HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.council.19910708Regular Meeting Asnen City Council Jul 8 1991
Y
CITIZEN COMMENTS 1
ORDINANCE #18, SERIES OF 1991 - Institutional Controls
Smuggler 2
. .
. .
COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS ~
CONS ENT CALENDAR 9
LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS 9
SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS g
ORDINANCE #21, SERIES OF 1991 - Electrical Code Revision ,
9
REPORT OF ENERGY COMMITTEE 10
19 9 0 FINANCIAL REPORT 11
APPEAL OF CODE INTERPRETATION 13
HUNTER CREEK ACCESS 14
RUEDI RESERVOIR WATER RELEASE 16
RFTA CROSS TOWN SHUTTLE 18
19
Regular Meetinct Aspen City Council July 8,_1991
Mayor Bennett called the meeting to order at 5 p.m. with Council-
members Richards, Pendleton, Reno and Peters present.
Mayor Bennett said Ordinance #17, Tagert Lot Split will be tabled;
the Youth Center Lease will be continued; Ruedi Reservoir Water
Release and RFTA Cross Town Shuttle may be moved to action items.
Ordinance #18, Institutional Controls on Smuggler will be the
second item on the agenda.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
1. Dave Harris, 533 Spruce Street told Council every morning at
5:30 hot air balloons take off from Rio Grande park and wake him
up. Their set up requires a large fan and as they fill the
balloons up it gets louder and louder. Harris said there is no
noise regulations governing balloons at 5:30 a.m. Council
requested Carol O'Dowd, city manager, look into this and report
back.
2. Doug Allen, property owner affected by the proposed under-
grounding, said staff may be requesting this project be dropped.
Allen said the letter sent out to the homeowners by staff contained
figures that may be revised down. Allen said this project should
be reconsidered as the costs may be less than previously stated.
Mayor Bennett said staff had suggested the city wait until the
residents make their mind up about this project rather than
imposing a project that is not acceptable to the homeowners . Allen
said he would be willing to work with staff on this project.
Councilman Peters said it would be worth it to renotice property
owners with new costs to see if there is interest.
3. David Muckenhirn, Snowbunny Lane, submitted a letter to
Council on the same issue, undergrounding project. Muckenhirn said
the original costs were $7,000; there may be creative ways to
reduce this cost. Everyone wants the project done; however, many
people objected to the costs. Muckenhirn requested this project
not be abandoned by the city and that a more accurate letter be
sent to the property owners. Mayor Bennett said Council would like
to see the community more united on this project before it goes
farther. Councilman Reno said the property owners should also be
working with Holy Cross to drop their primaries fairly close to
where they are currently located which will decrease the costs of
the secondary to the homeowners.
4. Paul Lux, Snowbunny Lane, agreed with Muckenhirn about the
undergrounding project. Lux said the power lines are unsightly.
Lux told Council after he received the letter, he was confused
about the costs. Lux also requested the city not drop the project
yet. Carol O'Dowd, city manager, told Council she will sent out a
letter explaining the data and costs to the property owners.
1
Regular Meeting Aspen City Council July 8, 1991
Councilman Peters suggested including a form reply. Mayor Bennett
agreed with the concept of a citizens group on this project.
Councilman Peters moved to table Ordinance #17, Tagert Lot Split
Amendment; Ordinance #20, GMQS Exemption Messiah Lutheran Church,
Ordinance #22, Code Amendment Square Footage, and Ordinance #24,
Pitkin County Bank Vested Right to July 22; to remove Aspen Youth
Center Lease from the agenda at the request of the applicant; and
to move Ordinance #18, Institutional Controls Smuggler to the next
item; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. (Councilman Reno stepped
down due to a conflict of interest) . All in favor, motion carried.
ORDINANCE #18, SERIES OF 1991 - Institutional Controls Smuggler
Jim Scherer said the remediation method selected and negotiated as
the Denver agreement called for less than a ... than is nationally
used on lead; a minimum of 2 feet is used, and this area was to
have 1 foot. This requires institutional controls to make sure the
remedy stays in place. Alston said the EPA is in the bidding mode;
the contract, through the Bureau of Reclamation, is out for bid.
Alston said it will be impossible for the EPA to go ahead with the
remediation without the institutional controls in place. Alston
requested if Council is not going to enact the institutional
controls, that they continue them into the future.
The EPA will have to consider their options. Alston told Council
the EPA does not have the authority to remove a site from the list
unless it is remediated. This is not an option. Alston said the
EPA feels the best thing to do is get on with as much remediation
as possible without institutional controls. Alston said the EPA
can remediate hot spots that do not require institutional controls.
Alston said they will move hot spots that have 20 to 40,000 ppm
that are way above any standards and are the highest risk area.
Alston said with this work, the EPA hopes to convince the community
they can do the work right and do the rest of the work next summer.
Alston suggested the city appoint a group or individual or hire a
technical assistant to represent the community to watch over the
remediation work.
