HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020.07.22_Engineering Comments Gorsuch Haus Detailed ReviewGorsuch Haus Detailed Review
Engineering Comments
July 23, 2020
PD Development Agreement:
1. Article IV. Public Improvements – All Exhibits referenced in this section need to be submitted to
the Engineering Department for review. This section of the PD shall include all public
improvements including those that overlap with the Lift One Lodge. Given the overlapping
complexities of the LOL and Gorsuch projects the PD Development Agreement needs to speak to
the expectations of installation timing for all public infrastructure including but not limited to (1)
the 16" waterline connection from S Aspen St to Monarch St (2) the electric primary from S
Aspen St to Monarch (3) any necessary interim drainage and mudflow infrastructure should one
project proceed ahead of the other (4) the condition of the termination of S aspen St for both
vehicles and pedestrians should LOL proceed ahead of Gorsuch and (5) the completion of all
Dean St improvements in regards to Gorsuch or if those improvements are solely tied to Lift One
Lodge.
2. Section 3.5 c states “Soil stabilization shall be located within the property boundaries or follow
Section 21.12.140 of the Municipal Code.” This is acceptable. Section 3.21 B of the Draft PD
Development Agreement proposes a fee-free easement. This is not acceptable to the COA
Engineering Dept.
3. If just the cul-de-sac and not the whole street is snowmelted, snow plows will use the cul-de-sac
to turn around. The plows have chains on the tires that will damage a concrete cul-de-sac.
Damage to snowmelted concrete will have additional costs to maintain. The maintenance and
replacement will be the responsibility of the Gorsuch Haus. The City will not be responsible for
damage incurred by Street maintenance. This language shall be added in the PD Agreement.
4. Section 30 of Ordinance 39 specifies the process for determining snowmelt along all of South
Aspen St. This process needs to be acknowledged and included in the PD Agreement. The
development agreement shall have the same winter maintenance process agreement for South
Aspen St that was laid out in Ordinance 39.
Use of the Public ROW:
5. The COA Engineering Department does not approve of waiving all fees for the use of the ROW
during construction. It is not appropriate to waive the ROW fees for the construction of this
project. Ordinance 39 clearly states the projects stabilization shall be located within the
property boundaries or follow section 21.12.140 of the Municipal Code. Section 21.12.140
requires fees be paid for use of the ROW for stabilization. The ordinance permits the use of the
ROW for stabilization but does not waive fees. In addition to stabilization in the ROW fees, the
fees for rental of the ROW for staging storage and laydown shall not be waived.
Easements:
6. Gorsuch Haus will need permission from Mountain Queen to change their drainage and access
easement. Maintenance of an open channel is very different than maintenance of a road with
pipe. Provide documentation of this approval.
7. The subdivision Plat needs to show easements for channel flow, not just infrastructure.
8. The access easement is written to provide pedestrian and bicycle access from Hill St to Monarch
but not up the ajax mountain access road. Pedestrian and Bicycle access should be provided up
the mountain road. The DRC response document states a public access is agreed and
documented but it is not shown in an easement on the plat. Section 3.7 c of the Development
agreement only addresses pedestrian and bicycle access from Hill St ROW to Monarch St ROW.
9. While the Shadow Mountain transformer has been relocated to the transformer by South Aspen
Townhomes, there are still utility meters for Shadow Mountain at the south side of their
property. How will these be accessed? Provide adequate easements and accessibility.
Slope Stability:
10. Page 1 of the slope stability report does not support the oversteepening of the hillside and
recommends structural walls on either the building or hillside. This needs to be addressed
where the civil plans propose 1:1 slopes. The 1:1 slopes are not approved.
Revocable Encroachment License Hill Street ROW:
11. In addition to the Hill St encroachment agreement, a standard encroachment license will be
required at the conclusion of the project prior to CO.
12. Engineering needs to review Exhibit A and B reference in the Encroachment license.
13. Language needs to be added to the permanent encroachment license agreement that should
the City need to perform work on the 16" waterline or electric primary within the Hill St ROW
the replacement of the "landscape improvements" removed for excavation of the utilities will
be at the sole cost of the Gorsuch property to replace.
14. In Section 1. Encroachment Permission delete "building improvements". There shall be no
building improvements in the Hill St ROW
15. Finalize the call out for the encroachment distance. I think it is 110 ft of the westernmost
portion of the Hill St ROW.
Mudflow:
16. Per the Tetra Tech mudflow report 3' of freeboard is needed along the south side of Gorsuch
Haus. It does not appear this is met given the FFE and door openings shown on sheet C.2.03.
Please address. Also reference window plan to show all windows have 3' freeboard.
