Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
coa.lu.rz.540 E Main St.0045.2015.ASLU
Alk 0045.2015. ASLU 540 E MAIN ST COA CAPITAL ASSET - JEFF PENOARVIS THE ZUPANCIS PROPERTY Vy C3 THE CITY OF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: May 4, 2015 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, o c-)4 5.2-o l 5 AS UA We have received your land use application for Zupancis property —Rezone and have reviewed it for completeness. ❑ Your Land Use Application is incomplete: Please submit the following missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete. Please submit the following to begin the land use review process. • Digital copy of the application (PDF). • 10 copies of the drawings. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. aife �Y�ou, V `nr Ph 1 , Deputy Planning Director City of Aspen, Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Mineral Rights Notice Required Yes Now_ GMQS Allotments Yes Now_ _ Qualifying Applications: New PD Subdivision, or PD (creating more than 1 additional lot) Residential Affordable Housing Commercial E.P.F. Lodging lu THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0045.2015.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2737 073 24 003 PROJECT ADDRESS 540 E MAIN ST PLANNER HILLARY SEMINICK CASE DESCRIPTION COA CAPTIAL ASSETS REPRESENTATIVE ALAN RICHMAN DATE OF FINAL ACTION 08/10/2015 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 12/13/2015 • THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0045. 2015.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2737 073 24 003 PROJECT ADDRESS 540 E MAIN ST PLANNER HILLARY SEMINICK CASE DESCRIPTION COA CAPTIAL ASSETS REPRESENTATIVE JEFF PENDARVIS DATE OF FINAL ACTION O8/10/2015 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 12/13/2015 • 1�1 v w- , 2015 , fi> L-11 Permits Fil e Edit Record Navigate Form Reports Format Tab Help i J YX Y DJ -, .71 A ir-- lump 1 I,�� U 0 o Main Custom Fields : Routing Status Fee Summary Actions Routing History Q Permit type astu - Aspen Land Use permit # v Address 640 E MAIN ST Apt/Suite o Ctty ASPEN State CG Zip 81611 rr K Permit Information O Master permit Routing queue aslul5 Applied 06�06'201� n` jO Project Status pendrrg Approved Z o I y Description APPLICATION FOR ZUPANCIS PROPERTY -REZONE Issued FEES ARE WANED BY 50% SEE SUPORTING DOCUMENTS IN FILE SIGNED BY CH RIS BENDON Closed/Final nal Submitted ALAN RICHMj*J 920 1125 Clod Running Days Expires 04!30/2016 Submitted via Owner Last name IZUPANCIS LOUIS J 1f2 First name 540 E h1AIN ST JJ I ASPEN CO 81611 Phone { ) - Address Applicant ❑ Owner is applicant? ❑ Contractor is applicant? Last name JPENDARNAS First name PEFF 130 S GALENA Address EN CO 81611 Ph. ( Ph ) 3064638 Cost ir 28091 Email Lender Last name First name Phone ( ) Address AspenGald5 (sererangeias M1 of 1 FEES WAIVED @50% $7,800 = $3,900.00 / 70% OF THIS TO COME FROM A/C# 000.91.86001.95145 FEES WAIVED @50% $275 = $1,211.25 / 30% REAINDER TO COME FROM A/C# 000.91.95325.86001 9 ORDINANCE NO.28 (SERIES OF 2015) A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE REZONING OF THE PROPERTY COMMONLY DESCRIBED AS 540 E. MAIN ST., LEGALLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A; CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. PARCEL ID: 2737-073-24-003 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from The City of Aspen Capital Asset Department (Applicant), represented by Alan Richman, requesting the City Council approve a Rezoning of 540 E. Main Street, legally described in Exhibit A of this Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, the property at 540 E. Main. Street is currently zoned Service Commercial Industrial (SCI), Commercial Core (CC), and Commercial (C-1); and, WHEREAS, the property located at 540 E Main Street is listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmarks and Structures; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.310.060 of the Land Use Code, Rezoning shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the City Council, after receiving a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission; and, WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended approval of the Application; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the zoning proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation for the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing.; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on June 30t', 2015, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 12, Series 2015, by a six to zero (6-0) vote, recommending the Aspen City Council approve Rezoning of 540 E. Main Street; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the rezoning application under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on September 14, 2015; and, Page 1 of 2 0 0 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Rezoning Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the City Council hereby approves the Rezoning of 540 E. Main Street to Public (PUB). Section2: Placement on Official Zone District Map Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Community Development Director shall place the amendment on the City's Official Zone District Map. Section 3: Effect Upon Existing Litigation This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be construed and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5• A public hearing on this ordinance was held on the 15th day of September, at a meeting of the Aspen City Council commencing at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, a minimum of fifteen days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. Section 6: Effective Date In accordance with Section 4.9 of the City of Aspen Home Rule Charter, this ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days following final passage. Page 2 of 2 INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 10t' of August, 2015. Attest: Linda Manning, City Clerk Steven Skadron, Mayor FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 15t' day of September. Attest: Linda Manning, City Clerk Approved as to form: James R. True, City Attorney Exhibit A — Legal Description Steven Skadron, Mayor Page 3 of 2 Ordinance No. 28, Series 2015 Exhibit A 540 E. Main St. Legal Description PARCEL OF LAND IN THE EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 108453, DITCH BOOK 2A AT PAGE 252 OF THE REAL ESTATE RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, BEING A PORTION OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED BY MAYOR'S DEED RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. 109112 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR EAST MAIN STREET BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 20 EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE CONCEPT 600 CONDOMINIUMS AS SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 383 AND PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 442; THENCE N 75°09'11" W A DISTANCE OF 97.60 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR EAST MAIN STREET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS S75009'11E A DISTANCE OF 7.5 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 10, BLOCK 19, EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE; THENCE N 14150149" E A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET ALONG A LINE 7.5 FEET EAST AND PARALLEL TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 10, TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 10, BLOCK 19, EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE; THENCE N 75009'11" W A DISTANCE OF 7.5 FEET ALONG SAID LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10, BLOCK 19, EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE; THENCE N14050'57"E A DISTANCE OF 20.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 9, BLOCK 19, EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE; THENCE N 75009'11" A DISTANCE OF W 10.10 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 9 TO AN ANGLE POINT OF LOT 1, FIRST AMENDED PITKIN COUNTY CENTER SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 93, PAGE 57; THENCE N14050'49"E A DISTANCE OF 188.06 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, FIRST AMENDED PITKIN COUNTY SUBDIVISION TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID LOT 1, ALSO BEING AN ANGLE POINT IN THE BOUNDARY OF OBERMEYER PLACE CONDOMINIUMS AS SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 80, PAGE 57; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES S 57025'00" E A DISTANCE OF 24.94 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID OBERMEYER CONDOMINIUMS BOUNDARY; THENCE S 19049'00" E A DISTANCE OF 138.72 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID OBERMEYER CONDOMINIUMS BOUNDARY; THENCE S 04008'00" W A DISTANCE OF 67.55 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID OBERMEYER CONDOMINIUMS BOUNDARY, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 20, EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE, ALSO BEING THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF SAID CONCEPT 600 CONDOMINIUMS; THENCE S 14050'49" W A DISTANCE OF 120.39 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID CONCEPT 600 CONDOMINIUMS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 0.607 ACRES MORE OR LESS; COMMONLY KNOWN AS 540 E. MAIN ST. Page 4 of 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Skadron and Aspen City Council FROM: Hillary Seminick, Planner Technician THRU: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director RE: 540 E. Main St. Rezoning Second Reading of Ordinance #28, Series 2015 MEETING DATE: September 15, 2015 APPLICANT: City of Aspen, Capital Asset Department REPRESENTATIVE: Alan Richman, Alan Services, INC. Richman Planning LOCATION & PARCEL ID:: 540 E. Main St. Aspen, CO 81611. 2737-073-24-003. The lot is a parcel of land within the East Aspen Townsite Addition. CURRENT ZONING & USE: The zoning for this property is Service/Commercial/Industrial (SCI), Commercial (C-1) and Commercial Core (CC). The City of Aspen Parking Department operates on the lot. PROPOSED ZONING & USE: The Applicant proposes to rezone the property to Public (PUB) Zone District. There is no proposed use change. SUMMARY: The Applicant requests to rezone the property to the Public (PUB) Zone District. Redevelopment is not being considered in the Application; however, as a City asset, the PUB Zone District is an appropriate one and clears up the mix of zone districts. The property is designated historic. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request to rezone the subject property to the Public (PUB) Zone District. Figure B. 540 E. Main St./City Parking Dept. facing south towards Aspen Mountain 540 E. Main St. Rezoning Staff Memo September 8, 2015 Page 1 of 7 CHANGES SINCE FIRST READING: The First Reading of Ordinance No. 28, Series 2015 was on August 10, 2015. Council raised concerns regarding the following issues: loss of SCI Zone District area, current Zone District compatibility with future development, and dimensional requirements. The minutes from this meeting can be found in Exhibit F. Loss of SCI Zone District Area Council expressed concern regarding the loss of the SCI Zone District Area at First Reading. The subject property is owned by the City of Aspen. Currently the property has housed the City Parking Department. Rezoning the property from SCI to PUB does not displace existing business space. Opportunities for suitable uses within SCI are not reduced because the City intends on utilizing the parcel for municipal facilities. Staff has calculated the current area of the SCI Zone District and compared those figures to the area of the SCI portion of the subject property. The figures provided in Table 1 are not indicative of the total developable area within the SCI Zone District nor the existing floor area of the structures within the SCI Zone District. Table 1. SCI Zone District Area Current Area 112.3 acres 536,048 sf Area within Subject Property 0.3 acres 16,523 sf Reduction o SCI Area -3 % change The current area, calculated in GIS, is 12.3 acres/536,048 sf. The subject property represents 0.3 acres/16,523 sf. This represents a 3% decrease of area in the SCI Zone District, a small percentage of the available land within SCI. Current Zone District Compatibility The purpose of the Public zone district is "to provide for the development of governmental, quasi -governmental and nonprofit facilities for cultural, educational, civic and other nonprofit purposes. Permitted uses in the Public zone district include essential governmental and public utility uses, facilities, services and buildings. The intent of the SCI Zone district is to preserve and enhance locale serving primarily non retail small business areas while preserving light industrial and service uses. Permitted uses in the SCI Zone District, while various, do not include either office, governmental or public use. The purpose of the Commercial Core Zone District is to allow for the use of land for retail, service commercial, recreation and institutional uses to enhance the business and service character in the historic central business core of the City. While Commercial Core allows for office, these uses are only permitted on the second floor unless those uses are set back 40' from the street. While this promotes vitality of the core, this creates an unworkable solution for a government facility, of which a large component may be office use. The Commercial Zone District is to provide for mixed —use buildings including commercial uses with opportunities for a residential affordable housing component. The Commercial Zone districts permit office use on all floor without restriction. Both Commercial and Commercial Core allow for arts, cultural and civic uses on all but the third floor, which is restricted to lodging. Due to the use restrictions by floor, the Commercial and Commercial Core zone districts would preclude many of the 540 E. Main St. Rezoning Staff Memo September 8, 2015 Page 2 of 7 governmental uses essential to serving City functions as outlined in the Dimensional Requirements section below Dimensional Requirements The dimensional requirements of the Pubic Zone District are determined through Planned Development Review. This is to allow for the flexibility to provide for adequate facilities for government offices. There are several areas throughout the City currently zoned Public. While not intended to be a comprehensive list, the uses of the current City -owned properties in the Public Zone District outlined below are various and as such, the dimensional requirements of each vary greatly. ■ Marolt Ranch Employee Housing ■ Aspen Golf Course ■ The Thrift Shop ■ Mountain Rescue ■ Holden Marolt Barn ■ Water Treatment Plant ■ Rubey Park Transit Facility ■ Aspen Ice Garden ■ Rio Grande ■ City Hall ■ Water Place ■ Yellow Brick School ■ Aspen Airport Business Center The Planned Development review is an exhaustive process to vet the project to ensure it meets the intent of adopted regulatory plans, desirable development patterns, preservation of natural and cultural features, efficient use of land, public and government facilities, safe and convenient transportation. The review also ensures the incorporation of public input in the planning process to ensure sensitivity to the surrounding neighborhood, community goals and objectives. The planned development must consider several review criteria, including but not limited to site planning and dimensions. Through the planning process, with the input of the public, a suitable development solution with appropriate dimensional tolerances and site planning, meeting both the needs of the Police Department and the community, shall be met. Alignment with the Goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan Implementation Steps of the AACP provides guidance on goals to carry out the AACP. One of the steps to preserve and enhance our non-profit and quasi -public facilities and spaces (VI.3.a, Appendix — 10) states "Address the potential future loss of civic buildings and spaces through a variety of methods, including public -private partnerships". Rezoning the property to Public would allow for preservation of civic space by allowing the entirety of the parcel to be redeveloped for government use. While a development is not being considered at this time, the City is pursuing redeveloping the Subject Property as a future home for the Police Department. It is not Staffs intent to analyze the need for this space nor the suitably of the site for the potential programming, rather it is to address the imminent need for civic space locations to provide offices for adequate municipal function. The City Police Department was located at the County owned Courthouse and has since been temporarily relocated to Obermeyer Plaza. The need for replacement of the lost civic space is a direct result of lost lease space. Capital Asset addressed the requirements of the Police Department relocation, in addition to other civic space needs, in a July 29`h 2015 memo to Council (Exhibit G). In this memo, Capital Asset noted that finding a solution to the loss of 540 E. Main St. Rezoning Staff Memo September 8, 2015 Page 3 of 7 • 0 downtown leases held by the City is a top priority of City Council. Additionally, addressing the civic space relocation addresses Goal 8 of the Department to "achieve direction from City Council on a solution for the loss of downtown police and municipal office spaces". Capital Asset has estimated that the new Police Department will require approximately 14,900 sf of floor area to address current and longer term needs. Capital Asset is also considering employee housing at the subject property. Neither the number of units nor the floor area is known at this time. Rezoning the subject property is a mechanism that both addresses the goals of the AACP and the one of Council's top ten goals. LAND USE REQUESTS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approval: Rezoning — pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.310.060, Rezoning — Procedure for Amendment. The Planning and Zoning Commission is tasked with determining if the application meets the standards for an amendment to the Official Zone District Map, and to provide a recommendation to City Council. City Council is the final review authority. PROJECT SUMMARY: 540 E. Main St. is located just north of the Commercial Core between Main St. and Rio Grande Pl. The parcel measures approximately 27,000 square feetl0.6 acres in size and the City Parking Department is located on the property. Figure C. Project Location & Vicinity. Subject property is indicated by a white boarder and star. 540 E. Main St. Rezoning Staff Memo September 8, 2015 Page 4 of 7 0 0 The City Parking Department is considered a public use. Public use is not an allowed use within the Service/Industrial/Commercial (SCI) Zone District, while the Commercial Core (CC) and Commercial (C-1) Zone Districts do allow for Public use on the ground floor. The City Parking Department office is located on the front portion of the property in the former residence within the CC Zone District. In accordance with Section 26.710.022.A, Zoning of Lands Containing More Than One Zone District; when a proposed use is not allowed in all Zone Districts, the use can only be developed on land in which it is a permitted use. As shown in Figure D, the Parking Department office building falls within the CC Zone District. The accessory building to the rear, which is located in the SCI Zone District, is used by the Parking Department for storage of department cars and appurtenances. The accessory building is considered an accessory use to the Parking Department office and is permitted as a use in the SCI Zone District. To bring the entire lot into conformance and to allow for the future expansion of City facilities, the Applicant is initiating an amendment to zone districts of the subject property from CC, C-1, and SCI to Public (PUB). Figure D. Subject Property Site Programming At this time, no development is proposed on the subject property; however, the parcel is being considered for expansion of future City facilities. The PUB Zone District requires a Planned Development when development occurs on the property. The dimensional characteristics of the parcel will be determined through the Planned Development Review process. At this time, the Applicant does not wish to pursue a Planned Development designation on the Official Zone District Map. Should the property be redeveloped with new City facilities; the Official Zone 540 E. Main St. Rezoning Staff Memo September 8, 2015 Page 5 of 7 District Map shall be amended to reflect a Planned Development designation upon approval of an Ordinance approving the Planned Development review. The subject property received historic designation in Ordinance 34, Series of 1992. At that time the property was addressed as 600 E. Bleeker St. The property received the designation because of three 19th century cabins, known as the Zupancis-McMurtchy cabins, located on the southern portion of the property; shown in Figure E and Figure F. Should a Planned Development review be pursued by the Applicant, the Historic Preservation review process may be combined with the review. Figure E. Historic photo of the site, date unknown Figure F. One of the historic outbuildings today STAFF COMMENTS: The subject property currently houses the City's Parking Department and provides some parking for the City Police Department. As shown on Figure C, the adjacent County property to the west of the subject property is zoned PUB. The surrounding uses to the west of the property include the Concept 600 Building, zoned C-1 and Obermeyer Place, Zoned SCl/Planned Development (PD). Both Concept 600 and Obermeyer Place are mixed use buildings housing a variety of uses and providing various services. Public zoning of the subject property will allow necessary civic functions in a central location near other government facilities and is consistent with the current land use and neighborhood characteristics. The site is being considered for future expansion of City facilities; however, no development is proposed as part of this Application. Impacts created by new development to public facilities such as transportation, utilities and the natural environment shall be evaluated in the Planned Development application process. A memo was provided to the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) on June loth, 2015 to inform them of the Application and to solicit comments. This memo can be found in Exhibit A. The Application received a positive endorsement from HPC. A small amount of public comment was received and comments generally regarded concern for how the property may be developed. Public comments may be found in Exhibit B. 540 E. Main St. Rezoning Staff Memo September 8, 2015 Page 6 of 7 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In reviewing the proposal, Staff finds the application to be consistent with the applicable review standards as found in the City Land Use Code and in Exhibit C. Staff is recommending approval of this request. PLANNING AND ZONING RECOMMENDATION: A public hearing was held during a special meeting on June 30, 2015. The Planning and Zoning Commission expressed some concern regarding the future development of the property. No public comment was received during the hearing. The minutes from the hearing can be found in Exhibit D. Resolution No. 12, Series 2015 providing a recommendation that City Council approve the rezoning was approved with a six to zero (6-0) vote and is included as Exhibit E. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: PROPOSED MOTION: "I move the adoption of Ordinance 28, Series of 2015." ATTACHMENTS: EXHIBIT A — HPC Memo EXHIBIT B — Public Comment EXHIBIT C — Review Criteria EXHIBIT D — P&Z June 30, 2015 Meeting Minutes EXHIBIT E — P&Z Resolution No. 12, Series 2015 EXHIBIT F — First Reading Meeting Minutes (August 10, 2015) EXHIBIT G — Capital Asset Memo to Council (meeting date August 3, 2015) EXHIBIT H — Second Reading Public Notice Materials EXHIBIT I — Survey EXHIBIT J — Application 540 E. Main St. Rezoning Staff Memo September 8, 2015 Page 7 of 7 E • MEMORANDUM �3 THE CITY of ACPFN TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jack Wheeler, Capital Asset Manager Jeff Pendarvis, Capital Asset Project Manager Thru: Scott Miller, Public Works Director DATE OF MEMO: July 29, 2015 MEETING DATE: August 3, 2015 RE: Civic Space Relocation Project (CSRP) — Conceptual Design Presentation REQUEST OF COUNCIL: Staff requests City Council select one of the options to move forward into schematic design and ongoing public process and approve the programing for the Police Facility. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: In a worksession on July 14, 2015, staff presented the Armory option, the Galena option, and the Galena Alternate option conceptual design. Council discussed each design and were in favor of the staff recommended selection of the Galena Option 3-2. In an effort to get more unanimity council requested that the team come back with the following information on the Galena and Armory option on August 3ra • Story pole and staking at Armory and Galena Plaza side of Galena option. • More comprehensive Architectural presentation on each option, including review of Architectural 3D model. • Presentation of costs • Presentation on the Public service aspects of each option. BACKGROUND: Finding a solution to the loss of downtown leases is a top priority for City Council and is articulated in one of its top ten goals. Goal 8 - Achieve direction from city council on a solution for the loss of downtown Police and municipal office spaces. Champion: Scott Miller Staff received direction From Council, as part of the Facility Master Plan Project, in November 2014 to issue Request for Proposals (RFP) for Architectural Design teams and Program Manager/ Owners Agent for the "Aspen Building Replacement Project". The Aspen Building Replacement Projects Main Goal is to provide a comprehensive solution for the Police and Municipal Facility by mid- year 2018. The RFP will close on February 5, 2015 at which point the team will make a recommendation to select the design team and the PM/OA, these contracts will be on consent agenda late February 2015. The first milestone of Page 1 of 9 • 0 Tur Crry nr Acvra that team will be to work closely with staff and the steering committee to develop and present, to Council in the first quarter 2015, two conceptual level plans for selection of the preferred option. Staff will check in with Council throughout the year to keep them informed of the progress of the project as well as review all decision points. Staff and the team will continue to do public outreach at all phases of this project to keep the public informed. The preferred option will be taken to design development level drawing and be submitted into the Planning and Zoning approval process by September 2015, this will give us a clear direction, cost information and schedule for a solution to our Police and Municipal facilities by end of year 2015. The team is targeting mid 2018 for completion of a solution. Staff started the Facility Master Plan Process in early 2014. As part of the project our team inventoried all of the City facilities and carried out an overall space analysis. During this, the need for space in the downtown core became apparent. Prior to and during this effort several things happened that have made the downtown core need for office space more crucial than ever: • The City and County executed an agreement that the Police would move out of the County owned space at the Courthouse and County Community Development would move out of the City owned Armory sometime in 2018. Eventually, this building is going to be for exclusive court use. • The Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority would move out of the County owned Courthouse Plaza Building. The County is preparing to renovate this building to accommodate their increasing space needs. • The Aspen Daily News Building (City Hall Annex) was sold and the new owner asked that the Building, Engineering, City Manager, and Canary initiative relocate by the end of 2015 to allow for redevelopment. • The team identified the inappropriate use of the basement of the Yellow Brick as City offices due to access and security concerns in a child care facility. This equals a loss of about 24,000 gross square feet (gsf) of the overall 50,000 gross square feet that the City presently operates out of in the downtown core. In early 2015 the team verified all programing for building design criteria and assessed space needs. After careful consideration with the staff, City Manager's office and Human Resources, the team dialed back its space assumptions to be more appropriate for our unique Aspen market. This led us to a reduced standard, about 30% smaller than common office space planning standards used in the US. This "Verified Program" (attached) is the space plan we are using for design which includes 14,900 gsf for Police and 51,900 gsf for City office program. The team has challenged themselves through careful, efficient, design to reduce this by another 5%. Page 2 of 9 CJ C� THE CPPY or ASPEN During the fall of 2014 the team held several open houses and presented various options to the public and Council on how to use all of our currently held assets to come with a space needs solution. This process started with identification of a "kit of parts" then development of four option that programed all of our needs into solutions utilizing these assets. In this process we reached out to the staff, public, and Council to find out what the important values we needed to bring forward in solutions. We found the following: • Plan City Hall under one roof • Utilize all of our currently owned assets • Must be a sustainable solution, we should be leaders in this area • No tax increase • Far reaching • Police should have an appropriate facility • Police facility should be planned at 540 Main • City should own not lease facilities as there is a major cost advantage The program design team took all of the criteria and presented four options to Council in November 2014 and the request of council was to select two preferred options to form the basis of design moving forward. This meeting set the first milestone as conceptual level design on the two selected options along with more public outreach followed by a presentation to council for selection of the preferred solution to move into schematic level design. During the open houses the following core values featured as a common thread in both internal and external outreach: • A minimum of a LEED Gold certification; the City should be leaders in sustainable practices. • Humble yet exemplary solution is very important to the community • The Police facility should be at 540 Main St. and we should work collaboratively with Pitkin County to maximize efficiency with the