Scherer said during this time the city may go ahead with additional
health studies. Scherer said the Agency does not have financial
capabilities for the studies nor is that their role. The EPA is an
environmental agency; they are to make sure that the environment is
not a problem. Patti Clapper asked if the city does not approve
the institutional controls, which are the last part of the deal for
the contract, 4 party agreement, by July 31st, what happens to the
state superfund contract and the lawsuit that is pending. Person
said the EPA has requested of all parties that the July 1st date be
extended to July 31. The city has not yet discussed this. Mayor
Bennett said the topic of an earlier meeting was the city ~ s request
2
Regular Meeting Aspen City Council July 8, 1991
and EPA's agreement to furnish additional technical details of
exactly what they are proposing to do this summer. Ms. Clapper
noted the EPA was only going to do a limited remediation plan this
summer anyway.
Stephanie Costello told Council her land in Smuggler lies adjacent
to and is part of the berm area. Part of her land has been fenced
off for the last 5 years . Ms . Costello said she has been negotiat-
ing with the EPA on the relocation of the berm and has not been
able to come to an agreement. Ms. Costello said there is no plot
plan or agreement on what will be done on her property. The EPA is
pushing for a clean up process to begin and there is no agreement
on the finished look of the berm and the residences along the berm.
Ms. Costello pointed out the berm acts as a sound and visual
barrier between Smuggler and the Racquet Club. Mayor Bennett asked
if it is possible to get more information from the EPA on the berm
and its relocation. Mark Alston said he thought the berm configu-
ration was worked out. Ms. Costello said the location and
materials have not been agreed to and there is nothing signed.
Sue, president of Smuggler homeowners association, told Council
their association does not yet have a remediation plan for the
common areas. Sue said they too are concerned about what the
remediation will look like for the Racquet Club repository. Sue
said they would like to see finished drawings and a remediation
plan. Mayor Bennett said EPA has said they do not need Council's
agreement to go forward with their plan. Mayor Bennett asked that
the berm related concerns be addressed by the EPA.
Barry Siegel said the purpose in delaying the clean up is to
protect the residents from possible airborne contamination. Siegel
said it seems the residents should have the scientific data to
reassure them before the clean up is started. Siegel said he would
like to see pictures of the planned repository. Siegel said he
would like to know that the dirtiest dirt is not going to be moved
before it is moved. Tim Anderson, Smuggler Trailer Park, said the
EPA is making this up as they go along. Anderson said the EPA law
is not just. Anderson said he would like the noise aspect of the
clean up probed.
Deedee Brownstein said she is concerned about noise and diesel
fuel. This is not the way to care for the earth. Preparing the
repositories is moving dirt and boulders around. Sue Considine,
Smuggler Trailer homeowners association, said if the homeowners
want to dig trees or beautify their land, they will have to get
permits. The rules in the institutional controls are unacceptable.
Terry Hale told Council he has gotten involved in this because the
EPA does not seem to be doing this project right. Hale said the
real question is whether there should be a remediation at all.
Hale pointed out the EPA standards for blood levels in post
3
Regular Meeting Aspen City Council July 8, 1991
remediation are that 95 percent of the population be under 10.
Aspen's population is already was under 10. Hale said Aspen is a
town of environmentalists and is in favor of what the EPA generally
is trying to do. Hale said it is not easy to share the idea that
this area needs remediation in the face of all data that has been
accumulated. Hale asked who would have to tell the EPA that there
is no health hazard in this community.
Scherer said EPA is not a health agency and does not regulate human
health; the EPA regulates the environment. The standards the EPA
is given is that 500 ppm of lead is an acceptable level. Scherer
pointed out this has already been changed that to 1000 ppm.
Scherer said when there is a change in Washington D.C. in the
scientific community that supports the standard, he will change his
implementation. Scherer said it is the cumulative effect of lead
in the environment that is the responsibility of the EPA by law to
get rid of.
Nick DeWolfe said cleaning lead up is a high tax burden being
imposed on the citizens. DeWolfe said residents feel this program
will reduce the lead levels by 2 or 3 micrograms per deciliter of
1 or 2 people at a cost of $30,000,000 for stages 1, 2, and 3.
DeWolfe said that is too high a cost to pay. DeWolfe said a large
scale blood test should be done before one wheelbarrow of dirt is
moved. DeWolfe said this study should be done so that the
community is in the position of making the EPA liable if people's
lead levels go up.
Pat Simpson, Smuggler Trailer Court, said geotextile put in the
dirt that is going to last 50 to 100 years has got to be more
dangerous than the lead currently in the soil. Ms. Simpson said
the green muck they are going to use in the area must also be
dangerous. Tom Dunlop, environmental health department said this
is a dust stablizer with color added which is being used at the
request of the BOR. Jan Wirth, Smuggler Caucus, told Council they
were given the encouragement there may be room for negotiations.
The Caucus came up with proposals for negotiating points and
possibilities under the ROD and suggestions for future actions that
everyone could work on.
Mike Garrish commended Council for their time on this issue.
Garrish told Council he has lived in this area 80 years, worked in
the mines, and gardened, and is healthy. Garrish now has 1/2 acre
in the superfund site that he cannot sell or contract out. Patty
Clapper said as long as mines have operable permits, they do not
have to be remediated. Scherer said the mine would be under a
permit from the state of Colorado. It would be outside the purview
of the superfund. The tailings in place right now would be within
the purview of the superfund. Jeff Winagle asked what is the
liability of EPA to the city for 2500 dump truck loads of dirt
4
Regular Meetina Aspen Citv Council July 8, 1991
going through town on the roads, bridges and pedestrians, and to
the tourist industry. Scherer said the EPA is liable for negli-
gence. Scherer said one reason the EPA went with an on-site remedy
was because of tourism. John Moscato, attorney for Department of
Justice, said the United States liability is defined in the federal
court claims act, like negligible acts. Moscato said there may be
other laws that permit legal action against the United States.
