HomeMy WebLinkAbout0034.2015.ASLU
0034.2015.ASLU/2015-04-02_Lazy Chair Road - Revised Land Use Application/2015-04-02_Lazy Chair Road_Insubstantial Land Use Application.pdf
CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PACKET Attached is an Application for review of Development that requires Land Use Review pursuant to
the City of Aspen Land Use Code. Included in this package are the following attachments: 1. Development Application Fee Policy, Fee Schedule and Agreement for Payment Form 2. Land
Use Application Form 3. Dimensional Requirements Form 4. Matrix of Land Use Application Requirements/Submittal Requirements Key 5. General Summary of Your Application Process 6.
Public Hearing Notice Requirements 7. Affidavit of Notice All applications are reviewed based on the criteria established in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. Title 26 of the
Aspen Municipal Code is available at the City Clerk’s Office on the second floor of City Hall and on the internet at www.aspenpitkin.com , City Departments, City Clerk, Municipal Code,
and search Title 26. We strongly encourage all applicants to hold a pre-application conference with a Planner in the Community Development Department so that the requirements for
submitting a complete application can be fully described. Also, depending upon the complexity of the development proposed, submitting one copy of the development application to the
Case Planner to determine accuracy, insufficiencies, or redundancies can reduce the overall cost of materials and Staff time. Please recognize that review of these materials does not
substitute for a complete review of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. While this application package attempts to summarize the key provisions of the Code as they apply to your type of
development, it cannot possibly replicate the detail or the scope of the Code. If you have questions which are not answered by the materials in this package, we suggest that you contact
the staff member assigned to your case or consult the applicable sections of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Land Use Review Fee Policy
The City of Aspen has established a review fee policy for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of
application submitted. A flat fee is collected by Community Development for applications which normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. Review fees
for other City departments reviewing the application (referral departments) will also be collected when necessary. Flat fees are cumulative – meaning an application with multiple flat
fees must pay the sum of those flat fees. Flat fees are not refundable. A review fee deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff review is required.
Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Various City staff may also charge their time spent on the case in addition to the case planner. Deposit amounts may be
reduced if, in the opinion of the Community Development Director, the project is expected to take significantly less time to process than the deposit indicates. A determination on
the deposit amount shall be made during the pre-application conference by the case planner. Hourly billing shall still apply. All applications must include an Agreement to Pay Application
Fees. One payment including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of Aspen. Applications will
not be accepted for processing without the required application fee. The Community Development Department shall keep an accurate record of the actual time required for the processing
of a land use application requiring a deposit. The City can provide a summary report of fees due at the applicant’s request. The applicant will be billed for the additional costs
incurred by the City when the processing of an application by the Community Development Department takes more time or expense than is covered by the deposit. Any direct costs attributable
to a project review shall be billed to the applicant with no additional administrative charge. In the event the processing of an application takes less time than provided for by the
deposit, the department shall refund the unused portion of the deposited fee to the applicant. Fees shall be due regardless of whether an applicant receives approval. Unless otherwise
combined by the Director for simplicity of billing, all applications for conceptual, final, and recordation of approval documents shall be handled as individual cases for the purposes
of billing. Upon conceptual approval all billing shall be reconciled and all past due invoices shall be paid prior to the Director accepting an application for final review. Final
review shall require a new deposit at the rate in effect at the time of final application submission. Upon final approval all billing shall again be reconciled prior to the Director
accepting an application for review of technical documents for recordation. The Community Development Director may cease processing of a land use application for which an unpaid invoice
is 30 or more days past due. Unpaid invoices of 90 or more days past due may be assessed a late fee of 1.75% per month. An unpaid invoice of 120 days or more may be subject to additional
actions as may be assigned by the Municipal Court Judge. All payment information is public domain. All invoices shall be paid prior to issuance of a Development Order or recordation
of development agreements and plats. The City will not accept a building permit for a property until all invoices are paid in full. For permits already accepted, an unpaid invoice
of 90 or more days may result in cessation of building permit processing or issuance of a stop work order until full payment is made. The property owner of record is the party responsible
for payment of all costs associated with a land use application for the property. Any secondary agreement between a property owner and an applicant representing the owner (e.g. a contract
purchaser) regarding payment of fees is solely between those private parties. January, 2013 City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena St. | (970) 920-5090 ATTACHMENT 2 –LAND USE APPLICATION
PROJECT: TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): Name: Location: (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED)
APPLICANT: Name: Address: Phone #: REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Address: Phone #: GMQS Exemption Conceptual PUD Temporary Use GMQS Allotment Final PUD (& PUD Amendment)
Text/Map Amendment Special Review Subdivision Conceptual SPA ESA – 8040 Greenline, Stream Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, Mountain View Plane Subdivision Exemption (includes condominiumization)
Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) Commercial Design Review Lot Split Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion Residential Design Variance Lot Line Adjustment Other: Conditional Use EXISTING
CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Have you attached
the following? FEES DUE: $_________ Pre-Application Conference Summary Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements
Form Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5” X 11”
must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic
3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: Applicant: Location: Zone District:
Lot Size: Lot Area: (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition
of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing:__________Proposed:___________________ Number of residential units: Existing:__________Proposed:___________________
Number of bedrooms: Existing:__________Proposed:___________________ Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only):__________ DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing:_________Allowable:__________Pro
posed:________ Principal bldg. height: Existing:_________Allowable:__________Proposed:________ Access. bldg. height: Existing:_________Allowable:__________Proposed:________ On-Site parking:
Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ % Site coverage: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ % Open Space: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________
Front Setback: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ Rear Setback: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ Combined F/R: Existing:_________Required:___________Propo
sed:________ Side Setback: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ Side Setback: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ Combined Sides: Existing:_________Required:___
________Proposed:________ Distance Between Buildings Existing ________Required:__________Proposed:_____ Existing non-conformities or encroachments:________________________________
___ _______________________________________________________________________ Variations requested: ______________________________________________________ _____________________________________________
___________________________ ATTACHMENT 4- MATRIX OF LAND USE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For application requirements, refer to the numbers in the in second column. These numbers correspond
to the key on page 9. For multiple reviews, do not duplicate information. All application materials must be complete and submitted in collated packets. All drawings must include
an accurate graphic scale Type of Review App. Submission Requirements (See key on page 9.) Process Type (See Process Description in Att.5) Number of Required Submittal Packets 8040
GREENLINE REVIEW 1-7, 8-10,35 P & Z 10 8040 GREENLINE EXEMPTION 1-7, 8-10, 35 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 1-7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 35 P & Z OR ADMINISTRATIVE (Based on Location)
2 for 0 Admin., 10 for P &Z STREAM MARGIN EXEMPTION 1-7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 35 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW 1-7, 13, 14, 35 P & Z 10 MOUNTAIN VIEW PLANE 1-7, 15, 16,
35 P & Z 10 CONDITIONAL USE 1-7, 9, 17 P & Z 10 SPECIAL REVIEW* 1-7, Additional Submission Req. depend on nature of the Special Review Request. P & Z 10 SUBDIVISION 1-7, 18, 19, 20,
21, 35 P & Z, AND CITY COUNCIL 20 EXEMPT SUBDIVISION 1-7, 18, 19, 20, 21, 35 CITY COUNCIL 10 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1-7, 22 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 LOT SPLIT 1-7, 22 CITY COUNCIL 10 CODE
AMENDMENT 1-4, 7, 23 P & Z, AND CITY COUNCIL 20 WIRELESS TELECOM. 1-7, 16, 24, 25, 26, 27, 35 ADMIN. OR P & Z 2 for Admin., 10 for P & Z SATELITE DISH OVER 24” IN DIAMETER 1-7 ADMIN.
