The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutGorsuch zoning DRC commentsGorsuch zoning DRC comments Page: 1 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Zoning Marked up pages.pdf If any portion of the building encroaches into the setback, it will need to be shown that it either was allowed per the approvals, was depicted in the approved drawings, or meets section 26.575.020.E.5, Allowed Projections into Setbacks, of the Land use Code. If not, then it will need to be approved or receive a variance as part of the Final review Zoning Marked up pages.pdf (13) Page: 1 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Zoning Marked up pages.pdf If any portion of the building encroaches into the setback, it will need to be shown that it either was allowed per the approvals, was depicted in the approved drawings, or meets section 26.575.020.E.5, Allowed Projections into Setbacks, of the Land use Code. If not, then it will need to be approved or receive a variance as part of the Final review Page: 2 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Zoning Marked up pages.pdf I think this better fits as lodge space Page: 2 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Zoning Marked up pages.pdf Based on our administrative determination from 2015, this would not be considered commercial space. Page: 2 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Zoning Marked up pages.pdf chases count as FA - probably non-unit Page: 2 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Zoning Marked up pages.pdf These two spaces are very likely FA. MO U N T A I N O P E R A If any portion of the building encroaches into the setback, it will need to be shown that it either was allowed per the approvals, was depicted in the approved drawings, or meets section 26.575.020.E.5, Allowed Projections into Setbacks, of the Land use Code. If not, then it will need to be approved or receive a variance as part of the Final review If any portion of the building encroaches into the setback, it will need to be shown that it either was allowed per the approvals, was depicted in the approved drawings, or meets section 26.575.020.E.5, Allowed Projections into Setbacks, of the Land use Code. If not, then it will need to be approved or receive a variance as part of the Final review 5T72 24 5T72 24 5T 6024 5T 60 24 5T6024 5T60 24 5T 3624 5T66 24 5T 7224 5T 7224 BEV/SERVICE DISH ASSEMBLYPLATING STOR. HOTHOLDING REF. REF. FR.FR. STORAGE ICE D WINSTON CAC-522 D WIN S T O N CAC-522 D WIN S T O N CAC-522 DBL RACK TRUE T-49F TRUE T-49F U N IVER SAL MOP 20-8 1331NEW AGE 1331NEW AGE 1331NEW AGE AIRIN DD C AIROUT HOSHIZAKI KM - 1 3 0 1 S A H 3 D 1331NEW AGE RDRD LODGE = NON-UNIT SPACE = AFFORDA COMMER C B I think this better fits as lodge space LODGE = 2986 sf NON-UNIT SHARED SPA A B COMMERCIAL = 180 sf Based on our administrative determination from 2015, this would not be considered commercial space. 5T 7224 5T60 24 5T60 24 5T 48 24 5T 48 24 5T48 24 5T48 245T 48 24 5T72 18 5T72 18 5T72 18 5T72 18 5T 36 24 48 24 36 24 5T 7224 5T36 14 5T3014 JAN. BEV/SERVER ICE COOKEXPO HOST PANTRY SHEL F S H E L F SHELF SHELF UNIVERSAL MOP 20-8 HFISHER2445 DC D DBL RACK CHE M DH H C H C 14 5T72 14 5T72 2783 SF LODGE NON-UNIT SPACE (SHARED) = 1790 SF COMMERICAL = 5723 SF COVERED EXTERIOR SPACE B chases count as FA - probably non-unit 5T 7224 5T60 24 5T60 24 5T 48 24 5T48 24 5T72 18 18 5T72 18 18 48 24 3624 5T 7224 5T36 14 5T3014 JAN. BEV/SERVER ICE COOKEXPO SERVICE HOST HOST PANTRY SHEL F S H E L F SHELF SHELF UNIVERSAL MOP 20-8 HFISHER2445 DCD DBL RACK CHEMDH H C H C 14 5T72 14 5T72 LODGE NON-UNIT SPACE (SHARED) = 1790 SF COMMERICAL = 5723 SF COVERED EXTERIOR SPACE B C These two spaces are very likely FA. Page: 2 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Zoning