Moscato said the Agency cannot say what it's liability is for acts
that are speculative. Moscato said the Agency needs to comply with
the same types of regulations the city applies to normal construc-
tion activity when they are off-site.
Winagle asked what the noise and pollution factor for 3 years of
2500 more trucks going up and down the city trucks would be.
Dunlop said he does not perceive the EPA as different from anyone
else they would take an action against. The EPA knows the maximum
sound level readings. The environmental health department will
enforce on complaints. Phoebe Ryerson asked why the EPA cannot
delay this whole project until more medical reports are in and the
petitions in the county are in. Councilwoman Richards asked if
there is a relocation plan for Council to look at. EPA representa-
tive told Council they will have this plan when they give Council
the report to look at. Dodie Rourke told Council she has received
a letter stating they will have to be relocated for 3 weeks, which
is a long time to move out of one's residence. Councilwoman
Richards also requested a mock up of what the repository is going
to look like. Councilman Reno said he favors continuing this until
there is more detail on the EPA proposal. Scherer agreed the city
deserves a relocation plan and a conceptual plan of the repository
plan before they adopt the institutional controls. The citizens
next to the berm need to know how it will work aesthetically and
for a noise barrier. The EPA will come back to Council with these
plans.
Councilman Reno said he would like to see as much information on
the entire program, including operable unit #2, before the city
votes on the institutional controls. Angie Griffith asked why one
has to wait 5 years after remediation to get off the list. Scherer
said the 5 years is from the beginning of the remediation and the
reason is to make sure the remedy works. Moscato said 120(c)
mandates 5 years review whenever hazardous waste is left at a site.
Someone said there is a recent residential liability policy change
made by EPA which states if an individual homeowner is cooperative
in the clean up of their site, there will not be any liability on
the part of that homeowner. Scherer said this indicates the same
would be true of future homeowners who buy a site.
Walt Siebert asked if the city can find out why the EPA does not
have to do an environmental impact statement. Jed Caswall, city
attorney, said he has researched this and found that the EPA has
5
Reaular Meetina Asben Citv Council Julv 8. 1991
been exempted from having to perform those types of analysis.
Caswall pointed out most of these analysis are submitted to the EPA
for their study. This issue has been litigated and the EPA has
prevailed. Coleman suggested getting the EPA to upgrade Chris
Weiss's study to include a more realistic estimate of the differen-
tial impact of their proposed remediation but also to cover dust
that is brought indoors and trapped. Councilman Peters asked if
the city has gotten a response from the EPA requesting the
allowable blood levels be lowered. Dunlop told Council he has not
received a response.
DeWolfe asked if backup beepers meet the city's noise standards.
Dunlop said mobile sources are allowed louder decibel levels
because they are thought to be transient.
Mayor Bennett closed the public hearing.
Councilman Reno moved to table Ordinance #18, Series of 1991, to
July 22, 1991; seconded by Councilman Peters.
Councilman Peters asked if the contract for air quality monitoring
will be let with the overall contract for clean up; will one
contractor be responsible for both. Dunlop said there will be a
prime contractor awarded the major contract and subcontractors
under that. They will hire a company or health and safety officer
to do the monitoring separate from the prime contract. Dunlop told
Council he requested the ability to look at the air monitors and to
request equal authority with the Bureau employee to discontinue
work on the project if their health and safety officer does not
initiate that action. Dunlop said he cannot order the contractor
to stop work but can go to the health and safety officer and have
them order work to be stopped. Mayor Bennett said the EPA seems to
be inviting that type of participation. Mayor Bennett said if the
city cannot stop the work from starting this summer, they ought to
make sure there is all the monitoring with the city ability to shut
the job down. Mayor Bennett said the city ought to take that right
unilaterally if it is not offered by the EPA. Councilwoman
Pendleton said the city ought to be pushing for blood level studies
to be done before one shovel of dirt is turned.
Roll call vote; Councilmembers Pendleton, yes; Peters, yes;
Richards, yes; Reno, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried.
Mayor Bennett suggested directing the city staff to get together
with the medical community, the residents, the EPA and CDC to plan
a health study to determine what type of health threat there is.
Dunlop said he would like to set a strategy session to see where
they are going to go with this, get some guidelines laid out and
see where there are resources. Terry Hale told Council a medical
committee staff has been set up from the hospital. Si Coleman
6
Regular Meeting Aspen City Council July 8, 1991
pointed out federal agencies are very protective of their methodol-
ogy and if tests are not done their way, they will determine the
tests are not valid. Mayor Bennett said the EPA in Washington
should know the second thing the Council did after tabling the
institutional controls was to vote on the health issues.
Councilman Peters moved to direct the city manager to work through
the environmental health department to coordinate with the Aspen
Valley Hospital staff and board and the EPA and ATSDR to devise a
health study that may include a blood screening program to evaluate
the environmental risk of living in Aspen; seconded by Councilman
Reno. All in favor, motion carried.
