.9 m0.900 527.64'6
R m4.tao 5a"5.6C0 n7b.000 6tw.(aU TiAD.Otw b50.(KK7 006 fag aa 606
Xl 3.000 18.000 305.000 333.040 600.000 500.0W 560.000 Ota 000 060
sR 781a.a~1866.600 1x.490 n94.oo0 26.066 neo.aa 30.000 mb.caa 44.WC
1 m4.9~55.0 1m.0~llo.oau m9.oo4 3ao.0~n68.cao 365.0(a nb7.ca0 314.ut16
n67.9ca 330.006 nb8.4aa 333.9W m4.444 a.0~a mz.aa7 3ao.aw m4.cao 390.x70
mb.OW 400.000 7800,000 475.000 7810.000 449.0CU Na fa6 000 000
EJ 060 01w u00 Lwa 0 000 COO OW 000
w±TH I'~5'4 C^iaj Ec r!
ti. .I
Ac'SS ..iiF. _~_
SOB OCR eruB aIUB ACH ntiun lfiL i'h'A L'-t1~Riv-'-iT
I~ 't Oy 4li ir;CGB XNL X?7C:H XtiR NTN ECYIN SS-~
U3FE XLBi XLGa XLOBR iTRIfu PC ICCNT CORFR TIPNID uti-ST
PTitF 1
9;= .100 LEND= .300
zsEC.~ 123.000
123.0 b.80 1745.80 7145.64 1145.B0 1747.81 1.81 00 00 7740.00
5100. 210. 3847.1643.b0.29B.425.0.0.7740.E
W 3.49 12.84 3,86 100 045 1(a)7734.00 251.x!
012274 0. ~i.0.0 7 0 i 213.49 46;,.x)
tSEr~ 1.000
0I NV CN,D f THAN hYIN5
1.00 4.9b 7748.46 00 1744.56 60 1.82 f2 774B.~
1300. ]. 1249.0.2.204.0.1.7150.00
41 .66 8.23 00 100 045 100 00u 1'r44.~1 225.23
005434 200. 180.160.3 0 0 00 53.02 278.26
j
zSEG~ 2.000
36~, 20 TRIES ATTEl~TE- SSEL,Cr~.
593 PROBABLE N[NIMOM SPECIFIC E?fA61'
720 CRITICN_ DEPTH AS5lk~D
2.(Q 2.42 7756.92 J756.42 G 7757.8 61 3.44 UO 1756.(x1
1304. 343. 952.4.214.131.4,5.2.77,`5.00
03 i .61 7.21 1.03 100 045 100 00 7754.00 134.74
013650 340. 425.
r
4(b,20 14 0 UO 304.44 434.18
FStC?~ 3.000
718`i MININUi SPECIFIC ENERBY
3720 fnITiCAL -EPTr1 ASSI~D
3.0. 4.32 m1.32 m1.32 i0 7772.34 1.02 6.42 12 Tib8.00
1300, 129. 1040.123.95.111.5;'i.9.b.7768.04
05 1.36 8.96 2.34 ivi!045 IG9 0c~7767.00 174.48
011072 600. 560.50t,10 I!0 195.:.§369,82
03-08-41 12:34:46 ACti 3
t #tttt t tt tttttt tttttttttttittttttttlit ttttt Stit tt
t~C2 'r7EASE OATID AbV 76 (kOATE- PWY 1984
CORK - Oi,G2,03}04,U'S}06
NO-IFICATION - 50,Si,52,w,54,55,58
ifs-PC-XT 4'EASiGN AL~1ST 19(~
tttttttttttttt;tttii#itttttttttttt#tttttttt#tt#tt
THIS RON EXECOl'lr. 03-08-41
Y.: ??', it SL:.i t:.f J.., ° - r '.': S. I ., ,., ,, r° __ _.,...t uii. i xiii, .;., .•1S,,.I[ . R'...:iI _ISZI SS7. ,.S.i . d.,
81, _
I ,!C•~ 4,~`I j1.94 r... rj t F ~4;.'.: r. I '1 :~
i [P~ + X~ r GiC^i 6:L>::°i i4c5 ? ? vrl ,dLi= h i_~:e t
P 5'jj DATE ~-li-4i TI ti t~e;04:~:,5 t t ';915; ~:~ [105 i~iel 1x48-2UP, t
tttttt;titttttttitttttttitttttttttittittttttttttttitit ittttttttttttttttttttit#tttitkitttititt
