The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.apz.20260107AGENDA ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION January 7, 2026 4:30 PM, Council Chambers 3rd Floor, 427 Rio Grande Pl, Aspen I.SITE VISIT II.ROLL CALL III.COMMENTS IV.MINUTES V.DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST VI.OTHER BUSINESS VII.PUBLIC HEARINGS VII.AResolution #01, Series of 2026 - Minor Planned Development Amendment to Detailed Review, Amendment to Final Commercial Design Review - 610 S. West End St., The Gant Condominium Association VII.BResolution #02, Series of 2026 - 10 Club Circle - Maroon Creek Club - Minor PD Detailed Review Amendment, Amendment to Final Commercial Design Review P&Z Site Visit - The Gant, 610 S W End St. - 3:00pm Start point in the lobby of the Gant at 3:00pm. Election of Chair and Vice Chair Staff Memo_610 S West End St_Minor Amendment to Detailed Review.pdf Draft Resolution #01 Series of 2026.pdf Attachment A_Application.pdf Attachment B_Staff Analysis of Criteria.pdf Attachment C_Compiled Referral Comments.pdf 10 Club Circle_Maroon Creek Club_Memo_Minor PD Amendment.pdf 10 Club Circle_Maroon Creek Club_Draft Resolution #02, Series of 2026.pdf 10 Club Circle_Maroon Creek Club_Exhibit A_PD Detailed Review Standards Responses.pdf 10 Club Circle_Maroon Creek Club_Exhibit B_Commercial Design Standards Responses.pdf 1 1 VIII.BOARD REPORTS IX.ADJOURN TYPICAL PROCEEDING FORMAT FOR ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS 1) Conflicts of Interest (handled at beginning of agenda) 2) Provide proof of legal notice (affidavit of notice for PH) 3) Staff presentation 4) Board questions and clarifications of staff 5) Applicant presentation 6) Board questions and clarifications of applicant 7) Public comments 8) Board questions and clarifications relating to public comments 9) Close public comment portion of bearing 10) Staff rebuttal/clarification of evidence presented by applicant and public comment 11) Applicant rebuttal/clarification End of fact finding. Deliberation by the commission commences. No further interaction between commission and staff, applicant or public 12) Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed among commissioners. 13) Discussion between commissioners* 14) Motion* *Make sure the discussion and motion includes what criteria are met or not met Revised January 9, 2021 2 2 STAFF REPORT TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Sophie Varga, Zoning Administrator THROUGH: Dan Folke, Planning Director MEETING DATE: January 7th, 2026 SUBJECT: 610 South West End Street, The Gant Condominium Association - Minor Planned Development Amendment to Detailed Review, Amendment to Final Commercial Design Review, Mountain View Plane Exemption __________________________________________________________________ INTENDED OUTCOME: The request of the Planning and Zoning Commission is to consider the following land use code review processes: • Minor Planned Development (PD) Amendment to Detailed Review (Sections 26.445.110.e, 26.445.070) • Amendment to Final Commercial Design Review (Section 26.412.060) • Mountain View Plane Exemption (Section 26.435.050.d.1) The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review authority of these requests. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The purpose of this report is to provide the Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) with an overview and analysis of a request for a Minor PD Amendment to Detailed Review and Amendment to Commercial Design Review so that the P&Z can make an informed decision. The P&Z may approve, deny, or approve the application with conditions. The P&Z may also continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to approve or deny. Overview of Project: The application proposes changes to building materials and landscaping elements. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requests with conditions, as noted in the draft resolution. 3 DISCUSSION: Background: The Gant Condominium Association (The Gant) received final planned development approval in 1973 and was re-zoned via Ordinance #41, Series of 1989, to Moderate- Density Residential (R-15) with a Lodge Preservation Overlay. The Gant is approved as multi-family residential buildings with the ability to operate as a lodge. Project Summary: The application proposes changes to building materials in order to address wildfire resiliency and modernize the property as well as adjustments to exterior amenities on the site. The Gant currently has a pool area on the west side of the property, tennis courts in the middle, and a second pool area to the east. The application proposes to remove the western pool and replace it with an open gathering area. The central tennis courts are proposed to be removed and replaced with a pool and spas. The eastern pool and spa are proposed to be replaced in substantively the same location. Staff Comments: Staff find that the application meets applicable criteria. Full staff analysis of the application can be found in Attachment B. Highlighted responses can be found below. Minor PD Amendment to Detailed Review (Sections 26.445.110.e, 26.445.070) Detailed Review concentrates on specific aspects of the project, including site planning, landscape architecture, Commercial Design Standards, and Engineering Design Standards. Landscaping plans were reviewed by Parks staff and found to be appropriate. Engineering found that the application meets the intent of the Engineering Design Standards and Urban Runoff Management Plan. Additional review will take place at time of building permit. The proposed materials comply with applicable design standards. Amendment to Final Commercial Design (Sections 26.412.060, 26.412.090) The application includes changes to materials and landscaping. The Mountain Base character area includes a mix of architectural styles and materials; the application reflects this mix and the proposed changes were therefore found to be appropriate. The landscape changes do not impact overall site design. Mountain View Plane (Section 26.435.050) The application included a view plane analysis; this analysis shows that existing and proposed development on the property does not infringe on the Glory Hole Park View Plane and is not subject to Mountain View Plane review. 4 Referral Comments: The application was referred to the Building, Engineering, and Parks Departments. Combined comments can be found in Attachment C. The comments resulted in the three conditions found in the recommendation below. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend approval with the following conditions: 1. Water easements shall be formalized in an easement agreement with easement extents reflecting as-built conditions of the water mains and fire hydrants. 2. A tree removal plan and phased tree removal approach will be reviewed and approved by the Parks Department via a tree removal permit. 3. All exterior materials shall comply with adopted or State mandated building codes regarding wildfire resiliency in place at time of building permit submittal. Proposed Motion: “I move to approve Resolution #01, Series of 2026.” ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolution 01, Series of 2026 Attachment A – Application Attachment B – Staff Analysis of Criteria Attachment C – Combined Referral Comments Attachment D – Existing and Proposed Site Plans 5 610 S. West End St. Resolution 01, Series of 2026 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION #01 SERIES OF 2026 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT TO DETAILED REVIEW AND AN AMENDMENT TO FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW AT 610 SOUTH WEST END STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: THE GANT CONDOMINIUMS, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 14, 1974 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 499 AS RECEPTION NO. 171343 AND RECORDED AUGUST 24, 1976 IN PLAT BOOK 5 AT PAGE 22 AS RECEPTION NO. 186413 AND ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR THE GANT CONDOMINIUMS RECORDED NOVEMBER 16, 1973 IN BOOK 281 AT PAGE 390 AS RECEPTION NO. 163549 AND SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION THERETO RECORDED NOVEMBER 14, 1974 IN BOOK 293 AT PAGE 291 AS RECEPTION NO. 171345 AND AMENDED SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION RECORDED DECEMBER 5, 1975 IN BOOK 306 AT PAGE 352 AS RECEPTION NO. 179993 AND SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION RECORDED AUGUST 24, 1976 IN BOOK 315 AT PAGE 716 AS RECEPTION NO. 186412, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO, AND SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS, INCLUDING RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR GANT CONDOMINIUMS RECORDED JUNE 11, 1986 IN BOOK 512 AT PAGE 605 AND RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION RECORDED SEPTEMBER 4, 2020 AS RECEPTION NO. 667792; AND ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF THE GANT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION RECORDED NOVEMBER 16, 1973 IN BOOK 281 AT PAGE 445, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. PARCEL ID: 2737-182-67-800 WHEREAS, the Community Development department received an application (the “Application”) from Jessica Garrow of Design Workshop representing the Gant Condominiums (the “Applicant”), requesting Planned Development Amendment and an amendment to Commercial Design Review related to proposed changes to building façade materials and site updates at 610 South West End Street (the “Property”); and, WHEREAS, the application was referred to other City Departments for comments and the Community Development department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval of the requested development application; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered the application under the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code as identified herein, in particular Sections 445.110.e and 26.445.070, Minor PD Amendment to Detailed Review, Section 6 610 S. West End St. Resolution 01, Series of 2026 Page 2 of 3 26.412.060 and 26.412.090, Amendment to Final Commercial Design, and Section 26.435.050.d.1, Mountain View Plane Exemption, considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and took and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on January 7th, 2026; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets the applicable review criteria and that approval of the request is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare, and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission approves Resolution #01, Series of 2026, by a XX to XX (XX-XX) vote, approving the requested land use reviews as identified herein. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Section 1: Minor Planned Development Amendment to Detailed Review Approval, Amendment to Final Commercial Design Review Approval The Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a Minor Amendment to Detailed Review and an Amendment to Final Commercial Design Review for the following: • Building material changes. • Site layout updates as shown in Attachment A, including changing the western pool area to a gathering area, removing the central tennis courts and adding a pool and spas, and replacing the eastern pool and spa. Changes of a technical nature may occur via building permit. Section 2: Conditions of Approval The application shall meet the following conditions of approval: 1. Water easements shall be formalized in an easement agreement prior to building permit issuance with easement extents reflecting as-built conditions of the water mains and fire hydrants. 2. A tree removal plan and phased tree removal approach will be reviewed and approved by the Parks Department via a tree removal permit. 3. All exterior materials shall comply with adopted or State mandated building codes regarding wildfire resiliency in place at time of building permit submittal. 4. Proposed development may not project further into the setback than existing development. Section 3: Vested Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a vested property right attaching to and running with the Property for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property right. 7 610 S. West End St. Resolution 01, Series of 2026 Page 3 of 3 Section 4: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such site development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 5: Existing Litigation This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 6: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. FINALLY, adopted, passed, and approved this 7th day of January, 2026. Approved as to form: Approved as to content: ______________________________ __________________________________ James R. True, Special Counsel Teraissa McGovern, Chair Attest: _______________________________ Tracy Terry, Deputy Clerk Attachment: Exhibit A – Existing and Proposed Site Plans 8 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X DYH DYH D S S S S S D D D D D D D D D S D DYH DYH D D D D E E E OSW CO CO COCO COCO CO CO CO CO CO D WV WV WV ICV ICV ICV ICV G ICV ICV D G DOG DYH CO W WV WV FO F ICV E ICV CTV CTV CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V D D ICV T1 T6 T11 T12 T13 T18 T19 T20 T30 T107 T108 T110 T111 T112 T113 T130T131 T134 T136 T141 T147 T148 T150 T151 T152 T176 T178 T179 T182 T183 T184 T194 T195 T196 T198 T213 T214 T215 T241 T242 T243 T250 T251 T265 T266 T276 T294 T295 T296 T300 T305 T306T307 T308 T310 T311 D G G AC D ICV ICV X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X T312* T313* Gant Campus Enhancement Plan 610 S. West End Street, Aspen, Colorado EXISTING SITE SETBACKS PER PREVIOUS APPROVAL AND R15 ZONE DISTRICT DECEMBER 29, 2025NORTH0 ORIGINAL SCALE: 10 20 40 1"=20'-00" DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning · Urban Design · Tourism Planning 22860 Two Rivers Rd #102 · Basalt, Colorado 81621 · 970-925-8354 Facsimile 970-920-1387 BUILDING A BUILDING C BUILDING C BUILDING B BUILDING J BUILDING K CONFERENCE CENTER TENNIS COURTS PARKING PARKING PARKING PARKING BUILDING D BUILDING E BUILDING F BUILDING G BUILDING H PROPERTY BOUNDARY P R O P E R T Y B O U N D A R Y PRO P E R T Y B O U N D A R Y PRO P E R T Y B O U N D A R Y PR O P E R T Y B O U N D A R Y U T E A V E . SO U T H W E S T E N D S T R E E T 5' and 10' Setbacks, Per P&Z Resolution 4, Series of 2013 5' Side Setback, Per P&Z Resolution 4, Series of 2013 10'-0" R-15 Zone District Setback 25'-0" R-15 Zone District Setback 10'-0" R-15 Zone District Setback 9 FO CTV CTV CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V G G AC X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Gant Campus Enhancement Plan 610 S. West End Street, Aspen, Colorado SITE PLAN: SETBACKS SEPTEMBER 25, 2025NORTH0 ORIGINAL SCALE: 10 20 40 1"=20'-00" DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning · Urban Design · Tourism Planning 22860 Two Rivers Rd #102 · Basalt, Colorado 81621 · 970-925-8354 Facsimile 970-920-1387 22 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 0 " 5'-0 " 5'-0 " 2' - 0 " 2'-0" 10 a | THE GANT PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF ASPEN AUGUST 2025 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT & COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW | 19 CENTRAL GARDEN 22860 TWO RIVERS ROAD #102 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 970.925.8354 11 2 | COVER LETTER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 EXHIBIT A: Responses to CD Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 EXHIBIT B: Responses to Mountain View Plane Criteria . . . . . . . . . .11 EXHIBIT C: Responses to PD Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12 EXHIBIT D: Vicinity Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 EXHIBIT E: Conceptual Landscape Renderings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 EXHIBIT F: Landscape Plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20 EXHIBIT G: Conceptual Architectural Renderings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .36 EXHIBIT H: Architectural Elevation Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42 EXHIBIT I: View Plane Exhibit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .51 EXHIBIT J: Letter of Authorization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55 EXHIBIT K: Proof of Ownership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .56 EXHIBIT L: Land Use Application Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .58 EXHIBIT M: Pre-Application Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .66 EXHIBIT N: Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .69 PLANNER + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT | APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE Design Workshop, Inc . 22860 Two Rivers Road Suite 102 Basalt, Colorado 81621 970.925.8354 www.designworkshop.com APPLICANT + OWNER The Gant Condominum Association 610 S West End Street Aspen CO 81611 970.925.5000 Project Manager: Jean.Coulter@GantAspen.com ARCHITECT OF DESIGN CCY 228 Midland Ave. Basalt, Colorado 81621 970.927.4925 ARCHITECT OF RECORD OPI ARCHITECTS 419 Main Street, Unit 1 Frisco, Colorado 80443 970.668.1133 CIVIL ENGINEER Roaring Fork Engineering 592 CO-133 Carbondale, Colorado 81623 970.340.4130 SURVEYOR Peak Surveying Inc . PO Box 1746 Rifle, CO 81650 WATER FEATURE ENGINEER Water Design Inc . 6740 S. 1300 E #110 Cottonwood Heights, Utah 84121 801.261.4009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 12 3 | Design Workshop, Inc. Landscape Architecture Planning Urban Design Strategic Services Environmental Graphic Design 22860 Two Rivers Road Suite 102 Basalt, Colorado 81621 970.925.8354 designworkshop.com August 15, 2025 Mr. Daniel Folke Community Development Director City of Aspen 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 RE: The Gant - Insubstantial PD Amendment PRE-25-084 Dear Mr. Folke, We are pleased to submit the enclosed land use application on behalf of the Gant Condominium Association (“The Gant”). Please accept this application for a Planned Development Amendment and Commercial Design Review approval in accordance with Sec. 26.412, 26.435.050(d), and 26.445.110 of the City of Aspen Code for updates to the site plan and architectural materials. The Gant is a multi-family complex located in the east end of town. It is in the R 15 Zone District within a Lodge Overlay. In the fall of 2024, the Gant experienced a local fire within its property premises, causing the homeowners to begin considering the best ways to address fire safety of the property and update and improve amenities for the residents and guests of the property in a resilient and sustainable way. The Homeowners’ Association submitted an initial application earlier this year to update the roofing material to address these needs. After continued exploration, additional updates to the site plan and other architectural materials is proposed. No changes to floor area or heights are proposed as part of this application. The Gant seeks to renovate and modernize the original pools and spas with similarly sized ones, including relocation and centralization of the main pool as part of the modernization with removal of the existing tennis courts; renovation and modernization of the original building cladding materials; and updates to the campus paving materials. The proposed selected building materials align with the architectural character of the current neighborhood block context and improve the property’s wildfire resilience as well as its lifespan. Responses to required Commercial Design and Planned Development criteria are all included as Exhibits A, B, C, and D. Renderings illustrating the changes are included in the landscape set (Exhibit E and F) and architectural set (Exhibit G and H). We appreciate your time in reviewing this request and look forward to working with the Community Development Department to move forward with this important safety and sustainability improvement. Please let us know if any additional information is required or if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jessica Garrow, FAICP Principal, DESIGN WORKSHOP, INC. COVER LETTER 3 13 4 | An application for commercial design review may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied based on conformance with the following criteria: (a) Guidelines and Standards. (1) The Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Standards and Guidelines are met as determined by the appropriate Commission. The Standards and Guidelines include design review criteria that are to be used to determine whether the application is appropriate. RESPONSE: See detailed responses to criteria in the next section. (2) All applicable standards in the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Standards and Guideline shall be met unless granted a Variation pursuant to Section 26.412.040(d), Variations. RESPONSE: A variance is not requested . This criterion is not applicable. (3) Not every guideline will apply to each project, and some balancing of the guidelines must occur on a case-by- case basis. The applicable Commission must: a. Determine that a sufficient number of the relevant guidelines are adequately met in order to approve a project proposal; b. Weigh the applicable guidelines with the practicality of the measure. RESPONSE: See detailed responses to criteria in the next section. (b) Pedestrian Amenity. The proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.070, Pedestrian Amenity. RESPONSE: Pedestrian Amenity areas are not proposed to be changed in this application . These criteria are not applicable . EXHIBIT A: RESPONSES TO TO CD CRITERIASEC . 26 .412 .060 REVIEW CRITERIA . 4 | Exhibit A 14 5 | SITE PLANNING AND LANDSCAPE 1.1 All projects shall provide a context study. RESPONSE: This application features a context map and land survey to provide an overview of the project context . 1.2 All projects shall respond to the traditional street grid. RESPONSE: No changes to the driveways or streets are proposed . This is not applicable . 1.3 Landscape elements (both hardscape and softscape) should complement the surrounding context, support the street scene, and enhance the architecture of the building. RESPONSE: The project proposes updated landscaping in three areas of the site – the existing pool areas and tennis courts . Landscape materials and location are driven by best management practices for wildfire mitigation . On the interior portions of the site, where the Alpine Garden and relocated pool are proposed, limited areas of synthetic turf are proposed . These are not visible from a public street, in a “No Pets” area, and are included to minimize water usage and support longer term maintenance . Tree and landscape placement is based on Firewise principles, with non-combustible materials in the two-foot Zone 1 (stone, high moisture content perennials, and non-flammable mulch), high moisture content plant materials in the five-foot Zone 2 area (irrigated shrubs and perennials with limited mulch), and Limited high-moisture content deciduous trees in the ten-foot Zone 3 . An anticipated tree removal plan to address these best management practices are included in Exhibit F . Phased tree removals are anticipated and ongoing with standard tree removal permits with the Parks Department . Limited adjustments to landscaping are proposed in the public-facing areas along Ute Ave and S . West End Street . 1.4 Where there is open space on a site, reinforce the traditional transition from public space to semi-public space to private space. RESPONSE: As a lodging property, there is a mix of public and private spaces . The improvements are all to the interior of the site and create semi-private spaces for guests to gather, as well as more public spaces such as pools and lawn areas . No changes to the landscaping on the edges or streetscape are proposed . 1.5 Maintain alignment of building facades where appropriate. RESPONSE: The materials for the buildings are proposed to change, but no other façade adjustments are proposed . This criterion is not applicable . 1.6 When a building facade is set back, define the property line. Review the context of the block when selecting an appropriate technique. RESPONSE: No façade adjustments are proposed . This criterion is not applicable . ALLEYWAYS 1.7 Develop alley facades to create visual interest. 1.8 Consider small alley commercial spaces, especially on corner lots or lots with midblock access from the street (See Pedestrian Amenity Section PA4). RESPONSE: There are no alleys on the site . This criterion is not applicable . EXHIBIT A: RESPONSES TO TO CD CRITERIACOMMERCIAL, LODGING AND HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 5 | Exhibit A 15 6 | PARKING 1.9 Minimize the visual impacts of parking. RESPONSE: The property includes an existing central parking area, located adjacent to the current tennis courts . The tennis courts are proposed to be removed and replaced with an updated pool and lawn area . This is smaller in size than the existing tennis courts, providing an opportunity for ten (10) new parking spaces . These new spaces are proposed to be interior to the property, created from a reorientation to the current parking configuration, and will be screened from view of the pool through landscaping and a fence with climbing vines (a green wall) . This is proposed to be 8 feet in height (the existing tennis court fence is 10 feet high) . The inclusion of native shrubs and trees will provide a minimized view of these parking spaces from the property premises, and for people coming into the Gant . BUILDING MASS, HEIGHT, AND SCALE 1.10 A new building should appear similar in scale and proportion with buildings on the block. 1.11 A minimum building height difference of 2 feet from immediately adjacent buildings is required. 1.12 On lots larger than 6,000 square feet, break up building mass into smaller modules. 1.13 Development adjacent to a historic landmark should respond to the historic resource. RESPONSE: No additional buildings will be constructed as part of this project proposal . These criteria are not applicable . STREET LEVEL DESIGN 1.14 Commercial entrances shall be at the sidewalk level and oriented to the street. 1.15 Incorporate an internal airlock or air curtain into first floor commercial space. 1.16 Entries that are significantly taller or shorter than those seen historically or that conflict with the established scale are highly discouraged. 1.17 ATMs and vending machines visible from the street are prohibited. RESPONSE: No building entry locations or massing changes are proposed . These criteria are not applicable . ROOFSCAPE 1.18 The roofscape should be designed with the same attention as the elevations of the building. 1.19 Use materials that complement the design of the building façade 1.20 Incorporate green roofs and low landscape elements into rooftop design where feasible. 1.21 Minimize visibility of rooftops railings. RESPONSE: Changes to the roof are not proposed as part of this application . These criteria are not applicable . 6 | Exhibit A 16 7 | MATERIALS AND DETAILS 1.22 Complete and accurate identification of materials is required. RESPONSE: The Architectural Plans (Exhibit G and H) include a material sheet that shows the proposed materials . The proposed materials include : •Cementitious Siding (such as GFRC, Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete) •Exterior cementitious plaster •Exterior wood siding (WUI Compliant with SFM 12-7A-1 Fire Rating) •Metal window and door trim, and railings •Pavers for the building’s exterior elevated walking surfaces Renderings and an example elevation are also provided to show where these materials will be applied to the buildings . 1.23 Building materials shall have these features: •Convey the quality and range of materials found in the current block context or seen historically in the Character Area. •Convey pedestrian scale. •Enhance visual interest through texture, application, and/or dimension. •Be non-reflective. Shiny or glossy materials are not appropriate as a primary material. •Have proven durability and weathering characteristics within Aspen’s climate. •A material with an integral color shall be a neutral color. Some variation is allowed for secondary materials. RESPONSE: The building is currently all wood from the original construction, which has reached the end of its useful life and is less wildfire resistant than newer materials . The updated design introduces thermally modified wood in key visual areas such as gable edges and gable conditions to preserve the mountain character and ensure continuity with existing aesthetics . To enhance durability while maintaining a textured and crafted appearance, cementitious (GFRC) siding will be used as the primary material, allowing for articulated surface expression . Wood railings will be replaced with metal railings, designed to complement the building’s overall palette while providing a refined, low-maintenance detail . The new building materials will align with the current neighborhood block context for the Character Area . The primary goal of the project is to improve wildfire defensibility and resilience . The primary exterior materials are cementitious siding and cementitious plaster, which provide a high degree of wildfire resistance . Materials will be non-reflective, durable, and ideal for Aspen’s climate . Neutral colors are anticipated to be used across the outdoor landscape design and building design . The building materials will align with the local community character and context . The space will be walkable, and the landscape elements will provide visual interest by utilizing diverse plant textures and artistic elements and features across the programmed spaces . The outdoor materials used will be in alignment with the architectural character of the building . 