OR P & Z 2 for Admin., 10 for P & Z RES. DESIGN STANDARDS VARIANCE 1-7, 9, 28, 29, 30 P & Z OR DRAC 10 GMQS EXEMPTION* 1-7, Additional Submission Req. depend on nature of the Exemption
Request. ADMIN., OR P & Z, AND/OR CC (BASED ON EXEMPTION TYPE) 2 for Admin., 10 for P & Z, 20 for P & Z and CC CONDOMINIUMIZATION 1, 31 ADMINISTRATIVE 2 PUD 1-7, 32, 33, 35 CONCEPTUAL
– P & Z, AND CC FINAL – P & Z, AND CC 20 for P & Z and CC (Submit Separately for Final PUD Review) LODGE PRESERVATION PUD 1-7, 35 P & Z, AND CC 20 PUD AMENDMENT 1-7 ADMIN., OR P &
Z, AND/OR CC (BASED ON AMENDMENT TYPE) 2 for Admin., 10 for P & Z, 20 for P & Z and CC SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA (SPA) 1-7, 35 CONCEPTUAL – P & Z, AND CC FINAL- P & Z, AND CC 20 for P
& Z and CC (Submit Separately for Final SPA) AMENDMENT TO SPA 1-7 ADMIN., OR P & Z AND CC (BASED ON SIGNIFICANCE OF AMENDMENT) 2 for Admin., 20 for P & Z and CC TEMPORARY USE 1-7 ADMIN.
OR CC (BASED ON DURATION TIME) 2 for Admin., 10 for City Council ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT 1-7, 9 ADMIN OR P &Z(BASED ON IF THE PROPOSAL MEETS REVIEW STANDARDS) 2 for Administrative Review
REZONING 1-7 P & Z AND CC 20 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS VARIANCE 1-7, 34 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 9 * Consult with a Planner about submittal requirements. ** A pre-application conference with
a Planner should be conducted prior to submitting any land use application. Please call 920-5090 to schedule a pre-application conference. ATTACHMENT 4-CONT’D- SUBMITTAL
KEY 1. Land Use Application with Applicant’s name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of
the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 2. The street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur. 3. A disclosure
of ownership of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State
of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s
right to apply for the Development Application. 4. An 8 1/2” x 11” vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. 5. A site improvement survey including topography
and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of Colorado. (This requirement, or any part thereof, may be waived
by the Community Development Department if the project is determined not to warrant a survey document.) 6. A site plan depicting the proposed layout and the project’s physical relationship
to the land and it’s surroundings. 7. A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to
the development application. 8. Plan with Existing and proposed grades at two-foot contours, with five-foot intervals for grades over ten (10) percent. 9. Proposed elevations of
the development 10. A description of proposed construction techniques to be used. 11. A Plan with the 100-year floodplain line and the high water line. 12. Accurate elevations
(in relation to mean sea level) of the lowest floor, including basement, of all new or substantially improved structures; a verification and recordation of the actual elevation
in relation to mean sea level to which any structure is constructed; a demonstration that all new construction or substantial improvements will be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse
or lateral movement of any structure to be constructed or improved; a demonstration that the structure will have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to at least two (2)
feet above the base flood elevation, all as certified by a registered professional engineer or architect. 13. A landscape plan that includes native vegetative screening of no less
than fifty (50) percent of the development as viewed from the rear (slope) of the parcel. All vegetative screening shall be maintained in perpetuity and shall be replaced with the
same or comparable material should it die. 14. Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect, or engineer shall be submitted showing all existing and proposed
site elements, the top of slope, and pertinent elevations above sea level. 15. Proposed elevations of the development, including any rooftop equipment and how it will be screened.
16. Proposed elevations of the development, including any rooftop equipment and how it will be screened. 17. A sketch plan of the site showing existing and proposed features
which are relevant to the review. 18. One (1) inch equals four hundred (400) feet scale city map showing the location of the proposed subdivision, all adjacent lands owned by
or under option to the applicant, commonly known landmarks, and the zone district in which the proposed subdivision and adjacent properties are located. 19. A plat which reflects
the layout of the lots, blocks and structures in the proposed subdivision. The plat shall be drawn at a scale of one (1) equals one hundred (100) feet or larger. Architectural
scales are not acceptable. Sheet size shall be twenty-four (24) inches by thirty-six (36) inches. If it is necessary to place the plat on more than a one (1) sheet, an index shall be
included on the first sheet. A vicinity map shall also appear on the first sheet showing the subdivision as it relates to the rest of the city and the street system in the area
of the proposed subdivision. The contents of the plat shall be of sufficient detail to determine whether the proposed subdivision will meet the design standards pursuant to Land
Use Code Section 26.480.060(3).20. Subdivision GIS Data. 21. A landscape plan showing location, size, and type of proposed landscape features. 22. A subdivision plat which
meets the terms of this chapter, and conforms to the requirements of this title indicating that no further subdivision may be granted for these lots nor will additional units be
built without receipt of applicable approvals pursuant to this chapter and growth management allocation pursuant to Chapter 26.470. 23. The precise wording of any proposed amendment.
