HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.rz.440 Maroon Creek Rd.A010-99
"""
,
Ii
~~~.
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
1"'"\
MEMORANDUM
Mayor and City Council
i""""\
Amy Margerum, City Manager
John Worcester, City Attorney
Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
Christopher Bendon, Planner ~
Iselin Park Rezoning - 2nd Reading & Public Hearing (cont. from March 22nd)
Ordinance No.3, Series of 1999
April 6, 1999
SUMMARY:
The City of Aspen has recently armexed a 21 + acre tract of land known as "Iselin"
and "Rotary" Parks. As part of the statutory requirements of armexation, the City has
an obligation to zone the property within 90 days of the armexation. In Pitkin
County, the property straddled two zone districts. The northern half of the land was
zoned AFR-2 and the southern half AFR-10. Both of these zone districts permit
single-family residential uses and general outdoor recreational uses.
The Community Development Department's original recommendation was to zone
this parcel Public (PUB). This City zone district allows for the current use and the
uses being considered in the master plarming effort. The Public Zone also allows,
however, for uses not being considered, such as hospital, fire station, and museum,
which raise concerns with neighboring property owners.
The Park Zone District allows for the current land use and allows for all uses being
considered in the master plarming effort with the exception of affordable housing.
(The Planning and Zoning .commission requested the development team investigate
the possibility of including a few units of affordable housing to offset the generation
of additional employees by the project.) The City Attorney expressed concern about
the City Council considering the Park Zone District while the public noticing
identified the Public Zone District and requested the hearing be continued and the
neighbors re-noticed.
The public hearing has been re-noticed for consideration of the Park Zone District.
The property was posted, the property owners within 300 feet ofthe property were
mailed notice, and a legal notice was published in the Aspen Times.
Staff recommends City Council adopt Ordinance No.3, Series of 1999, to rezone
Iselin and Rotary Parks to the Park Zone District.
1
,1"""\
,~
ApPLICANT:
Community Development Department, City of Aspen.
LOCATION:
450 Maroon Creek Road (Moore Pool). Located west ofthe School Campus.
ZONING:
Pitkin County Zoning: AFR-2 for the northern portion. AFR-10 for the southern
portion.
Proposed City Zoning: Park (P) Zone. A copy of the proposed zoning is attached as
Exhibit B.
LOT SIZE:
21.269 acres.
CURRENT LAND USE:
Active and passive open space and recreation. Municipal pool and tennis courts.
PROPOSED LAND USE:
The City Parks and Recreation Departments are considering a redevelopment of this
parcel to accommodate an indoor public ice rink, pool, ball fields, and affordable
housing. The proposed Park zoning would accommodate all the uses being
contemplated with the exception of affordable housing. The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommended the Public Zone by a 6 to 0 vote.
PROPOSED LAND USE:
The parcel was annexed into the City on January 11, 1999. The Planning and Zoning
Commission reviewed this zoning request on March 2, 1999, and recommended the
Public Zone District. The latest conceptual development plans were reviewed during
a work session with the development team.
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
Rezoning. Upon receiving a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the Community Development Director, the City Council shall
consider the application at a public hearing and approve, approve with conditions, or
deny the rezoning request.
BACKGROUND:
The subject property was annexed into the City of Aspen on January 11, 1999.
According to State statute, the City must rezone the property within 90 days of the
final annexation. The property was zoned AFR-2 and AFR-10 in Pitkin County.
These are low-density residential zones.
2
.;;
.'
r-..
f""':
STAFF COMMENTS:
The City Planning Department originally recommended the Public Zone District
because it represented the best possible "fit" with the uses being considered in the
Iselin Park Master Plan. The Public Zone District allows for public recreational
facilities and for the provision of affordable housing on-site -- a use not allowed in the
Park Zone.
The Public Zone also allows for uses, such as a museum, which are not part of the
current planning concepts. After concerns were raised by the neighbors over the
provisions of the Public Zone District, the Community Development Department is
recommending the Park Zone District as an appropriate zoning which does not allow
for uses not being considered in the master planning effort.
Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit A. A copy of the
Park Zone District requirements has been provided as Exhibit B. A vicinity map has
been included as Exhibit C.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council adopt Ordinance No.3, Series of 1999, rezoning
Iselin and Rotary Parks to the Park (P) Zone District with no conditions.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to adopt Ordinance No.3, Series of 1999."
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Comments
Exhibit B -- Park (P) Zone District provisions
Exhibit C -- Vicinity Map
3
r-,
r1
I FeAt nF~RIP110N
:y
IREA
A lRACT OF lAND LOCAlEO iN lHE SWI/... OF SEClION II AND lHE NWI/'" OF
SEClION I'" ALL IN 1I0S. R85W OF lHE 6lH P.M.. COUNlY OF PI11<IN. STATE OF
COLORADO. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT lHE SV'" ,CORNER OF SAID SECTION II. lHENCE 539'51'00'W. 1061.60
FEET ALONG lHE SouTJ,lEASTERL Y UNE OF lHA T lRACT OF lAND AS DESCRIBED IN
DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 119 AT PAGE 40 OF lHE RECORDS OF PI11<IN COUNlY.
COLORADO; ,
lHENCE N...2'35'OO'W, 372.00 FEET ALONG lHE SOUlHWESTERL Y UNE OF lHA T
lRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 119 AT PAGE 40;
lHENCE N90'oo'oo'W, 178.75 FEET ALONG lHE SOUlH UNE OF lHA T lRACT OF
LAND AS DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 119 AT PAGE 40 TO lHE APPROXIMATE CENTER-
UNE OF MAROON CREEK;
lHE FOLLOWING FlIIE (5) COURSES AND DISTANCES ARE ALONG lHE APPROXIMATE
CENTERUNE OF SAID MAROON CREEK;
N3IeOS'20.W, 51.37 FEET;
N07"29'45'E, 167.28 FEET;
NI8'51'21'E, 86.99 FEET;
NI5'02'2B'E, 188.91 FEET;
NI0.01'03'W. 71.19 FEET TO lHE SOUlH UNE OF lHE SWI/... OF SAID SEClION II;
lHENCE. LEAVING lHE APPROXIMATE CENTERUNE OF SAID MAROON CREEl<. 589' 48'20'E,
26.91 FEET ALONG lHE SOUlH UNE OF lHE SWI/'" OF SAID SEClION II AND lHE
SOUlHERL Y UNE OF MAROON CREEK CLUB SUBDIVISION (SOUlH) AN ANNEXA liON MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 4/ AT PAGE 76 IN lHE RECORDS OF PI11<IN COUNlY. COLORADO;
lHENCE NOo'I""51'W. 20l.B2 FEET ALONG lHE EASTERLY UNE OF SAID
MAROON CREEK CLUB SUBDIVISION (SOUlH) ANNEXA liON;
lHENCE N33.0I'1....E. 281.07 FEET ALONG lHE EASTERLY UNE OF SAID
MAROON CREEK CLUB SUBDIVISION (SOUlH) ANNEXA liON;
lHENCE N02'16'09'W. 26....36 FEET ALONG lHE EASTERLY UNE OF SAID MAROON
CREEK CLUB SUBDIVISION (SOUlH) ANNEXA liON TO lHE NORlHEASTERL Y UNE OF
lHAT lRACT OF lAND AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 789 AT PAGE 21...
OF lHE RECORDS OF PI11<IN COUNlY. COLORADO;
lHENCE 556'32'30' E, 605.85 FEET ALONG lHE NORlHEASTERL Y UNE OF lHA T'
lRACT OF lAND AS DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 789 AT PAGE 21... TO lHE NORlH-
WEST CORNER OF lHA T lRACT OF lAND AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN BOOK
341 AT PAGE 127 OF lHE RECORDS OF Pll1<lN COUNlY. COLORADO;
lHENCE 556'32'20'E, 1.......15 FEET ALONG lHE NORlHEASTERL Y UNE OF lHA T TRACT
OF lAND AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 34/ AT PAGE 127 TO lHE NORlHWEST CORNER OF
lHAT TRACT OF lAND AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 246 AT PAGE 962
OF lHE RECORDS OF PI11<IN COUNlY. COLORADO;
lHENCE SOUlHEASTERLY. 129.76 FEET ALONG lHE ARC OF A CURIIE CONCAIIE
TO lHE NORlHEAST AND ALONG lHE NoRlHEASTERLY UNE OF lHAT lRACT OF lAND
AS DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 246 AT PAGE 962. SAID ARC HAVING A RADIUS OF
700.00 FEET. A CENlRAL ANGLE OF 10.37'1...., AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
lHA T BEARS 561'12'27'E, 129.57 FEET;
lHENCE 589' 48'20'E, 50.85 FEET ALONG lHE NORlHEASTERL Y UNE OF lHA T
lRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 246 AT PAGE 962 TO lHE NORlHEAST
CORNER lHEREOF;
'FESSlONAL
INFORMA liON
ERK AND
-'
~~A
Ii T
I
.Orz1\lI\C1l\ce.. ?,l~~~
:1
.~
.'"
,
,tI""'\
r-,.
EXHIBIT A
STAFF COMMENTS: Iselin Rezoning
Section 26.92.020, Standards Applicable to Rezoning
In reviewing an amendment to the official zone district map, the City Council and the
Commission shall consider:
A. Whether the proposed amendment is in conflict with any applicable portions of this title.
Staff Finding:
The proposed zoning is consistent with the Land Use Code and does not represent any potential
conflicts. The Park zoning requires all development on the site to proceed through the PUD
process in order to determine the appropriate dimensional requirements, parking, general impacts,
and intensity of uses. Therefore, before any development occurs, the Planning and Zoning
Commission and Council will have the opportunity to review the proposal under a PUD process.
B. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the Aspen Area
Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Finding:
The 1993 AACP identifies the Iselin and Rotary Park parcel with the following suggested action:
Expand Iselin Park for organized recreational activities, and incorporate the Rotary
Club proposal for a passive park and semi-active park.
The Park Zone District is appropriate for these types of proposed uses. This zone does not allow
for affordable housing, which may be a desirable element for the final program.
C. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with surrounding zone districts and land
uses, considering existing land use and neighborhood characteristics.
Staff Finding:
Surrounding the site is the public school campus, medium-density residential, and Maroon Creek.
There is a proposed bridge linking the parks with the base area of Tiehack. The Park Zone
allows for uses compatible with the surrounding area. The subsequent PUD process will
determine the intensity of those uses allowed and any mitigation measures to offset adverse
impacts to the surrounding area.
D. The effect of the proposed amendment on traffic generation and road safety.
Staff Finding:
The level of development and its level of traffic generation and impacts on road safety will be
evaluated through the PUD process. Traffic, transit, pedestrian facilities, and overall road safety
have been issues raised by the Commission in work sessions with the Parks Department. These
issues will remain important elements in the planning process. The existing and potential level of
traffic in the area must combine with the high level of existing and potential pedestrian
movements in a safe manner, especially considering the age of the pedestrians and peaks in level
Staff Comments 1
f"""'\
~
of activity. Transportation issues, the acceptable level of trip generation, and the most appropriate
and safe design will be determined and required through the PUD process. The project team
includes a traffic consultant who will address transportation in detail.
The development program for the parcel is in the conceptual stages. The applicant realizes that
safe transportation is a primary design parameter and has made specific accommodations in
designing the site. This zoning does not allow development as of right to occur without full
review as a PUD, and the Parks Department has been very cooperative in accommodating the
concerns of staff and the Commission in programming the site.
E. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment wonld result in demands on
public facilities, and whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would
exceed the capacity of such facilities, including, but not limited to, transportation
facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, and emergency
medical facilities.
Staff Finding:
The zone district designation will not, itself, have an effect on the provision of public facilities.
Again, this topic is a criterion ofPUD and ofGMQS. Applicants are required to provide letters
of intent for services which the development affects, and upgrades to the system or other
appropriate mitigation measures are typically required iffound to be necessary.
F. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant
adverse impacts on the natural environment
Staff Finding:
The natural features of the site are being considered with the master planning effort. The river
corridor, recreational connections, transit, and use schedules with the surrounding parcels are all
being considered to reduce the level of impact the development may have on the natural
environment. The Park zoning designation will not adversely affect the natural environment.
G. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent and compatible with the community
character in the City of Aspen.
Staff Finding:
The Parks Department has been working with the surrounding property owners to achieve a
reasonable compatibility with the neighborhood. This process will continue. Staff believes the
master planning effort is consistent with the AACP and that the Park zoning is compatible with
the City character.