Councilman Peters said one question that has come up is what has
happened to the Colorado Department of Health study and why is it
taking so long. Councilman Peters moved the city Council request
of the Colorado Department of Health that this report and raw data
be released immediately; seconded by Councilwoman Pendleton. All
in favor, motion carried.
COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS
1. Councilwoman Richards said she has received a call from
citizens regarding the danger of bicycle riding on sidewalks.
Councilwoman Richards said this should be added to the work program
for the pedestrian enhancement of the downtown area.
2. Councilwoman Richards asked the city attorney for a written
legal statement to have payroll bonding for new businesses or out
of state ownership of businesses. If this is not possible to do
through liquor license process, suggestions for the same objective.
Councilwoman Richards said she is looking for protecting the
employees or small persons from having to collect monies from out
of state.
3. Councilwoman Richards said the airport has conducted an
independent audit of the airport hostess program. Councilwoman
Richards asked that the airport and county make this available to
the city when it is complete. Councilwoman Richards requested the
city manager prepare a proposal for Council to consider auditing
the funds the city gives to the Aspen Chamber Resort Association in
general and in specific to the visitor's center. Councilwoman
Richards said she would like to understand how many employees this
buys the city; what are the performance standards of these
employees; are all funds passed forward to the ACRA being spent in
the visitor's center. Council agreed with this request. Council-
woman Pendleton said she resists singled out one group; this should
either be done for all groups Council gives money to or none.
Councilwoman Richards agreed but said she is concerned about the
magnitude of funds given to the ACRA. Carol O'Dowd, city manager,
7
Reaular Meetina Aspen Citv Council July 8, 1991
told Council one procedure for this year's budget is for groups
that have received money from the city to write up what they did
with these funds and how they implemented what Council contributed
funds for. Mayor Bennett asked if Council specifically wants an
audit or wants an accounting of how the money was spend. Council-
woman Richards said she wants an audit. Mayor Bennett requested
the city manager to bring back to Council what this would entail.
4. Councilwoman Richards said she is concerned about the
discussions between RFTA and the Ski Company regarding the skier
shuttle system. This has large effects on the city, the pedestrian
plan and mass transit. Councilwoman Richards said there is a work
session scheduled July 15th and Council should understand the
players and the positions being taken on this issue. Councilwoman
Richards requested the city manager have staff review the applica-
tion of the Little Nell SPA and the gondola as it relates to
traffic mitigations and assurance given to Council on traffic
generated from the center. Councilwoman Richards said Council also
has to look at the sales taxes and the free city buses that take
people to Rubey park in order to use the free skier shuttle.
Councilwoman Richards requested research from the city attorney's
office why there is no tax on ski lift taxes. Amy Margerum,
planning director, told Council staff is working on the research.
Councilwoman Richards said it is important that this issue come to
full community light. The community needs to answer the large
questions of whether there is a commitment to mass transit; is the
community willing to trash a great marketing tool ; is the community
willing to eliminate the greatest perceived value that the guests
receive. Councilwoman Richards said the ski company has not been
taxed on its transportation impact because it had voluntarily
contracted to mitigate that impact.
5. Councilwoman Pendleton moved to move RFTA Cross Town Shuttle
to IX(f); seconded by Councilman Peters. All in favor, motion
carried.
6. Councilwoman Pendleton brought up the housing day care fund.
Councilwoman Pendleton said she has not been able to read the
housing authority's budget. Councilwoman Pendleton said she has
pushed to get housing produced. Councilwoman Pendleton suggested
Council sit down with the housing board and housing authority to
determine what subsidy Council feels comfortable with, what units
they want to see produced, and what Council expects from the
housing authority. Councilwoman Pendleton said she expects a much
better accounting system for the monies given than what she has
received. Councilwoman Pendleton said she thought the city would
be getting monies back from housing project that would be turned
into more projects. Councilwoman Pendleton requested input from
other Councilmembers on what they would like covered at a work
session. Council scheduled this for August 5 at 5 p.m.
8
Regular Meeting Aspen Citv Council Julv 8, 1991
7. Councilwoman Pendleton commented the ice cream social was a
good community event and complimented the Historical Society for
putting this event on.
8. Councilman Reno agreed with Councilwoman Richards' comments on
the skier shuttle. Councilman Reno emphasized any work should be
done in a spirit of cooperation rather than "us" and "them".
9. Councilwoman Pendleton nominated Augie Reno to serve on the
Nordic Council; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. All in favor,
motion carried.
10. Councilman Reno said he received a letter about the drainage
problem in the west end. Councilman Reno said during budget he
would like to see proposals from the staff on what can be done in
the west end to help the drainage.
11. Councilman Reno thanked staff for arranging 2 extra weeks on
the day camp.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilman Peters moved to approve the consent calendar; seconded
by Councilwoman Richards. The consent calendar is (a) Minutes June
10, 24, 1991; (b) City Hall Bike Lockers. All in favor, motion
carried.
LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS
Councilwoman Pendleton moved to approve the renewals of Syzygy and
Omi; seconded by Councilman Reno. All in favor, motion carried.
SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS
Councilman Peters moved to approve the special event permit for
Swiss American Day August 2 and Aspen Writers' Foundation July 27;
seconded by Councilwoman Pendleton. All in favor, motion carried.
ORDINANCE #21, SERIES OF 1991 - Electrical Code Revision
Tom Parry, building department, told Council this amendment is to
update the electric code to 1990 from 1978.