24. Site Plan or plans drawn to a scale of one (1”) inch equals ten (10’) feet or one (1”) inch equals twenty (20’) feet, including before and “after” photographs (simulations)
specifying the location of antennas, support structures, transmission buildings and/or other accessory uses, access, parking, fences, signs, lighting, landscaped areas and
all adjacent land uses within one-hundred fifty (150’) feet. Such plans and drawings should demonstrate compliance with the Review Standards of this Section. 25. FAA and FCC Coordination.
Statements regarding the regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). 26. Structural Integrity Report from a professional
engineer licensed in the State of Colorado. 27. Evidence that an effort was made to locate on an existing wireless telecommunication services facility site including coverage/
interference analysis and capacity analysis and a brief statement as to other reasons for success or no success. 28. Neighborhood block plan at 1”=50’ (available from City
Engineering Department) Graphically show the front portions of all existing buildings on both sides of the block and their setback from the street in feet. Identify parking and front
entry for each building and locate any accessory dwelling units along the alley. (Continued on next page.) Indicate whether any portions of the houses immediately adjacent to the
subject parcel are one story (only one living level). 29. Roof Plan. 30. Photographic panorama. Show elevations of all buildings on both sides of the block, including
present condition of the subject property. Label photos and mount on a presentation board 31. A condominium subdivision exemption plat drawn with permanent ink
on reproducible mylar. Sheet size shall be twenty-four (24) inches by thirty-six (36) inches with an unencumbered margin of one and one-half (1 1/2) inches on the left hand side of
the sheet and a one-half (1/2) inch margin around the other three (3) sides of the sheet pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.480.090. 32. A description and site plan of the proposed
development including a statement of the objectives to be achieved by the PUD and a description of the proposed land uses, densities, natural features, traffic and pedestrian circulation,
off-street parking, open space areas, infrastructure improvements, and site drainage. 33. An architectural character plan generally indicating the use, massing, scale, and orientation
of the proposed buildings. 34. A written description of the variance being requested. 35. Exterior Lighting Plan. Show the location, height, type and luminous intensity of each
above grade fixture. Estimate the site illumination as measured in foot candles and include minimum, maximum, and average illumination. Additionally, provide comparable examples already
in the community that demonstrate technique, specification, and/ or light level if they exist. ATTACHMENT 5 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURE 1. Attend
pre-application conference. During this one-on-one meeting, staff will determine the review process which applies to your development proposal and will identify the materials necessary
to review your application. 2. Submit Development Application. Based on your pre-application meeting, you should respond to the application package and submit the requested number
of copies of the complete application and the appropriate processing fee to the Community Development Department. 3. Determination of Completeness. Within five working days of the
date of your submission, staff will review the application, and will notify you in writing whether the application is complete or if additional materials are required. Please be aware
that the purpose of the completeness review is to determine whether or not the information you have submitted is adequate to review the request, and not whether the information is sufficient
to obtain approval. 4. Staff Review of Development Application. Once your application is determined to be complete, it will be reviewed by the staff for compliance with the applicable
standards of the Code. During the staff review stage, the application will be referred to other agencies for comments. The Planner assigned to your case or the agency may contact you
if additional information is needed or if problems are identified. A memo will be written by the staff member for signature by the Community Development Director. The memo will explain
whether your application complies with the Code and will list any conditions which should apply if the application is to be approved. Final approval of any Development Application which
amends a recorded document, such as a plat, agreement or deed restriction, will require the applicant to prepare an amended version of that document for review and approval by staff.
Staff will provide the applicant with the applicable contents for the revised plat, while the City Attorney is normally in charge of the form for recorded agreements and deed restrictions.
We suggest that you not go to the trouble or expense of preparing these documents until the staff has determined that your application is eligible for the requested amendment or exemption.
5. Board Review of Application. If a public hearing is required for the land use action that you are requesting, then the Planning Staff will schedule a hearing date for the application
upon determination that the Application is complete. The hearing(s) will be scheduled before the appropriate reviewing board(s). The Applicant will be required to mail notice (one
copy provided by the Community Development Department) to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property and post notice (sign available at the Community Development Department)
of the public hearing on the site at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing date (please see Attachment 6 for instructions). The Planning Staff will publish notice of the hearing
in the paper for land use requests that require publication. The Planning Staff will then formulate a recommendation on the land use request and draft a memo to the reviewing board(s).