Transportation Impact Analysis:
17. The TIA as submitted is accepted. The necessary number of trips is mitigated.
Civil Plans:
18. The headwall and catch basin will be the maintenance responsibility of Gorsuch, as the City does
not have the equipment to maintain the catch basin over the retaining wall. The responsibility of
the catch basin to Gorsuch will be memorialized in a permanent encroachment license.
19. The LOL and SATH PUDs required public parking spaces be provided at the top of South Aspen
St. The response to project review DRC comments stated that the parking spots are moved in to
the parking garage. The cul-de-sac design is great and should not be altered to add parking spots
but the project needs to ensure the requirements from the previous approvals for SATH and LOL
are properly acknowledged.
20. Given the proposed improvements, it is not clear that the trees along the property line of the
Mountain Queen and Caribou condos can be retained. This needs to be worked out with Parks.
Call out the cut depth and location in reference to the drip lines.
21. The stormwater vault placed partially in the ROW will be accepted as a permanent
encroachment. The vault treats approximately 1,000 sf of the ROW thus it is permitted.
22. The plat revokes the permanent encroachment license of Shadow Mountain Townhomes with a
plat note. A proper process is needed to revoke the existing encroachment license and issue a
new encroachment license for Shadow Mountain. The new license will require a new survey
exhibit and coordination with Shadow Mountain.
23. Sheet C2.00 Cul-De-Sac Plan Profile and Grading
a. Snowmelt in the cul de sac is not approved until a design solution is agreed upon by the
applicant and City of Aspen that will eliminate any possibility of ice damning at the
interface between the snowmelt and non snowmelt areas on South Aspen St. While
some alternatives have been discussed with Sopris and COA Engineering, we do not feel
confident that these plans guarantee a design solution. Possible solutions that should be
fully vetted are (1) trench drain (2) valleypan (3) grooved pavement (4) ending snowmelt
at a less steep location (5) altering grading.
b. It appears the west side of the retaining wall extends onto Shadow Mountain Town
homes property. Is this the existing Shadow Mountain stairway wall or a new
improvement? Improvements cannot extend onto neighboring properties without
written approval. Show the Shadow Mountain Town home Improvements on the survey
and planset to demonstrate the proposed Gorsuch plans tie in to the Shadow Mountain
Improvements without any issues.
c. Provide vehicle protection and a pedestrian deterrent along the north side of the cul-de-
sac so people do not walk across the cul de sac and jump down to the sidewalk and so
that vehicles do not cross the landscape buffer to the sidewalk 4 ft lower.
d. The trees next to Shadow Mountain Townhomes will not survive the installation of the
retaining wall and inlet and associated grading. It is the City Foresters discretion if the
tree removal will be permitted. The plans should show removal.
e. Call out the highpoint at the garage entrance. Drainage exterior to the garage must
drain to the storm system, drainage interior to the garage must drain to interior drains
that are routed to the sanitary sewer. Demonstrate this is the case.
24. Sheet C.2.03 Conceptual Perimeter Grading Plan
a. The design proposes a cut in excess of 10' for the drainage swale in the South Aspen St
ROW. At Project Review the Engineering Department commented that a swale was an
appropriate use of the ROW in this area. However, it appears the 1:1 slopes, 2:1 slopes,
and excessive cut is proposed to benefit the Gorsuch building, not because it is
necessary for drainage or mudflow purposes. Looking at the cross sections the east side
of the swale is much lower than the west to accommodate the building not the
drainage. The use of the ROW in this manner is not fair to the Shadow Mountain
Townhomes and further limits available access for any maintenance needs. The
Engineering Department does not approve nor support such a drastic cut. An alternative
design needs to be proposed that limits the cut depth, and the steepness of the side
slopes. Extending the storm system and catch basin up the mountain might be a more
acceptable alternative.
b. Due to the unusual difficulty to access the catch basin, the inlet will require a revocable
encroachment license and will be the responsibility of the Gorsuch Haus to maintain.
Additionally, an easement shall be provided up the summer road and around the
building in the event the city needs access the west swale and inlet.
c. Provide a detail of the riprap for the west swale. The swale should be armored below
with grass on top. The SATH project had a hard time getting vegetation stabilized over
the rip rap on the existing inlet. How will Gorsuch accomplish stability and aesthetics?
25. Sheet C.2.05 Mountain Road Sections
a. The plan proposes 2:1 slope which is in excess of the COA standard of 3:1. Per the
stability report the 2:1 slope is acceptable with appropriate vegetative stabilization.
Include a note on the stabilization plan.
26. Sheet C.2.06 West Swale Plan, Profile and Sections
a. The West Side Swale Profile has a note that calls out 3:1 (Max) Side Slopes. The side
slopes on the cross sections exceed 3:1. Section 2-2 has 2:1 slopes. The max slope
should be limited to 3:1 as the note suggests. Please address.
