HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.620 Gillespie St.0033-2020-BCOM (28)
Ordinance #1, Series 2020
Page 1 of 7
ORDINANCE #1
(SERIES OF 2020)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING HISTORIC
DESIGNATION AND BENEFITS, GROWTH MANAGEMENT, PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT, SPECIAL REVIEW, TRANSPORTATION IMPACT AND TRASH
STORAGE APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 620 GILLESPIE
AVENUE AND 845 MEADOWS ROAD, ASPEN INSTITUTE
PARCEL ID: 620 Gillespie Avenue, Parcel ID: 2735-121-29-809
and 845 Meadows Road, Parcel ID: 2735-121-29-008
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application for Historic
Designation and renovation of the Boettcher Building and construction of The Resnick Center
for Herbert Bayer Studies and a storage shed from The Aspen Institute, represented by Curtis and
Associates, Jeffrey Berkus Architects and Rowland + Broughton Architects, which requires the
following land use review approvals:
• Historic Designation and Benefits (Section 26.415.030.C) for voluntary historic
designation of the Boettcher Building, as an example of AspenModern.
• Commercial Design (Section 26.412.040) for remodel of the Boettcher Building,
construction of The Resnick Center for Herbert Bayer Studies, and construction of a new
storage building.
• Historic Preservation Major Development (Section 26.415.070.D) for remodel of the
Boettcher Building, construction of The Resnick Center for Herbert Bayer Studies, and
construction of a new storage building.
• Growth Management Employee Generation Review for an Essential Public Facility
(Section 26.470.050.C) to establish employee generation to be used as the basis for
affordable housing mitigation.
• Planned Development, Project Review (Section 26.445.040.B) for allowed land uses,
layout, mass and scale, and dimensions of the project.
• Transportation and Parking Management, Special Review (Section 26.515.080) to
establish, vary or waive transportation, mobility, or off-street parking requirements to
serve the project.
• Trash and Recycling Storage (Section 12.10) to incorporate the determination of the
Environmental Health Department into the land use review; and
WHEREAS, all code citation references are to the City of Aspen Land Use Code in effect on the
day of application completeness– December 10, 2019, as applicable to this Project; and,
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received referral comments from City
Engineering, Building Department, Environmental Health, Parks, Aspen/Pitkin County Housing
Authority, and Zoning as a result of a Development Review Committee meeting; and,
Ordinance #1, Series 2020
Page 2 of 7
WHEREAS, said referral agencies and the Aspen Community Development Department
reviewed the proposed application and recommended conditions; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.304.060 of the Land Use Code, the Community
Development Director may combine reviews where more than one (1) development approval is
being sought simultaneously; and,
WHEREAS, all required public noticing was provided as evidenced by an affidavit of public
noticing submitted to the record, a summary of public outreach was provided by the applicant to
meet the requirements of Land Use Code Section 26.304.035, and the public was provided a
thorough and full review of the proposed development; and,
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the application at duly noticed
public hearing on January 22, 2020, during which the recommendations of the Community
Development Director and comments from the public were heard by the Historic Preservation
Commission. The Commission granted Conceptual Commercial Design Review and Conceptual
Major Development Review and recommended, by a vote of 6 to 0, that Council approve
Historic Designation and Benefits, Growth Management, Planned Development, Special Review,
Transportation Impact and Trash Storage; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed the application and finds that it meets all
applicable standards, and that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public
health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ASPEN, COLORADO THAT:
Section 1: Approvals
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the
City Council hereby grants Historic Designation and Benefits, Growth Management, Planned
Development, Special Review, Transportation Impact and Trash Storage approval subject to the
following conditions.
1. The designation of the Boettcher building shall include The Resnick Center for Herbert
Bayer Studies and the surrounding landscape as depicted on Exhibit A to this Ordinance.
Only the Boettcher Building itself will be considered a historic resource. HPC will have
purview over the future and current development of this designated area in perpetuity.