Mayor Bennett opened the public hearing. There were no comments.
Mayor Bennett closed the public hearing.
Councilman Reno moved to adopt Ordinance #21, Series of 1991, on
second reading; seconded by Councilwoman Pendleton. Roll call
vote; Councilmembers Reno, yes; Pendleton, yes; Richards, yes;
Peters, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried.
9
Regular Meetina Aspen City Council July 8, 1991
REPORT OF ENERGY COMMITTEE
Bill Stirling said in April 1991 Council approved forming an energy
committee in town. The committee has been working over the last 4
months. Stirling acknowledged members of the committee and the
work they have done. The committee held a session and invited
various vendors to demonstrate what is being done in energy
efficiency . Stirling said the committee is trying to have Aspen do
its part to slow global warming and halt acid rain. Stirling said
the parts of this concept are efficiency, conservation, and self-
sufficiency. Stirling said the committee is wrestling with a long
range process and with immediate one project at a time.
The committee has decided to use city hall as an example. Staff
analyzed the last 15 months bills for city hall and it has cost
$33,000 beginning April 1990. Stirling requested Council's
approval to do an audit on city hall and bring to Council's budget
hearings the cost for an energy retrofit. Stirling said the
committee has asked the CCLC to do the same type presentation to
Council on all the city's street lights. Tom Baker, assistant city
manager's office, told Council the committee has estimated the city
could save $.50 per square foot annually or $8,000 which is about
1/3 of the electric costs of the building. Baker said the Snowmass
Club has done a retrofit of their facility. They have saved 66, 000
kwh and $3300 in the first year, including expanded hours of
operation. Baker said energy efficient street bulbs over the life
of the bulb over 1700 pounds of CO2 is being avoided is.
Stirling requested a ceiling of $2,000 to come out of the city hall
restoration fund. If the city uses less energy, they will be
putting less pollutants into the air, damaging the eco-system less
by not digging up fossil fuels. Stirling said transportation is
the biggest energy conservation issue. The community needs to
increase non-automobile travel. Mayor Bennett asked if this would
not be a better use of contingency funds rather than from the city
hall renovation fund. Councilwoman Richards asked if the work done
in the energy audit would be able to be used in the renovation, and
if so it would be a renovation item.
Councilwoman Pendleton moved to direct the committee to advertise
for bids to undertake and energy audit of city hall and if
necessary to spend up to $2,000 of the city hall renovation fund;
seconded by Councilwoman Richards.
Baker said it is not legally required for this to go out to bids.
Baker asked Council if they would trust the energy committee in
getting a contract. Councilwoman Pendleton said she would be
willing to accept the recommendation of the energy committee.
Mayor Bennett said he would prefer to see the city bid everything.
Mayor Bennett said for this project he would make an exception to
10
Reaular Meetina Asnen Citv Council Julv 8, 1991
his own rule. Councilman Peters said he does not want to waste the
committee's time analyzing $2000 bids.
Councilwoman Pendleton amended her motion to direct the committee
to undertake an energy audit of city hall and if necessary to spend
up to $2 , 000 of city hall renovation fund; seconded by Councilwoman
Richards. All in favor, motion carried.
1990 FINANCIAL REPORT
Cindy Wilson, finance director, introduced Dave DeZutter from
Grant Thornton in Denver. DeZutter pointed out the Annual
Financial Statement contains their audit opinion. Grant Thornton
serves at the pleasure of the Council to fulfill the statutory
audit functions. The Financial Statement is divided into an
introductory letter from Cindy Wilson and her staff which summariz-
es the 1990 financial information, including a certificate of
achievement for financial reporting. The financial section is
primarily what Grant Thornton is engaged to audit. DeZutter told
Council theirs is a clean opinion and has been for several years.
The financial section summarizes the accounting policies and
methodology used to accumulate the information within the report.
There are several different accounting policies and several
different funds covered within the report. The final section of
the financial statements are statistical summaries. These contain
trend information, how expenditures have evolved over a 10 year
period, how revenues have evolved.
DeZutter said generally the city is in pretty strong financial
position. During 1990 the sales taxes were up about 8.8 percent;
total tax revenues were up about 14 percent; general governmental
revenues are up about 3.5 percent overall; general governmental
operating expenses are up about 6 percent. The general fund
balance at the end of 1990 was about $1.9 million, which represents
about 28 percent of the annual operating expenditures of the city
or approximately 3 months. DeZutter told Council for operating
funds, he recommends 1 to 3 months of operations in a fund balance.
The land fund had $1.7 million reserve . The city' s policy has been
to build up 70 percent of the debt service requirements or $650, 000
funded out of that fund. The mall fund has about $200,000 at the
end of 1990. The city's goal is about 2 percent of operating
expenditures or $140,000. The Wheeler fund has about $180,000;
this fund is primarily servicing some debt and funds are trans-
ferred this debt.