X X XKXXXXK XXXXX XKXXX
K X X X X X X
X X X X X
XKXXXXX XXXX X XXXXX XXXXK
X X K K X
K X K K X K
K X XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX
1
03-11-91 U8:04:05
THIS RLN r7,ECUtID 03-11-41
t t tttttt ttttt ttt tt tt tt t tt#tttitttt tt tittt tt t ttt tt t
HEC2 RELEASE GATED ~V 76 IPDATED t41Y 1984
EHRDR Cl%Ct - 01,02,03,04,OS,Ob
MdiDIFICATIW! - 50,51,52,53,54,55,5b
Itv`FPC-XT VERSIOPI 'tR,6115T 1485
i itit ttitttitttiU itti tt#tt t t tt t t:t t ttt t t tttttttt
F(~ 1
EXHIBIT-3
iR9:^: I';'C Dii'~+t iDi'STRT YfTRIC I\5 i trSe~U
0, 2, 0.0.00~~1tw lift 0 0. /745.900 0:1i
2 '+NROF IPLOT i'RF4'9 XSBCU X9ECN FN ALLOC IBIv CEtitiIN iTRACe
1.t~1 .OOU .000 000 0~4CK~tKKl 000 .O(K~000
73 UARIAf4E L~069 fCR (~;N~ARY rRINTCt1i
15O.tb0 .~ .VOO 4~t~44 400 OC>V t~ .t~4(~0
ltw 1tW 045 ICW 300 000 KKr OW 000 400
3T 1.000 5700.000 000 0~0~000 900 d00 000 0~
Xl 123.000 18.000 275.000 320.000 K10 000 i>t,b 000 900 000
7760.000 x10 77`,A.004 100.000 77`,A.C~i40.0(b 7749.x10 190.000 774b.400 2`.0.000
7744.0 2b0.000 7742.4 270.000 7740.000 275.000 7739.000 280.000 7134.000 310.000
FA 7740.000 320.000 7742.000 345.000 1742.000 400.000 7744.000 420.0 1746.000 470.000
7748.000 495.000 7754.000 444.000 7160.0 520.400 0 000 000 000
7T 1.001 1300.404 0~G00 a~0 040 940 040 000 000
f,!1.0~15.000 230.000 290.000 200.000 160.000 1(?'O.tKq 010 0~tb0
9R 7770.000 nw 1160.040 30.000 7758.000 40.0(b 1756.C>Mt 55.000 1754.4tq 14.0
x'i 7752.000 1(x.000 1750.000 145.000 1750.000 220.0 7748.(~X 230.000 7744,0 235.004
Lfi(7744.Uw 270.000 1754.GA0 280.000 1754.000 415.000 1752.tb0 430.4Cq 77b0.Otw 480.000
tl 1.100 Ib.G40 i25.tg0 180,000 200.tg0 160.OUtX 180.000 aw 000 000
n 7'i3.000 000 1757.OC~1 44.QW 7759.000 44.040 1759.000 3.000 1755.000 77.000
Eit 7753.0 65.000 7763.000 85.000 7763.000 101.000 7753.001 101.000 7752,0 116,000
uR 7751.M~0 125.i~0 1748.t~00 IZfl.Crctl 7745.000 IC.O(b 1145.000 170.000 7154.000 190.000
6R 7755.(~~0 260.400 000 040 000 000 040 400 0~CqO
XI 1.?~16.000 42.000 120.000 62.000 70.(80 b5.tg0 000 000 OOU
6R 1759,000 iK~O 1757.004 4.000 7759.~U 11.0 7759,0X1 I7.(~7761.000 17.000
7 7761.0 30.Oi10 7154.0(~~30.1Xw 759.(~JQ 3.000 773.00'0 60.tK>D 77~.IX~0 74.400
a"2 7752.10 9Z.(g0 7'r48.000 97.tKw 7748,000 IiB.Ow 7754.Otw IZO.CKiO 1758.000 150.000