7 | Exhibit A 17 8 | 1.24 Introducing a new material, material application, or material finish to the existing streetscape may be approved by HPC or P&Z if the following criteria are met: •Innovative building design. •Creative material application that positively contributes to the streetscape. •Environmentally sustainable building practice. •Proven durability. RESPONSE: New streetscape elements are not proposed . New building materials are focused on durability and environmental sustainability and resilience . 1.25 Architecture that reflects corporate branding of the tenant is not permitted. RESPONSE: No corporate branding is proposed . This criterion is not applicable . LIGHTING, SERVICE, AND MECHANICAL AREAS 1.26 The design of light fixtures should be appropriate to the form, materials, scale, and style of the building. RESPONSE: All lighting fixtures will meet the requirements of the City of Aspen lighting code . 1.27 Trash and recycle service areas shall be co-located along an alleyway where one exists, and screened from view with a fence or door. 1.28 Design trash and recycle areas thoughtfully and within the style of the building, with the goal of enhancing pedestrian and commercial uses along alleys. 1.29 Delivery areas shall be located along an alleyway where one exists. 1.30 Mechanical equipment, ducts, and vents shall be accommodated internally within the building and/or co-located on the roof. 1.31 Minimize the visual impacts of utility connections and service boxes. 1.32 Transformer location and size are dictated by City and utility company standards and codes. RESPONSE: Changes to these elements are not proposed . These criteria are not applicable . REMODEL 1.33 All remodel projects shall meet Standards 1.22 and 1.23. RESPONSE: See responses to these standards, above . 1.34 Consider updating windows, doors, and/or primary entrances to better relate to the Character Area and pedestrian experience. RESPONSE: Material updates to the doors and windows are proposed as part of the remodel to improve overall durability and reduce maintenance costs . The size and location of doors and windows are not proposed to change, though recladding may result in slight changes to proud window trim . The overall size of glazing is not proposed to change . 8 | Exhibit A 18 9 | 1.35 Design alternations to relate to the existing building style and form may remain. RESPONSE: There are no exterior massing changes proposed . Materials are proposed to be updated to improve overall resilience of the buildings and to implement wildfire best management practices . The materials include: •Cementitious Siding (such as GFRC, Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete) •Exterior cementitious plaster •Exterior wood siding (WUI Compliant with SFM 12-7A-1 Fire Rating) •Metal window and door trim, and railings •Pavers for the building’s exterior elevated walking surfaces 1.36 Incorporate elements that define the property line in accordance with Guideline 1.6. RESPONSE: Guideline 1 .6 relates to changes to building facades, which are not changed as part of the proposal . This criterion is not applicable . 1.37 Creative solutions that incorporate ADA compliance into the architecture are encouraged. RESPONSE: ADA access is currently provided to buildings at The Gant’s buildings . Landscaping updates will be completed to comply with ADA requirements . For instance, as part of the updates to the pool and hot tubs, an 18-inch transfer wall is incorporated into the hot tub designs to enable ADA access without a mechanized chair . All improvements will meet the applicable requirements of the building code . MOUNTAIN BASE CHARACTER AREA GUIDELINES BUILDING PLACEMENT 6.1 On lots greater than 15,000 square feet, the massing of the building should be broken into smaller volumes. 6.2 Place a building into the topography to minimize visual impacts from downtown and to reinforce a strong relationship to the mountain. 6.3 Minimize retaining walls. 6.4 Incorporate open space into building placement and site design. 6.5 Eclectic and creative approaches to break up building mass and scale is encouraged. 6.6 Create interest along the street, for instance by providing places for the public to sit. RESPONSE: There are no changes to the building locations as part of the remodel project, so most of these criteria are not applicable . Site plan updates are proposed, which will adjust the common open areas on the site . There are currently three open areas on the property, which are proposed to be updated as follows: •The lower existing pool area will be updated to include an alpine garden with a lawn, semi-private gathering areas, an updated grill area, a fire pit, and a relocated water feature . •The existing tennis courts will be removed as replaced with a lawn, semi-private seating areas, fire pits, a relocated pool and two relocated hot tubs (spas) . •The upper pool and hot tub will be reconfigured and retain the existing general size . The raised grilling and gathering space in this area is not proposed to change . 9 | Exhibit A 19 10 | ARCHITECTURE 6.7 Carefully plan parking areas and loading zones to minimize visual impacts. RESPONSE: Ten (10) new parking spaces are proposed in the center of the site as part of the removal of the tennis courts . These are located adjacent to existing parking and will be screened from the proposed central pool through fencing and planted material . 6.7 Roof forms should be low pitched to reinforce the mountain character of the neighborhood. RESPONSE: No changes to the roof forms are proposed . This criterion is not applicable DETAILS AND MATERIALS 6.8 Easily identifiable architectural details are encouraged. RESPONSE: The Gant maintains its recognizable character through the thoughtful integration of identifiable architectural details . While the buildings are currently all wood clad, the updated design introduces thermally modified wood in key visual areas such as gable edges and gable conditions to preserve the mountain character and ensure continuity with existing aesthetics . To enhance durability while maintaining a textured and crafted appearance, cementitious siding will be used as the primary material, allowing for articulated surface expression . Wood railings will be replaced with metal railings, designed to complement the building’s overall palette while providing a refined, low-maintenance detail . Pedestrian areas and walkways are also addressed with attention to material expression . Porcelain pavers will be used on elevated building walkways and around the pool areas, while concrete pavers and natural stone paving are proposed for ground-level walkways to reinforce a tactile and layered sense of place . These details support the architectural identity at The Gant and provide clear, expressive elements that contribute to the pedestrian experience and the site’s contextual harmony . 10 | Exhibit A 20 11 | EXHIBIT B: RESPONSES TO MOUNTAIN VIEW PLANE CRITERIA SEC . 26 .435 .050 . MOUNTAIN VIEW PLANE REVIEW . (d) Exemptions. The following development activities on properties located in the mid- and background of a view plane are exempt from the provisions of this Section and may proceed directly to zoning compliance check and building permit review, where the applicant shall demonstrate the improvement meets the following review criteria. (1) Structures. a. Any addition or remodel of an existing structure that does not change or decreases a building’s height at any point or visible mass from the view plane reference point; or b. Any of the following structures or structural elements that comply with the standards contained herein or in the applicable code section for those structures or structural elements RESPONSE: The Glory Hole View Plane crosses the property and was established just prior to the development of the Gant . In fact, adjustments in the original approval to building height and location were made to comply with the new view plane . A portion of Building A and Building B are located in the view plane – these do not encroach and are located below the view plane line . Today, existing vegetation and buildings off the Gant property infringe on the view plane and block the Gant . This is illustrated in the View Plane Exhibit (Exhibit I) . The proposed changes are all located below the view plane line, in full compliance with the requirements of the view plane regulations . When viewed from the protected reference point, the updated design is not visually prominent and does not materially alter the preserved mountain views . Sightline studies and view simulations in the View Plane Exhibit confirm that the development does not obstruct or significantly change the character of the view corridor . 11 | Exhibit B 21 12 | Amendments to an approved Project Review or to an approved Detailed Review shall be reviewed according to the standards and procedures outlined below. Amendments to Planned Unit Development and Specially Planned Area approvals (pre-Ordinance 36, 2013, approvals) shall also proceed according to the standards and procedures outlined below and the Community Development Director shall determine the type of procedure most-applicable to the requested amendment. (a) Insubstantial Amendments. An insubstantial amendment to an approved Project Review or an approved Detailed Review may be authorized by the Community Development Director. An insubstantial amendment shall meet the following criteria: (1) The request does not change the use or character of the development. RESPONSE: This request does not change the use or character of the development . The materiality updates to the building and the landscape features will not change the building’s architectural integrity and will not change the existing land use . The building material and landscape updates are intended to improve the resilience of the Gant, providing additional protection from fire hazards . The landscape plans replace the pools, spas, and other water features in a like-for-like manner . (2) The request is consistent with the conditions and representations in the project’s original approval or otherwise represents an insubstantial change. RESPONSE: The exterior building material updates, amenity reconfiguration, and landscaping enhancements maintain the intent and character of the approved design . These changes do not alter the building form, height, or use, and remain within the originally approved dimensions and location . There are 12 buildings on site, which include the conference center, front desk and check-in areas, and individual units . No changes to the floor area or height of buildings are proposed, and there are no building expansions that would impact the setbacks . Where updates are proposed, they are technical or programmatic refinements that represent insubstantial changes and reflect best practices in durability, maintenance, and site functionality . All renovations will preserve the project’s original vision and compliance with applicable standards . Updates proposed to the building materials include: •The existing all-wood siding will be updated with thermally modified wood on key architectural features, such as the gable ends . This material is fire rated and is used in key areas to provide texture and materials that are consistent with the existing character . •The general siding will be replaced with high-quality cementitious (likely GFRC) and exterior plaster . These are fire resistant materials that will provide long-term durability and fire hazard mitigation while retaining the existing character of the property . •Wood railings will be replaced with metal railings and steel accents, providing additional fire resistance in the interior walkways and on exterior balconies . •Building elevated walkways will feature pavers, which are anticipated to be porcelain . •Neutral color tones such as dark brown, grey, and dark grey and similar colors are anticipated for all building materials . Landscape updates are focused on meeting modern building and ADA requirements, as well as wildfire best management practices . The property currently includes two (2) pools, three (3) hot tubs (spas), and multiple water features . With the proposal, the existing pools will be replaced in a similar size to ensure compliance with the city’s water requirements . One water feature is proposed to be relocated as part of the proposal, which will also retain its size to comply with city requirements . There are three amenity areas that currently exist which will be updated as follows: EXHIBIT C: RESPONSES TO PD CRITERIASEC . 26 .445 .100 . AMENDMENTS . 12 | Exhibit C 22 13 | •The lower existing pool area is located between the lobby and conference center, and currently includes a grill area, two hot tubs (spas), one pool, and pathways . This pool area does not include fencing, which is now required by modern building and insurance safety requirements . Given these modern requirements, the pool and hot tubs are is proposed to be relocated to an area with adequate space to provide this safety fencing . This area is proposed as an alpine garden, with an updated grill area, lawn, low plantings, a water feature relocated from an existing feature at the conference center, and fire pit with seating . •The existing tennis courts in the center of the site are proposed to be removed and replaced with the relocated pool and hot tubs . A rectilinear pool is proposed with two hot tubs and an at-grade pool deck area . A new lawn and seating areas are proposed to the west of the pool area, providing space for lawn games and gatherings . The new pool and lawn area will require less space than the current tennis court area, providing an opportunity for new parking spaces . A total of ten (10) new head-in parking spaces are proposed, which will be EV ready . An existing fence (approximately 10 feet in height) with Virginia creeper surrounds the tennis courts . A similar green wall that is 8 in height and new trees are proposed on the eastern side of the pool area to provide screening from the parking area . The remainder of the pool area is proposed to include a fence that is no more than 6 feet tall . •The existing upper pool area remains substantially similar to what exists today . The pool will be updated to be rectilinear in shape and the hot tub will be relocated and updated to a rectilinear shape . An existing fence around the pool will remain . •Additionally, throughout the site the pathways will be updated with concrete and natural stone paving . (3) The request does not require granting a variation from the project’s allowed use(s) and does not request an increase in the allowed height or floor area. RESPONSE: The proposal does not request any variation from the project’s allowed uses, nor the allowed height or floor area . All improvements, including exterior material updates, site amenity modifications, and landscape enhancements remain fully within the parameters of the existing approvals . No additional square footage is being added, and the project continues to comply with all applicable land use, height, and floor area requirements . (4) Any proposed changes to the approved dimensional requirements are limited to a technical nature, respond to a design parameter that could not have been foreseen during the Project Review approval, are within dimensional tolerances stated in the Project Review, or otherwise represents an insubstantial change. RESPONSE: There are no changes to heights, floor area, net leasable, nor net livable calculations . The project approvals do not have clear setbacks areas identified, so existing conditions are proposed to remain . The Landscape Plans illustrate the setback areas and identify the setbacks proposed for the areas impacted by this project . The pool relocation results in the ability to provide ten (10) new parking spaces, which is proposed to be memorialized as part of this approval, pending any referral comments from the Building Department regarding the required mix of regular and ADA spaces . This change is only possible due to the removal of the tennis court and is a technical change that is insubstantial . All proposed changes are insubstantial and do not materially alter the project’s approved design intent, land use, or zoning compliance . The revised exterior materials maintain visual consistency with the established character of the Gant, and the landscape and amenity changes represent functional upgrades that do not increase density or intensity of use . Overall, the modifications improve durability, aesthetics, and site functionality while remaining consistent with the original approval . (5) An applicant may not apply for Detailed Review if an amendment is pending. RESPONSE: Detail Review not required . This criterion is not applicable . 13 | Exhibit C 23 14 | N 0 0.04 0.09 0.14 0.180.02 Miles 0 0.04 0.09 0.14 0.180.02 Miles UTE MESA UTE CEMENTARY THE GANT EXHIBIT D: VICINITY MAP U T E A V E N U E ASPEN MTN BASE AREA S. W E S T E N D S T R E E T COO P E R A V E / H W Y 8 2 OR I G I N A L S T R E E T LEGEND Existing Site Development Boundary 14 | Exhibit D 24 EXHIBIT E: CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE RENDERINGS 15 | Exhibit E 25 | 14 ALPINE GARDEN 16 | Exhibit E 26 | 17 LOWER POOL PERSPECTIVE CENTRAL POOL 17 | Exhibit E 27 | 19 CENTRAL GARDEN 18 | Exhibit E 28 | 21 UPPER POOL 19 | Exhibit E 29 EXHIBIT F: LANDSCAPE PLANS 20 | Exhibit F 30 SHEET INDEX Sheet No.Sheet Name Landscape Drawings: L0-00 Cover L0-01 Illustrative Site Plan L0-02 Site Plan L0-02a Site Plan Enlargement L0-02b Site Plan Enlargement L0-02c Site Plan Enlargement L0-03 Vegetation Protection and Tree Removal Plan L0-04 Defensible Space L0-05 Landscape Plan L0-05a Landscape Plan Enlargement L0-05b Landscape Plan Enlargement L0-05c Landscape Plan Enlargement L0-06 Site Materials L0-07 Site Fencing L0-08 Site Planting Palette OWNER/CLIENT The Gant 610 S. West End Street Aspen, Colorado, 81611 Tel: (970) 925-5000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Gant project is located at 610 S. West End Street, Aspen, Colorado. The Land Use application package includes landscape architecture and site design drawings as shown on the Sheet Index. The work contained within these documents consists of site renovations to identified areas within the Gant Campus, including renovating an existing swimming pool terrace between Building A and the Conference Center into a garden; replacing the area of the removed swimming pool and spas in the location of the existing tennis courts, along with some additional new parking; and comprehensive renovations to the east swimming pool, spa and terrace east of Building F and G. VICINITY MAP GANT CAMPUS ENHANCEMENT NOT TO SCALE DW Project Number: 7110 NORTH NORTH PROJECT TEAM CIVIL ENGINEER Roaring Fork Engineering 592 CO-133 Carbondale, Colorado 81623 Tel: (970) 340-4130 610 S W END STREET ASPEN, COLORADO ARCHITECT OF DESIGN CCY 228 Midland Ave. Basalt, Colorado 81621 Tel: (970) 927-4925 ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN LAND USE APPLICATION ISSUED: AUGUST 11, 2025 C C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT & LAND PLANNING DESIGNWORKSHOP 22860 Two Rivers Road #1 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Tel: (970) 925-8354 S W END STREET PROJECT LOCATION S. ORIGINAL STREET HWY 82 / E. COOPER AVE. UTE AVENUE BUILDING A BUILDING C BUILDING C BUILDING B CONFERENCE CENTER BUILDING J BUILDING K BUILDING D BUILDING F BUILDING E BUILDING GBUILDING H ARCHITECT OF RECORD OPI ARCHITECTS 419 Main Street, Unit 1 Frisco, Colorado 80443 Tel: (970) 668-1133 WATER FEATURE ENGINEER WATER DESIGN INC. 6740 S. 1300 E. #110 Cottonwood Heights, Utah 84121 Tel: (801) 261-4009 31 SO U T H W E S T EN D S T R E E T S . U T E A V E N U E X EX-U E EX-UE EX-U E EX-UE EX-U E EX- U E EX - U E EX-U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E T T W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W G G G G G G G G G G G G G T T T T T T T T E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E G T T T T T T T T G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G W T EX - U E EX-U E DYH DYH D S S S S S D D D D D D D D D S D DYH DYH D D D D E E E OSW CO CO COCO COCO CO CO CO CO CO D WV WV WV ICV ICV ICV ICV G ICV ICV D G DOG DYH CO W WV WV FO EX-UE F ICV E T T T T EX-UE ICV EX - U E E X - U E G GGEX-UE EX-UE EX - U E EX - U E CTV CT V CT V EX - U E EX - U E E X - U E G T D D W ICV D G G AC EX - U E EX-UE EX - U E EX - U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX- U E D ICV ICV X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN NORTH 0 ORIGINAL SCALE: 15'30'60' 1"=30' A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 7 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g C ISSUE DATE: SHEET NUMBER REVIEWED: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN: 1 REVISIONS 7110 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C D E AS P E N , C O L O R A D O C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. F 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 7 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g JP, AH MA AUGUST 12, 2025 DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning Urban Design · Tourism Planning Aspen · Austin · Denver · Houston Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Raleigh W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M 22860 Two Rivers Road #1 Basalt, CO 81621 (970) 925-8354 TH E GA N T LAND USE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION L0-01 CONFERENCE CENTER PARKING PARKING POOL LAWN LAWN POOL SPA SPA SPA BUILDING A BUILDING C BUILDING CBUILDING B BUILDING J BUILDING K BUILDING D BUILDING E BUILDING F BUILDING G BUILDING H EX I S T I N G T R A I L SHEET LEGEND PROPERTY LINE SID E S E T B A C K 32 SO U T H W E S T EN D S T R E E T S . U T E A V E N U E EX-U E EX-UE EX-U E EX-UE EX-U E EX- U E EX - U E EX-U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E T T W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W G G G G G G G G G G G G G T T T T T T T T E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E G T T T T T T T T G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G W T EX - U E EX-U E DYH DYH D S S S S S D D D D D D D D D S D DYH DYH D D D D E E E OSW CO CO COCO COCO CO CO CO CO CO D WV WV WV ICV ICV ICV ICV G ICV ICV D G DOG DYH CO W WV WV FO EX-UE F ICV E T T T T EX-UE ICV EX - U E E X - U E G GGEX-UE EX-UE EX - U E EX - U E CTV CT V CT V EX - U E EX - U E E X - U E G T D D W ICV D G G AC EX - U E EX-UE EX - U E EX - U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX- U E D ICV ICV X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X SITE PLAN NORTH 0 ORIGINAL SCALE: 15'30'60' 1"=30' A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 7 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g C ISSUE DATE: SHEET NUMBER REVIEWED: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN: 1 REVISIONS 7110 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C D E AS P E N , C O L O R A D O C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. F 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 7 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g JP, AH MA AUGUST 12, 2025 DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning Urban Design · Tourism Planning Aspen · Austin · Denver · Houston Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Raleigh W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M 22860 Two Rivers Road #1 Basalt, CO 81621 (970) 925-8354 TH E GA N T LAND USE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION L0-02 CONFERENCE CENTER PARKING PARKING POOL LAWN LAWN POOL SPA SPA SPA BUILDING A BUILDING C BUILDING CBUILDING B BUILDING J BUILDING K BUILDING D BUILDING E BUILDING F BUILDING G BUILDING H EX I S T I N G T R A I L SHEET LEGEND ENLARGEMENT AREA ENLARGEMENT A - SEE SHEET L0-02A ENLARGEMENT B - SEE SHEET L0-02B ENLARGEMENT C - SEE SHEET L0-02C AREA OUTSIDE OF SCOPE OF WORK PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LIMIT OF SCOPE OF WORK SITE MATERIALS LEGEND EXISTING METAL CHAIN LINK FENCE X X X TALL METAL FENCE SHORT METAL FENCE COMPOSITE WOOD PRIVACY FENCE X X X X STONE PAVING CRUSHER FINES CONCRETE PAVING STEPPING STONE LANDSCAPE BOULDER STONE COPPING STONE VENEER STEP GRAVEL STONE STEP TYPE 2 PORCELAIN PAVER UNIT PAVER STONE STEP TYPE 1 SYNTHETIC TURF 33 T T T T T T T TT G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G T T T D D CO CO CO CO D D G CO EX- U E CT V CTV CTV CTV CTV CT V CT V T T EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E G A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 7 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g C ISSUE DATE: SHEET NUMBER REVIEWED: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN: 1 REVISIONS 7110 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C D E AS P E N , C O L O R A D O C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. F 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 7 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g JP, AH MA AUGUST 12, 2025 DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning Urban Design · Tourism Planning Aspen · Austin · Denver · Houston Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Raleigh W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M 22860 Two Rivers Road #1 Basalt, CO 81621 (970) 925-8354 TH E GA N T LAND USE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION L0-02A SITE PLAN ENLARGEMENT NORTH 0 ORIGINAL SCALE: 15'30'60' 1"=30' CONFERENCE CENTER LAWN BUILDING A BUILDING B EX I S T I N G T R A I L ENLARGEMENT A BUILDING B PA PA PA PA PA PA PA BUILDING J PA = PLANTING AREA SHEET LEGEND AREA OUTSIDE OF SCOPE OF WORK PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LIMIT OF SCOPE OF WORK EXISTING GRILL FEATURE WATER FEATURE FIRE FEATURE SITE MATERIALS LEGEND TALL METAL FENCE STONE PAVING CRUSHER FINES CONCRETE PAVING STONE COPPING STONE VENEER STEP PORCELAIN PAVER UNIT PAVER STEPPING STONE LANDSCAPE BOULDER GRAVEL STONE STEP TYPE 2 STONE STEP TYPE 1 SYNTHETIC TURF SID E S E T B A C K 5 ' - 0 " , T Y P . S I D E S E T B A C K 34 EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-UE T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T D E CO CO EX- U E EX-UE EX - U E EX - U E CT V CTV CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V T T EX-U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 8 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g C ISSUE DATE: SHEET NUMBER REVIEWED: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN: 1 REVISIONS 7110 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C D E AS P E N , C O L O R A D O C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. F 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 8 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g JP, AH MA AUGUST 12, 2025 DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning Urban Design · Tourism Planning Aspen · Austin · Denver · Houston Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Raleigh W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M 22860 Two Rivers Road #1 Basalt, CO 81621 (970) 925-8354 TH E GA N T LAND USE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION L0-02B SITE PLAN ENLARGEMENT NORTH 0 ORIGINAL SCALE: 15'30'60' 1"=30' POOL LAWN SPA SPA BUILDING C BUILDING B BUILDING J BUILDING K ENLARGEMENT B PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PARKING PA PA = PLANTING AREA SITE MATERIALS LEGEND SHEET LEGEND AREA OUTSIDE OF SCOPE OF WORK PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LIMIT OF SCOPE OF WORK STONE PAVING CRUSHER FINES CONCRETE PAVING TALL METAL FENCE STONE COPPING STONE VENEER STEPFIRE FEATURE COMPOSITE WOOD PRIVACY FENCE X X X X PORCELAIN PAVER UNIT PAVER STEPPING STONE LANDSCAPE BOULDER GRAVEL STONE STEP TYPE 2 STONE STEP TYPE 1 SYNTHETIC TURF FIRE FEATURE FIRE FEATURE 35 W W W T EX- U E EX-U E EX-UE E X - U E EX - U E EX - U E E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E G G G G G G G G G GEX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE E X - U E EX - U E X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 8 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g C ISSUE DATE: SHEET NUMBER REVIEWED: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN: 1 REVISIONS 7110 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C D E AS P E N , C O L O R A D O C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. F 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 8 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g JP, AH MA AUGUST 12, 2025 DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning Urban Design · Tourism Planning Aspen · Austin · Denver · Houston Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Raleigh W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M 22860 Two Rivers Road #1 Basalt, CO 81621 (970) 925-8354 TH E GA N T LAND USE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION L0-02C SITE PLAN ENLARGEMENT NORTH 0 ORIGINAL SCALE: 15'30'60' 1"=30' BUILDING G POOL SPA PA PA PAPA PA PA PA = PLANTING AREA SHEET LEGEND AREA OUTSIDE OF SCOPE OF WORK PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LIMIT OF SCOPE OF WORK SITE MATERIALS LEGEND EXISTING METAL CHAIN LINK FENCE X X X TALL METAL FENCE (POOL ENCLOSURE) SHORT METAL FENCE (PATIO ENCLOSURE) FIRE FEATURE PATIO PATIO PATIO PATIO PATIO PATIO STONE PAVING PORCELAIN PAVER UNIT PAVER CRUSHER FINES CONCRETE PAVING STONE COPPING STONE VENEER STEP STEPPING STONE LANDSCAPE BOULDER GRAVEL STONE STEP TYPE 2 STONE STEP TYPE 1 SYNTHETIC TURF SIDE SETBACK 2' - 0 " , TY P . S I D E S E T B A C K EXISTING SITE WALL TO REMAIN, TYP. EXISTING PATH TO REMAIN PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA ENLARGEMENT C 36 X X X X X X X X X EX-U E EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-U E EX- U E EX - U E EX-U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E T T W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W G G G G G G G G G G G G G T T T T T T T T E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E G T T T T T T T T G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G W T EX - U E EX- U E X X X X X X X X X X X X X X FO EX-UE T T T T EX-UE EX - U E E X - U E G GGEX-UE EX-UE EX - U E EX - U E CTV CT V CT V EX - U E EX - U E E X - U E G T W T3 T4 T5 T7 T8 T10 T14 T15 T16T17 T21 T22 T23 T24 T25 T26 T27 T28 T29 T31 T32 T33 T34 T35 T36 T37 T38 T39T40 T41 T42 T44 T43 T45 T46 T47 T48 T49 T50 T51 T53 T55 T52 T54 T56 T57 T59 T60 T58 T61 T62 T63 T64 T65 T66 T67 T68 T69 T70 T71 T72 T73 T74 T75 T76 T77 T78 T79 T80 T81 T82 T83 T84 T85 T86 T87 T88 T89 T90 T91 T92 T93 T94 T95 T96 T97 T98 T99 T100 T101 T102 T103 T104 T121T120 T119 T118 T105 T106 T109 T114 T115 T116 T117 T122 T123 T124 T125T126 T127 T129 T131 T128 T132 T133 T135 T137 T138 T139 T140 T142 T143 T144 T145 T146 T149 T153 T154 T155 T156 T157 T158 T159 T160 T161 T162 T163 T164 T165 T166 T167 T168 T169 T170 T171 T172 T173 T174 T175 T176 T178 T179 T180 T181 T182 T183 T184 T185 T186 T187 T188 T190T189 T191 T192 T193 T197 T199 T200 T202 T203 T205 T206T207 T208 T209 T210 T211 T212 T216 T217 T218 T219 T220 T221T222T223 T224 T225 T226 T227 T228 T229 T230 T231 T232 T233 T234 T235 T236 T237 T239 T240 T238 T244 T245 T246 T247 T248 T249 T252 T254 T255 T256 T257 T258 T259 T260 T261 T262 T263 T264 T267T268T269 T270 T271 T272 T273 T274 T275 T276 T277 T278 T279 T280 T281 T282 T283 T284 T285 T286 T287 T288 T289 T290 T291 T292 T293 T295 T296 T297 T298 T299 T302 T303 T304 T309 G G AC EX - U E EX-UE EX - U E EX - U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX- U E X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X EX-U E EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-U E EX- U E EX - U E EX-U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E T T W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W G G G G G G G G G G G G G T T T T T T T T E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E G T T T T T T T T G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G W T EX - U E EX- U E X X X X X X X X X X X X X X FO EX-UE T T T T EX-UE EX - U E E X - U E G GGEX-UE EX-UE EX - U E EX - U E CTV CT V CT V EX - U E EX - U E E X - U E G T W T3 T4 T5 T7 T8 T10 T14 T15 T16T17 T21 T22 T23 T24 T25 T26 T27 T28 T29 T31 T32 T33 T34 T35 T36 T37 T38 T39T40 T41 T42 T44 T43 T45 T46 T47 T48 T49 T50 T51 T53 T55 T52 T54 T56 T57 T59 T60 T58 T61 T62 T63 T64 T65 T66 T67 T68 T69 T70 T71 T72 T73 T74 T75 T76 T77 T78 T79 T80 T81 T82 T83 T84 T85 T86 T87 T88 T89 T90 T91 T92 T93 T94 T95 T96 T97 T98 T99 T100 T101 T102 T103 T104 T121T120 T119 T118 T105 T106 T109 T114 T115 T116 T117 T122 T123 T124 T125T126 T127 T129 T131 T128 T132 T133 T135 T137 T138 T139 T140 T142 T143 T144 T145 T146 T149 T153 T154 T155 T156 T157 T158 T159 T160 T161 T162 T163 T164 T165 T166 T167 T168 T169 T170 T171 T172 T173 T174 T175 T176 T178 T179 T180 T181 T182 T183 T184 T185 T186 T187 T188 T190T189 T191 T192 T193 T197 T199 T200 T202 T203 T205 T206T207 T208 T209 T210 T211 T212 T216 T217 T218 T219 T220 T221T222T223 T224 T225 T226 T227 T228 T229 T230 T231 T232 T233 T234 T235 T236 T237 T239 T240 T238 T244 T245 T246 T247 T248 T249 T252 T254 T255 T256 T257 T258 T259 T260 T261 T262 T263 T264 T267T268T269 T270 T271 T272 T273 T274 T275 T276 T277 T278 T279 T280 T281 T282 T283 T284 T285 T286 T287 T288 T289 T290 T291 T292 T293 T295 T296 T297 T298 T299 T302 T303 T304 T309 G G AC EX - U E EX-UE EX - U E EX - U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX- U E X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X SO U T H W E S T EN D S T R E E T S . U T E A V E N U E PLANT PROTECTION AND REMOVAL PLAN NORTH 0 ORIGINAL SCALE: 15'30'60' 1"=30' VEGETATION PROTECTION AND TREE REMOVAL PLAN CONFERENCE CENTER PARKING PARKING POOL SPA D e c 1 9 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 3 9 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L 1 - R E M O V A L . d w g C ISSUE DATE: SHEET NUMBER REVIEWED: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN: 1 REVISIONS 7110 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C D E AS P E N , C O L O R A D O C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. F 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 D e c 1 9 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 1 : 3 9 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L 1 - R E M O V A L . d w g JP, AH MA AUGUST 12, 2025 DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning Urban Design · Tourism Planning Aspen · Austin · Denver · Houston Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Raleigh W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M 22860 Two Rivers Road #1 Basalt, CO 81621 (970) 925-8354 TH E GA N T LAND USE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION L0-03 5' FIRE PROTECTION OFFSET EXISTING CONIFEROUS TO REMAIN. DO NOT DISTURB. PROTECT IN PLACE. EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO BE REMOVED; INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMP. FILL DEPRESSION WITH SUITABLE SOIL. PITCH TO DRAIN. SEE ALSO CIVIL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS. TREE PROTECTION FENCE XXX EXISTING VEGETATION AND HARDSCAPING, INCLUDING POOLS AND SPAS, TO BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED. STRIP, SALVAGE AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL. PLANT PROTECTION AND REMOVAL LEGEND SPA SPA POOL EXISTING TENNIS COURTS EXISTING DECIDUOUS TO REMAIN. DO NOT DISTURB. PROTECT IN PLACE. EXISTING DECIDUOUS TO REMAIN. DO NOT DISTURB. PROTECT IN PLACE. EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED; INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMP. FILL DEPRESSION WITH SUITABLE SOIL. PITCH TO DRAIN. SEE ALSO CIVIL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS.XXX EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED; INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMP. FILL DEPRESSION WITH SUITABLE SOIL. PITCH TO DRAIN. SEE ALSO CIVIL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS.XXX 1 TYP. BUILDING A BUILDING C BUILDING CBUILDING B BUILDING J BUILDING D BUILDING E BUILDING F BUILDING G BUILDING H SHEET LEGEND PROPERTY LINE LIMIT OF SCOPE OF WORK T178 TREE REMOVAL AND DEMOLITION REFERENCE NOTES 1 Existing tree to remain. Do Not Disturb. Protect in place. 2 Existing tree to be removed, including roots. Fill depression with suitable soil. Pitch to drain. Contractor to salvage and not scar. 3 4 5 Existing Boulder to remain. Do not disturb. Protect in place Existing BBQ structure to remain. Do not disturb. Protect in place. Existing site wall to remain. Do not disturb, protect in place. 6 Existing pool and spa(s) to be removed, including all related equipment. 7 Existing gate to be removed. for land use submittal T176 T179 T182 T183 T184 1 TYP. 2 TYP. 3 4 4 5 TYP. 7 7 IDENTIFIED TREE TO BE REMOVED IN FUTURE AS PART OF AN EXISTING ON-GOING PROCESS OF REMOVING TREES AS PART OF WILD FIRE MITIGATION. SIZETREE TYPETREE # TREE REMOVAL LIST 10 109 155 156 202 203 212 245 248 249 U.POOL NOTES: List includes "code-size" trees only. (4" DBH Coniferous) (6" DBH deciduous) COTTONWOOD ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN ASPEN 15" cal. 8" cal. 6" cal. 6" cal. 8" cal. 12" cal. 6" cal. 6" cal. 6" cal. 6" cal. 6" cal. SIZETREE TYPETREE # U.POOL U.POOL 10" cal. 6" cal. TO REMOVE - TO REMOVE - W/IN 5' WILDFIRE SETBACK ASPEN ASPEN TOTAL 85" cal. TOTAL 16" cal. NEW DEVELOPMENT 37 A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 8 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g C ISSUE DATE: SHEET NUMBER REVIEWED: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN: 1 REVISIONS 7110 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C D E AS P E N , C O L O R A D O C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. F 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 8 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g JP, AH MA AUGUST 12, 2025 DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning Urban Design · Tourism Planning Aspen · Austin · Denver · Houston Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Raleigh W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M 22860 Two Rivers Road #1 Basalt, CO 81621 (970) 925-8354 TH E GA N T LAND USE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION L0-04 DEFENSIBLE SPACE Zone 1 | 2’ Offset Remove flammable vegetation and woody debris Allowed: non-combustible ground materials adjacent to structures (stone, high-moisture content irrigated perennials, non-flammable mulches) Zone 2 | 5’ Offset High-moisture content plant materials (irrigated shrubs and perennials, limited mulch) Zone 3 | 10’ Offset Limited high-moisture content deciduous trees BUILDING A BUILDING C BUILDING C BUILDING B CONFERENCE CENTER BUILDING J BUILDING K BUILDING D BUILDING F BUILDING E BUILDING G BUILDING H ZO N E 3 : 1 0 ' O F F S E T ZO N E 2 : 5 ' O F F S E T ZO N E 1 : 2 ' O F F S E T Two-Story Residential Building TYPICAL CROSS SECTION 10' OFFSET 5' OFFSET 2' OFFSET 38 SO U T H W E S T EN D S T R E E T S . U T E A V E N U E EX-U E EX-UE EX-U E EX-UE EX-U E EX- U E EX - U E EX-U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E T T W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W G G G G G G G G G G G G G T T T T T T T T E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E G T T T T T T T T G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G W T EX - U E EX-U E DYH DYH D S S S S S D D D D D D D D D S D DYH DYH D D D D E E E OSW CO CO COCO COCO CO CO CO CO CO D WV WV WV ICV ICV ICV ICV G ICV ICV D G DOG DYH CO W WV WV FO EX-UE F ICV E T T T T EX-UE ICV EX - U E E X - U E G GGEX-UE EX-UE EX - U E EX - U E CTV CT V CT V EX - U E EX - U E E X - U E G T D D W ICV D G G AC EX - U E EX-UE EX - U E EX - U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX- U E D ICV ICV X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 8 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g C ISSUE DATE: SHEET NUMBER REVIEWED: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN: 1 REVISIONS 7110 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C D E AS P E N , C O L O R A D O C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. F 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 8 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g JP, AH MA AUGUST 12, 2025 DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning Urban Design · Tourism Planning Aspen · Austin · Denver · Houston Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Raleigh W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M 22860 Two Rivers Road #1 Basalt, CO 81621 (970) 925-8354 TH E GA N T LAND USE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION L0-05 LANDSCAPE PLAN NORTH 0 ORIGINAL SCALE: 15'30'60' 1"=30' CONFERENCE CENTER PARKING PARKING POOL LAWN LAWN POOL SPA SPA SPA BUILDING A BUILDING C BUILDING CBUILDING B BUILDING J BUILDING K BUILDING D BUILDING E BUILDING F BUILDING G BUILDING H EX I S T I N G T R A I L ENLARGEMENT A - SEE SHEET L0-05A ENLARGEMENT B - SEE SHEET L0-05B ENLARGEMENT C - SEE SHEET L0-05C SHEET LEGEND ENLARGEMENT AREA AREA OUTSIDE OF SCOPE OF WORK PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LIMIT OF SCOPE OF WORK PLANTING LEGEND Cotoneaster lucidus Peking Cotoneaster 117 Rhus aromatica 'Gro-low'Dwarf Fragrant Sumac 96 Spiraea betulifolia 'Tor'Birchleaf Spirea 180 Spiraea nipponica 'Snowmound'Snowmound Spirea 64 Syringa vulgaris 'Charles Joly' Double Red French Lilac 64 SHRUBS Populus tremuloides Quaking Aspen 18 TREES Populus tremula 'Erecta'Swedish Aspen 13 QTY. Aegopodium podagraria Green Bishop's Weed 314 Astilbe 'Bridal Veil'Bridal Veil Hybrid Astilbe 295 Athyrium filix-femina Lady Fern 450 Galium ordoratum Sweet Woodruff 765 Helictotrichon sempervirens Blue Oat Grass 295 Hosta 'Blue Angel'Blue Angel Hosta 190 Hosta 'Honeybells'Honeybells Hosta 75 Nepeta x faassenii 'Walker's Low'Walker's Low Catmint 115 PERENNIALS & VINES Parthenocissus quinquefolia Virginia Creeper 22 Populus tremuloides Quaking Aspen Multi-Stem 21 39 T T T T T T T G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G T D D CO CO D G EX- U E CT V CTV CTV CTV CTV CT V CT V T T EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E G A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 8 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g C ISSUE DATE: SHEET NUMBER REVIEWED: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN: 1 REVISIONS 7110 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C D E AS P E N , C O L O R A D O C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. F 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 8 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g JP, AH MA AUGUST 12, 2025 DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning Urban Design · Tourism Planning Aspen · Austin · Denver · Houston Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Raleigh W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M 22860 Two Rivers Road #1 Basalt, CO 81621 (970) 925-8354 TH E GA N T LAND USE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION L0-05A LANDSCAPE PLAN ENLARGEMENT NORTH 0 ORIGINAL SCALE: 15'30'60' 1"=30' CONFERENCE CENTER LAWN BUILDING A BUILDING B EX I S T I N G T R A I L ENLARGEMENT A BUILDING B BUILDING J SHEET LEGEND AREA OUTSIDE OF SCOPE OF WORK PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LIMIT OF SCOPE OF WORK FIRE FEATURE SID E S E T B A C K 5 ' - 0 " , T Y P . S I D E S E T B A C K PLANTING LEGEND Cotoneaster lucidus Peking Cotoneaster 117 Rhus aromatica 'Gro-low'Dwarf Fragrant Sumac 96 Spiraea betulifolia 'Tor'Birchleaf Spirea 180 Spiraea nipponica 'Snowmound'Snowmound Spirea 64 Syringa vulgaris 'Charles Joly' Double Red French Lilac 64 SHRUBS TREES Populus tremula 'Erecta'Swedish Aspen 13 QTY. Aegopodium podagraria Green Bishop's Weed 314 Astilbe 'Bridal Veil'Bridal Veil Hybrid Astilbe 295 Athyrium filix-femina Lady Fern 450 Galium ordoratum Sweet Woodruff 765 Helictotrichon sempervirens Blue Oat Grass 295 Hosta 'Blue Angel'Blue Angel Hosta 190 Hosta 'Honeybells'Honeybells Hosta 75 Nepeta x faassenii 'Walker's Low'Walker's Low Catmint 115 PERENNIALS & VINES Parthenocissus quinquefolia Virginia Creeper 22 Populus tremuloides Quaking Aspen 18 Populus tremuloides Quaking Aspen Multi-Stem 21 40 EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-UE T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T D E CO CO EX- U E EX-UE EX - U E EX - U E CT V CTV CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V T T EX-U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 8 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g C ISSUE DATE: SHEET NUMBER REVIEWED: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN: 1 REVISIONS 7110 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C D E AS P E N , C O L O R A D O C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. F 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 8 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g JP, AH MA AUGUST 12, 2025 DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning Urban Design · Tourism Planning Aspen · Austin · Denver · Houston Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Raleigh W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M 22860 Two Rivers Road #1 Basalt, CO 81621 (970) 925-8354 TH E GA N T LAND USE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION L0-05B LANDSCAPE PLAN ENLARGEMENT NORTH 0 ORIGINAL SCALE: 15'30'60' 1"=30' POOL LAWN SPA SPA BUILDING C BUILDING B BUILDING J BUILDING K ENLARGEMENT B PARKING SHEET LEGEND AREA OUTSIDE OF SCOPE OF WORK LIMIT OF SCOPE OF WORK METAL POOL FENCE WOOD PRIVACY FENCE FIRE FEATURE FIRE FEATURE FIRE FEATURE PLANTING LEGEND Cotoneaster lucidus Peking Cotoneaster 117 Rhus aromatica 'Gro-low'Dwarf Fragrant Sumac 96 Spiraea betulifolia 'Tor'Birchleaf Spirea 180 Spiraea nipponica 'Snowmound'Snowmound Spirea 64 Syringa vulgaris 'Charles Joly' Double Red French Lilac 64 SHRUBS TREES Populus tremula 'Erecta'Swedish Aspen 13 QTY. Aegopodium podagraria Green Bishop's Weed 314 Astilbe 'Bridal Veil'Bridal Veil Hybrid Astilbe 295 Athyrium filix-femina Lady Fern 450 Galium ordoratum Sweet Woodruff 765 Helictotrichon sempervirens Blue Oat Grass 295 Hosta 'Blue Angel'Blue Angel Hosta 190 Hosta 'Honeybells'Honeybells Hosta 75 Nepeta x faassenii 'Walker's Low'Walker's Low Catmint 115 PERENNIALS & VINES Parthenocissus quinquefolia Virginia Creeper 22 Populus tremuloides Quaking Aspen 18 Populus tremuloides Quaking Aspen Multi-Stem 21 41 W W W T EX- U E EX-U E EX-UE E X - U E EX - U E EX - U E E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E G G G G G G G G G GEX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE E X - U E EX - U E X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 9 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g C ISSUE DATE: SHEET NUMBER REVIEWED: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN: 1 REVISIONS 7110 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C D E AS P E N , C O L O R A D O C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. F 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 9 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g JP, AH MA AUGUST 12, 2025 DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning Urban Design · Tourism Planning Aspen · Austin · Denver · Houston Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Raleigh W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M 22860 Two Rivers Road #1 Basalt, CO 81621 (970) 925-8354 TH E GA N T LAND USE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION L0-05C LANDSCAPE PLAN ENLARGEMENT NORTH 0 ORIGINAL SCALE: 15'30'60' 1"=30' BUILDING G ENLARGEMENT C POOL SPA SHEET LEGEND AREA OUTSIDE OF SCOPE OF WORK PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LIMIT OF SCOPE OF WORK X X X X X X X X X EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE FIRE FEATURE EXISTING SITE WALL TO REMAIN, TYP. SIDE SETBACK 2' - 0 " , TY P . S I D E S E T B A C K PLANTING LEGEND Cotoneaster lucidus Peking Cotoneaster 117 Rhus aromatica 'Gro-low'Dwarf Fragrant Sumac 96 Spiraea betulifolia 'Tor'Birchleaf Spirea 180 Spiraea nipponica 'Snowmound'Snowmound Spirea 64 Syringa vulgaris 'Charles Joly' Double Red French Lilac 64 SHRUBS TREES Populus tremula 'Erecta'Swedish Aspen 13 QTY. Aegopodium podagraria Green Bishop's Weed 314 Astilbe 'Bridal Veil'Bridal Veil Hybrid Astilbe 295 Athyrium filix-femina Lady Fern 450 Galium ordoratum Sweet Woodruff 765 Helictotrichon sempervirens Blue Oat Grass 295 Hosta 'Blue Angel'Blue Angel Hosta 190 Hosta 'Honeybells'Honeybells Hosta 75 Nepeta x faassenii 'Walker's Low'Walker's Low Catmint 115 PERENNIALS & VINES Parthenocissus quinquefolia Virginia Creeper 22 Populus tremuloides Quaking Aspen 18 Populus tremuloides Quaking Aspen Multi-Stem 21 42 A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 9 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g C ISSUE DATE: SHEET NUMBER REVIEWED: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN: 1 REVISIONS 7110 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C D E AS P E N , C O L O R A D O C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. F 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 9 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g JP, AH MA AUGUST 12, 2025 DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning Urban Design · Tourism Planning Aspen · Austin · Denver · Houston Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Raleigh W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M 22860 Two Rivers Road #1 Basalt, CO 81621 (970) 925-8354 TH E GA N T LAND USE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION L0-06 SITE MATERIALS SITE MATERIALS - IN NATURAL SUNLIGHT INDIVIDUAL SITE MATERIALS EXISTING MATERIALITY OF SITE WALLS STONE PAVING AND STONE STEPS - GRAY FLAGSTONE PORCELAIN PAVER - GRAY UNIT PAVER STONE VENEER FOR STEPS, AND COPPING - TO MATCH EXISTING SITE WALLS CRUSHER FINE - GRAY SYNTHETIC TURF 43 EX-U EEX-U E T T D E CO CO CT V EX - U E X X X X X X X X X X X X EX-U E EX-U E T T D E CO CO CT V EX - U E X X X X X X X X X X X X A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 9 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g C ISSUE DATE: SHEET NUMBER REVIEWED: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN: 1 REVISIONS 7110 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C D E AS P E N , C O L O R A D O C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. F 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 9 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g JP, AH MA AUGUST 12, 2025 DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning Urban Design · Tourism Planning Aspen · Austin · Denver · Houston Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Raleigh W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M 22860 Two Rivers Road #1 Basalt, CO 81621 (970) 925-8354 TH E GA N T LAND USE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION L0-07 SITE FENCING 6'-0" PLAN ELEVATION ELEVATION SECTION 8' - 0 " 4x4 TUBULAR STEEL POSTS 1 1 / 2 " T Y P . ADJACENT SURFACE SEE PLAN 2x4 TUBULAR STEEL POST BELOW CONCRETE FOOTING BELOW PER STRUCTURAL. FINISH SURFACE. SEE PLAN ANCHOR PLATE. PER STRUCTURAL CONCRETE FOOTING. PER STRUCTURAL. 1' - 0 " MI N . GROUND ANCHOR CONDITION AT TYP. PAVING TYPICAL PANEL ASSEMBLY. IMBEDDED 2" INTO POSTS ELEVATION OF TOP RAIL FOOTING. PER STRUCTURAL. ANCHOR PLATE. PER STRUCTURAL. 1/ 2 " T Y P . 3 1 / 2 " T Y P . 1/4 " POST FASTENER 8' - 0 " 1 1 / 2 " T Y P . 1/ 2 " T Y P . 3 1 / 2 " T Y P . 1/4 " POST FASTENER COMPOSITE WOOD PRIVACY FENCE DETAIL 6'-0" PLAN ELEVATION ELEVATION SECTION 5' - 0 " 2x2 TUBULAR STEEL POSTS 1X2 CAPPED U-CHANNEL OR TUBULAR STEEL RAIL AT CABLE INFILL CONDITION. SEE "TOP RAIL ENLARGEMENT" OPTIONS ABOVE. 3" O.C. TYP. (CENTER PATTERN IN FRAME) 1" 3 16" DIA. STANDARD MANUFACTURED CABLE INFILL. TYP. MANUFACTURER STANDARD CABLE START ASSEMBLY AND STAINLESS HARDWARE CAP. QUICK START ASSEMBLY TO TOP OF PANEL. MANUFACTURER STANDARD TENSIONING HARDWARE AND CABLE ASSEMBLY. TENSIONING HARDWARE TO BOTTOM OF PANEL. THRU. HOLE FOR CABLE. BOTTOM OF TOP RAIL ONLY. .2" DIA. HOLE. THRU TOP OF BOTTOM RAIL TYP. SEE RAIL ENLARGEMENTS. 2" T Y P . 5' - 0 " 2" T Y P . ADJACENT SURFACE SEE PLAN 2x2 TUBULAR STEEL POST BELOW TOP RAIL. PER INFILL CONDITION. CONCRETE FOOTING BELOW PER STRUCTURAL. FINISH SURFACE. SEE PLAN ANCHOR PLATE. PER MANUFACTURER CONCRETE FOOTING. PER STRUCTURAL. 1' - 0 " MI N . GROUND ANCHOR CONDITION AT TYP. PAVING TYPICAL PANEL ASSEMBLY. MESH OR CABLE INFILL. ELEVATION OF TOP RAIL REMAINS CONSTANT AT ENTIRE PERIMETER OF POOL TERRACE. FOOTING. PER STRUCTURAL. ANCHOR PLATE. PER STRUCTURAL. TALL METAL FENCE (FOR POOL ENCLOSURE) COMPOSITE WOOD PRIVACY FENCE CROSS SECTION TALL METAL FENCE (FOR POOL ENCLOSURE) CROSS SECTION SCALE: 3 4" = 1'-0"SCALE: 3 4" = 1'-0" ParkingPlanting with 8' Privacy Fence SidewalkPlanting with 5' Pool Fence Planting IMAGE OF COMPOSITE WOOD MATERIAL TALL METAL POOL FENCING WITH GATE NOTE: THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE "TALL METAL FENCE" AND THE "SHORT METAL FENCE" IS THE OVERALL HEIGHT OF THE FENCE. THE TALL METAL FENCE, WHICH ENCLOSES THE POOL AREAS, HAS A HEIGHT OF 5'-0". THE SHORT METAL FENCE HAS A HEIGHT OF 3'-0" AND ENCLOSES INDIVIDUAL PATIOS. 44 A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 9 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g C ISSUE DATE: SHEET NUMBER REVIEWED: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWN: 1 REVISIONS 7110 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C D E AS P E N , C O L O R A D O C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. F 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A u g 1 5 , 2 0 2 5 - 1 0 : 0 9 a m F: \ P R O J E C T S _ A - L \ 7 1 1 0 - G a n t 2 0 2 3 C a m p u s E n h a n c e m e n t P l a n \ D - C A D \ 0 2 . S h e e t s \ L a n d u s e S u b m i t t a l \ d w - 7 1 1 0 - L a n d U s e S u b m i t t a l S h e e t s . d w g JP, AH MA AUGUST 12, 2025 DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning Urban Design · Tourism Planning Aspen · Austin · Denver · Houston Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles · Raleigh W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O M 22860 Two Rivers Road #1 Basalt, CO 81621 (970) 925-8354 TH E GA N T LAND USE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION L0-08 SITE PLANTING PALETTE Aegopodium podagraria / Green Bishop's Weed Astilbe 'Bridal Veil' / Bridal Veil Hybrid Astilbe Athyrium filix-femina / Lady Fern Galium ordoratum / Sweet Woodruff Helictotrichon sempervirens / Blue Oat Grass Hosta 'Blue Angel' / Blue Angel Hosta Hosta 'Honeybells' / Honeybells Hosta Nepeta x faassenii 'Walker's Low' / Walker's Low Catmint Cotoneaster lucidus / Peking Cotoneaster Rhus aromatica 'Gro-low' / Dwarf Fragrant Sumac Spiraea betulifolia 'Tor' / Birchleaf Spirea Spiraea nipponica 'Snowmound' / Snowmound Spirea Syringa vulgaris 'Charles Joly' / Double Red French Lilac TREES Populus tremuloides / Quaking Aspen Populus tremula 'Erecta' / Swedish Aspen SHRUBS PERENNIALS, ORNAMENTAL GRASSES & VINES Parthenocissus quinquefolia / Virginia Creeper 45 EXHIBIT G: CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGS 36 | Exhibit G 46 | 8 ENTRY PLAZA 37 | Exhibit G 47 | 9 BUILDING EDGE CONDITION 38 | Exhibit G 48 | 10 BUILDING PLAZA 39 | Exhibit G 49 MATERIAL PALETTE THERMALLY MODIFIED WOOD STAINED TIMBERSCEMENTITIOUS (GFRC) SIDING METAL RAILINGS WITH GRATE/MESH INFILL ELEVATED WALKWAY PAVER EXTERIOR CEMENTITIOUS PLASTER 40 | Exhibit G 50 | 12 BLACKENED STEEL THERMALLY MODIFIED WOOD EXTERIOR PLASTER PERFORATED METAL RAILING GFRC SIDING PORCELAIN PAVER PROPOSED MATERIAL SAMPLES MATERIAL PALETTE 41 | Exhibit G 51 EXHIBIT H: ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION EXAMPLE 42 | Exhibit H 52 A200.1-B 1 1 A200.1-B 2 2 A200.1-C 1 1 A 2 0 2.1-A12 12 A203. 1-A 1 1 A202.1-B 1 1 A202.1-B 22 A202.1-B 3 3 A202.1-B 44 A202.1-B 5 5 A202.1-B 66 A202.1-B 7 7 A202.1-B 88 A202.1-B 9 9 A202.1-B 1010 A202.1-B 11 11 A202.1-B 1212 A203.1-B 1 1 A203.1-B 22 A203.1-B 3 3 A203.1-B 44 A203.1-B 55 A203.1-B 6 6A203.1-B 77 A203.1-B 9 9 A203.1-B 8 8 A203.1-B 1010 A203.1-B 1111 A203.1-B 12 12 A204.1-B 11 A204.1-B 2 2 A204.1-B 3 3 A204.1-B 44 A204.1-B 55 A204.1-B 6 6 A204.1-B 7 7 A204.1-B 9 9 A204.1-B 88 A204.1-B 10 10 A204.1-B 11 11 A202.1-C 6 6A202.1-C 99 Revisions: Project No: Date: Drawn by: Checked by: P.O. Box 2773 737 Ten Mile Drive Unit 206 Frisco, CO 80443 Tel: 970.668.1133 www.OPARCH.com 8/ 1 4 / 2 0 2 5 3 : 0 9 : 4 1 P M A u t o d e s k D o c s : / / T h e G a n t / T h e G a nt _ R 2 3 . r v t BUILDING B - LEVEL1 - PROPOSED TH E G A N T 61 0 S W E S T E N D S T . AS P E N , C O , 8 1 6 1 1 08.11.2025 2821.00 KT AB A100.1-B3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - LEVEL 1 - PROPOSED1 53 A200.1-B 1 1 A200.1-B 2 2 A200.1-C 1 1 A202.1-B 1 1 A202.1-B 22 A202.1-B 3 3 A202.1-B 44 A202.1-B 5 5 A202.1-B 66 A202.1-B 7 7 A202.1-B 88 A202.1-B 9 9 A202.1-B 1010 A202.1-B 11 11 A202.1-B 1212 A203.1-B 1 1 A203.1-B 22 A203.1-B 3 3 A203.1-B 44 A203.1-B 55 A203.1-B 6 6A203.1-B 77 A203.1-B 9 9 A203.1-B 8 8 A203.1-B 1010 A203.1-B 1111 A203.1-B 12 12 A204.1-B 11 A204.1-B 2 2 A204.1-B 3 3 A204.1-B 44 A204.1-B 55 A204.1-B 6 6 A204.1-B 7 7 A204.1-B 9 9 A204.1-B 88 A204.1-B 10 10 A204.1-B 11 11 A202.1-C 6 6A202.1-C 99 Revisions: Project No: Date: Drawn by: Checked by: P.O. Box 2773 737 Ten Mile Drive Unit 206 Frisco, CO 80443 Tel: 970.668.1133 www.OPARCH.com 8/ 1 4 / 2 0 2 5 3 : 0 9 : 4 2 P M A u t o d e s k D o c s : / / T h e G a n t / T h e G a nt _ R 2 3 . r v t BUILDING B - LEVEL 2 - PROPOSED TH E G A N T 61 0 S W E S T E N D S T . AS P E N , C O , 8 1 6 1 1 08.11.2025 2821.00 Author Checker A101.1-B3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B LEVEL PLAN - PROPOSED1 54 A200.1-B 1 1 A200.1-B 2 2 A200.1-C 1 1 A 2 0 2.1-A12 12 A203. 