DeZutter told Council at the end of 1990 there was about $1.7
million of fund balance in the housing/day care fund of which
$780,000 has been designated as an expenditure to the 1991 budget
primarily for the Kraut project. Another $700,000 of this fund is
reserved to meet debt requirements under the g.o. housing bonds,
11
Regular Meeting Aspen Citv Council Julv 8, 1991
leaving about $200,000 fund balance. The debt service funds are to
service the city's debt funded by sales tax. Council should keep
an eye on the water fund; it has a $325,000 loss in 1990, about
$1,000,000 was used in operation in 1990, primarily for construc-
tion and capital assets. $900,000 was transferred to employee
housing and repaid in 1991. The cash position of the water fund is
getting slimmer. The electric fund has a $560,000 loss before
depreciation, about $950,000 was transferred to other funds;
$360,000 went into the transportation fund for overruns in the
parking structure. This will not happen in the future. The
parking fund generates sufficient sales tax revenue to service debt
but not to cover operations. The Ruedi, golf course and ice garden
funds are all cash sufficient; the operations have been consistent
throughout the years and generate enough income to support their
operations.
DeZutter said the housing fund is comprised of the operations of 2
housing projects supported by general obligation debt. These are
Truscott and Marolt project. There is a deficit in the fund; there
is an operating income of $150,000 before depreciation. This fund
needs to be watched very closely to make sure the operating
revenues are sufficient to fund debt service and the operations of
the projects. Councilwoman Richards asked if DeZutter would
recommend specific funds that should have greater reserves.
DeZutter said this is a decision of management and what they
anticipate these funds to be doing in future years. Ms. O'Dowd
told Council these are reviewed with Council during the budget
process.
DeZutter said the other document is a management letter. As part
of the audit, they review the internal control procedures in the
city and make a determination on the sufficiency of these proce-
dures. DeZutter told Council they found the city's internal
control structure is sufficient to safeguard the city's assets and
to generate financial information that is able to be relied on.
DeZutter said during the audit they come across practices they like
to comment on to Council. The comment letter is divided into 2
sections. The first section addresses comments from the 1989 audit
and the status of those issues. DeZutter pointed out in all
instances the city has addressed the comments to the mutual
satisfaction.
DeZutter said one comment on the 1990 audit is the housing fund and
the potential for cash flow shortages. Another comment relates to
the enterprise funds and operating losses before depreciation.
DeZutter recommended the useful lives of assets be looked at by
staff and the auditors. This is not a significant issue from year
to year but it can build up where it becomes a problem.
12
Regular Meetina Aspen Citv Council Julv 8. 1991
Councilman Peters moved to accept the 1990 financial report;
seconded by Councilwoman Pendleton. All in favor, motion carried.
APPEAL OF CODE INTERPRETATION
Jed Caswall, city attorney, told Council staff was hand delivered
a letter from Charles Collins' attorney, Tom Smith, asking to
withdraw the request for the public hearing, not their appeal.
Caswall asked Council to formally accept the letter. The applicant
has waived their right to be present and to be heard. Councilwoman
Richards asked about de novo and the implications to staff.
Caswall said in his memorandum he pointed out the land use code
does not specify the type of review under which they are to conduct
this appeal. Caswall suggested Council use a standard of review
which is arbitrary and capricious which means unless Council finds
the interpretation is not substantiated by any reasonable interpre-
tation of the Code, Council affirm that. The applicant's attorney
has asked Council use a standard of review called de novo, which
means Council start fresh; they hear the views of the planning
director but do not give it any type of weight and make a determi-
nation in the absence of the planning director's determination.
Caswall asked Council specify which type of standard of review they
are going to use and recommended using arbitrary and capricious.
Council has the authority to review administrative decision making;
generally these standards are arbitrary and capricious not de novo
reviews. It is consistent and fair to continue to utilize that
standard.
Amy Margerum, planning director, told Council the first issue
brought up by Collins was discussed in detail during the Meadows
public hearings. The issue is that by putting a road across
Charles Marquesee's lot, which is currently a non-conforming lot,
it would be inconsistent with the non-conforming section of the
land use code. Ms. Margerum told Council her interpretation of the
land use code is that a new, non-conforming lot cannot be created.
The code does not speak to an easement over an existing lot.
Ms. Margerum said the second issue raised is subdivision. Collins
was concerned throughout the process that the city was not
following the subdivision requirements of the land use code as they
related to the new road entering the Meadows property and the types
of safety improvements for a new road. Ms. Margerum told Council
this is not a real valid concern. Staff processed an amendment to
the code to allow any project with an SPA overlay to vary the
subdivision regulations. Ms. Margerum said Collins would have been
correct if this code amendment was not processed prior to taking
action on the Meadows.
Councilwoman Richards asked if "new" is one lot that is changed for
the creation of a new, second lot. Ms. Margerum said Collins feels
13
Regular Meeting Aspen City Council July 8, 1991
a new lot was created by virtue of putting an easement across an
existing lot. Ms. Margerum said this is not creating a new lot.
Councilman Peters asked if Marquesee received any payment for the
easement. Ms. Margerum said this is still being worked out.
Caswall pointed out this is an appeal and code interpretation and
Council is to consider what is on the record, not take public
comment. Caswall said this is the opinion of the planning director
that is under scrutiny based upon the documentation in front of
Council. Ms. Margerum reiterated the code was amended to make it
clear that under an SPA, the city has the ability to vary the
requirements on roads. Caswall said Council should put on the
record which standard of review they have chosen to examine this
matter under and whether or not an interpretation made by the
planning director should be affirmed, reversed or otherwise
modified.
Councilman Peters moved to use the arbitrary and capricious
standard; seconded by Councilman Reno. All in favor, motion
carried.