H. Whether there have been changed conditions affecting the subject parcel or the
surrounding neighborhood which support the proposed amendment.
Staff Finding:
Annexation of the property into the City of Aspen is a condition which requires this process. The
Park Zone District allows for the current use of the property and allows for the uses being
considered in the master planning effort.
Staff Comments 2
1""""-,
('\
I. Whether the proposed amendment would be ill conflict with the public illterest, and is in
harmony with the purpose atld illtent ofthis title.
Staff Finding:
This proposed Park Zone District does not pose any conflicts with the public interest. The AACP
specifically reflects a community desire for increased recreational facilities at this location, and
the flexibility to accommodate employee housing on-site for those additional jobs created by the
development represents good land use planning and should be encouraged. Staff believes this
zone district will promote the purpose and intent of this Title and will be in harmony with the
public interest.
Staff Comments 3
1""'\
,..-.
EXHIBIT B
26.28. 240 Park Zone District
A. Purpose. The purpose of the Park (P) zone district is to ensure that land intended for
recreation use is developed so as to serve its intended use, while not exerting a disruptive
influence on surrounding land uses.
When a Park (P) zone district is designated with a Transportation Overlay (T) zone
district designation, its purpose is to provide for the use off or both parks and public
transportation facilities in the most compatible manner practicable, but with the park
character remaining dominant.
When a Park (P) zone district is designated with a Drainage Overlay (D) zone district
designation, its purpose is to provide for the use of both park and drainage system
facilities in the most compatible manner practicable, with the park character remaining
dominant.
When the Park (P) zone district is designated both with the Transportation Overlay (T)
zone district and the Drainage Overlay (D) zone district, its purpose is to provide for the
use of parks, public transportation facilities, and drainage system facilities in the most
compatible manner practicable, with the park character remaining dominant.
When the Park (P) zone district is designated Golf Course Support (GCS) Overlay zone
district, its purpose is to provide for the use of public golf courses and adjacent support
facilities in the most compatible manner practicable, with the park character remaining
dominant.
B. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted as of right in the Park (P) zone district.
I. Open-use recreational facility, park, playfield, playground, golf course, riding
stable, nursery, botanical garden; and
2. Accessory buildings and uses.
C. Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted as conditional uses in the Park (P)
zone district, subject to the standards and procedures established in Chapter 26.60.
I. Recreation building;
2. Sport shop;
3. Restaurant facility; and
4. Park maintenance building.
D. Dimensional requirements. The dimensional requirements which shall apply to all
permitted and conditional uses in the Park (P) zone district shall be set by the adoption of
a conceptual development plan and final development plan, pursuant to Chapter 26.84,
Planned Unit Development.
E. Off-street parkhig requirement. The following off-street parking spaces shall be
provided for each use in the Park (P) zone district subject to the provisions of Chapter
26.32.
1. Lodge use: I space/bedroom
2. Residential use: N/A
3. All other uses: Requires special review pursuant to Chapter 26.64. (Ord. No. 22-
1995, ~ 6: Code 1971, 9 5-219)
,,/~~
.) "\
.~
r~G~,~d:, C-
. ,""" ~
{\~ ,~.. ke\,,^ 0,,^,,i^~
~~~ "'-:: 0> q [
"= Hi-!! I . I
r
I=--/ ( ;:J "I" 'I; II
r ~ Maroonl~ ) A .r- .r-') ~ .
r<c~ ~ I ~ · -.....J j\-
~I~, I-',V)' - ~;~ ' Viii
~ ,'- ~ IV ~ jV L ......-- ~~..~~~.., l2:']\;J ~~
'<U ~ 'Ut . It. r:~ \ )x ":';i~
"",' '$;, l~ ..~ ' .
\ ~ . ~
-, J'j :'-- ~ ~
\ :.. - School Campus w, - =~~ "ll>j
1'" - ,;,"'JY ~~. cI.c
>> .'<'} ~~~
IJ..A, IA . r; ~ .d"tI ~"~...u. I....r.
II 'YJ/' .~~ Iselin & Rotary Park,~'"}?" II
J/f./ .. ~~~ V ~ p~'- 'l:i1
t;t;L, a. ~~ ~ M W',....,W~"" '/U
'E. 'l .1-..' ~::::: . ___
~~ ,.. ~ ,
.~ ,;:. .
~ ~~ ~ ~/
( :d:: ~v ,/
1/~ xV I ./'~~-
\!. /, ~ ~y ,
l TJlI 't7-I F v
fl7r~fJ.-..,.u .
~ J{ '5vf
Jj
--:-
~
~
I
.J;:
I
....--.....
~
)
@ v ~
';7 ~t L1L
iJ ~ (
. I
"
f 4rJ;~
,
....
./
Z
/
,
/, .\
... -.
I ... ;-
ff1
Ii
j
Jr/:~ i /
e I~ ...r/-~
~
7
~ G
~~
~
I \ ~'" t::y--.
i
I
,
.{,.&.,c1i.-. ,.".-!tdiVJ-.._-_!JZ&1~_.._---_._-.f;vtt{~,../1etza~.".....
"
]~~U~~~- , .JeZ
,.__ ,..,,'. ... .,:1"" "".,.l~,e....(k~ .(/w~....&2atd_---e&--~
"!
r",
,t""',
J
!!
;~1-' 'flU
... ~;,..Il#
:I
HI
!
~o.
f~~'-
'-'--1'1
.i,
I
,
..~ ~
11
:
'.'n-'
I
_"";J.
..___'n .--,-~'t'.-..
:!
"
"
,;i
,---",,':"j
"
,
I
-------:'r--."
, ~ I
iTr
"i
iii
"I
:,i
. "~'I
::i
,,,
i,1
,I
:'i
~I
'il
, ~ I
I_'i
'-~"Trr
iii
.-~~.,
I:,
iii
,",~.i-",,_
,1!
i;i
111
:1!
----~-r.
i!1
~-i-t--_.._-_.
ili
1'1
'il
'in
i;1
,'1
- -"T":1
:i
'-'iTI
':o.'GI
'-.
'-
r----.
County of Pitkin }
}
State of Colorado }
ss.
I, (J;\~\S ~
~
Attachment 8
AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT
TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS
SECTION 26.52.060(E)
, being or representing an
Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice
requirements pursuant to Section 26.52.060(E) of the Aspen Municipal Code in the following
manner:
1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class postage prepaid U.S.
. Mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the s~bject property, as indicated
on the attached list, on the 22 -:%ay of tJ\ ~~ , 199 -l (which is tt days prior to the public
hearing date Of~\('t \(0). .
2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from
the nearest public way) and that the;Cd sign was p~sted and visible continuously from theU-~ay
of ~~ , 199~t to the ~day of ~ \ , 199~. (Must be posted for at least
ten (10) full days before the hearing date ).A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto.
\
QJt~W
Signed before me this 'Zj~ay of U- ~c..vd--.
19~. by .
.~S ~~\)~.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
My Commission expires
~~ expires: 12/26/2000
-~A, Adtk .
Notary Public - - ..
-..
'-.-- ...,....
-:.
...
-
.
-
,..
~
MAROON CREEK LLC
10 CLUB CIRCLE
ASPEN, CO 81611
!"""vORE .\LBERTA L PERS RES TRUST
. -..I BOX 116
WOODY CREEK. CO 81656
ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
0235 HIGH SCHOOL RD
ASPEN, CO 8]611
MAROON CREEK LLC
PEARCE EQUITIES
10 CWB CIRCLE
.o\SPE)i. CO 81611
LOTS 7 & 8 ~1AROON CREEK LLC
C/O GARF]ELD & HECHT PC
601 E HY1vlAN AVE
ASPEN. CO 81611
LOTS 7 & 3 y!AROON CREEK LLC
C/O GARFIELD & HECHT PC
601 E HYMAN AVE
ASPEX CO 81611
HARTRICH JAivlES G
PO BOX 12285
ASPEN, CO 31612
L W DEVELOPMENT fNC
OATES LEONARD M ESQ C/O
533 E HOPKlNS AVE
ASPEN, CO 81611
CARSON L KELLEY
PO BOX 8927
ASPEN, CO 31612
BRADFORD DEBORAH
PO BOX 4856
ASPEN, CO 3]612
BRADFORD DEBORAH
PO BOX 4856
ASPEN, CO 8]6]2
FRAMPTON GEORGE T JR
C/O US DEFT OF THE fN7ERIOR
3215 NEWARK STNW
W ASHlNGTON. DC 20008
L W DEVELOPMENT fNC
OATES LEONARD M ESQ C/O
533 E HOPKlNS AVE
ASPEN, CO 8]611
SCHENNUM EARL C JR
SCHENNUM CAROL M
PO BOX 867
ASPEN, CO 8]QI2
',--
WOODWARD RALPH H
I05WOODWARDLN
ASPEN, CO 8]611
r'iBOER MARIL YN S REVOCABLE TRUST
.2 E CENTRAL AVE
WICHITA. KS
aOSIER GERALD D
PO BOX 12354
ASPEN. CO 31612
HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
PO BOX 4970
ASPEN. CO 81611
CHURCH OF msus CHRIST OF LATTER
D,c,y STS
C/O REAL ESTATE DIVISION
50 EN TEMPLE
SALT LAKE CITY. UT 34150
DOREMUS ANDREW J & JEANNE C
i8.10i%>
85 GLEN GARRY DR
ASPEN, CO 81611
SLATER LAWRENCE J
lOn MAROON CRK RD
ASPEN. CO 3161]
MCCREARY W]LLIA.lVl F & PHILLIS M
9750 AivlANITA A VB
TUJUNGA. CA 91042
~ '--'~
,......"
~
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: ISELIN AND ROTARY PARK REZONING TO THE PARK ZONE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, April 6,
1999 at a meeting to begin at 4: 15 p.m. before the Aspen City Council, Council Chamber,
City Hall, Aspen, to consider an application submitted by the City of Aspen requesting
rezoning of the property to Park (P). The property is legally described as a tract ofland
located in the SW 1/4 of section 11 and the NW 1/4 of section 14, Township 10 South,
Range 85 West of the 6th PM, Pitkin County, Colorado. This tract ofland is commonly
referred to as "Iselin Park" and "Rotary Park," contains the "Moore Pool," and is located
on the west side of Maroon Creek Road near Glen Eagle Drive. For further information,
contact Chris Bendon at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S.
Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 920-5072, chrisb@cLaspen.co.us.
stJohn Bennett, Mayor
Aspen City Council
The above referenced item was continued from the City Council meeting held on March
22 to change the zoning from Public (PUB) to Park (P).
-.
~ -",:~
-
MAROON CREEK LLC
10 CLUB CIRCLE
ASPEN, CO 81611
ASPEN SCHOOL DlSTRICT
0235 HIGH SCHOOL RD
ASPHI, CO 81611
LOTS 7 & 8 :V1AROON CREEK LLC
C/O GARFIELD & HECHT PC
601 E HYl'vlAN AVE
ASPEN. CO 81611
HARTRICH JAi'vIES G
PO BOX 12285
ASPEN, CO 81612
L W DEVELOPMENT INC
OATES LEONARD M ESQ C/O
533 E HOPKINS AVE
ASPEN. CO 81611
BRADFORD DEBORAH
PO BOX 4856
ASPEN, CO 81612
FRAMPTON GEORGE T JR
C/O US DEPT OF THE IN7ERIOR
3215NEWARKSTNW
W ASHlNGTON. DC 20008
SCHENNUM EARL C JR
SCHENNUM CAROL M
PO BOX 867
ASPEN, CO 81612
,~
',-
~ORE .\LBERTA L PERS RES TRUST
. jBOX [26
WOODY CREEK: CO 81656
~
."