Marked up pages.pdf The ramp counts as non-unit FA Page: 3 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Zoning Marked up pages.pdf The landing is not exempt and will count as non-unit space. Page: 3 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Zoning Marked up pages.pdf Non-unit FA on this level Page: 4 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Zoning Marked up pages.pdf All exterior lighting will be verified at permit to ensure that it meets the limitations of 26.575.150, Outdoor Lighting. Page: 4 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Zoning Marked up pages.pdf In order to accurately illustrate that the decks are meeting the Height exceptions granted in the approvals, please add a line showing the top of the decking surface. The height exception for the deck surface will be measured using the deck surface as well as the railing exception, which will also be measured from there. Page: 4 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Zoning Marked up pages.pdf In order for the railings to enjoy the exception to height, they must be 50% transparent as per 26.575.020.E.5 Page: 4 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Zoning Marked up pages.pdf The Land use Code does not allow exceptions to be compounded. Therefore, since there is already an exception for the elevators and stairs towers to exceed height, the screens would need to be under the maximum height exception for the elevator or else removed. COMMERCIAL= LODGE= NON-UNIT SPACE = EXEMPTIONS = (-100 sf) 180 sf 2,986 sf 8,532 sf 11,598 sf LODGE = 2986 sf NON-UNIT SHARED SPACE = 8532 sf UNCONDITIONED RAMP AH JG I K L COMMERCIAL = 180 sf F SCALE:1" = 40'-0"2 LEVEL 01_FAR The ramp counts as non-unit FA RDRD RDRD RESIDENTIAL = NON-UNIT SPACE = EXEMPTIONS = 457sf A D _FAR The landing is not exempt and will count as non-unit space. FDFD FDFD CTURE NOT 26.575.020.D.8 9' - 0 " H SCALE: 1" = 40'-0"3 LEVEL 07_FAR Non-unit FA on this level All exterior lighting will be verified at permit to ensure that it meets the limitations of 26.575.150, Outdoor Lighting. ALLOWABLE DORMER PER HIGHEST RIDGE POINT AT ACCEPTABLE STAIR / ELEVATOR OVERRUNPER 26.575.020.f.4.c HIGHEST CORNER AT ELEVATION 8,082.65' ROOFTOP POOL TERRACE W/ GLASS RAILINGACCEPTABLE PERMANENT ROOFTOP AMENITY PER 26.575.020.f.4.k ROOF MID 8,039.75' T ROOF MID-POINT 8,065.00' T.O. SHEATHING ROOF MID-POINT 8,073.35' T.O. SHEATHING 8,088.20' T.O. SHEATHING ROOF MID-POINT OF MID-POINT In order to accurately illustrate that the decks are meeting the Height exceptions granted in the approvals, please add a line showing the top of the decking surface. The height exception for the deck surface will be measured using the deck surface as well as the railing exception, which will also be measured from there. ALLOWABLE DORMER PER 26.575.020.F.2.g ACCEPTABLE ELEVATOR OVERRUN PER 26.575.020.f.4.c HIGHEST CORNER AT ELEVATION 8,090.5' ROOFTOP POOL TERRACE W/ GLASS RAILING ACCEPTABLE PERMANENT ROOFTOP AMENITY PER 26.575.020.f.4.k ROOF MID-POINT 8,073.35' T.O. SHEATHING NG In order for the railings to enjoy the exception to height, they must be 50% transparent as per 26.575.020.E.5 10 8 46759 ALLOWABLE DOR HIGHEST RIDGE P ACCEPTABLE STAIR / ELEVATOR OVERRUN PER 26.575.020.f.4.c HIGHEST CORNER AT ELEVATION 8,082.65' ER 26.575.020.F.2.g OVERRUN PER EVATION 8,090.5' ER 26.575.020.F.2.g T ELEVATION 8,097.00' E W/ GLASS RAILING NT ROOFTOP AMENITY ROOF MID-POINT 8,065.00' T.O. SHEATHING NT HEATHING The Land use Code does not allow exceptions to be compounded. Therefore, since there is already an exception for the elevators and stairs towers to exceed height, the screens would need to be under the maximum height exception for the elevator or else removed.