1-A 1 1 A202.1-B 1 1 A202.1-B 22 A202.1-B 3 3 A202.1-B 44 A202.1-B 5 5 A202.1-B 66 A202.1-B 7 7 A202.1-B 88 A202.1-B 9 9 A202.1-B 1010 A202.1-B 11 11 A202.1-B 1212 A203.1-B 1 1 A203.1-B 22 A203.1-B 3 3 A203.1-B 44 A203.1-B 55 A203.1-B 6 6A203.1-B 77 A203.1-B 8 8 A203.1-B 1010 A203.1-B 1111 A203.1-B 12 12 A204.1-B 11 A204.1-B 2 2 A204.1-B 3 3 A204.1-B 44 A204.1-B 55 A204.1-B 6 6 A204.1-B 7 7 A204.1-B 9 9 A204.1-B 88 A204.1-B 10 10 A204.1-B 11 11 A202.1-C 6 6A202.1-C 99 Revisions: Project No: Date: Drawn by: Checked by: P.O. Box 2773 737 Ten Mile Drive Unit 206 Frisco, CO 80443 Tel: 970.668.1133 www.OPARCH.com 8/ 1 4 / 2 0 2 5 3 : 0 9 : 4 2 P M A u t o d e s k D o c s : / / T h e G a n t / T h e G a nt _ R 2 3 . r v t BUILDING B - LEVEL 3- PROPOSED TH E G A N T 61 0 S W E S T E N D S T . AS P E N , C O , 8 1 6 1 1 08.11.2025 2821.00 Author Checker A102.1-B3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - LEVEL 3 - DEMO1 55 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-02 MT-02 EXT-03EXT-03 EXT-03 EXT-03 EXT-01 MT-02 MT-03 EXT-02 EXT-01 EXT-01 MT-01 MT-03 MT-03EXT-02 MT-01 EXT-03 EXT-02 EXT-01EXT-01 EXT-01EXT-01 EXT-01 EXT-01 EXT-01 EXT-01 EXT-01 EXT-02 MT-01 MT-02 EXT-04 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-03EXT-02 MT-03 EXT-01 EXT-01MT-03 MT-03 EXT-01 EXT-01 EXT-01 EXT-04 MT-01 MT-02 EXT-03 THERMALLY MODIFIED WOOD SIDING EXTERIOR CEMENTITIOUS PLASTER CEMENTITIOUS SIDING EXTERIOR WALL MATERIAL KEY Revisions: Project No: Date: Drawn by: Checked by: P.O. Box 2773 737 Ten Mile Drive Unit 206 Frisco, CO 80443 Tel: 970.668.1133 www.OPARCH.com 8/ 1 4 / 2 0 2 5 3 : 0 9 : 4 5 P M A u t o d e s k D o c s : / / T h e G a n t / T h e G a nt _ R 2 3 . r v t BUILDING B - PROPOSED ELEVATIONS TH E G A N T 61 0 S W E S T E N D S T . AS P E N , C O , 8 1 6 1 1 08.11.2025 2821.00 Author Checker A200.1-B3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - ELEVATION 1 - PROPOSED1 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - ELEVATION 3 - PROPOSED2 MT-03 METAL RAILING WITH GRATE/MESH INFILL MT-02 METAL FASCIA MT-01 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF EXT-04 STAINED TIMBERS EXT-03 EXTERIOR CEMENTITIOUS PLASTER EXT-02 THERMALLY MODIFIED WOOD EXT-01 CEMENTITIOUS SIDING MATERIAL TAG MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 1 08.11.25 PRICING SET 56 MT-01 MT-02 MT-03 EXT-01 EXT-01 EXT-01 EXT-03 EXT-03 EXT-03 EXT-01 MT-03 MT-03 EXT-01 EXT-03 EXT-01 EXT-03 EXT-01 MT-02 Revisions: Project No: Date: Drawn by: Checked by: P.O. Box 2773 737 Ten Mile Drive Unit 206 Frisco, CO 80443 Tel: 970.668.1133 www.OPARCH.com 8/ 1 4 / 2 0 2 5 3 : 0 9 : 4 8 P M A u t o d e s k D o c s : / / T h e G a n t / T h e G a nt _ R 2 3 . r v t BUILDING B - PROPOSED ELEVATIONS TH E G A N T 61 0 S W E S T E N D S T . AS P E N , C O , 8 1 6 1 1 08.11.2025 2821.00 Author Checker A201.1-B 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - ELEVATION 4 - PROPOSED2 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING - ELEVATION 2 - PROPOSED1 1 08.11.25 PRICING SET 57 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" MT-03 EXT-03 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-01 MT-03 EXT-03 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-01 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-01 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-03 MT-03 EXT-01 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-03 MT-03 EXT-01 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-01 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-01 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" MT-03 EXT-01 EXT-03 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" MT-03 EXT-01 EXT-03 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-01 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-01 MT-01 Revisions: Project No: Date: Drawn by: Checked by: P.O. Box 2773 737 Ten Mile Drive Unit 206 Frisco, CO 80443 Tel: 970.668.1133 www.OPARCH.com 8/ 1 4 / 2 0 2 5 3 : 0 9 : 5 1 P M A u t o d e s k D o c s : / / T h e G a n t / T h e G a nt _ R 2 3 . r v t BUILDING B - PROPOSED ELEVATIONS TH E G A N T 61 0 S W E S T E N D S T . AS P E N , C O , 8 1 6 1 1 08.11.2025 2821.00 Author Checker A202.1-B 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION1 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION2 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION3 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION4 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION5 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION6 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION7 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION8 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION9 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION10 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION11 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION12 1 08.11.25 PRICING SET 58 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-01 MT-03 EXT-03 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-03 MT-03 EXT-01 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-03 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-01 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-01 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-03 MT-03 EXT-01 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-01 MT-01 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" EXT-01 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-01 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-03 MT-03 MT-03 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" MT-03 EXT-03 EXT-01 Revisions: Project No: Date: Drawn by: Checked by: P.O. Box 2773 737 Ten Mile Drive Unit 206 Frisco, CO 80443 Tel: 970.668.1133 www.OPARCH.com 8/ 1 4 / 2 0 2 5 3 : 0 9 : 5 6 P M A u t o d e s k D o c s : / / T h e G a n t / T h e G a nt _ R 2 3 . r v t BUILDING B - PROPOSED ELEVATIONS TH E G A N T 61 0 S W E S T E N D S T . AS P E N , C O , 8 1 6 1 1 08.11.2025 2821.00 Author Checker A203.1-B 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION1 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION2 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION3 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION4 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION5 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION7 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION8 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION9 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION10 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION11 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION12 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION6 1 08.11.25 PRICING SET 59 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-01 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-01 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-01 MT-03 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-02 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-02 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-01 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-03 BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" BLDG B 1 7954' - 10" BLDG B 2 7964' - 0" BLDG B 3 7973' - 1" EXT-01MT-03 MT-03 Revisions: Project No: Date: Drawn by: Checked by: P.O. Box 2773 737 Ten Mile Drive Unit 206 Frisco, CO 80443 Tel: 970.668.1133 www.OPARCH.com 8/ 1 4 / 2 0 2 5 3 : 1 0 : 0 0 P M A u t o d e s k D o c s : / / T h e G a n t / T h e G a nt _ R 2 3 . r v t BUILDING B - PROPOSED ELEVATIONS TH E G A N T 61 0 S W E S T E N D S T . AS P E N , C O , 8 1 6 1 1 08.11.2025 2821.00 Author Checker A204.1-B 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION2 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION3 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION4 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION5 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION6 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION7 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION8 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION9 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION10 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION11 3/16" = 1'-0" BUILDING B - PARTIAL ELEVATION1 1 08.11.25 PRICING SET 60 EXHIBIT I: VIEW PLANE EXHIBIT 51 | Exhibit I 61 3 A101 2 A101 1 A101 TREES BLOCKING VIEW IN VIEW PLANE GLORY HOLE VIEW PLANE EXTENTS BUILDING A - 3 STORY BUILDING B - 2 STORY BUILDING J - 2 STORY BUILDING C - 2 STORY TREES BLOCKING VIEW IN VIEW PLANE 3 STORY BUILDING BLOCKING VIEW PLANE 1" = 40'-0"VIEW PLANE DRAWINGS THE GANT 2025 - 06 - 17 A100 62 TREES BLOCKING VIEW PLANE TREES BLOCKING VIEW PLANEEXISTING 3 STORY BUILDING IN VIEW PLANE GLORY HOLE PARK VIEW PLANE START 7947.55' SECTION OF BUILDING B NOT BLOCKED BY EXISTING BUILDINGS 2 - STORY, BELOW VIEW PLANE SECTION OF BUILDING A IN VIEW PLANE TREES BLOCKING VIEW PLANE TREES BLOCKING VIEW PLANEEXISTING 3 STORY BUILDING IN VIEW PLANE GLORY HOLE PARK VIEW PLANE START 7947.55' SECTION OF BUILDING B NOT BLOCKED BY EXISTING BUILDINGS 2 - STORY, BELOW VIEW PLANE TREES BLOCKING VIEW PLANE TREES BLOCKING VIEW PLANEEXISTING 3 STORY BUILDING IN VIEW PLANE GLORY HOLE PARK VIEW PLANE START 7947.55' SECTION OF BUILDING B NOT BLOCKED BY EXISTING BUILDINGS 2 - STORY, BELOW VIEW PLANE 1" = 20'-0"VIEW PLANE DRAWINGS THE GANT 2025 - 06 - 17 A101 1" = 20'-0"1 VIEW PLANE SECTION 1 1" = 20'-0"2 VIEW PLANE SECTION 2 1" = 20'-0"3 VIEW PLANE SECTION 3 63 VIEW PLANE DRAWINGS THE GANT 2025 - 06 - 17 A102 TREES BLOCKING VIEW PLANE 3 STORY STRUCTURE BLOCKING VIEW PLANE TREES BLOCKING VIEW PLANE 64 29 | EXHIBIT J: LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION April 6, 2025 Mr. Ben Anderson Community Development Director City of Aspen 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Letter of Authorization to Submit Land Use Application for The Gant Condominiums, 610 S West End Street Dear Mr. Anderson: As the General Manger of the Gant, authorized by the owners to act for and on their behalf, I hereby authorize Design Workshop, Inc. and CCY Architects to act as my designated and authorized representative for the preparation, submittal and processing of any land use reviews related to development on our property. Design Workshop Inc. and CCY are also authorized to represent me in meetings with City of Aspen staff, the Hearing officer, the Planning and Zoning Commission, City Council, and/or the Board of Adjustment. Please also see the letter from Paul Taddune outlining the proof of ownership and management structure for the Gant. Should you have any need to contact us during the course of the review, please do so through Design Workshop, Inc, whose address and telephone number is included in the application. Thank you. Sincerely, Donnie Lee General Manager, Gant Condominiums 610 West End Street Aspen, CO 81611 Design Workshop, Inc. Landscape Architecture Planning Urban Design Strategic Services Environmental Graphic Design 22860 Two Rivers Road Suite 102 Basalt, Colorado 81621 970.925.8354 designworkshop.com 55 | Exhibit J 65 30 | EXHIBIT K: PROOF OF OWNERSHIP 56 | Exhibit K 66 31 | 57 | Exhibit K 67 32 | EXHIBIT L: LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 58 | Exhibit K 68 LAND USE APPLICATION PACKET Name: __________________________________________________________________________________ Location: ________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ (Indicate street address, lot & block number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel ID #: ______________________________________________________________________________ PROJECT: Name: __________________________________________________________________________________ Address: ________________________________________________________________________________ Phone # : _______________________ E-mail: __________________________________________________ APPLICANT: Name: __________________________________________________________________________________ Address: ________________________________________________________________________________ Phone # : _______________________ E-mail: __________________________________________________ REPRESENTATIVE: EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) City of Aspen | City Hall, 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 | (970) 920-5000 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 69 City of Aspen | City Hall, 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 | (970) 920-5000 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM LAND USE APPLICATION PACKET Project: __________________________________________________________________________________________ Applicant: ________________________________________________________________________________________ Project Location: ___________________________________________________________________________________ Zone District: _____________________________________________________________________________________ Lot Size: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Gross Lot Area:________________________________ Net Lot Area:_________________________________________ For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high-water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code. Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued: Variations requested (identify the exact variations being requested): 70 City of Aspen | City Hall, 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 | (970) 920-5000 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM LAND USE APPLICATION PACKET Commercial net leaseable: Existing: _____________ Proposed: _____________ Number of Lodge Pillows: Existing: _____________ Proposed: _____________ Number of Lodge Units: Existing: _____________ Proposed: _____________ Number of residential units: Existing: _____________ Proposed: _____________ Number of Free-Market residential units: Existing: _____________ Proposed: _____________ Number of Affordable residential units: Existing: _____________ Proposed: _____________ Proposed % of demolition: ________________ % DIMENSIONS: Write N/A where no requirements exists in the zone district. Floor Area: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________ Height Principal Building: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________ Accessory Building: Existing:_____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________ On-Site Parking: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________ % Site Coverage: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________ % Open Space: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________ Front Setback: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________ Rear Setback: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________ Combined Front/Rear: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________ Indicate N, S, E, W Side Setback: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________ Side Setback: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________ Combined Front/Rear: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________ Distance between Buildings: Existing: _____________ Allowable: _____________ Proposed: _____________ 71 LAND USE APPLICATION PACKET TYPE OF APPLICATION ESA Review (Stream Margin, 8040 Greenline, View Plane, or Hallam Lake Bluff) Non Conformities Pre-Development Topography Temporary Use Accessory Dwelling Unit/Carriage House Dimensional Variance Growth Management Review Outdoor Vending Planned Development Review Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit Establishment of Zoning or Rezoning Subdivision Review Condominiumization Approval Documents Special Review Wireless Facilities Residential Design Standard Review Conditional Use Review Historic Designation Certificate of Appropriateness Minor Historic Development Major Historic Development (select one below) Conceptual Development Final Development Relocation (temporary, on or off-site) Demolition (total demolition) Substantial Historic Preservation Amendment Historic Landmark Lot Split Establishment of Transferable Development Rights (TDRs) Other City of Aspen | City Hall, 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 | (970) 920-5000 HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEWS 72 City of Aspen | City Hall, 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 | (970) 920-5000 AGREEMENT TO PAY APPLICATION FEES LAND USE APPLICATION PACKET An agreement between the City of Aspen (“City”) and Property Owner Name: _____________________________________________________________________________ Address of Property: _______________________________________________________________________________ Representative Name (If different from Property Owner): _________________________________________________________ Billing Name and Address - Send Bills to: ____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ Contact Email for Billing: ____________________________________________ Contact Phone for Billing: ____________________________________________ I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No.40, Series of 2018, as may be amended, review fees for Land Use applications and payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For Deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possi- ble at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for no-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render and application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay addi- tional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. 73 33 | City of Aspen | City Hall, 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 | (970) 920-5000 AGREEMENT TO PAY APPLICATION FEES LAND USE APPLICATION PACKET For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. Engineering Fee: $ __________ Parks Fee: $ __________ APCHA Fee: $ __________ Other Fee: $ __________ $_________ deposit for __________ hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. $_________ deposit for __________ hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. City of Aspen: ____________________________________________ Ben Anderson, AICP Community Development Director Property Owner, or Representative Signature: ___________________________________ PRINT Name: ________________________________ Title: ________________________________________ City Use Fees Due: $ _____________________ Received: $ _____________________ Case # _________________________ Principal Jessica Garrow 13.694450 975 1605 74 34 | City of Aspen | City Hall, 427 Rio Grande Place Aspen, CO 81611 | (970) 920-5000 HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION COMPLIANCE POLICY LAND USE APPLICATION PACKET All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Property Owner (“I”) Name: _______________________________________ Email: _______________________________________ Phone Number: ________________________________ Address of Property (Subject of Application): _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ I certify as follows: (Select One) This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document. Owner Signature: __________________________________________ Date: _______________________ Printed Name: ____________________________________________ or, Attorney Signature: _________________________________________ Date: _______________________ Attorney Printed Name: _____________________________________ The Gant Condominium Association,Donnie Lee,General Manager donnie.lee@gantaspen.com 970-920-6070 The Gant Condimuniums 610 S.West End Street Aspen,CO 81611 August 15,2025 Donnie Lee 75 35 | PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PRE-25-084 DATE: July 1, 2025 PLANNER: Dan Folke, 970-404-9200, daniel.folke@aspen.gov REPRESENTATIVE: Jessica Garrow, 970-399-1404, jgarrow@designworkshop.com PROJECT LOCATION: The Gant, 610 W West End Street PARCEL ID: 2737-182-67-800 REQUEST: Planned Development Amendment & Commercial Design Review DESCRIPTION: The Gant is a multiple-family property located in the R-15 Moderate Density residential district with a Lodge and Planned Development overlay. As identified in the January 2013 Administrative Determination both multi-family residential and lodge/short term rentals are permitted uses. The owners would like to complete an exterior remodel with all new exterior materials. No new square footage will be added to the existing units, but site improvements will include relocating a swimming pool, landscaping and parking. The applicant may also make changes to property lighting and signage. As found in the Aspen Land Use Code Section 26.412.020, Commercial Design Review applies to all commercial, lodging and mixed-use developments. Planned Developments with no outdoor lighting plans are subject to underlying zoning and related lighting zone. Properties within the R-15 zone are in Lighting Zone 1. The property is within the Glory Hole and Wagner Park mountain view planes, although no changes in height are proposed and should qualify for an exemption. Proposed improvements include: • Change of all exterior materials including siding, fascia, trim, railings and balconies. • Removal of the west swimming pool and tennis courts • Construction of a new swimming pool • Reconfigure parking and install new landscaping Based on the information provided the improvements should qualify for an Insubtantial Amendment to the Planned Development and there should be no impacts to the mountain view planes. Commercial Design Review does require review by the Planning & Zoning Commission, but will be a one step process. RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS: Section Number Section Title 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.412 Commercial Design Review 26.435.050(d) Mountain View Plane exemptions 26.445.110 Planned Development Amendments 26.510 Signs 26.512 Outdoor Lighting 26.710.050 Land Use Regulations - Moderate Density Residential (R-15) EXHIBIT M: PRE-APPLICATION FORM 66 | Exhibit M 76 36 | Commercial, Loding, and Historic District Design Standards and Guidelines 1.33 All remodel projects shall meet Standards 1.22 and 1.23 … HELPFUL LINKS: • Land Use Application (PDF) • Land Use Code (PDF) • Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Design Standards (PDF) REVIEW BY: • Staff for completeness and recommendations • Community Development Director for PD Amendment • Planning & Zoning Commission for Commercial Design Review REQUIRED LAND USE REVIEW(S): • ESA Review (Mountain view plane exemption confirmation) • Planned Development Review (Insubstantial Amendment) • Commercial Design Review (Final only) PUBLIC HEARING: Yes, Planning & Zoning Commission PLANNING FEES: $4,450 (P&Z Commercial Design Review only) (Additional/ lesser hours will be billed/ refunded at a rate of $325 per hour.) REFERRAL FEES: $1,605 (flat fee Board Review minor) Engineering, $975 (flat fee) Parks TOTAL DEPOSIT: $7,030 APPLICATION CHECKLIST: Below is a list of submittal requirements for this review. Please email the entire application as one pdf to cdehadmins@aspen.gov. Include PRE- 25-084 in the subject line. If more than 18 months has lapsed since this letter was issued, please reach out to planneroftheday@gmail.com.  Completed Land Use Application, signed Fee Agreement, and signed HOA Compliance form  Pre-application Conference Summary (this document).  Contained within a letter signed by the applicant, the applicant's name, address and telephone number and the name, address and telephone number of any representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant.  The street address, legal description and parcel identification number of the property proposed for development.  A disclosure of ownership of the parcel proposed for development, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company or attorney licensed to practice in the state, listing the names of all owners of the property and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the development application.  An eight and one-half (8½) inches by eleven (11) inches vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. 67 | Exhibit M 77 37 |  Proposed and existing site plans depicting the proposed layout and the project's physical relationship to the land and its surroundings including locations of swimming pools and parking  A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state, showing the current status of the parcel including the current topography and vegetation.  A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application.  Sec. 26.412.050 Commercial Design Review application requirements including proposed architectural elevations and exterior material samples  Proposed landscape plan  Lighting plan (if new lighting is proposed)  Sign Plan (if changes to public facing signage are proposed) Depending on further review of the case, additional items may be requested of the application. Once the application is deemed complete by staff, the applicant/applicant’s representative will receive an e-mail requesting submission of the deposit. Once the deposit is received, the case will be assigned to a planner and the land use review will begin. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not creat e a legal or vested right. 68 | Exhibit M 78 EXHIBIT N: SURVEY 69 | Exhibit N 79 SHEET 3 SHEET 4 SHEET 5 SHEET 6 SHEET 7 SHEET 8 SHEET 9 SHEET 2 S 75°0 9 ' 1 1 " E 2 6 4 . 9 9 ' S 75°0 9 ' 1 1 " E 1 3 3 . 3 2 ' S 1 5 ° 0 5 ' 0 0 " W 4 7 . 6 1 ' S 0 2 ° 0 0 ' 2 9 " W 1 1 6 . 8 9 ' S 2 7 ° 0 3 ' 3 3 " E 1 2 8 . 7 8 ' S 89°35'43" W 371.31' S 2 8 ° 2 8 ' 0 0 " W 1 3 4 . 5 6 ' 100.13 ' 33.19' PH A S E I I PE R B O O K 4 P A G E 4 9 9 PH A S E I PE R B O O K 4 P A G E 4 3 1 PH A S E I I PE R B O O K 4 P A G E 4 9 9 PH A S E I PE R B O O K 4 P A G E 4 3 1 PHA S E I I PER B O O K 4 P A G E 4 9 9 PHA S E I PER B O O K 4 P A G E 4 3 1 P H A S E I I P E R B O O K 4 P A G E 4 9 9 P H A S E I P E R B O O K 4 P A G E 4 3 1 95.3 2 ' 56.9 8 ' 3 1 5 . 3 7 ' 3 9 . 3 3 ' 52 . 4 4 ' 64 . 4 5 ' PH A S E I I I PE R B O O K 5 P A G E 2 2 PH A S E I I PE R B O O K 4 P A G E 4 9 9 PH A S E I I I PE R B O O K 5 P A G E 2 2 PH A S E I I PE R B O O K 3 0 6 P A G E 3 5 2 BOO K 4 P A G E 4 9 9 BOO K 5 P A G E 2 2 BUILDING B BUILDING A BUILDING C BUILDING C BUILDING D BUILDING E BUILDING F BUILDING G BUILDING H BUILDING J BUILDING K CONFERENCE BUILDING PHASE I BOOK 4, PAGE 431 88,426 SQ. FT. ± 2.030 ACRES ±PHASE II BOOK 4, PAGE 499A 93,901 SQ. FT. ± 2.156 ACRES ± PHASE III BOOK 5, PAGE 22 38,261 SQ. FT. ± 0.878 ACRES ± THE GANT CONDOMINIUM 5.27 ACRES ± 20' CITY OF ASPEN UTILITY EASEMENT, PER BOOK 4 PAGE 431 20' CITY OF ASPEN UTILITY EASEMENT PER BOOK 4 PAGE 499A 20' CITY OF ASPEN UTILITY EASEMENT, PER BOOK 4 PAGE 431 SHED ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE BUILDING ELEVATOR STONE POOL MECHANICAL BUILDING DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE ELEVATOR STAIRWELL ELEVATOR STAIRWELL ELECTRIC AND GAS SHED U T E A V E N U E A S P H A L T R O A D S O U T H W E S T E N D S T R E E T A S P H A L T R O A D ASPHALT DRIVE AND PARKING ASPHALT DRIVE AND PARKING ASPHALT DRIVE AND PARKING CONCRETE APRON CONCRETE DRIVE PK NAIL AND SHINER P.L.S. NO. 37972 FOUND BASIS OF BEARINGS TBM = 7968.18' NO. 5 REBAR AND 1.25" BLUE PLASTIC CAP P.L.S. NO. 37972 FOUND 1.46' WITNESS CORNER 0.10' BELOW GROUND NO. 5 REBAR AND 1.25" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP P.L.S.ILLEGIBLE FOUND 0.30' UNDER GROUND BASIS OF BEARINGS 20' CITY OF ASPEN UTILITY EASEMENT, PER BOOK 4 PAGE 431 20' CITY OF ASPEN UTILITY EASEMENT PER BOOK 4 PAGE 499A 20' CITY OF ASPEN UTILITY EASEMENT PER BOOK 5 PAGE 22 20' CITY OF ASPEN UTILITY EASEMENT PER BOOK 5 PAGE 22 PHA S E I I P E R PHA S E I I I PER PAR C E L 2 , C L A R E N D O N C O N D O M I N I U M S PER P L A T B O O K 1 1 3 , P A G E 6 CIT Y O F A S P E N SOU T H W E S T E N D S T R E E T PER P L A T B K 4 , P G 3 8 1 CIT Y O F A S P E N SO U T H W E S T E N D S T R E E T PER P L A T B K 4 , P G 3 8 1 1" IRON BAR FOUND 0.18' ABOVE GROUND NO. 5 REBAR AND 1.5" ALUMINUM CAP ILLEGIBLE FOUND 0.25' UNDER GROUND LOT A , B L K 1 2 0 LOT B , B L K 1 2 0 LOT C , B L K 1 2 0 LOT D , B L K 1 2 0 LOT E , B L K 1 2 0 LOT F , B L K 1 2 0 LOT G , B L K 1 2 0 LOT H , B L K 1 2 0 LOT I, B L K 1 2 0 CAM P B E L L S U R V I V O R S T R U S T 919 W A T E R S A V E LOT A , B L K 4 1 LOT B , B L K 4 1 LOT C , B L K 4 1 LOT D , B L K 4 1 LOT E , B L K 4 1 ALLE Y B L O C K 1 2 0 NOT S H O W N O N O F F I C I A L C I T Y P L A T PER P L A T B K 4 , P G 3 8 1 OPEN S P A C E - P U B L I C W A Y P E R PLAT B K 4 , P G 3 8 1 O P E N S P A C E - P U B L I C W A Y P E R P L A T B K 4 , P G 3 8 1 O P E N S P A C E - P U B L I C W A Y P E R P L A T B K 4 , P G 3 8 1 LOT 4 CALDERWOOD SUBDIVISION PER PLAT BK 2A, PG 264 LOT 5 CALDERWOOD SUBDIVISION PER PLAT BK 2A, PG 264 LOT 6 CALDERWOOD SUBDIVISION PER PLAT BK 2A, PG 264 LOT 7 CALDERWOOD SUBDIVISION PER PLAT BK 2A, PG 264 UTE CREEK CONDO LOT 6 UTE PLACE SUBDIVISION PER PLAT BK 19, PG 80 LOT 5 UTE PLACE SUBDIVISION PER PLAT BK 19, PG 80 LOT 17-R UTE PLACE SUBDIVISION PER PLAT BK 19, PG 80 LOT 1 UTE PLACE SUBDIVISION PER PLAT BK 19, PG 80 CITY OF ASPEN UTILITY EASEMENT PER BOOK 5 PAGE 22 LAUNDRY STAIRWELL SHED LOT 1 , C L A R E N D O N C O N D O M I N I U M S PER P L A T B O O K 1 1 3 , P A G E 6 LO T 1 , C L A R E N D O N C O N D O M I N I U M S PER P L A T B O O K 1 1 3 , P A G E 6 PARCEL 1, CLARENDON CONDOMINIUMS PER PLAT BK 113, PG 6 N 3 7 ° 4 7 ' 3 4 " W 3 5 4 . 6 3 ' N 49 ° 1 3 ' 0 0 " E 1 5 2 . 3 0 ' N 1 9 ° 0 1 ' 0 0 " W 1 0 6 . 6 2 ' N 47 ° 5 4 ' 0 0 " E 1 2 4 . 7 3 ' N 56°24'10" E 3.13' N 79°28'49" E 11.09' PH A S E I I PE R B O O K 3 0 6 P A G E 3 5 2 ∆=90°10'52" R=55.00' L=86.57' L=86.62' (PLAT) CHB=N29°57'28"W CHL=77.90' GLORYHOLE VIEWPLANE 20' - 30' GLORYHOLE VIEWPLANE 20' - 30' GLORYHOLE VIEWPLANE 30' - 40' GLORYHOLE VIEWPLANE 30' - 40' GLORYHOLE VIEWPLANE 40' - 50' GLORYHOLE VIEWPLANE 40' - 50' COURTHOUSE #1 VIEWPLANE 170' - 180' COURTHOUSE #1 VIEWPLANE 180' - 190' COURTHOUSE #1 VIEWPLANE 190' - 200' COURTHOUSE #1 VIEWPLANE 190' - 200' WAGNER VIEWPLANE 130' - 140' WAGNER VIEWPLANE 140' - 150' WAGNER VIEWPLANE 150' - 160' WAGNER VIEWPLANE 150' - 160' WAGNER VIEWPLANE 140' - 150' WAGNER VIEWPLANE 160' - 170' COURTHOUSE #1 VIEWPLANE 180' - 190' COURTHOUSE #1 VIEWPLANE 200' - 210' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 280' - 290' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 290' - 300' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 290' - 300' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 300' - 310' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 300' - 310' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 310' - 320' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 310' - 320' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 320' - 330' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 320' - 330' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 330' - 340' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 330' - 340' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 340' - 350' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 340' - 350' NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. ByNO.Date Project NO.RevisionDrawn By: Checked By: Date: Computer File: P.O. Box 1746 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone (970) 625-1954 Fax (970) 579-7150 www.peaksurveyinginc.com S NW E P e a k S u r v ey ing, Inc. Es t . 