Temporary tents, artwork and other similar temporary elements and improvements shall be
exempted from HPC review. The final historic designation site map to be recorded
following HPC Final Review will reflect the findings of the Historic Preservation
Commission at that Final Review hearing.
2. Approval of the proposed development and historic designation shall be granted within the
AspenModern negotiation period, which has been extended to March 19, 2020 by mutual
agreement of the City and the applicant.
3. Building permits for the approved project will be processed according to the Expedited
Permit Policy administered by the Building Department.
Ordinance #1, Series 2020
Page 3 of 7
4. Approval is granted for the removal or relocation of the Spruce Tree immediately adjacent
to the Boettcher Building, subject to additional oversight by the Parks Department. If the
tree is relocated, the location must be approved by HPC at Final review.
5. The Park Development Impact Fee and Transportation Demand Management/Air Quality
Impact Fee for the approved development shall be waived as a benefit of the AspenModern
historic designation.
6. Pedestrian Amenity, as required in the Commercial Design Standards in the Land Use
Code, is provided in the form of the open space surrounding the structures in this project.
7. No food preparation or kitchen facilities are permitted in The Resnick Center for Herbert
Bayer Studies, but kitchen facilities exist and are permitted in the Boettcher Building. No
private events may be held at the Boettcher Building or The Resnick Center for Herbert
Bayer Studies. The Resnick Center for Bayer Studies building may host events that are
sponsored by the Aspen Institute, whether inside the building or in the patio/lawn art in
front of the building. Educational and arts groups do not need to be sponsored by the Aspen
Institute. The Boettcher building may host events that are sponsored by the Aspen Institute
and Aspen Meadows Resort inside the building or on the lawn area on the North side of the
building. All outdoor events must conclude by 10:00 PM, and indoor events must conclude
by11PM.
8. The storage shed along Meadows Road adjacent to the tennis facility may be used for
storage and for charging electric vehicles only. The structure shall not be heated or
plumbed without further land use approvals. The long-standing parking area between the
tennis courts, which was paved in 2006 when an associated project was approved via
Ordinance #46, Series of 2005, but not fully executed, are incorporated in this approval and
may be used for tennis or general parking.
9. The applicant’s proposal to mitigate as an Essential Public Facility for a proposed employee
generation rate of 2.0 FTEs is approved. Those FTEs shall be mitigated at a rate of 100%
through the extinguishment of Certificates of Affordable Housing Credits. A formal
employee audit of the Boettcher Building and The Resnick Center for Herbert Bayer
Studies operations will be conducted prior to building permit approval and provided to
APCHA to review and approve. Additional employee generation audits are required to be
conducted two years and five years after Certificate of Occupancy. The auditor and audit
will be reviewed and approved by APCHA. Any costs associated with the audit will be at the
expense of the applicant. The Housing Authority shall request the audit from the applicant
and the applicant shall provide the Housing Authority and the Community Development
Department with the audit report. Failure to request the audit shall not render any of the
approvals invalid. The Housing Authority and Community Development shall forward the
audit to the Housing Board and/or City Council for review, as applicable.
10. Any additional FTE’s over the 2.0 proposed for the Boettcher Building and The Resnick
Center for Herbert Bayer Studies will require mitigation through a means approved by City
Council if over 0.10, or by the current cash-in-lieu rate established at the time of that
specific employee audit if under 0.10 FTEs. APCHA does not recommend anything greater
than 0.10 FTE’s to be mitigated by cash-in-lieu. Cash-in-lieu for FTEs in addition to the
2.0 approved in this ordinance and in excess of 0.10 additional FTE requires the approval of
City Council.
Ordinance #1, Series 2020
Page 4 of 7
11. A Trash Storage and Recycling facility plan acceptable to Environmental Health is included
in the approved HPC Final Review documentation and building permit application materials.
12. The Aspen Institute and Music Associates of Aspen have entered into a MOU providing for
shared parking in the MAA lot. The MOU details the number of spaces that will be available
to users of The Resnick Center for Herbert Bayer Studies, and the dates and times that they
may be used. This agreement is subject to renewal every five years and either party may
terminate it with no notice to the City of Aspen. The Institute has represented an intention to
seek long term cooperation and renewal of the agreement, or an alternative, including the
possibility of relocating the parking to the Paepcke Auditorium in the future lot if necessary.