Staff will supply the Applicant with a copy of the Planning Staff’s memo approximately 5 days prior to the hearing. The public hearing(s) will take place before the appropriate review
boards. Public Hearings include a presentation by the Planning Staff, a presentation by the Applicant (optional), consideration of public comment, and the reviewing board’s questions
and decision. 6. Issuance of Development Order. If the land use review is approved, then the Planning Staff will issue a Development Order which allows the Applicant to proceed into
Building Permit Application. 7. Receipt of Building Permit. Once you have received a copy of the signed staff approval, you may proceed to building permit review. During this time,
your project will be examined for its compliance with the Uniform Building Code. It will also be checked for compliance with applicable provisions of the Land Use Regulations which
were not reviewed in detail during the one step review (this might include a check of floor area ratios, setbacks, parking, open space and the like). Fees for water, sewer, parks and
employee housing will be collected if due. Any document required to be recorded, such as a plat, deed restriction or agreement, will need to be reviewed and recorded before a Building
Permit is submitted. CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Hillary Seminick, 970.429.2741 DATE: January 20, 2015 PROJECT: Maroon
Creek Club PUD Private Roadway Easement Adjustment REPRESENTATIVE: Dustin Anderson, Forum Phi REQUEST: Insubstantial Planned Development Amendment DESCRIPTION: Background: The Maroon
Creek Club has several private roadway easements in the Maroon Creek Club PUD and Plat, as amended. There is an existing 30 foot wide easement in the Maroon Creek Club Golf Course,
Lot C of the Maroon Creek Club Subdivision. An adjacent golf cart path runs parallel to and overlaps the private access easement/road. Proposal: The applicant is interested in adjusting
a segment of the existing roadway easement within Maroon Creek Club Golf Course to separate the golf cart path and the road surface. The applicant is pursuing this option to reduce
the potential of golf cart/vehicular traffic conflicts and for life safety issues. Review Process: An Insubstantial Planned Development Amendment is required to relocate the easement
and to construct the new roadway alignment. All of the review criteria in Section 26.445.110.A will be addressed by the applicant as part of the application process. The applicant will
be required to submit a plat memorializing the amended easement. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use App: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Por
tals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2013%20land%20use %20app%20form.pdf Land Use Code: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-UseCode/
Applicable Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.445.110.A Planned Development, Amendments, Insubstantial
Review by : Staff for complete application Staff for recommendation Referrals: Parks, Engineering Community Development Director for approval Public Hearing : N/A ASLU PD Amendment,
Insubstantial Maroon Creek Club Golf Course Lot c 2735.112.09.053 1 Neighborhood Outreach: N/A Planning Fees: Planning Deposit – Administrative PD Amendment ($1,300 for 4 hours) Referral
Fees : Engineering (per hour, billed with planning case) - $275 Parks (flat fee) - $650 Total Deposit: $2,225 (additional planning hours over deposit amount are billed at a rate of
$325/hour; additional engineering hours over deposit are billed at a rate of $275/hour) To apply, submit the following information (apply to both options unless otherwise noted):
Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development
is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice
in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating
the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application. Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone
number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. HOA Compliance form (Attached) A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic,
or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property.
Building elevations, plans and renderings are required. A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status
of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. Written responses to applicable review criteria. An 8 1/2” by 11” vicinity map locating
the parcel within the City of Aspen. 1 Complete Copy. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted: Total deposit for review of the
application. A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. 2 Two 24”x36” paper draft plats will be submitted for review two at completion of the project (upon approval).
Two 24” x 36” plats on mylar will be required for recordation of the amended plat Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The
summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal
or vested right. 3 March 26, 2015 To Whom it may Concern, This Insubstantial PUD Amendment for Maroon Creek Golf Course, Parcel C intends to adjust the existing access easement from
Tiehack Road, via Lazy Chair Road, to Pfister Exemption Subdivision Lots 2 & 3. Existing conditions include an overlap of the golf cart path and lazy chair road access to Pfister lots
2 & 3, 511 Lazy Chair Road. The plat access easement adjustment intent is to provide clear separation from vehicular traffic and golf cart traffic for improved safety. This benefits
both construction traffic and residential and golf maintenance traffic after construction completion. Lazy Chair Road is proposed to be relocated to provide clear width required for
emergency vehicle access. Landscaping will be provided to add screening of relocated Lazy Chair road from adjacent golf tee boxes. Regards, Dustin Anderson, Project Manager – Forum
Phi danderson@forumphi.com 970-389-7399 April 1, 2015 TO: City of Aspen Planning Reviewer RE: Insubstantial Amendment Specific Requirements A. Insubstantial Amendments. An insubstantial
amendment to an approved Project Review or an approved Detailed Review may be authorized by the Community Development Director. An insubstantial amendment shall meet the following criteria:
1. The request does not change the use or character of the development. In Book 733, page590 – an Access Easement Agreement between Pfister and Maroon Creek states: 1. “Grantor hereby
grants to Pfister an access easement for ingress to and egress from the Retained Property over and across the existing roads know(n) as Lazy Chair Road. ...an access easement for for
ingress to and egress from the Retained Property over that road adjacent to the Retained Property running across Common Area Parcel P and Golf Course Parcel C of Maroon Creek Club and
identified on the Final Plat [Plat Book 33, page 12] as a “30 Ft. Wide Private Access Easement” (collectively the “New Access”). The proposed access easement adjustment does not change
the use or character of the development by maintaining a 30 foot easement through MCC Golf Parcel C. Maintaining connection to existing easements to remain at the North and South of
property lines. The easement adjustment extent is approximately 19 feet to the West, with the road moving approximately 8 feet to the West, connecting to existing pavement to the North
and South property lines. This request improves the existing condition by removing an overlap of Golf Cart and Private Access traffic. 2. The request is consistent with the conditions
and representations in the project's original approval, or otherwise represents an insubstantial change. Refer to Book 733, page 590 Easement Agreement and Plat Book 33, page 12 for
original approved easement within the Final Subdivision Plat & PUD for Maroon Creek Club. The proposed access easement adjustment modifies the alignment to mutually benefit MCC Golf
activities and private road access to 511 Lazy Chair Lots 2 & 3, consistent with the intent of the original approval. 3. The request does not require granting a variation from the project's
allowed use(s) and does not request an increase in the allowed height or floor area. This project does not request change from existing use from a “30 Ft. Private Access Easement”.