development of their public safety building. • We should be innovative and creative to produce the best result in the smallest box. • We should be collaborative with the community • We should solve the problem with our currently held assets • We should own not lease • Most participants preferred Galena Plaza Option • Some people felt sentiment to the Armory Option and felt that it spoke to who we are. • There is momentum in the community to return the Armory to its historic configuration for community benefit. Page 3 of 9 • Below is an outline of the remaining options: ARMORY OPTION** Remodel and Expansion of City Hall Some City Services at 540 East Main Street Some City Services at existing ACRA Building Some City Services at existing Rio Grande Building Police at 540 East Main Street BUDGET CONSTRUCTION COST* = $48 mil RISK & OWNER COST = $9 mil. REMODEL EXISTING BUILDING = 22,000 SF NEW ADDITION = 10,600 SF 540 E. MAIN CITY OFFICES = 10,800 SF REUSE ACRA BLDG = 4,500 SF REUSE RIO GRANDE BLDG = 4,000 SF TOTAL = 51,900 SF POLICE PROGRAM 540 E. MAIN = 14,900 SF IF TNF CITY nr ACVFN *Costs subject to change based on progress of conceptual design. ** Square footage excludes ACRA replacement space, parking structures, & site. ARMORY OPTION - MASSING IMAGE FROM HOPKINS A Page 4 of 9 GALENA OPTION City services at Galena Site Police at 540 East Main Street Employee Housing at 540 Main Street Re -purpose City Hall (Armory Site) BUDGET CONSTRUCTION COST* _ $46 mil. RISK & OWNER COSTS = $2.5 mil. GALENA PROGRAM** = 51,900 SF NEW PLAZA BUILDING NEW RIO GRANDE BUILDING POLICE PROGRAM = 14,900 SF POTENTIAL EMPLOYEE HOUSING 12 UNITS C ) R 9W *Costs subject to change based on progress of conceptual design. **Square footage excludes ACRA replacement space, parking structures, & site. Page 5 of 9 CAI THE CrrV nr ACDEAI DISCUSSION: The common theme we have heard through the public outreach and internal process has been the solution needs to be forward thinking and far reaching. We believe the solutions that we have presented reach out 50 years and are flexible and have the ability to either expand or contract our facilities. There is total of 3000 gsf planned for growth through the year 2030. We are facing a loss of space for several of our busiest departments and our Police department, and it is clear that doing nothing is not an option. To try to lease space (if it is available) would cost more in lease costs and tenant improvements in 10 — 15 years than the cost to responsibly invest our dollars in owned facilities, utilizing all of our currently held real estate assets in the downtown core area. There a pros and cons outlined on the assessment criteria. Staff recognizes that the single biggest detriment to any plan that includes use of the Armory in a configuration for municipal offices would be the disruption of City operations and service for a period of one to three years as we moved the operations out of the building, leased temporary office space and remodeled the building and then moved everyone back in. Based on the availability of space this would likely be in 6 — 10 locations throughout town. Staff feels this is an unneeded burden on the community considering that we can accommodate a solution that meets more of the core values on our other currently held land assets with the added benefit of returning the Armory to its historic configuration. If the Galena Plaza option is selected, the team will bring the issue of restoring the Armory to its historic configuration for community benefit back to council in work sessions in July and August to determine what this process would be. This is a very important decision. The solution that staff has determined meets our needs in the best way, delivering the most core values, with the least risk, and the most efficiency's for public benefit is the Galena Option. The assessment criteria below used for scoring does not weight the categories i.e. the two year construction impacts to the community are weighted the same as construction cost, yet it is a simple way for us to gauge the values presented by internal and community stakeholders. Based on this criteria as well as weighing what we heard in the process we have gone through to date, we feel the Galena option presents the best solution for the community. If council agrees, this option would be taken to the next phase of design which includes by year end 2015, as outlined in our schedule, three public open houses, four stakeholder meetings, and three more work session presentations to Council. We will also engage Design Workshops facilitation group out of their Austin office to help us run two community meetings in a meaningful way. Page 6 of 9 • 0 THE Cry of ASPEN OPTION ASSESSMENT CRITERIA ARMORY OPTION GALENA OPTION GALENA ALTERNATIVE DO NOTHING Customer and Public Service Q • Q O Operational Efficiency Q • C. Orgartvatiorul Adjacencies Q • (, O Ease of Community Access Q • • O (Armory) Opportunity for a New Community Benefit O • O O Environmental Sustainabil'rty Q • Q O Public and Employee Safety • • O O Opportunity for Housing Q • • O Construction Costs O Q • • Logistic and Moving Costs C j • Q Q Lorg•tenn Lease Coos • • • O Reduction of Risk O • Q O Construction impact to Community O _ Q • TOTAL RATING SCORE 10 1 24 15 5 Development Rating According to Crri na • (2 Points) Favorable (1 Point) Compromised 0 (0 Points) Unfavorable FINANCIALBUDGET IMPACTS: Armory Option Galena Option Galena Alternate Construction $48.4 mil $45.8 mil $40.6 mil Risk Contingency $3.0 mil $0.5 mil $0.7 mil Owner Costs $5.9 mil $2.0 mil $3.7 mil TOTAL $57.3 mil $48.3 mil $45.0 mil Page 7 of 9 bo MODO 55,000,000 50A00,000 45,000,000 40=,O)O 3U=,000 30,000,000 25MOMO 20=,000 • 9 City of Aspen - Civic Relocation Project Program Verification - option budget summary Armory Option C� Tuc Crry nr ACPpm Galena Option Galena Alternate ■TOTGICCMSTRIk'nON ■ COST Rig ITEMS ■OTWAOWNFA UMSTOTAt RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council approval of the Galena Plaza Option. Selection of this option includes returning the Armory to historic configuration for community benefit, with the notion that the process, cost and specifics of this need to be decided in the future. Staff will schedule a work session in August to discuss Council's vision on this this process. We have time to develop this process as the city offices can remain in the Armory while the Galena option is designed and built. This recommendation includes the decision to have the Police facility as outlined at 540 Main to allow collaboration and efficiencies with the County public safety facility at the Page 8 of 9 TNR C rry nr Acprm adjoining location. Once we set the additional programing in schematic design on the site, the Police facility will move to its own track for completion of design and construction. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit I: Presentation slides Page 9 of 9 0 • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Skadron and Aspen City Council FROM: Hillary Seminick, Planner Technician THRU: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director RE: 540 E. Main St. Rezoning First Reading of Ordinance #28, Series of 2015 Second Reading is scheduled for September 14, 2015 MEE'111N G llA 1'E: August 1 U, 2U 1 J APPLICANT: City of Aspen, Capital Asset Department REPRESENTATIVE: Alan Richman, Alan Services, INC. Richman Planning LOCATION & PARCEL ID:: 540 E. Main St. Aspen, CO 81611. 2737-073-24-003. The lot is a parcel of land within the East Aspen Townsite Addition. CURRENT ZONING & USE: The zoning for this property is Service/Commercial/Industrial (SCI), Commercial (C-1) and Commercial Core (CC). The City of Aspen Parking Department operates on the lot. PROPOSED ZONING & USE: The Applicant proposes to rezone the property to Public (PUB) Zone District. There is no proposed use change. SUMMARY: The Applicant requests to rezone the property to the Public (PUB) Zone District. Redevelopment is not being considered in the Application; however, as a City asset, the PUB Zone District is an appropriate one and clears up the mix of zone districts. The property is designated historic. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request to rezone the subject property to the Public (PUB) Zone District. Figure B. 540 E. Main St./City Parking Dept. facing south towards Aspen Mountain 540 E. Main St. Rezoning Staff Memo July 31, 2015 Page 1 of 5 0 0 LAND USE REQUESTS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approval: • Rezoning — pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.310.060, Rezoning — Procedure for Amendment. The Planning and Zoning Commission is tasked with determining if the application meets the standards for an amendment to the Official Zone District Map, and to provide a recommendation to City Council. City Council is the final review authority. PROJECT SUMMARY: 540 E. Main St. is located just north of the Commercial Core between Main St. and Rio Grande Pl. The parcel measures approximately 27,000 square feet/0.6 acres in size and the City Parking Department is located on the property. Gra ode pyre PUB R-30 NOWW"OUB l R-6 Pckin Caanry Court>� Pam RMF r� cc C l Figure C. Project Location & Vicinity. Subject property is indicated by a white boarder and star. The City Parking Department is considered a public use. Public use is not an allowed use within the Service/Industrial/Commercial (SCI) Zone District, while the Commercial Core (CC) and Commercial (C-1) Zone Districts do allow for Public use on the ground floor. The City Parking Department office is located on the front portion of the property in the former residence within the CC Zone District. In accordance with Section 26.710.022.A, Zoning of Lands Containing More Than One Zone District; when a proposed use is not allowed in all Zone Districts, the use can only be developed 540 E. Main St. Rezoning Staff Memo July 31, 2015 Page 2 of 5 on land in which it is a permitted use. As shown in Figure D, the Parking Department office building falls within the CC Zone District. The accessory building to the rear, which is located in the SCI Zone District, is used by the Parking Department for storage of department cars and appurtenances. The accessory building is considered an accessory use to the Parking Department office and is permitted as a use in the SCI Zone District. To bring the entire lot into conformance and to allow for the future expansion of City facilities, the Applicant is initiating an amendment to zone districts of the subject property from CC, C-1, and SCI to Public (PUB). Figure D. Subject Property Site Programming At this time, no development is proposed on the subject property; however, the parcel is being considered for expansion of future City facilities. The PUB Zone District requires a Planned Development when development occurs on the property; however, a Planned Development is not proposed at this time. The dimensional characteristics of the parcel will be determined through the Planned Development Review process. At this time, the Applicant does not wish to pursue a Planned Development designation on the Official Zone District Map. Should the property be redeveloped with new City facilities; the Official Zone District Map shall be amended to reflect a Planned Development designation upon approval of an Ordinance approving the Planned Development review, pursuant to Section 26.445.100, Planned Development Designation on Official Zone District Map The subject property received historic designation in Ordinance 34, Series of 1992. At that time the property was addressed as 600 E. Bleeker St. The property received the designation because of three 19th century cabins, known as the Zupancis-McMurtchy cabins, located on the southern portion of 540 E. Main St. Rezoning Staff Memo July 31, 2015 Page 3 of 5 the property; shown in Figure E and Figure F. Should a Planned Development review be pursued view process may be combined with the review. Figure E. Historic photo of the site, date unknown Figure F. One of the historic outbuildings today STAFF COMMENTS: The subject property currently houses the City's Parking Department and provides some parking for the City Police Department. As shown on Figure C, the adjacent County property to the west of the subject property is zoned PUB. The surrounding uses to the west of the property include the Concept 600 Building, zoned C-1 and Obermeyer Place, Zoned SCl/Planned Development (PD). Both Concept 600 and Obermeyer Place are mixed use buildings housing a variety of uses and providing various services. Public zoning of the subject property will allow necessary civic functions in a central location near other government facilities and is consistent with the current land use and neighborhood characteristics. The site is being considered for future expansion of City facilities; however, no development is proposed as part of this Application. Impacts created by new development to public facilities such as transportation, utilities and the natural environment shall be evaluated in the Planned Development application process. A memo was provided to the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) on June loth, 2015 to inform them of the Application and to solicit comments. This memo can be found in Exhibit A. The Application received a positive endorsement from HPC. A small amount of public comment was received and comments generally regarded concern for how the property may be developed. Public comments may be found in Exhibit B. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In reviewing the proposal, Staff finds the application to be consistent with the applicable review standards as found in the City Land Use Code and in Exhibit C. Staff is recommending approval of this request. PLANNING AND ZONING RECOMMENDATION: A public hearing was held during a special meeting on June 30, 2015. The Planning and Zoning Commission expressed some concern regarding the future development of the property. No public comment was received during the hearing. The minutes from the hearing can be found in 540 E. Main St. Rezoning Staff Memo July 31, 2015 Page 4 of 5 0 • Exhibit D. Resolution No. 12, Series 2015 providing a recommendation that City Council approve the rezoning was approved with a six to zero (6-0) vote and is included as Exhibit E. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to make a recommendation of approval to City Council for the rezoning of 540 E. Main St. from Service Commercial Industrial, Commercial Core and Commercial to Public as noted in Ordinance 28, Series of 2015." ATTACHMENTS: ExHIBIT A — HPC Memo ExHIBIT B — Public Comment ExHIBIT C — Review Criteria ExHIBIT D — P&Z June 30, 2015 Meeting Minutes ExHIBIT E — P&Z Resolution No. 12, Series 2015 ExHIBIT F — P&Z Hearing Public Notice Materials ExHIBIT G — Survey ExHIBIT H — Application 540 E. Main St. Rezoning Staff Memo July 31, 2015 Page 5 of 5 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council August 10, 2015 CITIZEN COMMENTS & PETITIONS...................................................................................................... 2 COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS............................................................................................................2 AGENDA ADDITIONA AND DELETIONS..............................................................................................2 BOARDREPORTS...................................................................................................................................... 2 NOTICEOF CALL UP................................................................................................................................ 2 CONSENTCALENDAR............................................................................................................................. 3 ❑ Resolution #80, Series of 2015 — Contract for Main and Maroon Pedestrian Improvements ..............4 ❑ Resolution #74, Series of 2015 — asphalt Trails Overlay Contract.......................................................4 ❑ Resolution #82, 83, 84, Series of 2015 — Police Vehicles Purchase and Equipping .............................4 ❑ Resolution #75, Series of 2015 — Wheeler Opera House Lobby/Box Office Improvements Contract.4 ❑ Minutes — July 27, 2015........................................................................................................................ 4 ORDINANCE #28, Series of 2015 — 540 E Main St. Rezoning................................................................... 4 RESOLUTION #76, SERIES OF 2015 - Affordable Housing Credits Policy Direction .............................5 ORDINANCE #24, SERIES OF 2015 — Castle Ridge Apartments 8040 Greenline Review and Minor Planned Development Amendment Review................................................................................................. 7 ORDINANCE #25, SERIES OF 2015 — CC and C1 Code Amendments.................................................... 8 ORDINANCE #27, SERIES OF 2015 — Land Use Code Reliance Code Amendment..............................12 ACTION ITEM - Executive Session — C.R.S. 24.6.402(4)(b) conference with attorney ...........................12 1 • • Regular Meeting Aspen City Council August 10, 2015 At 5:05 pm Mayor Skadron called the regular meeting to order with Councilmembers Mullins, Daily, Myrin and Frisch present. CITIZEN COMMENTS & PETITIONS 1. Randy Gold stated he had a conversation with Councilman Daily about the traffic and parking. He suggested creating a round a bout at Cemetery lane. It would eliminate the light and ease the traffic flow in and out of town. He also suggested underground parking in conjunction with the round a bout and the intercept lot. The question is how to get people to use them. Incentivize them by making the garage there free with the downtown garage and parking more expensive. Randy Ready, manager's office, said CDOT has looked at this and the problem is the unbalancing at the light. The traffic coming from Cemetery Lane is such a small amount. He suggested the possibility of a Texas T alternative there. COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS 1. Councilwoman Mullins said she just returned from visiting her older son in Amsterdam and it still doesn't compare to Aspen. 2. Councilman Myrin thanked everyone for the small farm talk on Friday. There is the potential to have more food grown locally. He would like to experiment next summer for the City Hall garden to move to the front of City Hall. 3. Mayor Skadron said AREDay is in Snowmass and there are many outstanding speakers. 4. Mayor Skadron will be attending the Mayor's innovation convention this weekend in De Moines. AGENDA ADDITIONA AND DELETIONS Ordinance #27 will be continued. BOARD REPORTS 1. Councilman Frisch stated the Nordic Council approved the master nordic trail plan. He gave a hats off to Matt Kuhn and staff. There will be new signage in the valley. We have one of the top Nordic trail system in the country if not the world. 2. Mayor Skadron said RFTAs board meeting will be on Thursday and he will report back at the next Council meeting. NOTICE OF CALL UP 710 & 720 E Durant Ave., P&Z Approval Justin Barker, community development, told the Council currently on the property there are two — three story mixed use buildings. The applicant has proposed to replace the exterior materials. The parapets will be enclosed on the top level on the east building. Councilman Myrin asked if there is any change in the deck size. Mr. Barker replied no, they all remain same. Mayor Skadron said on page two of the memo the picture that shows the improvements indicates there is a difference that impacts the view plane up the valley and is it a consideration of Staff. Mr. Barker said the direction of Staff is the existing walls are already there and the applicant is only facing them off. They are being dropped by four or five inches to comply with the height of the zone district. The height will be 32 feet. There is no Council direction to call this up. Regular Meeting Aspen City Council August 10, 2015 CONSENT CALENDAR Resolution #75 — Wheeler Opera House Lobby/Box Office Improvement Contract Mayor Skadron said the Wheeler has been going through improvements. There were two significant stages of improvement and now the focus is on the lobby. Jeff Pendarvis, asset, said the focus is on the bar and light focus on the box office. They saw an opportunity to enhance the experience when you walk in the door. It was well received by the wheeler board. Mayor Skadron asked what are the budget numbers. Mr. Pendarvis replied the initial number was 3.154 million. It included the second floor and box office as well as the roof and Hvac. The scope grew to include an upgrade to the control system for the Hvac of 134,000 dollars. To take down the wall between the grand staircase was another 102,000. The owners contingency is 25 percent. Mayor Skadron said the 25 percent contingency is partially informed by the theater portion of the Wheeler. Mr. Pendarvis said that is some of the thought process. We feel like we have done all our due diligence. Councilwoman Mullins said it is a good move to do the lobby. It will make an enormous difference. What is the schedule. Mr. Pendarvis said construction will start on the 3151 of this month with the hope to wrap up around thanksgiving on construction and punch list by December 18`h. Councilwoman Mullins asked what is being done on the bar. He said they will push back everything. The entrance to the men's room will move to the east of the bar to free up the ladies room. There will also be the addition of a drop in stage. Councilwoman Mullins asked for that portion of the budget. Mr. Pendarvis said the reconfiguration is in the initial portion of budget. It is the adds downstairs that increase the budget. Councilman Daily stated he appreciates the work. He thanked Staff and the architects. The space of both floors is attractive. Councilman Frisch said he is excited to see the final result. Resolution #80 — Main and Maroon Pedestrian Improvements Councilwoman Mullins said the memo says there are four areas needing flashing lights, Garmisch and Hunter, Third, Original and Hopkins. This is for Original and Hopkins, and Fourth and Main instead of Third and Main. What about Garmisch and Hunter. Are they lower priority. Trish Aragon, engineering, replied they are lower priority. Staff wanted to do these locations first. The thought on Main is to come down 8`h and Hallam, now that the Jewish Community Center is constructed we wanted to put it in there. Hopkins and Original is at the end of its usable life. Councilwoman Mullins said they are surprisingly expensive. Ms. Aragon said it is to get the permanent power. Councilman Myrin asked if the flashing lights will be on both sides like they are on Main or one sided like Mill. Justin Forman, engineering, replied they will be on both. Mayor Skadron asked if they work. Ms. Aragon said they have noticed an absolute improved compliance rate. Councilman Frisch said he is supportive of this but is also willing to look at something not as intrusive. Mayor Skadron said he personally crosses at intersections and does not push the button but waits for traffic to stop. Last winter Council did a site visit on Main Street with new technology. Steve Barwick, city manager, said we talked about possibilities of technologies of lighting systems that light up just the intersections. Bill Linn, police, said he has officers at Main Street intersections and the ones with the lights the officers don't have anything to do. Resolution #82, 83, 84 - Police vehicle purchase 3 0 • Regular Meeting Aspen City Council August 10, 2015 Councilman Myrin asked if we are we doing this for recognition and uniformity or to replace Toyotas with Fords. Bill Linn, police, said the Toyotas have had their challenges. They have had catastrophic failures six times. Officers are coming down with back issues sitting in seats not designed to do police work. Councilman Myrin said they have to do quite a few modifications to the Fords, is it possible to modify the existing Toyotas with new seats. Mr. Linn said he would have to defer with fleet on the timing of replacing the cars. The cars are on a schedule with 60,000 mile replacement or five year. They are well past that in terms of mileage at 75,000. Councilman Myrin said they are not buying new cars because of seats. Were there options that would have a real world option of more than 12 miles per gallon. Mr. Linn replied it is not that we put on miles so much but we crawl around. Idling around town is not the most efficient use of a motor. Mayor Skadron asked is 75,000 a lot of miles on a police vehicle. Mr. Linn said he does not know the answer to that. Mr. Barwick replied that is a standard replacement for the city. • Resolution #80, Series of 2015 — Contract for Main and Maroon Pedestrian Improvements • Resolution #74, Series of 2015 — Asphalt Trails Overlay Contract • Resolution #82, 83, 84, Series of 2015 — Police Vehicles Purchase and Equipping • Resolution #75, Series of 2015 — Wheeler Opera House Lobby/Box Office Improvements Contract • Minutes — July 27, 2015 Councilman Frisch moved to adopt the consent calendar•, seconded by Councilman Daily. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #28, Series of 2015 — 540 E Main St. Rezoning Hillary Seminick, community development, told the Council the City is requesting to rezone from SCI, commercial and commercial core to public. Redevelopment is not being considered as part of this land use application. The site is being considered for a new police department. The property is approximately 27,000 sq ft. It currently houses the City parking department. At this time there is no proposed change in use. The property is designated historic with three 19`h century cabins in the rear of the lot. Staff finds the public zone district is appropriate and cleans up the mix of zone districts. When a proposed use is not allowed in all of the zones the use can only be developed on the land which it is a permitted use. The parking department is considered a public use. While public use is not permitted within SCI, it is allowed on the ground floor of both commercial and commercial core. The parking department is located within the commercial core portion of the property. The public zone district will require a planned development to be established when development occurs. A PD is not being pursued at this time. The dimensional characteristics of the parcel will be determined through the planned development review process. There will be a historic preservation review as well. HPC received an overview on June 10 and expressed no concern. On June 30, P&Z passed Resolution 12 with a recommendation to approve the rezoning. Staff recommends adoption of Ordinance 28 on first reading and schedule second reading for September 14. Councilman Frisch has no concerns at this time. Councilman Myrin asked for rezoning for public what can go on public. Is it established by the PD or by the underlying zoning. The ideal would be a combination of SCI, commercial and CC. What protections do neighbors have. It may be a conversation about the public zone in general. Ms. Seminick said the PD overlay relies on the underlying zone district. There are no dimensional requirements in the public zone district. Those are set by the planned development process. Councilman Myrin stated that frightens him. Alan Richman, representing the applicant, said the PD review criteria speaks to compatibility of surrounding developments. The array of uses that can happen on public need to accommodate things like a hook and ladder truck that can be set by dimensions that require you to look at surrounding uses. It is 4 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council August 10, 2015 not as if we are opening Pandora's box to trump tower. We are not varying from a number but establishing the number. Councilman Frisch said he appreciates where he is coming from. It is the nature of the beast of a PD. Mr. Richman said the rational is the difficulty is assuming you know the dimensional requirements. It is a one of a kind building. The process itself is the assurance the community gets there is a full airing with the neighbors. We are imposing a PD requiring a review. Councilwoman Mullins stated currently there is SCI, CC and C 1. It would be good to have why we can't expand or have CC or C 1 across the site. The SCI zone has value and there has been hesitation to change it. This will represent a decrease in overall SCI across town and what is the possibility of finding anywhere else in town to replace that lost area of SCI. She is in support of rezoning to public but we need to explain the consequence of getting rid of or not using the other zone districts. Councilman Daily is in support of the proposal. There are three zones on the current property and not an effective mix. He tends to agree with Mr. Richman. The standards of the PD are in effective to protect the public. The uses the City needs to have are broad and unusual and this is a good start to a proper zone. Councilman Frisch moved to read Ordinance #28, Series of 2015; seconded by Councilwoman Mullins. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE NO 28 (SERIES OF 2015) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE REZONING OF THE PROPERTY COMMONLY DESCRIBED AS 540 E MAIN ST., LEGALLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A; CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Councilman Frisch moved to adopt Ordinance #28, Series of 2015 on first reading; seconded by Councilman Daily. Roll call vote. Councilmembers Daily, yes; Myrin, yes; Frisch, yes; Mullins, yes; Mayor Skadron, yes. Motion Carried. RESOLUTION #76, SERIES OF 2015 - Affordable Housing Credits Policy Direction Jessica Garrow, community development, stated this is a policy resolution to consider if the City should pursue code amendments to the housing credits chapter of the land use code. The program was established in 2010. It was intended to encourage private sector development of affordable housing. To date housing for over 47 full time equalivents has been created through the program. The program allows a private developer to build voluntary affordable housing units and receive certificates from the City. The developer can sell the certificates to others to satisfy their own housing mitigation requirements. Staff is proposing a number of amendments. They have conducted outreach with P&Z, APCHA and informed the Next Gen board. Recommendations from P&Z, APCHA and an email from Next Gen are included in the memo. The first change is related to who can create the credits. In 2014 Council provided direction to limit the program to the private sector. Private development should not have to compete with the public sector. The second change is related to dormitory units. Staff is recommending they not be eligible for housing credits. They serve an important part of our community but not full time workers. The third change is related to sales limitations. Staff is proposing the units be permanently deed restricted as for sale units. P&Z suggested a full affordable housing project could be rental units as long as there is a specific agreement that they are forever deed restricted. The fourth is related to fractional credits. Should slight overages be eligible for certificates. Staff concern is they are often integral to that development. P&Z disagreed with staff and supported Peter Fornell comments. The overage encourages building on site housing. The next change is related to category limitation. Staff has operated that credits are only created Regular Meeting Aspen City Council August 10, 2015 for category one through four. There needs to be a conversion mechanism. APCHA supports this direction. P & Z generally supported this as well. Next Gen disagrees with the Staff recommendation. Staff is proposing to codify where hosing credits may be created and projects outside the City of Aspen not qualify. Councilman Daily Commented on P&Z and APCHA ignoring the Next Gen suggestion of including the higher category. It is worthy of more discussion. Ms. Garrow said they have to have the conversion ability. They could write the language where it is limited to categories where there is an APCHA established number rather than specifically calling out a category number. Councilman Daily said he would like to hear from Next Gen. Councilwoman Mullins asked about cash in lieu being the basis for the housing credit value and we talked of phasing out that program. How will that happen when the program is gone. Ms. Garrow replied we have to have a mechanism to convert so we would either establish that conversion factor in another code amendment or find another method. Councilwoman Mullins asked for an explanation of the fractional. Ms. Garrow gave the example of a developer who has a certificate that says 20 fte's. Another developer generates 2.15 FTE's needs to mitigate for it. The code requires he uses housing certificates, on site unit or cash in lieu. Most chose on site or certificates. For an on site, the easiest way to mitigate the 2.15 FTEs is to build a single two bedroom unit. That would mitigate 2.25 FTEs. This over mitigates by .1. The policy question is should this slight overage generate a certificate that I can then sell. Councilman Frisch stated he supports the public sector limits. He supports the dormitory recommendation. He supports the sales limitation. For category limitations, is staff against category five because it is bad or because the technical limitations. He appreciates the higher demand of two through four but we want to be welcoming to all the categories. We can solve the technical issues. Ms. Garrow said the concern is the administrative mechanism to convert the credits. APCHA felt strongly there is not a need for the higher categories. Councilman Frisch said for fractional credits if someone is over mitigating he needs further clarity to the downside if someone buys more credits then they need why they should not use them how they see fit. He is not sure what the downside of onsite mitigation is. Ms. Garrow stated they are concerned those units are deed restricted as for sale permanently as affordable housing. Councilman Myrin asked if the public sector participation looked at the supply and demand side. Ms. Garrow replied only on creation. Councilman Myrin said he supports it on the demand side. He said if there are mechanisms to support the fractional he would definitely support it. He would support for sale more strongly than deed restriction. One of our top ten goals is to reduce traffic. He would support these being built on this side of the round a bout in an effort to reduce traffic. Mayor Skadron stated he is interested in the category limitation discussion. Mayor Skadron opened the public comment. 1. Peter Fornell said good job to community development. He said the memo says that units must have one or more bedrooms but he heard studios mentioned. 518 Main had one studio and there were 35 applicants. They are a valid part of the affordable housing mix. Everyone freaks out when you say fractional but it is remainder mitigation. If my mitigation is one employee and I build a three bedroom in the back why am I not eligible for two certificates. I'm building in excess of my requirement. All units created for housing credits must be for sale so I can't tear them down. There are methods to do away with the cash in lieu number. He agrees with the notion of build within the city limits. 2. Skippy Mesirow, Kimbo Brown-Schiratto, Christine Benedetti, Lindsey Palardy, representing the Next Generation Housing Committee, read the memo they submitted with the packet. Ms. Brown-Schiratto stated they suggest expanding to categories five through seven. The number one problem facing their demographic is not enough available units in certain categories. 30 percent 2 • • Reiular Meeting Aspen City Council August 10, 2015 of participants in their survey stated a total annual income before taxes between 100,000 to 150,000 dollars and 20 percent with 150,000 dollars or higher. They believe there is a demand for family friendly housing in the higher categories. Next Gen fully supports the argument that more lower category rental units need to be made available or created. Mr. Mesirow said the realities of affordable housing has changed. Having this discussion is critical to the Aspen Idea. Mayor Skadron asked for a comment on APCHAs policies and Next Gens research and is interested in the quality of the data. Jim True, city attorney, stated it is important to get Mike Kosdrosky' s input. Councilman Frisch asked if they want to see category five included or incentivized. Mr. Mesirow replied for now they are interested in a broad discussion that focuses on all members of the community. It is early to suggest whether it should be incentivized or not. If there is a need for it and it is good for the community it should be built. Ms. Brown-Schiratto said she believes the City has done a great job of developing and selling the lower category unity. If the City is not interesting in the higher category units that is where we suggest the public private partnership. Councilman Frisch said the higher the category the less subsidy. We are trying to offer a well balance offering for the community. Mr. Bendon went back to Councilman Frisch's question of is our hang-up philosophical or technological. It is most definitely technological. We don't have the mechanism to deal with categories five through seven. We should keep this as a technological discussion and not keep this as a housing guideline discussion. That should stay with APCHA. Councilwoman Mullins said she would like to hear how Next Gen is working with APCHA and sharing data with them. Councilman Myrin stated incentives can be based on a variety of things. We need to be aware of the moving parts. Councilman Daily expressed his appreciation for the Next Gen group. Ms. Garrow proposed two changes. There was an oversight by Staff in the first bullet. It should say studio or more. She suggest Section one bullet three be deleted and replaced with get additional feedback from APCHA. Councilman Myrin moved to approve Resolution #76, Series of 2015 with amendments, seconded by Councilman Frisch. Councilman Myrin wants bullet two to have language to include for sale information. Ms. Garrow suggested adding language that fractional units are not eligible unless the unit is deed restricted as for sale or some other agreement. Councilman Frisch agrees. Councilman Myrin would like to add to final bullet point an incentive where it does not increase traffic. Councilman Frisch asked whether it should say must or should be incentivized. He also asked about Aspen or inside the round a bout. Councilman Myrin said he is not ready to commit to it tonight but would like it as a discussion. Mr. Bendon said they may want to expand that to all types of mitigation. Councilman Frisch is ok with that. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #24, SERIES OF 2015 — Castle Ridge Apartments 8040 Green line Review and Minor Planned Development Amendment Review Sara Nadolny, community development, stated this is a minor amendment to a project review approval and 8040 green line to the Castle Ridge property. It is located south of Aspen Valley Hospital and west of Castle Creek Road. Zoning is R15 with a PD overlay. There are eight multi -family housing buildings on the site. There is no formal PD approval associated with the site. It is estimated to be approximately Regular Meeting Aspen City Council August 10, 2015 64,251 sq feet. The applicant is proposing a floor area increase of 988 sq ft to construct a new maintenance storage shed. Currently there are two small sheds with decks and fences just over 300 sq feet. At first reading she may have gave the impression these were not legally established. From the building department she has it from good authority that these were legally established. The applicant is charged with meeting the criteria for 8040 and PD. The 8040 review is for locations above 8040 feet in elevation. The intent is to consider the impact on development on the natural environment. It looks at natural watershed, unstable slopes, air pollution and minimize disturbance to the terrain. It was reviewed by planning staff and engineering. The site is level and suitable for development. The water runoff has already been mitigated. There is no adverse effects anticipated to the water shed. There is no reason to think the shed would negatively affect the air quality. There will be no new roads or grading. Staff feels the applicant has met the criteria for the 8040. For the criteria for the minor amendment to project review, Staff looks at site suitability and compatibility of development with the site. The shed is oriented towards the paved parking lot. The proposed building reflect the style of the residences surrounding it. The height is 16 feet 3 inches. The engineering department has no real concerns. The applicant will need to submit a drainage report. Staff finds the review criteria has been met and recommends approval with a condition the applicant record a new site plan with the new structure on it. Luis Menendez, architect, said the eight buildings were constructed in 1981 and require ongoing maintenance. Neither the sheds or fenced in areas are large enough to contain all the necessary materials. The proposed shed is at the parking elevation and will be cut in to the slope. Councilman Myrin asked if the current structure impacts the review criteria. Ms. Nadolny replied there is not a credit. Without something showing an approval there is no existing credit. Mayor Skadron asked if minor PD amendments have always been subject to Council review. Mr. Bendon said in the past PDs would be minor at staff or major at Council. Adding sq ft, height or changing dimensions would need done at Council since the change is done by ordinance. In the past it would have triggered a full P&Z and Council review. Councilman Myrin said currently there is no housing attached to this. Could that happen. Ms. Nadolny replied that is a change in use. Mr. Bendon stated this can't just morph into a residential unit. It would require a Council review. Mayor Skadron opened the public comment. There was none. Mayor Skadron closed the public comment. Councilman Frisch moved to adopt Ordinance #24, Series of 2015; seconded by Councilwoman Mullins. Roll call vote. Councilmembeis Mullins, yes; Frisch, yes; Myrin, yes; Daily, yes; Mayor Skadron, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #25, SERIES OF 2015 — CC and C 1 Code Amendments Jessica Garrow, told the Council, the code amendment would legalize existing free market residential units in the CC and C1 zone districts. In January of 2013 Council approved Ordinance 25-2012 that eliminated free market residential as an allowed use in CC and C 1. It made existing free market residential units non -conforming and placed limits on investments as well as prohibited expansions. The proposed amendment would legalize all existing free market residential units in those zone districts as well as units that were under construction or approved prior to the passage of the 2012 ordinance. The amendment would prohibit any new free market residential units from being established. It would allow for internal expansions or combinations. It would prohibit external expansions. The proposed changes apply equally to all properties in C 1 and CC. There are almost 200 residential units in those zone districts. Exhibit E outlines those locations. Staff tried to balance the obstacles with the financing and 8 0 • Regular Meeting Aspen City Council August 10, 2015 doing upgrades. The thought at the time was the expansion of free market units was threatening the vitality of downtown. Floor area exemptions apply equally to all properties in these zones. There are certain exemptions in the code. One of those is decks. There is a limit on deck area to 15 percent of the floor area. With the change in the code to prohibit free market residential units it meant that regardless of the code exemption you could not expand. In 2014 decks were exempted as part of mixed use buildings. Free market residential were not part of the conversation. Staff is proposing existing free market residential units be legalized but not take advantage of free decks. Councilman Myrin asked if the 15 percent that was limited prior to 2014 address the concerns of commercial vitality. Ms. Garrow replied no, it was just a general provision that applied to all properties to allow some outdoor space. Councilman Myrin asked if it exist anywhere now. Ms. Garrow stated all single family duplex districts and all multi family districts. Councilman Myrin said all Main Street would be 100 percent. Ms. Garrow said correct. Councilman Myrin said some of this came forward when the penthouse decks came. Ms. Garrow said partially. The calculation was complicated for mixed use. The thought at the time was allowing more roof top would be more visually pleasing and clean up the mechanical gunk. Councilman Myrin said Staff s view is going to the limited deck space would impact the CC negatively. Ms. Garrow said it has the potential to push out commercial uses. Mr. Bendon said it is not the presence of the deck per say that is going to challenge the commercial viability of the building. Councilman Myrin asked if he is comfortable differentiating CC with Cl . Mr. Bendon stated they consider CC and C 1 the downtown proper. Councilwoman Mullins asked for the difference in intent of CC and C I. Mr. Bendon said he recommends to treat them the same. There are some differences where CC is a historic district where C 1 is not. CC prohibits offices on the ground floor. Ms. Garrow said there are higher heights and larger floor areas on CC. Councilwoman Mullins said investment is limited currently, how. Ms. Garrow said to 10 percent of the cost to replace the entire structure that the unit is in for any one year period. Councilwoman Mullins said it might be a bad idea to lift all the restrictions on garages but she does not understand it for decks. It won't increase the mass. Mr. Bendon said it's not a mass or scale issue. It could be seen as an enhancement. It is the amount of improvements that are made to the resident. It is the disproportionate value of enhancement made to the rest of the units. Councilwoman Mullins said there is no way to expand the size of the unit even if you land a TRD. Ms. Garrow said the overall size of the building could not be expanded but the individual unit could. Councilwoman Mullins asked if there is a limit on the height of furniture or permanent/non-permanent fixtures for roof top decks. Mr. Bendon said there are limitations on permanent fixtures but not furniture. Councilman Daily said he agrees with Councilwoman Mullins. He is more inclined to the second option for floor area exemptions to allow some exemptions not all. To allow decks and at grade patios. He does not see the negative impact of allowing these kinds of decks to be enlarged. It is restoring the rights they once enjoyed. Councilman Frisch said he supports the direction Councilmembers Daily and Mullins are heading. Mayor Skadron asked what is Staffs direction. Ms. Garrow said they recommend option four, not allowing any exemptions away from Ordinance 25-2012. If Council wants to allow some floor area exemptions they be limited to decks and at grade patios since it has the least impacts. Mayor Skadron asked why isn't it the primary recommendation. Mr. Bendon replied they are trying to stay true to Ordinance 25-2012. Councilwoman Mullins asked what is the reasoning for option three to allow exemptions in C 1 and not CC. Ms. Garrow stated it was recommended by Councilman Myrin to start with a smaller impact. 0 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council August 10, 2015 Councilman Myrin asked for option two, is there a way to include times prior to ordinance 25. Ms. Garrow stated they can fmd a way to write it. Mayor Skadron opened the public comment. 1. Jurine Bears, 605 E Main Street owner, said she was shocked to find out the property rights have been taken away without notice. She is hopeful that Council will change the ordinance. She hopes Council lets people use their decks because they are a wonderful amenity. 2. Jim Smith said the owners of Concept 600 appreciate that Staff and Council are willing to work on this issue to return to conforming status. There is another long standing property right they would like to have back and that is to expand decks, balconies and roofs. He reviewed the history of the ordinances affecting decks. He is surprised Community development has recommended option four. The other four zones have not been curtailed of that right. He believes option one would be more preferable as it is more consistent with what Council did just a year and a half ago. Ordinance 25-2012 had an unintended consequence on 200 units and he hopes ordinance 25-2015 does not have an unintended consequence on those same units. 3. Jody Edwards, representing Concept 600 HOA said there is a lot of fear of some unintended consequence if Staff allowed the floor area exemptions to apply to these units. The expansion of these units creates pressure to have quieter uses in the commercial space. The owners have different expectations of the uses. We are only talking about existing units and floor area exemptions. Staff would have a valid fear if we were talking about newly developed residential units. I can't see how adding a deck would affect the commercial space. He suggested changes to page five of ten section C 1 — the purpose is different from the intro language and legally established free market housing needs added. Page eight of ten section 12 F, the last sentence that states "Free Market Residential units shall not be able to utilize any exemptions to floor area outlined in the code" should be struck is the easiest way to fix this problem. 4. Ms. Garrow added letters from Judy Fick, The Doran Family and Jim Smith. Mayor Skadron closed the public comment. Councilman Myrin stated he is leaning more towards number two limited to prior to ordinance 25-2012. We are concerned with things going forward. It would be limited to decks and at grade and nothing else. He would like to see the limit at 15 percent held. He would like to start with a small zone and smaller limit on FAR. Start with baby steps and limit to a prior date. He is very concerned with expanding to CC. Mr. Bendon asked if he is concerned with rooftop deck versus what Concept 600 is talking about. Councilman Myrin replied absolutely. Having an unlimited deck space with the ability to cover it could give another floor. Mr. Bendon replied they do think there may be a difference to a roof top deck and one on the side of a building. We think the same issue will come up in CC if we just do this in C 1. The limits on investments for non -conforming uses were established when the prevailing thought in the planning profession was those uses would eventually just amortize themselves away. We don't think that will happen. The value is just way too high. Councilman Myrin asked if that would then be a change in investment on non -conforming uses and not FAR. Mr. Bendon replied it is but it is somewhat back burner. Mayor Skadron asked in regard to roof top decks versus decks on the side of the buildings could you find reason to modify point two. Mr. Bendon stated they seek simplification and we get there by complicating the code. Mr. Edwards said they agree the non -conforming section of the code was made for another time. He agrees that roof top decks are different. The potential solution is to not allow roof top decks. Councilwoman Mullins stated it is difficult trying to maintain the town for the benefit of the residents but here is an individual interest versus a community wide one. How does the 15 percent address garages, storage and patios. Mr. Bendon suggested an addendum stating expansions to FAR permitted except for at grade patios and decks (other than rooftop), balconies, exterior stairways, trellis, and other similar 10 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council August 10, 2015 features up to 15 percent of the free market residential floor area. Councilwoman Mullins said once the residents become conforming there is no limit on the money that can become invested. Councilman Frisch said the limit on investment needs to go as soon as possible everywhere in town. We need to stop the non -conformity in both zones no matter what. He is more swayed by Staffs argument that we need to treat the two zones the same. It should apply to both CC and C 1. We need to get rid of the non -conforming and investment limits. Councilman Daily said he is supportive of option two. He sees severe risk factors in allowing roof top decks as a possible use. He concurs with Mr. Bendon that limiting to C1 is too restrictive. 15 percent of FAR restores the rights from 2011. He prefers to go with option two. Mr. Edwards asked how are you going to calculate the 15 percent when some exemptions apply and some don't. How is an unlimited deck such a big problem when a 15 percent one creates a huge problem. Mr. Bendon stated that's why we have two zoning officers and a town full of architects. The 15 percent is closest to what it was prior to 2011. Ms. Garrow said floor area is still calculate the same way. Councilman Myrin asked how long has the 15 percent been in the code. Mr. Bendon replied it's been in the code for some time. 20 years. Lindsey Smith said the 15 percent could cause issue with the HOA. We are ready to move forward with our project. She respectfully request Council draw a line through the 15 percent. Mayor Skadron said the overall desire is to maintain consistency with the CC and C 1 amendment established in 25-2012. He is somewhere between option two and four. We should cure the non - conformities but he is hesitant to expand development rights. He wanted to allow 15 percent as was allowed prior to ordinance 25. The exemptions should be limited to decks and patios and treat C1 and CC similarly. Mr. Bendon said point two could be modified to allow for at grade patios and decks other than roof top up to 15 percent. In terms of how an HOA manages itself any option works for Staff. CC and C 1 would be treated the same. Councilman Frisch asked what 100 looks like from a cautious standpoint. Mr. Bendon said that is difficult to answer. It would require a property by property examination and they are not prepared for that tonight. Councilman Myrin said the 15 percent is restoring back to what it was. What happens between a property is between them. He is ok with that. The only difference is CC and C1. Mr. Bendon suggested changing CC and C 1 within Section 12 E Floor area Subsection I —"limit to the existing floor area no expansion to the floor area shall be permitted except for at grade patios and decks other than roof top decks, balconies, exterior stairways, trellis and other similar features up to 15 percent of the free market residential floor area. Any subsequent reduction of floor area occupied by such residential use shall be deemed a new limitation and the use shall not thereafter be enlarged to occupy a greater floor area. Free market residential units shall not be able to utilize any exemptions of floor area outlined in Section 26.575.020(D), Measuring Floor Area, except as noted above." The same language would also replace 12F. Language would also be added within the purpose statement C1 legally established free market uses prior to ordinance 25-2012. 11 • 0 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council August 10, 2015 Councilman Frisch moved to adopt Ordinance #25, Series of 2015 with amendments; Seconded by Councilman Daily. Roll call vote. Councilmembers Frisch, yes; Mullins, yes; Daily, yes; Myrin, no; Mayor Skadron, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #27, SERIES OF 2015 — Land Use Code Reliance Code Amendment Councilman Frisch moved to continue Ordinance #27, Series of 2015 to August 27, 2015; seconded by Councilwoman Mullins. All in favor, motion carried. ACTION ITEM - Executive Session — C.R.S. 24.6.402(4)(b) conference with attorney Councilwoman Mullins moved to go in to executive session at 9:45 p.m.; seconded by Councilman Daily. All in favor, motion carried. At 10:20 p.m. Councilman Frisch moved to come out of executive session; seconded by Councilwoman Mullins. All in favor, motion carried. Councilman Frisch moved to adjourn the regular meeting at 10:20 p.m.; seconded by Councilwoman Mullins. All in favor, motion carried. Linda Manning, City Clerk. 12 RESOLUTION NO. 12 (SERIES OF 2015) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PROVIDING A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR REZONING FOR THE PROPERTY COMMONLY DESCRIBED AS 540 E. MAIN ST., LEGALLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A; CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. PARCEL ID: 2737-073-24-003 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from The City of Aspen Capital Asset Department (Applicant), represented by Alan Richman, requesting the Planning and Zoning Commission provide a recommendation of approval to City Council of a Rezoning of 540 E. Main Street, legally described in Exhibit A of this Resolution; and, WHEREAS, the property at 540 E. Main. Street is currently zoned Service Commercial Industrial (SCI), Commercial Core (CC), and Commercial (C-1); and, WHEREAS, the property located at 540 E Main Street is listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmarks and Structures; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.310.060 of the Land Use Code, Rezoning shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the City Council, after receiving a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission; and, WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended approval of the Application; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the zoning proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation for the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing.; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on June 301h, 2015, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 12, Series 2015, by a six to zero (6-0) vote, recommending the Aspen City Council approve Rezoning of 540 E. Main Street; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and.; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. Page 1 of 2 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a recommendation to the Aspen City Council to approve the Rezoning requests, pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, for 540 E. Main Street, as listed below. Section 1: Rezoning Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends the City Council approve Rezoning of 540 E. Main Street to Public (PUB) Section 2• All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be compiled with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 3• This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4• If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 30'h day of June, 2015. Ryan Walterscheid, Vice Chair APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney Cindy Klob, Records Manager Page 2 of 2 Resolution , Series 2015 Exhibit A 540 E. Main St. Legal Description PARCEL OF LAND IN THE EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 108453, DITCH BOOK 2A AT PAGE 252 OF THE REAL ESTATE RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, BEING A PORTION OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED BY MAYOR'S DEED RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. 109112 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR EAST MAIN STREET BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 20 EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE CONCEPT 600 CONDOMINIUMS AS SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 383 AND PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 442; THENCE N 75°09'11" W A DISTANCE OF 97.60 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR EAST MAIN STREET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS S75009'11E A DISTANCE OF 7.5 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 10, BLOCK 19, EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE; THENCE N 14150'49" E A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET ALONG A LINE 7.5 FEET EAST AND PARALLEL TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 10, TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 10, BLOCK 19, EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE; THENCE N 75009'11" W A DISTANCE OF 7.5 FEET ALONG SAID LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10, BLOCK 19, EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE; THENCE N14050'57"E A DISTANCE OF 20.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 9, BLOCK 19, EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE; THENCE N 75009' 11" A DISTANCE OF W 10.10 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 9 TO AN ANGLE POINT OF LOT 1, FIRST AMENDED PITKIN COUNTY CENTER SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 93, PAGE 57; THENCE N14050'49"E A DISTANCE OF 188.06 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, FIRST AMENDED PITKIN COUNTY SUBDIVISION TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID LOT 1, ALSO BEING AN ANGLE POINT IN THE BOUNDARY OF OBERMEYER PLACE CONDOMINIUMS AS SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 80, PAGE 57; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES S 57025'00" E A DISTANCE OF 24.94 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID OBERMEYER CONDOMINIUMS BOUNDARY; THENCE S 19049'00" E A DISTANCE OF 138.72 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID OBERMEYER CONDOMINIUMS BOUNDARY; THENCE S 04008'00" W A DISTANCE OF 67.55 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID OBERMEYER CONDOMINIUMS BOUNDARY, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 20, EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE, ALSO BEING THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF SAID CONCEPT 600 CONDOMINIUMS; THENCE S 14050'49" W A DISTANCE OF 120.39 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID CONCEPT 600 CONDOMINIUMS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 0.607 ACRES MORE OR LESS; COMMONLY KNOWN AS 540 E. MAIN ST. Page 3 of 2 MEMORANDUM TO: City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Hillary Seminick, Planner Technician THRU: Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Community Development Director RE: 540 E. Main St. Rezoning MEETING DATE: June 30, 2015 APPLICANT: City of Aspen, Capital Asset Department REPRESENTATIVE: Alan Richman, Alan Services, INC. Richman Planning LOCATION & PARCEL ID:: 540 E. Main St. Aspen, CO 81611. 