6R 1760.MKi 210.0 OW 00<7 OCK1 044 000 040 G00
XI 0042 13 CA~1 90.tw0 434.004 28.Ot~(X 170.000 150.OM 000 000 tq0
6k 7780.000 Oil 7714.tKq 10.0 77b0.W0 50.040 7156.t~164.ta~G 71`.,6.0 OtW
tXt 1754.000 390.004 7754.000 425.0 7756.00?434.400 7760.tb0 470.000 7710.000 520.000
uR 7714.000 53.000 7776.000 o04.Ca0 7790.0CK1 654.404 000 000 CwU X~0
XI 3 19 0w 305.tg0 33.t~4 600.C~i0 St~.O~)560.i~J0 000 440 XNi
Cv?7910.tr:K1 000 79iq.OCA 10.000 7794.C~V0 20.t~1<80.000 30.004 77'ib.~4 40.QC~
7774.(Kxl 3.000 i772.v00 110.010 71'i0.(>70 300.aXi 7768•tw4 305.0 7'r67.000 310.004
GR Pr67.40i1 34.000 7168.000 z"~,0~7770.(KK1 3~U.OUO 1772.000 384A00 7174.0tw 390.1
Sic 7?Jb.u04 4t~.utw 78~.Otw 475.«.'0 1810.tXq 490.iKX~ice 400 Otq 00d
a two 44i~ut>rr utw 044 a.~044 444 two t~~4
u8 J6 ~ 'Jrf,F
n'CF l
t';~i.^
n Y'_
H1A_
X: w~ X ;
ii~4 1~.~IY
hY
h~ w:::~9
i : IhA11 I~YViry
r 'L_
S'^ \ x
nU= .100 CSNU=3C><1
FSEC'~ 123.000
12..00 6.80 7745.80 1145.84 7745.80 7741.61 1.61 CW GO 114U.U0
57W. 210.3847.ib43,b0.298.425.0.0.7740.00
04 3.49 IZB4 3.88 100 045 100 OCm 71:9,00 251.04
012274 0.0.0.0 7 0 00 213.44 4b5.00
j
tSECNB 1.0~
5311 nv cN~m rici¢ Tww HuINs
l.ao 4.96 n4B.96 ao od na9.s6 60 1.BZ 12 raa.oo
1300. 1. 1249.0.2.209.0 .2.1.7750.00
Ol .b6 6.23 00 100 045 100 000 7744.x1 215.23
005439 Z00. 180.1b0.3 0 0 00 53.02 278.26
0
1'xCNB 1.100
1,10 4.95 1749.95 00 7750.51 56 95 00 7751.E
1300. 0. 1300.0.0.218.0.3.1.7754.00
02 .00 6.0't 00 100 U45 100 000 7745.00 12b.05
005105 200. 180.160.2 0 0 49.45 115.50
X~CNO 1.209
iUl HV CHPN6E- M~ THAN HJ INS
20 TRIALS ATTElE'TED VrSEL,LI~L
693 Pft08ABLE MINII£M SPECIF IC ENER6Y
3720 CRITICAL 11EPTH A551AiE0
1.20 4.b4 7752.b4 7752b4 00 7754.70 ZO6 61 45 7152.59
1300. 0. 13W.0.0.113.0.3.i.7754.00
02 .38 11.51 00 100 045 11X1 000 774B.t'~U 87.03
023144 b2. 65.70.20 8 0 1 32.52 119.55
15E~ 2.0~
7301 NY (NAKED NCf~ THAN HVINS
2tb 3.02 7757.02 00 UO 7751.54 51 2.84 15 7756.{ut
I;AlO. ,~4. 421.5.240.1;:E.5.4.1.7?56.~
03 1.56 6.16 1.00 Its 045 icro 004 7'154.00 131.84
011185 128. 180.170.4 0 0 00 309.40 440.24
t5ECN0 3.0~
585 25 TRIrY5 ATTEMPTE- 6SEL,CNSEL
543 F'R88ABLE NINIML49 SPECIF IC Eb:fi'6Y
720 CiiiTICr'4_ DEPTH ASSL4'~D
5,00 4.~~ 7711.E T77i.53 00 7712,34 1.01 b.2b 15 7768.00
i3tq, 1?A. 1047.123.45.117.53.8.5.P;b8.00
15 i.[w 8.93 2.3w 100 045 100 000 7767.00 173.83
010486 biW. 5b0.Stb.20 II 0 Oli 146.04 364.81
1.