MAROON CREEK LLC
PEARCE EQUlTlES
10 CLLB CIRCLE
ASPEOi. CO 816lf
LOTS 7 & 8 'vlAROON CREEK LLC
C/O GARFIELD & HECHT PC
601 E HY'vIAN AVE
ASPEN. CO 81611
CARSON L KELLEY
PO BOX 8927
ASPEN, CO 81612
BRADFORD DEBORAH
PO BOX 4856
ASPEN, CO 81612
L W DEVELOPMENT lNC
OATES LEONARD M ESQ C/O
533 E HOPKINS AVE
ASPEN, CO 81611
WOODWARD RALPH H
!O5 WOODWARD LN
ASPEN, CO 81611
~BOER MARIL YN S REVOCABLE TRUST
12 E CENTRAL AVE
WICHITA. KS
HOSIER GERALD D
PO BOX 1235"
.\SPEX CO 81612
HlNES HIGHLANDS LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
PO BOX 4970
ASPEN. CO 816lf
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER
Dc,Y STS
C/O REAL ESTATE DlVISION
50 EN TEMPLE
SALT LAKE CITY. DT 84150
DOREMUS ANDREW J & JEANNE C
78.1 07%
85 GLENGARRY DR
ASPEN, CO 81611
SLATER LAWRENCE J
1072 MAROON CRK RD
ASPEN, CO 81611
MCCREARY WILLIAM F & PHILLIS M
9750 AMANITA AVE
TUJUNGA. CA 91042
,~
I"""
... t~{i=..'/ lSd/V! PWIr- (ez&l1i'w;
tI)~~
... A1uFl/JJ1 ()&t- fluCIIJS.
. f)vvk/ 1J~l... ~ '
I
~, ?'Z~ 'lJ
'~ii ~
~t 0w.
t""".
~
YU'"
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council ~
Amy Margerum, City Manager
John Worcester, City Attorney
Julie Ann Woods, Community Develbpment Directo~'
Mitch Haas, Interim Deputy Directo*, 7
Christopher Bendon, Planner CJNvW '
Iselin Park Rezoning - 2nd Reading & Pnblic Hearing
Ordinance No.3, Series of 1999
THRU:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
March 22, 1999
SUMMARY:
The City of Aspen has recently annexed a 21 + acre tract of land known as "Iselin"
and "Rotary" Parks. As part of the statutory requirements of annexation, the City has
an obligation to zone the property within 90 days of the annexation. In Pitkin
County, the property straddled two zone districts. The northern half of the land was
zoned AFR-2 and the southern half AFR-10. Both of these zone districts permit
single-family residential uses and general outdoor recreational uses.
The parcel is owned by the City and managed by the Parks and Recreation
Departments. The parcel is currently being planned for expanded municipa:!
recreational facilities including an ice rink, ball fields, a redesigned pool, and possibly
a few affordable housing units. This memorandum addresses only the rezoning and
does not contain any recommendations regarding the redevelopment of the parcel.
The Community Development Department recommends the parcel be zoned Public
(PUB). This City zone district allows for the current use of the property but removes
the provision for single family homes. The Public Zone District provides for
affordable housing as a conditional use - a use not allowed in the Park Zone District -
and establishes all dimensional requirements of the site through the PUD process. ,
Staff recommends City Council adopt Ordinance No.3, Series of 1999, to rezone
Iselin and Rotary Parks to the Public Zone District.
ApPLICANT:
Community Development Department, City of Aspen.
LOCATION:
450 Maroon Creek Road (Moore Pool). Located west of the School Campus.
1
r-. (1
ZONING:
Pitkin County Zoning: AFR-2 for the northern portion. AFR-10 for the southern
portion. .
Proposed City Zoning: Public (PUB) Zone. A copy of the proposed zoning is
attached as Exhibit B.
LOT SIZE:
21.269 acres.
CURRENT LAND USE:
Active and passive open space and recreation. Municipal pool and tennis courts.
PROPOSED LAND USE:
The City Parks and Recreation Departments are considering a redevelopment of this
parcel to accommodate an indoor public ice rink, pool, ball fields, and affordable
housing. The proposed Public rezoning would accommodate all the uses being
contemplated. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the
Public Zone by a 6 to 0 vote.
PROPOSED LAND USE:
The parcel was annexed into the City on January 11, 1999. The Planning and Zoning
Commission reviewed this zoning request on March 2, 1999, and reviewed the latest
conceptual development plans during a work session with the development team.
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
Rezoning. Upon receiving a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the Community Development Director, the City Council shall
consider the application at a public hearing and approve, approve with conditions, or
deny the rezoning request.
BACKGROUND:
The subject property was annexed into the City of Aspen on January 11, 1999.
According to State statute, the City must rezone the property within 90 days of the
final annexation. The property was zoned AFR-2 and AFR-10 in Pitkin County.
These are low-density residential zones.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The City Planning Department is recommending the Public Zone District because it
represents the best possible "fit" with the, uses being considered in the Iselin Park
Master Plan. 'The Public Zone District allows for public recreational facilities and for
the provision of affordable housing on-site -- a use not allowed in the Park Zone.
Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit A. A copy of the
Public Zone District requirements has been provided as Exhibit B. A vicinity map has
been included as Exhibit C.
2
1"'-,
~
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council adopt Ordinance No.3, Series of 1999, rezoning
Iselin and Rotary Parks to the Public (PUB) Zone District with no conditions.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to adopt Ordinance No.3, Series of 1999."
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Comments
Exhibit B -- Public (PUB) Zone District provisions
Exhibit C -- Vicinity Map
3
I"""',
~
EXHIBIT A
STAFF COMMENTS: Iselin Rezoning
Section 26.92.020, Standards Applicable to Rezoning
In reviewing an amendment to the official zone district map, the City Council and the
Commission shall consider:
A. Whether the proposed amendment is in conflict with any applicable portioris of this title.
Staff Finding:
The proposed zoning is consistent with the Land Use Code and does not represent any potential
conflicts. The Public zoning requires all development on the site to proceed through the PUD
process in order to determine the appropriate dimensional requirements, parking, general impacts,
and intensity of uses. Therefore, before any development occurs, the Planning and Zoning
Commission and Council will have the opportunity to review the proposal under a PUD process.
B. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the Aspen Area
Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Finding:
The 1993 MCP identifies the Iselin and Rotary Park parcel with the following suggested action:
Expand Iselin Parkfor organized recreational activities, and incorporate the Rotary
Club proposal for a passive park and semi'active park.
The Public Zone District is appropriate for these types of proposed uses. This zone also allows
for the provision of affordable housing as a conditional use, which may be a desirable element for
the fmal program.
C. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with surrounding zone districts and land
uses, considering existing land use and neighborhood characteristics.
Staff Finding:
Surrounding the site is the public school campus, medium-density residential, and Maroon Creek.
There is a proposed bridge linking the parks with the base area of Tiehack. The Public Zone
allows for uses compatible with the surrounding area. The subsequent PUD process will
determine the intensity of those uses allowed and any mitigation measures to offset adverse
impacts to the surrounding area.
D. The effect of the proposed amendment on traffic generation and road safety.
Staff Finding:
The Public Zone District allows for affordable housing as well as uses similar to those allowed in
the Park Zone District. The level of development and its level of traffic generation and impacts
on road safety will be evaluated through the PUD process. Traffic, transit, pedestrian facilities,
and overall road safety have been issues raised by the Commission in work sessions with the
Parks Department. These issues will remain important elements in the planning process. The
Staff Comments 1
~
t""">.
existing and potential level of traffic in the area must combine with the high level of existing and
potential pedestrian movements in a safe manner, especially considering the age of the
pedestrians and peaks in level of activity. The difference between the Public and Park Zone
Districts would have no bearing on this transportation issue - both allow the sall).e uses and
intensities, and both are reviewed through the PUD process. Transportation issues, the
acceptable level of trip generation, and the most appropriate and safe design will be detennined
and required through the PUD process. The project team includes a traffic consultant who will
address transportation in detaiL
The development program for the parcel is in the conceptual stages. The applicant realizes that
safe transportation is a primary design parameter and has made specific accommodations in
designing the site. This zoning does not allow development as of right to occur without full
review as a PUD, and the Parks Department has been very cooperative in accommodating the
concerns of staff and the Commission in programming the site. Staff believes the Public Zone
District is the most appropriate for this parcel and that the PUD process requirement allows for
sufficient review of the final proposaL
E. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on
public facilities, and whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would
exceed the capacity of such facilities, including, but not limited to, transportation
facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, and emergency
medical facilities. '
Staff Finding:
The zone district designation will not, itself, have an effect on the provision of public facilities.
Again, this topic is a criterion ofPUD and ofGMQS. Applicants are required to provide letters
of intent for services which the development affects, and upgrades to the system or other
appropriate mitigation measures are typically required if found to be necessary.
F. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant
adverse impacts on the natural environment.
Staff Finding:
The natural features of the site are being considered with the master planning effort. The river
corridor, recreational connections, transit, and use schedules with the surrounding parcels are all
being considered to reduce the level of impact the development may have on the natural
environment. The Public zoning designation will not adversely affect the natural environment.
G. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent and compatible with the community
character in the City of Aspen.
Staff Finding:
The Parks Department has been working with the surrounding property owners to achieve a
reasonable compatibility with the neighborhood. This process will continue. Staff believes the
master planning effort is consistent with the AACP and that the Public zoning is compatible with
the City character.
H. Whether there have been changed conditions affecting the subject parcel or the
surrounding neighborhood which support the proposed amendment.
Staff Comments 2
t'I,
"-.,,
,
Staff Finding:
Annexation of the property into the City of Aspen is a condition which requires this process. The
Public Zone District allows for the current use of the property and allows for the uses being
considered in the master planning effort.
I. Whether the proposed amendment would be in couflict with the public interest, and is in
hannony with the purpose and intent of this title.
Staff Finding:
This proposed Public Zone District does not pose any conflicts with the public interest. The
AACP specifically reflects a community desire for increased recreational facilities at this
location, and the flexibility to accommodate employee housing on-site for those additional jobs
created by the development represents good land use planning and should be encouraged. Staff
believes this zone district will promote the purpose and intent of this Title and will be in harmony
with the public interest.
Staff Comments 3
~
~
EXHIBIT B
26.28.250 Public (PUB).
A. Purpose. The purpose of the Public (PUB) zone district is to provide for the development
of governmental and quasi-governmental facilities for cultural, educational, civic and other
governmental purposes.
B. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted as of right in the Public (PUB) zone
district.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
II.
12.
13.
Library;
Museum;
Post office;
Hospital;
Essential governmental and public utility uses, facilities, services and buildings
(excluding maintenance shops);
Public transportation stop;
Terminal building, and transportation related facilities;
Public surface and underground parking areas;
Fire station;
Public school;
Public park;
Arts, cultural and recreational activities, buildings and uses; and
Accessory buildings and uses.
C. Conditioual uses. The following uses are permitted as conditional uses in the Public
(PUB) zone district, subject to the standards and procedures established in Chapter 26.60.
1. Maintenance shop; and
2. Affordable housing.
D. Dimensional requirements. The dimensional requirements which shall apply to all
permitted and conditional uses in the Public (PUB) zone district shall beset by the adoption ofa
conceptual development plan and final development plan, pursuant to Chapter 26.84, Planned
Unit Development.
E. Off-street parking requirement. The following off-street parking spaces shall be
provided for each use in the Public (PUB) zone district,' subject to the provisions of Chapter
26.32.
1. Lodge uses: N/ A
2. Residential uses: Requires special review pursuant to Chapter 26.64.
3. All other uses: Requires special review pursuant to Chapter 26.64.
//% '\
} "
~~
y ?- ~.\
~
~
.Q;:~ . · ~6~\~\L ~
if---: ~ ' .~. l~\V\ 0.1eMiV\f:;
~~~ ,~ e><>
/14''''''''/ ~'
I I
~ If _
!/~ ~~~nhi-7Y I ~
~ Oub I )
"I:..I!/J · I \.' \ N~~_
\~~IJI'V _~~M"I...k-. ~~~~,
) ljjjj/ ~ I.. ~;;~ J; q
~ . k.:l:, -: ~ ~ \ ~ .. .....'
j ,\ I ~ 8 _ all ~ ~ v ... .!I_ r~
"\ ," ~J Iy- ifl'!j\' ~
~ ~ \\0; School camp~ ~ ...~.... ~/ ! _____
~. h-. ~r 4~_ ~~;---
,~ J), I ~ ~?'t ~~ ~ ,
Lid! I (f d~ V\ U1 ~ 'y,;1 ~. ~
II 'f! · I ~ Iselin & Rotary Park::" ~- ..~~. vi
i/1 llo ....KJr? - V /- A' ~- \~ r~ ~
1.1, .,.. 1.\\" 1I,fJ; ~...Y.J ~'r.J '. ~
If a.-. ~"}/ JL-
~i ~y ~
t ".:L.#'""~ V ~
,,/ ,~Vl)\h~ ~'/J
-r, tt- I: ,'W~ -I fj T
,~~~JY _. ~~
) 1 ,/ ~~Ii ~>
- 7' ?!l~~ ",'
/ ~ I .-: \ f'{ ~ ' L-...,
~ ~ 'J _ \\
. / AM [I (J I ~
'if k:;\fl l/ \~ ~
~'~r' / ' f'-..