Councilwoman Richards moved to reject this appeal of the planning
department's code interpretation; seconded by Councilman Reno. All
in favor, motion carried.
Councilwoman Richards moved to suspend the rules and extend the
meeting to 9:30 p.m.; seconded by Councilwoman Pendleton. All in
favor, motion carried.
HUNTER CREEK ACCESS
Fritz Benedict submitted a letter to the Forest Service and one to
the County Commissioners. Benedict read "Enclosed are two letter
I hope environmental and governmental groups will endorse. Last
year the county decided that the road over Smuggler should be the
only automobile access into Hunter Creek. This decision was in the
spirit of the Forest Service's management policy the Hunter Creek
valley remain as free of cars as possible. The Commissioners are
well aware that Jim Auster had hired an appraiser who value Jim's
property at well over $1,000,000 provided Auster was able to force
a public road through McCloskey's land". Benedict said it very
unlikely the Commissioners will pay that kind of money and if the
road has to be up Smuggler, the appraisal will be much less.
"Recently the Forest Service announced that the Smuggler road does
not provide adequate access and they want a paved road through
McCloskey's and a parking lot within the valley. Many of us feel
that that would be the end of Hunter Creek as we know it. Whether
or not it was paved, the road would mean that the valley could be
reached in just 7 minutes". Benedict showed a map of the road
going up Red Mountain and to McCloskey's house. Benedict told
14
Regular Meeting Aspen City Council July 8, 1991
Council the Forest Service's plan would be to continue the road to
a parking lot in the valley with a road continuing to Van Horn park
and the upper Hunter valley. Benedict said if there is a road and
a parking lot in the valley, it will be so much more used.
Art Daily said the Hunter Creek valley is one of the most wonderful
areas and open space resources close to Aspen there is. Daily said
the decisions about the use of the valley should be made in this
community rather than by a judge in Denver. Daily requested
Council take a position on the issues of Hunter Creek that will be
before the Commissioners shortly. If there is a road and parking
lot, there will be a dramatic increase in the number of people
using the valley. Daily said the environment is too fragile for
any more intense type of use. Daily said Friends of Hunter Creek
have achieved the goals of good accesses to the valley. Daily said
the community should now shift their focus to saving the valley
from too much access. Daily requested Council give encouragement
to the County to settle this matter without providing any addition-
al vehicular access along the north side of Hunter Creek.
Councilwoman Richards said she is concerned about getting a one-
sided presentation on this issue and cannot consider taking action
unless there is a proposal from the Forest Service.
Councilwoman Richards moved the Council take no formal action on
this proposal; seconded by Councilman Peters.
Councilman Peters said he feels the county has done a good job
trying to work this issue out. Hunter Creek valley has been
despoiled more by development than it will be by people using it.
Councilman Peters said he does not think the Forest Service is
trying to build a highway to Van Horn park. Councilwoman Pendleton
said she feels there is plenty of access to Hunter Creek right now.
Councilman Reno agreed he does not want to see any more access.
Mayor Bennett said he feels strongly about this issue and supports
what Benedict is trying to do. Mayor Bennett said he would like to
support the County without usurping any of their powers. Mayor
Bennett said there should be parking where the traditional parking
has always been. Mayor Bennett said he abhors the idea of a
parking lot within Hunter Creek. Mayor Bennett said Hunter Creek
is the most valuable open space the city has. Mayor Bennett said
there should not be cars in Hunter Creek. Councilwoman Richards
reiterated she is concerned Council is only hearing one side of
this issue. Councilwoman Richards said she feels the city is being
asked to interfere in a county issue. Mayor Bennett said he feels
the city is helping present a united front to the Forest Service
and to the courts in the same way the city is trying to present a
united front on the EPA issue.
15
Regular Meeting ___ Aspen City Council July 8, 1991
Councilman Peters said if Council wants to speak as one voice, they
should do some listening to the County first. Mayor Bennett agreed
to consulting the Commissioners before the Council takes any
action.
All in favor, with the exception of Mayor Bennett. Motion carried.
Councilwoman Pendleton moved to suspend the rules and extend the
meeting to 10:00 p.m.; seconded by Councilman Reno. All in favor,
motion carried.
RUEDI RESERVOIR WATER RELEASE
Councilwoman Pendleton, member of the Ruedi Water & Power Authority
as well as the Aspen Yacht Club, told Council Ruedi is full at 101
acre feet. In the record of decision and round 2 marketing program
of January 1990, the Bureau of Reclamation has said they will try
and keep the marketing sales of the water and the recreation
program going and try to take care of the squaw fish near Grand
Junction. The BOR will let out 10,000 acre feet in the months
between August and October. Part of this water should come from
Green Mountain reservoir as long as their water level is not below
20,000 acre feet. When Ruedi reservoir drops below 91,000 acre
feet, it impacts the recreational activities. For it to drop any
lower than that and to 81,000 acre feet would just about shut the
reservoir down. Councilwoman Pendleton said there is no informa-
tion that the water released is helping the squaw fish spawn.
Councilwoman Pendleton said it is too much of an impact on Ruedi to
ask to contribute another 10,000 acre feet when part of the
agreement was to take care of recreational facilities at Ruedi.