2 0 0 7 23089 1 OF 9 THE GANT CONDOMINIUM ASS. ASPEN, COLORADO EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY THE GANT CONDOMINIUM 610 S WEST END STREET SMS JRN MARCH 27, 2024 089.DWG 1 04/24/25 ADD VIEWPLANES JRN NOTES: 1) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS, BUILDING SETBACKS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OR IN PLACE. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE COMMITMENT THEREFORE, EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE THAT MAY AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAVE NOT BEEN RESEARCHED BY PEAK SURVEYING, INC. 2) THE DATE OF THIS SURVEY WAS DECEMBER 5, 7, 20, 2023, JANUARY 11, 30, FEBRUARY 4, 13, 14, MARCH 1, AND 6, 2024. 3) BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF N 15°32'36" W BETWEEN A SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY POINT, A PK NAIL AND SHINER P.L.S. #37972 FOUND IN PLACE AND A WESTERLY BOUNDARY POINT, A NO. 5 REBAR AND YELLOW PLASTIC CAP ILLEGIBLE, FOUND IN PLACE. 4) UNITS OF MEASURE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON IS U.S. SURVEY FEET. 5) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE THE GANT CONDOMINIUMS, ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM MAP RECORDED NOVEMBER 16, 1973 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 431, AS RECEPTION NO. 163550, THE SUPPLEMENTAL MAP OF THE GANT CONDOMINIUMS, PHASE TWO, RECORDED NOVEMBER 14, 1974 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 499 AS RECEPTION NO. 173343, AND THE SUPPLEMENTAL MAP OF THE GANT CONDOMINIUMS, PHASE THREE, RECORDED AUGUST 24, 1976 IN PLAT BOOK 5 AT PAGE 22 AS RECEPTION NO. 186413, IN THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE, THE SURVEY OF THE GANT CONDOMINIUMS PREPARED BY HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING INC. DATE AND JOB NUMBER UNKNOWN, AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE. 6) THERE WAS APPROXIMATELY 12-60" OF SNOW AND ICE ON THE GROUND AT THE TIME OF SURVEY. 7) ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON A GPS OBSERVATION UTILIZING THE WESTERN COLORADO RTVRN GPS NETWORK (1988 DATUM) YIELDING AN ON-SITE ELEVATION OF 7968.18' ON A TBM AS SHOWN. CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. 8) THIS PROPERTY IS ZONED R-15 PER CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SITE BUILDING SETBACKS SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PRIOR TO ANY PLANNING, DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION. SUBJECT PROPERTY VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 2000' SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT: I, JASON R. NEIL, HEREBY CERTIFY TO THE GANT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO; THAT THIS EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE BASED ON MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF AS LAID OUT AND SHOWN HEREON; THAT THIS EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY IS NOT A GUARANTY OR WARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, THAT THIS EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY WAS MADE BY ME FROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY OF THE REAL PROPERTY PERFORMED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ON DECEMBER 5, 7, 20, 2023, JANUARY 11, 30, FEBRUARY 4, 13, 14, MARCH 1, AND 6, 2024. DATED: APRIL 24, 2025 BY:___________________________________ JASON R. NEIL, P.L.S. NO. 37935 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PEAK SURVEYING, INC. EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY THE GANT CONDOMINIUMS ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM MAP THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 16, 1973 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 431, PHASE 2 MAP RECORDED NOVEMBER 14, 1974 IN PLAT BOOK 4, AT PAGE 499, AND PHASE 3 MAP RECORDED AUGUST 24, 1976 IN PLAT BOOK 5, AT PAGE 22 CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THE GANT CONDOMINIUMS, ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM MAP RECORDED NOVEMBER 16, 1973 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 431, AS RECEPTION NO. 163550, THE SUPPLEMENTAL MAP OF THE GANT CONDOMINIUMS, PHASE TWO, RECORDED NOVEMBER 14, 1974 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 499 AS RECEPTION NO. 173343, AND THE SUPPLEMENTAL MAP OF THE GANT CONDOMINIUMS, PHASE THREE, RECORDED AUGUST 24, 1976 IN PLAT BOOK 5 AT PAGE 22 AS RECEPTION NO. 186413 IN THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS OFFICE, CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. N E S W 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 P e ak S u r v e y i n g , I n c . 030 30 60 12015 COL O R A D O L I CE N S E D P R O F E SSIONAL L A N D S U RVEYO R JAS O N R . N E I L 37935 80 EX- U E EX- U E E X - U E EX- U E EX- U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-UE T T T T T T T T W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W G G G T X X X X X X X 3 STORY WOOD FRAME BUILDING A 610 S. WEST END STREET #A DYH D S S D D D E CO WV WV ICV FIRE HYDRANT EDGE OF ASPHALTSIGN WATER VALVE UNDERGROUND WATER LINE (TYPICAL) STORM GRATE SEWER MANHOLE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE (TYPICAL) UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE (TYPICAL) DECIDUOUS TREE (TYPICAL) FENCE (TYPICAL) FLOWLINE DITCH 20' CITY OF ASPEN UTILITY EASEMENT 20' EASEMENT 20' CITY OF ASPEN UTILITY EASEMENT SIGN (TYPICAL) SEWER MANHOLE RIM = 7954.16' ELECTRIC MANHOLE (TYPICAL) LIGHT (TYPICAL) WATER VALVE (TYPICAL) STONE WALL (TYPICAL) DECIDUOUS TREE (TYPICAL) CON C R E T E PATI O W I T H DEC K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E AS P H A L T WA L K W A Y CONCRETE DRIVE CONCRETE DRIVE CONCRETE PAN ASPHALT DRIVE CONCRETE DRIVE CON C R E T E WAL K W I T H WAL K A B O V E CONCRETE ENTRY SIGN (TYPICAL)LANDSCAPE TIE (TYPICAL) 3 STORY WOOD FRAME BUILDING C 610 S. WEST END STREET #C 3 STORY WOOD FRAME BUILDING A 610 S. WEST END STREET #A LIGHT (TYPICAL) NO.5 REBAR AND 1.25" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP P.L.S.ILLEGIBLE FOUND 0.30' UNDER GROUND BASIS OF BEARINGS C T V CTV CT V FO FO FO FO EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX - U E EX- U E EX - U E EX-U E EX - U E E X - U E E X - U E EX- U E F ICV E ICV EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E 2.9 ' 4.7' 5.0 ' 15.9' 0.6 ' 2.5' 15 . 5 ' 3.0'2.2 ' 2.0' 1.0 ' 2.1' 2.2 ' 3.0' 15 . 5 ' 2.5' 0.7 ' 15.9'5.0 ' 4.7' 2.8 '3.0' 15 . 7 ' 2.6' 0.6 ' 15.9'4.6 ' 2.0' 0.6 ' 0.6' 2.0 ' 10.8'2.0 ' 0.6' 2.0 ' 25.1' 16 . 5 ' 11.7' 24 . 1 ' 11.6' 15 . 6 ' 11.6' 5.4 ' 5.2' 6.4' 7.6' 4.9' 3.0 ' 11.8' 15 . 9 ' 2.6'0.6 ' 2.6' 15 . 5 ' 3.0' 4.9 ' 25.2' 4.9 ' 12.1' 4.9 ' 13.4' 5.4 ' 2.5' 0.7 ' 2.5' 15 . 7 ' 3.1' 2.9 ' 16.4' 11 . 6 ' 11.8' 5.5 ' 16.0' 0.8 ' 2.6' 15 . 6 ' 3.1' 6.0' 8.0 ' 11.8' 36 . 0 ' 19.9' 12 . 6 ' 7.6' 14.8' D 3 4 . 5 ' 2.1' 11.6' 7.6 ' LO T 1 , C L A R E N D O N C O N D O M I N I U M S PER P L A T B O O K 1 1 3 , P A G E 6 SOUTH WEST END STREET ASPHALT ROAD LOT A, BLOCK 120 LOT B, BLOCK 120 LOT C, BLOCK 120 LOT D, BLOCK 120 LOT E, BLOCK 120 CITY OF ASPEN SOUTH WEST END STREET CITY OF ASPEN SOUTH WEST END STREET PER PLAT BK 4, PG 381 ALLE Y B L O C K 1 2 0 NOT S H O W N O N O F F I C I A L C I T Y P L A T PER P L A T B K 4 , P G 3 8 1 1" IRON BAR FOUND 0.18' ABOVE GROUND LOT F BLOCK 120 CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E UNDERGROUND FIBER MARKER OUTLET (TYPICAL) STONE WALK CONCRETE PATIO WITH DECK ABOVE ST A I R W E L L CON C R E T E WAL K W I T H WAL K A B O V E CON C R E T E WAL K W I T H WAL K A B O V E CON C R E T E WAL K W I T H WAL K A B O V E STONE COLUMN WITH LIGHT STONE COLUMN WITH LIGHT IRRIGATION VAULT IRRIGATION BOX (TYPICAL) LIGHT (TYPICAL) SIGN (TYPICAL) LIGHT (TYPICAL) CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CLEANOUT (TYPICAL) CON C R E T E RAM P GAS METER AND ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURESTONE WALL (TYPICAL) C O N C R E T E R A M P STAI R W E L L T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10 T11 T12 T13T14 T15 T16T17 T18 T19 T20 T21 T22 T23 T24 T25 T26 T27 T28 T29 T30 T31 T32 T33 T34 T35 T36 T37 T38 T39 T40 T41 T42 T44 T43 T45 T46 T47 T48 T49 T50 T51 T53 T55 T52 T54 T56 T57 T59 T60 T58 T61 T62 T63 T64 T65 T66 T67 DSTORM DRAIN 7959.17' FL @ DOME G 17.5' 8 . 6 ' 38 ' PARCEL 1, CLARENDON CONDOMINIUMS PER PLAT BOOK 113, PAGE 6 ART SCULPTURE E X - U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-UE EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX- U E EX- U E EX- U E EX- U E EX - U E EX - U E 7955 7 9 5 3 7954 7956 7 9 5 3 7 9 5 4 795 3 7955 7958 7 9 5 4 7958 7959 7959 7 9 5 5 7955 7 9 5 7 7 9 5 8 7959 7956 7 9 5 5 795 5 795 9 7958 7959 7957 7956 7 9 5 5 795 6 7956.23' 7954.51' 7954.27' 7954.68' 7954.60' 7954.58' 7954.59'7954.56' 7954.87' 7954.29' 7953.78' 7953.81' 7955.05' 7954.93' DRY WELL RIM = 7954.35' STORM GRATE RIM = 7952.79' STORM GRATE RIM = 7954.04' STORM MANHOLE RIM = 7953.97' ELECTRIC MANHOLE RIM = 7954.03' GLORYHOLE VIEWPLANE 20' - 30' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 280' - 290' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 290' - 300' NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. SEE SHEET 9 SE E S H E E T 3 SEE SHEET 3SEE SHEET 9 ByNO.Date Project NO.RevisionDrawn By: Checked By: Date: Computer File: P.O. Box 1746 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone (970) 625-1954 Fax (970) 579-7150 www.peaksurveyinginc.com S NW E P e a k S u r v ey ing, Inc. Es t . 2 0 0 7 23089 2 OF 9 THE GANT CONDOMINIUM ASS. ASPEN, COLORADO EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY THE GANT CONDOMINIUM 610 S WEST END STREET SMS JRN MARCH 27, 2024 089.DWG 1 04/24/25 ADD VIEWPLANES JRN N E S W 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 P e ak S u r v e y i n g , I n c . 010 10 20 405 EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY THE GANT CONDOMINIUMS ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM MAP THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 16, 1973 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 431, PHASE 2 MAP RECORDED NOVEMBER 14, 1974 IN PLAT BOOK 4, AT PAGE 499, AND PHASE 3 MAP RECORDED AUGUST 24, 1976 IN PLAT BOOK 5, AT PAGE 22 CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO 81 EX-U E EX-U E EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX- U E EX- U E EX- U E EX- U E EX- U E E X - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX- U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-U E EX-U E W W W W W W W W W W W T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T G G G G G G G G G G T T EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 STORY WOOD FRAME BUILDING D 610 S. WEST END STREET #D 20' CITY OF ASPEN UTILITY EASEMENT 20' CITY OF ASPEN UTILITY EASEMENT CONCRETE PAN ASPHALT DRIVE ASPHALT DRIVE ASPHALT DRIVE CONCRETE DRIVE ASPHALT DRIVE ASPHALT DRIVE AND PARKING PAV E R WAL K W A Y CON C R E T E RAM P UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE (TYPICAL) STONE WALL (TYPICAL) CONIFER TREE (TYPICAL) DECIDUOUS TREE (TYPICAL) FENCE (TYPICAL) FLOWLINE DITCH ELEV A T O R ST A I R W E L L STAI R W E L L C O N C R E T E W A L K STONE WALK (TYPICAL) STONE WALK (TYPICAL) STEPS (TYPICAL) STONE STEPS LIGHT (TYPICAL) STONE WALL (TYPICAL) BOULDER BOULDER BOULDER WALL (TYPICAL) FLOWLINE DITCH CONCRETE PATIO BUILDING COLUMN (TYPICAL) BUILDING COLUMN (TYPICAL) IRRIGATION VALVE BOX (TYPICAL) BOULDER EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX- U E EX-UE E EX-UE EX-UE E X - U E E X - U E EX - U E EX - U E E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX - U E E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E EX - U E E X - U E E X - U E EX - U E E X - U E E X - U E G G G G G G G G EX - U E EX - U E E X - U E 2.5' 0.7 ' 2.5' 0.8 ' 2.6' 15.9' 0.7 ' 2.5' 15 . 8 ' 3.1' 2.8 ' 2.8 '3.0' 23.9' 11 . 7 ' 24.6' 11 . 6 ' 15.6' 11 . 6 ' 32.4' 11 . 6 ' 15.6' 11 . 6 ' 24.2' 14 . 7 ' 7.9' 8. 9 ' 2.6' 2. 0 ' 2.5' 11 . 8 ' 5.3' 15 . 8 ' 0.7' 2. 5 ' 15.5' 3. 0 ' 2.1' 2. 0 ' 1.0' 2. 0 ' 2.1' 3. 0 ' 15.5' 2. 5 ' 0.7' 15 . 8 ' 10.3' 15 . 8 ' 0.7' 2. 4 ' 15.5' 3. 0 ' 2.1' 2. 0 ' 1.0' 2. 0 ' 2.1' 3. 0 ' 15.6' 2. 4 ' 1.0' 15 . 8 ' 5.0' 4. 6 ' 2.9' 3. 0 ' 15.6' 2. 8 ' 0.7' 16 . 2 ' 5.0' 4. 6 ' 2.8' 3. 1 ' 15.6' 2. 4 ' 0.7' 15 . 7 ' 4.7' 2. 5 ' 0.7' 0. 6 ' 2.0' 10 . 7 ' 2.0' 0. 6 ' 2.0' 25 . 1 ' 16.4' 11 . 7 ' 19 . 6 5 ' 11.70 ' 16 . 4 5 ' 25.1' 1.9 ' 0.6' 1.9 ' 6.7'3.9 ' 4.4' 3.9 ' 13.6' 5.3 ' 2.4' 0.6 ' 2.4' 15 . 6 ' 7.8' 13 . 9 ' 7.8' 13 . 9 ' 24.7' 24.1' 24.1' 11 . 2 ' 7.5' 14 . 6 ' 2.46' 3. 5 6 ' 2.52' 11 . 1 ' 4. 8 ' D LOT F BLOCK 120 LOT G, BLOCK 120 LOT H, BLOCK 120 LOT I, BLOCK 120 CAMPBELL SURVIVORS TRUST 919 WATERS AVE LOT A, BLOCK 41 LOT B, BLOCK 41 LOT C, BLOCK 41 LOT D, BLOCK 41 OPEN S P A C E - P U B L I C W A Y P E R PLAT B K 4 , P G 3 8 1 NO.5 REBAR AND 1.5" ALUMINUM CAP ILLEGIBLE FOUND 0.25' UNDER GROUND LOT F BLOCK 120 LIGHT (TYPICAL) PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CONC R E T E PATI O W I T H DECK A B O V E CONC R E T E PATI O W I T H DECK A B O V E CONC R E T E PATI O W I T H DECK A B O V E CONC R E T E PATI O W I T H DECK A B O V E CONC R E T E PATI O W I T H DECK A B O V E CONC R E T E PATI O W I T H DECK A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CON C R E T E WAL K W I T H WAL K A B O V E CON C R E T E WAL K W I T H WAL K A B O V E CON C R E T E WAL K W I T H WAL K A B O V E STONE WALL (TYPICAL) SHED PAVER PATIO CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E IRRIGATION BOX IRRIGATION BOX CONCRETE CURB AT SNOW STORAGE LOCATION UNKNOWN EDGE OF ASPHALT PER H.C.E. SURVEY ROCK WALL AT SNOW STORAGE LOCATION UNKNOWN ICV CONCRETE CURB (TYPICAL) STONE WALL (TYPICAL) DECIDUOUS TREE (TYPICAL) UTILITY SHED T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T59 T60 T58 T61 T62 T63 T64 T65 T66 T67 T68 T69 T70 T71 T72 T73 T74 T75 T76 T77 T78 T79 T80 T81 T82 T83 T84 T85 T86 T87 T88 T89 T90 T91 T92 T93 T94 T95 T96 T97 T98 T99 T100 T101 T102 T103 T104 T121T120 T119 T118 T105 T106 T107 T108 T109 T110 T111 T112 T113 T114 T115 T116 T117 T122 T123 T124 T125T126 T137 T138 T139 T140 T141 T142 T143 T146 T294 DSTORM DRAIN 7959.17' FL @ DOME UP P E R F L O O R WA L K W A Y S UPP E R F L O O R WAL K W A Y S G AC GAS METER A.C. UNIT 28 . 1 ' 112.3' 24.1' ALLE Y B L O C K 1 2 0 NOT S H O W N O N O F F I C I A L C I T Y P L A T PER P L A T B K 4 , P G 3 8 1 EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-UE EX-UE EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-UE EX-U E EX-U E EX-UE EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E 7958 7959 7959 7 9 5 5 7955 7 9 5 7 7 9 5 8 795 9 7960 7958 7959 7957 7956 7 9 5 5 796 0 79 5 9 79 5 6 79 6 0 79 6 5 796 0 7960 7 9 6 5 7970 7 9 7 0 7 9 7 0 7 9 7 5 7 9 8 0 7980 7975 797 0 797 0 796 8 797 2 79 7 5 79 7 0 796 5 7964 7962 7961 7960 798 0 79 7 5 797 0 79 5 7 7 9 6 2 7 9 6 3 7956.36' 7956.54' 7958.35' 7955.77' 7955.60' 7955.41' 7956.18' 7958.59' 7960.45' 7964.61' 7964.96' 7964.98' 7965.71' 7955.05' 7954.93' ELECTRIC MANHOLE RIM = 7954.89' STORM MANHOLE RIM = 7955.11' GAS RISER ICV ICV CMP LIGHT (TYPICAL) UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE (TYPICAL) UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE (TYPICAL)UNDERGROUND GAS LINE (TYPICAL) NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. SEE SHEET 4SEE SHEET 4 SE E S H E E T 9 SE E S H E E T 2 ByNO.Date Project NO.RevisionDrawn By: Checked By: Date: Computer File: P.O. Box 1746 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone (970) 625-1954 Fax (970) 579-7150 www.peaksurveyinginc.com S NW E P e a k S u r v ey ing, Inc. Es t . 2 0 0 7 23089 3 OF 9 THE GANT CONDOMINIUM ASS. ASPEN, COLORADO EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY THE GANT CONDOMINIUM 610 S WEST END STREET SMS JRN MARCH 27, 2024 089.DWG 1 04/24/25 ADD VIEWPLANES JRN N E S W 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 P e ak S u r v e y i n g , I n c . 010 10 20 405 EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY THE GANT CONDOMINIUMS ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM MAP THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 16, 1973 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 431, PHASE 2 MAP RECORDED NOVEMBER 14, 1974 IN PLAT BOOK 4, AT PAGE 499, AND PHASE 3 MAP RECORDED AUGUST 24, 1976 IN PLAT BOOK 5, AT PAGE 22 CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO 82 X X X X X X X EX- U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WT T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T G G G G G G G G G G G G GGG G G G G G G G G G G G E X - U E EX - U E E X - U E EX- U E EX- U E E X - U E W W W W W W W T T T T T T T T T T T T T X X X X X X X X 3 STORY WOOD FRAME BUILDING E 610 S. WEST END STREET #E 3 STORY WOOD FRAME BUILDING F 610 S. WEST END STREET #F D D DYH WV 20' CITY OF ASPEN UTILITY EASEMENT ASPHALT DRIVE ASPHALT DRIVE ASPHALT DRIVE AND PARKING PAV E R WAL K PAV E R WAL K W A Y STONE WALK (TYPICAL) STONE WALK (TYPICAL) STEPS (TYPICAL) STONE STEPS BOULDER BOULDER WALL BOULDER WALL (TYPICAL) CONCRETE PATIO STAIRS DOWN TO LOWER LEVEL WALK BUILDING COLUMN (TYPICAL) IRRIGATION VALVE BOX (TYPICAL) T T T T T T T T T T T T T T EX- U E EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX- U E EX-U E EX-UE E X - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE E X - U E E X - U E EX - U E EX - U E G G G G G G G G G G G EX - U E EX - U E E X - U E E X - U E EX - U E T T T T 15 . 8 ' 3.1' 2.8 ' 23.6' 16.4' 2.8 '3.0' 15 . 6 ' 2.5' 0.6 ' 15.9' 0.7 ' 2.5' 15 . 6 ' 3.0' 2.2 ' 2.0' 1.1 ' 2.2'2.1 ' 3.0' 2.6' 2. 0 ' 2.5' 11 . 8 ' 5.3' 15 . 8 ' 0.7' 2. 5 ' 15.5' 3. 0 ' 2.1' 2. 0 ' 1.0' 2. 0 ' 2.1' 3. 0 ' 15.5' 2. 5 ' 0.7' 15 . 8 ' 10.3' 15 . 8 ' 0.7' 2. 4 ' 15.5' 3. 0 ' 2.1' 2. 0 ' 1.0' 2. 0 ' 2.1' 3. 0 ' 15.6' 2. 4 ' 1.0' 15 . 8 ' 6.2 ' 15.6' 1.0 ' 2.5' 15 . 3 ' 5.7' 5. 9 ' 5.8' 15 . 3 ' 2.6' 0.9 ' 15.7'5.3 ' 11.7'3.5 ' 15.7' 0.9 ' 2.7' 15 . 4 ' 5.8' 3.3 ' 18.9' 11 . 2 ' 18.8' 3.3 ' 5.8' 15 . 4 ' 2.6' 0. 8 ' 15.6' 7.3 ' 0.8' 2.0 ' 10.9'2.0 ' 0.8' 2.0 ' 25.0' 16 . 9 ' 11.7' 27 . 1 ' 11.7' 16 . 9 ' 11.7' 16 . 0 ' 11.7' 6.2 ' 11.1' 9.1 ' 0.5' 16 . 9 ' 4.1 ' 11.9' 16 . 3 ' 11.7' 15 . 7 ' 11.70 ' 16 . 3 5 ' 6.05' 7.3 7 ' 11.65 ' 16 . 3 0 ' 5.65' 19 . 6 5 ' 11.70 ' 16 . 4 5 ' 25.1' 1. 9 ' 0.6' 1.9 ' 6.7'3.9 ' 4.4' 3.9 ' 13.6' 5.3 ' 2.4' 0.6 ' 2.4' 15 . 6 ' 3.0' 2.8 ' 16.3' 11 . 7 ' 6.1' 5.3 ' 15.7' 0.6 ' 2.4' 15 . 6 ' 3.0' 2.8 ' 10.7' 5.0 ' 15.8' 0.6 ' 2.4' 15 . 6 ' 3.0' 2.1 ' 2.0' 1.0 ' 2.0'2.1 ' 3.0' 15 . 5 ' 2.4' 0.6 ' 2.4' 5.4 ' 50.3' 2.5' 0. 6 ' 2.5' 15 . 6 ' 15 . 6 ' 11.8' 16 . 3 ' 50.3' 5.3 ' 16 . 8 ' 8.5' 16 . 8 ' 16 . 8 ' 6.8' 2.46' 3. 5 6 ' 2.52' 11 . 1 ' OP E N S P A C E - P U B L I C W A Y P E R PL A T B K 4 , P G 3 8 1 LOT 5 CALDERWOOD SUBDIVISION PER PLAT BK 2A, PG 264 UPPER ASPHALT DRIVE AND PARKING WITH COVERED PARKING BELOW 3 STORY WOOD FRAME BUILDING E 610 S. WEST END STREET #E 3 STORY WOOD FRAME BUILDING G 610 S. WEST END STREET #G TENNIS COURTS W W W W W X X X X X X X X X X CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CONC R E T E PATI O W I T H DECK A B O V E CONC R E T E PATI O W I T H DECK A B O V E CONC R E T E PATI O W I T H DECK A B O V E CONC R E T E PATI O W I T H DECK A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E TIE WALL DILAPIDATED BOULDER DRY WELL RIM = 7964.75' WATER VALVE LIGHT (TYPICAL) ELECTRIC PEDESTAL FENCE (TYPICAL) STAIRWELL LIGHT (TYPICAL) SIGN (TYPICAL) FIRE HYDRANT (TYPICAL) IRRIGATION BOX IRRIGATION BOX LIGHT (TYPICAL) CO N C R E T E WA L K W I T H WA L K A B O V E GAS SHED ELECTRIC ICV STAIRWELL STONE WALL (TYPICAL)TIE WALL DILAPIDATED TIE WALL DILAPIDATED LIGHT (TYPICAL) PLANTER UNDERGROUND WATER LINE (TYPICAL) GUARDRAIL CON C R E T E WAL K STONE WALL (TYPICAL) LOWER ASPHALT DRIVE AND PARKING LOWER LEVEL PARKING EL = 7959.1' UTILITY SHED T121T120 T119 T118 T113 T114 T115 T116 T117 T122 T123 T124 T125T126 T127 T129 T130T131 T128 T132 T133 T134 T135 T136 T137 T138 T139 T140 T141 T142 T143 T144 T145 T146 T147 T148 T149 T150 T151 T152 T153 T154 T155 T156 T157 T158 T159T204 T205 T206T207 T208 T295 T296 T297 T298 T299 T300 UPP E R F L O O R WAL K W A Y S UPP E R F L O O R WAL K W A Y S UPP E R F L O O R WAL K W A Y S UPP E R F L O O R WAL K W A Y S UP P E R F L O O R WA L K W A Y S UP P E R F L O O R WA L K W A Y S UPP E R F L O O R WAL K W A Y S WATER FEATURE 24.1' 21.2' 17.3' 9.6' EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-UE EX-UE EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E UPPER LEVEL WALKWAYS ABOVE LOWER LEVEL WALL AND WALK BELOW SECOND LEVEL WALL AND WALK ABOVE 7975 797 0 796 8 797 2 79 7 5 79 7 0 796 5 7964 7962 798 0 79 7 5 797 0 79 7 0 797 6 7 9 7 0 7 9 7 0 7 9 7 2 79 7 6 7 9 7 5 7977 7 9 7 0 7970 7970 79 7 5 7970 796 8 79 6 7 796 6 79 5 7 7960 796 5 79 6 6 79 6 6 7957 7 9 5 8 7 9 5 9 7 9 6 0 7 9 5 8 7 9 6 2 7 9 6 3 7 9 6 3 7 9 6 4 79 6 5 7967 79 6 6 7958 7959 SECOND LEVEL 7977.52' SECOND LEVEL 7977.52' LOWER LEVEL 7968.59' 7968.51' SECOND LEVEL 7977.50' SECOND LEVEL 7977.50' SECOND LEVEL 7977.53' LOWER LEVEL 7968.18' LOWER LEVEL 7968.11' 7968.00' 7967.99' 7967.90' 7977.48' 7976.04' 7956.36' 7956.54' 7958.34' 7958.35' D LIGHT (TYPICAL) ICV ICV STORM DRAIN RIM = 7967.99' UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE (TYPICAL) UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE (TYPICAL)UNDERGROUND GAS LINE (TYPICAL) UNDERGROUND GAS LINE (TYPICAL) UNDERGROUND WATER LINE (TYPICAL) UNDERGROUND PHONE LINE (TYPICAL) STONE WALK (TYPICAL) PLA N T E R PL A N T E R EDGE OF UPPER LEVEL PARKING FENCE (TYPICAL) GLORYHOLE VIEWPLANE NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. SEE SHEET 3 SE E S H E E T 9 SEE SHEET 3 SE E S H E E T 6 SEE SHEET 6 SEE SHEET 5 SEE SHEET 5 ByNO.Date Project NO.RevisionDrawn By: Checked By: Date: Computer File: P.O. Box 1746 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone (970) 625-1954 Fax (970) 579-7150 www.peaksurveyinginc.com S NW E P e a k S u r v ey ing, Inc. Es t . 2 0 0 7 23089 4 OF 9 THE GANT CONDOMINIUM ASS. ASPEN, COLORADO EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY THE GANT CONDOMINIUM 610 S WEST END STREET SMS JRN MARCH 27, 2024 089.DWG 1 04/24/25 ADD VIEWPLANES JRN N E S W 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 P e a k S u r v e y i n g , I n c . 010 10 20 405 EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY THE GANT CONDOMINIUMS ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM MAP THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 16, 1973 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 431, PHASE 2 MAP RECORDED NOVEMBER 14, 1974 IN PLAT BOOK 4, AT PAGE 499, AND PHASE 3 MAP RECORDED AUGUST 24, 1976 IN PLAT BOOK 5, AT PAGE 22 CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO 83 W W W W W W W W W W T T T T G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G E X - U E EX- U E EX- U E E X - U E W W W T EX-U E EX-U E EX- U E EX- U E X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 STORY WOOD FRAME BUILDING G 610 S. WEST END STREET #G 3 STORY WOOD FRAME BUILDING H 610 S. WEST END STREET #H D D D S CO ICV G ICV ICV SPA POOL UPPER ASPHALT DRIVE AND PARKING WITH COVERED PARKING BELOW E X - U E EX - U E EX - U E E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E G G G G G G G G G GG G G G G E X - U E EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-U E EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-UE EX-UE T BRICK PATIO FIRE PIT BBQ E X - U E EX - U E 6.2 ' 15.6' 1. 0 ' 2.5' 9.1 ' 0.5' 16 . 9 ' 5.1' 4.1 ' 20.7' 4. 1 ' 11.9' 2.5' 0. 6 ' 2.5' 15 . 6 ' 3.0' 2. 1 ' 2.1' 1. 0 ' 2.1'2. 1 '3.0' 15 . 5 ' 2.5' 0.6 ' 15.7' 10 . 3 ' 15.6' 0.6 ' 2.4' 15 . 6 ' 3.2' 2.8 ' 16.6' 11 . 8 ' 16.3' 2. 8 ' 3.0' 15 . 7 ' 2.6' 0. 6 ' 2.6' 5.3 ' 31.0' 11 . 7 ' 16.4' 2.8 ' 3.0' 15 . 6 ' 2.5' 0.6 ' 2.5' 5.3 ' 13.3' 2.0 ' 0.6' 2.0 ' 10.9' 2.0 ' 0.6' 2. 0 ' 24.9' 16 . 3 ' 11.5' 19 . 9 ' 6.0' 16 . 1 ' 11.7' 8. 7 ' 2.7' 10 . 4 ' 2.7' 8.6 ' 11.7' 32 . 4 ' 11.8' 15 . 6 ' 11.8' 5.3 ' 40.4' 16 . 8 ' 14.7' 15 . 1 ' 11.6' 16 . 7 ' 11.6' 16 . 1 ' 11.8' 27 . 4 ' 10.7'2.0 ' 0.6' 18 . 2 ' 25.1' 1.9 ' 0.6' 1.9 ' 10.8' 1.9 ' 0.6' 1.9 ' 13.1' 4.8 ' 2.4' 0.6 ' 2.4' 15 . 7 ' 3.0'2. 8 ' 16.5' 11 . 5 ' 18.7' 3.2 ' 5.2' 15 . 4 ' 2.6' 0.9 ' 15.8'5.2 ' 11.7'4.5 ' 15.9' 0.9 ' 2.5' 15 . 3 ' 5.2' 5.7 ' 5.3' 15 . 4 ' 2.5' 1.0 ' 15.8'5. 3 ' 16 . 8 ' 8.5' 16 . 8 ' 8.5' 16 . 8 ' 6.8' 16 . 8 ' 6.8' 6.4 ' 3.4' 6.2 ' 3.4' 8.3 ' O P E N S P A C E - P U B L I C W A Y P E R P L A T B K 4 , P G 3 8 1 LOT 6 CALDERWOOD SUBDIVISION PER PLAT BK 2A, PG 264 SUBDIVISION PER PLAT BK 2A, PG 264 LOT 6 UTE PLACE SUBDIVISION PER PLAT BK 19, PG 80 LOT 5 UTE PLACE SUBDIVISION PER PLAT BK 19, PG 80 LOT 17-R UTE PLACE SUBDIVISION PER PLAT BK 19, PG 80 PARKING WITH COVERED PARKING BELOW CLEAN OUT LIGHT (TYPICAL) 3 STORY WOOD FRAME BUILDING E 610 S. WEST END STREET #E 610 S. WEST END STREET #G X CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E LIGHT (TYPICAL) LIGHT (TYPICAL) STONE WALL (TYPICAL) BBQPOOL MECHANICAL BUILDING SEWER MANHOLE RIM = 7967.43' IRRIGATION BOX (TYPICAL) LIGHT (TYPICAL) CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYPICAL) MECHANICAL VENTS CO N C R E T E WA L K W I T H WA L K A B O V E PA V E R W A L K W I T H WA L K A B O V E GAS SHED ELECTRIC ROOM TIE WALL DILAPIDATED UNDERGROUND WATER LINE (TYPICAL) BOULDER WALL (TYPICAL) BOULDER WALL (TYPICAL) TRENCH DRAIN T134 T157 T158 T159 T160 T161 T162 T163 T164 T165 T166 T167 T168 T169 T170 T171 T172 T173 T174 T175 T176 T177 T178 T179 T180 T181 T182 T183 T184 T185 T186 T187 T188 T190 T189 T191 T192 T193 T194 T195 T196 T197 T198 T199 T200 T201 T202 T203 T204 T205 T206T207 T208 WA L K A B O V E BU I L D I N G B E L O W PAV E R W A L K W I T H WAL K A B O V E PA V E R W A L K W I T H WA L K A B O V E UP P E R F L O O R WA L K W A Y S UP P E R F L O O R WA L K W A Y S UP P E R F L O O R WA L K W A Y S UPPER LEVEL PLANTER UPP E R F L O O R WAL K W A Y S WATER FEATURE UP P E R L E V E L PL A N T E R UP P E R L E V E L PL A N T E R UP P E R L E V E L PL A N T E R LO W E R L E V E L LA U N D R Y 8.9' 6. 4 ' 6.1' 16 . 2 ' 15.1' 22 . 6 ' NEW CONCRETE NEW CONCRETE 17.3' 5. 5 ' 5. 8 ' 20 . 9 ' 1. 6 ' 7.6 ' 7 9 7 0 7970 7967 796 7 7967 79 6 7 79 6 9 797 0 797 1 796 8 79757973 7 9 7 2 79 7 6 79 7 6 7977 7979 7980 7984 7 9 8 0 7 9 7 8 7 9 7 8 7 9 8 0 7 9 8 0 7 9 7 8 7 9 7 7 7976 7977 7976 7977 7 9 7 7 797 7 797 5 796 7 79 6 6 7967.90' 7968.05' 7968.16' 7968.16' 7968.27' 7967.86' 7968.37' 7968.39' 7976.04' 7975.54' 7975.89' 7976.40' 7976.51' 7976.47'7976.20' 7975.54'7973.05' 7970.59' 7969.37' 7968.81' 7968.05' TRENCH DRAIN RIM = 7968.09' TRENCH DRAIN RIM = 7968.04' TRENCH DRAIN RIM = 7968.26' TRENCH DRAIN RIM = 7968.21' D STORM DRAIN RIM = 7966.56' STORM DRAIN RIM = 7966.52' DRY WELL RIM = 7966.89' IN GROUND LIGHTS UNDERGROUND GAS LINE (TYPICAL) EDGE OF UPPER LEVEL PARKING EDGE OF UPPER LEVEL PARKING GAS METER (TYPICAL) STAIRWELL GLORYHOLE VIEWPLANE 40' - 50' NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. SEE SHEET 4 SE E S H E E T 6 SEE SHEET 4 SE E SH E E T 7 ByNO.Date Project NO.RevisionDrawn By: Checked By: Date: Computer File: P.O. Box 1746 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone (970) 625-1954 Fax (970) 579-7150 www.peaksurveyinginc.com S NW E P e a k S u r v ey ing, Inc. Es t . 2 0 0 7 23089 5 OF 9 THE GANT CONDOMINIUM ASS. ASPEN, COLORADO EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY THE GANT CONDOMINIUM 610 S WEST END STREET SMS JRN MARCH 27, 2024 089.DWG 1 04/24/25 ADD VIEWPLANES JRN N E S W 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 P e ak S u r v e y i n g , I n c . 010 10 20 405 EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY THE GANT CONDOMINIUMS ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM MAP THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 16, 1973 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 431, PHASE 2 MAP RECORDED NOVEMBER 14, 1974 IN PLAT BOOK 4, AT PAGE 499, AND PHASE 3 MAP RECORDED AUGUST 24, 1976 IN PLAT BOOK 5, AT PAGE 22 CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO 84 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-UE W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T EX- U E EX - U E G G T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G EX - U E E X - U E WOOD FRAME 610 S. WEST END STREET #J 3 STORY WOOD FRAME BUILDING K 610 S. WEST END STREET #K DYH D D D S DYH D E CO CO ICV ICV UPPER ASPHALT DRIVE AND PARKING WITH COVERED PARKING BELOW ASPHALT DRIVE AND PARKING ASPHALT DRIVE BRIC K WAL K TENNIS COURTS ELEVATOR CON C R E T E WAL K NO. 5 REBAR AND 1.25" BLUE PLASTIC CAP P.L.S.NO. 37972 FOUND 1.46' WITNESS CORNER 0.10' BELOW GROUND EX-U E EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-UE EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E CTV CTV CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V T T EX-U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E T T T T EX - U E EX - U E 16 . 