7
("."
Ralph Woodward, 05:03 PM 3/16/99 , Re: Iselin and Rotary Park
r"
To: Ralph Woodward <rhw@snLnet>
From: Chris Bendon <chrisb@ci.aspen.co.us>
Subject: Re: Iselin and Rotary Park
Cc: bude, juliew, jeffw, amym
Bcc:
X-Attachments:
Dear Ralph:
As you may know, the Iselin property was recently annexed into the
City of Aspen and City Council has an obligation to provide the,land
with a zoning classification. The Public Zone District provides for
the best "fit"
given the existing uses and the use being considered with the City
Parks master planning effort. The zoning, however, does not grant the
City any development rights or ability to bypass the land use approval
process. Any development on this property will proceed through a land
use process involving public hearings and the opportunity to comment
on the appropriatness of the proposed development and associated
impacts. In fact, the planning team for the Iselin property is
already aware that traffic and transit provision will be a issue of
significance during their review. If you have not already been in
contact with Jeff Woods, City Parks Director, about the master plan
for this property, I encourage you to contact him. His phone number
is 920.5120.
As far as the impacts from the Hines/Ski Company development upon your
neighborhood, I agree. There does appear to be parking problems,
especially considering the limited parking available at the base of
Highlands Ski Area. Unfortunately, this area is entirely within
Pitkin County and there is not much I can do for you as a City
Planner. The best alternative is to contact Bud Eylar, County
Engineer, or to speak directly to the Pitkin County BOCC about
enforcing the existing no parking signage on the road.
Thanks,
Chris Bendon
City Planning
At 11:58 AM 3/11/99 -0700, you wrote:
>Dear Chris Bendon,
>
> I am the owner of the property 25 Glen Garry Drive, and
personally I
>am adamantly
I Printed for Chris Bendon <chrisb@ci.aspen.co.us>
1
,-..
.1".,
>opposed to any rezoning changes, or any changes at Iselin Park,
Rotary
>Park, or at
>the Moore Pool.
the
>Aspen Highlands
>Subdivision are being adversely impacted by the Highlands
Redevelopment -
>there is
>substantially more traffic - including vehicles being parked along
Maroon
>Creek Road
>by skiers - it is a big inconvenience to me personally, these
vehicles are
>often parked
>on the paved road
>vehicles so close
>the paved surface
definitely do
>not approve.
>At first these vehicles were being ticketed and then that stopped -
what is
>going on?
>There seems to be no interest in correcting this bad situation. It
is the
>responsibility
>of Gerald Hines to provide adequate parking for Highlands customers -
he is
>not doing
>this and no one is holding him accountable.
Less is better in my opinion.
All of us owners in
surface and it is a dangerous situation - with
to
and with people walking in the roadway - I
the
You government officials
are'
>not doing
>a credible job of controlling this - you have either made the mistake
of
>not seeing this
>problem - or not enforcing whatever you may have required of Hines.
This
>is a mess
>in our area - our homes are being adversely impacted. Please correct
this
>impossible
>situation. Thanks, Ralph Woodward, 25 Glen Garry Drive
>
>
>
Printed for Chris Bendon <chrisb@ci.aspen.co.us>
2
I
"
~
Attachment 8
County of Pitkin }
}
State of Colorado }
AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT
TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS
SECTION 26.52.060(E)
SSe
I, ~~ ~~C9t-J.
, being or representing an
Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public .notice
requirements pursuant to Section 26.52.060(E) of the Aspen Municipal Code in the following
manner:
1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class postage prepaid U.S.
Mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as indicated
on the attached list, on the 3! day of .t.1t~^ , 199 t (which is 11.days prior to the public
hearing date of tlcvr~ "/.Z. )'. .
2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from
the nearest public way) and that the said sign wasVposted and visible continuously from the~day
of -ti4~, 199i, to the ~ay of J16~ , 199~L: (Must be posted for at least
ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto.
~~-~AJ
Signed before me this '111 day of II Me-h ,
1991-. by
O~~~ ~t>~
~ _01
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
My Commission expires
~~on e.XPires: 12/2:~~ -:_~ _____
~<L A - ~. :'- ~--- ----__ _ ,
Notary Public ~... ,/ ~ ~---->>:~
.:: : -........
-
,....".-
"
'., .....~.
'"
.
;'v1AROO,'\i CREEK LLC
10 CLUB CIRCLE
ASPEN. CO 81611
ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
0235 HIGH SCHOOL RD
ASPEN. CO 81611
LOTS 7 & 8 MAROON CREEK LLC
C/O GARFIELD & HECHT PC
601 E HYMAN AVE
ASPEN. CO 81611
HARTRlCH IA.1\1ES G
PO BOX 12285
ASPEN, CO 81612
LW DEVELOPMENT INC
OATES LEONARDM ESQ C/O
533 E HOPKlNS AVE
ASPEN. CO 81611
BRADFORD DEBORAH
PO BOX 4856
ASPEN, CO 81612
FRAMPTON GEORGE T IR
C/O US DEFT OF THE INTERIOR
3215NEWARKSTNW
WASHINGTON, DC 20008
SCHENNUM EARL C IR
SCHENNUM CAROL M
PO BOX 867
ASPEN, CO 81612
1
~OORE ALBERTA L PERS RES TRUST
, 0 BOX 126
WOODY CREEK. CO 81656
MAROON CREEK LLC
PEARCE EQUITIES
10 CLUB CIRCLE
ASPEN. CO 81611
LOTS - 3< 8 MAROON CREEK LLC
cia GARFIELD & HECHT PC
601 E HYMAN AVE
ASPEN. CO 81611
CARSON L KELLEY
PO BOX 8927
ASPEN, CO 81612
BRADFORD DEBORAH
PO BOX 4856
ASPEN, CO 81612
LW DEVELOPMENT INC
OATES LEONARD M ESQ C/O
533 E HOPKlNS AVE
ASPEN, CO 81611
WOODWARD RALPH H
105 WOODWARD LN
ASPEN, CO 81611
DE BOER :YIARIL YN S REVOCABLE TRUST
~42 E CENTRAL AVE
mCHITA. KS
HOSIER GERALD D
PO BOX 12354
,\SPEN. CO 81612
HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
PO BOX 4970
,-\,SPEN. CO 81611
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER
DAY STS
C/O REAL ESTATE DIVISION
50 EN TEMPLE
SALT LAKE CITY. UT 84150
DOREMUS ANDREW I & JEANNE C
78.107%
85 GLEN GARRY DR
ASPEN, CO 81611
SLATER LAWRENCE I
, 1 072 MAROON CRK RD
ASPEN. CO 816] 1
MCCREARY WILLIAM F & PHILLIS M
9750 AMANITA AVE
TUJUNGA. CA 91042
Saturday-Sanday,ttarch 6-7, 1999. 'Fhe Aspen Times 2j.c
"n.l.'.. ,'." "., .',',...
. _ ',,", '-,.' ,.,', ,
, ' ,
. tlon, envlronm~ntal' impacls, wl1~llIe hazards. philosophies regarding: th~ logical provision of
open space, neighborhOod compatibility. com- public facilities and urban, .ervlcel; the prev.n-
pllllbUlty with existlns master plans, Inlrastruc- tl~m 01 a!fordable hOusing development where It
ture requirements, fiscallmp;lcts and noise and would .fundamentally, ~hange the character 01
. safety Impacts lion} the airport: ". " 'the neighborhood or' area; the development
, I. On November .16, 1998, by Ordlnan'ce No, 98- shQuld nqt be auto.dependent: the ~Islble ,tom-
55, the SOCC- enacted a moratorium 'on private-' patlblllty 01 sue:h development:, lbe optimal den-
Iy-Inltlated rewnlngs and ,~de amendments slty of the sites, BIVen their location and carrying
along the half-mtl~ radius' In unIncorporated cap~lty; ,and th~'(Jscal impact ,of such develop-
Pltkll). County along either side oHhe Highway ffi,ent where other sites closer to Aspen would
, 82 90rrldor ,and along either, side of the .Rio J'e$Ult In,a Iar.lesser llppact. -
Grande Right 01 Way from the City of Aspen Ilm~ 5. The rezoning to RS-20 pup Is also compatible
its north to the Eagle County Jlne ,(in the mora.' with, the surrounding zone districts and land
torlum this ..rea was ealled ~he ~Ttansportation uses, considering existing land uses and nelg~
Corridors"). The, Ordinance adopting the mora.. borhood characferlstlcs. There wl11 actually be a
torlum listed' several' ongoing planning ,efforts reduction in the demand on publiC facilities as
Including the reviSion of ~all of the affordable cbmpared to the demand for publ~c facilities
~g zoning districts.".. with develoJ)ment at' potential den!Jltles under
~ nsuant to the BOCC's,:,dlrectlon,' the ~he AH 'zone. The rezoning wlll,also not result in
l......'nunity Development Department began . significant ~dverse'lmpacts to the natural envl-
examining the zo~ng maps of Pitkin County and, . ronment, will beconsistent and compatible with
preparing amendments to the affordable hous- the community character and will not' conflict
ing zone districts of the,Pilkln County Land Use with the publici interest. . ,
Code to bring them ,Into compliance with pre- ; C.', The ,rezoning -01 the' Wildcat Affordable
,vailing land, use, policy and, adppted masier' Housing Parcel will substantially advance legit!-
plans. ,:',"-" ','" ,,' mategoverqmentpurpose:;assetforthhereln.
K. On February:9, 1999 and March'2" 1999, the, D. There" Is no vested right, neither common
Community Development Department present- law nor staUitory, to the continuation of the AH
ed to the Pitkin County & 'Zoning Com million . &one dlltrlct de'lin.Uon 01 the Wildcat
leveral Code: amendments- affecting the alford- Affordable Housing Parcel.
able housing zone districts along with an entire- E. The're~ning to the RS-20 PUD zone district
Iy new zone distri~t called the Rural Cluster will '"provide the,Wildcat Alfordable Housing
Affordable HOUSing Overlay 'Planned Unit Parcel' with an economically viable, beneliclal
Developmeflt district CRC AHOJPUD"). In con-
nection with its Code amendments, ,.the 'and productive use:
Community D~lopment Department reviewed Emergency Rezon~
the zoning maps 'of Pitkin County and deter- A. There Is an emergenc:~.that warrants the
mined that ,the Wildcat AIlQrdable Housing immediate rezoning of the"\Wildcat Affordable
Parcel was Inappropriately zoned AH. ,Housing Parcel, to wit;
L. The Planning & Zoning Commts,slon made Its .1. Conditions have changed substantially since
recommendation to the 'BOCC on. March 2, 1999. -the AH zoning 01 the WlIdcat Affordable Housing
III, JUSTIflCAnON FOR REZONING Parcel; ,
, A. The BOCC finds that, the rezoning of the 2. 'Development under the AH zone district
Wildcat Alfordable HOUsing 'Parcel comports ' would result In Inappropriate devel()pment 01
with the PlIkln C,Qunty Land Use Code, section 3- the Wildcat Affordable HOustng Parcel consider-
22()'o20, Rezoning,:, ,',''' :.-' ,_ '" . lng the potential def!slty of the development, the
l.IiiiiIle ,development res!Jltlr'IS from, the rezoning 'character of the area, the unavailability 01 pub-
,,- 'Ie AH ;,:one district to the RS-2O PUD zone : lie fadliti~ and urban .servlces to serve any
Q. .l wlll ~ot confllct.with any applicable see- . development, and the surroundlns p.efghbOr-
tl I ' hoOd' '. ' ~,
ons 0 ',,,'X' "";:/'.''''"';''" \,~"" . ",'.. '3. Chan,ln, conditions and development p""
,,1he Land \Js'eCodej' ':'/':" .:: ',' " .
2;-The rezonlng.froni'itle'AH zone district to the- ' ".sures place the Wildca~ Affordable Housing
RS-20 PUD zone district Is conslstenfwitlJ Pitkin ,Parcel at Immediate risk for Inappropriate, unce--
County ma#er 'plans;:',..;" ",C" ", '_i. ' ordlnated and unplanned development; and
~. The rezoolng fro~ the AH zone district to the ' 4. Development under the existing AH 'zoning
. RS-20 PUD ZOf!.e district Is compatl1>l~ with sur- would violate Pitkin County master plans, land
rounding ~ne Districts' and land iJses, consld- . use policies and. regulations': An Immedi~te
erlng ~xlstlng I.an~, use and nelghborholld cl1ar~':: '"." rezoning Is necessary to eliminate the threat of
acteristics;, _ ',,,,,:,,,.,' ", " ' ' such Inappropriate development.