Councilwoman Pendleton said there is a letter requiring the Bureau
of Reclamation to not dump another 10,000 feet down the river.
Wayne Ethridge, county commissioner and member of Ruedi Water and
Power Authority, told Council in 1989 there was an EIS prepared at
the request of fish and wildlife service to look at ways of
augmenting flows in August, September and October to assist in
spawning. The EIS said that 10,000 acre feet could be utilized;
5,000 from Ruedi and/or Green Mountain. In 1990 10,000 acre feet
was released from Ruedi. This year the proposal is 20,000 acre
feet from Ruedi. Ethridge told Council when he asked fish and
wildlife why other sources were not used, the answer was there were
political and technical problems with other sources. Ethridge said
it is disturbing this has gone from 5,000 acre feet to 20,000 acre
feet in 2 years.
Ethridge told Council about half the normal pond of Ruedi is for
sale. Ruedi WAPA has been attempting to purchase the water for a
number of years. WAPA has been opposed by the Colorado River
Conservation District. Ethridge said the community needs to
16
Regular Meeting Aspen City Council July 8, 1991
organize a political effort. Ruedi WAPA is willing to host this
effort to make people aware this reservoir is in jeopardy.
Ethridge said in addition to the 53,000 acre feet for sale, there
is some concern the oil shale reserve on the western slope is
looking at Ruedi as a source of water. With these two concerns and
the endangered species releases, Ruedi would be dewatered.
Ethridge said the recreation economy based on this reservoir has
never been addressed by the BOR. Ethridge pointed out Ruedi serves
a large area of the western slope.
Gideon Kaufman said from Aspen to Grand Junction to Vail, Ruedi is
the only recreational reservoir there is. Kaufman told Council the
eastern slope has purchased the dam above Shoshone and will start
taking water down. The only water available to fulfill that is
Ruedi. Kaufman said if the water is purchased, there will be no
water-based recreation in this entire valley. Ethridge said the
city is also concerned about a predictable power supply. If the
reservoir is drained in the summer, there is nothing available in
the winter for power generation. There are incredible spikes.
Councilwoman Pendleton said it seems like a waste of water just to
let it go.
Kaufman told Council the river district and BOR are siding against
allowing either Pitkin County or WAPA to acquire the water.
Kaufman said the county will have to lobby the congress on this
issue. Councilwoman Richards asked what can be done to create
pressure to also stop from over selling the Colorado river and then
using Ruedi to save the squaw fish. Ethridge said this is part of
the effort of Ruedi Water and Power Authority is willing to
undertake. WAPA is at odds with the water district. The most
immediate issue is trying to preserve the recreational aspect of
Ruedi. The other issue of over-appropriation of the Colorado is
separate. Councilwoman Pendleton said there is a deadline of July
15th for public input.
Councilman Peters said this release does not have to be; it can be
drawn down from Green Mountain reservoir whose change in levels are
so drastic it does not have recreational uses. That reservoir is
not being tapped for this. Ethridge said if Council is interested
in having the Ruedi WAPA double their efforts to preserve this
recreational resource, they can work through Councilwoman Pendle-
ton. The other action is to have the Mayor sign the letter to the
Bureau of Reclamation. Councilwoman Richards asked if WAPA has a
budget or will this be volunteer. Ethridge said WAPA does have a
budget for water issues and some small hydro projects.
Councilman Peters moved to ratify the letter to Felix Cook changing
"Aspen Yacht Club docks" to "boat docks" and to follow up in
support of the Ruedi WAPA to safeguard and preserve recreational
17
Regular Meeting Aspen City Council July 8, 1991
interests at Ruedi Reservoir; seconded by Councilwoman Pendleton.
All in favor, motion carried.
Councilwoman Pendleton moved to suspend the rules and meet for 15
more minutes; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. All in favor,
motion carried.
RFTA CROSS TOWN SHUTTLE
Dan Blankenship, RFTA General Manager, gave Council a memorandum
highlighting the issues to be addressed in order to make a cross
town shuttle successful. Blankenship told Council he checked with
Snowmass about the availability of their vehicles. Snowmass uses
these to handle conferences at Snowmass and could not let RFTA have
them all the time. Blankenship said because of the passage of the
Americans with Disabilities act, the law states any vehicles new,
used or leased must be equipped with wheelchair lifts. Blankenship
said the vehicles he has looked at would run about $1500/month.
Blankenship said the summer is half over, and it may be better to
target the winter season. Councilwoman Pendleton said what she
wants to see is Council give RFTA the go ahead to come up costs and
alternatives in order to make this a good test program and to have
these numbers by the budget session. Mayor Bennett said he would
like to see alternatives besides the Council paying far this or
other service being reallocated. Council agreed. Councilwoman
Richards said a cross town shuttle from the parking garage to the
gondola is a publicly-subsidized skier shuttle, which is adding
again to the skier shuttle in a public way. Councilwoman Richards
said she would like to see some routing proposals. Councilwoman
Richards said she is not in favor of the shuttle going down the
Mill street mall. Mayor Bennett agreed; he would like to see a
proposal for a shuttle north/south on Galena. Council scheduled a
work session on the cross town shuttle August 19th at 5 p.m.
Councilwoman Richards moved to adjourn at 10:15 p.m; seconded by
Councilwoman Pendleton. All in favor, motion carried.
Kathryn Koch, City Clerk
18