Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Presentation1020 E. Cooper Conceptual Major Development, Relocation, Demolition, Growth Management, Certificates of Affordable Housing Credits, Transportation & Parking Management Site Location 1020 5’ 6’ 6”11’ 6” 10’ 10’ Previous Design Revised Design Previous Design Revised Design 2-Bed Unit Storage Egress Me c h a n i c a l 2-Bed Unit 2-Bed Unit 3-Bed Unit Co m m o n Ou t d o o r A r e a 2-Bed Unit Pa r k i n g 3-Bed Unit 2-Bed Unit 3-Bed Unit2-Bed UnitDe c k De c k Growth Management | Affordable Housing Credits PROPOSED CREDITS Two-bedroom 3 Units x 2.25 FTEs =6.75 FTEs Three-bedroom 2 Units X 3.00 FTEs =6 FTEs Total Proposed 12.75FTEs Net Livable Area | Within Historic Resource Unit Beds Basement (sf) Ground Level (sf) Second Level (sf) Total (sf) Min. FA Difference 1 landmark 2 462.5 450.4 103.9 1,016.8 900 116.8 above 2 landmark 3 482.9 533.7 182.9 1,199.4 1,200 0 above/below Net Livable Area | Rear Addition Unit Beds Basement (sf) 1st Level (sf) 2nd Level (sf) 3rd Level (sf) Total (sf) Min. (sf) Difference (Expressed as %) 3 2 436.5 449.7 X X 886.2 900 2% below min. 4 3 X X 1,011.8 X 1,011.8 1,200 16% below min. 5 2 X X X 786.7 1,013.0 900 13% below min. The proposed affordable housing units are designed in such a manner which exceeds the expectations of the APCHA guidelines and promotes the unit’s general livability by demonstrating compliance with as many of the following conditions as possible: a. Significant storage, such as additional storage outside the unit. b. Above average natural light, such as adding more window area than the Building Code requires. c. Unit amenities, such as access to outdoor space or private patios. Net livable square footage can be reduced by up to 20 percent pursuant to the following criteria: Staff recommends approval for 12.75 FTEs Staff finds the criteria related to Growth Management & Certificates of Affordable Housing are Met Commercial Area Transportation & Parking Mitigation The Residential Multi-Family zone district requires one parking unit per residential unit within a multi-family development. In this case, 5 parking units are required. 1 2 3 4 4 Min. 0.2 Miles1 Min. 180 ft. Within the Residential Multi-Family zone district, 100 percent of parking mitigation may be met via cash-in-lieu. No on-site parking is required on this site. Staff finds that Transportation & Parking Mitigation Standards are met. 20 ft. 3.5 ft. in alley 3.5 ft. in alley Alley width 16.5 ft. Alley width 16.5 ft. City of Aspen Engineering Standards Angle of Parking Space Minimum One-Way Drive Aisle Minimum Two-Way Drive Aisle Parallel 11-ft. 22-ft. 90 24-ft. 24-ft. 25 ft. R/MF Zone District Minimum Rear Yard Setback= 5-ft. 20 ft. [alley width] + 5 ft. [rear setback] = 25 ft. 611 W. Main 10’ Required 7’ 3” Approved 5’ Required 0’ Approved 10 ft. required ~ 5’ approved Residential Multi-Family Zone District Purpose: provide for the use of land for intensive long-term residential purposes, short-term vacation rentals and customary accessory uses. Existing deed- restricted units Our housing policy should bolster our economic and social diversity, reinforce variety, and enhance our sense of community by integrating affordable housing into the fabric of our town. A healthy social balance includes all income ranges and types of people. Each project should endeavor to further that mix and to avoid segregation of economic and social classes…” 2000 & 2012 Aspen Area Community Plan Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commission approve this application for the following: 1. Conceptual Major Development 2. Relocation 3. Demolition 4. Growth Management 5. Transportation and Parking Management 6. Certificates of Affordable Housing Credits QUESTIONS