If the MOU with the MAA is not renewed or is otherwise terminated, the applicant shall
provide to the City an alternative, equivalent transportation plan within 90 days of such non-
renewal or termination.
Section 2: Subsequent Reviews
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the
Applicant is required to obtain Planned Development – Detail Review and Final Major
Development Review to proceed to building permit. These applications may be combined and
shall be made no later than one (1) year following City Council approval of the reviews outlined
herein. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render the Planned
Development – Project Review, Conceptual Major Development approval and Growth
Management approval null and void. This deadline may be extended by the Community
Development Director, pursuant to Section 26.445.090.C of the Land Use Code.
In addition to the general documents required as part of a Planned Development – Detail Review,
the following items shall be required as part of the application’s Planned Development – Detail
Review:
a. An Outdoor Lighting Plan, pursuant to section 26.575.150.
b. A Site Development and Landscape Plan.
c. A Tree Removal and Mitigation Plan.
d. A finalized Transportation Impact Analysis approved by the City of Aspen Engineering
Department.
e. Demonstrated resolution of Referral Agency comments to the extent possible prior to
building permit submittal.
Section 3: Engineering Department
The applicant must address the following to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department as
part of building permit review.
Public Improvements:
a. All adjacent sidewalks and curb & gutter, as identified by the City Engineer and depicted
in HPC Final Review documents must be replaced prior to issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy. The sidewalk along Gillespie St. involves tree conflicts and the final
alignment must be approved by the Parks and Engineering Departments.
b. Pedestrian circulation facilities throughout the approved project area and adjacent rights-
of-way must be upgraded to ADA compliant access facilities.
Ordinance #1, Series 2020
Page 5 of 7
c. Curb and gutter are required along Gillespie Street and the parking lot entrance in
accordance with Engineering requirements.
Drainage Improvements:
A detailed drainage, storm water, and water quality plan is required per Engineering Department
standards.
a. A pervious pavement approved for use within the URMP is required for the parking area
and proposed shed location, apron, and access point.
b. The existing drywell at the Boettcher Building must be cleaned, and the rim brought to
finished grade as part of building permit, or if abandoned, a replacement drainage plan
shall be approved by the Engineering Department.
c. New asphalt must be treated and/or detained. Develop a plan for treatment of asphalt area.
Transportation Impact Analysis:
d. The applicant’s Transportation Impact Analysis must be approved by the Engineering
Department prior to HPC Final Review.
Utilities:
e. All ditch modifications or improvements must be coordinated with and approved by
relevant City departments and the Si Johnson Ditch Company prior to building permit
issuance.
f. The water service line may not be aligned within the sanitary easement. Only crossings will
be allowed in the easement.
g. Fire suppression calculations must be submitted and demonstrate that 2” fails. Prior to
building permit submit fire flow calculations and see section 5.4 of the Water Distribution
Standards.
h. Shared service lines are not recommended, but if allowed, Section 5.5 of the Water
Distribution Regulations applies, and a common service line agreement must be entered by
the parties. Further review of water service will occur prior to and at building permit.
i. An easement is required for the fiber and electrical primary lines on neighboring properties.
Section 4: Parks Department
The applicant must address the following to the satisfaction of the Parks Department as part of
building permit review.
a. A tree removal permit is required for the removal of trees and excavation within the
driplines of trees. Detailed tree preservation plans and tree mitigation plans with tree ID
numbers are required along with shoring plans prior to building permit submittal.
b. The two large Cottonwoods on either side of the new entrance at the south east corner of
the property are not approved for removal. These trees are identified as tree # 6898
which is a 35” DBH Cottonwood in the city right-of-way, and the large multi-stem
Cottonwood between the front lawn and the parking lot.
c. Application of fertilizers, growth regulator/inhibitors, and or root pruning, in
coordination with the City Forester and Historic Preservation Officer may be required
prior to the start of excavation within the driplines of trees.