2737-073-24-003. The lot is a parcel of land within the East Aspen Additional Townsite. CURRENT ZONING & USE: The zoning for this property is Service/Commercial/Industrial (SCI), Commercial (C-1) and Commercial Core (CC). The City of Aspen Parking Department operates on the lot. PROPOSED ZONING & USE: The Applicant proposes to rezone the property to Public (PUB) Zone District. There is no proposed use change. SUMMARY: The Applicant requests to rezone the property to the Public (PUB) Zone District. Redevelopment is not being considered in the Application; however, as a City asset, the PUB Zone District is an appropriate one and clears up the mix of zone districts. The property is designated historic. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning provide a referral to the City Council to approve the request to rezone the subject property to the Public (PUB) Zone District. Figure B. 540 E. Main St./City Parking Dept. facing south towards Aspen Mountain Page 1 of 5 0 LAND USE REQUESTS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approval: • Rezoning — pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.310.060, Rezoning — Procedure for Amendment. The Planning and Zoning Commission is tasked with determining if the application meets the standards for an amendment to the Official Zone District Map, and to provide a recommendation to City Council. City Council is the final review authority. PROJECT SUMMARY: 540 E. Main St. is located just north of the Commercial Core between Main St. and Rio Grande Pl. The parcel measures approximately 27,000 square feet/0.6 acres in size and the City Parking Department is located on the property. Figure C. Project Location & Vicinity. Subject property is indicated by a white boarder and star. The City Parking Department is considered a public use. Public use is not an allowed use within the Service/Industrial/Commercial (SCI) Zone District, while the Commercial Core (CC) and Commercial (C-1) Zone Districts do allow for Public use on the ground floor. The City Parking Department office is located on the front portion of the property in the former residence within the CC Zone District. In accordance with Section 26.710.022.A, Zoning of Lands Containing More Than One Zone District; when a proposed use is not allowed in all Zone Districts, the use can only be developed on land in which it is a permitted use. As shown in Figure D, the Parking Department office building falls within the CC Zone District. The accessory building to the rear, which is located in Page 2 of 5 the SCI Zone District, is used by the Parking Department for storage of department cars and appurtenances. The accessory building is considered an accessory use to the Parking Department office and is permitted as a use in the SCI Zone District. To bring the entire lot into conformance and to allow for the future expansion of City facilities, the Applicant is initiating an amendment to zone districts of the subject property from CC, C-1, and SCI to Public (PUB). Figure D. Subject Property Site Programming At this time, no development is proposed on the subject property; however, the parcel is being considered for expansion of future City facilities. The PUB Zone District requires a Planned Development when development occurs on the property; however, a Planned Development is not proposed at this time. The dimensional characteristics of the parcel will be determined through the Planned Development Review process. At this time, the Applicant does not wish to pursue a Planned Development designation on the Official Zone District Map. Should the property be redeveloped with new City facilities; the Official Zone District Map shall be amended to reflect a Planned Development designation upon approval of an Ordinance approving the Planned Development review, pursuant to Section 26.445.100, Planned Development Designation on Official Zone District Map The subject property received historic designation in Ordinance 34, Series of 1992. At that time the property was addressed as 600 E. Bleeker St. The property received the designation because of three 19th century cabins, known as the Zupancis-McMurtchy cabins, located on the southern portion of the property; shown in Figure E and Figure F. Should a Planned Development review be pursued by the Applicant, the Historic Preservation review process may be combined with the review. Page 3 of 5 • 0 Figure E. Historic photo of the site, date unknown Figure F. One of the historic outbuildings today STAFF COMMENTS: The subject property currently houses the City's Parking Department and provides some parking for the City Police Department. As shown on Figure C, the adjacent County property to the west of the subject property is zoned PUB. The surrounding uses to the west of the property include the Concept 600 Building, zoned C-1 and Obermeyer Place, Zoned SCl/Planned Development (PD). Both Concept 600 and Obermeyer Place are mixed use buildings housing a variety of uses and providing various services. Public zoning of the subject property will allow necessary civic functions in a central location near other government facilities and is consistent with the current land use and neighborhood characteristics. The site is being considered for future expansion of City facilities; however, no development is proposed as part of this Application. Impacts created by new development to public facilities such as transportation, utilities and the natural environment shall be evaluated in the Planned Development application process. A memo was provided to the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) on June loth, 2015 to inform them of the Application and to solicit comments. The Application received a positive endorsement from HPC. A small amount of public comment was received and comments generally regarded concern for how the property may be developed. Public comments may be found in Exhibit B. Staff finds all relevant criteria regarding rezoning as found in Exhibit A to be met and recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission provide a recommendation of approval to City Council. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to make a recommendation of approval to City Council for the rezoning of 540 E. Main St. from Service Commercial Industrial, Commercial Core and Commercial to Public as noted in Resolution , Series of 2015." Page 4 of 5 0 • ATTACHMENTS: EXHIBIT A — Review Criteria EXHIBIT B — Public Comment EXHIBIT C — Survey EXHIBIT D — Application Page 5 of 5 Exhibit A Review Criteria 26.310.090. Rezoning - Standards of review. In reviewing an amendment to the Official Zone District Map, the City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider: A. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with surrounding zone districts and land uses, considering existing land use and neighborhood characteristics. Staff Response: The applicant is proposing to change the underlying zoning from Service Commercial Industrial (SCI), Commercial Core (CC) and Commercial (C-1) to Public (PUB). As shown on Figure C in the Staff Memo, the adjacent County property to the west of the subject property is zoned PUB. As part of a recent application submitted for the Pikin County Center property, the boundaries of the Public zone district were adjusted to coincide with the parcel boundaries for the Courthouse and Jail properties. Zoning the subject property PUB would be congruent with the zoning of the adjacent County property. The surrounding uses to the west of the property include the Concept 600 Building, zoned C-1 and Obermeyer Place, Zoned SCl/Planned Development (PD). Both Concept 600 and Obermeyer Place are mixed use buildings housing a variety of uses and providing various services. The subject property currently houses the City's Parking Department and provides some parkingfor the City Police Department. Both of these public uses are allowed uses in the PUB zone district. Public zoning of this property will allow necessary civic functions in a central location near other government facilities. The rezoning of the subject property is consistent and compatible with surrounding zone districts and uses. Staff finds this criterion met. B. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities and whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities including, but not limited to, transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools and emergency medical facilities. Rezoning the property to Public will allow for community -serving public use of this property. No development is proposed as apart of this application. Expansion of the facilities may place demands on some of the above -listed public facilities (such as transportation, water supply and sewage disposal), such use will also provide an essential public service. Development in the PUB Zone District requires a Planned Development (PD) review. A PD Application will provide the opportunity to evaluate impacts and the ability to ensure development impacts are appropriately mitigated by the Applicant. Staff finds this criterion met. C. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significantly adverse impacts on the natural environment. • 0 Staff Response: Staff does not anticipate any significant adverse impacts to the natural environment as a result of this proposal. The proposed zoning change would zone the property with a more appropriate zone district for its use. Staff finds this criterion to be met. D. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent and compatible with the community character in the City and in harmony with the public interest and the intent of this Title. Staff response: The rezoning of the parcel to the PUB Zone District would be consistent and compatible with adjacent Civic uses. The rezoning to PUB would allow the parcel to continue to serve the community and provide a future location for essential public facilities. The proposed amendment is consistent with and compatible with the community character and in harmony with the public interest and intent of the Land Use Code. Staff finds this criterion to be met. OA 0 0 Special Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission June 30, 2015 Ryan Walterscheid, Chair, called the Planning & Zoning Commission (P&Z) meeting to order at 4:30 PM with members Jesse Morris, Skippy Mesirow, Kelly McNicholas, Jasmine Tygre, Keith Goode, and Ryan Walterscheid. Also present from City staff; Debbie Quinn, Jennifer Phelan, Hillary Seminick, Chris Bendon and Jessica Garrow. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Ms. McNicholas asked if Council has made a decision regarding the SCI zoning for Obermeyer Place. Ms. Phelan replied the first reading is scheduled in July. STAFF COMMENTS: There were no comments. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments. MINUTES Ms. Tygre moved to approve the minutes for April 21", seconded by Mr. Morris. All in favor, motion passed. The draft minutes for May 26th were discussed. A couple of corrections were requested by Ms. McNicholas. Mr. Morris moved to approve the minutes pending the requested corrections and was seconded by Ms. Tygre. All in favor, motion passed. Mr. Mesirow moved to approve the minutes for June 16`h and seconded by Ms. McNicholas. All in favor, motion passed. DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST There were no conflicts expressed. 540 E Main St - Rezoning - Public Hearing Mr. Walterscheid opened the public hearing and asked if public notice had been provided. Ms. Quinn replied it appeared notice had been appropriately provided. Ms. Seminick, Community Development Planner Technician, reviewed of the application. The City of Aspen, Capital Asset Department is requesting to rezone the subject property. The property is currently zoned Service Commercial Industrial (SCI), Commercial (C-1) and Commercial Core (CC) and they are requesting it be zoned as Public (PUB). As a City asset, the Public zoned district is an appropriate one and clears up the mix of zoned districts. The property is also designated as Historic due to three cabins located on the northern portion of the property. The property is approximately 27,000 sf and the City 0 0 Special Meeting Planniny, & Zoning Commission June 30, 2015 Parking Department is currently located on the property. There is no proposed change in use at this time. The City Parking Department is considered a public use and is not allowed in within the SCI zoned district. The C-1 and CC allow for public use on the ground floor only. She displayed a map to show where the property is located and the location of the current single story Parking Department structure located on the CC zoned portion of the property. There is an accessory use building located on the SCI portion of the property which are allowed within the SCI zoned district. She also pointed out the location of the historic structures. She added no development is being proposed at this time, but the parcel is being considered for the future expansion of City facilities. Nothing has been approved at this time for any future development. The PUB zoned district would require a Planned Development (PD) review when any development is proposed for the property. With the PUB zoned district there are no dimensional requirements and would be set in the PD review. Should a development be proposed in the future, a Historic Preservation review would be combined with the PD review. The PUB rezoning as would consistent with zoning of adjacent properties which provide public uses. To the west is Pitkin County Courthouse, Plaza and Jail. Further west is the Pitkin County Library and to the north is the Rio Grande Park. Staff recommends P&Z provide a referral to City Council by adopting Resolution 12, series 2015 to approve the request to rezone the subject property to the PUB zoned district. She showed photos of the existing property including the existing structures. Mr. Walterscheid asked if there were any questions of Staff. Ms. Tygre wanted to know if the same result could be obtained by changing SCI to allow public use. Ms. Seminick stated it wouldn't address the issue with the property currently being in three different zoned districts. To change the SCI zoned district would require a change to the code. Ms. Phelan stated the project would also be subject to the dimensional requirements of the SCI zoned district. She added when you have a property with multiple zoned districts, you must stick to the allowed uses on the specifically defined areas. Mr. Mesirow and Mr. Morris asked if had been proposed previously and why not. Ms. Phelan asked Mr. Richman, representing the City, when the property was purchased by the City at which he answered in 2002. Mr. Richman added the property was previously a private property and zoned as such. He feels this is a housekeeping issue in that the property has been owned by the City for 13 years and the rezoning will allow for current and future public uses. He does not believe the City plans to sell the property. Ms. Tygre asked if zoned PUB, it would have no dimensional requirements. Ms. Phelan stated she was correct and added and it would have to go through a PD review for any proposed development which includes review criteria regarding mass, scale and context. 0 • Special Meetinlz Planning & Zoning Commission June 30, 2015 Mr. Walterscheid asked Staff to confirm the review process for a proposed development application. Ms. Phelan stated it would be reviewed by HPC for mass, scale and historic resources and then to City Council for review and ordinance approval and then back to HPC for the final skin approval. Mr. Walterscheid turned the floor over to the applicant. Mr. Alan Richman, Alan Richman Planning Services Inc, represents the City of Aspen as the applicant. With him was Jack Wheeler, City of Aspen Capital Asset Manager, and Scott Smith, the project architect. Mr. Richman feels this is more of a housekeeping option. The property was purchased in 2002 to serve as a public function and was considered for the new fire station. More recently it has been considered to meet the long term office needs of the City or possibly a site for the Police Department. No uses are being proposed at the meeting. He added having a site trisected by three different zoning districts is a confusing situation. All the current zoned districts are all high density and high intensity commercial zones which would anticipate a big building. He does not feel this would be upzoning the property. Rezoning the property will ensure the uses are conforming. Mr. Walterscheid asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Ms. Tygre asked at what point in the planning process will the public have a chance to weigh in on the uses they feel are appropriate for the property. Mr. Richman feels it will happen in two phases. One being during the public discussions going on right now to identify uses in the building replacement projects. The second phase will be during the project review phase to go over the use and mass. Mr. Wheeler stated public outreach started a year ago including several open houses presenting concepts to the public. The City has also reached out to stakeholders and neighbors and have received a lot of feedback on what they think is appropriate for the site. They are currently going through a rigorous process internally, with Council, the public and stakeholders. They plan to go to Council later in July to discuss the conceptual designs. He added the City is going through the inventory of all City properties and rezoning property over the next year where appropriate to eliminate zoning issues. Mr. Walterscheid asked for any public comment at which there were none so he closed that portion of the meeting. Mr. Walterscheid opened for discussion with the commission members. Ms. McNicholas feels it is an appropriate change to make and is in line with the uses of adjacent properties to the west. Mr. Goode, Mr. Morris and Mr. Mesirow agreed. Ms. Tygre stated on the surface it seems to be a reasonable request and it makes sense to have the public adjacent to County Courthouse. She is concerned is what happens down the road. Although this is a housekeeping measure, she feels we've been burned by housekeeping measures before because once you allow step one to happen, then step two, which you didn't anticipate, winds up being a 70,000 sf building. She wants to make sure we are not going down that road especially since there has been a lot of concern expressed by a lot of people including herself about the potential size of some the buildings to be constructed for public use and what types of public use. Special Meeting Planning & ZoninjZ Commission June 30, 2015 Mr. Mesirow agreed you could be setting the environment where that could be possible based on the needs the City states it has for public uses. He feels a building for the expressed public uses will be built somewhere and is this an appropriate location for a public entity. He feels the community will have an opportunity to say what they do and do not want in regards to the building to be proposed. Mr. Goode motioned to approve Resolution 12, Series 201S recommending the approval of the rezoning for S40 E Main St. Ms. McNicholas seconded the motion. Mr. Walterscheid requested a roll call to vote: Ms. McNicholas, yes, Mr. Morris, yes; Mr. Mesirow, yes; Ms. Tygre, yes; Mr. Goode, yes; Mr. Walterscheid, yes. The motion passed with a six to zero (6-0) vote. Mr. Walterscheid then closed the hearing. Work Program Check -In - Other Business Mr. Walterscheid turned the floor over to Staff for the work program check in with Mr. Bendon and Ms. Garrow. Mr. Bendon stated Staff wanted to touch base with P&Z on the department's work program. They will be meeting with Council in late July to update them on the items they were asked to pursue. They also want to update Council on items that have come out of HPC, P&Z and things from the community plan that should be added to the work program. The meeting will also allow Council to clarify what they want Staff to work on. He said tonight is an opportunity for P&Z to ask questions on any of the items identified in the agenda packet. Mr. Morris asked in regards to transportation the two items currently on the work program include the Rethink the Street and the Off -Street Parking Requirements. Ms. Garrow confirmed those are the two transportation related items. He agrees both items should be on the work plan and feels Rethink the Street is number one. When looking at the community plan and how the community is performing on the sustainability front, he feels transportation is the weakest in terms of congestion. He feels the Off - Street Parking item could be key in transforming Aspen. He recommended conducting a study similar to on conducted for the city of Fort Collins by Donald Shoup, known as a parking guru. He added it could be used as a case study to help other cities. Mr. Morris asked for an update on the Rethink the Street item. Mr. Bendon stated with street related projects, typically the City will study, budget, plan and build without obtaining outside input. Now they are trying to engage people with experimental projects. One project is the bulb -outs near City Hall and another one with the new island with flexible curbing on N. Mill St. They would like to experiment more and make more changes. Mr. Walterscheid asked about the feedback they have received on the experiments. Mr. Bendon replied about two thirds (2/3) or stronger responding like the City Hall experiment. The major pushback is on aesthetics for the one near City Hall. Folks who do not like it are pretty adamant about it. Others have stated it is more dangerous for bikes by pushing them more into traffic. 4 Special MeetinU Planning & Zonin2 Commission June 30, 2015 Mr. Walterscheid asked if they plan to do experiments it in other areas. Mr. Bendon stated they would like to but the City departments involved with helping including Parks and Streets are at operational capacity now with the summer season. Ms. McNicholas asked it the experiments are limited to the core currently and Mr. Bendon confirmed it is right now. There are not necessarily limits for future projects. Mr. Walterscheid asked about experimenting with Main St and Mr. Bendon stated they will probably not occur on Main St because it is a State Highway and would involve other agencies. He added there are continuing discussions with Engineering to address the barriers in crossing Main St. Mr. Bendon stated the City is also looking into utilizing a text based service to allow the public to easily respond to the experiments. Currently the public can utilize a Quick Response (QR) code to take them to a site for a response and they are using a chalkboard. Ms. McNicholas asked if they are considering any experiments for the pedestrian malls. Mr. Bendon stated they are not right now, but they will probably started a process next year to re -imagine the malls. There is a need to update some major infrastructure for the malls. There are also some significant development projects stacking up. The City may try to leverage some of its improvements at the same time the development will be occurring. Mr. Goode asked when the malls were built at which Mr. Bendon replied the 70's and it was a grassroots effort to close off the streets for a year to obtain feedback. Ms. McNicholas asked if there was a plan to put together a comprehensive transportation plan. Ms. Garrow stated it is broadly covered within the transportation chapter of the Aspen Area Community Plan. The Transportation Department completed some internal planning related to busses but there is no overall transportation master plan. The City has strived to implement it by targeting specific areas including policy. In 2012, one of Councils top goals was a mitigation system for development to ensure any addition trips generated are mitigated. This is now a new requirement for all development applications and it has been incredibly successful. The Parking item on the plan is a next step in the mitigation plan. Ms. McNicholas asked if the Lift One neighborhood fits in any type of master plan or vision. Mr. Bendon stated there has been a lot or recent activity in the area. The townhomes are in for a building permit and should start construction by the end of the year. The Lift One Lodge was recently purchased and they just started conversations with the new owner who they anticipated will be in the next month or two with a development application. There is plenty of opportunity for the City to step in to organize a plan for the area. Ms. McNicholas asked if there is a plan to retain the area as residential or become a gondola plaza west and include commercial. Mr. Bendon stated previous planning involved re- invigorating the area as a portal. Currently it is three percent or less of the uplift traffic and largely because it takes too long to get from Dean St up the mountain to the current lift. Right now as part of the Lift One Lodge approvals there would be a historical museum run by the Historical Society focused on skiing. Improvements to Dean St to include pedestrian access to connect to the gondola as well as a platter pole lift to move skiers up to a redeveloped Lift One A. There have been recent efforts to encourage the owners of the properties work together. The Lift One Lodge has lodging with a timeshare ownership and a restaurant. There are plans for 50 public parking spaces in the lodge as well. Ms. McNicholas feels it should be a priority for the City to engage to ensure the parts become cohesive for the town. Mr. Bendon feels with the two remaining parcels there is a scenario for a positive or negative outcome and feels it is important how the two projects relate to each other. 5 Special Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission June 30, 2015 Mr. Mesirow feels he shared his opinions during the Next Generation meeting. The four priority items identified by the Next Generation Board included Housing Credits, Rethink the Streets, and the Uphill Economy in conjunction with looking at the SCI rezoning. He felt the overall list is pretty impressive. Mr. Walterscheid asked about the status for the lodging code improvements. Ms. Garrow stated there are a few more items to move forward on. In December, Council approved a policy resolution as the first step in code amendment listing a number of priorities. The first one was helping small lodges. The next one was looking at the condominium bed base which makes up 40% of the bed base. They also want to look at timeshares and multi -family replacements. In June, Council passed a small lodge preservation program including incentives for small lodges for the 12 identified lodges including planning assistance, energy efficiency related rebates, reductions in building permits and other general assistance with general code compliance. They have obtained feedback from P&Z related to condos and timeshares and want to confirm with Council this is still a priority. Mr. Walterscheid asked if there is any prioritization of items with the recent passing of Referendum 1. Mr. Bendon stated there has been some amendments to integrate it into the code language. They are trying to make people fully aware of what triggers a vote. Mr. Bendon and Ms. Garrow stated there will be some code cleanups in the Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA) code section which includes Hallam Lake, 8040 greenline reviews, stream margin reviews, and view planes. The view plane language has not been updated since the 70's. There are some confusing areas regarding exemptions from view planes. Mr. Bendon explained currently there is a process for P&Z and HPC to exempt a project from view plan limitations if it is behind a building that already blocks the view. Now this exemption would trigger a Referendum 1 vote which highlights the need to cleanup the code. There are similar little items that need to be addressed. As an example, Ms. Garrow stated the Aspen Alps would have never thought they were in a view plane, but it submitted an application and discovered it is in the Cooper St view plane. The application was submitted prior to Referendum 1 so it is not subject to a vote. Ms. Garrow stated they asked City Council to adopt a map to identify the zone districts identified as of the date specified by Referendum 1 (Resolution 69, Series 201S). Staff is working on compiling additional information to help out everyone. Mr. Walterscheid asked if there was any way to adjust zoning to address the 'Zone it like you mean it' statement. Mr. Bendon stated they haven't had the opportunity yet to discuss it but feels it will come out in the upcoming retreat. The trick is getting past the sound bite and figuring out the definition of "mean it" or "fix it". He feels there needs to be a good and thorough conversation to determine the destination prior to amending any code. The Council retreat is scheduled for July 23`d - 24`h. Mr. Walterscheid asked when the housing credit item goes before Council. Ms. Garrow replied it has been stalled with the Aspen \ Pitkin County Housing Authority (APCHA) because there has not been a quorum at the last two meetings. Ms. Garrow anticipates it will be presented to Council in August. Mr. Walterscheid asked when the residential mitigation would go before Council. Mr. Bendon stated the first reading is scheduled for the end of July. He added APCHA is still working on the cash -in -lieu rates. Mr. Walterscheid asked if Staff could hold a meeting for calculations and measurements similar to the residential design standards update meeting held earlier in the day. Mr. Bendon stated it was possible. 