This Insubstantial Plat Amendment only requests a minor relocation of the existing easement. This request will not contemplate change in any building height or floor area. 1. Any
proposed changes to the approved dimensional requirements are limited to a technical nature, respond to a design parameter that could not have been foreseen during the Project Review
approval, are within dimensional tolerances stated in the Project Review, or otherwise represents an insubstantial change. Relocation of surface easement solely used for private access
easement and will not impact the dimensional requirements. The bounds of the original agreement and consented by both parties. Letters from Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC and Lazy Chair Lot
3 LLC have been provided to City of Aspen Community Development Department under separate cover, along with MCC Golf Letter to represent within the land use application. 2. An applicant
may not apply for Detailed Review if an amendment is pending. No other detailed reviews pending at this time Regards, Dustin Anderson, Project Manager – Forum Phi danderson@forumphi.com
970-389-7399 SI TE Mar oon Cr eek Cl ub, Par cel C Mar oon Cr eek LLC 10 Cl ub Ci r c l e Aspen, CO 8161 1 For um Phi 715 W. Mai n St . , Sui t e 204 As pen, CO 8161 1 Vi ci ni t
y Map
0034.2015.ASLU/2015-04-02_Lazy Chair Road - Revised Land Use Application/2015-04-02_Revised Lazy Chair Road Land Use Application.pdf LAZY CHAIR LOT 3
RETAIN EXISTING NATIVE TREES, TREE PROTECTION TO BE IN PLACE BEFORE SITE WORK BEGINS, TYP. TEE BOXES TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED TEE BOXES TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED TEE BOXES TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED
TEE BOXES TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED TEE BOXES TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED BOULDER WALL RETAIN EXISTING NATIVE TREES, TREE PROTECTION TO BE IN PLACE BEFORE SITE WORK BEGINS, TYP. SPRINKING HEADS,
PIPES, AND BOXES TO BE REPLACED PER MCC AMEND SOIL & SOD PER MCC SPEC NATIVE GRASS SEEDING EXISTING 30' EASEMENT PROPOSED 30' EASEMENT EXISTING 30' EASEMENT PROPOSED 30' EASEMENT PROPOSED
NATIVE SEED MIX PROPOSED CART PATH TEE BOX TEE BOX TEE BOX TEE BOX EXISTING OAK TEE BOX PROPOSED LAZY CHAIR RD EXISTING BENCH TO BE USED FOR PHASE ONE PLANTING ON LOT 3, TO BE REVEGITATED
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED MAROON CREEK CLUB COMMONS PARCEL P MAROON CREEK CLUB GOLF LOT C PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED PFISTER EXEMPTION LOT 3 SECTION RETAIN EXISTING TREES BOLLARDS
AND COLORED STRIP IN PAVEMENT PROPERTY LINE EXISTING OAK EXISTING OAK EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING LAZY CHAIR RD LAZY CHAIR ROAD (PRIVATE DRIVE) LAZY CHAIR RD., ASPEN,
CO, 81611, USA LAZY CHAIR ROAD BUILDING PERMIT & CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM: NFPA 13D (EXISTING TO BE REVISED PER PLANS) CODE EDITIONS: 2009 IRC, 2009 IMC, 2009 IECC,
2009 IPC, 2009 IFGC, 2011 NEC, CITY OF ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 8 PARCEL ID # 273511209053 SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDES CERTIFICATION I (Designer/Architect) certify that the information
shown here in the 'Z Sheets' is correctly and accurately drawn to reflect what is to be constructed in regards to floor area, setbacks, and heights. Designer/Architect SCOPE OF WORK
The relocation of an existing road and cartpath and associated trees and irrigation per MCC specifications. CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR COPYRIGHT CONTRACTOR CIVIL SHEET TITLE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
STEVEN WILSON 402127 S T A T E O F C O L O R A D O L I C E N S E D A R C H I T E C T 3/26/2015 PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: SEM 1421 FORUM PHI, LLC Tuttle Surveying Services Jeff Tuttle 823
Blake Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601.0 jeff@tss-us.com (970) 928-9708 Roaring Fork Engineering Richard Goulding Suite 200b, 0123 Emma Rd, Basalt, CO 81621 richardg@rfeng.biz (970)
948-7474 Sherlock Homes Tom Sherlock 133 Prospector Suite 4102D (970) 379-0520 Tsherlock@SherlockHomesAspen.com DATE OF PUBLICATION CVR CVR LAZY CHAIR RD., ASPEN, CO, 81611, USA 715
West Main Street, Suite 204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P: 970.279.4157 F: 866.770.5585 PARCEL ID # 273511209053 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3/26/2015 SUBDIVISION: MAROON CREEK CLUB GOLF COURSE PARCEL
C ZONE DISTRICT P MAROON CREEK CLUB Premier Green Brady Smith 12149 East Baseline Rd. Lafayette, CO 80026 Brady@PremierGreen.com 303-926-7260 CD 02/27/15 SUBMISSION SARC & GOLF LAND
USE APPLICATION03 /26/15CD SITE HWY 82 RETAIN EXISTING NATIVE TREES, TREE PROTECTION TO BE IN PLACE BEFORE SITE WORK BEGINS, TYP. TEE BOXES TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED TEE BOXES TO REMAIN
UNDISTURBED TEE BOXES TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED TEE BOXES TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED TEE BOXES TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED BOULDER WALL RETAIN EXISTING NATIVE TREES, TREE PROTECTION TO BE IN PLACE
BEFORE SITE WORK BEGINS, TYP. SPRINKING HEADS, PIPES, AND BOXES TO BE REPLACED PER MCC AMEND SOIL & SOD PER MCC SPEC NATIVE GRASS SEEDING EXISTING 30' EASEMENT PROPOSED 30' EASEMENT