d. Tree Protection Zones (TPZ) will be required at the drip line of all preserved trees. No
storage of construction materials, storage of construction backfill, storage of equipment,
Ordinance #1, Series 2020
Page 6 of 7
foot or vehicle traffic is allowed within this TPZ. This TPZ must be inspected and
approved by the City Forester or his designee prior to any construction activity
commences.
e. Proposed sidewalks and curb and gutter shall be of a “floating design” where driplines of
trees are encroached upon and may need to be adjusted to achieve appropriate offset to
the trees.
f. One-sided micro piling walls will be required along the south and west sides of the new
Bayer building to prevent impacts to adjacent tree driplines.
g. More information is required to be submitted for review and approval by Parks as part of
building permit submittal to determine impacts from utility cuts coming in from the north
side along the trail.
h. More details with regard to the proposed patio on the west side of the new building as
they relate to tree roots must be submitted for review and approval by Parks as part of
building permit submittal. Sand set pavers on existing grade may be required for this
patio.
i. The applicant shall provide detailed information regarding the boxing and transplanting
of the spruce tree to the courtyards sculpture garden.
j. All trenching and excavation for irrigation system installation within the driplines of trees
require City Forester approval prior to building permit issuance.
k. Shed design and location shall be coordinated with the Historic Preservation Officer and
City Forester to ensure compliance with tree preservation requirement.
l. If the transplanting of the spruce tree is deemed not feasible by the Parks Dept. then the
Applicant has no obligation to plant a spruce tree in the designated location, and if the
transplanted spruce tree dies, Applicant has no obligation to re-plant a spruce tree in the
designated location. Applicant shall pre-mitigate upfront for the transplanted spruce tree
such that Applicant has no obligation to pay a mitigation fee should the spruce tree die.
Section 5: Environmental Health Department
Environmental Health accepts the applicant’s proposal to pave a portion of the bus lane area on
the MAA parking lot, as represented in the application, as a beneficial improvement to fugitive
dust concerns on that property. Any future improvements to the MAA parking lot or dust
mitigation measures shall be coordinated with the Environmental Health and Community
Development Departments.
Section 6: Zoning
The applicant must address the following to the satisfaction of Zoning as part of building permit
review.
a. All fencing must comply with LUC section 26.575. All mechanical and venting
equipment shall meet the exceptions in 26.575.020.F.5, Allowed Exceptions to Height.
Section 7: Material Representations
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation
presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation
Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development
Ordinance #1, Series 2020
Page 7 of 7
approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by
other specific conditions or an authorized authority.
Section 8: Existing Litigation
This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of
any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended
as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
Section 9: Severability
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason
held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be
deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions thereof.
Section 10: Public Hearing
A public hearing on this ordinance shall be held on the 25th day of February, 2020, at a meeting of
the Aspen City Council commencing at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall,
Aspen, Colorado, a minimum of fifteen days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same shall
be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council
of the City of Aspen on the 28th day of January, 2020.
Attest:
______________________________ ____________________________
Nicole Henning, City Clerk Torre, Mayor
FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this ____ day of _____________, 2020.