1 Special Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission June 30, 2015 Mr. Walterscheid asked it the permit process change and standardized building subdivision items were Council directives or just items within the department. Mr. Bendon stated they are identified because they require a big effort on the part of Staff to update and maintain. Mr. Walterscheid thought it would be beneficial to standardize as much as possible and Mr. Bendon agreed. Mr. Walterscheid asked if they are seeking any 3D models from architects in town who may have generated them in the last five years. Ms. Garrow stated they just recently resolved an issue converting some of the GIS data in SketchUp. She anticipates reaching out to local firms for completed models. Mr. Bendon stated they have temporary help dedicated to the project. Mr. Walterscheid asked if there would be a surveyor provided actual heights on items and contours. Ms. Garrow stated they are requesting new data on the next flyover when the information is collected. She stated all the building heights should be accurate as it relates to topography. She added having the entire town surveyed is cost prohibitive. Mr. Morris asked if Staff had updated P&Z on the housing credit policy changes. Ms. Garrow stated P&Z had been updated and she is still waiting on formal feedback from the APCHA Board. The APCHA Staff is recommending is similar to the City's Staff recommendation except the APCHA Staff is recommending allowance of credits to be available for housing created anywhere in the Roaring Fork Valley. Mr. Walterscheid asked about the fee. Mr. Bendon stated they are still evaluating cash -in -lieu methodologies APCHA should use. Mr. Goode would like to add an item to address interior lighting code. Mr. Walterscheid then adjourned the meeting at 5:50 pm. Cindy Klob City Clerk's Office, Records Manager 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Hillary Seminick, Planner Technician THRU: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer DATE OF MEMO: June 4, 2015 MEETING DATE: June 10, 2015 RE: 540 E. Main St. (A.K.A Zupancis) Rezoning SUMMARY: 540 E. Main St., which is also known as the Zupancis Property, currently lies within three zone districts, Commercial Core (CC), Commercial (C-1) and Service/Commercial/Industrial (SCI). Three 19t' century cabins, known as the Zupancis-McMurtchy cabins, are located on the southern portion of the property. The property is designated historic. The City Parking Department, a parking garage, and surface parking are located on the property. The property and existing overlying zone districts are depicted in Figure 1. Page 1 of 2 • 0 The City Parking Department is considered a public use. Public use is not an allowed use within the Service/Industrial/Commercial (SCI) Zone District, while the Commercial Core (CC) and Commercial (C-1) Zone Districts do allow for Public use on the ground floor. In accordance with Section 26.710.022.A; which pertains to lands within more than one zone district, where a proposed use is not allowed in all Zone Districts, the use can only be developed on land in which it is a permitted use. The Parking Department falls within both the CC and SCI Zone Districts; therefore, the existing use of the property as the City Parking Department is a non -conformity. To bring the existing use into conformance, the City of Aspen Capital Asset Department is initiating an amendment to zone districts of the Zupancis property from CC, C-1, and SCI to Public (PUB). The subject parcel is approximately 27,000SF in size. At this time, no development is proposed on the subject property; however, the parcel has been considered for future City facilities. The Public Zone District requires a Planned Development; however, one is not proposed at this time. The dimensional characteristics of the parcel will be determined through the Planned Development Review process. PROPOSAL: Alan Richman, of Alan Richman Planning Services LLC, and Charles Cunniffe Architects, on behalf of the Applicant, the City of Aspen Capital Asset Department; have submitted an application to rezone the subject property to the Public Zone District. This application seeks to bring the existing use into compliance and allow for potential redevelopment for City facilities. SUMMARY: The intent of this Memo to the Historic Preservation Commission is to inform the Commission of the Application to Rezone the Zupancis Property to the Public Zone District. Additionally, Staff seeks to receive comment from the Commission regarding the proposal. Page 2 of 2 11 0 C y� N N 0 ^« c c U « C 0 i .o ai °) > d m v a r 'UD E =O C c La.> 8 L o 0 0 0 0 w o n e E A ^� '@ o w° w u � U N y .O y C W cn 0 0 0 U« 9 CL -� � 0. C Id N U F p nY o u N O « p >_ o C .n C U Q�pyp Q mo �j� x« c g cc O 'D d U 7 w c c E Oq G— O F T O m U U E N n. « —ouy a N -seyy — o c O � « N U COL n. a y m _ O Lbo U �C ft�y] y y at3 L 'C1 A W 0 N '— 7 ... y.0L .� ar w a" E 3 ° >, iu 0 a �, � o D leO« U O C N 0 N E .2 . 3 o E o°'o E o o U U .2 m E C 3 ° 0 M c .D > 0 10 0 0 v �O 0 N C N C. O C Ol M U U 3 O 0 N N C 7 N C 7 ti N C 7 ti Cl N O N O N AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: SLi-y Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: I S. IS' f;:) 5 :60pm , 201-C STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I,5c (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: (/ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this oZ7 day Of �c� 2q5—, by ' c✓ g=: WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: A J 6 JA QQ n Notary Public KAREN REED PATTERnoo; NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORAD," ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: NOTARY ID #19964002 My Commission Expires February • COPY OF THEPUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BYAWL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-I03.3 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 540 E. Main St. Public Hearing: September 15, 2015 Meeting Location: City Hall, Sister Cities Room 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 Project Location:540 E. Main St. Legal Description:Beginnin at a point on the Norther)y right of way line for East Main Street be- ing the Southwest comer of that parcel of land con- veyed in Book 191 at Page 186 and whence the Southwest corner of Block 20 East Aspen Addi- tional Townsite bears S 75o09'l 1" E 5.19 feet; thence N 75'09'11" W 69.81 feet along the North- erly right of way line for East Main Street to the Southeast corner of Block A% 521i1 Aspen Addi- tional Townsite; thence N 75-09-11" W 22.59 feet along the Southerly line of Lot 1 0, Block 19. East Aspen Additional Townsite to the Southeast comer of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 197 at Page 166; thence N 14"50'49 E 100.00 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 197 at Page 166 to the Northerly line of Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75o09'11' W 7 .5 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 1 0, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75*09'11' W 10.09 feet along the South line of said Lot 9 to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 119 at Page 126; thence N 14050'49' E 186.03 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 119 at Page 126 to a No. 5 rebar in place; thence S 61'50'02' E 24.43 feet to the Northwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 19'49' E 138.63 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 191 at Page 186; thence S O4o08' W 67.55 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 20. East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence S 17°09'11' W 120.50 teat along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the point of begin- ning. Oescription:The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Commercial Core (CC), Commer- cial (C-1) and Service Commercial Industrial (SCI) to Public (PUB). The property currently houses the City's Parking Department. A small cabin and two small outbuildings are located on the northern por- tion of the lot and the property is a designated his- tonc landmark. Land Use Reviews Req:Rezoning Decision Making Body:City Council Applicant: City of Aspen, 130 S. Galena St., As- pen CO 81611 More Information:For further information related to the project, contact HillarySeminick at the City of Aspen Community Deveopment Department, 130 P Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2741. Hillary.seminick@cityofaspen.com. Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on August 27,2015. • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: Soo F_*$ � S C.e , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: VS , 20k� STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, (name, please print) Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: k Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. X Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the' day of ArJ^--&,r , 20 t� , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. r�A Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) V`A Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. %'�� 4 Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. — k= Signature 5f' The fore oin "Af# Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this I day of VI/1 Ije1� , 201'j, by �00 � 1(h wia o WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL TARA L. NELSON NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO My commission expires: 20 NOTARY ID 20014030017 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 0912612017 Notary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: • COPY OF THE PUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BYMAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 • • 7Lj7 THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970) 920.5197 w: www.aspenpitkin.com Public Hearing: Meeting Location: Project Name: Project Location: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 540 E. Main St. Rezoning 5:00 PM Tuesday September 15, 2015 Council Chambers, City Hall 540 E. Main St. Rezoning 540 E. Main St. Legal Description: Parcel ID #2737-073-24-003, Beginning at a point on the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street being the Southwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 191 at Page 186 and whence the Southwest corner of Block 20 East Aspen Additional Townsite bears S 75'09'11" E 5.19 feet; thence N 75°09'11" W 69.81 feet along the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street to the Southeast corner of Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 22.59 feet along the Southerly line of Lot 1 0, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 197 at Page 166; thence N 14'50'49" E 100.00 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 197 at Page 166 to the Northerly line of Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75°09'11" W 7 .5 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75°09'11" W 10.09 feet along the South line of said Lot 9 to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 119 at Page 126; thence N 14'50'49" E 186.03 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 119 at Page 126 to a No. 5 rebar in place; thence S 61°50'02" E 24.43 feet to the Northwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 19*49' E 138.63 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 04*08' W 67.55 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the • 0 LJNWW_ THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970) 920.5197 w: www.asDenoitkin.com Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 20, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence S 17'09'11" W 120.50 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the point of beginning Land Use Reviews Requested: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Commercial Core (CC), Commercial (C-1) and Service Commercial Industrial (SCI) to Public (PUB). The property currently houses the City's Parking Department. A small cabin and two small outbuildings are located on the northern portion of the lot and the property is a designated historic landmark. Decision Making Body: City Council Applicant: City of Aspen More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Hillary Seminick at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2741, hillary.seminick@cityofaspen.com. 0 • PITKIN COUNTY CAPITAL LEASING CORP SL PROPERTY LLC BORCHERTS ROBERT H REV TRUST 530 E MAIN ST 2606 STATE ST 1555 WASHTENAW ASPEN, CO 81611 DALLAS, TX 75204 ANN ARBOR, MI 48104 BORCHERTS HOLDE H REV TRUST BROUGH STEVE B & DEBORAH A EMPHASYS SERVICE COMPANY 1555 WASHTENAW 599 TROUT LK DR 1925 BRICKELL AVE BLDG D ANN ARBOR, MI 48104 SANGER, CA 93657 PENTHOUSE 11 D MIAMI, FL 33129 EMPHASYS SERVICES COMPANY BULKELEY RICHARD C & JULIE J DORAN RALPH 1925 BRICKELL AVE BLDG D 600 E MAIN ST #401 2600 WOODWARD WAY PENTHOUSE 11 ASPEN, CO 81611 ATLANTA, GA 30305 MIAMI, FL 33129 LEBARRE FAM LLC SMITH JAMES F & N LINDSAY ALLEN CARROL A REV TRUST 7518 MIDDLEWOOD ST 600 E MAIN ST #302 15495 SW ALDERBROOK CIR HOUSTON, TX 77063 ASPEN, CO 81611 TIGARD, OR 97224 ALLEN RONALD W REV TRUST MAESTRANZI ALEXA LEE TRUST MANN KATHLEEN A REV TRUST 99% 50 SW 137TH AV 1736 PARK RIDGE PT PO BOX 1455 BEAVERTON, OR 97006 PARK RIDGE, IL 60068 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 VAN WALRAVEN EDWARD C REV TRUST 1% COPPOCK RICHARD P SHERMAN CAPITAL COMPANY PO BOX 1455 PO BOX 44 5840 E JOSHUA TREE LN CARBONDALE, CO 81623 DEXTER, MI 48130 PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253 JENSEN CARLY J LAMB DON REV TRUST GILKERSON LINDA REV TRUST 15 S WILLOW CT 1449 E 56TH ST 1449 E 56TH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 CHICAGO, IL 60637 CHICAGO, IL 60637 HICKS GILBERT W & PATSY K ASPEN LEGACY LLC MARASCO FAMILY TRUST 33.4331% 3674 WOODLAWN TERRACE PL 17740 E HINSDALE AVE 653 26 1/2 RD HONOLULU, HI 96822 FOXFIELD, CO 80016 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 MARASCO RAE 0 TRUST 33.4331% MARASCO EMILY A AK MEYER EMILYA 11.0� STARMER MARY JOSEPHINE 11.0446% 653 26 1/2 RD 21701 FLAMENCO 12738 W 84TH DR GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92692 ARVADA, CO 80001 MARASCO BERNARD R 11.0446% GENE MCCUTCHIN LTD II 600 ASPEN LLC 320 DAKOTA DR PO BOX 802043 625 E MAIN ST #102B PMB 233 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 DALLAS, TX 753802043 ASPEN, CO 81611 MCGAFFEY FAMILY & CO NO C LLC 2465 NOB HILL AVE NORTH SEATTLE, WA 98109 ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER 1300 S STEELE ST DENVER, CO 80210 HOVERSTEN PHILIP E & LOUISE B 2990 BOOTH CREEK DR VAIL, CO 81657 • QTIP MARITAL TRUST 1/2 40 E 80TH ST #PH 26A NEW YORK, NY 10075 MARSH HUGH 631 E MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 HUNTER SQUARE LLC 90% PO BOX 2 SONOMA. CA 95476 117 SOUTH SPRING STREET HOLDINGS LLC SLS LLC PO BOX 11600 101 FOUNDERS PL #104 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 CONCEPT 600 LLC PITKIN COUNTY PO BOX 2914 530 E MAIN ST #302 BASALT, CO 81621 ASPEN, CO 81611 530 HOPKINS LLC JARDEN CORPORATION 530112 E HOPKINS 2381 EXECUTIVE CENTER DR ASPEN, CO 81611 BOCA RATON, FL 33431 CICUREL CARY LUCKYSTAR LLC 2615 N LAKEWOOD PO BOX 7755 CHICAGO, IL 60614 ASPEN, CO 81612 ORR KEITH MURPHY GEORGE W 4545 N STATE LINE PO BOX 4146 TEXARKANA, TX 75503 ASPEN, CO 81612 VECTOR ENTERPRISES LLC BOSELY MARY ANNE REVOCABLE TRUST 0490 ASPEN OAK DR PO BOX 26 ASPEN, CO 81611 WOODY CREEK, CO 81656 G & G CORPORATE OFFICES LLC NGS LLC 2520 S GRAND AV # 114 101 FOUNDERS PL #109 GLENWOOD SPGS, CO 81601 ASPEN, CO 81611 ROTHBLUM PHILIP 1/2 40 E 80TH ST #PH 26A NEW YORK, NY 10075 THOMAS KATHRYN 631 E MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 JURINE LLC 10% PO BOX 2 SONOMA, CA 95476 HOLLAND AND HART PO BOX 8749 DENVER, CO 80201 STEWART TITLE CO PO BOX 669 HOUSTON, TX 77001 AUSTIN LAWRENCE CONNER LLC 532 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 WILSON FAMILY TRUST 101 FOUNDERS PL UNIT 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 OP LLC 424 PARK CIR #6 ASPEN, CO 81611 OBP LLC 101 FOUNDERS PL #104 ASPEN. CO 81611 CRUMMER KLEIN TITLE TRUST 2008 1305 N BEVERLY DR BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 • • SINTA SCOTT BALLINGER ELIZABETH F SEYFFERT STEVEN J PO BOX 2872 PO BOX 10205 102 FOUNDERS PL #201 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 BERG KRISTOFOR KLEIN JAMES J & SALLIE R SMITH H W III 102 FOUNDERS PL #202 PO BOX 12022 PO BOX 10914 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 HUNTER ALEXANDER DONAHUE ELIZABETH GLATHAR KIMBERLY J PO BOX 1638 102 FOUNDERS PLACE #2302 PO BOX 12197 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 GWM PROPERTIES LLC 311 ASPEN LLC GOLDFEIN MICHAEL PO BOX 4146 2317 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 1724 BRAESIDE LN ASPEN, CO 81612 WILMINGTON, DE 19806 NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 GOLDFEIN PAMELA J BOMBA LAURIE A REV TRUST WELSCH SUSAN FLEET REVOCABLE TRUST 1724 BRAESIDE LN 5601 HIGH DR 101 N SPRING ST #201 NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 MISSION HILLS, KS 66208 ASPEN, CO 81611 RAMOS WALTHER JR & MARJORIE R GALANTER YALE & ELYSE FESUS GEORGE J & SUSAN C 133 TALL TREES DR 525 S ANDREWS AVE PO BOX 9197 BALA CYNWYD, PA 19004 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 333012831 ASPEN, CO 81612-9197 ATWOOD STANFORD H & PAMELA S LVG TR MARTINEZ RITA PEARSON DOUG 16125 GREENWOOD LN 101 N SPRING ST #3104 101 N SPRING ST #3105 MONTE SERENO, CA 95030 ASPEN, CO 816111518 ASPEN, CO 816111518 DOCKEN ANDREW ARENELLA BETH & FRANK III SHAPIRO FREDERIC M & SUSAN 101 N SPRING ST #106 101 N SPRING ST #107 101 N SPRING ST #3108 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 NIBLACK SCOTT GRAHAM NARELDA SATTLER SANDRA A 101 N SPRING ST #3109 101 N SPRING ST #203 101 NORTH SPRING ST #3204 ASPEN, CO 816111560 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 CURET JORDAN LAZAR FAMILY TRUST BASSI PETER A AND BARBARA J 1996 FAMII PO BOX 3380 5342 ALDEA AVE 18 CHANNEL VISTA ASPEN, CO 81612 ENCINO, CA 91316 NEWPORT COAST, CA 92657 COHEN NANCY C REV TRUST LEONARD FAMILY TRUST MOSCOE THOMAS D 2026 N MOHAWK PO BOX 710 14700 ROCKSBOROUGH RD CHICAGO, IL 60614 RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067 MINNETONKA, MN 553453718 SMITH GAILEN B FAMILY TRUST OBERMEYER 204 LLC PARDEE JAMES LEE III REV LIV TRST 625 E MAIN ST #102B 2727 ALLEN PKWY STE1400 PO BOX 4153 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON, TX 77019 ASPEN, CO 816124153 BIG BOY LLC LINDENAU SCOTT A REV TRUST TUSCANA LLC 205 S MILL ST #301A 501 RIO GRANDE PL #104 501 RIO GRANDE PL STE 105 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 UNIT 109 OP LLC ANDERTON JAMES L FELDMAN JONATHAN 501 RIO GRANDE PL #107 100 OBERMEYER PL #4101 100 OBERMEYER PLACE DR #102 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MILNE SHEILA NGUYEN MICHAEL TAM UNIT 106 OP LLC PO BOX 8286 DAO OANH KIM 205 S MILL ST #301A ASPEN, CO 81612 430 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 816112497 ASPEN, CO 81611 GRW RIO GRANDE PROPERTY LLC FORTIER TIMOTHY MAROLT ENTERPRISES LLC PO BOX 4491 601 RIO GRANDE PL #102 PO BOX 8705 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 TSE HOLDINGS LLC PAM LLC JOSA LLC 601 RIO GRANDE PL #120 PO BOX 4446 PO BOX 10147 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 LCC ASPEN HOLDINGS LLC SCHENKELBERG LLC K & J ENTERPRISES LLC PO BOX 1550 140 VISTA GRANDE 601 RIO GRANDE PL #119A ASPEN, CO 81612 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81507 ASPEN, CO 81611 OBERMEYER PLACE RENTAL GRP LLC DIXIE DOG VENTURES LLC FURTHUR CANCUN LLC 115 AABC 1690 HOMESTAKE DR PO BOX 2199 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 LANE TAMMIE ARTIM LLC KIMPLE 2004 TRUST BRUNSWOLD KIRK PO BOX 30106 3505 TURTLE CREEK BLVD #PH20A 601 RIO GRANDE PL #118 NEW YORK, NY 10011 DALLAS, TX 75219 ASPEN, CO 81611 0 OLITSKY TAMAR & STEPHEN ASPEN BLEEKER STREET LP PO BOX 514 625 E MAIN ST #102B GWYNEDD VALLEY, PA 19437 ASPEN, CO 81611 OBERMEYER PLACE CONDO 620 EAST HOPKINS CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA COMMON AREA 210 N MILL ST #201 620 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 CONCEPT 600 CONDO ASSOC DML REALTY LLC COMMON AREA PO BOX 305 BASALT, CO 81621 CHAVIES, KY 41727 RIO GRANDE PARTNERS 88 LLC PR ASPEN HOLDINGS LLC 1008 E HOPKINS AVE PO BOX 1006 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 HUTCHESON LAURA TRUST CALHOON THOMAS C 54 RAINEY ST PH02 315 LAVACA ST AUSTIN, TX 78701 AUSTIN. TX 787013036 WAGAR RICHARD H PO BOX 9063 ASPEN, CO 81612 625 MAIN INVESTMENTS LLC 1482 E VALLEY RD #463 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108 ROY ADAM C & SARAH G 625 E MAIN ST #203 ASPEN. CO 81611 CAREM LLC 655 MADISON AVE 11TH FL NEW YORK, NY 10065 CARVER RUTH A 116 S ASPEN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 SPRING STREET CONDO ASSOC UNIT 5E OP LLC DBA BIG BOY LLC 205 S MILL ST #301A ASPEN, CO 81611 214 WEST COOPER LLC 6 NE 63RD ST #220 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73105 HAUSER MARYJANE 1540 BOHNS POINT RD WAYZATA. MN 55391 HUNTER & HOPKINS PROF BUILDING COND( CONNER CABINS & LOFTS CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA COMMON AREA 600 E HOPKINS AVE 530 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 CWAREI LLC TRACY KATHLEEN 3030 HARTLEY RD #350 625 E MAIN ST #202 JACKSONVILLE, FL 32257 ASPEN, CO 81611 STUDIO SIX LLC PO BOX DID ASPEN, CO 81612 625 MAIN ASPEN LLC 465 N MILL ST STE 12-113 ASPEN. CO 81611 EMCAR LLC 655 MADISON AVE 11TH FL NEW YORK, NY 10065 ALPINE BANK ASPEN PO BOX 10000 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 CITY OF ASPEN FICKE FAMILY REV TRUST LARSON MARIA M 130 S GALENA ST 15 W ARRELLAGA ST #3 PO BOX 8207 ASPEN, CO 81611 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101 ASPEN, CO 81612 0 MARCHETTI FAMILY LLC 1526 FOREST DR GRIMES DAVID L 3510 BROMLEY WOODS LN RKJR PROPERTIES LTD 5934 ROYAL LN #250 GLENVIEW, IL 60025 GREENSBORO, NC 27410 DALLAS, TX 75230 City of Aspen Community Development DepaRmen• 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81 " , „,,,•.,ne�„ l_�RA+ritZJUNCTION CC)'�.,��*w"��...„,,,,�R��•'�ii�iwis 29 AUG 2015 PM 02 8 0001377893AUG 21 2015 ,RT LAUDERDALE. FL 333012831 NIXIE 333 7E 1909 9899/12/15 PLANTER YALE 8 ELYSE 5 S ANDREWS AVE RETURN TO SENDER • ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN UNABLE TO FORWARD 33X3 1S I BC: 8151119@23@ *2979-13788-29-42 _�II„IIII,.I..... • 2LLu eeacc-LY1t-.) v ouvV-,Lj we-+c-.t S 0 THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970) 920.5197 w: www.aspenpitkin.com Public Hearing: Meeting Location: Project Name: Project Location: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 540 Ea Main St. Rezoning 5:00 PM Tuesday September 15, 2015 Council Chambers, City Hall 540 E. Main St. Rezoning 540 E. Main St. Legal Description: Parcel ID #2737-073-24-003, Beginning at a point on the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street being the Southwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 191 at Page 186 and whence the Southwest corner of Block 20 East Aspen Additional Townsite bears S 75°09'11" E 5.19 feet; thence N 75°09'11" W 69.81 feet along the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street to the Southeast corner of Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 22.59 feet along the Southerly line of Lot 1 0, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 197 at Page 166; thence N 14050'49" E 100.00 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 197 at Page 166 to the Northerly line of Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 7 .5 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75°09'11" W 10.09 feet along the South line of said Lot 9 to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 119 at Page 126; thence N 14°50'49" E 186.03 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 119 at Page 126 to a No. 5 rebar in place; thence S 61°50'02" E 24.43 feet to the Northwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 19°49' E 138.63 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 04*08' W 67.55 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the 7L.J7 THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970) 920.5197 w: www.aspenpitkin.com Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 20, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence S 17°09'11" W 120.50 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the point of beginning Land Use Reviews Requested: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Commercial Core (CC), Commercial (C-1) and Service Commercial Industrial (SCI) to Public (PUB). The property currently houses the City's Parking Department. A small cabin and two small outbuildings are located on the northern portion of the lot and the property is a designated historic landmark. Decision Making Body: City Council Applicant: City of Aspen More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Hillary Seminick at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2741, hillary.seminick@cityofaspen.com. City of Aspen Commun4 Development Department 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 G, RAND 3UNCTION 9 AUG 2015 ANDERTON JAMES L 100 OBERMEYER PL #4101 ASPEN, CO 81611 co F'f4f 02�k: 0001377893 AUG 21 2015 NIXIE 802 7E 1009 0009/14/15 I RETURN TO SENDER ATTEMPTED - NOT t04O 1N 1 UNABLE TO FORWARD •� 3[: a1E11i90730 *?079-2-3901-29-42 342 f1 ilAi4w 'LI""1"'i'1"'I{11'11"II""I'it'I'Il""'I111""'III"'11'� 13 THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970) 920.5197 w: www.asaenDitkin.com Public Hearing: Meeting Location: Project Name: Project Location: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE. 540 E. Main St. Rezoning 5:00 PM Tuesday September 15, 2015 Council Chambers, City Hall 540 E. Main St. Rezoning 540 E. Main St. Legal Description: Parcel ID #2737-073-24-003, Beginning at a point on the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street being the Southwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 191 at Page 186 and whence the Southwest corner of Block 20 East Aspen Additional Townsite bears S 75'09'11" E 5.19 feet; thence N 75°09'11" W 69.81 feet along the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street to the Southeast corner of Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75°09'11" W 22.59 feet along the Southerly line of Lot 1 0, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 197 at Page 166; thence N 14°50'49" E 100.00 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 197 at Page 166 to the Northerly line of Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75°09'11" W 7 .5 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 10.09 feet along the South line of said Lot 9 to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 119 at Page 126; thence N 14°50'49" E 186.03 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 119 at Page 126 to a No. 5 rebar in place; thence S 61°50'02" E 24.43 feet to the Northwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 19°49' E 138.63 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 04°08' W 67.55 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the CIA THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970) 920.5197 w: www.aspenpitkin.com Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 20, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence S 17°09'11" W 120.50 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the point of beginning Land Use Reviews Requested: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Commercial Core (CC), Commercial (C-1) and Service Commercial Industrial (SCI) to Public (PUB). The property currently houses the City's Parking Department. A small cabin and two small outbuildings are located on the northern portion of the lot and the property is a designated historic landmark. Decision Making Body: City Council Applicant: City of Aspen More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Hillary Seminick at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2741, hillary.seminick@cityofaspen.com. City Oi ASpen GRAND JUNCTION CO: Communk Development Department 130 S. Galena Street 29 AUG ' 1DI S PM Aspen, Colorado 81611 G 81 fi"" 0 �.