EXISTING 30' EASEMENT PROPOSED 30' EASEMENT PROPOSED NATIVE SEED MIX PROPOSED CART PATH TEE BOX TEE BOX TEE BOX TEE BOX EXISTING OAK TEE BOX PROPOSED LAZY CHAIR RD EXISTING BENCH TO
BE USED FOR PHASE ONE PLANTING ON LOT 3, TO BE REVEGITATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED MAROON CREEK CLUB COMMONS PARCEL P MAROON CREEK CLUB GOLF LOT C PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED
KATHRYN FINLEY 550 LAZY CHAIR RANCH RD PFISTER EXEMPTION LOT 3 SECTION RETAIN EXISTING TREES BOLLARDS AND COLORED STRIP IN PAVEMENT PROPERTY LINE EXISTING OAK EXISTING OAK EXISTING
EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING LAZY CHAIR RD LAZY CHAIR ROAD (PRIVATE DRIVE) PROPOSED DRIVE 1" = 20' CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR COPYRIGHT CONTRACTOR CIVIL SHEET TITLE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
STEVEN WILSON 402127 S T A T E O F C O L O R A D O L I C E N S E D A R C H I T E C T 3/26/2015 PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: SEM 1421 FORUM PHI, LLC Tuttle Surveying Services Jeff Tuttle 823
Blake Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601.0 jeff@tss-us.com (970) 928-9708 Roaring Fork Engineering Richard Goulding Suite 200b, 0123 Emma Rd, Basalt, CO 81621 richardg@rfeng.biz (970)
948-7474 Sherlock Homes Tom Sherlock 133 Prospector Suite 4102D (970) 379-0520 Tsherlock@SherlockHomesAspen.com DATE OF PUBLICATION D.1 LAZY CHAIR ROAD LAZY CHAIR RD., ASPEN, CO, 81611,
USA 715 West Main Street, Suite 204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P: 970.279.4157 F: 866.770.5585 PARCEL ID # 273511209053 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3/26/2015 SUBDIVISION: MAROON CREEK CLUB GOLF COURSE
PARCEL C ZONE DISTRICT P MAROON CREEK CLUB Premier Green Brady Smith 12149 East Baseline Rd. Lafayette, CO 80026 Brady@PremierGreen.com 303-926-7260 CD 02/27/15 SUBMISSION SARC & GOLF
LAND USE APPLICATION03 /26/15CD ROOT INHIBITOR, PER MCC SPEC ROOT INHIBITOR, PER MCC SPEC DRIP EMITTER PER MCC SPEC ROCK WALL DRAINAGE SWALE SEE CIVIL ASPHALT, SEE CIVIL ASPHALT, SEE
CIVIL ROOT INHIBITOR, PER MCC SPEC ROOT INHIBITOR, PER MCC SPEC VALVE BOX, IRRIGATION LINE, & SPRINKLER REPLACED PER MCC SPEC SITE SECTION 1/4" = 1'-0" CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR COPYRIGHT
CONTRACTOR CIVIL SHEET TITLE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT STEVEN WILSON 402127 S T A T E O F C O L O R A D O L I C E N S E D A R C H I T E C T 3/26/2015 PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: SEM 1421 FORUM
PHI, LLC Tuttle Surveying Services Jeff Tuttle 823 Blake Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601.0 jeff@tss-us.com (970) 928-9708 Roaring Fork Engineering Richard Goulding Suite 200b, 0123
Emma Rd, Basalt, CO 81621 richardg@rfeng.biz (970) 948-7474 Sherlock Homes Tom Sherlock 133 Prospector Suite 4102D (970) 379-0520 Tsherlock@SherlockHomesAspen.com DATE OF PUBLICATION
D.2 SECTION LAZY CHAIR RD., ASPEN, CO, 81611, USA 715 West Main Street, Suite 204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P: 970.279.4157 F: 866.770.5585 PARCEL ID # 273511209053 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3/26/2015
SUBDIVISION: MAROON CREEK CLUB GOLF COURSE PARCEL C ZONE DISTRICT P MAROON CREEK CLUB Premier Green Brady Smith 12149 East Baseline Rd. Lafayette, CO 80026 Brady@PremierGreen.com 303-926-7260
CD 02/27/15 SUBMISSION SARC & GOLF LAND USE APPLICATION03 /26/15CD Appendix
1-‐
Tree
Inventory
Spreadsheet
Tree # Species D.B.H. Condition Mitigation 72 Oak 4 3 $514.96 72 Oak 3 2 $289.67 72 Oak 3 2 $289.67 72 Oak 3 3 $289.67
72 Oak 5 3 $804.63 72 Oak 3 2 $289.67 72 Oak 3 3 $289.67 72 Oak 3 3 $289.67 72 Oak 4 2 $514.96 72 Oak 4 2
$514.96 72 Oak 6 2 $1,158.66 72 Oak 4 2 $514.96 72 Oak 4 3 $514.96 72 Oak 5 2 $804.63 72 Oak 3 3 $289.67 72
Oak 3 2 $289.67 72 Oak 3 3 $289.67 72 Oak 3 3 $289.67 72 Oak 5 3 $804.63 72 Oak 3 3 $289.67 72 Oak 3 3 $289.67
73 Oak 3 3 $289.67 73 Oak 3 3 $289.67 73 Oak 5 5 $-‐‑ 73 Oak 7 3 $1,577.07 73 Oak 7 2 $1,577.07 73 Oak
3 3 $289.67 73 Oak 5 2 $804.63 73 Oak 3 3 $289.67 73 Oak 6 4 $-‐‑ 73 Oak 7 3 $1,577.07 73 Oak 3 3 $289.67
73 Oak 3 2 $289.67 73 Oak 4 5 $-‐‑ 73 Oak 7 3 $1,577.07 73 Oak 3 3 $289.67 73 Oak 4 3 $514.96 73 Oak 5
3 $804.63 74 Oak 4 4 $-‐‑ 75 Oak 4 3 $514.96 75 Oak 5 3 $804.63 75 Oak 5 2 $804.63 75 Oak 4 3 $514.96
75 Oak 3 3 $289.67 75 Oak 3 3 $289.67 76 Oak 4 3 $514.96 76 Oak 5 2 $804.63 76 Oak 4 3 $514.96 76 Oak 4 3 $514.96
76 Oak 4 3 $514.96 76 Oak 5 3 $804.63 76 Oak 6 2 $1,158.66 76 Oak 3 3 $289.67 76 Oak 3 3 $289.67 76 Oak 4
3 $514.96 76 Oak 4 3 $514.96 76 Oak 7 2 $1,577.07 76 Oak 6 3 $1,158.66 76 Oak 3 3 $289.67 76 Oak 3 3 $289.67
76 Oak 8 2 $2,059.84 76 Oak 5 3 $804.63 76 Oak 5 3 $804.63 76 Oak 4 3 $514.96 76 Oak 5 3 $804.63 Total maximum
mitigation value of oak stems with conditions of 1-‐‑3 $38,042.67 Appendix
1-‐
Tree
Inventory
Spreadsheet
Tree # Species D.B.H. Condition Mitigation 72 Oak 4 3 $514.96 72 Oak 3 2 $289.67 72 Oak 3 2 $289.67 72 Oak 3 3 $289.67
72 Oak 5 3 $804.63 72 Oak 3 2 $289.67 72 Oak 3 3 $289.67 72 Oak 3 3 $289.67 72 Oak 4 2 $514.96 72 Oak 4 2
$514.96 72 Oak 6 2 $1,158.66 72 Oak 4 2 $514.96 72 Oak 4 3 $514.96 72 Oak 5 2 $804.63 72 Oak 3 3 $289.67 72
Oak 3 2 $289.67 72 Oak 3 3 $289.67 72 Oak 3 3 $289.67 72 Oak 5 3 $804.63 72 Oak 3 3 $289.67 72 Oak 3 3 $289.67