0.C L ME. M
i.C I L ilE . M
i{~).C I L R af. M
1;0.C i L R~. M •
140.C I l WE. M
160.C I L c. M .
1.00 181.C I L6Fc M
200.C I LSD M.
220.C I MEk M.
244.C I WER M .
260.C 1 IiE R M .
2E?0.C I E R M.
300.C I E k M.
320.C I E R M
340.C I EL R M
1.10 360.C I 6~ RM
380.C I .NE R M
4oa.c I . i~R n .
420.C I . W E M.
S.N 440.I . i~ M.
460.C I. N(;£ .M
480.C I. L'aE M
500.C I Y~ M
520.C i l6~ M .
s44.c I LaE .n
56D.C I LSD n
580.C I L6~ M
600.C ILE n .
2.00 620.C i L6~ . M
694.C ILE. .M
660.C 1 LVIE. , n
680.C ILE. M
700.C I L'aE M
120.C ILE M
740,C I LWE M
76it,C ILE M .
1(~i.C IL.i~ M.
804.C ILE M
B20.C IL 4~ .M .
84n,C I.L E , M
860,C L 1~ M
884,C I L t M
5C~).C IL ttiE M
920.C L E M
940.C I l I£ M .
460.C iL '~ M .
584.C I L VE M. .
lua<i.C IL ~ . M .
1020.C I L hf . .A .
1440.C IL WE. 8 .
1060.C IL 4iE. M
IG84.C L itiE M •
11110.C IL kE M •
1120.C IL ~'E M •
1140.C it r~ M .
1160.C iL .kE M.
3.00 1180.IL .WE M .
Ikktkkkkktktkktktt#tkktttkkkkkkktttkktttktkiktkkkt
rEC` RELu15E UATE- NGV Th l;r'CATED M~ii 1494
tiiA~t Cf7fi92 - 01,02,U3,04,G5,I'C
MQDiFICATiCti - 5U,51,52,~,54,55,56
IIPFPC-XTl~'"i,oICEV A(,'~i51 IS85
k# k kt#tkktkkk#k k kt kk kk k t k kktk#t#tkktkkk iktk k t#kktk
TO: City Engineer
Housing Director
Roxanne Eflin*
Zoning**
FROM: Kim Johnson, Planning
Y
RE: Gordon Stream Margin Review and Conditional Use Review
Case #A8-91
DATE: March 11, 1991
Attached for your review and comments is an application from
Sheldon Gordon requesting approval of Stream Margin and
Conditional Use Reviews.
Please return your comments to me no later than !larch 29, 1991.
Thanks.
Roxanne, please comment on trails.
Zoning please comment on site visit.
ASPEN/PITRIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
303) 920-5090
March 11, 1991
Bracken Raleigh
Stan Mathis Architect
501 S. 5th Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Gordon Stream Margin Review and Conditional Use Review
Dear Bracken,
This is to inform you that the Planning Office has completed its
preliminary review of the captioned application. We have
determined that this application is complete.
We have scheduled this application for review at a public hearing
by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, April 16,
1991 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 pm. The Friday before the
meeting date, we will call to inform you that a copy of the memo
pertaining to the application is available at the Planning
Office.
Please note that it is your responsibility to post the subject
property with a sign for the public hearing.
If you have any questions, please call Kim Johnson, the planner
assigned to your case.
Sincerely,
Debbie Skehan,
Office Manager
AT~$4•NP 1
r.AND usE APPLSQ~TIGN >U~i -°~
1) Project Name S+IEL.fJoN 1''~.GB2LaoN PHMO L_RND ATJ~1T~O1~/
2) Project locatian (IOO FSLAc~ BIR.GN a21~~~
indicate street --'~'^^^^, lot & block nmtber, 1s3a1 dev-cripkian whez,e
appropriate)
3) Piasent Zoning R • I rj PuO 4) Iat Size
5) Applicant's Name, Address & ERwne # ~F1EL'Gol'l }q, Go~1xT1
1310 MDNTa4-rai~ /Iry~ Svl'1Z~64 SJcM'Pc'MONIG~G/t:L1~gD~3 Z13•¢$$•5~7$
6) Rep ~-~-five's Name, Address & Phone # STLtti) IstATFI•\S RP,c.f}ITEC~~
0 5 S. 5~` e,1-REET ~'SP1=nl Ga ~.0 2.A;oo `~ZO • 1434
7) 1]+pe of AppliC1~aptian (pleaase diec-dc all that apply)
Ck][ldltlona~. Usd' ^ ~~ ~a7. SPA car~b~al historic Dev.