4. The rezonl~g from:th-e"AH zone district to the B. ,The rezoning 01 the Wildcat' Affordable
Rs..20 PUD zone" district will not. result In flouslng Parcel to RS-20 PUD Is tlecessary for the
demands on publiC facilities, and will not exceed Immedla~e 'preservation and p~tection of the
the capacity of_such"publlc fac;:U1t1es, Including.., ,public health, safety and welfare of the citizens
but_ not limited to,,: transportation lacllities, of Pitkin' County.' . .... .
sewage facllilles;\water supply" par,ks, drainage; '. Now TliEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board
schools, and emergency medical f~clllties; '. 01 Clluntf Commlls,loners "of Pitkin County,
5. Tbe rezoning from the AH zone district to the Colorado, that It does, hereby rezone the Wildcat
RS-20 PUD zone district wlll not res~lt In signln- Alfordabl,e Housing, Parcel (as described In
cl(lnt .adverse;lmpacts ,on th~." natural".envlro~1 ' Attachinent ~A'1 from the AH 'zone district (see-
ment, ,\, _ "". , ,,'" ,', ..' .'tion '3-4Q.70; Pitkin County Land US{: Code) to
6. The rezonln~fron\~ifi~)H zone dlstrlctto t"e . the RS-20 PUD zo_ne district (section 3-40-110,
~20 rUD, zo'ne 'dIStrict. ,is consIStent and conr Pitkin County ~nd Use Code) subject to the fo1-
patlble:wlththecommunlty,char~cter:,and ",' lowlngprovlsio.~s:, '-".
, 7. The rezoning from.Jhe ,Al:t lOne'dlstrlct to the . 1. The Board 01" CO.unty ,Comiltssioners IncQr-
~RS-20 PUD zone district is'not ~n conRict with the:' < parates tbe above reCitals as the justification for
public interest.: this Ordinance and.,re:roillng.
..8. There have been changed'coi1dlUons'affect~ ,2. This Ordinance and rezoning Is effective
Ing the Wildcat, Affordable' Housing Parcel and ,'Immedlately upon' final adoption pursUant to
';1he' l>urroun~IRg';,cr.elghbQrh<<nl..wh-lc:h. support"", c.a.t-s3(l,,1s.40~"JI~~MYJ5l_U~Jml!!e,._
the rezoning lrom th~ AHzotiE! ~Istrlct to the JG.; dlate1>te.ervaUon of the pU,bUc'bealth and sa(e-
.~ PUD zone dlstritt:, ':," '. ' -",' _ '::~""', ' ,," ty of thedtlzens of PItkin County, the c:ircum--
;:~a'; :Subsequent tQ ,'the' 'Zonlng- 'of ttie Wildcat stanCes 01 the em~rgerl.Cy having 'been set lo,r~h
AffOrdable :Houslng Parcel to the ,AH zone dis- In .thls Ordinance:. , _ .'j . . . .
, 'trlct, the AH ~onfng,on (fie " ':' ,_ 'Copies of t~ entire Qn:flnaace are available tor
,Wildcat, All,",dable. H, ouslni(,paic"el', beca, me" "public Inspe(.t1on ,at the...c" led" a,n~ ,ReCorder's
'inconsistent with Col,lnty"maSters plans (the . Office, Jeanette Jones, a'530 East Main St~,
Clt#en'H~slhJi"~I!..ri; ttte:MCP../md ttle DVCP); Aspen, 'Colorado 81611:~url,nB regular business
b'.'ln,'No~m~~'0"'1998~,the-:BO<;C,enacted,'a' hOurs.' .
:, '., ,... ""'./",. .'l't.":' "'''' '...' "I' EXnIBIT"A"
, .. wn.oCAT AFFORDABLE nOISlNQ PAIlat
, '" OWNF.Il BY rl11a~ COUNTY " .'
A-,tract of !,and 1IIltuatl!; In Sectloll S. ToWnship "9
"districts; and :"" i' ':":,:',",, \""t,': ,:',:: ":<',"": ":':':.~":" " ;. ~:~~~r~:~=;:~~~:I~t:;M.:btlln"g more
"c" The ,Comm'u~ity':'~10P'rn~'i'_~patimedt Beglnn'lng,at'a polnt,'whence t~ St'Comer' of
ha..s' prepa!'ed ain~ndniellts""to-,the'Pltkln' Cou'nty, '. ';~sald: Section 8 bears g,'61'''30'S9~ f;'F3S.77 'eet;'
'lancl:Use Code:,reoJatlng,t,~"tJie:~alfor"ilble hollS:-, tl~"~"'10"W7,'940'''1.6'OO9' 1"...i.iW,..;~:~~;59",.,'~~,~,;' th~~"",: N:3"
Ins zone dlsirlcts whlch'ma1j:e_th"e 'AH"zone des-:
19na'tlon of 'the/;,W!ld~t""AlIofd~~le,,Housln8'~;'~' '~;'~s..~~~;~~~5~ 5~1,03 f~et;,' theriC~ S
,ina::~~~p~late:,,~, ",,"..' ..,:~,:>~,!,:,:",:~~;,~,;,>~,,;, ::', ' " thence 'S 63.25'22" W '57397' feet;, thence N:
9: ,The rezoning ',o.f.:'t~e.'-'Yildcat;::'Aflor~able 32.02~17" W 321.79 fee~j ,
Housing Parcel fnn>>, the:AH-zone dJStrlct'lo the' thence N 09.25'23~ E 354:98 feet; thence': N
RS-20,~lJD zoqe ,YJiIlIJOli~u1t,I"n"slgniflcant traf~' 59.44'29" ~ 276.50 leer. '.-
lic gene,ratlon, nor wUl It.impact ro",d salew In' then~ N_20'2 N20.21'21,"21 ~ W 369.31 feet~"
fact, such rezoning wlll'reduce the" P'ltenUal the southerly, right-of-way line, of'a road as buUt
tr:alfl~ ,ge~era,t1qn ,and,,: pottintlal/ road 'safl!lY,.: "and in place; thence ilIong said rlght-ol-way line
iS~S"as,compa.r~~~deyelopnient.~~" ",~ ,: lhelolli:1wingcourses: ',,'
"~he RS-20PUD zone."" '~_," .,."::",,, <,' 55,52 'feet aRms the arc of a 320,()(), foot rJ'dlus
Ie exlstins.. AH, "zoning ~:on '.t.htt, Wildcat wrve to, the right haVing a central angle of
.Aflordable Housing Pai'i::e'.l.s in~'n~stenH...lth ,09'56'26."and subtencl!llg'a chord bearing N:
County, master:' p\ans\ wl1e.r~~.the:l~S-20' POD . $2007'22~: ,E 55.45 feet; thence N 87.05'35.'i E
;:one district l$'Conslstent Wltl'!, 5U~~"plans:.' . 112.07feet; thence 124.71 feet ~Iong the arc of ail.
l, The DVCP did no1 ,contemplate. nor does it &30.00 foot radius curve to the lelt h.aving a cen-
support, medium to high den"IW development "tralangel of 08'36'32" and subtendlng a chord
on the Wildcat Affordable Houslng:rarcel. AH bearing N 82.47'19" ~ 124.59, feet; thence N
zoning creates a possi~i1ity',()( jievelopment 78.29'03"'E251.90 leet; thence 91.S8feet along
with densities entlrelr too hlgh to be supported " the arc, oJ a 34Q.OO loot'radiu~ curve to the right
by Ihe DYCP. Further. the goaJ~rand ob,eCtives 01 having a'Central angle 0115.25'58" and subtencJ..
the DVCr wer,e to disco\lrage ~Igh dens~ties In < . 'ing 'a chord, bearing N 86'12'02. E 91.30 feet;
. ~on-urban areas,...and generally,would not sup- thence S 86'04'59" E',105.19 feet; thence 112:86
port th~ type 01 sprawl ,develollment that would feet along the arc o~a 245.00 foot radius curve to
. occUr with, development ~ursuant 10 the AH the lelt having a central angle of 26"23'36" and,
..zone district In ",these,_ niT;!!.. tQ s:eml-rural areas. subtending a chord bearlng'N 80.43'13" E 111:86
R5-20 PUD zoni!lg ,Is ,COll'!pati.lile.wlth .th.e rural feet;. thence N 6703 ~r31'25., E 349.86 feet;
densities envisioned by the QV€R ; ,thence,190.74 fee~ al9ng the 8;TC of a 345.00 foot
2. The Woody Creek Ca"-~"'~',~ster' Plan" ',:radiuS'curve to the le1thavln~ a centr~1 angle of
("WCCMP") recl)mmendS thatl ~no addJri~, ::.,i3V,40'36.' a~d 'subt~riPlng a chord bearing N
high de.nslty or hlgh'rate,houSinS:,;tlWelop:ment$'~,;,-,:'/5l.41'~r... E'..J88.32' feet; '~hence N 35.~O'49~ ,E
i be permltted.,in Wood~"C~~Th4!:AH zol1lng ~n, ~::.l~!.:~'feet; ~~ence 48~5() f~et ~Io~ th: arc 01 a
WoOdyro........l!' '.. 1__A__I'.I"l4"'~.'.""~-s-C'" . ,,' '-'.'" ' " ..' , ..'
WC(:MF '/',
" patlble
3. Thl:
'.,
"
, .
"_nc:'1.u.......:-.j::"..'..fI.~_."_.L___.:...,_.
"
.,
.... ,
,.'
",.... ..l ,~. .'
'; <\t 'AlIordable HO~Slng :,pafcel; 'are., lricom: -~ i_'" r., '" .'~", ~~. . ''''';'' ... ~ ! ......""",~, . .,.....:" . ..... .:l, "!. ~
pa~~~~e w~~~ t~e ~<:'~.Rs:2~ PO~.~~ln.8 i~,~~~"' ,,'j-\~O"W~~'i+"'~~O~~E:t
I ,: This Notice Is given wit\:! regare! to the D~ '01
.". T\\Ist described as follows;, " .
j. O'rlglnal Grantor (Borrower): SCOTI' PICARD
Onglnal Beneficiary: MlV OE'tJELOPMENT COR
, , PoRATION, a Colorado corporation ~
,'. Curre;nt Owner 01 the EVldence-Of
:,\'D~l ~C(:ured by the Deed of Trust; MTV
PEVEl.OIlMENT CORPORATION, a Colorado
corporatkm
Date of Deed ,of Trust: pecember 18; 199.7
Date of Deed 01 Trust
. Modification Agreement: December 16, 1997
Counl)' of Re(:o.rillng: Pitkin County, Colorado
Recording Date ot Deed 01 .
Trust 'and Deed, "of Trust
"MOdification Agreement: DeCember 19, 1997_
Recording In(ormation lor Deed of Trust: 6ecep
"UonNo.41!752
" Reco'fdlng l!llormatlon for Deed 01 Trull,t Madill
cation !'greement: Reception No. 411753
.,',
~ ,",' " ., '
Housing" ,Parce,l. "The Cltl2en -Housing Plan cre,,~.
at1;!:s a prel~rence for:aflor411ble:houslng within
, the' metro, areas::and "~lRploymerit ',centers .and'
adjac:ent, available, public;"i mas~:', trl\l1$lt. The ,,'
Wildca~ Alfordable,"Ho~sin~ ,Parc'elr~ does' 'Rot
meet' either; of.. these', 'criteria. ,The, Citizen
Housing Plan also contains the:phlloso'phy arid
criteria that aflordabie hou'slngl'onlrb~ permit.
ted In locations where the'dlWeloplri"fmt of such
housing, is cqntalnable:'and will, /lotA>rom,ote,
addlUonal developIllent,orsprawl.. Development
pursuant to the, A~'-z9nlng .on' "he Wildcat
Affordable Housing 'Parcel would' lead to uncon- '
talnable development and promote sprawt' AH'
development would, In lact, be sprawl Itself. AH
devt:!lopment ,would' als<i ,: be ,vlola~lve 01 the
....\','"
"", ' ; "; ,~ ..:
_~~m
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the current
ownl!lr of the original flvldC!ince '01 ,d.bt leci,!red
by the De-e<1 of Trust delcrlbed above, as modI-
fi~d by the Deed' of Trust, Modillc<ttion
Agreement described above, ~as' flied written
lefectlon and demal1d lor sale ~8 provlded,ln said
Deed of Trust: Th~ origin'!] p~ln~I\)a1 amouJlt 01
the evidence of debt w~, Tw~ Hundred fort)'-
Nine Thollsand Nine Hundred, Forty-Two and
no/lOOt~, Dollars ($249,,942.00), and as o!