73 Oak 3 3 $289.67 73 Oak 3 3 $289.67 73 Oak 5 5 $-‐‑ 73 Oak 7 3 $1,577.07 73 Oak 7 2 $1,577.07 73 Oak
3 3 $289.67 73 Oak 5 2 $804.63 73 Oak 3 3 $289.67 73 Oak 6 4 $-‐‑ 73 Oak 7 3 $1,577.07 73 Oak 3 3 $289.67
73 Oak 3 2 $289.67 73 Oak 4 5 $-‐‑ 73 Oak 7 3 $1,577.07 73 Oak 3 3 $289.67 73 Oak 4 3 $514.96 73 Oak 5
3 $804.63 74 Oak 4 4 $-‐‑ 75 Oak 4 3 $514.96 75 Oak 5 3 $804.63 75 Oak 5 2 $804.63 75 Oak 4 3 $514.96
75 Oak 3 3 $289.67 75 Oak 3 3 $289.67 76 Oak 4 3 $514.96 76 Oak 5 2 $804.63 76 Oak 4 3 $514.96 76 Oak 4 3 $514.96
76 Oak 4 3 $514.96 76 Oak 5 3 $804.63 76 Oak 6 2 $1,158.66 76 Oak 3 3 $289.67 76 Oak 3 3 $289.67 76 Oak 4
3 $514.96 76 Oak 4 3 $514.96 76 Oak 7 2 $1,577.07 76 Oak 6 3 $1,158.66 76 Oak 3 3 $289.67 76 Oak 3 3 $289.67
76 Oak 8 2 $2,059.84 76 Oak 5 3 $804.63 76 Oak 5 3 $804.63 76 Oak 4 3 $514.96 76 Oak 5 3 $804.63 Total maximum
mitigation value of oak stems with conditions of 1-‐‑3 $38,042.67 30.00' Access Easement as Shown in Plat Book 33, Page 3 Pine Tree Aspen Tree Cottonwood Tree Telephone
Pedestal Found Monument Nail / Lath Note: All Trees are scaled to approximate drip line LEGEND TEE BOX TEE BOX T GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS SM TEE BOX TEE BOX TEE BOX
SM SM GENERAL NOTE: ALL TREE PROTECTION MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF APPROVED TREE CLUSTERS NATIVE OAK GROVE TO REMAIN. ONLY REMOVE CLUSTERS OF NATIVE TREES APPROVED BY PROJECT
ARBORIST AND COA PARKS DEPT MAROON CREEK CLUB COMMONS PARCEL P MAROON CREEK CLUB GOLF LOT C KATHRYN FINLEY 550 LAZY CHAIR RANCH RD PFISTER EXEMPTION LOT 3 72 73 74 75 76 PROPERTY LINE
LAZY CHAIR ROAD (PRIVATE DRIVE) TREE REMOVAL 1" = 20' $10460.19 CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR COPYRIGHT CONTRACTOR CIVIL SHEET TITLE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT STEVEN WILSON 402127 S T A T E O F
C O L O R A D O L I C E N S E D A R C H I T E C T 3/26/2015 PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: SEM 1421 FORUM PHI, LLC Tuttle Surveying Services Jeff Tuttle 823 Blake Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601.0
jeff@tss-us.com (970) 928-9708 Roaring Fork Engineering Richard Goulding Suite 200b, 0123 Emma Rd, Basalt, CO 81621 richardg@rfeng.biz (970) 948-7474 Sherlock Homes Tom Sherlock 133
Prospector Suite 4102D (970) 379-0520 Tsherlock@SherlockHomesAspen.com DATE OF PUBLICATION D.3 TREE REMOVAL LAZY CHAIR RD., ASPEN, CO, 81611, USA 715 West Main Street, Suite 204 Aspen,
Colorado 81611 P: 970.279.4157 F: 866.770.5585 PARCEL ID # 273511209053 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3/26/2015 SUBDIVISION: MAROON CREEK CLUB GOLF COURSE PARCEL C ZONE DISTRICT P MAROON CREEK
CLUB Premier Green Brady Smith 12149 East Baseline Rd. Lafayette, CO 80026 Brady@PremierGreen.com 303-926-7260 CD 02/27/15 SUBMISSION SARC & GOLF LAND USE APPLICATION03 /26/15CD 1 2
3 8 0 2 2 8025 8 0 2 5 8 0 2 6 8 0 2 4 8016 8 0 2 5 8 0 3 0 8 0 3 5 8 0 3 0 803 5 8 0 3 0 8 0 3 0 8 0 2 5 8 0 2 0 8 0 2 5 8 0 1 0 8 0 1 5 8 0 2 0 8020 8 0 2 0 8 0 1 5 8 0 2 3 8024 8
0 1 0 8 0 1 5 8 0 2 0 24.17' 19.97' 21.37' 24.00' STA.0+71.52 O/S 0.00' D TEE BOX TEE BOX TEE BOX TEE BOX TEE BOX 1 5' 1 6' 1 4' 1 5' 1 4' 1 5' 1 7' 1 9' 1 4' 1 5' M M S S S S S S S
S S S EXISTING PRIVATE DRIVE E X I S T I N G C A R T P A T H EXISTING PRIVATE DRIVE 1 4' 1 5' 1 5' 1 6' TREES TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN EXISTING
TREES TO REMAIN A R E A O F D I S T U R B A N C E A R E A O F D I S T U R B A N C E A R E A O F D I S T U R B A N C E A R E A O F D I S T U R B A N C E REQUIRED DRAINAGE SWALE PER COA
REQUIRED DRAINAGE SWALE PER COA ENTRY COLUMNS AND SIGN EXISTING EVERGREENS NO DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING TEE BOXES SITE WORK NOTES: 1)CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AT JOB
SITE AND NOTIFY GENERAL CONTRACTOR OF DIMENSIONAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK. 2) CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
ALL CONTRACTORS MUST COMPLY WITH PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, CITY OR COUNTY RULES AND REGULATIONS AND LAND USE APPROVAL CONDITIONS AT ALL TIMES. 3)ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROPRIATE
AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF POINT OF CURVATURE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, LINES AND STRUCTURES PRIOR TO EXCAVATION OR TRENCHING. DAMAGE SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR
AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 4)SEE ARCH SET FOR TREE REMOVAL, SURVEY FOR UTILITIES, AND CIVIL DRAINAGE AND GRADING. PREMIER GREEN ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES
NOT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY THE EXACT LOCATION OF UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY PREMIER GREEN OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE EXTREME
CAUTION WHEN WORKING OVER OR NEAR EXISTING GAS AND ELECTRICAL LINES. 5)PREMIER GREEN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION MEANS. METHODS. AND TECHNIQUES OF THE CONTRACTOR. 6)LAYOUT
AND VERIFY DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY GENERAL CONTRACTOR OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 7)VERIFY EXISTING ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. NOTIFY GENERAL CONTRACTOR OF ANY DISCREPANCIES.
EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES ARE BASED ON SURVEY DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY SURVEYOR. 8)CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE PLACEMENT OF FLAT WORK PENETRATIONS TO ENSURE COORDINATION OF SURFACE
FIXTURES, SUCH AS DRAINS AND LIGHTS. NOTIFY GENERAL CONTRACTOR OF DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 9)ALL FINISHED GRADES SHALL MEET AND BLEND SMOOTHLY WITH EXISTING GRADES
AT THE PROJECT LIMIT. 10)THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES. 11) ALL DISTURBED NATIVE AREAS TO BE REPAIRED AS GOOD OR BETTER THEN ORIGINAL CONDITION
A) REFERENCE ASPEN NATIVE GRASS MIX NOTE: PLANT MATERIAL TO BE MAINTAINED AND IRRIGATED BY GOLF COURSE a) Contractor to replace all disturbed irrigation pipe, heads and boxes.
b) Contractor to tee off golf course lateral for new irrigation zone(s), per MCC Golf specifications. c) Zone control valves must be added to integrate with golf course controls. QA
3 PP 1 CS 1 QA 3 RTD 3 CS 1 CS 1 QA 3 PL PL PL PL QA 3 RTD 3 RTD 3 ID 5 FR 19 ID 9 RTD 3 RTD 3MULCH ( TYP.) DRIP EMITTER, INSTALL PER DRIP EMITTER PLACEMENT DETAIL 2" DRIP TUBING
INSTALL 2" BELOW FINAL GRADE. MICRO-TUBING ( TYP.) PLANT DIFFUSER CAP: PC-DIFFUSER SINGLE OUTLET TUBING STAKE TOP OF MULCH TOP OF MULCH FINISHED GRADE 1/4" TUBING, 24" LENGTH MAX. 1/2"
DRIP POLY PIPE INSTALLED 2" BELOW FINISHED GRADE 1/4" BARB TRANSFER FITTING: EITHER XBF1CONN OR XBF3TEE SHRUB / TREE EMITTER PLACEMENT NTS 2 Deciduous Trees (3"-4" CAL.) Rain Bird
PC-20 3-4 ea. Evergreen Trees (10'-14') Rain Bird PC-20 3 ea. Evergreen Trees (15'-20') Rain Bird PC-20 3-4 ea Install drip emitters as described
below: Shrubs (4' B&B) Rain Bird PC-10 3-4 ea. Shrubs (#5) Rain Bird PC-10 2 ea. DRIP IRRIGATION DRIP EMITTER
PLACEMENT NTS 1 PLANTING BEDS 3"-4" DEPTH MINI NUGGET MULCH TYPE S RTD 3 FR 13 2.19.15 3.2.15 S QA 2 12" BANDING 1 4' 1 5' 1 4' 1 5' 1 4' 1 5' PP 3 PP 3 RTD 3 PLANT SCHEDULE SYM./NAME
QA QNTY. TREES COLORADO SPRUCE BOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAME 2 PLANTING SIZE 17'-19' 1 Picea pungens CS QUAKING ASPEN (NURSERY GROWN) EVEN BLEND SINGLE STEM AND CLUMP Populus tremuloides3"-4"
CAL. 1 5' 1 6' 15'-16' COLORADO SPRUCE CS EXISTING TREES 14 E VE RGRE E N TOTAL ASPE N TOTAL TOTAL 13 7 20 Picea pungens 1 5' 1 6' EXISTING EVERGREENEVERGREEN 1 4' 1 5' 7 B&B B&B B&B
B&B Pinus ponderosaPONDEROSA PINE 14'-15' PP M = MULTI STEM S = SINGLE STEM TREES TO BE REMOVED 1 7' 1 9' SHRUBS FG 21 ID ISANTI DOGWOOD Calamagrostis x acutiflora 'Karl Foerster' Cornus
sericea 'Isanti' FEATHER REED GRASS#5 RTD4' B&B #5 14 REDTWIG DOGWOOD Cornus sericea 'Baileyi' 32 20' SPACING ON CENTER 4.1.15 SCALE :1"=20' 01030507090 FT NORTH 12149 E. Baseline
Rd. Lafayette, Colorado 80026 Phone: (303) 926-7260 Fax: (303) 926-7262 291 Summit Dr. Carbondale, Co 81623 Phone:(970) 963-9154 LAZY CHAIR ASPEN, CO 81611 L1 0 DATEISSUE
SHEET NEW ROAD PLANTINGS
0034.2015.ASLU/System Volume Information/IndexerVolumeGuid