Attest:
______________________________ ___________________________
Nicole Henning, City Clerk Torre, Mayor
Approved as to form:
______________________________________________
James R. True, City Attorney
Attachments:
Exhibit A: Approved plans and elevations
Exhibit B: Map of Boettcher designation area
02/11/2020
Boettcher & Bayer | Rendered Site Plan
Gi
l
l
e
s
p
i
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
CENTER FOR
HERBERT
BAYER STUDIES
BOETTCHER
SEMINAR
BUILDING
PODS
Walkway to Music Tent /
Paepke Building
Walkway to Music Tent /
Paepke Building
N 5TH Street Bus Lane
N
1
1
2
2
3
3
34
4
5
5
6
6
9
7
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
12
10
11 11
LEGEND
Central Lawn
Existing Entry Walk
Perimeter
Hedge
Gateway Sculpture
Benches
Perimeter Fencing
Reception Plaza
North Meadow to
Remain
North Meadow
Perimeter Walk
Event Lawn
20x20 Event Tent
20x30 Event Tent
AMFS Parking Lot
8
EXHIBIT A
01/22/2020
Boettcher & Bayer | Aspen Music Access
Section A
01/22/202001/22/2020
01/22/2020
Boettcher & Bayer |
1/16”=1’-0”
Partial Site Section Looking West
LEVEL ONET.O. EXST
BOND BEAMT.O. EXST
ROOF PLYT.O. EXST
PARAPETT.O. EXSTPARAPETT.O. EXST
T.O. PARAPETEXST
PARAPETT.O. EXST
13
'
-
1
1
/
2
"
18
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
0
"
17
'
-
4
"
BAYER CENTER
MAIN LEVEL
7885' - 6"
BOETTCHER
SEMINARMAIN LEVEL
7885' - 0"
BA
Y
E
R
H
I
G
H
E
S
T
P
O
I
N
T
BO
E
T
T
C
H
E
R
BAYER CENTER BOETTCHER SEMINAR BUILDING
BAYER CENTER
UPPER ROOF
7900' - 6"
4'
-
0
"
PARAPET
7903' - 0"
BOETTCHER
T.O. EXST
15
'
-
0
"
2'
-
4
"
STORAGE
12
'
-
6
"
BAYER CENTER
LOWER LEVEL7873' - 0"
CREATIVE
LAB LOBBY ENCLOSED
COURTYARD
HUDSON
ROOM
7885' - 0"
7894' - 9 1/2"
7895' - 11"
7898' - 1 1/2"
7903' - 0"7902' - 10"
BAYER CENTER
HIGHEST POINT 2"
BAYER CENTERMAIN LEVEL
7885' - 6"
6"
11/11/2019
Boettcher Seminar Building | Existing Building and Proposed Scope
PROPOSED SCOPE NOTES
EXISTING ROOFTOP MECHANICAL
UNITS TO BE REMOVED, ROOFS AT
THESE LOCATIONS TO BE INFILLED
WITH LOW-SLOPE ROOF (2” RISE)
BUILDING MASSING, ENTRY
LOCATIONS, ETC. TO REMAIN. ALL
ROOF FORMS TO REMAIN. FASCIA
AND STRUCTURE TO BE REPAIRED/
REPLACED AS REQUIRED
EXISTING CONCRETE PLINTH, CMU
BLOCK, AND CONCRETE BOND-
BEAM TO REMAIN
ALL EXISTING WINDOWS TO BE
REPLACED WITH NEW ALUMINUM
CLAD WOOD WINDOWS IN
CONFIGURATIONS, PROFILES, AND
TRIM DETAILS SIM. TO EXISTING
NEW DOORS TO MATCH EXISTING
EXPOSED CONDUIT, WIRING,
BOXES, ETC. TO BE REMOVED
AND RELOCATED TO INTERIOR OF
BUILDING
PROPOSED GRADE TO EMPHASIZE
CONCRETE PLINTH AT ENTRY
AND MEET BUILDING IN SIMILAR
MANNER AS EXISTING FOR
REMAINING BUILDING
WOOD FLOOR FINISH ON “BRIDGE”
ELEMENT TO BE REPLACED WITH
DRIP-THROUGH GRATE. WOOD
FASCIA TO REMAIN, REPAIR/
REPLACE AS REQUIRED
STAINED WOOD DECK TO BE
REPLACED WITH SIMILAR-SIZED
DECK, BENCH TO BE REMOVED
NEW VESTIBULE LINKING POD
ENTRIES AT BRIDGE TO BE ADDED
FOR GREATER ENERGY EFFICIENCY
AND ACCESSIBLE ACCESS
NEW OVERFRAMED ROOFS TO
HOUSE MECHANICAL BEYOND.