27. Sheet C.3.00 Master Conceptual Utility Plan
a. Does shadow mountain have the access they need for the meters and utilities left in the
south east corner of their property? Provide an easement around Gorsuch so Shadow
Mountain Townhomes can access their utilities.
b. Has Holy Cross reviewed the proposed easement to the transformers and agreed there
is adequate easement width for accessibility?
28. Sheet C.3.03-C3.04 16” Water Main Plan and Profile
a. The Second Amendment to Development Agreement for Lift One Lodge
Subdivision/PUD deferred the installation of the 16" waterline from S Aspen St to
Monarch St. Originally it was to be constructed with South Aspen Townhomes but the
amendment allowed the installation to take place when LOL is developed. A timeline
was set for five years from 2017 with the ability to extend via written decision by the
City Engineer. The 16" waterline must be constructed prior to CO of either the LOL or
Gorsuch property. This shall be addressed in the Gorsuch Development Agreement. Lift
One Lodge will need to make a formal request to extend the completion date beyond
2022.
b. Call out 10' separation between outside diameter of the waterline and outside diameter
of the relocated sanitary service line.
c. The waterline replacement on Monarch St needs to match what was approved in the
original LOL/SATH approvals which is shown in the diagram below. All pipe needs to be
replaced to the gate valves north of the east-west 8" CIP. The 16" line needs to be
replaced to the gate valve beyond the service line to the east
i. d. Can the waterline be constructed without impacting the trees on the Caribou property?
The applicant needs to show the exact location and excavation depth to Parks Dept for
their approval.
e. Fire flow calculations for a 6" service line will be required at building permit. Full fire
flow calcs for a 4" line demonstrating the 4" line fails also will be required at building
permit.
f. Include a note that the two dry line hydrants will be a different model than the standard
water distribution hydrant so there is no confusion in the future or mix up thinking the
hydrants have a permanent water source.
g. The portion of the waterline in the Hill St ROW was deferred for construction from the
South Aspen Town homes project because there was concern about the installation of
the waterline prior to excavation of LOL. How has this been resolved? The waterline
must be constructed under whichever project is constructed first. Does this work with
the proposed excavation and project sequencing?
29. Sheet C.4.04 West Storm Pipe Profile
a. The Existing Inlet OS5 in the planter box next to Shadow Mountains drive entrance does
not collect runoff from any area. It may make more sense and look a lot better to
convert it to a manhole or remove it. This can be more closely looked at and refined at
building permit and is not necessary for landuse approvals.
30. Sheet C.4.06 East Storm Pipe Profile
a. The stormpipe going up Ajax needs to be in an easement. It will be the responsibility of
Gorsuch to maintain but the City requires access in the event of emergency work.
b. Is an inlet permitted in the existing Mountain Queen fire access and drainage easement?
Is emergency access maintained with the inlet location? This inlet needs approval from
Fire Dept and from Mountain Queen per bk 275 pg 378.
c. How are the inlets integrated in to the skiway? Is the intent to cover the inlets or block
them off from skiers?
31. Sheet C.5.00
a. A drywell detail is shown. Is a drywell proposed on the site? If not remove the detail.
32. Final Plat of: Gorsuch Haus PD/Subdivision Dedications and Reservations
a. Numbers 7 and 8:
i. In addition to lots 1 and 2 receiving an easement for onsite storm and drainage
infrastructure, an easement should be granted for the City to access the
drainage infrastructure that takes runoff from Ajax mountain for any
maintenance necessities. Item 8 gives the utility owner (the city for stormwater)
an easement. Include language so it is clear the easement includes sub surface
infrastructure and above grade swales and sheet flow.
b. Number 2
i. The Public Trail Easement connecting S Aspen St to Monarch St should be a
minimum of 8 ft. A 5 ft public easement is proposed.
ii. The dedication states “owner reserves the right to unilaterally re-align this
public trail easement.” The City of Aspen needs to approve any alteration to a
public trail easement. It cannot be done unilaterally.
c. Number 5
i. The dedication states “such private access easement does not confer any rights
to the general public, and no public access is intended to be created by this
dedication;” The Engineering Department supports pedestrian and bicycle
public access to Summer Road.
33. Final Plat of: Gorsuch Haus PD/Subdivision Sheet 4 of 4
a. The sheet shows a temporary construction easement in the ROW. This line should be
removed in the ROW. Construction uses in the ROW shall follow section 21.12.140 of
the Municipal Code.
b. Provide an easement for access to the swale and inlet on the west side of the property.
There is concern about the accessibility of the swale and inlet for maintenance. Is the
intent to drive around the building to access the inlet? Due to the unusual difficulty to
access, the inlet will require a revocable encroachment license and will be the
responsibility of the Gorsuch Haus to maintain. Additionally, an easement shall be
provided up the summer road and around the building in the event the city needs
access the swale and inlet.