Special Review
t^
Final SPA Final Historic Dev_
8040 Gn~iiline
Strnam Mav~in
Mcwttain View Plane
rminitmi ~atian
Iat Split/Lot Line
Adjustment
rneptual FUD Minor Historic Dev.
Final PUD Historic D®olitian
Subdivisian Historic Desic~oatian
ct/Map Amer~tt CM,bS Allotment
c;r~s F]a~tian
8) Description of Fsrictir~ Uses (amber and type of pscicf-irn~ stnx-tines:
gppnTrimate sq. ft.; nlm6er of be~nams; any pzevious a=mmvalc q~recl to the
PAY) -
SIN6l.fi lMIL4-F~E SID~/.1G`.t.T wa~UILp~NC~wIBRILY..ECCNN~Cr~!';.
1QOOby XISTIr`ktf PiZEVIOU RSRODi=LS -A 7.+D~'XPh-I-~SI~NS•
9) D~criptian of Development Application
L.1VIld4 ~OOYt A'N cEV6~~~vEST BED(~ool-t~L.owE2L~vo~1 AvfJlTlotil
EXI»wS1eN f,~ U>J~~i Exlsrlnc a.4aeA~E 2E~ro'DFC.
1 J•lT0 EM PLU~i'EE {I OyStlyCi /) N cT.
10) Have you attad>red the followi>;g? [
gipRPSpOPiSet0Attadment2, lA(inimm Sl i2miSClOn ~Itents
1 LIJ ' 6ResponsetoAttarimPnt3, Specific ~,~i~ian Oor[tents
Response to Attac3ment 4, Review Stand.~.~G for Your Application
F'~r3, II !94!
n/TK/A~ COfiNTf' pLgNN~FJ4 De.r.•M77~/T
To w~ !?' MA¢- coy
Z'Hl5 !5 To syI)2o4UG~ yt~u 7'0 ~ P,Qo~SEa
2~1~-fo~~~ ~.~nr>!z-larl Z-o .4 Hovst' gu/c.r /,J197G fj T
l/oo ,~3lt7GC g/,e~lt .oR/l/F. THt;'!zE IfAV£ ,SEEiy Two
P,2~!//ovs f}D,DIT/I~SJ ?NS'SEGONA ,~E/NG /.v /`r85
T#E ~Al~/Tlbxl A.~/~ RGMOf~BI- To TffE gO,QDO~tI
DES/.O.E'NGE Loc.•/4~TE7J ®N GoT !o OF TN's' ~w4a1C /B/RGH
ESTi~T~ 5U~3.0/ t!/g /oal ~}N~ 3yoWN ou THc .9TTAGyED
2AWi~xiS Go/~1'ptY w1TH f3GC, 'S77zSft/-1 Mfg-Rt~/N i4EViE~en/
rAr>~-IZnS R~zQU/aC~ /N ~.~.7~So¢~c~ ore ~7-{}E ASPJ~/
e.K1NA us£ GaA~'. TffE R&SPoNSES To THOSE
Tf}Nl~fl-det~S i1RL~ As ~otGOWS
j, f} GE'7-TDe ,L~r-~'O A ~ EFEG-2 ~fi'~oOD ANA~Gysis W/LL f~E
jJ20V/l.7ED ~o/Z G~ST~E GREEK /95 !7 RSL9TFS era
OEV~C~/Y/~NT W/TH-I~! T+i~ 14.eoaPGA/~1. THE A.vALy~/5
JILL maw TftATTHEPRO.~'dSC`TJ D~V~zo~,n-l~i~/T- W/u.,.vo7
N~it~•"E THE .~9''r~ ~GOOr.~ ~-!~'//iT/cn/,
2~ Tii~,~ At2El~/o >7E5/4.~/ATL•D PvBt./c. T~J3/ag -St/oW~I
N THET~.A/GS JWASTE72 Pl..f3n/.