NEW SLOPED INSULATION TO BE
ADDED TO FLAT ROOF BEYOND
PARAPET. ALL NEW ROOF RIDGES
SHALL BE LOWER THAN EXISTING
PARAPET HEIGHTS. NEW SKYLIGHT
TO BE ADDED, PEAK IS MINIMALLY
VISIBLE (APPROX. 100’ TO NORTH
AND 200’ TO SOUTH).
01/22/202001/22/2020
11/11/2019
Boettcher Seminar Building | Existing Plan + Roof Plan - 6,090 S.F. (Main Bldg, incl. Courtyard)
- 1,478 S.F. ([2] Pods)
EXISTING GROUND FLOOR PLAN EXISTING ROOF PLAN
ENTRY
ENTRY
LOBBY
EXTERIOR
COURTYARD
HUDSON
ROOM
HARRIS
ROOM
DINGMAN
ROOM
POD
POD
BRIDGE
STO.
MECH.
LINE OF EXISTING
ROOFTOP MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT, TYP.
MISC. EXISTING
MECHANICAL VENTS
AND PENETRATIONS
(NOT ALL SHOWN)
LINE OF
EXISTING
ROOF
ABOVE
FLAT ROOF (NO
SLOPE)
SKYLIGHTS
KIT.
TRANS-
FORMER
STORAGE
DECK
OFFICE
OFFICE
COPY RMOFF. OFF.
RR
RR
OFFICE
OFFICE
OPEN
TO
BELOW
scale: 3/64” = 1’-0”scale: 3/64” = 1’-0”north north
01/22/202001/22/2020
11/11/2019
Boettcher Seminar Building | Proposed Plan + Roof Plan
PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN PROPOSED ROOF PLAN
ENTRY
ENTRY
LOBBY
CREATIVE
LAB
RR
RR
RR
ENCLOSED
COURTYARD
HUDSON
ROOM
HARRIS
ROOM
DINGMAN
ROOM
POD
POD
NEW
VESTIBULE
BRIDGE
MECH.
IT
KIT.
EXTERIOR
TRASH &
MECHANICAL
STORAGE
STO.
DECK
PREP /
STORAGE
EXISTING
SKYLIGHTS
LOW SLOPE INSULATION
LOW-SLOPE INFILL
ROOF TO CONCEAL NEW
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
(2” TOTAL RISE)
NEW SKYLIGHT, RISE
IS APPROX. 3’ ABOVE
PARAPET WALLS (MINIMAL
VISIBILITY)
OVERFRAMED ROOF,
RIDGE IS LOWER THAN
PARAPET WALLS
HUDDLE
scale: 3/64” = 1’-0”scale: 3/64” = 1’-0”north north
- 6,090 S.F. (Main Bldg, incl. Courtyard)
- 1,519 S.F. ([2] Pods + New Vestibule)01/22/202001/22/2020
01/22/2020
Boettcher & Bayer |
MAIN LEVEL0' -0"
01 Plate9' -6"
UPPER ROOF15' -0"
MAIN ROOF11' -0"
15
'
-
0
"
4'
-
0
"
11
'
-
0
"
WHITE PRECAST CONCRETE PANEL
PTD. STEEL WINDOW FRAMES
W/ TRIPLE GLAZING
WHITE PRECAST CONCRETE PANEL
PTD. STEEL FASCIA
ROOF MONITOR