3 ' 37.1' 1.9 ' 0.6' 1.9 ' 10.8' 1. 9 ' 0.6' 1.9 ' 13.1' 4.8 ' 2.4' 0. 6 ' 2.4' 15 . 7 ' 3.0'2.8 ' 16.5' 11 . 5 ' 18.7' 3. 2 ' 5.2' 15 . 4 ' 2.6' 0.9 ' 15.8'5.2 ' 0.9 ' 2.5' 5.2' 5.7 ' 37.2' 16 . 4 ' 11.7' 24 . 1 ' 11.7' 15 . 7 ' 11.7' 24 . 0 ' 11.7' 16 . 4 ' 4.0' 7.7 ' 11.7' 17 . 1 ' 16.0' 9.7 ' 16.0' 9.7 ' 19.6'3.1 ' 15.7'5.3 ' 25.1' 1. 9 ' 0.6' 1. 9 ' 10.9'1.9 ' 0.6' 1. 9 ' 13.3' 5.3 ' 2.3' 0. 6 ' 2.3' 15 . 5 ' 3.0' 2.2 ' 2.0' 1.0 ' 2.0'2.0 ' 3.0' 15 . 6 ' 2.4' 0.6 ' 15.8' 5.3 ' 6.1' 5.0 ' 15.6' 0.7 ' 2.4' 15 . 5 ' 3.0' 2. 1 ' 1.9' 1.0 ' 1.9'2.1 ' 3.0'16 . 4 ' 11.7' 15 . 6 ' 11.7' 16 . 4 ' 6.1' 18 . 0 ' 7.7' 2.0 ' 4.0' 15 . 7 ' 11.6' 13.0' 8.4 ' 13.0' 8.4 ' 11 . 2 ' 9.2' 11 . 1 ' 9.2' 24.5' 8.3 ' 24.5' 8.3 ' 15 . 9 ' LOT 17-R UTE PLACE SUBDIVISION PER PLAT BK 19, PG 80 UPPER ASPHALT DRIVE AND PARKING WITH COVERED PARKING BELOW CLEAN OUT LIGHT (TYPICAL) LIGHT (TYPICAL) ELECTRIC MANHOLE RIM = 7958.12' TENNIS COURTS W W W W X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXX CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E WATER VALVE LIGHT (TYPICAL) STAIRWELL FIRE HYDRANT STONE WALL (TYPICAL) DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE BOULDER (TYPICAL) BOULDER (TYPICAL) SEWER MANHOLE RIM = 7967.43' IRRIGATION BOX (TYPICAL) LIGHT (TYPICAL) CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYPICAL) BOULDER WALL (TYPICAL) LOWER ASPHALT DRIVE AND PARKING LOWER ASPHALT DRIVE AND PARKING LOWER LEVEL PARKING EL = 7959.1' CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E STAIRWELL SHED T200 T201 T202 T203 T206T207 T208 T209 T210 T211 T212 T213 T214 T215 T216 T217 T245 T247 T248 T249 T255 T256 T257 T258 T259 10.5' 16 . 6 ' 17 . 1 ' 10.5' WALL HYDRANT 8.2 ' 20 . 9 ' 1. 6 ' 9' LOT 17-R UTE PLACE SUBDIVISION PER PLAT BK 19, PG 80 79 6 6 79 6 6 7 9 5 8 7967 796 7 7967 79 6 7 79 6 9 797 0 797 1 796 8 796 7 79 6 6 7968 7 9 5 9 79 6 0 79 6 1 796 1 79 6 0 79 5 9 79 6 1 7961 7963 7963 79 6 3 796 2 7 9 5 9 7959 7 9 6 1 79 6 1 7968.81' 7968.05' 7959.02' 7959.02' 7960.41' 7961.87' STORM DRAIN RIM = 7966.56' STORM DRAIN RIM = 7966.52' DRY WELL RIM = 7966.89' STORM DRAIN RIM = 7961.24' UNDERGROUND GAS LINE (TYPICAL) UNDERGROUND PHONE LINE (TYPICAL) PL A N T E R EDGE OF UPPER LEVEL PARKING EDGE OF UPPER LEVEL PARKING (TYPICAL) GLORYHOLE VIEWPLANE 30' - 40' GLORYHOLE VIEWPLANE 40' - 50' GLORYHOLE VIEWPLANE 40' - 50' WAGNER VIEWPLANE 150' - 160' WAGNER VIEWPLANE 150' - 160' WAGNER VIEWPLANE 140' - 150' WAGNER VIEWPLANE 160' - 170' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 310' - 320' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 320' - 330' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 320' - 330' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 330' - 340' NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. SEE SHEET 4 SEE SHEET 9 SE E S H E E T 8 SEE SHEET 7 SEE SHEET 5 ByNO.Date Project NO.RevisionDrawn By: Checked By: Date: Computer File: P.O. Box 1746 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone (970) 625-1954 Fax (970) 579-7150 www.peaksurveyinginc.com S NW E P e a k S u r v ey ing, Inc. Es t . 2 0 0 7 23089 6 OF 9 THE GANT CONDOMINIUM ASS. ASPEN, COLORADO EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY THE GANT CONDOMINIUM 610 S WEST END STREET SMS JRN MARCH 27, 2024 089.DWG 1 04/24/25 ADD VIEWPLANES JRN N E S W 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 P e a k S u r v e y i n g , I n c . 010 10 20 405 EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY THE GANT CONDOMINIUMS ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM MAP THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 16, 1973 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 431, PHASE 2 MAP RECORDED NOVEMBER 14, 1974 IN PLAT BOOK 4, AT PAGE 499, AND PHASE 3 MAP RECORDED AUGUST 24, 1976 IN PLAT BOOK 5, AT PAGE 22 CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO 85 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G EX- U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E G G G G Y S D E COCO ICV A S P H A L T W A L K W A Y A S P H A L T W A L K W A Y PARKING CON C R E T E WAL K CLEAN OUT DECIDUOUS TREE (TYPICAL) DECIDUOUS TREE (TYPICAL) DECIDUOUS TREE (TYPICAL) ELECTRIC MANHOLE (TYPICAL) LIGHT (TYPICAL) RETAINING WALL PK NAIL AND SHINER P.L.S.NO. 37972 FOUND BASIS OF BEARINGS TBM = 7968.18' NO. 5 REBAR AND 1.25" BLUE PLASTIC CAP P.L.S.NO. 37972 FOUND 1.46' WITNESS CORNER 0.10' BELOW GROUND E X - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E G G 9.7 ' 16.0' 15 . 5 ' 3.0' 2.1 ' 1.9' 1.0 ' 1.9'2. 1 ' 3.0' 15 . 5 ' 2.4' 0.6 ' 2.4' 5.4 ' 13.4' 1. 9 ' 0.8' 1. 9 ' 11.6' 1.9 ' 0.6' 1. 9 ' 24.4' 16 . 4 ' 11.7' 15 . 6 ' LOT 1 UTE PLACE SUBDIVISION PER PLAT BK 19, PG 80 XX STONE WALL (TYPICAL) STONE WALL & CONCRETE CURB AT SNOW STORAGE LOCATION UNKNOWN CONCRETE CURB AT SNOW STORAGE LOCATION UNKNOWN EDGE OF ASPHALT PER H.C.E. SURVEY CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CON C R E T E PATI O W I T H DEC K A B O V E CON C R E T E PATI O W I T H DEC K A B O V E U T E A V E N U E A S P H A L T R O A D T210 T216 T217 T218 T219 T220 T221T222T223 T224 T225 T226 T227 T228 T229 T230 T231 T232 T233 T234 T235 T236 T237 T239 T240 T241 T238 T242 T243 T244 T245 T246 T247 T248 T249 CONIFER TREE (TYPICAL) 46' 20.3 ' 20.9 ' 79 6 0 79 6 1 7963 7963 7968 7967 796 6 796 5 79 7 3 797 0 79 6 5 7 9 6 7 7 9 6 6 7 9 6 5 796 3 79 6 5 7962 7963STORM DRAIN RIM = 7965.75' STORM MANHOLE RIM = 7964.65' COURTHOUSE #1 VIEWPLANE 190' - 200' COURTHOUSE #1 VIEWPLANE 200' - 210' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 330' - 340' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 340' - 350' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 340' - 350' NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. SEE SHEET 6 SEE SHEET 8 ByNO.Date Project NO.RevisionDrawn By: Checked By: Date: Computer File: P.O. Box 1746 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone (970) 625-1954 Fax (970) 579-7150 www.peaksurveyinginc.com S NW E P e a k S u r v ey ing, Inc. Es t . 2 0 0 7 23089 7 OF 9 THE GANT CONDOMINIUM ASS. ASPEN, COLORADO EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY THE GANT CONDOMINIUM 610 S WEST END STREET SMS JRN MARCH 27, 2024 089.DWG 1 04/24/25 ADD VIEWPLANES JRN N E S W 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 P e a k S u r v e y i n g , I n c . 010 10 20 405 EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY THE GANT CONDOMINIUMS ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM MAP THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 16, 1973 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 431, PHASE 2 MAP RECORDED NOVEMBER 14, 1974 IN PLAT BOOK 4, AT PAGE 499, AND PHASE 3 MAP RECORDED AUGUST 24, 1976 IN PLAT BOOK 5, AT PAGE 22 CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO 86 X X X X X X EX-U E EX-U E EX-U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-UE W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W G G G G G G G G GG G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E E X - U E EX- U E EX- U E EX- U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E G G G G G G G G G G G G 3 STORY WOOD FRAME BUILDING J 610 S. WEST END STREET #J 3 STORY WOOD FRAME BUILDING K 610 S. WEST END STREET #K S S DYH D D D D E OSW CO CO COCO CO ICV A S P H A L T W A L K W A Y A S P H A L T W A L K W A Y BRI C K WAL K BRI C K WAL K DYH ELEVATOR DECIDUOUS TREE (TYPICAL) ELECTRIC MANHOLE (TYPICAL) CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER (TYPICAL) WV WV CONIFER TREE (TYPICAL) DECIDUOUS TREE (TYPICAL) 3 STORY WOOD FRAME OFFICE BUILDING 610 S. WEST END STREET CTV CT V CTV CTV CTV CTV CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V T T EX-U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E 11.7' 16 . 3 ' 37.1' 5. 8 ' 37.2' 16 . 4 ' 11.7' 24 . 1 ' 11.7' 15 . 7 ' 11.7' 24 . 0 ' 11.7' 16 . 4 ' 4.0' 7.7 ' 11.7' 17 . 1 ' 16.0' 9.7 ' 16.0' 9.7 ' 19.6'3.1 ' 6.5' 3.1 ' 10.8' 1.9 ' 0.7' 0.6 ' 1.9'4.7 ' 15.7' 0.6 ' 2.4' 15 . 6 ' 3.0'2.8 ' 8.7' 5.0 ' 15.7' 0.7 ' 2.6' 15 . 5 ' 3.0'2.7 ' 4.6' 4.9 ' 15.8' 0.7 ' 2.5' 15 . 7 ' 3.0'2.0 ' 2.0' 1.0 ' 2.0' 2.2 ' 3.0' 15 . 5 ' 2.4' 0.6 ' 15.7'5.4 ' 4.6' 2.8 ' 3.0' 16 . 0 ' 2.4' 0.6 ' 15.7'5.3 ' 25.1' 1.9 ' 0.6' 1. 9 ' 5.3 ' 6.1' 5.0 ' 15.6' 2.4' 15 . 5 ' 3.0' 2.1 ' 1.9' 16 . 4 ' 11.7' 15 . 6 ' 11.7' 16 . 4 ' 6.1' 18 . 0 ' 7.7' 2.0 ' 4.0' 15 . 7 ' 11.6' 13.0' 8.4 ' 13.0' 8.4 ' 11 . 2 ' 9.2' 11 . 1 ' 9.2' 15 . 9 ' CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E TRENCH DRAIN RIM = 7956.99' 11 . 0 ' 5 . 0 '6.2' 1 6 . 3 ' 11.2 ' 3 4 . 0 ' 6.9' 4 . 7 ' 59.0 ' 8 . 5 ' 10.0 ' BOULDER (TYPICAL) BOULDER (TYPICAL) STORM DRAIN RIM = 7959.58' CLEANOUT (TYPICAL) BOULDER (TYPICAL) STA I R W E L L STA I R W E L L ASPHALT DIVE AND PARKING CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E STAIRWELL SHED U T E A V E N U E A S P H A L T R O A D T246 T247 T248 T249 T250 T251 T252 T253 T254 T255 T256 T257 T258 T259 T260 T261 T262 T263 T264 T265 T266 T267T268T269 T270 T271 T272 T273 T274 CLEANOUT (TYPICAL) 10.5' 16 . 6 ' 17 . 1 ' 10.5' WALL HYDRANT 20.9 ' 22.7 ' 3.3' 8.2 ' TIE WALL (TYPICAL) STAIRS FLAGSTONE WALK 796 1 7963 79 6 3 796 2 7 9 5 9 7962 7963 7964 7 9 6 4 7 9 6 1 79 6 1 79 6 2 7 9 6 3 796 2 7 9 6 3 7 9 6 3 796 1 79 6 0 7 9 6 0 795 9 7959 7 9 6 1 796 1 7959.02' 7959.02' 7957.24' 7960.41' 7961.87' STORM DRAIN RIM = 7961.24' STORM MANHOLE RIM = 7964.65' SEWER MANHOLE RIM = 7963.23' STORM MANHOLE RIM = 7962.65' STORM DRAIN RIM = 7960.07' WATER VALVE (TYPICAL) FIRE HYDRANT (TYPICAL) CURB STOP (TYPICAL)C O N C R E T E D R I V E COURTHOUSE #1 VIEWPLANE 190' - 200' WAGNER VIEWPLANE 150' - 160' WAGNER VIEWPLANE 140' - 150' COURTHOUSE #1 VIEWPLANE 180' - 190' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 310' - 320' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 320' - 330' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 320' - 330' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 330' - 340' NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. SEE SHEET 7 SEE SHEET 6 SEE SHEET 9SEE SHEET 9 ByNO.Date Project NO.RevisionDrawn By: Checked By: Date: Computer File: P.O. Box 1746 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone (970) 625-1954 Fax (970) 579-7150 www.peaksurveyinginc.com S NW E P e a k S u r v ey ing, Inc. Es t . 2 0 0 7 23089 8 OF 9 THE GANT CONDOMINIUM ASS. ASPEN, COLORADO EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY THE GANT CONDOMINIUM 610 S WEST END STREET SMS JRN MARCH 27, 2024 089.DWG 1 04/24/25 ADD VIEWPLANES JRN N E S W 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 P e a k S u r v e y i n g , I n c . 010 10 20 405 EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY THE GANT CONDOMINIUMS ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM MAP THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 16, 1973 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 431, PHASE 2 MAP RECORDED NOVEMBER 14, 1974 IN PLAT BOOK 4, AT PAGE 499, AND PHASE 3 MAP RECORDED AUGUST 24, 1976 IN PLAT BOOK 5, AT PAGE 22 CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO 87 X X X X X X X X X X X T W W W W W W W T T T T T T T T T TT G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G T T T X X X X X 3 STORY WOOD FRAME BUILDING B 610 S. WEST END STREET #B 3 STORY WOOD FRAME BUILDING C 610 S. WEST END STREET #C 3 STORY WOOD FRAME OFFICE BUILDING 610 S. WEST END STREET 3 STORY WOOD FRAME BUILDING C 610 S. WEST END STREET #C D D CO CO CO CO D DECIDUOUS TREE (TYPICAL) CONIFER TREE (TYPICAL) BOULDER POOL SPA SPA AS P H A L T WA L K W A Y ASP H A L T WAL K W A Y CONCRETE PATIO CON C R E T E WAL K CON C R E T E WAL K CONCRETE WALK CO N C R E T E WA L K CON C R E T E WAL K CON C R E T E WAL K CON C R E T E WAL K CON C R E T E WAL K BRI C K WAL K BRI C K WAL K CONCRETE ENTRY PAV E R WAL K W A Y CON C R E T E WAL K D G DOG STORM DRAIN RIM = 7956.54' RETAINING WALL LIGHT ROOF DRAIN CLEANOUT (TYPICAL) STAIRWELL ELEVATOR 3 STORY WOOD FRAME BUILDING A 610 S. WEST END STREET #A CO E X - U E EX- U E T T EX - U E CT V CTV CTV CTV CTV CT V T T EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX-UE EX-UE FIRE PIT BBQ FLAGSTONE PATIO 6.4' 7.6' 4.9' 3.0 ' 11.8' 10 . 5 ' 38.7' 15 . 9 ' 2.6'0.6 ' 2.6' 16.0' 0.8 ' 2.6' 15 . 6 ' 3.1' 2.6 ' 1.4' 5.4 ' 15.9' 2.5' 15 . 8 ' 3.1' 2.8 ' 23.6' 0.6 ' 12.2' 0.6 ' 6.0' 5.8 ' 11.7' 18 . 0 ' 6.0' 8.0 ' 11.8' 4.0' 4.2 ' 4.2' 15 . 2 ' 11.8' 16 . 0 ' 11.8' 16 . 4 ' 11.7' 26 . 1 ' 11.7' 25 . 7 ' 11.6' 24 . 0 ' 11.7' 16 . 3 ' 37.1' 5.8 ' 15.8' 0.6 ' 2.5' 15 . 5 ' 3.0'2.9 ' 4.7' 5. 0 ' 15.8' 0.7 ' 2.4' 15 . 6 ' 3.0'2.8 ' 14.7' 11 . 7 ' 14.7' 2.8 ' 3.0' 15 . 6 ' 2.4' 0. 7 ' 15.7'5.0 ' 4.6' 2. 8 ' 2.5' 15 . 5 ' 2.5' 0.7 ' 15.8'5.0 ' 11.7' 5.3 ' 15.7' 0.7 ' 2.5' 15 . 5 ' 3.0'2.2 ' 8.6' 8.7 ' 4.9' 3.6 ' 28.4' 0.6 ' 15.8' 4.6 ' 2.0' 0.7 ' 39.2' 16 . 5 ' 11.7' 15 . 6 ' 11.7' 16 . 1 ' 6.0' 16 . 2 ' 11.7' 8.3 ' 6.1' 0.6 ' 12.2' 0.6 ' 7.2' 0.3 ' 16.4' 2.8 ' 3.0' 15 . 6 ' 2.5' 0.6 ' 15.8' 4.9 ' 6.0' 5.3 ' 15.9' 0.7 ' 2.5' 15 . 6 ' 3.0' 2.2 ' 2.0' 1.1 ' 2.2'2.1 ' 3.0' 15 . 6 ' 2.5' 0.6 ' 2.4' 0.6 ' 15.7'5.3 ' 26.3' 10 . 0 ' 26.3' 10 . 0 ' 7.6 ' 14.8' 14.8' 3 4 . 5 ' 2.1' 7.6 ' CIT Y O F A S P E N SOU T H W E S T E N D S T R E E T PER P L A T B K 4 , P G 3 8 1 STONE WALK CONCRETE PATIO WITH DECK ABOVE CON C R E T E WAL K W I T H WAL K A B O V E TENNIS COURTS CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E IRRIGATION (TYPICAL) CLEANOUT (TYPICAL) CLEANOUT (TYPICAL) STORM DRAIN RIM = 7959.25' CON C R E T E RAM P GAS METER AND ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURESTONE WALL (TYPICAL) STONE WALL (TYPICAL) DRY WELL RIM = 7957.63' GAS RISER DOG STATION STONE PATIO FIRE PLACE ELEVATOR TRENCH DRAIN RIM = 7956.99' 11 . 0 ' 2 9 . 3 ' 2.1' 9 . 4 ' 2.1' 2 8 . 4 ' 23.6 ' 1 . 1 ' 13.3 ' 1 . 1 ' 11.0 ' 1 . 0 ' 1.1' 1 . 0 ' 17.0 ' 8 . 5 ' 10.0 ' BOULDER (TYPICAL) STA I R W E L L CO N C R E T E WA L K W I T H WA L K A B O V E CO N C R E T E WA L K W I T H WA L K A B O V E CON C R E T E WAL K W I T H WAL K A B O V E C O N C R E T E R A M P CO N C R E T E PA T I O W I T H DE C K A B O V E T111 T112 T139 T260 T261 T275 T276 T277 T278 T279 T280 T281 T282 T283 T284 T285 T286 T287 T288 T289 T290 T291 T292 T293 T294 T295 T296 T297 T298 T299 T300 T301 T302 T303 T304 T305 T306T307 T308 T309 T310 T311 G 4 . 7 ' 5 5 . 1 ' 8.2 ' 17.5' 10 ' 5 . 1 ' 17.4' LOT 1 , C L A R E N D O N C O N D O M I N I U M S PER P L A T B O O K 1 1 3 , P A G E 6 PAR C E L 2 , C L A R E N D O N C O N D O M I N I U M S PER P L A T B O O K 1 1 3 , P A G E 6 P A R C E L 2 , C L A R E N D O N C O N D O M I N I U M S P E R P L A T B O O K 1 1 3 , P A G E 6 CON C R E T E RAM P STONE WALKSTAIRS STAIRS STAIRS STAIRS 7956 7 9 5 8 7959 7 9 5 5 7 9 5 9 7 9 6 0 7958 7959 79 5 9 79 5 9 7 9 5 9 7 9 6 0 7 9 5 9 795 8 795 7 7957 795 6 7 9 5 8 7 9 6 3 7 9 5 9 7 9 5 9 79 5 8 7 9 5 7 7959 79 6 0 796 0 7959 7959.02' 7957.24' 7957.24' 7958.34' 7958.35' 7959.12' 7957.49' 7957.19' 7956.23' 7957.62' 7956.66' 7956.82' 7956.78' 7956.80' 7956.65' 7956.70' 7956.79' 7956.73' 7956.75' 7956.62' 7954.51' 7954.27' TRENCH DRAIN RIM = 7956.59' TRENCH DRAIN RIM = 7956.66' TRENCH DRAIN RIM = 7956.65' STORM DRAIN RIM = 7956.40' WATER MANHOLE RIM = 7961.28' (TYPICAL) CURB STOP (TYPICAL)C O N C R E T E D R I V E GLORYHOLE VIEWPLANE 20' - 30' GLORYHOLE VIEWPLANE 30' - 40' COURTHOUSE #1 VIEWPLANE 170' - 180' COURTHOUSE #1 VIEWPLANE 180' - 190' WAGNER VIEWPLANE 130' - 140' WAGNER VIEWPLANE 140' - 150' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 290' - 300' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 300' - 310' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 300' - 310' MAIN STREET VIEWPLANE 310' - 320' NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. SEE SHEET 2 SEE SHEET 8 SEE SHEET 6SEE SHEET 8 SEE SHEET 2 SE E S H E E T 4 SE E S H E E T 3 ByNO.Date Project NO.RevisionDrawn By: Checked By: Date: Computer File: P.O. Box 1746 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone (970) 625-1954 Fax (970) 579-7150 www.peaksurveyinginc.com S NW E P e a k S u r v ey ing, Inc. Es t . 2 0 0 7 23089 9 OF 9 THE GANT CONDOMINIUM ASS. ASPEN, COLORADO EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY THE GANT CONDOMINIUM 610 S WEST END STREET SMS JRN MARCH 27, 2024 089.DWG 1 04/24/25 ADD VIEWPLANES JRN N E S W 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 P e a k S u r v e y i n g , I n c . 010 10 20 405 EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY THE GANT CONDOMINIUMS ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM MAP THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 16, 1973 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 431, PHASE 2 MAP RECORDED NOVEMBER 14, 1974 IN PLAT BOOK 4, AT PAGE 499, AND PHASE 3 MAP RECORDED AUGUST 24, 1976 IN PLAT BOOK 5, AT PAGE 22 CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO 88 39 | DW LEGACY DESIGN® Legacy Design is the defining element of our practice. It is our commitment to an elevated level of design inquiry to arrive at the optimal solutions for clients. The process ensures that our projects reflect the critical issues facing the built environment and that they deliver measurable benefit to clients and communities. It is the foundation of the firm’s workshop culture and guides all projects. www.designworkshop.com 89 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X DYH DYH D S S S S S D D D D D D D D D S D DYH DYH D D D D E E E OSW CO CO COCO COCO CO CO CO CO CO D WV WV WV ICV ICV ICV ICV G ICV ICV D G DOG DYH CO W WV WV FO F ICV E ICV CTV CTV CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V D D ICV T1 T6 T11 T12 T13 T18 T19 T20 T30 T107 T108 T110 T111 T112 T113 T130T131 T134 T136 T141 T147 T148 T150 T151 T152 T176 T178 T179 T182 T183 T184 T194 T195 T196 T198 T213 T214 T215 T241 T242 T243 T250 T251 T265 T266 T276 T294 T295 T296 T300 T305 T306T307 T308 T310 T311 D G G AC D ICV ICV X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X T312* T313* Gant Campus Enhancement Plan 610 S. West End Street, Aspen, Colorado EXISTING SITE SETBACKS PER PREVIOUS APPROVAL AND R15 ZONE DISTRICT DECEMBER 29, 2025NORTH0 ORIGINAL SCALE: 10 20 40 1"=20'-00" DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning · Urban Design · Tourism Planning 22860 Two Rivers Rd #102 · Basalt, Colorado 81621 · 970-925-8354 Facsimile 970-920-1387 BUILDING A BUILDING C BUILDING C BUILDING B BUILDING J BUILDING K CONFERENCE CENTER TENNIS COURTS PARKING PARKING PARKING PARKING BUILDING D BUILDING E BUILDING F BUILDING G BUILDING H PROPERTY BOUNDARY P R O P E R T Y B O U N D A R Y PRO P E R T Y B O U N D A R Y PRO P E R T Y B O U N D A R Y PR O P E R T Y B O U N D A R Y U T E A V E . SO U T H W E S T E N D S T R E E T 5' and 10' Setbacks, Per P&Z Resolution 4, Series of 2013 5' Side Setback, Per P&Z Resolution 4, Series of 2013 10'-0" R-15 Zone District Setback 25'-0" R-15 Zone District Setback 10'-0" R-15 Zone District Setback 90 FO CTV CTV CT V CT V CT V CT V CT V G G AC X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Gant Campus Enhancement Plan 610 S. West End Street, Aspen, Colorado SITE PLAN: SETBACKS SEPTEMBER 25, 2025NORTH0 ORIGINAL SCALE: 10 20 40 1"=20'-00" DESIGN WORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning · Urban Design · Tourism Planning 22860 Two Rivers Rd #102 · Basalt, Colorado 81621 · 970-925-8354 Facsimile 970-920-1387 22 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 0 " 5'-0 " 5'-0 " 2' - 0 " 2'-0" 91 Attachment B Staff Response to Review Criteria Sec. 26.412.060. – Commercial Design Review, Review Criteria. An application for commercial design review may be approved, approved with conditions or denied based on conformance with the following criteria: (a) Guidelines and Standards. (1) The Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Standards and Guidelines are met as determined by the appropriate Commission. The Standards and Guidelines include design review criteria that are to be used to determine whether the application is appropriate. (2) All applicable standards in the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Standards and Guidelines shall be met unless granted a Variation pursuant to Section 26.412.040(d), Variations. (3) Not every guideline will apply to each project, and some balancing of the guidelines must occur on a case-by-case basis. The applicable Commission must: a. Determine that a sufficient number of the relevant guidelines are adequately met in order to approve a project proposal; b. Weigh the applicable guidelines with the practicality of the measure. Staff response: Staff has found that the proposal meets applicable guidelines. Refer to full response below. Staff find the criteria met. Applicable Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Design Standards and Guidelines General - Remodel Standard 1.22 Complete and accurate identification of materials is required. • Provide drawings that identify the palette of materials, specifications for the materials, and location on the proposed building as part of the application. • Physical material samples shall be presented to the review body. An onsite mock-up prior to installation may be required. Staff response: The applicant provided complete and accurate identification of materials. Refer to Attachment A – Application. Staff find Standard 1.22 met. Standard 1.23 Building materials shall have these features: • Convey the quality and range of materials found in the current block context or seen historically in the Character Area. • Convey pedestrian scale. • Enhance visual interest through texture, application, and/or dimension. 92 Attachment B Staff Response to Review Criteria • Be non-reflective. Shiny or glossy materials are not appropriate as a primary material. • Have proven durability and weathering characteristics within Aspen’s climate. • A material with an integral color shall be a neutral color. Some variation is allowed for secondary materials. Staff response: The application proposes a number of materials, including cementitious siding, cementitious plaster, wood, stained timbers, and metal. The materials are not reflective and have proven durability in Aspen’s climate. The Mountain Base character area includes a mix of architectural styles and materials. The mix of materials proposed by the application is appropriate. Staff find Standard 1.23 met. Standard 1.33 All remodel projects shall meet Standards 1.22 and 1.23. Staff response: Refer to Standards 1.22 and 1.23 above. Staff find the criterion met. Mountain Base Building Placement Guideline 6.1 On lots greater than 15,000 square feet, the massing of the building should be broken into smaller volumes. Staff response: The application does not propose any changes to building massing. Staff find the criterion not applicable. Guideline 6.2 Place a building into the topography to minimize visual impacts from downtown and to reinforce a strong relationship to the mountain. • Make mountain access easier when siting a building. • For larger projects, offer pedestrians multiple entry points. • Emphasize horizontal elements to blend the building into the topography. • Step a building up the hillside to minimize visual impacts and allow points of entry to be at natural grade. Staff response: The application does not propose any changes to building location. Staff find the criterion not applicable. Guideline 6.3 Minimize retaining walls. • When retaining walls are necessary, integrate them into the architecture. Staff response: The application does not propose any changes retaining walls. Staff find the criterion not applicable. 93 Attachment B Staff Response to Review Criteria Guideline 6.4 Incorporate open space into building placement and site design. • Create views through the property to the mountain slopes to strengthen mountain connection to the neighborhood and improve the pedestrian experience. Staff response: The application does not propose any changes to open space. Staff find the criterion not applicable. Guideline 6.5 Eclectic and creative approaches to break up building mass and scale is encouraged. • Consider separate buildings on a property, or linked exterior walkways instead of internal corridors. Staff response: The application does not propose any changes to building massing or scale. Staff find the criterion not applicable. Guideline 6.6 Create interest along the street, for instance by providing places for the public to sit. Staff response: The application does not propose any changes the streetscape. Staff find the criterion not applicable. Guideline 6.7 Carefully plan parking areas and loading zones to minimize visual impacts Staff response: There are no meaningful changes to the visual impact of the existing parking area. The parking area is not visible to the street. Staff find the criterion met. Architecture Guideline 6.7 Roof forms should be low pitched to reinforce the mountain character of the neighborhood. • Other roof forms may be considered on a case-by-case basis depending on the context of the block, adjacent historic landmarks, and other restrictions such as viewplanes. • Flat roofs are particularly appropriate to provide upper level decks and for installation of mechanical equipment. Staff response: The application does not propose any changes to roof form. Staff find the criterion not applicable. Details and Materials Guideline 6.8 Easily identifiable architectural details are encouraged. • Character defining details are recommended to engage the pedestrian, to promote variety of architecture, and to aid in wayfinding 94 Attachment B Staff Response to Review Criteria Staff response: The application proposes a range of materials, reflecting the existing character of the Mountain Approach Character Area. Staff find the criterion met. Sec. 26.435.050 – Mountain View plane review Staff response: Per Sec. 26.575.050.c.1.c, Applicability, “[t]his Section shall not limit the ability of development to occur below a view plane. If development on a property is within the lateral extent of a view plane but does not infringe into the view plane, then that development is not subject to the requirements of this Section”. Per Sec. 26.575.050.b.1, “a development "Infringes" (or creates an "Infringement") on a view plane if the height of the development would be above the height at any point at which the view plane angle cuts across the subject property”. The application included a view plane analysis; this analysis shows that existing development on the property does not infringe on the Glory Hole Park view plane. The application does not include any new infringements and is not subject to Mountain View Plane review. Staff find the section not applicable. Sec. 26.445.110 – Planned development, Amendments Amendments to an approved Project Review or to an approved Detailed Review shall be reviewed according to the standards and procedures outline below. Amendments to Planned Unit Development and Specially Planned Area approvals (pre-Ordinance 36, 2013, approvals) shall also proceed according to the standards and procedures outline below and the Community Development Director shall determine the type of procedure most-applicable to the requested amendment. (e) Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review approval. An amendment found by the Community Development Director consistent with a Project Review approval and to be generally consistent with the allowances and limitations of a Detailed Review approval, or which otherwise represents an insubstantial change, but which does not meet the established thresholds for an insubstantial amendment, may be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Historic Preservation Commission as applicable, pursuant to 26.445.040(b)(3) - Step Three. Staff response: The application is consistent with Project Review approval and is generally consistent with the allowance and limitations of Detailed Review approval. 95 Attachment B Staff Response to Review Criteria Sec. 26.445.070 – Planned development, Detailed Review Standards (a) Compliance with Project Review Approval. The proposed development, including all dimensions and uses, is consistent with the Project Review approval and adequately addresses conditions on the approval and direction received during the Project Review. Staff response: The proposed amendment is consistent with Project Review approval. It does not include changes to dimensions or use. Staff find the criterion met. (b) Growth Management. The proposed development has received all required GMQS allotments, or is concurrently seeking allotments. Staff response: The proposed development does not require GMQS allotments. Staff find the criterion not applicable. (c) Site Planning and Landscape Architecture. The site plan is compatible with the context and visual character of the area. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used: (1) The landscape plan exhibits a well-designed treatment of exterior spaces, preserves existing significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate. Vegetation removal, protection, and restoration plans shall be acceptable to the Director of Parks and Open Space. (2) Buildings and site grading provide simple, at-grade entrances and minimize extensive grade changes along building exteriors. The project meets or exceeds the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and applicable requirements for emergency, maintenance, and service vehicle access. Adequate snow storage is accommodated. (3) Energy efficiency or production features are integrated into the landscape in a manner that enhances the site. (4) All site lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. All exterior lighting shall comply with the City's outdoor lighting standards. (5) Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in compliance with Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and shall not negatively impact surrounding properties. 