3~ TffE RG~1.QlN4 ~G/2Kli~e~~NW y f- l~LA~/ not' .voT
AlJ~7R85S TiflS 5/TE.
G OHT/NBE'D
STREAM Mf},~G1N l~ENIEW lelZ.GoHlQ~SI~EMG£ Aflni7'io~/
gNaRErioo~
NO 1,/£LiETAT/bN W/LG f3E 2£MoVL~D Nom ~SLcPE
4R/~/JE Gt/yA/lrE~ µ//Lt. f3~ J`~1 ~fJ~' Tt/l}T
WGULIJENGOUR.~'F G'PLOS/oN Ore ajEDJM~
NTRTIbJ~/.5) ?FfE PizaP05Ep •~n~iT~aiv acBs Na'T ~N7ER~~
r~'y~d?H `Z'yd£ NATuR.A~. '5T~/3•t-l GOV25~' Gt,'N~
v4ES ,il 7N6 oWN~ ~~ gP/~L /c./9-IVT 5o A4RE'
F T.~ A• 41~!lRH.~TE w/c~- ,eE P.eod/rJ~
7D,8~, GoPiFS w/u 6~ PRav~r>~
v.PG~Y~~ PvTTIf/5 P,eoJE~-T ~.v T/fE ~
lYr2LIE5%A•1JGENA Fd2 GoNg/A~~¢TIO~
J.
Jr~t ~v MA ?l,~ l 5 /j,2
CffiTecr7,5'd! S. ~ ~K~
T.i}SPErv~ GDLcR/fTJ
oS/
G//9Zo !~
November 26, 1990
City of Aspen
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Attention: Pitkin County Planning Office
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
I hereby authorize Stan Mathis to speak to
you on my behalf regarding my residence at
1100 Black Birch Drive, Aspen, Colorado.
c "
M. GORDON
1310 Montana Avenue • Santa Monica, CA 90403 • (213) 458-5678 • FAX (213) 458-7270
STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC.
OWNERSHIP AND ENCUMBRANCE REPORT
PREPARED FOR: BRACKEN RALEIGH ORDER N0. 18100
HEREBY CERTIFIES from a search of the books in this office that
the owner of:
LOT 10, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES SUBDIVISION, according to the PlatthereofrecordedMay1, 1967 in Plat Book 3 at Page 244 as
Reception No. 127234.
Situated in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, appears tobevestedinthenameof:
SHELDON M. GORDON
and that the above described property appears to be subject to
the following:
A Deed of Trust dated November 6, 1989, executed by Sheldon M.Gordon, to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County, to secure an
indebtedness of $873,000.00, in favor of Desert Palace, Inc.,
recorded December 29, 1989 in Book 610 at Page 773 as ReceptionNo. 318593.
EXCEPT all easements, rights-of-ways, restrictions and
reservations of record.
EXCEPT any and all unpaid taxes and assessments.
This report does not reflect any of the following matters:
1) Bankruptcies which, from date of adjudication of the most
recent bahk,ruptcies, antedate the report by more than fourteen
14) years.'
2) Suits 'and judgements which, from date of entry, antedate
the report by more than seven (7) years or until the governingstatueoflimitationshasexpired, whichever is the longer
period.
3) Unpaid tax liens which, from date of payment, antedate the
report by more than seven (7) years.
Although we believe the facts stated are true, this Certificate
is not to be constructed as an abstract of title, nor an
opinion of title, nor a guaranty of title, and it is understood
and agreed that Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc., neither assumes,
nor will be charged with any financial obligation or liabilitywhateveronanystatementcontainedherein.
Dated at Aspen, Colorado, this 23rd Day of January A.D. 1991 at
8:00 A.M.
BY: ~
Authorized S nature
STEWART TITL)H:
GUARANTY COMPANL'
99C
Q
Beealt
o
VO
l~~'
r
1'q )NC
xumn
Lake
t.
Aspen
7y1GLE EYE MAPS
9SAed
4:
Nol UI ~VUb a raA~ w
nNn~A en m~yw l.oMiNellon
of ~Inwp uW ro~C~ mq b~ In
pro0nu In osrlUn ~ruw
w ,~I ~~~
iIMr~ ~ ~.