January 26, 1999, the out,tandlng principal bal-
ance due and owing (In tJ:le evidence of debt 1$
$208,285.00.
NOm: THE DEED ,OF 11lUST BE1~G FORE-
.<:LOSED MAy NQT SEA flRST UE~.
The real propertY' to he foreclosed, which Is all
of the property currently ~ncum1>ered by the
Deed 01 Trust, Is located In, Pitkin County,
Colorado, and Is delcrlbed as follows:
Lot ~7, Horse Ranch, aecordins to the Plat there-
of recorded August 27,1991 in Plat Book',27 at
Page 27 as Reception No. 335915,
also ,known as:' 19 Spur Ridge l4ne, Snowma~s
Vlllag~, Colorado 81615. <'
THEREFORE, NOTICE IS ,HEREBY GIVEN that I
will, at 10:00 o'clock A.M., on the date 01 March
17, 1999, in tile Office of the Public Trustee, 506
E.,Maln Street, Suite 201, Aspen, CQ 81611, Seell at
public: auction tli the higheltand bell bidder for
cash, the real property delcrlbed above, and ,l!
Interest 01 said Grantor, the helrs,and as$lgns 01
said Grantor, for the purpose of paying the
Indebtedness provided In said note and deed of
trust, attorney fees, and the expenses of sale,
and will deliver to the purchasttr a certilicate of
purchas~, all as provided by law,
Date: January 27 , 1999
First PubUcatiQn Date: February 6, 1999
Last Publication Date: March 6, 1999
THOMAS CARL OKEN, Public Trustee
By: Judy J"mes, Deputy Public Trustee
Published In The Aspen Times February 6, 13,
20,27, March 6,1999. (34416)
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE OF, PUBLIC TRUSTEE SALE:
No..99-5
This Notice 01 Public Trustl:l~ Sale Is given with
respect to the follOWing Deed 01 Trust:
Original Grantor, WJ, High llnd Trisha High
Orlglnal Beneficiary; Colorado 'Federal SavIngs
Bank .
Date ofD-eed '01 Trust: December 23, 1994
Recording Date of Deed of Trust: January 5, 1995
Recording Inlo.; Book 771, Page 158, Film N/A.
Reception 377813
County of Recording: Pitkin
Orlglnal,P,rlncipal Amount:. $142,500.00
Current Unpaid Prln~lpal: $140,0:09.75
Property foreclosed'ls all of the pt()perty encum-
. bered by Deed 01 Trust:
'-t...!pT 15, BLOCK 2, CRYSTAL RIVER COUNTRY
mJ'ATES,' ACCORDING TO THE PLAT FILED IN
THE PLA"t BOOK 3- AT PAGE 312. .
Purported Common Addres$: 0483 Crystai
Circle, Carbondale, Colorado
THE UEN FORECLOSED MAY ~OT BE A flRSf
UEN,
WHE~EAS, Bankeys . Trust, Company 01
CalilotniCl.~~.A., as custodian or, trustee under
the appUcible custody or,. trust agreement;
Advanta as master serv~er, the-legal holder 01
the Note secured by the aboVe-descrl~d D~
of Trust has lIIed written Election and Demand
for Sale as provided In said Deed of Trust.
THEREFORE, notice IS,hereby given that I will,
at 10:00 fi.m'. 0/1 Aprjf,7, .1999,'al the Iront stel's
01 the court house, !i06 E. Main Street, Aspen,
. -"eo~U--ilrpObnc-auctlolT'tlflhe I1lgh~$t .
and best bidder for ,eash, the:;ald real' property
and 'all Interest of the...:s:ald Orantor(s), their
heirs, their successors; 'and'thelr as'slgns, IQr the
purpose of paying the indebtedness provided in
said Note and Deed of Trust, attorney's lee, and
the expense of sale Olfld will deliver to',tIl'e-' pLir-
chasers a Certificate' of" Purchale" all as' proVid-
ed by law. " ',' ",
Date: February 18,' 1999
Thomas Carl Oken, . ,
Public Trustee of Pitkin County
By C1irol L Foote, Dep~ty Public; Trustee
First Publication: February 27, 1999
wt Publicatl(ln: ~arch'27, 1999 '
Publisher: ,The As~ TJmeS ,: '
. rURSUANl" TO TIfffo FAIR DEBT COLLECTtON
. PRACTICES 'A,CT- YOU ARE ADVISED THAT MElN-
. HOW, STAWIA~K1, SHAPI~O. &CODlLIS, LLp IS
DEEMED A DEI3T CO~ECTOR AtTEMPTING TO
COLLECT A :DEBT AND ANY' INFORMATION
~ " ^ .
~.. .
: '
'.
HaY/ef,kHeR,~ "., .,;'. '
Attorney file 1#06199-0097 Client fH521483
~200' ~st Mineral Avenue;'Sulte,380
Engiewood, Coloiado ~0112
:(303) 799-Q083 :: '.' " ,
Published In, The ,ASpen TImes February 27,
~arch,6, 13, 20, ~7, 1999. (35408)
PUBLIC NOTICE
ORDINANCE NO.3
(SERIES OF 1999)
'..,.. ORDINANCE Of THE Crry COUNCIL, OF
_ CITY OF ASPEN; COLORADO, TO REZONE
ISELIN AND ROTARY PARKS TO THE
PUBLIC (PUB) ZONE DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, a parcel of land locate~ west 01 the
l>ubllc school campus on Maroon -Creek Road,
co~mQflly relerred tQ as ~lselln and "Rotary
Paris,. the property,' was l1lnexed Into the City
of Aspen ,ofl" January n, 1999, pursuant to
Ordinance No. 53, Series "Of 1998;' and,
WHEREAS, the PI'9~rty is approximately
21.269f acres, ~I number 2735-142-00-851,
and is_l~any described In' Attachment A 01 this
Ordlnll<nce; and, ,: _ '
'WHEREAS, the' City Council of the City of Aspen
must,deslgna~e a zon:e d.lstrlc~ lor the property
within 90 c1a)'s 01 the cffi....exatloll; and, '
WHEREAS, ~ the~ City -Council lTIay approve
:Amendments: to '~hl;l:'Ofllclal 'Zone Dlstr!ct Map
(RezonIng) ;alter taking a!'.ld",~~sldering recom-
mendations from the CommlJJllty Development
~ireclor;, ~h~ PI8:nn~n,g and Zoning Commission
made at a duly ,n9~Ic~d 'p~bllc hearIng, and tak-
ing ,and cons:ld~rln(l: public: testimony at a duly,
noticed plJbllc hearlng'ln, conformance with the
'rtvleW crlt~rla set forth In Section 26.92; and,
WHEREAS;, <th~' C,ommunlty, Development
~paitment analyz~ ~h~ parcel of land and',rec~ '
,ommended' the pro~rl)' ~e included Iq the
public (POB) 'Zone DIs:trlct;'_and,
WHEREAS, during a duly fU.ltlced public hearing
on March 2, 1999, the Planning and Zoning
Commission took aP,d CQnsldered publiC testi-
mony and fecommended, ~y a _ to _ vote,
City COUll;cil,lnclude this property In the Public
(PUB) ZOn~ District; and,
WHEREAS, City Council reviewed and consid-
ered the recommendatlons 01 the Community
Development Dlrettor and the Planning and
Zoning Commission during a duly noticed public
hearing; and, l'
. WHEREAS, the City Council linds that the
Public (PUB) Zone District. Is the most approprl- .
ate zoning classification for this property, meets
or exceeds all applicable standards, and Is con-'
'slstent with the goals and elements ol.the Aspen
Area CQmmunlty Plan; and, '.
WHEREAS,: the City Council flnds that this
Ordinance furthers and Is necessary lor the pro-
motion of public health, salety, and wellllre.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE
CITY COUNCIL Of DIE CITY OF ASPEN, COL-
ORADO, lHAT:
Section 1:
. The Official Zone District Map of the City of
Aspen shall be amended by the Community
Development Director to rellect Iseiln and
Rotar!( Parks, as described in Allachment A, as
Included, In the Public (PUB) Zone District. The
Community Devt;llopment Director shall use the
annexation plat as the basis lor determining
this zoning boundary.
SectIon 2:
This Ordinance shall not effect any existing liti-
gation and shall not operate as an abatement 01
any action or proceeding now pending under or
by virtue 01 the ordinances nepealed or amend-
ed as herein provided, and the same shall be
conducted and concluded under such prior
ordinances.
Secdon 3:
If any section,' subsection, sentence, clause,
phrase, or portion 01 this Ordinance is lor any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a
court 01 competent jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a'separ:ate; distinct and Inde-
pendttnt provl.lon and shall not aflect the valid-
Ity 01 the remaining portions thereol.
Section 4:
That the Cily Clerk is directed. upon the adop"
tion of this Ordinance, to record among the real
estate records of the Pitkin County Clerk and
Recorder a copy of this Ordinance.
Section 5:
A public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held
on the 22nd day 01 March, 1999, at 5:00 in the
City Council Chambers, Aspcen City Hall. Aspen
Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hear-
Ing a public notice of the same was published in
a newspap~r 01 general circulation within the
City 01 Aspen.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
as provided by law,
by the City Council 01 the City of Aspen on the
8th day of March, 1999.
Attest:
Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk
FINALLY, adoj)ted, passed
_day of _' 1999.
Attest:
Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk
John Bennett
Mayor
approved this
and
John Bennett
Mayor
Approved as to lorm:
City'Attllrney
Attachment A - Legal description ul pn)perty
Published in The: Aspen Times March 6, 1999.
PUBLIC NOTICE
ORDINANCE NO.4
(SERIES OF 1999) ',\,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL, Of
THE CITY Of ASPEN, COLORADO. AMENDING
AN exISTING AGREEMENT WITH THE PORATH
. FAMILY TRUST FOR PROVISION OF
TREATED WATER SERVICE.
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 27, Series of 1998,
(the Ordinance) provided treated water service
to properties located In Pitkin County, 'along
North Spruce Street Inciudlng a parcel 01 land
owned by the Porath family Trust; and,
WHEREAS, the Ordinance conditioned the pro-
vlsioll ofwatet' upon submission alld approval of
the Porath family Trust develupment phlOS pur-
suanCto.-tne 'Clly o.Aspen -8040' GreeitlUlir-
Review and Residential Design Sta~ards: ~nd,
WHEREAS, the Ordinance further conditioned
(I.Ily,<tilvelopme'nt of the porath lamily Trust par-
cel upOn anll~xatlon Into the City of Aspen for
~"'e purpose 01 ensuring the development would
'be'compatible with the development standards
of the City's Low Density Resid~ntlal (R-30) Zone
District; and, '
WHEJn;AS, the Porath family Trust has agreed
to development their property In conformance
_witt! th,!, City's R.30 Zone District, as speCified In
the conditions contained herein, and has agreed
1(1 t1Ql' cOntest annexation II and when the City 01
Aspt,n Initiates the annexaUo~ of their property;
and,
WHEREAS, the Community Development
Department analyzed the parcel of land and rec-
ommended the cOl1dltions 01 approval con.
taln~ herein to ensure conformance wllh ClIy
development standards and compliance with
the land !,lse code provisions of 8040 Greenline
Review and Residential Design Standards; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the spirit
and intent of Ordinance 27, Series of 1998. is fur-
thered by the adoption' of this Ordinance and
that the extension 01 treated water to the Porath
family Trust property is in the best interests of
the City; and,
WHEREAS. the City Council finds thut this
Ordinance furthers and Is necessary lor the pro-
motion of public health,safety, and weltare.
NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY TilE
em CQUNCIL OF mE cm OF ASPEN, COL-
ORADO, THAT:
Section I:
Ordinance 27, S~ries of 1998, is hereby lllllended
to allow the Porath Family Trust pan:el to be
developed and served wilh municipal water
while locat~d in Pitkin Cou~IlY wllh the following
conditions:
1. The Porath Family Tru:;t property shall be
developed In conlormance with lhe City 01
Aspen's R-30 Zone Distrlct'regulations. The City
of Aspen Zonil1l:l OJfic'~r 'shall review the building
plans lor' compUance witll all aspects of the
City's R-30 Zcme District.' using the same inclu-
sions and exclusions for Lot Area and Floor
Area;' as delln"ed In the City 01 Aspen Land Use
Code, 'applicable to all lands in the City. except
as provided lor herein. '
2. The architectural development plans submit-
ted ~o the City Planning Department, dated
February 24. 1999, shall not require a variance
from the City's Residential Design Standards.
Amendments to the architectural plans are sub-
ject to all aspects 01 the City 01 Aspen
Residential Design Standards, as amended.
3. Highly reflective materials shall not be used
on th~ exterior of the structure, Including the
roof.
4. Any disturbance to the natural terrain and
areas of cut and liII' shall be revegetated alt~r
construction with native species. Any areas too
steep for adequate revegetation shall incorpo-
rate retaining walls which ilre of simililr culm to
the natural soils and vegetation to visually blend
into the mountainside.
5. The existing vegetation outside the designat-
ed building envelope shalt be preserved :1I1d
maintained in its natural state to the extent
pr..qical. Disturbance ~ssociated with. alld inci-
dental to, pedestrian and vehicular access lu Ihe
property is approv~(1.
6. Exterior lighting shall be down-clirecUunal,
sharp cut-off. and in no ca$e shall outdoor Huod
lights be used.
7. The POf<lth Family Trust is encouraged 10
either apply lor and construct an Accessury
Dwelling Unit (ADU) on the property al this lime
or leave enuugh available lIoor arei\ lur the
future construction of an ADU.
8. All alOpects 01 the Pitkin County 1041 Review,
as amended, shall relnaln In ellect ahd shall be
reviewed 1m compliance by the Pitkin County
Communil.y I)evelopment Department.
Section 2:
Except as slleciHcally amendea herein, all
a:;\)&l:; of Ordinance 21, Series of 1998, shall
remain indft:ct.
Section 3:
The City 01 Aspen may initiate annexation 01 the
Porath Family trust par<:el at it own discretion
and the Porath Family 'frust hereby agrees to
not contest anll~xation if the City of aspen initi-
ates annexation.
Secaion 4:
This Ordinance shaH not effect any existing liti-
gallon alld shall not operate as an abatement 01
~ny a~tlon or proceeding now pending under or
by virtue of the ordinances repealed 9r amend-
ed as herein provided, and the same shall be
conducted and concluded under such prior
ordinances.
Sec::tlon 5:
. U any section. subsection, sentence, clause,
phrase, or portion 01 this, Ordinance is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional In a
court of competent jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separato, 4lstinc:t and Inde-
pendent provision and shall not a!fect the valid-
'Ity 01 the remaining portions thereof.
Sec::tton6: -.:;
That the City Clerk is directed, upon the adop"
tion Qlthis Ordinance, to r~ord ;:l.I:nong th(! real
" estate records of the Pitkin County Clerk and
, Recorder a <:opy 01 this ordinance. .
Seclion 7: .
A publiC hearing on the Ordinan~ shall be held
on the 22nd day 01 March, 1999, at 5:00 In the
City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen
Colorado, fiheen (15) days prior to which hear.
ing a public notice 01 the same w~publlshed in
a newspapt!r 01 general circulation within ahe
City ol Aspen.
lNTIWDUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED
as provided by law,
by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the
8th day of March. 1999.
Allest:
Kathryn S. Koch. CIty Clerk
"
John Bennett
Mayor
FINALLY, a.joptt!d, passed and approved this
_day of _. 1999
Attest:
Kathryn S, Koch, City Clerk
John Bennett
Mayor
Approved as to lorm:
City Attomt:y
Published III The Aspen Times March 6, 19:99.
PUBLIC NOTJCE
PROPERTY AND LIABILITY INSURANCE
REQUE'ST FOR PROPOSAl- NO. 213
Colorado Mountain College (CMC) requests pro.
posals lrom qualified firms and/or Individuals
to place lis property and liability insurance pro.
gram. Scal~d proposals will be received by
Colorado Mountain College Purchasing
Dep;lrtment, AUn: Danlelle Hlnz, 931 Grand
Avenue, r 0 Box 10001,' Glenwoo~ Spgs CO
81602, until 3:00 p.m., April 9.l999. Any IIrm
desiring to be coo,!ildered must Ob~aln! t'
lo~, Proposal (RFP) document. b cUng:
Colorado Mountain COllelWo"Ad#i'" anlelle Hlnz,
PO Box 10001, 831" 9(.nd Ave, Glenwood
Springs CO 8 1602. phone: (970) 945-8691
x8402 (Mo' (.11m 1947.8324, -mall: dhiQz*-ol-
orado;lJtn l'gU. Cnlorat\u Moulltaln Coli. does
nQt obitgatlt ibdl to-accept the-~owesl, or-an)'
other'propO$al. and reserves sole discretion 10
reject any or all ,proposals.
Published in The Aspen Times February 27,
March 6, 13. 20, 27, 1999. (35405)
PUBLIC NOTICE l'
CITY OF ASPEN
PARKS DEPARTMENT
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
The City of Aspen, Colorado Is ac<;eptlng
Proposals lrom Design/Build Sltework contrac-
tors for Improvements to the Community
Campus which includes: Iselin Park, the Moore
Playing l-1dds. Rotary Park and improvements
to the Aspen School District athletic facilities
and campils. The work Involves the design
refinement of the parks and facilities as outlined
In the current Master Plan, accurate construc-
tion cost estimates and project scheduling.
prepllring cllnstructlol\ documents and speclfl-
catlons. constroclion activities InvoMns earth-
moving. drainage. construction of athletic lIelds,
pedestrian bridges and adjacent parking areas,
installation 01 trees and shrubs, restoration of
native grass/shrub area~,' bullding- multi-use
trails and creation of wetland areas. The work
will take place in phases between May 1999 to
the 10111 of 200i. The estimated amount of the
design/build contract is $3.500,OOO.0~ (Three
Million Fivt;! Iluodred Hollars). The only Phase
which currently has funding Is the Moore
Playing Fields for $350,000. The city is seeking
the remilillder (lIthe funding for this project as
part 01 a General Obligation Bond which will be
v()h~d on hy Aspen Resldenfs in May 1999.
COlllplete IUCJl'osallJ.lckages may be picked up
alter Fnday February 26, 1999 at the City of
Aspen Parks Department, 585 Cemetery Ln".
Aspen, rO 81611 or ~all (970) 920-5120.
Sealed 'proposals should be labded
"Commullity Campus HFP" and malled to: City of
Aspen Parks Department, 130 S. Galena St.,
Aspen, CO 81611. PrQPosals will be acceptoo
unlll Wednesday. March 24, 1999. 2:00 P,M., MST.
A mandilt'ory prc.proposal meeting is scheduled
lor Tuesday, March 16. 1999, 1:00 P.M..
The City of Aspen us~s a Two Part Design/Build
Agreement consisting of two separate agree-
ments (POII'll and par~,; ) and General Conditions
related to each part."art r 'Agreement, covers
design dt:!velopment 'and biJdgetlng. Part 2
agreement covers final design 'al'ld construction
This proposal seeks a design/build team to
accomplish both parts ollhe contract. However,
the team is only proposing for Pari I WIth this
RFP. Upon co"mpletion of Part f by the successful
team the City will negotiate with the team lor the
Part 2 01 this contract.
The selected design/build contractor will
demonstrate experience hi. mountain construc.
tion and a high percentage of in-house perfor-
mance. III addition. slgnilicant exp.erience in
designing "lid building high q\lality athletic
fields is required. The expertise 01 the
design/build team should include but not limit-
ed to, lalltlsc.:4pe lm:hitecture, civil engineeri1lg.
design of natur;\l areas, cost estimation, project
manageml.'nt alnng with the capability and expL'-
rience to COllstruCt the design. The City will
select tht! design/build c;ontractur from the qual.
ifications sublllittals received and neguli:\te
with that contractor. The City reserves the right
to rcjl~ct illlY :lIlt! all proposals lor any reason
whatsuever uud rt~structuring proposals ifnultu-
ally agrCcabl'e. The con~acl pl:!rson for the
request lur prup(lsals IS; Jell Woods, Parks
Director, (g7U) 920--5120.
BY THE OlmER Of THE CITY OF ASPEN COL-
ORADO
.
Jell Woods
l'arksDlrector
l'ublislll,:tllll 'fill,: Aspen Times March 6, 13, 1999.
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
r""".
("'\,
PT..A.
MEMORANDUM
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Julie Ann Woods, Community Devel?f,ment Director
Mitch Haas, Interim Deputy Director>>ttc"
Christopher Bendon, Planner ~
Iselin Park Rezoning -- Public Hearing
March 2, 1999
SUMMARY:
The City of Aspen has recently annexed a 21 + acre tract of land known as "Iselin"
and "Rotary" Parks. As part of the annexation process, the City has an obligation to
zone the property within 90 days of the annexation. In Pitkin County, the property
straddled two zone districts. The northern half of the land was zoned AFR-2 and the
southern half AFR-10. Both of these zone districts include single-family residential
uses and general outdoor recreational uses.
The parcel is owned by the ,City and managed by the Parks and Recreation
Departments. The parcel is currently being planned for expanded municipal
recreational facilities including an ice rink, ball fields, a redesigned pool, and possibly
a few affordable housing units. Representatives from the Parks and Recreation
Departments will be in attendance at the meeting and will be presenting conceptual
plans during a work session at the conclusion ofthe Commission's public hearing
agenda.
The Community Development Department is recommending the parcel be zoned
Public (PUB). This City zone district allows for the current use of the property but
removes the provision for a single family home. The Public Zone District provides
for affordable housing as a conditional use - a use not allowed in the Park Zone
District - and establishes all dimensional requirements of the site through the PUD
process.
Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission forward a
recommendation of approval to City Council for this property to be included in
the Public Zone District.
ApPLICANT:
Community Development Department, City of Aspen.
LOCATION:
450 Maroon Creek Road (Moore Pool). Located west of the School Campus.
1
I""j I""j
ZONING:
Pitkin County Zoning: AFR-2 for the northern portion. AFR-10 for the southern
portion.
Proposed City Zoning: Public (PUB) Zone. A copy of the proposed zoning is
attached as Exhibit B.
LOT SIZE:
21.269 acres.
CURRENT LAND USE:
Active and passive open space and recreation. Municipal pool and tennis courts.
PROPOSED LAND USE:
The City Parks and Recreation Departments are considering a redevelopment of this
parcel to accommodate an indoor public ice rink, pool, ball fields, and affordable
housing. A more detailed presentation of the conceptual development plans will be
made during a work session. A PUD application requesting formal approval of the
development plans will be submitted in the Spring.
PREVIOUS ACTION:
The Commission has not previously considered this rezoning request. An informal
presentation ofthe conceptual development plan was made to the Commission in the
Fall of 1998.
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
Rezoning. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the application at a
public hearing and recommend approval, approval with conditions, or denial to City
Council.
BACKGROUND:
The subject property was annexed into the City of Aspen on January 11, 1999.
According to State statute, the City must zone the property within 90 days of the final
annexation. The property was zoned AFR-2 and AFR-10 in Pitkin County., These are
low-density residential zones.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The City Planning Department is recommending the Public Zone District because it
represents the best possible "fit" with the uses being considered in the Iselin Park
Master Plan. The Public Zone District allows for public recreational facilities and for
the provision of affordable housing on-site -- a use not allowed in the Park Zone.
Representatives of the City Parks and Recreation Departments have been invited to
present a conceptual development plan to the Commission during a work session
following the public hearing for the rezoning. The purpose of this work session is to
2
1""\.
!~
provide direction to the development team for their preparation of a land use
application.
Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit A. A copy of the
Public Zone District requirements has been provided as Exhibit B.
RECOMMENDATlON:
Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission forward to City Council a
recommendation of approval to rezone Iselin and Rotary Parks to the Public (PUB)
Zone District, with no conditions.
RECOMMENDED MOTlON:
"I move to recommend City Council rezone this property, Iselin and Rotary Park, to
the Public Zone District."
q" -<)"7
0-0 1r~'
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Comments
Exhibit B -- Public (PUB) Zone District provisions
Exhibit C -- Vicinity Map
Exhibit D -- Proposed P&Z Resolution
3
f"*'\.