� 02 0001377893 AUG 21 2015 SLS LLC 101 FOUNDERS PL #104 ASPEN, CO 81611 NIXIE 802 SE 1009 0009114/15 1 1 RETURN TO SENDER AT TEMF IED — *NOT K*NOVMIli I UNABLE TO FORWARD 13C: ss1G11190239 *2079-13729-29-42 0 III III lilt " "1 r�i�i�i�����z I ii i t It it II I l l l l I 7LJ THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970) 920.5197 w: www.aspenpitkin.com Public Hearing: Meeting Location: Project Name: Project Location: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 540 E. Main St. Rezoning 5:00 PM Tuesday September 15, 2015 Council Chambers, City Hall 540 E. Main St. Rezoning 540 E. Main St. Legal Description: Parcel ID #2737-073-24-003, Beginning at a point on the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street being the Southwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 191 at Page 186 and whence the Southwest corner of Block 20 East Aspen Additional Townsite bears S 75°09'11" E 5.19 feet; thence N 75'09'11" W 69.81 feet along the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street to the Southeast corner of Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75°09'11" W 22.59 feet along the Southerly line of Lot 1 0, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 197 at Page 166; thence N 14'50'49" E 100.00 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 197 at Page 166 to the Northerly line of Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 7 .5 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 10.09 feet along the South line of said Lot 9 to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 119 at Page 126; thence N 14'50'49" E 186.03 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 119 at Page 126 to a No. 5 rebar in place; thence S 61°50'02" E 24.43 feet to the Northwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 19°49' E 138.63 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 04°08' W 67.55 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970) 920.5197 w: www.aspenpitkin.com Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 20, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence S 17°09'11" W 120.50 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the point of beginning Land Use Reviews Requested: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Commercial Core (CC), Commercial (C-1) and Service Commercial Industrial (SCI) to Public (PUB). The property currently houses the City's Parking Department. A small cabin and two small outbuildings are located on the northern portion of the lot and the property is a designated historic landmark. Decision Making Body: City Council Applicant: City of Aspen More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Hillary Seminick at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2741, hillary.seminick@cityofaspen.com. r' STiti5'+ s GRAND 3UNCTION CO City of Aspen Community Development Department -,.AUG -2 015 FM 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 0001377893 AUG 21 2015 OBP LLC 101 FOUNDERS PL #104 ASPEN, CO 81611 NIXIE 802 Sc 1009 0009; 14/15 I RETURN TO SENDER I ATTEiKFI iED - `NOT KNuriry UNABLE TO FORWARD q} 9} yA�'. qc, a1c711o0730 *2a7o-14156-29-42 3 42 "I'III'tl"'llil'I"II"111...... . Il'1"III1....... .ill.. .. I". II 7LJ THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970) 920.5197 w: www.aspenpitkin.com Public Hearing: Meeting Location: Project Name: Project Location: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 540 E. Main St. Rezoning 5:00 PM Tuesday September 15, 2015 Council Chambers, City Hall 540 E. Main St. Rezoning 540 E. Main St. Legal Description: Parcel ID #2737-073-24-003, Beginning at a point on the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street being the Southwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 191 at Page 186 and whence the Southwest corner of Block 20 East Aspen Additional Townsite bears S 75°09'11" E 5.19 feet; thence N 75°09'11" W 69.81 feet along the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street to the Southeast corner of Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75°09'11" W 22.59 feet along the Southerly line of Lot 1 0, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 197 at Page 166; thence N 14*50'49" E 100.00 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 197 at Page 166 to the Northerly line of Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75°09'11" W 7 .5 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75°09'11" W 10.09 feet along the South line of said Lot 9 to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 119 at Page 126; thence N 14*50'49" E 186.03 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 119 at Page 126 to a No. 5 rebar in place; thence S 61°50'02" E 24.43 feet to the Northwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 19°49' E 138.63 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 04°08' W 67.55 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the 7L.7j THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970) 920.5197 w: www.aspenpitkin.com Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 20, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence S 17°09'11" W 120.50 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the point of beginning Land Use Reviews Requested: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Commercial Core (CC), Commercial (C-1) and Service Commercial Industrial (SCI) to Public (PUB). The property currently houses the City's Parking Department. A small cabin and two small outbuildings are located on the northern portion of the lot and the property is a designated historic landmark. Decision Making Body: City Council Applicant: City of Aspen More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Hillary Seminick at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2741, hillary.seminick@cityofaspen.com. 1, 3'o a f _ ... PUBLIC NOTICE Date: September 15, 2015 Time: 5:00 PM Place:City Hall, Council 3 Chambers Purpose: The applicant seeks to rezone the ZX ro ert from Commercial Core p p Y 4�k --- CC Commercial (C-1) and Service Commercial Industrial (SCI) to Public PUB). For further information contact Aspen Planning Dept at 970-920-2741. d 44 Acl� 1; . ft AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: !,lip e a� Sk , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, A22--n- vt (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the _ day of , 20_, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) • Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and. new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Al Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this /-/- day of�c.vr2_ , 201�_, by.-L--,� Aspen Additional Townsite bears S 75009'11' E PUBLIC NOTICE 5.19 feet: thence N 75°09'11' W 69.81 feet along For further information contact Hillary Seminick at RE: 540 EAST MAIN STREET, AKA ZUPANCIS the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street the City of Aspen Community Development Dept., PROPERTY: REZONING to the Southeast corner of Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11- W 22.59 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado. (970) OFFICIAL SEAL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing feet along the Southerly line of Lot 1 0, Block 19, 429-2741. for Rezoning will be held on Tuesday, June 30th, East Aspen Additional Townsite to the Southeast y Ryan Waflerscheid 2015 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 197 Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister at Page 166; thence N 14°50'49' E 100.00 feet Cities Conference Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena along the Easterly line of said Book 197 at Page City of Aspen St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by 166 to the Northerly line of Lot 10, Block 19, Eas; Published in the Aspen Times on June 4th, 2015 Alan Richman Planning Services, Inc.. on behalf of Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75*09'11" W (11238643) The City of Aspen, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen CO. 7 .5 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 1 0, cants, owner of the subject property. The Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite: thence _.�_�._/, ,/, ; cant is proposing to rezone the property to Public Public N 75009'11' W 10.09 feet along the South line of IY�`lrL KULAo4k �-1,�-{/ a (PUB). The applicant seeks to rezone the property from said Lot 9 to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 119 at Page 126; thence N 14°50'49' E 186.03 feet along the Easterly line of �7 Votary Public "`� Commercial Core (CC), Commercial (C-1) and said Book 119 at Page 126 to a No. 5 rebar in Service Commercial Industrial (SCI) to Public place; thence S 61°50'02' E 24.43 feet to the KAREN REED PATT �.`ISON (PUB), The property currently houses the City's Northwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed Parking Department. A small cabin and two small by Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 19°49' E NOTARY PUBL iC outbuildings are located on the northern portion of 138.63 feet along the Westerly line of said Book STATE AR PUBL CUO the lot and the property is a designated historic 191 at Page 186; thence S 04°08' W 67.55 feet landmark. along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page NOTARY ID #1996d!!t12767 Beginning 1a6 to sp n Additional Omer of Lot,, Block 2 S AS APPLICABLE: � The land is legallydescribed as y line a t East Al en Additional Townsite; thence S M1,,ty, CommisS10n Iles FC•t't,jary 15, 2016 point on the Northerly right of way line for East 17°09'11 W 120.50 feet along the Westerry line of "'1 Main Street being the Southwest corner of that said Book 119 at Page 186 to the point of begin- parcel of land conveyed in Book 191 at Page 186 ning; Commonly known as 540 East Main Street and whence the Southwest comer of Block 20 East and the Zupancis property. ,,,,; - -- - - - ----- -_ - - ---- - - __ . NOTICE (SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY CAS. §24-65.5-103.3 so PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 540 EAST MAIN STREET, AKA ZUPANCIS PROPERTY: REZONING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing for Rezoning will be held on Tuesday, June 30t', 2015 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Conference Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Alan Richman Planning Services, Inc., on behalf of The City of Aspen, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen CO, 81611, owner of the subject property. The applicant is proposing to rezone the property to Public (PUB). The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Commercial Core (CC), Commercial (C-1) and Service Commercial Industrial (SCI) to Public (PUB). The property currently houses the City's Parking Department. A small cabin and two small outbuildings are located on the northern portion of the lot and the property is a designated historic landmark. The land is legally described as Beginning at a point on the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street being the Southwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 191 at Page 186 and whence the Southwest corner of Block 20 East Aspen Additional Townsite bears S 75'09'11" E 5.19 feet; thence N 75'09'11" W 69.81 feet along the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street to the Southeast corner of Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 22.59 feet along the Southerly line of Lot 1 0, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 197 at Page 166; thence N 14°50'49" E 100.00 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 197 at Page 166 to the Northerly line of Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 751109111" W 7.5 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 10.09 feet along the South line of said Lot 9 to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 119 at Page 126; thence N 14°50'49" E 186.03 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 119 at Page 126 to a No. 5 rebar in place; thence S 61 °50'02" E 24.43 feet to the Northwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 19°49' E 138.63 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 04°08' W 67.55 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 20, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence S 170911" W 120.50 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the point of beginning; Commonly known as 540 East Main Street and the Zupancis property. For further information contact Hillary Seminick at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept., 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado. (970) 429-2741. s/ Ryan Walterscheid Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission City of Aspen Published in the Aspen Times on June 4"', 2015 E HIBIT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: s_(o E , 11116, r, 5 � , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: _-Fy✓12 -3 Q , 20� STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, o �&4 irrPq 0 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E), of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) • Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, PDs that create more than one lot, and new Planned Developments are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. ignatu.re The for oing "Affidavit of Notice" was wknowledged before me this day Of — , 20_, by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL KAREN REED PATTERSON My commission expires: NOTARY PUBLIC—� STATE ID COLORADO �Ow� �� NOTARY ID #19964002767 ion 9�— MY CommissExpires February 15, 2016 Notary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: 9o��oN--�Zom�Zoom� m��mmwoN���Y�o�m L�oLm°O„ "ICED m m0i W �« O mOmm mOk U] U m `°a3:. 3°m-ox8"co5Z5m�¢0 a3c«O�°wc°nm'Obo0 S'0o+m$ioteoO�mv-c' _ca«m-3C.t3mn Jm_cmC;OmL m Tmmm�O�LC OO-Lm�Nmrnao��Wa�� cN�UdEE�_DWCmODDmLS$_mm '�O¢n v'0(�nid�CO_�t�mn�ramNom"d� �cm . iNOTICE m Om 2U0. WZc3kmOE w= on66mOm0GEccoE 'o,moc"-.bnntp 3 Ua o_: ��a«y"momt mF UHJ�LL��ppQ4 aNmCuo ,$mmc'�mmcp¢°omm OOpYo.O.Cm$m.' mOid>m.C�oEa«�,3._� �C mm�mm° _`mm��cO+��`U L`ymm^0Om>o0Go�ma�mO To��$tC�cf?J'coU� mLJ.. n�[p'L;am°-'m-°�-otOocmmdLamN_�cQaOml UxCmCm H`cUoHa9V0^3mm'miEm°��comm ' "�SmAcmm¢'_m¢onycyNC�LL_c2«Fai��amTU��QQQdg_i�tO LN'na¢m°m o3Y�^c Enp2cm�° mlu in03O�dNO1mm9omE LCUO-a2t1f OwoE'2moowuoaWP�NNmFm C �OE.y-nm�t�OaULUnN'Z¢NNN4C OmmUZm XR .o E /�0W NwnOaE R SO2all o mt m¢EmmV�.E o uof-wom£n�2oaNmc c Ed- EGa a=7 O(L mJ°-U'oB o-°Nc �m-Nm_m. . nVm L) :_._am<_m dN • • • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 51i c i'ksk w-^Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: S7 -Z,o ,2015 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County oofPitkin ) I, A-`, A-." (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: ✓ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. ✓ Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the %' - day of 3 `''t , 20 \S, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. ✓ Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. n\A Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this tot day of , v..wQ , 201- , by ANGELA JUN SCOREY NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID #20154011826 My Commission Expires March 23, 2019 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: 2.3. 20 I �t S Notar Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: • COPY OF THE PUBLICA TION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED B Y MAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 40 • • PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 540 EAST MAIN STREET, AKA ZUPANCIS PROPERTY: REZONING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing for Rezoning will be held on Tuesday, June 30'', 2015 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Conference Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Alan Richman Planning Services, Inc., on behalf of The City of Aspen, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen CO, 81611, owner of the subject property. The applicant is proposing to rezone the property to Public (PUB). The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Commercial Core (CC), Commercial (C-1) and Service Commercial Industrial (SCI) to Public (PUB). The property currently houses the City's Parking Department. A small cabin and two small outbuildings are located on the northern portion of the lot and the property is a designated historic landmark. The land is legally described as Beginning at a point on the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street being the Southwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 191 at Page 186 and whence the Southwest corner of Block 20 East Aspen Additional Townsite bears S 75'09' 11 " E 5.19 feet; thence N 75'09' 11 " W 69.81 feet along the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street to the Southeast comer of Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 22.59 feet along the Southerly line of Lot 1 0, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 197 at Page 166; thence N 14°50'49" E 100.00 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 197 at Page 166 to the Northerly line of Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 7 .5 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 10.09 feet along the South line of said Lot 9 to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 119 at Page 126; thence N 14°50'49" E 186.03 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 119 at Page 126 to a No. 5 rebar in place; thence S 61 °50'02" E 24.43 feet to the Northwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 19°49' E 138.63 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 04°08' W 67.55 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 20, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence S 170911" W 120.50 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the point of beginning; Commonly known as 540 East Main Street and the Zupancis property. For further information contact Hillary Seminick at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept., 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado. (970) 429-2741. s/ Ryan Walterseheid Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission City of Aspen Published in the Aspen Times on June 4t', 2015 LEITCH B BRYAN III SEGREST DAVID H BORCHERTS ROBERT H REV TRUST 2606 STATE ST 2606 STATE ST 1555 WASHTENAW DALLAS, TX 75204 DALLAS, TX 75204 ANN ARBOR, MI 48104 BORCHERTS HOLDE H REV TRUST BROUGH STEVE B & DEBORAH A EMPHASYS SERVICE COMPANY 1555 WASHTENAW 599 TROUT LK DR 1925 BRICKELL AVE BLDG D ANN ARBOR, MI 48104 SANGER, CA 93657 PENTHOUSE 11 D MIAMI, FL 33129 EMPHASYS SERVICES COMPANY BULKELEY RICHARD C & JULIE J LEBARRE FAM LLC 1925 BRICKELL AVE BLDG D 600 E MAIN ST #401 7518 MIDDLEWOOD ST PENTHOUSE 11 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON, TX 77063 MIAMI, FL 33129 SMITH JAMES F & N LINDSAY ALLEN CARROL A REV TRUST ALLEN RONALD W REV TRUST 600 E MAIN ST #302 15495 SW ALDERBROOK CIR 50 SW 137TH AV ASPEN, CO 81611 TIGARD, OR 97224 BEAVERTON, OR 97006 MAESTRANZI ALEXA LEE TRUST MANN KATHLEEN A REV TRUST 99% VAN WALRAVEN EDWARD C REV TRUST 1% 1736 PARK RIDGE PT PO BOX 1455 PO BOX 1455 PARK RIDGE, IL 60068 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 COPPOCK RICHARD P SHERMAN CAPITAL COMPANY JENSEN CARLY J PO BOX 44 5840 E JOSHUA TREE LN 15 S WILLOW CT DEXTER, MI 48130 PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253 ASPEN, CO 81611 PITKIN COUNTY CAPITAL LEASING CORP MARSH HUGH THOMAS KATHRYN 530 E MAIN ST 631 E MAIN ST 631 E MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOVERSTEN PHILIP E & LOUISE B MCGAFFEY FAMILY & CO NO C LLC 117 SOUTH SPRING STREET HOLDINGS LLC 2990 BOOTH CREEK DR 2465 NOB HILL AVE NORTH PO BOX 11600 VAIL, CO 81657 SEATTLE, WA 98109 ASPEN, CO 81612 SLS LLC HOLLAND AND HART CONCEPT 600 LLC 101 FOUNDERS PL #104 PO BOX 8749 PO BOX 2914 ASPEN, CO 81611 DENVER, CO 80201 BASALT, CO 81621 PITKIN COUNTY 530 HOPKINS LLC JARDEN CORPORATION 530 E MAIN ST #302 5301/2 E HOPKINS 2381 EXECUTIVE CENTER DR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BOCA RATON, FL 33431 0 AUSTIN LAWRENCE CONNER LLC 532 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 WILSON FAMILY TRUST 101 FOUNDERS PL UNIT 201 ASPEN, CO 81611 OP LLC 424 PARK CIR #6 ASPEN, CO 81611 CICUREL CARY 2615 N LAKEWOOD CHICAGO, IL 60614 ORR KEITH 4545 N STATE LINE TEXARKANA, TX 75503 VECTOR ENTERPRISES LLC 90% 0490 ASPEN OAK DR ASPEN, CO 81611 BOSELY MARY ANNE REVOCABLE TRUST OBP LLC PO BOX 26 101 FOUNDERS PL #104 WOODY CREEK, CO 81656 ASPEN, CO 81611 NGS LLC 101 FOUNDERS PL #109 ASPEN, CO 81611 BALLINGER ELIZABETH F PO BOX 10205 ASPEN, CO 81612 KLEIN JAMES J & SALLIE R PO BOX 12022 ASPEN, CO 81612 DONAHUE ELIZABETH 102 FOUNDERS PLACE #2302 ASPEN, CO 81611 311 ASPEN LLC 2317 PENNSYLVANIA AVE WILMINGTON, DE 19806 BOMBA LAURIE A REV TRUST 5601 HIGH DR MISSION HILLS, KS 66208 CRUMMER KLEIN TITLE TRUST 2008 1305 N BEVERLY DR BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 SEYFFERT STEVEN J 102 FOUNDERS PL #201 ASPEN, CO 81611 SMITH H W III PO BOX 10914 ASPEN, CO 81612 GLATHAR KIMBERLY J PO BOX 12197 ASPEN, CO 81612 • LUCKYSTAR LLC PO BOX 7755 ASPEN, CO 81612 MURPHY GEORGE W PO BOX 4146 ASPEN. CO 81612 OBERMEYER PLACE HOLDING CO LLC 10% 115 AABC ASPEN, CO 81611 G & G CORPORATE OFFICES LLC 2520 S GRAND AV # 114 GLENWOOD SPGS, CO 81601 SINTA SCOTT PO BOX 2872 ASPEN, CO 81612 BERG KRISTOFOR 102 FOUNDERS PL #202 ASPEN, CO 81611 HUNTER ALEXANDER PO BOX 1638 ASPEN, CO 81612 GWM PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 4146 ASPEN, CO 81612 GOLDFEIN MICHAEL GOLDFEIN PAMELA J 1724 BRAESIDE LN 1724 BRAESIDE LN NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 WELSCH SUSAN FLEET REVOCABLE TRUST RAMOS WALTHER JR & MARJORIE R 101 N SPRING ST #201 133 TALL TREES DR ASPEN, CO 81611 BALA CYNWYD, PA 19004 GALANTER YALE & ELYSE FESUS GEORGE J & SUSAN C ATWOOD STANFORD H JR & PAMELA S 525 S ANDREWS AVE PO BOX 9197 LIVING TRUST FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 333012831 ASPEN, CO 81612-9197 16125 GREENWOOD LN MONTE SERENO, CA 95030 MARTINEZ RITA PEARSON DOUG DOCKEN ANDREW 101 N SPRING ST #3104 101 N SPRING ST #3105 101 N SPRING ST #106 ASPEN, CO 816111518 ASPEN, CO 816111518 ASPEN, CO 81611 ARENELLA BETH & FRANK III SHAPIRO FREDERIC M & SUSAN NIBLACK SCOTT 101 N SPRING ST #107 101 N SPRING ST #3108 101 N SPRING ST #3109 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 816111560 GRAHAM NARELDA SATTLER SANDRA A TREDER CAROLE A 101 N SPRING ST #203 101 NORTH SPRING ST #3204 101 N SPRING ST BOX 3205 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 LAZAR FAMILY TRUST BASSI PETER A AND BARBARA J 1996 FAMII COHEN NANCY C REV TRUST 5342 ALDEA AVE 18 CHANNEL VISTA 2026 N MOHAWK ENCINO, CA 91316 NEWPORT COAST, CA 92657 CHICAGO, IL 60614 LEONARD FAMILY TRUST MOSCOE THOMAS D SMITH GAILEN B FAMILY TRUST PO BOX 710 14700 ROCKSBOROUGH RD 520 S MAIN ST #178 RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067 MINNETONKA, MN 553453718 GROVE, OK 743443439 OBERMEYER 204 LLC PARDEE JAMES LEE III REV LIV TRST BIG BOY LLC 2727 ALLEN PKWY STE1400 PO BOX 4153 205 S MILL ST #301A HOUSTON, TX 77019 ASPEN, CO 816124153 ASPEN, CO 81611 LINDENAU SCOTT A REV TRUST TUSCANA LLC VECTOR ENTERPRISES LLC 501 RIO GRANDE PL #104 501 RIO GRANDE PL STE 105 0490 ASPEN OAK DR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 UNIT 109 OP LLC 90% ANDERTON JAMES L FELDMAN JONATHAN 501 RIO GRANDE PL #107 100 OBERMEYER PL #4101 100 OBERMEYER PLACE DR #102 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MILNE SHEILA NGUYEN MICHAEL TAM UNIT 106 OP LLC PO BOX 8286 DAO OANH KIM 205 S MILL ST #301A ASPEN, CO 81612 430 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 816112497 ASPEN, CO 81611 GRW RIO GRANDE PROPERTY LLC FORTIER TIMOTHY MAROLT ENTERPRISES LLC PO BOX 4491 601 RIO GRANDE PL #102 PO BOX 8705 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 TSE HOLDINGS LLC PAM LLC JOSA LLC 601 RIO GRANDE PL #120 PO BOX 4446 PO BOX 10147 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 LCC ASPEN HOLDINGS LLC SCHENKELBERG LLC K & J ENTERPRISES LLC PO BOX 1550 140 VISTA GRANDE 601 RIO GRANDE PL #119A ASPEN, CO 81612 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81507 ASPEN, CO 81611 OBERMEYER PLACE RENTAL GRP LLC DIXIE DOG VENTURES LLC FURTHUR CANCUN LLC OBERMEYER PLACE SALES GRP LLC 1690 HOMESTAKE DR PO BOX 2199 115 AABC ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 LANE TAMMIE ARTIM LLC KIMPLE 2004 TRUST BRUNSWOLD KIRK PO BOX 30106 3505 TURTLE CREEK BLVD #PH2OA 601 RIO GRANDE PL #118 NEW YORK, NY 10011 DALLAS, TX 75219 ASPEN, CO 81611 OLITSKY TAMAR & STEPHEN ASPEN BLEEKER STREET LP CARVER RUTH A PO BOX 514 520 S MAIN ST #178 116 S ASPEN ST GWYNEDD VALLEY, PA 19437 GROVE, OK 74344 ASPEN, CO 81611 OBERMEYER PLACE CONDO 620 EAST HOPKINS CONDO ASSOC SPRING STREET CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA COMMON AREA 210 N MILL ST #201 620 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 CONCEPT 600 CONDO ASSOC DML REALTY LLC UNIT 5E OP LLC DBA BIG BOY LLC COMMON AREA PO BOX 305 205 S MILL ST #301A BASALT, CO 81621 CHAVIES, KY 41727 ASPEN, CO 81611 RIO GRANDE PARTNERS 88 LLC PR ASPEN HOLDINGS LLC 214 WEST COOPER LLC 1008 E HOPKINS AVE PO BOX 1006 6 NE 63RD ST #220 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73105 HUTCHESON LAURA TRUST CALHOON THOMAS C HAUSER MARY JANE 54 RAINEY ST PH02 315 LAVACA ST 1540 BOHNS POINT RD AUSTIN, TX 78701 AUSTIN, TX 787013036 WAYZATA, MN 55391 WAGAR RICHARD H HUNTER & HOPKINS PROF BUILDING COND( CONNER CABINS & LOFTS CONDO ASSOC PO BOX 9063 COMMON AREA COMMON AREA ASPEN, CO 81612 600 E HOPKINS AVE 530 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 TASTERS RESTAURANT INC 625 MAIN INVESTMENTS LLC CWAREI LLC PO BOX 6211 1482 E VALLEY RD #463 3030 HARTLEY RD #350 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108 JACKSONVILLE, FL 32257 TRACY KATHLEEN ROY ADAM C & SARAH G STUDIO SIX LLC 625 E MAIN ST #202 625 E MAIN ST #203 PO BOX DID ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 EMCAR LLC CAREM LLC 625 MAIN ASPEN LLC 655 MADISON AVE 11TH FL 655 MADISON AVE 11TH FL 465 N MILL ST STE 12-113 NEW YORK, NY 10065 NEW YORK, NY 10065 ASPEN, CO 81611 QTIP MARITAL TRUST 112 ROTHBLUM PHILIP 1/2 HUNTER SQUARE LLC 90% 40 E 80TH ST #PH 26A 40 E 80TH ST #PH 26A PO BOX 2 NEW YORK, NY 10075 NEW YORK, NY 10075 SONOMA, CA 95476 DORAN RALPH FICKE FAMILY REV TRUST LARSON MARIA M 2600 WOODWARD WAY 15 W ARRELLAGA ST #3 PO BOX 8207 ATLANTA, GA 30305 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101 ASPEN, CO 81612 MARCHETTI FAMILY LLC GRIMES DAVID L RKJR PROPERTIES LTD 1526 FOREST DR 3510 BROMLEY WOODS LN 5934 ROYAL LN #250 GLENVIEW, IL 60025 GREENSBORO, NC 27410 DALLAS, TX 75230 JURINE LLC 10% ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER ALPINE BANK ASPEN PO BOX 2 PO BOX 10000 SONOMA, CA 95476 1300 S STEELE ST GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 DENVER,CO 80210 CITY OF ASPEN LAMB DON REV TRUST GILKERSON LINDA REV TRUST 130 S GALENA ST 1449 E 56TH ST 1449 E 56TH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 CHICAGO, IL 60637 CHICAGO, IL 60637 HICKS GILBERT W & PATSY K ASPEN LEGACY LLC MARASCO FAMILY TRUST 33.4331% 3674 WOODLAWN TERRACE PL 17740 E HINSDALE AVE 653 26 1/2 RD HONOLULU, HI 96822 FOXFIELD, CO 80016 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 • MARASCO RAE O TRUST 33.4331% 653 26 1/2 RD GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 MARASCO BERNARD R 11.0446% 320 DAKOTA DR GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 STEWART TITLE CO PO BOX 669 HOUSTON, TX 77001 MARASCO EMILY A AK MEYER EMILYA 11.04 21701 FLAMENCO MISSION VIEJO, CA 92692 GENE MCCUTCHIN LTD II PO BOX 802043 DALLAS, TX 753802043 STARMER MARY JOSEPHINE 11.0446% 12738 W 84TH DR ARVADA, CO 80001 WASKOW SUSAN A TRUST 5710 CRESCENT PARK E APT 241 PLAYA VISTA, CA 900942074 -T City of Aspen Wommun4 Development Department 130 S. Galena Street 12 3UN 201S. Ppj Aspen, Colorado 81611 0 000 1377893 JUN 05 2015 GRW RIO GRANDE PROPERTY LLC PO BOX 4491 ASPEN, CO 81612 HT XrE 892 SE 1069 9696/22115 RETURN TO SENDER ATTEA?TELw NOT KNjj,Lwfw e J M., 4'm i Ml lei W,4'5 i 0 • PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 540 EAST MAIN STREET, AKA ZUPANCIS PROPERTY: REZONING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing for Rezoning will be held on Tuesday, June 3&, 2015 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Conference Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Alan Richman Planning Services, Inc., on behalf of The City of Aspen, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen CO, 81611, owner of the subject property. The applicant is proposing to rezone the property to Public (PUB). The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Commercial Core (CC), Commercial (C-1) and Service Commercial Industrial (SCI) to Public (PUB). The property currently houses the City's Parking Department. A small cabin and two small outbuildings are located on the northern portion of the lot and the property is a designated historic landmark. The land is legally described as Beginning at a point on the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street being the Southwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 191 at Page 186 and whence the Southwest corner of Block 20 East Aspen Additional Townsite bears S 75'09'11" E 5.19 feet; thence N 75'09'11" W 69.81 feet along the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street to the Southeast corner of Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 22.59 feet along the Southerly line of Lot 1 0, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 197 at Page 166; thence N 14°50'49" E 100.00 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 197 at Page 166 to the Northerly line of Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75009111" W 7.5 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 10.09 feet along the South line of said Lot 9 to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 119 at Page 126; thence N 14050'49" E 186.03 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 119 at Page 126 to a No. 5 rebar in place; thence S 61°50'02" E 24.43 feet to the Northwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 19°49' E 138.63 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 04°08' W 67.55 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 20, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence S 170911" W 120.50 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the point of beginning; Commonly known as 540 East Main Street and the Zupancis property. For further information contact Hillary Seminick at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept., 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado. (970) 429-2741. s/ Ryan Walterscheid Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission City of Aspen Published in the Aspen Times on June 4 h, 2015 Gity Ot ASpen *ommun4 Development Department 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 e V 111:)c: 0 JUNICILI! 