site grade-0' -7"
MAIN LEVEL0' -0"
01 Plate9' -6"
UPPER ROOF15' -0"
MAIN ROOF11' -0"
PTD. STEEL CHANNEL FASCIA
CONDENSERS IN
ACOUSTICAL ENCLOSURE
WHITE PRECAST CONCRETE PANEL
15
'
-
0
"
4'
-
0
"
11
'
-
0
"
PTD. MECH. LOUVER
WHITE PRECAST CONCRETE PANEL
ROOF MONITOR BEYOND
WHITE MASONRY PANEL
FASCIA & SOFFIT
BLACK MASONRY PANEL
BLACK MASONRY PANEL
site grade-0' -7"
Exterior Elevations (East & West)
West Elevation
East Elevation
1/8”=1’-0”
01/22/2020
Boettcher & Bayer | Exterior Elevations (North & South)
MAIN LEVEL0' -0"
01 Plate9' -6"
UPPER ROOF15' -0"
MAIN ROOF11' -0"
PTD. STEEL WINDOW FRAMES
W/ TRIPLE GLAZING
PTD. STEEL CHANNEL FASCIA
WHITE MASONRY PANEL
FASCIA & SOFFIT
WHITE PRECAST CONCRETE PANEL
WHITE MASONRY PANEL
ROOF MONITOR
11
'
-
0
"
4'
-
0
"
BLACK MASONRY PANEL
site grade-0' -7"
MAIN LEVEL0' -0"
01 Plate9' -6"
UPPER ROOF15' -0"
MAIN ROOF11' -0"
15
'
-
0
"
4'
-
0
"
11
'
-
0
"
CONDENSERS IN
ACOUSTICAL ENCLOSURE
WHITE PRECAST CONCRETE PANEL
ROOF MONITOR
PTD. STEEL CHANNEL FASCIA
BLACK MASONRY PANEL
WHITE MASONRY PANEL
FASCIA & SOFFIT
WHITE PRECAST CONCRETE PANEL
PTD. STEEL CHANNEL FASCIA
BLACK STONE VENEER
WHITE MASONRY PANEL
PTD. STEEL WINDOW FRAMES
W/ TRIPLE GLAZING
BLACK MASONRY PANEL BLACK MASONRY PANEL
site grade-0' -7"
North Elevation
South Elevation
1/8”=1’-0”
01/22/2020
Boettcher & Bayer | Entry Level Floor Plan - 3,121 S.F.
1/8”=1’-0”
TERRACE
ELEVATORSTAIR 1
MEN'S
RESTROOM
GALLERY 3 GALLERY 2 /
HISTORY
GALLERY 1
ENTRY
VESTIBULE
GALLERY 4
BRIDGE
GALLERY 5 /
LOUNGE WOMEN'S
RESTROOM
RE
T
A
I
L
S
H
E
L
V
I
N
G
MECHANICAL
ENCLOSURE
WITH LOUVERED
DOORS
VI
T
R
I
N
E
DN
DN
STAIR 2
BE
N
C
H
BE
N
C
H
MECHANICAL
ENCLOSURE
WITH LOUVERED
DOORS
01/22/2020
Boettcher & Bayer |
1/8”=1’-0”
Lower Level Floor Plan - 4,415 S.F.
UP
UP
GALLERY 10
STORAGE
ARCHIVE
GALLERY 6ELEVATOR
GALLERY 8
GALLERY 7
STAIR 1
PASSAGE
GALLERY 9
ELECTRICAL
WATER ENTRY /
MECHANICAL
GALLERY 11
STAIR 2
VEST.
VEST.
ELEV. EQ.