~
EXHIBIT A
STAFF COMMENTS: Iselin Rezoning
Section 26.92.020, Standards Applicable to Rezoning
In reviewing an amendment to the official zone district map, the City Council and the
Commission shall consider:
A. Whether the proposed amendment is in conflict with any applicable portions of this title.
Staff Finding:
The proposed zoning is consistent with the Land Use Code and does not represent any potential
conflicts. The Public zoning requires all development on the site to proceed through the PUD
process in order to determine the appropriate dimensional requirements, parking, general impacts,
and intensity of uses. Therefore, before an development occurs, the Planning and Zoning
Commission will have the opportunity to review the proposal under a PUD process.
B. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the Aspen Area
Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Finding:
The 1993 AACP did identify the Iselin and Rotary Park parcel with the following suggested
action:
Expand Iselin Parkfor organized recreational activities, and incorporate the Rotary
Club proposal for a passive park and semi-active park.
The Public Zone District is appropriate for these types of proposed uses. This zone also allows
for the provision of affordable housing as a conditional use, which may be a desirable element of
the final program.
C. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with surrounding zone districts and land
uses, considering existing land use and neighborhood characteristics.
Staff Finding:
Surrounding the site is the public school campus, medium-density residential, and Maroon Creek.
There is a, proposed bridge linking the parks with the base area of Tiehack. The Public Zone
allows for uses compatible with the surrounding area. The subsequent PUD process will
determine the intensity of those uses allowed and any mitigation measures to offset adverse
impacts to the surrounding area.
D. The effect of the proposed amendment on traffic generation and road safety.
Staff Finding:
The Public Zone District allows for affordable housing as well as uses similar to those allowed in
the Park Zone District. The level of development and its level of traffic generation and impacts
on road safety will be evaluated through the POO process. Traffic, transit, pedestrian facilities,
and overall road safety have been issues raised by the Commission in work sessions with the
Staff Comments 1
"....,\
~
Parks Department. These issues will remain important elements in the planning process. The
existing and potential level of traffic in the area must combine with the high level of existing and
potential pedestrian movements in a safe manner, especially considering the age of the
pedestrians and peaks in level of activity. The difference between the Public and Park Zone
Districts would have no bearing on this transportation issue - both allow the same uses and
intensities, and both are reviewed through the PUD process. Transportation issues, the
acceptable level of trip generation, and the most appropriate and safe design will be determined
and required through the PUD process. The project team does include a traffic consultant who
will address transportation in detail.
The development program for the parcel is in the conceptual stages. The applicant realizes that
safe transportation is a primary design parameter and has made specific accommodations in
designing the site. This zoning does not allow development as of right to occur without full
review as a PUD, and the Parks Department has been very cooperative in accommodating the
concerns of staff and the Commission in programming the site. Staff believes the Public Zone
District is the most appropriate for this parcel and that the PUD process requirement allows for
sufficient review of the final proposal.
E. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on
public facilitIes, and whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would
exceed the capacity of such facilities, including, but not limited to, transportation
facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, and emergency
medical facilities.
Staff Finding:
The zone district designation will not, itself, have an effect on the provision of public facilities.
Again, this topic is a criterion of PUD and of GMQS. Applicants are required to provide letters
of intent for services which the development affects, and upgrades to the system or other
appropriate mitigation measures are typically required if found to be necessary.
F. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant
adverse impacts on the natural environment.
Staff Finding:
The natural features of the site are being considered with the master planning effort. The river
corridor, recreational connections, transit, and use schedules with the surrounding parcels are all
being considered to reduce the level of impact the development may have on the natural
environment. The Public zoning designation will not adversely affect the natural environment.
G. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent and compatible with the community
character in the City of Aspen.
Staff Finding:
The Parks Department has been working with the surrounding property owners to achieve a
reasonable compatibility with the neighborhood. This process will continue. Staff believes the
master planning effort is consistent with the AACP and that the Public zoning is compatible with
the City character.
H. Whether there have been changed conditions affecting the subject parcel or the
surrounding neighborhood which support the proposed amendment.
Staff Comments 2
r--.
^
Staff Finding:
Annexation of the property into the City of Aspen is a condition, which requires this process.
The Public Zone District allows for the current use of the property and allows for the uses being
considered in the master planning effort.
I. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in
hannony with the purpose and intent of this title.
Staff Finding:
This proposed Public Zone District does not pose any conflicts with the public' interest. The
AACP specifically reflects a community desire for increased recreational facilities at this
location, and the flexibility to accommodate employee housing on"site for those additional jobs
created by the development represents good land use planning and should be encouraged. Staff
believes this zone district will promote the purpose and intent of this Title and will be in harmony
with the public interest.
Staff Comments 3
""""
~
EXHIBIT B
26.28.250 Public (PUB).
. A. Purpose. The purpose of the Public (PUB) zone district is to provide for the development
of governmental and quasi-governmental facilities for cultural, educational,. civic and other
governmental purposes.
B. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted as of right in the Public (PUB) zone
district.
I.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
II.
12.
13.
Library;
Museum;
Post office;
Hospital;
Essential governmental and public utility uses, facilities, services and buildings
(excluding maintenance shops);
Public transportation stop;
Terminal building, and transportation related facilities;
Public surface and underground parking areas;
Fire station;
Public school;
Public park;
Arts, cultural and recreational activities, buildings and uses; and
Accessory buildings and uses.
C.' Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted as conditional uses in the Public
(PUB) zone district, subject to the standards and procedures established in Chapter 26.60.
I. Maintenance shop; and
2. Affordable housing.
D. Dimensional requirements. The dimensional requirements which shall apply to all
permitted and conditional uses in the Public (PUB) zone district shall be set by the adoption of a
conceptual development plan and final development plan, pursuant to Chapter 26.84, Planned
Unit Development.
E. bff-street parking requirement. The following off-street parking spaces shall be
provided for each use in the Public (PUB) zone district, subject to the provisions of Chapter
26.32.
I. Lodge uses: NI A
2. Residential uses: Requires special review pursuant to Chapter 26.64.
3. All other uses: Requires special review pursuant to Chapter 26.64.
ttt1 . ~1w ~f
~
^
LEGAl DFSCRIP1lDN
ION
A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN lHE SWI/4 OF SEC1l0N II AND iHE NWI/4 OF
SEC1l0N 14 ALL IN 1105. R85W OF lHE 6lH P.M., COUNTY OF PI1l<IN, STATE OF
COLORADO. DESCRI8ED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT iHE 51/4 CORNER OF SAID SEC1l0N II. lliENCE S39'51'DD"W. 1061.60
FEET ALONG lliE SOUlHEASTERL Y UNE OF iHA T TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN
DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 119 AT PAGE 40 OF iHE RECORDS OF PI1l<IN COUNTY,
COLORADO;
iHENCE N4Z'35'OO"W. 372.00 FEET ALONG lliE SOUlHWESTERL Y UNE OF iHAT
TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 119 AT PAGE 40:
lHENCE N90'OO'00"W, 178.75 FEET ALONG lliE SOUlH UNE OF lliAT TRACT OF
LAND AS DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 119 AT PAGE 40 TO lliE APPROXIMATE CENTER-
UNE OF MAROON CREEK;
lHE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES AND DISTANCES ARE ALONG iHE APPROXIMATE
CENTERUNE OF SAID MAROON CREEK;
N31'08'zO"W, 51.37 FlEET;
N07"29'45'E, 167.Z8 FEET;
NI8'51'ZI"E, 86.99 FEET;
NI5'Dz'28"E. 188.91 FlEET;
NI0'0I'D3"W, 71.19 FEET TO lHE SOUlH UNE OF lliE SWI/4 OF SAID SEC1l0N II;
lHENCE. LEAVING iHE APPROXIMATE CENTERUNE OF SAID MAROON CREEK, 589'48'ZO'E,
26.91 FEET ALONG lHE SOUlH UNE OF lHE SWI/4 OF SAID SEC1lON II AND lHE
SOUlHERL Y UNE OF MAROON CREEK CLUB SUBDIVISION (SOUlH) AN ANNEXA 1l0N MAP
RECORDED IN 800K 41 AT PAGE 76 IN lHE RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO;
lliENCE NOO'14'51"W. 201.82 FlEET ALONG lHE-EASTERLY UNE OF SAID
MAROON CREEK CLUB SUBDIVISION (SOUlH) ANNEXA 1l0N;
lHENCE N33'OI'14"E, Z8I.07 FlEET ALONG lHE EASTERLY UNE OF SAID
MAROON CREEK CLUB SUBDIVISION (SOUiH) ANNEXA1l0N;
lHENCE N02'16'09"W, 264.36 FEET ALONG lHE EASTERLY UNE OF SAID MAROON
CREEK CLUB SUBDIVISION (SOUiH) ANNEXA 1l0N TO lHE NORlHEASTERL Y UNE OF
lHAT TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 789 AT PAGE 214
OF iHE RECORDS OF PI1l<IN COUNTY, COLORADO;
lHENCE SSS'32'30" E, 605.85 FEET ALONG iHE NORlHEASTERLY UNE OF lHAT'
TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 789 AT PAGE 214 TO iHE NORiH-
WEST CORNER OF lHA T TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN BOOK
341 AT PAGE 127 OF iHE RECORDS OF PI1l<IN COUNTY, COLORADO;
lHENCE S56'32'20"E, 144.15 FEET ALONG lHE NORlliEASTERLY UNE OF iHA T TRACT
OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 341 AT PAGE 127 TO lHE NORlHWEST CORNER OF
lHAT TRACT OF LAND AS- DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 248 AT PAGE 962
OF lHE RECORDS OF PI1l<IN COUNTY, COLORADO;
lHENCE SOUiHEASTERL Y, 129.76 FEET ALONG lHE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE
TO iHE NORlHEAST AND ALONG lHE NORlHEASTERLY UNE OF iHAT TRACT OF LAND
AS DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 246 AT PAGE 962, SAID ARC HAVING A RADIUS OF
700.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10'37'14", AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
lHA T BEARS S61'12'27'E. 129.57 FEET;
lHENCE S89' 48'20"E. 50.85 FEET ALONG lHE NORlliEASTERL Y UNE OF iHA T
TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 246 AT PAGE 962 TO iHE NORlHEAST
CORNER iHEREOF;
iHENCE SOI'22' 4O"W, 41.23 FlEET ALONG lHE EASTERLY UNE OF iHA T TRACT
TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 246 AT PAGE 962;
lHENCE SlI'12'40'W, 191.00 FEET ALONG lHE EASTERLY UNE OF lHAT TRACT
OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 246 AT PAGE 962; TO lHE SOUlli UNE OF iHE
SWI/4 OF SAID SEC1l0N II;
lHENCE S89'411'20'E 130.00 FEET ALONG iHE SOUlli UNE OF lHE SWI/4 OF SAID
SEC1lON J1 TO lliE POINT OF BEGINNING.
A
..,.
f~~ ~"q~.-o3
~
- .
,~
..,~
'I
ill
Iii
Iii
Iii
~~
Jj,
lj]
iiitw.~ - (l"u.hJ" ;;. P;j,(", J;., ='7 10 da.p. 0 4,'UI
,Ii ~ --r- I~
II~~ ~L~ 1JA-~---
1';_ a
,I!
Ii:
ili 4Uflil'-:J~ ~~I~-~t:
.,11 ~:~
111
I~ D~. .. . . _
Ii! 12....1 _ I t.e. {\"",k..,; wi CS&fu'lII.e--.
"I ~-T ~'7;7
H, ~'
1;,
!1 ! l'^"'(;
Ili "'-
ilil
III
iI:
\Ii
'''1
nl
---ffi5;IA?Ul
r"'1T ",i/i)7t.:;;;j;;~\.~Th.( t.".iGT
,1\ ~~L ~ .-c= I ~
i: i a,l11.G..S .J:,. ~\ I~
m-
Iii ~~ ~_~
!Ii QiWA.~. _-&S- ~vv-. \
iii 919JAw-. ~ 0( ~-
!Ii ~1 d P'V~ \fW)Jt~ \~ ~. "
Hi
"""
.~
.
~ 1~, 4
6'~j\.ow .[1"(' ~
jji
~j f
ii.1
1il
,L]!
III
ill
~U
II:
,I
I::
11'
I.,
Hi
'I
hi
:"1
II'
'I'
111
00 ~? ;tI~
. d.~ __
---rrr- <1o,t)f.L
AML
A,r&J
?k
~1
rc-