11�4 4— --';i 8 12 JUN 2015 Pr-T N 5 5 620 EAST HOPKINS CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA 620 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 PIXIE 8 Et 2; SE 16e9 -6996 'I't c&/-1 K RETURN TO SENDER VACA14T jhikSLE TO' FOR *AR PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 540 EAST MAIN STREET, AKA ZUPANCIS PROPERTY: REZONING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing for Rezoning will be held on Tuesday, June 30t`, 2015 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Conference Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Alan Richman Planning Services, Inc., on behalf of The City of Aspen, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen CO, 81611, owner of the subject property. The applicant is proposing to rezone the property to Public (PUB). The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Commercial Core (CC), Commercial (C-1) and Service Commercial Industrial (SCI) to Public (PUB). The property currently houses the City's Parking Department. A small cabin and two small outbuildings are located on the northern portion of the lot and the property is a designated historic landmark. The land is legally described as Beginning at a point on the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street being the Southwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 191 at Page 186 and whence the Southwest corner of Block 20 East Aspen Additional Townsite bears S 75'09'11" E 5.19 feet; thence N 75'09'11" W 69.81 feet along the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street to the Southeast corner of Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 22.59 feet along the Southerly line of Lot 1 0, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite to the Southeast corner of that pardt of land conveyed by Book 197 at Page 166; thence N 14°50'49" E 100.00 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 197 at Page 166 to the Northerly line of Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09' 11 " W 7 .5 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 10.09 feet along the South line of said Lot 9 to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 119 at Page 126; thence N 14°50'49" E 186.03 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 119 at Page 126 to a No. 5 rebar in place; thence S 61 °50'02" E 24.43 feet to the Northwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 19°49' E 138.63 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 04°08' W 67.55 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 20, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence S 170911" W 120.50 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the point of beginning; Commonly known as 540 East Main Street and the Zupancis property. For further information contact Hillary Seminick at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept., 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado. (970) 429-2741. s/ Ryan Walterscheid Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission City of Aspen Published in the Aspen Times on June 0, 2015 U7 GRAND JUINIC-f 7: W7-aaZZ=�' CitY of Aspen ZIP 8 1 Cmvnun4Develom*ntDePartmnt 12 JUN 1 130 S. Galena Street m2_1010N Aspen, Colorsdr P I r, 1, HUNTER & HOPKINS PROF BUILDING COND( COMMON AREA 600 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 992 5 E 7L.e 9 S- 0 9 S - I RB,rjRn To 5B'"DB1R VACANT 'j-WA'.Ph-E TO FOR'WARD PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 540 EAST MAIN STREET, AKA ZUPANCIS PROPERTY: REZONING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing for Rezoning will be held on Tuesday, June 30t', 2015 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Conference Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Alan Richman Planning Services, Inc., on behalf of The City of Aspen, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen CO, 81611, owner of the subject property. The applicant is proposing to rezone the property to Public (PUB). The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Commercial Core (CC), Commercial (C-1) and Service Commercial Industrial (SCI) to Public (PUB). The property currently houses the City's Parking Department. A small cabin and two small outbuildings are located on the northern portion of the lot and the property is a designated historic landmark. The land is legally described as Beginning at a point on the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street being the Southwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 191 at Page 186 and whence the Southwest corner of Block 20 East Aspen Additional Townsite bears S 75'09' 11 " E 5.19 feet; thence N 75'09' 11 " W 69.81 feet along the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street to the Southeast corner of Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 22.59 feet along the Southerly line of Lot 1 0, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 197 at Page 166; thence N 14°50'49" E 100.00 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 197 at Page 166 to the Northerly line of Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 7 .5 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 10.09 feet along the South line of said Lot 9 to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 119 at Page 126; thence N 14°50'49" E 186.03 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 119 at Page 126 to a No. 5 rebar in place; thence S 61 °50'02" E 24.43 feet to the Northwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 19°49' E 138.63 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 04°08' W 67.55 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 20, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence S 17'09'11" W 120.50 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the point of beginning; Commonly known as 540 East Main Street and the Zupancis property. For further information contact Hillary Seminick at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept., 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado. (970) 429-2741. s/ Ryan Walterscheid Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission City of Aspen Published in the Aspen Times on June 4t', 2015 �. {{ yy : ; iiir.azcwwEs CID, City. 01 ASpen •Community Development Department +� �� f� �� � � � l�1 �. 130 S. Galena Street ...� Aspen, Colorado 81611 a `' =} $ , ... :� a; •: 02 1VV 0001377893JUN 05 2015 MILNE SF EILA PO BOX 286 ASPEN, O 81612 ffvAvCv� z/ RETURN TU 5ENDER • NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED I UNARI F Tn F,]RWARD BC: 81611199230 *2079-14781-12-42 5 44 i 'i $� �2{I�1'�lui���ilt�ll'II���{�1�11�11'1Jill PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 540 EAST MAIN STREET, AKA ZUPANCIS PROPERTY: REZONING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing for Rezoning will be held on Tuesday, June 30'', 2015 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Conference Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Alan Richman Planning Services, Inc., on behalf of The City of Aspen, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen CO, 81611, owner of the subject property. The applicant is proposing to rezone the property to Public (PUB). The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Commercial Core (CC), Commercial (C-1) and Service Commercial Industrial (SCI) to Public (PUB). The property currently houses the City's Parking Department. A small cabin and two small outbuildings are located on the northern portion of the lot and the property is a designated historic landmark. The land is legally described as Beginning at a point on the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street being the Southwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 191 at Page 186 and whence the Southwest corner of Block 20 East Aspen Additional Townsite bears S 75'09'11" E 5.19 feet; thence N 75'09'11" W 69.81 feet along the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street to the Southeast corner of Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 22.59 feet along the Southerly line of Lot 1 0, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 197 at Page 166; thence N 14°50'49" E 100.00 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 197 at Page 166 to the Northerly line of Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 7 .5 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 10.09 feet along the South line of said Lot 9 to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 119 at Page 126; thence N 14°50'49" E 186.03 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 119 at Page 126 to a No. 5 rebar in place; thence S 61 °50'02" E 24.43 feet to the Northwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 19°49' E 138.63 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 04°08' W 67.55 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 20, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence S 1700911" W 120.50 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the point of beginning; Commonly known as 540 East Main Street and the Zupancis property. For further information contact Hillary Seminick at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept., 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado. (970) 429-2741. s/ Ryan Walterscheid Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission City of Aspen Published in the Aspen Times on June 4 h, 2015 City or Aspen GRAND JUNCTION CO • Community Development Department ' 130 S. Galena Street 12 JU N 2015 P Aspen, Colorado 81611 ' 000I Oz'J JUN 05. 2015m STARMER MARY JOSEPHINE 11.0446% 12738 W 84TH DR ARVADA, CO 80001 1 RETURN TO SENDER -y NOT DELIVERASLE 45 ADDRESSEDI UNABLE TO FORWARD j BC: 81611190230 *2079-15166-12-42 $r8��a�z,1���41��,��i{�{„1�11�1►►1�1�1�{I��t���1��{��I�,I�����1{j��{��,� PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 540 EAST MAIN STREET, AKA ZUPANCIS PROPERTY: REZONING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing for Rezoning will be held on Tuesday, June 30'', 2015 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Conference Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Alan Richman Planning Services, Inc., on behalf of The City of Aspen, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen CO, 81611, owner of the subject property. The applicant is proposing to rezone the property to Public (PUB). The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Commercial Core (CC), Commercial (C-1) and Service Commercial Industrial (SCI) to Public (PUB). The property currently houses the City's Parking Department. A small cabin and two small outbuildings are located on the northern portion of the lot and the property is a designated historic landmark. The land is legally described as Beginning at a point on the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street being the Southwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 191 at Page 186 and whence the Southwest corner of Block 20 East Aspen Additional Townsite bears S 75'09'11" E 5.19 feet; thence N 75'09'11" W 69.81 feet along the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street to the Southeast corner of Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 22.59 feet along the Southerly line of Lot 1 0, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 197 at Page 166; thence N 14°50'49" E 100.00 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 197 at Page 166 to the Northerly line of Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 7 .5 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 10.09 feet along the South line of said Lot 9 to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 119 at Page 126; thence N 14°50'49" E 186.03 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 119 at Page 126 to a No. 5 rebar in place; thence S 61 °50'02" E 24.43 feet to the Northwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 19°49' E 138.63 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 04°08' W 67.55 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 20, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence S 170911" W 120.50 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the point of beginning; Commonly known as 540 East Main Street and the Zupancis property. For further information contact Hillary Seminick at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept., 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado. (970) 429-2741. s/ Ryan Walterscheid Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission City of Aspen Published in the Aspen Times on June 4 h, 2015 City of Aspen Cmnunity NW*wt Department •130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 GRAND JUNCTION CO 12 _JUN 2015 PM s - }# 000 1377893 JUN 05 2015 GALANTER YALE & ELYSE 525 S ANDREWS AVE FORT LAUDERDALE, FI. 333012831 NIXIE 333 7E 1009 0007/94/15 RETURN TO SENDER ATTEMPTED — NOT KNOWN UNABLE TO FORWARD 40 SC: 81611190230 *2079-17405-12-42 „r,.'6, 1.-$.,q,,Q111111Ilia lIIIIaI„I"III,I"IIIIII IMIdd Ili I'II1,111111,i PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 540 EAST MAIN STREET, AKA ZUPANCIS PROPERTY: REZONING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing for Rezoning will be held on Tuesday, June 30', 2015 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Conference Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Alan Richman Planning Services, Inc., on behalf of The City of Aspen, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen CO, 81611, owner of the subject property. The applicant is proposing to rezone the property to Public (PUB). The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Commercial Core (CC), Commercial (C-1) and Service Commercial Industrial (SCI) to Public (PUB). The property currently houses the City's Parking Department. A small cabin and two small outbuildings are located on the northern portion of the lot and the property is a designated historic landmark. The land is legally described as Beginning at a point on the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street being the Southwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 191 at Page 186 and whence the Southwest corner of Block 20 East Aspen Additional Townsite bears S 75'09' 11 " E 5.19 feet; thence N 75'09' 11 " W 69.81 feet along the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street to the Southeast corner of Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite. thence N 75'09'11" W 22.59 feet along the Southerly line of Lot 1 0, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 197 at Page 166; thence N 14°50'49" E 100.00 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 197 at Page 166 to the Northerly line of Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75009111" W 7.5 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 10.09 feet along the South line of said Lot 9 to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 119 at Page 126; thence N 14050'49" E 186.03 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 119 at Page 126 to a No. 5 rebar in place; thence S 61 °50'02" E 24.43 feet to the Northwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 19°49' E 138.63 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 04°08' W 67.55 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 20, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence S 170911" W 120.50 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the point of beginning; Commonly known as 540 East Main Street and the Zupancis property. For further information contact Hillary Seminick at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept., 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado. (970) 429-2741. s/ Ryan Walterscheid Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission City of Aspen Published in the Aspen Times on June 4 h, 2015 City a1 Aspen Community Development Department 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 SLS LLC j 101 FOUNDERS PL #104 ASPEN, CO 81611 GRAND JUNCTION CO 12 JUN 2015 SUM! " 4 81 1 w, 0001377893JUN 05 2015 NT XT E 5 9i 5 F 9 p04 R007 I "Ali 1 G I RETURN TO SENDER ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN UNABLE TO FORWARD . BC: 81611190231D *2079-15220-12-42 � rl�,���I,Illll�lli�r�lrli(1111�11`I�Irr`�`rl�l�rll�lilll'�'�I111� PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 540 EAST MAIN STREET, AKA ZUPANCIS PROPERTY: REZONING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing for Rezoning will be held on Tuesday, June 30`", 2015 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Conference Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Alan Richman Planning Services, Inc., on behalf of The City of Aspen, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen CO, 81611, owner of the subject property. The applicant is proposing to rezone the property to Public (PUB). The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Commercial Core (CC), Commercial (C-1) and Service Commercial Industrial (SCI) to Public (PUB). The property currently houses the City's Parking Department. A small cabin and two small outbuildings are located on the northern portion of the lot and the property is a designated historic landmark. The land is legally described as Beginning at a point on the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street being the Southwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 191 at Page 186 and whence the Southwest corner of Block 20 East Aspen Additional Townsite bears S 75'09' 11 " E 5.19 feet; thence N 75'09' 11 " W 69.81 feet along the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street to the Southeast corner of Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 22.59 feet along the Southerly line of Lot 1 0, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 197 at Page 166; thence N 14°50'49" E 100.00 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 197 at Page 166 to the Northerly line of Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 7 .5 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 10.09 feet along the South line of said Lot 9 to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 119 at Page 126; thence N 14°50'49" E 186.03 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 119 at Page 126 to a No. 5 rebar in place; thence S 61 °50'02" E 24.43 feet to the Northwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 19°49' E 138.63 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 04°08' W 67.55 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 20, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence S 17'09'11" W 120.50 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the point of beginning; Commonly known as 540 East Main Street and the Zupancis property. For further information contact Hillary Seminick at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept., 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado. (970) 429-2741. s/ Ryan Walterscheid Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission City of Aspen Published in the Aspen Times on June 4�', 2015 City of Aspen 4ro"M unity Development Department 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado Al r 11 OBP LLC 101 FOUNDERS PL #104 ASPEN, CO 81611 • GRAND JUNCTION CO 12 7UN 2015 PM 1 �.00,,N 0001377893JUN 05 2015 NT'XT P S 91 S 1 AR4 6►pi)7 J aiR i G i RETURN TO SENDER ATTEMPTED — NOT KNOWN UNABLE TO FORWARD BC: 81611190230 *2079-17157-12-42 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 540 EAST MAIN STREET, AKA ZUPANCIS PROPERTY: REZONING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing for Rezoning will be held on Tuesday, June 30"', 2015 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Conference Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Alan Richman Planning Services, Inc., on behalf of The City of Aspen, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen CO, 81611, owner of the subject property. The applicant is proposing to rezone the property to Public (PUB). The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Commercial Core (CC), Commercial (C-1) and Service Commercial Industrial (SCI) to Public (PUB). The property currently houses the City's Parking Department. A small cabin and two small outbuildings are located on the northern portion of the lot and the property is a designated historic landmark. The land is legally described as Beginning at a point on the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street being the Southwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 191 at Page 186 and whence the Southwest corner of Block 20 East Aspen Additional Townsite bears S 75'09'11" E 5.19 feet; thence N 75'09'11" W 69.81 feet along the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street to the Southeast corner of Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 22.59 feet along the Southerly line of Lot 1 0, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 197 at Page 166; thence N 14°50'49" E 100.00 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 197 at Page 166 to the Northerly line of Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75009111 " W 7.5 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75'09'11" W 10.09 feet along the South line of said Lot 9 to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 119 at Page 126; thence N 14°50'49" E 186.03 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 119 at Page 126 to a No. 5 rebar in place; thence S 61 °50'02" E 24.43 feet to the Northwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 19°49' E 138.63 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 04008' W 67.55 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 20, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence S 17'09'11" W 120.50 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the point of beginning; Commonly known as 540 East Main Street and the Zupancis property. For further information contact Hillary Seminick at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept., 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado. (970) 429-2741. s/ Ryan Walterscheid Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission City of Aspen Published in the Aspen Times on June 4 h, 2015 r City of Aspen Wnmunity Development Department 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 • r GRA,NQ JUNCTION CO GLATHAR KIMBERLY J PO BOX 12197 ASPEN, CO 81612 0iftl 2 12 3l1N 2015 PM! NIXIE 802 7E 1009 0001377893JUN 05 2015 0006/22/15 RETURN TO SENDER ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN UNABLE TO FORWARD oC: Sioii13s.23w ' �t �Illi���}��I��IIIII'IIIIII{Il��t<<.Ii..}�IIIIIIIlIIII�{I�IIIII�1! City Ot Aspen • Community ae"eloA 130 5, ►nent 0epa�t Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 „ ' ' F 02 ,D 0001377893 AUG 21 2015 STARMER MARY JOSEPHINE 11.0446% 12738 W 84TH DR ARVADA, CO 80001 N I X1 E 8 6Z 7 E 1009 RETURN TO SENDER NOT Mt T VF R ARl F AG ADDRESSED ; UNABLE TO FORWARD RC: 8161.116923E *?Q7 O_1dAC7-7 ��dy I 7LJ THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970) 920.5197 w: www.aspenpitkin.com Public Hearing: Meeting Location: Project Name: Project Location: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 540 E. Main St. Rezoning 5:00 PM Tuesday September 15, 2015 Council Chambers, City Hall 540 E. Main St. Rezoning 540 E. Main St. Legal Description: Parcel ID #2737-073-24-003, Beginning at a point on the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street being the Southwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 191 at Page 186 and whence the Southwest corner of Block 20 East Aspen Additional Townsite bears S 75°09'11" E 5.19 feet; thence N 75°09'11" W 69.81 feet along the Northerly right of way line for East Main Street to the Southeast corner of Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75°09'11" W 22.59 feet along the Southerly line of Lot 1 0, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 197 at Page 166; thence N 14°50'49" E 100.00 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 197 at Page 166 to the Northerly line of Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75°09'11" W 7 .5 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 10, Block 19, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence N 75*09'11" W 10.09 feet along the South line of said Lot 9 to the Southeast corner of that parcel of land conveyed in Book 119 at Page 126; thence N 14°50'49" E 186.03 feet along the Easterly line of said Book 119 at Page 126 to a No. 5 rebar in place; thence S 61°50'02" E 24.43 feet to the Northwest corner of that parcel of land conveyed by Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 19*49' E 138.63 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 191 at Page 186; thence S 04*08' W 67.55 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the 7L.7j THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970) 920.5197 w: www.aspenpitkin.com Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 20, East Aspen Additional Townsite; thence S 17'09'11" W 120.50 feet along the Westerly line of said Book 119 at Page 186 to the point of beginning Land Use Reviews Requested: The applicant seeks to rezone the property from Commercial Core (CC), Commercial (C-1) and Service Commercial Industrial (SCI) to Public (PUB). The property currently houses the City's Parking Department. A small cabin and two small outbuildings are located on the northern portion of the lot and the property is a designated historic landmark. Decision Making Body: City Council Applicant: City of Aspen More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Hillary Seminick at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2741, hillary.seminick@cityofaspen.com. 0 V. PUBLIC NOTICE' Date: June 30th, 2015 Time: 4:30 pm Place:. City Hall - 30 1S. Galena - - ------ - - St.- Sister Cities Purpose: The City of Aspen, represented b Alan Richman Planning S Inc. will take part in a IDU — ------ blic hearing at the above date and time with the Planning Zoning Commission to consider an 9P -P�-qgiont - q - rezone the property to the Public Zone District. For more information contact the ASP-qn.-P.,lanning Dept. at 429-2741. -- - ------- i ALAN RICHMAN PLANNING SERVICES, INC. P.O. BOX 3613 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 970-920-1125 May 1, 2015 Ms. Hillary Seminick, Planner Technician City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RECEIVED MAY 01 2015 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN1 RE: REZONING APPLICATION FOR 540 EAST MAIN STREET (A/K/A "THE ZUPANCIS PROPERTY") Dear Hillary, This is an application requesting rezoning of the Zupancis property, located at 540 East Main Street. The property's Parcel ID# is 273707324003. The subject property is owned by the City of Aspen. Proof of the ownership of the property is provided in the form of a letter from the City Attorney (see Exhibit #1). The City (hereinafter, "the applicant") has designated Alan Richman Planning Services and Charles Cunniffe Architects as its representatives for this application. The letter authorizing submission of this application is attached hereto as Exhibit #2. An improvement survey of the property has recently been completed and accompanies this application. It demonstrates that the subject property is an irregularly shaped parcel of land that is approximately 27,000 square feet in size. The property is surrounded by prominent buildings on its east and west sides. The Courthouse Plaza Building and the Pitkin County Jail are located to the west/northwest of the property. The Concept 600 Building and the Obermeyer Complex are located to the east/northeast of the property, The property is improved with five (5) small structures. The southern portion of the property contains an older residential structure that is currently being occupied by the City's Parking Department. There is also a small garage located behind this structure. The northern portion of the property contains a small cabin and two small outbuildings, all of which are designated as historic resources. • Ms. Hillary Seminick May 1, 2015 Page Two As shown on the attached current zoning exhibit, today the property is subject to three distinct zone district designations. The southern portion of the property is zoned Commercial Core (CC) and Commercial (C-1) while the northern portion of the property is designated as Service Commercial Industrial (SCI). The boundary between the northerly and southerly portions of the property generally follows the centerline of the alley that has been vacated through this property. For the past several years the property has provided a temporary home for the City's Parking Department. The back of the property has been used to park some of the City's police car fleet. These uses are considered to be public uses. A public use is allowed on the ground floor in the CC and C-1 zones, but is not an allowed use in the SCI zone district. Therefore, the applicant proposes to rezone the subject property to the Public (PUB) zone district to ensure that the current public use of the property is conforming. Furthermore, as you know, the City has been engaged for some time in a planning effort to evaluate space needs for its municipal administrative functions. The subject property was purchased by the City for the purpose of accommodating necessary public functions. As part of the space needs analysis this site has been determined to be the appropriate location for a new building for the City's Police Department. Therefore, this rezoning application can be considered to be a first step towards re -development of the property with a new Police Department Building. Of course, a full PUD development application will need to be prepared and reviewed in a public hearing process before any determination can be made as to the appropriateness of this site for that type of project. I discussed this rezoning proposal with you and you issued a pre -application summary, attached as Exhibit #3. This document lists the following land use approvals that must be obtained by the applicant: Sec. 26.310 Amendments to the Official Zone District Map (Rezoning). Following below are the applicant's responses to the standards of this section of the Aspen Land Use Code. Responses to Standards for Rezoning Section 26.310.090 of the Code provides the standards of review for an amendment to the City's Official Zone District Map. These standards and the applicant's responses to the standards follow below. A. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with surrounding zone districts and land uses, considering existing land use and neighborhood characteristics. 0 Ms. Hillary Seminick May 1, 2015 Page Three Response: The proposed rezoning is compatible with the surrounding zone districts. As shown on the Existing Zoning Map, the adjacent County property to the west of the subject property is zoned Public (PUB). As part of a recent application submitted for the Pitkin County Center property, the boundaries of the Public zoning were adjusted to coincide with the parcel boundaries for the Courthouse and Jail properties. Zoning the subject property as Public would complement the zoning of the adjacent County property. Zoning the property as Public would also be consistent with the current use of the property. The subject property currently houses the City's Parking Department in the former Zupancis residence. The area behind this structure is used as parking by the City Police Department. Both of these public uses should be located in the Public zone. As the Map also shows, surrounding uses to the west of the property represent a dense urban scale of development, including the Obermeyer PUD and Concept 600 Building. Public zoning of this property will allow necessary civic functions to be located there, in an appropriate location right near the center of the urban fabric. Rezoning of the property to Public (PUB) will also require all development of the property to proceed through the City's PUD process. This means that the development will be subject to Project Review by the P&Z and City Council and then Detailed Review by the P&Z. This extensive type of public review process will provide another means to ensure that the development will be compatible and consistent with surrounding land uses. B. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities and whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities including, but not limited to, transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools and emergency medical facilities. Response: The property's current commercial zoning would support a relatively intense, commercial form of development such as is present on the adjacent Obermeyer property or the newly developed 625 East Main Street commercial building across from this site. Rezoning the property to Public will instead allow for a community -serving public use of this property. While any public use will most likely place demands on some of the above -listed public facilities (such as transportation, water supply and sewage disposal), such use will also provide an essential public service. The PUD application will provide the community with the opportunity to evaluate the nature of those impacts and the ability to ensure that all such impacts are appropriately mitigated by the applicant. Ms. Hillary Seminick May 1, 2015 Page Four C. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significantly adverse impacts on the natural environment. Response: The proposed rezoning will not result in any adverse impacts on the natural environment. The subject property is a developed site located in the middle of the City's urban fabric. It is an appropriate place for re -development to occur, in that it is not limited by any mapped environmental constraints such as floodplains, steep slopes or geologic hazards and does not impact open space or other natural features. The natural environment would be well served by the kind of infill development that would be allowed by the requested rezoning. D. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent and compatible with the community character in the City and in harmony with the public interest and the intent of this Title. Response: The proposed amendment would be consistent and compatible with Aspen's community character and would serve the public interest. This location, which is adjacent to the City core, is an appropriate location in which to extend the community's Civic campus. It is adjacent to the Jail and the Courthouse complex, including the site where the County intends to relocate the Sheriff. It is also proximate to City Hall as well as to other sites identified in the space needs study as being where the City's administrative functions could be housed in the future. It would provide a central, visible, accessible home for the City's Police Department and is entirely appropriate for rezoning to Public, if for no other reason than to make its current use by the Parking Department conforming to underlying zoning. Conclusion The above responses and the attached documents provide all of the information requested by staff to process this application. We look forward to the public review of this application. If there is any other material I can provide to you or any other questions I can answer please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ALAN RICHMAN PLANNING SERVICES, INC. Ator "- Alan Richman, AICP 0 0 EXHIBITS EXHIBIT #1 The City of Aspen City AnorneY's Office March 20, 2015 VIA EMAIL Chris Bendon Community Development Department 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Mr. Bendon: I have been asked by Jeff Pendarvis of the City of Aspen Asset Management Department to provide an opinion regarding the ownership of property known as the Zupancis parcel at 540 E. Main St., upon which the City seeks development approval and/or a building permit for proposed construction. I have reviewed the documents associated with the acquisition and ownership of the subject property. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Colorado. The Zupancis parcel was acquired by the City in 2002 from general funds pursuant to a deed from Louis J. Zupancis and Robert L. Zupancis, recorded on October 1, 2002 at Reception No. 472856. Thus, it is my opinion that this property is owned by the City of Aspen, and that there are no mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel or other encumbrances that would prevent the work proposed. Thank you. Sincerely, Electronic copy: Original Signed by James R. True James R. True City Attorney • EXHIBIT #2 Ms. Hillary Seminick, Planning Technician City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION FOR LAND USE APPLICATION FOR 640 EAST MAIN STREET (ZUPANCIS PROPERTY) Dear Hillary, The City of Aspen is the owner of the property located at 540 East Main Street in Aspen, commonly known as the Zupancis property. We hereby authorize Alan Richman Planning Services, Inc. and Charles Cunniffe Architects, Inc. to submit a land use application to rezone the property to Public (PUB). Mr. Richman and Mr. Cunniffe are authorized to submit said application on our behalf and to represent us in meetings with City of Aspen staff, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and City Council concerning said application. Should you have any need to contact us during the course of your review of this application please do so through Alan or Charles, or you may contact me directly. Sin r y, '�z Steve Barwick, City Manager City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 EXHIBIT #3 CIT* ASPEN • PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Hillary Seminick, 970.429.2741 DATE: April 16, 2015 PROJECT: 540 East Main Street, AKA Zupancis REPRESENTATIVE: Alan Richmond REQUEST: Rezoning DESCRIPTION: Proposal: 540 E. Main St., which is also known as the Zupancis Property, currently lies within three zone districts, Commercial Core (CC), Commercial (C-1) and Service/Commercial/Industrial (SCI). Three 19th century cabins, known as the Zupancis-McMurtchy cabins, are located on the southern portion of the property. The property is designated historic. The City Parking Department, a parking garage and surface parking is located on the property. The City Parking Department is considered a public use. Public use is not an allowed use within the Service/Industrial/Commercial (SCI) Zone District. Commercial Core (CC) and Commercial (C-1) allows public use on the ground floor. In accordance with Section 26.710.022.A; which pertains to lands within more than one zone district, where a proposed use is not allowed in all Zone Districts, the use can only be developed on land in which it is a permitted use. The Parking Department falls within both the CC and SCI Zone Districts; therefore, the existing use of the property is a non -conformity. To bring the existing use into conformance, the City of Aspen Capital Asset Department is initiating an amendment to zone districts of the Zupancis property from CC, C-1, and SCI to Public (PUB). ASLU Rezoning 540 E. Main St. (Zupancis) 273707324003 • Review Process: Rezoning is required to amend the current zone districts. Application contents shall include all materials outlined in Section 26.310.080. A rezoning land use review is a two-step review process with public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use App: http://www. aspenpitkin. com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2013%20land%20use%20a pp%20form.pdf Land Use Code: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use- Code/ Applicable Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.304.060 Modification of Review Procedures 26.310.060 Rezoning — Procedure for Amendment 26.310.080 Rezoning — Application Contents 26.310.090 Rezoning — Standards of Review 26.310.100 Notation on Official Zone Map 26.310.110 Recordation of Designation (pending approval) 26.310.120 Placement on the City's Official Zone District Map (pending approval) 26.710.140 Commercial Core (CC) 26.710.150 Commercial (C-1) 26.710.160 Service/Commercial/Industrial (SCI) 26.710.250 Public (PUB) Review by: Staff for complete application Staff for recommendation Referrals: Engineering Community Development Director for approval Public Hearing: Planning and Zoning, Neighborhood Outreach: Yes Planning Fees: $7,800.00 for 24 hours of staff time. Referral Fees: Engineering (per hour, billed with planning case) - $275 Total Deposit: $8075 (additional planning hours over deposit amount are billed at a rate of $325/hour; additional engineering hours over deposit are billed at a rate of $275/hour) To apply, submit the following information (apply to both options unless otherwise noted): ❑ Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. ❑ Pre -application Conference Summary (this document). 2 0 • ❑ Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. ❑ Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. ❑ HOA Compliance form (Attached) ❑ A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. Building elevations, plans and renderings are required. ❑ A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. ❑ Written responses to applicable review criteria. ❑ An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. ❑ 1 Complete Hard Copy. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted: ❑ TBD Additional, Complete Hard Copies. ❑ Total deposit for review of the application. ❑ A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. CJI LL (1-4 P UO V) LLJ LO 0 0 -r`t6- cof-k-t/3 7LJ fiiL Crr) or A�r.x Community Development Department Internal Funds Transfer Date: S DI Department: Amount Requested: Account Number:::,Cot Permit Permit Number:?. Permit Address: Permit Description: yD F MAM Requested By: �- E 6�,j p,4 R✓ 5 Received By: GG RECEIVED MAY cirr oFAsPEN 31)7b 000.gl.9s3as. Sboo� REOEIVED Fk MAY 01 2,1 CITY OF ASPEN C0WMTYY_VE[N; Fee Waiver Request Form THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department This form must be submitted to the Community Development Director. You will be notified when a decision has been made. For what fees are you requesting waiver? ❑ BUILDING 13/PLANNING Applicant Name: / �r r F I�P�NAV(5 Contact Ph.# 3D-7( 32 Department"or Mailing address:_ CT19). ASS j E-mail address: Project address: 5-q-0 i % / A) 11, Project description: Z,O PJI�)(9- 1 C/47-/ oA Fee Breakdown: I Fee Description Fee Amount Requested Waiver Fee Description Fee Amount Requested Waiver Energy Code Fee REMP Fee Excavation Foundation Fee Zoning Review Fee Inspection Fee Planning Application Fee 7 04 3.1roose Permit Fee HPC Application Fee Plan Check Other: IrUaS 4 51 13 7, E) Total of Request: $ y D37. 52D Reason for Waiver: ❑ City General Fund Department —100% waiver [city Capital or Other Department — 50% waiver ❑ Waived or decreased by City Council (please provide documentation) ❑ Other— Please explain with attached letter of request /U,� /_a4t _- �-/6- Appj aq ig ature Date For office use only: a77111, .'APP E DISAPPROVED Total fees waived: $ a77 Com nity Development Director Date ter• � � No wAra - /' j \ ( ra.o eras vrx Jso•sow aH' e� a1asR NWNI BRw9 NDC -mY N IDlw YaW-EAST PrD'n f#EEx RASM W YAnp LS bAl> X, r,Eo. ,w tta atR 1f RR as LMwxr Msr AYfxOmTRAT a ILT I 1LFi / // ' '/ a YIEA Rnw caNrc Lw1m slNwsw .P . � � >/ � sax w PAIaf11�M0. R)JI�-DJJ-w-wl aANTNL , L6 N _ V C rwET RArR r Px MAl S Da5 CWTt0. SW EYAN {iNEI \ ANER)YAN® YAaYEM1A�TCW PAMFI M0. ] J )}].-Dal \ ) raMN xu aMER att a Asp \ ,� r 91N4 X M Ib i DYFNA SIRFET 1 I Improvement Survey Plat City of Aspen Engineering Department Compliant Survey 540 E. Main Street Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West, 6th P.M. City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado 5. ro ` Ite G r�^ram -VIONFY MAP- YCL SUtF: 11,1ch • 2A0a Feet SH9{'Ww 1 m I H3J' LEGEND -- / I SEI w xA4 • YYNm LS 11Nb IW: nID.SI' / _ 1 19P YIAET P - re•d Ye.nunl a Dro6w - r Dw..Dr / / `� P— YANEn Is INa ......... 'IavEn NI - L�LIya«nnca OPEN RTNI CAIXR 4R1A1 g —� ` —+y , A ` "An r•• i � : _ i / / IE nNlw {RHT Nr mRaN. ■ - cw udr ®-ury rN.w _ � -. / / (Sa I USr M MNNDUIa UNr AWETS) lVafrr Tw LLtlrpa•d tLeb4 IYN XIE4NE '....•. w I / DeeNrY relepllre lM RIOR -- 9) _ / r :l _w� IXr{NealelY ALl4raw INe xl{10'% n{ -- 1 . , / I — nYNawaY ibr DpH the SD HT �' o.r -- rWxo xD.s {mAR �� • � � � - MAML I¢LDW RAsrc cw -LWETAYLE- LMf1 NSA,Mq ImANa Yam, ffiIr, 91H a ,.Phle sear O 0� �a.rr GSGM City of Aspen M N w H.n.�w .•� ^Ye\ wan I I wed Si.lh Shw1, SO. zoo L 1--d sswbIw, co 916o1 --- 540 E. Main Sheet I:L.SRR.S. AS OcAaP]AAaINYJALSDxorH. xsD0a. LIAlNItNDHA ENwIN1E.'IDDOnEmL NARam:Rama AvSYNN'aWPX1NMENxxO 0. FN1—. PUr ewm— Alma Al Cw wPw AT P- 52a [s1AT R[Al RaAY,w x0. lall3 a{q&T Al rOLLOMi �WHc AT A Pdlr d TE wNTEWY Rwll a MY u[ fat EA91 YAx S1Ri BLIeO M SWmwsr Anal a LAXD CWK1T0 N Nbx n Al PAa Iro Axp Mora TE SWTAF51 GMwP T"[ATr AJP[x ADaiexa TaNYrt SYS S l{TA11' C Sro FFFr, TEMtl X n991I' N HAI nf9 ,Ca1C T[ NDXR— Nall a YT lK CDR GSr YAN {TNEI ro T[ 1HEASr Ca{INI . N. F 19. T FM1ir ATW AANNXAL roN Tgla x )5T911' Y ]2w rCfl NDYG TIC SWTGIr eE a L0110. eatY 11. III 4L11 I.; ro+lYrt ro TE SCYTEASi FTV A tl THAT PA- tl tAle aIME'6D BY 7 AT III 1 rAO: Iw iXFHa N Ixsow' E 11A rfP 1A Mf EAsrtNY IXE tl SAe 8001( I{i Al PAa iH ro TE ea(TELLY t{E a IL) l4 NDt)r 14 Lwi A9P[N ADAMRIN ibM191E Rvax Jsmlr R) s r¢r ro nE xmnNLs1 mlRlEn a sAN Lm 10, woa n. eAsr A�fx AaMnoaL nm 1ilDA .- x HAYIf R IQW CQr ANC IEnrl/Y tl SM Wl I ro M STIIMFAst Dx{n a TAl pat a LAMD Cd\LMD N eWM M NINSD NYE 1{{O) rLEE 1plc TIE JT 11. IT G- An Y LIE a SMD {DDM III Al rAa I2{ ro A N05RE&A N Via: ix[AT - IbS, 2' f 2aNJ rFCI r0 rlE x0PMa31 Ca1rQ tl TNr PYER tl l.Aee CWE1ID IRH[Na srll'AY C IY..1 tl AL— n( aSRKr IINE a SIMf BDDIt 19I AT PNY 1{{ s HTE • a153 rFET Aldo TE N31a4r IM[ a SAN eDON 119 ,J vAa Iw ro TIE SWnwCir CAMFP tl IDl I, eDa ]4 FI6f ,SMM AdbTN1J4 row9R MfNa S I>q'11' W 110.J0 Rt Nd0 MF wSTIaY Rl[ OF.— 119 Al PAa IH 1D TE PAHI a KOIH' (TK IFDeI asAwral A9 RED]A[p Day .1 a. Y,rrt T-1 .1 NDrt D.) NlIIi. I. B�wa�d de.n Irem .. !atl m e OeN9 nr N1-411 mq M wet Fe a WI LaTaaTrlrrW�r� ] CareA�ml Sn.Y aarw p✓ww1 10 elril rgrt b . alr d Aar L�nera9 Daalmrl J Dw d Ne .rwY: Ape a•e wr. ]DIJ e. UnIY DI 01er mwevemrle a,e aYpoleA N u9 SewY Crf. i H1an re f=ntm nlsY NAb H al Dtrio. AN. lnx vNa•q Nm a .Yx eawnwN a n10.s1' daN a mrxmrl m Ins .nl M rabee nrwn. {. Sal A rl Ne ,earba b ry W.9ee mass Y M Yb411 ralab a, peeee•Ir. sap Ipu4n M da. al �riamnl al H ralaHrb M r�i M ewwr rY nrd =1 Ne« �e of wow, we wl nxnw XY aambl• ullilY ea.•.orw of Ne Ire al tly ryr m. blm me ur""• ti Awlhrl,alo m".r ,rma a«IM wwT �ei tbbm Nnw rl Twee r M aa,ne al u.",i etw�A�l �n e: �`r*.�pa�°w"ml> va�l..e:'ewr 9. ma aaPry TaY {e "1' m IT--1"la <.wap aunt«. I M [awbr � F M remeee 4 �e®pN Iv W pseM of N� 1M w. eJ]65F m�taYv crew —bIY�e.rb�Lr..�ee.. t. i i I ls000 Sri anmgea•�a awl Y1"ne e.+�ra M II Hre eNMr ,w, M nacre r,wN. ,m. Mp tawanxr PrY xa am9JPome 4 Hae MT. A IH). aepar {r'M a rT 9O1j ur•R9enrl Aw=r. M .eya r,aMr a ewawlr r wbq wemr !w %, Nee Io M wan SDD-pr AmepkF'. It Brw aYr ar rgee ES-S el M 1WI vbr 6vFa9e mrb peau {xe aarlY a rol Mlualr .xlxn rra Ne pelrla 9eYa•x r)on rer npalw be.r. ID Tw pant wow. Nan Y .1.1 le ! errNrLL Ab -d- aYNq rroa6e a am ,nValwe a �«a,a r xNn uNne Tar an«l ua Rarer Tw Nrb, n. �m warrL a n{. A nr ma aarW�b > b elre'r eper�rY v aNr rwwmw er ,arms. Ala — MlabN9 le e.r awe rY am awMrmu It rrN nr . 1M Man w 11 NI«Ilw nl"�"nl A 1 arW by 2015 DalnwmlrL N.Xe tiara h—g r [wry mbar nr Xrn man b dw d wnrLL ngrAe-a-wl do mnb N M YA m'd�" .ar�lre � Na waan. PYaY srw .NA ery met aN H Ywr (L. Im _) a1 raTYrrl eupllrw r n na .MnewYl a®we a ,mnY Yorrwle b Yw:n aaNYwn a II MY re Mwae r mp.rl wwrlw v p Ner dl«I ae aoMY N 9r+d, I, Jaeaaa � w.e.. �a, Rp.lrr Lre s=wla. INrw . M slat. a ae1 e"a'y �' N"tl "' reerr r wr 1, ]Ai Ian • In. McNeeqd bb.1.1 d'«bp oq MI EeN Ne la rY nr©PP 1" By Improvement" M Survey W.. Plat Homeowner Association compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representin.q the property owner. Property Name: City of Aspen Owner ("I" ): Email: jack.wheeler@cityofas pen, corn Phone No.: 970-429-1790 Address of 540 East Main Street Property: Aspen, CO 81611 (subject of application) I certify as follows: (pick one) This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. ❑ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary, ❑ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Evidence of approval is attached. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public docVrRaL Owner signature: 14A"1date: �5 Owner printed name:i�r`'ZL�q R1/1 -'5 or, Attorney signature: Attorney printed name: date: October, 2013 City of Aspen 1 130 S. Galena St. 1 (970) 920-5090 PPITA.1111 FOR ARMAN.EONT FiLF-S OECEIVED MAY 01 2015 Agreement to Pay Application Fees Hn agreement oecween [ne titof Ns en t n ano Property City of Aspen Phone No.: 970.429.1790 Owner ("I'): Email Address of 540 E. Main St. Billing COA, Capital Asset Department Property: Aspen, CO 81611 Address 130 S. Galena St. (subject of p (send bills here) application) Aspen, CO 81611 I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. S.0 flat fee for Select Dept S. 0 flat fee for Select Dept S 0 flat fee for Select Dept $ 0 flat fee for Select Review For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. S deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325 per hour. 275 177) S deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $265 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: cnt(1� hJlkk Chris Bendon /J/ Community Development Director Name- � �l All City Use: Title (_ �i 4 Fees Due: 5 8075 Received: $-. 6 37, 2013of . 1 1 1 1• 0 190 ,& � 1912 ARCHITECTS �4 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Hillary/aspen Planning Dept. From: Scott Smith Company: CCA Date: 5/26/15 Telephone: Job No. # 1506 Address: Project: Aspen CSRP REGARDING: 540 E Main St Rezoning Application WE ARE SENDING YOU: ❑ Attached via Pick up @ CCA Office 2 Via: Mssgr the following items: ❑ Shop drawings 0 Prints ❑ Originals ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change order ❑ Computer Disc(s) ❑ Other: DESCRIPTION: (1) stamped signed improvement survey plat (SGM) THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution 0 As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ Review & comment ❑ Prints returned after loan to us ❑ Other REMARKS: 610 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 tel: 970.925.5590 fax: 970.925.5076 www.cunniffe.com O, 3 N57'20'50"W 8.64' FOUND BRASS PLUG IN CONCRETE MARKED LS 28643 ___S57'25'00"E 24.94' SET NO.5 REBAR & GREEN PLASTIC CAP MARKED LS 38417 CITY PROPERTY ENCROACHMENT \ AREA PLAT BOOK 80 PAGE 58 OBERMEYER PLACE CONDOMINIUMS COMMON AREA �o J .. PARCEL NO. 27737-073-05-801 4p 201 N. MILL ST #201 " 0 ASPEN, CO 81611 ...7goo ....... ya 0-159i 6 id O GPS CONTROL MONUMENTATION �h tr CITY OF ASPEN / DlLgp 90� WOOD !pq TED •. FRgM •� ...... BUILO11VG # ° _ NG g0\0\N� •......... .. 1... FF:7911.a' .............. k 10' P PERMITTED c PEDESTRIAN BUILDING 3n $..` EASEMENT �� T ENCROACHMENT ' w..... v, PLAT 80 P O PLAT BOOK 80 PAGE 57 AGE 58 -30 GPS-5 / �9os•..,,. + ` SET PK NAIL & J� GPS CONTROL •' \ ', 2, 540 E,.MAIN STREET , WASHER MARKED / MONUMENTATON PARCEL NO. 2737-073-24-003 LS 38417 �\ CITY OF ASPEN I OWNER: CITY OF ASPEN \ 0 FOUND ILLEGIBLE CAP ON SPIKE IN WALL FOUND NO.5 REBAR & YELLOW PLASTIC CAP 1' W.C. MARKED LS 29030 TBM: 7910.51' / SMH RIM: 7910.88' / 12" PVC INV IN (W): 7904.01' 6" PVC INV IN (SW): 7903.59' / 4" PVC INV IN (NW): 7904.28' 12" PVC INV OUT (E): 7903.28' t e FOUND NO.5 REBAR & RED PLASTIC CAP MARKED LS 16129 N12'01'I3"E 7914.0' 0.6' COURTHOUSE PLAZA ANNEX BUILDING PARCEL NO. 2737-073-24-004 OWNER: PITKIN COUNTY CAPITAL LEASING CORP. 530 E. MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 1 1....... .... FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & I ILLEGIBLE YELLOW PLASTIC CAP N16'20'36"W 0.6' MaN S77?, 0000• R0 rr W.) FOUND NO. 5 REBAR S09'50'24"E 0.9' - LINE TABLE - LINE # BEARING DISTANCE L7 N75'09'11"IN 7.50' L2 N14'50'57"E 20.39' L3 N75'09'11"W 10.10' Notice: According to Colorado Low, you must commence any legal action based upon any defect in this survey within three years after you first discover such defect. In no event may any legal action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more than ten years from the date of the certification shown hereon. c m 130 S. GALENA STREET / ASPEN, CO 81611 1 0.607 AC.t PERMITTED FOUND k I[ BUILDING / NAIL & ENCROACHMENT SHINER IN GINDE STORY I ' PLAT BOOK 80 PAGE 58 FENCE POST gq R BLOGK I N06.17'24 W: 'c ; RAGE I co L3 0.6' j FF:7911.5 m I�" x I� T - FF:7911.5' I SO4' �P4 Liu CIV 67.55' t�T , / J SET PK NAIL & -� �F I !ASHER S 38417MARKED t �r SMH C1 U RIM: 7906.02' 12" PVC INV IN (W): 7893.49' k SS 8" PVC INV IN (W): 7902.42' 12' f \ 12" PVC INV OUT (E): 7893.19' / SEWER EASEMENT BOOK 264. PAGE 857 ,l I R.0 / s ALLEY \ /l l� \ \ �PUBLIc)W. \ \ 1V / o_ / 8.0' PEDESTRlq \ _ o c GORE? lv l BOOK 4 P GE 4gMENT \ \ WOOD FRgMED4:791.1 ..4 / 10' HUNTER STREET E HOUSE U l TRAIL CONNECTION / EASEMENT W BASEMENT 3 / , °- � " PLAT BOOK 80 PAGE 57 :7914.Y 1.3, 10' ._ 6„ 1 / J/ c / — LEGEND —_ Q� - Found Monument as Described O - Found Monument as Described O - Set Monument as Described E0 - Electric Transformer ❑m - Electric Meter EP - Electric Panel * - Light Pole 0 - Telephone Ped - Water valve - Fire Hydrant Water Meter ®- - Water Shut-off B - PVC pipe - Sanitary Sewer Manhole - Cleanout [aj - Gas Meter © - CATV Pedestal ® - Storm Manhole o- - Sign - Single Pole FF. 7911.00 - Finish Floor - Fiber Optic Pedestal 8" Typical Tree Size Labels Indicates one tree, 8"trunk (DBH) Deci uous Tree ue Underground Electric Line 1.19 Gas Line x Fenceline ss Sanitary Sewer Line w Water Line or Overhead Telephone Line ur Underground Telephone Line ro. — Underground Fiber Optic Line - Concrete - Asphalt - Gravel - Deck - Flagstone /y�5. U9'71"w Surveyor's Certificate: •••..... 9760 :' 7" coNCEPr coo corlDornwwMs COMMON AREA I, Joshua L. Wilson, being a registered Professional Land Surveyor, licensed in the State of 10' / f PARCEL NO. 2737-073-25-800 Colorado, do hereby certify that this is an Improvement Survey Plat as defined by CRS "••... a 38 51 102(9)- - , resulting from a monumented land survey, showing the current location of all significant visible structures, utilities, fences, hedges, or walls situated on the described .' _ parcel and within five feet of all boundaries of such parcel, and also an visible conflicting P Y 9 boundary evidence or encroachments, and all easements and rights -of -way of a or Public private nature that are visible, or apparent, or of record, and underground utilities described in or other sources as specified in the title commitment referenced hereon, and 3 " _ FOUND NO.5 REBAR & that this Improvement Survey Plat was prepared by SGM, on this date, May 22, 2015, ... YELLOW PLASTIC CAP .f ; based on site conditions as they existed during a field survey performed during April and 1' � May of 2015, under my direct supervision and checking and that it is true and correct to MARKED MARKED LS 9184 . the best of my knowledge and belief. O P Graphic Scale Joshua L. wnson Colorado PLS # 38417 : o 0 10 20 40 For, and on behalf of SGM �• g8417 - ' o In Feet: 1" = 20' s`r/ ,- �JQ wAL LAC10 Improvement Survey Plat City of Aspen Engineering Department Compliant Survey 540 E. Main Street Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West, 6th P.M. City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: AS DESCRIBED IN THE WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. 472856: A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 108453, DITCH BOOK 2A AT PAGE 252 OF THE REAL ESTATE RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, BEING A PORTION OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED BY MAYOR'S DEED RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. 109112 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR EAST MAIN STREET BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED IN BOOK 191 AT PAGE 186 AND WHENCE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 20 EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE BEARS S 75'09'11" E 5.19 FEET; THENCE N 75'09'11" W 69.81 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR EAST MAIN STREET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 19, EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE; THENCE N 75'09'11" W 22.59 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 10, BLOCK 19, EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED BY BOOK 197 AT PAGE 166; THENCE N 14'50'49" E 100.00 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID BOOK 197 AT PAGE 166 TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 10, BLOCK 19, EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE; THENCE N 75'09'11" W 7.5 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10, BLOCK 19, EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE; THENCE N 75'09'11" W 10.09 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 9 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED IN BOOK 119 AT PAGE 126; THENCE N14'50'49"E 186.03 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID BOOK 119 AT PAGE 126 TO A NO.5 REBAR IN PLACE; THENCE S 61'50'02" E 24.43 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED BY BOOK 191 AT PAGE 186; THENCE S 19'49' E 138.63 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BOOK 191 AT PAGE 186; THENCE S 04'08' W 67.55 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BOOK 119 AT PAGE 186 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 20, EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE; THENCE S 17'09'11" W 120.50 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BOOK 119 AT PAGE 186 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. The boundary described in the recorded legal description for said parcel at Reception No. 472856 contains errors and omissions which cause a mis-closure in the boundary. The boundary shown hereon relies on adjoining legal descriptions and plats described hereon to account for said errors, arriving at the Resulting Legal Description, which has a mathematical closure of less than 1:15,000. RESULTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 108453, DITCH BOOK 2A AT PAGE 252 OF THE REAL ESTATE RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, BEING A PORTION OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED BY MAYOR'S DEED RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. 109112 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR EAST MAIN STREET BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 20 EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE CONCEPT 600 CONDOMINIUMS AS SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 383 AND PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 442; THENCE N 75'09'11" W A DISTANCE OF 97.60 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR EAST MAIN STREET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS S75'09'11E A DISTANCE OF 7.5 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 10, BLOCK 19, EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE; THENCE N 14'50'49" E A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET ALONG A LINE 7.5 FEET EAST AND PARALLEL TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 10, TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 10, BLOCK 19, EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE; THENCE N 75'09'11" W A DISTANCE OF 7.5 FEET ALONG SAID LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10, BLOCK 19, EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE; THENCE N14'50'57"E A DISTANCE OF 20.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 9, BLOCK 19, EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE; THENCE N 75'09'11" A DISTANCE OF W 10.10 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 9 TO AN ANGLE POINT OF LOT 1, FIRST AMENDED PITKIN COUNTY CENTER SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 93, PAGE 57; THENCE N14'50'49"E A DISTANCE OF 188.06 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, FIRST AMENDED PITKIN COUNTY SUBDIVISION TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID LOT 1, ALSO BEING AN ANGLE POINT IN THE BOUNDARY OF OBERMEYER PLACE CONDOMINIUMS AS SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 80, PAGE 57; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES S 5725'00" E A DISTANCE OF 24.94 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID OBERMEYER CONDOMINIUMS BOUNDARY, THENCE S 19'49'00" E A DISTANCE OF 138.72 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID OBERMEYER CONDOMINIUMS BOUNDARY, THENCE S 04'08'00" W A DISTANCE OF 67.55 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID OBERMEYER CONDOMINIUMS BOUNDARY, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 20, EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE, ALSO BEING THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF SAID CONCEPT 600 CONDOMINIUMS ; THENCE S 14'50'49" W A DISTANCE OF 120.39 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID CONCEPT 600 CONDOMINIUMS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 0.607 ACRES MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. Basis of Bearings: Bearings shown hereon are based on a bearing of N14'50'49"E along the west line of said parcel, between corners being monumented as shown hereon. 2. This map has been prepared pursuant to client request for a City of Aspen Engineering Department Compliant Survey. 3. Date of field survey : April and May, 2015 4. Units of linear measurements are displayed in US Survey Feet. 5. Datum and Contour Interval: NAVD 88 elevation of 7911.98 on NGS Monument Q-159, City of Aspen Control Monumentation, carried over to a site benchmark of 7910.51' as shown hereon. 6. SGM will not be responsible for any changes made to this document after it leaves our possession. Any copy, facsimile, etc., of this document must be compared to the original signed, sealed and dated document to insure the accuracy of the information shown on any such copy, and to insure that no such changes have been made. 7. Any subsurface utilities not shown, were not marked by appropriate utility companies at the time of this survey and therefore may not be shown hereon. Client/contractor must contact specific utility companies to verify both the location and depth of respective utilities. Additional surveying work may be required to show any such subsurface utility locations on this drawing. SGM will not be responsible for protection of subsurface utilities not marked on the ground at the time of this survey. 8. Fences shown hereon, are for reference only, and do not necessarily indicate limits of ownership. 9. This property may be subject to apparent easements for existing utilities. 10. Based solely upon the flood insurance rate map Community Panel No. 08097cO204 C, Dated June 4, 1987, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the subject property is designated as being situated in Zone X, "Areas determined to be outside 500-year floodplain". 11. Based solely upon Figure ES-5 of the 2001 surface drainage master plan, this property is not situated within any of the potential geologic hazards areas depicted thereon. 12. The property shown hereon is subject to all easements, rights -of -way, building setbacks or other restrictions of record, as such items may affect this property. This survey does not represent a title search by this surveyor to determine ownership or to discover easements or other encumbrances of record. All information pertaining to ownership, easement and other encumbrances of record has been taken from the Ownership & Encumbrance Report issued by Title Company of the Rockies, Order No. 0704630&E, having an effective date of May 5, 2015. 13. Every attempt has been made to show all easements, rights -of -way, etc. referred to in the Schedule B2 Exceptions recited in said title insurance policy. Some such items may not be shown if they are standard title commitment exceptions, or if not sufficiently described in recorded documents to be shown graphically, or if they are situated on adjacent properties, or if they affect the property in general, etc. In regard to Schedule B, Section 2 of said Title Commitment: • Easement for utilities. (Affects subject property and to the extent possible is shown hereon.) • Right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States as reserved in United States Patent recorded in Book 185 at Page 69. (May affect subject parcel but cannot be graphically depicted.) • Easement granted to Aspen Metropolitan Sanitation District as set forth in Quit Claim Deed of Easement recorded in Book 264 at Page 857. (Affects subject property as shown hereon.) 6SGIM 118 West Sixth Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 881601 970.945.1004 www.sgm-inc.com City of Aspen 540 E. Main Street Revision Date By mprovement Survey rve y Plat Job No. 2015-352.001 �f Drawn by: ilw 2 Date: 05/22/2015 3 4 Approved: reb 5 Fj A_BuildingReplacement_Zupancis_Record