96 Attachment B Staff Response to Review Criteria Staff response: The proposal was referred to the Parks, Engineering, and Building, Departments. Referral comments may be found in Attachment C to the memorandum. Vegetation removal, protection, and restoration plans were reviewed by Parks staff and found to be acceptable, subject to review at permit. There are no changes to building entrances proposed. There are no energy efficiency/production features proposed or changes to site lighting. The Engineering department reviewed the proposal and a drainage plan will be required at building permit. Staff find the criteria met. (d) Design Standards and Architecture. The proposed architectural details emphasize quality construction and design characteristics. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used: (1) The project architecture provides for visual interest and incorporates present- day details and use of materials respectful of the community's past without attempting to mimic history. (2) Exterior materials are of a high quality, durability, and comply with applicable design standards, including those outlined in Chapter 26.410, Residential Design Standards, Chapter 26.412, Commercial Design Standards, and Chapter 26.415, Historic Preservation. (3) Building entrances are sited or designed to minimize icing and snow shedding effects. (4) Energy efficiency or production features are integrated into structures in a manner that enhances the architecture. (5) All structure lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. All exterior lighting shall comply with the City's outdoor lighting standards. Staff response: The proposed changes to exterior materials are of a high quality, durable, and comply with applicable design standards. Staff find that the proposal complies with the Commercial Design Standards; full analysis can be found above. There are no changes proposed to building entrances, energy efficiency or production features, or exterior lighting. Any exterior lighting proposed in the future will meet Chapter 26.512, Outdoor lighting. Staff find the criteria met. 97 Attachment B Staff Response to Review Criteria (e) Common Parks, Open Space, Recreation Areas, or Facilities. If the proposed development includes common parks, open space, recreation areas, or common facilities, a proportionate, undivided interest is deeded in perpetuity to each lot or dwelling unit owner within the Planned Development. An adequate assurance through a Development Agreement for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and shared facilities together with a prohibition against future development is required. Staff response: The proposal does not include any of these areas. Staff find the criterion not applicable. (f) Pedestrian, bicycle & transit facilities. The development improves pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. These facilities and improvements shall be prioritized over vehicular facilities and improvements. Any new vehicular access points minimize impacts on existing pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities. Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of the Project Review and as otherwise required in the Land Use Code. These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of the requirements and to determine any required cost estimating for surety requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents. Staff response: The proposal does not include change to vehicular access points or pedestrian, bicycle, or transit facilities. Staff find the criteria not applicable. (g) Engineering Design Standards. There has been accurate identification of engineering design and mitigation techniques necessary for development of the proposed subdivision to comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of the requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents. Staff response: The application was reviewed by the Engineering Department and found to comply with the intent of the requirements. Additional review will occur at building permit review. Staff find the criteria met. 98 Attachment B Staff Response to Review Criteria (h) Public Infrastructure and Facilities. The proposed Planned Development shall upgrade public infrastructure and facilities necessary to serve the project. Improvements shall be at the sole costs of the developer. Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of the requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents. Staff response: The proposed amendment does not require any upgrades to public infrastructure or facilities. Staff find the criteria met. (i) Phasing of development plan. If phasing of the development plan is proposed, each phase shall be designed to function as a complete development and shall not be reliant on subsequent phases. Phasing shall insulate, to the extent practical, occupants of initial phases from the construction of later phases. All necessary or proportionate improvements to public facilities, payment of impact fees and fees-in-lieu, construction of any facilities to be used jointly by residents of the Planned Development, construction of any required affordable housing, and any mitigation measures shall be completed concurrent or prior to the respective impacts associated with the phase. Staff response: The application does not include phasing. Staff find the criteria not applicable. 99 LPA-25-092 Building Comments Subject: PlanCheck Page Label: 5 Author: justinh File Name: Gant-Land Use Application Submittal-250815_compressed.pdf Color: Review the upcoming State of Colorado Wildfire Codes that will have to be adopted by April of 2026, as these will likely be your requirements for landscaping in regards to fire mitigation unless you submit for building permit before those codes are adopted. All alterations to landscape will have to comply with those codes if they have been adopted and in effect by time of permit submittal. Gant-Land Use Application Submittal-250815_compressed.pdf (5) Subject: PlanCheck Page Label: 6 Author: justinh File Name: Gant-Land Use Application Submittal-250815_compressed.pdf Color: Alterations effecting parking shall comply with section C503.6 for electric vehicle charging infrastructure Subject: PlanCheck Page Label: 7 Author: justinh File Name: Gant-Land Use Application Submittal-250815_compressed.pdf Color: Wood siding either needs to comply with either the currently adopted 2021 IBC Ch 34 requirements as amended by Aspen or the new State Wildfire Resistance codes depending on whether this building permit is applied for before or after April 1, 2026. I am not sure that the SFM 12-7A-1 Fire rating standard you reference here complies. Building permit submittal will need to provide detailing showing compliance with exterior materials for all altered building components. Subject: PlanCheck Page Label: 25 Author: justinh File Name: Gant-Land Use Application Submittal-250815_compressed.pdf Color: Accessibility provisions will need to be met at all renovated pools and spas this includes transfer/access into the pools and also routes to the pool and spa areas. Gates into pool/spa barriers must comply with both accessible reach range and operable part requirements, as well as pool barrier requirements from the ISPSC. SITE PLANNING AND LANDSCAPE 1.1 All projects shall provide a context study. RESPONSE: This application features a context map and land survey to provide an overview of the project context . 1.2 All projects shall respond to the traditional street grid. RESPONSE: No changes to the driveways or streets are proposed . This is not applicable . 1.3 Landscape elements (both hardscape and softscape) should complement the surrounding context, support the street scene, and enhance the architecture of the building. RESPONSE: The project proposes updated landscaping in three areas of the site – the existing pool areas and tennis courts . Landscape materials and location are driven by best management practices for wildfire mitigation . On the interior portions of the site, where the Alpine Garden and relocated pool are proposed, limited areas of synthetic turf are proposed . These are not visible from a public street, in a “No Pets” area, and are included to minimize water usage and support longer term maintenance . Tree and landscape placement is based on Firewise principles, with non-combustible materials in the two-foot Zone 1 (stone, high moisture content perennials, and non-flammable mulch), high moisture content plant materials in the five-foot Zone 2 area (irrigated shrubs and perennials with limited mulch), and Limited high-moisture content deciduous trees in the ten-foot Zone 3 . An anticipated tree removal plan to address these best management practices are included in Exhibit F . Phased tree removals are anticipated and ongoing with standard tree removal permits with the Parks Department . Limited adjustments to landscaping are proposed in the public-facing areas along Ute Ave and S . West End Street . 1.4 Where there is open space on a site, reinforce the traditional transition from public space to semi-public space to private space. RESPONSE: As a lodging property, there is a mix of public and private spaces . The improvements are all to the interior of the site and create semi-private spaces for guests to gather, as well as more public spaces EXHIBIT A: RESPONSES TO TO CD CRITERIACOMMERCIAL, LODGING AND HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES Review the upcoming State of Colorado Wildfire Codes that will have to be adopted by April of 2026, as these will likely be your requirements for landscaping in regards to fire mitigation unless you submit for building permit before those codes are adopted. All alterations to landscape will have to comply with those codes if they have been adopted and in effect by time of permit submittal. PARKING 1.9 Minimize the visual impacts of parking. RESPONSE: The property includes an existing central parking area, located adjacent to the current tennis courts . The tennis courts are proposed to be removed and replaced with an updated pool and lawn area . This is smaller in size than the existing tennis courts, providing an opportunity for ten (10) new parking spaces . These new spaces are proposed to be interior to the property, created from a reorientation to the current parking configuration, and will be screened from view of the pool through landscaping and a fence with climbing vines (a green wall) . This is proposed to be 8 feet in height (the existing tennis court fence is 10 feet high) . The inclusion of native shrubs and trees will provide a minimized view of these parking spaces from the property premises, and for people coming into the Gant . BUILDING MASS, HEIGHT, AND SCALE 1.10 A new building should appear similar in scale and proportion with buildings on the block. 1.11 A minimum building height difference of 2 feet from immediately adjacent buildings is required. 1.12 On lots larger than 6,000 square feet, break up building mass into smaller modules. 1.13 Development adjacent to a historic landmark should respond to the historic resource. RESPONSE: No additional buildings will be constructed as part of this project proposal . These criteria are not applicable . STREET LEVEL DESIGN 1.14 Commercial entrances shall be at the sidewalk level and oriented to the street. 1.15 Incorporate an internal airlock or air curtain into first floor commercial space. 1.16 Entries that are significantly taller or shorter than those seen historically or that conflict with the established scale are highly discouraged. 1.17 ATMs and vending machines visible from the street are prohibited. Alterations effecting parking shall comply with section C503.6 for electric vehicle charging infrastructure MATERIALS AND DETAILS 1.22 Complete and accurate identification of materials is required. RESPONSE: The Architectural Plans (Exhibit G and H) include a material sheet that shows the proposed materials . The proposed materials include : •Cementitious Siding (such as GFRC, Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete) •Exterior cementitious plaster •Exterior wood siding (WUI Compliant with SFM 12-7A-1 Fire Rating) •Metal window and door trim, and railings •Pavers for the building’s exterior elevated walking surfaces Renderings and an example elevation are also provided to show where these materials will be applied to the buildings . 1.23 Building materials shall have these features: •Convey the quality and range of materials found in the current block context or seen historically in the Character Area. •Convey pedestrian scale. •Enhance visual interest through texture, application, and/or dimension. •Be non-reflective. Shiny or glossy materials are not appropriate as a primary material. •Have proven durability and weathering characteristics within Aspen’s climate. •A material with an integral color shall be a neutral color. Some variation is allowed for secondary materials. RESPONSE: The building is currently all wood from the original construction, which has reached the end of its useful life and is less wildfire resistant than newer materials . The updated design introduces thermally modified wood in key visual areas such as gable edges and gable conditions to preserve the mountain character and ensure continuity with existing aesthetics . To enhance durability while maintaining a textured and crafted appearance, cementitious (GFRC) siding will be used as the primary material, allowing for articulated surface expression . Wood railings will be replaced with metal railings, designed to complement the building’s overall palette while providing a refined, low-maintenance detail . The new building materials will align with the current neighborhood block context for the Character Area . Wood siding either needs to comply with either the currently adopted 2021 IBC Ch 34 requirements as amended by Aspen or the new State Wildfire Resistance codes depending on whether this building permit is applied for before or after April 1, 2026. I am not sure that the SFM 12-7A-1 Fire rating standard you reference here complies. Building permit submittal will need to provide detailing showing compliance with exterior materials for all altered building components. EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E EX - U E T T T T E X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X SPA SPA PA PA PA PARKING FIRE FEATURE Accessibility provisions will need to be met at all renovated pools and spas this includes transfer/access into the pools and also routes to the pool and spa areas. Gates into pool/spa barriers must comply with both accessible reach range and operable part requirements, as well as pool barrier requirements from the ISPSC. 100 Subject: PlanCheck Page Label: 25 Author: justinh File Name: Gant-Land Use Application Submittal-250815_compressed.pdf Color: RREMP mitigation applies to pools, spas, and outdoor fireplaces/firepits. A completed RREMP worksheet will be required to be provided at permit submittal. EX-UE RREMP mitigation applies to pools, spas, and outdoor fireplaces/firepits. A completed RREMP worksheet will be required to be provided at permit submittal. 101 Memorandum TO: Sophie Varga, Sophie.varga@aspen.gov Community Development Department FROM: Kyla Smits, kyla.smits@aspen.gov Engineering Department DATE: September 29, 2025 SUBJECT: Engineering Department Referral Comments PROJECT: LPA-25-092, 610 S West End St., The Gant Remodel COMMENTS: These comments are not intended to be exhaustive, but an initial response to the Land Use application submitted for review. Other requirements may be requested at time of permit. 1. The water easements should be formalized in an easement agreement with easement extents reflecting as-built conditions of the water mains and the fire hydrants. 2. Water features are not permitted as of January 1, 2022, on any City of Aspen Water utility accounts. 3. A drainage plan will be required at building permit. The drainage plan must show how the new exterior areas will be accommodated in the existing drainage system. 102 Memorandum To: Sophie Varga Zoning Administrator Community Development Department From: Joseph Pewitt, joseph.pewitt@aspen.gov Permit Coordinator Parks & Open Space Date: September 30, 2025 Subject: Parks Department Referral Comments Project: LPA-25-092, The Gant Remodel These comments are not intended to be exhaustive, but an initial response to the project conceptual packet submitted for the purpose of the Gant Remodel, Commercial Design Review. Other requirements may be requested at time of permit. Comments: 1. Please reference Municipal Code Section 13.20.020(d)(5) and the City of Aspen Wildfire Mitigation Policy. a. At present, this policy is intended for stand-alone tree permits for existing structures in the City. b. A property owner intending to remove trees for fire mitigation purposes shall follow the steps as outlined in the Wildfire Mitigation Policy prior to permit submittal. 2. Clarify Tree Removal Plan and phased tree removal approach. a. Permit 0125-2024-TREE, issued 8/30/2024, provided the approval for the removal of forty-five (45) trees throughout the Gant Campus. i. Please ensure any duplicate notations for trees permitted and removed are reconciled prior to permit. b. All fifty-seven (57) tree removals are not reflected in the Tree Removal Plan. i. Designate all trees proposed for removal in the Tree Removal Plan. ii. Thirty-five (35) trees are designated for removal with twenty-two (22) additional trees illustrated for removal that are unlisted. iii. Clarify T4, T5, T9, T11, T29, T111, T131, T147, T148, T149, T153, T157, T194, T195, T200, T209, T263, T265, T266, T274, T295, and T296. iv. T29 is situated upon City property within South West End Street. v. Correct tree removal list for applicability per 13.20.020(a) prior to permit. 103 3. Provide tree #’s anticipated for removal where wildfire is identified as a basis for a removal permit related to the present remodel. 4. Provide tree #’s anticipated for removal to address tree health/condition. 5. Provide tree #’s anticipated for removal for the construction of structures or other improvements related to the present remodel. 6. Reference 2025 Colorado Wildfire Resiliency Code for defensible space considerations. a. Section 502.1 Structure Ignition Zone 1 (0 - 5 feet): Immediate Zone. i. There shall be no planting of new trees in the immediate zone. ii. Exception: Ignition-resistant plantings, per an approved list that is not less than that created by the Colorado State Forest Service, are allowed in the Immediate Zone. iii. Mature trees of no less than 10-inch diameter at 4.5 feet above ground level may be maintained. iv. Tree crowns extending to within 10 feet of any structure shall be pruned to maintain a minimum clearance of 10 feet. b. Section 503.2 Structure Ignition Zone 2 (5 – 30 feet): Intermediate Zone i. Tree crowns extending to within 10 feet of any structure shall be pruned to maintain a minimum clearance of 10 feet. ii. Prune tree branches to a height of 6-10 feet from the ground of a third of the total height of the tree, whichever is less. iii. Tree crowns within this zone shall be spaced to prevent structure ignition and promote fuel discontinuity to limit fire spread. 104 Parks and Open Space Building Permit Application Requirements: 1. Permit documents shall include accurate tree surveys for all sites dated within one -year identifying locations of all trees four (4) inches or over identified by trunk diameter and species; three (3) inches or over for native species as defined by Ch.13.20 .020(a). 2. Permit documents shall include tree removal plans, site specific tree protection and preservation plans, tree mitigation plans, and irrigation plans. All Critical Root Zones to be protected and preserved shall be accurately illustrated to scale on all plan sheets with 1” of surveyed tree diameter at breast height equaling 1’ in radius of required Tree Protection Zone. The protection and preservation plans shall indicate the location of all protective zones and methodology for approval by the City Forester and prohibit excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfills, storage of equipment, and access over or through the zone(s) by foot or vehicle. 3. Permit documents shall include, and note, any proposed grade changes within critical root zones of trees to be protected and preserved during site disruption. 4. Permit documents shall include the location of all site improvements including subsurface improvements such as utilities, irrigation infrastructure, or foundation work. 5. Tree Protection Zones shall be erected at the limits of Critical Root Zones to be protected and preserved throughout construction until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for all proposed sites unless otherwise approved by the City Forester. 6. Protection areas shall be established on site to protect existing natural resources as appropriate, including trees not included in the definition set forth in 13.20.020(a). 7. A Development-Related Tree Removal / Critical Root Zone Excavation Permit shall be submitted, reviewed, and issued by the City Forester upon completion of Parks & Open Space building permit application review. 8. Tree Removal Permit issuance and Parks initial inspection are required prior to activity occurring on site. Mitigation for removals must be met by the replacement of trees on site, paying cash-in-lieu fees, or a combination of both, pursuant to Chapter 13.20 of the City Municipal Code. The applicant shall explore potential planting sites around the property to allow sustainable planting and full maturation of all trees planted. 105 Page 1 of 7 STAFF REPORT TO: City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Jeffrey Barnhill, AICP, Principal Planner THROUGH: Daniel Folke, AICP, Planning Director MEETING DATE: Wednesday, January 7, 2026 SUBJECT: Resolution #02, Series of 2026 | 10 Club Circle – Maroon Creek Club – Minor Planned Development Amendment to a Detailed Review Approval and Commercial Design Standards Review __________________________________________________________________ INTENDED OUTCOME: The request of the Planning and Zoning Commission is to consider the following land use code review processes for changes to the Maroon Creek Club Clubhouse area: • Planned Development | Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review Approval (Land Use Code Section 26.445.110) – Detailed Review focuses on finalizing the detailed aspects of the project within the parameters established during Project Review. Detailed Review specifically focuses on landscaping, materials, and lighting. • Commercial Design Review (Land Use Code Section 26.412) – Commercial Design Review ensures appropriate building design to create walkable neighborhoods and support Aspen’s unique heritage. The review standards do not prescribe architectural style, but do require that certain building elements contribute to the streetscape and neighborhood character. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Applicant proposes to reconfigure interior space to provide for previously undocumented elements that count towards the floor area on site , memorialize changes to the roof of the outdoor dining terrace, and redesign the gym expansion on site. Staff finds that all applicable criteria have been met and recommends that the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission approve Resolution #02, Series of 2026. 106 Page 2 of 7 DISCUSSION: Background: The Maroon Creek Club was initially approved under Pitkin County Resolution No. 111 - 91 granting detailed approval and Resolution No. 93-104 granting final plat approval. Eventually the project was annexed into the City of Aspen via Ordinances No. 33 , 34, and 40, Series of 1996. Since being annexed into the City, the Maroon Creek Club has pursued several land use cases and approvals from the City of Aspen, most recently in 2024 and earlier in 2025. The applicant team provides an excellent background on the entire project history in the application packet. The 2024 approvals recognized the ability for the club building to be expanded by 8,319 square feet. The scope of work for that expansion included: a covered terrace, covered fitness area, a covered event space south of the clubhouse near the pool, the gym expansion, the guest services kitchen expansion, and the addition of observation decks for the tennis courts. These improvements utilized the entire allowable floor area on site. The 2025 approvals were for Insubstantial Planned Development and Commercial Design Reviews via a Notice of Approval (Reception #709090). These approvals revolved around changing two tennis courts into Padel courts, changes to the trellis area, and a reconfiguration of the kitchen. The applicant requests the ability to amend the previous approvals to reconfigure the floor area to address areas that were not included in the previous floor area calculations and to allow for the redesign of the gym expansion. Additionally, the applicant wishes to memorialize the changes to the roof of the outdoor dining terrace canopy. Staff determined that these changes could not be approved administratively which pushed the proposal to Planning and Zoning Commission approval. Project Summary: The project involves several changes from the original 2024 approvals. The restaurant dining trellis will be increased by 112 sq. ft., the guest services kitchen will be reduced by 352 sq. ft., the covered fitness area will be reduced by 156 sq. ft., the gym will be expanded by 104 sq. ft., the elevator lobby will account for 136 sq. ft., and the pool vault will account for 106 sq. ft. of floor area. Table 1 illustrates the originally approved floor areas and the proposed floor areas of each section of the structure. There is no net gain in floor area. 107 Page 3 of 7 Table 1: Previously Approved Floor Areas to Proposed Floor Areas The original approvals did not account for both the mechanical vault and the elevator lobby in the floor area measurements. This has caused the need for the applicant to reconfigure spaces to accommodate these changes. Exhibit 1 shows the mechanical vault and elevator lobby locations. Exhibit 1: Mechanical Vault and Elevator Lobby locations The biggest departure from the initial approvals is the significant redesign of the gym area. Exhibit 2 conveys the changes from the approved plans to the proposed plans. 108 Page 4 of 7 The applicant proposes to shift the gym expansion into a more contemporary aesthetic. The sloped atrium roof is replaced with the flat roof with support beams (Exhibit 2). Additionally, the applicant proposes to memorialize the changes to the roof design of the outdoor dining trellis (Exhibit 3). Exhibit 2: Approved and Proposed Elevation Renderings (larger rendering included as attachment) Exhibit 3: Dining Trellis Roof Changes Staff Comments: Planned Development | Detailed Review (Exhibit A) Memorializing details such as building design, materials, height, bulk, mass, density, parking, landscaping, lighting, and street layout will aid in maximizing the use of the site. Adopting a Planned Development overlay clarifies these details upfront. Project Review is intended to establish the allowed dimensions of a property and ensure site planning is compatible with the context of the area. Detailed review is intended to 109 Page 5 of 7 perfect and finalize the detailed aspects of the project within the parameters established during Project Review. As mentioned previously, this review is simply for the Detailed Review Criteria. It is important to note that staff found that all the criteria were either met or not applicable for the proposed project. The proposed project is compliant with the overall Project Review Approval. The dimensions and uses were clarified for this project under Planning and Zoning Commission #09, Series of 2024. This approval clarified the remaining expansion rights of the building (8,319 sq. ft.). The proposed project stays fully within those project limitations. The scope of the project is to include a pool vault and elevator lobby area that were not included as floor area in the original 2024 approvals as well as change the design of the gym area. The proposed project does not require any additional GMQS allotments nor is it concurrently seeking allotments. The proposed project design affects hard-scape patio areas without existing vegetation. There are no changes to site layout, parking, or snow-storage areas. The project currently meets ADA requirements, and this will not change because of this application. Energy production facilities are mounted on the building and not into the landscaping. All site lighting shall meet City of Aspen requirements at building permit submittal. Exhibit 4: Approved to Proposed Elevation Renderings 110 Page 6 of 7 The building incorporates design characteristics that are consistent and compatible with the rest of the structure. The materials are seen throughout the current design and they are incorporated to provide more visual appeal. As shown in Exhibit B – Commercial Design Standards Staff Responses, the gym addition utilizes materials seen throughout the existing structure. These materials are of a high quality, durability, and comply with those design standards. The materials have a proven durability in Aspen’s climate and the materials consist of timber columns, horizontal wood siding, metal framed windows, metal flashing, stone veneer walls, and concrete hardscape. The building entrances remain the same as existing and the roof is a flat roof that will not shed snow/ice. Energy efficiency and production features currently exist on the current building and were approved under a previous Planning and Zoning Commission approval. These elements are not proposed to change. All exterior lighting shall comply with the City of Aspen’s outdoor lighting standards. Commercial Design Review (Exhibit B) All of the Commercial Design Review Standards were either fully met or not applicable for the scope of this project. The Maroon Creek Club Clubhouse (10 Club Circle) is located outside of the roundabout and is bounded by Burlingame, Buttermilk Mountain, and the Private Maroon Creek Club Golf Course. The adjacent development is a mix of ski area, affordable housing, and c onservation/open space. The applicant completely and accurately identified the materials to be used in this project. Materials consist of timber columns, metal flashing, metal framed windows, standing seam metal roof, horizontal wood siding, stone walls, concrete hardscape, and b ronze metal. Exhibit 5: Proposed Materials 111 Page 7 of 7 The building materials convey the quality and range of the materials found in the current block context and the overall context of the Maroon Creek Club and Clubhouse building. The building provides a pedestrian scale by breaking up of roof pitches and massing. Although the building is two stories, the breakup of the massing and the size of the windows portray an appropriate pedestrian scale. The building does not utilize shiny or glossy materials. The materials have proven durability and weathering characteristics within Aspen’s climate. Referral Comments: This project was referred to the Engineering and Zoning Departments. The Zoning Department had no comments or concerns about the proposed project. Engineering had one comment for the proposed project. Engineering: 1. All drywells must be a minimum of ten feet away from any water main or valve or provide blueboard insulation equivalent to that separation distance. As part of the Resolution review, the Planning and Zoning Commission may remove or alter any of these proposed conditions or add/remove additional conditions. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve Resolution #02, Series of 2026. Proposed Motion: “I move to adopt Ordinance #15, Series of 2025.” ATTACHMENTS: Resolution #02, Series of 2026 Attachment A – Planned Development Detailed Review Standard Staff Responses Attachment B – Commercial Design Review Standard Staff Responses Attachment C – Application 112 P&Z Resolution #02, Series of 2026 Page 1 of 5 RESOLUTION #02 (SERIES OF 2026) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DETAILED REVIEW AMENDMENT AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW, FOR THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 10 CLUB CIRCLE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: LOT 51, MAROON CREEK CLUB, ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT AND PUD FOR MAROON CREEK CLUB, RECORDED NOVEMBER 15, 1993 IN PLAT BOOK 33 AT PAGE 4 AND AS PARTIALLY CORRECTED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED MARCH 31, 1994 IN PLAT BOOK 34 AT PAGE 23 AND MAP RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1996 IN PLAT BOOK 40 AT PAGE 61 AND FURTHER AMENDED BY HARMONY ROAD PLAT RECORDED AUGUST 9, 2002 IN PLAT BOOK 61 AT PAGE 89, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2735-023-09-051 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the Maroon Creek, LLC, 10 Club Circle, Aspen, CO 81611 (Applicant), represented by Chris Bendon, BendonAdams, 300 S Spring Street Suite 202, Aspen, CO 81611 requesting approval for the following land use review approvals: • Planned Development – Detailed Review pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.445; and, • Commercial Design Review pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.412 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards; and, WHEREAS, the Engineering Department and Zoning Department provided referral comments to the Community Development Department; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, reviewed, and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director and took and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on January 7th, 2026; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets the applicable review criteria, and that approval of the request is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission approves Resolution #02, Series of 2026, by a ___ to ___ (___-___) vote, approving the request for a Minor Planned Development- Detailed Review Amendment and Commercial Design Review. 113 P&Z Resolution #02, Series of 2026 Page 2 of 5 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVES THE FOLLOWING: Section 1: Minor Planned Development Amendment to a Detailed Review Approval, Amendment to Final Commercial Design Review Approval The Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a Minor Amendment to Detailed Review and an Amendment to Final Commercial Design Review for the following: • Memorialization of the floor area reconfigurations to include the elevator lobby and pool vault and the other elements in the table below. • Memorialization of the dining trellis roof changes. • Redesign of the gym expansion. Section 2: Engineering Department Conditions of Approval 1. All drywells must be a minimum of ten feet away from any water main or valve or provide blueboard insulation equivalent to that separation distance. Section 3: Vested Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a vested property right attaching to and running with the Property for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property right. Section 4: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such site development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 5: Existing Litigation This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Dining Trellis Observation Bridges Guest Services Kitchen Covered Fitness Area Gym Expansion Event Space Elevator Lobby Pool Vault Total Expansion Proposed Floor Area (sq. ft.) 1,511 1,846 652 450 2,538 1,080 136 106 8,319 Changes of a technical nature (as determined by the Community Development Department) may be made during the building permit review process. 114 P&Z Resolution #02, Series of 2026 Page 3 of 5 Section 6: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED by the Commission at its meeting on January 7th, 2026. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: ___________________________ ___________________________ James R. True, Special Counsel Teraissa McGovern, Chair ATTEST: ____________________________ Tracy Terry, Deputy Clerk Attachments: Exhibit A: Approved Plans 115 P&Z Resolution #02, Series of 2026 Page 4 of 5 Exhibit A: Approved Plans 116 P&Z Resolution #02, Series of 2026 Page 5 of 5 117 Exhibit A Detailed Review Standards Review Criteria Staff Findings 10 Club Circle – Maroon Creek Club Planning and Zoning Commission Page 1 of 5 Sec. 26.445.070. - Detailed Review Standards. Detailed Review shall focus on the comprehensive evaluation of the specific aspects of the development, including utility placement, and architectural materials. In the review of a development application for Detailed Review, the Planning and Zoning Commission, or the Historic Preservation Commission as applicable, shall consider the following: (a) Compliance with Project Review Approval. The proposed development, including all dimensions and uses, is consistent with the Project Review approval and adequately addresses conditions on the approval and direction received during the Project Review. Staff Response: The proposed project is compliant with the overall Project Review Approval. The dimensions and uses were clarified for this project under Planning and Zoning Commission #09, Series of 2024. This approval clarified the remaining expansion rights of the building (8,319 sq. ft.). The proposed project stays within those project limitations. The scope of the project is to include a pool vault and elevator lobby area that were not included as floor area in the original 2024 approvals as well as change the design of the gym area. Staff finds this criterion is met. (b) Growth Management. The proposed development has received all required GMQS allotments or is concurrently seeking allotments. Staff Response: The proposed project does not require any additional GMQS allotments nor is it concurrently seeking allotments. Staff finds this criterion is met. (c) Site Planning and Landscape Architecture. The site plan is compatible with the context and visual character of the area. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used. (1) The landscape plan exhibits a well-designed treatment of exterior spaces, preserves significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate. Vegetation removal, protection, and restoration plans shall be acceptable to the Director of Parks and Open Space. (2) Buildings and site grading provide simple, at-grade entrances and minimize extensive grade changes along building exterior. The project meets or exceeds the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and applicable requirements for emergency, maintenance, and service vehicle access. Adequate snow storage is accommodated. (3) Energy efficiency or production features are integrated into the landscape in a manner that enhances the site. 118 Exhibit A Detailed Review Standards Review Criteria Staff Findings 10 Club Circle – Maroon Creek Club Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 of 5 (4) All site lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. All exterior lighting shall comply with the City’s outdoor lighting standards. (5) Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in compliance with Title 29 – Engineering Desing Standards and shall not negatively impact surrounding properties. Staff Response: The proposed project design affects hard-scape patio areas without existing vegetation. There are no changes to site layout, parking, or snow-storage areas. The project currently meets ADA requirements, and this will not change because of this application. Energy production facilities are mounted on the building and not into the landscaping. All site lighting shall meet City of Aspen requirements at building permit submittal. Staff finds these criteria are met. (d) Design Standards and Architecture. The proposed architectural details emphasize quality construction and design characteristics. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used. (1) The project architecture provides for visual interest and incorporates present-day details and use of materials respectful of the community’s past without attempting to mimic history. (2) Exterior materials are of a high quality, durability, and comply with applicable design standards, including those outlined in Chapter 26.410, Residential Design Standards, Chapter 26.412, Commercial Design Standards, and Chapter 26.415, Historic Preservation. (3) Building entrances are sited or designed to minimize icing and snow shedding effects. (4) Energy efficiency or production features are integrated into structures in a manner that enhances the architecture. (5) All structure lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. All exterior lighting shall comply with the City’s outdoor lighting standards. Staff Response: The building incorporates design characteristics that are consistent and compatible with the rest of the structure. The materials are seen throughout the current design and they are incorporated to provide more visual appeal. 119 Exhibit A Detailed Review Standards Review Criteria Staff Findings 10 Club Circle – Maroon Creek Club Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 of 5 As shown in Exhibit B – Commercial Design Standards Staff Responses, the gym addition utilizes materials seen throughout the existing structure. These materials are of a high quality, durability, and comply with those design standards. The materials have a proven durability in Aspen’s climate and the materials consist of timber columns, horizontal wood siding, metal framed windows, metal flashing, stone veneer walls, and concrete hardscape. The building entrances remain the same as existing and the roof is a flat roof that will not shed snow/ice. Energy efficiency and production features currently exist on the current building and were approved under a previous Planning and Zoning Commission approval. These elements are not proposed to change. All exterior lighting shall comply with the City of Aspen’s outdoor lighting standards. 120 Exhibit A Detailed Review Standards Review Criteria Staff Findings 10 Club Circle – Maroon Creek Club Planning and Zoning Commission Page 4 of 5 (e) Common Parks, Open Space, Recreation Areas, or Facilities. If the proposed development includes common parks, open space, recreation areas, or common facilities, a proportionate, undivided interest is deeded in perpetuity to each lot or dwelling unit owner within the Planned Development. An adequate assurance through a Development Agreement for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and shared facilities together with a prohibition against future development is required. Staff Response: The proposed development does not include common parks, recreation areas, or common facilities; however, the development includes common open space. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. (f) Pedestrian, bicycle & transit facilities. The development improves pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. These facilities and improvements shall be prioritized over vehicular facilities and improvements. Any new vehicular access points minimize impacts on existing pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities. Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of the Project Review and as otherwise required in the Land Use Code. These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of the requirements and to determine any required cost estimating for surety requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents. Staff Response: The size of the facility is not changing from what was approved in 2024. There are no changes to transportation demands because there is not increase in floor area with the proposed project. As previously mentioned the main scope of the project is to include the pool vault and elevator lobby in the floor area measurements, and change the design of the gym area. Staff finds this criterion is met. (g) Engineering Design Standards. There has been accurate identification of engineering design and mitigation techniques necessary for development of the proposed subdivision to comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of the requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents. Staff Response: The expansion was previously approved, this proposal changes a few items not associated with the Engineering Design Standards and URMP. The project will still have to fully comply with those criteria as set out by the Engineering Department at building permit. Staff finds this criterion is met. (h) Public Infrastructure and Facilities. The proposed Planned Development shall upgrade 121 Exhibit A Detailed Review Standards Review Criteria Staff Findings 10 Club Circle – Maroon Creek Club Planning and Zoning Commission Page 5 of 5 public infrastructure and facilities necessary to serve the project. Improvements shall be at the sole costs of the developer. Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of the requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents. Staff Response: There are currently no plans to update public infrastructure and facilities at this time; however, if there is a need to update these items, they will be at the sole cost of the developer. Staff finds this criterion is met. (i) Phasing of development plan. If phasing of the development plan is proposed, each phase shall be designed to function as a complete development and shall not be reliant on subsequent phases. Phasing shall insulate, to the extent practical, occupants of initial phases from the construction of later phases. All necessary or proportionate improvements to public facilities, payment of impact fees and fees-in-lieu, construction of any facilities to be used jointly by residents of the Planned Development, construction of any required affordable housing, and any mitigation measures shall be completed concurrent or prior to the respective impacts associated with the phase. Staff Response: Phasing of this development is not proposed. Staff finds this criterion not applicable. 122 Exhibit B Commercial Design Review Review Criteria Staff Findings 10 Club Circle – Maroon Creek Club Planning and Zoning Commission Page 1 of 6 Section 26.412.060 – Commercial Design Review Criteria All projects are required to be consistent with the Commercial, Lodging and Historic Design Standards and Guidelines. This section addresses the Standards and Guidelines and their applicability to the proposed development. General - Site Planning and Streetscape Standard 1.1 All projects shall provide a context study. Staff Response: The Maroon Creek Club Clubhouse (10 Club Circle) is located outside of the roundabout and is bounded by Burlingame, Buttermilk Mountain, and the Private Maroon Creek Club Golf Course. The adjacent development is a mix of ski area, affordable housing, and conservation/open space land. Staff finds this criterion is met. Standard 1.2 All projects shall respond to the traditional street grid. Staff Response: The Maroon Creek Club does not respond to the traditional street grid as it is located outside of the roundabout where the street grid is nonexistent. The development currently exists and is located off of Harmony and Stage Road. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. Guideline 1.3 Landscape elements (both hardscape and softscape) should complement the surrounding context, support the street scene, and enhance the architecture of the building. Staff Response: The landscape elements proposed in this application complement the surrounding context, support the street scene, and enhance the architecture of the building. Trees, shrubs, native grasses, and ornamental landscape treatments are already incorporated into the design. The rest of the proposed project does not affect the landscape elements. These include: fenestration, material, and floor area changes. Staff finds this criterion is met. Guideline 1.4 Where there is open space on a site, reinforce the traditional transition from public space, to semi-public space to private space. Staff Response: Open space elements are not materially changing with this proposal. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. Guideline 1.5 Maintain alignment of building facades where appropriate. Staff Response: Building facades remain aligned where appropriate with the proposed design. Staff finds this criterion is met. Guideline 1.6 When a building façade is set back, define the property line. Review the context of the block when selecting an appropriate technique. Staff Response: The Planned Development currently has defined property lines. These are not changing as a result of the proposed project. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. General – Alleyways 123 Exhibit B Commercial Design Review Review Criteria Staff Findings 10 Club Circle – Maroon Creek Club Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 of 6 Guideline 1.7 Develop alley facades to create visual interest. Staff Response: This property has no alleyways. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. Guideline 1.8 Consider small alley commercial spaces, especially on corner lots or lots with midblock access from the street. Staff Response: This property has no alleyways. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. General – Parking Standard 1.9 Minimize the visual impacts of parking. Staff Response: There are no changes to the parking configuration in the proposal. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. General – Building Mass, Height, and Scale Guideline 1.10 A new building should appear similar in scale and proportion with buildings on the block. Staff Response: There are no new buildings proposed. Staff finds this criterion not applicable. Standard 1.11 A Minimum building height difference of 2 feet from immediately adjacent buildings is required. Staff Response: There are no buildings immediately adjacent to the Maroon Creek Club Clubhouse building. Staff finds this criterion not applicable. Guideline 1.12 On lots larger than 6,000 square feet, break up building mass into smaller modules. Staff Response: The architecture is broken up into different planes and articulation elements. The proposed gym adds to the articulation of the structure into smaller “modules”. Staff finds this criterion is met. Guideline 1.13 Development adjacent to a historic landmark should respond to the historic resource. Staff Response: This property is not adjacent to any historic landmarks. Staff finds this criterion not applicable. General – Street Level Design Standard 1.14 Commercial entrances shall be at the sidewalk level and oriented to the street. Staff Response: Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. Standard 1.15 Incorporate an internal airlock or air curtain into first floor commercial space. Staff Response: Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. 124 Exhibit B Commercial Design Review Review Criteria Staff Findings 10 Club Circle – Maroon Creek Club Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 of 6 Guideline 1.16 Entries that are significantly taller or shorter than those seen historically or that conflict with the established scale are highly discouraged. Staff Response: Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. Standard 1.17 ATMs and vending machines visible from the street are prohibited. Staff Response: ATMs and vending machines are not proposed in this application. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. General – Roofscape Guideline 1.18 The roofscape should be designed with the same attention as the elevations of the building. Staff Response: The proposed project does not include any mechanical equipment, etc… on the roofscape. The proposed project incorporates a flat roof in design. Staff finds this criterion is met. Guideline 1.19 Use materials that complement the design of the building façade. Staff Response: There are no roofscape improvements proposed in this project. Staff finds this criterion is met. Guideline 1.20 Incorporate green roofs and low landscape elements into rooftop design where feasible. Staff Response: Green roofs and low landscape elements are not planned on the rooftop. There are no other green roofs/low landscape elements found on this structure. Staff finds this criterion not applicable. Guideline 1.21 Minimize visibility of rooftop railings. Staff Response: There are no proposed rooftop railings in this application. Staff finds this criterion not applicable. General – Materials and Details Standard 1.22 Complete and accurate identification of materials is required. Staff Response: The applicant completely and accurately identified the materials to be used in this project. Materials consist of timber columns, metal flashing, metal framed windows, standing seam metal roof, horizontal wood siding, stone walls, concrete hardscape, and bronze metal. These materials have a proven durability in cold-weather climates. Staff finds this criterion is met. Standard 1.23 Building Materials shall have these features: • Convey the quality and range of materials found in the current block context or seen historically in the Character Area. 125 Exhibit B Commercial Design Review Review Criteria Staff Findings 10 Club Circle – Maroon Creek Club Planning and Zoning Commission Page 4 of 6 • Convey pedestrian scale. • Enhance visual interest through texture, application, and/or dimension. • Be non-reflective. Shiny or glossy materials are not appropriate as a primary material. • Have proven durability and weathering characteristics within Aspen’s climate. • A material with an integral color shall be a neutral color. Some variation is allowed for secondary materials. Staff Response: The building materials convey the quality and range of the materials found in the current block context and the overall context of the Maroon Creek Club and Clubhouse building. The building provides a pedestrian scale by breaking up of roof pitches and massing. Although the building is two stories, the breakup of the massing and the size of the windows portray an appropriate pedestrian scale. The building does not utilize shiny or glossy materials. The materials have proven durability and weathering characteristics within Aspen’s climate. Staff finds this criterion is met. Guideline 1.24 Introducing a new material, material application, or material finish to the existing streetscape may be approved by HPC or P&Z if the following criteria are met: • Innovative building design. • Creative material application that positively contributes to the streetscape • Environmentally sustainable building practice. • Proven durability. Staff Response: The building does not introduce a new material, material application, or material finish to the existing streetscape. All of the materials chosen currently exist in some fashion on the existing building. Staff finds this criterion not applicable. Standard 1.25 Architecture that reflects corporate branding of the tenant is not permitted. Staff Response: The proposed development does not reflect corporate branding of the tenant. Staff finds this criterion is met. General – Lighting, Service and Mechanical Areas Guideline 1.26 The design of light fixtures should be appropriate to the form, materials, scale, and style of the building. Staff Response: No new light fixtures are planned around the expansion areas. Staff finds this criterion is met. Standard 1.27 Trash and recycle service areas shall be co-located along an alleyway where one exists, and screened from view with a fence or door. 126 Exhibit B Commercial Design Review Review Criteria Staff Findings 10 Club Circle – Maroon Creek Club Planning and Zoning Commission Page 5 of 6 Staff Response: There is adequate trash and recycling service on site, this is not changing with the proposal. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. Guideline 1.28 Design trash and recycle areas thoughtfully and within the style of the building, with the goal of enhancing pedestrian and commercial uses along alleys. Staff Response: There is no alleyway on this site. Staff finds this criterion not applicable. Standard 1.29 Delivery areas shall be located along an alleyway where one exists. Staff Response: Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. Standard 1.30 Mechanical equipment, ducts, and vents shall be accommodated internally within the building and/or co-located on the roof. Staff Response: There are no visible utilities or mechanical equipment in the proposed expansion elements. Staff finds this criterion met. Guideline 1.31 Minimize the visual impacts of utility connections and service boxes. Staff Response: The utility connections and service boxes are not changing with the proposal. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. Standard 1.32 Transformer location and size are dictated by City and utility company standards and codes. Staff Response: Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. General – Remodel Standard 1.33 All remodel projects shall meet Standards 1.22 and 1.23. Staff Response: The proposed remodel project meets the Standards 1.22 and 1.23 as shown above in this document. Staff finds this criterion is met. Guideline 1.34 Consider updating windows, doors, and/or primary entrances to better relate to the Character Area and pedestrian experience. Staff Response: The proposed gym redesign incorporates an updated design to fit a more modern aesthetic. The increased window sizes on the top floor convey a sense of demarcation between the upper and lower floor in relation to the pedestrian experience. Staff finds this criterion is met. Guideline 1.35 Design alterations to relate to the existing building style and form that may remain. Staff Response: Similar materials as found on the existing building are utilized in this new design. Staff finds this criterion is met. 127 Exhibit B Commercial Design Review Review Criteria Staff Findings 10 Club Circle – Maroon Creek Club Planning and Zoning Commission Page 6 of 6 Guideline 1.36 Incorporate elements that define the property line in accordance with Guideline 1.6. Staff Response: Staff finds this criterion not applicable. Guideline 1.37 Creative solutions that incorporate ADA compliance into the architecture are encouraged. • Minimize the appearance of ramps by exploring other on-site options such as altering interior floor levels or exterior grade. Staff Response: The existing building conforms with ADA standards as built. The proposed project does not change that aspect of the building. Staff finds this criterion is met. 128