8'
-
0
"
H
I
G
H
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
8'
-
0
"
H
I
G
H
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
DESK WITH OPEN SHELVES ABOVE
UNISEX
ACCESSIBLE
RESTROOM
JANITOR
CLOSET
11/11/2019
Service Yard Shed Structure | Site Plan
PROPOSED SERVICE YARD SHED
EXISTING SERVICE YARD
EXISTING TENNIS COURT
EXISTING TENNIS COURTSEXISTING TENNIS COURTS
north
EXIS TING S ERVIC E YARD
01/22/202001/22/2020
11/11/2019
Service Yard Shed Structure | Proposed Plan
PROPOSED AXONOMETRIC LOOKING NORTHEASTPROPOSED AXONOMETRIC LOOKING NORTHWEST
scale: 1/16” = 1’-0”scale: 1/16” = 1’-0”
01/22/202001/22/2020
11/11/2019
Service Yard Shed Structure | Proposed Plan
/,1(2)($9($%29(
('*(2)&21&5(7(3$'
6/23($1''5$,1$*(7%'
:6,7(6859(< 67((/&2/801 ;+66
78%($6680(' 7<3
(;,67,1*&+$,1/,1.)(1&(
:,7+35,9$&<1(77,1*
(;,67,1*(/(&75,&$/
(48,30(17725(0$,1
(;,67,1*6(59,&(<$5'
(;,67,1*7(11,6&2857
352326('6(59,&(
<$5'6+('
6))/225$5($
%8,/',1*3$'
(;,67,1*3$5.,1*/27
$3
3
5
2
;
5$&(75$&.23(163$&(
%2//$5'7<3
&21&3$'
&
2
1
&
3
$
'
scale: 3/32” = 1’-0”
north
01/22/202001/22/2020
11/11/2019
Service Yard Shed Structure | Proposed Elevations & Section
PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION
PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION
PROPOSED SECTION
(;,67,1*)(1&(
72
725,'*(%($0
0$,1/(9(/
726/$%
/,1(2)*5$'(
*$1*(/(&75,&$/287/(7 (;,67,1*
(;,67,1*7(11,6&2857)(1&(:,7+35,9$&<1(77,1*
35(/,0,1$5<%5$&,1*6+2:17%':
6758&785$/&225',1$7,21
)$%5,&6&5((1,1*$7*$%/(63$&(
(;,67,1*)(1&(
72
725,'*(%($0
0$,1/(9(/
726/$%
/,1(2)*5$'((;,67,1*7(11,6&2857)(1&(:,7+35,9$&<1(77,1*
(;,67,1*)(1&(
72
725,'*(%($0
0$,1/(9(/
726/$%
67$1',1*6($00(7$/522)
/,1(2)*5$'(
3$,17('67((/
6758&785($1')$6&,$
(;,67,1*)(1&(
scale: 3/32” = 1’-0”
scale: 3/32” = 1’-0”
scale: 3/32” = 1’-0”
01/22/202001/22/2020
01/22/2020
Boettcher & Bayer |
3 Phase Power
3 Phase Power & Fiber Optic Lines
Fiber Optics
Wildlife Protection Zoning
Amy’s Meadows Conservation Easement
Wildlife Protection Zoning
Amy’s Meadows Conservation Easement
Fiber Optics
3 Phase Power
01/29/2020
Boettcher & Bayer |
Prop
e
r
t
y
L
i
n
e
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
L
i
n
e
1
8
5
.
8
’
G
i
l
l
e
s
p
i
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
Physics
Boettcher Seminar
Building
Physics
Amy’s Meadows Conservation Easement
1992 Preservation Zoning Boundary Line1992 Preservation Zoning Boundary Line
Amy’s Meadows Conservation Easement
Irrigated
Lawn
Physics
Volleyball
Property Line 411.0’
Prop
e
r
t
y
L
i
n
e
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
L
i
n
e
1
8
5
.
8
’
Property Line 411.0’
Property Line 458.41’
Irrigated
Lawn
368.0’ to Zoning Boundary
Property Line 458.41’
368.0’ to Zoning Boundary
368.0’ to Zoning Boundary368.0’ to Zoning Boundary
Proposed Context Site Plan
Bayer
Center
New PathNew Path
Notes:
1. Only the Boettcher Seminar Building is hereby designated to
the City of Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and
Structures, but the HPC shall have review over any permanent
changes to the buildings or grounds in the designated area,
except as noted below.
2. There shall be no HPC review of outdoor art installations;
movable objects such as tables, chairs, or umbrellas;
temporary tents; or similar temporary elements. These
elements may not be permanently attached to the Boettcher
Seminar Building.
Red dashed line indicates extents of
historic designation, see notes for
further information.
(see notes)
Proposed Historic Designation Map
FINAL MAP WILL BE ADJUSTED AND RECORDED AT THE TIME OF RECORDING APPROVAL DOCUMENTS BASED ON HPC PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT - DETAIL REVIEW AND FINAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND APPROVALS
DRAFT MAP
01 / 29 / 2020
Northern limits of Historic Designation
correspond to northern edge of site
disturbance, exclusive of proposed
path through Amy's Meadow
EXHIBIT B