I~
I~
M~""t~a
GI N I? Y M A'P
HEL-~.FJ CaOt2ppll HOUSE
MQh-E-L AND ADt~1TtOt~1:
114Z~-~SL.AG1C-f3112U=1 DfzIVE
nlTktN GZDI-Ill"fY ~---STAN
hfATEOS
ARCHTfECfURE
MD
PLAN1~'t1C
Post
Office
Box
1984
Aspen
Colorado
81612
w,+
PN
EXNIBIT-1
VAA _ _ _ A~~,.iJ~~i-~
Va
2~n
tl~
z~m
J (
m
m J
V
L 1
W
X
til
N
k
t
j m _4
3
I
o
I.
I ti
1
1
5
I
J
n
i
n
oo _. ,
1 -
z
r /
m. ~~O ~~'~`~
Q
O / ~ 14
a ~
o ~~ ~
Z I \a41~
v:Y
STAN MATHIS
Architecture & Plann)nb
P. O. Box 1984
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
303) 920.1434
TD ~P~xl 7~t-,emu N ~ ~~ ~ ~ ,~~
FEB 2 ~:
WE ARE SENDING YOU ^ Attached ^ Under separate cover via_
Shop drawings ^ Prints ^ Plans
Copy of letter ^ Change order ^
COPIES DATE NO.DESCRIPTION
L 17~ 5 ~ c_ a til ~ ~ t~P vE~ I-~'Qf~
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below
For approval Approved as submitted Resubmit copies for approval
For your use Approved as noted Submit copies for distribution
As requested Returned for corrections Return corrected prints
For review and comment
FOR BIDS DUE 19 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS l~ I1'1 T~La' 2 !`7 T b /3~ ~~~F //V ~"/~6Lfj'
COPY
DRTE 1 ~ /)
L/^ 7
JOB NO.
NTTENTIOrv
c
RE.
d r- ~-~
Samples
following items:
Specifications
1
vA0WC111Q1 nia.omn, a.a mul. If enclosures are not as noted kintlly notify ua at once.
CITY OF ASPEN
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERET
PROJECT:
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE:
REPRESENTATIVE'S PHGNE:
OWNER'S NAME:
SUMMARY
is/y
V SUMMARY
1. Type. of Application:_~~~? 0~~,~,.. ~J192r. ~~~~ f~`~'G /oo~`C
2. Descxib~e~~a-ction//type of .dyevelo/pment being qugest~d•G~,~~1~lit-Own- Tb O~,C i~/1,/~~A l ~,,~,~0,~. i~ ~~i.~d n~i.~ 1•
Policy Area/
Referral Auent Comments
4. Review is: ( &7y Onl ) (CC Only) (P&Z then to CC)
5.
6.
7.
Public Hearing: (YES) (NO)
Number of copies of the application to be submiQQtted:
What fee was applicant requested to submit: ~pUD 7~ ~~ = g
Anticipated date of submission: ~~ 0~ /~3 ~ ~
COMMENTS/UNIQUE CONCERNS:
frm.pre_app
3. Areas is which Applicant has been requested to respond,
types of reports requested:
STAN MATHIS
Architecture & PlannY.,g ~
P. O. Box 1984
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
303) 920-1434
u.v ~ ~- / ~L/}7l/A/ / ~ ~
o i ~1 JP/r-~v' ~ ~~ ~l
X12
Q ~~ ~QQ~~~~~~Q~
OATE~ ~ /
JOB NO.
ATTENTION
l
RE..
ct
or~~-
e -- ~--~ ~r'2-c_
L~ v~
a
SENDING YOU ^ Attached ^ Under separate cover via HYt~~ the following items:
Shop drawings ~ Prints ^ Plans ^ Samples ^ Specifications
Copy of letter ^ Change order ^
COPIES DATE NO.DESCRIPTION
vr~ GiNl~
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below
For approval Approved as submitted Resubmit copies for approval
For your use Approved as noted Submit copies for distribution
As requested Returned for corrections Return corrected prints
For review and comment
FOR BIDS DUE 19 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS ll_r Thl/~Ira I'"PRG~/k`,>fr L ~F' Tr!-E l~~lf'>Ok7[= L
A-Gi41e~~ /,c~~c~1 z /1-c/~~o y fz-r u ~i %~-c y N ~ T
COPY